Just when they thought they were moving away from Project Camelot World, Dan and Jordan get sucked back in. Dan needed a break from Alex Jones, so the gents discuss some paranormal weirdos. In this installment, they look into the time Kevin Moore (the guy who is making a takedown documentary about Project Camelot and Mark Richards) interviewed a guy who claims to talk to time travelers, which is as close as this show gets to a Halloween episode.
I don't like the idea of like, hey, if you like candy corn, God bless you, but I don't feel like we need to feel bad for not liking it and declaring the objective fact that it stinks.
Merman will not factor heavily into this conversation.
But before we get down to business and talk about what we are here to talk about today, Jordan, we've got to give a shout-out to some people who have signed up and are supporting the show.
To discredit Mark Richards, because he is friends with space raptors, and they're trying to help humanity against the Illuminati, it's all very complicated.
So the subject at the heart of this episode is this YouTube channel called Apex TV.
The channel's run by an anonymous guy who appears on camera wearing a hat, big sunglasses, and headphones with his head mostly behind a big microphone.
They mostly post videos about people who claim that they're time travelers.
And I want to make one thing super clear right off the bat.
I'm not mad at anyone for engaging in online immersive fiction.
I know a lot of people really enjoy the titillation of stuff like that.
You know, the clearly fake stories presented as truth.
And I don't necessarily believe that a lot of people who take in this kind of entertainment actually believe the things that they're watching.
It's not my thing, but I'm not going to spend a lot of my energy judging someone for liking that kind of entertainment.
And as an extension of that, I'm not going to spend too much of my time critiquing the person who creates that kind of entertainment themselves.
To the extent that this is just a YouTube channel that lets people send them videos where they pretend to be time travelers, which they then post and make money off of, I'm not going to make too big a deal out of that.
I'm not going to get all self-righteous about that.
Because in reality, the video of this guy, whose name is Hakan Norkvist, was actually a viral marketing campaign created to promote the pension plans sold by the Swedish insurance company AMF.
By the time that they have their interview, it's been years since it came out that the person Apex TV was suggesting was a real time traveler was just an insurance commercial.
If Kevin's trying to rebrand himself as the guy who calls out frauds in the community like Mark Richards, this is a good place to work that muscle a little bit.
Yeah, I was actually going through the people who were subscribed to my channel, sorting by the most popular, and you were just only a couple down, and I went onto your channel and I saw you have a bunch of interviews with people that I'm really into, and I'm really into the subjects, the videos that you make.
So I thought, hey, maybe he'd be interested in having me as a guest on the show, and it looks like a cool show, so I'm glad to be on.
This was the first indication to me that something might be up here.
You know, I was looking through the people who are subscribed to my channel, and you were, you know, up there in the most popular, so I thought I'd reach out and see.
Now, this is the kind of weirdest interview I've done, and that's kind of cool, because I think out of all my interviews today, right, this is probably going to be the most fun one, even though it stresses me outright to have no questions, but it's still kind of fun.
He's trying to establish his brand as this gatekeeper, like a trusted voice to guide you through the good and the bad of the space paranormal weirdo world.
He clearly has interest in calling people out who he feels are giving the community a bad name, so you'd expect he'd have that more broadly speaking than just singularly applied to Carrie and Mark.
So if he's trying to present himself, like we talked about, as some sort of a gatekeeper, you'd think he'd apply this perspective more broadly as opposed to the singular focus.
If he wants to get any mileage out of the perception that he takes this stuff seriously and resents people who are out there scamming people, making the serious researchers look bad, he takes on certain responsibilities, namely that he should be trying.
Case in point, he's starting this episode out framing it as if Apex TV is talking to time-traveling whistleblowers, which is meant to lend credibility to their videos.
If he'd done any preparation, he could ask about how exactly these people ended up promoting a viral insurance ad as if it was a time-travel whistleblower.
That would be a good place to start.
I feel like that's the first question that needs to be answered before you can even proceed with the interview.
At least...
It would be if Kevin were an interviewer who was actually interested in upholding certain standards in the paranormal world, which it appears that he's not.
So anyway, I don't know.
This is bad.
When you start off with, like, I don't have any questions for you, guy who talks to time travelers?
There's no amount of immediacy that the interview could come that I wouldn't have some sort of like, all right, I'm going to gather my thoughts really quick.
Again, he's not talking to the time traveler, but, you know, you still could ask those questions of, like, you clearly have asked those questions to the time travelers.
Well, I don't want to give out any personal information as of right now, because I've interviewed a lot of people who've expressed concerns for their security, and I think by distributing their messages, if they're telling the truth, that concern for their security could translate into me and the team here at Apex TV.
Yeah, I was surprised at the reception of one of those interviews we did with a man named Noah, who claimed to be a time traveler from the year 2030.
And it was actually him that went on a lot of those talk shows and everything.
I did go on a couple, but it's amazing the reach into the mainstream news that this has gotten because the ironic thing is that the people we've interviewed say they've tried to contact the mainstream news and they haven't been receptive to them and they haven't taken up their stories.
And then by us taking up their stories and it actually reaches the mainstream news, that's a...
It really surprised me, and it really gave me hope.
So, one of Apex TV's biggest claim to fame was their work that they did with a person named Noah, who was said to be, like you said, a time traveler from the year 2030.
Noah had been recruited into a time travel program in 2025, where his job would be to go back in time to help compile a compendium of all history.
So Noah traveled back to our time, which makes almost no sense.
Since, you know, 2017, the time that he showed up in, wouldn't be a mysterious time to the people in 2030.
You'd think they'd be more interested in figuring out what was going on in ancient times, or checking out that Jesus character, or something like that.
You could make a good argument that the 2016 election may be historically relevant for future civilizations, but I would suggest that they will not be wanting for information about it.
So anyway, Noah came back to our time, but ended up getting fired from his job with this future time travel organization after he got into a bar fight in South America.
This trapped Noah in the present day, which was his past, so he had to create a new persona and try and do the best he could.
If you consider for one second the story that's being told here, you have to pause and ask some serious follow-ups.
The first is, what kind of secret time travel program is just going to recruit someone who will then know all their secrets and fire them for something as trivial as getting into a bar fight?
I used to work at a movie theater and one of my co-workers showed up for a shift with a black eye and a big cut bragging about getting into a bar fight the night before and they didn't even tell him to take the day off.
It seems unlikely that a time travel program would consider this termination worthy as an offense.
See, Noah explained that by that point, a law will be passed that allows younger people to be president.
But he doesn't seem to understand that this would require a full-on amendment, since the presidential age limit is from Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.
I feel like if we get to the point where two-thirds of the House and Senate pass an amendment lowering the age required to be president, and then three-quarters of the states ratify it, I think the fact that 21-year-olds could be president is not the headline.
The big story here would have to be the massive political realignment that would have to happen in the next 10 years to get us to the point where these stuffy-ass Washington political class are trying to get youth into the White House.
Like, really, from a political science perspective, what could bring that about?
Like, really think about it.
One possibility would be that we see a trend of high levels, like, we already are seeing this, and it would have to continue, the high levels of political engagement in the youth.
It would have to continue to the point where they become the only political relevant voting bloc in the country.
As more and more people control the vote, they could vote in younger senators and representatives who would be then inclined to push for that amendment, I guess.
But this younger voting bloc wouldn't be single-issue voters just based on lowering the age you have to be to run for president.
There would be ripple effects, like polling shows that the youth are pretty overwhelmingly in favor of some pretty left positions, particularly ones related to civil rights issues and climate change.
If they fix their wills to the point where they got that kind of constitutional amendment passed, you have to assume their presence would be felt in so many other places.
Like, this amendment would be a side note to the bigger news that fossil fuels have been outlawed.
It's clearly part of some corner of the internet that I'm not a part of and I don't fully understand.
So I'm not going to stake too much of my effort on being like...
Shaking my fist at it.
But at the same time, if you look at it, it is still like a guy trying to present himself as like, you know, you can decide whether this is real or not.
Well, why don't you help people decide a little bit by asking a fucking question?
Anyway.
Also, Noah predicted that multiple U.S. cities would be completely destroyed by snowstorms in February 2019, which I don't think happened.
Yeah, so Noah made the rounds on some talk shows and got a bunch of publicity, which was largely filtered back to Apex TV, since he was appearing with his face obscured, you know, he had a pixelated thing, and they altered his voice, so that made it pretty much anonymous.
Sure, sure.
Oh, okay.
their logo.
It's all free press.
This is one of the more low-rent, lazy scams I've seen in my time looking at the paranormal space grifter world.
It's remarkable to me to imagine that anyone would look at this shit and even give it a second thought, quite honestly.
It's even more insane that this Apex TV would promote this story that's so clearly full of basic holes.
Unless they don't care.
It's just like, this is all just bullshit.
Who cares?
Get it out the door.
We'll get some money out of this.
Then on top of that, it's bananas.
Kevin Moore would have such low standards that he's doing a softball interview with the guy who's promoting this very clearly full of shit nonsense.
Yeah, well, the only thing I was thinking is because Moore asks him, or he says, you went on TV, did all these interviews all around the world, and then he goes like, no, I did some, but it was this other guy making me think that Moore knows that it was all him, and he has to then say...
Eventually, we got contacted by this man claiming to be a time traveler from the year 2026, I think, and that was our first interview in which we actually sat down with somebody in person.
And he told us an amazing story.
I think he really believed what he was saying.
Whether or not he was telling the truth is another story.
But it was a really interesting interview, and I think the viewers thought so as well.
The reach to that was incredible.
And ever since then, like in my inbox in the last week, I have maybe 20 people claiming to be time travelers from various years.
So it's getting hard to...
To interview all these people and going through each one, one by one, is quite the challenge.
We got an indication earlier that there is this sort of, like, huh, you know, this guy is coming on Kevin's show because he's one of his more popular subscribers.
I guess on the one hand, you could look at it as, like, we're just talking about it in terms of the financials, but what we're really actually talking about underneath is, like, how many people are seeing the message.
I don't think that if our listeners email you and try and make you vet them, I don't think you're going to have too tough a time with it because, like I said, you'll just ignore all of it and say none of them are time travelers.
Like, we've had a few who we go through with doing a...
So you see, we don't go straight to doing an in-person interview.
First off, we do a couple of Skype interviews.
We ask them if they have any conclusive proof or anything.
And if what they're showing us seems to be holding up, we sometimes do go as far as meeting them in person.
We've done it a variety of times, traveled all over the world, actually had some of the best experiences of my life.
For example, we went to Armenia on several occasions, other European countries.
To do interviews with these people.
So, yeah, that's a major issue.
It's like, how do we know?
Yeah, and what we're trying to do is create an environment in which people aren't afraid to tell their story.
So I think almost the less vetting, the better.
But if someone's obviously trying to pull your leg, like we've had that many times, like we go on with an interview with somebody and they're wearing a ski mask.
And they seem to be making a joke out of the whole thing.
Well, in July 2019, Apex TV put out a video revealing that the person claiming to be Noah, the time traveler who got all this mainstream news coverage, was actually just a guy named Jason who'd faked the whole thing.
In the video put out by Apex, Jason explains that he was an alienated kid, lonely and bullied, who'd stumbled into Apex TV.
He really got into the whole thing and decided to contact them claiming to be a time traveler.
The entire message feels very curated, though, with lines like, quote, just because I lied, it doesn't mean that other people aren't telling the truth.
The video feels like it was created in order to address the fact that this story was bullshit, but also maintain the perception that everything else probably isn't.
It also feels like it serves a very specific purpose, namely to put the blame for the lie on Jason.
He was socially isolated and insecure, so he concocted this plot.
Apex TV was just a media outlet for him to tell his lie.
And they did everything in their power to check his story.
They even gave him a lie detector test.
So what more do you want from these people?
This feels a lot like media relations, not like an update to the story.
Another thing that seems weird is that all of the NOAA videos are still up on the Apex channel.
So you have Noah lying, and now you have a completely separate person who decided to get in on the lie.
So Apex TV sets up a meeting between the two?
If this is supposed to be true, how can this even work with the story?
I thought Noah got fired from the time-traveling job and got stranded in 2017, so this guy from 2070 would have to be like 60 years older than him, but he's clearly not.
He's just how old he would be aged from 2030 onto 27. It makes no sense.
So Kevin asks an interesting question, and that is like, have you ever been talking to one of these people and just be like, eh, I don't know about this?
During the mermaid interview, I remember when he, when I asked him if he could speak mermaid, and he started making those sounds, that was the hardest I've ever tried not to laugh during an interview.
I didn't want to be disrespectful if this man really believed he was a mermaid, but...
I mean, look, you know, I deal with a lot of shows that with people that channel, you could say the same thing for them, do you know what I mean, in some respects.
And, I mean, I never, you know, I'm doing a documentary on channeling, that's why I'm heading back out to the States soon, just to finish that documentary off.
The most, like, one interpretation you could take of that is that Kevin Moore is saying, like, oh, that's very similar.
The channeler to the bullshit that I deal with, which is the channelers who do all these ridiculous voices.
The other reading of it that you could take is Kevin Moore believing that the channeler's weird voices are sincere and genuine and then being like, well, you know, maybe that guy was talking mermaid.
And he's like, well, you know, I know that you won't think this is future technology, but people in the future who look back and see this video, they will know that I was a timed...
What we have here is possibly a slight indication of some bigotry creeping into the proceedings.
Now, it's entirely possible that this guy who he's talking to is just a weirdo who has some ahistorical views and some revisionism, but generally, when you hear someone in the present day talking about the Ottoman Empire and how it never really went away, you're listening to a rank Islamophobe.
The Ottoman Empire is one of the largest historical examples of a widespread Islamic kingdom, and it existed until relatively recently, only being dissolved after World War I. In modern anti-Muslim circles, it's not super uncommon to hear references to the Ottoman Empire as what the Muslims want to recreate.
I know that I've definitely heard people express the idea that the empire never fell and is actually still alive today in what they would describe as expansionist Islam.
All this really serves to reinforce the perception that the turmoil in the world is easily understandable as a civilization-level conflict between Christians and Muslims.
It could just be that this dude is writing some sort of benign historical fiction.
I accept that's entirely a possibility.
But little things like that kind of hint at a possible underbelly of the sorts of things that you could accidentally give a platform to when you have literally zero editorial oversight or quality control in what you put out and what you allow these supposed time travelers to disseminate.
You could accidentally give a platform to somebody who has some like Crypto fucked up messages.
Yeah, well, I mean, I imagine that it is at the very least statistically representative, the percentage or the ratio of out-and-out bigots versus non in the space weirdo community as it is for the population at large.
When you have no standards of what you put forward because you want everybody to be able to come forward with your message, you kind of got to expect that some people might subconsciously or even consciously try to Trojan horse those sorts of messages through.
And if you're doing no oversight, no editorial process, nothing, you'll end up just airing shit that could possibly be space-white nationalism.
Yeah, easily.
So now we get to another, the plot sort of shifts, and we get to a very familiar topic in paranormal talk, and that is, of course, the Mandela effect.
Okay, just swapping the subjects a little bit, but the Mandela effect, that's something that you've covered on your channel as well, and that's got a lot of, that Mandela effect, a lot of people are talking about that on YouTube right now.
Yeah, the Mandela Effect is where you think something happened in a certain way, and it's more so where a mass of people think something happened in a certain way.
For example, at the end of the Star Wars movie, Darth Vader says, Luke, I am your father.
It turns out he never said that at all, and you can look this up on YouTube.
I forget what he actually said.
But it wasn't that.
And there's been a variety of examples within mainstream media.
People tend to remember the line at the end of Empire Strikes Back as, Luke, I am your father.
But in reality, it's not quite the line.
In the movie, Luke says to Darth Vader, you killed my father.
And Vader replies, no, I am your father.
It's really easy to see how this could be quoted as, Luke, I'm your father, to the point where people just accept that that's how the line must have been.
Because, like, discussing it out of context, or if you're quoting the movie...
That's how it is with pretty much all of these things that get cited as examples of the Mandela effect.
They're all just things that are slightly off from what actually happened, because what actually happened is slightly off from what your brain would naturally assume.
The Baron Stain Bears is remembered as Baron Stein Bears, because Stein is a much more common suffix in last names than Stain.
I've looked at a bunch of examples of the Mandela Effect, and pretty much all of them are somewhere in between completely uninteresting and, ah, that's weird.
Mandela Effect shit is good and fun, and honestly, I think it's kind of neat to look at it as like a cataloging of little ways that we misincorporate information into our collective cultural memory.
Almost like it's a database of times that we veered off from integrating precise information, preferring simplicity.
But it becomes really serious bullshit when you take it seriously.
And try to present it as a paranormal phenomenon, which pretty much all of these grifters do.
And it makes sense why they would.
The Mandela Effect, at its core, is pointing out errors in cultural memory.
And by definition, we're all engaged with cultural memory.
Everyone who's part of the culture takes on some relation to it.
We draw information from it.
If we didn't, we'd have a much more difficult time relating to each other, without shared references and touchstones.
And easy ways to make metaphors.
Because we're all interacting with this collective memory, pointing out times when it was just slightly off is compelling to a large number of people.
Almost every single person you'll ever ask about the Berenstain Bears will think it's spelled Stein because that's the way our culture ended up remembering the name.
Thus, whenever you point out these little quirks, you will get a response out of most people.
Ranging from, that's weird, to, no fucking way, man!
And it's that response that you need in order to inject a kernel of doubt in them that reality is not what it seems to be.
You can take that visceral experience of learning that Darth Vader doesn't say, Luke, I am your father, and use it to say, hey, you were certain that he said, Luke, I am your father, but he didn't.
So what else are you certain of that you might be wrong about?
In this way, the Mandela Effect shit is a really useful entry point for paranormal grifters to use to open their audience's mind to the possibility that other complete horse shit they're trying to sell them might actually be real, even though you're certain that it's not.
That's why it's such a mainstay of these weirdo grifters' content.
So I'm not surprised to see both Kevin and ApexTV are interested in the subject.
Yeah, I think it's weaponized in the same way that so many games are optimized to maintain your attention and keep giving you that...
You know, like when you're playing Candy Crush or something like that, they have psychologists who have spent their careers figuring out ways to make you spend 20 cents every time you need to press a button.
All those kinds of entry-level meme-type things, they serve to open you up to the grander and larger, less believable conclusions that they want to walk you towards.
So I consulted the Google Trends, and what you see is a relatively flat graph, with a giant spike in December 2013, which makes sense, since Nelson Mandela died on December 5th, 2013.
What makes slightly less sense is that there's another spike, smaller than the December one, but it's still very noticeable, in June.
Now, Apex TV was saying it was a long time before he died.
It's a couple months.
So he's fudging things a little bit here.
But there is still another spike.
In cases like this, it's important to consider possible explanations for this before jumping to conclusions and thinking this means that Nelson Mandela died in June and then again in December or whatever this dude is trying to imply.
Possibly alternate timelines or whatever.
Google Trends only reflects what people are searching for.
So, if they were searching for Nelson Mandela death, it's entirely possible they were searching for those terms in order to find out if he was dead.
In 2013, Nelson Mandela was 94 years old, and in early June, he was admitted to a hospital in Pretoria with a recurrence of a chronic lung infection.
The doctors initially put his condition as serious but stable, but after a few weeks in the hospital, he was downgraded to being in critical condition.
South African citizens held vigils outside the hospital, and it became a really big deal with the media, questioning if President Obama was going to be able to visit him while he was receiving treatment.
The South African press was reporting urgent meetings to, quote, discuss delicate matters, which many interpreted as signs of them preparing for his imminent passing.
Outside of December, when he actually died, June 2013 was the month when the most speculation about his passing was done in the press.
Google Trends reflect an increase of search traffic for his death at a time that makes complete sense, unless you're willfully obtuse and want to mislead people.
It's weird when you have, like, an hour to talk to a guy who knows time travelers, and a significant amount of the time is spent, like, talking shop about just being a YouTube video maker.
And again, That's fine for him if that's what the game is.
I feel like Kevin Moore would like to pretend that that's not what his game is.
But at the same time, it takes on a different feeling if it's not just a guy who's like, hey, here's a video some guy sent me claiming to be a time traveler.
If he's involved in it, it takes on a different feeling for me.
I'm not sure why.
I think that's important, and this next clip kind of bummed me out.
I deeply feel sorry for Noah because we did a lie detector test with him, and the lie detector said he was telling the truth when he said he was a time traveler, and if he's telling the truth or not, it's clear he's very depressed, he's in a lot of stress, and I feel really bad for...
Like, this is Kevin pretending to be doing an interview, but honestly just kind of hoping for some easy clicks that he doesn't have to work too hard for.
I mean, really, when you get right down to it, the fact that they put out that video is clear proof that Apex is willing to own up to its own mistakes, and that it will even expose themselves if they've stepped in it.
In a completely bizarre and almost certainly unrelated coincidence, 10 days prior, on July 13th, Another person named Dennis Bell had posted a video where he revealed that he was Noah, and he was sick of playing the character.
He was scared that people would discern his identity and dox him, so he decided the best way to minimize the threat was to address the issue head-on.
According to Dennis, when he was 14 years old, he was a kid making comedy YouTube videos, posting them pretty much daily.
Through his channel, he ended up meeting Apex TV, who enlisted him to play the role of Noah.
He claimed that Apex pressured him to sign a non-disclosure agreement, which is kind of funny to think about.
Even if they ever took him to court to enforce the NDA, the obvious question of why they have an NDA active with a 14-year-old who looks a lot like their time traveler, that would probably come up.
It's really only useful as an intimidation tactic against a 14, 15-year-old.
It's ridiculous.
Dennis alleges that he was paid by Apex, and that when they recorded the videos, everyone was just laughing because of how stupid it was.
It would be really easy to just take this as a guy who's trying to get into the scam and involve himself, except that his video includes clips of the original Apex TV videos unedited.
The video of Jason saying that he was Noah does not look anything like the unedited versions that Dennis put out, but it does look a lot like him.
He includes clips that Apex didn't release initially that definitely indicate coaching.
One of the more damning ones is probably a clip of Noah about to shake hands with his older self that begins with an off-camera voice saying, action.
It's kind of impossible for me to say whether or not this Dennis guy is 100% the kid in the original videos, but they look very, very similar and have the same voice and mannerisms.
Personally, it looks to me a lot like this kid's telling the truth, and those receipts are pretty tough to explain otherwise.
Although, you could say, okay, he just shot recreation videos of it.
Is there a big difference between soliciting independently created videos where people are pretending to be time travelers and creating videos yourself where people pretend to be time travelers?
In the first case, you're just posting bullshit and profiting off it and in the process probably enabling some mentally unwell people down this road, encouraging them, validating this.
In the second case, you're perpetuating a fraud, but it's also kind of in the realm of performance art on some level.
The fact that the channel portrays itself as just reporting on things, you know, like, hey, we're just passing this along, while they're, in fact, apparently orchestrating those things themselves, I think that's intrinsically dishonest and manipulative.
It would be kind of like if we created a right-wing talk show host to say things that we wanted them to say so that we could cover them.
It's kind of a betrayal of the format of whatever you're doing.
It feels like damage control, and it probably was.
Because it's not that big a deal to the presentation of the channel if one of their sources turns out to be a liar.
No one's perfect, and we're all going to fall for something at one point in our lives.
It's a much bigger deal for their presentation if the impression is that they're just creating bullshit on their own and passing it off as if it could be real.
It's the difference between naivete and trusting people and a hoax.
Being exposed as naive might hurt your reputation a little, but being a hoaxer really destroys any possibility of future credibility.
But again, I don't care that much.
But the idea that a 14, 15-year-old was being put in this kind of a position makes me pretty uncomfortable.
It is interesting to me that Kevin Moore is interested in talking to this guy and even giving an ounce of, this could be real to him.
That indicates a complete inability or unwillingness to critically engage with the subject he's covering.
And, in fairness to him, the stuff about Noah being fake hadn't come out by the time he made this video that we're listening to.
But the stuff about the Swedish insurance commercial had.
There were plenty of red flags that would suggest that maybe this operation isn't on the up and up, even by the almost non-existent standards of the paranormal YouTube community.
Kevin Moore is not a critical voice.
There's something else going on with his beef with Carrie and Mark Richards.
I'm not sure what it is, but I need to figure it out.
I don't know if we'll ever be able to get to the bottom of it.
If there's one thing that we've learned, or I've learned from listening to him, because we've listened to a couple of his videos now, as long as he has a personal connection, he will let anything go.
And I definitely don't think that it's not worth considering.
The idea that if this Dennis guy is telling the truth...
Then what's going on is really inappropriate behavior with a minor.
Oh, absolutely.
He talks about how uncomfortable he was as it went along and how he started to get harassing messages when people started to try and figure out who he was.
And so putting a minor in that kind of a situation is probably legally actionable.
I don't know if it is, but it's definitely not something that someone with good intent would do.
But you've got to assume that if you're a parent, even if you're a decent parent, and like, alright, I'm going to be in a YouTube video, it's acting, you might not have any alarm bells.
In much the same way Richard Belzer was not a passive actor on the day of the Boston bombing when he was a guest on Alex Jones' show, he was a participant.
Kevin Moore is trying to become a little bit of a participant in this charade.
If you care about the credibility of your community, your space weirdo community, you want to be like, hey, us channeling people, we demand to be taken seriously.
It kind of behooves you to not be like, oh, maybe these folks are demons.
No, it's very much like, in its own way, it's like if you're...
Doing an interview on fucking Fox News and you answer one of the questions and then you return it back with them and it's like, oh, well, how do you think it's possible for us to do this?
And then he just comes up with a...
The anchor comes up with a reason that your shit makes sense for you?
In this next clip, Apex is talking about how people think that they're involved with the people that they feature in their videos, which they very well may be.
Apparently, that's a criticism that they get, and a theory that some people have.
There's been a lot of misunderstanding, though, people thinking we're in on these videos.
I'm planning on making a video soon explaining to people because I don't think people get that we're not affiliated with these people that we're interviewing.
And there's been a lot of people who don't really get it.
And I'm going to make a video soon talking about how we don't know these people and just explain things, put things in more context.
In the same way that when they put out their video with Jason revealing that he had lied to them, it was also to serve the purpose of, like, we were the ones who were lied to.
Like, the idea that someone would watch this video of Kevin talking to him and it somehow, like, debunks the time traveler videos because, like, hey, you guys keep talking about social media engagement a lot.
Whatever judgment aside that I have for whatever Apex is doing, I have strong judgment for Kevin because you can't do both.
You can't try and take down Mark Richards because he's an affront to the community and appreciate and applaud what fake time travel bullshit clickbait nonsense YouTube channel is doing.
You can't exist in both of those spaces.
It leads me to believe that something is insincere.
And based on everything else I have, all the other information of Kevin, between his weirdo channeling videos, other videos that I've watched of his where he is woefully uncritical of other people, the anomaly is the being critical of Mark Richards and Carrie.
And because we have a long-standing interaction, quote-unquote, with Project Camelot...
I feel like I'm the only person who cares enough to try and figure this out.
So, Jordan, I would like to announce here and now, I am going to make a documentary about Kevin Moore.
It's reinvigorating my interest in things a little bit because it actually is something that, like, maybe you could get to the bottom of what the fuck's going on here.
I'm never going to be able to tell you whether spider aliens are real or not.