Today, Dan and Jordan check in with Alex Jones in the present day to see what he's up to. It turns out, he's spending his time accusing Antifa of engaging in chemical warfare and talking to his Oathkeeper buddy about how excited they are about the idea of a civil war starting soon.
So Alex showed up on Monday in studio and did his show.
And I was having a grand old time preparing a completely different episode.
Found a lot of really interesting things to talk about that don't suck.
But, you know, hey, Alex had been gone.
We haven't done a present-day episode in about a week or so.
So I figured it is our duty to cover the July 1st, 2019 episode.
And I'm not looking forward to this in any way.
I think that, I told you before we started recording, I think that towards the end of this is one of the scariest passages that I've ever heard on Alex's show.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I like this show, I'd like to support what these guys do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
We'll get into some more of the details about that as this goes along, but that sets the stage for what Alex has a bee in his bonnet about as we begin this July 1st episode.
There was a, and we'll get much more in depth about this here after a few clips, but one of the things that came out of the protests and the clashes between counter-demonstrators and the right-wing dum-dums is that, uh-oh, showed my bias.
But hey, man, just because the mainstream media, just because the MSM isn't reporting on this stuff doesn't mean that it's not true, because Alex has proof.
We have them admitting it on the Antifa site in D.C., the Antifa site in Portland, Oregon, the Antifa sites in San Francisco, the Antifa sites in Austin, Texas, that there are different ways to produce acid compounds and to then throw them on people to blind them.
Ladies and gentlemen, They themselves said, and there's photos and videos that are on screen, if you're a TV viewer, that they were going to mix quick-setting concrete and throw it in people's faces.
Now is probably a pretty good time to point out that pretty consistently the right wing has either manufactured or been tricked by fake Antifa accounts.
On Twitter and Facebook and ruses like that have been real prominent.
Or people playing pranks going on TV pretending to be Antifa like, I want to punch a horse.
Yeah, that's some variation of damning you with faint praise.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So, the narrative that Antifa was mixing up concrete milkshakes is going to play a very large part in this episode, so we should probably exhaustively deal with it right about now.
Surprise.
Just a small point, I might use the term Antifa as the way that Alex does, but I do not believe that they are a centralized group, like something like Patriot Prayer.
That is a group.
Antifa is not the same way.
Patriot Prayer has Joey Gibson as the leader of the group.
I'll get into the specifics here in a couple minutes, but for now, I want to make it totally clear that this did not happen.
It's a completely manufactured fascist smear being perpetrated by dangerous monsters and useful idiots.
Before I get into some of the details about this narrative, it's important to address why it's spreading.
And it actually gets into something we've discussed in the past.
The milkshake is the perfect weapon against people like Nigel Farage or Alex Jones, because it really doesn't elicit that much sympathy from them, no one's like you're hurting them, but it does make them look really silly.
Nothing he can ever do in his life will undo the image in the headline of Nigel Farage refusing to leave his bus, surrounded by people with milkshakes.
These motherfuckers are a joke, and seeing their feverish response to data Yeah.
unidentified
We understand that, but unfortunately, so do they.
They realize that the potential of having to put up with a constant barrage of milkshakes whenever they're out in public is a fate that they're not particularly interested in.
Because make no mistake about it, that's exactly what is going on.
I will do a lot of hours of community service to throw a milkshake on Pol Pot.
The best way to fight back against this is to transform the milkshake into a deadly weapon.
This is honestly one of the most predictable developments in this information war we find ourselves in.
It's a really short brainstorm.
It's like, hey, this thing people are throwing at us is...
and makes us look silly.
But if we get too mad about something as trivial as people throwing milkshakes at us, that makes us look even more silly and way less manly and effectual.
Oh, I got a solution.
Let's just say they're trying to kill us with those milkshakes.
It's like the milkshake is almost adapting the behavior in consideration of how a rock would hurt you.
Thus, the narrative of the concrete milkshake is born out of that necessity.
Portland police have said that, quote, as the event progressed, officers learned from some participants that a substance similar to quick-drying concrete was being added to some of the milkshakes.
This is not evidence.
That is hearsay.
But it was enough for the department to post a tweet on their official Twitter account saying, quote, police have received information that some of the milkshakes thrown today during the demonstration contained quick-drying cement.
We're encouraging anyone hit with substance today to report it to the police.
Now, at least that tweet said just that they'd received information that the Immediately, the right-wing media's fear of shitheads jumped into action.
Jack Posobiec retweeted a picture shot by Shane Burley of people making milkshakes at the event, but added his spin that maybe this is where they were adding the concrete, with no evidence at all, just talking shit.
Much like the quick-drying concrete that wasn't in the milkshakes, the narrative began to solidify very rapidly.
Articles started being published with misleading headlines that implied that the Portland police had said that there was concrete in the milkshakes that were being thrown as opposed to what they had said, which is someone, possibly even a right-wing shithead themselves, had told them that it was the case.
Business Insider published an article with the headline, quote, Protesters threw milkshakes containing quick-drying cement as far-left and far-right groups clashed in Portland, according to police.
That article includes this passage, quote, Currently, there is no evidence to substantiate the claim of concrete or cement found in any milkshakes.
The headline was tailored to the right-wing narrative that was developing, as evidenced by Jack Posobiec, tweeting it out as proof that he was right all along.
There is a game that's being bounced back and forth.
It's very clear to see.
This is a right-wing smear from the core, and anyone who's falling for it, and I'm looking sharply in the direction of dum-dums like Jake Tapper, are playing right into the right-wing media's hands.
The goal is to make this avenue of making fascists look stupid and silly, making it treated like a life-threatening attack.
So counter-protesters can't make them look silly anymore.
That is the name of the game.
There was no concrete being mixed into these milkshakes because if there was, there's literally no way there wouldn't be any physical evidence by now, days later.
How many people would have accidentally drank concrete and died?
How many easily identifiable puddles of concrete would be strewn around the park?
How many people would be able to easily produce articles of clothing with concrete all over them?
How many police officers would have their uniforms covered in concrete?
It would be a really easy thing to prove if it were true.
None of this has been produced as evidence because it doesn't exist.
And let me be clear.
The burden of proof is not on me or anyone else to prove that there wasn't concrete being thrown in milkshake form.
Right-wing shitheads are making this outrageous claim that concrete milkshakes are being used as weapons in Portland, and thus it is on them to make their case and prove it.
And until they do, this is shit talk being circulated by career shit talkers who have a pretty clear motive to talk this specific line of shit.
By Sunday, the Portland Mercury put out an article, quote, Portland police offer no proof that protesters had milkshakes with quick-dry cement, but it doesn't matter.
By that point, the right-wing narrative's concrete had dried.
It was impenetrable to facts, new revelations, or refutation.
It's even more perfect because the most common form of concrete is called Portlandite, or Portland concrete.
You would think Alex would make a conspiracy out of that, but I guess that would take some reading to learn about, and he's not really into that sort of thing.
In a release put out July 1st, the police in Portland offered a little bit more insight into why they thought that there was concrete in the milkshakes or why they would follow through with this.
So I get the feeling that that saying, like, well, we had someone who said...
That there was concrete in the milkshakes.
Alright, I understand that you've got to do something about that, which you did wasn't the right thing to do.
And I think that they probably realized, hey, we kind of really fucked up.
Hey, someone sent a troll email.
Let's use this as further rationalization, even though we got it after the fact.
It doesn't support the actions that were taken.
It only works...
Post-factually, it's fucking stupid.
For now, the last thing I want to say about this is that Alex's take on the situation is far more severe than most of the right-wing shitheads on Twitter and Fox News.
Most of them were approaching this from an angle that leftists are trying to make concrete milkshakes in order to have bricks to throw, but some of them dabbled a little bit in the chemical idea, but not nearly to the extent Alex is.
Alex is full-on going to argue that Antifa was out there making chemical weapons.
In this sense, Alex is actually...
Because if the argument is that they're trying to make bricks out of milkshakes, simple chemistry debunks that theory.
Both salt and sugar have a delaying effect on the solidifying of concrete.
And in fact, many concrete workers use sugar or similarly constituted products in order to give them more time to work the concrete before it sets.
And it doesn't really take much sugar to cause that effect.
A very small percentage composition of sugar will cause very serious delays in the settling of concrete.
You just wouldn't be able to take the ingredients in a milkshake and add concrete to it.
Yeah, it's just not possible.
Right.
While Alex does say that that was being done, his bigger argument is that there's chemicals in fast-drying concrete that'll cause chemical burns to people's skin.
And to this, I say that he's technically correct.
Concrete does cause alkaline burns when exposed to human skin.
However, all he's done is further sensationalize a thing he in no way has proven is even real.
So all he's really doing when you get down to it is making things worse.
If this narrative were true, there would be even more evidence available.
Consider how many people were hit by stray milkshakes.
How many people had them spill on them.
There would have been chemical burns all over the place, and evidence would be overwhelming.
But it's not.
All Alex is doing is escalating the narrative to unsustainable levels.
If the mainstream of the right wing media is just interested in getting people to stop throwing milkshakes at them, Alex wants you to be able to kill anyone you think has a milkshake.
It's profoundly scary stuff, and some of the things that end up being said on this episode, like I said, rank up there with the most upsetting things I've heard him advocate for.
They imply that there's nowhere else for his rhetoric and worldview to go other than murder, and I am not pleased by this development.
And that's why when you look at the photos and the videos of people that were hit with it, their skin is all burned, their eyes are all totally bloody and bloodshot, they will guarantee have vision loss.
So what you're looking at is mass terrorists, if you're a TV viewer, radio listeners, the articles are on Infowars.com, literally mixing acid attacks, and then notice the left is all about deception, calling it milkshake attacks.
Two pictures were circulated after the events on Saturday, and one of them was a picture of a hand that had been chemical burned, and another was a woman who had her face had some chemical burns on it.
The hand, you just reverse image search it, and it's a standard picture of a chemical burn that is all over the internet.
I want to stress, like, I've been talking a little bit extremely about the conclusions that Alex could come to in terms of, like, what he's trying to do is justify being able to shoot people who have milkshakes.
One of the reasons that people took particular offense at the Portland Police Bureau's official Twitter account being used to publicize and lend credibility to the right-wing smear campaign about the concrete and the milkshakes is that in the past few years there's been a troubling trend of the Portland police taking the side of right-wing protesters, even when they're doing things that are kind of fucked up.
In June 2017, there was a rally in Portland that turned a little bit ugly.
An Oregon Live article about it has this headline.
Dueling Portland rallies end without major violence, but police intervene.
Which might give you the impression that everything turned out pretty alright.
However, here's the fourth paragraph of that article.
Officers deployed explosives and pepper balls to scatter anti-fascist crowds gathered at Chapman and Lownsdale squares just north of the pro-Trump rally.
The rally was taking place a week after Jeremy Christian had murdered two men on a train in Portland who were trying to stop him from verbally assaulting two women with racist attacks.
He would go on to tell the police that stabbing those two men made him, quote, happy.
That rally was being organized by Joey Gibson, that rally that ended up with explosions and pepper balls.
Joey Gibson's the leader of Patriot Prayer.
Incidentally, Gibson had also organized a far-right rally in Portland in April 2017 where Jeremy Christian was in attendance and was found on video marching around doing Nazi salutes.
At the June rally, Gibson made a concerted effort to distance himself from Christian, which I think is a good idea that's good for business.
At the rally in June, the police detained approximately 400 counter-protesters for about an hour.
But a report that came out from the Independent Police Review Division pointed out that the police never gave a legal reason for their detentions, which seems like the sort of behavior Alex Jones might call tyranny.
Pictures and videos came out of Portland police wrestling a counter-protester to the ground.
That might not have been too shocking or cause for serious concern, but the other thing that was in that video certainly was.
Todd Kelsey, a member of the American Freedom Keepers militia, is seen literally helping the police detain the demonstrator.
Kelsey would go on to tell the Guardian that the police officer who was arresting the guy had asked for his help, despite there being a ton of other cops around, literally three of them on top of this demonstrator alone.
But you get this militia guy, hey, give me a hand.
There's a really suspicious theme emerging there, that the police were being on the side of the right-wing folks, as opposed to being neutral upholders of the law.
And this suspicion was confirmed on June 27, 2018, when the Independent Police Review released their full report about the police response at that rally.
They said, quote, More into the right wing because the left wing folks were, quote, a group that was diverse in their viewpoints and tactics.
It was pretty plain to see that the Portland Police Department was more or less showing where their priorities were.
And things got worse from there.
In October 2018, it was announced that members of Patriot Prayer were found on the roof of a parking structure in downtown Portland, quote, with a cache of firearms, before a scheduled protest on August 4th, a couple months earlier.
The cache was said to have included long guns.
No one was arrested, which may be an okay decision if none of the guns were illegal and everyone's paperwork was in order and all that, but even if you're not going to arrest anyone when you find them with what might be considered a strategic location with a cache of firearms, that revelation should at least inform how you behave as law enforcement during the upcoming rally.
But it didn't.
Police charged counter-protesters at that rally with their clubs drawn after someone told them that they'd been hit by a water bottle, which, quote, likely came from a counter-protester.
Likely came from a counter-protester.
Doug Brown, a photographer who was there on the scene, told The Guardian, quote, the first missile I saw and heard came from the Patriot prayer side, across the street, toward the protesters.
I don't know who set it off, but it went towards the black block, and then the police just swarmed them.
A woman was sent to the hospital after being hit by a flashbang.
Joey Gibson's second in command, a man named Tiny, was seen at the protest in a shirt that read, Pinochet did nothing wrong.
That August rally was a month after another rally that they had on June 30th, which descended into total chaos and was declared a riot.
There's a clear pattern here, and it's one where the police department is not interested in doing anything to control the far-right elements like Patriot Prayer and the Proud Boys.
They work to stage violent street actions under the guise of free speech rallies, and that's sort of dumb bullshit.
In February 2019, Katie Shepard of the Willamette Week reported on text messages that were exchanged between Joey Gibson and the Portland police.
The messages start to make things a little more clear.
On multiple instances, Portland Police Lieutenant Jeff Nia appears to be providing Gibson with intel on where left-wing protests were taking place.
And on one occasion, he, quote, told Gibson that Portland Police were not monitoring a protest hosted by the Queer Liberation Front in an attempt to dissuade Gibson's right-wing group from showing up.
Which is to say, you're going to get fucked up if you go there.
But it should be pointed out that in 2017, it did come out that he was also texting with someone from the anti-fascist side.
It came out that 20-year-old anti-fascist activist named Tan had been texting with him a bunch.
But that situation was a little bit different.
Whereas Neo was providing Joey Gibson with information to protect his right-wing group, Neo was using Tan as an informant to gather information about where counter-demonstrators were marching.
I feel like this is a pretty succinct illustration of the way the Portland police have engaged with this unfolding situation.
reach out to the left in hopes of finding a snitch, and feed information to the right-wing provocateurs so they can avoid and evade trouble.
There's far more to this story than I can credibly explain to you here on this episode, but it's important to remember that nothing exists in a vacuum.
So when the Portland Police Bureau tweets out something that's dumb as shit, like the concrete milkshakes nonsense, it often can't be seen as a single isolated event, but rather just one more instance in a years-long pattern of the police department declaring their allegiance to siding with the crowd that is intermingled with neo-Nazi Do you mean just the Republican Party?
This has nothing to do with anything, but it deserves mentioning that the Portland Police Bureau's current chief is named Danielle Outlaw.
So, I mean, this isn't to say that the Portland Police Department is 100% working with these right-wing provocateurs or anything like that, but it does seem to indicate, you know, when you look at the information that's available, you look at the stories, you look at the trends, you see that there is a clear preference.
There is a differential treatment of the two groups that is not explained by the behavior of those two groups.
Antifa, the Maoist communist group in the United States set up 30 years ago that calls for overthrowing the government, killing their political enemies, banning free speech.
They are now nationwide saying they're going to attack anybody at 4th of July rallies, anybody that tries to go out in public, anybody that tries to support Trump.
Because do you know what I love at my barbecues with all of my family, none of whom are gun-loving people who all carry guns and are afraid in the exact same way, is that when there are a lot of people together with guns and somebody maybe has a janky trigger finger and somebody walks up with the milkshake, maybe they fire on accident.
All of a sudden, there are a lot of guns firing real quick, aren't there, Dan?
In May 2018, video artist Vic Berger, formerly of Super Deluxe, was on a bit of a streak, making fun of the Proud Boys and their leader, Gavin McGinnis.
The gang didn't take kindly to that, and according to a message posted in their group chat, they had a goal of doxing Vic, saying in all caps, quote, Let's show them their consequences.
Then, a dude showed up at Vic's house.
Speaking to HuffPost, Vic Berger said, quote, When I answered the door, he seemed nervous, like he wasn't expecting me.
It was the middle of the day, and my wife was home.
He said, are you Vic?
Your videos are hurting a lot of people.
You're really hurting the Proud Boys.
You need to stop making these videos.
Probably because Vic chased the guy immediately, this incident didn't escalate.
But it's the sort of thing that absolutely is the next level of scary.
The Proud Boys are a gang where you literally have to get into a fight or get arrested for the gang in order to reach the fourth degree of initiation.
Which is the sort of thing, you know, it's the sort of thing that the sort of shitheads who gravitate towards a gang where you have to name cereals while getting softly punched in order to join, they might take that to mean track down and assault people who...
Oh, yeah.
Oh, you also have Tommy Robinson, who recently showed up at a critic of his, Mike Stuckberry's, house at 11pm and banged on his doors and windows.
This is, of course, after giving out the dude's...
And social media accounts on a live stream that he was doing.
So, of course, the banging on the walls was accompanied by a flood of threatening messages on the guy's phone.
Mike called the police and Tommy left, only to return at 5 a.m. and do it all over again.
This is clear intimidation, meant to get people to stop giving critical coverage to xenophobic, far-right, racist, misogynistic, anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, and overall shithead actors in our society.
Antifa, in quotes, isn't doing that.
They're not showing up at your house.
They're showing up when you have a rally to make it harder for you to speak in public because your views are repulsive.
And it's always great to hear noted guy who cries about free speech all the time, Paul Joseph Watson, advocating publicly that the government should be in the business of regulating citizens' clothing choices.
This shit is really stupid, considering how many right-wing demonstrators wear masks and how the government control of people's clothing is a fucking insane thing for a supposed libertarian to advocate for.
If the problem is that masks make people harder to identify, and your solution is to ban them, I got bad news about hats, wigs, face paint, makeup, sunglasses, and facial hair.
Those things make people harder to identify, too, so I guess the state should probably crack down on any of that shit.
And the best part about this, Jordan, if you look at the pictures of the people who were making the milkshakes at the Portland protest, most of them were not wearing masks.
If you sincerely believe that these people were mixing up goddamn chemical weapons in broad daylight around everybody taking pictures, you would expect they would have been the most heavily masked people out there, and that was not the case.
Paul Joseph Watson and his ilk want these people not to be allowed to wear masks because they want to dox them and subject them to targeted harassment.
It's that simple.
And Paul wants the state to step in and make it easier for them to figure out who these people are so they can start propaganda campaigns against them and somehow tie them to Soros or some shit.
This is one of their favorite weapons in the information warfare arsenal.
And a simple bandana so completely stymies them that they're willing to throw away all their limited government, individualism, freedom bullshit.
These are sad people.
Sad people when they're pushed to the wall.
When their back is to the wall and people with bandanas and a dessert are wrecking their shop.
So, you know, Alex and Paul Joseph Watson are also dudes who are very seriously, like, mad about the idea that they've been kicked off social media, and, like, they're not allowed on Patreon, they're not allowed on all sorts of other places where normal people congregate.
They've literally got a post on Facebook right now celebrating the, quote, amazing success of their people smashing in old men's heads with crowbars and macing them in the face.
unidentified
They're on Twitter, not being banned, not being suspended on Twitter.
They're raising money from a website called rally.org.
People need to contact this website called rally.org and ask them, do you support domestic terrorism because your platform is being used to raise money for domestic terrorists?
Because if you do believe that somebody is so way out of line and they're being supported by being on this platform and you want to make your voice heard, your disapproval towards that platform, that they are hosting this person, I'm of the belief that you have every right to express that to the platform and if they so choose, they can kick the person off.
Paul Joseph Watson should not believe that.
Based on everything that InfoWars has been saying for the last year, at least, they absolutely should not be being like, hey, you know what?
You need to go apply pressure so these places kick people off of them.
All they do is complain about how that's what happened to them.
I didn't even really think too much about the fact that he literally said on air that he took the name from 4chan and 8chan, because he pretty much takes everything from there.
So I didn't even really cross my mind that this is somehow weird.
However, it's come to my attention from some people who spend more time in the bad parts of the Internet than I do that the term clown world has some really bad connotations in those parts of the web.
And Alex is clearly signaling to those people.
The clown world meme began on the chans.
As the publication Forward put it, quote, they were, quote, describing what they see as the logic of a liberal non-racist society as being clown world.
When they would post stories that seemed to fit into their worldview, they'd use the code honk-honk to express that everything was backwards.
From there, the terminology and meme took hold in all of the wrong places.
It became really popular on the Daily Stormer, and on April 22nd of this year, quote, two members of the American Identity Movement, the white nationalist group formerly known as Identity Europa, dressed as clowns and entered the New Orleans Public Library to disrupt a children's storytime program being led by local drag queens.
Welcome to clown world, honk honk, their sign said.
So I'm probably not the best person to cover this topic and all the nuances of it.
But suffice it to say that Alex Jones is fully aware of the racist and anti-Semitic roots and world that this meme that he's naming his Democrat debate coverage comes out of, you know?
He knows what he's doing, and it's equal parts disturbing and kind of pathetic to see how far he's fallen.
He's gone from being heavily associated with Ron Paul's campaign in 2012 to trying to court racist edgelords as fans and doing interviews with Count Dankula in 2019.
It's really sad what a couple of really big bad decisions can do to a person's career.
I'm not saying that his career was amazing before, but comparatively...
So, the argument that Antifa is going out there through doing some chemical warfare, I mean, that would certainly be emboldened by past stories of Antifa committing chemical warfare.
And thankfully, Paul Joseph Watson has one such story.
Get into what you predict's coming next, D.C., the lack of action on this terror group, the mixing of the chemical weapon in front of everybody, the police standing down.
This shows they're really going to go the whole way coming into 2020.
Representatives from Disrupt J20 have said they knew that the person they were talking to was a Project Veritas plant, and they were just fucking with them.
And that might be true.
It might not be.
But either way, this is not evidence of anyone planning an acid attack.
Framing it that way only serves one purpose, and that is to exaggerate your side's victim status, which is really sad to see.
There's a lot of stuff that just makes me real sad on this episode.
So it's interesting the way that Paul Joseph Watson's covering the story here about Roy Larner, the Lion of London Bridge.
While it is true that Roy did engage in what you could easily call a selfless act of heroic...
When he put himself in harm's way to charge a terrorist, it's absolutely unfair to say that the reason he may have been asked to get some sensitivity training is because he dared to say that the terrorist is Muslim, which is what Paul Joseph Watson's angle on the whole thing is.
Also, small point, Paul Joseph Watson in this appearance says that Larner charged the terrorist yelling that he was British, like, yeah, come on, you can't do this, I'm British.
But actually what he said is, fuck you, I'm Millwall, referencing his favorite soccer club.
A couple weeks before his actions on London Bridge, Larner was caught on camera spitting on a black photographer and yelling at him and calling him a foreign cunt who stinks like shit before yelling, National Front!
There were a lot of Reddit comments that I could find about discussing the situation, and they're like, oh my god, someone who likes Millwall is a piece of shit.
These soccer rivalries are brutal.
Also, after his altercation on the London Bridge, he decided to drop by his MP's office, Neil Coyne.
I just wanted to go say hi, and to tell him that Sadiq Khan is a piece of shit, and that, quote, all Muslims are the same.
One of the problems with the right-wing propagandists like Paul Jo's Watson is that their world and how they make their money doesn't allow for complexity.
Everyone has to be all good or all bad, and that's just not realistic at all.
Just like how some generally good people do bad, bad things sometimes, it's also the case that sometimes total pieces of shit rise to the levels of heroics when their mettle is tested.
Staking everything on this guy always being in the right because one time he was drunk and fought the right people seems like a bad way to live.
And from everything I can tell, it seems like Roy Larner is a piece of shit who just did something amazing one time.
And it's something that I don't know if I would have the wherewithal to be able to do.
I hope that should I be tested in such a way I would rise to the occasion, but I don't fucking know.
Dude with knives slashing around, charging at him?
I have no idea.
I'm impressed by being able to do that.
But now we've come to the point of the episode where everything goes wrong, Jordan.
President Trump is going to take decisive action right now.
In addition to declaring Antifa a terrorist organization, he should go ahead and disfederalize the National Guard and deploy them into both California and Oregon.
And while he's there, not just press Antifa, but also start rounding up illegal aliens and hoarding them using the National Guard, frankly.
Based on everything he believes, he should be against the idea of an executive, a president, federalizing the National Guard and taking them into states where the governor doesn't want them to be used for that purpose.
That's against states' rights.
That's opposed to literally everything he believes in.
But he's for it now.
Yep.
So, Stuart Rhodes, first of all, I gotta say, this drives me fucking crazy that he needs to change the battery on his smoke detector.
Because it keeps beeping in the background, and it's driving me nuts listening to this.
Very small issue in terms of the interview and the problems that are here.
So what Stuart is saying there in that last clip was enough to make me be like, oh God, oh God.
We got the president, the head of the Oath Keepers coming in and saying that Trump needs to declare a vaguely, nebulously defined group of people who oppose fascism to be a terrorist group.
And not only that, needs to federalize the National Guard, take them into...
Two left-leaning states in order to militarily suppress this anti-fascist counter-demonstration.
of President Trump declaring what it is and declaring an insurrection and deploying the military on the border to seal it.
And then internally, he should use the National Guard and he should call on us, the retired military veterans out there in particular, and bring us into service, too, as the military So, on our last episode in 2013, we were discussing, basically...
How Stuart Rhodes was coming in and making an appearance and largely a lot of his rhetoric seemed to be about the idea of finding ways to justify being able to kill your political enemies.
Now, six years later, what do we do on our very next episode?
We find Stuart Rhodes coming in and arguing that Trump needs to make him and his buddies the official militia to go in and with the tacit and explicit support of the state go in and suppress...
the political activity of the people that they're opposed to.
This is next level fucked up not only in how fucked up Yeah, I know.
But then also what Adam Carolla used to call the great magnet, just the force that controls coincidences in the universe, where you take a step back and you're like, wow, that's weird.
Because if there was a peaceful transition of power, say, and your political enemy then had precedent that it's fine to organize and federalize the National Guard and send them in to find terrorist organizations, guess who the fuck they would be coming for?
Like I said, I don't think they really give a shit.
But I also think that they see our democracy and the way it's set up, the rules, the timing of it, as a necessary challenge that they need to get around.
And the way that this is being built up, the idea of, like, we got to do it while Trump, it's best that we just do this while Trump is in charge.
And if we don't, they're going to steal the election.
It's them showing all their cards that they know.
They know that he's fucked in 2020, or at least they believe that there's no way that he's going to win that election.
Or at least they're insanely worried about that possibility, and this is the only way that they can guarantee that the train towards, I don't know, an ethno-state, an illiberal state, certainly, is maintainable, or their progress can be continued.
So, Judicial Watch didn't prove that millions of illegal votes were cast in California.
This is Alex and Stewart repeating completely insane and not true talking points that Trump disseminated in his recent interview with Chuck Todd.
All that Judicial Watch found was that there were as many as 1.59 million inactive voters on the California voter rolls.
This has nothing to do with illegal votes being cast.
There's no indication from anything that Judicial Watch put out that any of these people voted.
These are just people who moved away, or maybe they died, and they never sent in a notice to take them off of voter rolls, probably because literally no one ever does that.
Presenting this as proof in any way that California admitted that they had millions or more illegal votes cast in any election is an absolute lie.
These people are liars and they're lying because they want to kill people and they don't want to miss their chance.
This is not true, but it's the way that my mind is wrapping itself around what's going on right now is, like, immediately following the loss of the Civil War, like, the...
People in the Confederate South kind of got together and were like, do you know what was the problem?
We didn't take the military with us when we left.
So what if we just had control of it and then tried to secede?
That's silly and all that stuff, but it does have that feel of like, this is a group of people feeling like they have their chance to win the Civil War in 1865, finally.
So, in this next clip, Alex does what he always does, which is express what he wants by saying that he doesn't want it, but he does want it, but it's someone else's fault that it has to happen.
So, I know that Stewart has already kind of referenced this, but in this next clip they talk about how this has got to happen soon because Trump isn't, you know, like his term ends in 2020 and we have to do this when Trump is in charge.
And if it's going to kick off, and of course the thing that's back in your mind is, well, if we do any of these things, if he deploys the military on the border, he sends the National Guard out there and federalizes them and has them go around and round up illegal aliens, then it will cause a revolution or cause a civil war in this country.
Well, so be it.
The left is going to go kinetic.
Let it happen while Trump is commander-in-chief of the U.S. military.
So, I mean, like, if you have already used this judicial watch bullshit to lie, to prove that everyone's going to steal an election, then no matter what, if Trump loses, you're going to say it was stolen, and now you've already framed it that if the election is stolen, based on my definition of that, a civil war is going to break out.
We're going to start a civil war if Trump loses the election, so we might as well do it now.
All of this is Stuart Rhodes arguing, if not now, when?
But at the same time, if you're going to make this argument, and in that he's even lying about the concrete nonsense, the idea that eventually they're going to kill somebody, so we've got to take care of this.
Tim Pool was saying that what this is is Antifa is an identitarian white movement.
He's right.
It's almost predominantly, like, 99% white.
It's young white liberals who have been conditioned like a zombie invasion, basically, to hate their own country.
And so they'll fight to the death.
And as I said before on your show, they'll fight to the death believing that they're being killed by Nazis.
When us veterans get up and take them to the task and beat them and kill them in the streets in the Civil War, they will die believing with all their heart that they're fighting Nazis like their grandparents did in the...
When I heard that clip the first time listening through, my heart fluttered.
Like, I got a real sense of, holy shit, I can't believe we've reached a point where someone who is the head of an organization of people who have had domestic terrorists within their ranks.
Absolutely.
The guy who is the head of the Oath Keepers.
Feels comfortable coming on a program, talking about how we've got to do a civil war, so we might as well do it now, and then talking about, with a blasé indifference almost, the idea of killing people in the streets.
When we kill them in the streets, they'll think that they were fighting against fascists.
And I can't believe that I haven't heard media covering this.
Yeah, right.
Granted, it's only July 2nd as we're recording this, but that's the day after this came out.
I have not heard anybody saying, like, well, Stuart Rhodes is casually discussing starting a civil war immediately and giving graphic fantasies about murdering people in the streets.
Especially when part of that, what he was really saying there, and he hit it really, really close, but when he's talking about how Antifa is mostly young and white, he said, hate their own country.
And it's like, what you meant was hate their own kind.
But we want to make sure that the President gets the message from the military, from his current serving and retired military, that he has to act as Commander-in-Chief.
He must deploy the military on the border.
He must call on the federal service, all the National Guard units of the states, and put them on the border, or even better, put them to work backing up eyes to go and round up the illegal aliens who are going to be the voting bloc.
So in this next clip, which is the last one we have of Stuart, and then we just have one palate cleanser afterwards, they discuss, Alex and Stuart discuss how it's not just Antifa that's going to get killed in the streets.
And everybody I know is just, they're like, tell us, Alex, when we stop paying taxes and we start doing whatever we want and we start going after people.
And by the way, my listeners aren't dumb.
They're not dumb.
People aren't going to go find antifa.
We're going to, and I don't want this to happen, but I hope all the politicians and bureaucrats and people know Santa Claus has been making a list.
I am absolutely sickened by this rhetoric being put out, even by someone I hate.
I don't understand how anybody in good conscience can do a show like this.
Like, the idea that you can start with this excessively over-the-top propaganda lie about chemical weapons and milkshakes and then have Stuart Rhodes on your show to use what you've built.
In the first hour and a half of the show or so to come in and advocate for a civil war that we might as well fucking do now.
And by the way, we're going to kill journalists too.
And they asked for it because they're the ones who are saying Trump's attacking them when they're really starting the civil war.
It's insanely fucked up.
If people take this seriously, the danger of an appearance like this, an interview like this, it gets impossible to overstate.
I pray that nothing happens.
I pray that no one...
Is inspired to action by this.
But these sorts of things make me really worried that Alex is trying to manifest the predictions that he's making about the 4th of July parades and 4th of July rallies.
He's trying to get people in a mind state where it is trigger-happy time.
It's already the revolution.
And if the revolution's going to kick off, it better well shot her around the world happening on the 4th of July?
And I have no interest in spending my time critiquing the political views of someone who's still in high school.
There is something really disgraceful about Alex doing the show that he does and then having a 14, 15-year-old who says horrible things on his show as if she's an expert.
In the middle of the interview, she's complaining about her principal.
I don't think I can handle it even like just physically from a...
From a whiplash situation, it's like, okay, if Johnny Carson had Goebbels on and then his next guest was a dog trainer and the dog can do little flips, I just wouldn't be able to hand it.
In much the same way that I have avoided your ideas about Trump's not going to step down, I have also resisted the urge to think that Alex listens to our show.
However, on this episode, Alex brings up something that we've heard him talk a lot about in 2013, but not so much in the present.
And then the system, once it catches you in a scam, like a Nigerian scam, that you're going to get $1,000 is you're going to get $100,000.
They go, oh, Prince Abubu needs $10,000 now, but you're going to get a million.
And once you've already invested $20,000 in the scam, you're supposed to get $10 million from Prince Abubu or whatever his name is.
These people will tell their family, no, you're jealous I'm getting money from Prince Abubu.
And then they'll have a Nigerian fly over here, get on a Greyhound bus, this happened to people I know, come to their house in a Prince outfit, but they have no money and they have a one-week visa.
And then families break up.
And people's wives run off, their husbands run off, going, no, the prince is here.
I hit the jackpot.
So it's the same thing.
And then they'll sign their house over to them because now the prince is going to give them a billion.
And they can never admit they got conned, so the left keeps doubling down the betting.
They're like compulsive gamblers believing they're finally going to be the ruling class.
Their degrees are finally going to work.
Once Bernie Sanders or Hillary takes over, she'll give them places in the whole economy.
I assume it's because you're forcing all of your staff to listen to our show to remember pieces of your rhetoric from years past that you've forgotten about.
Or maybe you're trying to remember what you said about Sandy Hook in anticipation of the lawsuit.
I don't know where you draw the line in terms of harm deterrence, but I think allowed to continue at the rate he's going and the trajectory he's going, he's going to get people killed.
I don't think there's any way around it.
I don't know how much that fits in with...
A robust, societally useful version of free speech.
But man, whenever things do...
If things go bad, it's important to remember that Alex made them worse.
That's a very important piece of this that is very clear.
Look, I don't know how to end this episode.
I don't at all.
It was an emotional wreck trying to get this all prepared.
And I'm glad it's over-ish.
Or at least I'm glad the episode's done.
Because I hate this.
I hate this shit.
I mean, I like...
I like doing the show, but...
I hate that his show in the present day exists like this.
I want the episodes where he's, even if he's still going to probably get some people in Green Bank hurt down in West Virginia.
Episodes where you have Stuart Rhodes in talking about the Civil War has to start before Trump leaves office because he's going to lose the election and we can't accept that result and then we won't have an opportunity to appear to be in the right when we start killing people.