All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 19, 2024 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
01:03:42
Sam Dickson — “Whitey on the Psychiatrist’s Couch.” (2024)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, our final speaker is Sam Dixon.
Sam and I have a lot of things in common.
We're both Southerners, and we're both boomer geezers.
And we've both spoken at every single American Renaissance Conference.
That makes 21 of them.
I've introduced him 20 times, and it's hard to think of new things to say.
Another thing we have in common is that we are both sons of Presbyterian ministers, and we were both raised on fairly strict Sabbatarian principles.
And I believe our fathers, looking down on us now, would not be pleased on this kind of carrying on on the Lord's Day.
However, the Sabbath may be broken for reasons of charity and necessity.
And in case Brother Dixon has any lingering feelings of Presbyterian constraint, I declare this an issue of deep necessity.
Now, there's one thing we do not have in common.
In the SPLC write-up of Brother Dixon, it calls him weaned on hate.
Now, this is...
A recognition and a tribute that I have not achieved in the annals of the SBLC.
And I've thought sometime what they had in mind by that.
And I believe by that, that is their hateful way of saying that Sam Dixon has been active ever since he was old enough to think.
And that started at an early age.
Unlike me, he understood the issues very early, from high school, college.
Law school, throughout his life, he has been working for our people.
And he has gone about it in a way that I think is a model for some of you to consider.
He's established himself professionally.
At the same time, maintaining a constant interest in our issues, making himself available financially sometimes, speaking in this way, he has built a life that has contributed to our movement in, I believe, one of the most effective ways possible.
There are only a few people who can be full-time participants in this movement.
We're not yet at the point where we have hundreds of people.
Many people stay outside, but he has contributed, I think, in a wonderful way, right from the beginning.
So, if you'd please welcome Sam Dixon.
Thank you.
Well, divine intervention.
You may have seen me running around the room in desperation because I could not find.
My notes for my speech.
I've been to my room, I've been to my car, and I figured I would have to wing it all, and you would have been spared so much, but God has intervened on my side and not yours, because now, on the podium, somehow I find the notes to my speech.
How they got here, I have no idea.
But first things first, obviously the first thing is to thank Jared Taylor for the opportunity to be heard.
I've done very little for our cause, not nearly what I should have done.
I've focused most of my life on material things, and this has been a hobby of mine.
When people like Jared and many others here, it's been a full-time, dedicated vocation.
And I recognize that, and to what little influence I've had, it has been due to Jared's kindness.
It is the 30th anniversary of the first American Renaissance Conference.
And I think that we need to take stock of that and to recognize that Jared has spent over 30 years of dedicating his entire life to this cause, and this organization and institution is entirely his creation.
And he deserves a round of applause and gratitude.
Thank you.
Our people may not know, but these in this room, we know what a hero Jared Taylor is.
There are differences between me and Jared, as he mentioned.
I am far harsher and harder than Jared, and much less full of human kindness, and not what the Germans call gut gloibig, as good believing as Jared is about people.
And so that will be reflected in some of my talk.
To the extent that that is, these are my ideas and not those of Jared Taylor or of American Renaissance.
Jared was kind enough to have me make a few words, a retrospective, about the 30th anniversary.
I had written these words up and given them to him.
Unfortunately, I didn't review them before the talk Friday.
But I did want to mention Emile Zola's novel, Germinal.
And the ending of it, in which the defeated leader of the strikers is leaving, and he's walking in the sunlight and warmth of the brown day, and he knows that his comrades are now once again being exploited in the mines by the Catholics, and he thinks of them as seeds,
that despite the defeat, the seeds are germinating under the ground, and he concludes that someday their germination will shake the earth.
And that's what I think is true of Amaran.
And of those of you here today, especially you young folks, you are the seeds, and from those seeds will come something that will split the earth, which unfortunately I will not see, but if there is a hereafter, I will be blessing you from the hereafter.
One other note before I try to hurry through this speech to meet Jared's time deadlines, he's worse than Mussolini.
He would have made the trains run ahead of time if he had been Mussolini.
He wants Amaran run tightly, whereas I'm kind of easygoing and slothful and all that.
But you may have seen these two guys, Andrew and...
Colwyn handing out Heritage and Destiny.
I was asked to give these out by the editors of Heritage and Destiny and to urge you to subscribe.
They're struggling to survive.
They've been going for over 10 years, faithfully, every month.
And if you're interested in the European movement and also the movement in the homeland of many of us, the United Kingdom, this is the best paper you can subscribe to to tell you what's happening in Europe.
So I've prepared a subscription form.
It's in there.
And I urge all of you, if you are interested in this racial cause worldwide, and it is a worldwide cause, to subscribe.
Now, the title of my talk is Whitey on the Psychiatrist's Couch.
And the psychological is the key.
Contrary to Marxism, The psychological is more important than the material.
If a man feels he is poor, even if he has money, he is poor.
If a man feels he is rich, even if he doesn't have money, to some extent, he is rich.
And we see this in things like voting patterns, where in my city of Atlanta, the wealthiest neighborhoods, like Antley Park...
Vote almost identically to the poorest neighborhoods in Perry Boulevard.
Obviously, someone does not perceive reality when these two neighborhoods that differ in race, education, wealth, and everything else are voting the same.
And the reason is that white people are psychologically weak and they suffer from some sort of mental illness.
And I'm not qualified.
I have no degree in psychiatry.
And these are just layman's observations for a lifetime of trying to figure out the white problem.
And the white problem is the first problem we should address.
Blacks and other races are acting normally.
They're united.
They feel a common culture.
They feel a link in a community.
They're aggressive.
They want to take what we have.
Whites are abnormal.
We are not mentally healthy people.
And the first thing we should do is to study ourselves individually and as a race and as a nation to see exactly what psychological weaknesses we have.
And so I'm going to start out first with Americans, really with Anglo-Saxons and then Americans.
Jung, the great Swiss psychiatrist, Did not believe in a world psychology.
He believed that races and nations had different psychologies.
And I think that's true.
The white psychology is very different from the Oriental or black psychology.
And we have different psychologies among our own peoples.
It's an unfortunate thing of history that the defense of the white race has fallen to my people.
The Anglo-Saxons, my component of our white family, instead of people who I think are better prepared to do that from experience, like the Russians or the Spaniards or the Greeks, who lived for centuries under alien rule and whose psychology has been affected by that.
And so, starting with our roots as Anglo-Saxons, which is, after all, the country that put the mold...
On America, I'm the American personality.
I'm not excluding those of you of German or Italian or French ancestry.
I'm something of a mongrel myself.
I have a lot of French blood through the French Huguenots and some German blood.
But the Anglo-Saxons set the form.
And when we look at the Anglo-Saxons, they overran England in the 400s.
And they have been there now for 16 centuries.
They've only been invaded successfully one time in their history, which left severe trauma, the Norman invasion in 1066.
But these people were not equivalent to the Mongols, who kept such a hard school for the Russians, or the Ottoman Turks, or the Saracens, who kept hard schools for the Greeks and Spaniards.
So we were very fortunate.
In our geography, we were babied.
The English Channel babied us.
And this was to be replicated in the Atlantic Ocean that would baby Americans.
Our ancestors had to deal only with the Celts, predominantly today the Irish, whom they outnumbered and who were decidedly weaker than they.
But we forget...
That we had to deal with the Celts and the Irish, the way the Germans had to deal with the Poles and the Russians had to deal with Poles and Lithuanians and others.
We tend to be very self-righteous and look at European nations and be very judgmental and to forget that when faced with the same problems of hostile white neighbors, we used the same tactics and techniques as we had to.
In dealing with the Irish.
The very favorable babying geography made the Anglo-Saxons, in my opinion, overly individualistic, and it gave them an exaggerated idea of freedom, which permeates our society both in Britain and in America.
You hear incessantly about freedom, freedom, freedom, freedom, freedom.
You don't hear that as much with Germans or Russians or Italians or people in the Balkans because for them, freedom was subordinate to survival, to racial survival, to national survival, and they couldn't afford the luxury of the kind of individualism and freedom that our ancestors in Britain could enjoy without endangering the survival of their race.
We see today...
That freedom in America, in my opinion, is incompatible with the survival of the white Europeans in America.
We have to rethink a whole lot of things.
The Constitution, states' rights, individualism, private property, freedom, all of these things have to be rethought in terms of new facts on the ground.
No political philosophy fits all situations.
was fatal to the Southern Confederacy.
They lost their war because of their attachment to states' rights.
States' rights would have been fatal to the Russian people when Dmitry Donskoy, the founder of Tsarism, led them to the historic great white racial victory in 1380 in the Battle of Kulakova Field, in which for the first time white Christians defeated yellow people,
the Mongols, who had inflicted so much harm.
When we turn, when we look at our people in England, we see the same faults.
I've ridden all over England and Scotland and really all over Ireland and Northern Ireland.
I have to say, to be fair to the Irish who are our racial brothers, I have never had a harsh word with an Irishman.
I've had very, very friendly reception in the Republic of Ireland.
When I talk about the obsession with freedom, you notice in Britain, and then you notice in America, that we are the people who cannot speak our name.
All over Britain, you see monuments to the dead, the war dead.
They invariably read, they died for freedom.
They died for freedom.
They died for freedom.
You never see a monument that they died for England or Scotland, maybe not even for Ireland.
It's always an ideology, a moral principle that they died for.
This permeates historiography and historical thinking in the Anglo-Saxon world.
You hear people say ridiculous things like Leonidas and the Spartans at Thermopylae died for freedom.
They died for Greek freedom and democracy.
No. They died for Sparta.
They died for their wives and children and little brothers and elderly parents back home in Sparta.
That's why they gave their lives, was for Sparta and its people.
But we can't say that.
And it's true when you come to America.
Drive around the South.
Do you ever see a monument that says, they died for Dixie?
They died for the South.
They died for the Southern people.
Or even they died for the Confederacy.
What you see are monuments that read, they died for the Constitution as it was originally intended, or they died for states' rights.
We cannot utter our own name.
This is not true of healthier members of our great extended white European family.
When you go to France, you see monuments to soldiers that say that they died for La Patrie.
Not Liberté, but La Patrie, the fatherland.
You go to Germany and you see monuments.
They died for Das Vaterland, for the fatherland.
We don't see those among English-speaking peoples.
And this is a psychological problem that we have to recognize and with which we have to deal.
Americans are Britons on meth.
They have the English Channel.
We have the Atlantic Ocean.
We have never been successfully invaded in our entire history.
We've invaded other people, but never been invaded ourselves.
Only the South in America has an experience with invasion and defeat, and they have forgotten that and have been captured now in a sort of Stockholm Syndrome, and you hear them talking away about how race had nothing to do with the Confederacy.
Race had nothing to do.
Slavery had nothing to do.
It was all an exercise and a debate over states' rights and forms of government.
You can read these books, The South Was Right, which is actually to say that race had nothing to do with it.
The southern people don't count.
It's just a matter of some moral principles.
The only enemies we faced were Indians.
Even less dangerous than the primitive Celts and Irish.
We had endless resources.
When oil became an important resource, in Pennsylvania there were pools of oil on the surface of the land.
You just scoop it up.
Our foreign policy, as a result, is ludicrous.
They profess foreign policy, the one that the gullible people, the cannon fodder, believe, not the real policies that are governed by sociopathic war profiteers like Liz and Dick Cheney or the others that had ethnic stakes in our wars.
We always have a moral purpose.
We're always intervening in Syria, or should intervene in Syria, to save democracy.
Woodrow Wilson wanted to make the whole world safe for democracy, to export democracy to the entire world.
In this, by the way, he reflected a shocking thing that Emerson, the New England transcendentalist, said about the Civil War when he said, this is not merely a war to make all of America New England.
It is a war to make the entire world New England.
And that idea, I think, still is in the subconscious of the American people.
And I'm not saying that as a southerner with an axe to grind.
For those of you from New England, three of my great-grandparents were from New England.
So I have a foot in both camps, and I'm not ashamed to be the descendant of Puritans.
But it's always a moral purpose.
In my book, since I judge wars based on what they do for my people, The greatest war that America ever fought was the Mexican-American War.
It doubled the size of the country.
It expanded in North America for settlement by Anglo-Saxons and related immigrants and did so with very few casualties.
To our enemies, in their assessment of history, the Mexican-American War is the most immoral war.
We are a fault.
And those of you who have children in high school, just look for this.
This is really the treatment.
It's just a terrible thing.
It'll get in the textbooks.
It's a terrible thing that America expanded.
What they consider a good war is something like the Civil War, in which they say, you know, 600,000 white boys on both sides gave their life killing each other over a moral principle.
Liberals love that kind of war.
That's the only meaningful war to them and to us.
Such wars are meaningless except as a tremendous tragedy for our whole race.
Now, having laid out some of my thoughts about American Anglo-Saxons and their American descendants, well, let me say one other thing.
And this will ruffle the feathers of a lot of people here, but I'm not nice and sweet like Jared.
I'm an unpleasant person.
The fatal error, the first fatal error in America was at Jamestown because they allowed people to come here voluntarily.
And that error has gone down all the way through even the white subsequent settlement and immigration of similar white people like the Irish and Germans and Sloths and Latins.
It would have been much better if the king had simply sealed off a village in Yorkshire and resettled the entire village at Jamestown.
What you get when you allow people to come here as individuals are people who, again, are highly individualistic.
They're willing to leave their homelands and abandon where their ancestors have lived for thousands of years to, quote, get a better life, end quote.
The ones who had a normal connection to community stayed at home.
They stayed in Europe.
So the Europeans have a much better field to plow than we have in America with all of these highly individualistic and materialistic people for whom things like race, religion, language, nation were secondary values,
maybe even tertiary values.
And that was the first great mistake.
The second great mistake was the revolution, the war for independence, and the propaganda that comes out of that that you hear every year about how we rose up against British tyranny.
Britain was the freest country on earth in 1776, and America was there with them.
We had essentially all the rights that our ancestors had created in Great Britain.
Britain is the mother.
Of all these freedom ideas.
Our Bill of Rights came from a template of the Declaration of Right by the British Parliament in 1692.
But none of this is treated in standard American history.
It's depicted that we are against Britain, therefore it's an easy step to be against Europe.
That we are a reaction against all of that.
A healthier psychology is found among Jews.
The most Jew among American Jews in the first half of the last century was Rabbi Stephen Wise.
And he very wisely had a great dictum that he reminded Jews of constantly.
And that was, we have been Americans for only 250 years.
We have been Jews for 2,500 years.
We have been Americans since 1607 when Janestown started.
Even those of us with original ancestors like Jared and I have who came here early on.
We've only been Americans now for about 420 years.
but we have been Europeans for thousands of years.
Thank you.
And so the revolution and the way it has been treated is the second fatal error in America.
Now let's look briefly at whites in general.
What is wrong with white people?
Well, as is usually the case, one's virtues are also one's vices.
The Greeks had that wise dictum on the altar of Apollo at Delphi, nothing too much, nothing in excess, moderation in all things.
We have...
These virtues that have enabled us to create this situation, to split the atom, to solve polio, to do all these things that whites have done that have blessed our people and the entire world.
These same traits, psychological traits, that have enabled us can give rise to danger.
And the ones that I see are an excessive capacity for imagination.
Whites have a tremendous...
The power for imagination.
I've talked about this before.
You've probably heard me talk about it.
But when the...
When Dickens was writing his novels, they were serialized.
And the novels would arrive in Boston.
And the Bostonians, these hard, tough Puritans with remarkable IQs, my guess is that the Puritans probably had an average IQ of about 120.
These tough-minded businessmen would go down to the docks and wait for the next installment, and they would cry out to the sailors, tell us, tell us, is Little Nell dead?
And the sailors would reply, yes, Little Nell has died.
And they would get all choked, well, Little Nell is dead.
And I've known people like that.
There was a girlfriend of mine for many years for whom Masterpiece Theater was so real that she would get...
An elevated mood or depressed based upon what was happening to people in masterpiece theater.
I'm very dull and unimaginative and I would tell her, Jane, these people don't exist.
There's no reason to be concerned if they're dying or marrying the wrong person.
They just don't exist.
But whites have this capacity to leave reality and to live in a world of imagination and fantasy.
And our enemies...
Have very shrewdly analyzed that, and they have created an alternate reality that people live in.
Another thing that is true is that abstract reasoning, which I think walks hand in hand with the power of imagination, makes us in some senses vulnerable.
My neighbors in my neighborhood are very intelligent people.
It's a great neighborhood, and they're filled with wonderful people.
They are young people.
They're heterosexual people.
They have babies.
They are able to buy houses for $800,000, even though they're 30 years old.
And they vote two to one for Stacey Abrams and Joe Biden.
And I was remarking about this to a friend of mine's widow, who's a very astute woman, and I said, I don't understand.
How they can't see that there's nothing good coming to them from Stacey Abrams for governor or Joe Biden for president.
And she looked and said, well, it's very easy to understand.
She said they use subject-verb sentences, they have high vocabularies, and so on, because you have to have high intelligence and education in order to follow all of the fallacious logic.
That leads to these positions.
Simple people don't have the ability to follow these arguments and so they see things as they are.
And I think that's very true.
And we know it's true.
Because formal education has been found in studies to be heavily correlated with susceptibility to frauds.
The more education you have, the more susceptible you are to frauds.
There are little interesting things that I hear now and then that contribute to my thinking as a lay psychiatrist of trying to figure out what is wrong with our people.
I heard a fascinating thing on National Public Radio.
One of my mental illnesses is that I'm a masochist, and that's why I subscribe to the New York Times, and I listen to National Public Radio so that I can suffer.
But anyway, they had a report on National Public Radio.
They had a guy on, they interviewed him in the local station for a half hour.
He was one of the guys that found the Titanic.
He went down the bathyscope and found the Titanic.
He's written about it and he's traveled America speaking about it.
And the most interesting thing for me and us was, the interviewer asked, well, how have people received your talks?
And he said, well, that's a very interesting thing.
He said, it's a way I never expected.
He said, people are very proud of their trove of Titanic knowledge.
And they become very angry when you challenge their trove of Titanic knowledge.
And he said, many of the things that we think we know about the Titanic are false.
The story of the boy that put on the women's clothing and got in the lifeboat.
He said, that's completely false.
Totally false.
It was invented by someone with a personal antipathy to this person.
He was a young guy.
He got in the first yacht lifeboat before they started keeping him anywhere.
They were just telling everybody to get in the lifeboat.
But he said, you tell them that.
And they hear this when you lecture.
He said, another thing we know is the Titanic did not sink in this.
This sort of soap opera way that you see in the movies where it goes down majestically with the Union Jack flying and the last thing is the Union Jack slipping beneath the waves.
He said it broke in two.
It was badly built.
The contractors had cheated the people that had hired them to build the Titanic, which is one reason it sank.
And he said there were 700 people in the lifeboats watching as the Titanic sank.
And he said they had a big parliamentary inquest, the primary purpose of which was to make up a story that would make England look good in the Parliament.
And so the 700 people in the lifeboats all said they saw the boat split in two.
But the British Parliament had the naval officers testify, no, no, no, it went down dramatically with the flag flying.
And so the Parliamentary Commission discounted the opinions of the 700 people in the lifeboat and adopted the ones of the handful of perjured naval officers.
And they said that, well, you have to remember, these naval officers were trained observers.
And the ordinary people in the lifeboats, they couldn't see whether an ocean liner split and true.
You had to have a certification from the Navy to be able to see this and see that it happened.
But he said...
He said, they come down to the question by the microphone and angrily argue, don't tell me that guy didn't put on those women's clothes.
Don't tell me the ship slid into.
He said, they are furiously committed.
To their trove of titanic knowledge.
And I've seen this myself.
I knew a girl who worked for the Atlanta Journal of the Constitution.
And one day I walked her through some issue and boxed her in.
There was no question I was right.
And she said, well, Sam...
I see where this goes, but if I were to accept the things you say, it would mean that I wasted four years of my life at Agnes Scott College, and my father wasted $100,000 on my college education.
And I wanted to tell her, yes, Kay, that's exactly what it means.
That's exactly the point.
But she would not change because it would be a recognition of failure.
So, we have a hard job to do.
We have to change people's thinking from a form of thinking that allows them to feel good about themselves, to feel virtuous, to feel better than others, to adopt ideas that expose you to anxiety and stress and unhappiness,
and potentially, if you would act on them, to the kind of things that many of us in this room have suffered, like Dr. Wax and Jared and me and any of you have suffered.
And we have to overcome authority.
The power of authority is very powerful.
Authority is extremely powerful.
When you're a little child, your mother tongue is imposed on you in a very fascistic manner.
When mommy and daddy say, this is an apple, it's an apple.
You don't argue and say, oh no, it's a yablaca.
It's an apple.
And you just accept.
And children like that.
Up to the age of seven, they have virtually no capacity for abstract reasoning.
They're just blotter minds.
They accept whatever daddy and mommy say.
That's why those of you who have children or will have children need to expose them to our ideas when they're little.
And believe everything you say rather than waiting until they're teenagers when they're not going to listen to anything you say.
If you tell them chocolate ice cream tastes good, they'll say, no, I prefer broccoli.
Just to be defiant the way teenagers are.
But our enemies believe in authority.
You saw this in the COVID vaccine.
I went along.
I had the vaccinations.
I wouldn't today.
But, you know, I would have people holler at me in the grocery store, where's your mask?
Where's your mask?
And in dealing with these people, I came to realize that the people who were really into the establishment's narrative on COVID, and the same thing is true of their narrative on raising their thing, they're the kind of little brats in third grade who raised their hands and said,
teacher, Sam talked while you were out of the room.
That's the kind of mentality that we're dealing with.
They're little suck-up brats.
But anyway, let's look for a minute at our enemies.
For one thing, they are manic.
Their behavior is manic.
In Atlanta, there's a magazine, a weekly magazine, called Creative Loafing.
And in the back of it, they have or used to have four or five pages entitled Happenings.
And it was a list of all these organizations that you could join.
There were hundreds and hundreds of liberal organizations, gays to save the whales, you know, all this sort of stuff.
Every once in a while there'd be something with young Republicans.
But when you deal with leftists and liberals, and by the way, I'm a liberal on moral issues than I'm a conservative.
I don't like the label conservative, right-wing, left-wing, liberal.
These are labels we've got somehow to shed because we are adherents of our people and advocates of our people and not advocates of an ideology.
But for the sake of convenience and time, since Jared is glaring at his watch, I'll just call them liberals.
They are manic.
And you can see this in the ads of these meetings in Creative Loafing.
They have elevated energy levels that are abnormal.
And you see the demonstrations.
Hundreds of thousands of them will turn out.
We're lucky to get 20 people who are willing to turn out.
We need to become a little bit more manic.
But we have to recognize what manics are like.
I've had...
Several mentally ill second cousins and was involved in the trust as the lawyer the family set up for them.
I had experience with Mannix.
One of them was a Mannix, another was a schizophrenic, whom I'll deal with later.
But Mannix are very opinionated and they get very angry when you try to bring them down to reality, and this is a facet of the liberal mind.
Also, their views are religiously based.
They are a new religion.
They are a secular religion.
That's why they are willing to be so hateful to us.
Torquemada, who headed the Spanish Inquisition, was more tolerant than these people are.
We are secular atheists.
We don't believe in the secular religion.
And they happily will utilize all the techniques of the Inquisition to bring us into obedience to their religion.
There really is an element of mental illness which comes partly from American history.
The term, all men are created equal.
As my father used to point out, this is the most preposterous idea you could imagine.
Anybody that believes such a thing is clearly mentally ill.
And most Americans believe it.
I've never met anyone...
I've met people superior to me.
I've met people different from me.
I've met people inferior to me.
But I've never met...
Human beings are not roofing tacks.
They're not fungibles.
They are very different.
And there was no man...
They should have started out with, no man is created equal.
That would have been a much healthier thing.
Or maybe they could have said something more believable, like, the cow jumped over the moon.
That would have been more believable and outside of people's daily experience than asking them to believe that all men are created equal.
This kind of ability to suspend attachment to reality I don't think applies to other races.
I don't think Africans, yellow people...
I don't think they are able to suspend reality and get into this, as I said before.
And it doesn't end with all men are created equal.
It goes on.
The current incarnation of this kind of mental illness is the idea that sex is a matter of one's opinion instead of the matter of physical, genetic, and anatomical reality.
This is just an astonishing idea.
I think I have this right.
Men have an XY chromosome.
Women have an XX chromosome.
This is determined by solid reality, not one's subjective thinking.
But instead, our enemies want to say that you can transcend reality.
By subjective thinking.
Where will it end next?
They say, well, a little boy who's five years old thinks, or more likely has it put in his head by some woke kindergarten teacher, that he's a little girl.
They say, oh, we need to castrate him so he can be a little girl.
Because that's what he thinks, and that's what he is.
Well, what if he's decided he was Napoleon?
Are we to address him as Your Excellency, General Lee Simone, General Napoleon?
Well, he thinks he's Napoleon.
Why isn't he Napoleon?
This kind of religious delusion that possesses liberals leads to what I call fact-free thinking.
You see in the stores, fact-free.
Well, in the bookstores of these liberal books, they should say fact-free because they don't.
Facts do not matter to these people.
It's all a matter of religious belief.
They say this now about the founding fathers.
They say that the original sin was slavery.
They didn't live up.
To the high sacred ideal, all men are created equal.
Well, thank God they didn't.
I mean, how many hundreds of millions of people, billions would die if you actually tried to enforce something as insane as all men are created equal?
Their minds, and I have a close relative who's like this, their minds remind me...
Of the old-fashioned records we used to play before, you know, with the controllers.
And when the needle would come around to an obstruction, if something, a grain or something had fallen on the record, usually the needle did not go through the obstruction.
The needle hopped over to the next groove.
And this is the way my relative is.
If I confront him on something, he was talking about how...
The MAGA people tried to kidnap Governor Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan.
And I told him, no, that didn't happen.
That was a fable, a fairy tale that was concocted by the FBI as a way of prosecuting people, and the courts dismissed it.
They were acquitted because it was all made up by the FBI.
Instead of dealing with that, his mind just hopped over to the next thing, that Trump tried to push...
What was it?
Some sort of drug that was going to cure COVID.
His mind never deals with what you put out in front of him.
The needle just hops over and he recites the next groove.
Our enemies are highly theoretical.
They have to be.
Like I said, they engage in fact-free thinking.
They're possessed by quasi-religious delusions.
And I like to say that the way they think is, in a sort of highly theoretical way, is that they basically are telling you, yes, it works in practice, but does it work in theory?
That's their approach to things.
They really are crazy.
Jared gets on to me about this, because he's a recovering liberal, and he doesn't think the liberals are crazy, but I think that they've been obviously crazy since I was a child.
They also are schizophrenic in a way.
The Southern Poverty Law Center is an example of the schizophrenia.
The stuff they put out is so silly.
In a sane society, the authors of this would be confined to mental institutions for treatment.
You probably won't remember Eric Rudolph, but he was accused of planting a bomb at the Olympic Games and bombing a homosexual nightclub at an abortion clinic.
And so they announced with great fanfare the release of the indictment and that the feds were chasing him.
He was in hiding.
And the next day, I read in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, they had a headline, Rudolph linked to white racist and Holocaust deniers.
And I thought, well, uh-oh.
I hope I don't know any of these people he's linked to.
But anyway, I read the article, and this had come from the, quote, intelligence report, unquote, of the SPLC.
And here were some of the links.
He grew up in an area of North Carolina.
Known for racist Klan violence in the 1920s before his parents were born.
He grew up in an area, the hills, the rocks, the creeks, the stones, the trees, they're all somehow associated with white racist violence.
It went on to say he was born only 20 miles from a place where a Holocaust denier I checked this out.
The Holocaust denier died when Eric Rudolph was 11 years old.
Little Eric would have been a candidate for the Olympic bicycle team to have pedaled his little bike over 20 miles of mountain roads to somehow find the Holocaust denier.
And I can tell you, this is classic schizophrenic thinking.
I don't know if any of you have had experience with schizophrenics, but I had this second cousin who was a schizophrenic.
And he could live much of the time outside of sanatoriums.
And he would say things like, well, you know, it was August 11th when such-such happened several years ago, and now such-such has happened to me, and it's happened to me in August.
And he would connect these dots.
That no sane mind would connect.
And the SPLC engages in this kind of schizophrenic nonsense.
But our enemies are so manic and living in such a trance that the Atlanta Journal would put this kind of comedic garbage up.
And probably the majority of people in my very liberal city, they probably believed all of this.
Ooh, he grew up in an area known for...
For Klan violence in the 1920s.
Well, alright.
That's enough of that.
In the remaining minutes, I want you to change from being so negative to trying to deal with what do we practically do.
And here's what I have as suggestions.
We have to recognize our own congenital weaknesses.
This happened in my household.
My parents were deeply religious.
My family worked extensively in the work of the church to combat alcoholism.
My parents drank, modestly.
But they would tell us, from little children, you have a genetic pattern of alcoholism on both your paternal and maternal sides of your family.
When you go to college, you're almost certainly going to drink, to fit in with your buddies.
But always keep in mind, you do not want to end up like Cousin Jimmy.
You know, and that you have the genetic potential.
And be very careful how much you drink.
And so all through college, even though I was a rebellious kid like most of them, I'd go to parties and I'd get a drink and I'd nurse it the entire party and then my cup would be half empty.
And I'm very thankful that I avoided alcoholism because it has affected family members of my generation.
We have to recognize the dangerous tendency toward individualism which permeates our ranks.
All of this bickering and fighting, it's unavoidable in a sense because we don't get the fraternity boy, the back-slapping guy, getting ready for a corporate path.
We get dissidents.
And we get people who have very strong principles.
But there's a tendency to get this individualism.
To really create unnecessary and exhausting divisions in our movement.
We need to emphasize teamwork.
We need team players.
Our people need to learn to be team players as a whole.
We need to curb our obsession.
And this is very important and will raise a lot of hackles here.
It does all the time when I say this.
We need to curb our obsession with freedom.
In all of its forms, states' rights.
I hear fellow Southerners, when I go to their meetings, say,"We need to get back to states' rights." No, we do not need states' rights.
We need Zan Dmitry Donskoi, who led to the victory at Kulakova Field, like I told you,"We are going to have to set this country right, and there must not be any scope." The states like Massachusetts and California to sabotage the program.
Only very powerfully centralized power can help us in our present conditions.
States rights is off the list.
It doesn't fit current conditions.
Going back to the Constitution, I hear people say this, sweet people, people I like, people I know are very good people.
No, we cannot go back to the Constitution.
The Constitution failed.
The Constitution has never been there when we needed it.
The Constitution did not exist in 1861 in the North when Abraham Lincoln put 40,000 Americans in the North in jail.
It did not exist in the North when Abraham Lincoln closed 1,100 newspapers by royal or presidential fiat.
It did not exist in World War I when Woodrow Wilson banned the teaching of German and the speaking of German in America.
It did not exist in World War II when Franklin Roosevelt Contrived his mass sedition trial and arrested over 30 of his opponents and carried them to Washington and financially ruined them in a completely baseless prosecution under the Smith Act.
The Constitution is only there when you don't need it.
It's never been what it's been cracked up to be.
I'm sorry.
You know, like Jared, my ancestors were here.
I'm descended from a revolutionary general, but no.
the Constitution is not going to save us, and we have to draw a very different system of government in our new ethno-state.
Thank you.
Limited government will not save us.
We need a government that will take the property away from our enemies.
We cannot allow private property to remain in the hands of people who are determined to destroy our race and our civilization and our religion.
It cannot be done.
Our guiding principle in law will have to be the ancient Roman law.
Solus Populi Lex Suprema.
The health of the people is the supreme law.
It's greater than freedom.
It's greater than states' rights.
It's greater than private property.
The health of the people is the supreme law.
Now, I still have about 12 minutes left, I think.
I'd like to give you more reasons for hope.
Somebody said in one of his talks here that a speech that doesn't indicate a way of action is detrimental to us.
I believe that we should end our speeches on up note rather than say, and that's, ladies and gentlemen, why the red Chinese are going to occupy us in six months.
You'll all be dead.
Now go home.
Which is how many movement speeches end.
Our enemies have everything.
They have the academic world.
They have the banks.
They have the big globalist corporations.
They have the Chamber of Commerce.
They have the labor unions.
They have the churches.
But total authorities have lost power before.
Somehow, it's hard to figure out, but these episodes happen in history in which the authorities lose control.
And I don't mean to inject religion, religious division, among our...
Our friends.
We're all here as friends.
There are many different religious experiences in our movement.
There are Roman Catholics, Latin Mass Catholics, there are Calvinists, there are Orthodox, there are atheists, there are pagans, there are all kinds of people.
The example I pick is the only one I can find in history.
And that is the Reformation, which shows how authorities can lose control.
And the facts on the ground, the events, the developments that set in motion the collapse of authority.
When Gutenberg invented movable print and made it possible for large numbers of people to read books, this, I think, set in motion the dissolution of priestly authority that had been absolute in Western Europe up to that point.
If the Pope said it, that was it.
If the bishop said it, that was it.
If the priest said it, you've got to shut up or he'll burn you at the stake.
But anyway, with the printing press, it became possible for people to read, from one of the other things, the scriptures for themselves.
And this is standard talk that, well, the Bible was put in the hands of the people.
Actually, I think an argument can be made that the Pope was right.
So much mischief has come from letting people read the Bible that maybe they shouldn't be allowed to read the Bible.
But they were allowed to read the Bible, and they could read things in the Bible that didn't fit in with what the Church said.
And it undermined the previously existing absolute authority of the Church, and it made it possible.
For the Reformation to come and for the authority figures to be toppled, at least in Northern Europe.
What else happens?
Well, I think failure becomes apparent in the Reformation.
The financial and sexual abuses of the Roman Church became so undeniable, so visible, that even its supporters like Erasmus...
We'd write things about the astonishing corruption of the church.
And the authority figures come to be viewed as corrupt and as hostile to the people rather than some sort of surrogate parent, which authority figures, I think, subconsciously are viewed when they're healthy.
And then some means, like Gutenberg's printing press, comes into effect also that allows...
The people who are opposed to the authority to be heard.
Does any of this sound familiar?
We have just come out of an election, as Jared said in his opening remarks, in which 52% of the American people defied all of the authority figures.
The churches, the labor unions, the chamber of commerce, the schools, the professors, the teachers, the media, the elected officials.
This would not have happened 40 years ago.
I was middle-aged 40 years ago, and I can tell you it would not have happened.
It happened because of the Internet.
Because despite all the efforts to de-platform, to control the Internet, it's possible for information to get around the establishment corporate media, which was not possible in the 1950s or'60s.
It could not be done.
You could not get around it.
A clear example is the Ruther memorandum compared to the Hunter Biden laptop.
Back when I was a kid, to get to learn anything other than what the three major networks and the two press associations wanted you to learn, you had to come into contact with some sort of obscure...
Right-wing, underground newsletter, you know, the Spotlight, or the Counselor, or, you know, the Frank Capel report, the Don Bell report.
And these things had pitiful subscriptions.
Many of them had only a few thousand subscribers.
But back in the early 1960s, if you were fortunate enough to be in contact with one of these, and independent enough to consider it, we learned about the Ruther Memorandum.
Walter Ruther was one of the two top people in the AFL's CIO.
He was the head of the CIO.
Walter Ruther was, they say, a former communist.
I'm dubious about that.
I think he may have split with the party, but he was still basically a communist.
He had gone to the Soviet Union in the 1930s as a volunteer to help Stalin build the workers' paradise.
And he had written...
Butters back to his union that appeared in the newspaper that ended in a rallying cry, carry on the fight for a Soviet America.
And this man went to the White House for a chummy, chummy, chummy little meeting with President Kennedy and Attorney General Robert Kennedy.
And they discussed, in very cynical Machiavellian terms, you can find this online, how they could use the power of government to crush and silence people like us.
Even though we were minuscule, we were still on their radar.
They discussed things like how to use the IRS, how to harass people with investigations by the IRS.
How to use the Federal Communications Commission to take away licenses from stations that allowed people like us to buy time on them.
Well, anyway, somebody in the White House leaked this memorandum, which, of course, really, President Kennedy should have been impeached.
Bobby Kennedy should have gone to jail.
But the media completely killed the story.
Nobody heard about it.
But now, with Hunter Biden, the story kept going.
The FBI, as we know, visited the media and told them, this is a story that the agency has determined is Soviet or Russian intelligence.
We'd rather that this story not be reported.
And people like Mary Louise Kelly of NPR and Anderson Cooper of CNN, they all complied as good little brain-dead liberals, collaborationists and all of this.
And the only people who heard about the story were us.
We live in two different worlds now, two different nations.
We heard about it, but it might surprise you, if you talked to so-called normal people, they didn't even know the laptop story until it reemerged a few months ago.
And of course, we now know it was not Russian intelligence.
Biden lied about it in his last debate with Trump, in which he claimed it was, knowing all the time it was true.
And the system media will never challenge him on that.
So, the internet has enabled us to get the story out.
It's like the Gutenberg printing press.
It's enabling us to bring this out.
What about the psychology of people who have been victimized by the system and its lies?
One thing to keep in mind is what we know about abused children.
An abused child is usually more loving to his parents than a child that has normal parents.
He works and seeks to find some way to win his parents' love.
It takes a long time for it to dawn on him that I'm not going to get their love.
Destiny dealt me a bad card in Daddy or Mommy, and it's never going to work.
But when they do, they drop their parents.
And I think that's what will happen as people become aware, and it has happened, as they become aware of how these lies, how they have been tricked and lied to.
How then can we treat mentally ill liberals?
There are some suggestions, and I'm about out of time, but I should make the deadline.
I see you.
I see what you're up to.
They use authority.
We must also use authority to create confusion, like happened in the Reformation.
You opposed the authority of the Scriptures to the authorities of the saints and the Pope.
We have authorities.
We have studies.
And you use rhetorical questions.
They don't want to interact with you.
This relative of mine does not want to interact when I tell him that nobody ever planned to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer.
It was all government fake, and the people were acquitted.
But when you ask them questions, people kind of have to react to it.
And one of the questions I like to ask is, can you cite me any study that shows that mixing the races in the schools ever brought about an improvement, a significant improvement in black academic performance?
The fact is, there are no such studies.
They will look at you and say, well, everybody knows that happened.
And I say, well, I know you think that, but I happen to believe it's the other way around.
And common sense should tell you, if there were such studies...
You'd be reading about them in the New York Times.
And then you break their faith.
You ask them questions.
You break their faith in the authorities.
You have to break them free of the cult.
They have to come to realize they will never get the truth from Anderson Cooper or Mary Louise Kelly or the New York Times.
These people are in the business of lying and they have no credibility.
One thing that Jared doesn't understand is that you must also shame people.
Jared wants to mollycoddle and baby these liberals.
He thinks they're noble and good and sincere.
I don't like them.
But they shame us.
They need to be shamed too.
And one...
APPLAUSE APPLAUSE
Here's an example of how they could be shamed.
I mentioned this before in talks.
It's disgusting.
I'm sorry to ruin your day.
Early 20s-year-old prisoner in Alabama, in jails, who was sodomized to death last October, a year ago.
He was stripped, he was tied to a bed, and for two days, blacks sodomized him until he died of a hemorrhage.
You can find this online.
The reaction was, first of all, you have to ask, how in the hell did this happen, and no one saw it and put a stop to it?
But anyway, The authorities at the prison tried to cover it up.
They told the family that he had died of a heroin overdose.
They didn't believe it.
They had their own family doctor examined him and said, no, this guy died of a horrific sexual assault.
They also, it turned out, that the Negro who initiated this action by this gang had nine previous occasions in which he had assaulted white prisoners, and yet he was still in the general population.
Now, this is a disgusting and hair-raising and horrifying story that shows you what life in America is really like.
But the key here is, what was the reaction of the media?
You know they heard about it.
This stuff comes out in media outlets.
They see this.
But all across America, people like Mary Louise Kelly, of all things considered on NPR, the New York Times editorial board, they said, this isn't something that we want to report.
Wrong gender?
Preference? Wrong race.
And so they killed the story.
But you can use this to shame people like Mary Louise Kelly.
This should be thrown in her face every time she speaks publicly.
Finally, and that's the end, on time, we must also recognize and understand the good thing, which is that liberals are racists.
Everybody is a racist.
Liberals do not advocate the programs they advocate because they love black people.
Psychologically, what they intend to do through things like Head Start, Section 8, you know, age-dependent children, all these programs is to cure blacks.
They are deeply uneasy about blacks, and they want to turn them into white people because they really don't like black people.
We must find a way to put them in touch with their feelings and show them that they are never going to cure this.
The only solution is separate states for separate folks.
And with that, I will lay to rest Jerry's anxiety.
Bless you all.
▲
Export Selection