Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor - ‘Non-Crime Hate’
Aired: 2024-11-29
Duration: 08:21


=== Non-Crime Hate Incidents (02:15) ===

[00:00:00]  I bet you have never heard of a non-crime hate incident.
[00:00:04]  So far as I know, this is an exclusively British perversion.
[00:00:08]  Someone can denounce you for just thinking you said something rude about our usual pets.
[00:00:15]  Something entirely legal, by the way.
[00:00:17]  And the police will come around and give you a stern warning.
[00:00:20]  You can be written up and filed away as the perp of a non-crime hate incident.
[00:00:26]  And you have no recourse, no appeal.
[00:00:29]  This is supposed to keep real hate speech under control, but all it does is punish Brits who step out of line.
[00:00:36]  Even children can be written up for non-crime hate.
[00:00:41]  His Majesty's Government has an 11,000-word webpage explaining non-crime hate incidents, updated just last June, that explains how this all works.
[00:00:53]  This sentence sets the tone.
[00:00:56]  Freedom of expression is a qualified right.
[00:00:59]  Which means that it can be restricted for certain purposes to the extent necessary in a democratic society.
[00:01:06]  You can get yourself written up if you do anything that is perceived by a person other than the subject, that's you, to be motivated wholly or partly by hostility or prejudice towards persons with a particular characteristic.
[00:01:23]  Hostility can be nothing more than dislike or unfriendliness.
[00:01:27]  And the characteristics are the standard stuff:
[00:01:30]  race, religion, sex orientation, disability,
[00:01:33]  An officer can get creative.
[00:01:36]  He can write up any kind of dislike or unfriendliness if he deems it necessary to record an incident involving a different characteristic that is not covered by hate crime legislation.
[00:01:49]  And officers have.
[00:01:51]  The alleged victim Or anyone else can rat you out.
[00:01:56]  It can be something you said or did or just a tweet.

=== Two Years for Tweeting? (06:20) ===

[00:02:00]  If and only if the investigating officer determines there was no dislike or unfriendliness, then he needn't write up the incident.
[00:02:08]  If he thinks you are a nasty character who might do it again, at his discretion, he can put you into a database.
[00:02:16]  If you apply for certain jobs, such as teaching, child care, medicine, social work, A potential employer could find you out and decide not to hire you for something that's not a crime.
[00:02:29]  There is no provision in the law to punish or even reprimand people who call in fake or ridiculous incidents.
[00:02:37]  And many are ridiculous.
[00:02:40]  Dirty pants on washing line recorded as non-crime hate incident by police.
[00:02:46]  Someone in North Wales complained that her neighbor hung a very large, soiled pair of underpants on their washing line and left it there for two months.
[00:02:56]  She said it was because she has an Italian name.
[00:03:00]  The same article mentions a complaint against a man who refused to shake hands with someone he thought was a transsexual.
[00:03:08]  A Russian-speaking man claimed that a barber gave him an aggressive haircut after they talked about the war in Ukraine.
[00:03:16]  A nine-year-old girl was written up for calling a classmate a retard, and two secondary school girls got the treatment for saying that another pupil smelled like fish.
[00:03:27]  As I said, police can be creative.
[00:03:30]  This article says that a vicar got a visit from the police because a homosexual was alarmed and distressed when the vicar said homosexuality is a sin.
[00:03:40]  People get a knock on the door for misgendering someone.
[00:03:44]  The manager of a pub got a write-up because he kicked out customers who were having sex in the restroom.
[00:03:51]  The complaint claimed it was only because one of the fraudikers was transsexual.
[00:03:56]  I guess nobody cares if normal people copulate in pubs.
[00:04:00]  The Home Office is supposed to have issued common-sense rules to cut back on the foolishness so that write-ups are reserved for incidents clearly motivated by intentional hostility.
[00:04:12]  Where there is a real risk of escalation causing significant harm or a criminal offense.
[00:04:18]  All of this is utterly subjective.
[00:04:21]  A lot of people think the whole business should be scrapped.
[00:04:24]  The Times of London, not exactly a hot-headed journal, is running a poll that asks should police stop investigating non-crime hate incidents.
[00:04:35]  When I looked, 90% of people said yes, and only 8% said no.
[00:04:41]  The current labor government, of course, is siding with the 8%.
[00:04:45]  The Home Office says logging this stuff helps the police to build an intelligence picture around community tensions in order to map trends and prevent escalation.
[00:04:57]  You never know when misgendering could escalate into murder.
[00:05:02]  Home Secretary Yvette Cooper says tracking these incidents can be a crucial tool to enable police and other authorities to track and warn of rising abuse against Jewish and
[00:05:14]  Well, I guess that settles it.
[00:05:18]  You know what?
[00:05:29]  I bet every protected category says exactly the same thing.
[00:05:34]  The whole idea of the police investigating non-crime is absurd.
[00:05:39]  The only consequence is that people get the word, button your lip, don't upset Britain's special people.
[00:05:47]  Last year, police logged more than 13,000 cases of non-crime hate.
[00:05:53]  Each took an estimated five hours of police time, and that works out to about 60,000 cop hours.
[00:06:01]  Britain must be wonderfully crime-free to be able to send police out to dress people down if they won't shake hands.
[00:06:08]  Well, let's see.
[00:06:09]  Here is a graph of violent crimes in Britain over the last 20 years.
[00:06:14]  There's been a slight dip the last two years, but there is still well over twice as much violent crime as there was 10 years ago.
[00:06:22]  What's more, three in four burglaries unsolved in England and Wales last year.
[00:06:29]  That was 200,000 unsolved break-ins, and a suspect was charged in only 6% of cases.
[00:06:37]  So far, all I've talked about is non-crime hate.
[00:06:41]  Maybe I'll make another video about, sure enough, criminal hate.
[00:06:45]  Apparently, there's plenty of that too.
[00:06:48]  Malicious communication, and that can be just a tweet, can get you two years in the pokey and a fine for whatever the judge thinks he can squeeze out of you.
[00:06:58]  You can spend seven years in the pokey for inciting racial hate, and you don't have to do a thing, just say things.
[00:07:08]  These are sad times for a country that used to believe in personal liberty.
[00:07:13]  Britain is a perfect example of what the great Sam Francis called anarcho-tyranny.
[00:07:19]  Francis died in 2005.
[00:07:22]  And for those of you who did not know him, Wikipedia helpfully explains that he was an American white supremacist writer.
[00:07:30]  Just what Wikipedia says about me.
[00:07:33]  We get anarcho-tyranny when police can't or won't control real crime.
[00:07:39]  That's the anarchy.
[00:07:41]  Instead, police go after law-abiding people like you and me for non-crime hate incidents, malicious communication, praying in school.
[00:07:50]  Smoking in the wrong place, jaywalking, owning the wrong pistol magazine, not wearing a bicycle helmet, etc., etc.
[00:07:58]  That's the tyranny.
[00:08:00]  These are sad times for our country, too.
[00:08:04]  And Francis saw it coming 30 years ago.
[00:08:16]  You'll find videos, podcasts, articles, a lot of things I feel sure will interest you.