All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 8, 2024 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:58
Post a Harris Sign, Take in Five Guatemalans

Jared Taylor and Paul Kersey laugh about a prank note sent to Harris supporters telling them they will be housing refugees. The hosts also discuss Maxine Waters, Sadiq Khan, Kemi Badenoch, and Daniel Penny. Thumbnail credit: © Valerie Plesch/dpa via ZUMA Press

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, welcome to Radio Renaissance.
I'm your host, Jared Taylor, with American Renaissance.
And with me is my co-host, the indispensable Paul Kersey.
Today is November 7th, year of our Lord, 2024.
And we will start with comments, as we usually do.
One of our listeners sent in a news item.
And the headline of the story is, Boy 17 who killed two during Halloween Orlando shooting, refused to show up in court, sends mom instead.
Well, it's really the same old story.
Jalen Dwayne Edgar, age 17, one of our African-American fellow citizens, has been charged with two counts of first-degree murder, six counts of attempted murder.
He killed two people.
One of the people he killed was a teenage soccer star named Timothy Schmidt.
And the 19-year-old University of Central Florida freshman was enjoying a night out when gunfire just broke out, as it so often does.
So this white gob, the name of Schmidt and 25-year-old Tyrek Hill, another African-American, were pronounced dead.
And the only odd thing about this story that I don't quite understand, here's a guy who's killed two people and nearly killed six others.
Why was he not behind bars already?
Why is he sending his mom in for the arraignment?
But the listener writes in after having called my attention to the story, and he says, I hate to engage in victim blaming, but look at the photos of the shooting.
And yes, there are surveillance cameras and you get a good idea of what this Halloween crowd was like.
He says, I think the soccer player who was the victim was probably the only white person in the crowd.
He says, if you want to live, don't be the only white person in a black crowd.
How do we teach our children this?
Walking while white can be deadly if you're in the middle of a feral black crowd.
One does wonder what he was doing there, but apparently he was a perfectly okay guy, probably was not there buying drugs or anything.
He was out for a good time, Halloween, and he stops a bullet.
Now, Mr.
Kersey, this is praise for you.
Our listener writes, I've heard Mr.
Kersey called indispensable.
Even incandescent.
May I suggest a third adjective?
Indefatigable.
It's a centuries-old word, the deep Latin roots and a wonderful history.
Several Royal Navy ships bore the name.
HMS, indefatigable.
And its meaning suits, Mr.
Kersey, to a T. Keep up the good work.
I agree.
Keep up the good work, Mr.
Kersey.
Thank you for that nice praise.
Yes, that's very nice.
That's very nice.
Thank you, listener.
Thank you for that nice compliment from my indispensable, indefatigable, incandescent co-host.
Another comment.
In defense of Trump, I warn liberal friends that we're in serious danger of becoming South Africa because of third world immigration, DEI, etc.
They invariably say, yeah, they said that about the Italians and the Irish.
They were considered lower than whites, but they integrated and it turned out, okay, your worrying is irrational.
I try to explain, look, despite 400 years of living here, Blacks still have not integrated.
Humans are inherently different.
Europeans are far easier to integrate, more able to function in a civilized nation, etc.
I would love to hear what you gentlemen would say in such a debate.
Can you please help me out?
But it seems so obvious to us, but explaining it to an ignorant person is actually a very difficult task.
Well, Mr.
Kersey, I think that is one of the very best arguments to point out.
Well, yes, there was a little bit about friction when we're absorbing people from other parts of Europe, people who were Catholics, for example, people who didn't necessarily speak English, and people who brought with them animosities towards other people who were here, the Irish and English never got along back in the home country, bringing them here, they didn't always get along either.
Very quickly, very quickly, they assimilated.
Whereas the two groups that have been here before any of the European ethnics, American Indians and Blacks, are still not integrated.
If that is not a good enough argument for you, I don't know what is.
Do you have any suggestions for our friend, the listener?
Gosh!
If that doesn't convince you, I mean, here's what I'd say.
I mean, if you wouldn't mind repeating the question, I kind of got lost listening to your response.
Oh, well, the point is, this is a listener who points out all this third world immigration is going to turn us into South Africa.
It'll wreck the country.
And a lot of white people will say, hey, that's the turn of the century, the 20th century.
A lot of people said that about the Poles, about the Italians, about the Irish.
It's never going to work.
They're subhuman.
But look, they're integrated just fine.
So how do you argue against that?
And I said...
Yeah, I heard what you said.
Yeah, I mean, America really was the true concept of a European Union, as long as it was Western European immigrants, the Poles.
Even Eastern European.
I'm going to be very careful with what I say because we had somebody on Twitter.
I put out a tweet that went absolutely viral, Mr.
Taylor, about calling America a white Anglo-Saxon Protestant country.
One of our listeners, one of our long-time reader, I should say, of your site, of the amrin.com website, I took great offense to that saying, I'm Catholic, my family's fought for generations.
And it's like, well, hold on a second.
I'm not saying that Catholics obviously aren't American.
I went to Mass, actually, on Friday for All Saints Day with a friend and had a great time.
Basically, what I'm saying, though, is that our institutions, at their heart, were created by white Anglo-Saxon Protestants.
I think that's an indisputable fact.
The only thing that I would say, and I, you know, if I can find it, you know, it's fascinating.
Here's what I want to ask you, Mr.
Taylor.
You know, what do you think the top demographics were, the top three that voted against Trump?
The top three?
Well, hey, hey, hey, hey, you certainly did sidestep the question.
Let's talk about the, once we've gotten through the comments, let's talk a little bit about the election.
Okay.
No, I mean, no, I'm very My view is that most people are just visiting the United States.
That's a quote from a movie called The Good Shepherd.
They talk about the Italians.
You got your family, your traditions, the Jews.
You have your religion, your people.
What do you have?
And he's talking to a wasp and he's like, the United States of America.
And you're all just visiting.
Yeah.
I'm of the mind that our ancestors did a lot of great things.
And the Naturalization Act of 1790 was quite clear who can be what we want as citizens.
And I don't see much of a difference between an Italian and an Englishman in a lot of ways.
Eastern Europeans, it's much easier for Europeans to assimilate into the true European Union that is the United States of America.
And that's what I'd say.
Well...
Neither of us can really come up with a better argument than the one he has.
And so, as he points out, sometimes, no matter how obvious the logic of your argument is, some people refuse to grasp it.
I think a lot of people refuse to grasp the obvious because it calls into question so much, they have to then rethink the last 60 years of American history.
If diversity really is not a strength, oh my gosh!
We've made terrible mistakes.
And people hate to think that their country is run by nincompoops or malicious people.
It's just a horrifying thing to come to terms with.
But let's see.
Here is another comment.
I am 62 years old and naturalized American citizen from your enemy du jour, Russia.
I have three gorgeous blue-eyed blonde daughters of which I'm immensely proud.
All are now married to beautiful white American young men.
I love these boys as if they were my own sons.
Boy, I'm very happy for our listener.
Of course, I'm proud to say that over the years, I helped my daughters to develop a love for everything European, including homo sapiens europaeus.
Please understand that your biggest problem here in America is not illegal immigration.
It's the so-called legal immigration.
Since 1965, the gates are open.
People of other races are flooding in.
It would be impossible to deport even a fraction of the illegals.
Donald Trump seems to think otherwise.
And you can't touch the legals.
The enemy is already inside the gate.
So what do we do?
Simple.
Educate young people to stay within their own race.
Choosing to be among your own race is a matter of person preference, but it is a natural result of the natural striving of people towards our own race because of beauty.
One of our greatest writers, Fedor Dostoevsky, wrote in 1869, beauty will save the world.
And another giant of Russian literature, Anton Chekhov, wrote in 1897, everything should be beautiful in a person, face, clothing, soul, and thoughts.
So this is the Russian solution, Mr.
Kersey.
Go to beauty.
And I do think that white people do have an absolutely unique form of beauty.
I think there are other races who have produced beautiful people, but our beauty is very much our own and one that absolutely must be preserved 100%.
This looks like our last comment.
Both of you have acknowledged at different times that Trump does not do enough to help white Americans.
And I personally think he does not care one iota about the white race or its future.
I've heard arguments that it'd be better to have Kamala as president because she would create the ideal environment for a white political awakening that will one day lead to a white revolution.
The other side of the argument is that Trump will create the ideal environment for white racial consciousness by seeming to give permission, though unspoken, to racially conscious whites to assert their interests and attack the system.
They say Trump's America will embolden white people and allow a stronger movement to take shape versus the mass crackdowns on white advocacy of all kinds that would likely occur under a democratic administration like Kamala's.
I'm interested to hear how the two of you land on this issue.
Why don't you go first, Mr.
Kersey?
What's your view about this?
I mean, this is a debate that has taken place amongst our folks.
Yeah, you know, it's funny.
I don't believe the worst is ever the better because we saw what happened in Rhodesia.
We saw what happened in South Africa.
And we've talked about that at length on this podcast before about how can Afrikaners, how can The English, how can – there that are still in South – or just the white South Africans, how can they tolerate what's happening as the BEE completely takes over the way that jobs are distributed, the way that income is stolen and then redistributed?
Wait, wait.
That's not quite his point.
His point is that – I mean, I don't think it's quite good to that point under – is that what you're suggesting could be as bad as South Africa?
I'll tell you.
I mean, go back and look at some of – I mean, this is something that people haven't talked about.
What were Kamala's last couple pitches to the brothers and to Hispanics?
It was you could get these loans that would be absolved, that you would not have to pay back.
They were explicitly racial in the terms of how you would get them.
Well, she then said they'd be open to everybody.
She did.
But at first, if you went to her website, she attacked Donald Trump for his so-called racism.
I don't think if things had gotten worse.
I mean, but then again, they got pretty bad in the second term of Obama as he became far more racially explicit, especially with the situation that happened with George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin.
And then, of course, if you remember, you and I were on the phone.
I'll never forget this November of 2014 when he gave that incredible speech as Ferguson, Missouri started to burn, where he said basically that what the that things, you know, the the the local.
The DA.
The DA had, I don't remember if he said acted stupidly, I don't remember the exact phrase of words that he used, but it was astonishing to watch because he was barely containing his rage as you and I are on the phone.
I was in the gym watching this as all of a sudden Ferguson erupted into more violence.
And I think he said something along the lines of – If people out there are going to do something, you know, I understand your emotions.
I understand why you're upset.
And so, yeah, in a lot of ways, maybe that did lead to Trump.
But at the same time, I don't want things to get worse anymore.
I want things to get better.
And I went there to be free speech.
I went there to be less censorship online.
And I think we would have seen the exact opposite of that had Kamala I'm all at one on Tuesday.
Yes, I agree 100% with that.
And the idea that somehow Donald Trump emboldens white people, I think that's completely wrong.
That was something that his opponents said many times during the first administration under Donald Trump.
I don't think anybody who was interested in talking about white advocacy or race realism suddenly thought to himself, well, Donald Trump is president.
Now I can talk about these things.
No, not at all.
They were going to talk about those things one way or the other.
Furthermore, even if, even if a Kamala Harris administration had turned up and there was even more open discrimination against whites.
Now, I think Under Joe Biden, the federal government was more viciously anti-white than it was even under Barack Obama.
In any case, if the idea that somehow things get more anti-white is going to wake more white people up, how many more people will it wake up?
It's already sufficiently anti-white, so that millions of whites are already waking up.
And in the meantime, A Kamala Harris administration probably would have let in, who knows, 9, 10, 11, 20 million illegal immigrants.
And maybe a million more illegal immigrants are the kind of people we don't want here.
So would that be a fair exchange?
Say X number of white people woke up because of Kamala.
And in exchange, we get, what, 15 million non-whites?
Also, and you made this point really in a slightly different way, if Kamala Harris were president, how many Supreme Court justices would she be appointing?
And I can easily imagine enough Kamala Harris type appointed Supreme Court justices deciding that the First Amendment does not protect people like you and me, that this is hate speech, this is illegal, that we need to be shut up.
By putting us in jail if need be.
So, no, I disagree 100% to the idea that a Kamala Harris administration would have been better because that would wake white people up.
Yeah, if I could go one step further and just put a bow in this conversation.
Today, you know, yesterday, Letitia James went on this unhinged rant.
I'm not sure if you saw the press conference she did, Mr.
Taylor.
Letitia James, of course, the attorney general of the state of New York.
And she basically said, we're not going to stop.
We're not going to stop going after Donald Trump.
And today, a member of Trump's incoming administration said, hey, listen, this lady needs to stop her lawfare, or we're going to find a way to put her fat ass in jail.
Wait, did he say it?
No, who said that?
This fat ass?
Are you quoting directly?
I am quoting directly.
I am quoting directly.
So basically, let's see here.
It was Mike Davis.
It was...
Give me one second.
Trump lawyer Mike Davis just told...
Letitia James, I dare you to continue your lawfare against President Trump.
We're not messing around this time and we will put your fat ass in prison for conspiracy against rights, end quote.
Now, of course, this lady probably was on the shortlist, Mr.
Taylor, for being the attorney general of the United States.
Oh, yeah, I'm sure she would have done a great job, done a great job.
And she might have decided that you and I are public enemies and dangerous to the health of democracy and had to be put away.
No, it would have been a bad thing if Kamala and the girls had ended up running the show.
Well, let's see.
That's the end of our comments.
Rather longer than usual, but we would like to end by explaining to our listeners how to reach us.
We'd love to hear from you.
We'd love to hear you point out to us the things that we might have missed.
Anytime we make a mistake, any observations about some of the things we've said, we'd love to hear from you.
And there are two ways to do it.
You can send a message to me by going to amren.com, A-M-R-E-N.com, where you will find all sorts of other exciting and interesting things, and click on the Contact Us tab, and you can get a message.
It'll come straight to me.
The other way is?
Yeah, shoot me an email, because we live here at protonmail.com.
Because we live here at Proton.me.
One of those two will get you to my email inbox.
And we really appreciate each and every one of you.
And we hope you, again, we're not endorsing candidates, but, you know, we've got to talk quickly about the election and what happened.
And I know that I was watching until about 3, 3.30 a.m.
Eastern Standard Time.
What were your thoughts on it?
I know you've got a video coming out on it, but just give us your thoughts, Mr.
Taylor.
Well, let's see.
The thumbnail version would be that this is an absolutely flabbergasting, tremendous, spellbinding, breathtaking comeback and victory.
It's a victory over the combined massed forces of liberalism of an enormous machine here in the United States and basically around the world of hardened Trump enemies who hate him.
I think Donald Trump is the most hated man in all of American history and he has defeated them and got himself elected president.
This is just an eye-opening, startling, remarkable thing.
The other thing that is very significant to me Is that it means that, what, 70, 75 million Americans absolutely refused to do what our elites, our betters, the people who think they're so much smarter than we are, told them to do.
They ignored the media, they ignored the universities, they ignored churches, they ignored all the talking heads, or at least 99% of the talking heads.
They said, to heck with you, I'm going to vote for Donald Trump.
And this unwillingness to be bossed around, told what to think, who to vote for, that is to me a very, very beautiful thing.
The only other observation I would make, of which I could say a lot of things about this, and that is, this is a great and beautiful victory for Donald Trump.
I think it is not such a great and beautiful victory for white people.
The last time around 2016, I thought there was some potential that Donald Trump was secretly really one of us.
I'm convinced now that he is not.
And he does not have an active or sophisticated racial consciousness.
He will do a number of good things.
And he's much, much, much better than Kamala Harris would have been.
But don't count on him to be our champion.
We still have a tremendous amount of work to do.
What are your comments?
I look forward to seeing your video.
I'm just going to say this.
What do you think the top three demographics were, Mr.
Taylor, that voted against Donald Trump?
Well, you know, I was seeing an exit poll by religion.
And I don't know if that is included in one of your demographics.
Jews, I believe, they voted 80% for Kamala Harris, or at least only 20% for Donald Trump.
Maybe some of them voted for Joe Stein, etc.
But of all the religions, they were just remarkably way at the bottom in terms of voting for him.
Now, another demographic that did not vote for Donald Trump is people with PhDs, advanced degrees.
The more you go to an American university, the more poisons you swallow, and the less able you are to see reality when it's staring you in the face.
Those are the two that first come to mind, but you will probably put me in my place by telling me I'm wrong.
And what are the three that you have in mind?
Well, I would love to see the PhDs broken down by discipline.
I would love to see...
Oh, yes.
That's, you know, hard STEM versus...
Social science or, you know, PhD in literature or, you know, computer studies.
Women's studies, oppression studies, black studies, yes.
Yeah, exactly.
I think that would be fascinating because I'm sure some of those would be, you know, close to 98% for Harris.
But yeah, according to one of the people that I really like on Twitter, this has actually gone viral.
Top three demographics have voted against Trump.
Black women, 91%.
Oh yes, of course, of course.
Silly me not to have thought of that.
Yes.
Jewish women, 88%.
LGBTQ plus people, 86% voted against.
Right, right.
Yes, yes.
So, anyways.
If I'd had a little more time to think about it, I probably would have gotten there.
But yes, black women.
Black women were proudly screeching and wailing.
For Kamala Harris.
Yes, well, let's see.
Well, Mr.
Kersey, this is a story that caught my eye, but you seem to have sunk a harpoon in it, so I'd like you to tell this story.
Tell us what happens in, what's the town in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts, if you posted a Harris sign in your yard?
This is one of those funny stories that...
After everything that happened, unfortunately, to Ricky Vaughn, you got to be careful what you do.
But Massachusetts residents claim they're being trolled with fake Harris postcards saying migrant family moving in.
Again, like I said, community claim they've been trolled with fake Kamala Harris campaign postcards.
All because they had Harris signs in their front yard.
One of the residents of Shrewsbury told NBC Boston 10 that she received a postcard after she put a sign in her yard supporting Harris and Tim Waltz.
Really creeped me out, she said, but she didn't want to be identified.
The postcard made to look like mail from the Harris-Waltz campaign thanked her for putting up a sign and showing her support and alerting her that a family from Nicaragua would be moving into her home.
Quote, That's when I realized it was an obvious attempt to try and either scare me or rage bait me and make me upset.
Really sad that the country has come to this point where we can't put a lawn sign out, support a candidate without being harassed with something like this.
You know, again, why would she not want a lovely, lovely family from Nicaragua to come grace her?
Yeah, I mean, anyways, another Shrewsbury resident claimed to have received a similar postcard in the mail, except her said she'd have a family of five from Guatemala.
Quote, it makes me angry.
Again, the woman didn't want to be identified to NBC10, but she said this, quote, But if the takeaway is, don't put up a lawn sign in support of a little candidate, I feel the exact opposite.
Next time there's an election, I'll put up three signs in my yard.
Well, hopefully next time there's an election, she'll get a postcard saying she'll get 15 Guatemalans into her home because of the three signs she has.
The resident added that she reached out to the Shrewsbury Democratic Town Committee, which told her to file a police report.
She also advised us to report it to the post office in case any federal mail laws may have been broken.
A third resident in Shrewsbury community posted her postcard on Reddit, which matched similar wording from the other residents.
Thank you for supporting Kamala.
We are so appreciative of you putting out a yard sign, but now we need your continued help.
The postcard is addressed to a resident with the Kamala Harris logo posted on the front of the postcard.
Then it goes on to read this.
We will be moving a family of four from the country of Belize into your home on 11-3-2024.
They'll need food, toiletries, and transportation.
Thank you!
The card reads...
Not clear where the postcards came from, of course, as there was no political organization or return address listed.
Again, I thought this was something very funny, but you've got to be careful in our world because look what happened to Ricky Vaughn.
Well, yes, I think it's quite hilarious.
A story I read about this quoted a guy named Thomas Whalen, a professor of social sciences, no doubt a Kamala voter, at Boston University.
And he said these mailers were a ham-handed attempt to undermine our democratic process.
Did you know that?
Wow!
Then he went on to say he was concerned this could be considered an illegal violation of the Civil Rights Act.
What?
What insanity!
He says those behind the mailers are using the federal postal system in a way of disseminating false and misleading propaganda.
As if the mailer you got from your Democrat campaign headquarters wasn't misleading and false propaganda.
In a statement, the U.S. Postal Service spokesman said the mailers do not constitute a threat, and only a threat would be considered illegal.
What an overreaction.
In an era where Ricky Vaughn has been prosecuted, persecuted, and forced to have a legal defense fund for what he was accused of doing back in 2016.
Briefly explain.
Some of our listeners probably aren't aware of what Ricky Vaughn did.
Ricky Vaughn was one of the most influential, instrumental in getting Mr.
Trump elected back in 2016.
There was some research done into who had the most impactful, effective Twitter.
And he was in the top 10 in regards to his Twitter account up against institutions like CNN, Fox News.
Tell us what he did.
I believe he put up, was it phone messages where you could call to do your votes?
He said, vote by text message.
Vote by text message.
That's right.
You can vote for Biden by texting this message.
And it was a joke, of course.
But he was accused of interfering with the election.
And now he ended up being found guilty.
Didn't he go to the big house for a while?
I believe he has spent some time.
I think he has.
I think he's had to spend some time.
He had to spend thousands and thousands of dollars trying to defend himself.
This is obviously a joke.
He's vote by text message.
And I think he, did he put it out on Twitter?
I can't remember what.
I think it was just a Twitter message.
And it was directed to white, to black people in particular.
You know, just vote by text message.
Anyway, yeah, you got to be careful.
But I think this idea, I think it's quite hilarious.
And as you say, if somebody supports Harrison Waltz, if they think people should just come pushing across the border and get free housing, why not your place, lady?
And it's interesting to me that some of the houses were predicted to get families of five, some just families of three.
I suppose the people who went by and looked at the houses with Harris sons must have looked at the size of the house.
The bigger the one, the larger the family.
That could only be fair.
Yeah, you got a five-bedroom home.
You only got a couple people in the house.
That's plenty of rooms.
You can put some bunk rooms in those guest rooms.
You can put five or six families in.
Yeah, of course.
Now, this is a brief item about Maxine Waters, that congresswoman.
You know, I always forget.
Is she from Texas?
Black.
Where is she from?
I believe she is.
Yes.
Black congresswoman.
She says Trump was elected because of racism.
Despite the fact that only 54% of whites voted for him, and he got more non-white votes than ever.
Racism is what put him over the top.
And, excuse me.
A fellow named Pastor Michael Jordan of the New Era Baptist Church of Birmingham He got into campaigning in a big way.
He decided to post eye-catching mottos outside his church.
He's got one of those signs where you can put up block letters in any combination that you like.
And one of the signs that he put up said, a black vote for Trump is mental illness.
He also put up a sign that said, a white vote for Trump is pure racism.
Man, pure racism.
I mean, these days are so much racism, institutional racism, systemic racism, colorblind racism, but pure racism.
Man, you should probably bottle that and, I don't know, bury it underground.
Pure racism.
Then another one.
This is pretty good.
He put up a sign that said, attention to all blacks who plan to vote for Trump.
You are an ignorant, stupid Negro.
That's pretty dramatic.
But this poor guy, I guess there must be, what is it, 20% of black men must be ignorant, stupid Negroes, because apparently one out of five voted for Donald Trump.
But let's see.
Then here is the reaction of Sadiq Khan.
He's the mayor of London.
And I can't remember.
I think he's a Pakistani.
He's some subcontinental.
I believe he's a Pakistani and not an Indian.
But in any case, he's the mayor of London.
He was just voted into a second term.
But he said the U.S. presidential election results show that progress is not inevitable.
He went on to say that the British capital is and always will be for everyone.
This is just incredible to me.
I've been elected mayor of London, and I guess he's got the right to speak for Britain and for the entire country, both now and forever.
London is and always will be for everyone.
Well, apparently it's not for me.
I guess I should write him and say, dear Sadiq, His Majesty's government says I can't go to Britain, but you say London's for everyone.
Please let me in.
He went on to say, the lesson of today is that progress is not inevitable.
Because of Donald Trump.
Of course, Trump called Khan a stone-cold loser in 2019 after Khan compared Trump to the fascists of the 20th century.
Meanwhile, Sadiq Khan's labor colleagues have tried to smooth over ties.
But Khan told Politico earlier this year that Trump is a racist, a sexist, a homophobe, and that the United Kingdom should call him out.
Boy, that's a great way to establish what is the special relationship between Britain and the United States.
But anyway, no, it really, you know, there's something about these subcontinentals who waltz into our countries and tell us how to run our countries.
Imagine going to India and say you get citizenship and you start telling the Indians, no, no, no, you got it all wrong.
You got to do it my way.
I'm not sure you'd survive.
But the stuff people get away with in white countries, it's just outrageous to me.
Well, Mr.
Kersey, you have an interesting insight on the Daniel Perry trial.
New York Post article.
I think that in a lot of ways, we're all somewhat Daniel Pinney, especially if you live in a Democrat-controlled jurisdiction.
He's been labeled the white man by prosecutor at the racially charged manslaughter trial in New York City.
On day two of his manslaughter, Slaughter case, he ceased having a name.
Well, you probably ought to explain to listeners just what the case is about here.
Yeah, we'll get into that as the story progresses.
Okay, all right.
Very quickly.
So on day two of his manslaughter case, he ceased being called Daniel Pinney and became merely the white man.
This is something straight out of a Tom Wolfe, Bonfire of the Vanities novel.
During the prosecution's opening statements on Friday, they asked why Penny 26 did not see Mr.
Neely's humanity.
The Marine Corps veteran, he's facing 15 years for the subway chokehold that killed mentally ill homeless man Jordan Neely, was reduced by the same prosecution to his race and sex over and over and over and over again.
It started when Yvette Rosaria, a bystander on the train that day, was called to the stand.
Rosaria, appearing invisibly shy and nervous, captured a short, shaky video of Penny holding Neely in a chokehold on the uptown F train.
It became clear that Rosaria, whose voice at times was barely audible, didn't know Penny's name, so she referred to him as the White Guy.
But she was not corrected by Assistant DA Jillian Chartrand, nor did the lawyer inform Rosaria of the defendant's name.
Instead, Chartrand adopted it as her own, calling him The White Man.
Chartrand continued to question Rosario, referring to the defendant as such more than a half dozen times, over and over again, calling him the White Man.
It was jarring to hear it repeated so casually.
Given the racial undertones of the case, with BLM protesters hurling accusations of Penny being a racist vigilante, It felt doubly reckless, according to York Post, even if it wasn't wholly malicious.
In fact, when Penny's defense attorney, Thomas Kenneth, got to cross-examine Rosaria, his client's name was the first order of business.
He clarified that the white man was indeed his client and kindly agreed with Rosaria that they'd refer to him as Danny and Neely as Jordan.
Thus, Danny, sitting almost motionless in court, was finally back in the room.
So was the fear that Rosario, a regular subway rider, felt on May 1, 2023.
The Bronx residents testified that, like most New Yorkers, has seen her share of underground nonsense and situations.
But not like that, she said about the situation with Jordan Neely.
Not like Neely's outburst when he boarded the train at Two Avenue.
According to witnesses, Neely said, quote, someone is going to die today, end quote, and that he was ready to go to Riker's prison.
On that short but hammering wide, she testified she was nervous that she buried her head in her friend's chest and thought she might pass out.
I got scared by the tone.
It was an angry tone, she said, of Neely's voice and threats.
Rosaria's footage was shown to the jury, darted around, barely capturing a clear shot opinion.
Neely, their figures obscured by their friend's coat.
The one object that was very much in focus, Rosario's non-recording hand shaking violently in the frame.
In the video, one onlooker could be heard saying, he's dying.
You've got to let go, as another said.
Let him go.
She told jurors, yeah, you can hear the video, but in the moment, I couldn't hear it in the moment.
The jury was shown a far more graphic video.
This one shot by Mexican journalist Juan Alberto Vasquez, who lives in Brooklyn.
Through a translator, he testified his journalistic instincts kicked in, leading him to film Penny holding Neely as the struggle ensued, and another man helped to restrain Neely's arms.
The unfolding horror and tragedy understandably proved too much for Neely's father, Andre Zachariah, who left the courtroom as it played for the jury.
For his part, Penny seemed to be staring straight ahead, like a white man, briefly glancing toward the large screen for a split second before his head almost reflexively snapped back.
It'd be easier for all to look away, ignore how a city's disastrous compassionate policies toward the mentally ill unhinged violent drug users have endangered everyday New Yorkers, but one man didn't look away during the chaos, and he's standing trial for it.
That was the New York Post's words.
And in a lot of ways, we're all Daniel Penney because if you want to try and stop a situation, a racially charged situation, if you're a white man, you're probably going to get the Daniel Penney treatment if you're in a city that has a Soros-funded DA. So this is a trial we'll keep our eyes on for everyone.
Yes.
I don't suppose you know how long it's expected to last.
I don't.
I don't.
It's interesting to me that, well, first of all, The DA, who's doing the first examination, called this woman as a prosecution witness, obviously.
And it's fascinating to me that she said this was so awful and so scary that she thought she would pass out.
That is not the kind of testimony that the district attorney wants.
That's very good for For the defendant.
And it's very important that people realize that this guy was acting so weird and so dangerous that he had to be restrained.
So that's quite interesting.
On the other hand, it's quite fascinating to me that she just picked up this, the white guy, the white guy.
That is so deliberate, just so over the top.
I bet a lot of jurors, no matter what their race, are going to be rather shocked by the fact that she didn't point out that he's actually got a name.
And it Had it required the defense lawyer to come up and say, well, let me remind you, the witness, this guy has a name.
Anyway, quite fascinating.
We'll see what happens.
Now, let's see.
The British conservatives, the British Tory party, has named a new leader.
I'm sure you followed this, Mr.
Kersey.
The new leader is named Kemi Badenak.
She's the first black woman to lead a major British political party, and she has pledged to bring the Tories renewal by pushing for a smaller state and rejecting identity politics.
I should think she would have to reject identity politics if she's going to lead the Conservative Party.
Baden-Ock defeated rival candidate Robert Jenrick in an online postal poll of party members and she got 57% of the nearly 100,000 votes cast versus 43% for Jenrick.
Now, this frankly is astonishing to me.
I'm sorry.
They poll the members of the party and they decide who's going to be the party leader and the prime minister if they win.
And apparently, of 100,000 voters, The black woman got 57% and the white man got 43%.
Amazing.
Now, of course, she's now replacing former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.
He was of Indian origin.
He led the Conservatives to their worst election results since 1832.
That goes back almost 200 years.
Well, they tried an Indian, now they're going to try Nigerian.
She was born in London to Nigerian parents and spent much of her childhood back home in Africa.
A self-proclaimed enemy of wokeness, Beynok opposes identity politics, gender-neutral bathrooms, and government plans to reduce carbon emissions.
During the leadership campaign, she drew criticism for saying that not all cultures are equally valid.
Well, she's right about that.
She's absolutely right about that.
So she reminds me in a way of Suella Braverman, who was the Home Secretary under Rishi Sunak.
She was of Indian origin, but she was very stern about wanting to keep illegal immigrants out of the country.
That she was Indian, but she was a better white woman than just about anybody else in the cabinet.
It's quite remarkable.
So now they have their fourth female leader, the Tories, after Margaret Thatcher, who did a great job.
Theresa May, who did not do such a great job, and Liz Truss, who lasted, what, three weeks?
All of them became Prime Minister.
So we shall see.
I would be very surprised if this person becomes Prime Minister, but you never know.
Here's another story about Britain.
This one surprised even me.
Britain rarely surprises me by its foolishness, but it pushes the outer limits this time.
A British Army veteran by the name of Adam Smith Conner He was found guilty for breaching the local government's public spaces protection order after he stood outside an abortion facility nearly two years ago with his head bowed in silent prayer.
The Bournemouth magistrate's court ordered him to pay prosecution costs of £9,000.
That's nearly $12,000.
Video captured that day shows local council officers approaching him within the buffer zone of the abortion clinic.
And asked him to tell them the nature of his prayer.
He said he was praying for his deceased son.
And then he was warned that this prayer was considered an act of disapproval of abortion, and thus he was in violation of the Buffer's own law.
Now, Smith-Connor explains that he often prays outside of clinics for people who are considering abortions, as well as for his son, whom he paid to be aborted two decades ago.
So he's praying presumably for the soul of his son for whom he had abortion paid for.
Never that son never grew up and he stands silently praying.
On the day in question, Smith Connor said his back was turned to the building and he had not looked at or engaged with anyone coming or going before the police arrived.
And he was surprised to be arrested because just the week before local authorities had told him that he was allowed to pray Outside a different abortion clinic.
His sentencing comes as the UK rolls out additional buffer zones across England and Wales.
These extend to a 500 foot radius.
That's quite a ways.
Making it a crime intentionally or recklessly to influence a person's decision and obstruct access to an abortion facility.
Well, he was there praying silently, not saying anything, not saying anything.
And this law apparently assumes that simply by the nature of his prayer, he was intentionally or recklessly influencing a person's decision.
Wow.
And if this is not a thought crime, Mr.
Kersey, I really don't know what it is.
I just don't know.
Here you are praying, they come up and ask you, well, what's the nature of your prayer?
And I guess if he had said, well, I'm hoping that the Jets will win the Super Bowl.
That's what I'm praying for.
Then he'd be okay.
But he's praying for the soul of this boy or fetus that he had aborted.
And so he is in violation of law.
These are strange and astonishing times.
Well, Mr.
Kersey.
I think you have some good news about Proposition 36 in California.
This is one of the most encouraging votes we had short of the election of Donald Trump.
Yeah, we'll have some time to distill the election.
I know that a lot of people are asking, hey, when are you and Hood going to do view from the right?
We're going to do one this weekend about the election.
Don't worry.
Our black-pilled friend is still trying to recover from all of the stories he was digesting, making him think that the election outcome wasn't going to be what I told you guys it was going to be.
I don't know, months ago, when I was getting ready to go to a party.
I basically said, you know, he's going to sweep all of the so-called swing states, and if my current state of, you know, where I've lived for, gosh, 15 years, Virginia, if they don't call that for a long time, it's going to be a resounding state.
Tidal tsunami, tidal wave tsunami in favor of President Trump.
And I mean, Mr.
Taylor, I mean, look at a state like New Jersey, how much that shifted to almost being in serious contention.
Let's not call it a landslide.
What did you get to 200 and what's 30 or 40?
Electrical votes.
You can't call that a landslide.
You know, I would call this a landslide.
Prop 36 overwhelmingly passes in California, reversing some Soros-backed soft-on-crime policies.
So, Proposition 36, the Homelessness, Drug Addiction, and Theft Reduction Act, sought to undo portions of Prop 47 by increasing penalties for some crimes.
When Prop 47 passed in 2014, it downgraded most thefts from felonies to misdemeanors if the amount stolen was under $950.
It was under $950, I want to make that clear, unless the defendant had prior convictions of motor rape, certain sex offenses, or certain gun crimes.
An overwhelming 71 percent of Californians supported Prop 36, according to a September survey by the Public Policy Institute, despite a strong progressive rebuke of the proposition.
But in the last several years, retail chains and mom-and-pop shops, as we've talked about, have been hit hard by theft, smash and grab robberies, and organized retail crime gangs in places like San Francisco.
It's basically an entire city that's a food desert, a pharmacy desert, all because of the videos we've seen and we've snickered at looking at these people who walk in with garbage bags.
And then they leave with the garbage bags full of items that they've just taken from the shelves.
And I guess when you have to go to a grocery store or convenience store, Mr. Taylor, and ask, hey, I'd like a Snickers, and it's behind plexiglass because otherwise it's going to be stolen.
Or if you need an item under $950, everything's behind plexiglass.
I think that might be a Republican campaign ad every time that happens.
Prop 47 also reclassified some felony drug offenses as misdemeanors.
Progressive LA County DA, George Gascon.
How do you pronounce that?
How do you pronounce his last name?
It's Gascon.
Gascon.
Backed by billionaire George Soros, he helped offer Prop 47, and he may have also lost his seat.
I believe he did lose his seat, by the way, to Republican challenger Nathan Hochman.
Gascon has sought to reform the criminal justice system through more progressive policies.
Again, I can go on and on, but the most important thing is that this passed overwhelmingly in the so-called deep blue state.
It has been shocking to see a breakdown of California 2020 by counties which went blue in 2020 versus those that now went so-called red in 2024.
It's quite shocking.
It's alarming to look at in terms of, wow, something's happening here.
And I think the whole soft on crime policies, all these videos you see on TikTok, YouTube, shared on Snapchat and Instagram and Facebook, and Twitter most especially, they do have an impact on people.
And we don't have to live this way.
And I think we're seeing that pendulum shift and I think it's going to shift significantly in the next couple years based on what's happening and based on these failed policies and based on the fact that these jobs are going away and it's impacting people who will continue to belittle white men and white capital for food deserts happening when the reason why you have a food desert is because black men and black women feel that they're entitled to steal.
As a way to rebuke white privilege.
And it doesn't work that way, pal.
It does show you that the excesses of liberalism can get to a point where even liberals, even Californians, decide we have gone too far.
We've got to change this.
And what did you say the percentage was in favor of Prop 36?
70%?
Yeah, 71%.
71%.
Well, what I understand Is why the State House didn't do its job.
The State House could have passed legislation to change this back.
That's perfectly possible.
And something that is supported by 70% of the voters, this just goes to show you how completely out of touch the legislators in the State House are in California.
This is something that they should have recognized was just impossible.
As you and I know, and as practically anyone who lived in San Francisco or a lot of California cities recognized.
You simply can't run a society when people can just march into a drugstore or any kind of retail store, clear out the shelves, march out, and just thumb your nose at the store clerks and any kind of security officers with absolutely no fear of being arrested.
This is just an impossible way to run a country.
We'll run any kind of society.
And it's about time that California recognized that.
Again, why didn't the legislature do its job?
This is just simply disgusting.
Well, here is a story about a city going the other way.
Jaywalking, that time-honored practice of crossing the street outside of the sidewalk, outside of the crosswalk or against the traffic light is now legal in New York City.
Council member Mercedes Narcisse, a Brooklyn Democrat.
I suspect her ancestors did not come over the Mayflower, although I have not checked.
She sponsored the legislation and she said the new law ends racial disparities in enforcement, noting that more than 90% of the jaywalking tickets issued last year went to black and Latino people.
Laws that penalize common behaviors for everyday movement shouldn't exist, especially when they unfairly impact communities of color.
Now, Mr.
Curzon, my suspicion is that when black and Latino people and for the small number of white people who got tickets for jaywalking, they were doing something absolutely outrageous, something dangerous, something that was liable to get themselves killed or make cars screech to a halt.
You can walk against a traffic light if there's nobody around, and there can be a policeman standing on the corner in New York City.
I've done it many times.
They're not even going to bat him out.
You're not going to get a jaywalking ticket just for crossing against a light.
But the new law also warns that pedestrians crossing outside of a crosswalk do not have the right of way, and they should yield to other traffic that does have the right of way.
Well, what an idea.
That should be obvious, shouldn't it?
Other cities and states from Denver and Kansas City, Missouri to Nevada and some in Virginia.
I didn't know about this, Mr.
Kersey.
They have decriminalized jaywalking in recent years according to America Walks, a Seattle-based group that's been tracking these proposals.
The jaywalking law in New York City had been on the books since 1958.
I'm surprised you could jaywalk legally up until 1958, and it carried a penalty of up to $250.
Now, I checked with a friend of mine who lives in New York City, and I asked him to look into it.
He hasn't gotten back to me.
But my guess is that even if it's legal to jaywalk, if our dusty brethren decide to have a twerking contest in the middle of the East Side Drive, Then they could be arrested for obstructing traffic or something like that.
There have to be limits on what you can do outside the crosswalk and against the flow of traffic.
He hasn't gotten back to me on that, but that surely must be something that you can do.
And my guess is that the people who arrested for jaywalking were doing something, as I say, absolutely outrageous.
But if you have standards and these standards, are ones that non-whites are less likely than whites to meet, then you got to get rid of the standards.
Yet another example.
Let's hope that, well, we'll see what happens.
Of course, the people who are liable to be run down, run over, killed, injured, they're more likely to be Blacks and Hispanics too, because they are probably the ones who are doing outrageous, flagrant and dangerous things.
Now, here's an interesting story from Indiana.
A man from India, He asked that his name be withheld.
He came to Indiana on a student visa in the fall of 2017 to attend Indiana University.
And then after he graduated, he worked for a while at the university on an H-1B visa.
He says he attended a meeting in 2023 where someone was passing out the voter registration cards and he filled one in.
He checked the box on the form that says he's not a citizen of the United States.
But he looked up this year and he found his name had been added to the voter roll.
One wonders how many...
You said voter roll?
Voter roll.
Okay, sorry.
It was hard to hear you.
Okay, gotcha.
Yes.
No, my voice is a little strange today.
If I am incomprehensible, you let me know, Mr.
Kersey.
No, no, no.
I just want to get clarification.
Yes, of course.
No, he checked the card and says he's not a citizen, but he's now an official voter in Indiana.
So...
Inquiring minds want to know how many other non-citizens are on the rolls.
And the people who handle this sort of thing were asked about this and a representative said, we cannot check about citizenship until July 1st, 2025.
The spokesman was referring to a bill that was passed by the Indiana General Assembly.
On February, it requires county election officials to cross-reference their voter rolls with the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, but they can't do it until July 1st of next year.
Now, according to the website of Indiana University, as of the fall of 2024, there were 5,042 foreign students enrolled at the main campus in Bloomington in Monroe County.
This is where all this is going on.
Well, for that 5,042, 38% are from India, 18% from China, and 9% from South Korea, and many, many other countries around the world account for the rest.
This man from India, he says he can't for the life of him understand how the United States can have such a crazy system.
In India, he explained, he has to have a voter ID card in order to vote, and you sure can't get one if you're not a citizen.
Well, Jerry Bonnet, the chief counsel at the Indiana Secretary of State's office, he says, we basically have an honor system.
When he asked if he knew how many non-citizens may be on the voter rolls in the state of Indiana, he says, nope, we do not know.
And apparently there's no way to stop them if they show up.
Incredible.
Well, who knows how many actually showed up and voted, but maybe they voted Donald Trump.
He had a multiracial coalition this time, Mr.
Kirsten.
Well, let's see.
Time is moving on.
Well, let's talk about Claudine Gay.
Claudine Gay, as you will recall, is the former Harvard University president.
Well, she stepped down, partly for just general incompetence.
The thing that was the death blow for her was it turned out, but of course, she had been an inveterate and shameless plagiarist.
But she was leading what's considered the top university in the United States.
But she was black and she was a woman.
And boy, is there black and sometimes female privilege.
Well, she recently won a Leadership and Courage Award.
The Harvard Black Alumni Society awarded her its award for leadership and courage at the first university-wide Black alumni conference in more than a decade.
I wonder where they've been hiding all this time, Mr.
Kersey.
Can you imagine a university-wide white alumni conference at Harvard?
She was not only the first black president in the school's history.
I actually can't.
It would just be called the Harvard Alumni Alliance if you didn't let non-whites in.
Well, they can't do that, can they?
I'm sure if you wanted, if you were a Harvard alumnus, you wanted to join the Harvard Black Alumni Society, they'd probably say, no, no.
Well, So, she was the first black president, but also had the shortest tenure.
I can't remember.
Do you remember how long she lasted?
Maybe four or five months.
I think maybe six months.
And of course, she got in trouble when she testified in Congress.
And she actually was a champion for free speech on that occasion, like those other college presidents.
People saying, well, you know, can you run around advocating genocide of the Jews?
She said, well, you know, we believe in free speech.
And I wish she'd stuck her guns.
Yeah, you can advocate for genocide.
If people advocate for genocide, white people all the time.
Nobody cares about that.
I'm sure they do that at Harvard, too.
But the Alumni Association decided that she gets their Leadership and Courage Award.
Well, our Dusky brethren do stick together, don't they?
They want to hand another award to their own.
And apparently Claudine Gay still picks up about a million dollars a year for her various services that she renders at Harvard University.
Well, Mr.
Kersey, our time is running out.
It always seems to do that.
And so, ladies and gentlemen, it is a great pleasure and an honor to spend this time with you.
And we look forward to doing so next week.
I should probably give you a last minute warning.
The American Renaissance Conference is going to open next Friday.
That is a week from tomorrow.
Be there or be square.
You can go to amran.com and learn all about it.
And we still have a few places we can shoehorn you into.
So perhaps we'll see you there.
But we look forward to seeing you again next week.
▲
Export Selection