Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor - Anti-White Fanatics Never Sleep
Aired: 2024-05-23
Duration: 10:38


=== Congress Wants Racial Quotas (09:08) ===

[00:00:04]  Hello, I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
[00:00:07]  Diversity, equity, and inclusion are the national religion.
[00:00:12]  The initials DEI, pronounced Dei, mean God in Latin.
[00:00:18]  And DEI is the guiding deity of the United States.
[00:00:22]  Its goal of equity, repeatedly stated, is equal outcomes for every racial group.
[00:00:28]  This guarantees disaster because racial groups are not equal.
[00:00:34]  DEI is everywhere.
[00:00:36]  Take the American Privacy Rights Act of 2024.
[00:00:40]  Congress wants to set up rules for how companies use your personal information.
[00:00:46]  But the bill would force racial quotas into just about every part of our lives.
[00:00:52]  So far, only Reason Magazine seems to have figured this out in an article called Congress is Preparing to Restore Quotas in College Admissions and Everywhere Else.
[00:01:04]  There is a vicious bit of language buried on page 35 of the proposed bill.
[00:01:09]  It's trying to make sure artificial intelligence ignores racial reality and spits out equity.
[00:01:16]  It would legally require the kind of thinking that made Google's image generation program invent black, Asian, and Indian founding fathers, female popes, and Vikings who look like Genghis Khan.
[00:01:31]  The bill says...
[00:01:32]  Algorithms must not have potential harms.
[00:01:36]  But the definition of an algorithm is so broad it includes anything that uses numbers to make decisions.
[00:01:43]  That would include banks looking at credit scores to avoid lending money to deadbeats.
[00:01:48]  But what's the potential harm of that?
[00:01:52]  Disparate impact.
[00:01:54]  More blacks and whites have bad scores, so using them to decide who gets loans has a disparate impact on blacks.
[00:02:02]  The only way to avoid disparate impact would be deliberately to distort decision-making so that people of all races get the same group results, not the same treatment, the same results.
[00:02:16]  What's this got to do with data privacy?
[00:02:19]  Nothing. It's about how you use the data.
[00:02:23]  And you better use it to promote equity.
[00:02:26]  Disparate impact goes back to a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision called Griggs v.
[00:02:32]  Duke Power.
[00:02:33]  If you have a standard for hiring, and minorities can't meet that standard as often as whites do, that's disparate impact, and it is assumed to be discrimination.
[00:02:45]  You might want to hire computer programmers only if they have IQs of at least 125.
[00:02:51]  That would have a disparate impact on blacks and be illegal because whites are 30 times more likely than blacks to have IQs that high.
[00:03:01]  Just about any standard, whether it's a passing grade on a test or good credit or not having a criminal record, has a disparate impact.
[00:03:10]  There are some very capable blacks, but as a group, they almost never measure up.
[00:03:17]  Some job requirements are essential.
[00:03:20]  Lifeguards have to know how to swim.
[00:03:22]  If you can show that your job requirement is absolutely essential for the job, you can stick to it even if blacks are less likely to meet it.
[00:03:32]  But what's essential?
[00:03:33]  Do policemen have to have clean criminal records?
[00:03:37]  Or is it okay to have a few felonies?
[00:03:40]  It's not easy to prove in court.
[00:03:43]  That your job standards are essential.
[00:03:45]  So most companies meet quotas by lowering standards for BIPOCs.
[00:03:50]  That's what DEI is.
[00:03:53]  Discrimination against whites and sometimes Asians.
[00:03:57]  Back to the Privacy Act.
[00:03:59]  It says anyone using personal data, and that's just about everyone, has to mitigate potential harms from covered algorithms.
[00:04:09]  And anything that uses numbers is a covered algorithm.
[00:04:13]  The harm is disparate impact on the basis of individuals' race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability status.
[00:04:23]  Weirdly, the bill also forbids disparate impact on the basis of individuals' political party registration status.
[00:04:31]  I've never seen that before.
[00:04:33]  But it means you could have an uplift program for unemployed dropouts.
[00:04:38]  They are more likely to be Democrats than Republicans, so there would be a disparate impact on Republicans.
[00:04:44]  As I said, under Griggs, you can have disparate impact for essential hiring standards, but not in this bill, no exceptions.
[00:04:53]  If you're hiring lifeguards, you have to jigger the algorithm so as to give a boost to blacks, theoretically, even if some of them can't swim.
[00:05:03]  Insane. It would be the same for systems that help police decide what parts of town to patrol.
[00:05:25]  Going where the bad guys are always has a disparate impact.
[00:05:29]  As the Reason article points out, Forcing complex AI systems to eliminate disparate impact leaves users in the dark.
[00:05:38]  If a bank buys a system to help it make loans, it might not even know that the AI was tuned to try to give American Indians loans at the same rate as Asian Indians.
[00:05:52]  Both parties in Congress are desperate to do something on data privacy.
[00:05:56]  Law firms are already analyzing the bill so clients can be ready for it.
[00:06:01]  I looked at three websites.
[00:06:03]  They had detailed summaries, but not one even hinted at disparate impact.
[00:06:10]  Here's an alert from Pillsbury.
[00:06:12]  At the end, it says the bill may be the best vehicle for finally passing the U.S. national standard on privacy.
[00:06:20]  Almost at the very top of its homepage is Diversity and Inclusion at Pillsbury.
[00:06:26]  Hear from our lawyers.
[00:06:27]  This nice black lady explains how wonderful and diverse Pillsbury is.
[00:06:33]  All these firms whoop about diversity.
[00:06:36]  They have clearly read the bill, and they must think fighting disparate impact everywhere is just fine.
[00:06:44]  President Biden.
[00:06:45]  He loves to brag about the CHIPS Act.
[00:06:48]  Which promises $39 billion to bribe companies to build chips in America.
[00:06:53]  Companies love handouts, but as this article says, DEI killed the Chips Act.
[00:07:00]  How'd it do that?
[00:07:01]  To get your hands on the swag, you've got to hire loads of women, minorities, and ex-cons to build chips.
[00:07:09]  If not enough women, minorities, and ex-cons know how to build chips, you have to train them.
[00:07:15]  It's crazy.
[00:07:17]  If you're building a plant, you have to hire women, minorities, and ex-cons to build it and provide child care for these imaginary lady electricians and bulldozer drivers.
[00:07:28]  As the article notes, the world's best chipmakers are tired of being pawns in the Chip Act's political games.
[00:07:36]  They've quietly given up on America.
[00:07:39]  How's this for a headline?
[00:07:41]  Biden's DEI rules are worse than Hamas.
[00:07:45]  Top microchip makers are postponing U.S. expansion and instead expanding in dangerous Israel because American grants come with so many equity caveats.
[00:07:56]  Well, that was Intel.
[00:07:58]  Taiwan's semiconductor manufacturing company, the world's top producers, sniffed at the money and decided to let Joe Biden keep it.
[00:08:07]  Instead, it's building a second plant in Japan, which is not run by morons.
[00:08:13]  Chipmakers can just build new factories somewhere else.
[00:08:16]  But in this privacy bill, there is no way out.
[00:08:20]  Here's more equity foolishness.
[00:08:23]  The California lower house has already passed a bill to require shorter criminal sentences for BIPOCs.
[00:08:29]  It passed 58-13 and is now in the Senate.
[00:08:33]  It requires that whenever the court has discretion to determine the appropriate sentence, the court presiding over a criminal matter shall consider the disparate impact on historically disfranchised and system-impacted
[00:08:48]  populations. The court presiding over a criminal matter shall consider the disparate impact on historically disfranchised and system-impacted populations.
[00:08:51]  Disparate impact again.
[00:08:52]  The only way to avoid it is to have equal outcomes, not equal treatment for people of different races.

=== Carving Corners of Sanity (01:40) ===

[00:08:59]  Not enough white guys in the big house for armed robbery?
[00:09:02]  Well, just stop sending black armed robbers to prison.
[00:09:07]  Speaking of California, guess how many full-time equity bureaucrats there are at Stanford University?
[00:09:13]  At least 177.
[00:09:17]  And guess which school has the most?
[00:09:19]  The highest concentration is in Stanford's medical school, which has at least 46 diversity officials.
[00:09:27]  I used to think that at least med schools...
[00:09:30]  And flight training wouldn't fall for this stuff.
[00:09:33]  Silly me.
[00:09:35]  That's where you have to lower the standards the most, because all that wicked disparate impact viciously kept BIPOCs out for generations.
[00:09:45]  These are astonishing times.
[00:09:47]  Just three weeks ago, I made a video called Where DEI Comes to Die.
[00:09:53]  Eleven states have passed laws banning anything that smells of DEI in state universities.
[00:09:59]  And at one university, the whole Gender Studies Department got the axe.
[00:10:03]  The feds, though, are completely ruled by DEI, as are some of the states.
[00:10:08]  But other states aren't.
[00:10:10]  Assuming this crazy privacy law doesn't kill off good sense everywhere, divisions between states will widen.
[00:10:18]  California doctors could get a reputation for killing patients, while Florida doctors save lives.
[00:10:24]  Maybe we can carve out a few corners of sanity.
[00:10:28]  In a country gone mad.
[00:10:30]  They could be models for the rest of the country.
[00:10:32]  Or maybe just havens for Americans who don't worship the new day.