All Episodes
Previous Next
March 5, 2024 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
01:27:45
20240305_Tue
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Everybody, this is Gregory Hood.
I'm here with Paul Kersey and welcome to another episode of You From The Right.
And Paul, I can't believe that they're doing the meme.
They're actually doing the meme.
And the meme, of course, is the worst thing imaginable if there was a nuclear weapon set off in New York City is the backlash against peaceful Muslim terrorists.
And now they're doing the exact same thing with illegal immigration.
As you might know, in Athens, Georgia, a young woman, young American woman named Lincoln Riley was murdered.
Allegedly by a quote undocumented immigrant.
And I'm just going to read a selection of stories just from last couple days.
Online Athens.
Hispanics fear for safety after killing flames immigration debate.
CNN.
Latino students at UGA face hostility after police say suspect in Lincoln Riley killing an illegal immigrant.
Death threats caused UGA students to cancel CNN interview.
Venezuelans in Georgia worry about backlash after student killed on UGA.
Lake and Riley press conference gets heated as officials face backlash.
Georgia Venezuelans concerned after migrant backlash to Lake and Riley murder.
That's Fox News, conservative Fox News.
Georgia Latino groups condemn heinous crime at UGA as they fear.
Latino groups condemn heinous crime at University of Georgia and plea for and plea against anti-immigrant
rhetoric and they even brought in uh libs of TikTok to blame there.
Editorial easy to start blaming a community after a legal immigrant charged with murder
and Georgia students death at the center of immigration debate.
I mean we're at the point now where I think that whenever you see one of these stories the real
story is not the story itself because obviously you have some all these sorts of tragedies and
stories where it has almost no impact on politics but the way the media reports it becomes the more
important story.
When you say so.
Yeah.
And first off, thanks everybody for listening to, I think this is the fourth, maybe fifth episode of View From The Right.
Exciting to talk to all of you about this really important issue that I think shows that immigration, illegal, and I increasingly believe legal immigration is going to become the ultimate issue of 2024.
But just to go back to what you said, Mr. Hood, at the beginning, You said the meme.
Let's clarify what that means.
The late comedian Norm Macdonald, probably the most brilliant comedian of our time, he tweeted back on December 16th, 2016 this, quote, what terrifies me is if ISIS were to detonate a nuclear device and kill 50 million Americans.
Imagine the backlash against peaceful Muslims.
I mean, and as you said, I don't mean to laugh, but that's exactly what the media did.
I mean, one media organ, the New York Post, actually did a story.
Migrant charged with murdering Lakin Riley likely panicked when she fought back.
It should be noted that the reporter who did that, they found out who wrote it, the reporter, and the backlash, now I'm doing the main, the backlash on X was so infuriated.
That the reporter actually deleted his social media profile and got rid of his account on X because everybody was calling him out, which, you know, I think is important.
The fact that, you know, the world isn't.
Being the world isn't dying, it's being murdered, and the people who are murdering it have names and addresses, and that's how it is with journalists where.
It was a radical environmentalist who said that, by the way, before everyone gets down my throat and says I'm inciting violence or something.
But when it comes to journalism, the people who write these kinds of things, it's not just newspapers that are doing it.
It's specific people who write articles that way, who decide to frame articles in that way.
And it's always very enlightening when people go after, they find out who actually wrote this stuff and call them out for doing it.
Because the idea of blaming a murder victim for their own death in a headline knowing that the only thing most people are going to read is the headline Displays a level of contempt for ordinary Americans.
That's it's almost unfathomable I mean Arne McIntyre who's right for the blaze.
He has a book coming out about the way democracy almost inherently leads to totalitarianism he has this saying, you know, don't make me tap the sign and the sign is You can never hate journalists enough.
You may think you hate journalists enough, but you don't.
But I would respond that however much you hate journalists, the journalists hate you more.
Because it would never occur to any of us to frame a story in that way.
It would never occur to us to dunk on somebody in their lowest moments.
But this is the center-right, conservative-leading New York Post.
This is the biggest story in the country right now.
Again, there was a great story in Bloomberg that is buried behind a paywall that Venezuela just had their lowest murder rate in something like 22 years.
And that's because, as the article says, migrants have left the country who were largely committing these murders.
And what do they mean by migrants?
It's the same word that in that New York Post story I just quoted.
Illegal alien.
They're not migrants.
They're illegal aliens.
They're invaders.
They're, unfortunately, demographic conquerors, I think is probably the best way to put it.
And one of these alleged Venezuelan migrants, illegal aliens, is who murdered this nursing student, a beautiful white girl, in Athens, Georgia.
And for those who don't know, who might be listening from around the world, Athens, Georgia is home to the University of Georgia, the flagship State school in the state of Georgia.
It's a very good school.
Mind you, Athens is, I have deep roots in the Athens area.
It is unfortunately a very, very liberal school.
And what used to be a very, very red state, arguably before mass third world immigration, you know, Georgia in 1990, Mr. Hood was about 73% white.
And now it's about 52% white.
73% white and now it's about 52% white.
That's why it's even a purple state.
I would argue it's still a red state.
You've just run some really bad candidates for for Senate recently because Brian Kemp the governor who if you remember back in 2018 He won the primary as a Republican by having a shotgun and saying let's round up all the illegal aliens It's a great.
He's a dad He's only become kind of a demon to MAGA because he didn't do enough they think for the election in 2020 but Barring that, I mean, he would be seen as a very conservative governor.
And of course, he was the one who beat Stacey Abrams.
He beat Stacey Abrams, not just once in a very election.
Yeah.
Where Stacey Abrams was trying to galvanize the black vote, saying that she was going to, oh gosh, what's the word?
Well, her whole strategy was based on demographic change leading to electoral conquest for the Democrats.
In fact- The New York Times article that said, we're going to replace- Oh, we can replace them.
Yeah, Michelle Goldberg.
That infamous headline that everybody talks about, we can replace them.
That was in direct reference to that race, to the Adams race in Georgia.
Sorry to talk over you.
That's right.
word I was looking for was sandblast Stone Mountain.
That's right.
That's right.
Dude, I was trying to remember the actual language she used.
And of course, Stone Mountain is home to the most beautiful carving on the planet
of Stonewall Jackson, Robert E. Lee, and Jefferson Davis, I believe.
The incredible Jeff Davis.
Yeah, I'm not the biggest fan of Jeff Davis.
Well, yeah, there's a lot of controversy in that.
We're not going to spurg out on history.
But the point is, I think at this point, they're going to sandblast it for no other reason than it's attractive.
I mean, if you look at a lot of the art that's being destroyed, it's not just political.
I think it's also because They just hate beauty.
And if you look at the kinds of things they replace it with, it's almost like they're doing it deliberately to make something worse.
But what's interesting about Abrams, and then we'll pivot back to the immigration thing, but I want to make this point.
Abrams' whole political career.
And remember, this is somebody who the media put up as a hero.
This is somebody who never admitted defeat in the first race.
I mean, she was an election denier, saying that she won over and over again, and nobody ever called her out on it.
Nobody ever said, you have to back down on this.
Nobody ever said she was questioning democracy.
It was the best thing that ever happened to her career.
I think some Star Trek show made her, like, President of Earth.
Where, you know, she smiles patifically, the obese black woman, earth mammy that you see in all these ads now, kind of smiling down on all of us and telling us what to think.
They portrayed her as a giant hero, but she never actually did anything and she never won anything.
And her whole electoral strategy was basically, we're going to replace the white boys with immigration and then we're going to vote them out and that's it.
And she actually put out a document.
Where she spells this out in explicit detail, like, this is my entire electoral strategy.
It's just race.
It's just turning out different racial groups.
An analysis I wrote of it, actually, there was some book, I'll have to look it up, maybe I'll put it in the notes to this, but one of the few references to me in academic literature was from some professional anti-racists who were complaining about the fact that I had noticed this and said, hey, you know, this is replacement ideology, but Because she's doing it.
It's okay.
And they were saying, well, isn't this evil that he's noticing this and calling it replacement ideology, this idea of the great replacement, but what else would you call it?
I mean, that's explicitly what her entire career is.
Her entire career is essentially the great replacement is happening and it's good, but the great replacement has other consequences.
It's not just politics.
It's not just elections.
It's not just demographics.
It's also who you're replacing them with.
And then this particular case, I think one of the, The things that reminds me of is, especially for some of you listeners who remember the Mariel boatlift over from Cuba, or if you don't remember that, if perhaps you've seen the movie Scarface.
And at the beginning of that film, there were all these Cubans coming over.
Tony Montana, of course, played by Al Pacino is one of them.
And Fidel Castro essentially emptied the jails and dumped all his criminals on Florida.
And one of the immigration officials who's getting ready to interview Tony Montana is complaining and he's saying, ah, you know, Fidel Castro is crapping all over us and there's nothing we can do about it.
We're being taken advantage of here.
And this kind of sets the tone for the whole movie that all these criminals are being dumped on Miami and unleashing this chaos.
Well, in this case, it's actually our own government that's doing this to us.
And it's the states trying to fight back and the courts saying that you're not allowed to.
But it's our government dumping these criminals on us.
It's our government that's literally flying them in and paying for everything and unleashing them on communities.
And then when people die, you're not allowed to say anything about it, lest you be accused of creating a backlash.
Steve Saylor, of course, true legend of our time, has a saying about this where he says the frontlash, where essentially that there's always an attack on the people who might notice that something's happening even before they say anything.
Because one of the remarkable things about all this is that there actually hasn't been much of a backlash against, certainly, Hispanics.
Because, as Republicans would point out over and over again, and I think even race realists like ourselves would point out here, the point is not that it's a Hispanic guy that killed a white girl.
The point is that it's an illegal immigrant who was brought in, and they're specifically bringing criminals in, who was then dumped on this community, who then killed somebody.
In most of these cases, it's always people who should have been deported already.
We're not talking about, like, oh, this happened to occur, and now we're trying to blame an entire community.
I mean, we're talking about very specific people, people who should have been kicked out because of things they themselves did, and the federal government says, no, we think it's funny if they do this, and then they kill somebody, and then the media coverage is, how dare you notice this?
Yeah, wasn't the individual who was allegedly the murderer of Laken Riley, he was arrested in New York, correct?
I believe so.
We'll have to check it as we're talking through here.
If you can check that as we're going through this, because there's another point I want to bring up vis-a-vis Cuba, which is that a lot of the media coverage, when you think of the popular pop culture history of Florida, particularly, you know, the cocaine boom and the, again, Scarface, but also everything that kind of came out of that, There's always this debate about whether these people, the Mario Botliff specifically, whether they were driven to this because they weren't as prosperous as the prior waves of Cuban refugees.
A lot of the first waves of Cuban refugees that came after the communist takeover tended to be wealthy, tended to be business owners, tended to be the people who had lost everything.
But in this case, you had people who were coming from a lower socioeconomic status, And some might say, well, there were criminals that were being deliberately unleashed here.
Some people might say, well, that's unfair.
They were just coming from a lower status and therefore you have to deal with certain problems.
But in this case here, we're dealing with people that it's almost like the governments are selecting their worst people.
Certainly the government of Venezuela, it's already been reported that they are deliberately doing this.
Selecting the people they just don't want to deal with.
Deliberately sending them to us and our government is actually subsidizing it and every single one of these NGOs Catholic Charities and the rest of them that bring them in Is being paid with your tax dollars It's not just people doing it out of the goodness of their hearts.
It's not Altruism, it's not bleeding hearts out of control You can't even blame the churches or something like that because fundamentally it's the government that is funding this stuff And so when you see a murder like this, this is not a failure of the state.
This is not government screwing up.
This is government policy.
This is the system working exactly as it's intended.
And as you can see with the media coverage, the only thing that anybody is really upset about is that people noticed it and that people are mad about it.
That's the scandal.
The scandal is that people are mad about it.
The fact that an illegal immigrant killed a girl I mean, I would say that to the people who run our country, that's either neutral or kind of funny and probably justified because, you know, check your privilege, white girl.
This is, you had it coming.
I mean, what else are they going to learn at these universities after all?
Yeah, you know, University of Georgia, we can get really, we can do a deep dive into UGA, which has been infected.
I mean, the marching band used to be called the Dixie Redcoats.
That was named in 1955.
Of the Well, you need the football players.
And they actually dropped Dixie from the name the Redcoats in 1971.
Think about that, that they dropped it that fast, the name Dixie, from the from the civil
rights push.
That's how quickly UGA was disenfranchised of the history and how quickly they just succumbed
and surrendered and capitulated.
But I just need the football players.
You can't risk offending them with a flag.
It's actually just to be blunt, in 1970, Georgia and Auburn, they were both undefeated.
They played one of the more legendary games in college football history.
That's actually the game that Pat Sullivan won the Heisman Trophy.
I'm sorry, this was 1971, so this is that same year.
Pat Sullivan, who just died a couple years ago, he won the Heisman Trophy because of his performance in that game.
Auburn beat Georgia, and both teams had all-white Starting lineups, all white rosters.
There might have been one scholarship black player, but they didn't play.
The SEC was not integrated until the early seventies.
Um, but, and, and, and it's, it's really sad to think about that.
How quickly because of that, what you just said, we can't offend black players.
There's a great story that hasn't really been told Mr. Hood that during the whole controversy of George Floyd, there was a black Mississippi state running back who said he would not play if the state of Mississippi Didn't change their flag.
Well, guess what happened?
The Republican-controlled state legislature changed the flag of Mississippi, which used to have the Confederate battle flag, the stars and bars.
Well, that running back before the season started in 2020, he actually transferred away from Mississippi State.
He didn't even play it down.
But it's one of the funniest stories that hasn't been told.
There's actually another story that I found as I was just quickly researching the very question that you had asked.
It turns out that this individual who allegedly murdered the white nursing student, his name is Jose Ibarra.
He was, and this is something that a lot of people haven't talked about yet.
He was arrested and released in New York.
He was put on a bus in September of 2022 and sent to New York.
Was that when Abbott started doing the busing campaign?
Yeah, this has been going on for a while, but he was arrested.
But the key is that he was arrested and this is something else I want to bring up quickly.
He was, before he was charged with felony murder, he was arrested for driving under the influence and driving without a license.
Now, The key here is that the Democrats in Congress just a few days ago, I think it was maybe two weeks ago, had a vote where they specifically said immigrants who are convicted of a DUI can't be deported.
They specifically voted to make sure that migrants who are convicted of driving under the influence can't be deported.
That is not a serious crime.
It's a serious crime if you do it.
It's not a serious crime if they do it.
So then when you see something like this, again, This is the system working as it's intended.
This is supposed to happen.
This is what they want.
You're just not supposed to notice it.
No, I mean, Mike Collins from Georgia, Mike Collins is one of the more conservative people in the House.
Now, one of the key things about ICE right now is that you have a number of localities where they refuse to actually work with ICE.
with local theft or burglary after a migrant accused of such crimes was released
and later charged with the murder of an American college student.
Now, one of the key things about ICE right now is that you have a number of localities
where they refuse to actually work with ICE.
Sometimes ICE will request for somebody to be held by local authorities until they can pick them up
and deport them.
But the local authorities will actually free them before this happens.
That's how important criminal migrants are to rulers.
Bye.
And I think one of the keys to the entire debate that's happening right now is that while a lot of reporters and politicians are upset that the right is using this one particular case to make a larger point, what is every single left-wing triumph of the last 20 years?
Been.
Except taking one marker, often with details in the case that don't really match the story you're being told.
And then using that to guilt through an entire thing.
Sometimes, even if the entire story falls apart, it doesn't change the political objective, and the political objective succeeds anyway.
Never forget, it was the Jussie Smollett case.
You know, MAGA country and having bleach dumped on them and all the rest of it.
That was used to push through a federal anti-lynching bill, and that passed.
That's law now.
That worked.
I mean, sure, the story fell apart, but it doesn't matter.
They got their objective.
Depending on who you believe, and I'm going to point out that this is a progressive author who pointed this out.
Obviously, I don't know for sure, but Matthew Shepard.
I mean, one of the most important things when it comes to hate crimes, while we even have to deal with hate crimes as a separate thing in law, where the government essentially has to read minds and decide whether one motivation for committing crime is more serious than another motivation for committing crime.
Matthew Shepard supposedly was killed for being gay.
Well, then here comes a book.
Years later saying that, well, actually it had nothing to do with him being gay.
It had to do with the fact that it was a meth deal gone wrong and that this was just another kind of act of violence that comes with degenerates doing drugs that we see every single day.
Doesn't matter.
He's a saint.
Certainly with George Floyd, you have somebody who was the last thing he did on earth was commit crimes and lie to police officers.
Doesn't matter.
We're going to have multiple funerals with a gold coffin.
People are going to build statues to him.
People are going to remember this forever.
And yet, in this case, when you have somebody who is unquestionably innocent, you still, in the case of the New York Post, have a headline attacking the victim.
And then you still have the entire national media just instantly, absolutely, shields interlocked, building a phalanx, ready to fight to the death for the honor of this illegal immigrant murderer.
What's really weird about everything we're talking about is I'm reading an article right now from the NBC affiliate 11 Alive.
I know an awful lot about Atlanta.
So I'm reading this and I'm just fascinated because it points out that this guy was arrested in New York and then a month later he was released.
ICE could have taken him into custody but according to a written ICE statement he was released by the NYPD before a detainer could be issued.
Now a month after this He and his brother were accused of stealing from a Walmart in Athens.
Now, if that Walmart's still there, I think I've been to this Walmart before.
I think I actually threw a friend of mine who went to UGA.
We were fake wrestling late one night.
I threw him through a cereal display, and we were both escorted out of the restaurant.
That was back during the fun days of college.
Anyways, crazy anecdote for all of you listeners.
But get this, Mr. Hood.
According to the police report, The two, and I'm referring to the Venezuelan illegal aliens, they allegedly took bacon, smoked sausage, Cueso fresco cheese, and some clothes.
And they were given a citation for the misdemeanor shoplifting and let go.
So they had already committed some crimes and they weren't asked about their criminal status and the reason why, I'm sure you know this story and I'm going to educate our listeners, Athens-Clarke County has a black sheriff.
Yeah.
I mean, one of the things that I think was most revealing is when the mayor of Athens, Kelly Gertz, spoke about this case after the murder.
And it was a remarkable display because you had people in the audience shouting at him, telling him to resign, telling him to be ashamed.
And instead, I mean, again, this is one of the key things.
Liberals are not moral relativists.
It drives me insane when conservatives say this kind of stuff.
They have a morality that is so absolute and so black and white that there is absolutely nothing that can shake it.
So here you have this case that seemingly would put this guy in the defensive, and not only does he not go on the defensive, he sits there and lectures the audience about how they are the ones who should feel ashamed, how they are the ones who need to watch out for hate, how they are the ones We need to make sure that they don't get mad and that we need to rededicate ourselves to the collective pursuit of equity and whatever else.
This is something that he had said because in 2019, Athens had passed a resolution saying that it was welcoming to people from all lands and backgrounds and strives to foster a community where individuals and families of all statuses, i.e.
including illegal immigrants, feel safe, are able to prosper, and can breathe free.
And it added that white nationalists and xenophobes have been, quote, emboldened by some politicians and members of the media, and that, quote, our immigrant and undocumented neighbors, especially those of Latinx heritage, face daily fears and threats from individuals and institutions such as ICE.
So ICE specifically called out as the enemy, the enemy of Latinx people, a term that no actual Hispanic ever uses to describe themselves.
And this is what he said.
This is the mayor of Gertz.
I was a career educator.
And there's your first problem.
I was a career educator.
I've worked with a lot of students and their families in this community.
The practical reality is those families tend to be blended amongst a variety of immigration statuses.
Well, yeah, there's another problem right there.
We should probably put a stop to that, don't you think?
We want to create a stable environment for people in our communities.
When that community is disrupted by hate or vitriol, that's not a safe environment for the school children or their families to live in.
That resolution speaks to that question.
At that point, somebody in the audience said that it wasn't vitriol, it was righteous indignation.
That's about what happened.
Now, there are a number of really revealing things in this.
First of all, there's always this phrase, and once you look for it, you see it all the time, our communities.
This to me, this is the surefire sign of social poison.
Whenever somebody talks about our communities, first of all, it means that you don't you no longer have a community.
It's not our communities, our communities, meaning that you have a group and they never put it in these terms, but this is what it means.
You have groups of little tribes.
Little minority groups, all who are divvied up.
You got your blacks, you got your Hispanics, you got your gays, and everything else.
And each little tribe is a little group of victims, officially recognized by the government as a protected class, that get special protections, that get special political goodies, that you can't talk adly about or criticize, but they can talk bad about the majority, the majority that subsidizes them.
And we have to keep peace among these communities because if we try to hold all these communities to the same standard, everything will fall apart and everything will explode into violence and we might have riots and no justice, no peace.
So we can't expect people to obey the law.
We can't expect people to believe in the country.
We can't expect people to have the most basic loyalty to the United States.
We can't expect people to take care of the actual community of the actual city they live in all that that's that goes out the window.
What we need to do is we need to police everybody to make sure that we have just enough.
Force and supervision and censorship such that the communities aren't at each other's throats Because frankly the only thing that we're united by is mutual hatred And whatever resources we can steal from the white people and kind of distribute it to everybody else on welfare.
That's that's our communities That's how our communities work It's interesting too that they talk about the school children and they say well the school children Can't be educated if they're afraid now, of course I can't help but think, but Proposition 187 in California, where we wouldn't have this problem if that had been allowed to stand, because that said, illegal immigrants just can't be educated in schools.
Problem solved.
Then there won't be any people with different statuses in the public schools.
And even if they are legal, even if they're quote-unquote citizens, because of the ridiculous way that the 413th Amendment has been interpreted, hopefully until recently, Parents wouldn't be here either if they couldn't dump them on the public schools.
But even though California passed Prop 187 with a highly significant share of the Hispanic vote, I might add, even though California voted to save itself, one judge decided, no, unconstitutional.
Gray Davis, who was the governor at the time, did not try to defend it.
He was later recalled.
But this is America, so the fact that Resolution, a referendum passed overwhelmingly.
The fact that the governor who wouldn't defend it was recalled and outraged, none of that matters.
Policy stands.
Illegal immigration continued.
California is now the bluest of the blue states, completely destroyed by mass immigration.
And now it is taken for granted throughout the entire country.
That illegal immigrants and kids of illegal immigrants have to be educated by the public schools.
And more than that, to make these invaders feel safe, we are not allowed to enforce immigration laws based on everyone else.
And the real problem, even in a case like this, is white nationalists who are emboldened by politicians.
And of course, the implication of something like that is what we really need to do is not regulate immigration laws.
Heavens no, that might offend our communities.
What we really need to do is regulate the speech of American citizens.
Yeah, you know, Pete Wilson was the governor when Prop 187 was passed.
And he was a huge moderate.
That's like what kills me.
He was not like a huge conservative.
No, he was a lot like Donald Trump.
He didn't have the charisma of Donald Trump.
He was basically a Republican moderate of the 80s.
Again, we're talking about the early 90s here when Prop 187 passes.
California's demographics, they weren't as bad now.
You know, I've got a lot of family in Orange County, Laguna Niguel.
I love California.
It's a great state.
Unfortunately, like you said, Pete Wilson decided to run for president.
I think he had some health problems in 96.
He ran during that period.
He probably would have been a good candidate for president for POTUS in 96, had he not had health problems.
Of course, you know, Pat Buchanan would have been a great candidate as well had he not
been neutered in 1992 by the Republican establishment, being called racist and anti-Semitic by William
F. Buckley, who even wrote a book, by the way.
Have you ever read the book that Buckley wrote about Buchanan?
Yeah, In Search of Anti-Semitism.
I mean, maybe that's something for another day.
I think the interesting thing about that book, of course, is he concluded that Pat Buchanan was not personally antisemitic, but he was basically associated with these things, which is a way he could kind of disown him without taking the responsibility of disowning him.
But Joe Sobrin, who had been a close colleague and probably National Review's best writer for a very long time, he was personally denounced by Buckley.
Buckley, you know essentially excommunicated Joe Sobering.
So that's that's a story for another day, but There's a whole movement within the within American conservatism where you had you definitely had a period in the early 90s after the Cold War with the rise of Buchanan the candidacies in 92 and 96 with the immigration battles in California where you had a sustained effort to get rid of affirmative action and Where you had efforts to link make sure like welfare recipients couldn't have more kids.
I mean all sorts of like issues that we well to the right of the kinds of things we talk about now.
And all of these issues were popular.
I mean, they were really on the edge of kind of solving all these problems.
I mean, think about Pat Buchanan's speech at the 1992 Republican National Convention, where he talked about taking America back block by block, just as the National Guard did Los Angeles during the Rodney King riots.
I love that speech.
I mean, it's, it's, I was, my God, what was I, eight during that?
Yeah, I mean, that was, I mean, to me, the Buchanan speech at the, at the GOP convention is probably, like, the greatest expression of oratory in the modern American right.
I mean, that was, that was the moment, that was the time.
But there was a deliberate effort within the conservative movement, and it's a lot of inside baseball, it's a lot of names that I think would bore a lot of people, it's a lot of stories of, like, somebody getting this job or not getting this job, or this guy getting knifed in the back.
And the conservative movement was really purged thoroughly to make sure nothing was accomplished.
I mean, again, the point is to lose.
And if you look at a lot of things people were saying at the time, Peter Brimlow, of course, with Alien Nation, who predicted, hey, all of these things are going to happen, and everybody laughed at him, and then they all happened.
Charles Murray, this is when you had the bell curve.
This is when you had American Renaissance really getting its start.
Jared Taylor often talks about this this was a time when you you kind of had a Period where the censorship it sort of reminds me of how the internet was in 2015 You had a period where the censorship just wasn't there you could talk about these issues sort of openly and you saw real progress and then They just slammed it down and that was the end of it.
But of course everything that the far-right conspiracy theorists predicted happened and now we're dealing with a situation when it comes to illegal immigration where There are things that we could do to solve this problem, but they are more difficult than the things we could have done 20 years ago.
But we weren't allowed to do those things.
Yeah, 30 years ago.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, yeah, 20 years ago.
Well, also, I think after... I meant 30, but also 20 years ago.
I mean, obviously, one of the biggest missed opportunities is after 9-11.
9-11, they could have shut the borders the next day.
And instead, what happened?
We doubled down on multiculturalism.
Islam was not a force in American life before 9-11.
Now it is a huge force.
It's beyond criticism.
Muslim immigration has increased tremendously.
And it's precisely because of the 9-11 attacks that it was made beyond criticism.
I mean, that was the greatest thing that ever happened for Islam in America.
It's funny you say that because one of the things that people are talking about is Michigan, which Trump won in 2016, could be in play for Trump.
Because the Islamic community, the Muslim community in Dearborn, in Detroit, in these areas are so upset about the current situation with Hamas and Israel that they're going to either sit out or they're going to vote against Biden.
I mean, it's... Look at what just happened in the United Kingdom.
I mean, George Galloway, talk about a blast from the past.
I remember listening to George Galloway debate Christopher Hitchens about the Iraq war way back when.
But George Galloway is a white, he's not A Muslim immigrant or anything like that.
I mean, he's white leftist socialist and he's charismatic.
He's definitely got the gift of gab and he knows how to talk to Muslims.
He's always taken a very strong anti-Israel stand.
It was very strong stand against the Iraq war and he ran as kind of an independent candidate sort of a fringe third party.
Well, not third party.
There's multiple parties in the UK, but sort of a non mainstream party not labor.
In the UK, ran in Rochdale as an MP.
This would be the third time he'd be elected as an MP.
And it's actually hilarious.
He put different advertisements to the different racial groups.
So for the white people, he talked about law and order.
He even made like the occasional nod toward enforcing the law, i.e.
immigration law.
We're going to do more for infrastructure and cleaning up litter and all this kind of stuff.
For the Muslims, Gaza, Gaza, Gaza.
He didn't even talk about what was happening in the United Kingdom because what do they care?
It's not their country.
So he talked about Gaza the whole time and he just Absolutely demolished everybody else.
He just cruised to victory.
So he won and then Rishi Sunak in utter panic, you know the Indian Supposedly conservative Prime Minister of the United Kingdom who nobody voted for to be Prime Minister, by the way I mean he became Prime Minister basically because of little maneuverings within the Tories or that they kept Kicking out their leaders one after another because they're so incompetent Holds this press conference Where he says that the victory of George Galilee is a threat to democracy and calls for all these new restrictive laws.
And of course, he doesn't just mean against the Muslims.
He doesn't just mean people who are opposed to Israel.
It's also the extremist far right, because the far right is just as bad as the Muslim terrorists.
Now, there are a lot of things to unpack about this, but first, what does this tell you about what I just said about the whole our communities thing?
Again, Every Western country is now much in the model of a British colonial power ruling over some savage African country where you've got a bunch of different tribes that all hate each other, and you as the colonial supervisor, your job is just to keep everybody from killing each other.
That's what it is to govern a Western country now.
Because we've imported all these different groups.
You know, you have all these people demonstrating for Israel, and demonstrating against Israel, and people waving the Palestinian flags, and people raising the Israeli flags, and the people who actually live here are just like completely forgotten.
They're a matter of total indifference to the people who run the show.
The idea of championing our own interests, just, it's not even spoken.
Even, especially in the UK, even by the so-called conservatives, which is why the conservatives are looking at a complete wipeout In the next general election to the point that I mean they're just gonna go totally and I they're certainly gonna lose the majority that's I mean we can take that for granted but I mean the real question that some are saying they might go down to 80 seats might be even less like they may be finished as a major party and that's the most successful party probably in world history just wiped out out of sheer cowardice again
You can't even say they're pursuing self-interest.
It makes no sense, but they would rather die than championing the actual well-being of the English people.
Second thing about George Galloway.
I'm not a fan of George Galloway, but a man winning an election by telling the people what they want to hear is not a threat to democracy.
That is democracy.
If you win an election, that's what that is.
To use the phrase, that is what democracy looks like.
If you don't like it, maybe you should have thought of that before you imported all these Muslims to change the voting roles of that city.
And here's another important point.
Though Rochdale has a very large Muslim population, it's not true that it's majority Muslim.
It's not that Galloway won just because of Muslims.
He also won the vote of a lot of People in that area, native-born British people.
So he won Muslim votes too, but he didn't win just because of Gaza.
That helped.
And you could say, oh, well, it's dishonest because he communicated one thing to the Muslims and one thing to the other people.
What do you think happens now?
Why do you think politicians in this country run ads in Spanish that say one thing, and then run ads in English that say something else?
Democrats have made an art about that.
You'd be blown away what they say to the people in Spanish about their immigration policies, as opposed to what they say to the moderate voters in the Rust Belt on their immigration policies in English.
And then the final thing, of course, in the UK, and Keith Woods made an excellent post about this today on X, which I would encourage you all to read, is, and I'm going to quote him here, The UK is already arresting people for thought crimes.
Just recently, a man in the UK was arrested and sent to prison for two years for putting up stickers.
And these are not stickers that were particularly violent or hateful.
As a matter of fact, there were things that probably wouldn't even raise an eyebrow.
It didn't say something like, you know, kill Jews or kill Muslims or something like that.
White people are going to be a minority, something like that.
I mean, it was, it was very mild stuff.
Two years in prison and this in a country where rapists, where people commit assault, where people commit the most horrific crimes are often let go with no jail time because the judge feels bad for them or the migrant.
And so they don't understand that they're supposed to obey the law, but two years prison.
And here's the kicker.
You could say, well, the stickers weren't very extreme.
What's the justification?
Well, the judge didn't say that the stickers are why he was sent to jail.
It was because he believed in other things.
Because he had books in his room, and there were things in his house that were very naughty, and he's not allowed to have those things.
Therefore, because of his views on other things, They sent him to jail for two years because of these stickers.
The stickers themselves were not the issue.
Furthermore, even if the stickers themselves were true, he can still be punished for that.
That's from the judgment.
So, we really do have thought crime now in the UK, and we're going to have more of it because an election went the way that the Prime Minister, who's of dubious British identity anyway, doesn't like.
You have to ask yourself, when you look at the reaction to this killing in Georgia, are we that far away from that in the United States, where the scandal is not that a murder happened.
The murder itself does not change the opinion of anybody who matters, anybody with power, anybody who has media access, anybody who has money.
What matters is what really troubles them, what outriches them.
The true scandal is our reaction to it.
We are the problem for saying something about it.
If you know the view from the right, if you're familiar with Lawrence Oster.
Lawrence Oster was a conservative writer, Jewish descent.
He was Episcopalian for most of his writing life and then before he died he converted to Roman Catholicism.
Correct.
Met him once before he died.
He may have actually been Catholic by that point.
It was pretty close to the end.
And spoke to him for a while.
We even spoke about what ended up- 2015.
Yeah.
And we spoke about what ended up becoming the Trump campaign.
You know, the idea of white working class voters kind of joining together on a nationalist agenda and pushing somebody over the top by winning the Rust Belt.
And it turns out that happened, although I wouldn't have expected it as Donald Trump.
And I doubt he would have either.
But he had a number of really great ways of looking at things.
And one of the things that he had was Auster's First Law of Majority-Minority Relations, and it was something to the effect that the worse any minority population behaves, the more white people have to be blamed for it, and have to be censored, and have to be repressed, because if you accept liberalism, and the essence of liberalism is non-discrimination, if you accept that, it's not possible For one group to be worse for the country than another you can't you can't admit that because if you admit that the entire worldview falls apart Therefore it follows that if you have something like this happen, the real problem is white people So when you when you see something like this, it's not Boy, they're crazy.
It's political correctness out of control.
No, it's perfectly logical.
It has to be this way and it's especially Dangerous for us because The people being brought in, specifically from Venezuela, and I'm not saying this is the fault of the migrants themselves, although it is, but they're not the ones who made the call.
They're not the ones with power here.
According to some reports, they're being selected because they're criminals.
The Venezuelan government is basically using this opportunity to dump the people they don't want on the United States of America, much the way Castro did.
And unlike with Castro, He's not being clever.
Maduro is not being clever and taking advantage of a policy that we were using to try to fight communism, to get rid of people he doesn't want.
The government, our government, Biden, Mayorkas, these guys want these criminals.
They are subsidizing it.
They will punish you if you try to stop it.
The Supreme Court just ruled today that a Texas immigration law is constitutional and that, not the Supreme Court, I'm sorry, a lower court, Rule today that a Texas immigration law is constitutional and that they can start enforcing.
Correct said immigration law.
The reason I said Supreme Court, the Biden administration is appealing it.
They have Supreme Court.
Yeah, right.
So they are going to fight all the way to the Supreme Court to make sure that immigration laws are not enforced.
And again, that is how serious these guys are about bringing criminals.
And if you think that an American girl being murdered by a migrant is gonna make anybody in power delay for even a second.
You're completely wrong.
The only thing this is gonna make them do is say, we need to make sure that we get a hold of misinformation and disinformation that's harming our communities because the real danger here is that it's gonna offend people and it's gonna get the wrong message out there.
The fact that Americans are being killed, it's not even an issue.
And although some people might disagree with me, I think they get off on it.
No, I don't agree with you on that.
I don't agree with you on that, but I will say this Lake and Riley.
There's gonna be four things when I talk about real quick.
Most important thing is again.
Anybody listen to this you can go to you can you can Bloomberg.com has the story Venezuela's violent deaths fall to 22 year low on migration.
This article was published on December 28th, 2023.
The rate is lowest since 2001.
Observatories of violence stated again, this is because illegal aliens, not migrants, they can say migration, illegal aliens are flowing into the United States because Biden that immediately upon day one of his administration on January 21st, 2021 rescinded every order that Trump had put in place.
To stop, you know, to, uh, to keep, you know, uh, to keep, uh, what was it?
What was the order called?
Uh, prop 48.
Am I wrong there?
No, I don't know the name of the exact role, but there were, there were a number of executive orders, but that was prop 42.
It was prop 42 stay in Mexico.
You're talking about title 42.
It wasn't an executive order.
Yeah.
The stay in Mexico order basically made sure because the, the issue just quick background, but it's, yeah, it's, but it's important to understand this.
People are claiming asylum.
Now really what needs to be done is you need to scrap these asylum laws and you need to because it's very easy to get it because NGOs will basically coach these people about what to say.
And of course the kinds of things that will get you asylum keep getting expanded all the time.
So you claim to be gay, you claim that your husband's beating you, you claim that the police are after you.
There's no way to prove any of this.
You don't actually have to do anything.
But in theory, there's a hearing.
They assign you a court date.
The court date is 10 years away.
You're probably not going to show up to it anyway.
And if you're in stay in Mexico, you're there until you go through the process, meaning that you're not actually going to get into the country.
Well, the first thing Biden did was he got rid of that.
You let him loose into the country.
You never see these people again.
Yep.
And then, of course, one of the other things that the Biden administration has done on December 14th, 2022, when Arizona started to put up shipping containers to protect their border, the Biden admin sued Arizona over border wall shipping containers, and they were all forced to be removed.
The same thing happened with Texas.
The DOJ asked a federal judge in Austin to force Texas to remove a roughly 1,000-foot line of bright orange wrecking ball-sized buoys that the Biden administration says raise humanitarian and environmental concerns over the Rio Grande.
Again, these states were doing the job the federal government refused to do.
And now, this is one of the strangest stories that's come out about the whole Lake and Riley This is the New York Post again.
This is February 28th.
Again, there's that word, migrant.
This dude's an illegal alien.
And here's what I'm going to say, Mr. Hood.
If it turns out that this guy was transported on one of these Greyhound buses by Governor Abbott, I believe that if Trump wins, I think we should actually look at these whole ridiculous busing by Governor Abbott and these other Republican governors.
I think that they failed their duty.
These people should have been forced out of the country, not sent to, you know, blue cities where they were going to be Basically given free hotel stays, free food.
Of course, had they not done that, though, you wouldn't have seen the reaction by these blue states against and these blue localities against these illegals, though.
I agree.
It's such a catch 22.
But the point is, you know, it's like I do agree.
Theatricality and deception are powerful, powerful agents to the initiated, aren't they?
To the uninitiated.
To the uninitiated.
No, but the point is, let me let me just read this quick story real quick.
Nursing student Lincoln Riley desperately tried to call 911 last week when a Venezuelan migrant pounced on her during a morning run.
Police documents show Jose Antonio Iberra, 26, prevented the 22-year-old from dialing the emergency helpline before he dragged her body to a secluded air after the vicious attack.
Iberra then panicked and likely bashed her in her skull when Riley bravely tried to fight back, According to an analysis by a former criminal profiler, Riley was found hours later on the UGA campus with a disfigured skull.
She died of blunt force trauma.
The gruesome details of her injuries and new warrants suggest that the Augusta University College of Nursing
student likely fought back when she was grabbed during a run.
And her killer likely panicked while trying to subdue her.
I mean, you read this, and it's just, it's like, what in the heck?
Just lie back and think of diversity.
Apparently that's the advice that the journalists want to give us.
No, no, it's not just that.
It's even worse.
A black, former Georgia Bureau of Investigation investigator
told WSB TV this, quote, in this case, the offender was met with resistance,
which he wasn't expecting.
And it got overpowering, and he couldn't control it, and he resorted to violence, end quote.
What a poor baby.
I mean really he's the true victim.
I mean obviously if we had paid reparations and Maybe made a Statue of Liberty, like, duplicate on the border.
We should probably blow up the one in New York, because, you know, that one was welcoming white immigrants, and so that's kind of bad.
You know, it's Indian land, it's stolen land, Native American land, excuse me, it's stolen land after all.
We really should build a new monument on the southern border, and we should have, if we had paid this guy more money, he wouldn't have been so threatened by the nursing student, and then none of this would have happened.
I wish I wasn't making what I'm about to say, but the article goes on to say this.
This former member of the GBI says this, quote, About the illegal alien alleged murderer.
He says this quote, but he didn't know what he was in for and I suspect she probably fought back.
He's not a very big fellow and he may have been overwhelmed by her size and her strength and tenacity to fight back.
Well, really, I mean, that's obviously you're not supposed to fight back, especially against a protected class and a POC.
I mean, I suppose.
The one mercy is that if she had actually managed to gotten away, they might have arrested her for a hate crime.
But there's no nothing would shock me at this point.
I mean, when you see these kinds of stories, the idea of blaming the victim, especially at a time when we're supposed to be.
All freaking out about violence against women and how, you know, this picture or this movie or this song, you know, inspires violence against women.
We have to worry about internet forums, we have to worry about video games, we have to worry about this, that, or the other thing.
But in this case where you have the most depraved act against a woman imaginable, the most terrifying situation imaginable, one of the worst deaths imaginable, with horrific injuries, and the first instinct of everybody involved is to blame her Protect the alleged attacker and shame all of us for getting mad.
Well, white people heroes or victims, right?
That's the story of the that's the story of the subway cat up in the former Marine up in New York City.
Who's some dude parent?
Yeah, and it's the same thing with well, and certainly we should remember with that case that He was, when he was brought to court, there was a black crowd outside saying, we're going to get you Whitey.
Screaming taunts at him as he went in and everything.
We're going to get you honky.
Yes.
And they were screaming taunts at him as he went in.
And of course they are going to get him.
Of course, of course.
He doesn't have a chance.
I mean, like we know this.
And when you, These sorts of things, I mean, this is sort of the danger of our communities versus our country, is when you have a country and when you have something in common with your fellow citizens, you're of the same race, you have the same culture, you have the same religious background, you have something, something binding you guys together and you have a shared history and shared interests.
When something happens, you have a reason to care about them.
I mean, I think kind of the last gasp of that was probably 9-11 where you saw people charging up into the towers to try to save people even though they knew we're gonna die and people throughout the country thought of New York City as as Their country I mean people in the deep south were like deeply affected and what happened to New York City and we're ready to fight to avenge New York City and to avenge Washington DC and to send money and to help and everything else It was even it was still America even then now
Frankly, when you see somebody in trouble, when you see something happening, when you see any kind of disorder, what is your first instinct?
Your first instinct is, I got to get out of here.
I can't get caught up in this because the minute I caught up in this, I don't know who's involved.
I don't know what the media is going to be.
I don't know what the law is going to be.
You're immediately going to get sucked into some kind of racial drama you don't really understand.
And if the wrong categories of people are going to be in there, you could go to jail for a very long time simply for doing what people 20 years ago would have thought to be the nice, normal, natural thing.
I think a lot about John Derbyshire, who was fired from National Review for writing a column called The Talk.
Now, the reason he wrote this column is because a black columnist had written a column called The Talk.
Where they said black parents have something with their kids called the talk where they basically say, oh, you need to be very cautious about police officers because the police officers might just shoot you at any moment.
Now, back in the real world, when you actually see tapes of the way that blacks behave around police officers, they're jumping on the cars, they're trying to attack them, they're trying to take their gun, they're disobeying them, they're talking back, they're not scared of police officers at all.
If they did actually have the talk with their kids, we wouldn't have any problems, but, you know, this is all fake.
Derbyshire writes this thing basically saying, well, actually whites have their own version of this, and he said one of the rules that he had was When you see a group of blacks in trouble not just gathering in a group where you should leave quickly if you see the numbers increase all of a sudden you should get out of there but even if you see blacks in trouble you should not stop because it's probably a setup and there probably something bad is probably going to happen to you and that was specifically what was called out and that was specifically why he got fired but fact is we've seen plenty of stories we see them all the time in American Renaissance where
Somebody fakes having their car broken down, somebody fakes being hurt, somebody rings the doorbell and says they need money, and this is always a precursor to getting robbed, being mugged, being killed.
And from a larger point of civic virtue, When you see these sorts of things where somebody is making a nuisance of themselves, somebody is shoplifting, somebody is assaulting somebody in front of you, the right thing to do in any of these circumstances is basically banned by law.
Because if you put yourself in this situation to stop what is happening, you will be punished.
And when I hear a case like the one that just happened in Georgia, I can't help but wonder, It sort of reminds you of the old case in New York, the Kitty Genovese story, where Kitty Genovese was a New York City woman who was supposedly being raped, and I believe murdered.
And she was screaming for help, and nobody called the police.
And that was even more extreme than not helping.
I mean, nobody even called the police, but they figured, why get involved?
Black, by the way.
Yeah, of course.
You know, that's one of the things they don't tell you about it.
But yes, the killer was black.
You kind of wonder in a case like this, where if somebody was screaming, was she, I mean, presumably it was quite a struggle.
Presumably there was a lot of noise.
Presumably there was a lot of screaming involved.
Did anybody hear anything and just figure, well, why get involved?
Why do anything?
And who, after all, is going to stand up for you in a case like that?
If you do get involved, and let's say you stop the crime, but it becomes a public thing, what happens if you're the white kid who called the police on an undocumented migrant?
I mean, in some localities, it's actually illegal to call the police on minorities unless you've basically got them dead to rights on a crime.
But if they're just rummaging around or something like that, that's actually illegal.
Hold on for a second.
Wasn't there a New York Times article where they actually had, like, a picture, like, should I call the police on a black person?
There were, yeah, there were, there have been a number of columns on this, more than I can count.
Yeah, but there wasn't, there was one in the New York Times, but there's also been a number of things, and you always see it on social media and stuff like that, where should I call the police?
Is it moral to call the police?
There was a Law & Order episode not too long ago where a woman gets raped by a black guy and they figure out who did it and she rather heroically says, well, I don't want to press charges because I don't want to be responsible for sending another young black man to prison.
And this is portrayed as like a very noble thing that she did and everything else.
When that's the message being blasted at you 24 hours a day, that's going to have an impact.
And that's going to have an impact on safety because nobody wants to get involved with these kinds of things.
If you hear a noise and you think somebody's in trouble, there's always a part of you that's saying to yourself, well, if I don't know this person, am I going to become the next great media villain if I put myself in this situation?
And as a result, I think the larger problem of American society is when you have our communities, you have no actual community.
It's worth noting that even within our communities, particularly the black community, it's just a basket case of crime and shooting each other and illegitimacy and everything else.
I mean, certainly not the way an actual community behaves.
Chicago and Baltimore are not actual communities.
But there's no larger American community either because nobody really has a stake in the common good when the people who matter, the people with power, the people who get a respectful hearing in media, make their living at the expense of other people and only exist because there's a highly sophisticated mechanism in place to essentially loot and guilt and repress the white middle class.
And it's not just something that happens in the United States, it's throughout the Western world, certainly it's even worse in the United Kingdom than it is here.
And every time there's some sort of expression of anger, every time there's an expression of political will, every time there's people groping towards some sort of an understanding that there's a collective interest involved here, the reaction of the system is essentially panic.
I think we should close by bringing up the The book that made quite a splash on social media and but also on the interview on MSNBC is White Royal Rage.
Did you see that?
The coverage surrounding that book?
No, no, yeah, yeah.
Two interesting scholars.
Two scholars who are not of the white royal background.
No, they're not.
They're right with Larry David.
Yeah, they're not very happy with white royal people, but they And on MSNBC, they're brought on and, you know, they announced the entire demographic as a threat to democracy because they're anti-immigrant and anti-LGBT and anti-this, that, and the other thing.
And, you know, the host sits there and nods.
Oh, yes, this is very profound.
And the idea of labeling an entire demographic, specifically, you know, the demographic that went all said and done, is the country.
Because you know they wouldn't exist the country doesn't exist without white people and for most of this country's history it was a white rural country so like that that is the country.
The idea that those people are specifically a threat and the way democracy is.
Described because democracy no longer has anything to do and especially you know capital O capital D our democracy It no longer has anything to do with popular sovereignty or election results You see the same sort of thing and lest I just be accused of going after the left here I mean Rishi Sunak right Prime Minister a conservative party same thing Galloway's victory is a threat to democracy.
Well, what does he mean by that?
What did these guys mean by that?
Democracy is being pro unlimited migration being pro Sexual degeneracy being pro Right or as Jon Stewart said you know the the fact that there's trash all over in New York City and people committing crimes on the subways That's the price of freedom so like the more disorder you have and the more crime you have and the more outsiders you have coming in and Displacing you and out voting you and taking all your stuff the more democratic you are so like the worse off things are The more disgusting things are the more people don't want to live around it
That actually is democracy and nice things and orderly things and clean things and safe things.
That's all fascism.
And therefore you're not allowed to have it.
And nobody's really arguing for democracy as a system that can deliver good things anymore.
Have you noticed that?
Like if you read FDR, if you read FDR speeches, or even if you listen to FDR speeches, even some of the old new dealers and even LBJ, and certainly I hate LBJ, but even if you, If you read him, you read like the Robert Carroll biographies of him and whatever else, you do get the sense that they really did believe in the power of government to transform people's lives for the better.
They really did think that, listen, if we set up these programs, we can do these things, it's going to help people and we'll be able to solve our problems and it'll be a golden age for everyone.
I don't think a single progressive actually believes that anymore.
Well, they believe... It's just like sheer spite.
Well, I, I, again, I hate, I hate FDR.
I think that's the ultimate lesson.
If you've read Garrett, Garrett, if you've read the guys, I mean, certainly the old, like the old, right.
New old, right.
Yeah.
Yeah.
The pre Buckley right wing that they did probably believe that.
Sort of like the Whigs did, that each generation would get better.
Very utopian.
But again, what does utopia mean?
Nowhere.
And I think that, you know, this whole Lake and Riley thing, you know, Mr. Hood, we have to go back to this and we have to think about the fact that the AP was upset and they tried to claim that female athletes face a danger when they run.
They didn't even mention it.
Oh, I completely forgot about it.
Yeah, that's right.
There was a whole framing.
There was a whole framing about this.
As you and I are talking, I kind of want to like jump two places here.
One, there's so much to this story that I didn't know about.
And this New York Post story is really hard to read because this former GBI, Georgia Bureau of Investigator, individual who's trying to equivocate what actually happened, this article actually tries to justify that Abeera, oh, he's reportedly five foot seven.
He's charged with malice, murder, felony murder, aggravated battery, aggravated assault, false imprisonment, kidnapping, hindering a 911 call, and concealing the death of another.
And again, he's basically trying to say that he did this because, and look at this whole thing, it's like a disorganized offender.
That's what we call them.
He just does it on the spur of the moment for whatever motivating factors.
And concealing her body, that's just an opportunity to distance himself from the crime.
And you go back to what we've been talking about.
Why was this person in the United States of America to begin with?
Had Trump won in 2020, this guy would never have been in the United States.
The answer, of course, is he's in the country because he's a criminal.
Because he can only do bad things to Americans.
Let me make my position very clear.
If the people coming in were productive, if there were even the chance that they had something to contribute to the country, there would be machine guns on the border tomorrow.
They'd be displaying it live on every single broadcast channel, and journalists would be applauding nonstop and volunteering to go down there.
They are being brought in because they're bad.
And the reason why, if you're like, well, why would they do that?
The reason is because the more chaos you have, the more dysfunctional people that are brought in, the more benefits you can get to your constituents, the more patronage you can send out to the people who support you, the more NGOs you can shovel money to.
And the more voters you're going to get, because the more people who are utterly dependent on the system, the more reliable political machine you have.
This country, as it is set up, has nothing to gain from the intelligent, from the productive, from the law-abiding.
We do not want those people.
See what would happen if some white South Africans tried to come up to the southern border.
Do you think there is any chance whatsoever they would be allowed to apply for asylum?
That they would even get a hearing in front of a judge?
They'd get sent back so fast doesn't matter I recall a case where they tried to go and Canada where immigration is just totally transformed the country within a very short amount of time but some white out South Africans tried to apply for asylum in Canada and Canadian judge looked at it and said hey you know these guys actually are being repressed and they're facing all these problems they can't get jobs or whatever else like we're gonna give them asylum and Government went completely nuts and another court was like no no no no no obviously this is terrible.
No asylum.
This is evil get sent back nobody cares about the actual facts of asylum nobody actually cares about the whether the these people are legitimate refugees in any real sense because there are rules to how this thing is supposed to work for example if you're fleeing war according to international law the first safe country that you go to you're supposed to stay there so let's say if you're fleeing from syria and you end up in say turkey
You have to stay there.
You can't just keep going to Britain because the welfare is better there.
But everybody just kind of ignores that, including the judges, including the lawyers, including the NGOs, because when you have people who have a vested interest in having as many of these people in the country as possible, so the system that pays them and tells them that they're good people and redistributes more money to them is as big as possible and as thriving as possible, obviously they're going to bring in more people.
And You could argue it's not even particularly good for a lot of the legitimate refugees themselves because as a lot of people have noticed I mean you see this phrase and it is a bit cynical I'll admit on the far on the I'm not even gonna say far right basically it's just kind of the conservatives doing this because the conservatives in a way are are sort of naive about this and sort of conspiratorial they always use the term military age males
And they say this, and I think Tucker even leaned into this a little bit, where they frame it as like it's the beginning of Red Dawn or something, where it's like, oh, this is actually a plot, this is a hidden invasion, and these guys are going to rise up and do all this stuff.
And it's like, well, it's actually worse than that.
It's not some plan by China or, I don't know, communist Latin Americans or something like that to have a military invasion.
They're just dumping Human debris on us because they're criminals and the people who might actually be legitimate refugees, i.e.
women and children, don't make it through because this has nothing to do with actually helping dependent people.
It has to do with just getting in as many people as possible and ideally getting in the worst people as possible.
That's why the governments are sending these people.
I mean, they're not coming, they're being sent here.
And In a lot of these cases, when you do see women, kids, people like that, they're being taken advantage of, of these coyotes.
A lot of them end up in sex slavery in the United States, a lot of them end up in labor slavery, you know, making cheap goods locked in a basement somewhere.
And it's always remarkable how nobody really cares about any of this.
There's no real outrage about this, because every once in a while you'll see some story where They'll find, you know, some horrible slum where 20 people are being held prisoner on the free these people.
They'll find somebody who's being held as a sex slave or whatever else.
And these are, on paper, the kinds of victims that the left, the media, should care about.
I mean, these are the ultimate underdogs.
These are the people that even someone like me is going to feel bad for.
Nobody cares.
There's no sympathy.
There's no celebration about like freeing them.
There's no holidays.
There's no protest that we can never let this happen again.
There's just kind of like a vague anger that people are talking about it.
Instead, who is the sympathy saved for?
It's saved for young men attacking women.
Why?
Because they're non-white and because the women they attacked were white.
It really is that simple.
I don't see any other way To view what's happening other than a combination of self-interest you know from time at democratic politicians certainly electoral and from strengthening a system that benefits them NGO employees money certainly those in the legal system money power.
Obviously from ethnic networks, you know demographic reinforcements because they the more of their race that's in the country They gain more power based on the race, you know They there's a rate there are Racial nationalism is the strongest force in the United States and it's not whites who are practicing it if it was we wouldn't have any problems It's other groups who are practicing white rural rage, right?
Yeah, if we had any white rural rage that there would be zero problems in this country and Ultimately the media I think it's it's not This sympathy for, it's not pathological altruism, it's not sympathy for the underdog, because if it was sympathy for the underdog, I think we'd be seeing a lot more sympathetic coverage of the real hard cases of migrants, and we're not.
Instead, we're seeing the protective instincts being deployed for people who really don't deserve it.
Young military age males are not really the appropriate by themselves.
Incidentally, it's not like they're bringing their families with them.
They're not really the appropriate target for pity and sympathy.
I mean, that's actually kind of the last people who deserve pity and sympathy, but they're the ones who are getting it.
And I think the only way you can interpret it is glee in spite that it's making white people's lives worse.
No.
Do you have another explanation?
I'll let you have the last word.
No, I don't.
Because this whole Lake and Riley story, the more you read about this, the more you realize that they're trying to say that this guy was 5'7".
This guy was a Venezuelan illegal immigrant who shouldn't have been in the country, whose policies that Trump initiated would have kept out.
And as we have mentioned, the Biden administration's policies going against Arizona's, the shipping containers.
The buoys that Texas put in place, everything that states have tried to do in the face of the federal government's refusal to do what they are actually obligated to do.
I mean, it's not, it's not malfeasance, it's state policy.
And I think that's the, that's the most horrifying thought about all this.
And I want to end with this really crazy thing.
It's not, it's not incompetence, it's malevolence.
Exactly.
And I want to end with this really sad thought about Georgia.
You know, obviously the past four years for everybody when, you know, it's, I think it's a couple of weeks from now.
No, it's probably, I think it's like March 13th, 14th, that it was the institution of two weeks to stop the spread.
You know, all of our lives were disrupted by COVID by the whole shutdown of the economy.
We thought it was going to be a couple of days.
And of course it went on for months.
That was all.
Happening then the George Floyd stuff happened, and I just happened to find this crazy article that I did not even know about You know everybody thinks Georgia's great red state well back on June 18 2018.
I'm sorry 2020 Georgia's redcoat band they decided to end the tradition of playing Tara's theme from gone with the wind So apparently I didn't even know this this is such a fascinating story The University of Georgia's Red Coat Band, remember, in 1971, they dropped Dixie from Red Coat Band because the band director thought that Confederates were the same thing as Nazis.
And that was in 1971.
So for those who don't know, Tara's theme is from Gone with the Wind.
The acting director of the Red Coat Band, Dr. Brett Baucom, He told Fox 5, that's the Fox affiliate in Atlanta, that the signature song for the band, now going to be George on my mind by the, uh, the blind black guy who died, uh, was that Ray Charles?
Anyways, the guy said this, the decision was complete my own.
Uh, of course, terrorist themes, the main score from the Academy Award winning movie gone with wind released in Atlanta in 1939.
Uh, people consider it to be sympathetic to the Confederacy at the end of the Civil War.
The signature piece had been played immediately after games since around 1959 by the UGA band.
It had since been limited to home games at Sanford Stadium only for the last couple decades.
And Mr. Hood, this is the most important line of everything.
Quote, I tried to put myself in the shoes of black students who played the piece and asked if I Would have been able to love the school as much as I do with Tara in the book.
I also asked what I might think if I were a black student who wanted to come to Georgia, was considering being in the band and learned that a big part of our identity might seem nostalgic for a time when I was enslaved.
While I don't think that's the only thing they would consider, I can only guess that it would be hard to call something that mine.
That isn't right, irrespective of how well meant that the tradition was in the first place."
End quote.
Now, why did I read that?
Why did I read about the Georgia band playing a song from Gone with the Wind?
That's because, ladies and gentlemen, the whole story of Lincoln Riley, the idea of America is gone with the wind.
And you're now living in a post-American society where white lives don't matter, where an illegal immigrant who killed a white girl Maybe he was just trying to give her flowers.
Maybe he was just trying to have a cultural exchange.
Maybe she reacted in a bigoted way.
Did he deserve to have a fight put up against him when he was just simply trying to potentially,
I don't know, allegedly rape this girl?
You know, maybe that's why he disfigured her because he didn't, as you said, Mr. Hood,
sit back and enjoy it.
Maybe he was just trying to give her flowers.
Maybe he was just trying to have like a cultural exchange.
Yeah, or maybe she reacted in a bigoted way.
We'll never know.
Yeah, the point is, we no longer have the rule of law.
We don't have anybody on our side.
You know, if white privilege existed, the story of Lake and Riley would be, it would be, it would be, there'd be a holiday.
I mean, you would, she would get the same treatment that George Floyd did.
And she's a far more, Aubrey did.
Yeah.
Day named in her honor.
Yeah.
That's a much better example.
Cause we're talking about Georgia.
I mean, in, in there again, This is a far more cut-and-dry case, clearly.
And, I mean, Kevin's black-pilled cynicism notwithstanding.
I mean, there's no... There's no scenario where she, in any way whatsoever, could have possibly brought any of this down on herself.
It's just not even something to think about.
And the fact that the media is airing it, even as a theoretical, is disgusting beyond words.
With the Aubrey case, even if And I'm being more than fair here.
Even if you buy every single line of the media narrative about that point, is it really justice that the guy who tapes it, the guy who tapes it thinking that the footage is going to clear him and clear his friends, gets convicted of murder?
That the guy deserves a holiday?
That the holiday needs to be preached by the Republican governor?
And the Republicans need to promote this?
And then they just get called racist anyway?
No, no, no.
This is not what a white privileged society looks like.
No, Mr. Hood, I hate to even bring this up, but this is so blackpilling this conversation because you think about, you know, the Ahmaud Arbery thing happened before George Floyd.
It happened, I want to say, it happened in February of 2020.
You know, we're basically four years after the fact where they've actually passed a resolution in Georgia.
For everybody.
I think it's like 224.
You're supposed to run like that many miles or something.
Two miles.
It's something ridiculous.
Lake and Riley was actually running.
She was actually jogging.
She was actually out for an enjoyment, a recreational activity.
Ahmed Aubrey was a, let's be honest, everybody.
He was somebody who was known for going to these sites and stealing stuff.
Laken Riley was out for a morning jog when she was allegedly murdered by an illegal immigrant who, come on, we all know she was probably wearing, you know, she, there was no justification for her murder and she was murdered because she was probably just wearing like normal running clothes.
But I mean, you see this in a lot of the, you've seen this, frankly, in a lot of situations in Europe where people who are wearing, girls who are wearing normal clothes, We would consider normal clothes, particularly for an athletic event, although cold out, so maybe it wasn't even particularly that.
They see it as justification for committing these horrific acts, particularly in Europe, particularly at the hands of Muslims.
Now, what the real motivation was here, it may have just been simple animal aggression, but Whatever the, and they're going to come up with something.
I mean, you know, there's going to be a story at the trial that, Oh, she said something or, Oh, he felt something or, Oh, he got scared.
Cause you know, obviously this guy's going to get like top legal defense and whatever else, but there's no scenario where on paper, even if you had equal treatment, you would see the media covering it in this way.
But instead the phalanx is deployed and I think that, and you bring up an excellent point, that in this case with the idea of like running or people, oh he's just going for a jog, that was the Ahmaud Arbery thing.
You don't get the people leaping out to defend this girl the same way they did with Arbery.
And certainly you don't see politicians and reporters and actors and everybody else saying their name.
Now I think there is one thing, there's kind of a dog that didn't bark here and I'll close with this, which is that her parents have not yet come out.
And I can't, you know, especially as a parent, the idea of sending your kid off to college and then they're murdered.
I'm not even going to say what I would do, but the you haven't seen the now expected.
I just want to come out here.
It's not been confirmed.
killer and talk about how great ethnic food is. And the reason there's an
article in Human Events by Royag Nationalist, or the guy who writes as Royag
Nationalist, writing about a team that the DOJ supposedly sends out, and I have
yet to see this confirmed by anything else, but we know this team exists and we
know what they describe. I just want to come out here. It's not been confirmed. I've
looked into this, but it's still very important to know.
But there is...
But there is a DOJ team that does do this.
There's a team with the DOJ that manages community relations.
And what they do is whenever there's a case between different little tribes in our communities, their job is to try to tamp it down.
Needless to say, you do not see this kind of effort when there's a white on black killing or some other group that can be used as a political totem.
In which case, and I'm not saying it's the DOJ that does this, but certainly the Biden White House ramps it up.
And it becomes the number one story in America.
And certainly, if we want to talk about violence being incited, I would argue that there are a number of cases over the last few years that are a direct result of the media inciting violence because of the George Floyd case.
That being said, to return to this, and then we should close, the DOJ supposedly, according to this article, has a team that basically sends, that goes out to talk to the families when a white person is murdered, and basically talk them through a kind of script.
Where you need to say that this had nothing to do with race, that you need to say that this had nothing to do with politics, it's just a one-time thing.
Now again, I have not seen this confirmed.
However, certainly we have seen that People talk about relatives this way.
We all recall the case in Nevada where the police chief was killed and daughter comes out and makes a point of saying, well, this isn't about race and whatever else.
And then, of course, you know, they go to the courtroom and the defendants are making faces at her and doing everything else.
I mean, the idea of approaching people fairly or saying that, oh, we don't know what's really going on.
None of this stuff matters to the type of people who are doing these crimes.
And we're talking about very low IQ, No impulse control.
People acting just like animals.
And your moral sensibilities just don't mean anything to them.
They don't understand it.
They don't have the IQ required.
Like, empathy is... It requires IQ, because you have to be able to grasp abstractions.
I mean, that's one of the things about Christianity.
I mean, Christianity even has a bit of an IQ requirement.
You have to have a certain IQ to understand the concept of the Golden Rule.
If you can't understand the concept of the Golden Rule, you can't be one.
But...
This is.
We don't know if it's being pushed on people.
Certainly there's pressure for it, even if it's not a direct pressure from the government, but could also simply be that white people have been trained to think of these things as random.
This is always the phrase that's brought up that it's random and Lawrence Oster wrote about this too, about how misleading it is to talk about these things as random.
Because these things are actually the very predictable consequences of very specific policy choices.
And in this case particularly, and I say this in sincerity, I'm not trying to be cute or whatever, it really isn't about race because we're not talking about Hispanics, and we're certainly not talking about Hispanics at the University of Georgia.
We're certainly not talking about students.
We're talking, and we're not even talking about illegal immigrants really.
We're talking about illegal immigrants Who have been arrested for specific and serious crimes who are then let go for no other reason but that the government thinks it is actually better for them if these guys are let go so they can get more benefits and they can keep more money coming into their system of NGOs and legal bodies and the political machines and whatever else and
Again, you know, you can disagree with me on that.
I think there is definitely an element of malevolence toward Americans.
There's a certain glee that the underprivileged, as they see it, are getting won over on the white privileged Americans.
And maybe they don't expect it to go this far.
And they certainly don't like it when it gets into the media and people react against it.
But what did you think is going to happen?
And the only way this stops, and this is where it does come about race, we can say whatever we want.
People listening to this can say whatever they want and you can say well, you know this policy choice or that policy choice But the fact is this is all be added tomorrow and even if you had like a civic nationalist President you can end all this tomorrow, but it's not going to be added tomorrow because you need real political will to break the other side's coalition and there is only one force that is strong enough to do that and that is a sense of racial identity And without white racial identity, without white identity, this just goes on and on and on and on.
And it never stops.
And everybody has to decide.
Would you rather be called a racist and put a stop to this, or be called a racist anyway and not put a stop to it?
There is no other option.
I'll close with that.
Yeah, and I'll close with this.
Every institution, whether it's public or private, exists to stop implicit whiteness.
From becoming explicit.
And that's why Lincoln Riley's story scares the heck out of everybody who has any hand in power right now, because they realize what this story represents.
And that's why when Donald Trump called and said that he spoke to Lincoln Riley's family, again, that's another instance where you can't have positive, positive examples of white people being impacted negatively by the consequences of the current Democracy that we must protect at all costs.
The more I've looked into this story as we've talked, Mr. Hood, the more it's infuriated me and the more I realize why we have to convince Mr. Taylor to really do a big thing on this.
This is a big story.
I'm sure it will, but it's not over yet.
We should pause by saying this is being recorded on March 4th and certainly there's going to be a lot more to this story.
We have to see how it goes to the courts.
We have to see what kind of defense they put up, and we have to see if all the little lawyers and sprites that populate our system are going to come up with some crazy technicality to get them off, because in the system we live in now, anything is possible, and it's going to continue to be this way until whites discover their identity again, and are willing to fight for it.
So with that, I'm going to close.
I'm Gregory Hood.
As always, I was joined by Paul Kersey, and thank you very much for listening.
▲
Export Selection