All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 24, 2023 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
40:47
Gregory Hood — "The Moral Necessity of White Nationalism." (2023)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Our next speaker is Gregory Hood, our star writer at American Renaissance.
And you know, it's not easy to prepare an introduction for a man who works for you.
What do you say about a guy that you talk to every day and you kind of don't see the forest of trees?
And so for inspiration on what to say about...
Gregory Hood, I turned to an objective source of wisdom and insight, the Southern Poverty Law Center.
And they said this.
He started an activist organization called Youth for Western Civilization in 2006, which, and these are the very words of the SPLC, served as the institutional basis for the web-savvy white nationalist movement that would come to be known as the alt-right.
Later, it adds, he continued his work in the white national movement, eventually becoming one of, if not its main, ideological architects.
Wow. High praise and well-deserved, Mr. Hood.
They sure never said anything nice like that about me.
Now, as I said, he came to work for us in 2019.
He's a wonderful writer, an inspiring speaker.
He's the author of Waking Up from the American Dream.
And we're hoping that he's going to publish a book this year as well.
And on this occasion, he's going to speak about a very important subject, namely the moral necessity of white nationalism.
Please welcome Gregory Hood.
You know, over the last few years, a lot of people might say that it's been a pretty dramatic time in American politics with the rise of Trump, the counter-revolution of 2020, the most destructive riots in American history, and it's certainly been interesting working at American Renaissance.
We've seen people who have spoken here go to the center of American politics and back.
We've seen some of the most militant activists bow out and beg for mercy, or at least for reporters to take their phone calls again.
And then we've also seen some people who were totally in the mainstream briefly take the national leadership as spokesman for what identity?
I mean, who would have thought that the creator of the Dilbert cartoon would briefly become the leading spokesperson against a black-on-white crime?
And yet, in another way, nothing really has changed.
And in a lot of ways, politics can be very boring right now.
After all, the next election seems to be a repeat of Joe Biden and Donald Trump.
And sometimes it's kind of hard to get worked up about it, especially in a lot of ways because there's a sense that we've already said everything that there is to be said, particularly when it comes to racial questions.
I just want to read something real quick.
This is what Representative Cori Bush said about the death of Michael Brown.
Michael Brown died nine years ago.
Of course, it was his death that really kick-started the Black Lives Matter movement.
And I quote: He would be alive if the institutions of racism and white supremacy were eradicated.
Now, leave aside all the faux militant rhetoric about eradication and whatever it means to abolish the institution of white supremacy.
We all know the true story of Mike Brown.
We all know hands up, don't shoot was a lie.
We all know he was charging a police officer when he was killed.
And yet, none of this matters.
We can't even say that It's been covered up by the media.
The media reported it quite accurately after the fact.
It was Eric Holder's Justice Department that found out the truth about all this.
And yet it doesn't matter.
The same people who are putting forward this still believe in it.
And even if it comes from an unimpeachably liberal source, they will continue to believe in it no matter what happens.
I think this is why there's this sense of exhaustion.
Race has become the center of the American political debate.
More critically, it's become the way the current ruling system legitimizes itself.
It always comes back to race, and yet, we aren't allowed to talk about race.
So, at least not honestly.
So, of course, no progress is possible, and no problems get solved.
Every institution has to bend the knee to diversity and inclusion and equity, or it will be destroyed.
And these examples get more and more ridiculous as time goes on.
I'll just read a couple headlines.
Hate crime experts to rule whether the English countryside is harboring rural racism.
The colorful world of birding has a conspicuous lack of people of color.
English cricket is racist, sexist, and elitist, says landmark paper.
Now, who could have imagined that when you bring in experts on race relations to investigate whether something is racist, Sure enough, they found out that it's racist.
And you know what the cure is?
Give them a bunch of money to monitor the problem.
But it gets worse because this is also happening to the institutions that we would consider to be definitive for Western civilization.
Heather MacDonald wrote in her book, When Race Trumps Merit, that museums, classical music...
A lot of what we would consider to be the elite institutions, the very people who run these institutions, are now working essentially to deconstruct and abolish them, saying that they are defined by racism, essentially apologizing for their own lives, essentially saying that their own lives are meaningless because they're forwarding a system of evil.
Now, why is this happening?
I think the reason that this is happening tells us a lot about the way democracy actually works in practice.
In a democracy, we all talk about some ideas and we discuss them together and then eventually we come up with the best idea and we agree to put it forward and we have a vote and there are these rules that we all agree to apply by and then it goes forward but we're all in this together.
In reality, that's not how democracy works at all.
As a matter of fact, it seems that democracy is the most effective system as far as resisting change and a lot of times as far as resisting what the people actually want.
We heard earlier today that an overwhelming majority of the Irish people are completely opposed to the mass immigration that is swamping them right now.
And yet, within the democratic system, this fact has no importance whatsoever.
And there is not a single political party that will support these people.
Clearly, democracy does not work.
The way that we have been told.
And as it takes on an increasingly formal tone of our democracy, capital O, capital D, we begin to sense that it really is some kind of a closed system.
The way democracy really works is you shape the population and you condition it to support the policies that you want.
One of the most effective ways to do this is to reconstruct the people into a bunch of different categories of victim groups.
And if that doesn't work, Well, you can always import a new population, which is what the Great Replacement is all about.
Now, I know we're not supposed to mention the Great Replacement.
As a matter of fact, the United States Congress was debating whether that was a white supremacist conspiracy theory.
But the Hill enthused just a couple days ago that America's white majority is aging out, and they could barely contain their excitement.
Maybe it's a conspiracy theory.
Maybe it's not.
But it's happening either way.
And I would say, as far as the current system goes, It is pretty much the only thing that the current system exists to do.
The object of power is power.
It seems like an obvious thing, but maybe we need to restate it.
And this is going to be a constant regardless of what system you live under.
Chris Caldwell, who is a mainstream conservative scholar, recently wrote a book called The Age of Entitlement.
Where he explained that the Civil Rights Act has essentially replaced the American constitutional order.
And the reason for this is because the Civil Rights Act basically lets you do whatever you want when it comes to American law.
You can mess around with any business that you want.
You can mess around with any public institution that you want.
You can change election laws if the groups that you like aren't represented adequately.
And now with the event of transgenderism, you can even break open the family.
And start taking people's kids away from their parents in the name of individual liberation.
Perhaps one of the strangest things is how democracy, a system ostensibly dedicated to individual liberation, has now transformed itself into a system of unlimited government where bureaucrats get to supervise every single aspect of social relations and speech must be carefully monitored and regulated because the wrong kind of speech could be unsafe.
They're far more tolerant of.
Perhaps the best way of explaining democracy in theory and practice is what Supreme Court Justice Kanteji Brown Jackson said in her dissent to the recent decision getting rid of affirmative action.
Now, it didn't really get rid of affirmative action.
It left a pretty big door open.
Basically, if you can say that you are a victim and this somehow helps the college somehow, they can still let you in.
It just creates one more obstacle for these colleges to overcome.
But the headline was that it got rid of affirmative action, and she was still pretty mad about this.
But some of the exact quotes are worth listening to, if you'll indulge me.
And I quote, Gulf-sized race-based gaps exist with respect to the health, wealth, and well-being of American citizens.
They were created in the distant past, but have indisputably been passed down to the present day through the generations.
Every moment these gaps persist is a moment in which this great country falls short of actualizing one of its foundational principles, the self-evident truth that all of us are created equal, theory, practice.
And I quote, the only way out of this morass for all of us is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly.
And then do what evidence and the experts tell us.
I'm going to pause here to say that this is a very good idea if the expert in question is Jared Taylor, and the evidence that we're talking about is the type that is produced by American Renaissance, but she doesn't mean that.
And then do what the evidence and the experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together, collectively striving to achieve true equality for all Americans.
Let's think about what's being said here.
What is the law?
The law is you sit there.
Some experts come along, tell you what you need to do, you shut up, listen to them, march forward toward an impossible goal, and then this just kind of goes on forever.
And that's your life.
And it's fair to say that any kind of national existence where this is your national purpose, not only is there no law or freedom to speak of, it's also completely pointless.
It's essentially just rolling up the boulder over and over again and letting it roll down.
But instead of at least acknowledging that this is a pointless task, you said that this is the highest aspiration of humankind.
I, for one, will have none of it.
We know that liberals have a bit of a double-think when it comes to diversity.
For example, in 2018, there was a study showing that white liberals, not white conservatives, interestingly enough, But white liberals actually talk down to black people.
They actually lower their verbal IQ and talk as if you were talking to a child.
White conservatives actually do not do this.
They, we, speak to people as people.
But white liberals actually seem more aware of racial differences when it comes down to certain things.
At the same time, according to opinion polls accumulated by a scholar named Zach Goldberg, White liberals, we already know that white liberals have a negative in-group preference when it comes to white people.
And that's been around for a while.
But beginning in 2020, they actually said whites are dumber, lazier, and more violent than blacks.
Now here's the thing.
As he pointed out, if you actually believed that racial stereotypes are a bad thing, you wouldn't say this.
You would just say all groups are equal.
But they're not saying that.
They believe in racial stereotypes.
They even believe in racial hierarchy.
They simply believe that all the bad things are associated with whites.
And yet, according to another study, this is by a scholar named Kaufman who wrote an excellent book called White Shift.
He called it white flight from immigration, and it was a study of liberal housing patterns in the United Kingdom and the United States.
And basically, independent of what your political opinions are, White liberals tend to move to white neighborhoods.
Now, there's a lot of weird things going on here because we can't say, oh, well, they're just being hypocrites.
Because they do actually believe in what they're saying, at least as we can measure these types of things.
And yet, when it comes to how they behave and in some of their unconscious behavior, clearly there's something else going on here.
There's a bit of a mystery.
Part of it, unfortunately, and I think there is a little bit of hypocrisy here, just comes down to seeking power and the thrill of seeking power over people you don't like.
This is from a study in Current Psychology that just came out a couple months ago.
And they found a link between left-wing authoritarianism to narcissism and psychopathic behavior.
Such people are, and I quote, attracted to certain forms of political and social activism which they can use as a vehicle to satisfy their own ego-focused needs instead of actually aiming at social justice and equality.
Now how much of this is due to leftism and how much is due to the fact that we have a leftist system and therefore if you get off on exercising power over other people, you're going to say you're a leftist.
You're not going to say you're a race realist.
We really don't have much to offer if you like pushing people around.
But if we look at the history of radical leftism, I think there's something to that.
And I think that the pursuit of egalitarianism oftentimes is just simply a cynical pursuit of status in a way that people who want to push other people around are allowed to do it and feel good and justified about themselves.
Unfortunately, there's no aspect of American life where we can get around this stuff.
Let's think about education.
Recently, you may have seen that the biggest settlement in New York City's history, at least when it comes to education, $1.8 billion paid to teachers and would-be teachers.
You may be asking yourself, well, what was the horrible crime that New York City has to shell out almost $2 billion?
Well, they had a test, and too many white people passed the test, and too many non-white people didn't pass the test.
No, that's it.
You actually get paid, like, thousands of dollars for failing a test.
And amazingly enough, if you subsidize incompetence, you're going to get more of it.
I mean, if we take a look at, say, New York City schools, which had a dramatic drop-off in performance from 2019 to 2022, not that there were much to speak of in 2019, something about 14% of blacks and 15% of Hispanics were proficient in fourth-grade math in 2022.
They did a study looking at various cities, including Cleveland, Baltimore, Milwaukee.
The average rate was about 28% in terms of how many people in fourth grade were proficient in math standards.
And then it goes down by eighth grade.
In Baltimore, there were 23 schools, I believe, where not a single student was proficient in math.
But don't worry, the Baltimore Sun said it was still due to the fact that people aren't spending enough money.
It's just that one-third of the money was being spent on meals and survival things because these people would starve to death unless the school system was actually paying for all their meals.
Now, to me, that's even a bigger problem, not an excuse for this kind of performance.
And yet, if you look at the top 50 prep schools in the country, 21 of them now have mandatory anti-racism training, and far more, the majority, have some sort of diversity program or some sort of curriculum program like this.
Now, you could say, well, Obviously, this isn't really doing much in terms of improving education, but that's not the point.
What is the point of an elite school?
It's to get somebody who can then move into an elite position.
And if we can call it wokeness, what is it other than a very effective tool for taking out competitors when you are striving for status?
Let's think of housing.
In the Obama administration, there was something called Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing.
Now, the way this worked, the Trump administration got rid of it.
The way this worked was that different communities, if they accepted HUD money, had to accept Section 8 housing from other groups, from other communities.
Now, what do you think you're going to do if you're the city of Chicago?
You're going to export your Section 8 housing to other communities, and you're basically going to destroy these communities, and you're going to be rewarded for doing so.
Now, the Trump administration stopped this before it could really get going.
But now, as you might expect, the Biden administration has a new plan that they're considering, where if you receive any kind of HUD money, you have to submit what's called an equity plan to make sure that you have equal access to core community resources.
And guess what?
You don't have to pay for those core community resources.
You just need to make sure that everyone, maybe not even the people who live there, get access to that.
So this isn't just a return of affirmatively furthing fair housing.
This is probably something that is far worse.
As Steve Saylor has pointed out, a lot of times when people talk about equity, for many of us, the equity is what's in the house.
That's where a lot of people's wealth is.
Well, guess what?
You're not going to have that for very long once the federal government decides that Section 8 housing is going down the street.
Let's think about the law.
California is currently considering a bill where judges will be required to think about sentencing disparities.
If there are black criminals.
Because after all, they're not actually black criminals.
You may think there are, but they're not.
They're actually criminalized.
Because people don't actually do things.
And again, these are their terms.
Black bodies, which is how they call themselves, black bodies, they don't have agency.
They simply exist.
And then repressive systems criminalize them and do things to them because they are vulnerable populations.
And so it's our job.
To make sure that these repressive systems are restrained from doing these terrible things.
Now every once in a while there may be crime, and yeah, people get hurt and that's a little bit unfortunate, but not something we want to think about too much.
But the way we solve this is through restorative justice.
And not by imprisoning people, but thinking about the root causes of crime, which of course are poverty and discrimination.
There was a pretty tragic case, and I was going to give her name, but I'm not going to because I actually don't think this kind of stuff is funny.
I think it's extremely sad.
There was a woman in Oakland.
She was a left-wing activist, her whole life left-wing activist, and she was robbed.
Somebody tried to steal her purse, and she fought for her purse trying to get back, and she was basically dragged by a car, and she suffered for a few days and died.
Immediately after she died, her friends, I'm told, Reportedly.
Immediately issued a statement saying that because she was some kind of anarchist and believed in restorative justice, they did not want a suspect to be imprisoned.
They wanted a new kind of restorative justice program to deal with this.
And then, of course, when the suspect was arrested, they reissued these statements.
Now, you compare Oakland, of course, has gone quite downhill in the last few years, and yet people are still talking about these kinds of things as if they could meaningfully fight crime.
Let's compare this to El Salvador, where the murder rate has gone down by about 60% through the revolutionary tactic of, you'll never guess, throwing the gangs in prison.
The fact is, and the Guardian was very upset about this, the Guardian said that he's not confronting the root causes of poverty and discrimination.
Well, you know what?
I don't think the root causes are poverty and discrimination, and frankly, I don't think they believe that either.
If you say that El Salvador's approach to crime is ineffective, and actually what we need is restorative justice, I just don't believe you.
And if you look at the two examples of Oakland and El Salvador and the way both those societies are going, I think that if you do truly believe that, that is a worse crime because a deliberate failure to understand constitutes a moral offense.
There does come a point where willful stupidity is a crime.
Thank you.
Let's think about health.
About 237 governments at different levels have issued some sort of a statement saying that racism is a public health crisis.
And yet, during this time, the American lifespan has actually declined for two years in a row.
It's now at the lowest spot it was in in decades.
And this can't just be attributed to COVID, because when other industrialized nations started recovering, America's life expectancy continued to decline.
The obesity rate is now over 42%.
It's gone up about 28% since 2008.
Suicides last year, I believe, were 49,500, the largest number of suicides in American history.
I don't think anyone particularly cares about any of these problems because, frankly, there's no money to be made.
How is power exercised in a democracy?
You have a problem.
You get to manage the problem.
You get to manage social relations the problem.
You have victimized populations that you get to administer programs for and you can have staffing decisions and move people into various bureaucracies and NGOs and everything like that.
If you solve the problem, that money goes away.
That power goes away.
That sense of moral righteousness goes away.
If we return to what was said in George Orwell's 1984, if the object of power is power, And you remember the wars that the different powers in that society fight are not meant to be won.
They're just meant to justify the structure of society.
Just as the wars are not meant to be won, I do not think the problems that we have in this society are meant to be solved.
Going further, I think that if you have societies where there are no problems, they will invent some, because they benefit from doing so.
Perhaps instead of arguing with these people about how their programs are ineffective or how they're actually making things worse for the communities they want to defend, I don't think they care one way or the other.
I think what's important is to look at it in terms of power relations and say, how do they materially benefit from these conditions going forward?
Are we supposed to be surprised or impressed that people in power have some BS justifications about why they should be in power?
Every ruling elite in history has done the exact same thing.
Does that imply a moral obligation on us to listen to them?
Of course not.
Immigration, I think, is probably the greatest example because we're constantly told how much we need skilled workers and how much we need immigrants of all kinds.
White South Africa has been getting quite a lot of attention in recent weeks, and of course the people there are being brutalized and slaughtered, and they would be probably skilled workers, and they have a lot of things to bring to the table.
And yet Western countries are not exactly lining up to welcome them, are they?
As a matter of fact, in some cases where they've applied for refugee status, they've been rejected and then essentially shamed by the court system, at least up in Canada, for daring to apply for this.
But yet...
There are hosts of NGOs who are quite eager to bring in populations from all sorts of different societies, and these seem to be completely independent of the conditions in their home countries.
As a matter of fact, just a few days ago, the Biden administration extended the right of people from El Salvador to stay in the country.
Now, you remember the reason that being in El Salvador was so bad, and the reason they had to be here, is because of an earthquake, and then crime was so high that it was too dangerous for them to stay there.
Well, now crime is going down, but they still have to stay here.
And furthermore, the United States State Department is upset with the leader who reduced crime.
Something tells me these people actually don't care about crime in El Salvador or the well-being of these people.
Something tells me that they want these people here not because they have something to bring to the table, but because it creates more problems that they get to solve.
If a lot of these immigrants that they are bringing in deliberately, consciously, and for a great amount of pay, I might add, at least when it comes to the NGOs in Europe, if these people had something to contribute, there would be machine guns on the border and gunboats circling every single country of Europe.
It's because they don't have anything to contribute.
It's because they make things worse that they're bringing them in.
Thank you.
Thank you.
You may think you can run away from any of this, but you can't.
Housing, law, education, however you live your life, these problems are going to chase you down wherever you go.
I want to give one example.
This is a young girl whose father was, I believe, a millionaire.
A biracial girl, white father, who made headlines for trashing her father at his own funeral.
And I quote, this is her eulogy.
Your death solidified the fact that you'll never be what you could have been, but only what you are.
And what you are is a racist, misogynistic, xenophobic, Trump-loving, cis-straight, white man.
The irony is that would have worked out great for him if he hadn't been a miscegenator, too.
Thank you.
They said that he disrespected and disregarded the lives and deaths of entire communities.
How quickly language changes.
Communities. Every time I hear the word community, I know that no real community actually exists.
What is a community now but a group of people who have an artificial bureaucratic identity where they get wealth that's redistributed from other groups?
People aren't homeless.
They're de-housed.
Why? Because they have no responsibility for what they're doing.
It's just things that have been done to them.
What are vulnerable populations?
Vulnerable populations are the ones you have to worry about robbing you when you're coming home from the subway.
Who are the disenfranchised?
Who are the marginalized?
Those are the groups where you fake your own identity so you can get into college or get a job.
We may think about some of the more tragic cases, and I don't...
I'm not trying to be snarky or cute or any of this.
If you think about what Joe Biden recently said about the Emmett Till case, and we can get into the details of that and everything else, but obviously, crime should not have occurred.
But one has to suspect the motives of somebody who's constantly bringing up a violent crime as if to divide an already divided society further.
If you were in a relationship with somebody and they kept bringing up something bad that happened over and over again, you would consider yourself in a toxic relationship.
And furthermore, we can think of plenty of black-on-white cases that would not be brought up.
And even I think it's sort of bad taste to kind of bring up these cases over and over again.
But that's the way the left operates.
But you may say, well, what about cases where one of the left's little pets has done something?
Well, unfortunately, in this state, we don't have to think too far back, do we?
It was only earlier this year, I believe, where there was a shooting by a transgender shooter near Nashville.
And this included the slaughter of children.
This is about the most horrific circumstance that you can think of.
What happened in this overwhelming Republican state?
Well, they passed more gun control.
There was a lot more support for quote-unquote transgenders.
You're not saying this like, oh, we're going to attack transgenders or something like that.
You had a whole subculture of people openly urging violence to protect trans kids and whipping people into a frenzy saying they're at the risk of genocide.
You can't just say stuff like that to people and then act surprised when somebody takes that rhetoric to their logical conclusions.
As a matter of fact, we are the ones always being shamed and marginalized and censored because they say, well, if you say white people are in trouble, some people are going to take that as an invitation of violence.
Well, let's see how the media reacted to this.
And I quote, the right exploits Nashville shooting to escalate anti-trans rhetoric.
Nashville school shooting, trans community fears backlash.
After school shooting, some...
Trans-Tennesseans fear backlash.
I'm reminded of the joke by Norm MacDonald.
Think of how horrible it would be if ISIS set off a nuclear weapon in New York City.
Think of the backlash against peaceful Muslims.
I think the most extraordinary one came from MSNBC.
Research shows mass shooters often experience trauma and deep levels of social rejection and bullying, conditions that far-right rhetoric reinforces.
So now they have sympathy for the shooters, and it's our fault.
I think the biggest constant in human behavior is status.
The competition for status and power is a constant throughout all of human history.
And we can try to excuse this, we can say it's in the name of egalitarianism, but I think this is always there.
And I know it's sort of a joke within the right wing to say, imagine if it was the other side doing this and expect, like, that's going to do something.
We all get how this game is played.
It's hierarchy.
It's not hypocrisy.
The double standard is the point.
It's a flex.
We get that.
But there is something inherently delegitimizing about a power system that relies entirely on hierarchy.
Because let's think about status for a moment.
It's pretty low status, and even admitted by them if you look at where they live, to actually live with the consequences of what you advocate.
Who wants to take the public transportation in, say, Selma?
Who wants to go to the public schools in Philadelphia?
Heck, who wants to go on the public transportation in New York City these days?
And increasingly, we find that the left not only is okay with this, but often trumpets it.
Like, the destruction has become the point.
I was really struck by this with the New York City subway case because the subways in communist Russia were considered the cathedrals of the people.
This was the great thing that we could bring the common people and the masses.
And now in New York City, it's because it's dirty.
It's because it's dangerous.
It's because you have to look over your shoulder every five minutes that it's good.
Because we're owning the chuds.
We're owning those conservative white guys.
We're owning the racists.
Heck, I mean, who can think of a better way to own the racist is when you have your own child stabbed to death, and then you say, well, the biggest problem is if they endanger these immigrants who bring us such great food.
At a certain point, when the power structure is like this, you have to ask yourself, why do we continue to go along with this?
Like, what is it exactly that this power system relies on?
What, the God they don't believe in?
The Constitution that they've long since repudiated.
The national leaders that they despise.
The rule of law that's a sick joke.
The masses that they'd be rather burned alive than have to live among.
Forget it.
No. The only thing that we're facing right now is power.
And I will do what you say as long as you have a gun pointed to my head.
But no longer than that.
And I think that's the way a lot of Americans feel right now.
I don't think I'm alone.
And thinking the only thing I'm submitting to right now is sheer force, with no righteousness behind it, and increasingly no pretense of righteousness behind it.
We've spoken a lot this weekend about the need for another political theory.
I'd like to believe that identitarianism can become that.
And I think the three wings of that would be the Machiavellian view of politics, the realistic view of how power operates, especially as explained by James Burnham and the late great Sam Francis of the American Renaissance.
The second thing would be how we as biological creatures respond to our environment.
Biology, evolutionary psychology, a lot of the things that we talk about in American Renaissance, which is the so-called"I love science" left, is very eager to reject or ignore.
And then the last thing is a traditionalist view of spirituality, because we're not just animals.
We are something more than that.
And I think it's this last point that's the most important because at the end of the day, guys, it's not really about them.
It's not about power and how we overcome it and everything else because an entirely cynical view of things is not what motivates men.
It's about us.
Perhaps I'm being extreme, but...
I see Jared getting nervous.
But I can't help but think...
When I see a society where white men are overdosing on opioids or castrating themselves so they can have some kind of a fake identity or painting the walls with their brains, that this is the way the system is actually intended to operate.
I no longer concede that this is system failure.
This is what they want.
The more miserable people are and the more they can monetize that misery and use it To create artificial victimhood and tear down what good exists, the better off they are.
And this is the thing about being a leftist.
One's life is entirely meaningless.
Because everything that you do will ultimately be deconstructed by your own movement.
And you yourself will go down as a racist, or a sexist, or a transphobe, or whatever they come up with ten years from now, as this goes forward.
Because ultimately what we're fighting It's not even a thing.
It's just kind of a spirit of entropy and chaos.
And one's status is entirely hypocritical.
Because the only way you have status is by violating equity.
What makes life worth living is precisely those things that are not the product of equality.
The specific human relationships that you treasure.
The love you have for your kids.
The pride you take in your work.
The happiness that you have from Your property, your family, your friends.
The spirit of equity is the spirit of nihilism.
And it's the spirit that must be overcome.
And I don't owe any respect to it.
And when it comes to the way those with high status actually live their lives, they know that.
So why do we continue to go along with this?
The system wants us broken.
And I think this is the biggest consideration.
It's come to a lot of people's attention, especially when it comes to the so-called trans movement, where you have people and they are told that they've been born wrong and they've been born disordered.
This is about the most evil thing I can think to do to a child.
And I think a lot of normal conservatives are starting to come around to this.
And I think a lot of normal leftists and progressives, some of whom may have had good instincts at some point and had a sense of fairness and wanting to fight for the underdog, I think at least some of them are starting to realize this too.
But for those of us who are white, isn't this what's been done to us for about 50 years?
Haven't we been told that we are born guilty?
Haven't we been told not only that we are racist and evil, But there's actually nothing we can do to overcome this.
This is what white fragility is all about, right?
Denying that you're racist.
This is what white privilege is, right?
Admitting that there's some...
It's about admitting that you have white privilege no matter what you do.
And that there's no way to break out of this psychological prison.
Heather MacDonald even noted that one of the reasons so many white kids are killing themselves probably is because every single institution in their society is telling them that they're scum.
Why wouldn't you kill yourself?
What do you have to look forward to?
Everything that is great in this society is being enjoyed by the people who tell us that there is nothing great.
Everything that reminds us of better times is being claimed by those who say there were no such times.
And the greatest proof of hierarchy in this day and age is claimed by those who deny such a thing is possible or desirable.
All of American life now is about escaping the consequences of the Civil Rights Movement.
It's all about escaping legal traps and escaping compromised institutions and lying through your teeth every second of every single day.
about what it is that you're doing.
The system is creating a nation of sniveling cowards, and it is intended to do so.
I, for one, will not accept it anymore.
I will not accept this at any level other than at gunpoint.
Rejecting this is a moral imperative if you are a human being and not just a consumer.
If you are capable of choice, it is a choice that you must make.
And this is being thrown down at our feet, not as Christians, not as conservatives, not even as Americans, but as whites.
And we have to meet that challenge as whites.
And this whole rotten century of pointless fratricide and egalitarian nonsense will be redeemed.
In our long and glorious but often frustrating history, if for once we can unite as a common people, perhaps even as a new people, frankly dedicated to the spirit of overcoming and greatness, reaching forward to that world of health and fulfillment and flourishing that so many people have in their heart and that they want so badly,
if we can lead the way, especially we whites here in America, at the center of a rotten empire that is unfortunately responsible.
For so much evil that is happening in the world, if we can step forward as whites and claim what is our birthright, which is a state explicitly dedicated to our racial survival and our upward development, then all of it will have been worthwhile.
This system
Even at the heights, when you see how rotten our so-called elite really is and how hypocritical they are, this system, at a deep fundamental level, offers you nothing.
Nothing. Of course, of course I'm a white nationalist.
▲
Export Selection