All Episodes
Previous Next
March 8, 2023 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
47:19
Jared Taylor — "Madness: Rare in Individuals, Common in Groups." (2022)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello, I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
The other day, I ran across an old quote from Friedrich Nietzsche, and he said, Madness is something rare in individuals, but in groups, parties, peoples, and ages, it is the rule.
Now this, of course, got me thinking about white people.
Individually, not really very many of us deserve to be locked up.
But sometimes it seems to me that the whole doggone race deserves to be in the nuthouse.
And you wouldn't be in this room if you didn't know what I mean by the madness of white people.
So I'll give you just one example.
A few weeks ago, a woman by the name of Julie Powell died.
She was modestly famous because she tried in a single year...
To make all of the 524 recipes in Julia Child's cookbook.
She wrote about this, and it was picked up as a blog, and then they made a movie out of it, starring Meryl Streep.
Well, from her Twitter writings, you can tell that Julie Powell was a typical white liberal.
She thought anybody who could vote for Donald Trump had to be a degenerate.
But she also wrote this, white people are fucking horrible.
Murdering us all would be a totally sound decision.
She also said, Now, Julie Powell didn't explain why she wrote those things.
I guess she thought she didn't even have to.
But why would a moderately successful, not obviously insane, white person write something like that?
My guess is that it came from the murky depths from whence issued Susan Sontag's observation that the white race is the cancer of human history.
Sontag wrote that in 1967, before it was even cool to despise white people.
She was ahead of her time.
And it's the same impulse that resulted in the destruction or removal of no fewer than 30 statues of Christopher Columbus during the George Floyd riots.
If white people are the cancer of human history, I guess Columbus was patient zero in the entire hemisphere.
Now, Americans used to think they had a Negro problem.
Well, now, officially, it's by government decree we have a white people problem.
And the great tragedy is that this hatred for white people, that whites express so casually as Julie Powell did, this comes from, I believe, A thirst to be morally superior.
And today the best way for white people to be officially morally superior is to say the horrible things they currently say about their own people.
Now is this a contradiction?
No. Ever since the middle of the 20th century, the way a white person can become moral is to make very loud noises about caring, caring deeply for the underdog, for the oppressed.
And who are the underdogs who are at the bottom of the pack?
It's brown and black people, especially black people.
And to repeat, white people aren't liberal unless they think they are benevolent and humane.
And for that, they have to believe in equity and compassion and justice for the oppressed.
And because we white people, we are the only certified oppressors in all of human history, what better service to the world?
Than to kill us all.
I think that's probably what Julie Powell would have said.
Something along those lines if you asked her to explain herself.
Now, in itself, the urge to help people is not a bad one.
And it's only in white people that it has become essentially a death wish.
Some of you probably remember the Harvard instructor Noel Ignatieff.
Back in the 1990s, He was the editor of a magazine called Race Traitor.
And its motto was, abolish whiteness by any means necessary.
Now, to some of us, that sounded like a call for extermination.
But he said, no, no, no.
I don't mean abolishing white people.
I mean abolishing the structures of whiteness and oppression.
Well, maybe he meant that.
But these days, people like Julie Powell aren't even beating around the bush.
They just kill us all and be done with it.
And my question today is, what is it about white people that makes them think and say such extraordinary things?
And today I'm not talking about non-white people.
They're really pretty easy to understand.
They will happily accept anything and everything we give them.
That's all you need to know about non-whites when it comes to any of these questions.
But white people?
Nobody else in human history has ever thought it was virtuous to turn their own homelands over to complete aliens and then explain to them why they are justified not only in hating us but in actually exterminating us.
We're unique.
Any Chinaman who talked about his people that way, he would be a prime candidate for the psych ward.
But Julie Powell, she's just a slightly overexcited, typical progressive, nothing remarkable about her at all.
As you look back at history, though, you see that this is not actually brand new.
White people have a habit of tearing each other apart in the name of equality that goes back several centuries.
The French Revolution, and the closer you look at the French Revolution, the more gruesome and awful it appears.
It was supposed to be about liberty, equality, fraternity, with an emphasis on equality, and if it took mass murder to get it, well, then they were going to have mass murder.
The famous French encyclopedist, Denis Diderot, said at the time, Man will be free only when the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest.
Now, let me rephrase.
There will be justice only when the last white man is strangled with the entrails of the last white woman.
Isn't that a somewhat more evocative way of saying what Julie Powell was saying?
That'd be the final solution to the white people problem.
Of course, we haven't gone quite as far as the French did.
They massacred the aristocracy, they purged the priesthood, and they established the year 1792 as year one.
They were going to start counting all over again.
They changed the names of all the months, and we haven't yet got Frederick Douglass Month and Cesar Chavez Month, but as Sam Francis used to say every year, well, this is Black History Month.
Once known as February.
And of course, this is the same sentiment that gave us Martin Luther King, the holiday, and Juneteenth.
And as many of you know, the state of Georgia, henceforth and forevermore, is going to recognize February 23rd as Ahmaud Arbery Day.
As State Rep.
Sandra Scott explained, that's because Ahmaud Arbery is one of the state's most distinguished citizens.
Given the names like Germinal and Florian and Fractador, that sounds positively poetic.
So yes, the egalitarian insanity of the French Revolution went farther than our egalitarian insanity has gone so far.
But it was over in ten years.
And just five years after that, France was an empire.
Back to a highly, sharply, inegalitarian hierarchical system.
That U-turn was as sharp as if 15 years after the 1954 decision in Brown v.
Board of Education that integrated the schools, the country was then being run by the American Colonization Society, which was set up to send blacks back to Africa.
That's the kind of U-turn they went through.
And as I said earlier, our current insanity is grounded in this uniquely white thirst for egalitarian virtue.
The very first popular mass movement in the history of the world was the abolition movement in Britain.
It got off the ground officially in 1787 with the establishment of the Society for the Abolition of the Slave Trade.
And it grew into the first broad-based campaign of pamphleteering, lecturing, preaching, lobbying Parliament, and sure enough, just 46 years later, in 1833, The British abolished slavery throughout the empire.
And I would point out that the movement would not have succeeded without tremendous mobilization of women before they even had the vote.
Now, how many of you know that the first mass social uplift movement in the United States, you know what that was?
It wasn't abolition or prohibition or votes for women.
It was opposition to Andrew Jackson's 1838 policy of Cherokee removal, Trail of Tears, and all that.
That movement failed, but it too was the work almost exclusively of women.
And that was at a time when it was considered quite outrageous for women to take any interest in politics at all.
And when a group of women in Maine wrote the United States Congress in the name of the Cherokee, they apologized for writing to them at all.
They referred to that delicacy of feeling and the duty of deportment which should ever characterize the female sex, which might forbid the profanity of offending ourselves upon the notice of the United States Congress.
Come a long way, baby.
Egalitarian uplift has always been deeply, deeply female, and as public affairs have become evermore the province of women, They veer more and more into egalitarian folly.
But in America, nowhere has this craving for egalitarian virtue been stronger than in the abolition movement.
It had a powerful streak of this self-righteous fanaticism exactly the kind we see today.
And nowadays, every abolitionist is supposed to be considered a hero.
But at the time, it was well recognized that a number of them were basically psychotic, recognized as such.
And John Brown was only the most prominent of just a whole bushel of nutcases.
And many abolitionists also, they were followers of all kinds of outlandish cults at the time.
Owenite socialism, shakerism, phonology.
And James Russell Lowe, looking back with regret, On his own years of fanaticism, he wrote this.
Every possible form of intellectual and physical dyspepsia brought forth its gospel.
Everybody had a mission with a capital M to attend to everybody else's business.
Sound familiar?
All stood ready at a moment's notice to reform everything but themselves.
And one historian of the abolitionists, Wrote of their wishful credulity, mistrust of objective reality, and self-dramatization.
Very well put.
And at that time, opposition to slavery united every kind of reformer, just as anti-racism unites every climate change nut.
Every militant nudist or COVID commissar or story-hour drag queen or Antifa fanatic or Trotskyite, whatever else they are, they are all deep, committed anti-racists.
And something else that should be very familiar to us when you study the abolition movement is the outright hatred abolitionists had for their opponents.
Many didn't really give a hoot about black people.
The famous abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison, He swindled black people to get money for his projects.
But boy, did he hate white Southerners.
He called them human hyenas and jackals who delight to listen to Negro groans, to revel in Negro blood and batten on human flesh.
And someone once asked the famous lady abolitionist Angelina Grimke if this were not an exaggeration of the horrors of slavery.
She said, the horrors cannot be exaggerated.
It is impossible for imagination to go beyond the facts.
Now isn't this the kind of thing that right-thinking white people are supposed to say about us?
We're insurrectionists, fascists, domestic terrorists, the number one threat to our democracy in America.
It's that 100 proof, dizzying personal luxury of hate come back from the dead.
I don't know who first said it.
Love makes the world go round, but hatred can make it spin so fast the machine flies apart and wrecks everything.
And that hate is bolstered by an absolute cocksure self-righteousness.
Carrie Nation, she was a young abolitionist before she took her hatchets to the bar in her great war against demon rung.
And she called herself a bulldog running along at the feet of Jesus, barking at what God doesn't like.
She knew what God doesn't like.
Just the way our opponents know that they're on the right side of history.
So you see, white people have a history of this compulsion to throw themselves into virtuous causes.
Nobody else does it the way we do.
Can you think of a mass movement, a reform movement, of any other race of people that's been put into motion?
For the benefit of a different race, a different tribe, a different religion?
Is there a Hindu campaign in India for fair play for India's Muslims?
I mean, is there a mass movement in China to protect the rights of the Uyghurs, of Xinjiang?
And were the Tutsis calling for equal rights for the Hutu?
No, they were macheting each other, for heaven's sake.
Only white people have these mass uplift movements for alien people, other than themselves.
And, of course, the great tragedy of all this is all of this venom that they have, this frenzy, is vented on other white people, bad white people.
We're the problem.
Bad people have to be destroyed.
Now, it's interesting that Z-Man said the same thing earlier this weekend, but today in America there are three kinds of white people.
First, there are the people who believe, or at least...
Think they believe this suicidal nonsense, diversity, strength, all the races are equal, white people are awful.
Then there's our group.
We don't fall for any of this.
And increasingly, we are amazed that anybody can.
And then there's everybody else in between.
They go from near zombies to people who can see something is terribly wrong, but they're just not quite sure what.
And those people come our way all the time.
But back to the first group.
They're the ones who started the craziness, and unfortunately, they have a lot of power.
And what drives them to despise their own people?
First, of course, they're like the abolitionists.
They thrive on righteous indignation.
They love the thrill of moral superiority.
And one of the most interesting things I learned in a book called Pathological Altruism Is that feelings of righteousness, moral superiority, they stimulate the basal ganglia.
That is the same part of the brain that gets taken over by narcotic drugs.
And I wish this were more widely known.
It would be a great way to mock these people.
Somebody needs to say to these lefties, you realize you're an addict.
Every time you pat yourself on the back for being so morally superior and high, you think people like us are no good.
Don't you realize you're basal ganglia or pumping out dopamine just like a junkie with a needle in his arm?
Now, we may be convinced we're right, but we have nothing like this exhibitionist self-righteousness of the typical lefty.
We understand limits.
We understand human nature.
We don't fall for these crap-brained, self-glorifying utopian schemes.
I think you could almost define white people as a subspecies of homo sapiens with basal ganglia that are particularly susceptible to psychological stimulation.
And this craving for virtue, it drives all their fads, all the things that make...
Lefties feel righteous.
They're going to save the whales and they're going to stamp out poverty and they're going to protect the ozone layer.
They're going to stop exhaling carbon dioxide if they possibly can.
They're going to worship George Floyd and spit on Robert E. Lee.
And they truly believe that they are the 21st century of a bulldog walking along at Jesus' feet, barking at what God doesn't like.
And this moral exaltation, again, is a specialty of white people.
Non-white people, They can raise hell for their own interests, but not for larger causes or not for anybody else.
How many blacks or Hispanics really care about the ozone layer, the spotted owl, and global warming?
When it comes to that, the people of the third world, those countries, they are interested in only if it means that whitey is going to write them a fat check.
Non-whites never make a fetish out of opposing their own people.
Look what happens to the occasional black person who says, no, no, no, it's not the fault of those white people over there.
You, black people, you've got to pull up your pants, lace up your shoes, and get to work.
No, they catch hell in the worst sort of way.
I would say after Donald Trump, the most hated man in America is Justice Clarence Thomas.
Non-white people never build up a head of steam over this idea that their own people are no good.
Why do white people pick on other white people?
I think it's a kind of inverted white supremacy.
And Greg Johnson has written about this.
There's no liberal thrill in thinking you're better than black people or Hispanics.
White people have to aim high.
If they are truly going to be superior, and the most thrilling of all the thrill is to think you can look down on tall, handsome, blonde, German, Nazis.
You've got to be flying high if you can spit on white people.
And to take this inverted white supremacy even further, there is an incredible narcissism to think that white people don't even have to lift a finger to oppress whole races of people.
White silence is violence.
All it takes is a few random impure thoughts in one of your big white brains and black people start shooting each other.
We are so cosmically powerful that we can wreck the lives of millions of people without even thinking about it.
And nutty white people seem to have no idea that this reduces their beloved BIPOC pets to basically the significance of insects.
And there's also a colossal intellectual arrogance in being an anti-racist.
Wise progressives have understood things like systemic racism and white privilege that are beyond the grasp of ordinary people.
They've discovered these evil, powerful forces, and they are able to combat them.
And with these special gifts, they are, again, barking at what God doesn't like.
They're so gifted that they despise ordinary white people.
Those rubes who make the laughable claim, the laughable mistake of saying, I just tried to treat everyone fairly.
What ignoramuses those people are.
They're obviously the same boobs who think that race is something biological.
We can laugh at them.
It's only the anti-racist virtuous people.
Not only are they virtuous, they're the smartest people who ever lived.
Did Plato or Kant or Newton understand systemic racism?
No, no.
And so anybody who disagrees with them, you're both immoral and an idiot.
It must be a splendid feeling.
Of course, a lot of people go along with this baloney because most people just go along.
The trouble is, the people who are most likely to go along are in influential jobs.
They went to college where they swallowed gallons and gallons and gallons of all this fashionable nonsense.
And these days, going to college gives people the conviction that they can think for themselves while ensuring they never have an unfashionable thought in their lives.
College graduates love to parrot nonsense about subjects in which they are completely ignorant.
They're smart enough to figure out the sorts of things you have to say in order to get ahead, to make their way up the ladder.
But increasingly, many of them are seeing their careers wrecked by some anti-white chief diversity officer.
They don't dare complain, but those people are coming our way too.
But what about all those white people in between who don't groan under the burden of a college education?
Frankly, they're the people I believe who suffer the most.
Like the white middle-class father who takes two hard jobs so he can make money and send his children to college for the first time in their family.
And he sends his daughter off to school and she comes back a semester or two later and she says,"Daddy?" All your life you have benefited from vicious and cruel white privilege.
And with every breath you take, you are upholding the cis-hetero-white supremacist patriarchy.
What the hell?
Daddy probably doesn't even have the vocabulary to know how to respond to that kind of baloney.
Those must be some of the most unpleasant and bittering conversations in the history of the world.
I think it's working class people who pay really a tremendous price.
The people in this room, you can build a mental fortress around your identity.
You know who you are.
You're proud of who you are.
You can just laugh at these yapping lefties.
It's the ones who are less sure, who wonder if what they hear on TV might be correct after all.
They're the wounded ones, sometimes fatally.
I think it's no wonder we have a fentanyl, another narcotics epidemic.
The other day I was talking to a lady who understands race perfectly.
And I said, look, there's only one solution.
We have to just disengage.
Disengage from the BIPOCs.
Disengage from the people who really are rallying to them.
We need our own nation.
She says, no, no, no, no, no.
I don't want to say goodbye to our great universities.
I don't want to say goodbye to the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
And she says, and of course we can all live in our white utopians.
I said, look.
The only reason you can live in a Whitopia is you've got the money to buy your way in.
And if all we do is escape to Whitopia, and many of us have, myself included, if that's all we do, that's betrayal.
We have brothers and sisters who don't have the money that we do, who don't have the mental defenses we do, and who deserve to live in a country that does not treat them like dirt.
Thank you.
They're not going to read the bell curve.
They may not even read Ameren.
But they shouldn't have to.
They deserve a country to live in that appreciates them, tells them the truth about themselves, about their race and their history and their heritage, and promises them a future.
So how do we get there?
Some of us work in what you could call counter-propaganda, which is just another way of telling the truth.
And it's the truth that brings white people over to our cause, and they are coming, but how do we get more to come?
A number of people have told me that American Renaissance, things they found on our site, was really what opened their eyes.
And I always want to know, well, what exactly was it that did the trick?
What were the arguments?
What were the examples?
And most of the time, they can't come up with anything.
Often... All we did was put into words things that they were already sensing in some way.
They were off balance, baffled by the absurdities of orthodoxy.
And then they came to us and suddenly it all clicked.
I remember one woman at a conference who said, thank you for building a movement that could be there when I was ready for it.
True nuts.
They're impregnable to reason, but waverers are not.
And that's why when they begin to waver, they must find solid, reasoned analysis.
And we mustn't forget that the people who are coming our way have been marinated in this worldview of being riches.
They want to champion the underdog.
They want to be good.
We have to convince them that despite everything they have been told so far, we're the ones who are fighting for our lives.
And I know it's sometimes hard to recognize that ordinary liberals and progressives are not bad people.
They truly think they're on the side of the angels.
It's hard.
Not to misread motives.
How can people with good intentions be in the process of wrecking everything?
Well, let me explain one of the examples of how they misread the intentions of their opponents.
They're convinced the January 6th riot was an insurrection by people who hate democracy.
No, no, no, no.
Those guys were defending democracy.
They thought they were retrieving a stolen election.
And the idea...
I mean, you don't mount an insurrection against the United States of America waving hundreds and hundreds of American flags.
That alone should tell you they're wrong.
But this cuckoo idea that they hate democracy.
That's why when they talk about election denialism, they think we don't or they don't want democracy or elections at all.
And that justifies all this utterly lunatic talk of fascism.
Well, I was once a liberal.
I was.
And I wasn't a bad person and suddenly became a good person when I stopped being liberal.
I thought I was on the side of goodness, truth, and beauty.
That is the way liberals think.
Maybe a few of us, I'm sorry, a few of them, want us all to suffer horrible, painful deaths, but most of them mean well.
And just as it is important to understand ourselves, our own motives, we have to understand what motivates our opponents.
We can appeal to them better if we try to understand them.
We should not misread their motives any more than they misread ours.
As you know, they think we are unhinged and evil.
They aren't unhinged and evil any more than we are.
Just unhinged.
That they are.
And it's our job to set them back on their hinges.
Put that pin back in the hinges.
We need to take that craving for virtue.
And channel it into something good.
What if just a tiny bit of the effort that went into saving the polar bears and the whales went into saving white people?
But that won't happen if we approach those people the way they approach us, as enemies, sworn enemies who have to be destroyed.
Of course, this makes our job infinitely more difficult.
We have to actually respect our opponents enough to try to understand them and change their minds, because one thing is certain.
A good number of those people are going to have to come our way.
There's no other way around it.
And with white people, you can't change their minds simply by appealing to their self-interest.
I can't stress this enough.
Self-interest and appeals to that will work for people of every other race, but whites crave virtue.
They may also crave wealth and power, fame, but they also crave virtue.
And some of them crave it most of all.
And so when events push people our way, and they do it all the time, they have to come closer to us because we don't have a message that sounds harsh or vengeful or mean-spirited.
So if you take away just one idea from what I'm saying this morning, it's that we have to treat many of our anti-racist, deluded people as our brothers and sisters.
And that's how we have to treat them.
More than any other people on earth.
They want to think they're doing the right thing.
And any suggestion that white advocacy means mistreating or exploiting others, that'll just scare the pajamas out of them.
Of course, that's why the other side calls us white supremacists.
That term is meant to evoke slavery, lynching, everything cruel and awful.
It is designed to put us beyond the pale of virtue, to shut us up before we even open our mouths.
And the other side is very good at defining us that way.
As not just wrong, but bad.
And that's why it's important not to justify that view.
Be strong, be firm, be persistent, be courageous, but don't be unfair, petty, or spiteful.
Now, I know it's asking a lot, especially for young people who have been insulted for being white ever since kindergarten.
It's hard not to be furious.
It's hard not to want revenge.
But our goal is not to vent fury.
It's not to seek revenge.
Our goal is to save our people.
And to do that, we have to work as effectively as we possibly can.
I know there's a deep satisfaction in hating enemies, and that's why in wartime they teach the soldiers, your enemy is hardly human.
These are vermin.
But we can't permit ourselves.
This dizzying luxury of hatred.
We have to maintain a kind of revolutionary discipline, not be self-indulgent.
Because sometimes revolutionary discipline requires mercy for our deluded brothers and sisters.
The solution to all this may not be political in the conventional sense.
The solution may take a form that none of us can even imagine now.
But whatever form it takes, more white people have to agree with us.
See it serious and be willing to act on it.
Our most powerful weapon, of course, is that we're right.
We see the world correctly.
Our worldview is grounded in history, human nature, science, and it is morally unimpeachable.
But being right isn't nearly enough.
Ours is as noble a cause I believe as history has ever seen, one for which a man would thankfully lay down his life.
But as Sam Dixon points out, although many among us are willing to die for our people, we have to do something harder, and that is live and work for our people.
And if our race is to live, we must work and live as persuasively as possible.
Now, when I start talking about what's at stake for us and what we owe to our end, it's happening already.
I start weeping.
I'm going to try not to talk about that.
I liken our struggle to the Spartans at Thermopylae or the Franks at Poitiers.
I've often done that.
But our job is harder.
Our ancestors faced an enemy arrayed for battle.
Their job was simple.
Kill them all or die trying.
We have to have their courage and their determination, but we have to never forget that in the opposing camp, there are millions of our own people.
We are not to destroy them.
We have to enlighten them and lead them.
This is the greatest challenge our people have ever faced.
I think we will rise to that challenge.
We Southerners did lose the war, but we take lessons from it.
And one of those lessons is that crises breed great people.
Robert E. Lee would have been a man of great distinction no matter what age he lived in.
But Stonewall Jackson, he would have been a forgotten eccentric.
Nathan Bedford Forrester would have been just another businessman.
But when the war came, those people rose.
To heights of greatness.
No one saw in them.
We live in such a time now.
This crisis, too, will produce great men and great women.
Some of those people may be here this very weekend.
We may look back on this time and say, we didn't know it, but we were in the presence of greatness.
I'm not an optimist in all things, but I am in this.
Our people are waking up.
They're on the move.
They're coming our way.
They see what is at stake.
And together we will fight in the greatest cause which anyone has ever fought, and we will certainly win.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
I think we have time for a few questions before we bring on the great...
Sam Dixon.
Professor Edward Dutton, whom many of you are familiar with, in his book Witches, Feminists, and the Fall of the West, proposes that there's no reasoning with them, there's no enlightening them,
you've just got to let them die off, naturally.
They have few children and ultimately will be out-reproduced by conservatives.
Their view is epitomized by Jane Addams in her book My 20 Years at Hull House.
A hundred years ago she was a leader of the settlement movement to bring in immigrants to the United States.
She had no children of her own.
She ended the book saying, no, no, we want to be swallowed.
Meaning her entire Anglo-Saxon race should...
There are such people.
Yes. And some of them are absolutely hopeless.
I think it's Wilfredo Pareto who said, anyone who would wish to become a sheep will find a wolf to eat him.
And that's what we are.
Death wish is part of their psychology.
And it can be diverted harmlessly to puppy and kitten videos.
They need to show their superiority and compassion.
We can't persuade them, but we can use emotional manipulation.
To divert their energies to something less destructive.
Well, my point is, yes, as I said, if just a tenth of all of this reforming zeal and preserve every possible species under the sun were devoted to preserving us, for heaven's sake, that would be great.
But those people, I think, I like to think, those people are a minority and they will just be deluded and unhinged until they die.
But I know for a fact all the people who used to think those crazy things, who have stopped I can't tell you how many people have told me that personally themselves.
There must be thousands out there who have also gone through that process.
And I think at this stage of the game, before we really have a powerful political or some other movement on the ground, those things will spring up when there are more people who agree with us.
And there are already such movements springing up.
People organizing.
People putting together communities of like-minded people.
But, no.
Clearly, some of them are hopeless.
It's too bad.
Racially, they're our brothers and sisters, but they might as well be Martians.
They're not like us.
Mayor Rizzo of Philadelphia used to say that a conservative is a liberal who got mugged last night.
It seems to me we might use that as a tactic.
Any thoughts on that?
You know, it's a little disappointing to me, the number of people who write in with first-person Accounts of how they ceased to be an egalitarian liberal.
So many of them mentioned something like that.
They got robbed.
A sister got raped.
If that's what it takes, there may be none of us left by then.
It should not require being mugged or having your sister raped or being raped yourself to see through all of this baloney.
And in some respects, the way the left has overplayed its hand.
Exceedingly, excessively.
Every time they get a chance, they just push everything beyond the absolute imaginable pale.
I have vowed to myself so many times, I promise I will not be shocked.
And over and over, I have to break that promise.
Because what they do is things I cannot imagine.
Now, there are enough normal people who, as I said, are sort of off-bay, who are off-balance by this.
They look at this, they're, what is going on?
And those people will come our way.
And they are coming our way.
I see it all the time.
When talking with deluded whites, including family members, I've often got a response when talking about race differences.
Oh, so we should just kill all the black people?
How do you respond to that?
That's the gut reaction that I get.
You know, that's very interesting.
I remember years ago when I was living in San Francisco, I was at a party and I got into a conversation.
With the young lady, and somehow we ended up talking about race differences and IQ.
And I explained all this with some of the evidence, and she's found some of the evidence pretty convincing, and she says, well, if that's true, we just have to kill them all.
Well, no.
What you must explain to those people is that the idea that they are just as smart and hardworking as we are, it's relatively speaking brand new up until the 1950s.
Nobody thought that.
The abolitionists who were so ferocious about white people, they didn't think that.
Only a very, very few of them.
And they got ran out of town all the time.
It's one of the societies for abolition.
They built this big building in Philadelphia.
I think it was about 1833, 1835.
Because they could not find a public venue to host their congresses.
They were just like us back in those days.
So they built their own.
They had enough money to build their own.
Well, after they had this three-day period of celebration and consecration of the building, well, on the third day, the townsmen of Philadelphia came and burned the place down.
And the fire department came only to sprinkle water on the neighboring buildings to make sure they didn't burn down.
Everybody thought this was a great celebration.
So this idea, this idea is a new one.
And the fact is, even under slavery, even under the worst conditions you want to imagine, nobody ever talked about exterminating.
Never, never, never.
And that, to me, shows a kind of twistedness of the liberal mind to have that reaction immediately when you talk about racial differences and ability or IQ.
There's something wrong with somebody who thinks in those terms.
And I suppose it's all this stuff about the gas chambers and the Nazis and this, that, and the other.
People are susceptible to that stuff.
But I think that is the best argument to say, whoa, no.
Nobody ever had that idea.
Ever, ever, ever.
There was the American Colonization Society, gradual emancipation, etc.
But no, it's just cuckoo stuff.
Well, you talk about this young lady who's saying, well, what is the solution?
Of course, none of us, I think, want that.
Or even contemplate it.
But it seems, I talk to a lot of people here, it seems like nobody really, that I've heard anyway, really has an idea of some sort of path forward, a path to, let us say, to victory perhaps.
Or even knows what victory looks like.
Maybe somebody do, they don't talk to me about it.
The only guy yesterday, I think it was maybe Mr. Hood was talking about...
Well, perhaps someday, it seems like in the far future, that maybe some governor will come forward and push his state to be, of the 50 states, I mean of the United States, pushes his state to be the solution, I don't want to say final solution,
the solution to our dilemma or where we are going to go.
No one seems to have a path or even knows what the final thing is.
I don't necessarily foretell the form in which the solution will come.
This does not mean there won't be one.
And if I were to tell you my ideas of the most plausible way forward, it would be the construction of communities of racially conscious white people on the local level.
It would start there.
People who could elect the town council, elect the mayor, the police chief.
They would all be wide-away white people.
And you can move up from there to the counties, perhaps to a state.
It starts with real people doing real things in real communities.
At the same time, I would not by any means abandon the political process.
If Congressman King went back to Congress, if Laura Luma went to Congress, can you imagine the hell they would raise in any kind of congressional inquiry into immigration policy, for example?
All of that.
Thank you.
Thank you.
The political system may be so rotten that the government at the federal level cannot be salvaged, but I am absolutely convinced that if any group of Americans today were determined to secede, that the United States government would not come slaughter us just to keep our corpses within the Union.
I think those days are over.
And so if local ideas can take root, community can come forward, but again...
For all of this to be successful, there have to be more people who come our way.
And that's why I stress the idea of not forsaking people.
It's all very well for Ed Dutton to say those people are hopeless.
We just wait for them to die.
We can't wait for them to die.
We are in a hurry.
We have to act now and we have to act as persuasively as possible with all people.
But again, I base my optimism on the number of people all the time I see coming to American Renaissance despite...
All of the deplatforming, all of the nasty algorithms that shuffle our websites to the bottom of the deck, more people are waking up all the time.
And once there is a critical mass of such people, they will come forward.
I'm absolutely convinced of that.
One more question.
So I'm a classical liberal, and I support free speech, I support the concept of democracy, but I think democracy is supposed to be a good faith Settle good faith arguments between people who have the best interests of the society in mind.
When our founders set it up, it was a country of mostly white Christians and only white land-owning males could vote.
Now we have people who just recently essentially broke our laws to get into the country and they're given an equal vote.
We have many...
MSNBC types, people coming out of the universities who absolutely despise white people.
These aren't good faith disagreements.
So I just wanted to raise the prospect.
I think it's really interesting what's happened with Trump and we've seen what a charismatic leader can do.
And do you think that there is not a place for perhaps us to have our own Caesar or our own great Leader who can take us out of this system and not to oppress the people that we're leaving behind,
but to create maybe a new democracy for people who have our best interest in mind.
Well, if there's going to be our great Caesar, I'm afraid it's not going to be Donald Trump.
It's going to be somebody else.
Now, what you say about democracy is absolutely 100% true.
The other people across the aisle have to be viewed.
And they have to view you as the loyal opposition, as you say, that everybody has agreed on one thing.
We may have different ideas of what's best for our people, but we all agree that that's what we're in business to do.
None of this is in business about, let's give the country away.
The country's up for grabs.
Give this piece away.
Give that piece away.
Give our culture away.
Give our heroes away.
No. Ruben Calleb, the Estonian, he talked about how Estonians still have this rooted sense.
That their landscape is drenched with the blood of patrons.
And they are living in a democracy.
They have one vote, one man, one vote.
One woman, one vote, two.
And they still are able to maintain what he describes outright as an ethnicity.
So, yes, the kind of democracy we have now, with all these warring factions, where these days an election, to a large degree, just comes down to a racial headcount.
And there's not one elected Member of Congress or I believe any city council or even a school board that explicitly stands up to defend the rights of white people.
And I believe those people are coming.
They will come.
But yes, I agree.
Democracy does not work in a multiracial society.
And if we are saved by a Caesar, that's fine.
I said great crises create great men.
And that may be the form it takes.
That'll be fine.
But I am, again, optimistic.
Even if we can't imagine, even if we can't describe the steps to it, we will get there.
▲
Export Selection