All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 9, 2023 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
44:12
Sam Dickson — "A Time Whose Idea Has Come." (2022)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Let me introduce our next speaker.
I have introduced Sam Dixon more than probably 20 times, and I kind of run out of things to say about Sam, but I think this time I will say actually a little bit more about him than I usually do.
Some people among the audience are newcomers to our movement perhaps, but Mr. Dixon has been a faithful adherent to our cause since the age of 15, unlike me.
He saw the light early.
And those who follow politics will know, I'm sorry, will be interested to know that in 1978 he ran for Lieutenant Governor of the State of Georgia against Zell Miller.
He got 11.2% of the vote on a budget of $5,000.
But he is the only candidate that we know of in the entire history of the State of Georgia whose political advertising was rejected by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
I wonder why.
Mr. Dixon is a lawyer.
And believe it or not, there was a time in this country, a less evil time than the one in which we live, in which he got a special award from the Cherokee County Bar Association for representing unpopular people and organizations unable to find legal assistance.
Imagine that!
Well, that, of course, is the reason why whenever the mainstream media talk about Mr. Dixon, they invariably refer to him with the SPLC's words, Klan lawyer, Sam Dixon.
Well, Mr. Dixon has also been a very popular speaker, and justifiably so, in many, many venues here in the United States.
He's spoken in Britain, France, and Russia.
But to me, his greatest claim to distinction is that he's been the closing speaker of 18 American Renaissance conferences, and this is the 19th.
Please welcome my good friend, Sam Dixon.
No, no, not necessary.
Not necessary.
What a great friend and a great man he is.
Someone said that there are thousands of people who will die for the revolution, but none that will work for it.
but Jared will work for it, so let's give him another hand.
Thank you.
Thank you.
But anyway, I want to thank all of you for coming.
I'm in the presence of really great people, people who have done far more than I have, people who have published books and run organizations and gotten things done.
The most I've done for our cause has been through to the charity of Jared Taylor and allowing me to make all these talks.
And I'm grateful to all of you for enduring the talks and putting up with my talks.
And with that, I'll begin my discussion with you, my talk, which is entitled A time whose idea has come.
Back in the bad old days of 1964, when the Civil Rights Bill was passing through Congress, the Republicans in the U.S. Senate were led by one of the supreme traitors, Everett Dirksen, who helped Lyndon Johnson usher through this horrific bill.
And he got great media claim.
When he made a statement about the civil rights movement, the idea that you could solve the differences between blacks and whites by mixing them up in the schools and things like that, that this is an idea whose time has come.
And I think that's really putting the cart for the horse.
Dirksen borrowed that from the French radical Victor Hugo, the great novelist.
And it's something that strikes me as peculiarly French in the idea that an ideology can be imposed upon reality.
That you can impose a political philosophy or a philosophy of government the way a housewife cuts the dough with a cookie cutter and just impose your ideology upon reality.
And that's what we face today in our society.
The times make the idea.
No political philosophy, no philosophy can be judged except in terms of the facts on the ground.
The reality in which that idea, that theory will be applied.
It has to be there that way.
Political philosophies have to be adapted to real situations.
And only a fanatic believes that a philosophy or ideology can be imposed upon reality.
And we all know that that is the idea today because we are dealing with a movement of fanatics and lunatics along the lines of that led by Robespierre or Lenin.
We're dealing with people who are really addled and dangerous.
Somebody once said that before there is something to be done, there is something to know.
One of the last questioners to Mr. Taylor said that no one at this meeting had laid out a plan for the survival and triumph of our people.
But before you can lay out a plan, before you know what is to be done, you have to know things.
There are things to be known.
And the first of these would be...
To know who we are, which I'm told is the best translation of the old Greek maxim that is often mistranslated, know thyself.
Knowing who you are is a much bigger thing than know thyself.
Knowing who you are means knowing who you are in context of your sex, your race, your country, your city, your religion, your family, your friends, your profession.
Back in the first half of the last century, one of the most prominent leaders of the American Jewish community was a man named Rabbi Stephen Wise.
And he made a very wise statement, and he was counseling his people against excessive loyalty to the United States and their immediate identity as Americans.
And Rabbi Wise said that Jews should remember that they were Jews for thousands of years, but have been Americans for only a couple of hundred years.
And this is a very wise statement, and we should apply it to ourselves.
And we should realize we have been Europeans for thousands of years before we became Americans.
There is too much talk in America on the 4th of July about the revolt against Europe and British tyranny.
All of which is nonsense and completely false, a lie.
We did not live under any kind of tyranny before Thomas Jefferson drew up the dreadful Declaration of Independence.
The British people, the Anglo-Saxons, were the freest people on earth, and we shared that freedom.
We must understand who we are, that we are Europeans, that we are heirs to a civilization that is thousands of years old.
It did not begin at Jamestown.
It did not begin with the pilgrims at Plymouth Rock.
It didn't begin with Jefferson's Declaration of Independence.
We are heirs to a civilization created by our race.
Without which that civilization could never have been created and without which that civilization cannot survive.
We are heirs to a civilization created by our race through Christianity, filtered through the pagan antiquity of Greece and Rome.
And like it or not, whether you're a Christian of whatever variety or a pagan or an atheist, the fact of the matter is that that is what we are.
Christianity and paganism.
Everything that makes civilized life what it is today was created by us.
Everything. I think even those in this room often underestimate the contribution that has been made by the white race.
Everything in this room.
Look around you.
The microphone.
Virtually the podium.
The cameras.
When you got up this morning...
Dental floss was invented by white people.
Everything. Vaccinations against smallpox.
If you took white people out of the history of the human race, people would be cooking lizards by fires in squalor.
We are entitled to gratitude.
We are entitled...
To the immense gratitude of the other races for what we have done for them.
And there are a few, there was one here, who recognize that and understand the debt that is owed to us.
But the vast majority do not do that because it is a fundamental flaw of human character to covet and to be envious.
That's why it's included in the Tenth Commandment, Thou shalt not covet.
A commandment completely forgotten by woke Christianity today.
These people who have no gratitude are not motivated by love for their people or love for equality.
I believe they are primarily motivated by hate.
Even the whites who embrace it have some reason why they are full of hate.
They should remember the old It's trite saying that when you point the finger at somebody, there are three fingers pointing back at yourself.
And when people like Heidi Beirich or the Southern Poverty Law Center or the Anti-Defamation League or the NAACP talk about hate, there are three fingers pointing back at them because they are precisely acting out of hate.
They hate all the time.
And when you read their materials and see what they say, the hate is just dripping off the page.
As I said, before we know what to do, there are things we need to know.
And we need to know things about ourselves, not all of which are good.
Specifically, I'd like to talk about three fundamental problems that are peculiarly American, that apply to us as the descendants of people who came to these shores.
Anglo-Saxons and related peoples that are problems for us, and they are problems that need correcting to the extent they can be correct.
One of these was the fatal mistake, the fatal irtem, as German philosophers would call it, of the fact that people came here voluntarily.
We like to brag about that.
Our ancestors came here because they wanted a better life.
Or as my grandmother used to like to say, because she was proud of being part French Huguenot, our ancestors didn't come here for a better life.
They came here for reasons of conscience and conviction.
But the problem remains.
All of these people, whether the French Huguenots and white Russians who came here because they had to leave their homes, or the people that got on the ships because they wanted an extra plate of spaghetti or an extra helping of sauerkraut, They all came here voluntarily.
And what this meant was we got a population that was genetically predisposed toward materialism and individualism.
We got people for whom community loyalty and membership was a secondary or even tertiary value compared to seeking their own well-being, their own comfort.
Or getting their way, to speak of my sainted Huguenot ancestors, to them it was more important that there were two sacraments than seven than it was to live in a town or city in France where their family had lived for centuries and where they were related to most of the town's people.
These ideas, these religious beliefs, were more important than being a member of a community.
So we have a very poor raw material to work with.
In this respect, to construct the new country that I think we have to construct.
We are dealing with people who probably have a genetic predisposition to very unhealthy values and practices that are fatal in a competitive world.
The second problem is that from the very beginning of the country, The most important people, the core people, the founding stock of the nation, first the Anglo-Saxons and then the others who came here who were essentially Anglicized,
had a problem with the use of power.
They were opposed to the use of power.
They set up a government in the Constitution that was intended to thwart power.
By dividing these executive, legislative, and judicial branches and putting checks and balances, all the things that we learned in civics class, which were fine and good when this was a little colonial nation made up of 3.5 million Anglo-Saxons and the largest minority had absolutely no rights at all but were owned property.
They wanted to maximize the freedom of the individual.
Instead of the interest of the community.
And this worked for a fashion, like I said, in the early days when there was nobody here that was a competing ethnic group, and when we were far from Europe, before globalization and reduction in the time and cost of travel, it kind of worked.
It didn't work as well as it would have worked if we had even been a normal people who understood that the community comes ahead of the individual.
But at least it wasn't fatal.
But it became a fatal ideology when this country was settled by people who are animated by a total commitment to their community.
Groups that acted in concert with each other.
Groups that put their community first.
When that happened and these leftist groups came into the country, there was no competing with them.
They could go through a population of Power hostile, power yielding, power not using Americans like a warm knife through soft butter.
And this is still with us today.
We hear, even in meetings like this from Congressman King, appeals to the past and to the Constitution and to limited government.
And that appeals to me.
Most of my ancestors were here before the Revolution.
I have only two great-grandparents who came after the Revolution, from Schleswig-Holstein in 1848, after the failure of the German Revolution.
All of my other ancestors were here.
And some of them played conspicuous parts in the Revolution itself, which my father, to his great credit, regretted, because he saw how wrong it was.
That we separated from Britain and that we did not have a monarchy which he understood was a much better system of government than democracy.
I was blessed to grow up with these lessons that contradicted what I was told at school and which I realized more and more through life he was correct about.
The third problem we have arises from the hyper-individualism And the philosophy of powerlessness.
And that is the tendency of Americans to take the easy way out, to temporize, to find cheap, quick solutions, to put a band-aid on a severed artery, so to speak.
And this has been, it's true today.
You hear Republicans and cucks and others.
Talking about how, oh, if we can only get 5% more of the Hispanic vote.
Maybe we can find a way to get part of the Haitian vote or whatever.
We can wiggle the figures around and we can get 51% of the members of Congress.
This is insanity, but it's an easy way out.
It's a way of postponing the radical decision that must be made because the times cry out for it.
Over and over again, Americans chose Superficial, easy, quick, cheap ways out.
An example of this is Thomas Jefferson on the issue of slavery.
It's a very interesting episode in American history in the 1820s when the slavery issue really began to bubble and the enormity of the threat that the institution of slavery posed became apparent and the dangers came into view.
Jefferson, in a much better frame of mind than he was when he wrote those poisonous words that all men are created equal, recognized the threat.
And he made a public statement that the issue of slavery must be resolved, and that it can only be resolved by compensating the slave owners under the Fifth Amendment for legal investments and paying to repatriate The liberated blacks to their homeland and to help them create a nation there where they could live.
It would have been a Liberia or Sierra Leone on a scale 150, 200 times greater.
This idea was hooted down by the temporizers, by the quick fix guys.
And one of them was an editor of a paper in New York.
Who described Jefferson as, I think, an enthusiast.
He was a dreamer.
And he said, we don't have the money to undertake a program like that.
We need to just go on the way we are.
And Jefferson wrote a letter which was even more prophetic.
He wrote to the editor and he said, mark my words, this issue is going to lead to a civil war in this country.
And in the very first year of that civil war, not including damage to civilian property, we will spend more money on that war than it would cost under my proposal to compensate all the slave owners and to repatriate the blacks in as humane a way as possible to Africa.
And history shows us he was absolutely right.
Had the money that was spent on both sides of the Civil War after the outbreak of the war at Fort Sumter been used to solve this racial problem, this existence in this country of two very different peoples who were meant to live apart,
we would have spent less money to implement Jefferson's program than we spent killing each other in the Civil War.
Now, these are things we need to know about ourselves in evaluating the way forward.
What do we need to know about our enemies?
And here again, I think that people in this room included, but in general on our side, people cannot get their minds around just how wicked and evil and horrible our enemies are.
I think that it's like there's so much background noise that the salient features don't stand out of how horrible they are.
Our enemies have done us a great service in the last decade.
They have shown us what they really are.
I remember when I was in high school, I went to high school in a very liberal area of Atlanta, the Emory University area, and most of the kids were very liberal and their parents were very liberal and the faculty were socially very liberal.
And they had various ways to seduce people.
And one of these was things like, oh, we liberals, we believe in freedom of speech.
And we believe in ideas.
We believe in debate.
We're not like those awful conservatives who would censor things and suppress debate.
We're broad-minded.
If you want to be broad-minded, you need to believe what we believe.
And things like this.
We believe in peace.
We're opposed to the military-industrial complex.
We believe in the rights of the accused.
And I was smart enough, maybe prepared from home, but also I was always, I think, somebody that was skeptical and thinking, sifting what the old people said, to know that this was all nonsense,
that you could just tell the way the history books were written, they were full of lies.
They didn't include the truth.
You never read about Alger Hiss when they dealt with McCarthyism.
You never heard about the spy rings.
You never heard about Whitaker Chambers.
All you got was this little tableau, this little story about bad McCarthy and how he went out to innocent liberals.
When you dealt the Civil War, Lincoln, of course, was a saint.
I remember provoking one of these liberal teachers into an outbreak of rage after she had given a lecture about the saintliness and wonderfulness of Lincoln.
And in the class discussion, I pointed out, Mrs. Hill, we were sitting in a city that he burned to the ground, taking the sick out of the hospitals and throwing them on the ground, destroying the surgical instruments.
Destroying the food stores with winter coming on.
We hanged Germans for that.
Well, this reduced this liberal, broad-minded woman into paroxysms of rage that her beloved Lincoln had been criticized.
It's one of these things that it's obviously true.
Like Aristotle said, the truth has a certain appeal.
It's immediately obvious under so many circumstances.
Regardless of what one's feelings are about it.
The Civil War and the relative merits of either side.
It is undeniable that Lincoln was a brutal violator of the Bill of Rights.
He waged the war in an outrageously cruel and brutal way.
He was not a nice guy.
He may have been right that we were better off to be one nation, but he was not a saint.
Personally, to just touch on the Civil War, I believe with others that it was a brothers' war.
And it was a catastrophe.
All of my ancestors fought for the South.
I'm a Southerner.
But you have to look back that it was a catastrophe that we were killing our own people over issues that ought to have been resolved by adult men conducting business in adult ways and not killing each other.
Now, we believe, in this room and elsewhere, we have this weird belief that What we are told is hate and completely without foundation.
But we believe that the first consideration in making public policy is the reality of biology.
We believe that for an architect, the first consideration in whether a building can be built or how it should be built would be the construction materials available.
To our enemies, this is hate.
And they claim great knowledge.
Dr. Heidi Beirich, for instance, who will be known to most of you, Dr. Beirich, with her PhD in political science, she likes to talk about the junk science at American Renaissance, presented by people like Philippe Rushton.
With qualifications and thousands of times more knowledge than Dr. Byrish.
But that's junk science.
I look forward to today, using my analogy about architects, when Dr. Byrish could also advise us about architecture and could explain that there's no difference between steel beams and balsa wood, and that you can build a skyscraper out of balsa wood because we believe it's so,
and you'll be full of hate.
If you discriminated between steel beams and balsa wood, these people, our enemies, believe that biology is irrelevant because they believe that all men and women that hasten to say are equal, something that is obviously false to a child.
There's never been a human being equal to another human being ever in the history of the world, that no amount of eating Wheaties and lifting weights.
Would ever have made me quarterback of the Druid Hills High School football team.
That was not going to happen.
They now have carried this so far that they believe that gender is fluid, that gender is a matter of subjective choice, and that physical anatomy doesn't play any role in whether you're a man or a woman.
Now, someone who said that 20 years ago would have possibly been confined to a mental institution because it is obvious insanity.
But our enemies, one of the funny things, I live in a neighborhood of very liberal whites, and they have these signs up that I've been told were distributed by the Democratic Party that begin, in this house we believe.
How many of you have seen the in-house, this house we believe signs?
Well, it goes on with all of these platitudes designed to virtue signal to everybody.
And one of the best is that we believe that science is real.
Well, no.
That's the last thing these people believe.
They are opposed to science.
They live in a dream world.
They are spiritualists.
They are occultists.
In the case of gender, they believe in mind over matter.
They might as well break out their crystal balls and read the future.
They are divorced from reality.
They ignore the obvious.
They talk about white privilege.
In the context of all their belief that everybody is exactly equal, they never talk about female privilege.
Have any of you ever heard of female privilege?
Well, female privilege is shown by the fact that 90% of all the people in jail for violent crimes are men.
Where are the women?
Since they're all equal, what this has to mean in the ideology and the way of thinking of these people who are our enemies is that Obviously, things have been rigged to create female privilege because gender and hormones have nothing to do with the proclivity toward violent crime.
So obviously, large numbers of men are being put in prison by a system that deliberately does not prosecute all those women bank robbers.
Just think about it.
That's Heidi Beier's thinking.
America What kind of a country do we find ourselves in?
And for those of us who want genuine correction of problems, this is a time that cries out for a genuine solution.
The facts on the ground are such that our enemies cannot prevail.
They cannot.
America today is like Turkey in 1914 to 1918.
Those who have read into that obscure area of history know That Asia Minor, Anatolia, the bulk of Turkey, was inhabited by three peoples, Christian Armenians, Christian Greeks, and Islamic Turks.
Eastern Anatolia was about half Armenian and half Christian, and Western Anatolia was about half Greek and half Turkish.
The Greeks had lived there since antiquity, since before history.
Those three nations could not live within the same boundaries.
They were too different.
One or the other had to go, or they had to separate into separate countries, which would have been the most humane solution, a resettlement where each of these people would have had its country.
But nothing was going to bring them together.
No amount of brotherhood talk, no amount of democracy, whatever.
When the brutal hand of repression of the Sultan was taken off, these people would explode.
And that's what we have here in America today.
We have already separated into nations, to some extent ideologically, but certainly racially.
Racially, blacks, Haitians, immigrants, Mexicans, they arranged against us, the founding stock, the original European people.
And ideologically, we are split.
I deal a lot with liberals.
I know more liberals than that.
My days are usually spent with liberals and not people like in this room.
And I interact with them and I see how they work.
They live in a different nation than what we live in.
We assume that these white liberals know what we know, but they don't know what we know.
They don't know.
I was talking to a relative of mine last night when I went to bed.
He was unaware, for instance, that the January 6th committee has been fixed in breaking with over two centuries of congressional practice by having only two Democrats out of nine people, nine members, and by having...
Two Republicans out of nine, seven Democrats out of nine, in a House of Representatives that is almost evenly split, and breaking with it to allow Nancy Pelosi, as the majority leader,
to pick which members of the other party will serve on the committee.
I wanted to ask Congressman King last night, is there any chance that the Republicans would do the same?
Just give the Democrats, you know, the Republicans that have about the same margin in the House.
Perhaps they should have set up a committee to investigate Biden's laptop and have seven Republicans and only two Democrats and have the new speaker pick which Democrats and pick the most incompetent Democrats.
These liberals don't know things.
You start talking about things that we think everybody knows, like the January 6th committee or what happened at Charlottesville.
They listen to different sources of information.
They don't get our sources of information.
And we have to find a way to see to it that they do hear these things, that they find out that things are not as they're being told on the ridiculously named All Things Considered program on national public radio.
These two nations will never get along.
They cannot live in the same territory.
They have to separate.
We are like oil and water.
Contrary to what these people believe about mind over matter, no matter how much you shake up oil and water, they will sort out and the oil will be on one level and the water will be on the other, and that's what's coming.
That's the reality on the ground.
That's where we're going.
And that's the assurance we have that we and our ideals and our race will eventually prevail.
Now what do we learn about our enemies from the system media?
Again, I think that we often forget how...
How evil our enemies are.
The system media in America is in lockstep, as you all know.
Tucker Carlson does a wonderful way of mocking this.
But I'm not being cute.
I suspect there was more diversity of opinion in the focus of Bale Boxter under Hitler and Goebbels or in Pravda under Stalin than there is on national public radio and in the New York Times.
It's all the same.
It's all the same.
The same, the same, the same, the same.
And these weird journalists who are totally in lockstep, they are self-righteously outraged if anything breaks their monopoly or cracks their narrative.
They went into a state of righteous indignation.
They got their panties in a wad from coast to coast because Tucker Carlson interviewed Well, isn't that what journalists are supposed to do?
Isn't that what a free press is supposed to do?
To interview, not Assad, I've interviewed Orban.
Aren't we entitled to hear what Orban has to say?
What is so terrifying about letting Orban tell us what he believes?
But all over America, I listen to National Public Radio almost every day.
I read the New York Times.
It was just full of this stuff from journalists.
Tucker Carlson isn't a real journalist.
If he were a real journalist, he wouldn't interview Orban.
Talk about a confession of what they are.
In listening to National Public Radio, I have probably heard at least 500 interviews in the last 10 or 12 years of people with the so-called Free Syrian Army in Syria.
And everybody in this room, unlike my liberal neighbors in Atlanta, will know that this so-called Free Syrian Army, as was explained to me by two Christian Syrian foreign exchange students at Georgetown 15 years ago when all these troubles began, They said,
do Americans not understand why it is that these riots begin on Friday after prayers at the mosque?
They said, these people don't want a democracy like Switzerland or Denmark.
These are the fanatics.
These are the followers of the mullahs who intend to put women back in veils, suppress the colleges and universities.
But we only hear interviews from...
These people that are opposed to Assad in Switzerland on National Public Radio, and they're always categorized as people that are fighting for democracy, even as they kill priests and bishops and destroy churches and do all the things you can expect to happen when these fanatics take power.
You never hear, I've never, in all the times I've listened to All Things Considered, I have never heard a supporter of Assad ever interviewed on National Public Radio.
And there has to be a lot of them or he wouldn't be there.
I've never heard any Russian who supports Putin interviewed.
I've heard lots of dissidents, but not one Russian who will say why he and the majority of people in Russia support Russia.
I have never heard a Russian living in Crimea or the Donbass interviewed in any American media.
I've heard lots of Ukrainians.
National Public Radio, even for a long time, would have these interviews.
Every day they were the same with some Ukrainians.
Usually a woman with a baby crying in the background.
And the background music was literally soap opera music.
It's the stuff that you used to hear on television.
It's as the world turns.
You couldn't get any wilder than this.
These people have a total contempt for truth.
You can't get your mind how evil these journalists are.
The hunter, they like to talk about suppressing false news.
What is the number one example of the suppression of false news that we have?
We tend not to make our point with the broad, undeniable truths.
We get too bogged down in trivia.
What is the number one example of how they have suppressed what they call false news?
Well, I'll answer that question.
You probably know the answer already.
It's the Hunter Biden laptop.
That was part of the false news that had to be kept off of social media.
Even the Federal Bureau of Investigation, all those nice people you used to see on television in the Untouchable series, they got involved as what they are and what they have always been, the political police, the equivalent of the Okhrana or the Gestapo or the secret police,
NKVD in Russia.
They got involved with that.
They went around and helped the system media by going to media outlets and social media saying, oh, you mustn't report the Hunter Biden laptop.
Well, we know now it's totally legitimate.
The American people were denied the right to hear a very important issue on the threshold of the election.
The New York Post, as you will know, was the only newspaper in America to cover this story, and they yanked their social media contacts because they were engaging in it.
False news.
Do you ever hear Anderson Cooper or Rachel Maydow or anyone on National Public Radio apologize to the American people for what they did?
No. It's completely airbrushed out.
They're proud they did it.
They probably knew they were lying when they did it, and they'll go on lying because that's what they're about.
They are complete liars.
And this is not...
They have airbrushed Snowden out of the picture.
You hardly ever hear about Snowden anymore.
You certainly don't hear that the man that pursued Snowden viciously and vehemently in the Obama administration was the vice president named Joseph Biden.
He's the guy that got on the phone to threaten nations around the world that if they gave Snowden asylum, they would answer to the United States.
So the one guy...
Who told the American people the truth, who revealed that the Obama-Biden administration had been lying under oath about a program which is the greatest violation of the American Constitution in history.
The one guy that told the truth is now a wanted man in Moscow, and the people who instituted this criminal program lied about it and denied it existed under oath.
They've never been inside a grand jury room.
And these are the people who tell us that they stand for freedom and truth and democracy and fairness.
No. When is the media ever going to revisit that?
They will not.
You get these ridiculous claims about the media, about Trump's call to Ukraine.
Oh, he called Ukraine and tried to get them to prosecute Hunter Biden's country.
Well, here again.
There were three fingers pointing back at them because Biden had called and threatened the Ukraine to prevent his son's crooked company from being investigated and prosecuted for their crimes, which is worse.
Clearly, what Biden did was infinitely worse.
Anderson Cooper is another one that particularly irritates me.
He's a descendant of the...
Vanderbilt, as most of you will know.
A distinguished family.
And when you ask about the fact that some of his ancestors owned slaves, and what would he do?
He said, if I saw him, I'd kill him on sight.
Well, I like to say that a lot of people here are going to be against abortion.
I'm sure there are a lot of Roman Catholics and others here who don't believe in abortion.
Well, I submit to you that if...
If Anderson Cooper's family had known what was coming out of them, perhaps they would have considered aborting little Anderson, and perhaps he's an argument in favor of abortion.
Maybe we could even make abortion retroactive to age 90 in some cases.
What do we know about the system leaders, how evil they are?
We know from Biden that in his last debate with With Trump, he came out and said that he would never prosecute Antifa.
So you had a guy who's going to be head of state saying, I'm never going to enforce the law.
You see the FBI raiding people, arresting General Flynn, raiding the house of that Roman Catholic up in Pennsylvania who's opposed to the right to life, opposed to the abortion movement.
I'm running out of time, so I will hurry.
But to get to the end, we can be assured this system will fail.
You cannot build a skyscraper out of balsa wood, no matter how many doctors hide the viruses say that they know about architecture and you can do it.
It is doomed to failure because it is against science, it is against natural law, and it's against human nature.
There will be no soft landing, I'm sorry to say.
We see that in Yugoslavia.
The worst area in Yugoslavia, the worst violence took place in Bosnia-Herzegovina precisely because that's where diversity was being celebrated, and they all lived next to each other.
All over America, there's no clear homeland like there was in the Soviet Union.
So it will be a very unpleasant breakdown, but we will prevail.
We will only prevail, however, with a clear understanding that we cannot go back, as Gregory Hood said.
We cannot go back to the America that it was.
That America failed.
It's a failed experiment.
Ideas like limited government, states' rights, things like that, do not fit the facts in the ground.
There's no going back, and we must be led by people who are tough guys, who fight.
Who will do whatever is necessary for our people's survival.
We must become a heart as diamonds.
We will have to take strong and harsh measures.
It cannot be a libertarian solution.
Private property must be subordinate to the interests of the community.
And this time we have to hope when this thing breaks down that we will be led by the Lincolns and they will be led by the Davises.
And we will be led by the Lenyans and Stalins, and they will be led by the Tsar Nicholases.
And that is the only way out.
These are my views.
They are not the views of Jared Taylor.
They are not the views of American Renaissance.
I alone stand answer for these views.
But I've gone too long now, and I apologize for running over, and I wish you all a happy return to your home.
▲
Export Selection