Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 20, 2022 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor

59:56

Important Lawsuit Goes Forward

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Radio Renaissance.
	I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me is my indispensable co-host, Paul Kersey.
	Mr. Kersey, delighted to have you with me again, as usual.
	Great afternoon.
	Yes, sir.
	And today is July 20th, Year of Our Lord 2022, and as has become customary, we start with a comment.
	This is a comment reacting, Mr. Kersey, to one of your stories of last week in which you pointed out that Boulder, which is, what, 75% white, something along those lines, has a racial equity plan.
	And our listener writes in to say, looking closely at some of their projects, On their website, specifically the one entitled 28th Street Improvements Project, you'd think that would have a lot of awful racism.
	They're improving a huge street, a whole street.
	I do not see one mention of racism that this project is attempting to remedy.
	Hmm, says our listener.
	Seems like we just call everything racist in order cleverly to roll it into some great economic package and squeeze the public until the juice is all gone.
	I think he's got it figured out.
	Everything is racist.
	So whatever we do, it is fighting racism.
	I think that's probably how they figured it out at Boulder, Colorado.
	Yeah, and just to clarify, the city's almost 80% white, so it's even whiter than what you said.
	Yes, 80% white, but boy, every breath they take, every move they make, it's got to be fighting racism and white supremacy.
	Our listener goes on to say, this seems to be the nature of our lily-livered, traitorous government nowadays.
	It's so corrupt it actually allows for all this downright extortion just to keep happening.
	Our own people are essentially robbing themselves, their grandchildren, those yet to be born with all of these equity plans that will bring no prosperity at all.
	What do they know about long-range planning?
	Well, clearly, absolutely nothing.
	Now, this is a reminder of our listeners.
	We do love to hear from you.
	We love to hear your comments.
	We love to hear your corrections whenever we jump the tracks, which we seldom do, but occasionally we confess that we are not perfect.
	And so the way to get to us is you can go to amren.com, A-M-R-E-N dot com, and hit the Contact Us tab.
	You can go to your email and send a message to BecauseWeLiveHereAtProtonMail.com.
	Once again, it's all one word.
	BecauseWeLiveHereAtProtonMail.com.
	And we have some news that may be important.
	Sometimes these lawsuits go someplace and sometimes they don't.
	But I understand that a federal court has granted a request by Missouri and Louisiana officials to get information and documents from top ranking officials in the Biden administration over its collusion with social media giants in an effort to censor and suppress free speech.
	Can you imagine that?
	Terry Doughty, D-O-U-G-H-T-Y, a judge in the U.S.
	District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, has ruled in favor of the request for the discovery process to begin.
	And as those of you who are not familiar with American legal system, discovery means that you can put people under oath, And ask them very pointed questions about what they've been up to.
	You can ask them for all sorts of documents.
	And the ruling paves the way for the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana to get these documents from top ranking Biden administration officials and from the social media giants.
	The attorneys general named Meta, that's the Google outfit, Twitter and YouTube specifically.
	And it claims that Joe Biden himself along with other top-ranking government officials worked
	with these platforms to censor and suppress free speech. What an idea, Mr. Kersey. Could that possibly
	happen in America?
	Well, definitely with Meta, which is Facebook, just a mild correction.
	Oh, a big improvement.
	Google, actually.
	Google now is known as Alphabet.
	They keep changing their name because of so many negative connotations surrounding these tech giants.
	But no, this is exciting.
	This is what you have to do.
	This is the only way we're going to see a significant change.
	And these big tech companies, they have to have their feet to the fire.
	That's right.
	And according to this lawsuit, they suppressed truthful information pertaining to the origins of COVID-19, the effectiveness of masks, election integrity, the security of voting by mail, as well as the saga, the ongoing saga of the Hunter Biden laptop.
	And among the defendants named in the lawsuit are Joseph Robinette Biden himself, former Press Secretary Jim Psaki, Anthony Fauci, and former Disinformation Governance Board Executive Director Nina Jankowicz, the singing crazy lady.
	Crazy might be an understatement.
	And then there's Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
	Yeah, I think if you get those guys under oath, boy, what sort of song would the canary sing?
	The lawsuit alleges that the officials pressured and colluded with social media giants Meta—thank you for that correction—Twitter and YouTube to censor free speech in the name of combating so-called disinformation and misinformation, and that the U.S.
	Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board was created, quote, To induce, label and pressure the censorship of disfavored content, viewpoints and speakers on social media platforms.
	Now, they do not specifically mention Radio Renaissance as one of the people or groups that has been censored.
	But any fight, any fight to broaden what's allowed to the American public these days is absolutely our fight.
	And we wish these people every success.
	One last thought on that.
	You know, what we're seeing on Big Tech, and I pay attention to this, is really the censoring since COVID.
	Obviously, the YouTube channel was knocked down in June of 2020, both the Radio Renaissance YouTube channel and your channel, where your fantastic videos were with over 100,000 subscribers.
	But you have to think, it's really the COVID stuff that really gets people kicked off and to lose their ability to have an audience.
	But now, Mr. Taylor, it's the transgender stuff.
	It's this stuff that seems like it's come out of nowhere to be the primary vocal point for if you've voiced the wrong thing.
	It's even worse than talking about race or immigration in a lot of ways.
	It sure seems to be that.
	You know, it seems to me if they had simply stuck to censoring people that they could call white supremacists or Nazis or something, people wouldn't have gotten all that excited.
	But this lawsuit, it doesn't specifically say censoring conservative viewpoints on race or immigration, but once they start saying, OK, we want more freedom of speech, Then the door is open and they can't very well say, well, OK, freedom of speech for this, but not freedom of speech for that.
	Or they're doing exactly the thing that they claim they're combating.
	So we absolutely applaud what these attorneys general are doing.
	Now, in the meantime, though, Joe Biden's Department of Health and Human Services has granted New York University over $40,000 to conduct a three year research project on why children, quote, $40,000.
	I don't think that goes very far at New York University, but in any case, they're going to spend it over three years and just figure out why children favor whiteness and maleness.
	The project, according to the grant descriptions, intended to, quote, uncover the development processes by which children acquire the belief that white males represent the default person.
	A pattern noted in ideologies of androcentrism, centering the experiences of men, and ethnocentrism, centering the experiences of white people prevalent in the United States.
	Well, it seems to me they've already got it figured out.
	It's centered in ideologies of androcentrism and ethnocentrism.
	Well, Mr. Kersey, as one white man speaking to another white man, I can think of only one thing that we should do.
	We should sit down, wrap our arms around each other, and have a good cry over just how frightfully normal it feels to be a white man!
	It is chilling and refreshing at the same time.
	It's a contradiction.
	$40,000 is not going to go that far.
	Yeah, whatever.
	You know, we know we're supposed to be awful.
	We know that we are the villains of human history.
	But, you know, I'll tell you, I just can't work up the mental energy to feel bad about being a white man, you know?
	I've never lost a day of sleep or stress at all.
	No, no.
	Yeah, well, I guess that's because society just favors whiteness and maleness, you know?
	It just whispers in your ear every moment you're awake, you're a white man.
	You're the greatest thing on.
	What?
	What rubbish.
	Just what incredible rubbish.
	But in any case, the NYU grant comes as part of a larger HHS initiative to inject equity at every level of the department with a strong emphasis on race and gender.
	I wonder what else.
	What else is there besides race and gender?
	Oh, I guess sexual orientation and disabilities.
	I'm sure there's a way that they could say that somehow.
	That even white heterosexual males are favored in that community or something.
	You're right.
	And the fact that we're not on crutches, you know?
	Gosh, I wish I were lame in at least one leg, for heaven's sake.
	I'd feel vastly more virtuous.
	But somehow we can't change our sex.
	We can break our legs and we can claim to be women, right?
	We talked about that the other day.
	We can claim to be women.
	And HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra She, I guess that's a he, yes, Xavier, said, we at HHS treat advancing equity not just as a job, but as our mission.
	Here at the department, we're going to do everything we can to make sure equity is always a focus.
	So, you know, we've talked about this many times.
	Every move, every move the United States government makes, every act it takes, large or small, has got to be in the interest of making life better for people of color, especially Yeah, that's exactly right.
	And on that subject, each summer, New York City Public Theater puts on a festival of Shakespeare plays in Central Park.
	And they're now running Richard III.
	In Shakespeare's version, Richard is supposed to be a hunchback, and that part is significant in the plot.
	But he goes on to kill his predecessor, King, and then tries to woo the guy's widowed wife.
	And I'm Widoward Wife.
	Well, in this version, Richard is played by a fat black woman.
	This is Richard III, the British king.
	Fat black woman named Danai Gurira, who has no visible disability.
	However, lots of other actors in the play do have disabilities, including several who are deaf.
	And they apparently sign to each other while they talk.
	And they also have a dwarf on stage.
	But Richard III, who's this hunchback, and as I say, that's part of the plot, she doesn't have any visible disability.
	And then the woman whom this black lady Richard III woos is in a wheelchair.
	That's the queen.
	That's the queen, who is now a widow, having had her husband killed.
	She's white.
	And so I saw a photograph of this.
	Here is this chubby black woman with a crown on her head, a stolen crown, sort of wooing this lady sitting in a wheelchair.
	And this is supposed to be Shakespeare.
	Well, you know, I bet this Danai Gurira, now that she's cut her teeth as Richard III, I bet that she'll play Thor in a movie.
	I think she'd be the next James Bond, actually.
	Ah, now there you're onto something.
	Maybe she'd make a great Superman.
	Although how she'd leave the ground, I'm not sure.
	But when you've got superpowers, anything is possible.
	Well, of course, Mr. Kersey, you know, anybody who's non-white can be white.
	But if you're white and you're representing the British ladies, the English ladies soccer team, that's apparently a problem.
	You know, is there a more conquered, cucked country in the entire Western world, Mr. Taylor and dear listener, than the United Kingdom, than England?
	How about the United States?
	I don't know.
	They're neck and neck.
	There's still a lot of people, though, who are who are pushing back.
	I mean, just think last night on Tucker Carlson, he was Going on and on about the Great Replacement and about the Democrats' electoral strategy.
	Invite the world to replace white people.
	So I'm sorry.
	I don't know about the United States because there's still a significant population that is pushing back against such, such madness.
	But as you alluded to, here's a story from Summit.News.
	This is Paul Joseph Watson's outlet.
	I like it a lot.
	It's a BBC reporter highlights problem.
	A BBC presenter introduced a bizarre segment which expressed concern about the English female football team comprising of players who are all white.
	The presenter praised the team for securing an 8-0 victory against Norway to book their place in the quarterfinals of the Women's Euro 2022 Tournament.
	8-0.
	Wow.
	That's a huge victory.
	8-0.
	Wow.
	I'll say that.
	They crushed them, but the problem is they're all white.
	The problem is they represent England, and England can't be represented by just white people anymore.
	So she then ludicrously drew attention to their skin color.
	But they're all women.
	They're all women, too, right?
	The ladies team?
	team? They are all women, you know. I object. Exactly. The audacity of the team, gosh. But
	all starting 11 players and the five substitutes that came onto the pitch, for those who don't
	know what that is, that's the soccer field.
	They were all white, lamented the presenters, if it was a bad thing.
	Quote, and that does point towards a lack of diversity in the women's game, end quote, she said.
	The reporter then threw a piece by black presenter, Alex Scott, about the same supposed problem.
	Again, eight nothing victory to secure a trip to the quarter finals of Women's Euro 2022 Tournament.
	But that doesn't matter because all the people who represented the team for this just crushing victory,
	they're crushingly white to these people.
	Again.
	That's pretty sick.
	Here's what Paul Joseph Watson writes, English people being white in a country that is around 85% white.
	What was England in 1945 when they still had the empire, fresh off the victory over the Axis powers in World War II?
	Was it about 99% white?
	I would guess it was somewhere there.
	When was the empire windrush?
	Didn't it come in in 1954?
	Wasn't that the first boatload of black people from the empire?
	Indians and black people?
	I believe that's the case.
	1954?
	Yes.
	So, Joseph Watson, he continues with this, Mr. Taylor, would they express similar concern about the Nigerian team being all black, all Nigerian?
	Perhaps the BBC will draw attention to the shocking lack of diversity in the U.K.
	crime scene next.
	Or maybe not.
	Of course if the entire team was black that would be celebrated and not seen as a problem at all.
	Someone tweeted this out, quote, WTF exactly does this presenter want the English coach to do if the 15 most talented tactically appropriate players for the match happen to be white?
	Asked Emily Thurston.
	Quote, jeopardize the score in the name of diversity?
	The BBC are a joke.
	End quote.
	Again, we know France basically celebrated.
	I think they won the World Cup in 2018 over... Oh gosh.
	Italy.
	Didn't they beat Italy?
	I want to say they beat Hungary or someone, they beat an Eastern European team because I wrote an article for AR about that very subject.
	Oh, that's right.
	When they faced Italy, the Italians beat the French.
	Yes.
	I beg your pardon.
	Yeah.
	You're the better sportsman than I. But back in, I think back in the late, maybe it was early 2000s, they won with a heavily, heavily black, heavily Muslim team that in no way, shape or form represented historical France.
	It represented the, uh, Well, it represented the Fifth Republic rather tragically.
	Yes, we hope it doesn't represent the future of France.
	I don't think it's going to.
	I don't think it is either.
	The French are going to wake up.
	In the meantime, Portland, Maine is slowly, slowly losing its illusions about certain things.
	Here's a long article in the Christian Science Monitor.
	It begins with these words.
	Linode Lafleur, Lafleur means the flower, went from Haiti to Chile to Bolivia to Peru to Ecuador to Colombia, through the jungles into Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, Guatemala, Mexico, practically a world tour, much of it on foot, all to find shelter and safety in a small town in a northern corner of America, a town that has opened its doors, welcomed strangers, Now the town says it cannot take any more.
	The town, of course, is Portland, Maine, population 68,000, 84% white.
	However, Linode Lafleur, the flower, the little flower, she says, they gave me a room in a motel.
	They gave me food.
	They take care of me here.
	I'm never going to leave, says Linode.
	Isn't that a heartwarming story?
	A heartwarming story!
	Well, suck it up!
	That's what we learned from the Dominican immigrant to Allentown about the Great Replacement.
	Hey, suck it up, Whitey!
	Suck it up!
	That's right!
	Suck it up!
	This is your future!
	As I say, now the town says it can't take any more.
	It used to think it was snugly tucked away from any border problems, but there's no place in America snugly tucked away from border problems.
	The border is everywhere.
	Its shelters are filled.
	The city has put the newcomers up in motels while COVID-19 and winter created vacancies.
	But now the innkeepers want their rooms back because the tourists pay more than the city government does.
	But Portland has no place to put them.
	Well, enter Reza Jalali.
	He's from Iran.
	He wound up in Portland 37 years ago.
	He says, the pictures from Maine looked fantastic, except that they were all taken in the summer.
	There should have been a full disclosure that says, please don't expect this for 11 months out of the year.
	So he was very disappointed coming from Iran, all these summary pictures.
	But he stayed.
	He stayed.
	The welfare was good.
	And now he is head of the Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center.
	Well, they now have 1,200 immigrants housed in 12 motels all out of town.
	But to quote Linode LaFerr again, This lady from Haiti, she says they gave me room in a motel, they gave me food, they take care of me here, I'm never going to leave.
	On the same vein, I look forward to one day someone in Portland, Maine having the title of the Greater Portland Area Repatriation Center head.
	Would you volunteer for that job?
	I wouldn't.
	I do a pro bono.
	Of course I'd volunteer.
	It would be something that I would gladly do.
	I think it's the continuation of the American Colonization Society.
	So, yeah.
	Well, you know, she says Linode.
	Linode.
	There was a nice photograph of her.
	You know, she has this wistful look in her eyes.
	I'm sure she's not dreaming of all the good times she left behind in Haiti.
	She says, I'm never going to leave.
	And one wonders, is the white man never going to learn?
	But if the Vera Institute has its way, the white man certainly isn't going to learn.
	This is a nonprofit that is working to end mass incarceration.
	It's one of those outfits.
	It just netted a $172 million taxpayer-funded government contract That could potentially hit $1 billion if it is renewed, as expected, and it is destined to help unaccompanied minors avoid deportation.
	That's the government funding nonprofits to thwart its enforcement of the law.
	Can you believe that?
	That's the United States for you.
	You were insulting the British.
	I'm just not sure.
	We're really in a race to the bottom of the British on this.
	It's called the Vera Institute of Justice, a New York based group that supports defunding the police.
	I guess if they get a billion dollars, you know, they can single handedly defund the police with all that money.
	And they view immigration enforcement agencies as a threat to civil liberties.
	They got an HHS funded contract.
	And this is very much needed, of course, because in May, in just May, there were 239,000 what they call migrant encounters on the southern border.
	That's a record.
	Nearly a quarter of a million.
	A quarter of a million.
	And there were 14,699 encounters of unaccompanied minors in May.
	Can you imagine that?
	Nearly 15,000, 15,000 unaccompanied, I mean you've got to find places for these people to stay.
	They're typically given into the custody of HHS, then moved around the country either to parents or sponsors already in the country.
	You know, I wonder how many of these unaccompanied minors are going to then be turned out as child prostitutes or whatever they are.
	I would really be curious.
	I mean, you've got 15,000 a month coming in.
	How carefully can you vet the places they're going to end up?
	This is just a god-awful thing the Biden administration has got us into.
	But in the meantime, do you know what Joseph Biden and his crack team of border specialists have focused on?
	They are targeting root causes in the sending countries, like poverty, violence, corruption, and climate change in Central America.
	They're going to just whip all those problems in just a couple of years, and everybody's going to stay home, right?
	No, it's again, climate.
	Go ahead.
	Let me repeat.
	Poverty.
	They're going to solve that.
	Violence, corruption, and climate change in Central America.
	Nothing to it!
	Yeah, Joe and Kamala, they're going to roll up their sleeves and just solve those problems.
	But you were saying, I beg your pardon?
	No, I mean, the climate change stuff, it's fascinating to watch this.
	This is going to be used to justify the movement of, what's the projections for Africa?
	How many hundreds of millions of people are under the age of 20 in Africa right now and the quality of life there is
	just deteriorating and there's a lot of open space in Europe, there's a lot of
	open space in the United States and they can blame climate change, you know, our elites can
	blame climate change to their to their hearts or content to finally say, hey, let's just
	bring them over here and we'll be able to distribute this problem so that it is not local to
	Africa but a worldwide phenomenon.
	And they'll sure improve the climate in America and in Europe, won't they?
	They'll be lovely. Meanwhile, the guy who runs Starbucks, he seems to have had a change of heart about certain things.
	Yeah, if you recall back in 2015, I'm actually on Starbucks' site right now, and what Race Together means for Starbucks partners and customers.
	This is from March 16, 2015.
	If you recall, there was that incident in Philadelphia, I believe, or some city, I believe in the Northeast, where two black guys were in.
	They didn't order anything.
	They were asked to leave.
	This turned out to be a huge embarrassment.
	So, Starbucks opened a bunch of shops in inner cities across the country.
	They had everybody write Race Together on cups.
	They had a communist-style struggle session for every employee of Starbucks.
	Wow.
	And remember, the other thing they did, they instituted a Starbucks-wide policy of letting people just hang out and use the restrooms.
	So if you were a flea-covered hobo and wanted to just get a load off your feet and have a nice restroom, you didn't have to order anything, you could not be driven out of Starbucks.
	I've not actually voluntarily bought anything at Starbucks since then.
	I've had people buy me Starbucks, but ever since then I've decided, you know what, I'm going to stay away from that java.
	I found the story seven years later after they decided to race together.
	Oh, I remember the other thing.
	Those two blacks who were ordered off, I mean, they wouldn't go.
	That was the other part of it.
	This lady who was the manager of the Starbucks, she said, well, OK, if you're going to sit here and sit here and sit here and you're not going to order anything and use the restrooms and all that, well, you've got to go.
	And they said, hey, we ain't going.
	And she called the police.
	And those two guys, I think they were invited in to see the chief of Starbucks.
	They gave them money to get into some kind of entrepreneurship business.
	I haven't heard what finally happened.
	Did they take the money and run?
	Did they take the money and drink?
	Who knows?
	But remember, that was quite the saga in those days.
	And now, they're singing a different tune.
	Oh, and this is from National Review.
	I'm not too excited about quoting something from that website, that news organ, but here goes.
	Starbucks CEO, progressive cities have abdicated their responsibility in fighting crime.
	Howard Schultz, the CEO of Starbucks, he suggested that major U.S.
	cities and those managing their governments are neglecting the crime issue to the detriment of commerce and community safety.
	Talk about racing together, right?
	Yes.
	Quote, I must say in my view at the local, state, and federal level, these governments across the country and leaders, mayors, and governors, city councils have abdicated their responsibility fighting crime and addressing mental health.
	He said this in an internal meeting.
	The business leader's remarks came after his company announced plans to permanently close 16 locations in five progressive cities, including six in Seattle, Six in Los Angeles, two in Portland, one in Philadelphia, and one in Washington, D.C.
	by the end of the month due to repeated security disturbances.
	I'd be fascinated to know what the racial makeup of these neighborhoods, these communities where these Starbucks are located, particularly the one in Washington, D.C.
	and Philadelphia.
	Well, also, they say they've got these security-related disturbances.
	Well, as I say, they can't throw people out.
	Of course they're going to have security disturbances.
	They're going to have health disturbances.
	It's a mess.
	It's a mess.
	They are reaping what they have sowed.
	Now, this guy is complaining about the police not maintaining order.
	They refuse to maintain order in their own Starbucks.
	But he's saying nothing about that, is he?
	Well, the very next sentence in the paragraph, such incidents included customers.
	and other members of the public using drugs in the stores, quote, this is from Howard Schultz, quote,
	I don't have to spend too much time on what's going on in the country and how America is becoming unsafe,
	but you all read the press release over the last couple of days that we are beginning to close stores that are not
	unprofitable. It has shocked me that one of the primary concerns that our retail partners have is their own
	personal safety, end quote. Now, why is that shocking?
	You've been... Yes, what an idiot.
	They're making money on these places, but they say, okay, come on in, hang out, use the restroom, and now they're upset that some of the people who are showing up are undesirables?
	What a fool.
	These people are just, they're just so blinded by their own silly ideologies.
	It's quite hilarious, really.
	You know, for Schultz, the whole race together concept was declarative.
	It was supposed to be a positive thing, but as we now see seven years later, In 2022, it's more race together?
	Question mark.
	And it's just it's not working.
	I mean, guys, this is the same thing is going on with 7-Eleven.
	I was reading the Gateway Pundit and they're closing all their stores in Los Angeles because of so much violence.
	It's happening.
	You can you can just look at videos of these gas station attacks that are happening across the country.
	And there is a racial common denominator between them all.
	And as he would go on to say, Starbucks said it's going to help address the growing problems of crime.
	Starbucks said it would help train baristas to handle active shooter situations and conflict de-escalation at work, according to the Wall Street Journal.
	Active shooter situations?
	Yes.
	Store managers will now be authorized to close bathrooms, limit seating, or reduce operations.
	Well, hey, as we saw in Indianapolis the other day at that mall where there was a mass shooter that was stopped by a guy who Fired 10 rounds from 40 yards away.
	Eight of them hit the target.
	Great shooting.
	Great job.
	You're a hero, my friend.
	Indiana is a state that just passed constitutional carry.
	So he was able to carry concealed legally and he was able to stop this shooting.
	So hopefully that's what these baristas and these managers are going to learn.
	That's the only way to survive an active shooting.
	Well, I guess they're all going to get tactical pistol training.
	Yeah.
	In his speech, Schultz noted that Starbucks struggled to keep stores open in increasingly violent and volatile neighborhoods and metropolitan areas is a reflection of the national experience with the decline of law and order in recent years.
	I wonder how much money Starbucks gave to Black Lives Matter back in 2020.
	And I wonder if they're going to take that lady manager that they fired with such great ostentation back in, what is it, 2015, you said?
	She is sitting somewhere nodding her head saying, I told you so, you vermin.
	And what are they thinking?
	He who laughs, he who laughs last.
	He who laughs last, laughs best, Mr. Taylor. And I think that at the end of the day, all of us who
	laughed at the whole concept of race together, we now know where for the past two years, America
	has been racing toward implementing a anti-white mindset. I call it Black Run America.
	And in a lot of ways, that's what's been happening.
	And as you noted, our federal government is dedicated to rooting out white supremacy, wherever it can be found.
	And here you now have this quote from Mr. Schultz to finish it off.
	And I think this tells you where we are.
	Quote Starbucks is a window into America.
	We have stores in every community and we are facing things, which the stores were not built for.
	We're listening to our people.
	And closing stores.
	And this is just the beginning.
	There are going to be many more, he said, end quote.
	And Mr. Taylor, we've been we've been seeing a country.
	You said we went mad after the events of George Floyd, when the third precinct was burned in Minneapolis.
	You said a nation gone mad.
	I really believe it did start about the Trayvon Martin verdict, George Zimmerman, when BLM was founded.
	And then we saw what happened with Michael Brown and Darren Wilson and Ferguson, and then every little event that happened, you know, the horror of Charleston, that just brought about this idea that, wow, black people are, to quote Colin Flaherty, black people are relentless victims of discrimination and prejudice and bigotry, and that's the only thing that can describe their plight and their blight, their plight in life and the blight in their communities.
	So, Starbucks stores are facing things they're not built for.
	Well, I guess you don't have gun emplacements built into them, you know?
	They don't have minefields in front of them.
	This is, it's just incredible.
	Not yet!
	Mr. Taylor, I would volunteer to man a Starbucks turret.
	I would be a rooftop, what was the thing in Los Angeles in 92, the rooftop Korean?
	I'll be a rooftop Korean at Starbucks.
	You'll run the 50-kilo machine gun.
	No, I mean, just to put a bow on this story, I do think that this is really important
	because all these delusions, all these illusions that we've been forced to tell ourself,
	going back to Gunnar, what was his name?
	Gunnar Mydral's book?
	Murdoch, Murdoch.
	Murdoch, I'm sorry.
	Gunnar Murdoch.
	You don't hear much about him anymore.
	He's been replaced by other more melanin-enhanced, yeah, Ibram, Ibram.
	Yeah, exactly.
	All these guys who are this cottage industry of white privilege.
	But, you know, it's not a cottage industry.
	It's a mansion and full scale manufacturing industry.
	But what I'm saying is, yes, we continue to delude ourselves.
	And here you basically have someone saying, wow, you know, when Starbucks again, they're a window into America.
	And that window, Mr. Taylor is smashed.
	And we can't repair it until we have a real, real honest discussion about race.
	I wonder if he was the same CEO at the time of that 2015 fiasco.
	He was.
	Was he?
	Well, I would love to know what he thinks about that today, but we'll probably never, ever hear.
	It would take about half a dozen whiskies down his gullet before we can get any sense out of him, probably.
	But in the meantime, While Starbucks is falling apart and closing profitable stores, there is a new controversy brewing.
	This goes to show you what's important in American academia.
	It's among anthropologists who are complaining about archaeologists who identify ancient human remains by sex.
	Professors are objecting to identifying these ancient human remains by biological sex because we cannot know how the person identified at that time.
	So, others objecting to identifying race because that's, of course, something that fuels white supremacy.
	But the gender activists have now formed a group called, this is just great, the Trans Doe Task Force, not John Doe, not James Doe, the Trans Doe Task Force, to, quote, explore ways in which current standards in forensic human identification do a disservice to people who might not clearly fit the gender binary.
	We propose a gender-expansive approach to human identification by looking for contextual clues, such as the decedents wearing clothing culturally coded to a gender other than their assigned sex.
	Got that?
	In other words, you dig up a 1,000-year-old mummy of some kind, and you aren't allowed to say it's male or female, because it might have, who knows, it might have identified as a furry, for heaven's sake.
	Well, I guess these people just never go to Starbucks.
	They don't know what the country's really facing, so they think there's important things to be worried about.
	The fact is, if there were non-binary Neanderthals out there, I don't think we'd ever know.
	But I'd love to hear about it.
	You can determine race by the skeletal remains of a human, correct?
	Of course, yes.
	Just asking for a friend.
	Asking for a friend?
	You got some bones you need identified?
	No, it's a joke.
	Yes.
	In the meantime, in the meantime, James Madison has been reduced to essentially a cypher at Montpelier, his own home.
	Is that not the case?
	I've heard from a number of people that this is happening at Andrew Jackson's home in Tennessee as well.
	And as we know, as we discussed last week, I think we talked about Monticello.
	Yeah, the globalist billionaire who funded the woke transformation of Monticello, Thomas Jefferson's home, he's paid for a similar overhaul of James Madison, the father of the Constitution, his house here in Virginia, where the author, he's been shoved into a supporting role while slavery and racism take center stage as they should Mr. Taylor. Oh they're the
	stars of the show, the enslaved people.
	There's no room for James Madison when you can just basically bash people over the head with a
	ball-pinned hammer with the concept of a 1619 project.
	So no American flags fly at Montpelier, Madison's plantation home in rural Virginia, and not a single display focuses on the life and accomplishments of America's foremost political philosopher who created our three-branch federal system of government.
	He wrote the Bill of Rights and the Federalist Papers and served two terms as president.
	Instead, the New York Post writes, blindsided tourists are hammered by high-tech exhibits about Madison's slaves and current racial conflicts, thanks to a $10 million grant from left-leaning philanthropist David M. Rubenstein.
	Quote, I was kind of thinking we'd be hearing more about the Constitution, end quote, one baffled dad said when the Post visited the president's home this week.
	But everything here is really about slavery.
	It's been inspirational, I guess, shrugged John from Wisconsin after taking the $35 guided tour of white racism being embedded in the DNA of our country.
	The Post writes, reviewers on social media have been more harsh.
	George Hancock of Mesa, Arizona said, they really missed the mark.
	We left disappointed not having learned more about the creation of the Constitution.
	The worst part were the gross historical inaccuracies and constant bias exhibited by the tour guide, someone named Alex Z., who visited July 8th.
	Visitors to Montpelier get to see just three rooms in the sprawling mansion.
	The estate made Madison the philosopher, farmer, statesman, and enslaver that he was, the guide said as the post groups entered the home.
	A line she repeated at the end of her spiel.
	Outdoors and in the house's huge basement, dozens of interactive stations seek to draw a direct line between slavery, the Constitution, and the problems blacks face today in America.
	Quote, a one-hour critical race theory experience designed as tour.
	Proust.
	Mike LaPoglia of Tulsa, Oklahoma.
	That's great.
	That's great.
	And here we go.
	It gets even better.
	Here's what The Post writes.
	Hurricane Katrina flooding, the Ferguson riots, incarceration, and more all trace back to slavery, according to a 10-minute multi-screen video.
	So Madison was responsible for the Katrina flooding?
	Madison was responsible for the interactions that black people had with one another at the Superdome back in 2005.
	Yes, that's correct, Mr. Taylor.
	Another exhibit dams every one of the nation's first 18 presidents, even those like John Adams and Abraham Lincoln, who never owned slaves, because they've benefited from slavery in some way.
	The only in-depth material about the Constitution itself appears in the display that pushes the claim, championed by the controversial 1619 Project, that racism was the driving force behind the entire American political system, which I actually agree that it did play a lot, but I don't do so in a negative sense.
	I think you and I both praised the Naturalization Act of 1789.
	Our founding fathers just took it for granted that America meant I'll stick with Pout Pout Fish.
	and then for Europeans.
	And that's the problem.
	Even the children's section of the gift shop leans far left with titles like Anti-Racist Baby
	by the aforementioned Ibram X. Kendi.
	I've never actually read that, nor do I tend to.
	It's one of those sort of cardboard books, you know?
	I leafed through it once.
	It's only, I guess it's probably got no more than 200 words in it.
	I'll stick with Pout Pout Fish.
	That's a great book for kids.
	And she persisted.
	Oh, go ahead, go ahead.
	Really, just one thing.
	When you think about it, what on earth is Anti-Racist Baby doing in the gift shop
	of James Madison's house?
	This is just nuts.
	It's lunatic.
	Absolutely lunatic.
	You're going to go there because you're into James Madison's American History of the Founding Fathers, and you're supposed to go home with a baby book to turn your little white child into an anti-racist?
	This is lunatic.
	It's called spiking the football, Mr. Taylor.
	It's called spiking the football.
	It's a victory dance, and it is in the home of one of the most important Americans that most people probably can't even name.
	In his home, it's now, it's just spiking the football.
	It's, you know, that 8-0 victory that the all-white English team had over Norway.
	Guess what?
	It's about 56-0 right now in the post-George Floyd era.
	But, as we mentioned, if Starbucks is a window into what America is, people are starting to say, hey, wait a second, and this is the type of stuff that You know, again, New York Post, this is on the cover of Drudge.
	People know there's something wrong.
	And we're the ones to tell them exactly what's wrong.
	Yeah, and we're the ones to say, hey, if you really want to know the truth about our country,
	read about the 1789 Naturalization Act, which I believe James Madison was a supporter of.
	So, I mean, George Washington signed it into law, so... 1790, actually, but... I'm sorry, 1790, you're right, you're right, not 1789, 1790.
	Yeah, 1789 is when the first Congress met, the very first Congress.
	They're figuring out what kind of country we're going to have.
	That's right, and this was the first bill that they signed, so... So, moving on to something else.
	According to Pew, and Pew research comes up with some interesting data, they say about a quarter of Latino adults say they have personally experienced discrimination or unfair treatment from other Latinos.
	Got that?
	A quarter of Latinos having darker skin and being born outside the U.S.
	are associated with an increased chance of experiencing this type of discrimination.
	I guess Latinos, too, think that being white and male is the default category, Mr. Kersey.
	The poison affects us all.
	At the same time, Latinos say they are as likely to experience discrimination or unfair treatment from non-Latinos as from fellow Latinos, regardless of skin color.
	Now, yes, it must be tough.
	Apparently, 27% of Hispanics say that they've suffered discrimination at the hands of other Hispanics, and 31% say they have suffered discrimination at the hands of non-Hispanics.
	Now, my suspicion is that blacks are heavily overrepresented in this group of people who are mistreating the Latinos or Hispanics.
	Furthermore, about 4 in 10 Latinos with darker skin, 41% say they've experienced discrimination or unfair treatment by other Latinos, while 25% with lighter skin color say the same thing.
	In other words, if you've got dark skin, 41% say other Latinos beat on them.
	And 25% with lighter skin, again, they have absorbed this wicked white is right kind of stuff.
	Then, 48% of Hispanics say they hear racist or racially insensitive comments or jokes, either often, 13% or sometimes, 35% from Hispanic friends and family about other Hispanics.
	Isn't that interesting?
	48% of Hispanics, that's nearly half, say they hear racist or racially insensitive comments or jokes in their families or friends about other Hispanics.
	That's probably pretty healthy.
	I mean, they joke about, well, you know, Puerto Ricans are this way and Cubans are that way.
	And, you know, probably it's like, I don't know, you and me are joking about our Italian pals and who knows.
	Then this goes on to say, this is pretty good too.
	45% of Hispanic adults say they often or sometimes hear Hispanic friends or family members making racist or racially insensitive comments or jokes about others who are not Hispanic.
	What was the number again? 45%!
	Forty-eight percent, yes.
	Forty-eight percent.
	Your country's going to be great.
	Yeah.
	Well, you know, in a way, this is just human nature.
	People notice differences, and they talk about them.
	I'm not incensed by this.
	They notice that, you know, Asians are a particular—God, you see that Asian lady driving that car hardy-har, you know?
	Gosh, look at those poor stuck-up white people, you know, they can't do the bachata.
	It's just normal.
	This is natural when people But anyway, we're all supposed to be horrified, I guess.
	It's incorrigible.
	But moving on to a little different story.
	This just seemed poignant to me.
	There is a woman by the name of Julie, age 25, a professional violinist, originally from Switzerland, who had moved to Paris because apparently the level of play in Paris is pretty high for fiddle players.
	Well, one day she was attacked for her telephone.
	Some guy came up and wanted her phone.
	She said, I have strong hands because of my violin playing.
	I resisted.
	I held tight to my iPhone and I shouted, Are you mad?
	You coward!
	And the person left, presumably without the iPhone.
	However, just a few minutes later, she had her bracelets and necklaces torn off by a guy who threatened her with a knife at the entrance to a metro station.
	Just all in just a few minutes later. No report on ethnicity of robbers, but we can guess.
	Well, this was enough for Julie. She's going home to Switzerland, where the fiddle playing may not be
	at the same high level, but where it's less likely that it's going to be your jewelry or your life.
	Jeez.
	Jeez.
	Just one of those little vignettes about life in the big city.
	Life in the big city public.
	Speaking of a different big city, what's happening in Philly these days?
	You know, Philadelphia, I'm sure that's going to be a place where more of the Starbucks are shut down.
	We know that Mr. Schultz said that one thus far in Philadelphia has been shut down, but you know, Philly is the city that's been just hit the hardest by this lawlessness with With the police commissioner outlaw, just basically, cops are just standing down.
	And unfortunately, what happens is it boldens blacks to shoot one another and rob stores and engage in just lawless behavior.
	So here's what's happening.
	Gun violence advocates, researchers have mixed views on Philadelphia's new stricter curfew for older teens.
	And as our late friend Colin Flaherty would say, That's code word for blacks.
	Older teens.
	So early this month, the Philadelphia City Council unanimously passed an ordinance that makes the year-round curfew for teenagers stricter for older teens during the summer months under the former policy.
	Kids ages 14 and 15 had to be indoors by 10 p.m., and 16 and 17-year-olds could stay out until midnight.
	That's insane, by the way.
	Gosh.
	I had a very strict curfew until I graduated high school.
	So, yeah.
	Now the older group must also be in by 10 p.m.
	or face a curfew violation.
	Philly has had a curfew on the books since 1955.
	55.
	Yeah, so non-profit leaders.
	Yeah, you know back in the days when the Italians and the Irish they get in they get in brawls there I guess in Philadelphia at night.
	I don't know who knows but um, the Philly Police Department says enforcing the curfew does not involve arrest or fines.
	There are exceptions to the rule for teens who are coming home from work with a parent or on active duty armed services, but not for those who are returning from a community-based program.
	Councilmember Katherine Richardson, who introduced the policy, says the primary objective is to reunite teens in violation of the curfew with a family member or guardian.
	It may involve bringing them to a community evening resource center or police station until someone can pick them up.
	Resource centers are designed to provide membership, job readiness, skills, conflict resolution, and connections to services.
	And staff can also give teens a ride home.
	There have been 1,045 non-fatal shootings and 269 gun homicides in Philadelphia in 2022.
	and 269 gun homicides in Philadelphia in 2022.
	So you're talking about over 1,300 shootings in Philadelphia in 2022.
	And there's still a lot of 2022 left.
	We've still got another quarter.
	We've got another, yeah, we've got another, yeah, a lot of time left.
	So a total of 121 children under 18 have been shot.
	Now, if you recall, at 3 a.m.
	in June, that 70, that septuagenarian, that 73-year-old black man was beaten to death by seven, by seven blacks with With a traffic cone and a particularly gruesome homicide So Richardson says the goal behind the curfew is simple get kids inside so they're safe from gunfire Isn't that a isn't that a tragic thing to say you need to get them inside so they won't be hit by bullets Wow Yeah, yeah, and then and of course the I don't have it here.
	I don't see it in this where I print off my dick stuff, but Toward the bottom of this article, Mr. Taylor, it discussed how, oh, we're worried this is going to disproportionately impact people of color, primarily blacks.
	But if it keeps kids safe, again, it's, are we hurting the feelings of blacks?
	Are we deliberately targeting blacks?
	Is there going to be disparate impact that will then get this curfew knocked off the books?
	Because, gosh, even though we're protecting black lives, we're still harming black lives by Disproportionately arresting blacks for violating curfew.
	I got a better idea.
	Just be a better parent and actually care about where your kids are and don't let them go run around the city engaging in lawlessness and violent, reckless behavior.
	I guess making sure that blacks don't shoot each other.
	If that hurts their feelings, we've got to stop doing that.
	Disparate impact.
	Well, moving over to France.
	There was an Afghan immigrant by the name of Mohammed Rahman Arsala, age 32.
	He moved to Saint-Brieuc in northern France.
	Well, after having taken a permanent residency, he raped a 12-year-old boy.
	He followed the lad off a bus, hauled him off bodily to an abandoned warehouse, and buggered the poor boy.
	But before that rape, he assaulted and harassed two underage girls.
	So he was really cutting a wide swath.
	Well, you went to trial and the defense lawyer asked the judge to take into consideration the cultural element of the case, saying it was common practice for men to abuse underage boys in Afghanistan, back where Mohammed came from.
	And the defendant said, in my opinion, In my country, it is normal to have sexual relations with young boys because women are inaccessible.
	Well, this is a guy who had gone after underage girls.
	But in any case, when I arrived in France, I did not know your laws.
	But since then, I have learned that this is prohibited.
	Well, as it turns out, the practice is known as Bacha Bazi.
	It's theoretically illegal in Afghanistan, but perpetrators are rarely punished.
	Because they keep their wives carefully under wraps, and many powerful officials take part in this.
	Well, he ended up getting a prison sentence of 18 years for all of this misbehavior.
	And after serving his term, he'll be deported back to Afghanistan where he can practice bacha-bazi to his heart's content.
	Now, do you remember during, while we were in Afghanistan, some of the guys discovered that the local soldiers with whom they were supposed to be cooperating, We're doing exactly this.
	And there was quite a scandal in which one Afghan commander was discovered to have handcuffed some Bacha Bazzi boy to his bed and was buggering him for a month on end.
	And a few special forces guys beat him to a pulp.
	Do you remember that story?
	And they were they were not disciplined, but they were told, no, no, no, no, this is a local practice.
	You can't do this.
	You know, we're not here to cure them of bacha bazi.
	But it was the Americans just did not like care for that at all.
	But that's the way they do things.
	This is a story I don't want to even think about ever again, because it's it's it's you think about what's happening with how many Afghans have come over and And just the massive increase in the Muslim population of our country since the events of 9-11.
	And it's just... Well, yeah, well, I looked up in Wikipedia about the Bacha Bazi.
	It means boy play, boy play.
	And in some parts of Afghanistan and Pakistan, it's a widely circulated use.
	And it involves child sexual abuse by older men of young adolescent males.
	And also it means dancing boys and it involves sexual slavery and child prostitution.
	So don't tell me that you have not been culturally enriched because now you've learned a new Afghan word, Bacha Bazi.
	Mr. Taylor, I can't get the past 20 seconds back.
	I'm trying to, like, Control-Alt-Delete.
	All right.
	Well, we'll move on to something else.
	I will give you—well, here is a mystery.
	I will pose you a question.
	Police say that more than 100 spent casings were found after an exchange of gunfire overnight in a certain city.
	Two groups of people shoot at each other in the parking lot of an apartment complex.
	Investigation continues.
	Video evidence is being collected.
	Several apartments and vehicles sustained damage from bullets.
	One woman had her car window busted after a bullet went through it.
	But, now here's the important clue.
	Not a single bullet hit a human being.
	Now, here is the question.
	100 rounds.
	100 rounds, sir.
	What was the race of the shooters?
	Oh, obviously they were Italians, like we joked about earlier.
	Well-trained mafiosi, yes.
	Bonus question, bonus question.
	Where did the shooting happen?
	Now, alas, it could have happened anywhere in the United States.
	So, here's a clue.
	It's the same place where Duante Wright went to glory.
	Is that enough to help you?
	Duante Wright.
	That's after police officer Kimberly Potter reached for a Glock rather than her taser.
	Yeah, I believe you're talking about, I believe you're talking about a city that has elected three socialist mayors in its history.
	That would be Milwaukee.
	Close.
	It's Brooklyn Center.
	Brooklyn Center, Minnesota.
	That's where Duante Wright had his encounter with Kimberly Potter.
	But that's pretty good.
	You got the race right.
	I know you didn't say so, but I know you got it right, and you got pretty doggone close for the locale.
	Okay, the reason why I'm bringing this up is because I'm reading a story from June 25th, 2020, on Fox 6 Now in Milwaukee, and the article says this, shots fired on Southside, over 100 casings found, no one was injured.
	Wait a minute, Milwaukee?
	Yes, I'm reading the story right now.
	This is from June 25th, and it's 100 bullet casings at the scene near 17th and Scott.
	Well, well, then maybe, you know, it can't have happened twice, or it could have happened twice, but we'll get to the bottom of this eventually.
	Yeah, as I say, it could have happened anywhere.
	Yeah, you're probably right.
	If you're looking at the news right now, then you are probably correct.
	You are more likely to be correct on these things than I am.
	But it was quite a festive time.
	Now, we don't have much time left here, so here's yet another one of these Middle East traditions.
	Now, you better cover your ears.
	Better cover your ears.
	I know you're tender-hearted about these things, but Mavashi Legadi, age 24, got married in Firuzabad, Iran.
	And in Iran, they have the custom of firing guns at weddings.
	It's not supposed to be legal, but it's still quite common throughout the Middle East.
	And a guest, believed to be the groom's cousin, fired a rifle.
	Two bullets were fired, the first without incident, but the second hit the bride right in the head
	and went through her brain and hit two other guests.
	Jeez.
	Yes.
	She was in a coma and later died, but the two others have not been seriously injured.
	The man fled when he learned he'd shot the bride, but police later caught up with him.
	What a gruesome story.
	This is just, it's just so sad.
	But this is, these are the sort of people that are pouring into our country, pouring into our country one after another.
	Mr. Taylor, I'm not, I'm not tinder hearted.
	I'm Richard Lionhearted here in that story.
	So yeah, this is, this is, this was, Yes, yes.
	But I fear, I fear, Brother Kersey, we are approaching our time.
	And so we must thank our listeners.
	We are always pleased and honored that you spend this time with us.
	And it has been a great pleasure and an honor.

▲