All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 27, 2022 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
58:59
Professionalism Is Now Racist
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Radio Renaissance.
I am Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me is my indispensable, irreplaceable co-host, Mr. Paul Kersey.
And as has become a custom, we'd like to start with some listener comments.
This one is a bit of an embarrassment.
Last week, someone sent in a poem about Indian names butchered by my tongue.
Scalped?
Well, I guess so.
I didn't realize my tongue could scalp, but if looks can kill, then tongues can scalp.
In any case, I thought it was from a detractor, but I was apparently wrong.
The person who sent it in said, I meant no offense with that bit of light verse that I sent you.
I thought it would be obvious that my poem was a reference to that woman's remark in an earlier podcast that one of the funniest parts of the podcast is listening to Mr. Taylor try to pronounce Indian tribe names.
Well, I guess I didn't get the joke, and the idea that I was butchering Indians by means of my tongue struck me as not a playful jab.
So, I apologize to our listeners who sent that in, and I do my best pronouncing these names, and I contend that I would do better than Mr. Kersey, but these names with apostrophes and Strange consonants, and there are these nine jointed tribal names that I find it very difficult to pronounce.
And I bet any white person, even Indians, probably find them hard to pronounce.
But anyway.
I happily concede that, yes, you don't butcher or scalp them as bad as I would.
Scalp them paleface.
Well, so I apologize.
I took it in the wrong vein, and mea culpa.
Another comment.
You asked for questions, even personal ones.
Well, I don't recall asking for personal questions.
Maybe you asked for personal questions, Mr. Curzi, but not I. But this person says, I will present a complex question that I often face.
Do you feel your position as a white advocate puts you at odds with great people of other races with whom you might otherwise relate?
And my answer is no.
Great people of other races are great whether they're of another race or not.
And I have a huge admiration for people who advance their own interests in a noble and thoughtful way.
Courage is something admirable in all people.
Inventiveness, intelligence, honor, all of those things are very admirable no matter who the race of the person.
There are many Japanese, Japanese historical figures That I greatly admire.
And I believe, Mr. Kersey, you would feel the same, would you not?
Without question.
Yes, it being of a different race certainly does not detract from the admirable qualities that other human beings may have.
Also, other cultures have created great architecture, great art.
I think Islamic architecture and art, for heaven's sake, is quite marvelous and really underappreciated in the United States.
Be all that as it may.
No other races have had great achievements and include great people, and there's no reason not to admire them and appreciate them.
Also, a question was, that exercise from Uncle Jared's Fitness Challenge.
What is it called?
I'm an otherwise very fit and healthy man, and I struggle to do a single one.
Well, I don't know what it's called.
Now, Mr. Kersey, have you ever attempted one of those straight arm push-ups?
Oh, the straight-arm push-up where you basically, it's like a V, almost.
Not well, you put your arms straight on your stomach, arms are straightened as far as they can go past your head, and then you do push-ups with toes and hands.
It's an extraordinarily difficult workout that hits muscles, the core, the abdomen, you're sore immediately, you're somewhat You're embarrassed by the fact that this exercise levels you to the degree that it does.
I think, does the video still exist?
It still exists.
It still exists.
I can do a dozen of them.
I think it's just a freak of nature.
It's my party trick.
It happens to be one of those things that I, as a 70 year old, can do that a lot of very, very healthy and strong 25 year olds can't.
It's, as I say, it's just a freakish aspect of my physique.
Another comment in the AMRAN podcast entitled Episode 273, Privilege Bingo, from minute 26.22 to 26.37, it sounded as if a cat had something important to say.
I don't understand this particular feline dialect, but from my experience with my own cats, I'd guess it had something to do with food or wanting to go outside.
Well, listener, you're wrong.
She was saying she'd had enough crime stories and wanted something more, shall we say, appetizing.
It's the Race Realist Cat, much known and admired by listeners to our podcast.
And finally, well it's not finally, next to last finally, this is a request that we refer to the Irish in a modern way.
Just as Hispanics are now Latinx, the Irish must now be Irix.
Irix.
Irix.
Luck of the Irix.
The luck of the Irix.
I'm not sure we will comply, but we appreciate very much what we consider to be offered to us in a playful mood.
Then, finally, dear Jared Taylor, one of your last podcasts, your co-host Paul Kersey, one listener asked why you don't answer philosophical or historical questions.
My question to you is, what do you consider to be the greatest engineering achievements of Western man?
And here are my considerations, says he.
The first nuclear-powered submarine, the USS Nautilus, the Apollo program, the Roman aqueducts, the Panama Canal, the International Space Station, the light bulb, the motion picture camera, the telephone, the automobile, and the self-contained underwater breathing apparatus, Aqualon.
Well, that's quite a list.
And the question is, I hope you answer my question.
I listen to every podcast.
Well, to all of these, I mean, it's heavy on the space station, the Apollo program.
I would add the semiconductor.
I think that's a pretty important achievement.
And who was it that invented that?
William Shockley, the notorious racist.
Yeah, tell me a little bit more, some of our listeners who might not know about William Shockley.
William Shockley.
Well, yes, he was a Nobel Prize science winner for having invented the semiconductor, but he had a thorough understanding of racial differences, biology, IQ, etc., and he did not shut up about it, and he made himself a little bit notorious, but that does not detract from the importance of the semiconductor, to which I would add probably the airplane.
The airplane and the semiconductor.
Well, if any of you listeners out there in the United States or around the world ever find yourselves in the Washington, D.C.
area, there is a museum near the Dulles International Airport, the Udvar-Hazy Air and Space Museum.
Walk in there, spend the day, take your kids, and you will see some of the most incredible, if you think about the achievements of the first flight in 1903 to where we are now, a span of, what, 119 years?
Yeah, I think that the listener hit it right in the head when they talked about a lot of those advancements.
In any case, gosh, it's already eight minutes into our precious 60 here, Mr. Kersey.
We need to move right along.
And I think some of the most interesting news of the week is the fact the Supreme Court just this Monday agreed to hear a challenge to the use of race in college admissions decisions.
This could be a potentially landmark showdown over the whole race preferences business.
The case arose after a conservative-backed group, Students for Fair Admissions, sued Harvard and University of North Carolina, alleging that schools illegally discriminate against Asians.
The cases have been consolidated and will be heard next term, which begins next fall.
So, there's time enough for a certain amount of musical chairs among the justices between now and then.
The move rebuffed, the fact that the court accepted this, rebuffed the Biden administration that last month asked the justices to turn away the challenge.
They think affirmative action, racial preference, discrimination against whites is just fine.
Now the Students for Fair Admissions says Asian American applicants are held to a higher standard.
They argue that they are disadvantaged in the application process due to receiving a lower personal rating.
And are admitted at a lower rate than white applicants, despite having higher test scores.
So, we will see.
The SFFA, the plaintiff, has asked the court to overturn Grutter v. Bollinger, which was a 2003 decision that I analyzed in some detail, actually, in an article in American Renaissance, that upheld the right of colleges to factor in an applicant's race in order to benefit minority groups and enhance diversity.
As it turns out, on both of these cases, the plaintiffs were rejected by the Court of Appeals and by the trial court prompting these appeals to the Supreme Court, which had been accepted.
I find that very, very interesting.
We'll see what happens.
This is going to be an opportunity for at least nominally conservative Supreme Court to decide that race is an illegitimate
consideration.
You mentioned the piece you wrote, I want to say it was back in 2003 or 2004 on that decision?
Correct.
What was that infamous decision that maybe in 15 years we can revisit?
25 years.
25 years?
Yes.
Okay.
Okay.
Gosh, we're not even there yet.
We're getting there.
We're getting close.
We're getting close.
It's 2003.
That was Sandra Day O'Connor.
She says, you know, this smells bad.
We don't like it.
And we suspect that maybe 25 years from now, it won't be necessary.
On the assumption that black people, she didn't say this, black people are just as smart and hardworking as white people.
And once we sort of ironed out all the barriers against them, they'll just be able to compete just fine.
Alas.
Alas, no.
Anyway, I think you have interesting findings from the Portland District Attorneys.
Yeah, this is from Andy Ngo, a guy who spent a lot of time in Portland.
He's been attacked and milkshaked, and viciously, violently assaulted in that city.
So he takes a special interest in all the violent crime that's happening there, and he had a story that he bylined with this headline, called Portland Deputy DA's Believe more should be done to create equitable outcomes in criminal justice systems.
And we know what equitable means these days.
What do you think it means?
It means special preferences for BIPOCs.
That's what it means.
Everybody's got to come out exactly the same.
And for that to happen, you've got to put your thumb on the scale.
And in this case, it's special privileges for BIPOCs.
Criminal BIPOCs.
Of course.
They're BIPOCs too, man.
42.6% of respondents strongly agree with the belief that prosecutors should work to reduce the over-representation of people of color in the justice system.
While almost half of those surveyed strongly agree that prosecutors should reduce racial disparities in case outcomes.
Sounds bad already, doesn't it?
The Multnomah?
That's a good Indian name.
Multnomah, yes.
Multnomah County District Attorney's Office announced Tuesday that a report had been released on the survey data, which collected from dozens of Deputy District Attorneys serving under Portland's Chief Prosecutor, the very pale-faced Mike Schmidt.
Now, the Office's Prosecutor Attitudes, Perspectives, and Priorities Survey, conducted last year both as an anonymous written survey and through one-on-one interviews, provided qualitative and quantitative data about how these individuals within the MCDA Prosecutor's Office think about, quote, success, racial justice, community engagement, and the use of scientific knowledge, end quote, as they're reviewing and prosecuting criminal cases in the county.
And as we said, 43% of respondents strongly agree that the belief that prosecutors should work to reduce the over-representation of BIPOCs in the justice system.
That's what they believe.
Report findings from the past year quote, light the way for several avenues to re-envision the county prosecution's role in building a more just and effective office.
Whenever I hear that word, re-envision or re-imagine, I reach for my striker action pistol.
I'd reach for the office of the local U-Haul to get the hell out of that county.
I think that might be a lot better than a striker pistol.
Let's see here, we've got, like I said, almost half of those surveyed strongly agree that prosecutors should reduce, quote, racial disparities in case outcomes, end quote.
A large 48% with 38% agreeing as well.
39% of those surveyed believe that the office needs to be more racially diverse.
Now, Multnomah County, I want to say is 78% to 80% white.
So I guess they're just going to recruit, put up a LinkedIn ad and say, look, we need BIPOC lawyers in our prosecutor's office.
So that's the wave of the future.
I fear so.
I fear so.
Of course, the only way to reduce these disparities, of course, would be to persuade BIPOCs not to commit crimes.
Either that, or as I say, you put your thumb on the scales of justice.
Make sure they don't get imprisoned and don't get locked up.
Of course, that just means they'll be back on the street committing more crimes.
Here's one more of the discoveries within this 32-page report.
Prosecutors overwhelmingly agree that they should be involved in reducing disparities and the disproportionate Impact of crime on people and communities of color, end quote.
Oh, the impact of crime?
Yeah.
Uh-oh.
How are they going to do that?
I'm not quite sure.
If you continue to have a revolving door of combating the injustice of the structures of white supremacy.
The fifth topic of the report, racial ethnic disparities in the CJA criminal justice system, stresses, quote, the importance of using a racial equity lens in prosecution.
Okay, okay.
Well, this old Portland will remind me not to go.
Moving from Portland, not very far, up into Canada.
This is a story from a Canadian newspaper that starts with a warning.
It says, this article contains mention of racist stereotypes, so readers be warned.
It's the school paper of the University of British Columbia.
On January 19th, Dr. John Sherman told his Chem 313 class that black people do poorer than white people on IQ tests and that Asians score higher than white people on the same tests.
He then asked if it were racist to ask whether Asian people are smarter than white people and if white people are smarter than black people based on this fact.
The comments were made during a break in class when Sherman was discussing the semantics of calling something a fact or calling it racist.
So he said, do you ever know what anyone means when he says someone is racist?
It can mean all kinds of things.
I don't think it's racist to say black people do poorer on IQ tests than white people and that Asians score higher.
But that's just a historical fact.
You can get into all kinds of reasons for that.
So, it's grey, I think.
What's racist and what's not?
Well, apparently, it's not grey.
Matthew Ramsey, Director of University Affairs at UBC Media Relations said the university takes matters such as this very seriously.
And has a variety of measures and policies in place with which to address them.
In other words, you can't ask the question whether it is racist to say blacks score lower than whites on IQ tests.
You can't say that.
Now, Sherman is under investigation and he has been kicked out of his class and someone else will teach his Chem 313 section.
And this is, of course, during a break in class.
It wasn't even part of a lecture.
It wasn't talking about protons and neutrons.
He was talking about whether or not it's racist to say, okay, they score higher, they score lower.
Are they more intelligent by this measure?
What did he teach again?
What was his...?
Chemistry!
Chemistry, okay.
Chemistry, yes.
But that settles it.
You know, facts are racist.
Now, I suppose it would be sexist to say that men on average are taller than women.
Do you think that's sexist?
What was the book that New Century Foundation published by the professor Michael Levin?
Yeah, Michael Levin.
Michael Levin.
Was it Race Matters or Why Race Matters?
It's called Why Race Matters.
Why Race Matters.
Well, it sounds like this professor of chemistry should send a copy of that so he can know that this debate, sadly, has long been settled about what you can and can't say as an academician.
It seems that every generation has to discover what is taboo, and it's still taboo, alas, alack.
Now something else that I thought was really quite interesting.
New York City Mayor Eric Adams.
He will be restoring the anti-crime police units that were disbanded in 2020 after George Floyd died ignominiously in the streets of Minneapolis The gun control unit was disbanded.
Mr. de Blasio, then mayor, said that it had to be stopped because believing people of guns ended up somehow concentrating on blacks and Hispanics.
Now, they're going to re-establish the unit despite the fact that the current Manhattan District Attorney who was elected separately from Mayor Eric Adams, both African-Americans, had said during his campaign last year that he would avoid prosecuting people for gun possession unless they were actually involved in violent crime.
Just walking around with a gun, but now he's changing his tune.
This has to do, of course, with the fact that two police officers were shot.
One critically injured, one killed just over the weekend.
Actually, they both have.
The other one passed away.
Oh, they've both died.
They both died.
That was in Harlem you're speaking of, right?
Yes, yes.
Just, uh, boy.
He says they will now be prosecuted in a traditional manner.
So they're going to go back to putting this gun control unit.
Do you think they'll be stopping and frisking?
I wonder how else they're going to decide who might have a gun.
It worked for Bloomberg.
Yes.
It worked very well for Bloomberg.
Yes, yeah.
And now for a completely different approach to the gun problem, let us move to the great state of Georgia.
Yeah, this is one that I've been holding for a while.
This was published at News1.com.
If you're a new listener, you might not know News1 is a black news website with editorials written from the black perspective.
It has Fortune 100 companies advertising all over it.
When you go there, you're just splashed with ads.
Well, here's the headline.
Governor Brian Kemp pushing for looser gun laws.
As data shows, black people are shot the most.
Obviously he wants more people to have guns so more people can shoot black people.
Brian Kemp has pushed for new state gun laws during a press conference early in January.
This was I think the second week of January.
I love that law.
It's a fantastic law.
an outdoor sports store located about 15 miles northwest of Atlanta.
It's a gorgeous store, by the way.
The new law would do away with license needed to carry a handgun in public, open or concealed
on one's body.
I love that law.
It's a fantastic law.
An open carry state.
It's already open carry for long guns, right?
I believe it is, but to be able to, I'm sorry, a concealed, it'd be okay to conceal carry.
That's the beautiful thing.
Everyone armed.
Yeah.
Now, during the press conference, Kemp, who spoke to a nearly all white audience, News 1.
Always a bad sign.
Always a bad sign.
Plugged right, right Right-wing talking points who claim that Georgians needed looser gun laws to feel safer in their communities.
Quote, building a safer, stronger Georgia starts with hard-working Georgians having the ability to protect themselves and their families, said Kemp.
In the face of rising violent crime across the country, law-abiding citizens should have their constitutional rights protected.
End quote.
I agree, Mr. Governor.
The News 1 editorial continues, Kemp, like many Republicans, have used fear to create a false narrative that your family isn't safe because you need a license to open carry.
They also never addressed the real issues facing black Americans.
According to data from the Atlanta Police Department, by May 2020, there had been a reported 311 shooting victims for the year.
That's in Atlanta, Georgia, majority black city.
290 of them were black, And 252 of the 331 shooting victims were black men.
It'd be nice to know who the suspects were, but I think we can guess without being too far off the mark.
The editorial goes on to say that gun violence is a serious problem in the black community, and a solution was never mentioned by Governor Kemp as he touted the Second Amendment in front of his NRA buddies.
What do you think a solution would be to return fire?
That's a good solution.
Georgia Rep.
Lucy McBath expressed her frustrations.
She's a black woman whose son was actually gunned down and she ran for office and she's won a couple terms in a row.
She says the proposal is outrageous and endangers Georgia families.
Editorial just goes on and it's just, again, it's just this goofy editorial, but you've already have the data there.
You know, the largest city in the state of Georgia Again, who are the people who are primarily being shot?
291 of the 311 through May 2021 for the year were black.
And they refuse to consider the possibility that gun laws have absolutely no effect on the criminals.
Exactly.
Exactly.
So we're talking about more than 90% of those shot were black, and so logically it follows that more than 90% of the suspects in these cases were black.
I guess they think that by letting law-abiding citizens carry guns, that means that the law-abiding citizens are going to start killing each other too.
Can't have that.
Or at least the black ones are.
Oh, crazy stuff.
In any case, moving to Washington University in St.
Louis, another high crime neighborhood by the way, the university is asking students the question, is professionalism a racist construct?
I mean, what's next?
The event, this is going to be a seminar, a course of some kind, the event will answer its own question.
The term professionalism, quote, has at times been used to silence and marginalize people of color.
In this context, so-called professionalism is coded language, a construct that upholds institutional racist policies and excluding practices.
The event will focus on dismantling white supremacy and privilege in varied contexts while upholding social justice and advancing effective workplaces in which all contributors can bring their full selves to the job.
Now, their full selves.
Sounds like 300-pounders to me.
But maybe being late every day, swearing at customers, that's part of your full self?
I guess that would be, if you're fired for that, that's racism.
Professionalism is now racism.
Professionalism is coded talk for keeping black people off the job.
And so I'm surprised they even asked the question, is professionalism a racist construct?
The title should be, Professionalism is a Racist Construct!
Well, I think the last time we talked about Washington University, it was back in September, I believe it was.
It got national attention after a student senator plucked the American flags that were from a 9-11 display on campus and threw them in the trash bag.
I do remember this.
Yes, the student's name was Fadel Alkilani.
And I don't think that's a Hawaiian name, Alkilani.
In fact, he was clearly a Middle Eastern of some sort, but a U.S.
citizen.
He was Vice President for Finance of the Student Union.
He allegedly said to someone who was asking him about this, I did not violate any university or legal policy.
Now go away.
He called it a flag relocation incident.
Yes.
Can you imagine?
You took down a BLM banner.
This is a banner relocation incident.
Oh no, we know for a fact there have been a number of people who've been prosecuted across the country for hate crimes for taking down a BLM flag.
In fact, I think one of the guys the head of the...
Proud Boys or something like that.
In DC they took him down and they tried to prosecute him.
Well, actually he burned it too.
That's right.
He shouldn't have done that.
He should have relocated it.
Relocated it.
Or if this guy had been burning the flags, he would have called it a relocation and transubstantiation
incident.
In any case, he's not been punished, of course, despite having taken all these flags and put
them in the garbage.
Now, I believe you have some data on Mexican asylum requests.
Mexican Asylum seems to be the hot ticket these days.
Yeah, yeah.
Just briefly, real quick.
I know, like I said, we're trying to mosey along here, but I do want to quickly segue and just say we did have a lot of great questions.
We haven't answered all of them yet.
Definitely love hearing from you guys as we get ready to start Black History Month.
I'm sure we're going to have a lot of great stuff.
So go ahead and send us, make sure to send us comments, suggestions, stories, or just these great questions you have for us.
We love to answer those.
BecauseWeLiveHereAtProtonMail.com, once again, all one word, BecauseWeLiveHereAtProtonMail.com, or you can go to the American Renaissance website, www.amerin.com, click on the Contact Us tab, and Type in your question, comment, correction, adoration, contempt, whatever it is.
We're always curious to hear and we love to answer your questions.
And that way you then get signed up for the AmRen newsletter that's sent once a week, just once a week, with the best stories.
And that's just a simple humble request, just as asylum requests in Mexico are up almost 90%.
Some of the non-Mexican requests asylum in Mexico, which gives them the right then to stay there legally.
Perhaps then they can jump to the United States a little bit later.
See, that's the crazy thing.
They are making asylum requests in Mexico, not because they want to be in Mexico.
Nope.
It's because they want to come to the United States.
That's exactly right.
In 2021, the Mexican government received 131,448 requests for asylum, an increase of 87% from the previous years.
I think you misread that.
They received how many requests?
131,448.
What did I say?
You missed the thousand.
Oh my goodness.
You've got to make sure to have that.
That would make no sense.
131,448 requests for asylum.
An increase of 87% from the prior year, 70,341.
1,448 requests for asylum.
An increase of 87% from the prior year, 70,341.
So significant.
Well, yes.
Asylum is really very desirable these days as a stepping stone to illegal entry into the United States.
And just a quick breakdown.
These petitioners came from 110 countries.
The most were from these.
51,857 Haitians.
Haitians?
Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Haiti borders Mexico.
No, it doesn't.
Okay.
No, no.
Okay.
36,361 Hondurans.
Same question.
Let's see, Guatemala borders Mexico, but I don't think Honduras does.
8,319 Cubans.
Cubans?
Well, they're all good swimmers, just like the Haitians.
6,223 Venezuelans and 6,037 Salvadorians.
623 Venezuelans and 6037 Salvadorians.
Salvadorians.
So, the bulk of those are African descent.
Oh, they are.
I'm sorry, the Haitians.
If you look and see what it is.
Oh, heavens, I would expect all of them to be of African descent.
Well, you know, this is an excellent introduction to our next little note, which is that nonprofits funded by the United Nations are digging up repressed memories and offering guidance on the Mexican asylum system to enable more migrants to travel to the United States.
You see, some of them are being rejected, but the repressed memory method is being used to help migrants who've been turned down for Mexican asylum.
to create better stories for their appeals so that they can qualify for a residence card which means that they can amble on up to the northern border into their final destination in the United States.
Thousands have apparently cultivated recovered memories.
Recovered memories.
Talk about new age.
It is a brand new age.
This sounds like a fancy term for lying is what it is.
They've cultivated recovered memories after they're rejected for asylum because they told Mexican immigration authorities they just wanted to go to the U.S.
to make money.
That's not eligible.
So they've got to cook up a better reason for that.
And a coordinator of one of the U.N.
funded NGOs Disclosed that the use of recovered memories by migrants during Mexican immigration adjudication interviews produced a 90% approval rate.
Jesus!
Wow, that's right.
For repressed memories.
Just gin up those repressed memories, yes.
The recovered memories, yes.
Recovered, I'm sorry.
That's right.
I guess, you know, they were just so traumatic that they forgot all about them.
I think that's the only excuse.
That's the only reason.
Legacy of colonialism.
Just so awful.
Now, here's another interesting story.
I thought this was significant in its own way.
David Brooks, you know, he is the pet so-called conservative columnist at the New York Times.
He wrote on January 13th a column called, America is falling apart at the seams.
Well, I've never heard of anything falling apart at the seams.
Things fall apart.
They don't fall apart at the seams ordinarily, but in any case, David Brooks, your only writer from the New York Times, and you don't write the headlines, so you're forgiven, but he writes about the fact that more hate crimes, more murders, more drinking, more student misbehavior, more gun buying, The share of people, the number of people giving to charity is down.
Students are afraid to speak in class.
He talks about COVID, mask rules, and a deadly virus to worry about.
But, he says, something darker and deeper seems to be happening as well.
A long-term loss of solidarity.
A long-term rise in estrangement and hostility.
This is what it feels like to live in a society that is dissolving.
What the hell is going on?
The short answer, colon, I don't know.
David Brooks has no idea.
Fancy that!
Now, Mr. Curtis, Do you have any words of wisdom to our esteemed columnist of the New York Times, David Brooks?
What's going on?
I do have a simple rebuttal, or a simple statement of pretty much fact.
Pat Buchanan's column, I believe, Emren.com carries that.
We do.
Okay.
It's entitled, Is Democracy Dying or America Disintegrating?
That's the column for January 28, 2022.
I believe that actually takes what David Brooks is asking to its logical conclusion of what happens when what was the nation founded upon is inverted.
Yes.
Subverted.
Yep, John Jay, my great hero, he wrote about how he gave thanks, the fact that we are just as homogeneous as can possibly be, descended from the same people, worshiping the same God, the same customs, the same matters, the same aspirations, but somehow that all disappeared and David Brooks never noticed.
I want to say that the anniversary of the Naturalization Act of 1790 is coming up in March.
It's either March or May.
It's one of those two months.
So that's all you need to know, Mr. Brooks, of what our ancestors wanted for this great nation and now why we find ourselves on the precipice of so many counties within failed states like Oregon, Maryland, Trying to find a way to succeed.
Parts of western Maryland want to join West Virginia.
We know what's happening with the Greater Idaho Movement, with the counties in eastern Oregon, and even eastern Washington discussing this.
I mean, this is the future.
We talked about last week what's going on in Buckhead in Georgia, the rittiest part of Atlanta, also the whitest.
Yes, well Mr. Brooks, multiracialism has failed.
It has clearly failed and it has poisoned practically every institution in the United States, while in the same time it was clearly poisoning your mind.
What you just said there is so brilliant because everybody who has been promoted to position of power within private or public sector, they're still dedicated to the belief that that's not true.
They believe it in the teeth of all possible evidence that diversity is a wonderful strength.
We get more and more diverse, and we get weaker and weaker.
What's happening?
It's funny because we learned back in 2011, almost 11 years ago, when Pat Buchanan was told he couldn't talk on MSNBC anymore.
They didn't pick up his contract.
They said, these ideas aren't allowed.
Juxtapose that with what's happening in France right now, where you're seeing this just incredible presidential run by An Algerian.
And he's talking about this stuff in a very logical and intelligent manner in front of the entire French people on television.
That's right.
And I think that that's one of the greatest white pills you can think of right now.
It's a wonderful thing.
I hope he becomes president.
Wouldn't that be marvelous?
Every Western country needs its Algerian Jew.
Just like Eric Zemmour.
I'll say it again.
We all need one.
We need three.
We need a hundred.
Now, moving on to Algeria in fact.
Algerian authorities now refuse to accept any Algerian nationals who have been deported from France.
They say nada mas.
Algerian government now has a policy that all returns must be voluntary.
And anyone deported must buy his own airplane ticket in order for the Algerians to let them in.
This comes after months of tension between Algeria and the government of President Emmanuel Macron.
This began last September when the French significantly tightened up visa rules for Algerians, Tunisians, and Moroccans.
They said, nada más.
France reduced the number of visas granted to these countries due to a lack of willingness of the North African countries to take back their nationals who are living in France illegally.
So this is sort of an interesting case of tit-for-tat, because they won't take back people who don't belong.
That's why the French have said, okay, we're not going to grant visas to the ones who might deserve to come.
And so they're saying, okay, even more, we're not going to take any more of them back.
What they should really say is we won't let anybody with an Algerian passport in the country at all.
In any case, there are ways to make them see sweet reason.
But in the case of Algeria, the French government reduced the number of visas granted by 50%.
After it was revealed that only 22 of the 8,000 Algerians eligible for deportation had actually left the country.
I love that word, eligible for deportation.
It sounds like it's some kind of privilege.
But yeah, it's very simple.
There are all kinds of ways to put pressure on a country to accept its citizens back, even if they don't want to go.
So, I hope that Emmanuel Macron, who hasn't been a complete milquetoast on the question of... No, he hasn't.
Yes, he's done a few good things, but then he has to when he's forced on his right by all these people gaining popularity.
He has to do something semi-sensible.
Now this, I thought, was a very interesting news item that in some obscure way could relate to you and me, Mr. Kersey.
It has to do with podcasts.
Okay.
There's something called Pod Digital Media.
Pod Digital Media is an app that users can use to browse hundreds of shows across the platform hosted by, get this, Black, Latina, Asian, and other podcasts Who's missing?
I've got a guess.
They are in more than a dozen categories.
It's called the PDM app.
It officially launched in the spring of 2021, so it's pretty new, to further the company's mission to promote and drive revenue for multicultural podcasts.
Pod Digital Media is based in New York City.
It's the first multi-culti podcast agency network and a certified minority-owned small business.
So boy, you can just lavish resources on it.
And it exclusively caters to podcasters that are Black, Latino, Asian, and other podcasters of color, and connects them with blue-chip advertisers.
That's the punchline.
No whites, obviously.
The only people who are missing.
Anybody but white.
But I want to know, it says nothing about LGBTQ+.
I'm especially worried about the plus.
It will soon.
It totally will soon.
It depends on who leans on them.
But the plus are really being elbowed out here.
Pod Digital Media will help McDonald's connect with multicultural customers.
It will support McDonald's.
It's going to support McDonald's.
Out of the goodness of its soul, I'm sure.
Well, remember, McDonald's is 365 Black, so... It will support McDonald's by creating custom content, placing pre-roll and mid-roll advertisements.
I think that means pre-roll means before the jabber begins, and mid-roll is mid-jabber.
There'll be these wonderful, multi-culti-oriented McDonald's ads, and the Director of U.S.
Marketing DEI Strategy for McDonald's, We know what DEI stands for.
He says, diverse owned media provide opportunities for our fans.
Did you know McDonald's has fans?
Our fans to see and hear stories told for and by their community, making McDonald's a place where you can enjoy your favorite meal while feeling seen, heard, and respected.
Isn't that what you just want to do?
When you want to go to McDonald's, don't you want to feel seen and feel heard and feel respected?
Well, these ads are going to do it for you.
When I go to McDonald's, I feel like I need a colonoscopy afterwards.
Oh, dear me.
Well, but in any case, podcasts of, by, and for the BIPOCs, paid for by national blue chip advertisers.
Now, when do you think we're going to get McDonald's ads for our podcasts, Mr.
Well, again, I don't think we've ever actually solicited any donations.
Perhaps we should just say we're BIPOC allies.
I think we should.
We're BIPOC allies, and we will apply to POD Digital Media.
PDM.
Yep, yep, yep.
And hear that cash register go ka-ching with our fancy ads from McDonald's.
So, let's see.
Moving right along here.
Mississippi.
Mississippi had a vote on CRT.
I thought this was quite interesting.
The Mississippi State Senate, just last Friday, took a vote on Bill SB 2113 that will, quote, prohibit a child or a student from being told that he is inferior or superior to another.
It says, it goes on to say, and this is quite interesting, no institution of higher learning.
We're talking about universities now.
Shall direct or compel students to affirm that any sex, race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin is inherently superior, or that individuals should be adversely treated based on such characteristics.
Sounds more or less reasonable to me.
And the bill passed overwhelmingly, 32 to 2.
All the Republicans voted to ban universities from telling people that any race, sex, ethnicity, or religion is inherently superior, Even two white Democrats voted in favor.
There are still white elected Democrats in the state of Mississippi?
There are.
Wow.
There are.
But all 14 black Democrats walked out and didn't even vote.
They want people to be told, I guess, that people of a particular race are inherently inferior.
Now, what if it were being said about their race?
I think they would be singing a different tune.
But, of course, the universities are full of, for example, the University of Mississippi's Department of Writing and Rhetoric teaches a course on how whiteness is constructed.
Students analyze whiteness as it evolved over time, white identity and white supremacy, white privilege and whiteness.
And Ibram Kendi is splashed all over various university websites.
He says the only remedy to racist discrimination is anti-racist discrimination.
The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination, and the bill now moves to the House.
Now, was this done in response to the whole critical race theory?
Yes, very much so.
This is a missed to be voted on CRT.
So we'll see what comes of that.
One last point on CRT.
Colin Flaherty was writing about that about a decade ago, back in 2013.
He was writing about this, and I started thinking to myself, you know, because he started Writing for American Thinker, where a large part of his incredible writings are all still kept.
This is an excellent, excellent archive.
A phenomenal archive of Colin Flaherty's writing.
If you go there, you can read all about where he was talking about how this was animating a lot of this anti-white violence.
That this is what these kids were learning in colleges and at homes and in churches.
And in the entertainment that they were, that they were digesting on a daily basis and I started to think, I wonder if...
Chris Rufo, the guy who writes for City Journal and who's gone on this just incredible crusade to bring this to the forefront.
Now we're seeing people like Stephen Miller.
Did they read these pieces in American Thinker?
Because there was a time, Mr. Taylor, American Thinker was read by a lot, it had a massive audience.
I believe its audience, like so many right-of-center websites, have seen their algorithm hit very hard.
But I mean, American Thinker was one of the few websites that would allow this racial conversation to take place.
Remember when Breitbart had a subset called Black Crime in response to how popular some of McCall and Flaherty's writings were?
Yes.
And you've actually published at American Thinker, correct?
Yes, yes.
Once or twice.
That is correct.
I remember Rush Limbaugh actually quoted articles from American Thinker.
Yes!
He actually read one of Flaherty's articles from American Thinker on his show.
Well, that will never happen again.
Um, but yes, so moving on to a different area, one that you're very familiar with.
I know that you follow the news about Atlanta.
I'm sure you're aware of this, but Matthew Wilson, age 31, of Chertsey, Surrey in England, was visiting his American girlfriend.
She says, he was supposed to be here for three months because we've been long distance for a while, said Catherine Shepard.
And Ms.
Shepard, whose apartment is in the Atlanta suburb of Brookhaven, told news reporters that the couple woke up on January 16th, the sound of more than 30 gunshots coming from an apartment complex directly behind theirs.
Well, it wasn't just the sound of gunshots.
A bullet traveled through the wall of Ms.
Shepherd's apartment, hitting Wilson.
Police were in the vicinity pursuing reports of the gunfire when they called 911, and Wilson was then taken to a local trauma center where he died.
Now, the shooting appears to be one of those random acts involving individuals participating in reckless discharge of firearms, say the police.
This guy was a University of Exeter.
He was an expert in science.
And, well, I guess the problem is the Brits don't realize that some of the better Atlantans like to celebrate with a little noise.
You know, when the welfare check comes in, when baby daddy gets out of prison.
Now, the thing that surprises me is this round went through an exterior wall.
And the exterior wall, I looked at the photographs, it's siding, and then it went through drywall, and then it went through a headboard, but the headboard looks like upholstery, not hardwood.
So I'm wondering if this is a rifle round.
I was going to ask what caliber.
The news articles say nothing about that, but that seems like quite a remarkable penetration to me.
What the news articles also state is that they thought this was a, quote, safe area of Atlanta.
That's right.
Miss Shepherd chose it because she thought it seemed safe.
Yeah, it's an area called Brookhaven.
Now, Mr. Taylor, Brookhaven is one of those parts of Atlanta that created their own cityhood.
They seceded from Atlanta so they could have their own city hall, their own police force, keep more of their tax revenue.
Brookhaven is just past Buckhead.
They're right next to each other.
Oh, I see.
So it should be.
Well, it would have the reputation of being near Buckhead and probably reasonably safe.
Well, there's a MARTA station.
There's a Brookhaven MARTA station.
Uh-oh, always a bad sign.
There you go.
Well, you know, there are no specifications as to who the perps were.
There have been no arrests so far, so we should not jump to discriminatory conclusions.
No, we shouldn't, but... No, we will anyway.
Yeah, we will anyway.
Now, this leads us to a new form of blasphemy.
A fellow by the name of Christoph Hrabik.
He plays for the San Jose Barracudas, and that's in the American Hockey League.
Well, during a January 12th game against the Tucson Roadrunners, Mr. Hrabik imitated the movements of a monkey as he taunted Boko Imama of the Roadrunners.
Now, Boko Imama, as one would imagine, is melanin-enhanced.
Now, the American Hockey League became aware of the incident on January 13th and started an investigation during which Hrabik was removed from all team activities and was suspended for 30 games.
Now, I'm not much of a sports aficionado, but that seems like a pretty long suspension.
30 games.
30 games.
Well, Hrabik, of course, issued a public apology and he said he had already apologized personally to Imama He said people should know that I had absolutely no inappropriate intent.
The gesture was made in the heat of battle.
And while I didn't mean anything racist, I realize now through my own ignorance how my gesture could be interpreted.
I alone am responsible.
It was terrible.
When I heard about Boko's reaction, I was horrified by what I'd done.
He's a player I respect.
I'm sorry for putting him through this.
No, no, hold on.
You're the guy who's suspended for 30 games.
Yeah.
Uh-oh.
I sent a personal apology to Boko and sincerely hope that you'll forgive me.
And I want to apologize to the American Hockey League, etc, etc, etc.
Well, the Barracudas and the San Jose Sharks, their NHL parent, apologized to me, Mama, and the entire hockey community.
Well, why just to the entire hockey community?
Why not to the entire world?
To all past and future generations?
Don't you think they deserve apologies for this?
And as part of the suspension, Hrabik will be given a chance to work with the NHL's Player Inclusion Committee.
Well, I bet he was dying to do that.
He will get education and training on racism and inclusion, and he can apply to the American Hockey League for reinstatement after missing 21 games.
Oh my goodness.
After 21 games, he's going to apply.
But the decision will be based on an evaluation of his progress in the necessary education and training.
Poor guy.
He could have insulted him in any other way.
Insulted his mother, his religion.
Well, maybe not his religion.
No, no.
But in any other way, and not have gotten a penalty like this.
But he made some sort of monkey gesture.
I wonder what it was.
I wonder if it was caught on video.
I don't know.
But my question is, how many barracudas are there in San Jose?
These nicknames.
I mean, come on.
Barracudas.
It's on the coast, you know?
It's on the... Barracudas.
Well, roadrunners in Tucson?
I guess there's some of them, too.
In any case, as I say, this is a new form of blasphemy.
New form of blasphemy.
You can't... Now, this is a story that we didn't have time to squeeze in last time around, and it has to do with a certain state legislator by the name of Mike Holmes.
Yeah, I'll do this one really quick.
This is one that's been around for a couple weeks, but it's out of Alabama, and a Muslim group has asked state rep Mike Holmes to drop out of the Sons of Confederate Veterans.
Now, I'll make this brief.
The only reason why this is so interesting is because of the, what's that word, chutzpah, from this organization.
A Muslim civil rights group, just so you guys know it, the Council on American Islamic Relations, they've called upon this state rep to drop his membership.
In reverence of his ancestors.
It's got to go.
Quote, it is unacceptable for a lawmaker whose duty it is to represent all constituents in this district to be a member of an organization that honors traitors and white supremacists, said Ibram Hooper, director of national... Isn't it Hooper?
H-O-O-P-E?
Hooper!
Yeah, you're right.
Yeah, I've been following this guy for a while.
Old Ibram Hooper.
Hooper, Hooper.
Director of National Communications for the Council on American Islamic Relations.
Holmes informed of Hooper's statement declined Kerr's request.
Quote, I have no plan to leave in the sons of Confederate veterans, said Holmes.
He defended his membership in the group saying his ancestors fought in the Confederate Army
because they felt their way of life was being threatened.
He said none of his ancestors owned slaves.
A care has called for the removal of Confederate flags, statues, and symbols from public spaces nationwide.
We of course know what happened in Spain when the Moors took over,
what they did to all the Christian symbols in the Andalusian portion of that country.
Oh yes. You know, just the nerve of these people.
I mean, it'd be like going, it'd be like moving to the Muslim country and saying,
these people should stop being Muslim.
Muslims believe in forcible conversion.
Correct.
Muslims believe in this and that and the other. I don't like. Stop being Muslim.
Yeah.
The nerve of these people.
Join us in condemning your ancestors.
How dare they existed so you could breathe at this point.
They learn quick once they come over here.
It works for the blacks.
It's going to work for them.
Now, finally, Jordan Peterson.
I think probably a lot of our listeners know who he is.
He had quite a profile as a sort of a bit of an iconoclast.
He never went all the way into any kind of race realism or white advocacy, but he said a number of sensible things, many of them obvious.
But he wrote an article for the National Post, that's a big Canadian magazine, newspaper, I beg your pardon, called, Why I Am No Longer a Tenured Professor at the University of Toronto, which he used to be.
I'll read you just a few quotations from it.
My qualified and supremely trained heterosexual white male graduate students face a negligible chance of being offered university research positions, despite stellar scientific dossiers.
My students are also partly unacceptable because they are my students.
How can I accept prospective researchers and train them in good conscience knowing their employment prospects are minimal?
He goes on to say, how can I accept perspective?
Sorry.
He says there are simply not enough qualified BIPOC people in the pipeline to meet diversity targets.
There are not.
This means we're out to produce a generation of researchers utterly unqualified for the job.
Well said, Jordan.
Very well said.
Well said.
He goes on to say, all my craven colleagues must craft D.I.E.
statements, that's of course diversity, inclusion and equity statements, to get a research grant.
And they all lie.
then in parentheses it says accepting the minority of true believers and they teach their students
to lie and they do it constantly with various rationalizations and justifications
further corrupting what is already a stunningly corrupt enterprise. Well good for JP.
I think that's pretty good talk. He just he just went on uh gosh I don't know if we should
mention this guy's name you know talk about podcasts uh Joe Rogan has over a million listeners
each of his podcasts and Jordan Peterson just went on this program and I think one of the things
that we've seen over the past few years is just incredible push for censorship what we've learned
Anybody who has a contrarian position to what is regarded as the settled science on COVID, they have to be silenced.
Now we know what happened during the Trump era when anybody who was pushing things too far In what you would call our perspective, they were silenced.
They were targeted.
Your YouTube channel for the main Ameren channel had over 100, I want to say 150,000 subscribers?
No, about 130,000.
130,000.
A little off.
But if you added the podcast channel, which was never promoted, it was never something that we went out of our way to make.
It was well on its way to, I want to say it was over 30,000 when it was silenced.
And that was something that was just growing organically.
And that's the thing that I think scares those in power the most.
We talked earlier about those who have been promoted because of their steadfast resolve
and believing diversity is our greatest strength, regardless of the evidence that shows it not to be true.
There are still people out there who know this is wrong.
You are one of them.
And as we prepare for what's gonna be a bombardment of Black History Month, and it's gonna be nauseating,
I just wanna say thank you to all of our listeners, and especially to Mr. Taylor, who's,
I believe this is what, the 32nd anniversary of American Renaissance?
Getting up there.
And I am a devoted listener to the podcast.
I listen to every word that goes into the mic.
So does our racially aware cat.
The race-realist cat listens to all our podcasts, too.
Now, I think we have time for just one little story about Australian criminals.
Half of all the young people held in detention facilities in Australia are indigenous.
That means abos.
Just 60% of the population of the 10 through 17 age cohort is, but more than half are, aborigines.
And Steffi Trevith of the Change the Record Coalition said the data was an indictment on every state and territory.
Perhaps it's an indictment on the behavior of aboriginals.
Now, There's been a committee set up by the Australian government to raise the age of criminal responsibility, which in Australia is apparently age 10.
The police can intervene people age 10.
And that got me curious as to what the age of criminal responsibility is in the United States.
Have you ever thought about that?
I haven't.
At what age are you criminally responsible and subject to police intervention?
Well, in New York, it's age 7.
Age 7.
In North Carolina and Washington, just those two states, age 8.
In no state is it age 9, but age 10 in Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, and Wisconsin.
The age of criminal responsibility is age 10.
In Nebraska, it's age 11.
California, Massachusetts, Utah, and Delaware, 12.
In New Hampshire, age 13.
And everywhere else, it's age 14.
I just thought that was an interesting little statistic, all these interesting facts.
But they are saying that because 6% of a certain age cohort accounts for over half of the young people held in detention facilities in Australia are aboriginals, we must change the way the whole system works.
But we have come to an end of our time, and on behalf of the indispensable Paul Kersey, I'd like to thank you for your attention.
▲
Export Selection