All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 18, 2021 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:07
White Supremacy on Trial in Kenosha
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Radio Renaissance.
It is November 18th, Anno Domini 2021.
I'm Jared Taylor, and with me is my indispensable, irreplaceable co-host.
As is usual, we begin with a listener comment.
A rather fine detail, but we appreciate fine details.
Our listener wrote in to say, you mentioned the European hijab promotion campaign.
That had the slogan, freedom is in the hijab.
Now this was stopped due primarily from pressure from the French.
And you also quoted a politician who noted that the hijab is compulsory in some countries.
And this person added, just ask all those millions of girls in Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Somalia or Afghanistan if freedom is in the hijab.
Now, the idea was that Europeans have to get used to people wearing hijabs.
That's just wonderful.
And that freedom is in the hijab.
As this guy says... Alright, you quoted this guy that there are people in Nigeria, Burkina Faso, etc.
that are forced to wear hijab.
He says, Nigeria does not require women to wear hijabs.
So, the politician we were quoting got it wrong.
Wow!
And he goes on to say, as a matter of fact, that Lagos schools forbid the wearing of the hijab by female students, and they did so until a court overruled the rule.
And as far as religion is concerned, Nigeria is about evenly split between Muslims and Christians, and some reports say that Christians outnumber Muslims.
In any case, there are plenty of Christians and the hijab is not compulsory in Nigeria.
So, We were quoting someone who made an error, but our sharp-eared listeners caught that and they have corrected us.
Now, the big news for American Renaissance is we just completed our 18th American Renaissance Conference.
It was at Montgomery Bell State Park in Tennessee.
A crashing, smashing success.
It was delightful to be back in action after having had to cancel the conference last year because of the COVID.
We had a great turnout and interestingly enough our usual welcoming party of misfits and purple haired people was just a small scraggly band.
They were no bother ever so what?
So you're saying the police did their job?
Not only did the police do their job, the police kept them at a great distance.
You couldn't even feed them, you couldn't even toss peanuts to them, they were so far away.
You can throw a peanut pretty far.
No, you can throw a peanut pretty far, but they were across a small body of water, no less.
Could practically, couldn't practically even hear them.
And they were a tired, unhappy lot, maybe Oh, 10 people at most.
So, they were absolutely no problem at all.
We had some great talks.
People that some of our listeners have, of course, heard of.
Peter Brimelow was there.
Sam Dixon gave his usual rousing closing address.
Your Servant gave a talk that seemed to be well received.
Our star writer, Gregory Hood, he got a standing ovation for a really first-class talk.
The great misfortune was that our European parliamentarians Dries van Lagenhove and Ruben Canepa were unable to come because they refused to get themselves vaccinated, but they gave video addresses that were really quite excellent.
And Michelle Malkin was there.
Quite a courageous thing for her to have appeared before people who are called all the usual names.
But then she is increasingly being called all the usual names herself.
You know, Mr. Taylor, let's be blunt.
Any white person who dares object to anything at this point, if you're going out and you're protesting the COVID lockdown, you are actually being targeted by those same people who you said were kept across that body of water.
That now is a sign of White supremacy.
That's right.
Let's be blunt about how this term now is blanketing anybody who dares object to the state.
Because, let's say what they are, they are the shock troops of the establishment.
And Michelle Malkin has called them out, and she's bared the brunt of that for a long time.
Yes, she has.
And you can be Asian, 100% Asian, which she is, and still be a white supremacist.
That's what we are told over and over, over and over.
One thing that this brought home to me was the importance of people actually getting together with like-minded comrades.
It's all very well to listen to us on the podcast, but there is absolutely nothing like being in a room full of 200 or 300 people who really understand.
There's a kind of energy.
There's a kind of camaraderie.
And so many people told me that they left that meeting energized.
They were back in action.
They're feeling like fighting the good fight.
And as I thought about it, these days there are lots of people who make videos, people make podcasts, people have websites, but there's nobody else actually getting meetings together like this.
That's one of the most important things American Renaissance do, that does.
This was brought home to me.
We will definitely have our conference next year, probably about this time.
And it is my hope that this COVID nonsense will have been eliminated by then.
People will be able to travel internationally.
We'll have people from overseas, guests from overseas, speakers from overseas.
But it was a great conference.
And those of you who are listening, who attended, I'm sure you will agree.
And thank you so much for helping make it a great success.
There was one person who couldn't make the conference that I know a lot of people were probably really excited about hearing.
You haven't heard much about him recently.
Just real quick, just want to let everyone out there know.
Call him Flaherty.
Keep him in your thoughts.
Keep him in your prayers.
Send positive vibes his way.
He's a guy who, he was the canary in the coal mine doing those YouTube videos.
He built up channel after channel after channel that YouTube struck down in 2014, 2015, 2016.
Over and over and over and over again.
2015, 2016, over and over and over and over again.
And yet he never ceased his zeal and just showing what was actually happening.
Colin Ferguson is a great man and he is at a critical stage in a fight against cancer.
And so he was unfortunately unable to be there.
He was represented by a very talented musician called the Barbershop Man.
And the Barbershop Man had a musical tribute to him with music videos.
It was really very well done.
And I won't name all the other speakers who were there.
I will just mention F. Roger Devlin.
F. Roger Devlin is really one of the intellectuals of our movement.
His was not sort of a rousing, go-out-and-storm-the-castle kind of speech, but I think from an intellectual, interesting content, his was the very best.
He was talking about the role of envy.
in race relations and we will be publishing his article this Friday.
Really a top-notch investigation of an important aspect of race relations that I think is badly neglected.
In any case, it was really a great time.
We were very, very happy it went off so well.
And some of you out there, we'll see you next year.
So, At this point, the Rittenhouse jury is in deliberations.
It could very well be that today the verdict will come down.
And this is a trial that has just put the country on its ear in the strangest possible way.
Just reading from the Daily Mail.
The Daily Mail, of course, writes about, it's a British paper, it writes about some of these things more honestly than some of our local papers do.
But the dichotomy between the way people have seen this, Kyle Rittenhouse, of course, he said he was defending his hometown from this angry mob, protecting property.
His critics say, of course, that he embodies systemic racism.
Systemic racism.
This has been the usual refrain now.
He was a racist, no matter what.
It doesn't make any difference that he killed white people, shot white people.
He was a racist.
Only a racist would object to being called a racist.
I guess.
But, and this is one aspect of this, the lefties who've been demonstrating out in front of the courthouse, and by the way, their whooping and hollering is audible inside the courthouse where the jury is deliberating.
This is a kind of intolerable pressure on them.
They know very well that if they get this thing the wrong way, the city could very well burn.
Not just Kenosha.
They are calling the people whom he shot heroes.
Of course, these, the one was a sex pervert, they were criminals, they had criminal records, and they're out there burning things.
Rosenbaum, the first guy he shot, had put a dumpster on fire and was trying to push it to a gas station.
How wonderful and noble is that?
He wanted a gas station to go on fire?
Set on fire?
These are wild, lunatic, crazy, destructive people.
Why are they being called heroes?
Because they were out there demonstrating for racial justice.
Let's call them what they are.
We look at this gentleman with a highly negative light, unfortunately, in our increasingly anti-white world.
He is seen as the harbinger of hope against the battle of white supremacy.
These people are latter-day John Browns.
That's all they are.
And they view us the same way that John Brown and his band of murderers, they viewed slave owners.
They see us as the equivalent.
We are probably, well, we are, of course, the moral equivalent of slave owners.
But the U.S.
media has been very much involved.
This turned a case of clear-cut self-defense into this racially polarized circus.
And reports have emerged.
Now, I'm not sure that they are all that reliable.
Jack Posobiec appears to have been the source of these.
And what his sources are, I don't know.
But reports have emerged that two of the jurors have been holding out on a decision because they fear for their lives.
Also, the judge in the case has been receiving all kinds of intimidation.
Apparently, he got one email message that said, enjoy your term, judge.
It's going to be your last.
Another guy wrote and said, if I ever meet you in person, I fully intend to spit directly into your face.
You are disgusting.
Another one says, make sure and tell Schroeder, that's the judge's name, what a worthless piece of S-H-I-T he is.
Then another one, he'll find out officially when his heart seizes up in a few years and he has to stand before a real judge.
This is just a stopgap. They invoke religion when it's necessary for them.
Otherwise they're probably out there agitating against anyone who dares believe in morality and
ethics based on the commandments of a god. This guy has been following the law and he
has made rulings that disappointed both the prosecution and the defense, but the fact that
he has not just immediately condemned Rittenhouse, I suppose it should have been a directed verdict.
The judge should have said, I'm not going to bother with the jury.
This guy is guilty on all crimes, life imprisonment.
And, of course, police forces across the country are preparing for civil unrest.
The people are writing that, you know, this is going to be dangerous no matter which way the jury goes.
It's going to be dangerous only one way.
The people who support Kyle Rittenhouse are not going to be out with their AR-15s blowing up and shooting up the courthouse.
It's going to be dangerous if there is an acquittal.
I can tell you they won't be drinking black rifle coffee, though.
No.
Once Rittenhouse is acquitted.
Which I do believe, we don't make predictions often, today is November 17th, I do believe it will happen today.
So by the time people listen to this, I believe we will have already been into the next stage of whatever weird iteration we're in now in post-America.
That could very well be.
The verdict could be out by the time you hear this, ladies and gentlemen.
Now, in Kenosha, there's at least one house with a great big sign on it that says, kids live here.
In other words, please don't burn our house down.
Some people are clearly afraid of rioting.
Now, one of the things that is disturbing to me is that in this case and in the Arbery case, the jury has not been sequestered.
The jury, if it wants to, can very easily read just how upset all these lefties are and that is going to make them unwilling in some cases.
And according to Prosobiec, already two people have said they don't want to vote in a particular way because they're afraid that the riots will consume the city and perhaps the country.
You know, another aspect of this has been just the immediate, instant unfairness with which Kyle Rittenhouse is treated.
Immediately after the riots, when he was in the national spotlight, social media companies began to block users who were supporting him.
Twitter suspended the accounts of users who called Rittenhouse innocent, including his own lawyer.
His own lawyer was saying he was innocent.
I can't have a lawyer saying that.
And Facebook said it designated this shooter as a mass murderer.
And of course, his accounts were gone from Facebook and Instagram.
It also blocked searches for Kyle Rittenhouse.
You couldn't even search for Kyle Rittenhouse on Facebook.
And GoFundMe, of course, removed the page that was set up for his defense fund.
The company said it's violated its ban on fundraisers involving, and I'm quoting them, the legal defense of alleged crimes associated with hate, violence, harassment, bullying, discrimination, terrorism, or intolerance.
Now, I don't know just which of these they said that they were disqualifying him for, but they have certainly supported the fundraising for the family of one of Rittenhouse's assailants, Anthony Huber.
Anthony Huber was a course of violence, so they say this list here is violence, harassment, hate, bullying, discrimination.
Well, they certainly don't worry about violence in some cases.
Twitter is still banning or suspending users that support Rittenhouse, even as the trial proceeds.
And Facebook results for Rittenhouse's name turn up no results.
This is just astonishing, this immediate rush to judgment.
And I just learned the other day that very shortly after the shootings, none other in authority than Joe Biden himself called Rittenhouse a white supremacist.
And there's article after article, and the great Gregory Hood is putting something together on the number of people who are injecting race into this and saying this whole thing is white supremacy.
Yeah, in a lot of ways it's a class situation, but unfortunately any encounter that a white person has with a non-white can immediately be broadcast by the regime media as an example of white supremacy.
Go back to Sandman.
But there's no non-white.
Exactly!
And that's the funniest thing.
One of my favorite commenters, Jason Whitlock, he's a black He's a black reporter, talks about sports a lot, and he tweeted this out.
It appears that white liberals who die in a dispute with the white conservative are posthumously granted black status.
And I thought that was just brilliant!
I thought that was just brilliant because, again, there are so many articles you can read.
I understand Hood's working on this, but Fox News has been going on and on and on about how I mean, you've got Joy Reid calling him a vigilante.
Representative Gwen Moore, a Democrat from Wisconsin, used the term white supremacist when talking about Rittenhouse during an appearance on CNN back in March.
And, you know, go back to all the craziness of 2020.
This was one of those stories that, in a lot of ways, no, this was the story that kind of ended these riots.
I don't really think much else happened.
No, Portland continued after that.
Well, Portland continued, but again, Portland, the police had basically abdicated their role and acquiesced the streets to the rioters.
Well, basically, a white man with a gun is a white supremacist, no matter what he does with it.
I think that's really what it boils down to.
A white man with a gun is a white supremacist.
That's what gun control is all about, to get the hands out of white men with black guns.
I guess so.
Well, tell us what the connection with Nick Sandman is, and remind our readers who Nick Sandman is.
Yeah, you know, you have to go back to 2019.
Remember, I mean, it's basically been a witch hunt since Donald Trump was elected, because basically, how could this guy have been elected?
It had to have been white supremacy funding and fueling this movement.
Anyone who wears the red MAGA hat obviously is going to be a Obviously going to be enjoying that systemic racism,
regardless of their position in life.
So remember back in 2019, I had forgotten that Nick Sandman was in 2019 until I read
about this today.
He was swept in the controversy after a video depicted him wearing a MAGA hat, smiling at
a Amerindian, Nathan Phillips, who was beating a drum and singing a chant as he was surrounded
by Sandman's peers, who had joined also in on the chant on the front steps of Link Memorial.
This was in 2019 at the March for Life.
The way that it was portrayed by CNN, the incident with Sandman and the other white teens as being racially charged, before it was discovered by additional footage that a group of black Hebrew Israelites had provoked a confrontation.
So immediately all these media outlets and a lot of conservatives said, oh, throw these white kids under the bus.
This is disgusting!
Oh my gosh, how dare!
That they had apparently walked up to this Indian guy and were supposedly tormenting him and taunting him.
Which was completely, completely crazy.
But everybody jumped on that.
These white kids ran through a gauntlet of anti-white hate.
Yes.
And then they happened to come upon, you know, just this Indian and found pinging a drum and stuff.
And they just stared at him.
The radical group, the Israelite, the black Israelites, the racial Through anti-white slurs, let's just say racial slurs, anti-white slurs, the students as they were waiting for the bus following the March for Life.
Footage then showed Phillips, who was in town for the Indigenous Peoples March, approaching the students amid the rising tension.
Sandman believes, so of course Sandman was thrown through the bus, thrown under the bus.
He ended up suing, settling out of court with a number of media institutions that quickly libeled him.
Well, The smallest things come in, or sometimes the greatest things come in the smallest packages.
Both these kids were in high school, both Sandman and, if you remember at the time, Rittenhouse was 17 years old.
And let's be blunt, he showed more heart and more determination to protect small businesses that had been completely abandoned by That's right.
No, he was reacting to something that I have felt, I'm talking about Rittenhouse now, in a very, very visceral way.
It drives me crazy to see videos of people burning and looting indiscriminately.
I want to go in there with an AR-15.
You know the story of what happened when the city where I live was burning and anyways.
You want to do something.
Yeah, but there's nothing.
You go up there and people didn't understand what, you know, these buildings are being tried to burn down.
You're looking at these people.
It's not about what you think it is.
These people hate every symbol.
There's a, you know, every symbol, every statue, every street.
Every building named for a white person is now on the chopping block.
It doesn't matter if they were a confederate.
It doesn't matter if they were a Spaniard in 1492 sailing the ocean blue.
And you know the fact is probably every one of them was by contemporary standards a homophobe.
So that's good enough reason to take them down.
They wouldn't have liked transsexuals.
I don't think they even understand the transsexual stuff.
I don't understand it.
It's 2021, but here's why this is so important.
If you recall, at the 2020 Republican National Convention, one of the things that Trump did beautifully was he had the McCluskeys give an address, and the McCluskeys were, of course, the white couple who had that beautiful home in St.
Louis.
The mob went right by it.
They were marching, if memory serves, to go to the white Democrat mayor, the female mayor's house, who was right down the street, to protest against her.
And this was when the black cop had been murdered in cold blood.
David Dorn, the security guard, if you remember, who was in the 70s, shot by the black guy
while he was trying to protect St. Louis.
They were invited by Trump to give an address.
Sandman was invited by Trump to give an address.
Trump to his great credit defended, defended.
The McCloskeys.
The McCloskeys.
He defended Sandman, but he also defended initially, immediately, Kyle Rittenhouse.
What this is all about.
Sandman has come out and he thinks Kyle Rittenhouse should sue news outlets to hold the media
accountable after the complete rush to judgment on the case.
The parallels between Kyle Rittenhouse and myself are impossible not to draw.
The way the media has treated you is terrible and you don't have to face it alone.
Kyle was almost immediately labeled a white supremacist and a domestic terrorist.
To many, my red haggamate clearly meant that I was a racist.
Kyle wasn't given his day in court by his critics and neither was I. The attacks on Kyle came from the national news media just as they came for me.
They came quickly, without hesitation.
Because Kyle was an easy target that they could paint in the way they wanted to.
And then just to finish this off, here it is, and this is very good.
Quote, this is the problem with liberal media news outlets in the United States.
They want to get the story first, get the most views, make the most money, and advance the agenda from liberal patrons.
These outlets cover themselves when they are wrong with small footnotes at the ends of long stories clarifying that new information has come out And that they have updated their coverage.
News shouldn't be a scorecard that constantly changes.
News is about coverage that includes a statement of facts that does not need to be corrected.
But the media doesn't do this.
The media rushes to be the first to report.
In our hyper-polarized society, the first impression of Kyle has been set in stone probably for the rest of his life.
He then specifically called out President Biden.
He called out LeBron James, and he called out Rep Ayanna Pressley,
the Democrat of Massachusetts, who has the hair problem.
She's the bald black woman who's constantly berating white people
for insufficiently bowing down to her moral greatness because of her blackness.
But I think, again, this is just one of these moments where all the bad stuff that has happened, and again, the reaction, the blowback to Trump's election has been astonishing when you think about the amount of deplatforming that's gone on, when you think about the relationships among families that have been ruined.
But the point is, here you have two small stories that are turning out to be, you know, Lighting a path forward.
And Sandman has expressed himself very well.
Yeah.
I hope Kyle Rittenhouse follows his advice.
Of course, it would be easier to follow it if he's acquitted.
Now, Boston's new mayor is Michelle Wu.
Michelle Wu, a former city council member.
She became the first woman and the first person of color to be elected mayor of Boston.
That happened on November 2nd and she assumed office Tuesday this week.
That means every single mayor has been a white man.
Now that's got to stop, you know.
That's just no good at all.
And on the day she took office, NPR tweeted the following.
While many are hailing it as a turning point, others see it as more of a disappointment that the three black candidates couldn't even come close.
So this is very interesting.
All the world is whooping, ah, a woman, ah, a non-white, but NPR covers that on saying that people are disappointed.
Now, the tweet linked to a story on NPR about all the disappointed blacks, and I will read from the article.
A black says, I got home and I cried.
This is Danny Rivera, an artist and civil rights activist.
I cried my eyes out.
Here's this guy sobbing his eyes out, apparently, because I don't know the next time we'll see a black mayor in this city.
Now, there was an interim black mayor because Kim Janey, she was the head of the city council and she became interim mayor when Marty Walsh, the mayor at the time, was named labor secretary.
But there was a preliminary round and she finished fourth among the five mayoral candidates.
So poor Danny Rivera, crying his eyes out.
And NPR quotes someone else, a 20-year-old cottage student says, it's just one of those things where it feels like what else is new?
Another non-black.
What's the black population of Boston, anyway?
It's probably about, what, 25%?
It's not very large.
And they think they are owed a black mayor, for heaven's sake.
And it's very clear that for NPR, some BIPOCs are more BIPOC than others.
It's about 25%.
That number has gone up significantly.
NPR sure knows what counts.
I guess that's why the B is the first letter in BIPOC.
So NPR doesn't care that we got an Asian.
We got a non-white.
We got a woman.
No, no, no, no.
The poor black people.
The radio station's website also cited data showing that the three black candidates in the preliminary round who were eliminated They got three quarters of the vote in the highest concentrations of black neighborhoods, but only one-fourth in the whitest areas.
Obviously a sign of bigotry.
When black people vote for blacks, oh my gosh, that's obvious and normal.
If white people don't vote for blacks, ooh, how evil, evil they are.
And they quoted a former Massachusetts State Rep, Marie St.
Fleur, that data speak for itself and it's troubling.
Well, son of a gun.
Black people vote for blacks?
That's okay.
White people vote for whites?
That is troubling.
Well, it always has been.
Let's investigate this Ms.
Wu.
She's, I believe, only in her 30s.
She was born in Chicago to Taiwanese parents.
She was elected to the City Council November 2013.
And in this runoff election, after the original maybe half a dozen candidates, they just voted for the top two, she won with 64% of the vote, beating out Anissa Esaibi George.
Okay.
So that was a woman.
In fact, not one of the initial candidates was a white man.
Who had prior been the only people who had been mayors of Boston.
There wasn't even one in the running this time.
I guess they're all feeling Chastened.
You're setting aside to allow pure diversity to set in.
That's right.
White privilege has got to come to an end, so they're not even running.
Now, Anissa Esaibi George, she is half Jordanian, but she looks perfectly white to me, and she's one of these ladies who, when it suits her, claims to be a BIPOC, and when it suits her, she claims to be a non-BIPOC.
In any case, she is not this woo person.
I would not say she is entirely on the ball.
She wrote, metal detectors have been found to negatively impact students' sense of safety at school.
Well, she hasn't swallowed the baloney.
officers disproportionately criminalized black and Latin students perpetuating
the school to prison pipeline. Asians are often pretty sensible about this stuff.
This lady sounds as though she has swallowed the baloney.
Well she hasn't swallowed the baloney, she's willingly engorged herself in the baloney to try and get to be the mayor.
That's the only way you can.
But metal detectors have been found to negatively impact students' sense of safety.
I'd feel a lot safer if everybody has to go through a metal detector.
What is this nonsense?
And the SROs, oh, they disproportionately criminalize black and boys.
She's got it all figured out.
Latinx students.
She goes on to say, we must immediately move to dismantle these punitive measures and reinvest in restorative justice practices employed by trusted adult school community members.
And she was asked about the fact that we talked about this, I believe, just last week.
A white principal, a school principal, high school principal, was knocked out, had several ribs broken, by a black girl who attacked her.
She was asked specifically about this.
Her mind has not been changed.
So she's firm in her beliefs.
And speaking of schools, There was a board meeting held at the Fort Worth Independent School District just last week.
This meeting was devoted in part to considerations of critical race theory, which was opposed by some of the parents.
We're always happy to see the parents talking about This kind of horrible instruction to their students.
Well, a certain Malik Austin, I think we have to explain from that name.
He is one of our African American fellow citizens.
He got up and he was defending CRT.
It turns out he's part of the Brotherhood Movement, a Second Amendment group.
But he said, how dare you come up here and talk about the things my daddy and my grandparents went through, lynching, oppression, Jim Crow, and my kids are still afflicted by this.
So I guess that explains the reason why we have to talk about, you know, his kids are still being affected by lynching, oppression, and Jim Crow.
Well, word redlining in there.
Come on.
He left out the most important one that stopped black accumulation of wealth.
No, no.
He's way behind.
He's still living in the Jim Crow era.
But his one-minute time limit was up, and officers walked up to escort him out of the room, and as he left, Malik Austin says, I'll bring back my soldiers with me next time, locked and loaded.
I'll bring 1,000 soldiers.
And as he marched out, he's shouting, locked and loaded, locked and loaded.
I've seen a video of this.
He's an obstreperous, angry guy.
Now, one pair in the audience, Holly Plemons, told Fox News that she offered to take Austin aside and have a one-to-one conversation.
She turned to him and said, you're not intelligent.
You're not intelligent.
She's white, after all.
And images from Malik Austin's Facebook page show him with several members of the Brotherhood movement carrying around black rifles.
Needless to say, some of the people there felt somewhat threatened by this guy promising to bring back a thousand of his soldiers locked and loaded.
They're gonna get CRT at the barrel of a gun, I guess.
Well, as it turns out, he has something of a criminal record, this guy.
In 2004, he was convicted of public lewdness.
Not quite sure what's called public lewdness these days.
That's probably one of those crimes that George Soros thinks should be decriminalized.
Pooping in public?
Nope.
That's fine.
Urination in public?
No.
Copulation in public?
Who cares?
You know, that's good sex ed for the kids.
In 2009, he was sentenced to prison for assaulting a family member.
In 1993, he was sentenced to prison for sexual assault.
Lived there three years.
Lived in the big house for three years.
So he's a sterling character.
But, He is not the sort of person whom the FBI has been targeting.
No, he's not.
It turns out that House Republicans in the Judiciary Committee sent a letter Tuesday to Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Thank God that guy is on the Supreme Court, by the way.
After an FBI whistleblower provided a, quote, protective disclosure, end quote, revealing that the FBI's Counterterrorism Division is compiling and categorizing threat assessments related to parents, including a document Directing FBI personnel to use a specific threat tag to track potential investigations.
No, these are parents who are protesting CRT.
These are parents who are protesting CRT.
The evidence, an email sent that day before Garland testified on October 21st, referenced your October 4th directive to the FBI to address school board threats and notified FBI personnel about a new threat tag created by counterterrorism and criminal divisions.
This disclosure provides specific evidence that federal law enforcement operationalized counterterrorism tools at the behest of a left-wing special interest group against concerned parents.
This is astonishing.
FBI counterterrorism tracking parents at school board meetings.
Yeah, you know, he came under fire last month during a congressional testimony where he denied weaponizing the FBI against parents opposed to Critical Race Theory, or as we like to dub it simply, anti-white racist hate, and vaccine-related mandates, using a flimsy memo from the National School Board's Association of Justification.
Subsequently, the National School Board Association basically came out and said, Mea culpa, we're sorry, but it appears Merrick Garland has The fire rolling once the logs are lit.
There's no putting this out.
The disclosure came days after a National Association of School Boards asked the Biden administration to take extraordinary measures to prevent alleged threats against schools, staff that the association said were coming from parents who oppose mask mandates, and the teaching of Critical Race 3. I wonder what
percentage of a lot of this started because of the mask mandates across schools nationwide last year
and then when parents started to see as their kids were home and they were also at home and they
were watching these Zoom classes and they started to actually listen to what was being
taught.
And then they thought, wait, wait a second.
And they got online, they searched these terms, Mr. Taylor.
And they're like, wait, wait a second.
What?
They're saying that all the blame for all the problems in the world fall on Timothy and Tammy?
That's right.
And they are inherent oppressors.
They are inherent hereditary oppressors of every other human on the planet.
And while they've been at it, they've been raping the earth too, these white people.
So that's what they're being told, and they're sick of it.
Now, the idea that these people are a potential violent terrorist threat, this is just a Looney Tunes fantasy.
It just goes to show you the extent to which they really have got it fixed in their mind.
Anything white people do that is opposed in any way to this liberal nonsense is white supremacist and terrorist.
Now, I've got just a little story here, and this is typical of what's going on.
There was a recent ad in support of Senator Mark Kelly, Democrat of Arizona.
It starred a white woman, a medical doctor, Dr. Katie Harrell, founder of a non-profit health and wellness community.
And she praised Mark Kelly's record of delivering lower premiums for Arizona health insurance.
Well, it turns out Earlier this year in January, she tweeted the following, White men are the single greatest domestic terrorist group in this country.
And yet, where is the tear gas, the rubber bullets, the riot gear?
White privilege at its finest.
Now this is a lady who apparently is a sterling character trotted out to promote Democrats, but her Twitter page is now protected.
Now, back on this question of just how dangerous and contemptible white people are, I understand they're at the back of the bus when it comes to COVID treatment.
This is a story that a lot of people didn't believe first until there was evidence that sufficiently showed that no, no, this is true.
The video evidence made it quite clear that Harrison L. Smith, he's a Texas radio host, was denied monoclonal antibody treatment for COVID because he's white, not black or Hispanic.
This sounds like something from the Babylon Bee.
Maybe the onion, but no, it's not the case.
Smith, who presents the American Journal, he does work for Alex Jones' InfoWars network.
So a lot of people thought immediately this might be some sort of prank.
He should be left to die.
He should be allowed medical treatment if he has a toothache.
No dentist for you.
He tweeted this past Saturday.
While the New Century Foundation had their conference going on down in the great state of Tennessee, that he was denied receiving monoclonal antibody treatment for COVID because he was white, adding that such treatment was only available for blacks and Hispanics.
I wonder if Asians qualify.
Oh, he didn't?
He didn't specify.
He didn't specify, which he described as being, quote, fucking insane, end quote.
Oh, dear.
Despite some initial skepticism from leftists, Smith produced a video clearly showing medical staff declaring that the only reason for his injection, for his rejection, was his ethnicity.
I guess the only reason for his ejection had he been properly ethnicized.
Dave Riley, an American first commenter and former Republican candidate, was asked to elaborate Smith's story via phone call with the Texas State Infusion Hotline.
Quote, There's eligibility criteria that we go by, and African American and Hispanics are high-risk ethnicity groups.
So there would be a qualifier, the hotline staff member told Riley, saying that, quote, people with a body mass index of 25 or higher, people who are 65 years of age or up, or high-risk ethnicity groups can get it.
So then, excuse me, as our racially aware cat reappears, quote, so if you are a healthy, in-shape Caucasian and you show up, you're not going to get an infusion, Riley queried the phone rep.
Based on the criteria that we go by right now, that is correct.
The rep confirmed.
Now, what state did this occur in?
Stars are bright.
They're big and bright.
Deep in the heart of Texas.
Deep in the heart of Texas.
Wow.
So it's, again, an official Texas HHS and other government and state documents, including the FDA's emergency use authorization for the treatment that discusses high risk groups.
Ethnicities are not mentioned.
So this might be something that has come up.
Who knows what's going on here?
More, more anti-white, blatant anti-whiteness.
This is really quite, but you know, remember they were talking about this.
Who was going to first get the vaccine?
Oh, yes!
But it didn't pretty much pan out that way.
No.
It wasn't, but this is actually one of the first times I've heard of an explicit, not you Whitey, When it comes to COVID treatment.
Yeah, you can look at the CDC data, Mr. Taylor, and you can see that, again, the people who are primarily dying of this are over the age of 60, comorbidities, immunodeficient.
62% of the deaths in the United States, I looked at this yesterday, are Caucasian.
18% are Hispanic.
It does simply fall in line with the racial numbers.
It's not impacting any racial group disproportionately.
No, but this is the myth.
Regardless of people who wish it would.
All part of systemic racism.
Well, an interesting thing happened.
Let's see, Facebook, Facebook.
They've got, well, I guess we can't talk about Facebook anymore.
They're now meta-official.
They are meta, they did change their corporate name.
Well, how about if I were allowed to have a page, do I have a Facebook page or would I have a meta page?
You'd have a, you would definitely have, it's gone from the Facebook, Facebook, and now just simply Meta.
Pretty soon it's just going to be, just call it Z. Z. Lord Z. Okay.
Lord Zuck.
Well, there was a, there is a, I guess I have a hard time saying, Meta data center under construction in the state of Utah.
The Eagle Mountain Data Center is one of 17 such facilities worldwide.
And lo and behold, just a few days ago, on the inside of a port-a-potty at the Eagle Mountain construction site was discovered the words, kill a N-I-G-G-R day, November 29.
Well, that's 11 days from now.
So all our black listeners, beware.
Kill a n-word day November 29.
Now since the construction site is a secure area authorities told the press that the vandalism may have been an inside job.
And apparently there are maybe five or six hundred people working at the site every day.
Now a spokesman says meta Formerly, Facebook has zero tolerance for any racist acts, and the Mortenson Construction Company released a statement saying, today we stopped work.
To immediately and directly address the situation with team members and project partners, there's a $50,000 reward for information leading to the identification of the individuals responsible.
$50,000 for the N-word?
$50,000 for the N-word on the inside door of a porta-potty.
I mean, would it be a sexist hate crime if you wrote, for a good time, call Holly and gave a phone number?
Good grief!
So, the police are hot on the case.
Now, this reminds me.
We talked about this on Radio Renaissance in May of this year.
Amazon shut down a warehouse construction site at Windsor, Connecticut.
That's right!
The eighth noose at the location.
You remember this?
I do.
They shut it down for days at a time.
And this was what a five million dollar, I'm sorry, a five million square foot facility under construction.
People are just down tools sitting on their rumps while the FBI investigated.
The noose was found on the same day the NAACP was planning a meeting with workers to talk about the safety of black workers.
Amazon said today the site was shut down, again, to allow the FBI to continue their investigation.
The FBI, again, was hard at work.
Those guys must be busy!
School boards, nooses on construction sites.
Wow!
No, I'm sorry, it was a 3.6 million square foot building.
All of these nooses were discovered in an area with surveillance cameras.
And then Amazon, because they repeatedly found these things, doubled the reward to $100,000.
$100,000!
So, all of this terribly stressed a certain Karen Prescott, an African-Americaness, and she led a protest at the site in which, she said, many of our brothers and sisters hung from nooses like the ones that were left here at Amazon.
The NAACP, which held multiple press conferences in Windsor, led by the Reverend Cornell Lewis, He showed up once with members of the Huey P. Newton Gun Club and the New Black Panthers.
They were carrying guns.
He said the activists were there to defend black workers and make them feel empowered to speak their mind.
Do you think they were at all hesitant about speaking their minds?
No.
Now, this is really good.
The anger intensified when the police made a startling statement.
The department believed only two of the eight robes were actually nooses.
Now, Chief Donald Melanson said a hangman's noose is a specific knot.
He says these are others are just loops tied at the end used at construction sites for many different reasons like lashing down equipment.
Now this was the greatest, this is the greatest quote of all.
Ms.
Prescott, Karen Prescott, the community organizer, the African-Americaness, said that the police's conclusion that there were only two nooses was the biggest slap in the face.
Now, Mr. Kersey, 25% reduces.
Mr. Kersey, shouldn't she have been relieved that there were only two hate objects rather than eight?
No, no, no, no.
There's no relief in that because again, every object that they see, they believe is somehow an example of systemic racism.
And so this is, this is, this is just, you know, you'd think, you'd think they'd be happy to hear that it wasn't as bad as they thought, but no, no, no, no, no.
They want it to be worse than anybody thought.
Now, the City Police Chief Donald Melanson of Windsor, Connecticut said that hundreds of people had been interviewed and that the department was still following lead.
This is months later.
And Amazon met several times.
The NAACP said it would continue to provide enhanced security, free counseling for workers on the site.
Now, I bring this up because this story appears to have no resolution.
There are stories about it from May until August, and then the internet goes completely silent.
My question is, any arrests?
Did this turn out to be a hoax and nobody's talking?
They had surveillance cameras up there too.
And what happened to the $100,000?
And my question for you, Mr. Kersey, what if it turned out to be a hoax?
And the guy walked in and is so tempted by the $100,000 and the realization that all he's going to get is a slap on the wrist, said, OK, I did it.
I can prove it.
And where's my $100,000?
I agree.
Why not?
But no, this story has dropped into complete silence if we have any listeners who know anything about what's since happened.
I suspect that it was a hoax, and we'll never get to the bottom of this, but all of that, sound and fury, signifying nothing.
And this reminds me of another story.
The city of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, He's paying out thousands of dollars to 10 people who claim their rights were violated when they were arrested in connection with the vandalism and destruction of the city's Confederate monument in 2020.
You were aware of this story.
This included a Portsmouth judge, Brenda Spry, school board vice chair Lakeisha Atkinson, and James Boyd, president of the Portsmouth chapter of the NAACP.
They and seven others were charged in August 2020 with felonies after they participated in a demonstration of the Portsmouth Confederate Monument, during which the structure was covered with paint, damaged, and a man was nearly killed.
Now, it turns out that they were clearly there.
Body camera and social media videos showed that they were trespassing on the mine and spray painting at it, but the charges were eventually dropped.
Their lawyers argue their clients are due payment for being improperly defamed.
Now, I would love to know more of the details about this.
The city of Portsmouth is paying these 10 people And there is a shocking lack of diversity among them.
Every one of them is melanin enhanced.
They're all getting $15,000 each for being charged, and then the charges have been dropped.
Jesus!
What, what, what, what, what?
I'd love to know what else is behind this story.
It's just an astonishing thing.
And these settlements are on top of the already $250,000 spent to remove the monument that was damaged.
Now my guess is this has got a city council.
I don't really know the demographics of Portsmouth, Virginia, but this could have happened if perhaps the Portsmouth, Virginia City Council is likewise melanin supercharged.
But be that as it may.
If you're going to look up, you'll have to do that later because you have a story about John Gruden, who is back in the news.
Yeah, it's 52% black, 39% white.
Yes.
So there you go.
I think the city council, you probably had some policeman doing his job.
Look, these people, they got to be arrested.
And the city council says, Oh no, this is defamation.
These are the heroes.
Yes.
These, these be heroes.
See if you recall a couple weeks ago we talked about John Grudin multiple times.
One, turns out he had some emails from back in 2010-2012, don't remember the year, where he said some bad things about the black NFL, the players Rep, he also said some things about women.
We're not even sure what he actually said.
But he was forced to resign or he was going to be fired.
He then had his name removed from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers Hall of Fame, the ring of honor there, where he had coached them to a Super Bowl victory.
Basically, you ever read the book, Commissar Vanishes?
Well, guess what?
He's no longer a comrade of the regime.
All your accomplishments disappear if you say the wrong words.
It happened to Papa John.
It happened to John Gruden.
It could happen to you, dear listener.
It's about to happen to Georgia Washington, but anyway.
John Gruden filed a lawsuit against the NFL and Commissioner Roger Goodell in Nevada District Court on Thursday alleging they leaked private emails to the New York Times, the Washington Journal, To force him out of the head coaching job at the Las Vegas Raiders.
He's seeking damages on seven different claims, as well as punitive damages and lawyer fees.
John Gruden has filed a suit against the NFL and Commissioner Goodell in the 8th Judicial District Court in Clark County.
The complaint alleges the defendants selectively leaked Gruden's private correspondence to the WSJ, the NYT, in order to harm his reputation and force him out of the job, his lawyer said.
There is no explanation or justification for why Gruden's emails were the only ones made
public out of the 650,000 emails collected in the NFL's investigation of the Washington
Redskins, or for why the emails were held for months before being released in the middle
of the Raiders' season.
In a 21-page complaint obtained by Fox News, the NFL and Goodell are alleged to have sought
to destroy the career and reputation of Gruden through a malicious and orchestrated campaign.
The complaint drew a contrast to how Gruden's emails were handled to have the league's
investigation into the Washington Redskins ended.
Snyder was fined $10 million, but there were no written report or any emails from the other 650,000 emails that were released publicly.
Quote, in contrast to the formalities of the Washington Redskins investigation, defendants' treatment of Gruden was a Soviet-style character assassination.
There was no warning and no process.
Defendants held the emails for months until they were leaked in the national media.
In the middle of the Raiders season, in order to cause maximum damage to Gruden, Well, that's a very interesting aspect of it.
Of course, he should have been able to sue even if that information come out in a perfectly normal and legal way.
Being bounced simply for expressing yourself.
But be that as it may.
Good for him.
I say, go Gruden!
Yeah, again, he's apologized for comments he made about the black NFL PA executive director, Tamari Smith, and other remarks he made in emails with Bruce Allen that have been deemed racist and misogynistic.
But again, you talked tonight, you and we talked about this.
What was actually said?
You can just sprinkle these terms around in news stories and you have to immediately say, oh my god, recoil in horror.
We don't even have to know.
If the New York Times says it was racist and misogynist, well then, boy, that guy's got to go.
That guy's got to go.
Well, we're on to something else here.
Of course, everything is white supremacist, including grading.
Asao Inoue, that's a Japanese name, a professor of rhetoric and composition at Arizona State University, is in the news calling for the end of white supremacy language.
And here's a quote from him.
White language supremacy in writing classrooms is due to the uneven and diverse linguistic legacies that everyone inherits, and the racialized white discourses that are used as standards which gives privilege to those students who embody those habits of white language already.
In other words, if you speak ordinary English, that is racialized discourse, and those who embody the habits of white language are unfairly privileged.
He has coined the praise, Habits of White Language, to which he gives the acronym H-O-W-L, or HOWL.
And he says HOWL is used, it's the common way teachers and professors grade papers.
And so, if you grade papers down because they can't spell correctly or use proper grammar, you are indulging in white supremacy culture.
This makes up the culture and normal practices of our classrooms and disciplines, and to combat the issue, he suggests implementing labor-based grading.
Which redistributes power in ways that allow for more diverse habits of language to circulate.
Labor-based grading means that you grade people according to how much work they put into it.
Can you believe that this is Marxism?
Labor theory of value.
That is good.
Yes, it is.
He says, Labor-based grading structurally changes everyone's relationship to dominant standards of English that come from elite, masculine, heteronormative, ableist, white racial groups of speaking.
Did you know that heteronormative people speak differently from non-heteronormative?
I guess so.
Masculine people speak differently from women.
If you are able-bodied, good grief!
All of this, all these crazy buzzwords.
In other words, the harder you try, the better the grade.
But how does he even know how hard somebody tried?
This is insane.
Is he supposed to watch everybody working on his essay?
He says, I am arguing that we create better conditions in classrooms for all students, no matter their language backgrounds.
Pausing in our work helps us intervene and disrupt by first noticing ourselves participating in racism, engaging in white fragility and white rage or white language supremacy, he said.
This is yet another plea for destroying the rules because non-whites can't live up to the rules.
It's all the language that we use.
It's white supremacist because white people speak it, and if non-whites don't speak it as well, then it's all got to go.
In any case, I believe we have a little bit of time left, and you can inform us how many bad, bad people there are in the trucking industry.
Oh, there are a lot of bad people in the trucking industry.
Haven't you ever stopped at a truck stop?
Come on.
They all look mighty bad.
They all look like really great people who are doing a great job, especially in our current climate where You know, Thanksgiving's approaching.
I'm not sure what day we'll do a show next week, but we hope every listener out there is safe in these increasingly trying times.
And you're getting ready to have a great Thanksgiving and holiday season and Christmas.
But this story really shocked me because, again, you're seeing on these outlets These regime media outlets, just this visceral hate of anything that was represented by Trump.
And that, of course, is whiteness.
And so this encounter was pretty shocking.
MSNBC host Tiffany Cross took aim at the trucking industry Sunday for employing too many middle-aged white males who, quote, overwhelmingly voted for Trump and are, quote, too aggressive on the road.
During a segment on Cross Connection, she joined cross-country truck driving school owner and president Pamela Day To discuss the ways in which the trucking industry can attract a more diverse workforce.
Diverse workforce and middle labor shortage.
She began the segment by explaining that her brother is a trucker and that she worries about him because it's apparently a dangerous industry.
I guess there are a lot of white truckers out there on their intercom system saying, hey look, there's a black truck driver.
Let's go ahead and box him in.
Yeah, yeah.
So Tiffany is an African-American ass.
Yes, yes, yes.
So the host then handed off today to lay out how she will disrupt the industry while promoting diversity.
Disruption and diversity are wonderful two words.
They love to disrupt.
We say we're not building truck drivers, but safe CMV operators.
Folks that can get back to their home whenever they're done with their shift.
That's the most important part.
She says she's interviewed minority truckers who allege they experience hostility and acts of racism on the job.
They never had to define what those acts of racism are.
And asked today if the industry can become more welcoming to these workers.
Quote, this is an industry populated by a lot of white men over the age of 55.
This group of people overwhelmingly voted for Trump.
Some people have talked about aggressive truck drivers cutting them off and were not being helpful.
So obviously, the more populated it is with people of color, I think you'll see less of that.
There you go.
They just don't give up, do they?
They don't give up.
Every opportunity.
Every opportunity to slap the white man.
Well, thanks Tiffany.
Now we know.
Now we can go improve.
Maybe we should all go slit our throats.
Maybe that'll make her happy.
No more truck drivers.
Unfortunately, only 25% of those nooses at the Amazon site were actually nooses.
But I'll tell you, they could be for you and me.
That's right.
Well, we are rapidly approaching the end of our time.
And I believe we have failed to tell our listeners how to get in touch with us.
And as you all know, we love to hear from you.
Tell us what you would like us to talk about.
And by all means, tell us if we have jumped the tracks, slipped a cog, said something that was not true.
And you can do that by reaching us at the AMRAN page.
AMRAN.com.
A-M-R-A-N.com.
Go to the Contact Us tab and tell us what's on your mind.
Or there's an alternative.
Simple.
Email.
BecauseWeLiveHereAtProtonMail.com.
Once again, all one word.
BecauseWeLiveHereAtProtonMail.com.
Yes.
And again, tell us any particular stories that have come your way.
And also, if anyone knows about what happened with that Windsor, Connecticut business.
As I say, the internet went completely dark on the subject.
I'd like to know where that $100,000 went.
Maybe there's some way I could collect it myself if I get a tip from our listeners.
Be that as it may, it is always our honor and privilege to spend this time with you.
▲
Export Selection