All Episodes
Previous Next
July 22, 2021 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:08
‘Let Them Die’
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me is my indispensable co-host Paul Kersey, and the date is July 22nd, 2021.
We'll begin with some observations from a listener having to do with the name Enkosi Tandiwi, Last week, we were discussing this fellow, and we were at a loss as to where this name comes from.
And Mr. Kersey, could you remind us why we were discussing Mr. Nkosi Tandewi?
Well, sadly, July 15, 2021 was the 10th anniversary of a mass shooting that he participated in, all because of critical race theory.
And what he learned as a student at Western Georgia, he targeted three white girls and he killed 26-year-old Brittany Fox Watts in Midtown Atlanta.
And he paralyzed yet another girl.
He did.
He paralyzed another girl, and another girl has a scar on her left leg, which she'll carry for the rest of her life due to the anti-white animus that animated that shooting.
And which he was taught in college.
Anthropology class, yes.
So, yes, the shooter's name was Nkosi Tandiwi, and we have information from our always well-informed listeners.
Tandiwi is a boy's name of Zulu origin.
Meaning, loved one, the beloved one.
Now, the Zulus are one of the Bantu group, and Nkosi, the first name, is a Nguni word.
They are another Bantu people, meaning king, chief, or lord.
Therefore, Nkosi is a common name and surname among the Nguni people.
And Nkosi is also a Southern African term of address to a superior, master, or a chief.
So, you may address me, Mr. Kersey, as Nkosi.
Nkosi.
Nkosi.
Or Kimosabe, if you prefer.
So, this guy must have been quite a high-muckety monk.
But, what it all boils down to is this is very much a South African name.
Yes.
So, this guy was not a funny Irish name.
So, thank you, thank you, our well-informed listeners.
Now, we have a listener question.
He writes, I am both a death wish fan and an avid follower of your podcast.
Over here in South Africa, everything is predictably sliding into complete disarray and anarchy, of which we will speak slightly later.
And here's my question.
When I grew up in the 60s and 70s, we never imagined the possibility that the white government of South Africa would surrender and hand over power to the black masses.
To us, it was the great unthinkable.
Now, I'm curious.
What would you deem as the great unthinkable, which has already taken place in the U.S., and what still remains unthinkable?
I don't know if I want to give voice to the unthinkable, because I've got a few ideas that are pretty harrowing.
I'll defer to you on this one.
Oh dear, oh dear.
I was afraid you would.
Well, the great unthinkable.
The fact is, I don't think anything's off the table.
I really hate to say this, but that's true.
At the rate things are going.
Now, I never would have believed that the BLM equivalent would have taken place, at least at the pace at which it did.
I'd say a year or two before the Black Lives Matter riots and all the buildings being burned and looted and all the statues coming down.
If you had asked me three years ago, could I imagine that in response to black riots, White people would be tearing down statues of Columbus?
That that's supposed to appease black rioters?
I was like, no, no way.
So that was, to me, a real unthinkable.
And I'm afraid nothing is off the table.
You know, I don't know.
I'm pretty sure, Mr. Taylor, every state has a city named for Columbus.
And the image that sticks out in my mind of all these riots that, you know, there's so many images you can think of.
There's a picture of this massive statue in Columbus, Ohio, being taken down.
I think it's 40, 50 feet tall, and it's just being taken away on a tractor trailer.
It's like, wait a second, why is the city still named Columbus?
Why is the nation's capital still named Washington?
You know, all these chickens are going to come home to roost.
So to answer our question from South Africa, it's a very good one.
It's one that, you know, again, I mean, for example, it is now entirely possible that there be a white privilege tax added to the income tax, personal income tax for whites.
You've had white privilege all your life, start paying up.
Or I can imagine that, just like in South Africa today, that there has to be a certain number of blacks on every board of directors, a certain number of BIPOCs on every board of directors.
California said it that way.
We know that they're instituting rules.
And I think it was, what is it, NASDAQ has said they're not going to bring any new public companies unless they've got diverse board members.
I mean, all of this that one would never have imagined, and there is worse.
It's always this, I don't want to give vent to my imaginings because I can imagine that the other side, oh, that's a great idea!
And to work they will go.
So, yes, that's an excellent question.
What remains unthinkable?
Less and less all the time.
Here is a podcast question, and I will extend the question to you, Mr. Kersey, because my answer to this question is, I have no idea.
Has Mr. Taylor heard of tang ping, or laying flat, and are those productive ways whites can protest?
Now, the answer is, absolutely no idea.
Do you know what a Tang Ping or a Laying Flat is?
No, when I saw this question I thought they mean just keep our mouths shut and not say anything that can't be a Tang Ping.
No, surely not.
That's not, if that's what it is, it's not a productive way to protest.
So, you know, I think I will cast this to our well-informed listening audience.
Please let us know what Tang Ping, Tang Ping appears to be, capital T, capital P, and Laying Flat are, and we'd be deeply grateful.
But I promised a brief précis of what was going on in South Africa.
And it was the riots and protests, the looting and the burning and the shooting that went pretty much from July 9th to July 17th.
Just a few days ago it ended.
It started when Jacob Zuma was taken into custody after declining to testify in a commission that was an inquiry into his corruption during his term as president 2009 to 2018.
And the riots began as protests by his supporters in KwaZulu.
He being a Zulu, his supporters being Zulu, they didn't like the idea of their big man being arrested.
And then it escalated into widespread looting and violence in KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng provinces.
And, as of today, 337 people have been killed in this.
That's quite a lot of people.
That's a lot of cadavers.
Yes, yes.
We think we've done well with a few once here and there.
But yeah, that's a lot of people dying.
Now, an interesting little side light.
In the Indian majority town of Phoenix, KwaZulu-Natal, some of the residents had armed themselves to fight off looters.
And this stoked racial tensions between the blacks and the Indians with several racially motivated attacks reported to have taken place.
20 people died in Phoenix alone.
And on 12th of July, that is the third day of rioting, the South African National Defense Force, the military deployed in Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal, road closures on both the N3 and N2, those are very important national trunk roads, Affected transportation of goods from the east coast and provinces in the north, and also it stopped transportation of goods to landlocked countries Botswana, Zimbabwe, and Zambia.
Jeez.
Yeah.
Multiple logistics and fuel companies declared forced temporary closure of their operations, citing fears of looting, hijackings, truck burnings, and social unrest.
The container ports of Richards Bay and Durban ceased operations.
Containers in the port of Durban were looted.
They broke into containers.
Boy, it's Christmas year-round!
And after several attacks on trucks, that's when the N3 highway would link Durban and Johannesburg was closed.
There was damage to transport infrastructure that caused food shortages.
There are stores, long stores outside of grocery stores, and the transportation problems prevented harvesting and distribution of fresh produce.
Shelves are being cleaned out and dwindling supplies due to panic buying if in fact your local grocery store had not been burned down.
As of July 12th, that was just halfway through the riots, 200 shopping centers have been looted.
And Klix and Dischem, the two largest pharmaceutical retailers in South Africa, reported supply disruptions due to looting.
Now this is also pretty good too.
113 cell network towers had been vandalized, resulting in failures of cellular phones, cell phone networks.
And all over South, all the banks had to shut down their ATM branches and other facilities because there was just such a breakdown in law and order.
Now, US media mostly ignored this.
Oh yeah.
Very little to say about this is the rainbow country after all.
This is Nelson Mandela's gift to humanity.
This is all going to be just happy, happy, happy, and it doesn't look that way.
But whenever they said anything about this, to my surprise, not once did I hear the term legacy of apartheid.
I felt sure that that was going to be what the big problem was, but they all blame it on inequality.
Okay.
That there's this looting aristocracy.
They conceded that the ANC had gone corrupt.
And this was not necessarily all white people, but it's all inequality.
And if there were more equality, it'd be fine.
What it really boils down to is tribalism, I think.
The Zulus don't like their boy being taken in under arms.
They riot.
And as soon as there's rioting, everybody piles on.
It's as simple as that.
Blacks saw the chance to get a new big screen TV and pick up on a bunch of groceries.
But no, no.
You have to know it's all about inequality.
Now, speaking of what was going on in South Africa, we see little hints of this in the United States.
And one would be what happens to White Cop when he shows up to investigate a shooting.
You know, this is from the great city of Atlanta, Georgia.
You can actually watch some of the video.
You can take a look at it.
As is happening across the country, Mr. Taylor, we know that cops are being harassed.
We know that cops are afraid to go into a lot of areas.
I mean, just case in point, you didn't even know about the shooting at the Nationals game, which actually, this past Saturday night at the Washington Nationals baseball game in D.C., there was a shooting outside.
Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop.
A number of people shot.
They actually had to stop the game and cancel it because fans were running on the field.
Here we have a situation in Atlanta where a mob surrounded and harassed a white officer as he was attempting to respond to a shooting in Atlanta.
A black-on-black shooting, obviously.
Black police officers had to step in to calm the situation.
To rescue the poor honky.
The crowd was hurling anti-white racism at the officer.
Of course, the crowd was monochromatic.
They were black, including shouting things like, quote, get your white face out of here, end quote.
You know, the city is currently suffering from a police shortage.
In April, the APD currently has 1,632 officers according to its latest field vacancy report.
That's about 400 officers short of the department's authorized strength.
But he was there, a black guy shoots a black guy, a white cop shows up to try to get to the bottom of this, and they want him the heck out.
White face, gone.
And black police had to come and rescue him.
They do.
You know, two people are injured but expect to survive, but the point is, get out of here, Whitey.
We've been told for the past, no, that's just the past year, their entire lives.
It goes back to that book we always like to talk about, Hurt Through the Grapevine, you know?
Anything that goes wrong for him is our fault.
Exactly.
If you're wearing a uniform, it's doubly your fault.
Well, this is a perfect lead-in to what's happened in St.
Louis.
A fellow named Brandon Campbell, 30 years old, very melanin-enhanced, charged in December with fatally shooting 30-year-old Randy Moore, both from the 30 years old.
Now, the prosecutor who had Campbell's case Had gone on maternity leave and nobody else from the Circuit Attorney's Office had gotten the word.
And so, on three different occasions, the St.
Louis prosecutors failed to show up for hearings in court.
And the judge himself had put out an order asking for the prosecutors to produce evidence.
And as a consequence of three strikes and you're out, Circuit Judge Jason Sengheiser on Wednesday dismissed all charges.
So this guy accused of first-degree murder.
Off he walks.
Now, the decision, it's worth quoting from this decision.
Circuit Judge Jason Sengheiser wrote, The court does not take this action without significant consideration for the implications it may have for public safety.
Well, I should think not.
Off he goes, this murderer.
The Circuit Attorney's Office is ultimately the party responsible, this is the DA's office, for protecting public safety by charging and then prosecuting those it believes commit crimes.
In a case like this, where the Circuit Attorney's Office has essentially abandoned its duty to prosecute those it charges with crimes, The court must impartially enforce the law, and any resultant threat to public safety is the responsibility of the circuit attorney's office.
It's their job to catch the malefactors and prosecute them, and if they go off on maternity leave and they don't do their job, he has no choice but to let this guy go.
Now, I think it is not without significance that the circuit attorney, Kimberly M. Gardner, Another melanin-enhanced female prosecutor.
She is the same prosecutor who filed charges against the McCloskeys for defending their home in St.
Louis.
Now, nobody was out on maternity leave when it was their day in court.
No, no, no.
No, no, no.
Now, the person who was on maternity leave has not been named, as far as I can tell, and so we can only speculate as to just what level of melanin enhancement this lady enjoys.
All I have to say for her is, may she have a smooth childbirth.
Now, Mr. Kersey, uh...
So nice of you!
Well, you know, Mr. Trump would not have put up with this sort of baloney.
I think you would have made sure that an accused murderer was met in court by the prosecution, and he would have done other things, too.
Yeah, you know, he did voice his support for the McCluskeys, as you just mentioned, when they protected their beautiful home from a mob that, you know, Well, President Trump said he regretted not immediately deploying the military into U.S.
they gave up their weapons.
That's right.
That's right.
Quite terrible.
But now, isn't Mr. McCloskey running for office?
He's running for the Republican nomination for Senate in the state of Missouri.
Go man, go.
I agree.
Well, President Trump said he regretted not immediately deploying the military into U.S.
cities to quash the Black Lives Matter and Tifa Unrest last summer.
This is one of his biggest regrets.
You know, this is one of those horrible what might have been moments.
Quote, I think if I had to do it again, I would have brought in the military immediately.
End quote.
Trump told a couple of Washington Post reporters in a March interview, which is an excerpt
from an upcoming book entitled, I Alone Can Fix It, Donald J. Trump's Catastrophic Final Year.
After the death of George Floyd of a fentanyl overdose in May of 2020, calls for racial justice and condemnation
of police brutality obviously turned into protests.
We know what really was the catalyst.
We've talked about it, the burning of the Third Precinct.
We were actually doing a podcast the day that this all happened.
That night it was burned down and I said to you back in May of 2020, I said, hey, you know, they're looting St.
Paul during the day.
It's broad daylight and this is happening.
This is going to get bad.
And well, I'm sure President Trump was thinking the same things because on June 1st, 2020, after the attempt to breach the White House walls, if you remember, Mr. Taylor and dear listeners, President Trump was actually taken to the bunker of the White House because 60 plus Secret Service agents were injured protecting the White House.
And I guess the fear was that they might just penetrate the security area.
Exactly.
So on June 1st, 2020, Trump threatened to deploy U.S.
troops if states did not call up the National Guard to deal with the protest and at times rioting violence and destruction.
You told me that you visited the capital of Virginia and the cops told you they were told to stand down.
People could burn the city down if they wanted to.
No matter what, property damage is not to be stopped.
Human life is more important.
It would have been a fascinating thing if he had really sicced the military on them early on.
I wonder just what the reaction would have been if, I think, probably, in order to be effective, you'd have had to start shooting rioters.
You'd have had to start shooting people.
Looters.
Looters, anyway.
I mean, at the moment when they tried to breach the White House walls, there should have been shots fired.
You think what happened at CNN when the Black Lives Matter, that famous photo of the CNN center being attacked and all the people waving the Mexican flag, the BLM flag.
You know, Trump's remarks appear to indicate that he intended to invoke the Insurrection Act, which he should have.
It's a rarely used power that allows the president, via an executive order, to deploy active duty military troops domestically to address unrest and enforce the law.
At one point, Trump tried to put Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark
Milley, this is the guy who talked about he was reading critical race theory books to
understand white rage, if you remember, in charge.
So he tried to appoint this guy to be in charge of the military.
Response to the protests, Milley pushed back, which set off a profanity-filled shouting
match in the Situation Room.
This is according to a Wall Street Journal reporter in a new book.
It's called, Frankly, We Did Win This Election.
Trump has denied this took place, but this author, the Wall Street Journal author, he
says that Trump wanted to use the military to, quote, beat the fuck out of protesters,
But such aggressive rhetoric was met with resistance by other officials, including Miley.
They were worried that Trump planned to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807.
And they, the Secretary of Defense, I don't remember this, but apparently he publicly announced he did not support such a move back in June of 2020.
Well, it would have changed the game all right.
Well, 30 states ended up calling out the National Guard.
That's right.
Not a lot right in North Dakota or South Dakota.
I don't think they even had to call out the National Guard.
But that would have been very interesting.
Well, switching to the University of California.
In the online publication called Inside Higher Education, which always has quite eye-opening articles, there was the headline that ran as follows, just this last week, U of California gets more diverse without SATs.
What an idea!
What an idea!
Well, and we now learn, now this is the opening sentence, students from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups comprise 43% of admitted California freshmen at University of California campuses this year.
43%!
Now doesn't that make it sound as though the rest are going to be white?
These are underrepresented racial and ethnic groups.
They say this 43% is the highest proportion of an incoming undergraduate class.
Now, let's look at the numbers.
The number of Latinx students is 37%, and for a second year in a row, Latinx are the largest group.
Asian Americans are next at 34.
White students make up 20%.
20%.
So, Asians are not considered underrepresented because, of course, they are overrepresented.
But if you just read this, underrepresented 43%, that really doesn't make you think, well, gosh, whites are still a majority there?
Gee, no.
So, whites, I mean, think about this.
I think this is the largest state university system in the entire country.
Without a doubt.
And only one out of five of the students is white.
It's thanks to no SATs.
I hate to throw some water on you though.
You know that I think almost one in four students in the public school system in California are white at this point.
So that number is not that far off.
Sounds about right.
Squeeze them out.
Now, as far as Texas is concerned, this is interesting, I thought.
The Texas State Senate just passed a bill that would no longer require public schools to teach the writings of the civil rights movement, women's suffrage, and Native American history and social studies.
This provision, it's only passed by one house yet, but it would be appended to a law signed by Governor Greg Abbott in May, which is set to come into effect later this year to ban teaching critical race theory.
Now, what this would mean is the schools in Texas would no longer be required to teach about the life and works of the great Cesar Chavez, Dolores Huerta.
I mean, she's a great person, you know, in American history.
And the writings of Susan B. Anthony, Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King, whose I Am a Dream speech and Letter from Birmingham Jail would now be merely optional and not obligatory.
It also cuts a specific requirement to teach the history of white supremacy.
Did you know the Texas schools now teach the history of white supremacy?
I did not know this.
It includes slavery, eugenics, I don't know why eugenics is white supremacist, the Ku Klux Klan, and the ways in which these things are morally wrong.
They have to explain why eugenics is morally wrong.
Now, the bill says, also, instructors must not give deference to any one perspective.
Now, that's an interesting thing.
I suppose they're supposed to call in people to talk about various different perspectives, and forbids schools from granting course credit when students join organizations that lobby for legislation.
Hmm.
Apparently that's something they like to do.
Interesting.
And I'm sure all the things that they lobby for... They're, yes, they're not exactly what you would call conservative Republican ideas, ideals.
No.
Now this bill passed 18 to 4 in the Senate but could probably stall in the House where, as you probably know, the quorum has been lost.
Why is that?
Just last week, dozens of House Democrats fled to Washington, D.C.
to block the election integrity bills because they want to deny a quorum, and so they just buggered off.
Yeah, they all got COVID.
What percent of them got COVID?
I don't know.
They must have been clustering like mad up here in D.C.
having a final term.
Sixty guys, come on!
Yeah, but now, so this was a special session that ends August 6th.
So if they don't come back and vote, this thing will die.
But that was very interesting.
Now, moving clear across the country to Microsoft.
I just learned that Microsoft employees officially have an invocation, the Microsoft invocation for every public meeting.
And I will read it to you.
I will read it to you in toto and verbatim.
And it runs as follows.
This is, I'm sure to be said, with great solemnity.
I wonder if you're supposed to put your hand over your heart.
Maybe you probably hang your head in shame.
I guess that's probably what it is.
The words are as follows.
We need to acknowledge that the land where the Microsoft campus is located is traditionally occupied by the Sammamish, Duwamish, Snoqualmie, Suquamish, Muckleshoot, Snohomish, Tulalip, and other coastal Salish people since time immemorial.
A people who are still continuing to honor and bring to light their amazing heritage.
That's how you start every single meeting.
Now, are you Jared Taylor there or Dr. Seuss reading that?
All these names sound like something from a Dr. Seuss book.
Well, you know, I wonder if they're supposed to memorize this.
Are they going to stumble over this?
You know, the Snoqualmie, the Suquamish, the Succotash, the Muckleshoot, I don't know.
All these Indian names you got to say and they are continuing to honor and bring to light their amazing heritage.
Amazing.
Now, some meetings, as you know, open with a prayer, others with a pledge of allegiance.
Now, this one opens with a mission of white evil.
And I just learned that the city of Seattle and other municipal governments make similar announcements before public events.
White people bad, bad, bad, bad.
Now, here's a name to conjure with, one that I hadn't heard of, Catherine Lamon.
I don't know how you pronounce this person's name.
It's spelled L-H-A-M-O-N.
You know who she is?
I don't.
You'll soon find out, because she has been nominated by Professor Biden to return for a second stint as Assistant Secretary of the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights.
She had a previous term under President Obama, and under her leadership, the Office of Civil Rights strong-armed colleges to adopt a new preponderance of the evidence standard for any investigation of sexual assault or rape.
Remember that?
And so it was basically, she said, nah, he done it!
Then it was mere preponderance of an evidence, and out he could go.
There's all sorts of injustices that resulted from this.
And Betsy DeVos, when she came in as Donald Trump's Secretary of Education, she issued a regulation with a stronger emphasis on due process.
And at the time, Ms.
Lamont declared that this means, quote, students can rape and sexually harass with impunity.
That was her view.
Now, she also apparently was behind that edict on school discipline.
I'm sure you remember that.
This is going to be disciplined by quota.
The idea being that if blacks and other pets were being disciplined at higher rates, that was ipso facto evidence of racial discrimination and white supremacy, and so you had to basically discipline by quota.
And she would stop some deeply invasive investigation only when they agreed to adopt these very, very lenient or completely crazy discipline policies whereby you couldn't suspend a black person unless you suspended equal number of white people.
Correct.
After leaving the office of civil rights, she was appointed to lead the U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights, where she oversaw a report on disciplinary disparities in schools, which said flatly, and I quote from the report, students of color as a whole, as well as by individual racial group, do not commit more disciplinable offenses than their white peers.
I mean, that was an edict.
Even the Washington Post pointed out that the report's sources, quote, did not offer such evidence.
And one set of data referenced in the report showed the opposite.
Even the Washington Post realized that blacks commit more disciplinable offenses than whites.
Now, Earlier this year, the Biden's Office of Civil Rights and the Department of Education suspended a decision, a court decision, that the Evanston-Skokie School District violated Title VI's prohibition on racial discrimination when it segregated staff by race,
Instructed teachers to treat students differently based on race, publicly shamed white students based on race, and taught that whiteness was a contract with the devil.
Oh.
Evanston-Skokie School District.
Yes, whiteness is a contract with the devil.
And ordering people not to do that, that was no good.
So they've rehabilitated the idea of doing that.
That's Biden's Office of Civil Rights for you.
There's the unthinkable for you right there that our South African listener wanted to know about.
That's just it.
The un-unthinkable.
But now this lady, whose name you hadn't heard nor had I, Catherine Lamont, she had went through confirmation hearings.
Not one senator asked her about CRT.
So no one should be surprised if she enforces critical race theory, She will insist on voluntary agreements that require anti-racist audits, maintain race-focused professional development, require diversity, equity, and inclusion, etc., etc., etc.
And, unless a Democratic senator sees the light, Or opposes her or abstains, her nomination is all but assured.
So, she will be running the shop, boys and girls.
And she's another one of these fancy light-skinned black ladies who've just swanned into one elite position after another.
She went to Amherst as an undergrad, then Yale Law School.
These people lead charmed careers, and they're the ones, I think, who just seem to hate white people more than anybody else.
Oh yeah, yes.
The more you lather preferences and love, and the more you slobber over them, the more they hate you.
And she began her career as a law clerk for a United States Court of Appeals Justice.
That's a really fancy way to start.
Then she went to the Appellate Litigation Program at Georgetown University and in 2016 she was the chair of the United States Civil Rights Commission and Watch out for this.
In 2019, she was mentioned by liberal group Demand Justice as one of their recommended Supreme Court nominees.
Oof.
So you could be hearing a lot more about her.
Of course.
So, now, you have a story about yet another privileged black lady, as I recall, from the NAACP.
From the NAACP, I believe not far from where the headquarters of the New Century Foundation.
The world headquarters.
The world headquarters of the New Century Foundation.
Of course, there's a bunker in Antarctica somewhere that we don't talk about, but I'm joking.
This is a report that I saw over at townhall.com.
I don't remember who wrote it, but there were some disturbing remarks by a local NAACP leader in Fairfax County, Virginia.
Michelle Letty stood outside the Jackson Middle School and rallied protesters in favor of critical race theory.
And to a round of applause, as she declared, let them die about her opponents.
Well, now these are her personal opponents, the people who are opposed to her.
Who is she going to let die?
Her personal opponents are those who are against and who are saying that we need to get this anti-white, this anti-American, this anti-American hero ideology known as CRT.
This is creating anti-white hostility.
So here she is in a public rally saying, let them die.
Yes.
And the crowd is whooping with happiness.
They were cheering.
They were applauding.
They were clapping.
They were acknowledging some form of truth within Michelle's words.
Saturday morning, the Virginia PTA announced over Twitter that she's since resigned from position with them.
Oh, the poor dear.
She resigned from her position of vice president of training at the Virginia PTA.
She's also the vice president of the Fairfax NAACP and the vice president of communications for the Fairfax County PTA.
What did she resign from?
Just from her PTA position?
She did.
That's it.
Quote, while not speaking in a role with the Virginia PTA, we do not condone the choice of words used during a public event.
On Thursday, July 15, 2021, the statement read, Resignation announced the day after the Virginia PTA shared
that her views, quote, statement does not reflect the values of the
Virginia PTA, end quote.
Well, that's good.
That's a good thing.
However, they did note, we believe in diversity, equity, and inclusion.
However, we also know words have power, and that is important to understand the impact of our language, end quote.
Well, if they believe in diversity, equity, and inclusion, we know that if you rearrange diversity, inclusion, and equity, we know what that spells, Guy Whitey.
Let them die.
Exactly.
It's further revealed that the PTA board members will have to participate in sensitivity training over the summer to ensure that we remain mindful of our community and the impact of the words we use.
Now is that because of this lady telling her enemies to drop dead?
Or is this because of just sort of general white wickedness and we have to be rehabilitated?
I'm not quite sure.
but probably the latter but her let them die came after a ranting screed against those
who opposed CRT where she referred to them as and I quote, anti-education, anti-teacher,
anti-equity, anti-history, anti-racial reckoning, anti-opportunity, anti-help people, anti-diversity,
anti-platform, anti-science, anti-change agent, anti-social justice, anti-healthcare mentioned
twice, anti-worker mentioned twice, anti-LGBTQ+, anti-children, anti-environment, anti-admissions
policy change, anti-inclusion, anti-live and let live people end quote.
Good grief, no wonder they ought to die.
She went on to say, let them die as her words were drowned out, as I mentioned, by enthusiastic applause before she continued with saying, Quote, don't let these uncomfortable people deter us from our goal to march forward.
End quote.
Well, Mr. Taylor, does marching forward mean over the skull and bones of the enemies and the opponents of those who wish to make CRT the only language that we speak?
The only tongue that we know?
I guess so.
And this happened right in my very own county.
This happened not far from here.
Jackson Middle School.
Gosh, and I missed it.
Boy, son of a gun.
Should have been there, you know?
Well, well.
You would have seen the hate that they have.
Wow, I guess so.
You know, I'm always suspicious of people who talk about those who wish for us to die, but I guess she's a certified one of them.
Oh, she said, quote, let them die.
Because they're anti just about everything you can think of.
Wow.
Well, okay.
Now, this was a ruling on the DACA business.
As our listeners will remember, back in 2012, then Department of Homeland Security, Secretary Janet Napolitano established DACA, and let me remind you, that's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, in a brief memorandum that was called Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion.
With respect to individuals who came to the United States as children.
The idea was it's prosecutorial discretion if you don't pitch out any of them.
Now, this is for illegal aliens who came before age 16 and met certain other criteria.
They couldn't be hatchet murderers and they couldn't be typhoid Marys and a few other things.
Now, excuse me, this memo unilaterally Implemented what is now called, well, what would have been called the DREAM Act, had it been passed by Congress.
And even Barack Obama, for whom she'd been working, had said, this can't be done.
We can't suddenly amnesty these people, which in effect this was, without an act of Congress.
But if Congress wouldn't do it, okay, ho-hum, we don't need Congress.
Just a stroke of the pen, we'll do it.
And at its peak, almost 800,000 illegal aliens benefit from DACA, and according to U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, there are currently approximately 616,000 illegal aliens who are still DACA recipients.
That means they can work, they get work permits, social security numbers, they are, in effect, home free.
Now, Interestingly enough, Federal District Judge Andrew Hannon has finally ruled on the merits.
It had always been procedural matters up until this point, and he found that DACA was an illegally implemented program.
And the public interest of the nation is always served by the secession of a program that was created in violation of law and whose existence violates the law.
In other words, this was a unilateral attempt at legislation.
It overstepped the bounds of presidential power and is against the law.
However, and this is a very serious however, Judge Hannon neutered his decision by writing that, "...hundreds of thousands of individual DACA recipients, along with their employers, estates, and loved ones, have come to rely on the DACA program."
And so, he concludes, it is not equitable for a government program that has engendered such a significant reliance to terminate suddenly, even if it's illegal.
So many people are happy with it.
It doesn't make any difference.
If it's unconstitutional, that's overreaching of executive power, he's not going to stop it.
What a disappointing end.
But I would think that this could be appealed.
This is saying, okay, it's wrong, it's illegal, but who cares?
So, what that means is the current DACA population continues to keep their illegal benefits, but no new applications will be approved.
Of course, all the people who are going to do it have already done it.
And Republican senators are already expressing willingness to amnesty the DACA population anyway, and so it looks as though it's going to make no difference at all.
Too many years later, as I said, this thing was done back in 2012.
Nine years ago.
If we'd had a decision then, it might have made a difference.
But we didn't.
So, now we have a bit of a change.
We're going to talk about the English National Soccer Team.
As some of our listeners know who are sports fans, the Euro Championships are just finished, and Gregory Hood wrote, I thought, a really first-rate article about the English team.
It's up on the website now, well worth your attention.
And as he pointed out, the English team this time was one of these super diverse, it could have been an all-Africa team for anybody knows, and they were up against an Italian team that was just distressingly lacking in diversity.
And the British press was all hooping about the prospect of, oh, we're going to bring the cup home.
They haven't had a Euro championship since 1990 something or other.
You're the sportsman, Mr. Kersey.
I thought that was a lot, a lot, uh, 19, I don't know.
I think it was 1992 or maybe that was the last time they were in the finals.
I think that was the last time they were in the finals.
I think it was in the 60s.
Could be.
So they're in the finals, they're all happy, happy, happy, and all of these black and tan types are going to save England.
And as Gergerhood notes, in effect it became an opportunity for all of these non-whites to win the championship for England and discomfort any kind of English nationalist.
Well, that's what happened in France in the World Cup.
I think there was like one actual Frenchman on the team.
That's right.
And this was considered a great triumph, a great triumph.
As he says, it's no longer a game against the other side.
It's a game against your own people to prove them racist, to show that if you have all of these Africans, then you can finally win.
Well, of course, as you probably know, there was a penalty kick duel at the end.
Correct.
And some of these black players, these highly prized black players, choked.
And so they lost to this all-white Italian team.
And so, there was a certain amount of racially-oriented abuse against these people.
Yes, there was.
Now, somebody quoted having found 120 whole Twitter messages.
Now, if that's the extent of it, it's pretty feeble if you ask me.
But, as Hood points out, Probably these English fans who were all angry at it, if they had won the game, they would have been praising them to the sky.
Oh yes.
I'm sure they would have done that.
And so either way, either way, England loses.
If this non-white team wins, then that just shows, England can be any color at all, and we're all British after all.
And if they lose, then, oh my gosh, to object about that, that makes you racist.
You're the racist one way or the other.
It's really a very good story, and I don't usually poop these things on the air like this, but it's an excellent story.
Now, I believe, staying in the area of sports, you have something to tell us about the U.S.
Olympic soccer team.
Well, the women's soccer team, always trying to fight for equal pay.
There's a great meme you can see out there of one of the purple-haired lesbian, Megan Rapinoe.
She's taking a knee at a cartoon, and she says, yes, we have to be for equal pay.
And then it shows the Swedish girls going and scoring goal after goal.
And then she says, progress.
Yes, as the American team lost 3-0.
It's their worst defeat in decades.
Really?
3-0 is a devastating defeat?
It's pretty bad.
In soccer parlance, a 3-0 loss is the equivalent of, say, 45-52-0 in football.
I don't know if it's that bad.
It's pretty bad.
They were crushed.
They hadn't lost in, I want to say, they hadn't lost in...
I think close to 40 games. So this was unanticipated. Now they took a knee for Black Lives Matter.
And it should be pointed out that they also took a knee right before it started the game
against racism. However, during the national anthem, the women's team, you know, they were
wearing Black Lives Matter shirts over their uniforms and the red, white and blue.
Sponsored by Nike.
It's quite an interesting picture.
And again, I think that this accurately shows this pernicious global influence that these twin ideologies have.
This anti-white Uh, this anti-white movement that we started to see during Obama.
And they're doing this in Tokyo, where there are hardly no blacks anyway.
Oh, they're hardly anyone at the games, because there's no fans allowed.
Yeah, well, they're TV cameras.
So they're TV cameras, so the world gets to see.
And yeah, it's...
It was embarrassing.
I mean, again, if we want to just go briefly about sports, the NFL has decided they're going to play the Black National Anthem before every game.
Every game?
They did this last year to start the season, showing solidarity with the With the George Floyd, whatever we call them, protests, whatever the blacks got shot, they kept adding on.
Lift, lift every voice and sing, Mr. Kersey.
It will now be heard before every NFL game.
Are you going to lift your voice and sing?
I am going to make sure that I'm lifting heavyweights on Sunday.
It's actually a pretty nice song.
It's not very militant.
It's all about, you know, being good Negroes and marching forward and trying to work hard.
I'm sure you could say that Michelle Leddy would like to sing that as they say, let them die, about those who protest the teaching of critical race theory.
Maybe so, maybe so.
Well, our listeners will be chagrined to discover that yet another crisis has been revealed.
An article in Nature Communications Its first sentence is, Racism thrives in geoscience.
Geoscience, yes.
I think that has to do with geology and oil drilling and who knows whatever.
But it goes on to say, Following a national charge, numerous organizations, professional societies, colleges, departments, industries, labs, government agencies, and non-profits that house the geoscience community release statements calling out societal racism.
They do that.
Then they say, We assert that these statements of support, though important for steps, are generally ineffective at assisting minoritized people, i.e.
black, indigenous, and other people of color, BIPOC, disabled people, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and genderqueer, LGBTQ+, people, foreign nationals, and or women, in fighting racism or discrimination.
What a mouthful!
Gosh, there are all these queer and genderqueer and foreign nationals and or women who are fighting racism in the geoscience community and these statements just aren't doing enough for them.
Now, so there's pages and pages of blather about this, the usual stuff, but this is a sentence that really struck me.
The community, that is to say the geoscience community, must recognize that BIPOC and other marginalized geoscientists are not always safe in geoscience spaces.
For example... What?
No, listen to this.
Listen to this.
You sound skeptical, but you'll be even more so.
For example, holding objects, e.g.
a rock hammer, has been viewed as suspicious and continues to be used as a reason to call the police on black people, which can lead to the death of black individuals entirely because of racial profiling and an unjustified fear of black people.
So you see, If a black person is out in the field and he's holding a rock hammer in his hands, somebody might racially profile him, call the police, and he'll be shot to death.
So that's one of the reasons there are not enough BIPOC.
Now, I don't think that if a transgender, queer, genderqueer, bisexual, gay, or lesbian person, or woman, was holding a rock hammer out in the field, you'd have this problem.
What in the world does fighting racism and structural inequality and implicit bias have to do with the study of Earth, its oceans, atmosphere, rivers and lakes, ice sheets and glaciers, soils, complex surface, rocky interior?
I'm sorry.
I'm glad you got to the bottom of geoscience.
Geoscience is a very important discipline.
Well, but the very first sentence here, racism thrives in the rocky mantle of the earth, in the oceans, in the mountains, in the glaciers.
Racism thrives in geoscience.
You know, if there was a meteorite headed to the earth right now and there was an insufficient amount of melanin in the team, Compose a trend, figure out a way to stop this meteorite from hitting us.
I think the press would say, hey, there are too many white faces because they did this.
Do you remember back in January of 2020, CNN had an article calling out the lack of non-whites on President Trump's COVID-19 coronavirus?
I remember very well.
It's stories like this.
Yep, not enough BIPOCs, so they're never going to find that vaccine.
So, humanity can go extinct.
If white people are going to save the world again, we'd rather humanity go extinct because... They're not saying that.
They're not saying that.
They're saying with enough BIPOCs, we will for sure find the vaccine.
Come on, get it right.
Now, I think that you have another story, one of these unreasonable stories, about anti-Asian business in San Francisco, and they just refuse to see reality.
Yeah, you know, we've got a lot of stories, so I'm going to make this one quick, if I can actually locate it.
Yeah, it's one of these titles.
Here it is.
Fear and discord among Asian Americans over attacks in San Francisco.
And before you get started, if you were to read it and just hit control F, Type in the word African or black, you wouldn't find it.
There's no news about who actually is creating this fear and discord among Asian Americans by performing the attacks.
Yes.
Spoiler alert.
They're not white people.
They're black.
A string of attacks against older people of Asian descent has led to calls for more police officers.
An idea rejected by the city's Asian-American leaders.
They don't want more police officers because they're part of that intersectional wokeness, that coalition of the fringes.
Two grandmothers stabbed in the third punch in the face in broad daylight.
An 84-year-old man fatally shoved to the ground while on his morning walk.
In the past seven months, at least seven older Asian residents have been brutally attacked in San Francisco, a city with one of the largest Asian-American populations and oldest Chinatown in the country.
Tax first shocked and angered the Asian Americans in the city but the questions of what to do about the violence has now become a source of division because those leaders of the Asian American community however said they would rather explore solutions that do not involve law enforcement.
One of the more proudly liberal cities in the country is torn between its commitment to criminal justice reform in the wake of George Floyd's killing and the brutal reality of the city's most vulnerable residents being stabbed in the middle of the day on busy streets.
Connie Chan and Gordon Marr, the two members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors who are of Chinese descent, have been under pressure from Chinese activists to increase police staffing.
a move that all the local elected officials have resisted.
Chinese activists, many of whom denounced Chessa Boudin, the district attorney, for not
being tough enough on crime and back a recall effort against him, have shown up at meetings to
challenge officials. I believe that one of the people who, a couple years ago, when Chessa took
office, there was a murder of an Asian and instead of sending him to the black murderer, they did
this restorative justice. He didn't get He didn't actually get charged with the murder, but it was this restorative justice we hear so much about.
You know, again, the Asian American leaders and residents disagree over whether the attacks were random or were motivated by racial animus, but again, Who has the racial animus?
It's not white people attacking the Asians.
Well, of course you know that these black people are all agents.
Every last one of them are agents of white supremacy.
They have had this anti-Asian animus injected into their minds by wicked people like you and me, and our podcast is one of the big problems.
That's what's causing it, you know.
But we have the solution.
Rest assured, you San Francisco Asians, we have the problem.
We have the problem solved because the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service announces that the invasive Asian carp species will be renamed.
They decided that calling the fish Asian and advocating their culling had xenophobic connotations.
This could be referring to Asian people as being an invasive species, which is just as horrible, said Charlie Woolley, director of the Great Lakes Region of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service.
So once that fish is renamed because they say, we wanted to move away from any terms that cast Asian culture and people in a negative light.
The fact is, the species is wreaking havoc, infesting numerous rivers and bearing down upon the Great Lakes.
But once the name is changed, then everybody's going to be much, much happier about Asians in the United States, and the San Francisco elderly can walk and live in peace.
So, that's one solution.
And here's another one.
In Illinois schools.
Illinois has become the first American state to require public schools teach Asian American history.
That, too, will solve the problem.
Governor J.B.
Pritzker signed the Teaching Equitable Asian American Community History Act into law on July 9th, calling it a new standard that helps us understand one another.
And this will apply to public elementary and high schools.
Right in elementary school, you're going to have to study, this is in Illinois, mind you, Asian American history.
Now, Illinois State Representative Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz And she is originally a Gong, so you can imagine just what of ethnicity she is, she says.
After all, Asian American history is American history!
And all along, you know, we suppressed all those Asian signers of the Declaration, and all those Asian Civil War generals, and the Asian who invented the light bulb, and the Asians who worked on the Manhattan Project.
You know, we suppressed all these all these years, so now they will come to the fore.
And Ram Vilevalam, Illinois's first and only Indian American state senator, and another co-sponsor of the bill, said, The unfortunate rise in anti-Asian hate made it even more urgent.
Now, Stuart Quah, who was Executive Director of Asian Americans Advancing Justice, he said there are a lot of immediate things to address the violence, but the long-term strategy to deal with racism has to be education.
So I think that's definitely going to calm down those black people.
Once they're educated, once they learn about the Asian Exclusion Act, once they learn about the internment camps, then they will stop punching these Asian grandmothers, don't you think?
Possibility.
You sound skeptical.
Maybe.
The Illinois bill received, believe it or not, broad bipartisan support from Illinois lawmakers and unanimous votes in the Senate.
And you'll be glad to know that in 2019 there was a bill requiring Illinois grade schools and high schools to include LGBTQ plus history.
So one wonders, when will they learn to read and write?
But they can learn all about Asia.
So, let's move on to good news.
The poll on secession that you know all about.
Yeah, I'm going to pull it up so I can make sure I can show myself the geographic area.
So, there was what has been called a shock poll because we find out that two in three Southern Republicans Want to secede from the United States?
A YouGov poll found 66% of Republicans want to secede.
A survey in conjunction with Brightline Watch looks at the current political climate in America.
The most stunning concerted support or opposition for the state in which residents lived in seceding from the United States to join a new union With a list of states in the union.
Five prospective new unions were constructed by region and inserted the relevant states for respondents into questioning the word above.
For example, a participant from California in our survey would be asked about joining a new union with Washington, Oregon, Hawaii, and Alaska.
I don't really understand why that union would be made.
It doesn't make much geographic sense including Hawaii or Alaska.
But for the South, it was Texas.
Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South and North Carolina, And Virginia.
Interestingly enough, they didn't have West Virginia as part of that.
So this was going to be a new confederacy?
Yeah.
66% of Republicans said yes.
Wow.
50% of independents said yes.
20% of Democrats said yes.
Wow.
Now for the Midwest, the heartland, it's got 43% Republican support.
You know, the Northeast, goofy place, that had the lowest Republican support at only 26%.
The mountain region, which includes Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, 43% of Republican support.
Interestingly enough, 27% for that California, Washington.
Can you repeat the percentages of support by political affiliation for what would amount to a new Confederacy?
$66.50.
What? $66?
66% of Republicans, 50% of Independents, 20% of Democrats.
Save your Confederate money, boys!
The statues have to come back sometime, right?
It's funny, that's the thing about where we're all headed right now.
I think we all know something is wrong in this country.
Nothing unites this country except for Increasingly among the elite, they're, they're, they're, they're, I don't want to get in trouble with what I'm going to say or you might disagree, but they're rabid animosity toward white Americans, past, present, and future.
And I go back to this quote from a person who said this four or five miles from the headquarters, the worldwide headquarters of the New Century Foundation.
Yeah.
Let them die to rapacious applause.
Rapacious.
I think I used the word.
Uproarious.
Yes.
Uproarious.
Yes.
Yeah, yeah.
I know I just hate to attribute this kind of absolutely exterminationist sentiment to those who oppose what we do, but I suppose I have to come around.
Well, and as usual, the hour seems to be coming around, so we're going to have to end this fascinating, or at least fascinating to me, conversation.
And once again, we thank our listeners for the honor and the joy of taking this opportunity to be with you, and we urge you to get in touch with us.
If you have questions, if you have comments, and especially if you have corrections to any mistakes we've made, please send them to becausewelivehereatprotonmail.com Or you can send them to the Contact Us tab at amren.com.
We are always eager to hear from you.
You always enlighten us and often you entertain us.
And we did put out an All Points Alert bulletin on this series of terms of which we were completely ignorant.
And the joke will be on us if somebody had just invented them.
But they were ways that we could possibly fight back.
And they were known as... Let's see.
They were known as Tang Ping or Laying Flat.
So if any of you know, we'd love to hear from you.
So, on behalf of my indispensable co-hosts, Paul Kersey and myself, thank you so much for listening.
▲
Export Selection