Hello, I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
The 2019 Pulitzer Prizes have just been announced, and they are in perfect harmony with the current orgy of white capitulation.
Reporters like to strike a pose as courageous fighters against the establishment, but not one prize represented the slightest challenge to orthodoxy.
The prize for editorial writing went to Brent Staples of the New York Times for, quote, Columns written with extraordinary moral clarity.
You don't even have to know that Mr. Staples is black to know what the Pulitzer people mean by extraordinary moral clarity.
He wrote an editorial called Monuments to White Supremacy, which was about statues of Confederate heroes.
Some of his other editorials were called The Racist Trope That Won't Die, when newspapers justified lynching, and even the racism behind women's suffrage.
Not even the suffragettes escaped that extraordinary moral clarity.
The prize for breaking news went to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette for covering the massacre at the Tree of Life synagogue.
Of course, it had to be the most gruesome recent act of white butchery in America, and the series naturally smeared any kind of white advocacy.
One article quoted the SBLC warning that the killer, Robert Bowers, was...
So-called experts called for a comprehensive approach to the problem.
I have a feeling that means censorship.
For local reporting, the winner was the Baton Rouge advocate for, quote, You see, Louisiana...
is one of two states along with Oregon that allow a non-unanimous conviction for felonies.
That means a 10 to 2 vote can send you to the big house.
And as in every other state, blacks are more likely than anyone else to be in jail.
And so the paper blamed this unusual system.
The prize for feature writing went to ProPublica for a series on Salvadoran immigrants.
Apparently, and I quote, their lives were shattered by a botched Federal crackdown on MS-13.
Well, maybe the feds made some mistakes, but does this mean they should ignore MS-13?
In breaking news photography, Reuters won for a series of pictures that show the, quote, urgency, desperation, and sadness of Central American illegals.
It's all about children, preferably in diapers, designed to play on your sympathies and make you hate the Border Patrol.
America obviously needs these people.
Carlos Lozada, a Peruvian who has been a U.S. citizen for only a few years, won the prize for criticism or, in Pulitzer Talk, trenchant and searching reviews and essays.
One was called Can Truth Survive This President?
Another was Who Gets to Dream, which explains how Mr. Trump is snuffing out the dreams of deserving immigrants.
This leads me to what could be called the Get Trump category.
The Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting went to the Wall Street Journal 4 in Pulitzer Talk, uncovering President Trump's secret payoffs to two women during his campaign who claimed to have had affairs with him and the web of supporters who facilitated the transactions.
So, we can thank, or perhaps reproach.
The Wall Street Journal, for putting the spotlight on Stormy Daniels, as well as on her former lawyer and accused embezzler, Michael Avenatti.
The prize for explanatory reporting, that went to the New York Times for, and again I quote, an exhaustive 18-month investigation of President Trump's finances that debunked his claims of self-made wealth and revealed a business empire riddled with tax dodges.
Well, I wonder what an aggressive look at Nancy Pelosi's or Charles Schumer's finances might just turn up.
Darren Bell, another Trump hater, whose self-portrait we see here, won a prize for beautiful and daring editorial cartoons that took on issues affecting disenfranchised communities, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Daring? How's this for daring?
Presumably, this is about efforts to make college admissions colorblind, which would increase the number of Asians.
But under his MAGA hat, Mr. Trump is wearing one that says, make college white again.
And here's more silliness with Donald Trump playing the music of hate.
And he's saying, don't blame me.
I didn't tell him to dance.
And in the foreground, here we have illiterate white Nazis.
They are dripping in blood from Jews and blacks.
So daring.
More to the point, so stupid.
The winner for drama was Jackie Drury.
Black, of course.
For, in Pulitzer Talk, a hard-hitting drama that examines race in a highly conceptual, layered structure and brings audiences to face deep-seated prejudices.
Well, how does it do that?
Well, at one point, one of the characters asks all the white people in the audience to go up on stage.
Then she asks the non-whites, do I have to keep talking to the white people?
The winner in history was Frederick Douglass, prophet of freedom.
The winner in biography was The New Negro, The Life of Alan Locke, shown here with author Jeffrey Stewart.
Finally, Aretha Franklin got a special citation in the form of a posthumous Pulitzer.
The not obviously race-obsessed prizes tended to be just weird.
The prize for music was for an opera called Prism by two white women, and it's about, quote, the effects of sexual and emotional abuse.
All the main characters are women.
It's tempting to roll your eyes and say, well, who cares about the Pulitzers?
But people like to win prizes, and the committee is making it very clear what it wants, and what it rewards is what it will get.
You'll never get a prize if you write a series on Americans who've been murdered because of sanctuary policies, or about the astonishing racial difference in crime rates in New York City, or about the terrible chaos in classrooms after the Obama administration ordered schools to discipline all races at equal rates.
There would be no prize for exposing the financial secrets of the Soros Empire or for a portrait of what happens when culturally alien asylum seekers are dropped into a small town.
The mania for diversity and equality poisons journalism and art and culture.
If real journalism and art are going to make a comeback, they can't be propaganda.