All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 25, 2020 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:06
Reflections on 2020
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to the latest episode of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
The date is December 25th, Year of Our Lord 2020, so this is Christmas Day.
I don't know at what point this will be posted to the Internet, but whenever it is posted, I wish you and all of your loved ones a very Merry Christmas.
It is my pleasure and honor to have with me on this occasion none other than Sam Dixon.
Sam Dixon is a longtime comrade and collaborator of American Renaissance, and among his many distinctions is the fact of having been the closing speaker of every American Renaissance conference dating all the way back to the very first one, 1994.
So, thanks very much for being with us on this occasion, Mr. Dixon, and Merry Christmas to you!
Merry Christmas to you and all of the people who listen to this, and I'm very grateful and honored to be here.
Presence of my leader.
Hardly your leader.
I think what we'd like to do, because the year is coming to a conclusion.
So, in this year of 2020 that is about to perish, I thought I would ask Mr. Dixon some of his reflections on the most important things that happened this past year and what his views on these are.
Well, it has been a very momentous year.
I think it's important to take a long-range view of things and to think of things that have enduring impact.
Right now, December 25, 2020, Most attention is focused directly on the question of whether or not there was voter fraud that enabled Biden to carry the swing states and to be elected president.
While that is certainly an important issue, it's not a long-lasting issue.
And there are fundamentals that have happened that are worthy of our taking note of and considering how they will affect us in the future.
Overall, I think the year has been one that is optimistic for us.
It's had some very good things.
As you have said, I'm sure many of the things that I will say have been said by you and others and said perhaps even better.
The astonishing thing to me is that Trump got as big a vote as he did.
That's quite astonishing.
Yes, yes.
74 million Americans.
Almost all of them white.
As I recall, about 85% of them white.
Ignored what they were told for the last four years by the combined efforts of the media and the university and our rulers.
Note to the fact that he is a wicked fascist and the worst person in American history and they disobeyed and they voted for him anyway.
So yes, I agree with you.
That's a very significant event.
Yes, I like to say that it has shown that to a remarkable extent the majority of white people have now developed herd immunity They have herd immunity against the system and its media and its spokesmen.
The people who voted for Trump defied, as you said, the media, the print media.
You can probably count on your fingers the number of newspapers in America that endorsed Trump.
The television media, the radio media, the priests, the preachers, the organized labor, organized big business, all of these things.
Everybody in authority was against Trump.
My recollection is that there were seven newspapers that endorsed Donald Trump, the most noteworthy being the New York Post.
Yes, and to jump ahead, there are a number of things I'd like to, observations I'd like to make, and one of them is going to be that the election was fraudulent.
But we, the people who are followers of American Renaissance, the people who I call, most of them have denied themselves, but racial nationalists who want a country for ourselves, The things that we should note about the system and how fraudulent the election is go far beyond mere stealing of votes, which is nothing new in American history.
Lyndon Johnson stole his Senate election as his conceded even by his admirers.
Franklin Roosevelt conspired to steal votes and to work with the Communist Party.
against liberal reformist elements in the North who threatened his ability to steal votes.
Vote fraud is as American as apple pie.
It's part and parcel of a universal suffrage corrupt democratic system.
But the fraudulent nature, one example, a concrete example, is the New York Post.
The New York Post endorsed Trump It also was one of the very few newspapers in the country, system media in the country, to pick up on the Hunter Biden laptop.
Most media censored that out in the closing days of the campaign, something that the nannies felt that the children should not be allowed to hear.
The New York Post reported on it and Twitter Barred the New York Post from using its Twitter account to run the story about Hunter Biden's laptop.
Yes, yes, this was quite remarkable.
The fact that this major news story and that one that was circulated and purveyed by what is in fact a major news organ, a New York City newspaper of longstanding The fact that Twitter prevented this from being circulated.
I believe Facebook took the same tack against this story.
So anything that was potentially embarrassing to the favored candidate had to be suppressed.
Nothing new about that.
They like to say that when they take down Websites and move people from Facebook and that sort of thing.
The establishment media, the system media, like to say that well they're removing hate.
And it's worth noting they never tell us what the hate was.
If they had these examples of hate, when they took down the American Renaissance, if they had some sort of shocking example of calls for violence or violence against blacks or other minority groups, they would surely tell us, well, one of the horrible things that were taken down was such and such a YouTube thing that called for the extermination of non-whites.
They'd share with the public that they're trying to influence the examples of hate.
But they never do that because they're not taking hate down.
They're taking down alternate sources of information.
And on that they like to say that they're taking out false news.
Well, the Hunter Biden laptop was not false news.
And it exposes the Bidens as remarkable examples, state exhibit A, of crony capitalism and corruption among liberal leadership.
And they didn't want that out.
And so they censored it.
And they barred, as I said, they barred a major daily newspaper
from putting the story out on Twitter.
So Twitter is barring news.
They're actively engaged in the kind of things that Joseph Goebbels and Joseph Stalin engaged in.
That is what they're up to.
Except they are morally worse because they don't have the integrity to admit what they're doing.
Whereas in Germany and in the Soviet Union, There was no pretense that there was a free press.
Yes, this is the shocking thing.
As I've said many times, we'd be much better off if there were government censorship.
Then we would know who was putting his hands on the scale.
Also, if there were to be government censorship in the United States, it would probably follow in the wake of some kind of legislations defining hate crime or misinformation.
And presumably you would have standards and some sort of appeal.
This way, there are no standards, there is no appeal.
And so we are far worse off than we would be if we were in a situation in which every citizen knew that off-screen on the television there is someone with a peaked hat with a red star tacked into the middle of it telling the announcer what to say.
Under those circumstances, everyone knows that the truth is not the truth.
But this way, no, all of these private operators Yes, and looking at the fundamentals of the system, not the whether or not votes were stolen on election day, but the fundamental things of a fair system.
The election was unfair, it is an illegitimate election, but the vote counting frauds, to the extent they did occur, and they always occur as I indicated, and they always occur
mostly on the side of our enemies.
That blinds us, if you focus on that, it blinds us to the fundamental unfairness and illegitimacy
of this election. A genuine free society depends upon the free exchange of ideas in civic debate.
That was denied to the American people.
It was denied to the American people by private enterprise.
And here again, when I was a kid and you were at Yale and involved in your New Left activities and I was at the University of Georgia observing New Left activities and reading their propaganda and listening to left-wing liberal professors They were all against private property.
They were concerned about monopolies and the danger that business poses to society.
And I'm with them.
I am something of a socialist myself.
I think the needs of the community come ahead of individual self-interest, or as the SDS said it, people before profits.
I think people do come before profits.
I'm not a libertarian.
I do believe in private ownership of property.
I don't think Calling the government, have your plumber come on New Year's Eve to fix the broken pipe is going to work.
I'd rather call a plumber who's motivated by the profit system to come and fix my broken pipe.
But nevertheless, the interest of the people in clean air and in drinkable water comes ahead of the interest of big business in dumping radioactive waste into the rivers or emitting poisonous smoke into the atmosphere.
But anyway, Our enemies have now abandoned the pretenses they used to have of their positions.
There used to be a term, you spent your youth in Japan, not in the South, do you remember the term company town?
Oh yes.
Company town has disappeared from the vocabulary, but it meant a town in which one guy owned the mill.
And despite the illusion of people voting for things, basically nobody in the town could oppose the mill owner.
And that's what we have nationally.
We have a national company tax.
Well, we have a company country.
Yes.
And these leftists, the anti-far included, they're all for it.
The Marxist, anarchist, antifa with their little hammers and sickles and all the stuff.
They're as happy about big capitalism, about things like Facebook and Amazon.
They're thrilled.
There's no longer any pretense.
Well, it is a little surprising to me, perhaps because I'm such a naive.
That the internet lords turned so quickly against the idea of freedom of speech.
When the internet first was opening itself to the access of people like you and me, it was celebrated as an opportunity for any person to speak his mind.
And it was not so long ago that Twitter was calling itself the free speech wing of the free speech movement.
And it is not so long ago, I believe it was in 2015, that Amazon, which now bans my books and anything it considers dissident, Amazon was defending its decision not to withdraw from sale A Pederast Predator's Guide.
This was how to seduce and bugger little boys.
And their argument was, we find the contents of this book loathsome.
However, if we decide that we are going to ban this, that is a slippery slope down which we refuse to slide.
Very quickly, not only did they slide down, they leapt down that slope.
And I think something that did not get anywhere near the attention it deserved was a research study by Google called The Good Sensor.
This was something that was meant for internal consumption and not to be released to the rest of the world.
But someone within Google apparently supplied it to Breitbart News.
I wish that it had been possible to get a rise out of the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal, some larger organ.
But they probably were offered this and showed no interest in publicizing it.
But its point was that Google, Facebook, Twitter, they are now such dominant
forces in the distribution of information that they can control world events. And the whole point of
this was to say that Brexit was something that should not have happened. The election of
Donald Trump was something that should not have happened. And if we, in our wisdom and our
bliss, we who control the media, decide that we're not going to let something like that
happen again, we can do it.
And this is all fine and dandy with the socialists and the anti-capitalists. They all like this.
Now unlike you, I'm surprised that this wasn't done from the very beginning.
Knowing the kind of people that own Facebook, knowing the kind of people even setting aside various allegiances that the people that own things like Facebook and Twitter have, businessmen are just not protectors of freedom of speech.
There's an enormous difference between a plutocrat and an aristocrat.
One of the worst things that Buckley did was to confuse Bill Buckley and the conservative movement.
Conservatism Inc., as some people call it, did was to confuse the idea of a plutocrat and an aristocrat.
Businessmen are pleasers.
They go around the restaurant, is the tea alright?
Do you like the green beans?
They're not the kind of people that defend freedom of speech as we have seen with American Renaissance and many other organizations.
We can't have a meeting in America now through private business.
Libertarians should think about that when they glorify private business over the common good.
The only way that we can have meetings is through socialism.
Well, just so that our listeners understand the context of Mr. Dixon's remarks, American Renaissance used to hold its conferences in nice hotels which were chosen for their convenience and for their well-appointed facilities.
But after several years of doing it in that way, the hotels came under such pressure that they would cancel their contracts with us.
They would walk away from $150,000-$200,000 in business and at the same time pay a fat cancellation fee because the Antifa and other opponents of free speech put such pressure on them.
The most remarkable occasion was once in which a hotel was informed, if you let these horrible people have a meeting in your hotel, I'll come in and shoot up everybody.
Now, this was probably a toothless threat, but if a hotel has been warned of something like this, and then, heaven forbid, some violence do take place, then those are 25, 100, 200 lawsuits waiting to happen.
So, we were canceled for that reason.
Fortunately, now that we meet in a government-owned facility in the state of Tennessee, If you threaten the state of Tennessee with shooting up the facility, that's probably something that the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation is going to track down.
I'm not so sure of that.
I think once again you're very optimistic.
You have a very optimistic view on life and there's a lot of strength that comes from having a Happy talk view of life.
I don't have that view of life.
I think things are so bad in America that if the right people committed the crimes against the wrong right people, the state would go along with that.
We have a specific example in Atlanta, my native city.
In which the Antifa had a demonstration against the police.
In the course of that demonstration they bombed a police car.
They threw a bomb into a police car and blew the police car up.
Fortunately there were no cops in the police car.
But it was quite dramatic.
It's the kind of thing you'd expect in a lot of news media coverage.
The car exploded.
The gas tank exploded.
Flames shot a hundred feet up in the air.
The pictures are very dramatic.
Well, they weren't dramatic enough for the people of Atlanta to be told about this by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution or WABE Radio, National Radio.
There was one brief blip And then the story disappeared. It wasn't like these
arrests of people for plotting to kidnap the governor of Michigan and things like that. The story
was quickly killed. There were no politicians who issued ringing calls that we must have law
and order. No politicians, even the Republicans, came to the defense of the police and
called for something to be done.
Instead, it was just airbrushed out by the company town and the company country.
And furthermore, the story didn't stop there.
Our African-American district attorney refused to prosecute three antifa who were including the one who physically threw the bomb.
They didn't get prosecuted.
These three had been identified?
Yeah, they were arrested by the police in the act.
The Atlanta Journal has never covered this.
There was never an editorial criticizing the African-American district attorney.
All of that was airbrushed out too.
You compare these things, just how illegitimate the system is and why white Americans should withdraw, should abjure the realm and withdraw any allegiance to this system and its political police.
How bad this is, just look at this.
Imagine if they could find an incident in the South in which clan elements, some sort of racist whites,
threw a bomb into a car, you know, a police car, in the course of the struggle over the Black Rights
Movement back in the 50s.
We'd hear about it all the time.
There'd be photographs of it on school walls.
But instead, they're quite willing to go along with protecting people who throw bombs at the police.
That's the moral level of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
That's the moral level of the New York Times, as you've said many times, who have this Korean
who said that she looks forward to the happy day when all the white people are dead.
And the New York Times didn't fire her.
They defended her by saying, well, what do you expect?
She's an Asian woman living in a white, racist America.
This is an immigrant woman who was given a scholarship to Harvard.
That's not enough.
She's still entitled to want all the white people dead.
Well, yes, that was Sarah Jong.
I am naive enough so that when she was appointed to the editorial board of the New York Times, which is one of the most prestigious positions in all of American journalism, and then a few days later these tweets in which she expressed herself in that vicious manner came out, In my own naive way, I thought to myself, well, the New York Times would just have to fire her.
Oh, silly me!
Silly me!
As you say, the New York Times defended her.
They said that someone had called her a dog-eater or a gook dog-eater.
And this was justification enough for her to look forward to the day when people who look like you and me are all dead.
Yes.
And they knew about that ahead of time.
And that shows something.
They want that too.
I wouldn't go so far as to say that.
I don't know if they want that too, but certainly they behave as if they certainly are sympathetic to that kind of sentiment.
People who read the New York Times should keep in mind, white people, like the people listening to this, I think they often don't grasp the full nature of all of this.
But every time you pick up a New York Times, you should reflect, this is a newspaper that defends the mass genocide of white people.
And their writers, their editorial board, their owners.
This is the kind of person they are.
Well, I would not go so far as that.
I don't think they defend genocide.
On the other hand, they certainly do not shut up voices of people who revel at the thought that we will disappear.
At the same time, I am a subscriber online to the New York Times.
I'm a subscriber online to the New York Times.
And so I often read the comments.
And just the other day there was a story about the Berlin Ballet.
I was not aware of this.
I guess I don't watch enough ballet.
But there are certain ballets in which they ask all the dancers in certain scenes to cover themselves in white paint.
In Swan Lake, for example, the ballerinas that become swans, they put white paint over their bodies and over their faces, and so they are swans.
All white.
Apparently there are also ballets in which, if you are to be a ghost, if you're representing a spirit of some kind, you deck yourself out in white paint.
This is a tradition in Western ballet.
Well, in a performance that was scheduled by the Berlin Ballet of Swan Lake, there's one black dancer, and she was asked, likewise, to don the white paint.
And she, our little racially conscious thing that she was, she says, I will never look, I will never look white.
And apparently the makeup artist said, well, you'll just have to wear more paint.
So this was a great scandal.
And the New York Times ran, the headline was, Black Dancer in Berlin Ballet Asked to Wear White Makeup or White Paint.
And the implication was that just because she was black, in order to fit in with all the other pink-skinned dancers, she was asked to wear white makeup.
No, that was not the situation at all.
Once you got 15 paragraphs into the story, you realize that all the dancers were to be dressed up this way.
And so it's really a non-story.
This was some kind of self-laceration by the Berlin Ballet that promised to hire diversity experts and all the usual brainwashing because they'd asked this black woman to wear exactly the same kind of makeup as the whites.
Back to the comments.
Practically every commenter was, this is a deceptive headline.
She was not singled out to wear white paint.
Everybody was wearing white paint.
This is a non-story.
This is all disgusting.
So, I'm encouraged by even the readers of the New York Times.
As you said, there's much to be encouraged by this year, which was in many respects, I think, a very disappointing and frustrating year.
Still, many, many people are waking up to the double standard, this constant preaching to us as to how wicked we are.
Yeah, we're requiring herd immunity.
That's good.
People are coming to recognize the system media as a lying machine, as a not reliable source of information and something that is adversarial and hostile, dramatically so, to white Americans.
But I think we should move on to other examples of how the system is illegitimate, the election is illegitimate.
We've dealt with the suppression of freedom of speech where you couldn't have a A free thing.
Before we leave that though, I would like to point out something.
This will undoubtedly excite Heidi Beirich and people who are still with the SPLC.
I was actually reading some years back about the election in Iran when Ahmadinejad was running for re-election.
Well, first off, Iran had always been depicted as an authoritarian, totalitarian state to us.
Well, suddenly they're having an election and the system media seamlessly changed gears and the attack became That the election was stolen by Ahmadinejad.
That the votes weren't counted right.
Well, they had an election.
And people, the Babylonians, they had an election.
People who were opposed to him were able to get on the ballot.
And they were able to rent hotel rooms, unlike American Renaissance.
They were able to put ads in the newspapers, unlike American Renaissance.
In many ways, they had a freer election than we had in 2020 in the United States.
People need to keep this in mind, that this system doesn't change when it goes overseas.
Southerners especially are bad about thinking that, well, the government has hostile to
us here at home, but when it goes overseas, it's our boys and we're fighting to the righteous
cause to bring freedom to all these countries.
No!
The foreign policy is just an extension of the anti-white, anti-Christian policies of the United States of America.
And we should withdraw support from the military-industrial complex.
Southerners should withdraw support.
Our senators and congressmen should be the ones voting to defund the military.
It is ironic that southerners who were defeated in that great civil war in which Americans participated, they are the ones who, in many respects, are the most patriotic.
They're the ones who are the first to line up, presumably and potentially, to die for their country.
It is a strange thing.
I remember a British friend of mine pointing this out, marveling at why was it That the defeated Southerners who had so many reasons to resent that government was imposed on them, why are they now waving the Yankee flag?
Well, we prefer the Stockholm Synod.
Well, I'm not sure that's it.
I think that may play a role.
The desire to kiss and make up and show the government that we're loyal to them.
That's another thing.
I read a book on the U.S.
entrance into World War I recently by a guy named Thomas Fleming.
I can't quite... The Illusion of Victory is a book I hardly recommend.
But it described the declaration of war when Wilson, the hireling of the big banks and war profiteers, went to declare war on Germany, which had done nothing to us.
When he went to Congress to seek the declaration of war, the Southerners were the ones all jumping up and down with joy and screaming and yelling when the senator from Wisconsin, La Follette, tried to make a speech against the war declaration.
One of the senators from Mississippi got up and spent 17 minutes yelling at him from his seat to drown him out.
And when Wilson went back later on to get the declaration of war against Austria-Hungary, which certainly had never done anything to us.
They didn't have a submarine that ever sank a Lusitania.
The southerners stood and had their rebel yells, hey, we gonna kick Austrian ass!
Oh, we gonna kick Austrian ass!
It's things like this that cause me to, at times, to be very skeptical of the South.
Well, just to add a footnote to that observation, the Thomas Fleming you're speaking of is a historian and not Thomas Fleming that some of our listeners may be familiar with, who was the one-time editor of Chronicles magazine.
I think it's not so much Stockholm Syndrome as a kind of martial valor, a kind of aggressiveness of Southerners.
It's that borderlands willingness to fight.
I think Southerners are just much more militaristic.
They were far more, they're far better soldiers at the beginning part of the war between the states.
I think it's more having to do with that than some sort of subservient to the Yankee flag.
It is an irony that yes, the Southerners themselves in Congress expressed the idea that by going over and kicking Austrian ass and stuff, they were going to show, they were going to win the love of Yankees.
That's what our senators and congressmen said.
So I think we should take them at their word.
I am a Southerner.
I'm a loyal Southerner.
I can, as I've said before, I can criticize the South because I am a Southerner.
I don't like it when outsiders criticize.
It's like my mother.
I can criticize my mother, but other people better not criticize my mother.
So when I say this about the South, I'm saying it as somebody who is a cousin of Dushka Pickens, who was the daughter of the governor of South Carolina, who lit the fuse for the first cannon shot on Fort Sumter.
My credentials as a Southerner are very, very strong, despite the fact that I do have a lot of connections to New England, too, and my loyalties are with the South.
I would have fought for the South.
I'm still a southerner.
I still want the South.
But we should not go there.
There are a lot of things I'd like to say about the South and what's wrong with the South.
But we need to focus on the illegitimacy of the election.
We've mentioned the suppression of freedom of speech, that we did not have freedom of speech.
We were denied it by the big rich capitalist in the country.
There are other things too.
People seem to see things without seeing the significance of things.
There are all kinds of things that have happened that are very significant.
Starting in 2016, for the first time, well maybe not the first time, Lincoln used mobs and gangsters to attack rallies of his opposition.
But generally speaking in American history, we have not had a country in which violent attacks were made on people attending a presidential candidates rallies.
No.
In 2016, these happened all over America.
They happened three times in Atlanta.
The Antifa even beat up an 80-year-old woman.
This also didn't cause any quivers of conscience to people like the Atlanta Journal-Constitution of the New York Times.
In fact, a lot of them thought it was kind of funny and, you know, good that this was going on, that people were dealing with these racists and deplorables, the irredeemable, unredeemable, as Hillary also.
We're beyond redemption.
We can't even be redeemed.
I guess we need to be just, as the Korean woman of the New York Times said, we should just all die because we cannot be redeemed.
But anyway, this is quite a milestone on the way of America to collapse, and that's where we're headed.
To allow violent crimes nationwide With no outcry by the opposing party, Hillary Clinton said that the attacks were caused by Trump.
That's right.
That he caused them by the violence of his rhetoric.
So she wasn't about to say that there was anything wrong with him.
And now, four years later, we have the same thing.
And we've had four years of sustained anti-fire attacks on people.
We've seen them on the television and on the computers, the violent attacks in Portland, Oregon, and elsewhere, like in Atlanta.
In Atlanta, the local antifa for some months had up a death threat on me.
They had my address, they had my picture, they pinned a remark on one of their followers, Sam Dixon needs to die, and I am dedicated to bringing this about.
I went to the FBI about this death threat.
They could not, the political police, the corrupt FBI, could not care less.
They were far more focused on sending agents provocateur into white groups to try to drum up claims of violent conspiracy so they could arrest people, three of whom were in Griffin, Georgia, for plotting violence against the antifa.
Well, they didn't have to send any agent into the Atlanta antifa to get the death threat on me.
I'm sorry, I don't have any respect for the FBI.
I see no reason why I should ever have proposed any confidence in the FBI about anything.
If I were a juror, and I found out that one of the witnesses for the other side was an FBI agent, I would have to assume that his testimony would be unworthy of any credibility whatsoever.
Not just politically, if it was a drug case or something.
This institution is totally discredited, as is the rest of the American system.
And that's why we need to go beyond the system.
Well, we certainly need to go beyond the system.
I am not convinced that the FBI is rotten and corrupt in every single aspect of its operations, but it is certainly true that you touched earlier on the plot to kidnap Governor Gretchen Whitmer, I believe that's her name, of Michigan.
And as it turns out, the ringleader in all of this was the FBI plant.
Same thing with the three in Griffin.
The guy that suggested the violence was an FBI plan.
The guy that had them do the concrete step to implement the conspiracy was the FBI agent who put them in his car and drove them by a house that he identified as the residence of two Antifa activists.
Well, do you recall, I don't know how many years ago, I would guess maybe five, six, seven years ago, there was a legal proceeding in Germany to delegitimize the Republican Party.
The Republican Party was a nationalist party in Germany.
That was constantly accused of having Nazi antecedents.
And when they went to trial, it turned out that the most radical statements were made by the infiltrators.
And to the credit of the German system, a judge threw the case out.
He says, this is nonsense.
All of the most outrageous things you're telling me came from the mouths of government employees, not party activists.
So at least they saw through this and they got rid of this case.
Their system's not as corrupt as ours.
I've had personal experience defending people in court where the government lied, and they tried to pretend that they never revealed that the witness, the supposedly hostile witness that Morris Deeds put on the stand, was actually working for the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.
I found out from a lawyer who called me, I was from the state, and said, this guy I'm reading about in the paper, who was the only guy to show up at this rally in a Klan outfit, and to call for violence. And he's appearing now and the
media is going, lapping it all up. He appeared in a trial, an arson case I
had up here, as someone who was working with the GBI. And that came out
the next time the trial of the court reconvened. The lawyer was kind
enough to send me the transcript.
And they had to admit over Dease's objection that yes, this so-called person
who was at this white rally, who was the one urging violence,
the only one urging violence. Yes, he was with the Georgia Bureau of Investigations.
I'm sorry, I do not have your pleasant views of people like the Georgia Bureau of Investigation or the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
These are not good people.
And the rot extends, it isn't like, who's that guy on On Fox News.
Hannity.
It's not like Hannity claims that it's only at the top that the FBI is rotten.
No, it's rotten down to the agents on the street.
The whole thing is rotten.
And the way we know that is because of the way these stories that appear over and over in the media.
There was one in Atlanta not long ago about the suburb of Doraville.
There was an article in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, big headline, White hate leaflets in Doraville.
Somebody had handed out leaflets that we were told were hate.
I doubt that they were hate at all.
And this had come to the attention of the authorities and they quoted the local FBI field officer saying that the Federal Bureau is onto this.
We're investigating.
What is there to investigate?
When an American citizen gives another American citizen a pamphlet.
And this is not new.
This goes all the way back into the 1960s.
I know somebody who, in 10th grade, gave racialist leaflets to other 10th graders.
Two days later, two FBI agents and the county sheriff that they had gotten to go along with them, visited his parents to do something to stop the 10th grader from handing out leaflets.
That was in 1968.
So no, I have no use for them.
But that's another reason why the election system is invalid.
Not really the vote stealing, but the fact that you have these political police who are one-sided and who are violating the law.
Well, it is disturbing that whatever allegedly racist material is distributed or some sort of allegedly racist mail is sent to a black person or a Hispanic That the FBI is called in for investigation if we discover nooses hanging someplace or loops of rope that could be construed of as nooses but don't turn out to be that at all.
Why on earth would the FBI be called in?
As you point out, no crime has been committed so far as I know.
Apparently, you want to get the FBI in to humiliate, discover this person and humiliate him.
Well, and to send the message through the media that there is something criminal about saying that race matters.
Well, it's a criminal act and the average reader, we have people in Georgia that go around and lecture lawyers and claim that lawyers are officers of the court and can't engage in racist or sexist speech in private life.
This is not true!
But they're putting the story out and I look around the room and there are all these lawyers just drinking this in.
No one's saying, this is not the law.
You can't take this little phrase that we're officers of the court and regulate what we can say in the privacy of our homes.
I'm sure it is perfectly fine if you engage in communist or anarchist speech.
That's perfectly all right.
But anything construed as sexist is no good.
Now, it's something that you have not yet mentioned, but I think one of the most significant things that happened in 2020, in the long term, perhaps more significant than the election or this pandemic, this COVID that we're supposed to be living through.
And that is the extent to which many, many white people have absorbed this idea that they are personally responsible for the failures of blacks.
It used to be that when there was a race riot, it was exclusively blacks, or almost exclusively blacks, rioting and burning and looting, and mainly in their own neighborhoods.
Now we have not only white people participating in these demonstrations, in some cases some of the Antifa, being the first to use crowbars to smash open the stores, and then of course the blacks are delighted to leap in and loot to their heart's content.
But white people participating in this, and white people even if they're not violent, Chanting as loudly as they can, Black Lives Matter.
And then the other slogan, which is to me, not just insanity, but insanity on stilts.
White silence is violence.
By saying nothing, Mr. Dixon, you and I are committing acts of violence against black people.
Now, It is impossible for any of us to know the number of white people who genuinely feel personally responsible for this.
But there is some number, and I think that number has certainly increased.
That's a disturbing thing.
It is a very disturbing thing.
In general, I think there's a lot to be happy about.
But there is no surprising shift among young people.
In 2016, it was a matter of concern to the people who misrule us.
That a lot of young whites were getting involved in things like the alt-right and stuff like that.
But this time they've got, I don't know how the propaganda has become more effective, but they've got lots of kids in high school and started college that are now saying they're socialists.
Not in the right sense that I say I'm socialist, but in the Lenin sense.
The Lenin, Trotsky, Bernie Sanders sense.
Yeah.
And here again, let's look further into the illegitimacy of the system.
You had a candidate for president, Bernie Sanders, and he had two people on his staff who, I think it was Project Veritas or someone like Project Veritas, Yes.
Well, I don't recall they were saying it would kill them, but they were certainly going to such a re-education camp.
Soviet Union, we will set up goon logs and we're going to start killing people and sending
Yes.
them to the camps.
Well, I don't recall they were saying they were going to kill them, but they were certainly
going to send them to re-education camps.
I don't think they said they were going to kill them, but obviously lots of them died
in the camps, if they so admire.
There are pranks like that.
I mean, I knew a crank when I was in high school.
A woman later became a friend of mine.
But she was somebody that put up the Freedom Riders when they came to Atlanta.
Her house was a depot and she was one of the parents associated with the debate.
And I was president of the school debating team.
So I dealt with her.
And I gave a talk in a debate about the Hungarian Revolution in 1956.
And Mrs. Paschal explained to me that the people of Hungary were happy, as were all the people under Soviet rule, and that the Hungarian Revolution was simply a plot by the CIA and the fascists and stuff.
And I listened to her.
This woman is obviously a communist.
Only a communist could believe something like this.
But later on, as life has many surprising twists, Ms.
Pascal and I became good friends.
And she actually came to her senses when she saw that the racially neutral countries she thought she was helping to bring about had become more obsessed by race than the segregation itself had ever been.
It became an excuse for race to enter into every decision made nationwide.
So she had the capacity to rethink.
But anyway, there are lots of cranks like these two Bernie Sanders staffers.
But what was significant was Sanders stood by them and the mainstream media would not mention the story.
No, neither one was fired or disciplined or reprimanded in any way.
Imagine if somebody was a staff member for Donald Trump and said something like, well, if we face opposition at this election, there's always Auschwitz.
Wait, wait, wait.
No, no, no, no, no.
Let's not go too far.
You can say, well, we'll have to re-educate them.
Put them in camps and re-educate them.
Labor camps.
We'll have to resettle them in the east or something.
Whatever.
would cover for this tells us again what the media thinks and what they want, what the
system wants the destiny of white people America to be.
And you know, and it shows it is, I think it's not unfair to bracket Bernie Sanders
with Trotsky and Lenin, you know, I think it's very fair to bracket him with them because
he certainly, certainly politically, whether those people would, if they had the option,
bullets in the backs of our heads, I would not venture to say.
Look at their faces.
Just look at their faces, Sherrod.
I've looked at their faces.
I've looked to a Black Lives Matter rally in disguise.
These are not nice people.
No, they are not nice people.
And it is certainly true that those who wish to expose us And by doing so, wish to deprive us of our livelihoods.
Those people, if you take that to its logical conclusion, they wish, if they're going to deprive us of our livelihoods, they want us and our families to starve, in effect.
And I sometimes wonder, if I were facing a life-saving operation, and there were only one doctor in America who knew how to perform this, And if the SPLC found out about this, would they call up the doctor and say, look, this man is a very bad man.
Please don't operate on him.
I think I wouldn't put that way.
I mean, personally, personally, personally, there is a smear up on me that most of your listeners may have many of may have read this by the SPLC.
It is a lie.
It's not a matter of opinion.
It's not that they call me a white racist or all these other, the usual shotgun blast
and all the things you're supposed to be.
I'm talking about matters of indisputable fact.
There are lies throughout that thing.
The accusations of financial dishonesty, of fraud, these things are provably false.
And they knew they were false when they published them.
And they have kept them up now for 4,000 days.
They've been lying about this.
But that wasn't enough.
They made lists of my clients.
They contacted my clients.
They interviewed clients of mine to try to get things they could use, but also, I think, to intimidate them.
And their supporters mail that filth to all the judges and zoning officials that I practice in front of, my clients, and so forth.
Yeah, they would destroy my law practice.
And they would prevent lawyers from representing the people they're after.
And people like this are very dangerous people.
They are perfectly capable of this kind of thing.
Well, it's true.
Any attack of that kind.
It's not a political discussion.
On the one hand, I can understand a fanatic trying to silence someone, trying to make sure that their opponents do not have access to a radio program or television program.
It is another qualitatively different step to go beyond Limiting access and then making it impossible for that person to make a living that is attack that on one's own person in a way that is physical and it's Now now let me let me tell you a different story about the SPLC And I know that you will gnash your teeth and you will glare at me across the microphone as I tell this story but
One of the items about me in the SPLC write-up of Your Humble Servant was factually incorrect.
I got in touch with the SPLC and I explained this was factually incorrect.
And they corrected it, believe it or not.
That's very nice.
They did not do that for me.
I mailed to them.
The smear on me, the local source of the smear on me, was a scoundrel who's well known to be a scoundrel throughout Atlanta, by black people too.
He is a contemptible, evil, wicked person.
And he was after me because I refused to sign off on a thing he wanted people that bought tax days to sign off on that we would cooperate together.
Which is, of course, illegal.
And he set out, and I can prove all this, his wife left him and took his emails and stuff, and I was given some of the emails between him and the SPLC.
They know what kind of person he is.
They know these statements that are in there are false.
They've never taken them down.
So you're fortunate that you dealt with maybe the only person of any integrity with the SPLC, but I'm not willing to be charitable toward them.
No, I must say also that one of the SPLC activities against me had to do with my past life as a consultant for American companies doing business in Japan and I had an advertisement up On the Osaka Consulate of the United States Government.
And this is a little ad talking about my services, which I was able to offer, while the SPLC contacted the State Department and said, did you realize that this person who services your advertising is a notorious hate monger?
And they took that down.
Now, I'm sorry, they took down my advertisement.
Now, I never got much business out of it, but this was a deliberate attempt to take the food out of the mouths of my children.
This, as I say, this is going beyond any attempt to not simply refute someone in terms of political debate, but simply to shut them up, which is by far their most common tactic.
Never does the SPLC explain why Sam Dixon is wrong.
They simply say he's bad, bad, bad, evil, evil, evil, and we want to shut him up and deprive him of his livelihood.
But, be all that as it may, adventures with the SPLC are something that are probably of not consuming interest with the people who already know that the SPLC is our enemy in every possible respect.
But it is an example that the media keeps going to these people as if they are credible sources.
That's right.
It'd be like the media.
There was an organization when I was young called the John Birch Society.
It's virtually moribund today, but it was a big boogeyman of the right wing extremists And the accusation was made that they call everybody a communist.
Now, I was never a John Bircher.
I'm not even particularly friendly to the John Birch Society.
It was opposed to us on the critical issue of race.
They were race mixers and they wanted a desegregated America.
So, the most important issue to me, the John Birch Society, was not where I am on the political spectrum.
But in fairness to them, I read their materials.
I read a lot of their materials.
I knew a lot of fine people in it.
They did not call everybody communist.
And when they called somebody communist, they at least had criteria.
They had some sort of means of calling them communist.
They would quote things like FBI agents who testified before the House Committee on American Activities.
With the SPLC, there are no criteria, and the other watchdogs, as the media calls them, there is no criteria.
There are no criteria.
It's like some sort of Pythian Oracle.
You go to the Oracle and the Oracle says, Garrett Taylor is a hater.
Sam Dixon is a hater.
V&A are haters.
There's no basis at all to it.
No, no.
They look into their tea leaves and the tea leaves tell them that whoever they dislike is a hater.
The people that they hate are the people that they call haters.
Now, to me, one of the remarkable exploits of the SPLC only recently was ever since St.
George Floyd died in Minneapolis.
Even the SPLC has decided that its past was racially biased.
And they have changed their criteria for hate groups.
Now, if there is a black group that they formally designated as a hate group because of the vicious things it said about white people, that is no longer criteria for being a hate group.
They are allowed to hate white people all they like.
And a black group will not be characterized as a hate group unless it expresses hatred against homosexuals or Jews or women or some other group.
They can hate white people all they like because they are justified in this righteous fury and resentment against exploitation that they have suffered at our hands for centuries.
So they used to consider blacks They threw that in, though, just to try to give themselves some degree of credibility.
They never went after these groups.
They never addressed the problem which all of these groups have, which is the completely schizophrenic nature of the positions they take on Zionism as opposed to white nationalism.
You know, they're basically in favor of a wall for Israel to control immigration to Israel, and it's anti-Semitism to the SPLC to oppose that.
But they're opposed to one on grounds of principle to protect the European majority in America.
These people are completely illegitimate.
But to move on, this is part of what we're saying, do you remember the Hollywood Ten Were they the screenwriters?
They were the screenwriters who were in fact members of the Communist Party.
Yes, I remember.
The official, the definition of McCarthyism used to be somebody who smeared innocent patriotic liberals with false accusations.
Now in the New York Times, Is any opposition to communists.
So Paul Robeson, who was a black singer, who was in fact a communist, and sang in Moscow glorifying Stalin, he is now a victim of McCarthyism.
Of course.
But these ten people were fired from their jobs.
pretty much libertarian on matters of freedom of speech and not on matters of
ownership of vast amounts of private property but on freedom of speech, I'm not so
sure that I would support the firing of the communists, you know, the script
writers, but they were martyrs about once or twice a year, you know, every
year or so there's another article in New York Times about the terrible
persecution of these people merely because they were members of a party
that was controlled by Stalin when we were at war in Korea and a movement that
had killed tens of millions of people.
That was no grounds for them to lose their jobs.
But they're happy, they're delighted.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution is delighted to report the latest firings of somebody who's been doxed, who's been exposed.
You know, this is another change from our enemies.
They've abandoned all kinds of things that they used to seduce people, high school students and college students, with their pretenses when you and I were going along.
Fortunately, I knew enough from family lore and having read that when my high school teachers fed on all this stuff, I knew they were lying.
and I knew the college students were like, they weren't in favor of freedom of speech.
They never were. And then they were not in favor of peace.
They were always supporters of war.
And then there are many other areas to visit here before our time runs out.
Well, our time is rapidly running out.
Yeah.
As the great...
Let's focus on just a few things.
Well, as the great Joe Sobern used to say in that context, the first amendment,
oh, that's only for commies and pornographers.
Yeah. Yeah. Well, there are other things.
Let's retouch the change. We mentioned the violence, the casual acceptance of violent attacks
on even mainstream political rallies.
Our new president, who will win, I'm sure, that he will be inaugurated, Biden, in the second debate.
He said that, amazingly, somebody asked him what he would do about the Antifa.
Right off the bat, how many thousands of times has Trump been asked whether he condemned David Duke and White National?
This is the only time I can ever remember that anybody like Biden has ever been asked what they would say about the antifa.
And his reply was that he was not going to prosecute the antifa.
The police can't prosecute them because the antifa is an idea.
Really?
I don't think it was an idea that set up a website and ran the death threat on me with the blessings of the FBI.
I don't think that was done by an idea.
I think there were human fingers that created an organization called the Atlanta Antifa and set up a website and typed on a keyboard to put that death threat up.
Now what you have here is you have the prevailing political head, our next president, who is essentially saying, I'm going to turn a blind, what he's really saying when you deconstruct it, but you know Biden doesn't really believe that.
He knows better than that.
What he's really, he's sending the message, boys, when I'm president, we're going to turn a blind eye.
Go get them!
And no Southern Sheriff ever did that.
They can't find even Sheriff Clark or Bull Connor.
No one, George Wallace, Ross Burnett, nobody running for public office in the South said, well, we're just going to turn a blind eye on Klan violence against black people.
But we have a president who says that.
That's a shocking thing.
It is likewise shocking that the people who were prosecuted In terms of the political violence that we saw at various rallies, were the Rise Above movement.
Do you remember those fellas?
Yes.
Hardly known by anyone at the time, but the fact that they went across state lines with some apparent desire to mix it up with the Antifa, they are the ones that were prosecuted, whereas the Antifa that's been doing this regularly, consistently, and boasting about it, even under a Trump administration, faced no criminal prosecution.
Yeah.
The fact is, our time is rapidly approaching its end.
Now, it may be that we shall have to do another one of these before I move on to the next year.
So, I believe what I will say is that if we do have an opportunity, I will invite you to join me on another podcast.
But in the meantime, I'm afraid we must bid farewell to our kind listeners.
Well, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
And there's a lot to be happy about.
Keep your chin up.
Yes, yes indeed.
And so, as always, it is a pleasure and an honor to speak to you wherever you are.
We have many listeners in the United States, but many around the world.
And so, for Sam Dixon and me, Jared Taylor.
▲
Export Selection