Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 10, 2020 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor

59:13

A Hero’s Burial for Abdullakh Anzorov

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen, it's my pleasure to welcome you to Radio Renaissance.
	Today's episode is December 10th, Year of Our Lord 2020.
	My name is Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me, of course, is the indispensable and irreplaceable Paul Kersey.
	I'd like to begin with comments from our listeners.
	We love to hear from our listeners who are often better informed than we, and it is our pleasure to share their wisdom with all of our listeners around the world.
	One wrote in and told us, In your latest podcast, you touched on the demand for more police officers of color, as the community might react better to them.
	Your comment about the irony of returning to communities segregated by race was spot on.
	That seems to be the desire of the locals.
	He goes on to say, I also thought, who's the racist if blacks can't talk to a non-black cop?
	And finally, the hypothesis of black cop efficiency in black neighborhoods can be tested.
	How do black cops in black neighborhoods fare in getting information, making arrests, when compared to non-black cops?
	And in the hypothetical world of symmetry, after all, if blacks should get black cops, what if white people prefer white cops, or doctors, or politicians, or television announcers?
	Should their preferences be accommodated?
	All excellent questions that remain unanswered in these strange times.
	Strange times indeed, Mr. Taylor.
	I would like to request all of our listeners out there, make sure you get in touch with us so we can stay in touch with you.
	And if you have any comments, suggestions, or stories you'd like us to touch on, shoot them to us.
	We'll address them in a later podcast.
	Shoot them to me because we live here at ProtonMail.com.
	Once again, all one word, because we live here at ProtonMail.com or Please go to amran.com, click on the Contact Us tab, and leave a message for Jared Taylor, your humble and obedient servant and host.
	And another comment.
	This was from a listener who was reacting to the fact that last episode, last of ours, we talked about the renaming of schools in San Francisco.
	One of the schools that's likely to be on the chopping block is El Dorado.
	Eldorado, as our listener notes, because it was associated with Europeans, and he writes in parentheses, ahem, Hispanics after all, their violent quest for gold.
	He says, note that indigenous peoples were not known for peaceful coexistence either.
	That ritualistic ripping out of a living man's heart to please the gods.
	Then he goes on to say, I am pretty sure Machu Picchu wasn't built with union labor.
	No, I don't think it was either.
	I suspect not.
	Further, very likely that few to none of the El Dorado school staff or students knew or had any idea about the name or gave two hoots about it.
	All true, but it doesn't make any difference if it is not something that insults the students or the staff.
	As long as it insults a single woke white person, it's got to go.
	Now you, I believe you had some stories about school names in my local area.
	Not a single...
	A white, woke individual can bring down names such as Thomas Jefferson and George Mason, as we see in Falls Church, which is a city in Northern Virginia not far from where I believe AR is headquartered.
	That's correct.
	So the school board voted unanimously 7-0 on December 8th to change the names of Thomas Jefferson Elementary and George Mason High School.
	Now, there was a survey that was sent out to the community that showed that 56% of those surveyed opposed the name change.
	But Mr. Taylor, that doesn't matter.
	Doesn't matter.
	Let me tell you why that doesn't matter.
	I'll skim down to the most important part of this article.
	Now, 61% of the parents of Thomas Jefferson Elementary School said, no, we don't want it changed.
	57% of George Mason said, no, not at all.
	Keep the name.
	These are our heroes.
	Well, here's what we heard from one of the people who decided to cast their vote.
	Let me find her name here.
	Santiago.
	This is one of the speakers at the event, Dr. Jennifer Santiago.
	She said she represented the minority voice in the survey and agreed with the board's unanimous decision.
	Quote, while there are many times majority rules works in issues of equity, it is the opposite that is needed.
	If the majority rule worked for traditionally marginalized groups, we would not have systemic racism.
	Wow!
	Okay, Thomas Jefferson Elementary School.
	That is systemic racism and poor... What is her name?
	Gonzales?
	Santiago.
	Santiago.
	I beg your pardon.
	Dr. Santiago.
	Boy.
	Well, okay.
	Now, many school board members claim that they thought long and hard about the issue, and it wasn't until they reached understanding of the hurt that Jefferson and Mason names can cause African-American students.
	Here's school board member Shannon Litton.
	She said this, quote, The voice of some African Americans in our community who spoke up pushed me off the fence on the side of seeing that it is essential we change the names.
	What I heard from them It is that this matters.
	You know why?
	Because, again, she came to the understanding that the names Jefferson and Mason can cause hurt among the African American students in Falls Church.
	You know, I wonder how many African American students in Falls Church even know who George Mason was.
	And why is he so offensive?
	He's got a university named after him in Northern Virginia, I believe.
	He certainly does.
	I guess that's got to go, too.
	My daughter went to George Mason High School.
	Uh-oh.
	Uh-oh.
	I guess that taints me by connection too.
	That's why they actually changed the name.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	Because my daughter went to George Mason.
	Anyway.
	Okay.
	Let's see now.
	In the name of diversity, We talked about this, I believe, in a previous episode.
	The fact that CBS reality TV shows, including Survivor, Big Brother, and Love Island, beginning in the 2021-22 season, at least half of the cast members for these unscripted programs will be people of color.
	The CBS and the NAACP announced a co-production deal with the NAACP.
	25% of the network's programs would come from creators who are people of color.
	Probably, well, probably a majority NAACP member types would be my guess, because it's going to be a co-production with that ancient and venerable organization.
	And CBS also pledged that by 2022-23, 50% of the writers on these shows will be people of color.
	Now, so far as I last checked, whites are still 62-63% of the population, so the writers are going to be overrepresented.
	Now, if we are really working so hard for people of color, what about Muslims?
	What's the Muslim quota?
	I'd like to know.
	How about the LGBTQ?
	Come on!
	Or Samoan?
	Yes, yes.
	How many Samoans they got, huh?
	How many Republicans?
	That's what I'd really like to know.
	And how many people over age 65?
	How about the geezer quota?
	Well, in any case, there may be reasons for all of this concentration on people of color because, did you realize that blacks watch far more television than any other group?
	I actually did know that, yes.
	Yes, this has been a well-established fact for many years.
	They watch nearly 44 hours a week.
	They're watching the boob tube more hours a week than they are likely to be working.
	44 hours.
	Then in descending order come Hispanics.
	They like the tube too.
	Then whites, then Asians.
	Have we ever seen that pattern ever before, Mr. Kersey?
	I think we see that pattern play out and manifest itself Almost as if springing from Zeus's head.
	Just about everywhere.
	Asians are the least.
	They watch only 15 hours a week, which is still a lot when you think about it.
	That means sitting at two and a half hours a day in front of the screen.
	I mean, gosh.
	Now, does that account for watching movies, watching Blu-ray, or just watching television itself?
	This is television, apparently.
	I mean, some of it is time-delayed or Hulu-adjusted or all of this stuff that I don't understand.
	But in any case, Fifteen hours a week.
	That's a lot for anybody, it seems to me, but that's a smallish group.
	Now, because we are such a diverse and multi-culti society, the content has been increasingly narrow-focused.
	It's now narrowcasting rather than broadcasting.
	And there is not a single program among the top five which is ranked among the top five.
	I'm sorry, not one single ranked in the top five for whites, blacks, Asians, and Hispanics.
	Because everybody's got their own set of favorites.
	But of course B.E.T.
	and O.W.N.
	I know, even in my ignorance and my bliss, I know that B.E.T.
	stands for Black Entertainment Television.
	And apparently there's something else called O.W.N.
	I guess that's probably pronounced own.
	Apparently it's all very black oriented too, but I had never heard of them.
	They've long aimed at black viewers and 81% of the viewers of hip-hop, I can imagine what that's about, are black.
	And 88% of OWN's Tyler Perry series are also black viewers.
	You know who Tyler Perry is?
	Tyler Perry is one of the elite when it comes to the entertainment.
	I can't confess I've never seen any of his...
	Madea movies.
	I'm sure you've never gotten one on Netflix.
	No, I mean I should check it out as a form of cultural anthropology.
	I should look into Tyler Perry.
	He is a very very popular guy.
	I remember seeing him quoted once years ago that he says black women are number one audience for him and if he ever got caught fooling around with a white woman his career would be over.
	Well, he's right.
	I mean, again, that's why he is a... I'm sure his net worth is probably close to a billion dollars at this point.
	Well, he clearly is putting career first, you know?
	No white women he's going to be fooling around.
	Now, as a contrast in this wildly segregated world of United States TV, The Bachelorette, and I guess that's one of these programs in which some pop tart is hounded by men who want to marry her or something else with her, but The Bachelorette's audience is only 13% black.
	In any case, I just picked up a few general facts about television.
	98% of U.S.
	households own at least one TV set.
	That means they're own... 98%?
	98.
	2% don't have a TV set and I suspect mostly it's deliberate choice.
	Now, 40% of Americans have the TV on while they're eating dinner.
	That seems pretty high to me.
	And I'd like to know how many of those households are single households.
	I mean, if it's just one person eating sardines out of a tin watching TV, I could sort of understand that.
	But how many families eat with the TV on?
	Now, here's another.
	The average American student spends 100 hours more watching TV than they do attending school every year.
	Of course, school is not going on every day of the week.
	No, it's not.
	But they spend more hours, 100 hours more watching TV than in school.
	And here's another startling statistic.
	56% of children age 8 and above have a television set in their room.
	So they can be there watching who knows what.
	No supervision, come on.
	Mama don't know, daddy don't know.
	But moving on to the BBC, the BBC appears to be copying CBS in its commitment to diversity.
	This is on the BBC's own website bragging about how wonderful they are.
	It just went up this week.
	They say, this is an investment in diverse talent both on and off screen through bespoke progression programs.
	Now translated into American English, Bespoke means special purpose, tailored.
	Special purpose for minorities.
	Progression programs means that we're going to raise them through the ranks, reach down, find the talent, mentor them, get them right to the top as quick as we can.
	They're going to be working with existing industry partners to explore a central diverse talent database.
	No white men need apply.
	And Tim Davie, BBC's Director General, the top of the heap, who is hideously white himself, he says, diversity and inclusion is mission critical for the BBC.
	Mission critical.
	They will fall on their faces and fail without diversity and inclusion.
	Now, they have, as early as 2021, they claim they will set the gold standard for inclusion.
	And they've got a name for it.
	It's called the 50-20-12 targets.
	50-20-12?
	50-20-12.
	Now, if you sit and thought about it for a while, you'd figure out what they are, but we won't take the time to let you sit and think.
	The 50, that's 50% female.
	Okay.
	50% female on and off camera.
	The 20, that's what they call BAME.
	Black, Asian, Minority ethnic, yes.
	BAME, that means non-whites.
	So 50% female, 20% BAME, and 12% this you might not guess 12% with disabilities.
	Disabilities.
	So, I've always said, if you are a black, one-legged lesbian, these are happy, happy days for you.
	You can fill that quota all by yourself.
	And you know, these days, you don't even have to be a woman to be a lesbian.
	So, what the heck, you know?
	You could be a woman.
	It's interesting.
	You just said CBS is gearing toward 2023.
	Mr. Taylor, the BBC, Far more aggressive than their desire to 50-20-12.
	50-20-12.
	Now, I suppose, yes, women are about 50% of the world.
	So, 50%, I guess that's okay if they really want to push it.
	Now, 20%, though, that's an over-representation of these beautiful Bames.
	Because 13.8% of Britain is BAME.
	So, they're going to be over-represented.
	Dames at 50, Bames at 20, and then the Lames at 12.
	So, yes.
	Now, there is a lady who is in charge of all this.
	Her name is June Sarpong.
	She is the BBC's first director of creative diversity.
	Creative diversity.
	How about diverse creativity?
	Her parents are from Ghana.
	Of course, that makes her perfect for an important role in the British Broadcasting Corporation.
	And for her services in broadcasting, she has What's known as an OBE, that's an Officer of the Order of the British Empire.
	That's an award made by the Queen.
	Yeah.
	And that's on top of an MBE, Member of the Order of the British Empire.
	Of course, the British Empire, I thought we were supposed to have gotten rid of that long ago.
	I didn't know it existed.
	Yes, well, the Order of the British Empire, that persists despite the Empire having disappeared.
	And here's a Ghanaian, so it seems to me she sure qualifies, and she has Our listeners will be gratified to know a team of six as she enforces creative diversity.
	It'll be a team of 12, 24, 48.
	You do the math.
	96 within a few years.
	I wonder how many of them are disabled.
	But I have bad news for June Sarpong as she tries to diversify the BBC because in an unintentionally hilarious article at Real Clear Science, we learned that diversity training doesn't work.
	Oh!
	It just doesn't work.
	But first the good news.
	And it's very good news.
	The training does help people answer survey questions in the way training said they should.
	That's the one thing it does.
	I mean, if you are asked, do white people have unearned privilege?
	Now you know to say yes.
	It justifies the training.
	It justifies it.
	That's it.
	That's all it does.
	However, and this is long enough to be worth quoting, this is a very sort of a point-by-point study by a person by the name of Musa Al-Gharbi, who I suppose you really ought to know.
	It says, whether the programs change behavior, help with retaining employees, increase productivity, or reduce conflicts, they are overwhelmingly ineffective.
	How's that?
	They do not increase diversity in the workplace, do not reduce harassment or discrimination, do not lead to greater cooperation and cohesion, they do not increase productivity.
	Moreover, says Musa Al-Gharbi, many of the people who set up the training programs realize that they're useless.
	And one of the things they do bad are by articulating various stereotypes associated with particular groups and then calling for their suppression.
	They often end up reinforcing these stereotypes in participants' minds.
	If you keep talking about how criminal and lazy and non-welfare blacks are, and you better not ever say that or think that, Some people are apparently going to say that and maybe even think it.
	And sometimes they implant new stereotypes.
	You talk about all these stereotypes people never heard of and they think, gosh, didn't know that.
	It must be true.
	Furthermore, an empirical investigation of white privilege training found it did nothing to make participants more sympathetic to minorities.
	It just increased their resentment towards lower-income whites.
	I think you and I have talked about that before.
	In-group, out-group.
	Well, no, no.
	The idea is white people all benefit from this tremendous privilege.
	And so if you see a white bum on the street, you've got to think, what a loser he must be.
	Boy, he squandered all that privilege and he's a wino?
	Good grief.
	He's in the red.
	He's in the red with white privilege.
	That's right.
	Give him a kick.
	Give him a kick.
	He defaulted on his white privilege.
	That's right.
	And then this is interesting too.
	Encouraging people to ignore racial and cultural differences often results in diminished cooperation across racial lines.
	Why that would be, I don't know.
	Meanwhile, emphasizing differences often ends up reinforcing race essentialism.
	So, we don't know whether to say everybody's all different and you have to accommodate with that or we should be colorblind and ignore.
	We don't know what the best position is between those two poles, says Musa Al-Gharbi.
	And by the way, every one of these points he lists, oh, a dozen different sources.
	This is a very carefully researched piece up on Real Clear Science.
	I never heard of Real Clear Science, by the way.
	Real Clear Science.
	Is that part of Real Clear Politics?
	I think it is related, yes.
	And then he goes on to say, many diversity-rated training programs describe bias and discrimination as rampant.
	I mean, that they always do.
	You know, they say, ah, it's everywhere.
	Everybody's bad.
	One consequence of depicting these attitudes and behaviors as common is that it makes many feel more comfortable expressing biased attitudes and behavior.
	They say, well, you know, everybody says that.
	So, you know, why not me?
	Then, for others, the fact that the company has diversity-related training is proof that it's non-biased and they forget about bias and discrimination.
	Isn't this all quite interesting?
	Now, this is the part I like the best.
	Diversity-related training programs often depict people from historically marginalized and disenfranchised groups as important and worthwhile, celebrating their heritage and culture while criticizing the dominant culture as fundamentally depraved.
	I'm quoting directly from this article.
	Depraved.
	Depraved, and then in parentheses.
	Racist, sexist, sadistic, etc.
	I'm sure that's all true.
	It goes on to say, people from minority groups are discussed in overwhelmingly positive terms, while people from majority groups are characterized as typically and uniquely ignorant, insensitive, or outright malicious.
	This is strong talk.
	Then, Musa Al-Gharbi goes on to say, the result is that many members from the dominant group walk away from the training believing that themselves, their culture, and their perspectives and interests are not valued.
	Well, of course, you'd be told over and over and over again that white men are absolute criminals and as he says, depraved.
	I thought that was pretty good.
	Then the article goes on to talk about implicit attitudes and prejudices.
	As this article points out, nobody knows what they are or how they can be changed.
	And then microaggressions.
	Virtually no research on if and how microaggressions are harmful for whom and under what circumstances.
	Indeed, there is not even conceptual clarity as to what microaggression is.
	It doesn't stop people from talking about them.
	Exactly!
	Or systemic racism.
	That's right.
	Then, when presented with examples of canonical microaggressions, Black and Hispanic respondents overwhelmingly find them inoffensive.
	In other words, you say, gosh, where's your accent from?
	They don't just flame up in fury.
	And this guy says, we have reason to believe that sensitizing people to perceive and take greater offense at these comments could cause harm.
	Then, mandatory training causes mandatory training.
	Causes people to engage with the materials and exercises in the wrong frame of mind.
	Adversarial.
	Resentful.
	I would think so, but 80% of diversity-related training is mandatory.
	But you rope people in.
	They're busy.
	They've got stuff to do.
	You make them sit through this nonsense.
	It makes them angry.
	And then finally, why do people do this, even if it doesn't work?
	Even if training is expensive and doesn't work, it's relatively easy to implement.
	And it allows institutions to show, often in court, that they are doing something.
	Now, I thought this was quite remarkable because, as you know, this is a billion, billion and billions dollar of a year industry, teaching white people that they're depraved and non-whites that they're wonderful.
	And I was quite impressed by this lengthy, point-by-point refutation of the very idea they're even possible.
	The denunciation of this dogma, of this religion that you correctly noted has completely upended
	America in 2020.
	I mean, what were we just talking about?
	George Mason and Thomas Jefferson's names removed from a high school and kindergarten
	respectively because, what was the surname?
	Santiago said something about systemic racism and nobody dared to say, raise their hand,
	hey, what are you talking about?
	What does that word even mean because that word merely being stated gives her the moral
	high ground in any argument.
	And if you dare say anything, guess what?
	You're a bigot who was probably at Charlottesville.
	That's all you are.
	That's what you were doing, right?
	Where were you in August of 2017?
	That's right.
	We know where you are.
	They're waving a tiki torch.
	But, yeah, and the language is so regularly tortured this way.
	After all, the NFL's idea of celebrating diversity is what, Mr. Kirshner?
	Well, we talk about the NFL far too much on this program.
	Apologies to our listeners because we've told you to tune out professional and collegiate sports, so I'll give you the headline that I saw.
	On a number of news sites when this story first appeared, people said, a celebration of diversity.
	Headlines said, finally we see diversity in the NFL.
	What are we referring to?
	The headline we pulled for this story is brief.
	I'll make it quick.
	NFL's first all-black officiate, uh, I'm sorry, NFL's first all-black crew officiated Monday Night Football game.
	So this is what they referred to.
	Yes, it was the first time the league assembled an all-black officiating crew led by Jerome Boger, a 17-year NFL official.
	They basically said, a former player said this, he said, quote, this historic Week 11 crew is a testament to the countless and immeasurable contribution Contributions of black officials to the game, their exemplary performance, and to the power of inclusion that is the hallmark of this great game.
	Now, Mr. Taylor, having an all-black officiating crew doesn't seem actually that inclusive to me.
	It doesn't seem the least bit diverse to me, but there you go.
	That's a leftist's idea of diversity is an all-black crew.
	And as I recall, the people who give grades to professional sports leagues always tell us that the National Basketball Association is the most diverse, right?
	They do.
	It's the least white.
	It's an organization out of University of Central Florida called Tides.
	There's one more quote I want to pull out that I think puts an exclamation point on this story.
	From this article, they noted that The all-black officiating crew took to the field during a season where the NFL vowed to do more to elevate issues of diversity and racial equity.
	So, as we've heard many times, diversity, inclusion, equity means what to individual white males?
	Get lost.
	But now, I think you have the latest news on Senate candidate Raphael Gamaliel Warnock.
	Yeah, I thought this story was fascinating for one reason.
	And one reason only.
	Right now, down in Georgia, the great state of Georgia, we have everyone, you know, I think $250 million has poured into this race, Mr. Taylor.
	Massive amounts of money is being spent on these two seats.
	Senate seats.
	Exactly.
	Currently held by Perdue and Loeffler, Republicans both.
	Now, Georgia undergoing massive demographic changes.
	The white vote was down from 76% for Trump in 2016 to 69% in 2020.
	I don't know if you knew that.
	I did not.
	Here's what we know about Ralph Warnock.
	He is a black pastor.
	He's the senior pastor at Ebenezer Baptist Church, who's, of course, seeking to unseat Senator Loeffler.
	He's come under fire recently because, as it turns out, he has an interest in Marxism.
	Oh my gosh!
	This is what Republicans are thinking is going to actually get people excited to go to the polls.
	But here's what he said in his 2014 book, The Divided Mind of the Black Church, Theology, Piety, and Public Witness.
	Warnock prays Marxism is a way to, quote, teach the black church.
	And he criticized Gary Marx, whom Warnock described as a scholar who operates from within the theoretical framework of his famous namesake for trivializing black struggle against the obduracy of white capitalistic forces.
	Now, why I even mention this is because it's important that people understand it's not about Marxism.
	What Warnock is all about, Mr. Taylor and dear listener, is blackety black, black, black, black, to quote John Derbyshire.
	That's it.
	And one more quote we can pull out.
	Again, everybody wants to try and denounce him.
	Again, he has described Dr. James Cone, who has repeatedly defended Marxism and used provocative anti-white language, as his mentor.
	Now, Cone served as Warnock's academic advisor at the Union Theological Seminary, and Warnock considered Cone to be, quote, the father of black theology.
	Well, a lot of people call him that.
	Do you have any quotes from Cone?
	Cone is a remarkable guy.
	He says that stuff like, black people must kill the whiteness of the church, that they must eliminate whiteness from their minds, and only by thinking of God as black can they be true.
	All sorts of completely wild stuff.
	So this guy thinks Cone is great stuff.
	In his book, like I said, The Divided Mind of the Black Church, he quotes liberally.
	From Cone.
	So basically what you just said, that's what Warnock has said repeatedly.
	That's what he, that's what he, uh, when he's, when he's giving sermons.
	You'll clearly make a great Senator.
	Well, I mean, again, in Georgia, we talked about this at length back in 2018, and we'll move on briefly, but think about it.
	What would have happened if Stacey Abrams had won, as opposed to this goober Brian Kemp?
	You know, people need to see what dispossession looks like, Mr. Taylor.
	People need to see it.
	Oh, I think they're seeing it every day.
	They're seeing it at the BBC.
	They're seeing it at NBC.
	They're seeing it in Falls Church.
	That's right.
	They're seeing it every day.
	It'll be more of it.
	More and better dispossession.
	We can see it on its way.
	Okay, well, and of course, speaking of blackety-black-black, my favorite blackety-black-black-black is Charles Blow.
	Charles?
	Charles Blow.
	Boy, is he about as black as they get.
	He writes regular opinion pieces for the New York Times, the paper of broken record, as someone wisely referred to it.
	And he is talking about the coronavirus and then the vaccine that is possibly going to cure it.
	He says that 71% of black people know someone who's been hospitalized or died on account of the virus.
	Hispanics is 61% and whites only 49%.
	So black people are more touched by the virus, but says that black Americans continue to stand out as less inclined to get vaccinated.
	42%, only 42% would do so, compared to 63% for Hispanics and 61% for Whites.
	63%, that means Hispanics are more willing to be vaccinated than Whites.
	But, and this is of course the punchline, Why are blacks afraid of the vaccination?
	It's of course because of the Tuskegee Study.
	I think, and Mr. Kersey, be on the alert, and listeners, dear listeners, be on the alert.
	We're going to hear a lot about the Tuskegee Study over the next months as the vaccination comes rolling out because it will explain why black people are suspicious of the vaccine.
	Now, the Tuskegee Study.
	If you ask, I bet if you ask most black people, about the Tuskegee syphilis study.
	They would say, first of all, that the black people were deliberately infected with syphilis.
	That's what everyone's taught in school?
	Yes.
	They were deliberately infected and left deliberately untreated while they all died miserable deaths of syphilis.
	In fact, there is an excellent, excellent article on a website called Spiked.com.
	It's called Tuskegee Reexamined.
	I will repeat that for inquiring minds out there in podcast land.
	Spiked.com Tuskegee Reexamined.
	It is a careful study of the whole thing.
	That went on from 1932 to 1972.
	This study was meant to be an investigation of men in later stage latent syphilis who had been infected for at least five years and were not contagious.
	At that time, there was no proper treatment for people in late-stage syphilis.
	And one of the Tuskegee research reports states, the patients who had syphilis were all in the latent stage.
	Any acute cases requiring treatment were carefully screened for standard therapy.
	Furthermore, when penicillin was invented or discovered, and this became the standard treatment for syphilis, by then, these people were untreatable in that.
	That would not have helped them one bit.
	These people did not suffer in any appreciable way, and in fact, they got all sorts of free medical care simply from participation in this study.
	So, practically nothing that we're told about the Tuskegee study is true.
	But speaking of disease, and I'm sure it's on account of the Tuskegee study, that the Cornell flu vaccine guidelines have been modified for certain people.
	Oh!
	Yes.
	Now, Cornell has a health requirement.
	It requires that if you're studying on campus, you have to have a flu vaccine.
	If you don't, if you can't prove you've been vaccinated for the flu, you'll have a hold put on your registration status, and unless you shape up, you will be dis-enrolled from the university.
	Kicked, you can't, you can't study.
	However, there is an exception.
	An exception for students who identify as Black, Indigenous, or as persons of color.
	I suppose it's understandable that the current health compact requirements may feel suspect or even exploitative to some BIPOC members of the Cornell community.
	Additionally, recent acts of violence against black people by law enforcement may contribute to feelings of distrust or powerlessness.
	And so, for these reasons, BIPOCs, blacks, that BIPOC includes Asians, American Indians, any non-white who does not want to be vaccinated, they can stay on campus.
	They can stay on campus just fine without the vaccine, without the vaccination.
	But white people, boy oh boy, they better have it.
	Now, this makes you wonder.
	If we are suspending regulations exclusively for BIPOCs, can they hand in their papers late?
	I thought they already could.
	Well, shut my mouth!
	Can they cheat?
	Can they plagiarize?
	This is insane.
	And I'm sure they'll be talking about this Tuskegee business non-stop in this context.
	Now, I believe you have something to tell us about the new District Attorney in Los Angeles County, George Gascon, who has just been sworn in.
	He's quite a piece of work.
	He is.
	He was funded heavily by George Soros.
	We know that.
	He came in.
	It was a black female DA who was doing a great job in Los Angeles County.
	I'm not sure if you remember this, but back during the BLM riots, they actually went to her house and her husband came out, brandishing a gun.
	I think he got arrested, but crime was down, murders were down.
	Now, of course, just like they are all across the country, they're exploding in Los Angeles.
	Well, George Gascon, he's instituted a new prosecutorial, that, can't even pronounce it right now.
	Prosecutorial approach.
	Yes, sorry.
	And he just eliminated cash bail, by the way.
	Right, right.
	Yesterday, but here's a list of all the things that LA's new district attorney is gonna add
	to the do not prosecute list.
	He's a former San Francisco DA, and I know you don't want me to say this,
	but he's a former LAPD, member of the former Los Angeles Police Department.
	Probably post Rodney King.
	He worked with Bratton.
	Now it boggles my mind that a former police officer is going to be doing the things that you're going to tell us he's going to be doing.
	But do burn our ears with the truth.
	Yes.
	So basically what he came out and said that in a series of policy directives Many misdemeanor cases will be dismissed saying that nearly half of those incarcerated on pre-trial misdemeanor offenses suffer from mental illness.
	LA courts should not be revolving doors for those in need of treatment and services.
	As of Tuesday, many misdemeanor cases will be declined or dismissed prior to arraignment unless factors for consideration exist.
	The list of offenses include Trespassing.
	Disturbing the police.
	Disturbing the peace?
	Disturbing the peace.
	Disturbing the peace.
	A minor in possession of alcohol.
	Driving without a license.
	I'm sure that's going to impact primarily illegal aliens.
	Driving with a suspended license.
	Making criminal threats.
	Drug possession and paraphernalia possession.
	Being under the influence of a controlled substance.
	Public intoxication, loitering to commit prostitution, and resisting arrest!
	Wait, wait, wait.
	Resisting arrest is not going to be a crime?
	Not going to be prosecuted?
	No.
	Oh my goodness.
	Well, phew.
	And in addition, prosecutors will not seek the death penalty, and those accused of misdemeanors and low-level felonies will be referred to community-based programs.
	Wow, whatever they are.
	You know, we are expecting to publish at the American Renaissance website a whole investigation into the future of policing.
	What does it mean?
	Restitution judgment and community-based policing and alternative this and defunded that.
	All of this, it's a brave new world, Mr. Kersey.
	I think it's going to be a great day to be a criminal.
	Well, and not only would it be a great day to be a criminal, but imagine being a juvenile criminal because He stated that those accused of misdemeanors as a juvenile, hey, guess what?
	You're not going to be prosecuted at all.
	At all?
	At all.
	Man, boy, a lot of people are habitual offenders by the time they're 18.
	You know why that is?
	Here's the quote from Gasson.
	I can't pronounce this word right for some reason.
	I'm not going to try.
	Our prosecutorial approach should be biased towards keeping youth out of the juvenile justice system.
	And when they must become involved, Our system must employ the lightest touch necessary in order to provide public safety.
	Yeah, well, you know, as you pointed out, he wants to get rid of the death penalty.
	He says the reality is the death penalty does not make us safer.
	It's racist.
	It's morally untenable, says George Gascon.
	Now, as it turns out, he's got an interesting case to deal with in his first few days in office.
	As it turns out, there is a fellow by the name of Morris Jewel Taylor Sr.
	No relation.
	I was going to ask.
	He killed his son and daughter, cut off their heads, and kept their bodies of 12-year-old Maurice Jr., his namesake, that was the one he killed, and 13-year-old Maliaka inside their house.
	Cut their heads off, kept the heads and the bodies inside the house, and displayed the corpses to his two younger sons, ages eight and nine.
	And they were kept in their rooms without food.
	For how long?
	I just don't know.
	The children's mother was in the house but is not considered a suspect.
	Well, Maurice Jewel Taylor Sr.
	actually is being held in lieu of bond.
	4.2 million dollars.
	So bond has not been completely eliminated.
	Doesn't sound high enough for someone who is.
	Well, this is quite a guy, isn't he?
	Kills his son and his daughter, cuts her head off, exhibits the corpses and the heads to his younger sons, age 8 and 9.
	And it would be difficult for this guy to claim that he's a complete loony and was incapable of knowing what he was up to because apparently he worked as a physical therapy and fitness guru And he worked in the Santa Monica Physical Therapy Center until COVID came along.
	And since that time, he has been dealing with his clients via Zoom.
	And the police were alerted to this because he suddenly failed to show up for his scheduled Zoom sessions.
	And as one of his clients said, who'd been working with him both in the flesh and remotely because of the pandemic, said, he was so reliable, so responsive, so mellow.
	But this is what he's been up to.
	Now, because... Just another day in LA.
	Just another day in the life of Morris Jewel Taylor Sr., age 34.
	No relation.
	And as the new DA says, the death penalty is racist.
	And since Morris Jewel Taylor Sr., age 34, is one of our African-American fellow citizens, I suppose that will be all he needs to explain why the death penalty should not be sought in this case.
	But that is the direction in which LA County is moving after, as you say, this black woman who was doing a good job was voted out in favor of a white man Who, it looks to me, is going to make life miserable for the law-abiding people of Los Angeles.
	Well, another Soros-funded DA, just like we've seen in St.
	Louis, just like we've seen in Dallas, just like we've seen in Chicago, just like we've seen in, I think, Arlington, which is not far from you, and Alexandria.
	This is a pattern that's playing out all across the country with logical conclusions.
	You know, I saw a figure the other day that George Soros has poured $100 million dollars into these DA elections.
	Usually you can, if there are just a few thousand, a few tens of thousands spent in one of these elections, it's a lot of money.
	And this can really move the results.
	Why?
	I would like to know if George Soros has any explanation, really, as to why he wants DAs not to prosecute criminals in this fashion.
	I'd be very curious to hear what his, okay, it's racist, okay, we're no longer going to prosecute crimes of poverty.
	What does he really want?
	What is his vision of American society?
	I'd really like to know, but I suspect I'll never have an opportunity to sit down with George.
	Country being disunited and the fabric of social capital completely broken down.
	I guess he thinks that's a great thing.
	Maybe George and I'll sit down over a whiskey and he'll bare his soul to me.
	But, let's see, moving right along.
	You know, the Mexicans are bringing COVID patients to the United States.
	Just don't take them to Cornell.
	Well, this was something that was in an article put out by the Center for Immigration Studies.
	You and I have talked about that group before.
	CIS.
	They really do wonderful research.
	Disappeared on December 4th.
	In late October, The El Paso Fire Department ambulances were all lining up at the International Bridge, that's the border with Mexico, picking up COVID-19 patients who had just crossed over from Mexico and driving them to hospitals.
	That is, in fact, the ones in El Paso now filled to crisis proportions with genuine American.
	COVID patients.
	Nope.
	The whole, apparently, local TV quoted one of the fire department's paramedics saying, describing a kind of assembly line operation where the whole ambulance fleet of the city was pressed into service transporting Mexicans from the International Port of Entry to El Paso hospitals.
	It's filled beyond capacity hospitals.
	They quote a guy is saying, multiple times in this pandemic, we will be in a complete system overload where there are no ambulances available for the city of El Paso because they're picking up patients at the International Bridge.
	Now apparently what happens is Mexican hospitals are overrun with virus patients south of the border and an unknown but significant number of COVID sick patients apparently have green cards or dual citizenship or border crossing cards and they've exploited a legal loophole in President Trump's March 2020 emergency closure.
	If you are, if you are in fact a green card holder and for medical reasons you can cross, Which is too bad, but as a result, Gustavo Sanchez, President of the El Paso Regional Union representing the U.S.
	Customs Officers, he was quoted as saying, any little thing that's even non-threatening, they're bringing them over here because they're saturated.
	Their hospitals are saturated.
	So come one, come all, COVID-19 or any other thing that is bothering you, come across the border and Uncle Sam will pick up the tab.
	Here's a thought for you, Mr. Taylor.
	You know, bearing some legal miracle, Joe Biden will be inaugurated on January 20th, 2021.
	And you know, we've already talked about what he wants to do in his first hundred days.
	Now he's already stated he is considering a mask mandate nationwide for all Americans.
	Even when you're in your own home, you have to wear a mask.
	But at the same time, he's going to open up the borders and start allowing people to come and push for amnesty again, refugee resettlement during this global crisis when we still don't even know how effective these vaccines are going to be and if they can be distributed fast enough.
	We are approaching, ladies and gentlemen, 2021.
	You thought this past year was fascinating.
	You thought this past year was difficult, arduous.
	It's going to be that year where we finally see that Chinese proverb that Sam Francis quoted so long ago come true.
	May you live in interesting times.
	Well, is this going to be a year to remember or a year to forget?
	I think more like the latter.
	But this reminds me of birth tourism.
	Instead of COVID tourism, we now talk about birth tourism.
	Apparently there was an important bust last week, arrests, because there had been Facebook posts offering pregnant women in Turkey, in Turkish language of course, if you believe your baby should be born in the USA and become an American citizen, we can help.
	And as it turns out, for payments of between $7,500 and $10,000, Turkish women Got transportation, medical care, and lodging at a so-called birth house on Long Island, New York.
	This led to the births of an estimated 119 babies to Turkish women.
	This has been in operation since at least 2017.
	The costs of medical treatment were fraudulently billed to the state, costing New York's Medicaid program more than $2.1 million.
	These were billed as people living in the United States and utterly indigent, so the state picked up the tab for these phony Americans turning out phony American babies.
	Many of the women, of course, had actually substantial means, as the indictment points out.
	If you can afford $7,500 to $10,000 to hop on a plane and come over, Then it's not as though you're living under a bridge.
	Of course, once these children are 31, 21, they can sponsor a parent or a brother or child for a green card.
	So the chain migration just gets set up.
	Prosecutors said it was unlikely that any of these children would lose their U.S.
	citizenship, even though it was a crime to come here and do this for the purpose of producing a American citizen.
	The leader of this little ring of birth tourist frauds was Ibrahim Aksakal, and he explained... Mayflower names.
	Ah, very mayflowery.
	Very mayflowery.
	I guess it sounded more poppy flowery to me.
	But he said that women, when they showed up asking for their visa, they must not come at a time when the pregnancy had become obvious.
	So there you go, another happy little story about the American medical system and the American citizenship system being exploited.
	As it happens, earlier this year, the State Department gave visa officers more power to stop pregnant women from visiting the United States if it was suspected that their plan was to give birth.
	I imagine as part of Joe Biden's plan for America, he will reverse all of this.
	So there'll be yet more of this lovely stuff.
	Now, we are approaching the holiday season and Mr. Kersey, I believe you have a story of holiday cheer from Mobile County in Alabama.
	Mobile County in the heart of Dixie, Alabama.
	There's the real great state.
	So just I'll be brief with this one because we have talked about a lot.
	Sheriff's Office in Alabama deleted a Facebook post Sunday which showed and depicted a Christmas tree decorated with thug shots.
	Thug shots?
	No, no.
	Thug shots.
	Not ornaments.
	The ornamentations on this yule tree were apparent suspects of apparent thug shots of thugs after it received criticism from The NAACP, civil rights groups, and what it described as death threats.
	But I bet they were celebrating diversity.
	It was probably a very, very diverse collection of thug shots.
	Yeah.
	Well, there was a... Just like that NFL game.
	Very diverse.
	No, plastic orange sandals like those issued to inmates.
	That served as the tree topper.
	There was no star on this tree.
	There was no bells to ring.
	No angels are getting their wings with this tree.
	You know what?
	We're going to find out these thugs are going to are going to be celebrated for the crimes they committed
	for everyone to see.
	Mr. Kersey, every one of them is a star.
	Yeah, you know what? So a since-removed caption read, quote,
	We have decorated our tree with thug shots to show how many thugs
	we have taken off the streets of Mobile, Alabama this year.
	We could not have done it without our faithful followers.
	Now, here it continues with this.
	The post added the department was providing a special Christmas offer for all Mobile County thugs, an item, quote, from our property room, end quote.
	Quote, any of the things that your friend thugs have stolen will be available for you.
	But that's not all.
	After you choose your one stolen item, your very own personal concierge Concierge.
	Concierge.
	Hashtag corrections officer will provide an escort to the Metro Deluxe where you will receive your free COVID test.
	If you pass your test, then your concierge will take you for a custom fitting to receive your holiday jumpsuit with matching flat flops.
	And, of course, those flap-flops are what was on the tree at the top.
	And then they'll get, what do they call it, the Metro... The Metro... Metro Deluxe.
	The Metro Deluxe.
	Yes, I've never spent a night in the Metro Deluxe, but, and I hope I never will.
	The way things are going, you know, dissidents might, but one quick final quote.
	The Mobile County NAACP said in a statement it received phone calls and messages from residents angered by the post.
	Chapter President Robert Clopton, he said this.
	Oh, I don't care what he said.
	We have to hear what he said.
	Yeah, just real quick.
	Quote, we live in very volatile times.
	The relationship between law enforcement and the general public has been compromised, end quote.
	Point is this, we talked last week as that letter writer noted, hey, why should white cops
	have to reach out and create relationships with the community when, guess what, law-abiding people don't
	even need to worry about cops.
	Cops are just there to write speeding tickets.
	But in our diverse country, cops are basically there because they have to deal with very violent and
	dangerous more often than not.
	Can I say it?
	Maladin enhanced individuals?
	I'm afraid there's a pattern there.
	But seeing patterns is increasingly against the law.
	It's certainly against any kind of conventional morality.
	Now, we must skip to a foreign story.
	We haven't done enough of these.
	You will recall on the 1st of October, Samuel Paty, age 47, a Frenchman.
	He was a school teacher in the Paris suburb of Conflans-Sainte-Honorine.
	He was teaching a class on the merits of freedom of speech and he used as an example some depictions that were not very respectful of the Prophet Muhammad, the cartoons from Charlie Hebdo.
	Well, word got out about this, and an 18-year-old by the name of Abdullah Anzalov Killed him in broad daylight in the street and cut off his head.
	He was a refugee.
	He had been welcomed to the safety of the Republic of France, and he repaid the generosity of the French by killing this guy, butchering him.
	Now, I hadn't followed this event very closely, but apparently his body was shipped back to Chechnya, which is where he is from.
	And, according to telegram messages, Dozens, hundreds of men and women celebrated his burial.
	He was put into the ground in a great celebration of Islam.
	Men wearing heavy coats, walking through snow, chanting and carrying his body shrouded in green cloth.
	The funeral was held in the village of Shalazi in the Urus-Martin district of the North Caucasus Republic of Chechnya.
	More than 60 law enforcement officers were on duty to keep order.
	And according to one of the locals, there are still traffic jams in neighboring villages because of the large number of people who want to attend this funeral.
	As the head of the Shalazi administration, that's the city, was quoted as saying, he is a hero for the whole Islamic world because he killed and decapitated a Frenchman who displayed uncomplimentary cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad.
	In fact, the top dog in Chechnya, a fellow by the name of Ramzan Kadyov, has cast blame for all of this on the country's secularism and President Emmanuel Macron.
	Of course, since he was a martyr in the cause of Islam, he will certainly shoot straight to paradise and get his 72 hurries.
	You know all about the hurries.
	These are maidens who are described, according to scripture, as of modest gaze, whom neither man nor genie will have touched before them.
	That means they are inexperienced virgins.
	Now, I've always wondered, what is the reward for lady martyrs?
	What do they get?
	As it turns out, the commentators on the Quran have seldom bothered their little heads, their little turbaned heads, on the subject of rewards for women.
	But the 9th century scholar Al-Tabarani did argue that women will be reunited with their husbands in the next world, and that those who had multiple husbands can pick the best to be their eternal partner.
	They get to pick.
	Now, other commentators add that a woman who was never married, once she gets to paradise, can marry any man she meets in paradise.
	Now, the trouble is, as it turns out, it's not only martyrs, but all men who get to paradise will have their ration of virgins.
	And if every man's being distracted by 72 hoories, I don't think there's going to be much of a market in heaven for lady martyrs who want to get hit.
	No, I don't think so.
	But you just never know.
	In any case, in any case, this guy who decapitated Samuel Putty, age 47, this fellow named Abdullah Ansaroff, he is on his way to Hoorayland.
	Now, we have not much time left, but I did want to talk about crime in London, since we are now overseas.
	There's a fellow named Kevin Hurley.
	He is the former head of counter-terrorism in the City of London, and he used to be in charge of the London Street Crime Unit.
	And he wrote in RT, the Russian, I'm sorry, it's a Russian government-funded organization.
	Pretty good media outfit, actually.
	He writes to say, we saved upwards of 100 teenage lives by focusing dedicated police resources on putting hands in pockets.
	That's the British version of stop and frisk.
	Oh, put it in your hands and pockets.
	I like that.
	Yes, I like that too.
	He says, for the uninitiated, in police speak, that means stopping and searching those most likely to be involved in street crime and who may be carrying knives.
	Upwards of 90% of the teenagers who were killed were black males, but the biggest elephant in the room was And remains that the people murdering and maiming these mostly black teenagers were, well, mostly black teenagers.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	Well, Kevin Hurley is capable of saying this.
	He knows it.
	He's saying it, but he's saying it only in a Russian-funded publication.
	Because pattern recognition is the ultimate sin.
	It sure is.
	Yep.
	Most victims of muggings and knife points, street robberies in London describe their attackers as young black males.
	Then he goes on to say, We have a real and enduring problem in London with black youths committing violent street crimes.
	Well, gosh, I mean this guy... He'll never be invited to polite society again or tea at Downing Street.
	He's got to be cancelled.
	Well, as you know, Mayor Sadiq Khan, the first Muslim mayor, I love that when they, the first Muslim mayor, because we can anticipate many more, right?
	The first Muslim mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has just set a policy of forcing them at To ensure that 40% of its new recruits by 2022 are from BAME background.
	Non-white.
	Yes, black, Asian, and minority ethnic.
	And Kevin Hurley goes on to say, I can assure you, having worked with Gurkhas as a soldier, that Nepali police officers will not react well to insults from any black youth he deals with.
	He goes on to say, how is a policewoman whose parents come from Saigon and was raised as a Buddhist going to have any better chance of communicating with a black youth from Peckham than a white police officer?
	Diversity is our strength, Mr. Taylor.
	Just keep saying it.
	It just is.
	Just keep saying it.
	Oh boy, oh boy.
	Guys, you know, we don't even need to go to the gym and work out.
	Diversity is so much our strength, right?
	By osmosis, we should be able to bench press, you know, 405.
	Gosh, yes, just because of diversity.
	Well, you know, we're really coming to the close.
	I think what we will do is once again remind our readers how much we appreciate your comments and questions, your advice, your expressions of affection, and even Well, we won't go any further than that, and so please do write to us at amaran.com at the Contact Us page, and you can just note that your notice is for Jared Taylor, or your alternative contact is... Because We Live Here at ProtonMail.com.
	Once again, all one word, Because We Live Here at ProtonMail.com.
	And Mr. Taylor is too kind to do it.
	I will do it for him.
	The end of the year is approaching.
	The New Century Foundation is, of course, funded by your tax-deductible donations.
	Don't hesitate to send in a nice donation to make this a very Merry Christmas around the New Century Foundation offices.
	You are kind.
	I suppose since you have broken the ice and said such a tin cup rattling thing, to make it as a practical matter, I should give our address.
	It's Box 527, Oakton, Virginia, 22124.
	Box 527, Oakton, Virginia, 22124.
	And once again, we thank you for our attention.
	It is very much our privilege and honor for you to have spent this time with us, and we look forward, I, Jared Taylor, and my co-host, Paul Kersey, to speaking with you again next week.

▲