All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 13, 2020 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
41:17
Julian Langness: "Millennial Red-Pilling and the Future of Europe" (2017)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I'd like to introduce our speaker.
He is Julian Langness, who has come a long way since 2008 when he was one of the youngest delegates to the Democratic Convention in support of Barack Obama.
Yes. After a few adjustments to his thinking, He has become, I think, a fine representative of this younger generation of activists that gives my generation considerable hope.
He has written a book called Fistfights with Muslims in Europe, One Man's Journey Through Modernity.
And he has written a forthcoming book with an extremely promising title, which is as follows, Identity Rising, How Nationalist Millennials Will Retake Europe.
save America and become the new greatest generation.
Thank you.
I think we can all lift a glass to those ideas.
He says that his passions are the intersection of self-improvement and identitarianism, I think that's important, and how to translate Our increasing metapolitical power into real-life hegemony and future identitarian homelands.
So, this evening he will speak to us about millennial red-pilling and the future of Europe.
Please welcome Julian Langer.
Each of us in this room are here for noble and important reasons.
And foremost among those are the growing existential threats facing our people and civilization.
And no matter which nation or corner of the globe we each individually hail from, we are all well aware of their scope.
And while this speech will be about those dangers as a whole and the future of our struggle against them, it is clear That there's no place today more representative of those dangers than Western Europe.
And given that fact, and the escalating intensity of the situation there, it's crucial we acknowledge their significance.
For today in Europe, as we all know, on an almost weekly basis, native European men, women, and children are murdered by Muslim immigrants.
They're mown down by vehicles, ripped apart by bullets or bombs.
Left strewn across the streets of cities and towns once built by their ancestors.
Today in Europe, the country of Sweden, a country that just a few decades ago was a near utopia, now has the highest per capita rape rate in the entire Northern Hemisphere, and the second highest on Earth, behind Johannesburg, South Africa.
And today in Europe, in the UK, the name Rotherham, A name which refers to a town of 109,000 people where 1,400 white female children were gang-raped by Muslim immigrants, sexually enslaved, trafficked,
often tortured, their tongues nailed to coffee tables, doused in gasoline.
That name, Rotherham, and the names of countless other towns and cities where the exact same thing took place is not even spoken aloud by the country's traitors, politicians.
And today in Europe, these things only look to worsen.
For in multiple countries, including both Germany and Sweden, Native Europeans within the 18 to 29-year-old male demographic, the demographic in fighting-age men, the demographic that for all intents and purposes represents a society's future,
either already are or will, by 2020, be the minority.
And foreign immigrant and immigrant-descended young men, primarily Muslim, will outnumber them.
Now, these developments are of a nature wholly unparalleled in our history.
And while it is crucial we communicate their severity to those, especially here in America, who are not yet aware of them, what is most important are the scenarios through which they might be overcome and some kind of positive outcome or victory achieved for Western Europe and the West as a whole.
For, naturally, the desire to fight back against these evils burns within all of us.
And therefore, it is my hope that we as a people, and as a movement, and we, the millennial generation that I and many people in this room are a part of, will be successful in doing so.
And it is that latter lens, that of the millennial generation, through which I'll be examining these questions today.
And I think that that's appropriate, for the story of our people's descent over the last half century is, in many ways, a story of the generations and their respective impact upon that trajectory.
And to understand that story, we need to jump back in time a little ways to the 1960s first, for it was then that the first inklings of what we see today became apparent.
That the cultural zeitgeist of our nations last shifted.
The decade began with what was, compared to today at least, an atmosphere of traditionalism and conservatism, which was centered around those who today are often referred to as the"greatest generation." And while it's easy for us to sometimes be cynical about that moniker today,
given everything that's happened in the West since then, in many ways it was an accurate title.
For the greatest generation lived through both the Great Depression and World War II, as we all know, and each of those were tremendously difficult and strengthening experiences.
And no matter which country they came from, which side of World War II they fought on, those experiences catalyzed in the members of that generation a great degree of strength and tactical virtue, shared unity.
And there is a writer in our movement who goes by the nom de guerre of Anonymous Conservative, who refers to that strengthening process as"K selection." And in his theory, which many of you will have heard of,
and which is adapted from biology and ecology, and is called RK selection theory, periods of intense conflict or resource shortage encourage this process of K selection.
In individuals and groups.
And basically forces those individuals and groups to become stronger and more tribally oriented.
The 14th century Arab historian Ibn Khaldun also wrote about this process.
He was trying to describe those qualities that cause tribes or nations to grow stronger, expand, conquer territory, versus those qualities that cause tribes or nations to grow weaker and die out and be conquered.
And he called this quality, quote, Asabaya.
To Ibn Khaldun, Asabaya referred to this sense of shared unity and the shared willingness of individuals within a tribe or nation to fight or die on its behalf for the primalcy of the group as a whole.
In this regard, to use these terms, we can say that case selection leads to high Asabaya.
But the opposite is also true.
So, while the greatest generation was strengthened by the case election they went through in the Great Depression in World War II and became a high asabi of force as a result, their children, the baby boomer generation, represented the exact opposite phenomenon.
The baby boomers were born in to the immense prosperity that arose in the years after World War II, and as a result, they mostly grew up in environments of ease and safety.
And with that being the case, it comes as no surprise that they turned out quite differently as a result.
They were free, and I'm talking about a certain subset of the baby boomer generation here, to follow their bliss, explore new ideas, and experiment in whatever ways they wanted, without fear of consequence or repercussion.
And as a result, by the end of the 1960s, The majority within their generation had embraced a philosophy of left-wing utopian thinking.
As the former hippie, author David Mehmet, later lamented,"We were self-taught in the'60s to award ourselves merit irrespective of accomplishment.
We were the culmination of history, superior to all those misguided who had come before, which is to say, all humanity.
Though we had never met a payroll, fought for an education..." In this sense of superiority,
in the moral revolution they ushered in, would ultimately define the baby boomer generation.
And now, again, I want to very deliberately point out that there were Exceptions this and we have some very profound exceptions to this in this room.
But by the end of the 1960s, the majority within the baby boomer generation had subscribed to this left-wing thinking and what we now call cultural Marxism.
And as we all know well, in the 40 years since then, those individuals and the radical beliefs they embraced have fully taken control over our societies.
And become the dominant governing orthodoxy of the West.
And this ideology now rules academia, the entertainment industry, the media, public school system, government bureaucracy, and is fully entwined with multinational corporate finance and its oligarchic elite.
It represents an exact inversion of asabaya and the destruction and negation of our people's ethnic and cultural unity.
It's also, importantly, the ideology that the millennial generation, my generation, and the generation of many in this room, was born into.
We millennials were the first generation to wholly grow up within this paradigm.
And as a result, our childhoods and experiences were a perfect reflection of all that the baby boomer left valued.
We were taught that individualism was the highest value, that life was short, that we should cultivate a carpe diem mentality, chase our bliss, and live for the moment.
We were taught that we must rethink masculinity, that it was evil, outdated, and purposeless.
We were taught to revere the idea of feminism, and that traditional gender roles were bigotry.
We were taught distaste for our heritage and traditions.
And taught indifference, if not shame, regarding our ancestors.
We went to public schools run by liberal social workers and Democrat Party teachers' union functionaries that sought to fully indoctrinate us into progressivism.
And we were taught, unceasingly, in a never-ending collage of black history months and Holocaust films and diversity seminars, to feel guilt and nothing but guilt for having been born white.
Now, with all this being the case, it comes as no surprise that many in our generation fell sway to such teachings.
We became the stereotypical angry atheists and self-hating whites and punk rockers and those sorts of things, or at the least, apolitical individualists, focused only on our most base desires.
As we millennials came of age within this environment, many of us started to question things as our experiences proved incongruent with the ideology we were raised within.
We began to resent the carpe diem ethos and the degeneracy that had been so normalized by society.
We grew appalled by the selfish manifestations of such thinking and the toxic behavior of baby boomer icons like Bill Clinton and the sickening frequency We came to indict the enemy and social atomization around us,
and to realize that tribe and heritage were key parts of real identity.
We saw past the myths of feminism we had been taught, seeing its true manifestations not in the glamorized fictions of the entertainment industry, but in the millions of grandmothers forced to work slaving away for Walmart.
We rejected the meek, rethought masculinity of liberalism and realized it was nothing but a convenient excuse for cowardice and a welcome dynamic for those who wished our people to be powerless.
And most of all, we rejected the self-hatred and ethnomasochism that had been pushed upon us since birth and instead embraced a mindset of pride and duty in our heritage and resolved not to betray our ancestors.
Descendants and the suicidal fundamentalism of the left.
Now, these realizations and positions are defining beliefs of our movement as a whole and defining beliefs of this growing subset of the millennial generation.
And obviously, there are countless millennials who have not yet undergone this awakening or red-pilling, but the number of those who have is significant and seems to herald a larger shift.
This very conference, and others like it, testify to this fact.
So, too, do the rapidly growing number of other organizations and informal groups with the same purpose.
While, as a political movement, it's led, obviously, by Mr. Taylor and Mr. Brimelow, in the last years, in recent years, its ranks have been swelled by massive numbers of young identitarians.
And some are in their late 20s, early 30s, like myself.
But others, including many here today, are only 20, 18. They possess a depth of character and vision that belies their age in a deliberate and purposeful manner at odds with the stereotypes of modern youth.
Raised on hipster cynicism and degenerate pop culture, they found themselves instead drawn to traditionalism and sacrifice on the one hand, and esoteric frog humor, Buchanan and Evola on the other.
In this manner, they are rapidly becoming the worst enemies of our globalist adversaries who are used to preying upon the weakness of our youth to consolidate their power.
But as these young identitarians reject pornography for procreation, student loan debt for meme warfare, video games for shooting ranges, and OxyContin for red pills, they cut off the George Soros, John Stewart playbook at the knees and set a new precedent.
In the ongoing culture wars.
And they also represent the advent of right-wing youth as the new counterculture.
This is something that has gotten a decent amount of attention in the last year, as we all well know.
But the vast majority of those on the left still haven't quite realized what has occurred.
Those liberals and Especially the baby boomer variant among their ranks have considered themselves rebels and revolutionaries for the last 40 years.
Their entire emotional identity is predicated upon being transgressive and considering themselves part of a minority.
Yet life and reality has passed them by.
For today, they are about as stale and conformist To use a word they like to use, and uncool as any group could get.
Truthfully, is there anything less transgressive than social justice today and more orthodox and authoritarian?
Is there anything less attractive than aging progressives still pretending they are edgy or hip or sexy?
Thank you.
When Green Day, Sings, Trump, Fascist, USA, in language that perfectly mirrors that of their billionaire corporate record label masters.
Is there anything remotely rebellious about that?
The answer is no, and that the new counterculture in America and Europe is of the right.
And that phenomenon is of an increasingly significant scale.
The number of talented identitarian authors and thinkers, and especially young identitarian authors and thinkers, is unprecedented.
Gregory Hood, Lawrence Murray, Sam Hyde, Henrik Palmgren, Lana Lokteff, Master Chim, Marcus Willinger, Marcus Folin, H.B. Dicek, C.B. Robertson, Baked Alaska, Nathan D'Amigo, who's somewhere here, Paul Wagoner, Walt Bismarck, Tara McCarthy, Leigh Bergans, Millennial
Woes, Patrick Lebrun, Fennec Solaire, Mike Enoch, Hunter Wallace, Ruben Callet, Matthew Tate, Martin Lichtmez,
These are just a small sampling of such individuals.
And there are hundreds more just as talented.
And the question bears asking of when the last time was that there was this kind of organic awakening of youth culture and politics and writing.
If the ideology uniting these individuals was any other, the collective cultural phenomenon they represent would be on the front page of every major journal.
Right now, the opposite is the case, as we know.
And the ideology represented by these millennial writers and thinkers, and by all of us in this room, is anathema to the left-wing globalist forces that control our society.
However, I think there is no doubt that in some capacity, we will end up triumphant.
Yeah! Yeah!
Woo! Thank you.
I say this for a number of reasons, but in large part because our ideology is the only one within the modern West that is remotely tied to reality.
It is the only one that provides real answers to the confused white youth growing up in all our nations.
Furthermore, it is the only one that our ancestors would view as at all logical, the only one not twisted and tortured in its drive to be compatible with cultural Marxism.
And if this is the case, and our ideology and movement does indeed possess such power, then it cannot come at a more opportune time.
For, as previously mentioned, we, as a people, are now facing existential threats of a level completely unmatched in our history.
Great turbulence is on the horizon, and that turbulence and its results We'll have a greater impact upon our people's future than anything in hundreds of years, if not longer.
This turbulence will be multifaceted and is both a cause and a symptom of the threats that we face.
One side of it is economic, and while that aspect is the lesser of the potential coming dangers, its impact will still be profound, and it will affect everything else that happens.
Both North America and Europe, as examples, Now have levels of sovereign debt greater than any point in their history.
Pensions are vastly underfunded, and the next economic recession will create a domino effect of defaults and bankruptcies.
At the same time, the elderly will soon be the biggest group within all Western nations.
And the entitlements they've been promised will be impossible to fulfill.
Asset prices have been artificially inflated.
By runaway money printing.
And propped up with interest rates that are at 3,000-year lows.
And the governments of our nations are desperate to stave off any kind of economic turnaround.
But even mainstream economists increasingly see such a collapse as imminent.
And this is because, finally, and most importantly, in the West, in white nations today, we have no economic growth.
Because, for the first time in all of human history, Certain societies, our societies, because of liberalism, have below replacement rate fertility, meaning we are literally not having enough children to even replace ourselves and are on track to disappear.
Yet worse than all these economic variables is the imminent ethnic violence and civil conflict that anyone could have predicted would be the end result of mass immigration and multiculturalism.
We can see this here in America.
Where our globalist establishment politicians have succeeded in importing massive numbers of foreign immigrants.
And these immigrants, both legal and illegal, hail from all over the globe and share no common culture with those around them.
Whether good or bad as people, they do not consider themselves part of the same shared honor group as their neighbors.
And as a result, Their purposeful importation by our political elites merely serves to further destroy the asabaya of the nation, to further destroy what remnants remain of any sense of shared collective identity or purpose.
And this has set us up for great chaos.
And it is clear that when the economic music stops and our debt-fueled prosperity comes to an end, it will be anarchy that emerges.
But while things are bad enough in America, It is in Europe where we see this future most clearly.
We see it in Germany and Sweden, where, as previously mentioned, Muslim immigrants either already are or will soon be the majority among fighting-age men.
We see it in Austria, Switzerland, France, Holland, and Belgium, where the same will happen soon after.
Soon after that, it will be the entire under-40 population, and soon after that, all of society.
On the way to that point, Muslim political parties will take power.
Muslim on European violence will become that much more pronounced.
And one day, whether 20 years from now or 50, Europe's proud heritage and culture will slip away, submerged under vast waves of Islamization, enslavement, and death.
These will be the tragic outcomes if the present courses continue.
Yet, as stated earlier, There still might be other scenarios that could come to fruition, which is why we're all here today.
In America, these could range from some kind of partial victory through Trumpian civic nationalism, where our downward spiral is arrested but not reversed, all the way to the breakup of the country in some kind of peaceful mutual divorce with separate homelands for America's various concomitant peoples.
Which sounds pretty darn good, actually.
In Europe, the situation is more fluid.
Nick Griffin has stated that Britain is, quote, past the voting stage.
And it seems that this statement now applies equally to all of Western Europe.
So much evil has been done by Western Europe's left-wing baby boomer elites.
And the demographics are so far gone that there are no more electoral solutions.
And we've seen this this year.
In Austria, in the Netherlands, And France.
Yet on the other hand, the idea of any authoritarian government solution, or military coup or something, seems equally far-fetched, as Western Europe's militaries and police forces have been turned increasingly into social justice-dominated experiments,
very much removed from reality.
But the glimmer of hope in Europe comes instead from the very anarchy on the horizon.
For when this perfect cocktail of economic collapse and civil strife breaks out, many Western European governments will likely fall.
The insanity and utopianism they've been built upon will wash away.
They will go the way of all the other utopian experiments throughout human history, and a power vacuum will emerge.
History suggests what will happen next: that strong men will take charge and fill that vacuum.
And as youth always has the largest role in such episodes, the millennial generation may well play the greatest part.
Yet, even if one considers this some kind of LARP-y fantasy, what then?
Still, in 20 years, Western Europe's baby boomers will die out, and millennials will inherit the reins of leadership by default.
In this regard, for better or worse, the survival of Europe and the West is in many ways tied up in the future of the millennial generation.
And it can be hoped that our experiences will have prepared us for that role.
The violence of mass immigration, the experience of repeated economic recessions, and the insanity of degenerate late-stage liberalism will hopefully end up having been our own generation's case selection and will have molded us into a high Asabaya force as a result.
All those reasons previously outlined suggest that this is the case.
And if it is, then through some means or another, whether now or in the future, we will have our chance to fight back and prevail.
And we cannot know what avenue that struggle will take, and that's why we must become prepared for all.
Because if we are successful when that struggle comes, Then the opportunities given to us will be limitless.
We will have the opportunity to create new and better nations, ethnic homelands, like the ones that have been spoken about today.
The opportunity to reverse our people's demographic decline.
The opportunity to create cultures of honor and pride and sacrality.
The opportunity to create a positive future for our children.
The opportunity to take back our destiny.
And finally, more than anything, the opportunity to earn back the honor that comes with that most logical and natural choice to choose to defend one's people and race.
Thank you.
Can you hear me?
Jared had to step outside and ask me to take over his Master of Ceremonies for the question and answer period.
I just want to say what a fantastic speech and what an inspiring person you are.
And I will correct you, though, on two things while people come here.
You are too charitable and kind both to the baby boomers and to their parents.
I was the second year oldest baby boomer generation.
I can assure you the greatest generation were not ennobled.
Suffering can either ennoble people or it can cripple people.
The so-called greatest generation was not ennobled by the Depression.
They were crippled by the Depression.
And they emerged in the Depression basically as prostitutes.
And they lived their lives out as prostitutes to good times and abandoned their children to integrated schools so they could have a bigger paycheck.
There's nothing admirable about the greatest generation.
And my generation, my generation did not strike out and rebel.
My generation did exactly as they were taught.
In the schools, by left-wing textbooks, by left-wing teachers.
There was nothing new, as you said so very well.
There's nothing edgy, nothing new.
It was simply leftover Margaret Mead and Eleanor Roosevelt.
It was already rotten and moldy in the refrigerator when they were served up to us.
Don't deceive yourself.
Come back up here.
All right.
Surely there's somebody with a question.
Come on.
Where are you?
Well, come down to the microphone so people can hear you.
Yeah, hearing younger people such as yourself with such opinions is encouraging and heartening.
What was your transition from young Obama man to where you are today?
That's an excellent question and probably a good one considering the setup Jared gave before I spoke.
Yeah, so when I was, it would have been 2008, I would have been 21, 22 years old.
And I was a filthy, degenerate liberal like our friends outside today, pretty much.
Not that bad.
Anyway, I was a college student at the time.
And I was sort of a libertine libertarian.
I was very focused on issues like drug legalization for very dubious reasons.
And I very much liked Ron Paul and Barack Obama.
And for whatever reason...
I ended up volunteering on the Obama campaign and became a state delegate and then a national delegate for him.
And then it was not long after that that my views started to shift.
And I think like a lot of people in my generation, we were kind of raised that there's this dichotomy, you know, there's the left and the right.
So when I first...
Started feeling negative about liberalism and seeing past it, I kind of gravitated to that Sean Hannity, Mike Huckabee conservatism, because you think that's the only other alternative.
But, you know, that was never what I was ultimately drawn to.
And then, like many other millennials in this room, several years ago, quite randomly, I got drawn to the alt-right.
Actually, it was a speech at this very conference.
I think I...
I had listened to a podcast that Jack Donovan did on artofmanliness.com, and I was very impressed.
I read The Way of Men.
I googled his name to try to listen to more podcasts with him, and I immediately saw his speech from American Renaissance, I believe three or four years ago.
I listened to podcasts that he did with Greg at Countercurrents, with Richard at Radix, and that was...
The start of my racial awakening.
But I would say, really, that was the solidifying of feelings and thoughts and things that I'd been kind of on a quest for for a long time.
And finally stumbling upon these sites was what really clarified it and made me feel like I had a home, so to speak.
I was going to follow up first with Sam Dixon's remark.
I'm the same vintage of a baby boomer as he is, and I just remember Steve Saylor, who was also a baby boomer, once characterizing our immensely annoying generation.
And then he asked my question, but I've just got a follow-up to it.
What is your view of Obama himself now?
Yes, I'd say that...
He was probably a great president for those who voted for him.
If you're black in America, he probably was exactly what you wanted.
He certainly gave out a lot of gives me dat and did a lot of good stuff for those who voted for him.
If I was still a filthy degenerate 22-year-old, I probably would have been happy with what he did.
But I think his administration and he as a politician just go to the heart of the issue, that we are not a single unified nation anymore.
And he was the president for the 50% of people that voted for him, the radical left-wing self-hating whites and the coalition of blacks and other minorities that voted for him.
And I think it just speaks to the fact that we need separate homelands.
Thank you.
I'm curious if you'd have any tips for That's a great question.
I know I'm kind of putting you on the spot with that.
No, I think that the average millennial probably, well, at least white millennials, probably understands at some instinctive level deep down.
The faults in liberalism and the insanity of it.
I mean, I think, like I mentioned in the speech, anyone born after maybe 1980 was raised in a public school system that really just constantly, you know, impressed upon them the wrongness of being white and, you know, your historical guilt for being white, etc.
And I think it's just like anything else.
That's the dominant orthodoxy, and people are going to cling to that.
But I think more than anything, just the meme warfare and the red-pilling that goes on online, the meta-political warfare is probably more effective than anything.
You mentioned your opinion of Obongo.
What is your opinion of Ron Paul now?
Great questions, and I will address both questions.
So, yes, I think that was an excellent summation and without even getting into the Frankfurt School and a large number of other relevant things.
So, yes, I certainly agree with all that.
As far as Ron Paul goes, I guess, like many other people my age in this room, I went through a bit of a Ron Paul phase and then kind of grew out of it.
I think the libertarianism is a little bit silly considering all the much more pressing issues we have.
Once we create peaceful white homelands, then we'll worry about the best economies.
But we have more pressing concerns at the moment.
But no, I don't have negative feelings towards Ron Paul.
I think he's great in a lot of ways, but I don't spend that much time thinking about him anymore.
Obviously, most of my attention on all these issues is focused on Europe, and that's what I've been obsessed with for The last five to ten years, and that's what I spend most of my time writing on now, even though I'm American.
Obviously, I would add the caveat that I haven't been to Europe in seven or eight years, although I do plan to return very soon.
But from studying it intensely, I absolutely think that some type of civil war is on the horizon.
I guess that term can be deceiving because we think of that in kind of a, what would you call it, Bismarckian way.
Where different nation-states fighting, but basically I think it seems clear that at some point in the near to medium term future intense fourth-generation warfare We'll break out in Europe and it'll be more akin to what went on in the Balkans in the early 90s or Lebanon or any number of places like that.
Chechnya in the early 90s when the Soviet Union broke up.
And I think it depends.
I think, as was very eloquently spoken about earlier today, the Visegrad nations are doing an unbelievably wonderful job of rejecting all this insanity from Western Europe.
And I think that...
They're already implicitly white homelands and they're refusing Muslim immigration.
I think that's giving a lot of hope to people in Western Europe.
I think that as nations like the UK, Sweden, Belgium start to collapse in 10 or 20 years or sooner, there will be a lot of white refugees that flee to those Eastern European vice-grad nations.
But like I said, when you have a nation...
That has 50% of the fighting-age men are not native European.
They're immigrants, and most of those immigrants are Muslim.
I think if we look at any other nation on Earth that has those type of demographics, we see massive violence and civil conflict.
So it would be surprising if it didn't happen in Europe.
Yes? I have a follow-up question on that.
It seems to me that civil war is far more likely in America than in Europe, and we're so much farther down the road.
With the majority of people under the age of maybe even 18 now being non-white, if you look at our, quote, our, end quote, army in an airport, it's huge percentages of foreign mercenaries who are getting citizenship by coming in.
Why would you feel that it would come sooner in Europe than it would come here?
That is a fantastic question.
And no, I will admit, I...
I would describe myself as thinking it's probably more likely in Europe for whatever reason.
I think in America, to some extent, over the last 50 years, we've seen this utterly unprecedented prosperity that's unlike anything in human history.
And that's created this kind of shopping mall multiculturalism that has submerged a lot of the underlying issues under the surface.
And I think that if our economy starts to fall apart, those would immediately rise to the surface.
You know, if we look at Hurricane Katrina, obviously that turned into a civil war overnight.
American Renaissance did tremendous writing on that.
I've read all their articles on it from when it occurred.
But I think in Europe, in some of the countries, it's spiraled into more disorder than we have in America.
If you look at Malmo in southern Sweden or parts of France, there are the no-go zones and all that.
There are areas where the...
The government has completely broken down, and while we do have huge divisions in America, our government still seems to have held on to power by this point to a much greater extent than in some of these areas of Europe.
And then also, I guess the other thing I'd add is in America, we do have a lot of different immigrant stock and ethnicities and people who've come here from all over, whereas in Europe, the majority of their immigrants are all Muslim.
Well, there's a follow-up question on that.
Yes, they do have these blocks of immigrants, but basically the fundamental population is still of one stock, say Dutchmen in the Netherlands or Germans in Germany, Scots in Scotland.
Those people are still bound together by a culture and in many cases by a state religion, as in Scotland and the Netherlands.
In our country, the only thing that binds Americans together is money.
At heart, America is just a seething cauldron of groups who hate each other.
Basically, everybody in America hates everybody else.
▲
Export Selection