All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 27, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:01
Building the Wall
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to episode 146 of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor, editor of American Renaissance, and with me is my usual co-host, PK.
Always glad to have you with us.
Hey, it's a pleasure to be here.
We are a day after what I think a lot of our listeners thought we were going to talk a lot about.
Well, we're not.
We know what's happening with YouTube.
We know what's happening with censorship.
It's why we implore you to contact us so we can stay in touch.
So when the inevitable happens, We're ready to go, and you're ready to find us, whether it's on BitChute, whether it's on the Amarin.com URL.
So please, send me your email.
BecauseWeLiveHereAtProtonMail.com.
Once again, that email is BecauseWeLiveHereAtProtonMail.com, or You can always reach us at the Contact Us tab at www.amaran.com because the fact is we have many subscribers.
People tell us that we are part of their week, a necessary part of their week.
Correct.
But YouTube may decide that no matter how necessary you find us, they find us unnecessary.
And that goes for the main channel that you've worked so diligently to build over the years.
How close, well you know, because that was targeted by A certain organization that has been successful in convincing Google to access a number of channels.
That's right.
A great deal of our friends are no longer broadcasting, and so we suspect that our days are numbered.
So, if you do wish to hear from us, we plan to continue making these podcasts and making videos.
It's just it'll be much more difficult to get a hold of you, and so we want to make that possible.
And you can come up with some sort of alias email address if you are worried about being doxxed.
I will tell you, of course, that American Renaissance has never had a security breach of any kind.
Knock on wood, we never will.
But we entirely understand you want to come up with some kind of assumed name for this purpose.
But we urge you to do so.
And our first story, perhaps fittingly enough, has to do with the death penalty.
We seem to be getting the death penalty on one platform after another, but this is the reinstatement of the federal death penalty.
On July 25th, Attorney General William Barr announced that the Justice Department is going to start administering the death penalty at the federal level.
The fact is, for the last 16 years, there hasn't been a single federal execution.
And after the announcement, Attorney General William Barr immediately put five executions on the docket and said that there are quite a few more planned.
Now, you can imagine how the lefties were reacting.
Rolling Stone, their subhead to their announcement of this was, the federal machinery of death will begin to churn again in the age of Trump.
Then there was Diversity Inc.
They said, Federal death penalty reinstated.
Blacks disproportionately affected.
That reminds me of that rather cynical headline, Nuclear War.
Blacks disproportionately affected.
I think it was minorities and women.
You could be right.
Minorities and women disproportionately affect.
Maybe that was before they thought about the LGBTQ types.
Correct.
In any case, yes.
And you see, Diversity, Inc.
is all exercised about this because there are at the present time 62 people on death row in the federal system.
And although blacks are 13% of the population, they are 42% of the death row inmates.
So, it is ipso facto unfair, ipso facto racist, and they're all excited about this.
Now, as it turns out, 21 states and the District of Columbia have banned executions already.
And all of these people, of course, want the feds to stop killing people.
And four more states have formal moratoria in place.
And according to Diversity Inc., 106 countries have outlawed capital punishment.
Another 28 either have moratoria or just don't carry out death sentences.
So, they consider this all barbaric, can't be done.
And in a way, it's rather surprising given the preoccupation we have about anything that has a disparate impact.
The death penalty does have a disparate impact because black people are more likely to kill people.
Now, one of the points that's made over and over and over when people talk about death penalty is that black people who kill white people are more likely to get the death penalty than white people who kill black people.
That is true.
What these people always fail to point out is that white murderers are more likely than black murderers to get the death penalty.
Were you aware of that?
I was unaware.
The reason for this is that many, many deaths by blacks are these, you stepped on my shoe, I'll shoot you, kind of killings.
Or just some fight got out of control, somebody pulls out a gun.
Impulse control.
Impulse control.
Whereas, white people are far more likely to do it in a premeditated way.
They're less likely to do it, but they're more likely to commit murder one.
And they get the death penalty.
This is something you never ever read about.
White people who kill are more likely to get the death penalty than black people.
All you ever hear about is blacks who kill whites are more likely than whites who kill blacks.
And blacks who kill whites often kill them in combination with some other heinous crime.
Murder or rape or something.
The circumstances are just gruesome.
So What these people who insist that the death penalty is always and inevitably racist fail to point out are the different circumstances.
They just refuse to accept that there are racial differences in behavior.
But this is, so far as any objective research can tell, is what accounts for these disparities that are always being shouted about.
Now, in the wake of this announcement about the reinstatement of the death penalty, apparently there's been a whole wave of court challenges that have to do with the very first guy who's up for getting the death penalty, getting executed, and his name is Alfred Bourgeois.
I don't know what race he is, but lawyers for him are saying that he cannot be executed because he is, quote, intellectually disabled.
Now, our listeners may be aware that since 2002, the Supreme Court decided in Atkins v. Virginia that the Eighth Amendment bars the execution of intellectually disabled prisoners whose cognitive functions would render their executions cruel and unusual.
If you are profoundly stupid, apparently, the death penalty is cruel and unusual.
Why that is beats me.
I don't know why that's cruel and unusual.
No moral agency, perhaps, in the eyes of the court?
Well, but, you know, that's a different argument.
The moral agency argument would be to say, well, it wasn't really his fault.
He killed somebody, but he didn't have enough brains to realize what he was doing.
But what this argument is, is that killing people who are really dim is cruel and unusual.
It seems to me that if they're really dim, they don't even know what's happening to them, and they can't imagine the future, or whatever it is.
What Atkins versus Virginia in 2002 decided was it is cruel and unusual to execute people with particularly low IQs, but the decision left it to each state to decide who is intellectually disabled.
Now, almost invariably, the states have decided that IQ tests will decide.
In the state of Florida, for example, the presumption is that if you have an IQ above 70, now 70 is pretty low, but if you have an IQ above 70, then that leaves you beyond the reach of the safe harbor that's set out for the intellectually disabled in Atkins vs. Virginia.
That's a threshold, eh?
That's the threshold.
Now, the argument being made in the case of this Alfred Bourgeois is that he is dim.
I don't know how dim.
I suspect he's probably pretty dim.
But the theory here is that it is cruel and unusual under these circumstances.
Now, I've made this somewhat lengthy Commentary only to point out how amusing it is that this is the one area in which liberals firmly believe in IQ tests.
If somebody's on death row, then oh boy, IQ tests are infallible.
We believe in them.
They're tolerated.
Not just tolerated, they're required.
Yes, that's great stuff.
And we're going to be talking about a different usage of IQ tests later on.
But in the meantime, I want to move along to another story.
And that has to do with the construction of the border wall.
As we all remember, the Trump administration was unable to persuade Congress to vote funds for the border wall, and it was unwilling to keep the government shut down until Congress did vote the funds.
So, President Trump declared an emergency at the border, and in the name of this emergency, he was able to divert money from the Defense Department.
money for the armed forces for the tune of $2.5 billion.
This is challenging the court, but the Supreme Court, somewhat to my surprise,
said that, yep, yep, yep, this is all fine and good.
You've got an emergency on the border, and you can use this money unilaterally.
That was a 5-4 decision, I believe.
I believe it was, as so many of them are.
As so many of them are.
So, ground is being broken for this construction project, I'm very pleased to say.
I keep throwing this in your face, PK, but there was one of our podcasts in which you were just so down on Donald Trump.
That I've become obsessed with rebuilding him in your mind.
There are useful things that the Orange Man is doing.
I just want you to recognize that.
And again, it's so simple to do positive things as we've discussed.
Ad Nauseam, if you go back and listen to the archives, he came in with a mandate to do so many great things and I think there are a lot of reasons why unfortunately he was Dissuaded from doing those.
A lot of that has to do with Paul Ryan and the Koch brothers' insidious hands on the agenda.
But the point is, President Trump has an opportunity here in the next, gosh, we're 13 months from the election.
Pretty nearly, yes.
Got to do a lot of stuff, buddy, to persuade a lot of people to get excited again.
Yes, yes he does.
And it is true that he fumbled away many opportunities, but, and as you say, there were easy things he could have done, but this was not an easy thing, it seems to me.
Coming up with this procedure whereby you take money from the Defense Department, I had no idea that was possible, and he had some smart people working for him, and he argued it all the way up to the Supreme Court, and now the boys are going to work.
Now, what they're doing is they're installing 30-foot high steel fencing, but unfortunately, unfortunately, although we're working on 247 miles of fence, only 17 miles are new.
Most of this work is to replace stuff that apparently the border hoppers can hop.
So, it's going to be useful stuff.
So, I'm very glad about that, but I'm disappointed to know that it is extending the existing barrier by only 17 miles.
At the present time, barriers exist along 654 miles of Mexico border.
That's about a third.
And, of course, many areas are mountainous or desert and people have a hard time crossing them, but there are places where we need more wall.
And, you know, part of the work that's going on now is in an area called Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument.
This is apparently a very remarkable place because it's known for its peculiarly shaped cactuses that resemble organ pipes.
And it also has many cigarro cacti.
But I remember reading some time ago, until five years ago, big chunks of the park were completely closed to the public because there were so many coyotes hustling people through the park.
You're talking about smuggling activity going on.
Yes, that's right.
Coyotes, human coyotes, yes.
And in fact, there was a park ranger who was shot to death in a gun battle with these people who were running illegals and drugs through the park.
Just imagine that.
Here is a national park on the Mexico border, and it is so dangerous that big chunks of it were cordoned off.
You couldn't get into them, or you weren't supposed to get into them anyway.
It's so terrifying that we allow the state to cede any territory of the United States.
To that type of illegal behavior.
A national park should be for where families go and they see the beauty and the majesty of this great country.
Or a park in any area of the country should be available.
They shouldn't worry about a kid being shot.
Yes, yes.
Well, big chunks of it, big chunks of it.
Off-limits because Mexicans are streaming through.
Apparently, it's back open again.
That's one of the reasons why they are beefing up the fence in this Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument.
But, yes, back to the question of IQ in a somewhat roundabout way.
I believe on one of our podcasts, I forget which episode it was, we talked about the SAT had decided that they were very, very worried about income inequality being correlated with test scores.
It just is intolerable that the wealthier people get better test scores, that white people get better test scores than blacks, that Hispanics get worse scores than Asians, but of course nobody worries about the fact that Asians outscore whites.
But in any case, several months ago, the College Board announced that it was going to assign an adversity score to every student who takes the SAT.
And the idea, of course, is to make it clear to college admissions people just what sort of barriers and obstacles and hard times a student had in order to achieve the test score that he did.
But It faced all sorts of criticism about this.
But the criticism was not that that you and I might propose.
It was the fact that it was just a single number.
That's what was wrong.
And so what they're going to do, they have going to assign what they call on, it's a different sort of adversity score, and it's called landscape.
Now what Landscape is going to do, it's going to give admissions officers at university some snapshot of the quality of the school, its relative wealth, and stability of the neighborhood.
What they will see is a range of test scores at the school to see how you fit in, whether you're in the top quartile or the bottom quartile or whatever it is.
Also, you'll get information about median family income in the neighborhood, education levels in the neighborhood, crime rates, and also the percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunches, how many people take AP classes, etc., etc.
So the idea is, it's not really any indication of the individual student.
It's telling you the environment of the neighborhood and the kind of school that the applicant attends.
The theory is it will help colleges identify those who have done more with less.
So, but you know how people are going to game this system?
One thing that would occur to me is that some ambitious parent might tell the child, grit your teeth junior, you're going to go to this school at least for while you're taking the SAT.
It's gonna be some miserable lowdown school, but what's being judged is the school itself and not you.
So if you're a smart white kid or smart Asian kid and you do well, they're gonna think, wow!
What a brilliant guy!
Overcome all this adversity!
Talk about cruel and unusual punishment you're talking about.
You know, that's something... A couple years ago, I remember reading a story about a white family that decided to move their children from
Hoover or Mountain Brook, which is one of the best areas for
to live in the entire state of Alabama, one of the best suburbs of Birmingham.
And they said, you know what, we want our children not to be in a safe neighborhood.
They don't need to go to a great school.
They need to be in a diverse area.
That's right.
They need to be the only white kids.
And so they deliberately moved into Birmingham so that they could go to one of the worst ranked public school systems in the country.
And that is Birmingham Public Schools.
Just so their children could enjoy the fruits of diversity.
Was there an unhappy ending?
I think I read that back in 2013-2014.
You know, whenever I've heard stories about that, eventually, eventually, even these dimwit parents realize when the children start losing 10 pounds a week, when they're unable to sleep at night, when they come back bloodied and bruised, when they go to the principal and the principal says, oh, too bad.
They eventually pull them out.
But, you know, the fact is this information on the schools apparently is going to be released to the public in the 2020 to 2021 school year.
So, you know, a savvy parent might sort of dope around and say, well, OK, this is, you know, it's not all it's not Fatally dangerous.
But it's bad enough so that my child is really going to be a star at this school.
There's already a fantastic asset, I think it's called greatschools.org, where you can actually go and you can look at the quality of the school, you can look at actually the diversity, the racial composition, the breakdown, and you can get a pretty accurate representation of what that community is going to be like if you're going to move there.
Unquestionably, yes.
I think just about every public school in the country you can go on a website and find what the racial percentages are.
You can also find the percentage of students who get a free lunch as well and a free breakfast.
Yeah, free lunch, free breakfast.
Now what do these poor kids do in the summertime, you know, when they're out of school?
A lot of school systems are beginning to That's right.
You can't have the stigma.
some free lunch year-round. In fact, Atlanta Public Schools, I read, is
actually making free lunch available to everyone to remove the stigma.
That's right. You can't have the stigma. Correct. So free lunch for everybody.
Regardless of the home and the income level.
But you know, what are they going to do?
Are they going to put them on the bus during the summer?
Bus them to school for breakfast and lunch?
I mean, how does this work?
The whole thing, it just becomes a situation in which the federal government or the local government or the city government becomes everybody's mommy and daddy and nanny.
It's an astonishing state of affairs.
But this is going to, as I say, this landscape score is going to help colleges identify those who have done more with less.
And they quoted a Yale University admissions dean, Jeremiah Quinlan.
He says, it helps us identify students who have excelled in their context in a more clear and convincing way than we ever could have in the past.
So, this is something that we can all bear in mind.
And, of course, New York City, they have been struggling with this problem of inequality for years.
It just won't go away.
If you mind if I jump in, I'd like to let our listeners know, in case you didn't Google The individual who's on death row and who will be the first inmate that the federal government executes, he is black.
Oh, he is black.
Mr. Bourgeois is black.
Great last name.
Great surname.
Yes.
I thought he was a traveling Frenchman who somehow got caught up in our punitive justice system.
He is not.
Ah, he's not a traveling Frenchman.
Oh well.
But yes, New York City.
Bill de Blasio, some time ago, appointed something called the School Diversity Committee.
Its purpose, as you can imagine, is to mix things up because Bill de Blasio and all of these educrats simply cannot stand the fact that Asians and whites tend to cluster in some schools and blacks and Hispanics in the other.
Now, what the School Diversity Committee has decided is that they're going to get rid of all gifted and talented programs.
Because the process whereby you screen to get into these programs is, as this report says, this has become a proxy for separating students who can and should have opportunities to learn together.
In other words, because the people who can jump over the barriers and get into these gifted programs are overwhelmingly white and Asian, this has got to go.
No more gifted.
No more talented.
Everybody mixed up together.
Now, the panel also recommended ending any kind of academic admission screenings for grade schools, middle schools, and most high schools.
As you know, we've talked about this before.
We have.
A lot!
Stuyvesant High School and Bronx School of Science and several others in the New York system are rigorously selective, and they select exclusively on the basis of these test scores.
And for that reason, they're overwhelmingly Asian, with a few whites sprinkled in, but this is considered absolutely unacceptable.
Now, this recommendation from the Diversity Committee is non-binding, but Bill de Blasio, he has the power.
To do what they say.
And apparently, this panel was made up of several dozen education experts.
It'd be interesting to see a sort of a photo lineup of just what it was composed of.
But in any case, the experts say, no more of this gifted stuff.
But, now this bespeaks to me a remarkable sense of reality on the part of these several dozen experts.
They acknowledged that a change as sweeping as this could induce the widespread flight of those top students who are using Gifted and Talented.
Interesting.
Interesting slip of reality there.
Yes, yes.
A glimmer of sanity has penetrated this report and they'll just bugger off to private schools or they'll move to the suburbs.
Because apparently you can get a pretty good education if you get into one of these gifted and talented.
You've got smart people sitting next to you.
You've got motivated teachers.
Well, you're not scared of going to the bathroom and being held up for money.
All of those things.
And being beat up for being one of the few white or Asian faces at a majority black or Hispanic public school there in NYC.
That's correct.
That's correct.
But still, the fact is abolishing gifted and talented might face opposition from a few middle-class black and Hispanic families who want more gifted programs.
More gifted programs that are easier to get into because they think that this could be a way to beef up certain curricula in the schools that they attend.
And you know, that's an idea, frankly, if you think about it.
What you could have is the Hispanic gifted and talented program.
And in other words, if it's the, you know, you've got to be two standard deviations smarter than the average to get into the white one.
Well, you could be two standard deviations smarter than the average Hispanic to get into the Hispanic world.
Let's go back and think about one of the time periods in American history that we're supposed to celebrate.
The Tuskegee Airmen.
Now, we know currently there's a shortage of black pilots in the Navy and the Air Force because, as you just said, they are unable to compete with largely white males who set the standard of excellence when it comes to flight training.
We know this, but at the time of the Tuskegee Airmen, the military was segregated.
So guess what?
The black applicants who were going out for the Army Air Force positions with the Tuskegee Airmen were only going up against the top black applicants.
They didn't have to worry about a standard being set that they were unable to reach and have to compete with.
Yes.
Well, I've often thought people are complaining about failing schools and how do you reward teachers.
You should really, if the United States was at all realistic about this, you would reward teachers who get black people to perform better than the black average.
Hispanics to perform better than the Hispanic average.
And if they want, Well, I mean, and go back.
within these largely black and Hispanic schools, they could do that.
Easily.
They just shouldn't apply the same rules.
But that would be too realistic.
Well, I mean, and go back.
How many whites would be able to reach the same level that Asians would set?
Well, that's another problem, too.
You could have a super competitive standard for Asians.
What's that one school in, I guess it's Northern Virginia, Jefferson?
Thomas Jefferson High School.
Yeah, isn't it almost all Asian?
Oh, very heavily.
It's like Bronx School of Science in New York City.
Yes, very, very Asian.
And that's a STEM school, correct?
Oh, they're both, yes.
Very, very solidly stemmed.
But you know, back to New York City here, one of the problems is that in gentrifying neighborhoods, White parents have called for more gifted classes because that means that they can move into a neighborhood in transition, as it's called, that's sort of going our way, but still has a pretty dodgy public school system.
But if they've got gifted programs in there, then in effect, you get segregated classrooms within the same school.
That's been something that some of these savvy, gentrifying white people have done.
Now, we've also talked on this podcast about Richard Carranza.
He is the school's chancellor.
He has just been wanting to ditch the whole gift-intelligent system.
He wants to ditch any kind of competitive entry to these superior schools.
And he's also been promoting so much anti-white training, has been mistreating white people so much that three high-level employees that he's pushed out have actually brought suit against him.
But it'll be interesting to see what Bill de Blasio does about this.
The fact is, when it comes to their children's education, even goofy liberal white people are prepared to put up a stink.
And what's even more effective, given the preciousness of people of color, the Asians are willing to put up a stink.
So my guess is that if there are any reforms based on this school diversity committee, they'll be sort of decorative and around the edges.
But we'll see.
We'll see because there are school districts all across the country that are watching what's happening with bated breath to see if they're going to be able to implement the same type of changes to gifted programs because of a lack of participants from certain communities.
It's part of this deliberate blindness.
Absolute deliberate blindness.
And it's a deliberate blindness that apparently is never cured by the fact that Asians are better than whites.
You'd think, OK, if it were just blacks and whites, or just blacks and whites and Hispanics, you'd think, OK, well, maybe there's something to this.
Maybe there's a white supremacist.
But how come, in this land of white privilege, Asians do better?
The other aspect of it is, how come these Hispanics, many of whom don't even speak English very well, fresh off of a hop on the fence, they do better than blacks?
I mean, doesn't that tell you something, too?
I guess not.
I guess not.
It's all prejudice that works its way in mysterious ways that are difficult to understand.
White supremacy has no language barrier.
I guess that's it.
I guess that's it.
White supremacy works in mysterious ways.
It's wonders to perform.
And these are some of its consistent wonders.
But now we have a man, though, who is working very hard to fight white supremacy in all its manifestations.
That is Judge Carlos Murgia.
Now, I suspect this is pronounced Murgia, but I'm not sure.
M-U-R-G-U-I-A.
My Spanish isn't good enough to be certain about this, but this has to do with his interpretation of a 1952 law passed by Congress that makes it illegal to encourage illegal immigration.
Now, the law authorizes a fine and up to five years in prison for someone who, and I'm quoting directly from the statute, encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such will be in violation of the law.
So, you cannot encourage or induce an illegal alien to come break the law and live in the United States.
Now, if the defendant, if the person who's encouraged or induced this kind of behavior has acted for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain, then the maximum sentence rises to 10 years.
Well, some months ago, Judge A. Wallace Tashima, that's a Japanese name, by the way, for those of you who are not aware, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, that's San Francisco, notoriously liberal, he said that the entire law is unconstitutionally broad because it violates the First Amendment.
He's saying that because a language encourages or induces That could simply mean saying, you know, come boys, come one, come all.
That could mean that you've broken the law.
Correct.
And there's a certain logic to that.
Now, in the Ninth Circuit Court, the federal prosecutors argued that they were talking only about a substantial assistance in breaking the law.
And as you know, there are lots of laws on the books according to which if you help somebody in a burglary, or even if you simply accompany one, accompany somebody to hold up a liquor store, and you don't even have the gun, you don't even pull the trigger, but if your accomplice pulls the trigger, you can be guilty of murder.
So there are laws against even just being around others who break the law.
But in this case, Judge Wallace Tashima has said that it is unconstitutionally overbroad and violates your First Amendment right to encourage people to break the law.
But now, this brings us to the present day, or just a few days ago, and that is The federal judge in Kansas has made exactly the same decision as this Ninth Circuit Court guy, Mr. Justice Judge Tashima.
And his name is Carlos Mugia, and he issued a ruling from the bench just on Wednesday, and he threw out the convictions of José Felipe Hernández-Cavillo and Mauro Papalodzi, because these people were encouraging people to be in the country illegally, and they were themselves here illegally.
Well, double whammy.
Now, of course, the federal prosecutors again argued that we're talking only about individuals who provide, quote, substantial assistance to these lawbreakers.
But this Kansas guy, Carlos, he says, nope, absolutely the same argument as Judge Tashima.
But interestingly enough, Kansas is not governed by the Ninth Circuit.
9th Circuit is the western part of the United States.
Kansas is in the 10th Circuit.
And so, if they appeal it to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, and the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals upholds the law, then that will set the stage for a Supreme Court decision.
Now, obviously, the easiest thing, of course, would be to just rewrite the law.
Yes, it would be.
But we can't expect our Congress to do anything as sensible as that.
But, while we're on the subject of this particular lawsuit, I was curious to find out about this Carlos Murguia fellow.
He was nominated by President Bill Clinton in 1999.
But from 1985 to 1990, he ran something called El Centro, Inc.
This is in Kansas.
It was associated with National Council of La Raza.
And I looked up its mission.
Its mission is to, and I'm quoting, improve the lives of Latinos and others.
And others.
Through educational, social, and economic opportunities.
I love that.
When you hear that, and others, nice qualification.
Right.
I guess if they'd simply said, we're here to improve the lives of Latinos, that might be just a little overly narrow.
But they're here to improve the lives of Latinos, And others, and others.
But, I must say, on their website all I saw were photographs of happy Hispanics.
So, we've got a guy who is associated with National Council of La Raza, and, interestingly enough, Carlos Murguía's younger sister, Mary Murguía, She was appointed to the United States District Court of the District of Arizona.
Another Bill Clinton appointee in 2000, the year after Carlos, and they became the first brother and sister to serve on the United States federal bench.
Isn't this a success story?
Heartwarming.
Again, it shows that elections matter.
People can be as mad as they want to about the I think the incorrect assumptions of what a Trump presidency would have brought.
These shocking expectations that some people had.
And yet, Trump is doing a good job when it comes to court appointees.
He's being attacked over and over again because, gosh, where's the diversity?
You're trying to get all these white men through.
How terrible.
Well, we know in the current year there's nothing worse than being a white man.
But you go back and look at what Clinton did, and gosh, it looked like he was putting up people who don't really care about anyone, those others, except for, save the Hispanics that they fought and tried to represent.
Latinos and others.
There you go.
Now, there's more to this story.
Mary Mugia, the sister of Carlos Mugia, not only has she been elevated to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, she's up there in California with this Tashima guy.
She has a twin sister.
Her twin sister is Janet Mugia.
She has worked for years as the President and Chief Executive Officer of National Council of La Raza.
And what does La Raza translate to?
Oh, you know, that's when you raz somebody.
Okay.
Raza Raza, yeah.
Unfortunately, that's not the case for our sharp listeners who know that La Raza is, of course, the race, and that is a Hispanic advocacy organization.
Of course, it's been renamed, correct?
Yes, that's right, that's right.
You know what it's now called?
I do, but...
It's called UNIDOS US.
Or maybe it's UNIDOS US.
I don't know.
I've never heard it pronounced.
UNIDOS is Spanish, which means united.
And then it's U and S that comes after that without a space in capital letters.
Phonetically, it sounds like you need us.
Yeah, Lunidosus, or I don't know how they pronounce it.
But anyway, what a happy success story.
This is the American dream.
Their folks immigrated in 1950, apparently, and there were seven children.
Now, these three have gone on to great things, very clearly.
So, we should be happy.
This is the city on a hill.
This is a perfect example of what we want.
The kind of diversity, the kind of enrichment that immigration has brought us.
Legal warfare to dismantle the historic American nation and make it a crime.
To try and stop people from encouraging illegal immigration.
I mean, look, this is what the whole Democrat platform is in 2020.
We already know that.
I mean, what was it?
Wasn't it a senator?
Was it Cory Booker who walked a bunch of illegal aliens?
Of course, they don't even call that anymore.
The corporate media just calls them migrants or immigrants.
But I think he tried to march them across the border.
Yes, he took them under his wing personally.
And that's where President Trump's executive branch could do something.
You would think.
Yes.
Well, and they all want to decriminalize border hopping.
It's quite remarkable.
But, you know, then the obvious consequence of this is what's happening in Montgomery County.
Well, Montgomery County is, for those who don't know, that is a suburb of Washington, D.C.
It's pretty close to Virginia and what's known as the DMV area.
And an illegal immigrant has been accused of first-degree rape and attempted second-degree murder.
They were arrested in Montgomery County this past Monday, making this 26-year-old Honduran national, get this, the fourth suspected rapist who was unlawfully, illegally in the country, arrested in Montgomery County in just the past month.
The Sanctuary County of Montgomery.
It is.
Now here are some gruesome details about Kevin Mendoza of Silver Spring.
He brutally raped and attempted to murder an unidentified adult female in an apartment complex earlier in August.
So Montgomery County PD said that an investigation by SVID detectives Determined the victim was carrying items from her vehicle parked in the parking lot to the apartment building when she noticed a male that appeared to be following her.
She unlocked the door to the building.
The male suspect grabbed her from behind, threw her to the floor.
The victim attempted to yell and resist, but the suspect began to strangle her with his hands.
As the victim continued to attempt to escape, the suspect struck her multiple times in the face and head with a closed fist.
The suspect then raped the victim.
Now, again, this is the fourth rape by an illegal alien in Montgomery County in the past month.
ICE confirmed to Kevin Lewis of ABC7 that he was in the country illegally.
They had lodged a detainer, ICE has, requesting Montgomery County Police to notify the federal agency before Mendoza is released, whether on bond or for other reasons, and transfer him to federal authorities for detainment.
But they're probably not going to do that.
They just love having these illegal immigrant rapists around, I suppose.
No, and this is right in the shadow, basically, of the brutalistic Trump administration's home base.
And again, this is just happening four times in the past month.
You'd think President Trump could tweet about this.
There's been some great stories documenting these crimes.
Wasn't he going to have a website where they tracked illegal immigrant crime at one point?
I believe so.
Now he was going to have a special office that was going to provide special services to the victims of crimes by illegals.
That got set up I think, but I don't remember hearing a word about it.
I haven't seen anything about it either.
That'd be worth investigating actually, see if it ever does anything.
But then don't we have an equally blood-curdling story from the other part of the country?
You're talking about?
Seattle.
King County, I believe.
I am.
Well, Democrats in Washington state are going to lose a critical investigative tool which is needed for apprehending dangerous criminals of all backgrounds.
Get this, because the police want to protect illegal alien criminals.
Last week, KTTH, which is a conservative talk radio station in Seattle, reported that King County Sheriff Mitzi Joannick Nick.
Crazy last name.
I'm sure I'm butchering it.
Mitzi.
Sheriff Mitzi.
We'll just call her Sheriff Mitzi.
Yeah, I'm sure she's a real law and order person.
She's abruptly pulled her agency out of an important law enforcement sharing tool because she has a fear that ICE would see the information put onto it.
Dear listening audience, the Law Enforcement Information Exchange, LINCS, is a database of crime incident reporting used by over 2,000 local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies which shares information about criminal events in a given area of operations.
It's designed and operated by the U.S.
Navy.
It's a very useful tool for detectives trying to find fugitives or crack cases because they can draw upon arrest information in this system.
This is the kind of thing that you'd actually want to have multiple agencies speaking to one another so you can be able to track down stuff.
This is a fantastic tool.
So if an agency, for example, is looking for a fugitive sex offender and he's pulled over for a traffic stop by another police department, Lynx would be one of the first ways the detective would discover the criminal.
This is fantastic software.
A fantastic system.
Well, not according to Sheriff Mitzi of King County.
Nope, nope, nope.
It's used effective enough in catching fugitives, but as I said, the law enforcement feared that continued use of the system would violate the county's ordinance of not sharing any information on immigration status with ICE.
So King County, which used to be named for a white man, and back in, I think it was the 1980s, was renamed Retcon for Martin Luther King.
Yes.
So it's named now after Martin Luther King Jr.
King County there out in Seattle.
I'm not sure if Martin Luther King ever even went to Seattle.
I don't think he ever did, no.
But that doesn't matter, for heaven's sake.
You know, I'm surprised they haven't renamed the place Mandela County.
It doesn't matter.
Well, according to KTTH, undersheriff Scott Sommer sent an email to employees.
The department had no choice but to terminate its participation in Lynx.
He said this, we could not reach a solution that ensured the civil immigration functions would not have access, especially when viewed from a national level.
We had no alternative other than to terminate our membership and information sharing with Lynx.
This included the removal of all our information from the system.
Agency access to links was cut off per the agreement.
So now, just to protect illegal immigrants, ladies and gentlemen, this county is removing itself from this unbelievable resource that works to keep Americans safe.
Not just from illegal immigration crime, but from Fugitives, whether they're black, whether they're white, whether they're Asian.
That's right.
This is insanity.
This really is insanity.
It is almost as astonishing as these sanctuary cities and counties, etc., that refuse to hand over absolute murderers, rapists to ICE because they'll be deported.
They want them in the country!
Exactly.
I just read earlier today where the DOJ is going after Baltimore County because not enough entry-level blacks have had the opportunity to become police in Baltimore County.
You'd think that President Trump could use the DOJ to go after these sanctuary cities.
That's something that Jeff Sessions was doing, by the way.
Yes.
Well, but didn't there was a federal judge who decided that you cannot withhold any kind of money from any of these sanctuary entities because they are sanctuary.
I thought there was another court case where they decided that, no, you could do that.
Hmm.
Well, let's go back and look.
The point is Sessions was doing good things on this one.
He was trying.
He was trying.
And unfortunately, Trump was too busy making fun of him for his southern accent and for various other peculiarities.
So, yes, nope, that's the way the United States works, apparently.
You know, you want to cut down on law enforcement because you might scoop up an illegal alien.
Can't have that.
You want to have more criminals on the street committing more crimes because that's the only way to keep the feds from sinking their hooks into an illegal alien.
But moving just north of King County, across the border into Canada, there's a fellow named Maxime Bernier.
And he is the head of something called the People's Party of Canada.
And just over the weekend and just last week, the billboards popped up all over the country of Canada with a big photo of Maxime Bernier and the slogan that says, say no to mass immigration.
Because he's tired of it.
And his party's tired of it.
Now, this seems like a pretty simple message.
A photo and say no to mass immigration.
Keep it simple.
It's great.
Well, of course, this provoked the usual outroar.
Outcry, I should say.
Roarings of racism.
Roarings of this and that.
And at first, the company that owns the billboards, it's called Pattison Outdoor, issued a statement saying that this does not violate their terms of service.
They're a paying customer and we're going to leave them up, no matter what you think.
Well, the very same day, just a few hours later, they issued a second statement saying that although the ads don't violate any policy, they're going to take them down anyway.
Oh, Canada!
The Great White North, eh?
They're going to have to rewrite their policies, I guess.
And the guy, the president of the company, Randy Otto, He stated, it was never my or Pattison Outdoor's intention to offend, alienate, or in any way insult the public by allowing this ad to be run.
Well, it was their intention because they ran it.
But in any case, people are complaining that these ads are hurtful to newcomers and it doesn't recognize their contribution to Canadian culture.
So, you simply cannot put, say no to mass immigration, on a billboard.
Now, you could understand this a little bit better if this party, the People's Party of Canada, were some sort of fringy group started by fringy folks.
The more you dig into them, the more it's just a bunch of funny-looking people with ill-fitting clothes.
Not the case!
Maxime Bernier, he used to be with the Conservative Party of Canada.
He was served of Minister of Industry and Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Those are an impressive resume.
That's an impressive... under Stephen Harper.
And he nearly won election as the leader of the Conservative Party in 2018.
He got 49% of the vote.
He came very close to being the prime ministerial candidate of the Conservative Party.
But he left and he started this Party.
And one of the things that the party stands for is the idea that immigration, and I'm quoting, should not be used forcibly to change the cultural character and social fabric of our country.
Makes perfect sense to me.
Fancy that.
Well, that's not a legitimate position.
Now, I looked up his Wikipedia page.
It's fairly lengthy.
Not once on the pages he called a racist.
I consider this something of a disturbing sign.
Why do you consider that a disturbing sign?
No, seriously.
Well, I mean, this is a bit of a joke, really.
I'm very glad nobody's calling him a racist.
But the fact is, if somebody says immigration should not forcibly change the cultural character of the social fabric, you know you're going to have people screaming about that.
But my point is, this guy is by no means marginal.
He is a very important character out of Canadian politics.
And the photo of him, he looks like a movie star.
Really a handsome guy.
But he is not allowed to say, say no to mass immigration.
Well, it resonated with a lot of Canadians.
This is the message that's resonating all across the Western world.
Unfortunately, we're seeing it taken to Extremes in places like New Zealand and in places like El Paso because of the refusal of the federal government to do what they're tasked with doing.
I mean, again, go back to the insanity we just talked about.
King County is endangering citizens to protect illegal aliens.
King County in Washington.
You've got A county right in the shadow of Washington D.C., the citadel of the most powerful empire in human history, where 40 legal aliens in the past month have been arrested for rape.
Yes, Montgomery County, Maryland.
No, we live in astonishing times, absolutely astonishing times, but the fact that a white man can't stand up and say no to mass immigration on a billboard leads us to yet another story about white men.
Well, we've got a couple of white men stories, and we're running out of time here, so I'm going to try and keep this one quick because this hour has flown by.
I hope you've enjoyed this podcast, ladies and gentlemen.
This is, by the way, episode 146.
So, this story is about one we've talked about before, and that is we're seeing in a lot of these Ivy League schools and prestigious universities across the country, as the student body, the undergraduate enrollment gets more diverse, they see the white past looking back at them in pictures.
Portraits.
And as Steve Saylor put it best in a tweet today, he said, the white men of the past are hated less for their sins.
than for their contributions.
I thought that was very profound.
So I'll read briefly from this story.
So a few years ago, Rachel Maddow of MSNBC was at Rockefeller University to hand out a prize that was going to be given to a prominent female scientist.
She entered the auditorium and someone heard her say, hey, what's up with the dude wall?
She saw a wall covered with portraits of scientists from the university who've either won a Nobel Prize or the Lasker Award, which is a major medical prize.
Leslie Vossel, a neurobiologist with the university and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, she was quoted as saying, 100% of them are men.
It's probably 30 headshots of 30 men.
So it's imposing.
That's why it's the dude wall.
It is.
It's imposing.
Vossel says Matto's remark and the word dude wall crystallized something that had been bothering her for years.
She travels around the country giving lectures and attends conferences at scientific institutions.
She constantly encounters lobbies, conference rooms, passageways, and lecture halls.
that are decorated with portraits of white men.
Dead white men.
These aren't white men from ancient Greece, ancient Rome.
These aren't dead white men who founded the country.
These are the white men who founded individual universities.
who were instrumental in building these institutions.
So at a micro level, she's now attacking whiteness.
Also at a macro level.
So she's now on a committee that's redesigning that wall of portraits at Rockefeller University to add more diversity.
And this is hardly the only science and medical institution that's reckoning with its dude wall.
Your alma mater, Yale School Yale.
The Yale School of Medicine, for example, one of the main building's hallways features 55 portraits.
Three women and 52 men.
What is the common denominator between those 55 individuals?
Well, they probably all made a very significant contribution to the medical school, and are they all white by any chance?
They are all white.
So, Max Jordan Tiaki, Tiago, a medical student at Yale, said this, quote,
I don't necessarily always have a reaction, but then there are times when you're having a really
bad day. Someone says something racist to you or you're struggling with feeling like you belong
in the space, and then you see all those photos and it kind of reinforces whatever you might have
been feeling at that time. End quote.
Mr. Tiaco grew up reading Harry Potter books, and in the fictional world, portraits could talk to the characters.
And he said this, quote, if this was Harry Potter, if they could speak, what would they even say to me?
Everywhere you study, there's a big portrait somewhere of someone kind of staring you down, end quote.
So how dare all these white men and white women of the past stare down this poor, blighted soul?
You know, I suppose at some point they're going to have to go into the National Portrait Gallery where they have portraits of presidents.
What are they going to do about them?
In this case, what they're doing is they're taking a group, was it Rockefeller University?
Yeah.
Either won the Lasker Prize or Nobel Prize.
That's the criterion.
I mean, you can't change that.
You can't sort of go back in time and say, well, no, the person who won the chemistry prize, we're going to now say, was a black woman instead of this white man.
You can't do that.
Or maybe they will eventually.
I think they will.
They'll hologram it or something, you know.
But so, in effect, they're saying our history is unsatisfactory.
So to the extent possible, we are going to rewrite history.
And here's the great example.
We can move on after this.
Yale medical student, Tara Anderson, She is working with a couple of professors to get rid of all this and also do a study.
And she said this in an article that was published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine back in July.
Quote, students feel like these portraits were not just ancient historic things that had nothing to do with their contemporary experience.
They actually felt that the portraits reinforced contemporary issues of exclusion, of racial discrimination, of othering.
This is the Journal of Internal Medicine?
This is in the July issue of the Journal of General Internal Medicine.
I have absolutely no idea what that has to do with.
I would have thought it has to do with internal medicine, but apparently it has to do with internal insanity.
It has to do with waging a war on whiteness wherever whiteness may have a foothold.
Okay, well that's what our doctors are all thinking these days, I suppose.
Well, we are running out of time, so we do want to reply to this letter that we read actually two episodes ago.
And I will just go over it very briefly, what some of the main points were.
They were from a woman who is very conscious of the demographic changes in the United States, and she wanted to know How is it that, or where can she go?
Where can she go?
As she put it, I don't want to grow roots in a place my grandchildren will have to flee.
I don't want my gravestone to be littered with trash in an area where no one's name sounds like mine.
I think that's very eloquent and poignant.
And so she asked, what can I do?
Where can I go?
And sadly, the answer is nowhere in the United States.
No, nowhere.
There is nowhere where we can be sure that our grandchildren will not have to flee.
There is no such place.
And this is something I've been thinking about for some time, but one of our listeners wrote in and said we can build white communities.
We can put down our roots.
It will take some logistical planning and a good lawyer to construct the proper legal framework.
He goes on to say a group of self-conscious whites who move in and work their way into the local government could create a community regardless of state or federal politics.
The white ethos could breathe its way into the schools, the town council, town council and local businesses.
He recommends Vermont.
He says Vermont maybe may seem too cold, but global warming, warming the place up.
He said it'd be good to be near a college town, to have an elevated cultural level, and he's saying if we're talking about whites who don't have much money, we should even consider organizing collective real estate purchases, even though that obviously has difficulties.
But the point he's making is, if white people are going to have communities of that kind that we can count on, we're going to have to build them ourselves.
That was such a profound letter that we got, and we encourage you to contact us.
It's one of the most important things because that's the only way we know what you guys want to hear about.
If you have questions, if you have feedback, if you have commentary, and more importantly, in case the YouTube channel mysteriously disappears, Contact us so we know how to get back in touch with you to let you know how to find us.
This is very important.
Because we live here at ProtonMail.com.
Once again, that email BecauseWeLiveHereAtProtonMail.com or just go to Amarin.com and click the Contact Us tab and you can get right to us.
So for Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
Our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection