All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 7, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:09
Liberals on ‘The Hunt’
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, this is Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and you have just tuned in to Radio Renaissance.
I have with me our usual guest, PK, and we have another guest, an additional guest, a special guest, in the name of Colin Flaherty.
Colin Flaherty, of course, is the author of Don't Make the Black Kids Angry and of many other wonderful essays and books.
Mr. Flaherty, could you introduce yourself and tell people how to get in touch with you and what your major contributions are to goodness, truth, and beauty?
Well, let me say, I'm easy to find.
I'm the easiest guy to find on the Internet, so my whole reason for being is that I document black crime, violence, mayhem and dysfunction wildly out of proportion.
Then I also document how so many reporters and public officials are in denial, deceit and delusion.
So I'm always showing the difference between what they say has happened and what really happened.
And it's just enormous how big that gap is.
So I'm happy to be here.
Denial, deceit and delusion.
I like that.
You have a lot to work with.
Oh yeah, I got all kinds of catchphrases.
I like to trot them out regularly.
Well, I'm afraid we must begin with the El Paso shooting.
By now I'm sure our entire audience knows the details of what happened here.
There was this fellow named Crucius who walked into a heavily frequented by Hispanics shopping area in El Paso and killed about 20 people, wounded a certain number more.
But, to me, more important than the actual slaughter itself was the fact that he had put up a so-called manifesto in which he claimed that he was fighting great replacement.
And then, the reactions by Democrats.
It seems to me that the whole elite reaction to this thing has been one, first of all, blame the wrong people, misdiagnose the problem, and then start screaming wildly for the worst possible solutions.
But when it comes to blaming the wrong people, of course, the media just fell all over itself, saying that it's Donald Trump is to blame.
And beginning with some of the candidates who wish to become President of the United States on the Democratic side.
Beto O'Rourke, he was one of the most over-the-top.
He said Trump is, quote, a racist and he stokes racism in this country and it leads to violence.
Trump's language about Mexican immigrants is, quote, reminiscent of something you might hear in the Third Reich.
Pretty strong talk from Brother Beto.
And then, of course, Bernie Sanders, after the shooting, just, he couldn't really take a backseat to Beto, of course.
But he went on to say, we have a president who's a racist, who's a xenophobe, who appeals and is trying to appeal to white nationalism.
Then Cory Booker, Cory Booker, he says, I want to say with more moral clarity.
I guess he must have said something with insufficient moral clarity.
He wants to say with more moral clarity that Donald Trump is responsible for this, the mass murder in El Paso.
He's fueling an environment where white supremacists are finding more and more license to strike out against the vulnerable.
And then, of course, Elizabeth Warren.
She piled on, we need to call out the president himself for advancing racism and white supremacy.
gosh it's as though you know he marches around uh...
with uh... some kind of flag waving the white power flag or something
then uh... senator kyle harris said the president after the massacre he's quote
a racist there's no question in my mind which uh... does bring the question back to uh...
i mean if we have a white supremacist who is stimulating mass murder
uh... i think the democrats are going to start talking about impeachment again
i don't think there's a possibility that but what makes
some of this stuff about blaming donald trump particularly
annoying to me is that all of these shooters who have
at least understood the shooters manifesto to say that he was fighting
for replacement and this was an invasion by mexicans that he was turning back
single-handedly What did he himself say about whether or not Trump had anything to do with it?
Well, this is what he said.
My opinions predate Trump and his campaign for president.
I'm putting this here because some people blame the president for the attack.
This is not the case.
The media is infamous for fake news.
Their reaction to this attack will likely just confirm that.
Of course, he was absolutely right.
These people, it just strikes me, the utter shamelessness of blaming Donald Trump when the fellow himself says, my actions had nothing whatsoever to do with Donald Trump.
And I might point out that over the very same weekend where this massacre and the one in Dayton, Ohio took place, that very same weekend in Chicago alone, 54 people were shot and 7 are dead.
But this is, of course, nothing like news in the United States.
Well, Mr. Flaherty, what is your sense of this kind of blame game that the media and the Democrats have been indulging in as far as Donald Trump is concerned?
Well, I think the big takeaway from the third day after this big story hit is the enormous level of anti-white rhetoric that I've never seen it like this before.
And so everybody is saying the same thing, what you just read from the candidates, the people on MSNBC, CNN, all the legacy media, we don't have to name all 200 of them.
And so that's the big takeaway, is this anti-white hostility now is reaching new levels, reaching a new level of normalcy.
And you know, in the mass shooting things, of course, for the last six weeks, I've been documenting every week, every week, through headline by headline by headline, story by story, how many mass shootings there are in the country.
And I've been shooting three or more and I've been coming up with 20, 25, 30, 38 mass shootings,
always over 90% committed by black people. Like you were talking about the 46 people in Chicago.
Well, in Chicago, last weekend, there were two mass shootings.
One, eight people got shot.
One, seven people got shot.
In Philly, there was five people got shot.
There was a couple of fours and a couple of threes.
So, when I hear people going, white shooting is a mass thing, mass shooting is a white thing, That's purely, just 100% not true and it's way worse.
Like today I saw a headline that said, I think it came from some website that tracks them and said, 51% of the mass shootings are black people.
No, even the New York Times figured that out better.
They said 75%.
My numbers, recent numbers this year, I've done this year literally 15 stories on this mass shooting, who's doing it.
It's up around 85, 90%.
The only way you can get to a 51% number Is if you ignore a good number of shootings or if you somehow start classifying these shootings or something like saying like, well, we're not going to count drug shootings and we're not going to count gang related shootings.
We're basically not going to count most shootings where black people are involved.
Yes.
Wasn't, wasn't.
Yes.
Wasn't that in effect, Mayor Bill de Blasio's explicit reply.
When he was railing about all of these white people who are shooting folks up, that they're a menace to society, and somebody said to him, well, don't we have shootings like that in New York City all the time?
He says, oh, no, no, no.
We don't put them in the same category.
I heard that on NPR, so it must be true.
Well, here's the fascinating point about that article that was at Front Page Magazine by Daniel Greenfeld, where he pointed out, he looked at this website, MassShootingTracker.org, for the vast majority of these mass shootings, and that is when four more people are shot.
That's how they classify a mass shooting.
The shooter's unknown.
So that's what it states.
So when Daniel Greenfield comes out and says, well, 51% of known shooters are black.
Hey, Daniel, just here's a stat for you, pal.
Heather McDonald found out that in 2014, 99% of non-fatal shooting suspects in Chicago are non-white.
78% of those are black.
Only 1% of non-fatal shooting suspects in Chicago, which by the way is a 33% white city in 2014, were Caucasian, were white people.
As Colin has stated, these numbers that are being thrown around, I've seen this story Republished by a lot of people, Colin.
And again, you actually go to the MassShootingTracker.org.
No, PK, I did that today.
And I said, I just thought, and I thought the same thing I just said.
Sorry to interrupt.
But then I, so I looked, I started looking at their shootings and the very first, they have four, the very first four they listed, they said three were unknown.
Totally true.
I mean, of course they're known.
The three they said were unknown shooters were black people.
Yeah.
And I identified that in my article.
And so you have to work really, really hard to pretend that a mass shooting at 1 a.m.
in the ghetto in Chicago is not a black person.
But again, that's the information I'm getting from local cops.
Well, Mr. Flaherty, I understand that you do have contacts really all around the country, that you've built such a reputation for reporting these things that people will give you information that may not even necessarily appear in the press, but you've done extraordinary work in tracking down all of these diligently, exhaustively, and my guess is that nobody in the country has better numbers than you do.
I have so many cops telling me so many stories.
You know, I really encourage people, if you know a cop, go ask them what you heard on this show and see how they react to it.
You know what they're going to say?
It's way worse than PK and Jared and Colin say it is.
Well, go back to 2016.
Go back to July of 2016.
All the rhetoric we had seen over there because we've got the fifth anniversary of the Michael Brown-Darren Wilson encounter in Ferguson, Missouri coming up next week.
And think about just how anti-police, anti-white police, anti-white cop, basically, the rhetoric had gotten.
And the night that the Dallas massacre took place, when the Black Lives Matter inspired sniper shooting of, was it 12 white cops that were shot and 5 died, I think?
Barack Obama gave a speech that day denouncing the racist cops.
And as we found out last week, when that report came out, that white cops are less likely to shoot than black cops are.
A black perpetrator, a black suspect.
Yes, the media were very hesitant to report that, but it sort of trickled into the news.
Yeah, just this demonization.
Colin has written about this so... Splendid is the wrong word, because it's so tragic.
You know, people who want to serve their communities.
It's like what we saw in Galveston yesterday, where the Twitter storm was able to shame the Galveston police because they had two white cops on horseback leading a criminal, who happened to be black, down the street.
And everyone went crazy.
You know, the connotations that brings up.
And then someone showed a picture of two black cops who were doing it to a white guy that they had tied to a horse as they were bringing.
And it's like, well, wait a minute.
This is what they do.
The Galveston police apologized.
It's like, guys, punishment is supposed to be severe or it serves no purpose.
Come on, guys.
No, to the extent that you do have direct contact with the police, Mr. Ferguson, they must be absolutely disgusted with the way the brass and the city fathers are always blaming them for doing their jobs.
You know, you think about the young people thinking about being a cop today, and I have to tell them, listen, if you become a cop, you're going to go to work for somebody that hates you.
Why do you want to spend the next 25 years of your life working for people who hate you?
You don't get that.
Well, you know, the last time I got stopped for speeding, I had a very pleasant conversation with a very pleasant policeman who wrote me a very unpleasant ticket.
But I asked him, do you not find that these days people are hesitating to become a policeman?
He said, that is for sure.
He said 30 years ago, when he applied to be a state trooper, there were 350 applicants for two jobs.
He says, now we are scraping the bottom of the barrel, and we're getting in losers.
And so, obviously, people have understood that being a policeman in the United States today is one of the hardest, most thankless, most vulnerable jobs in the world.
The only people who are coming in are the ones that they actually have to drag in by their heels, and many of them are not very good.
I foresee very bad times ahead.
Let us move on, sticking to the question of the reaction to the El Paso shooting here, to Mexico's reaction.
I was particularly amused that Mexican Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard, he says that Mexico is going to sue the U.S.
He's threatening to take legal action against the United States for failing to protect its citizens after the mass shooting in El Paso.
Of the twenty people who lost their lives at the Walmart, at least seven were Mexican citizens.
So, he says that Mexican officials will also be participating in the investigation.
I mean, that'll be the first time that's ever happened.
This is an American citizen caught on American soil for committing an American crime.
He says they're going to participate in the investigation and the trial and will consider asking for extradition.
For heaven's sake, this makes absolutely no sense to me.
But, when you think about it, there is an extraordinary amount of impudence involved here.
After all, there were 36,000 murders in Mexico last year for a record rate of 29 per 100,000.
In the U.S., the rate is 5.3.
They have gotten more than five times the murder rate, but Mexico is going to sue the United States for not having properly protected their citizens?
This is just astonishing to me.
And in fact, if you think about the Mexicans who were killed on American territory, American soil, I suspect the huge majority of them are killed by other Mexicans.
How come they've never worried about that before?
To me, this is absolutely outrageous.
They think they're going to threaten us with some sort of legal action and get involved in the trial and ask for deportation.
But Mexicans, they certainly do not take a deferential position when it comes to dealing with the United States.
But, further reactions to this El Paso shooting, and one that I think all of us have good reason to look upon with a great deal of concern, is this question of the passage of so-called Red Flag Laws.
And I believe, Mr. Kersey, you were going to tell us what the latest moves are in that direction.
Before we get there, I want to ask both you gentlemen, how many homicides, do you believe, how many people murdered I lived on the border for 35 years to San Diego.
that's just across the board was the number that's that's that's the best
this evening across from el paso so what's the number of homicides
and twenty eighteen well mister flirty you are the mayhem expert uh... what
actually has a guest we know i i i i lived on the border for thirty five years
san diego i covered mexico for the san diego business journal and other places
and i'm sorry this is just a little bit of a tangent p k but people in america do not know the level of hostility
the mexican government has to Americans.
They're not down with us at all.
It's not like Canada up there.
No, the Mexican people are fine with us.
People around the Mexican government, they don't like us one bit.
So anyway, PK, whatever it is, I'll say it's 2,000.
Well, that's about, you know, you're about 40% off or above.
It's $1,259.
Homicides.
In 2018.
How many?
1,259.
1,259 homicides.
In the city of Juarez alone.
20 years from now, we're going to look back on this period and we're going to say, listen, Mexico during that time had been run by the narco, it was a narco country for a good 20 years.
That country is run by the drug dealers.
That's a plain fact.
Well, you know, some people talk about a potentially failed state in Mexico.
That would be a remarkable thing if the central government completely fell apart.
Now, the worst of it is along the Mexico-US border, but some of this craziness and utter anarchy and chaos could extend further into the interior.
On the other hand, if there are figures of 29 per 100,000 murders every year, is correct, that is still less than, I believe, El Salvador, which is in the 30s.
Yes.
So they are not the worst.
And much less than Baltimore.
Yes, Baltimore was in the 50s.
53.
Yes, 53.
Baltimore is more dangerous than any country in the entire Western Hemisphere.
That's correct.
But anyway, yes, that was an excellent diversion back to this question, what's going on in Mexico.
But, P.K., can you tell us something about these red flag bombings?
You know, I wish I didn't have to, because this is distressing to think what's happened.
After the Las Vegas Incident in 2017, the Steve Paddock shooting, we saw bump stocks banned and now after El Paso we're seeing a bipartisan support coalescing around these red flag laws.
Now of course red flag laws would allow the state to come in, it would authorize courts to issue orders allowing police to temporarily confiscate firearms from a person deemed by a judge as posing a risk of violence.
Now that requires A request from an order from a relative, a friend.
In the case of a gentleman by the name of Gary Willis in Maryland at the end of 2018, he got in an argument with his sister.
And ladies and gentlemen listening, his sister utilized Maryland's recently passed red flag laws to have the police come, show up at his house.
He had a gun in his hand.
They asked him to put it down.
He put it down.
They stated that they were going to disarm him.
He then got the gun and We're led to believe that he was shot in the process of the attempt to disarm him.
So, these are what red flag laws are.
Now, Congressional Republicans, they are, as I stated, coalescing around the legislation which would allow law enforcement to take guns from those who pose imminent danger.
Michael Turner, he's a Republican who represents the district, including Dayton, Ohio, where the Antifa shooter opened fire and killed nine people, which, of course, no one's really talking about.
He went a bit further.
He said, quote, I will support legislation that prevents the sale of military-style weapons to civilians, a magazine limit, and red flag legislation.
End quote.
Now, military-style weapons, again, he's probably referring to AR-15s, AK-47s.
I can even see him referring to maybe some of the 6.5 Credmore or 308 bolt-action sniper rifles that are becoming increasingly popular.
You know, Colin, I'm not sure if you're much of a gun guy, but what's your take on this red flag law?
I think I've sold, you know, I used to say I've sold more guns in this country than anybody else until somebody said, no, Barack Obama has sold more guns than you, Colin.
So I have to take the second spot.
But here's the thing.
It's like, okay, so they want to red flag us and take our guns.
I mean, what could go wrong?
You think of the experience people have with YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Patreon, even my t-shirt company has de-platformed me.
I mean, it all comes down to a 23-year-old girl with purple hair and nose rings saying, PK, Jared, and Colin, you can't have a gun anymore because some whack job just complained about you.
No, I don't think I'm down with that.
Deplatformed by your t-shirt company?
Gosh, you run around bare-chested these days?
Golly!
Boy, you know, we've had our printer.
Ten years we've had the same printer for print jobs.
They decided that we were just odious and that we pollute the environment and they can't do business with us either.
But I do have a question for you, gentlemen.
I'm very much a Second Amendment guy, but when this Republican, Michael Turner, talks about a magazine limit, I suppose he's talking about that hundred-round drum magazine that the Dayton shooter used.
My take is, I think a lot of these people are looking at states like California, Connecticut, Maryland, New York, Colorado even, where demographics have now enabled the Democrats to take over the state legislature in a lot of those states.
And I think you're going to see magazine limitations go into 10.
A lot of these, what this Congress critter calls Military-style weapons in those states, you can only have a 10-round magazine with your AR-15 that shoots .223 or your .308, or even handguns.
Yeah, I've never actually seen in the flesh a 100-round drum mag, but it seems to me if you've got that attached to a weapon, you're carrying around an awful bulky, heavy implement.
It doesn't seem like a very practical thing unless it's mounted on a bipod or something.
But be that as it may.
No, I'm sure you're right.
He's not talking about 100 rounds.
He's talking about 20 rounds, 30 rounds.
It's about 30 round magazines.
In some states you can get 40 round magazines for your .223, NATO 5.56.
But I look at it going down to handguns even.
I think that they'll say, hey, these Glock 17, Glock 19s, you can get these 33 round extensions.
Or even, my gosh, why are we selling these 9mms that come with 21 round magazine capacity.
You've got to get down to just carry a revolver.
Or what was it?
Was it Joe Biden or Barack Obama who said you could just have a double-barrel shotgun for self-defense?
That was Joe Biden.
A 12-gauge.
Good stuff, a 12-gauge.
Well, yes, but the Red Flag Law, as Mr. Flaherty was pointing out, if all it requires is someone to convince law enforcement or a judge that you are a danger to yourself or others, and to the extent that, as the New York Times says, White extremist ideology drives many deadly shootings.
We could very easily imagine a situation in which you start talking about the things all three of us talk about, and someone will say, oh, this is directly related to potential danger.
You could have no criminal record, no violent implications, simply for what you say, you could have your guns taken away from you, if this really goes bad in the way I think it could very well do.
Hey, Jared?
Yes?
The takeaway of El Paso is Every single white person in America is now a white supremacist, whether we want to be or not.
Well, of course, some of them like Beto O'Rourke are trying very, very hard to establish themselves as exceptions.
But ultimately, what you're saying is right, because whites, whether they consciously do so or not, are, of course, Inherently racist.
They are inherent beneficiaries of white privilege.
And I suppose, ultimately, if you take all of these ideas to their extreme conclusion, you would have a situation in which no white person is allowed to own a firearm.
That would probably just absolutely thrill many of these anti-white people, including people who are actually white.
But the NRA takes a position on this.
They say that, at a minimum, There has to be strong due process protections, and if this were to take place, then it would have to be accompanied by mental health treatment.
It would have to be something that was so obvious that it required that kind of treatment, and that there could be penalties against those who make frivolous claims.
Now, the fact of the matter is, maybe the two of you will consider me a miserable wet on this question, but if, in fact, there were some objective and reliable way to determine people who really were Adam Lanza types.
Here's the Sandy Hook guy.
I mean, just looking at him, you could tell he was a botched, defective nutcase.
If there were some way to really establish that someone was likely to be dangerous, then perhaps, under certain circumstances, it does make sense to take his weapons away before he commits a crime.
I'm not absolutely 100% opposed to something like that, although the way it would be enacted would be one that would be very, very disadvantageous to people like us.
Colin, I think you're still on Twitter.
I'm banned for a week.
Okay, well I've seen David from He's been going after people who posted pictures of their children with firearms saying, hey, red flag?
And I think that's actually where we're headed.
We've seen some terrifying things happen over the past few years.
You think about the acceleration and the attacks on American heritage symbols.
Something as innocuous as the Betsy Ross flag had to be removed from a Nike shoe.
Imagine you're a neighbor and you post that for July 4th or for some Memorial Day or for something you post a Gadsden flag on your outside your home and a neighbor sees it and they're terrified because they've been indoctrinated to believe that wow that is a symbol of Nationalism that's only a racist would fly that flag.
I'm gonna go talk to the police I'm gonna we've got to step in here.
We've got to stop this I mean, I'm looking at this quote on Twitter from a female actress by the name of Roseanne Arquette She tweeted a couple hours ago Quote, I'm sorry I was born white and privileged.
It disgusts me, and I feel so much shame.
End tweet.
I feel ashamed that I ever used to think she was hot.
She was pretty hot in True Romance.
Early 90s film.
But no, she's the one who tweeted out last week that 99% of mass shootings are done by white men.
Again, I think a sizable portion of the country believes this.
Going back to what we talked about with Dayton, and going back even a week later, earlier, to the Garlic shooting at the Garlic Fest there in California, I think a lot of people have... they believe that these shootings were all done by quote-unquote white supremacists.
Well, here's the thing, and I'm sorry for being Captain Obvious here, but We're not going to stop mass shootings by grabbing everybody's guns.
That won't stop anything for 10 years.
The only way to stop mass shootings is to have everybody in the country put a revolver in their pocket when they go to Walmart so they can take care of war.
Give every teacher in the country a revolver or something to put in their pocket.
That'll stop these things overnight.
Or better mental health.
Actually having reopening state facilities that were shut down decades ago.
Well, ultimately, these red flag laws are going to be an end run around the First Amendment.
Correct.
It's going to be a way, legally, to punish dissenters, simply for saying things.
I mean, it would not necessarily happen that way, but I feel sure that that is the direction things are going to go in.
So, I'm certainly opposed to them, and it was a disappointment to me that in his speech on Monday, Donald Trump called for such laws at the federal level.
And this leads to a different little story we have to talk about here.
When he called for red flag laws, he denounced white nationalism, he denounced white supremacy, he said these sinister ideologies must be defeated, hate has no place in America, and he said that as far as white supremacy is concerned, the nation must condemn it with one voice.
And also that's when he called for these red flag laws.
Well, the next day the New York Times had a headline.
Trump urges unity versus racism, which is in fact what he'd done.
He urged the nation to condemn it with one voice.
Now this seems to me to be an unobjectionable headline to me.
That's in fact exactly what he said.
Precisely.
It's objective.
It's highly objective.
Yes.
Trump urges unity versus racism.
Well, apparently an objective account of what Donald Trump said is unacceptable to the readers of the New York Times.
Dozens of people claimed to have unsubscribed or threatened to unsubscribe because of this tendentious, obviously fawning and subservient account of Donald Trump's speech.
And astonishingly enough, presidential hopeful on the Democratic side, Senator Cory Booker said, Lives literally depend on you doing better.
NYT, please do better.
This single headline is going to cost lives.
Beto O'Rourke, in here with his usual exaggeration, said that this headline was unbelievable.
Soledad O'Brien, the lady journalist, she called it an absurd headline, problematic framing, inaccurate, non-contextual.
And then there's a New York Times Magazine contributor, Yashar Ali, of whom I had never heard before.
He says, it wasn't just the readers, but Times staffers.
And to quote him, he said, they feel like their hard work is being sullied by a horrible headline.
Good grief!
These people think, I guess, clearly, they believe they work for a propaganda mill.
And if you simply describe Trump's speech as What it was.
It is calling for unity against racism.
That is doing, that is undermining all of their hard work of propaganda.
And as Soledad O'Brien says, it was non-contextual.
Yes, he may have said that, but we must remind the readers that he is a white supremacist and a racist and doesn't really believe it.
That's got to be in the headline too, I suppose.
Well, the New York Times quickly changed the headline to, assailing hate, but not guns.
This story is just astonishing.
It's appalling if it wasn't a pattern.
Back in 2016, the Memphis Commercial Appeal had on their front page of a newspaper after the shooting in Dallas that we spoke of earlier, the front page headline was, quote, gunmen targeted whites.
The very next day, Mr. Flaherty and Mr. Taylor, the editor of the paper, Lewis Graham, wrote a front page apology saying, quote, we got it wrong. He said, simply put, we got it
wrong.
Those three big words and headline type stretched across Saturday's front page.
Gunmen targeted whites were true, according to police accounts in Dallas at the time,
but they badly oversimplified a very complex, rapidly evolving story and angered
many of our readers and many more in the broader community.
End quote. Angered our readers for telling the truth.
Yes, yes.
Well, I mean, that was the Dallas case, right?
That was the Dallas case.
It was in the Memphis paper.
He would actually go on.
This is the crucial sentence that he would write.
Quote, In my view, the headline was so lacking in context as to be tone deaf, particularly in a city with a 65% African American population.
End quote.
That's just it.
This was exactly what Micah Johnson planned.
He wanted to shoot white people, and he wanted to particularly shoot white police officers, and that's exactly what he did.
There's no black and white involved.
Sorry.
There's no context.
It's going back to the whole concept of context as king, and the non-contextual, inaccurate framing of Soledad O'Brien's view.
It's like, no, this is simply what happened.
It's indisputable that a A black individual motivated by Black Lives Matter.
And Colin, how many of those cases have you documented that happened in 2016 in the lead up to that election, where Black Lives Matter influenced blacks when they shot police?
There were a couple more, weren't there?
Wasn't there one in Baton Rouge?
There were tons and tons of them.
I mean, we just kept documenting them over and over.
But, you know, this black on cop hostility, you know, you can use the excuse for Black Lives Matter.
They don't need an excuse.
The fellas don't like cops.
They hate cops.
It's very plain.
It's on the surface.
They tell you.
We see it every day.
Ask a cop.
Jared, in the experience you had, 100% of the... When you ask a cop, how many times when they pull over a black person, will the person say, you're only pulling me over because I'm black?
It's not 99.9%.
It's 100%.
Well, I can't remember if I mentioned this on a previous podcast, and if I did, I apologize to our listeners, but that very same policeman, I did have a conversation about that because as soon as he stopped me, he said, do you know who I pulled you over?
And I said, well, yeah, I guess I was going pretty fast.
And then he gave me the ticket and we started talking about what it's like to be a policeman these days.
And I said to him, well, look, how often do you get yelled at from a black person that says, hey, you just stopped me because I'm black.
Oh, but before that I'd asked him, I'd asked him, I was thinking about that while he was giving me the ticket, why did he ask me that question?
And I said, why did you ask me why I, why you stopped me?
He said, you wouldn't believe the things, the things people blurt out if they've got a bad conscience.
If they might have just robbed a bank and they'll say, oh, I guess, I guess you caught me for that bank robbery.
It's just quite astonishing.
You always ask that question.
Do you know why I stopped you?
That woman I beat up must have phoned in.
Whatever it is, people blurt out something.
Well, he says, you can't believe the number of black people when he stops them.
They'll say, yeah, you stopped me because I'm black.
Well, he explained to me that the only reason he stopped me was there had been a radar detection that I was speeding
way down the road from before he even saw me.
The radar picked me up, not even knowing how many people were in the car,
even what the make of the car was.
And he says, he gets this all the time.
All the time.
But he said something else that I thought was very interesting.
He said, you wouldn't believe how quickly Middle Eastern women have picked this up.
That Middle Eastern women will say, oh, you're just prejudiced against Muslims.
They really learn quickly.
He says, no, he's sick of it, but it happens all the time.
Exactly as you say, Mr. Flaherty.
Everybody knows the script, don't they?
They learn mighty quickly.
Well, it's like all these people who show up at the border, don't speak a single word of English, except asylum.
But anyway.
Well, speaking of asylum, I'm thinking it's increasingly something we should be looking for from another country, because there's a film coming out from a friend in Hollywood, and I use that term loosely.
It's called The Hunt, and I encourage you, listening, wherever you are around the world to stop this podcast for a brief moment.
No, don't do that!
Go to YouTube and watch the trailer before you continue on.
We'll wait.
We'll be right here.
All you have to do is just pause and you can watch the trailer and you'll know what we're talking about because Context is King and this movie The Hunt, which is coming out, it's about elite liberals, primarily white liberals, who kidnap, make America great again, MAGA types, deplorables, Irredeemables, and stalk and kill them for sport.
Early dialogue includes, quote, did anyone see what our rat fucker-in-chief just did, end quote.
One character asks early in the screenplay, another responds, quote, at least the hunt's coming up.
Nothing better than going out to the manor and slaughtering a dozen deplorables, end quote.
This reminds me of That little short story, The Most Dangerous Game.
Did you guys ever read this?
Oh sure, yes.
Great little story.
Yes.
Well the hunt, the original title was Red State vs. Blue State.
Now employees in different departments were actually questioning the wisdom of making such a movie in these times.
The Hollywood Reporter noted of the studio that's bringing this out.
It's an 18 million dollar film.
This isn't some low-budget Uh, shock film, you know, this has a sizable budget behind it.
It's going to be an R rated film from producer Jason Bloom.
It's going to be coming out in theaters on September 27th and Colin, I have a feeling you'll be there opening night to watch it.
Well, I'll tell you, you know, that money's not going to make it.
That movie is not going to make any money in the, in the States.
It will make money overseas.
They eat this anti-American racist, white American stuff up over there.
I'm not so sure this is going to be such a success overseas.
That's an interesting proposal.
I think it's more likely to be successful here in the United States.
All of these people... I'll bet you a quarter on that.
What's successful?
We'll see.
We will see how it does.
I'll get back with you on this.
Some of these civil rights porn movies have come out recently.
Think back to the one that a lot of people thought was going to be an Academy Award Potentially an Academy Award winning film, and that was the Nat Turner movie that came out and bombed.
I believe that the director, I think he had gotten involved in actual physical harassment, or did he beat his girlfriend?
And he got a lot of negative press, and that derailed some of the Oscar talk.
But most of these films, quickly, people love them.
I mean, look at the reaction that the top film critics had to Quentin Tarantino's movie, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.
They attacked it for being too white.
They attacked it because it was just glorifying white males.
And they noticed that.
And of course, we noticed the exact opposite.
We noticed a time where nobody had to apologize for being white.
I encourage our listeners to actually go check out that movie.
See, this movie apparently, it's R-rated because it's got very, very graphic violence.
And in one of the trailers, I hope I'm not spoiling things for some of you, but there's a woman who takes a stiletto heel and smashes it into the eye, straight into the eye of one of the deplorables.
Now, there may be a certain amount of success for people who just enjoy seeing gratuitous
violence, but I'm not sure that overseas people are going to understand white people killing
white people over political disagreements.
Well, we shall see.
Yes, we shall see.
Expected in theaters September 27th, although I'd heard that they had pulled some of their advertising about this out of respect for the people who died in Dayton and in El Paso.
But I think that kind of reverence and respect is not going to last long.
Well, based on the reports that we've seen coming out of what the Dayton shooter, what motivated him, it seems like that same animus that this movie is trying to, seems to be the main Vocal point of the movie.
Well, yes, it, the idea is anyone who has voted for Donald Trump is fair game for murder.
Now, they claim that this is ironic, this is tongue-in-cheek.
Well, there's no irony left.
No.
If you made a movie about killing liberals or non-whites and said, no, no, no, this is just ironic, and if you look at the trailer, it doesn't seem the least bit ironic.
There's no irony at all.
There's no irony at all.
Hey, Jared and PK, this might be just a touch-off script.
But the biggest earthquake in the popular culture about this exact topic this week was the death of Toni Morrison, Obama's favorite novelist, his favorite book, Song of Solomon, where it documents how every single white person in America is fair game for murder!
We've actually got a lot to talk about Toni Morrison.
Let's bring her up.
Sure, let's talk about Toni Morrison.
I mean, I put this on my podcast last night, a 20-minute segment from her book, because I just couldn't believe what was in there.
Step by step, why white people are bad, why white people, including John F. Kennedy, FDR, and Albert Schweitzer, why they're all bad people, why they all should be killed, And this is the person we're lionizing right now as the greatest literary talent since Shakespeare.
So compared to Toni Morrison, that movie is nothing.
Well, are you talking about Song of Solomon?
Is that the novel?
You know, I've not read that.
Well, read chapter six.
It's a monologue between Guitar and Milkman where they have a long discussion about why they should kill white people and nobody gets a pass.
Well, as I understand, I did read a summary of it.
Apparently, they have come up with this secret society called Seven Days, and it's composed of seven black men, each of whom is assigned a day of the week to kill a white person at random, but only every time a black person is murdered and the assailants are left unpunished.
Of course, according to Toni Morrison, that happens 20 times a day, every day, so there's no lack for pretext.
And, of course, it's driven by the firm belief that whites are unnatural people who, under the right circumstances, just naturally murder and pillage.
And, apparently, Adolf Hitler, according to this guy, Gittar, as you mentioned, murdered Jews only because there weren't any blacks around.
Now, according to the summary that I read, there is some black character who tries to talk them out of this.
No, he's a little bit of a foil, but he doesn't... No, nobody's talking anybody out of anything.
They're just kind of just walking him through it.
So you've read Song of Solomon?
Oh yeah, yeah, sure.
And see, here's the thing.
What I talked about on my podcast was all these people are glorifying Toni Morrison, who have not read the book, who have only experienced it third hand, and they think she's some kind of major race, bringing people together.
No, this is a very nasty, hate-filled, overrated writer, And we're just not going to hear that in the obituaries over the next 72 hours.
There is no racial reconciliation within any of her prose, and it's important to note, of our listeners who haven't heard Colin's podcast yet, Barack Obama famously said that this novel we're talking about, Song of Solomon, quote, taught him how to be, end quote.
Taught him how to think.
Michelle Obama said she's read it three times.
Wow.
And for those who don't know, Toni Morrison passed away.
She had been a professor emeritus at Princeton University.
Her resume is incredible in terms of the accolades that she's racked up.
She won the National Book Critics Circle Award in 1988.
She won the Pulitzer Prize and the American Book Award.
She's a graduate of Howard University in Washington.
P.K., don't forget the big enchilada.
Oh, we'll get to that.
The Nobel Prize.
She got that, but it's important to look at all this.
She was the first black female editor in fiction at Random House, and as you noted, the Nobel Prize in literature back in 1993.
What was that?
That was a year before South Africa, Nelson Mandela, right?
94?
That's true.
So in 1996, the National Endowment for the Humanities P.K., here's one thing I was curious about.
So we see all these great obituaries.
If you see an obituary of Robert Frost or another great writer, aren't they going to reproduce some of their writings?
Look to see what they reproduce from Toni Morrison's writings.
Nothing.
Well, I'll tell you what.
I'll reproduce something for you real quick.
In the, I think this was the New York Times obituary, it pointed out that she said that there were, quote, two things I want to see in life.
One is a white kid shot in the back by a cop.
Never happened.
The second thing I want to see, a record of any white man in the entire history of the world who had been convicted of raping a black woman.
Just one.
End quote.
Yes.
Also, this was in an interview with Charlie Rose.
She said about this, she says, if I take your race away, and there you are, all strung out.
All you've got is your little self.
And what's that?
What are you without racism?
Are you any good?
Are you still strong?
Are you still smart?
Do you still like yourself?
I mean, these are questions.
White people have a very, very serious problem.
They should start thinking about what they can do about it.
She says this to Charlie Rose.
That is her view of all white people.
But I think actually it is worth continuing with this list of awards that was lavished on her by what she no doubt considers an absolutely frothing with the racist society.
We've gotten as far as, let's see, she got the National Book Foundation's Medal of Distinguished Contribution to American Letters.
And President Barack Obama, who of course was taught how to be by her book, gave her the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
That's the highest civilian honor.
In 2016, she received the Penn Ball Saul Bellow Award for achievement in American fiction.
She got a Grammy Award for Best Spoken Word Album.
And she has an honorary Ph.D.
from a whole string of universities, and we'll just start with Harvard.
And she's got an honorary Ph.D.
from the University of Geneva, and one from Oxford.
Moreover, she has received the Commander of the Arts and Letters from the French.
Even the French think she's wonderful.
I mean, this is just the beginning.
If you go to her Wikipedia page, I just selected some of the highlights here.
This goes on and on and on.
So Jared, these are awards given to her by people who have not read her book.
There's only two groups of people who read her book.
Black people and college students who are forced to read it.
Nobody goes into a bookstore saying, hey, you got that Toni Morrison page turner?
Look, look, look.
I hate to disappoint you.
I bet you the people at the University of Oxford, probably some people at Harvard, have read her book and they love it.
They probably have dog-eared copies of Song of Solomon and they can't stop reading chapter 6.
I'd like to read from her essay that she wrote in 1976 which I think is very informative of who she actually is and her worldview.
She recalled watching her father attack a white man he discovered lurking in their apartment.
My father, distrusting every word and every gesture of every white man on earth, assumed that the white man who crept up the stairs one afternoon had come to molest his daughters and threw him down the stairs and then our tricycle after him.
I think my father was wrong, but considering what I have seen since, it may have been very healthy for me to have witnessed that as my first black-white encounter.
Holy cow!
This goes back to that book, Hate Crime Hoax, where even Tim Wise, somebody who hates everything about American society, wants to tear it down brick by brick.
He agreed with Jared Taylor when it came to analyzing FBI crime stats.
When it came to black-white violent encounters, 82% to 85% of violent acts of crime are black-on-white in this country.
And here is Toni Morrison saying in this essay from Well, clearly someone who's not very fond of white people.
So this is my sweet spot, of course, right?
So when I started reading and writing about this, I looked at everybody thinking that white people are roaming the country attacking black people.
But it's actually the opposite, just like PK just said.
And still that narrative still dominates today.
So that's what I do every day.
I just expose this.
I call it the greatest lie of our generation.
The black people are relentless victims of relentless white racism all the time, everywhere.
That explains everything.
It's a lie.
Well, you know, there has been another great example of black victimization by white people.
And PK is going to tell us all about it.
Well, we have to take ourselves to 70% black Baltimore and to an 83% black area of that city.
We're talking about West Baltimore.
And that was where an effort by a bunch of white conservatives led by pro-Trump activists, Scott Pressler, They rolled their pickup trucks into this 83% community in West Baltimore.
It's pretty much the most impoverished neighborhood in the entire city.
That's where, what's the congressman, Elijah Cummings, that's where he represents.
And they proceeded to suck the blood out of the neighborhood, right?
They went looking for people to beat up and attack, I think.
They went looking for a CVS to burn down.
That's right.
They went looking, you know, you know what they did?
You know what they did?
They went and they cleaned, I think, 12 tons of trash.
They picked up 12 tons of trash.
They brought with them brooms.
They brought with them bags to get the trash.
They brought with them shovels.
They brought with them things to sweep.
They brought with them sweat.
They brought with them tears.
And they brought with them hope.
And you know what?
They went there and they cleared alleyways of old tires, food containers, paper, and other debris.
They pulled up weeds and cut away overgrown grass.
And in one afternoon, like I said, more than 170 people, largely white people, it was spontaneous gentrification.
They came from all over the country and they cleaned up 12 tons of trash.
Well, the editors at the Baltimore Sun put out an editorial where they said, basically, call us skeptical.
They attacked the idea that these white guys, these white people, these white conservatives, these Trump supporters would come into Baltimore, And how dare they, how dare they come in here and verify every stereotype that people have of Baltimore.
This is what they said.
If this is, if this was all about Americans helping Americans, Baltimore Sun editorialized, why all the videos of Baltimore residents thanking Mr. Trump for bringing attention to the issue?
We happen to know that not everybody in West Baltimore feels that way.
And it's the same posts as videos.
Why the frequent reminders that it is in the, that it is, In fact, in Mr. Cummings district.
Um, there's even the, even the Baltimore Sun even noted that these, uh, these white Trump supporters who went and cleaned up this 83% black community that is like, like a, you know, rodent infested rat infested as, as has been noted.
Um, they found a Washington post front page from 2008 the day that Barack Obama was first elected.
It's there in the trash.
It's been sitting there for 11 years.
Yeah, Mr. Pressler tweeted that volunteers found this strikingly un-yellowed decade-old newspaper among the trash with the headline, Obama Makes History!
U.S.
Decisively Elects First Black President.
And he tweeted out, hey, it's been 11 years since this was here.
It's been sitting here for 11 years.
And what the Baltimore Sun noted was a not-so-subtle critique of How much good Mr. Obama did for Baltimore?
Now see, this is almost an unspeakable low blow and bad faith.
Here he's saying this thing's been around here for 11 years.
He's not saying Barack Obama did the city no good, but this is the way they read it.
It's just incredible.
Here's the line, just to get this out here for our listeners.
This is the piece de resistance.
Quote, whatever he says his motives were, Mr. Pressler's presence in Baltimore reinforces the tired image of our failing urban cores.
That the poor people in this dilapidated city can't take care of their own neighborhoods, and all the public officials around them have failed as well.
The silver lining in all of this is that the residents of West Baltimore did get a bit much needed cleaning up.
Well, no, actually, Baltimore Sun editorial writers, you basically could have just said, and you know what?
These guys did confirm.
That the residents of this area of Baltimore, which happens to be 83% black, and they elect almost entirely black public officials to represent them in local government, they are the ones neglecting it.
Jared, we've talked before about after the riots, you noted that New York Times article where the black resident of Baltimore was upset that the buildings were all falling down and no one was cleaning them up.
Well, he says, this is all that's given to us.
That's my big problem with that cleanup because there's way, way too many conservatives in this country that accept the liberal paradigm, which is there's nothing wrong with black people in this country.
We can't fix just by adjusting this enormous bundle of free stuff that we give them.
And so now the conservatives in this country go, well, you know, if we just we have a better bundle, we have a better offer for black people.
It's going to include white kids going into the ghetto to clean up.
No, no, no.
Bad, bad instinct.
Unbelievably damaging instinct.
You know, even on Breitbart, you see articles saying, in Democratic-run Chicago, there were X number of shootings over the weekend.
As if a Republican is going to change that?
This is just so short-sighted.
So stupid.
but what to do that the fact that started surgery what would be the idea that the baltimore the balsam
is keeping school on the fact that these white people showed up and removed
twelve tons of garbage
can't say thank you for the sake of a minus it's like how do you but you have
to do this and any what black people have done that with a felt any better
about it i mean but black people don't do it do that
No, they're the ones dumping.
They're the ones littering.
You'd think the ones who live there, who have real stake in the neighborhood, might do something about that.
No, it takes people from outside of the neighborhood, white people, to clean up their neighborhoods for them.
And what's funny, and what's revealing in this, hey, you know what, maybe it's not like, what's the guy's name, who's from Baltimore that everyone loves, like Tony Morrison, the writer.
Colin, he's one of your favorite writers.
Ta-Nehisi Coates?
Oh, Ta-Nehisi.
Yeah, Ta-Nehisi.
Everyone's always blaming redlining, all these things for lower property values.
Why is Baltimore a food desert?
Well, you know what?
The fact that a bunch of white people, a bunch of Trump supporters had to come in there, and it wasn't for a photo op.
These people literally believe this.
These people are true believers.
They actually, as Colin noted, these people want to help out.
They think that, oh, if they just voted Republican, things would be better.
The only reason Baltimore is a food desert is because of the demographic situation that Baltimore finds itself in in 2019.
The reason that West Baltimore has rodents and rats is because the people They don't practice proper sanitation.
How hard is this to understand?
They don't take the garbage out.
Well, they do take it out.
They just leave it in the street for 11 years.
You know, in the Baltimore Sun, I love that paper because they're part and parcel of everything going on down there.
They're the ones writing editorials endorsing the people who run the town.
Then the town goes off a cliff a long time ago and they're trying to pretend they had nothing to do with it.
No, no.
You know, they're the worst actors down there.
That's a truly awful paper.
Well, it goes back to when David Simon was writing a lot of the reports on crime, which became the book Homicide, and then he, of course, then wrote The Corner, and then he got to be the executive producer for The Wire.
All you have to do is read those books.
All you have to do is watch that show, and it's like, wait a second.
I don't think Baltimore's bad because of the lack of Republicans.
It's quite clear.
It's quite obvious.
If you just pay attention, if you just notice, there's one common denominator behind why Baltimore is bad, and it's the one thing that we're not allowed to say at all.
Or it could unravel this entire paradigm.
Well, yes, that's just it.
If you start pointing out, if you start noticing and observing, and as Mr. Flaherty does, documenting and chronicling the obvious, then the whole house of cards begins to tumble down.
We must keep our eyes deliberately and firmly closed.
Without denial, deceit, or what is it?
Delusion.
And of course, delusion.
The next thing, of course, is anybody who notices, red flag!
Give me your guns!
Well, you know, we still have so much more to talk about, but we're running out of time.
And so, once again, I would like you, Mr. Flaherty, to remind our listeners once more how to reach you and how to partake of your wisdom more frequently than we are offering them the opportunity on this occasion.
Well, I have a podcast every day, easy to find everywhere except for iTunes.
I was red-flagged off iTunes.
Is that because you're a danger to yourself or to others or both?
Yeah, all of the above.
I'm a danger to the Baltimore Sun when I call them out constantly.
OK, well, excellent.
And, of course, I would like to remind our listeners, if they like the sorts of things we say, some of you may not be aware of the fact that we have a YouTube video channel.
The videos are of a slightly different format from our more freewheeling approach to the podcast, but American Renaissance on YouTube, and you'll find a video channel.
And, of course, we invite you to come to our website at www.amran.com.
And, of course, please send us your questions and comments.
We'd love to hear from you.
On the website, it's www.amran.com at the Contact Us page.
And you can also write to... Yeah, shoot me an email.
BecauseWeLiveHere at ProtonMail.com.
Once again, that's BecauseWeLiveHere at ProtonMail.com.
So, for Colin Flaherty, for Jared Taylor, this has been PK.
Our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection