All Episodes
Previous Next
July 24, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:18
The Trump Jailbreak
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, you've just tuned in to the latest episode of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with Radio Renaissance, and with me is my co-host, Paul Kersey.
Delighted to have you here, Mr. Kersey.
And there's a lot to talk about, as always, as always.
And in this case, I'm going to say a few things about the business of crime.
Now, Mr. Kersey, I'm sure you remember that one of President Trump's great achievements, legislative achievements, has to do with something called the First Step Act.
This was signed in 2018, a bipartisan, major legislative breakthrough focusing on nonviolent offenders.
The idea was that the United States over-incarcerates.
We've got too many people in prison and this has got to stop.
And as President Trump said, this legislation reformed sentencing laws that have wrongly and disproportionately harmed the African-American community.
This from our white supremacist president, by the way.
Now, and he bragged about this at the last State of the Union address.
Well, it turns out that the first 2,243 inmates have been released under the First Step Act.
Now, as it turns out, only 960 were incarcerated for drug-related offenses.
The idea was that, oh, these are all people who are utterly unoffensive, they'll never harm a flea, they're in there under oppressive drug laws.
So, out of 2,243, only 960 were in there for drug-related offenses.
Now, as we know, People who are in for drugs often have pled down from something else.
Drug offenders are very likely to be other kinds of offenders as well.
You do not go to jail.
So what we're saying is they're arrested on multiple felonies, violence, perhaps maybe even an attempted murder charge, but their lawyer strikes a deal with the district attorney and And largely these are happening in urban areas.
We're talking about Philadelphia, Chicago, St.
Louis.
They strike a deal.
They go to jail for, as you said, the drug charges.
That's right.
And many of these, if drugs really were the thing, it's because they were caught with about 12 tons of marijuana crossing the border.
They are really serious drug dealers.
So, in any case, we got this 2200.
is 2,200. As it turns out, of this number, 496 were in the big house for weapons or explosive-related
crimes, 239 were for sex offenses, 178 for fraud, bribery, or extortion.
118 for burglary or larceny.
106 for robbery.
And 59 of these people who got to walk on account of this lovely new benevolent policy promoted by our president were in for homicide or aggravated assault.
That's attempted murder.
Now this president, prior to his even being nominated for the Republican opportunity for
president back in 2016, he claimed he was going to be the law and order candidate.
That's all he kept talking about during the primaries.
And then after the Dallas shooting in 2016 where five white cops were killed, seven more
were injured in a Black Lives Matter targeted attack on white cops there in Dallas right
after July 4th, 2016, he came out and said again about Hillary Clinton.
Hey, I am the law and order candidate.
Me.
I am.
Well, data doesn't prove that, pal.
It doesn't seem that way.
And these people are walking, and I hope someone will take very careful notes as to how many of these become recidivists and for what kinds of crimes.
Now, it's interesting also that of this 2,200, just under half are black, who've gotten out for a good time.
So, you know, you could argue maybe it is, maybe it isn't doing what he's saying, correcting a lot of these disproportionate harms that have been perpetrated against the African-American community.
But in any case, more whites than blacks.
1017 blacks, 1129 whites, and then just a sprinkling of American Indians and Asian
Pacific Islanders, 35 of them. So look out folks!
Some of these people are probably headed your way, thanks to our benevolent Congress and our benevolent President.
Well, it's fascinating to think that Kim Kardashian has had more of an impact on President Trump's domestic policy than pretty much any of his supporters have had on his domestic policy, especially when it comes to immigration.
Again, this is a president who continues to talk a big game.
We're going to get into some of those details.
Last week, we actually joked About how many illegals did he actually get?
And we were wondering what the number was going to be.
And this is called a teaser, ladies and gentlemen.
We're going to give you that number in a few minutes.
But in the meantime, I would like to talk about a fascinating article that appeared in the summer 2019 issue of City Journal.
City Journal is published by the Manhattan Institute.
Some of the best articles for it are written by Heather MacDonald, whom I consider to be an absolute national treasure.
But this is an article entitled, Everything You Don't Know About Mass Incarceration.
This article points out that for the 25 declared candidates for the Democrat nomination for president, one of the ideological litmus tests is to be a firm believer in the idea that the American criminal justice system is racist and overly punitive.
And they're all promising loads of reform.
Get these people back out on the streets where they will become model citizens.
Now, the idea, once again, is that they're all in there for being caught with a smoke and a joint.
Not so.
It is true that half of the federal prisoners are in there on drug charges.
But again, these people are in there on federal because they have been caught crossing crossing borders, crossing state lines.
These are big-time dealers.
But federal inmates are only 12% of all American prisoners.
Now, in the state system, which holds 88%, in that system only 15% are there for drug offenses.
And again, as Mr. Kersey has explained, a lot of these are plea deals.
They're just the kinds of person who's likely to do other crimes.
Now, four times as many state inmates are behind bars for one of five very serious crimes.
Murder, 14.2%.
As many people are in for murder as for drugs.
Rape or sexual assault, 13%.
Robbery, 13%.
This is strong arm or armed robbery.
Aggravated or simple assault, 10.5%.
Burglary, 9.4%.
These are crimes that Every American, practically every American, agrees these are people, these are bad hombres who deserve to be in prison.
You'd like to think so, that most would, but again, you never know.
The rate at which the literature is coming out, starting with the holy grail of criminal justice reform, Michelle Alexander's book, The New Jim Crow, I actually think a lot of the black intellectuals who are ensconced in academia in these positions of of power.
I mean, you constantly see these stories coming out of some black PhD who says, oh, you know, time is a racist concept.
They have all the power now because they have a position in academia, they're tenured, and they're capable of agitating for the release of black criminals from jail.
Because again, they still, they'll look at this article, Mr. Taylor, and they will let They won't let the facts cloud their judgment, their prejudices, that the criminal justice system is nothing but a white supremacist structure.
It's a religion.
It's a religion.
And, as this article points out, once again, it's in the City Journal, summer 2019, one in five state drug offenders serve less than six months, and 45% serve less than a year.
So it's not as though they are being hung out to dry forever for some sort of drug offense.
And this, I think, is one of the most significant findings of all.
More than three quarters of drug offenders are re-arrested for a non-drug crime.
Which just proves the point that these are bad characters.
It's not that they have an occasional marijuana cigarette on the back porch.
These are people who are generally criminals.
And it is worth noting that Baltimore police, they identified 118 homicide suspects in 2017.
homicide suspects in 2017, 70% had been previously arrested on drug charges.
Now, then, this is another astonishing finding.
This article really is full of wonderful statistics that I wish I could memorize.
Only about 40% of state felony convictions result in a prison sentence.
Not even half!
Not even half result in a prison sentence.
And then, although most state prisoners are serious and serial offenders, nearly 40% of inmates serve less than a year in prison, and the median time served is 16 months.
Just 16 months.
Was this piece you're citing, was this written by Heather MacDonald?
No, it's not by Heather MacDonald.
It's by somebody else.
It's an Italian-sounding name.
I didn't remember the fellow's name, but it's the kind of data-heavy and extremely reasonable piece that Heather MacDonald would write.
Then, and this is also very interesting too, 20% of convicted murderers and nearly 60% of those convicted for rape or sexual assault serve less than five years.
Less than five years.
You can be convicted for murder, and one out of five will serve less than five years.
Besides that, we've got these onerous, horrible, long sentences.
Now, here's another fascinating aspect here.
A January 2017 University of Chicago crime lab study found that of those arrested for homicides or shootings
in Chicago between 2015 and 2016, on average, had nearly 12 prior arrests.
12 prior arrests.
And almost 20% of them had 20 priors.
These are people who've been arrested for homicide or shooting.
Shooting is when you fire a weapon and it hits somebody but doesn't kill him.
So, on average, they've had 12 priors.
12!
What are they walking around?
Why are they still out?
And 83% of released prisoners are arrested for a new crime within nine years of getting out.
83%.
These people deserve to be there.
Recidivism.
Yeah, and this just goes to show you just how important it is to keep them behind bars because they commit so many crimes.
Furthermore, Police clear only 46.8% of violent crimes.
Not even half violent crimes.
And these are violent crimes reported to the police.
And remember, many violent crimes, assault, sometimes robbery, people don't even bother.
And of course, the police can't solve crimes they don't know about.
And they solve only 18.9% of property crimes.
One of the terrible things about this data that it fails to illustrate is that these
are largely crimes committed by blacks against blacks.
And one of the reasons why there is such a low clearance rate, even for the petty crimes
like you're talking about, is because of this new snitching.
Well, even of the most serious crimes.
Precisely, because you and I are both broken windows police aficionados.
We agree with William Bratton that that was what helped make New York City livable again after the demographic decline.
But you're talking about, as Rafael Manguel, who's the fellow and deputy director of legal policy at the Manhattan Institute who wrote this piece, he noted that the criminal justice system's imperfection Which, you know, liberals are trying to say, we've got to do everything we can to do this big jailbreak.
He says, listen, the real world consequences of these reforms that they're advocating for would be disastrous, especially for the most vulnerable neighborhoods in these communities, like the 98% black communities of, I think it's Austin, the neighborhood Austin in Chicago.
I think that's what it is, where some of the most violence occurs, or places in D.C.
and these other cities.
What's the guy's name again?
Rafael Mengual.
His surname is M-A-N-G-U-A-L.
Mingwa.
Well, good for him.
This is a great piece.
And then he goes on to point out that all of this non-clearance rate means that more than 7.5 million offenses, that's including violent and property crimes, are not cleared by the police.
7.5 million.
These are people walking around committing crimes.
They haven't been nabbed.
So clearly, a whole lot of people who should be in prison are not in prison.
And I'll quote to you one of his conclusions.
He says, Most prisoners have committed just the kinds of serious violations that most Americans agree should put them away.
And plenty of criminals already walk our streets today who committed their crimes without detection.
were released from prison or jail sooner than they should have been,
or received two light sentences given the level of their actual infractions.
And we have all of these Democrats who say, no, no, no, let them out, let them out.
I think one of the theories is that we could probably let out half the criminals in the
country because they're all good, law-abiding, church choir singing, wonderful people who are
in there because of racism and because of excess punishment of simple drugs.
This stuff is absolutely nuts.
So yes, a shout out to Manhattan Institute and City Journal for a really first-rate article.
And again, to get back to what I think are very important findings, that only 6% of all prisoners, that's the federal prisoners, are drug people and in the states it's 15% of state prisoners.
It's a very very small number.
This idea that they're just stuffed with war on drugs kind of people is wrong.
Now, more crime.
When police officers in the United States shoot minorities, black or Hispanics, and kill them, according to researchers at Michigan State University and University of Maryland, and this is a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, which is one of the most prestigious and demanding scientific journals in the country, this team discovered that Whites are no more likely and no less likely than black or Hispanic police officers to shoot minorities dead.
Of course, in the vast majority of cases, the person killed was armed and posed a serious threat or an open fire on officers.
But again, all of these people are telling us, oh, the problem with the police is it's full of white people.
If we had more Hispanic, we have more brown and black police officers, the shootings would go down.
No.
Not at all.
And Joseph Cesario, who was the lead researcher and who is an associate professor of psychology at Michigan State University, said, and I quote, I celebrate this kind of research.
disparities across shootings and white officers are not more likely to shoot
minority civilians than non-white officers. It's wonderful.
I celebrate this kind of research. It's actually being done.
It's a shame that this research isn't given to the mayor of South Bend, Pete,
whatever his name is, the guy who is raking in a lot of the money right now from
Democrat donors, especially those in Hollywood.
Remember, recall a few weeks ago, he was asked in Iowa, about hey why don't you just tell blacks in your community to stop committing crime and he proceeded to lecture and he's been attacked he lectured that white Iowan uh is that is that what they would be called Iowan?
Iowan I think so yes okay well you know he proceeded to lecture him how dare you make such a Obvious logical point, and then of course he's thrown the police force under the bus because of the shooting.
And everyone, I've gone back and read some articles about the South Bend situation, and like you just said, they've said, hey, the community, the police demographics don't reflect the community.
And as this study shows, it doesn't matter what the police look like.
White cops are not going out trying to find minorities to shoot who are not breaking the law and just acting angelic.
And you know what's happening in South Bend?
It is in complete and perfect conformity to the rule that if enough blacks yell loudly enough, some white guys got to be hung out to dry.
And they're yelling about this white police officer who shot a black.
What did they say?
He had a knife on him?
But if enough blacks make enough noise, then you've got to put some white guy under the microscope, and if possible, send him away.
But, you know, back to the study of Joseph Cesario of Michigan State University.
He said, That it is certainly true that in areas with high rates of violent crime by blacks, police are more than three times more likely to shoot a black person than a white person.
Well, of course!
If black people are committing the crimes, they're more likely to get shot.
On the contrary, and this I thought was very interesting, and I'm curious to know what sort of neighborhood they're talking about, In areas with white people more likely to be shot by police, or where whites committed many crimes.
Now, I'm guessing what that means is there are probably no black people around.
If there are very few black people around, yes, white people commit more of the crimes, and they're more likely to be shot.
Now, and this to me, this came at the end of the article about this, and this is to me the real thigh-slapping, hilarious aspect of it.
Roll the ugliness.
Melina Abdullah, who is a professor of Pan-African Studies at Cal State University Los Angeles, she says, We're less concerned about the racial makeup of police forces than we are with the institutional racism carried out by police, regardless of race.
So what she's saying, which, oh come on, it's very clear.
Oh, it's clear.
It's very clear.
She's saying it doesn't make any difference.
It could be an all-black police force and they might still be shooting black people, but because they have been institutionally brainwashed.
That is the only explanation.
You know, it used to be that, as far as crime statistics, people seem to just try to want to conceal the reality of the disproportion.
Nowadays, they don't conceal it so much as, yes, they'll talk about it.
They'll talk about arrests.
But they'll say, This isn't because they're more likely to do it.
It's because of intense racism.
It's like all the suspensions for misbehavior in school.
You don't conceal the fact that black kids are, what, five times more likely to be suspended than white kids.
You trumpet that from the rooftops, but say it's because the system is racist.
Well, here's a headline.
It's funny you say that.
I'm reading a story right now from Pittsburgh, and it's about how an annual report from Pittsburgh police shows a continuing racial disparity among the people they arrest, pull over, and frisk.
The total number of arrests, traffic stop, and frisks has dropped in recent years, but African Americans continue to experience numbers Disproportional to their population in the city.
Well, again, are they being arrested because they're committing the crime?
I mean, again, do you have a task force out there trying to go after exclusively white people to break this disproportionality that exists in every city in the country where records are kept by race?
Well, you know, in every city in the country, as soon as they swear in a new class out of the police academy, they sit them down and they tell them, It's your job to arrest innocent black people.
And they all say, yes, sir.
Yes, sir, sergeant.
And that's what they go out and do.
You know that, don't you?
You know what?
I didn't know that.
There must be people out there who believe that, though.
There must be people who believe that.
That there's just some sort of systematic instruction that they're supposed to go out and arrest innocent people.
Now, Back to this whole question of whether or not blacks are more or less likely to be shot by white police officers, this brings us back to Roland Fryer.
Roland Fryer came to my attention some time ago, and he is famous for a lot of reasons.
He completed his PhD in economics from Penn State in 2002, and in 2007, at the age of 30, he became the youngest black person ever to get tenure at Harvard.
He's a pretty, he's a magic negro, to use one of these recent expressions.
In 2008, The Economist listed Professor Freier as one of the top eight young economists in the world.
In 2011, he got a MacArthur Fellowship, and he is married to a very attractive blonde from Austria named Franziska Mikor.
That's what you do when you become a MacArthur Fellow, you know.
And unfortunately, alas, alas, just this year a Harvard investigation found that Professor Fryer had engaged in quote unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature with female employees in his research laboratory and just this month the Boston Globe reported that Fryer has been suspended for two years without pay By Harvard.
Now, why do I bring this guy up?
Why do you bring him up?
I bring him up?
You're my straight man today.
He said that after the deaths of Michael Brown and Freddie Gray and others, he became very angry.
He was very angry about what he assumed was this homicidal approach that whites take towards his fellow blacks.
So he assembled detailed data from police reports from 10 cities, including Houston, Austin, Dallas, Los Angeles, Orlando, Florida, etc.
They examined 1,332 shootings between 2000 and 2015.
And they were very, very careful to figure out the race of the person shot and the race of the person doing the shooting.
Okay.
And what he found is that officers were more likely to fire their weapons without having first been attacked when the suspects were white.
More likely.
And he found that when black and white civilians were involved in police shootings, they were equally likely to be carrying a weapon.
But, in fact, he found that officers are hesitant to open fire on blacks.
They are more willing to open fire on a white.
Which makes sense.
It makes total sense.
It makes perfect sense.
It's a cut-and-dry case.
What happened to the white guy?
There's no racial groups agitating.
There's no mass media promoting the lie of, hands up, don't shoot.
That's right.
Now, Professor Fryer called this quote, the most surprising finding in my entire life.
But you know, I remember that there was a simulation test in which police, you know, you have these in range tests when you have these laser operated weapons and things pop up and you have to decide who to shoot, not to shoot.
And they found even in those simulated tests, They hesitated to open fire on a black because every police officer in the country knows that your life can be ruined.
Your career can be over.
You can be finished if you shoot the wrong black guy.
Shoot the wrong white guy?
Who cares?
Every police officer in the country knows that.
Yeah, there's not one elected official who's going to begin to crusade on behalf of that white individual who was shot by a cop.
No, no matter what the circumstances.
Do you remember that guy in a, I think it was a Las Vegas hotel room?
He was, the police were called because he was making some kind of disturbance.
And he's crawling He's crawling on the floor and it's all on body cam and everything.
And this guy is telling him, crawl forward on your hands and knees.
This guy says, don't shoot, don't shoot.
He's on his hands and knees.
And he says, crawl forward.
And then for reasons completely inexplicable, this guy open fires with a semi-automatic rifle, shoots him dead.
Do you remember seeing the video of that?
It's hard to watch.
It's very hard.
It's the most cut and dry case of completely unjustified homicide by a police officer.
Nothing ever came of it.
Despite this video.
In any case, you're right.
But there are no pressure groups.
There are no people in the streets complaining about that.
Another white guy dead?
Who cares?
I mean, again, white people don't seem to care that much about the criminals in their midst as blacks do when it comes to agitating, as long as it can be used to pressure whites to give up more power or to concede that we say X, that means that you must give us Y. Anything to keep Whitey on the hop.
Now, I'm moving on to a different criminal.
Willem van Sponsen.
Now, I will be curious to know how many of our listeners have heard of Willem van Sponsen.
All you out there who have heard of him, raise your hands!
I don't see many out there.
I don't see anyone raising their hands, but this is a guy that I don't think anyone, in many circles, Mr. Taylor is familiar with this guy's name.
You're probably right.
I suspect that we have a few wide-awake listeners who've heard of this guy.
On July 13th, he attacked an ICE detention center in Tacoma.
He had Molotov cocktails.
He had a rifle.
He burned one car and he tried to set the building on fire.
In any case, not surprisingly, he was shot dead.
Now, he was a self-styled anti-fascist activist.
And he had a manifesto, just like Brenton Tarrant, the Christchurch shooter, just like most people do these days.
He had a nice manifesto all drawn up.
And he called for the comrades to arm themselves and follow his path.
It's time to take action against the forces of evil, he said.
And he claimed, quote, we are living in visible fascism ascendant.
That's a nice turn of phrase.
Visible fascism ascendant.
Well, No Network Except for Good Morning America, which gave him 17 seconds, talked about this.
17 seconds.
17 seconds he got.
That's a long time for TV, you know.
They really go into things in detail.
Now, the Puget Sound anarchists said that they found his actions inspiring.
They wrote, we are grief-stricken, inspired and enraged.
We need every form of resistance, solidarity and passion to fight against ICE and the borders they defend.
Willem van Sponsen gave his life fighting ICE.
He was killed doing what he loved, fighting for a better world.
And Kim Kelly, who writes for Teen Vogue.
Have you noticed the way Teen Vogue has become, aside from the lipstick, the short skirts, the makeup, this has become just the most virulent lefty propaganda organ.
It's not a periodical that I peruse that often.
I am familiar with a lot of their stories they're putting out that are That are, you would think, written as parody, but they're pushed and promoted and promulgated as part of a propaganda.
It's just astonishing.
There'll be things about the labor movement and how labor movement is important.
Teen Vogue!
And how white supremacy is ruining the country.
In any case, Kim Kelly has written loads and loads of articles about this.
She called him a... I assume it's a female, but you never know.
She called Sponsor a heroic comrade.
And it's going down.
That website said what he did was heroic.
Now, interestingly enough, there had been demonstrations against the ICE detention center in Tacoma shortly before Spronson went on his attack.
And as soon as the shooting took place, they all came back and demonstrated again.
Nobody's lying low.
And nobody's condemning this guy.
Sean King, a leading Black Lives Matter activist, he tweeted that Von Spronson was a martyr who was murdered.
He also called the Sponson Manifesto, in which he caused people to rise up and do exactly what he did, quote, beautiful, painful, devastating reading.
And just two weeks before the Tacoma attack, Sean King of Black Lives Matter tweeted that immigrants held in concentration camps should be liberated by any means necessary.
I believe he went back and deleted almost all of those tweets.
Well, he deleted the one about calling him a martyr.
But he did not delete the one saying that concentration camps should be liberated.
And you know, I don't care if people delete tweets.
That's what they said and that's what they thought.
It exists.
It exists.
And they deleted them only because somebody complained.
It makes no difference to me if somebody deleted.
That just means they're trying to hide their tracks.
If they mean what they say, they'll leave it up.
Now, it's interesting also that Von Spronson used the words concentration camps in his manifesto four times.
Now, who has brayed the loudest about concentration camps?
Oh, I think it's those four scoundrels, the rascals.
The squad.
I think Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has probably used that expression more frequently than anybody else.
She got in trouble because people said, oh, you're belittling the Holocaust.
In any case, she is Little Miss Concentration Camp.
Well, not surprisingly, Rebel Media, and hats off to them, Rebel Media cornered Congressman Ocasio-Cortez in the hallway with the television cameras on and said, would she condemn this guy?
Because he's clearly doing what she thinks.
She refused to condemn him.
That's right.
Refused to condemn him.
Ilhan Omar refused to condemn this violent attack on a government facility.
And you know, I don't think it occurred to anybody in the mainstream media that somebody might have created an atmosphere of hate.
Who radicalized this individual?
That's the question to ask.
That person, that organization needs to be deplatformed immediately.
Again, this was an opportunity for President Trump to address the nation.
This was an opportunity for President Trump to go and give an exclusive interview with Tucker Carlson or someone who can lead him and say, Mr. President, this anti-American rhetoric has now galvanized an individual to do a terror attack on our fellow citizens.
What are you going to do about it?
How hard is it for this orange man bad in the White House for President Trump to stop tweeting and actually do something that will put the pressure Back on those who have done so much since the moment he was inaugurated.
Think back to the terror attacks that happened in Washington D.C.
by this organization, this loosely based organization, the Antifa.
And all of those individuals were let go by the judge.
That's right.
They were originally indicted for inciting riot, which is pretty serious.
But no, the orange-haired man, how hard is it for him to do that?
I think too hard for him.
That's the answer.
Furthermore, this manifesto writer, Von Spronson, wrote that he had an AR-15, a ghost, that is to say an unregistered AR-15, and he called for all of his followers to do the same.
What you need is an unregistered AR-15, learn how to use it, and go out and use it.
Would you have to register weapons in Washington?
I don't know.
Maybe you do.
Interesting.
This is without a serial number or whatever it is.
Oh, I guess when someone says, oh, hey, I lost my AR-15 in a fishing accident.
Yes, exactly.
And they go report it.
Well, you know, and he walked in there with six magazines and a lot of cocktails.
And you know, it's the oddest thing.
I haven't heard anyone calling for gun control.
Well, no one's calling for gun control because the first order of business by the corporate media was to ensure that this story never saw the light of day.
And that's why we have to go back and point out President Trump had the opportunity to use this as a moment to get people behind the ICE raids that, as we're about to learn, never happened.
You have a chance to turn an organization, this government organization, that truly is trying to benefit all Americans.
We've talked about last week about how ICE is putting out Press releases about the retainers that go unrecognized by these sanctuary cities.
ICE is someone to get behind.
Orange man bad, Mr. President, President Trump, whatever you want to call you.
You have an opportunity here to brand yourself with this guy, with these men and women who are trying to do the job, and they want to do the job.
They want to go out there and make America great again.
They really do.
And, you know, I can't help but draw a contrast between the Christchurch shooting.
Now, the Christchurch shooter, of course, was much more effective.
He killed 50 people.
Was it 51 people?
I don't know that number.
No.
Regrettably, he was.
Yes.
He was a very serious offender.
He killed a lot of people.
And that does make a difference.
But this guy was attempting to do exactly the same thing.
He was incompetent.
He was a bungler.
And he didn't get it right.
I don't know of anybody anywhere who called Brenton Tarrant a hero.
No.
I don't know anyone anywhere who endorsed this stuff.
Absolutely not.
Antifa is running around saying this guy is a hero.
This guy is wonderful.
What's going on here?
And as I say, the very day he was killed, shot by police, you have Antifa people out there Promoting him at the very same facility?
Can you imagine anybody going on an anti-immigration demonstration at the mosque in Christchurch?
No.
No.
It is a completely topsy-turvy situation.
And just, if I could, do the math real quick.
Six magazines.
Yes.
AR-15 magazine is 30 rounds.
You're talking about 180 rounds this guy had on his person when he went to carry out this terror attack.
Orange man bad, Mr. President.
I implore you.
Do an address to the nation.
You know, I think that the Republicans are talking about having some hearing on Antifa or something.
There's been some word they want to call them a terror group or whatever.
Here's your story right here.
Run with this.
Address the nation on this.
And I will close this little jag on crime by quoting from a fellow named Christopher Szabo.
Christopher Szabo has a YouTube channel.
He only has about 2,000 subscribers, but just recently he put up a video called Important Message to Leftists in Memory of Will Vance Brunson.
And he goes on to say a number of things.
He says we need multiple instances like this.
We need not just one time, not just two times, multiple stormings.
Stormings of ice facilities.
Then he goes on to talk about ice agents.
We need to hang those motherfuckers from a fucking tree through all the fucking country.
Is this incitement to violence?
It sounds that way to me.
Well, and remember, dear listener, Jared's quoting from there.
Yeah, this is not the language I use.
Then he goes on to say, I advocate for the destruction of the United States.
White people should shut up and listen to people of color.
If you support ICE, you deserve a fucking bullet in your fucking head.
I think ICE deserves a fucking bullet in their fucking heads, and Donald Trump deserves a fucking bullet to his fucking head.
They are not even human beings.
They need to be hung from trees.
He says, I'm not LARPing.
Vance Bronson was not LARPing.
We must all do what he did.
Can you get any clearer than that?
I think our listeners surely know me well enough.
I think they know Uncle Jared quite well.
You're right.
This is terrifying language.
I just checked this video today.
It's up on YouTube.
Why does YouTube permit this kind of stuff but tear down American Renaissance videos?
I'm not saying that YouTube necessarily has to take it down, but this seems to me to come pretty doggone close to the specific kind of incitement for violence.
That is an incitement to violence.
But you can incite general violence apparently, but inciting specific violence, this may be in fact something that does not violate the free speech laws.
It seems to me it would come awfully close.
But in any case, you know, and then we've got people talking like this, and in the Christchurch shooting case, You can't own a copy of Brenton Tarrant's manifesto without being a criminal.
So what, in New Zealand?
Yes, I beg your pardon.
In New Zealand.
You can't.
The chief censor.
That's an official position.
New Zealand government.
The chief censor has declared this contraband and you can't own it without being a criminal.
The prime minister, I believe she put on a hijab.
I don't think we're going to see the governor of Washington put on an ice uniform in solidarity with ICE over this.
Boy, I wish you would.
That's what we need.
Yes, yes.
The contrast of this is just extraordinary.
But, as you say, the orange man has an opportunity to step forward, but the orange man is not exactly distinguishing himself, is he?
Well, one step forward, one thousand steps back.
Ladies and gentlemen, a few weeks ago we talked about these high-profile raids that were coming.
President Trump, I believe, tweeted out and said that there are going to be millions of illegals deported.
And last week we noted that William Faulkner, full of sound and the fury, tale told by an idiot, signifying nothing.
That's Shakespeare.
Is that from Macbeth?
I believe so.
Faulkner took the title, Sound of the Fury, from that speech.
Signifying nothing.
Correct.
We were joking, I wonder how many people are actually deported or captured during these raids that President Trump said were going to be millions.
Well, we learned today that the real list of those who had final deportation orders had 2,100 families on it.
The final tally from this much vaunted operation that had been delayed for two weeks, according to federal officials, 18 family members were arrested, not even enough to fit to a school bus.
And immigration officials arrested another 17 undocumented immigrants they encountered in these searches, or what they call collateral arrests.
So they weren't even those who were targeted on these lists.
So if my math is correct, and I believe it is, ICE announced that only 35 immigrants had been apprehended during this much anticipated, much Deliberated about, much attacked by the corporate media.
Again, these were... My timetable might be off here, but hadn't Trump made the announcement before that attack took place on the ice?
Yes.
That's right.
He also said, you just haven't heard about it.
We've got all of these massive arrests going on.
You just haven't heard about it.
And now ICE has to fess up and tell us the truth.
Was it 35?
35 arrests in this much-ballyhooed campaign to actually get people to leave the country after they've gotten their final deportation order.
Now, ICE did say that they arrested nearly 900 adults, most of them convicted criminals, and delivered 3,000 notices to companies nationwide that authorities are going to audit At some point, we promise they're going to audit to take a look at their records to ensure that the workers they're employing are in the United States legally.
Acting ICE Director Matthew Albence called the criminal operation successful.
I guess arresting 35 people out of a million, I'm not going to try and do the math, but that percentage, that ratio is...
Well, embarrassing.
Operation Border Resolve is what it was called.
Not much resolving going on, guys, when, you know, we're talking about these arrests.
Operation Lack of Resolve.
Now, it's funny, the first such operation In 2016, the Obama administration actually led to the arrest of 121 adults and children in Georgia, Texas, and North Carolina.
All states that have a huge illegal immigration population are on the verge of tipping blue forever because of demographic change.
And under Obama, three years ago, they arrested, my gosh, four times the amount of Or three times the amount, basically, of illegals that President Trump said was going to take place.
You know, what I hold against him, as much as anything, is simply failing to tell the truth about it.
Why is he saying, why is he saying, ooh, we're just going great guns, lots and lots of arrests going on, you just don't even know about it.
That's a complete fabrication.
In this Houston Chronicle article, there's one more little paragraph I'd like to educate our listeners on.
Immigration arrests from the interior have been flat for months as Democrat mayors, members of Congress, Democrats, church pastors, rabbis, and local residents rally to shield immigrants from deportation.
Such as one episode Monday in a Nashville, Tennessee neighborhood that thwarted at least one arrest of an illegal alien.
Federal immigration agents have long said they focus on arresting people who commit crimes and on recent border crossers, but they have struggled to detain and deport any of them.
Again, how is this not aiding and abetting a crime?
Mr. President, Orange Man Bad, again, all it would take is one high-profile call out one of these mayors, call out one of these congressmen who are shielding.
I know you've said before Mexico's doing more than the Democrats.
That's a fun talking point.
Yeah, it might be true when it comes to trying to stop the flow of illegal aliens, but Orange Man Bad?
What are you going to do?
As I understand, on that occasion, didn't neighbors and bystanders actually physically interfere with ICE agents?
They did.
Isn't that a crime?
You would think so.
You sure would think so.
And the police were not actually hindering them but refused to step in?
You lay hands on a federal agent, that's supposed to be a serious crime.
But, well, I guess our Commander-in-Chief is being consistent because, after all, I just saw a report the other day according to which the Trump administration has not installed a single mile of new wall.
Were you aware of that since he took office?
I am aware.
He called it fake news, by the way.
He called that fake news.
Well, all the fencing that's been completed since he took office is in place of what's called dilapidated designs because existing fence was in need of replacement.
Well, I'm all for that.
That's fine.
But the projects to put fencing in place where there were no fences, those are still in the works.
There are some that have been actually authorized by Congress.
They've been going around for two years this has been the case.
And the fact is the Army Corps of Engineers is better at replacement projects than new ones because the approval process for environmental and zoning permits is not nearly as onerous if there's already one there that's fallen down and you just need to put it back up again.
But, and of course, you know, to his credit, he's made some efforts.
He was going to take $6.6 billion in military and other department funding to use for border wall construction because Congress wouldn't vote it.
But the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals blocked that, so he couldn't do that.
And As you just mentioned earlier, in effect, Mexico has turned itself into President Trump's long-promised border wall.
Mexico is doing the job.
You know, it was on June 7th that they signed that agreement, Mexico and the United States, to avoid the 5% across-the-board tariff on Mexican goods.
Now, that was a very effective thing Donald Trump did.
He said, we're going to charge an extra 5%, and if you don't perform, we're going to raise the tariffs.
Well, that spoke winged words to our Mexican neighbors, and so they signed an agreement that they would really get to work.
And, according to preliminary data, Since June 8th and June 7th was signed until July 19th, there's been an average of 1,030 arrests of illegals every day.
That's 43,000 migrants that did not make it to our border because the Mexicans stopped them.
That is a data detention rate that is 88% higher than before the agreement.
Now, the deportations have also increased since the June 7th agreement.
The National Immigration Institute said that just last month, 22,000 of them were kicked out.
The highest single month since the new government took office in last December.
Now, this stuff is pretty important because if they're not even going to make it to the US border, That's going to be a real disincentive for these people who think they're going to become happy, happy, happy welfare cheats in America.
Especially if they get that court order to appear at a later date and they can disappear into the interior.
As we just mentioned, we're not seeing any deportations because they don't show up.
I think the stat close to 90, 94% don't show up for a court hearing, their court hearing, their court appearance.
And last week, do you want to say there are 900,000 case backlog for these?
Immigration judge hearings?
Yeah, they're home free.
But if they can't even make it to the U.S.
border, that's very, very important.
And you know, the Mexicans, they don't have any quibbles about sending people back if they feel like it.
None of this baloney about how, oh, if they're not from a contiguous country and there's a child, we can't send them back.
No, they do the needful.
Are you saying that they don't have an appreciation for human rights?
I think they have a great appreciation for the human rights of their own citizens.
That's what I think.
What a novel concept.
Yeah, because they do live there after all, Mr. Kersey.
And then as part of this agreement, this June 7th agreement, Mexico agreed to deploy 6,000 National Guard troops on the southern border and June 24th last month they announced that almost 15,000 federal security forces were to be deployed along the northern border.
So they're stopping them when they cross.
into Mexico and they're going to start stopping them when they try to slip across the border of the United States.
In other words, they wouldn't even let them go to a checkpoint, as far as I can tell.
If there's a convoy going, I mean, what they do, of course, they don't even hop the fence.
They just show up and say, I'm an SD, and those are the magic words.
So, yes, what the orange man is failing to do, our Mexican comrades seem to be on the way to doing, but it's thanks to the pressure tactics that the orange man put on them.
The tariff.
And again, that 5% tariff would have been a huge... have lasting ramifications on the Mexican economy.
Now, to play Mr. Kersey here, you could very well say, well, why did the Mexicans even bother to believe him?
Because the orange man is so full of hot air.
But at least they did act when he threatened to put that to 5% tariff.
Correct.
And so that was, you know, that goes very much on the credit side for President Donald J. Trump.
And again, we criticize him because you have to criticize him.
There is so much low-hanging fruit for him to simply pluck off.
And again, like we go back to the ICE stuff that we talked about, it wouldn't be that difficult and you would truly find that the whole, whatever you want to call his supporters now, MAGA, CAG, whatever, Keep America Great, this nonsense.
People are just wanting to see results.
It's that simple.
That's it.
Stop just saying stuff just to say it.
Results.
Do something, dude.
Speaking of doing something, we got three quick stories because we are running out of time here and I want to hit these three stories because as we see the country's demographics change and as we see this manic push for diversity within corporate America.
The consequences of that are, the corollary is, white people have to lose their jobs.
If you're going to increase diversity, whites have to lose their jobs.
Well there are three stories from across the country about white people individually saying, hey, I'm going to file a lawsuit.
I'm going to get litigious on you for this.
Fighting back.
Fighting back.
A white professor at the historically black Tuskegee University in Alabama is suing the school, claiming he was denied the salary he deserved because of age and racial discrimination.
Marshall Burns, he teaches physics at Tuskegee University.
Excuse me.
He filed the federal discrimination lawsuit just a few days ago, and he alleged that despite a four-decade tenure at the University Booker T. Washington founded that he makes $18,000 to $30,000 less I'm not a greedy person.
I applaud people who are successful.
They've earned it.
I think I've earned it.
But I haven't reached it.
HBCU are traditionally black.
So he is a clear minority there.
He said that, hey, quote, I'm not a greedy person.
I applaud people who are successful.
They've earned it.
I think I've earned it.
But I haven't reached it.
I've tried and tried and tried everything I know.
Now, he's been employed there since 1976, the bicentennial year of this country.
As an assistant professor, he's been employed since 1976.
He was promoted to associate professor a couple years later.
In 1980, he became a full professor.
He's written a textbook.
He's done a lot to help out the university.
But he alleges that his current salary is only $60,000.
It remains on par with associate professor salaries.
And he thinks he deserves about $90,000.
So he thinks that during his time that he has been full professor, that he's lost out on an additional $400,000 of wages.
And he says it's because he's white.
Well, let us hope he gets justice.
What's story number two?
Number two!
Yes.
Out of Atlanta, Paul Osman, he was the former chief meteorologist at CBS 46, there in Atlanta, has sued his former employer for, quote, racial and ethnically discriminatory termination.
And he said that the CBS affiliate also, quote, fosters a racially hostile work environment for white people.
Now, Paul Osman is a white man.
White man.
So in response, the CBS affiliate, which is owned by Meredith Corporation, said that he was terminated back in April for multiple complaints from female co-workers and conduct that violated our workplace policies.
Now, Well, in the lawsuit, Osman said he was first suspended for allegedly making an inappropriate comment to a co-worker.
He said, quote, he was not given a written statement from that co-worker nor allowed to provide a written statement of response.
He still had two years on his contract.
The aforementioned co-worker was not released.
So let's go to the details just real quick.
This is beginning to sound murky.
It sounds murky.
So, Osman in the lawsuit accused general manager Lyle Banks of getting rid of him as a pretext to promote a Hispanic female as chief meteorologist, dubbing it illegal activism to advance diversity within the CBS newsroom.
He joined the affiliate there in Atlanta as a part-timer in 2012.
He eventually moved to full-time and was named chief meteorologist in 2017.
Again, as of April 2019, he had two years left on his contract.
His departure came sudden, unexplained.
He says that as a 62-year-old white man, he also said he faced racist and ageist comments
by now former Evening Anchor Sharon Reid and or co-anchor Thomas Roberts.
He said Reid called him, quote, a white dog and a piece of excrement.
Well, you know, he probably does have a case, but I wish the waters had not been muddied by these inappropriate comments or groping charges or whatever it is they were.
But, okay, but at least he's fighting back, too.
And who's number three?
Number three!
Number three.
Shannon Blick.
She had run Lawton Elementary School for five years in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
She sued the district, saying she was pushed out of her job because she's She's a principal, right?
She was a principal for five years and possessed what her lawyer called a, quote, spotless and pristine employment record, end quote, before she was placed on administrative leave back in April.
And I guess that's T.S.
Eliot's cruelest month, since that's the same month that poor Osman got let go.
But effectively, she was forced to resign.
Here's what William Tishkoff, Lawton's lawyer, said.
White people have rights.
So yeah, this is a reverse discrimination case.
Right now, it's very timely in terms of what's happening in our country.
The lawsuit seeks $5 million and claims that Blick was forced out of her job so the district could replace her with an African-American principal.
Well, that sounds entirely plausible to me.
Entirely plausible.
As you say, when you promote diversity, that means you have to discriminate against whites.
That's the long and the short of it.
But employers are really caught in a cleft.
They're in a cleft stick here.
They're supposed to be increasing diversity, but they're not supposed to discriminate against whites.
But some of them, I think, just do it quite openly.
Well, here's something else that's in the lawsuit.
It goes on to say that when the conduct is consistent with the districts and the board of education's notoriety for inhibiting and stepping on the civil rights of Caucasian and non-minority administrators when African-American and minority administrators covet Caucasian and non-minority administrators legitimately earned and obtained positions, seniority, pay duties, Wow.
And jobs.
This is in.
And then, so, this is a district, by the way, that is only 14% black.
32% of the administrators are black in this district.
Well, they need more.
Clearly they need more.
Exactly.
I mean, why are any white people, why are any whites employed in this district in Ann Arbor?
You know, Ann Arbor is one of those significantly leftist districts like in Boulder or Madison or Berkeley where they're getting rid of I'd like to shoehorn in one last story.
It has to do with academics also.
This is the University of Nevada in Las Vegas.
They have segregated dorms.
And why is that?
Well, Orlando White, who is the Campus Assistant Director of Residential Life... Now, I have a feeling that Orlando White probably isn't.
But anyway, it became clear that there was both a desire and a need for dedicated spaces to explore identity in meaningful ways.
They're going to explore identity in meaningful ways.
Then, what they call HowlTown, which is only for blacks, offers strength through celebrating and exploring diversity, rather than just having diversity or the presence of difference.
I'm not sure I understand the difference, but they're going to explore and celebrate diversity by living apart from each other in an utterly undiverse environment.
So, they have got HowlTown, exclusively for blacks.
They also have Stonewall Suites.
Who do you figure lives in Stonewall Suites?
I think you can guess.
I'll take a guess.
It's named after the 1969 Stonewall riots, by the way.
Oh, I was thinking of a different Stonewall, but okay.
That Stonewall.
That Stonewall.
Well, shut your mouth.
Not that Stonewall.
And then, of course, the school has female-only housing.
Now, it's unclear whether transgender women are allowed in.
But according to the school's website, it quotes, it will make room assignments based on how the student identifies his her gender at the time of application.
So if you claim that you're a transgender female, they'll stick you in with all the girls.
Ah, sounds okay to me.
Now, believe it or not, believe it or not, there is a segregated study intensive hall.
Okay.
Can you imagine that?
According to that, it's a hall that places a greater focus on academics.
Who would have thought of such a thing?
Who would have thought of such a thing?
In any case, yes, we live in, really, a wonderland here.
A wonderland of absurdity.
But I believe we are running out of time.
We are running out of time.
Once again, we still want to hear from you, ladies and gentlemen.
If you have any questions, fire them over at our direction.
Because we live here at protonmail.com.
Once again, that email address.
Because we live here at protonmail.com.
At the Contact Us tab at www.amran.com on the homepage.
So for Jared Taylor, this is PK.
Our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection