All Episodes
Previous Next
July 11, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:31
‘Removing the Stain’
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, our beloved listeners, you have just tuned in to the latest edition of Radio Renaissance.
Welcome.
We're delighted to have you.
And once again, it's been an action-packed week for those of us who pay attention to race, immigration, and the demographic future.
And we'd like to start with that dark horse, may I call her, candidate, who is gaining in the polls.
No pun intended.
And we're going to Pronounce her name correctly.
No more references to Kamala the Ugandan giant.
We're only going to do it correctly, Mr. Taylor.
Kamala.
No.
Kamala.
Kamala is her name.
Kamala.
Okay.
Wasn't Kamala the Ugandan giant?
That is correct.
Yes.
As she explained, it's like the word kama.
It starts kama and with a la on the end.
Kamala.
So, Senator Kamala Harris of California.
I'm sure most of our listeners will know by now she has made a Well, racial proposal that I think is only going to help her rise up the polls as she tries to catch Senator Joe Biden, former Vice President Biden.
She's called on the nation to deal with the racial wealth gap as she has proposed a $100 billion federal program specifically setting aside this money to help blacks buy homes.
She said the plan would provide a down payment and a closing cost assistance of up to $25,000 to blacks renting or living in historically red-line communities and it could potentially help some 4 million homebuyers.
There's that term again.
Red-line communities that we see so often used as a justification for implementing Anti-white business practices.
Well, some kind of handout, anyway.
Exactly.
So, this plan's release, as stated, it came out as surging in the polls after she accused Vice President Biden in that first debate of basically being a racist for having the audacity to praise segregationists and for his stance on forced busing.
I think that that is where the Democrat Well, of course, he didn't exactly praise segregationists.
He said that they were civil.
I mean, he wasn't praising their segregationism.
No, he was not.
But even if you allow just a moment, a moment, of a glimmer of, hey, we're not bad people.
We could be civil with them.
We might not agree with their policies, but we could have more civility than we do now.
I mean, look at what's going on right now with the Democrat House.
We have the breakup between Ms.
Cortez and the House Majority Leader who has said Over and over again.
Hey, calm down.
Just get some work done.
Quit trying to hijack the agenda.
I think we're going to see more and more people of color primary white Democrats this upcoming year.
Oh, the center of gravity for the party is definitely non-white.
Yes.
And the more you can play to them, the better.
Now, this question of ladling out a hundred billion dollars.
It's not a hundred million.
One hundred billion dollars.
As I understand it, even households with incomes of up to $100,000, or in particularly expensive areas, up to $125,000, they can still get these handouts.
Yes.
Apparently, you can't be a black millionaire and cash in.
But anybody who's making up to $100,000, they can get the down payment.
Well, it's actually up to $125,000 in high-cost areas.
Here's your quote.
A typical black family has just $10 of wealth for every $100 held by a white family.
So we must right that wrong and, after generations of discrimination, give black families a real shot at home ownership.
Historically, one of the most powerful drivers of wealth in our country.
You know, Indian immigrants have higher net worths than whites.
They do.
Do we need to right that historical wrong?
That sounds pretty nasty to me.
They've gotten this despite our white privilege?
They must be pretty sneaky people.
Well, think about how many stories you see coming out about vacant homes in cities like Baltimore or St.
Louis.
I remember a New York Times article where they called these homes in St.
Louis dollhouses because you'd see What looked like a perfectly great house from the front, from the street, but if you went behind in the backyard, it was decaying and falling apart.
So it was like a child, a little girl's dollhouse.
In other words, the back wall was completely caved in.
And you think there are, I want to say there's over a hundred thousand vacant homes, these townhomes in Baltimore.
Why don't you just have a program where, hey, let's just do this instead of doing, you know, this is a historically redlined area.
Let's just, let's renovate these.
You know, you could pour that, if you're going to pour this money in, why not just pour it in where they can build Wakanda?
There have been many attempts to try to sell off these houses for basically the tax liens on them.
Yes.
But nobody will take them because you don't, they come with certain kind of neighbors that most people don't want.
But yes, Kamala is going to add a national debt in a big-time way, and I think you may be right.
This is the sort of thing that will appeal to Democratic voters, at least in the primaries.
Now, we'll see whether or not this is going to appeal to people in the general election.
It's just the kind of thing that if Donald Trump is facing Kamala Harris, I think that's one of the first things I would say to her.
Where is this $100 billion going to come from?
Well, I think obviously we are not fans of President Trump, but I think it is important to point out that after the first couple states, which are Iowa, New Hampshire, are very white, very few black voters in those electorates.
Once you get to the other states, that's where that great wall comes in and that's where Kamala will have the opportunity to savage her opponents with her racial pandering.
We'll see.
We'll see.
But there are people, there are blacks, who are apparently opposed to Kamala Harris.
Apparently there is a group, it's two people really, Antonio Moore, who's a lawyer, and Yvette Carnell, who is a lady political commentator.
They have started a hashtag called ADOS, and that stands for American Descendants of Slaves.
Now, They certainly are in the market for a handout.
They absolutely want a handout.
But they want to narrow the beneficiaries, the beneficiary categories.
And I think we're going to see more and more and more of this.
As the idea, as the greed glands get stimulated and mouths begin to water, the idea is going to be, well hold on, we need to limit the number of people who can stand around with their outstretched palms so that we get more of the swag.
And that is the idea here.
This hashtag ADOS stands for American Descendants of Slaves.
And the underlying message is that black Americans from immigrant families, even places like Jamaica, with a history of slavery under Spanish or British rule, don't have the same claim.
And on the ADOS policy page, the group says that the census should introduce a new designation for, and as they quote, ADOS.
And another one for black immigrants.
They go on to say black immigrants should be barred from accessing affirmative action and other set-asides attended for ADOS.
In other words, American Descendants of Slaves.
Now this was something that people grumbled about for a while when Barack Obama first came on the scene.
People doubted whether he was sufficiently African American.
Excessively African.
And people say the same thing about Kamala Harris.
They point out that her Jamaican ancestor was actually a slave owner.
He owned a lot of slaves.
They owned a lot of slaves.
That's correct.
Yes, their family owned a lot of slaves.
So when she starts talking in the name of all these poor, down-strodden African-Americans, there's a certain amount of skepticism.
And as I say, as the idea begins to circulate among blacks, and you see, at this point, I think the idea of reparations has gotten to the point that if nothing comes of it, there's going to be a whole lot of disappointment.
Oh, precisely.
There's just been too much talk now.
I mean, all the candidates have come out.
I mean, look at, you know, 2020, the Democrat slogan basically should be the race to redistribute white wealth.
Look what Beto O'Rourke has been saying over and over again, that the founding of the country is white supremacy to an adoring audience that just won't stop clapping.
We are at a point now where the Democrats, like it or not, ladies and gentlemen, they are on the road to, I won't say criminalizing whiteness, but they realize that the party has tipped.
There's no reason at all to pander to white voters.
And we saw that in 2018 when Stacey Abrams basically wrote off the white working class in Georgia.
Well, you know, if there isn't a substantial cash handout or something they can point to, they're at least going to have to put a reparation H on the market.
It's applied just the same way as Preparation H, and it relieves the burning, itching, and discomfort of living with white people.
Now, unfortunately, it has no effect in white countries, but I think there'll be a great market for Reparation H when the time comes.
And I suspect that somebody who needs it badly now is a fellow named Jeffrey Omari.
He's the fellow who teaches at Gonzaga Law School, and he is one of the few persons of color on the faculty.
And he recently wrote an article called, Seeing Red, A Professor Coexists with MAGA in the Classroom.
And this was published in the ABA Law Journal.
ABA, that's the American Bar Association, that is the premier organization for American lawyers.
And let me quote from this.
Well, first of all, it had to do with the fact that one of his white students showed up wearing a MAGA hat.
A red MAGA hat.
Now, according to Jeffrey Omari, and I'm quoting, MAGA is an undeniable symbol of white supremacy and hatred toward certain non-white groups.
I mean, why not all non-white groups?
Anyway, MAGA indexes an effort to return to a time in American history when this country was great for some, particularly propertied white men, but brutally exclusionary for others.
Now, he goes on to say, this white student's shiny red MAGA hat was like a siren.
Spewing derogatory racial obscenities at me for the duration of the 1 hour and 15 minute class.
Note, they are derogatory racial obscenities, not complimentary racial obscenities.
He goes on to say, as my blood boiled inwardly, outwardly I remained calm.
And in an effort to assuage the perceived tension, I mean, who's perceiving this tension?
Only he, I should say.
Exactly.
I jokingly told the student, I like your hat, when he raised his hand to participate in class discussion.
Without missing a beat, the student mockingly grinned from ear to ear and said, thank you.
Mockingly?
How do we know mockingly?
Is he just being courteous and polite by saying thank you?
Yes, he's just saying thank you.
But no, no, no.
This guy is absolutely sure.
I mean, this guy is hearing racial obscenities beamed at me by a siren spewing.
These sirens never spew, but in any case, he's spewing this sound at him.
Then he goes on to say, That this kind of thing contributes to, quote, the visceral feelings of exclusion that African Americans and other faculty of color encounter in the academy.
Such feelings are a contributing factor to the low retention rates.
So here this guy, I mean, who knows what this student was thinking.
I think he's just probably a Trump supporter.
Is he mentally spewing derogatory racial obscenities at his professor?
No.
He's going to raise his hand.
He's going to participate in classes like everybody else.
But this guy, this black guy, can't help but see red.
He's seething inside.
For him, it's an absolute reality.
There's another factor you might be overlooking.
Namely?
This didn't even happen.
Gonzaga Law School.
Come on.
You're saying that somebody would show up in law school prepared to ostracize himself at a university that is heavily, heavily leftist.
Or, if he did show up wearing this, perhaps it was to be, you know, he was trying to engage in irony to see what happened.
Again, I would argue that this incident never happened.
It's one of, you know, Ilhan Omar, the other day, tried to give some talk about some black woman who was racially profiled and racially abused.
It turned out she made the whole thing up, basically.
And she got called out for it.
You don't have anyone calling this professor out.
Again, like you noted, the APA Journal.
The upper echelon publication of, as you said, the American Bar Association.
Yes.
This is the top publication.
Well, you'd think that there would be certain rules for evidence here.
But I do think it happened.
I do think it happened.
Because I don't think that this guy would completely invent something that so profoundly discredits him.
Well, have you seen the videos of Jesse Smollett walking around and out of his apartment with a noose on his neck that the Chicago police just put out?
Well, you could be right.
You could be right.
No, I think this guy actually wore a cap.
Although, it does seem odd that a law school student would be wearing a cap inside anyway.
It stretches controllably.
That did strike me as odd, but I suspect something like this probably happened.
But, you know, you're right.
These things you just never can tell.
But we're getting, of course, increasing numbers of other minorities who are going to be just as sensitive and thin-skinned, I suspect.
Well, I was going to do a segue where there is a change in the American complexion that you can tell, and it's quite visible, because even in the past year, 1.2 million Hispanics have been added to what is now a record 59.9 million Hispanics are in the United States according to the U.S.
Census Bureau population estimates.
60 million.
60 million, which is 18% of the U.S.
population.
Blacks now are down to about 14% of the U.S.
population.
That's nearly one in five are Hispanics.
Correct.
Correct.
Now, the Pew Research Center analysis of this new data, which found that between 2008 and 2018, quote, Latinos accounted for about half Of all U.S.
population growth during that period.
Half of the population growth.
That sounds about right.
The rest are probably lots of Asians, just a handful of whites.
It'd be interesting to know who the other half is.
Well, where do you think the largest growth area for Hispanics has been in the country?
Well, probably in areas that haven't had that many Hispanics.
You go from, what, 3% of the population to 6% of the population.
So I would guess, I don't know, Upper West, Montana, where?
You would be wrong.
I would be wrong.
The south, the glorious south, the old confederate states.
I guess the weather suits their clothes better down there.
Well, there's so much white flight taking place and so you need cheap labor in places like Georgia, North Carolina, Alabama, and of course Florida. 33% Hispanic growth since 2008. Now that does include Texas and
Florida. Every region, as you noted, saw significant growth. And some of those areas,
well as you alluded to, they tended to have small Hispanic populations
prior to this.
North Dakota's Hispanic population grew by 135%.
Oh, that's the number one growth, isn't it?
The region, not state.
Specifically state, yes, South Dakota would be the highest.
But places like the District of Columbia saw a lot.
Like I said, it saw 57%.
Montana, 55%.
New Hampshire, 50%.
New Hampshire.
New Hampshire is now a border state.
I mean, think about this.
But see, again, if you had a 50% increase, it might have gone from, that would mean 2% to 3% of the population.
We just don't know what the absolute numbers are.
But, no, the point is they are growing everywhere.
And 60 million, that is a staggering figure.
60 million.
I'm sort of reeling at this idea that if you walk through the United States, one in five is going to be Latino.
Well, here's something for you.
So, in 2013 in Vermont, which the state we'll be talking about in a few minutes, 92 Live births were to Hispanics, which represented 1.5% of the live births in that state.
92?
Just 92.
92 people.
This was in 2013.
Conversely, there were 5,597 non-Hispanic white live births, which represented 93%.
This was in 2013.
Conversely, there were 5,597 non-Hispanic white live births, which represented 93%.
In 2017, that number had jumped to 123 Hispanic births, which was a increase to 2.2%.
White live births dropped to 5,134.
This is the trend nationwide.
Nationwide.
Very sorry to say, the Great White North is going to become the Great Hispanic North.
And the South is just going to, well, it's hard to describe what that's going to be.
It won't be Wakanda.
No, I'm afraid it won't be Wakanda.
Well, that is certainly sobering.
Certainly sobering statistics.
60 million.
One in five.
But this leads to something else that's happening in the South, and that is this procedure of Giving felons back the vote.
This is increasingly popular now.
Apparently, Americans think that after you've done your time, no matter what you did, you should be back into the political system.
Now, last November in Florida, this was the vote, of course, in which Ron DeSantis won by hair and became governor.
But at the same time as that vote, there was a popular ballot initiative that let people automatically If you're a convicted felon and you're out, you get the vote back.
And before then, people who'd served their time, they could apply for clemency to a board that was headed by the governor.
But it was a cumbersome and chancy procedure, and there was a multi-year backlog, and only a very small percentage of people even applied, and an even smaller percentage got the vote back.
However, what happened during this ballot initiative, it would restore voting rights to more than one million felons.
One million felons.
And I think they're not probably going to vote Republican.
No, they're not.
But the language of it is, voting rights shall be restored upon completion of all terms of sentence, including parole or probation.
Now, at the same time, it excluded those who'd been convicted of murder or felony sex offenses.
Why exclude them?
Really, I mean, if you think that an armed robber or an attempted murderer Or a professional embezzler has got the judgment to be a voter?
Why be prejudiced against rapists?
And people forget, I believe that that ballot initiative was overwhelmingly passed with 60% of the vote.
Andrew Gillum Almost became governor of that state.
It was just like the Beto O'Rourke-Ted Cruz Senate race and the Stacey Abrams-Brian Kemp.
Republicans can cheer for a couple more years, but guys, the demographic talk is tick-tick talking.
It certainly is.
But anyway, I say, representing felony sexual offenders and convicted murderers, I cry foul.
Why are we being excluded?
The fact is, though, now, the legislature just voted a new law.
And this new law says, okay, if the voting rights are to be restored upon completion of all terms of sentence, that means felons have to pay any outstanding court fees and fines before they get the vote back.
As Governor DeSantis said, the new law confirms that the amendment, that's to say the ballot initiative, does not apply to a felon who has failed to complete all the terms of his sentences by paying all fines and court costs.
Now, what's not to like about that?
Furthermore, the new law says, if you are indigent, a court may convert financial obligations to community service, in which case the felon may vote after completing hours of community service.
That seems fair enough to me.
Well, it's not.
According to the ACLU, the American Civil Liberties Union has filed suit describing this law as creating, quote, two classes of returning citizens, a group wealthy enough to afford their voting rights and another group who cannot afford to vote.
There's an argument to be made there, I suppose.
And Julie Ebenstein, who is senior staff attorney with ACLU's Voting Rights Project, said they cannot legally affix a price tag to someone's right to vote.
And so the lawsuit accuses election officials of, at the same time, racial discrimination.
One of the others say, bring back a poll tax.
Wow.
That apparently has been banned by, I think the 14th amendment got rid of that.
But again, if there's, you know, it's... But no, they legally cannot do that.
And they say, of course, once again, liberals are reading minds.
They're saying by doing this, they are discriminating racially because felons are disproportionately black.
Now, this whole story is an interesting one.
It reminds me of, I think, a pretty important article that appeared in American Renaissance just a few days ago.
It's called, Choosing Your Quality of Life, and it's by Joseph Kaye, who has written a number of good articles for us.
And Joseph K. points out that votes, like this vote to restore voting rights to felons, it is an expression of a popular decision to choose a certain quality of life.
And it's like voting for this Tiffany Caban character.
The district attorney in Queens is basically just going to decriminalize practically everything in sight, unless it's aggravated assault or murder.
And all of these decisions, and it was a ballot initiative in California also, that decriminalized fair evasion by minors.
Because?
Yes, for the usual reasons.
They discriminated not against poor people, but perhaps against poor people, but especially against people of color.
Precious people of color who must not be bothered in any way.
And I'm just musing on these decisions that people make to decriminalize and decriminalization of fare evasion in Washington, D.C.
As a result of it, I believe it's about 20% of the people getting on the bus don't pay.
They just march on board and they don't pay.
And bus drivers just have to grin and bear it.
But this is, of course, a terrible, terrible result.
People are going to watch this happen and they're going to, people who would ordinarily pay them, why am I going to be the chump who pays?
Well, going along that theme of DAs who are funded by Soros, the Philadelphia District Attorney, Larry Krasner, has announced that the city is going to Eliminate various court-related fines and fees for impoverished defendants and will instead focus on their payments of restitution in cases involving victims.
And this is all because of what they see as the inherent racism of the criminal justice system.
If all of the people that we see are impoverished black and brown people, why should they have to, after they've committed a crime, why should they have to have a further financial crime of having to pay for fines and fees?
Well, are they in fact going to be made to make the victims whole?
I doubt that'll be done either.
Why should they be asked to make restitution?
The whole idea, of course, is that there should be punishment for crime.
There should be consequences for breaking the law.
And all of these laws were set up in homogeneously white societies.
You go back to the laws of England, for example, and all of a sudden, just because a certain group is more likely to fall afoul of the law, then you go back on hundreds, even thousands of years of judicial thinking.
The idea that the law must apply.
And you have to, well, the law, it must be the fault of the law.
It's not the fault of these people.
This is really, this is a slow, but I think very significant,
upending of one of the basic concepts of Western equity.
Well, the white man's law is irrelevant in the face of racial change taking place and those, more often
than not, white district attorneys who wish to curry favor with their growing nonwhite constituencies.
We're seeing this all across the country or in a place like Dallas where the city now is completely run by elected black officials where the DA says, you know what?
If you don't commit a crime under $750, we're not going to waste time with you.
Isn't Dallas the city where, in order to make an arrest, a police officer has to get prior approval from the DA's office?
I think that's Houston.
Oh, you're right.
Houston's another one.
Guys, I don't think everybody out there who says, hey, Texas is this great state.
Houston and Dallas, Dallas is 29% white right now.
You're right.
It was Houston.
And so police see a young black guy pitching a revolver out the window of his car and calls up the DA and says, no, no, no, you can't arrest him for that.
They finally get him on littering.
Here's this loaded pistol he's pitching out.
He's underage.
He's not allowed to own the thing.
He's clearly breaking the law.
No, no, no, no.
If he's black, no, we can't do that.
So, yes, all of the ordinary laws by which we have operated are being thrown out the window in the name of fighting white supremacy.
Well, in the name of racial equity.
And may I be so bold to transition to Vermont.
Yes, please do.
Perhaps America's whitest state.
94% white right now.
Of course that could change if we see a bunch of Congolese decide that Maine isn't as inviting from a welfare standpoint as Burlington, Vermont could be.
I'd like to just read from a press release.
To show people what life is like in this 94% white state.
It's a state that has some of the highest rates of social capital.
It's just a beautiful place to live.
I'm sure a lot of our listeners around Christmas, they watch that great movie, With Bing Cosby, White Christmas, where they make that joke about going to Vermont and the only thing you'll find there are Republicans.
Well now of course it's the exact opposite of that.
Vermont is a state that nearly elected a transgender governor and overwhelmingly voted for Barack Obama in two elections with 67% of the vote in 2008 and 66% of the vote in 2012.
That is a tease for this press release, and may I read to you from the June 21st press release from Governor Phil Scott, who appoints Zuzanna Davis as Vermont's first Racial Equity Executive Director.
Governor Phil Scott today announced the appointment of Zuzanna Davis as the state's first Executive Director of Racial Equity.
She will work with state government agencies and departments to identify and address systemic racial disparities and support the state's efforts to expand and bring diversity to Vermont's overall population.
Mr. Taylor, if I may interject real quick, this is an admission that by the governor of the state, Who is basically apologizing, just like the governor of Minnesota did not too long ago, where he said, hey, we have too many B-plus citizens.
We need more diversity.
If you don't like it, get the hell out of my state.
I think that was Governor Dayton who said that.
Now we have Governor Phil Scott who's basically saying, you know what?
We've got to bring this Zuzanna Davis in to be the state's first Racial Equity Executive Director.
This is a title straight out of Soviet Russia.
One of our primary duties is to bring diversity to Vermont's overall white population.
Which, as we stated, 91% of live births right now in 2017 were to whites.
That's far too many.
It is far too many.
Isn't Vermont actually one of the states in which the income difference between blacks and whites is just about the smallest in the whole country?
That's correct.
It has the smallest income disparity in the country between blacks and whites, and there is a higher percentage of black residents holding a college degree than whites in the state of Vermont.
Boy, you've got to fix that!
Isn't there some sort of report that recently said that the state is just mired in white supremacy?
Let's retract that.
We can't excise that from the podcast, but ladies and gentlemen, pretend I didn't say that because Attorney General T.J.
Donovan was the author of this report.
It's Donovan's report, and he basically declared Vermont has a white supremacy culture.
And the governor, Governor Scott, proudly signed a new law on March 29th that will create a new school curriculum designed to, quote, change the underlying culture of our state, end quote.
The Attorney General and the Governor of the State, they are both, by all appearances, white men, are on an apology tour for Vermont, boasting too many whites, having too little crime, having an abundance of social capital.
And I just want to read real quick what Governor Scott said about Zuzana, whose prior role she had been the Director of New York City's Council Council's Black, Latino, and Asian Caucus.
So this woman is steeped in racial vitriol toward whites.
Well, no, no, no.
Maybe not.
Maybe not.
She could just be building bridges.
Building bridges will all hold hands.
But she may decide that it's just too hideously white up there.
She may have to escape back to New York.
Well, she might, but here's what she said.
Quote, I look forward to the opportunity to work collaboratively So basically, it's weaponizing the government of Vermont, a state that is 94% white, to do everything they can to decrease the white percentage of the state.
So basically it's weaponizing the government of Vermont, a state that is 94% white, to
do everything they can to decrease the white percentage of the state.
This is a clear indicator of where the country is headed in states that still resemble America.
Iowa, New Hampshire, Maine, Montana, the Dakotas, Idaho, Wyoming.
It is a form of... Hideously white!
Yes, collective insanity, isn't it?
What's this woman, Zuzana is her name?
Zuzana, yeah, she's... I mean, this is one of the stories that I happened to just see on Twitter.
I was playing around and it was on American Thinker.
the piece and then I actually read the press release and this came out you know almost
three three three weeks ago. Didn't Stephen Foster write a song about her? Oh Susanna.
Well it's X U Susan.
X-U.
X-U-S-A-N-A.
Alright.
But, you know, real quick to finish this off.
So, there's something called in the state a Racial Equity Advisory Panel, which consists of appointees by the Senate Committee on Committees, the Speaker of the House, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the Governor and the Human Rights Commission.
You were talking about a state-sponsored agenda of de-whitening the state of Vermont.
It can't be any more clear.
It couldn't be any more clear.
It's hideously white.
It has to be made vibrant.
And the only way to make it vibrant is to cut down on those white births.
Gotta stop having babies, white people.
Gotta let more people in from all around the world.
As you suggest, Somalis would be a good addition, I'm sure.
Somalis, Congolese, I'm sure there are plenty of black... But you know, all they need to do... You know, they could do it in a flash.
They could raise welfare rates above those in neighboring Maine.
Or in Maine, which is not far away.
No, it's not.
And Vermont only has 600,000 people.
So all you have to do is find 60,000 Somalis, bring them in, and that's 10% of the population right there to enrich the state.
There'd be nothing to it.
No.
Snap of the fingers.
Yes, just raise those welfare rates.
Poof!
Overnight, you're diverse.
Oh, Susanna, Vermont's no longer white.
Ah, yes.
Well, let's move on to what could be considered a good news story.
But to get to a good news story, we have to go an awful long way.
Go ahead.
We have to go all the way to Israel.
Israel, ever since May of 2017, there's something called the Deposit Law.
And it seems like an elaborate way to accomplish something that's relatively simple, but it seems to be working.
And what the deposit law does, it deducts 20% from the income or the salary of an illegal immigrant.
Now, illegal immigrants are people they call infiltrators.
Now, if they know who they are, and they can get their employers to deduct 20%, you'd think they'd easily enough find them and just give them the bum's rush.
But the way this works is, 20% of their salary is deducted by their employer and this money continues to be deducted month after month after month and the money is then handed over to the infiltrator when he decides to permanently leave the country.
Now they first started doing this as I said in May 2017 and gradually the numbers who are collecting their money has increased.
In 2017, 12 infiltrators a month collected.
That doesn't seem like very many to me, but in 2018 the number jumped to 52, from 12 to 52.
And in the first half of 2019, 82 infiltrators left each month after having collected their accumulated wages.
Now, so far, according to these statistics, 1,135 infiltrators.
Now, I really do like their language.
We should call them infiltrators.
They are infiltrators.
Yes, we always call them migrants.
They're infiltrators.
Aided and abetted by a lot of elected officials.
Yes, but this is the official Israeli terminology.
They are infiltrators.
But so far, 1,135 infiltrators have promised to clear out and stay out, and they have collected their money.
The total that's been collected is $3,600,000.
is $3,600,000.
Now that's money that presumably would have been spent in Israel.
But one of the reasons that they want these people out is because so many of these infiltrators, they don't spend
their money in Israel.
They shove it out the door.
They send it back to Eritrea or Somalia or wherever they're from.
And apparently Eritrea has more than half, more than half its GDP comes from overseas Eritreans.
And many of them are in Israel.
So the Israelis are very happy.
They are very happy with the way this law is working.
Now, Surprisingly, it is only partially being enforced.
They figure there are 34,000 infiltrators.
Of this number, deposits are being made for only 17,000.
That's only about half.
But they need to get the employers to make these deposits.
Some of the employers will make deposits for only a few months, and then they'll stop doing it.
I'm sure it's a bureaucratic nightmare for them.
Probably they're paying them not very much, but at least this is one way to get them to leave.
You deduct some of their money, and it accumulates.
I bet for a lot of these Eritreans, the average is approximately $3,200 per infiltrator.
That's an automatic savings plan.
And this automatic savings plan, you cash in only when you show up with a ticket
and promise never to come back.
It's something that might work here in the United States.
But again, if you know who these people are, they're here illegally,
and you know where they are well enough to be deducting money from their paycheck,
it seems to me all you need to do is show up and show them to the border.
I think the main thing to take away from this is that we can no longer use that term
migrant or illegal immigrant.
Infiltrator.
Infiltrator.
Get that seared into your mind, ladies and gentlemen.
That is the vernacular of Radio Renaissance.
Infiltrator.
They are infiltrators.
The idea that they are migrants, it makes them sound like, I don't know, birds that fly from one continent to another.
No, they are people who are deliberately defying our laws, defying our desires, defying our wishes, and infiltrating into the country.
What were your thoughts when Booker, when Cory Booker led a bunch of migrants across the border?
I'm sure you saw that story.
Oh, dear me.
Led these infiltrators.
A sitting senator of the United States from the once great state of New Jersey.
Pandering.
Yes, yes.
What he did, apparently he went into Ciudad Juarez, which is practically the murder capital of the Western Hemisphere, and he traveled with asylum seekers as they crossed the U.S.
southern border.
Solidarity with infiltrators.
Yes.
And according to a spokesman, Corey, they referred to him as Corey, nice to, I don't think of him as Corey myself, but Corey observed the crossing, their interactions with federal immigration authorities, and the disastrous impact of President Trump's cruel immigration policy.
As the migrants attempted to avoid the so-called migrant protection protocols.
Now, what the migrant protection protocols are is a system whereby they can apply for amnesty, but they got to stay in Mexico while they do it.
And this is, of course, anathema to Brother Cory.
And he goes on to say, an email from the campaign said that these women had originally been sent back to Mexico But Cory told the reporters on Wednesday that his office intends to keep in touch with them, adding that President Trump has created, quote, a human rights crisis and an American values crisis, and he is going to make sure that they get treated properly.
Now, my question for Cory is, if they get into the United States, why will he not give them places to stay in his own house?
He's only talking about five people here.
I'm sure he's got a place that could handle them just fine.
But this is Cory Booker's contribution to the American immigration crisis.
At the same time, he has recently been talking about his new, his very own immigration plan, which he has rolled out.
He unveiled it on Tuesday.
And he is going to virtually eliminate immigration detention centers.
Now, how is he going to do that?
Pretty easy.
It's no trouble at all.
You just turn them loose.
Yeah.
You turn them loose.
And you count on them to show up at their hearing before a judge.
And, of course, he's going to get rid of the Muslim ban.
He's going to get the Dreamers legalized.
And he's going to limit the amount of time a migrant can be detained.
Maybe 10 minutes.
I don't know.
But, yes, you know, we just voted all this money to build more and better detention centers.
Well, I suppose he can send that on beefsteaks for the boys because we won't need them anymore.
Well, you've got to pay for flights to Vermont somehow to ensure that Zuzana's plan of de-whitening the state takes place.
Ah, yes, that's an excellent use for this money.
Excellent use, yes.
I mean, buying him a Greyhound ticket, that would be just too unpleasant.
That's inhumane.
Yes, inhumane.
It's inhumane.
Instead they can fly first class on American Airlines or U.S.
Airways.
So, there you go.
That's Cory, that's our friend Cory, making sure that the infiltrators get the kind of treatment he thinks they deserve.
Well, there's a treatment that white heroes and all of white America's past deserves, and that's erase, erasing.
Right now, ladies and gentlemen, there is a push to have the stain.
It's actually remove the stain.
It's federal legislation that seeks to strip 20 Medal of Honor winners American soldiers, white soldiers, who participated in the 1890 Wounded Knee Massacre, as it's called.
Now, quick history.
The massacre that happened on December 29, 1890, near the Wounded Knee Creek on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in southwestern South Dakota.
A force of roughly 490 US soldiers armed with rapid-fire wheel-mounted artillery guns was attempting to disarm a camp of about 370 Lakota Sioux people when a shot rang out and then a chaotic firing battle ensued.
Well, you know, I was reading about that recently.
It was the Lakota Sioux had showed up and they were officially going to turn in their weapons.
This is near the end of the Plains Wars, and things are going very badly for the Indians.
And they said, okay, yep, we're giving you all our weapons.
Well, what they turned in were a bunch of broken, old, non-functional, a few blunderbusses, And it was all a sham.
It was a complete sham.
It was all very, very tense.
And they said, come on, you know, we know that you've got weapons there.
And so the American soldiers started going through the possessions, and the Indians didn't like that one bit.
And when this shot rang out, it is probably the case that it was an Indian who opened fire on the U.S.
Cavalry.
And then he said it was very confused because the people were all very close to each other.
You know, the men are going through the Indian camp.
And the idea, the way this is described, it sounds as though we just lined them up against the wall and shot them.
Not at all.
That's not what happened.
Not at all.
Not at all.
But your point is, and I'm surprised to hear that 20 people got the Medal of Honor on that occasion.
I don't know any of the details about what went into awarding those medals, but the idea that somehow, because it was Indians who were involved, their honor must be taken away from them.
Now, back in 1990, both houses of Congress They adopted a resolution where they express deep regret on the 100th anniversary of what's known as the Wounded Knee Massacre about what had happened 100 years prior.
Now, what's happening now, three members of Congress along with a group of Native American activists and descendants of wounded knee victims Obviously just the Indians, because they're the good guys in all this.
There were, you know, there were cavalrymen who died too, but they don't count.
They don't matter.
They don't matter.
So they announced this introduction of the Remove the Stain Act.
Now, think about that for a second.
Remove the stain in the eyes of people like Cory Booker and Kamala.
The stain on American history is anything that was done by whites.
Oh, of course.
Has there ever been a stain in American history that involved anything that was done by non-whites?
I mean, think about it. This could proliferate into removing the stain of all whiteness.
I mean, just last week we talked about what happened in Charlottesville, where they're no longer going to take off
for Thomas Jefferson Day.
And instead it was replaced with the general who came in, I think it was General Sheridan?
Yeah, Sheridan.
This is such an astonishing thing.
The city is going to celebrate the enemy arrival.
This is this utterly topsy-turvy suicidal mentality.
Remove the stain.
There's the title of this podcast.
I guess so.
Remove the stain.
So what's happening, and it's not even any congressman in South Dakota, none of the members of Congress affiliated with the bill are from South Dakota, as I said.
The bill's sponsor is a Democrat from Washington, and then you've got two co-sponsors.
You actually have a Republican from California, one of the few Republicans left in the congressional coalition there, And then a Democratic rep from New Mexico.
And again, it might not happen this year, but I can see down the road, not only this happening, but I could see whites who got the Medal of Honor, maybe even fighting the Japanese, having it stripped.
Seriously!
Of course!
They were people of color after all.
Exactly!
That's why you rarely see any discussion about World War II in Japan.
And you of course are Intimately familiar with that great nation.
But that's why all of the World War II films have to be about the European theater.
And only the European theater, because it's about whites killing whites.
Well, I believe a new version of Midway is coming out.
It's going to be incredible.
We were talking about that last week.
Yes, yes.
And they can't very well pretend that they were fighting the Italians in the middle of the Pacific.
No, they can't.
No, it has not been voted on.
But the fact that you've got this name that I think you could see in an upcoming Democrat primary.
I think you could see a discussion of Amplifying this Remove the Stain to, again, basically pick up a copy of Howard Zinn's People's History of the United States and just say, hey, this is all a stain.
All these quote-unquote white accomplishments.
Well, heck yes.
The whole history is a stain.
The only way to remove the stain is to get rid of us.
Ipso facto.
But speaking of stains, On July 4th, Independence Day, this was a little thing that took place in Tempe, Arizona, in Starbucks.
I'm sure you read about this.
The Tempe Police Department, six of its officers were drinking coffee at a local Starbucks, in uniform.
And a barista walked up and told them that an unnamed customer was feeling unsafe because of their presence.
Unsafe.
Well, and the barista told them, please leave or just stay out of sight.
Well, I don't know how you stay out of sight in a Starbucks.
You can't.
Most of them aren't big enough for you to sort of sneak off in a corner and not be seen.
So they left.
I wish they had said, well, anyway, I wish they'd stayed.
But they left.
They slunk off.
Like those two black guys did in Philadelphia that started the whole race together concept.
Well, exactly.
Exactly.
They are paying customers.
Stand your ground, Whitey.
Yes, stand your ground.
In any case, the hashtag dumpstarbucks began to trend after the Tempe Office Association sent a tweet that blasted Starbucks for doing that.
A few days later, I mean, there was enough of a backlash so that Starbucks responded with an apology to the entire Tempe Police Department explaining that the officers, quote, should have been welcomed and treated with dignity and the utmost respect.
Of course.
Now, of course, and the idea Now, how many white people do you think are going to feel unsafe because there are policemen sitting around?
I suspect this unnamed person who felt unsafe was surely not a white person.
And I bet if some white clown had said, oh, I feel unsafe, look at all those weapons on the hips of those police, they would have said, I get used to it.
But it's a precious person of color, and precious people of color have to be catered to.
That would be my guess.
They're our greatest asset.
Oh gosh, without them we would just be a dung heap.
But my question to you is this.
They have issued an apology.
They said they did wrong.
Now, will there be nationwide training?
Will they shut down every Starbucks, every franchise for a half a day of training on treating police with respect?
I don't see it happening.
You don't see it happening?
I don't see it happening.
I might be wrong.
Of course, that's what they did when those two guys in Philadelphia, they weren't even paying customers.
And the lady came up and said, oh, they wanted to use the men's room.
They said, no, no, you got to be a paying customer.
And in fact, and they said, we ain't going to pay.
We're just going to sit here.
We sit here as long as we like.
And so she said, well, they called the police.
Oh my gosh, the whole company had to go into a paroxysm of guilt and self-flagellation.
They shut the company down for, was it half a day of training?
A full day of training?
I think it was a half a day of training.
No, it was a full day of training.
It was a full day.
It was a corporate mandated training.
How about, you know, 10 minutes of corporate training to respect the police?
Any chance of that?
Maybe.
How about 9 minutes and 11 seconds?
Symbolic 9-1-1.
But there you go.
Just this utter, utter, again, topsy-turvy idea that if the police are drinking coffee, you feel unsafe.
And the police have got to go?
I'll throw this out there.
What are these police doing going to Starbucks?
It's a company that is basically sided with Black Lives Matter, a loosely affiliated organization that was responsible for killing a number of cops in 2016.
Don't go to Starbucks!
Beats me.
Beats me.
There's cheaper coffee at McDonald's.
Yes, you'd think they'd know better anyway.
Dunkin' Donuts sounds like the kind of place a police officer would be more likely to go.
Tempe Police Department.
Tempe's probably one of these high-tone places.
Actually it is.
Yes, yes.
Anyway, but moving on, I think we're moving from Tempe to Atlanta, are we not?
Oh, well we'll just briefly touch on this because this is actually something I might do a larger piece on.
Atlanta's one of the cities going through Quick, shocking gentrification.
While the metro area gets blacker...
The city gets whiter.
And the mayoral race about a year ago, it went down because no candidate actually got a majority of the votes.
They had to have a runoff.
The black candidate barely won.
And we've talked about this in a prior podcast when we were actually able to break down the polling data and look at it in these districts by race where they're heavily white versus heavily black.
And it was just a complete racial election.
A complete racial election.
And Mayor Bottoms, Mayor Kesha Lance Bottoms, I actually believe will be the last black mayor of Atlanta.
What's going on right now is massive gentrification.
Let me just give you a quick example of this.
In the birthplace of Martin Luther King, it's called the Old Fourth Ward, where home values are now up to 600 $60,000, where in 2013 the average was $280,000.
That is extraordinary appreciation in a span of five years.
$200,000 or $600,000?
Unreal growth.
And it's all done by the reintroduction of whites to Atlanta.
Now remember, Atlanta was majority white for almost the entirety of the city's history until the Civil Rights era.
And then whites were able to vacate and move to the suburbs.
This is maybe my favorite quote I've ever read about what gentrification is doing.
On the section of Auburn Avenue where King was born in 1929, large two- and three-story homes still stand across from rows of shotgun houses.
Today, new lofts, townhomes, and condos share space with aged buildings and century-old bungalows.
Homeless people beg for money on streets where diners eat at some of the city's best restaurants.
And another sign of change?
According to older black residents, white women jog and walk their dogs on streets that drug dealers once ruled.
Now, there's a little background on what's happening in Atlanta and I'll just be brief on this because we are running out of time.
What happened is there's been an uproar because a developer has come in and they have white faces all over this online brochure advertising this large luxury development which is slated for development in one of the oldest black neighborhoods, Bankhead of Atlanta.
And people were up in arms at this because they had, as the president and CEO of the Russell Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship said, James J. Bailey, this is so disturbing.
New Atlanta, and you only show pictures of whites.
But it wasn't only whites.
It wasn't only whites.
No, no, no.
There were a couple of photographs that had only white faces in them, but they've got the nice, the obligatory mix.
For heaven's sake.
Well, you know, this is supposed to be the happy ending, right?
The neighborhood improves, there's integration.
Aren't we supposed to be looking for integration?
I guess not.
Well no, this is, and again, this development is being built and this is where the Atlanta City Councilman Matt Westmoreland issued on his Facebook post after seeing this brochure.
He noted the development sits in an area with an attendance zone for an elementary school that is 99% non-white and also 86% of those going to this school qualify for a free lunch.
So you basically are about to have this massive It's going to increase tax revenue.
Yeah, you know what?
A lot of white people are going to move in there, but just like in the old fourth ward, home values are going to rise.
That's something I can never understand.
Why is it that when all of their home values suddenly increase, blacks resent it?
Isn't now the time to sell out and move someplace else?
You can sell and move to one of the majority white suburbs where you can get a house for You know, a tenth of what you just got a check for from some white person gentrifying the area.
Well, do we have time for one more story?
We have time for one more story.
Well, I just did not want to leave out Afro Future Fest.
It's set for the 3rd and 4th of August and the people organizing it decided they were going to charge whites double.
Double admission for whites.
Whites are going to pay $20 and POC are going to pay $10.
Not quite sure how they're going to test as to who is white and who's not, but the organizers explained it this way.
They said, equality means treating everyone the same.
Equity is ensuring everyone has what they need to be successful.
Our ticket structure was built to ensure that the most marginalized communities, in parentheses people of color, are provided with an equitable chance at enjoying events in their own community, Black Detroit.
Well, interestingly enough, once they announced this, one of their advertised performers, Tiny Jag, whom I'd never heard of.
I've never heard of her either.
She's a biracial rapper based in Detroit.
She pulled out.
She said, I was immediately enraged just because I am biracial.
I have family members that would have, under those circumstances, been subjected to something that I would not ever want them to be in.
Well, a certain amount of principled behavior going on.
That's actually a shocking statement.
I don't think I've ever read from anyone else.
Has Barack Obama ever?
acknowledged as white ancestors without disparaging them?
No, no. And here, Tiny Jag is basically standing up for her, for the white half of her family.
She says, what the heck's this? You know, my relatives are gonna have to pay double.
And so she pulled out. Now, frankly, I think that organizers for a private event like this
should have the right to do this. But there was quite a backlash against this. And they
changed their minds. Okay, okay, everybody can come in for $10. We're not gonna charge
white people anymore. But there will be a suggested donation for non people of color.
You're not white anymore.
The equity tax.
You're not white anymore.
You're a non-person of color.
Now, of course, there were some comments saying that, well, you know, they should have structured it better.
Having a discount for people who had attended historically black colleges and universities or members of African Methodist Episcopal churches.
But no, no.
They just came right out and said, blacks get in cheap.
But now, the one thing that I thought was very interesting about this, it's called Afrofuture Fest, and gosh, you haven't got any time, but I just wanted to find out what actual futurism is.
It's a cultural aesthetic philosophy of science, philosophy, and history that explores the developing intersection of African diaspora culture with technology.
So there you go.
It sounds like it leads with a straight line to Or Vermont if Susana gets her way.
Hey, real quick, ladies and gentlemen, be sure to contact us.
We never know when YouTube's going to pull the plug.
BecauseWeLiveHereAtProtonMail.com.
Email me once again so we can make sure we can stay in touch.
BecauseWeLiveHereAtProtonMail.com or The contact us page at www.emrin.com.
So for Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
Our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection