Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to this edition of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me is PK, my indispensable comrade in this undertaking.
And I think we'd like to start this podcast off with a little discussion of New York State.
Well, Mr. Taylor, welcome back, first and foremost.
I'd like to thank all of our listeners who took the opportunity to contact us last week to make sure that we can stay connected with you in case I don't want to say the inevitable, but in case the digital noose goes around our neck and we go down the gallows and the YouTube channel goes away.
That's true.
Our podcast channel could go away.
Our video channel could go away.
These things are all possible.
And so we are preparing for the worst.
And as PK points out, we are very pleased when you send us your email addresses so that we can get in contact with you, even if YouTube refuses to do so.
It's very important to stay in touch.
And I took the advice of one Peter Brimlow and I created a new email which I unveiled last week.
BecauseWeLiveHere at ProtonMail.com.
Once again that email, please shoot us over your email so you can stay in touch with us and know the latest of what's happening with the podcast and all that's happening with the New Century Foundation.
BecauseWeLiveHere at ProtonMail.com.
I'd also like to throw in one more plug I know Jared's books have regrettably largely been purged from Amazon but there is a new one at Amazon that I highly recommend you go check out.
Simply go to Amazon and type in Their Lives Matter Too.
It's a book dedicated to the late Amanda Blackburn and the daughter she carried.
You'll learn about that story in the book.
All you have to do is go to Amazon type in Their Lives Matter Too.
I'm not going to give anything away really because obviously we don't want to run into the Digital censors at Amazon, so you have to keep things as opaque and innocuous as possible.
So, Amazon, their lives matter too.
Email, because we live here, at protonmail.com.
And now, we have to roll the ugliness out of New York City.
New York State, I should say.
Trying to be as opaque and as innocuous as possible, which is hard to do under those circumstances, but this one is fairly straightforward.
New York State is just about getting ready to let illegal aliens apply for driver's licenses.
Now, this is reversing a policy that had been in place since 2002, but both houses of the state legislature have passed the bill and Governor Andrew Cuomo signed it into law just late Monday night.
But it will take 180 days to go into effect.
Now, it's interesting to me that the written test for the learner's permit is available in the following languages, and let me read them out to you.
But gosh, who would have thought that you could take your test for a license in Bosnian?
I guess there's a lot of demand for that.
But now, interestingly enough, and I suspect this is going to be a cause for all sorts of lawsuits down the road, if you want to take the written test for a commercial driver's license, that's available only in English or Spanish.
All those Nepalese are going to go on strike.
Discrimination.
Yes, bad discrimination.
and this is even worse the test for a hazmat license hazardous materials that's available only in english so they're gonna have to straighten all that out they're gonna have to get their bengali interpreters and their hebrew and their nepali interpreters hard to work here but I am glad to say that despite the governor and the state house deciding that illegal immigrants should get driver's licenses in New York, as I say, reversing a 17-year-old policy, there is resistance.
Because some people think that the 725,000 illegal immigrants who are estimated to be living in New York should not have driver's license.
And the resistance is coming at the county level.
And one of the reasons is, an American citizen, if he wants to register a vote, all he needs to do is show up with a driver's license and say, here I am, I'm a U.S.
citizen.
And they are required to swear that they're eligible, but nobody checks up on them.
As the state confesses, it's based on the anarchist system.
Now, the county clerk of Rensselaer County by the name of Frank Morola, and he represents the region close to Albany, the state capital, no less.
He says that he's not going to grant driver's licenses to illegal aliens.
I don't know how he's going to find out, but he says that doing so would make American citizens in New York indistinguishable from illegal aliens.
And nullifies citizenship.
Yes.
How hard is that to understand, folks?
In 2002, New York legislators understood that.
And think, in 17 short years, now the state, Mr. Taylor, is completely controlled.
Both levels of the legislative, the New York State Senate and House, both controlled by Democrats.
Dominated by Democrats.
It's a one-party state like California.
Yes, that's right.
That's right.
About which we will be hearing later on.
Correct.
But, you know, it's interesting.
I wonder whether Governor Cuomo and the people who voted in favor of this, whether they care about non-citizens voting.
I suspect they don't much worry about it at all.
If they decide to vote, so what?
They'll vote Democrat, so what the heck?
Also, it's not just Rensselaer County.
In Erie County as well.
The clerk, Michael Kearns, now this is a region around Buffalo, another substantial metropolis, he's written a letter to state officials saying that he will not give driver's licenses to illegals either.
He wrote that the policy is inconsistent with federal law and what he plans to do is file a declaratory action in federal court to challenge the law for being in violation of the Immigration Reform and Control Act, IRCA, of 1986 Which bans employers from hiring illegal aliens over Americans.
Now, I don't know quite how that invalidates a driver's license for illegal aliens.
Nobody's saying that you have to hire these people just because they got a driver's license.
But whatever angle they can use, it is encouraging to me that at least at the county level, There are some patriotic Americans with backbone who say, wait a minute, some of these illegals are going to start voting.
And in any case, it is completely inconsistent with our concept of who an American is to let people who are breaking the law just by being here to get a driver's license.
Well, citizenship at this point, what does it really mean in this country?
It's one of the saddest facts to think how far we've fallen at this point.
Now you're in the state where, again, like you said, Governor Cuomo, who looks at that Statue of Liberty and probably thinks to himself, this is what that statue represents.
Illegals should have a driver's license.
That's what Emma Lazarus meant on that poem.
That's right.
We want those people on the roadways all across this great state of New York.
And New York is a great state, and it is a travesty what's happening, but unfortunately it's not It's confined to New York.
It's also in California.
That's true.
The wretched refuge from your teeming shores is not just in New York.
So, tell us about California.
Well, this was only a week ago today, actually, on June 13th.
California lawmakers, once again, this is a state completely dominated by Democrats at the state government level.
approved a $215 billion state budget, Governor Gavin Newsom, who recently said that the GOP
is headed to the dustbin of history, he's expected to sign this. What does this bill include? Well,
ladies and gentlemen, it includes the expansion of Medi-Cal, the state's Medicaid program,
to cover poor illegal aliens up to the age of 26.
So Mr. Taylor we go from in 1993 what was it Prop 187 which was going to deny all benefits to illegal aliens to now the state.
Once it's controlled completely by Democrats they're going to go ahead and cover illegal aliens health care up to the age of 26.
This move is projected to saddle California taxpayers with billions of dollars in new spending commitments Medi-Cal already covers one third of the state's 39 million people.
Now let's stop and think about that.
One third of the state's people have got their palms out and are getting state-sponsored aid for medicine.
I mean, where does this stop?
One third.
It's well over 12 million people.
I mean, it's astonishing.
Yes, yes.
Well, it's like the people who pay taxes and the people who don't pay taxes.
Eventually, as Margaret Thatcher said, the trouble with socialism is you run out of other people's money.
You run out of other people's money to pay for all this medicine, too.
But anyway, I didn't mean to interrupt.
You didn't interrupt at all.
It's a very good point.
I mean, as California goes, so goes the nation.
The fact that Gavin Newsom is... We're not going to talk about it in depth, but he has stated that America in 2019 is a lot like California was when they passed Prop 187.
And you know what?
We're not gonna... California didn't bend.
We allowed ourselves to get rid of that xenophobia and we've embraced this glorious future where Los Angeles is riddled with homeless.
But don't worry!
We're gonna take care of all these illegal aliens and their children up to the age of 26.
So, illegal minors through age 18.
are already eligible for Medi-Cal.
That's right.
So once again we're upping that age limit 8 years to 26.
Raising that age cap to 26 is expected to bring an additional 90,000 people which is going to raise and of course this is what this is going to do.
The eligibility age will encourage more illegal alien young people To, hey, if they're in Texas, if they're in Arizona, they're not in health care.
Why would they just go to California and find a job and if they have any cuts or bruises or scrapes or an illness, hey, head over to the emergency clinic and it's all taken care of by the California taxpayer.
Up to age 26.
But I bet after age 26 they'll find some way to treat them anyway.
Of course.
Yes.
Or they just won't pay their bill and that will then cause more and more hospitals and networks to close because they're in the This used to be called moral hazard.
You pass a law and it encourages people to behave immorally.
And that's what's going to happen here.
As you say, all these people from all around the country are going to say, wow, free medicine in California.
California, here I come.
We live in a society where we're seeing more and more men in athletics, in high school and collegiate athletics, say that they're women so they can compete and win awards.
I'm surprised we have yet to see a person, an American citizen, who does not have health insurance, who says, you know what?
I'm an illegal alien.
I'm going to identify as an illegal alien.
And you know what?
I might be 40 on my ID, but you know what?
I identify as a 22-year-old.
And to see if they can then go and get medical care.
You know, on the subject of identifying as a certain age, there was a fellow in Holland, as I recall, that wanted his official birth date changed.
Okay.
This was because he was on Tinder and he was in his 40s and he said he wasn't getting dates with hot young 25 year olds because they think he's over the hill.
He said, no, I identify as 25 and so I want to get my birthday changed so I can claim on Tinder that I'm 25 years old.
So, anything's possible.
I don't know whether that went through.
But in these days, as you say, everything is fluid.
We are gender fluid.
We're age fluid.
We can be race fluid.
We can be species fluid.
Anyway, enough fluidity here.
Joe Biden got a little too fluid apparently here when he talked about the way the Senate was back in 1973 when he got there.
Well, that was a real country then.
Well, it was heading in a bad direction, but at least it was something that could be described as a country.
But earlier this week, he said the Senate got things done with civility back when he first showed up in 1973 when he was serving alongside out-and-out segregationists.
He said that long-dead senators such as James Eastland of Mississippi or Herman Talmadge of Georgia He said that they, he disagreed with just about everything they said.
We didn't agree on much of anything, he said, but we got along.
He said Washington functioned more smoothly a generation ago than under today's broken hyper-partisanship.
Now, these comments, which seem innocuous enough to me, they immediately sparked one of the most intense disputes of Democratic presidential primary so far.
All of his opponents are saying this is no doubt some sort of covert support for segregation.
Senator Cory Booker, the black candidate, he says, frankly, I'm disappointed that he hasn't issued an immediate apology.
For the pain his words are dredging up for many Americans.
The pain those words are dredging up?
Simply by saying that there was a certain civility in the Senate 73 years ago.
Sorry, in 1973.
And that there were out and out segregations there.
That's dredging up pain for so many Americans.
Joe Biden has said he's got nothing to be sorry for.
And he says it is Cory Booker who should apologize to him for questioning his motives because he is, and this is a really original phrase, Joe, he doesn't have a racist bone in his body.
So, he's standing firm.
Well, Mayor Bill de Blasio, who as we know is married to a black woman, And has a hybrid family.
He tweeted, it's 2019 and Joe Biden is longing for the good old days of civility typified by James Eastland.
And then he went on to say, he posted a picture of his family and he said, Eastland thought my multiracial family should be illegal.
I don't know if that's true or not.
I don't know what Eastland's position on that was.
And he says, Biden repeatedly demonstrates that he's out of step with the values of the modern democratic party.
You know... What are those values?
The values is anything goes.
We're just fluid, fluid, fluid.
We're citizenship fluid.
We're IQ fluid.
We're profession fluid.
We're just fluid.
We're just liquid.
We're not solid.
Anything goes as long as the pedal is always pushed to the maximum metal when it comes to the anti-white mindset.
Well, see, to me the significance of this is that Unless you take a position of total and complete ferocity towards anyone who is not a worshiper of orthodoxy, then you too are a supporter of all of this evil.
Correct racial orthodoxy in the current year.
Correct.
That's exactly right.
And for him to say these people actually had good manners, You're not supposed to allow to notice anything good about anybody who says the wrong thing, certainly about race.
And, you know, Joe Biden, it's quite interesting.
He sometimes notes that he will get into trouble before making some sort of standard pitch that the other side or the opposition is not the enemy.
That's taboo these days.
And he recognizes that.
And he got into, well, and this to me is quite remarkable.
He said that his rule Now, isn't that a remarkably fair-minded thing?
He says, okay, I may disagree with this guy, but he's not inherently evil, or he's not motivated by some sort of low, loathsome motive.
That is precisely what the Democratic Party refuses to accept.
We've talked about how far the left is dragging the Democratic Party with the Radical progressives, as they embrace more and more openly anti-white positions.
And if somebody dares mention that, you know, things actually used to work in the past, even as mundane as that might be, and a racial as the comment might be, the more diverse the Democrat Party gets, the more and more they must crack the whip on anyone who dares point out that America once worked a lot better and was more civil and had more social capital.
Oh, no, no, that's unspeakable.
And when Biden, he had called Vice President Mike Pence a decent guy.
Well, he had to backtrack.
He had to backtrack when people pointed out that the Republican vice president was opposed to LGBTQ civil rights protections.
And then Biden said, well, he was talking about foreign policy context.
And he said, there's nothing decent about being anti-LGBTQ civil rights.
So he will backtrack under certain circumstances.
But this is, as I say, this is what the Democratic Party's position now is.
You cannot say that he's kind to his children.
You cannot say that he gives to charity.
All of that's out the window.
A person who disagrees on whether it's LGBTQ or whatever the latest orthodox requirement is, is Unspeakably and completely and totally evil.
Yeah it's really that simple.
Anyway.
And you know we've talked about that book by Eric Kaufman, White Shift.
That has all the data and go back and listen to the podcast from the past few weeks where we've discussed these Terrifying shifts in the mindset of white liberals, and this is only being exasperated by people like Kamala Harris and by people like Cory Booker who are demanding, as you stated, that these aging white liberals who still think that it's the 1980s, like Joe Biden,
Even Bernie Sanders, they have to toe the line.
They cannot deviate from this, I don't want to use the word democratic plantation because that sounds like we're going to be in the mindset of the Democrats are the real racists, but you have to be on this, you have to be on this island that white privilege is the ultimate enemy.
And I don't think Joe Biden, this is what Joe Biden's going to run into in the next couple of weeks when they have that first big Yes, yes.
I have been predicting that he will plummet in the polls as this stuff comes out, but he hasn't so far.
He's still the leader, but we'll see.
Well, what is going to come out during that first debate, I think we're going to hear some of the real Joe Biden.
Let's bring up what he said back in 1975.
He was asked, he said, forcing blacks to integrate was quote a rejection of the entire black awareness concept
where black is beautiful black culture should be studied and the cultural awareness
of the importance of their own identity end quote he's basically saying that mixing with white
destroys black identity well uh you know it's okay for blacks to say that but boy white people
should not say that As a freshman senator, he told an all-white crowd, quote, and this is Joe Biden I'm referring to, he said, quote, black kids don't want to come to your school any more than you want to go to their school.
End quote.
On reparations, this is the hot issue right now.
It's being forced on us.
So obviously this is one of the reasons why.
Because in 2016, Hillary didn't have a lot of black support in a lot of the states.
It could have pushed her over the top.
So this is an issue, a wedge issue, that's going to get more and more blacks to the ballot box in 2020.
Here's what Joe Biden said on reparations.
Quote, I don't feel responsible for the sins of my father and grandfather.
I'll be damned if I feel responsible to pay for what happened 300 years ago.
End quote.
Hey, hallelujah, brother Biden.
That's a good quote.
You'll never, you won't even hear Republicans talk like that.
Republicans nowadays, Mr. Taylor and dear listener, they're too busy bashing the 1994 crime bill as racist.
I fear that that was probably back... I don't remember exactly when he said that.
It was in the mid-1980s.
You know what it was?
It was when Jesse Jackson brought it up in the 1988 Democrat primary.
That was the first time that that was really pushed.
Yes, I suspect that Uncle Joe will change his tune on that.
Now, whether or not he'll backtrack all the way, he will not express himself quite so forcefully.
No, and then finally, let's just wrap it up in a nice, this Biden, in a nice little bow, this racial package of Biden's past, which the Democrats, particularly Kamala Harris and Cory Booker, can't wait to unwrap during the primaries to make him look like a racist.
In 2008, he made blacks angry when he said, Quote, the community is in denial about the AIDS.
That's what he said, and I frankly don't believe him.
He said he went around in the community telling people to wear condoms, get themselves AIDS tested.
I frankly don't believe him.
If some white guy, even if he's a U.S.
Senator, shows up in the hood telling black people to wear condoms, he'd be lucky to get out alive.
What's this crazy cracker talking about?
Does he really expect us to believe that he was walking around on street corners telling black people to wear condoms?
That's what he claimed.
This has been a presidential debate.
I've seen it.
I've heard it.
It's been videoed.
Again, I just don't believe it.
But yes, as you say, the big thing these days is reparations.
And just this week, the House Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties Held a hearing.
And it's on HR 40 and the path to restorative justice.
That's what it was called.
And it is a commission to study reparations.
Now, do you know why it's called House Resolution 40?
Number 40?
No!
Please tell me why.
It stands for 40 acres and a mule.
Yes, yes.
Now, of course, they had all these people telling us it's absolutely necessary that it's not.
Well, Ta-Nehisi Coates was up there just bellowing about how it's not just slavery, it's been redlining, it's been this, it's been that, it's been lynching, it's been The incarceration complex, all this bad, bad, badness of white people up to the current day.
Redlining, don't forget, that's Tennessee Coats' big issue.
Redlining, oh boy, that's kept him down in the worst sort of way.
No, there were only two people who spoke up against.
Reparations.
Out of this whole panoply of witnesses.
They're both black, because white people can't stand up for themselves.
They are typical of what Robert Frost said about liberals, you know.
Liberals can't take their own side in an argument.
And of course, white people can't take their own side in an argument.
In any case, this fellow named Coleman Hughes, he's a writer for Quillette.
He's just 23 years old.
He's a student at Columbia.
But he said that reparations are a moral and political mistake.
I was fairly impressed with some of his arguments.
He said black people don't need another apology.
We need safer neighborhoods, better schools, less punitive criminal justice system.
That's not true and the criminal justice system should be punitive.
We need affordable health care and none of these things can be achieved through reparations for slavery.
He's right about that.
The criminal justice system should be far more punitive, actually.
Yes, yes.
But then he went on to describe rap race as not just as divisive but as an insult to many black Americans by putting a price on the suffering of their ancestors and we would turn the relationship between black Americans and white Americans from a coalition into a transaction.
He says the obligations of citizenship should not be transactional.
It's not contingent on necessary.
It never expires.
It can't be paid off.
Rather noble, civic nationalist sentiments.
And of course, the fact that he was not part of this clack, beating the drum for handouts.
Oh, the people in the audience got all upset about that and they booed.
And Steve Cohen, who is the subcommittee chairman, he banged on the gavel.
And apparently, using the hip new language in the United States Congress, he told them to be quiet by saying, chill, chill, chill.
I guess he thought he was being hip, huh?
Well, this is a guy who also not too long ago in some sort of congressional hearing was seen eating a bucket of KFC chicken.
I don't know if you forgot that video and those images of this balding white guy.
Doesn't he represent a heavily black district from around Memphis?
I think that's somebody else, but I could be wrong.
I could be wrong.
You remember details like that better than I do.
Now, apparently, after the audience, in fact, did chill, Cohen said, and I can't, I'm trying to figure out what he meant by this.
He says, he was presumptive, but he still has a right to speak, referring to this young man who said it would be a moral and political mistake.
He was being dismissive of his argument.
But presumptive.
I guess he was saying, he meant to say he's being presumptuous.
Perhaps.
See, presumptive doesn't make any sense under the circumstances.
He's probably saying, eh, this guy's wrong, but he actually has the right to say these things.
Well, that's mighty, mighty, mighty big, mighty big of Congressman Cohen.
You know, going back to one statement that he has here when we hear him talk about, you know, we need less punitive criminal justice system.
And yet at the same time, he says something along the lines of we need safer neighborhoods and better schools.
Well, there's only one way to have that happen in black neighborhoods.
be far harsher when it comes to sentencing actually do the concept of broken windows policing that is being lambasted by both and a bipartisan effort by people like President Trump who ran on a law and order candidacy and more importantly by completely abandoning the nonsensical Obama policy of trying to stop the K-12 punishment for students who display anti-social behavior.
Well, not stop the punishment, just make the incidence of punishment equal by race.
Correct.
So that you can suspend white children just as often as you suspend black children.
How dare we don't have enough white kids misbehaving and breaking the rules.
That's right, that's right.
But you were going to tell us about the Episcopal Bishop Eugene Sutton.
Yes, so he was a witness too, wasn't he?
He was.
He appeared before the House Judiciary subcommittee, HR 40, yesterday and he said, quote, I'm actually talking to my white brothers and sisters.
You need this more than we do.
He's talking about reparations.
You need this for your soul.
You need this to be able to look black persons in the eye and say, I acknowledge the mistake and I want to be part of the solution to repair that damage.
What does that do to your soul?
To know that some of the benefit that you get from your white skin and background is not accrued to everybody.
You know, this makes me feel so much better.
It's for us.
Reparations are for us.
It's your indulgence.
That's right.
So we can finally breathe a sigh of relief and say, free at last.
Great God Almighty, free at last.
Racial indulgence is passing out to the white folks.
That's right.
We have finally done what we need to do.
Oh boy, as I say, now I'm all for reparations because we're going to be feeling so good about it.
I never knew that my soul and your soul and everyone's soul that we're friendly with was in danger, was jeopardized.
So we were going to be in racial purgatory.
Does that mean?
Does that mean if we're talking about the history of this great country that every white person who has lived and died before reparations comes To fruition, that they exist in some sort of purgatory, that they've never made it to heaven.
Is that what Bishop Eugene Sutton is saying?
Their souls are in torment.
But you see, of course, it's going to be great because our souls are going to be saved when the federal government pays off.
It's not going to come out of your pocket or my pocket.
It's the federal government who's once again going to save our souls.
They might have to tax us a little bit more, but that is how our souls are going to be saved.
Not by anything we did, but by what the federal government does.
But I did want to talk about the one, there was one white person who actually testified.
You know, it's such a transparent charade.
You get this lineup of nothing but black people and one token white person to talk about reparation for slavery.
Does this make sense?
It's just such a parody of anything that could be remotely deliberative or remotely fair-minded.
But of course, the white lady, she was absolutely in favor of reparations.
Her name is Katrina Brown, and the reason she supports reparations is because, to her horror, she learned that despite the fact that her ancestors were Rhode Islanders, they were big slave traders.
Back before the slave trade was outlawed in 1808.
And she thought that being a New Englander, her family and her bloodline was clear of taint.
But oh my gosh, no, no.
She too was part of this horrible original sin, as they like to call it, of the United States.
And she even produced a film about her ancestors.
It's called Traces of the Trade, a story from the deep north.
Well, wasn't Daryl aware up until a few years ago known as the Plantation State?
The deep south, and now we know all those people are racist, but even the deep
north, Rhode Island, they can be racist too, is the message of her film.
Well wasn't Daryl aware up until a few years ago known as a plantation state and then
there was a push to have that removed because that was obviously a
commemoration of the racist past?
Oh, can't have that.
Can't have that, yes.
But, you know, all of this talk about reparations and the continuing wickedness of white people and what we owe our Dusky Brothers, it has real life consequences.
It does!
You know, a couple years ago when we were doing production for this podcast, we were talking about, or I brought up, that in 2016 there was a trial.
There was a white co-editor at Vanderbilt University in Nashville who had been raped.
And a football player by the name of Corey Beatty received 15 years for raping this unconscious white woman.
And it came out in court that he stated During this sexual, this raping, this encounter, quote, that's for 400 years of slavery, you bitch!
He yelled at her as he was raping her.
This came out.
Now, she was passed out drunk, wasn't she?
She was.
She was gang raped.
I think they all urinated on her, too.
They did.
And in prior court hearings, prosecutors didn't, you know, they acknowledged a racial statement had been made, but they did not make it available publicly until the sentencing was actually carried out.
So, what we're going to talk about now is a story that is blowing up all across the internet.
And this is a story of a 20-year-old white woman in the Bronx.
She met a black gentleman, but no.
Scratch that.
Scratch that for me vocabulary.
I've got to do it.
I don't know why I dared qualify that.
She met a degenerate.
by the name of Tamar Bishop, 23-year-old black cat, at about 5 a.m.
with other friends.
I don't know what she was doing, daring to do this.
We can't say that she had no moral agency in this situation.
She willingly met this guy, and they ended up hanging out with him on a rooftop of a public housing in the Bronx.
Now, it's bound to be a really salubrious place, you can imagine.
So, alarm bells are going off.
He punched her repeatedly before raping her.
He continued to beat her, kicking and punching her in the head and body until she fell unconscious.
She had a broken nose, broken teeth.
She was vomiting blood.
This white girl who went and met this black guy.
Yeah.
At 5 in the morning.
5am.
So a Special Victims Division investigator described this attack as, quote, one of the worst he's ever seen, end quote.
You won't see this story on any of the law and orders that take place in New York where they whitewash all the criminals, but this is one that should be there.
So why are we talking about this?
Well, Tamar Bishop, He was arrested twice in 2016 for robbing a 99 cent store.
We don't know if he went to jail, but he was locked up for over a year on robbery charge, a prior robbery charge, and he was released on parole on July 9th, 2018.
So, we know his backstory, that this is a criminal who has spent time in jail, who was a parolee.
What, pray tell, are we talking about this for?
Because just like that Vanderbilt story, where they tried to hide the racial angle of the rape, this time the racial angle slipped out.
Right from the start.
Right from the start.
And here was the motive from Mr. Bishop's lips.
Quote, she was a white girl.
She deserved it because us minorities have been through slavery.
End quote.
He said to someone who witnessed the 20 year old woman covered in blood.
Quote, this is what they used to do to us.
This is what they did to us during slavery.
Unquote.
Well, of course, how many Hollywood films have been made over the past decade?
From Django Unchained to 12 Years a Slave that pushed this narrative, this civil rights porn, this slavery porn that has been greasing the wheels for people like Stacey Abrams to come along and start pushing this idea.
I remember she was pushing this idea in the Georgia governor's race back in 2018.
In 2017 she was pushing this when she was beginning to make a name for herself as even running to displace the white female candidate that she ended up defeating.
So it's taken, remember, this whole reparation stuff, it didn't come from just out of the blue.
It's been slowly, slowly burning.
Well, it sort of waxes and wanes.
It does, but now it's a crescendo.
It's waxing more than it ever has before.
It's gotten to the point where there may actually, I can imagine, some sort of congressional vote on something like this.
What I predict will happen is you'll see a state try and take the lead.
A state like California or New York, even though California is what?
Four, five percent black, if that.
I think you'll see one of these states that is completely dominated on... Not California.
Too many Hispanics there.
See, and that's... This is... Hispanics are not going to vote for us.
This is the beauty of where we are in this racially polarized environment, where your average white Republican is going to look at this and say, what the heck?
He's going to think, she's going to think, just like Joe Biden did back in 1998, What the hell do I have to do with what happened 300 years ago?
With what happened in the 1800s?
But you know, to me, the significance of this guy is that if the air is filled with the idea that white people owe black people something, why not cut out the middleman?
Take it directly.
And if you're a black man, and you're a descendant from all of these generations of people who have been raped, abused, beaten, enslaved, murdered by white people, now's your chance.
Everybody's telling you you're owed something.
And if you're a man, maybe you're owed sex.
Or maybe you're owed money.
Don't wait for the government to act.
Cut out the middleman and take it yourself.
That seems to me the entirely logical consequence of this constant harping on what white people owe black people.
And this sort of abiding and I think increasing hatred that blacks have for whites is a remarkable thing that the mainstream media absolutely do not want to write about.
There was another example of this in a piece by a fellow named Nicholas Powers.
He was writing at a website called Race Baiter, which is not that well known.
But this guy himself, he's written for better known places like Huffington Post.
And he wrote an essay, the title of which is Seeing Poor Whites Makes Me Happy.
And let me read just a few passages from this.
It starts off with, Should I kick him in the face?
Hard?
Nah.
Chill.
He's not worth it.
But why is this white boy begging for money in a black neighborhood?
Is he stupid?
So here he sees a white person begging in a black neighborhood.
Now, I find this a little difficult to believe.
Why would a black guy, why would a white guy, some homeless white guy, be begging in a black neighborhood?
But let's assume for a moment that this happens.
And Nicholas Powers goes on to write, White people begging us for food feels like justice.
It feels like Afrofuturism after America falls.
It feels like a black nationalist wet dream.
It has the feelings I rarely feel.
A hunger for historical vengeance satisfied so well I rub my belly.
This is a blood lust that was reminiscent of what happened in San Domingo.
Well, at least those were slaves revolting against actual slave drivers.
These people, these people have had... They're our fellow citizens!
Not only that, but they have benefited now from several generations, not merely of equality, but actual racial preferences.
Then he goes on to say this, White homeless poor in the hood are a Rorschach test.
I see in them the history of colonization, slavery, mass incarceration that makes their begging black people for money ironic, if not insulting.
He goes on to say, you wasted your whiteness.
Why should we give to you?
In other words, you're white.
You've got all of that.
You've got centuries of white privilege behind you and you blew it.
Ha!
We're not going to give you a dime.
Remember, we talked about a study according to which people start talking about white privilege.
The idea is to make people sympathetic to blacks because they don't have white privilege.
What it does, apparently to blacks and whites alike, is to say, gosh, if there's all this white privilege going around, white people can't make it.
They must be real losers.
They blew their whiteness.
I'm looking at a website, the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, and it's got For 2017, the poverty rate by race and ethnicity.
And for the United States, Mr. Taylor, blacks, about 20% of blacks under the poverty rate.
For Hispanics, 16%.
For whites, it's 8%.
So there's a substantial amount of whites in this country.
Tens of millions of whites.
There are more poor white people than poor black people.
Exactly.
If you're breaking it down per capita.
Now think about what this guy is saying.
This is a sick racial fantasy that this guy is saying is a white dream.
This is orgasmic.
Oh, well, there's yet more.
He says...
I see three brothers run up and spit on him as people cackled at the white boy who wiped sticky gobs from his eyelids.
The laughter was cruel, joyful, and belly deep.
This guy, this guy is just happy, happy, happy to see whites humiliated.
Why not killed?
I mean, that's the next step.
His thinking leads to nothing less than lynching, extermination.
Why not?
That's the direction his thoughts are going in.
Well, that's what the whole white privilege concept is all about.
We talked about there's maybe two people in this country who will continue to bring up The white privilege story, and I can think of two.
There was a white World War II veteran who was killed in Minnesota.
You might recall, I don't remember his name right now, but this happened about a year ago.
And in court, his lawyer tried to argue that it happened because of white privilege.
That's the reason why this black guy killed this.
He didn't have the same opportunities that this white guy did, so that's why he did it.
And then going back to 2011, back in Atlanta, Georgia, in Midtown, I'm talking about...
I don't know how to pronounce this guy's name.
He's a black guy who targeted three white girls.
One of them died by Brittany Watts and it turns out that all of this was motivated.
It was all racially motivated because he had learned about white privilege and that's what he went out to do on that day in, I think it was July of 2011.
He went to end white privilege once and for all.
He was taught in college about this.
That's who radicalized him, precisely.
That's right, that's right.
So all those liberals, are they happy now?
Have they gotten the effect they wanted?
Well, let's finish up with this, remember this guy's name, Nicholas Powers.
He says, he writes this, a white man in tailored clothes and exfoliated skin talked to the homeless white boy.
Now, I don't know what exfoliated skin is, but anyway, this white guy had it.
And Nicholas Pars goes on to write, this white man is worried, like many whites are, that as they become the minority, fewer and fewer places will exist where they have power.
They worry that at some point the roles will be reversed and they will have to beg for food.
This is yet more part of his joy.
He's going to see the white man done down, the white man in the dirt begging for food, and nothing makes him happier.
Well, no, what he means there, exfoliated skin, that's when the, you know, the layer of dead cells from your face.
That means someone who's well tailored, someone with a coif, someone who's elegant, refined, somebody who has, who spends time and care about their appearance.
I suppose that means some sort of skin treatment, but how would you know that he's had skin treatments?
What's sick about this, this, this cat's comments here is I would imagine they're echoed by close to 90% of the black community.
See, that's where I just don't know.
I just don't know.
If 90% of black people felt this way, there would be even more anti-white violence than there is.
Even more expressions of anti-white hatred.
You say even more, but we know there is a lot of anti-racial violent crime.
85%.
Tim Wise agrees with you.
Wilford Riley's book, Hate Crime Hoax.
It's a solid book, but he tries to obfuscate just how bad the interracial violence the interracial violent crime situation is.
See, I would disagree with you.
We know how bad interracial crime is.
You're saying, look, we know that there are 600,000 acts of interracial violence that involve blacks and whites.
Of those, 85% are committed by blacks against whites and only 15% by whites against blacks.
600,000.
All right.
I'm surprised that if really 90% of black people feel this way, there should be Two million such acts.
Maybe it's something as simple as a rebellion when you're in a fast food restaurant and someone spits in your food.
We see more and more of these stories popping up.
That's why I encourage all of our listeners, ladies and gentlemen, to cook at home.
I don't have the answer to that question.
How widespread is this feeling?
I just don't know.
But moving out of the black community into a different kind of community.
You were going to tell us.
Well, we're going to talk about somebody that I don't really like to talk about too much anymore because I don't really have time for someone who tweets and then forgets about what he tweets and who says he's going to do something when it comes to ending birthright citizenship, putting troops at the border.
How many times has President Donald J. Trump Put that football out and said, you know what, base?
I'm gonna let you kick it this time, like Lucy.
And then, like silly, was it Charlie Brown?
We go to kick it and the football's moved and we go flying onto our backs and we look like an absolute fool.
Well, what I'm talking about is President Trump, this past Monday, said that ICE, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, would begin deporting millions.
You know what that means.
starting next week. Well we'll believe it when we see it.
Trump also said that Guatemala is getting ready to sign a safe third agreement. Now you know
what that means. That means anybody who shows up in Guatemala claiming to be an asylum seeker has
got to seek it there.
Correct.
Now Guatemala is important because that is the first country on the other side of Mexico.
Yep.
So anybody who's made it all the way up to Guatemala, if this agreement gets signed, theoretically supposed to apply for asylum there.
So there we go.
All those Hondurans and Nicaraguans.
Well, as we're finding out, we're seeing the border in a lot of ways overrun by Congolese and Haitians at this point.
That's right.
It's astonishing.
Yeah, imagine all those happy Congolese applying for asylum in Guatemala.
Anyway, we'll see what comes of this.
So the State Department also announced that it was going to begin cutting billions in foreign aid to El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras.
Countries that shouldn't be getting foreign aid to begin with, but the point is until the countries dealt with the immigration and the immigrants, illegal aliens coming here and leaving those countries for the United States.
Now see, if the State Department announces this, I'm inclined almost to believe it.
If Donald Trump had tweeted it, I would not believe it.
You dismiss it.
It's like, alright Donald, okay.
More hot air.
And, okay, you're being a little hard on Donald.
We know for sure that if Hillary were in the White House, none of this would be happening.
Yeah, but I think you'd also have an energized House and Senate completely controlled by the GOP at this point.
They would be pushing back.
We can't speculate on what happens.
We can only speculate on what is and what we're dealing with.
Oh, we can speculate.
We can speculate on anything we like.
We can.
We can.
But you know what?
All I care about is actually seeing the walls start to be built.
And I would love to start seeing the mass deportations that President Trump ominously tweeted about.
Well, we'll see.
You know, in the next five days.
So what's going on right now is the U.S.
authorities have detained more than 85,000 family units at the border in May, which is an average of 2,800 per day.
Now that number is starting to decline as we're seeing some of the impact of President Trump's agreement with Mexico going to
effect. Now, what we do know is that since this June 7th immigration deal that Trump cut
with Mexico when he threatened tariffs and Mexico caved immediately, all you know, of
course, what he should have just done is what we've talked about since day one when he
announced his presidency back in June of 2015. Hey dude, tax remittances, then it's over.
Tax remittances across the board.
It doesn't matter where they're going.
Mexico gets $30 billion a year.
China gets what?
$10 billion, I think?
Tax it and then we're all good.
Mexico has begun to deploy thousands of National Guard forces to set up highway checkpoints and catch more Central American migrants coming from those countries that we mentioned earlier, El Salvador, Guatemala, trying to go through Mexico.
So right now what we're seeing the U.S.
officials have said it's going to take several weeks for the full effect of the effort to show up but roughly 250 asylum seekers have been sent back to Mexico per day and the U.S.
officials plan to increase that to at least 1,000 per day in the coming weeks.
I'm hoping that we're going to see some high-profile strategic deportations of Key figures who go out and flaunt the system, who go on Twitter and they say, well, I'm illegal.
Some of these writers who basically challenge, who's the guy who was on the cover of Time Magazine?
Julia, some illegal alien from Mexico a couple years ago was on the cover of Time Magazine.
He was championed as this wonderful illegal alien.
And it's basically challenging Trump to deport him.
Well, you know what, ICE?
There's your number one target.
He's not going to do that.
I know.
I'm sure he's not.
I know.
I'm well aware he's not.
We can both speculate and we can fantasize.
And that, P.K., is fantasy.
But at least he is making some effort.
And you've got to hand to the Mexicans that they're willing to take, apparently, at least 250 people back across the border who already hopped the fence.
They're taking them back.
That's good.
And apparently they're going to start taking a thousand a day.
That is going to discourage the people who are wanting to come when they hear that even after they've managed to get into the United States, they get booted back to Mexico.
So we'll see.
I think, again, you know, the more I think about it, if Hillary went in the White House and the crisis on the border were taking precisely the same shape, I wonder if she might be able to get away with being, in some respects, harsher than Donald Trump, like Nixon going to China.
I don't know.
Or whether she would say, oh, these people deserve our compassion.
And after all, remember that talk she gave to a Brazilian bank?
This came out as part of the WikiLeaks in which she said she dreamed of a borderless Western Hemisphere.
So I don't know.
If Hillary were in the White House, would she say just let them all in?
It's a good question.
I think some people begin to get nervous about that.
But anyway, I'm standing up a little bit for Donald Trump.
I think you've been a little bit harsh.
I agree.
He is a loose cannon.
He is undependable.
He's mostly hot air.
But I think he's doing better than Hillary.
Well, this is the one thing and this is a preface for what you're about to bring up and to conclude our podcast is back in August or late July of 2018, President Trump did tweet out a number of Tucker Carlson video segments on South Africa and the crisis that white farmers are facing there when it comes to the expropriation of land.
Without compensation and what white farmers are facing in terms of the brutal murders we're seeing.
That's right.
That's right.
Kudos to him for that and maybe he'll do it again at some point.
That would be wonderful.
I agree.
It would be great.
But this is a lead-up into a story about what began when 32-year-old Sebenzele Semene shot his way into a South African farmhouse in the Eastern Cape.
There he found a woman by the name of Nikki.
We don't know her last name.
Her last name is being withheld because she was the victim not only of rape.
She's a 45 year old mother.
She was raped in front of her children and Sebenzele Semani first sexually molested the daughter and all of this family, the man was out of the house.
They were submitted to a four hour ordeal.
Now, This is typical of what goes on.
In recent years, between 55 and 75 farmers are killed every year, often after being horrifically tortured with boiling water, power tools, you name it.
They've come up with all sorts of imaginative ways to make death as painful as possible.
And about 22 farmers have been murdered in South Africa just this year, and 195 farms have been attacked Now, the children were aged 10, 14, and 16.
As I said, they were forced to watch as this fellow raped their mother.
Now, I would have thought if the 14 and 16 year olds could have taken action of some kind, unless they're tied up, or in any case, we don't know the details here.
I think if somebody, if I was even 10 years old, As somebody raping my mother, I wouldn't just stood around.
In any case, the South African government insists that the motive in these attacks, robberies, rapes, torturing, is not an attack on whites, it's robbery.
And that they go after these isolated farms because they are out in the boonies and the police are not likely to show up very quickly.
Well, One of the interesting aspects of this is that Nikki and her husband, Heini, who is 44 years old, they've been forced out of their farmhouse and their three children have been too terrified ever to go back.
They applied to Australia on a humanitarian visa.
But the Australian Home Affairs Minister turned him down.
Turned him down.
They said, no, no, too bad.
This isn't what we consider refugees to be.
I mean, if these people aren't refugees, I don't know what they are.
Exactly.
But this was, in effect, an interesting consequence because sometime back in September of 2018, the Home Affairs Minister then, Peter Dutton, said he was considering A special refugee intake program for South Africans because they are coming from a regime that is persecuting them for racial reasons.
And a number of liberal MPs, now liberal in Australia means conservative by our standards, they were talking about taking up to 10,000 persecuted South Africans every year.
Now, of course, that was then when they started talking about this.
Then the South African government started saying, oh, this is deeply insulting.
And the liberals, as well as Dutton, backed down.
But if anybody had a case, Nikki and Heine and their three children, it seems to me, would have had a case.
But as she says, as Nikki says, she said, I speak for thousands of South African farmers.
We need a lifeline.
The violence is escalating.
No, and they do.
And just in the past month, there have been a couple of high-profile murders of white South Africans.
In fact, one guy, I don't recall his name, but he had been featured in a New York Times article that was trying to downplay the severity of the violence.
And he said, no, no, he owned a big...
He owned a big winery.
He produced some fantastic wines.
I've actually tried to find some of the wines that his winery produced, and he was found murdered.
And then there was also a female, a white female South African, who was a loud proponent of whites being able to vacate this ANC, this nation that is dominated and controlled by rapidly anti-white, anti-Boer Ideology.
And she was found murdered by blacks.
Yes.
It happens routinely.
As I pointed out, 22 murdered so far.
And often in the most horrific and revolting, brutal ways.
So this is something that I think the United States, it's difficult to imagine, but if we had any sense at all, we would have essentially an open immigration policy for South Africans.
Has there ever been a story of a white South African trying to cross the Mexican border?
Because there are a lot of expat communities all across the country.
There have been a number of well-known cases in which a white South African did apply for asylum in the United States and was turned down just the way these people have been turned down.
There have been a number of fairly high-profile cases of that kind.
I remember we were trying to raise money for a family that had been turned down.
I think they were turned back at the border and they didn't have any money.
No, this is the United States.
I don't think there is a single country in the entire world that recognizes South Africans as proper refugees.
And I just want to clarify the names of the two whites who were murdered.
Stephan Smith, who had complained in a New York Times article about how there had been a number of nearby townships that were erecting shacks at the back of his farm.
In the New York Times article, he was pointing out that the government wants to take my property.
Well, he was found dead.
And then the white female who was found dead, her name was Annette Kennelly.
She spoke out against what Well, for lack of a better term, a holocaust against your own people.
And by extension, our people.
And it's hard to read some of these stories, Mr. Taylor, about what's happening and what these brave people are enduring because no one wants them.
And you think back to what that black writer that you spoke of, who fantasizes and who looks at this as Afrofuturism.
That is what they want us to be in this country.
That's the ideal lifestyle.
Whites living in squatter camps as Boers do in South Africa.
That's his vision.
That's right.
Nicholas Powers.
He wants vengeance.
I think he might as well just want us all dead.
The world would be a far better place in his view.
Now you're starting to think in a Kirsarian logic here.
Any guy who is delighted when some beggar gets spat on and laughed at.
A white beggar.
A white beggar by blacks.
But anyway, this is not exactly the most elevating note on which to end this podcast, but our time is approaching and we would like to remind our listeners that although we did not take up any listener questions on this occasion, we do love hearing from you.
And so, if you would, please send your questions to the Contact Us tab at amran.com or to... Yes, please send it to BecauseWeLiveHere at ProtonMail.com.
Send your questions.
More importantly, send us your email so we can keep you updated on whatever happens to this fantastic YouTube channel and, more importantly, on what's going on with the New Century Foundation.