All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 24, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
58:10
You Can’t Honor MLK If You’re White
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to this edition of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me is my indefatigable co-host Paul Kersey.
And I'm afraid that despite the millions and millions of words that have been said and written about the Covington business, We can't pass over that in complete silence, despite the fact that on the amaran.com page we've had about three original pieces on it, and I even did a video on it.
But just one thing that I wanted to follow up with.
As everyone in America, and perhaps the entire world, now knows, there was something of a confrontation between this lovely fellow, Nathan Phillips, who's been described as a Native American elder, And some high school students at Covington Catholic High School.
And the students were depicted as wicked racists, all false.
They were doing nothing wrong.
They had been taunted by a bunch of blacks.
And this black man, this Indian came up, who the heck knows why, beats his drum in this poor guy's face and he just stood there smiling, unoffending.
Now, as everyone knows, this prompted a huge outpouring of absolute hatred, which we've gone into both in the video and in some of our original pieces on Amaran.com.
And I am very pleased to say that Rob Sanders, a Kenton County, Kentucky prosecutor, confirmed just a day before yesterday that there are
several investigations into some of these Twitter users who made terroristic
threats as he put it.
He says we've got multiple ongoing investigations into numerous threats.
He says there are probably a dozen law enforcement agencies if not more looking into this.
Also the school as we know was closed.
They've had hundreds of threats, not just on Twitter, but actual threats being called in to Covington Catholic High School there in Kentucky.
This story, Mr. Taylor, and to our wonderful worldwide listening audience, is one of the more important stories of, I think, the past ten years.
Oh, I wouldn't go that far.
I'm afraid this is all too typical, but the importance of it, of course, is that it was blown up so huge and then deflated.
It's all too typical, correct, but what was not all too typical was there was no apology from the MAGA hat-wearing white students.
They never backed down, they never surrendered, they never acquiesced, they never said, oh, we were at fault.
Even though the media tried to do this on multiple occasions.
I know, I know.
It's great, but I think they knew in their heart of hearts they had done absolutely nothing wrong, that they were sinned against rather than sinning.
And good for them.
Healthy, white guys.
And as the prosecutor in Kenton County explained, In Kentucky, there is a felony offense called terroristic threatening for those who make a threat of violence to an educational institution.
And I well remember, there was one celebrated fellow who said, shove all the students in that place and burn it down.
No, there was not just that gentleman, but the guy, the producer.
Gentleman.
Gentleman is the wrong word.
Swine is better.
These nefarious individuals, particularly the producer of the Disney film Beauty and the Beast, on top of the live action film, who said, Put the MAGA hat-wearing kids headfirst into the wood chipper.
The fact that, you know, these accounts are still on Twitter and obviously we've talked about this ad nauseum.
You were one of the first people and the New Century Foundation's American Resonance Twitter account was one of the first accounts that were axed in what?
Was that December?
Oh yeah, it's been December of 2017.
Wow, so almost 13 months ago we're talking about an event to silence the voice and of course What I would like to say is the voice of reason.
I've never ever even come so far as to approach this kind of wild, violent, hateful stuff.
No, not at all.
No, but that stuff goes fine, but no, if you talk reasonably about racial differences in IQ and the legitimate interests of whites, then poof, gone.
So, in any case, we'll see what comes.
I suspect that nobody will be charged with terroristic threatening.
But it's punishable by one to five years in prison.
I would love to see some of those guys in the big house for this kind of wild raving against these utterly innocent white bulls.
The leaders of Kentucky, almost all Republicans, Senator Rand Paul, the governor of Kentucky, they've all said wonderful, admirable things in response to this.
None of them pounced.
Rand Paul, again, he's got an opportunity to be a strong leader in the future.
And now, more importantly.
But, I'm telling you, this is a moment where a lot of normal Trump supporters, who normally turn off the news, they're seeing these stories because this is fueling a rage.
And as a friend told me, He hasn't seen this type of intensity since before the election.
Right.
The significance of this is just the blatant, blinkered animosity and bias of the major media, and more and more white people are waking up.
It is a pity for these young boys who were caught up in this maelstrom, but it looks as though they're holding their own very well, and this will be a real education for them, and of course the millions of others who see this happening.
So, let us hope that some good will come of this.
But I cannot think of any good that will come from the arrest of Musa, Abd-i-Kakir Musa, and Muhammad Abd-i-Kakir Musa, and Muhammad Salat Haji, all three in their twenties.
Now, these three were arrested on Monday.
Two of them are brothers and one is a cousin, and the news invariably describes them as Michigan men.
Now, as it turns out, there were all three born in Kenya, but are U.S.
citizens.
One is naturalized, and the brothers got citizenship as minors when they were brought over by their parents.
Now, I'm sure if you saw them walking down the street, you'd think, wow, they're gold Michigan men.
They must be from Michigan.
No, they are obvious Kenyans.
But the reason they were arrested is because they had pledged allegiance to ISIS, And they had talked about the desire to go join ISIS, to go kill non-believers, and if they weren't able to make it to the battlefront, then they would stay home and they would operate one of these vehicle rundown businesses, one of these attacks, plow through as many non-believers in the United States as possible.
It's a story like this, Mr. Taylor, that makes you question the whole concept of Civic nationalism and citizenship.
Because what exactly constitutes citizenship when we just hand it out like it's a free candy at a carnival?
That's right.
And one guy, I mean, these two received citizenship as minors.
But one guy is a naturalized citizen.
That means he pledged allegiance to the United States.
He said he renounced any attachment to his former country.
He's going to devote himself body and soul to America.
No, Ed, but he's planning on either going to fight for ISIS on the battlefront or get some sort of car and run down and kill American citizens.
Now, the other significant thing about this, of course, is this is just going to be a blip in the news.
Very few people are going to notice or care, but this is the kind of thing that our law enforcement agencies are preventing all the time.
These are the sort of people that are coming into the United States, probably legally, That we should be keeping out, and they add more fuel, more support to the view that we need a wall, we need to keep these people out.
But, I just want to call attention to this phenomenon, which will not get the attention it deserves, but imagine the kind of bloodshed that this could lead to.
Well, again, I've mentioned this before, you've pooh-poohed the idea, but if we had total control of the media that we saw Directed toward Covington for the two-minute tape on Saturday and Sunday before the narrative flipped due to really good people I'd like to say hey if you're not reading the Gateway Pundit guys that website Jim Hoft phenomenal work on this it was it was pajama journalist
who were instrumental in turning this.
That's right.
Not professionals, just people who are paying attention.
Paying attention.
And we're going to talk about something happening in media lately, but the professionals who are high-paid, who exist in the thousands of thousands, they were all on the wrong side of this story.
They were, and they're on the wrong side of history, too.
We must always point that out.
You, listener, are on the right side of history.
And, you know, we've got another story here that I think is It's one that is becoming all too frequent for Mr. Taylor and I to talk about, and that's illegal alien crime.
And this was in Arizona, correct?
No, this was in Nevada.
This was in Nevada, in the Reno area.
A fellow by the name of Wilbur Martin Guzman, a 19-year-old illegal.
Initially, we had no idea who he was from, but he could not prove he was in the country legally.
He was arrested for three different killings over a period of a week.
He had killed Connie Koontz, 56 years old, in her home, Sophia Rankin, 74, in her home, and also a married couple, Jerry David and Sherry David, 81 and 80.
Now, all four of these people are white, three different killing operations, and this all happened between January 10th and January 16th.
In a very quiet Reno, Nevada area where nothing like this has ever been known to take place, Resulted, of course, in great concern and worry, and all of the victims, I've seen their photographs, are all typical white people.
Now, this fellow, Wilbur Martin Guzman, was picked up for burglary and for illegal monetary gain by having pawned stolen jewelry.
At the time they picked him up, they did not have the goods on him to charge him with murder.
And I think this is very significant because in Nevada, he was on immigration hold, so he couldn't even have made bail.
Ordinarily, you could probably make bail on a burglary charge.
Now, he's probably penniless, but who knows?
He probably would have gone to a bailiff's bondsman, got some money, and head south.
But that would have happened in California.
Of course.
Sanctuary State, but not in Nevada.
So he's being held and he looks like he is the guy.
And what is interesting about this, actually the point I really want to make here is that the role Donald Trump had In ensuring that something like this got big coverage, because he tweeted about this horrible thing, and I would bet you any amount of money that had it not been for Donald Trump calling attention to this, the Times would never have written a story about it.
But the New York Times actually wrote this up.
But interestingly enough, Their headline was, Arrest of immigrant suspected in four Nevada killings draws Trump's attention.
There you go.
How passive can you get there?
How passive?
It's an illegal immigrant.
These killings would not have happened if you didn't have publications like the New York Times agitating on behalf of granting amnesty to these illegal aliens where family values, of course, they don't stay on the other side of the And for the Times, it's newsworthy because it drew Trump's attention.
Good grief!
You have this guy sneak into our country, killing four utterly innocent, unoffending Americans, and the only aspect of it that makes it newsworthy to the New York Times is Trump called attention to it.
This is why, at this point, with all that's going on with the Covington crisis, with the government shutdown, with the lack of a a resolution on the shutdown for building the wall and what's
happening with Nancy Pelosi saying no you can't give the State of the Union.
Donald Trump needs to go ahead and just have a big rally where he says you know what this
is going to be my State of the Union to the people because I don't have to answer to the
enemy of the people, the media that hates my supporters, that hates America and doesn't
want to put us first.
And I think he will fulfill his constitutional duty if he simply invites Congress to come.
They can come or not come.
Exactly.
He has made his welcome available to them and to the Supreme Court, who's always there too, and they can come or not.
As you can say, he could turn it into a rally, a Trump rally.
But we'll see what happens.
That is to be continued.
But then, yes, take us to the D.C.
City Council.
What a wonderful time they might be having.
This is a story that unfortunately we're seeing happen all across the country as the left
completely dominates city councils and of course the DC council decided about a month
ago to, they voted to go ahead and decriminalize fair evasion because too many blacks, 90%,
91% of those who are arrested for fair evasion happen to be blacks.
Well, guess what?
The mayor of Washington, D.C.
decided to veto this legislation, Muriel Bowser.
Washington, D.C., Mr. Taylor, is a city that is on the cusp of being majority white.
If it already isn't majority white, I think it's one of the few, I think it's the only area of the country that actually increased the white percentage of the vote.
Lost white percentage.
But Washington D.C.
gained whites, of course.
It didn't help any.
It didn't help at all.
No, no, no, no, no.
But the point is, the D.C.
council voted on Tuesday to override the veto decriminalizing fair evasion, even though the almost all black workers' union The Metro Workers Union.
They opposed the bill.
And Washington Dimes, I want to say it was 2011, Mr. Taylor, they did a great story where they showed this workforce of the metros, almost all black.
These are great jobs.
And yet, for some reason, I guess the only people that apply for these jobs are black.
You know, we ran a very interesting piece at amred.com by a white guy who works for the system.
And he says, yes, it's overwhelmingly black, but he applied, and he got the job, and he said he detected no anti-white bias to starting to work for Metro.
But he says, everybody starts driving a bus.
And he says the people who live in Washington, D.C., they all want to be congressional aides, they all want to be legislative assistants, they don't want to drive a bus for a living.
No, no.
And so it is, he said, it's overhauling the back basically by default because nobody else goes for these jobs.
I thought, I assumed, perhaps in my bigoted, closed-minded way, that there was some kind of active attempt to keep whites out, but he said, no, no, that's not the case.
But he also said that the people who run the Metro despise fair beaters.
They've got this whole litany of colorful expressions to describe them that we will not pronounce over the air because we can get in terrible trouble simply for repeating what black people and the black people who run Metro describe their fellow blacks who jump over turnstiles.
Well, they did a study between January 2016 and February 2018, Metro Transit Police stopped 30,000 individuals for fare evasion.
91% of those citations and summons were issued to blacks.
Now, this costs the system $25 million a year in losses from passengers who fail to pay their bus fare, and combined with metro welfare evasion, the total cost exceeds $50 million!
That's right.
You talk about infrastructure collapsing.
How can you expect to make budget when you are losing this much money?
And then you have a city council that votes 11-2, overturning The mayor's veto.
This is liberal insanity.
You hear a lot of people talk about liberal insanity.
Michael Savage says liberalism is a mental disorder.
You know, you read a story like this, and it's like, guys, this makes no fiduciary sense when you're trying to put together a budget and have a city that works.
Well, as they say, this can give you a criminal record if it's a crime.
And we don't want all of these 90% of 30,000 people who are black getting a criminal record.
No, no, can't have that.
And so Metro goes $50 million in the hole already.
And I bet you, what's it going to do?
Double that?
Double that deficit once they stop criminalizing?
Well, of course, to finish up what we're talking about, the bill, it reduces the penalty for fair evasion to $50 civil infraction.
Prior to that, the offense was a misdemeanor that carried a potential penalty of jail time and a fine of $300.
Now, this is a sensible policy.
This is the broken windows policing that makes sense.
You crack down on seemingly insignificant crimes, because if you don't, that basically shows that the lawless Run the city.
And in this case of Washington DC, Mr. Taylor, those who are supposed to make the law enable the lawless.
To do whatever they want.
Well, apparently, this has to go to Congress for final approval.
That's right, because the city, I believe, does have oversight.
Yes.
Still.
The Congress still has oversight.
We'll see what happens.
We'll see what happens.
But, yeah, they said that it's more important to coddle these lawbreakers rather than make sure that people pay their fair.
And of course this is happening all across the country.
It's happening in Philadelphia, in Pittsburgh with Philadelphia's SEPTA.
This is happening, we've talked about the BART in Oakland and San Francisco.
Chicago's even talking about doing this because progressive woke city councils, Mr. Taylor, must do everything they can to legislate to benefit criminal black people.
That's right.
So we will see whether Congress will go along with this or not.
It'll be very interesting to see.
But of course, Congress now, with the Democrats in charge, my prediction is that they will go along with decriminalization.
I think it makes too much sense, regrettably.
But another story that, it's one of these that we actually debated about as we were doing our conversation prior to the podcast.
It's a story out of Phoenix, the Hacienda Healthcare.
There's a skilled nursing facility there and a woman in her 20s, I believe she's a Native American from what I read.
She's been disabled since she was a very, very young child as a result of seizures.
So she spent almost her entire life in this Hacienda Healthcare skilled nursing facility.
Again, this is a tough one to talk about because her parents said that though she was disabled, she could respond to sound, she could make facial gestures, and had ability to move her limbs, head, and neck.
Well, the employees of the Hacienda Healthcare Skill Nurse Facility were not aware that the woman was pregnant before she went into labor.
By the way, I don't know if you've seen this, but Phoenix is one of these cities that has a black population of under 5% and yet they have a black police chief.
Did you see the pictures at her press conference?
No, I'm afraid I did not, but let's hope she's doing a good job.
Well, police say that they were first alerted to this case when the baby was born, meaning that this woman in this, not a vegetative state, but she's pretty much there, was raped.
Oh, very clearly.
Very clearly.
This wasn't an immaculate conception, folks.
Unfortunately, it turns out that when police sought DNA samples from the male employees of the Hacienda Healthcare skilled nursing facility, it turns out that a gentleman by the name of Nathan Sutherland... A gentleman?
You've got to break that habit.
Gentlemen's are okay.
I'm trying to... If you're right for AR, you have to be sure to attribute Mr. to... But he's not a gentleman?
No, no, no.
You're right.
Nathan Sutherland, a black-looking Hispanic, was the individual who the DNA tests showed was the rapist.
This is a tough one to talk about.
VDare did a really good write-up about this, Peter Brimlow's site, that I encourage people to read, where they noted that there was a famous film in 2003.
where this actually, this raping of a individual who's comatose takes place.
And of course it was a white redneck in the film.
Of course.
And yet they then showed a number of other stories such as this Nathan Sutherland tale
and invariably they're all black.
Yes.
They're all black employees who raped these women.
That's right.
These women who are bedridden, unconscious.
It makes my skin creep.
I didn't want to talk about it.
I understand.
This is just so loathsome.
You know, I was once in court, back when I was a respectable fellow, and I did interpreting for Japanese witnesses in trials, and we had a break, and I went next door to the other courtroom, and there was a sentencing for a child molester.
And I sat there and listened to this.
There's this guy.
There's this creepy looking guy.
And I just felt filthy walking out of that courtroom.
Just seeing this fellow and hearing what he had done, and now this kind of thing, you just want to scrape the sleeves off your skin after you've read something like this, but this is the kind of thing, as you note, and as Vidya has pointed out, whenever you see these stories, or some hundred-year-old woman is raped, you just don't find white people doing that.
And one of the standards that we have at American Renaissance is if there's a gruesome story, if we can imagine white people doing it, then we won't run it.
But it's like these people who have sex with eight-year-olds.
You just don't find white people doing that.
Perhaps there are exceptions to that rule.
But in any case, let us move on.
Let us move on to Colorado.
We have a happy Martin Luther King story, because Colorado, the statehouse, voted unanimously to honor Martin Luther King.
Now, they attempted to do it just as they had before.
And as last year, Representative Perry Buck, a well-meaning white lady, introduced the resolution honoring MLK in the House of Representatives.
And, in the Senate, Vicki Marble, Senator Vicki Marble, another well-meaning white woman, introduced the resolution to honor Dr. Martin Luther King.
Wow!
As it turns out, somebody on the Black Caucus, the Colorado Statehouse Black Caucus, told them, no, no, no, they can't do it this year because they are white.
And interestingly enough, Leslie Herold, who is a chairwoman of the Black Democratic Legislative Caucus, did not return phone calls seeking comment on this.
As I say, the House and Senate adopted this thing unanimously, and here's Representative Perry Buck, one of the whites who wanted to introduce it, who of course voted for it.
She said, everybody bleeds the same color.
She hopes this is a lesson for everyone as they move forward through the session to embrace the message of Dr. King.
And she goes on to say, I will continue honoring an incredible man.
He was just amazing.
At the end of the day, I love all my colleagues as my brothers and sisters.
Now, here are these goofy white ladies.
They are introducing this thing all full of the milk of human kindness.
Martin Luther King wanted everybody to transcend race.
The fact is, the black people who told her, scram white lady, we own Martin Luther King.
They're correct.
They're correct.
Martin Luther King did not want to transcend race.
So long as there were laws against blacks, oh, he was all for race blindness.
But as soon as he got those laws, 64-65, he, without pausing to take a breath, became a pure affirmative action quotas race man.
Oh, exactly.
The night before he was shot in Memphis, he was there agitating on behalf of black workers.
Was it bus drivers?
No, it wasn't.
Garbage truck.
It was garbage.
It was a garbage truck.
He was also trying to shake down a number of companies.
He actually calls out to Jesse Jackson because he couldn't remember the company.
They were trying to shake down and it was Wonder Bread because they didn't have enough black employees and then he was also fighting to make sure that Coca-Cola had distribution centers that were owned by blacks and he basically became, the more you learn about MLK, he became almost irrelevant after the passage of the 65.
Well, and he very quickly realized that his relevance depended on not looking for colorblindness But for specific race-based preferences for blacks.
Correct.
He switched into that without much trouble at all, because I think that was really what was inside him anyway.
So these black people are right.
This guy does not speak for you, lady.
This guy does not speak for white people.
He speaks for us.
So you shut up and sit down.
And then these just open-eyed, empty-headed white ladies talking about how incredible he was, how amazing he was.
And we hope that this is just going to be love for all my colleagues and my brothers and sisters.
When are white people going to wake up?
Well, this momentary racial amnesia that white people have, I think, is found in Notre Dame in South Bend, Indiana, Mr. Taylor, where after a year of battling to get these either removed or covered up, these beautiful 12 murals that were painted in the 1880s by Louis Luigi Gregori.
Many of them depict Christopher Columbus.
Well, guess what?
As we know, that is a no-no honoring a man who brought so many bad diseases and was the first individual to bring white privilege to the New World.
We can't honor that.
So, the University President of Notre Dame, Reverend John Jenkins, said that they were going to cover up these murals.
That, you know, for almost the entire time they've been up since the 1880s, nobody ever cared or
batted an eye.
They looked at them and they realized these are absolutely gorgeous, ornate, opulent
murals depicting our past.
We must celebrate this.
I've seen photographs of these.
These are painted in that wonderful, realistic, romantic style in the main building.
Yes.
The main building that is the symbol of Notre Dame, but they've got to cover them up.
Well, it makes you wonder how long until enough atheists complain that the mural of Touchdown Jesus needs to go, that overlooks the football stadium.
Anyways, we know that won't happen, but Jenkins wrote that for Native Americans, Columbus's arrival in America was, quote, nothing short of a catastrophe.
Continue.
Whatever else Columbus's arrival brought for these people, it led to exploitation, expropriation of land, repression of vibrant cultures, enslavement, and new diseases, causing epidemics that killed millions.
It brought them out of the Stone Age, too, but we will cover over that aspect in silence.
But anyway... Well, I mean, the decision to coat these murals came after the Native American Student Association of Notre Dame In 2017.
So again, these were painted in the 1880s.
They've been on the campus for more than a century.
More than a century they're in South Bend, and only because this Native American Student Association of Notre Dame protested the murals.
So they're going to be covered up by woven material consistent with the decor of the space, though it will still be possible to display the murals on occasion.
I wonder what the occasions will be?
When will they trot out this evil?
What could possibly be a pretext to celebrate the repression of vibrant cultures, enslavement, and new diseases?
Again, at some point, you're going to have all the aggrieved groups protest every aspect of Notre Dame's past.
At least they didn't chisel them off the walls.
No, they didn't.
Not yet.
Or they didn't.
Exactly.
That's a foreshadowing of what's to come.
Juxtaposing this story with one of what is being put up on walls, let's go to the Black Mecca, the city too busy to hate, Atlanta, which will be host of the upcoming Super Bowl.
Well, about a year ago, nine artists were selected to create 30 public murals related to the city's proud civil rights and social justice movements.
Of course, Atlanta is most famous for white flight, Which, uh, you know, up until about in the 1960s, Atlanta was a majority white.
It was at one point in the, in the 20th century, 70% white.
And it got down to, in the early 1990s, it got to about 69% black.
Uh, and then basically they realized we can't let the city go that way.
And there was a huge effort to, well, with the Olympics, they were able to push out a lot of the government housing to the suburbs.
And now Atlanta, as Mr. Taylor and I have talked about on this podcast, Plenty of time, especially with the contentious mayoral election.
Atlanta is majority white, and they will have a white mayor soon.
But for the time being, those individuals going to Atlanta for the Super Bowl are going to see 15 murals going up for this unofficial holiday.
And they're huge!
They are huge, and again... And all the sides of buildings, for heaven's sake!
They are completely devoid of white people.
Chris Appleton, who was the Executive Director of an organization called Wonder Root.
It's an arts and advocacy organization.
They partnered with the Atlanta Super Bowl host committee, and he said this about the city's civil rights legacy.
Quote, there is no greater legacy than Atlanta's contribution to the civil rights movement, in particular, the Black The Black Liberation Movement of the 1950s and 1960s."
End quote.
Now, see, he says there is no greater legacy in the whole world, in the whole country.
I mean, or is he just talking about Atlanta?
But hyperbole is always permitted when you're talking about the Black Liberation Movement, as he calls it.
No, I mean, again, this is, and these murals are going to be huge.
They're going to be adorning walls.
And again, they all, there's one that might have a white woman.
One of them has A black woman dressed as the Statue of Liberty and she's holding a downtrodden black guy with dreads in the background.
You've got the U.S.
Constitution.
And so obviously highly racial in nature.
And then there's just a bunch of really just strange photos.
There's one of a black Dad with his son on his shoulders.
He's got a McDonald's cap on.
I guess it's 365 Black in Atlanta.
Yeah, this one's called Fatherhood and Growth.
Yes, to celebrate all of those 80% of young black children who are born to unmarried women.
And the artist's name is B. Mike, so definitely be on the lookout for some of his other photography.
Again, you can see these murals if you go to the AJC.com and just type in on your Google machine, see designs for murals going Atlanta before the Super Bowl.
Then there's this one image of, I don't know, a black woman.
That's supposed to be the Statue of Liberty where she's holding up a loft.
She's posed like the Statue of Liberty.
It looks like she's holding up what looks like a Colt .45 malt beer can.
malt beer can.
But it's a beer can that is illuminated in some sort of incandescent light and there's
a black woman looking rather melancholy.
Soulful, soulful.
Come on, soulful.
These murals are just, again, there was money paid to put these up, because all this does, this goes back to the fact that the current mayor of the city of Atlanta is A black woman, Mayor Bottoms, and all she wants to do is promote Atlanta as this city that's too busy to hate, but at the same time, when you put these murals up, all you're doing is just, it's, what is this?
It's too busy to be white, I guess.
But now here, this is the one white woman here.
Now you and I are wondering what's going on.
Here is a somewhat overweight white woman with wings, like angel wings, pink angel wings, and the title of this thing is Survivors.
Now, we were wondering, what the heck has she survived?
Maybe she's Icarus.
She's survived the flight to the sun with her angel wings.
I don't know.
You suspect that she might be transgender or, in any case.
Well, again, these murals are all across Atlanta.
Many of them are on parking garages.
There's some of black students.
One of the ones, so there were 30 murals that were submitted, if you'd scroll down.
One of the ones that I think is hilarious that was not selected.
It's a depiction of the Atlanta skyline with the words got milk, I'm sorry, got MLK question mark.
So you're just talking about how blacks take sole ownership over over MLK.
I think that shows a sense of humor.
I like that one.
Got MLK?
Yeah, obviously a play on the got milk But no, there's no humor to be got out of MLK.
No, this is all serious.
No, and again, this is all coalescing and all being unveiled at the Super Bowl.
And remember, the NFL is a league that we've talked about before on this podcast, where everyone was upset about all the black coaches being fired.
How dare this happen?
the NFL last year during the whole Colin Kaepernick nonsense, they decided to
to have 90 million dollars set aside for social justice, social justice causes.
That's it. And this is, they actually, some of the money was used to to fund the
the murals was given for this Mr. Taylor.
Oh, is that so?
I was able to find that out.
Oh, the NFL is to be thanked.
Every time you buy a ticket to a football game, or every time you turn on television to watch one, you're funding these gorgeous works of art that will be up there forever.
So, yes, here we have Columbus is draped.
Columbus is an indecency that we cannot poison our eyes by looking at.
And then all of these great black heroes and wonders are going to be up in perpetuity.
And I'm sure, even if Atlanta were to turn majority white, majority with white government officials, they would never dare take these down.
Well, they did take one mural down, real quick, in the Atlanta Hartsfield International Airport.
There used to be a mural that would greet you when you went up the escalator to go to baggage claim ground transportation.
You got off the little monorail there at the airport, you go up the escalator, and you would see
Atlanta Centennial Park, this mural, and there was this black girl with her arms stretched out.
And then all of the mural had other individuals painted that were there at Centennial Park.
And there was only this one lone white couple.
All the other images were of black children, black women laughing.
That's actually been taken down because the city decided they could make money selling that space by putting up LCD boards.
But it was not a political decision.
It was an economic decision.
They certainly weren't going to paint in a few more white faces no matter how white the city got.
No, no, no.
That can't happen.
No, can't have that.
But anyway, moving right along to a few important announcements made in the media business this week that was quite significant that, according to CNN, This week, 1,000 jobs nationwide were lost in the media industry.
And this is mostly in the pencil-pushing, either electronic or paper.
And, for example, HuffPost's entire opinion section has been laid off.
Now, I thought, isn't all of HuffPost pure opinion?
I mean, if the entire opinion section has been laid off, what else is there?
But apparently they have something they actually consider to be an opinion section.
And as Brian Magers said, who was the leader of the section, he said, and I thought this was interesting too, that unionizing the newsroom was the single most positive thing to happen to HuffPost in his eight plus years there.
Now, I suspect that they're having real revenue problems.
I'm sure unionization of the newsroom did not help, but these people are out the door.
Now, at the same time, It is worth pointing out that in 2017, Huffington Post fired 40 other employees, and I'm not quite sure how many it is this time.
But perhaps even more significant is BuzzFeed.
Yet another bastion of progressivism, as they would like to call it, is laying off 15% of their workforce.
that amounts to 250 people and that means they have 1450 staffers. Man, the mind boggles.
1040.
1,450 people work at BuzzFeed.
This is enormous.
I mean, I wonder how many people actually work for the New York Times, for example.
Maybe more, maybe fewer.
But this is a major, massive undertaking.
But I cannot shed a single tear.
For these media corporations that are losing money and laying people off because over and over and over, as we talked about with this Covington business, with the way the press have been treating Donald Trump and every single racially tinged episode in this country, they are losing credibility all the time.
The media have never been considered more untrustworthy than they are today.
Well, and a lot of large corporations gobbled up and bought up these properties because they thought that they were actually going to be valuable and they were going to be able to be a revenue stream.
But as Google and Facebook generates roughly or monopolizes 80 to 85% of all digital online advertising, because you can actually target people that you want to as opposed to doing the shotgun approach.
Guess what?
These large corporations found out when they looked at the quarterly revenue coming in and their balance sheets and their income, they said, wait a second.
We have a fiduciary responsibility to our shareholders to jettison and to make sure that we're bringing in a profit so that our stock price goes up.
And these woke publications, digital publications, they're not doing that.
They're sure not making money.
No, they're not.
But that's not the point of these organizations, is it?
In a lot of ways.
Yeah, well, you are thinking of outfits like ProPublica.
Correct.
Non-profits.
Those are folks that are non-profits.
They rattled a tin cup so that they can churn out this kind of bias, nonsense, ad infinitum and not worry about the bottom line.
Correct.
That is a dangerous threat, we also think.
Now, would you like to tell us about what's going on with the caravan?
I mean, the caravan update, I think that is a regular thing.
It's sort of dropped off the front page, but this is a continuing phenomenon.
Yeah, we're doing this constantly now.
I think this is going to become, until the wall, until we actually see the groundbreaking and the first shovel go in to build the wall, the caravan update probably is going to become something we do, you know, As a weekly update for you.
So what's happening now?
Well, guess what?
10,000 people from Central America have requested visas.
To cross Mexico's southern border as it grants legal documents to a member of this rapidly growing migrant caravan that is only going to continue to come until the wall goes up and basically the United States does stop.
Right.
I mean, this time we've got, you know, Mexico has a new policy of welcoming migrants with visas marked, which is of course a stark change from the past.
And this is something that could lead to an increase in migration.
Yeah, I think one of the presidents of the Migration Policy Institute, Andrew Silly, and the Migration Policy Institute is a very lefty organization.
They see the writing on the wall.
He says, if word gets out that people are able to get into Mexico legally and to work, that creates a huge incentive for people who haven't thought of migrating.
Of course, all of them have thought of migrating.
They all want to come here.
We see that poll after poll.
They would love to leave and come to the United States.
Hundreds of millions of people.
And this, of course, is the main reason why we are going to see the wall will inevitably be built, I do believe.
And Trump continues to stand his ground.
Just today, the Senate voted down both of the proposals.
Basically, this is a moment where Trump needs to go ahead and put up or shut up.
His opportunity in 2020 is coming to a head here.
We need to see some action, and the only action we're seeing, more and more Central Americans trying to get here.
Obviously, as we found out, the visas are part of a new policy by the center-left president, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador.
Is that how you pronounce his last name?
Obrador.
Obrador, yes.
Who has decreed the sometimes brutal treatment of Central American migrants.
by Mexican security forces in the past.
She says, we've been bad, we've been bad, we're going to let them in.
Now see, it seems to me that Lopez Obrador is kind of caught in a vice here,
because he's saying, we were bad by keeping them out in the past,
but at the same time, he's being remarkably cooperative with Donald Trump,
and saying, okay, we will hold them while you process them in small batches
for their probably phony refugee claims.
Of course.
And so what's he going to do?
He's going to end up with a whole lot of people he doesn't want.
He's granting them work visas.
All of them want to come to the United States, but some of them are going to decide, if there's
a wall, that they're going to stay in New Mexico, because Mexico is, in a lot of places,
Mexico even despite all of this horrible gangland and narco-traffic warfare, is a better place
to live in than Central America.
So Lopez Obrador is going to end up with a whole lot of people he doesn't want.
As you noted, he is speaking out both sides of his mouth when he says, hey, you know what,
the past was bad, we're going to listen to these people and with visas.
At the same time, he's working to reduce migration by investing money in job creation in Central
America.
Obviously, he's had some high-level meetings where they realize, hey, there could be millions
of people.
Millions of people trying to get through Mexico to get through the United States.
And this is going to be a crisis that the Mexican people, as we know from Tijuana, they aren't going to put up with for that long.
With crime, with diseases, and all of the anti-social behavior that is brought into the country by these caravans.
Yep.
And he's going to have a real problem on his hands.
But the idea of investing in Central America, even to get it to the point where it's as livable as Mexico, Good luck!
Good luck!
Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua, those places are pretty sorry places and it's going to take generations.
You just don't pour in handouts to a country like that and turn it into a good place.
People have to make progress on their own.
They have to have a complete transformation of the notion of social trust, social capital.
Just giving them money is not going to work.
Good luck.
18,000 Central Americans tried to cross into Mexico illegally.
In October, 12,000.
In November, of course, with this new change of granting visas, this now takes away that incentive of having to cross illegally.
So that's why this is such a crisis for us to look at because we could be talking about, next week, 20,000.
We could start to see this go from 10,000 to 20,000 to 40,000 to 80,000.
go from 10,000 to 20,000 to 40,000 to 80,000.
Compounding.
They're all headed our way.
They're all headed our way.
Well, tell you what, do you think we should switch to some of our listener questions here?
I think that's a great idea.
We have been neglecting our loyal listeners.
We have a couple of other news items we could have covered, but I think we really do deserve, our listeners do deserve some attention here.
Some have some very interesting observations.
In one of our podcasts several weeks ago, We talked about the preference of patients in the medical profession for being treated by people of the same race.
And someone writes in as follows.
He was talking about an ex-girlfriend who is a nurse.
And I'll read from his message.
He says, she says something to the effect of, it's amazing.
How these sweet little old white ladies, these are the patients, become such racists when they're in our care.
And this is a woman, this is a nurse who is by no means racially aware.
Then she went on to describe how her white patients didn't like being treated by non-white nurses and much preferred care from her and her white colleagues and asked for them by name.
And she suspects that it's not necessarily that they gave better care, although I suspect in many cases they did, but that she's white.
And there are plenty of non-whites in the hospital, Filipino nurses, etc.
Well, I'll tell you something.
The last time I had an extended contact with the hospital, when my second child was being born, the fact is there were Filipino nurses.
You couldn't understand a word they said.
That alone is reason enough to have a white, English-speaking nurse.
You are in a vulnerable position when you're giving birth, when you're a patient.
You want somebody to communicate without any trouble at all.
You don't want to be giving these semaphore signals to try to get across.
You know, how do you breastfeed?
You know, what do you do all this stuff?
And then this listener goes on to say, I think that if someone is in such ill health as to be in a hospital bed, such a person is very vulnerable.
I think a common fear of old age is to be abused.
by those on whom you are dependent.
And I think these, quote, racist patients, my ex-girlfriend described, figured that it's just much more likely with people who are not their kind.
They don't do it consciously, it's just instinct.
I'm sure he's onto something.
Now, you know, I had an idea years ago that, oh, if you had kind of a white community where you could have retirement homes staffed by young white people, You could sort of subtly get the word out, and I think that would attract a lot of people.
Oh, it would.
It would.
Think about how baby boomers have spent their entire lives trying to insulate themselves from the diversity that they so glowingly describe to their friends and family and their co-workers, but they live in areas that are, well, or they retreat to areas once they become undesirable, racially, to areas of course to upgrade their
home to a new area.
But you're right, this is going to be something they're going to encounter this new America
and retirement homes and VA homes wherever they're forced to go.
Like that skin-crawling story we felt obligated to mention about that hacienda home.
Correct.
You just do not want people like that creeping around when you are vulnerable and dependent.
So I think that would be a great boom industry until somebody marches in and says, oh, you've got a hire-by-quota, this usual stuff.
EEOC, yeah, exactly.
But if so long as this can be kept on the QT, That I think it would be a very, very attractive thing for baby boomers, no matter how anti-racist they profess to be, as you point out.
Well, one thing we don't want to keep on the QT is a reader correction from an individual who wrote in a couple weeks ago to talk about the Jefferson Quran.
You might remember that the Palestinian Rashida Tlaib... Tlaib.
Tlaib.
She, like Keith Ellison before her, decided to take the oath of office on The Jefferson Koran, as if this is some sort of, you know, historical artifact that somehow absolves America of its past heritage as beautifully stated in the Naturalization Act of 1790, which I've been trying, mind you, to see if Jefferson or Washington, what they actually thought of this, to see if there's any primary sources about this.
So if there's a listener out there who knows of any debates that went on, of any records of what the founding fathers talked about
when they were putting together the Naturalization Act of 1790. Shoot them over to me at svpdl1
at gmail.com or you can send them over to the contact us link at amaran.com
Remember, this is the one that reserved naturalization to free white persons of good character.
And this was ratified before the Bill of Rights.
This is one of the first things that the first Congress did in 1790.
And of course, we're going to be celebrating the commemoration of that on March 26th.
But yeah, the point that this guy corrects is the idea that Tlaib and Ellison have that somehow the existence of this Quran shows that from the start we embraced Islam and we were multicultural.
Instead, as he explains, he states, quote, a very important point to mention whenever the topic is discussed is to explain why Thomas Jefferson had a Quran within his vast library.
The reason simply was to get a better understanding of the enemy.
Our nation's very first overseas military excursion was against the Barbary Pirates that were attacking, looting, murdering, and imprisoning United States citizens sailing within international waters as they traded with Europe.
Unfortunately, not much has changed with regards to the behavior of the, uh... This is a word that I always mispronounce.
Mo... Mohamedians?
Mohamedans.
Mohamedans, yeah.
It's a word you don't hear anymore.
It's a lovely word to describe the followers of, uh... Mohamedans, yes.
Jefferson sent the United States Marine Corps to Tripoli, which is in present-day Libya, to settle the matter.
Hence the Marine Corps hymn, To the Shores of Tripoli.
Yes, that was Victor's historical note on when we mentioned that the current, I guess there are now three Muslim members of Congress.
And the fact that they all joyfully took their oath on this Bible, I wish they'd known.
I wish they'd known that he had this Bible so he could better understand the enemy.
Of course, it probably wasn't just that.
Jefferson had an omnivorous curiosity.
He wanted to know all sorts of things.
But this was how he would know better who he was up against.
You know, I'm hoping that at some point you can do a video so those searching for the truth about the Jefferson Bible can be Oh, dear.
Well, that's one of many, many videos that I must make.
I must make.
But when the mighty Paul Kersey tells me to make a video, I better do it.
Well, there's another story that we wanted to bring up, and this is one that is actually near and dear to Jared Tarkas.
He actually lived in California.
He owned a home there.
Well, that's true.
That's true.
We had mentioned Proposition 13.
That was a ballot initiative that was passed in 1978.
And the state legislature in California, which is now dominated by Hispanics and totally controlled by Democrats, is considering overturning the will of the people because what this did, it fixed property taxes.
Now, we had a slightly mistaken take on how it worked, and our reader says, I must protest your characterization of California property taxes as low.
Well, What he says is Prop 13, as it's called, did not lower or cap property taxes.
What it did was roll them back to the 1976 level, so that was two years before the Battle Initiative, and freeze them at the value of the property at the price at which it was acquired.
Now, when you think about it as a homeowner, that's a pretty comforting thing.
That's amazing, actually.
Yes.
You know your prop taxes aren't going to go up.
That's something that encourages home ownership.
But the point is, yes, even if the assessors come around and say, oh, your property is just going through the roof, your taxes don't rise.
As our reader explains, this creates quite interesting incentives.
He points out that his in-laws bought their modest 1,500 square foot home in the early 1970s and pay about $3,000 in property taxes.
He goes on to say that currently the houses in that neighborhood sell for about a million bucks.
And the property tax of the next door house is more than three times as much, $10,000 a year.
So you've got two houses, identical tract houses, side by side.
One family pays $3,000, one family sends $10,000.
Another curious aspect of this is it really gives you an incentive to stay where you are.
Yeah.
Because the tax can rise only when the property is sold.
That's right.
As soon as you leave where you're paying $3,000 a year, then the state can glom onto it and say, all right, next guy is going to pay us $10,000 rather than $3,000.
A very, very interesting correction from our listeners.
Do you remember what your property taxes were in the home that you owned?
I don't, I don't.
I do remember that I sold it for exactly $300,000, and you looked it up on Zillow the other day, and was it $1.9 million?
The home is currently worth $1.9 million.
$1.9 million, good grief.
It was roughly a ranch-style $1,520.
Yeah, yeah, something like that.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And you know, when I bought it, gosh, 1970?
No, I sold it in 1981.
I remember my dad came out, he was living in Louisville, Kentucky, and he walked around the house and he says, good, you could have bought five of these in Louisville for the price you paid for this.
I'd pay $240,000 and he thought, oh, he was just, Seeing red.
But I'd manage to sell it for profit.
But if I'd hung on, I guess I could retire.
1.9 million.
Not too bad, of course.
And I could have kept the property taxes, whatever they were.
And you could have still had that house.
That's right.
And again, what it's appreciated to, it's extraordinary, but the property taxes would have stayed at exactly what you would have bought it.
So I think it's important.
A great clarification from a very observant, discerning listener, which we appreciate each
and every one of you.
That's right.
We really do appreciate that.
And now, you know, we do have yet another question from a listener, but this one is so important, I think we should probably save it for another time.
I was going to suggest the exact same thing.
This bears a great deal of consideration.
I will just read out the question, just in general, and let our other listeners think about this.
And we should probably think about it, too, in order to answer it properly.
Our listener says, given the incredibly liberal educational system and the noxious policy and social environment we live in, it's difficult to educate children and reach young people about race, realism, and white identity.
How do you start to educate young people, starting, say, five and ten and even teenagers, about this in a tactful, decent way that highlights biology, science, facts, and logic?
That is a very, very difficult question.
And I think we will ponder it over the next week, and we will be sure to get back to this next week.
Are we agreed?
I am in complete agreement.
And the one thing that I'm also in agreement with is with you, Mr. Taylor, is we thank each and every one of you for listening to this podcast.
The growth of the YouTube channel has been phenomenal.
We appreciate that.
So be sure, if you aren't a subscriber, head over to YouTube and simply search Amarin Podcasts.
You'll find the channel.
Go and subscribe.
So the moment a new podcast goes up, you'll be notified in your email inbox.
That's right.
So you can listen to it, and we encourage you to go back and have fun with the archive.
There's a lot of great podcasts.
And if you have any questions, or if you would like to throw in your answer to the question Mr. Taylor just read, go ahead and send them to us, sbpdl1 at gmail dot com, or the contact us tab at amren dot com.
Because, yes, we certainly don't have the final answer on this very important, difficult question.
How do you rear healthy white people in this intensely, relentlessly hostile environment?
We know how hostile it is by what we talked about first with the Covington Catholic Boys.
We sure do.
For Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
Our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection