All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 20, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:16
‘These People are a Cancer’
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to today's edition of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me is my indispensable partner in this undertaking, Paul Kersey.
And we're going to wrap up the program on this occasion by celebrating Thanksgiving a little bit in advance, and we're going to talk about the things for which we are particularly thankful.
So you can look forward to that as we wend our way towards our conclusion.
But to start off, though, we're going to talk about this caravan that is wending its way and has, in fact, went its way clear up to the American border.
There are hundreds now of these caravanners who have managed to make it to Tijuana.
And unlike the relatively warm reception they've received throughout the rest of their trip, some of these Hondurans and Guatemalans have discovered that they're not very welcome.
The residents don't like them camping in parks.
They've been yelling at them.
There have been some fisticuffs.
And residents shouted, Mexico!
Mexico!
And some of them shouted, Tijuana!
Tijuana!
And they wave the Mexican flag, and they sing the Mexican National Anthem.
I like these folks.
And there have been several Facebook and WhatsApp groups that have gotten together, and they're talking about how they feel about these uninvited guests.
And some of the things they say, even the American media are all shocked by this, because who could have thought, who could have thought that our dusky friends south of the border could feel this way about outsiders?
But for example, these people are a cancer that signals the end of Mexico.
That's what one of the postings has said.
Then there's another one that says, Hondurans are equal to Gonorrheans.
We should clarify once again that for those who might want to take what Mr. Taylor just said out of context, those are quotes directly from Facebook or the WhatsApp, which is part of Facebook, that allows instant communication.
Those are what Mexicans are saying about the caravan, which is far beyond what we're seeing the joyous references we get from the mainstream media in America of what these caravan participants represent as they pursue the American dream.
And it's like I say, Mr. Taylor, all the time.
There's four words that I believe are going to be the most vital words of the 21st century.
This goes for any nationality, because we live here.
And the Mexicans, in opposition to this march, I think it shows that this transcends race, because they are the Mexican people.
Yes, they are.
I'm not sure I'm so keen on those four words of yours.
And the reason for that is, if people start saying, because we live here, there are an awful lot of people who can say, because we live here, in the United States, who arrived not all that long ago.
They can say, because we live here, too.
And if these sorry scoundrels, who have thronged by the thousands to the American border, after they have slipped in, if they manage to slip in and they're here for a month, then they, too, can say, because we live here, can't they?
Well, don't have to be an asterisk by it, which we can explain in a later podcast.
Yes, in a later podcast.
But I know some of the comments of these Mexicans are really quite interesting and entertaining.
Here's a fellow, a Mr. Garcia, age 52.
He was interviewed by BuzzFeed News and he says, I understand Trump.
I don't love him, but I know what it's like to have to defend your country.
Good man.
Good man.
And people are calling the people in the caravan ingrates and animals.
And they hint darkly in some of these articles about this by the shocked and appalled American press that some of them want to round them up and send them home or maybe Even do worse things to them.
Some people are talking about making sure that now that the city of Tijuana is feeding these people, they could actually slip poison into the food.
That's one of the ideas that's been floated here.
We won't get to it, but briefly we should point out that today, just as we prepared to go to podcast and to bring this to you, we found out that 30 members of this caravan have actually been arrested for crimes they've committed in Mexico and they face deportation.
NPR, of course, was nice enough to point out that that only represents 1% of those participating in this humanitarian caravan to the United States.
So, obviously, 99% are still law-abiding in the eyes of the respectable liberal.
Oh yes, yes, there'll be fine, fine additions to our multicultural melting pot.
But apparently, as many as 5,000 of these people are expected to arrive in Tijuana just in the coming days.
And it's not at all surprising that the Tijuanaenses, or whatever they call themselves, are not at all keen on it.
The mayor of Tijuana, a fellow named Juan Manuel Gastelum, he has been saying some interesting things about all this.
He says, there are some good people in the caravan, but many are very bad for the city.
He's not keen on having them around.
He has, in fact, been seen wearing a bright red baseball cap that says on it, Make Tijuana Great Again.
And his idea of making Tijuana great again is not fit to become a dumping ground for thousands of these people who are showing up uninvited.
Eventually, the people, the rivals in Tijuana could exceed 10,000 people.
And it could be very tough because the United States is telling these people that we're not going to let them in to the country.
They're going to have to have their asylum applications processed while they're still in Mexico.
I don't know quite what the legal precedent is for that.
Mostly people cross into the United States and seek asylum.
But I don't know how they're going to set that up.
But if they are there for months at a time, as many as 10,000 of them, there's going to be trouble.
And those numbers are only going to continue to increase as nothing is done by the United States to actually stop this.
And as we'll talk about, I have been.
President Trump tried to do with changing the asylum laws.
An Obama-appointed judge, of course, said, hey, that's unconstitutional.
We'll get to that.
But I have a question for you real quick.
Yes, certainly.
As we're on the subject of Tijuana and making Tijuana great again, have you ever been to
Tijuana?
I have been.
Yes, I have.
It's a pretty, it's not a very prepossessing place, at least where I was.
I walked around.
That was one of the two occasions in which I visited Mexico.
Have you been to Tijuana?
I've not been to Tijuana, but I did want to point out to our listeners who might remember this statistic.
2017 was the deadliest year in Tijuana history.
How many homicides do you think there were in 2017?
Oh God, you're going to put me on the spot here.
In Tijuana, there could have been as many as 600.
1744 homicides in 2017.
Obviously the San Diego Union-Tribune reported control for street drug He's got some work to do.
He's got a lot of work to do.
One interesting aspect of this is that the Mexican authorities have already processed 2,900 refugee requests from this band that entered their company.
was wearing this hat, make Tijuana great again.
He's got some work to do.
He's got a lot of work to do.
Yeah.
Well, one interesting aspect of this is that the Mexican authorities have already
processed 2,900 refugee requests from this band that entered their company.
I'm a little bit surprised they've been doing that.
And President Enrique Peña Nieto has offered them temporary jobs.
However, many of the people who are tramping to America have rejected the offer because they are distrustful of Mexican authorities.
They don't know whether this is really done in good faith.
Of course, the law of asylum-seeking is that you are supposed to seek asylum in the very first safe country.
But no, we're not holding them to that.
But at least a few of them are seeking asylum in their first safe country and Mexico apparently is offering to give them jobs while they process their requests.
Now, my suspicion is Mexico is going to find that practically none of these people is in fact a genuine refugee from the kinds of persecution that makes them legally entitled to be accepted into a country.
And my suspicion is the Mexicans, if they can keep a hold of them,
if they don't just let them disappear into the hinterland, they're going to find that they're not genuine,
as at least they're going to send them home.
But the Tijuana people don't want to wait for that.
No, no.
And they come to these camps and they stand around outside shouting,
don't come!
Go home!
I can't help but appreciate their directness here.
I concur entirely.
But the excitement's only going to build as these more and more thousands of people show up where they are clearly, clearly unwelcome.
But yes, to move to this question that you hinted at, what the Trump administration had decided to do Was make sure, well, this is going to be a new way of processing asylum seekers.
That is to say, if they enter the country illegally, if they try to sneak in not at a regular port of entry, they were going to summarily limit their opportunities.
They're going to say, nope, nope.
If you're going to try to, if you're going to pretend that you're a real refugee, you've got to come through at least the refugee back door, not just jump over the fence.
But this was a victory for the American Civil Liberties Union, which was joined, by the way, by the Southern Poverty Law Center that was militating in the interests of these people who have not yet arrived.
And the judge said that the manner of entry cannot add legal weight to a determination of of asylee status or granting asylum.
And there may in fact be some legal basis for that.
I can sort of understand that if the idea is you are an asylum seeker,
it should make no difference whether you drop from a balloon,
whether you arrive on the Concord, whether you come in a tunnel.
So long as you're there and you've got an asylum claim, presumably that's okay.
But Donald Trump is trying to keep this in an orderly way.
They've got to go through the regular ports of entry like anybody else.
But another victory for the American Civil Liberties Union.
This is an order that's going to be in effect until December 19th.
Now on December 19th, there's going to be another hearing in which the government is going to have an opportunity to make its case, but it sounds as though this Judge John Tiger Who is an Obama appointee and was once a public defender in San Francisco, and I think that's all we need to know about him.
From the look of him, a white man by the way, looks about as white as you and me, he's decided that nope, nope, we're not gonna do anything extraordinary to keep them from enjoying the benefits of asylum in the United States of America.
So does the ACLU, when they prepare to file one of these Of course, yes.
That's right.
against something that the president has done.
Do they search out the right judge?
Of course, yes.
So they've got a Rolodex or an Excel file of friendly judges that they can call upon to have this?
That's right.
It's called venue shopping.
Now, I don't know whether they could have chosen absolutely anybody in the United States.
My guess is yes, because they are talking about a federal directive by a federal official.
They could probably choose any federal official in the entire country.
And Judge John Tiger, Obama appointee, former public defender, was probably right at the top of their rolodex.
So this could be one of those cases we see the Supreme Court take up in early 2019.
Obviously, it will be.
We know it's going to be... Well, we'll see how important this matter is, and whether or not Judge John Tiger makes a different decision on December 19th.
But my suspicion is that he's going to say, nope, it makes no difference.
Now, he is reading the law on asylum and refugees in a particular way, which may be the only way.
It may be.
As I say, no matter how you arrive, if you've got a claim, you've got to claim.
And we can't say, nope, nope, you didn't come in the front door, so out you go.
So, we'll see.
But moving on, moving on to my favorite new congressperson, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
She has—since she won her election, she has been continuing to challenge the Democratic Party leadership.
In fact, she actually—now, this is quite astonishing to me.
She joined in a sit-in protest at Nancy Pelosi's office.
Correct.
Wow, this is a fellow Democratic Congresswoman-to-be is coming in in a sit-in protest.
Under ordinary circumstances, that's called trespassing.
Well, the coalition of fringes is going to start fraying considerably once they are all inducted and they take their oath of office, which I believe is in, what, early part of January 2019?
Yes.
We're already seeing that as we're about to talk about here, and you are already Witnessing a lot of white Democrats say,
hey, pump the brakes a little bit here.
What are you doing?
Because Ms. Cortez is—she's saying, hey, you're either with us or, hey, you're against us.
And it's quite clear that this is going to be the directive of this incoming freshman in Congress.
Well, she is part of something called the Justice Democrats, and they have officially launched their hashtag Our Time
project.
It's another way of saying our turn.
Another way of saying out white men and even out white women.
I don't think white women I don't quite understand the implications of what our time means.
The image of the four new Congresswomen that we talked about last week, it's quite clear.
It's Latino, Hispanic, and Islamic lawmakers.
That's right.
Anybody who's not white.
Anybody who's not white.
Now, this Justice Democrats, when they officially launched this Our Time, Our Turn, No Longer Your Turn project, they issued a statement that said this.
The Progressive Grassroots Organization will recruit the next generation of primary challengers to Democratic incumbents who are demographically and ideologically out of touch with their districts.
Demographically and ideologically out of touch.
I'm surprised they even include ideologically.
Of course, they can probably count on the idea that if they've got somebody who is demographically, in their view, in touch, That person will be ideologically in touch, too.
Now, I've said this many times on these podcasts.
Aren't white people paying attention?
Do white people read these things?
Do white Democrats read these things and say, uh-oh?
Do they?
Or do they applaud?
But we'll go further.
The Hashtag Our Time project is a grassroots candidate recruitment effort asking Democrats and progressives around the country to submit nominees for both potential candidates and districts where an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez-style campaign might succeed.
The significance of the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez-style campaign was that she kicked out, well, the number three, the number three Democrat in the House?
And on a budget that was one-eighteenth his budget?
A white male who had served for decades.
For 20 years he'd served.
Who thought he was an absolute shoo-in.
I mean, this is a declaration of war against every comfortable white Democrat.
Then she goes on to say, the organization will prioritize candidates who are women, represent the diversity of communities in their district.
Wow.
Now, of course, all the cool new congresswomen, as the New Yorker magazine described this crop, your cool new congresswomen, including Palestinian-American representative-elect Rashida Tlaib, are all piling on.
So this is the message.
This is message to the Democratic incumbents.
Now, I find it fascinating that you have a group that is explicitly putting the crosshair on Democratic incumbents.
They're not talking about an attempt to unseat Republicans.
They're not trying to promote their party.
They're trying to promote their particular racial, ethnic, ideological point of view within the Democratic Party.
And if they can knock off incumbents, so much the better.
Oh, it's open season of White Male Democrats, and you think of the irony of this, the dichotomy, when one of the primary individuals that Democrats are pushing to be their nominee in 2020 is Mr. Beto O'Rourke.
He currently leads, obviously, we're a long time away from the primaries, but already it's fundraising season for a lot of this, and Mr. Beto O'Rourke is at the top of the list.
No.
He sure doesn't.
He sure doesn't.
Are you going to modify your prediction and maybe think Kamala Harris is not going to be the nominee?
Oh no.
I still am convinced they're going to have to do what Stacey Abrams was able to do.
Again, you have to energize black women across the country.
You have to get them to the polls.
You have to get them to donate.
Even if it's an insignificant amount of $5, that adds up over time.
I mean, look what's going on right now with Michelle Obama's campaign for her new book that she just came out with and the massive amount of books that she's selling, largely to black women.
She sold, in the first week her book was out, 725,000 copies.
She is a billion dollar brand and it's largely on the backs of black women so they're going to have
to and they're going to have to have a member of the people of color coalition at the top of the
at the top of the uh at the top of the ballot. Well you're drawing the parallel to Stacey Abrams
but it may be that if they do that they'll be just a little bit ahead of their time.
What?
If they have a wild and really improbable non-white person at the top of their ticket, the voters might just not care for that.
That is the blowback.
Again, this is all happening too fast.
There are still too many white people in this country who realize that they have no place in this People of Color Coalition future.
And their children, they not only don't have a place, but they're going to be disenfranchised and stripped of their rights in a South African-style situation.
Well, we'll see.
We'll see how quickly white people wake up.
One respect in which some of them appear to be waking up, though, has to do with the reaction to a D.C.
council vote just today to decriminalize metro fare evasion in the district.
Now, they said that they were worried about soaring enforcement levels of fair beaters and that there was disproportionate enforcement against African Americans.
They had an initial vote of 11 to 2 to decriminalize fair beating.
Now, instead of penalties of up to $300 and a criminal record, you'd get a $50 civil infraction that would not appear as a criminal record, and there'd be no way to enforce it.
Essentially, this means if you want to jump the style, you can jump the style.
But one of the reasons, one of the big reasons why the DC City Council voted to make this change was that there was a study by the Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs that found that 91% of Metro Transit Police citations and summonses for fare evasions for the period of 2016 through 2018 were issued to African Americans, black people.
91%.
Well, we just can't have that.
That is obviously an example of why the police are not only implicitly biased, but they, this is fair evasions, are deliberately targeting blacks.
That's the only logical conclusion the left can take from this.
That's right.
They say they are targeting, the police are targeting blacks for enforcement.
Council member Robert C. White, argued that if they did not take this it would be condoning
that pattern and they he talked about an overwhelming number of black people being arrested
unnecessarily. Again it's hard to look at stories like this because as we're going to talk about
this is happening all across the country where radically left-leaning city councils these
progressive city councils have decided it is a right to have free access to public transportation.
So long as you're not white, apparently.
Of course, you're black.
You have to wonder what's going to happen when a white person gets arrested and they say, wait a second, I thought this was okay now.
I thought this was a free service.
One of the things that I saw in one of these stories about the DC decriminalized or voting
to decriminalize metro fare evasion, this is costing the system $20 million a year.
That's right.
That's right.
That's a lot of money.
There's going to be budget shortfalls starting to prop up when it comes to maintaining these
trains and this system.
I mean, goodness gracious.
Up to maybe $25 million.
$25 million they're losing because they let people hop on board without paying.
The crazy thing about it is, if you are a student in DC, you get a free card.
And they're all sorts of... If you come from a poor family, you get a half-fare car.
A lot of programs.
There are all these programs that make it possible for you to ride for practically nothing or for free.
But they are hop-and-turn styles anyway.
And DC Council Chairman Phil Mendelsohn He actually voted against it.
He was one of the two voting against it.
The other one is the guy who is the head of the metro, the transportation system himself.
He said, hold on, hold on, this is crazy.
The other guy, he said that, you know, Decriminalizing this would not solve the disproportionate policing of people of color.
He says that's an underlying problem that he called systemic and plagues the DC police as well.
So this This Phil Mendelsohn, apparently, at least in public, falls for the idea that there's some sort of unfair targeting of black offenders, but he says, this ain't how we're going to solve the problem.
And we do need to make sure that we don't send the message that it's okay to steal from the transit system.
Of course, the DC system is not unique.
San Francisco, they decriminalized fair beating for BART in 2008.
And in fact, in 2000, and I should add, for exactly the same reason.
Exactly the same reason.
And this is also a system that last year decided to no longer share security camera footage because the CCT videos showed black and brown people beating Passengers.
That's right.
And they didn't want to stigmatize these populations.
Exactly.
They used to have this stuff available to the public.
No, not anymore.
It would give people the wrong impression.
Of course, what it would give them is the correct impression, but that's precisely the impression we don't want to give.
In 2016, California statewide decriminalized fare beating for everyone under 18.
For exactly, again, the same reason.
Because blacks and browns are being, quote, targeted for enforcement of this.
Think how much that's costing the Los Angeles metro system, obviously the San Francisco metro system.
This is just a tax that, once again, is deferred to the largely white taxpaying, or in San Francisco, Asian, or Los Angeles as well.
There's a massive Asian population as well.
New York City did the same thing because blacks and Hispanics were 90% of the people that they hauled in for Fairbanks.
Well, this just happened two months ago.
I mean, these are stories.
There's so much happening that you don't see unless you've got a really good Google search and you're able to find this story.
Wait a second.
This isn't just isolated to one or two cities.
This is a pattern that is emerging from sea to shining sea.
We could be talking about the Dallas public transportation system.
We could be talking about the Tulsa, Oklahoma public transportation system, if there is one there.
It doesn't matter where you are, the variables are the same.
Yep.
For Seattle, it was 2015, after a study found black riders are more likely to be punished for fare evasion.
Oh my goodness, we can't have this.
And blacks, mind you, in Seattle, I believe are 7% of the population.
Oh, they're some tiny, tiny percentage.
As it turned out, the story in the Washington Post that was pointing out that we have to decriminalize this because 91%—was it 91%?—are African Americans who are charged with fair evasion.
You know, somewhat to my surprise, the comments were overwhelmingly, witheringly opposed to this.
Even the readers of the Washington Post realized this is crazy.
And I don't know how many of the commenters said, look, if 91% of you being picked up for fair evasion are black, It looks to me it's because that's because they're the people who are doing it.
He says, I've never seen a white person jump a style.
I've seen people who ride the metro all the time.
They're riding to say, this reflects reality.
And just because black people can't play by the rules, you're going to abolish the rules?
This is nuts.
No, these stories have a far more profound impact on your average white individual than any IQ study you could show them and bash them over the head with and say, look what Richard Lynn said.
You know, read what William Shockley wrote.
Look what he was trying to do back in the 70s with the sperm bank.
Don't you understand?
Hey!
The D.C.
City Council voted to decriminalize metro fare evasion because it's only black people who are committing these crimes?
Wait a second!
Wait a second!
And some people would say, you know, murder is disproportionately black.
This is one of the comments, too.
Murder is disproportionately black.
We better decriminalize that next.
That's the way things are going.
I mean, this is this incremental decriminalization of crimes that should be ruthlessly enforced as part of the broken The left is doing everything they can to try and push back against this concept.
Well, you know, even some lefties, I think, are annoyed by this.
There were people who were saying, now what does this make white people, how does this make white people feel?
Who pay in the fair?
They see black people just galloping over the stiles without paying?
What's that going to make the rate-paying white people feel?
I was surprised.
It was almost as if the commenters were all American Renaissance readers.
Most people who pay attention, once they start putting two and two together, logically they're
going to end up in America, Renaissance Reader, because when you see stories like this, this
leads to a dystopia across the country.
And there is no way back.
Once you start having budgetary shortfalls in these cities, you're going to start seeing
taxpayers leave.
You're going to see corporations leave.
I mean, there's a pattern emerging all across the country in 2018.
Look what happened in Philadelphia, where a black city council member said, hey, Plexiglas is racist.
Right.
And these stores are largely owned by Asians.
Yes.
Why is Plexiglas up to protect these Asian employees?
This stigmatizes blacks.
We need to take this down.
That's right.
Or in, what was it?
I think it was in both New York State and in Michigan.
two black lawmakers and the state legislators respectively said,
hey, you know what? It's got to be a crime to call 911 on a black person. This is just...
But if the black person is in fact found not to be committing a crime?
Correct.
You can't just arbitrarily call 9-1-1 because this is just wrong.
Look at all these white women who are calling 9-1-1 innocent black bodies.
Fortunately, I don't think any of those laws came into being, but that's the thinking.
That's the direction in which we're all supposed to be thinking.
So yes, I was very gratified by the comments, but as I pointed out to you, this has been going on for at least 10 years.
San Francisco decriminalized fair bidding and bargaining in 2008.
Seattle did it in 2015.
I mean, everybody's doing it, and you say this affects white people.
Well, I want to see the effect of affecting white people.
Well, here's a question to our listeners.
If you reside in a city that we don't have listed here, I think this would actually be a really good story for AR to show.
To show a map and to show a timeline of all the cities that have banned fair evasion.
Because I think this is the type of stuff that shocks taxpayers.
It's like, wait a second, because blacks are being arrested?
If you live in a city, Omaha, Nebraska, that has public transportation that has done this, send in the link to either sbpdl1 at gmail.com or the contact us page at amran.com.
We'd love to be able to put together a massive story that documents how This is not isolated to major cities, but also there are studies in minor cities, and that impacts public policy and public transportation.
Gosh, I don't want to go off too much of a tangent here, Mr. Taylor, but I was just reading a story about Walt Disney and his idea of Epcot.
When Walt Disney World was built in Florida, he wanted to create an experimental prototype, City of the Future, EPCOT, the acronym.
And it had the monorail system, it had this idea that public transportation was going to be, at some point, free, and it was just going to be fantastic because we'd cut down on pollution, there'd be no need for cars because you'd have the monorail system, and then there'd be transportation hubs, there'd be a separate system that would take you to where the domiciles were, the homes.
You look at this and you realize there were forward-thinking individuals who had hopes and ambitions for a better America, but of course those coincided with the racial realities that doomed the country with, of course, Shelley v. Kramer decision in 1948, which made restrictive covenants unconstitutional, which basically ensured that white flight is going to be the predominant theme of That's right.
until white people basically have nowhere else to run.
That's right, it makes white flight perpetual.
Exactly, and it's so sad because you think of, I would love to be able to take public transportation.
I'm sure there are listeners here who had to take public transportation,
and they probably looked around and they realized, wow, I'm the only white face on this bus or on this train.
All too often.
Well, you know, these stories about rules being changed because non-white people cannot abide by the rules.
I'd love to look deeper into that very question.
You know that the University of Virginia, ever since its founding by Thomas Jefferson, had an honor code.
But this honor code keeps being violated by black students and Hispanic students.
And there's a certain amount of cheating among the Asian students.
And there is always this terrible, hand-wringing, agonizing reappraisal of the honor system because it turns out that this system that was built for Virginians is a difficult one for others to adhere to.
Now, they still have the honor system, but it's not enforced with anything like the rigor that it used to be, because there have been too many violators.
If they really expelled everybody who violated the honor code, they just would be back to a non-diverse, well, maybe not quite that bad, but their diversity stats would be very bad.
So, and then there's another aspect of this.
I remember years and years ago, Before I was even very racially conscious, I knew a fellow who had spent a lot of time in Brazil, and we were walking down the street one day, and this was in New York City, and he put a quarter in the machine, and he opened it up, and he picked out a copy of the New York Times, and then he closed the machine back, and he said, you know, in Brazil, you couldn't do this.
I said, well, why not?
He said, well, somebody put in a quarter.
He'd empty the box.
He'd empty the box.
He said, hey, God, their attitude would be, wow, nobody's stopping me.
I'll give one to all my friends.
Couldn't do this in Brazil.
So there are all sorts of ways.
Things like public restrooms in subway systems.
When the New York City subway was first built, there were public restrooms.
Yes.
But before long, before long, as the demography changed, people ended up living in those places, people ended up raping people and mugging people in those places.
They just lock them up.
Lock them up.
But in Japan, where you've still got Japanese running the place, they've got public restrooms and subway systems.
But in all of these strange ways, because you get a population that cannot play by the rules, you change the rules, you make life inconvenient and awful for everybody.
Well, they can't maintain the standards of Western Civilization once the people who constituted and can perpetuate Western Civilization are no longer there.
Take, for instance, MARTA in Atlanta.
They've spent millions of dollars on urine detection systems in the elevators because of the amount of Times the ridership, the riders of the MARDIS system, which I should point out is 76% black according to most studies, which is why the acronym Moving Africans Rapidly Through Atlanta is what a lot of people believe MARDIS stands for.
Because they so often relieve themselves in elevators, they had to institute this system.
Some kind of detection system?
Because of the damage it was causing.
Elevators would be out constantly, and they realized they had to put the system in place so they would catch the person in the act, so that the actual elevator or escalator wouldn't be out of service.
Good grief.
So there's something, there's an alarm that goes off and they arrest the guy?
There is an alarm that goes off.
I encourage our readers, I'm sorry, I encourage our listeners.
Gosh, it's amazing.
Like you, I love the printed word, but our listeners, I encourage you to research the What they need is some sort of electric charge that travels up the liquid.
That would really discourage them.
If it can detect, it can probably react.
Moving on to our next story.
It has to do with Samuel Little.
He is a 78-year-old black man who has been in jail since 2014.
He was convicted in a couple of cold case murders of three women between 1987 and 1989 because of DNA.
So, he's got several life sentences attached to him, so he's going to be in the pokey until 78-year-old Samuel Little is no longer Samuel Little.
Now, as it turns out, he apparently was the guy who was involved in as many as 90 different killings nationwide, spanning a period of four decades.
Apparently, there is a detective who's gotten friendly with Samuel Litter and gotten him to talk.
And because he really doesn't face any additional penalties, he's happy to claim all of these unsolved murders.
Now, if he in fact is responsible for 90 murders, this guy could be the most prolific and successful serial killer in the history of the United States.
His competition, of course, is people like Gary Ridgway, Convicted of 49 murders, he is thought to be the one with the largest number of victims.
Ted Bundy confessed to 30 homicides.
John Wayne Gacy killed at least 33 boys and men, but 90?
That really puts him in a league pretty much close to all by himself, it seems to me.
And he had a particularly nasty modus operandi.
He would find women.
All of his victims are women, by the way.
And he had a habit.
He's an ex-boxer.
Apparently, he was 200 pounds.
He could deliver a really vicious punch.
He would knock a woman out and then masturbate while he strangled her to death.
You know, that's often the case with these serial killers.
They're just the weirdest, most twisted, perverted people.
That was his idea of a good time.
But there's also an aspect of this that has not been written up at all.
But whenever I've seen the names of the victims of this Samuel Little, every one of them sounds extremely white to me.
Now, I've not seen anything explicit about this, and it may be something that is the case, that all of his victims were white, but nobody will ever talk about it.
Interestingly enough, though, there have been a few cases of black serial killers, one in particular named Carl Eugene Watts.
It was known that virtually all of his victims were white.
And he apparently made a point of targeting, again, women.
Targeting white women.
So this is not without precedent.
But it's about time we laid to rest this silly view that serial killers are somehow exclusively white men.
Well, Coral Eugene Watts was known as the Sunday morning slasher, a guy from Michigan of course, and there's this fantastic book that was written by a criminologist by the name of Scott Vaughan.
The title is Why We Love Serial Killers, The Curious Appeal of the World's Most Savage Killers.
And this is a piece that was published at Scientific American, so this is a pretty renowned publication.
And the myth that he has, that he's trying to dispel, myth two, is that All serial killers are Caucasian, and he notes that, hey look, African-Americans comprise the largest racial minority group among serial killers, representing approximately 20% of the total.
That's right.
Per capita, it's going to be shocking, the over-representation that blacks are.
What that means is they are more likely than whites to be serial killers.
Right.
This is something that crops up in obscure corners of the press from time to time, but it is not at all well-known.
Well, and as he notes, and this is something hopefully an intrepid writer for AR can look into, he notes that significantly, however, only white and normally male serial killers, such as Ted Bundy, become popular cultural icons.
So I would ask you, why do you think that is, that the names that resonate are the guy
who dressed up as a clown, who's that, John Wayne Gacy, and then Ted Bundy, and then who's
the other one, Jeffrey Dahmer?
These are the guys that pop up so often.
I suspect it has as much to do with the fact that they are promoted in the press.
They're talked about.
They're talked about at great length.
Whereas, who's ever heard of Carl Eugene Watts?
Who's ever heard of this Samuel Little guy?
Samuel, he's just popping up now, but nobody's making much of a big deal about him.
No, that's a good question.
In fact, these black serial killers are so little known that many people think there isn't even a single one.
They would vehemently disagree with you if you tried to say, hey, don't you know this guy is a black guy who only targeted white women.
Yes, yes.
But speaking of another kind of crime, we seem to be having an interesting rash of hate crimes, phony hate crimes.
This one took place at Kansas State University.
And Broderick Burse, who is a sophomore there, he is a black person, and he clicked up a piece of paper on his doorframe that said, Beware!
N-words live here.
Knock at your own risk.
And this, of course, created the usual horrors.
And he tweeted out and said, This is still happening here at Kansas State.
So if So if it isn't as evident as it already was, everybody needs to get out and vote.
So apparently this was a trick he had to try to get out the vote.
Another one of these anti-Trump ideas.
Look at the country we live in.
Look at the world we live in.
Look at the university I go to.
So we have to vote.
What's terrifying to think is how many people this may have actually influenced in the state of Kansas to go and vote against Kobach.
It could.
It could.
That's right.
Chris Kobach.
Now, I find it interesting also that Broderick Burse is studying mass communications.
I guess he's trying to put his learning into effect here.
And this is kind of interesting because just last year, In the same city where Kansas State University is located, a man admitted that he painted racist slurs on his own car.
And as usual, now this guy claimed to be a former Kansas State University student.
Now, the university couldn't find any records of him, but that didn't stop the university from holding candlelight vigils and teach-ins and all the usual stuff.
Apparently, on the occasion of this guy, the get-out-the-vote hate crime hoaxer, they caught him quickly enough so that there was not a campus-wide shut-the-campus-down-and-have-teach-ins-on-racism.
But it's just a pattern that we happen to have noticed.
Now moving on to an international story.
This was a rather disturbing one.
And this is in Japan.
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.
He's got a plan to accept more foreign workers.
And this is to counter the aging and shrinking population of Japan.
And his cabinet just last week approved a draft bill and submitted it to Parliament.
And under this new bill, there would be two new visa categories.
One for unskilled workers.
They've never had unskilled workers allowed in the country who can stay by themselves.
I mean, they can't bring their family.
They come in by themselves for five years with no possibility of extension.
I mean, they're trying to be fairly careful about it.
But another, a new category for skilled workers who could bring their families and who could have their stay extended.
Well, fortunately he's met a lot of opposition on this.
Thankfully?
Yes, thankfully he's met a lot of opposition.
Although, there has been a poll showing that 54% of Japanese respondents said this is a good idea.
This is disturbing to me, with 34 opposing.
And young people particularly thought it was a good idea.
And Prime Minister Abe projected that during the first five years of a new system, there would be 345,000 blue-collar foreign workers who would join the workforce.
If, in fact, you could make sure that they came alone, that they were out for sure after five years, maybe you could do something with this.
But what happens when they, you know, they get drunk and molest a Japanese girl?
What happens, you know, when they get in a knife fight?
You don't know who these people are.
It's just going to be, it's going to be a real burden and the opposition parties are very worried about this.
You read a lot of stories that the Anti-second-amendment left puts out the Violence Prevention Center, the Violence Policy Center, all these leftist groups that attack and they try and chip away at the Second Amendment.
They always point to Japan.
They say, hey, there were only less than a hundred shootings last year.
The police only had to pull their guns.
X amount of times.
Right.
Whereas this is happening every day, constantly, continuously.
And of course, as you would know, well, look at the actual population.
It's actually Japanese.
Yes.
The police have nothing to do because there are no crimes committed because it's a homogenous population.
How hard is that to understand?
That's right.
And as you just noted, just one crime that's committed by one of these people that's going to be brought over if this bill actually does pass and the parliament then is able to start this program in April.
Well, you know, Japan really does have a problem with low birth rates and increasing age.
And they just cannot get young Japanese to make new Japanese people.
to end it immediately if Japan is still a serious country?
Well, you know, Japan really does have a problem with low birth rates and increasing age.
And they just cannot get young Japanese to make new Japanese people.
I don't know what the solution for Japan is going to be, but this is not my idea of a good way around it.
As you know, Japan has been in the forefront of developing robots.
One of the areas of robotics in which Japan is more advanced than any other place is in robots to care for the elderly.
The Japanese have a particular kind of bath called an ofuro.
And it's a deep bath you soak in up to your neck.
And it's not, you couldn't stand up straight, but you sort of sit down and it's a kind of a tub.
And they've got robots that help older people in and out of the bath.
And this is the kind of thinking that they need to develop more of.
But we'll see.
This will be a real beginning for them in actually letting unskilled Foreign workers in.
Japanese is a very tough language to learn.
We don't know what's going to happen in terms of teaching them how to get along.
But one, it is in fact the nursing care sector that's expected to take in the most of these blue-collar people if this comes to pass.
The second sector would be restaurant industry.
And so it's just like here in the United States.
All of these sort of low-skilled areas are going to be filled up with non-Japanese speaking non-Japanese.
Well, let's hope this bill fails and let's hope the Japanese succeed in raising their birth rate.
That would be something I'd be very grateful for if it were to happen because, as you know, I love Japan and I want Japan to prosper and be Japanese forever and ever.
But of the things I'm grateful for, you and I talked about how we might mention these things just because Thanksgiving is coming up.
I'm grateful for the New York Times.
I'm grateful for the New York Times for having hired Sarah Jong.
Sarah Jong, the open, white-hating, naturalized Korean woman with pink hair, I am delighted the New York Times hired her because it makes the battle lines so clear.
You can absolutely say over and over that you hate white people and the New York Times doesn't care.
I'm grateful that they finally came out of the open and made that clear for all of us to know and ponder.
And I'm also, I am grateful for Susan Collins of Maine.
Susan Collins of Maine, after having thought very hard about the Brett Kavanaugh nomination and the accusations against him, she stood up in the Senate and she gave what I thought was one of the best considered, most thoughtful explanations for a vote in the United States Senate that I've nearly ever seen.
I read the whole thing start to finish.
I thought, wow, this is really a very thoughtful woman.
And she had reasons for wanting to hesitate, but she finally said, OK, I'm going to vote for Brad Kavanaugh to be a Supreme Court justice.
Well, as soon as she voted, the usual lefty sites all started blaming white women.
She is somehow a symbol of white privilege, white female racism.
So again, I'm grateful to her and I am grateful for all the people who blamed all white women for Susan Collins' very careful decision to vote to nominate Brett Kavanaugh.
Then finally, I'm grateful for the quality of the young people in our movement.
Just the other day I was at a meeting, probably about 50 people, all of them young.
And I looked around that room and I thought, wow, my generation has made one hell of a mess of things.
If anybody can clean up the mess, it's these young guys.
Smart, well-informed, committed, attractive.
Compared to the days when I was first getting into the movement where you'd go to a meeting
compared to the days when I was first getting into the movement where you'd go to a meeting
and it'd be full of these weird people, funny looking people, and if clothes that didn't fit them,
to be full of these weird people, funny-looking people, and if clothes that didn't fit them,
and people that you just never dare well-informed, committed, attractive,
and people that you just never dare introduce to your girlfriend, or women just have an unerring
detection process for these weirdos and kooks.
I don't know where those people are gone, gone to, but they're gone, and I don't miss them.
So the young people, and then finally, I am grateful for the American people.
The American people, back in November of 2016, despite the fact that our press
was, had had a very, very lopsided record in terms of endorsing candidates,
there were 500 newspapers and weeklies that endorsed Hillary Clinton, 500.
500.
And there were 30 that they didn't necessarily endorse anybody, they said, anybody but Trump.
Do you know how many weeklies and dailies, et cetera, endorsed Donald Trump?
More than you might think.
I would probably guess under 10.
There were 28.
Wow.
There were 28.
Surprising, isn't it?
But most of them were these sort of little weird weeklies that you never heard of.
In any case, so it was 530 to 28.
So despite being told by the head table, this is our candidate, the American people voted.
In sufficient numbers to elect Donald Trump.
So I think the idea that we have got to the point where we can say to the people who think they run the country, think they know how to tell us what to think.
No, we are gonna do what we think best.
So I'm grateful for the American people.
No, tell me, for what are you particularly grateful for, Mr. Kersey?
It's Thanksgiving and normally this podcast hits On Thursday, so we wanted to get this up a little early.
I know a lot of our listeners are probably going to be traveling.
Hopefully you'll be able to listen to this as you get ready to go to your homes and be with your families and friends.
Obviously you're seeing a lot of people out there saying, a lot of people in the press are saying, hey, you should confront the Trump supporter and your family at Thanksgiving dinner.
You should shame them.
There shouldn't be any conversation at all.
We can't tolerate any of these ideas.
I want to be thankful for something that nearly happened.
It didn't, but I think, once again, it made crystal clear, and it will become increasingly clear to a lot of conservatives, especially the gentleman you noted, who has a long time in national politics, who said, I believe that 80% of whites will, in the next 10 years... In 10 years, that's what he's saying.
In 10 years.
I've heard from a lot of people that Stacey Abrams has shocked into action.
Individuals in Georgia who have prominent positions within the Republican Party, who were stunned at how close things were, and are realizing that, wait a second, we really have, the way trends are going, we have lost control of the state to a point where they almost went to a runoff.
It was, what, Kemp won 50.3?
Something like that, yeah.
Had he lost a couple thousand more votes, it would have gone to a runoff.
You would have seen so much money pouring into Georgia.
But the beautiful thing about Stacey Abrams is she, as I said, many months, when she first won the nomination, she's four years too early.
Georgia, you know, since 2010, I was reading a study, 80% of Georgia's population growth has been people of color.
80%.
Since when now?
Since 2010.
This is a state that was 71% white in 1990.
This is a state that still has this magnificent carving on Stone Mountain, which Stacey Abrams said, We're going to sandblast that son-of-a-bitch, that racist image that all these white Georgians have celebrated for decades.
We're going to sandblast that thing right off.
And just like what happened with Serzhong at the New York Times, she's made it quite clear what the Democrats will be in the 21st century with what she said of, we don't need to go after the white vote.
We don't need to do this.
And we saw that in the returns.
White women and white men voted overwhelmingly.
Almost three of every four votes went to Brian Kemp.
A guy who really didn't deserve their vote because he didn't really have any great plans.
And I think when you have these candidates who are so venomous and they're so vehemently anti-white, it is going to impress upon people that it's time we do something.
And that's why I've got to say, Even though there are so many things that he's done that we have to shake our heads at, and we have to, as you've noted, he has a number of integrity issues.
I still think that President Trump came along at the historically right moment, and it's one of those, what's that great word from Greek plays?
Deus Ex Machina.
Yeah, it's one of those situations where He is still doing all the right things to enrage our enemies and force them to show their true anti-white hand.
Except he's not really a deus.
That means the god on the machine, the one that comes right out of nowhere and saves you.
I just wish you were more of a deus, at least a gentleman, if not a deus.
But anyway, you know my quibbles about Donald Trump.
No, no, and they're correct, but at the same time, Just as you noted that you're thankful for the quality of people in the movement, Donald Trump is forcing people to take sides.
He is forcing the left to start coming out with a lot of their policy positions and electing individuals like our great friend Ms.
Cortez that, guess what?
America might be running out of white people, but there's still a lot of white people who remember what this country was like just a couple decades ago.
I mean, my goodness, I was thinking, just as we're preparing for this, where I was a decade ago, and that area, very nice area of the country, but it has changed so much.
I don't want to get into how it's changed, but... I think we can imagine.
It's just, it's so sad.
And it's thinking about, you know, A lot of white people out there probably feel powerless, that there's nothing that you can do to change the trajectory of what's happening, that there are forces united that are going to swamp everything that you love, everything that you've ever cared about.
Oh, no, no, no.
It's just a matter of enough people tumbling to the obvious, caring enough about it to do something, enough people willing to run for office, enough people to speak their minds.
I think that a great deal can be accomplished.
The idea that, no, no, that 200 million white people are just going to walk off the stage of history in the United States of America?
No, it's not going to happen.
And as I said, the young people that I meet in this movement are so impressive.
It fills me with joy to see them.
And as I've said to you before, I see people like this wherever I travel in Europe.
The same kind of deep understanding of the crisis we face, the need to act, the need to act now, intelligence, commitment, integrity.
Something is going to be done and I think the right things will fall into place.
At the end of the day, the most important thing is courage.
That really is what separates.
Our listeners are fantastic, and I think one of the things that I do want to say from a Thanksgiving standpoint, one more time, is Happy Thanksgiving.
I brought this up to you because I do think that we want to give something back to our listeners.
If I may be so bold, you've written a fantastic book that I think Put an exclamation point on why we must do something.
And that book, of course, is titled... If We Do Nothing.
We would like to give away a signed copy of If We Do Nothing to one of our listeners.
So if you would send over just an email, you don't have to put your address in immediately, just send over an email and say that you would like to be in the running for a signed copy.
A drawing, it'll be a drawing.
So send over an email to sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
Once again that email is sbpdl1 at gmail.com or Or, you can send a message to the Contact Us page at www.amaran.com.
Yes, we'd love to hear from you.
And in the meantime, have a wonderful Thanksgiving.
And there is a great deal to be thankful for.
And don't forget that things will go our way.
They are going our way, even though it doesn't always seem that way.
So, give thanks.
So, once again, be safe out there on this wonderful 2018 Thanksgiving week.
Have fun with your family and friends.
For Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
Our podcast time is up!
▲
Export Selection