All Episodes
Previous Next
April 6, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
39:12
Selma: A Civil Rights Legacy
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to another edition of Radio Renaissance.
I am Henry Wolfe here with the indefatigable Paul Kersey.
You know, the only word that I can use to describe you, Mr. Wolfe, You're a polymath.
You've done such great work for the New Century Foundation.
Today, of course, we've had a couple technical difficulties trying to get this recording for the audience.
We're gonna have some fun with this, though.
We're a couple weeks away from the next American Resonance Conference, and hey, just real quick, are there still some open seats available for people to be able to get in?
There are some open seats available for the conference.
Definitely encourage everyone, if you're planning on going to the conference, to register soon.
There are just a couple dozen slots left open.
The conference is going to be a blast this year.
We have a great roster of speakers.
We've been talking a lot with Park Security.
Things are looking tight.
Things are looking good.
Definitely plan on coming to the American Renaissance Conference.
A lot of energy, a lot of excitement.
Of course, Mr. Wolf, we are only a day removed from the 50th anniversary of the assassination.
There's no question.
I mean, all around the gym yesterday, and that's the only time when I get exposure to television, is plastered all over the screens at the gym.
mainstream media, academia, and the state have basically created religion out of Martin Luther King?
There's no question. I mean, all around the gym yesterday, and that's the only time when I get
exposure to television, is plastered all over the screens at the gym. Each station had a different
image of Dr. King up, and all were pointing out that this is the 50th anniversary of his
assassination.
What we'd like to break into is talking about a special in Yahoo News.
Yahoo News sent a number of correspondents out to do different takes on the anniversary and one that they've dialed in on was Selma, Alabama, which of course is the home of the Edmund Pettus Bridge.
Which in 1965 was marched across by 600 activists who were set upon by police and this really became a seminal moment in the civil rights era.
Two weeks later Dr. King came down and led a march from Selma to Montgomery which culminated in the Voting Rights Act.
That's right.
So, the article focuses on a lady named Joanna Bland, who is 64 now, but at the time was 11 years old and was actually on the bridge.
And she lives in Selma now, and so the journalists went and followed her around and got her impressions of the way the city is doing.
And Bland has a very bleak outlook of Selma, to put it lightly.
She says, quote, Selma is dying.
And the article says, you know, five decades later, Bland looks at her hometown and sees a city that once made history, but has seemingly been left behind by it.
That really is the tone of this article.
You get this sense of complete passivity that the people who live in Selma have been acted upon by this amorphous history.
In a lot of pop culture, in a lot of books, whenever there's a nuclear exchange between states, watches stop.
And they're always going to be at that exact moment when that atomic energy was released.
That's what we're led to believe has happened in Selma.
This great achievement, the breaking of the back of the Jim Crow self, and de facto segregation.
was accomplished with Selma.
This is a city that has been lionized in a movie by Ava DuVernay, a movie called Selma.
Interesting fact, Mr. Wolfe, in 2014 when that debuted, there was no movie theater opened in Selma, Alabama, so they actually had to create a non-profit to then go in and purchase the old theaters just so they could have the movie's debut.
Incredible.
The actual first viewing of the film, this great celebration, at that theater.
And of course, Mr. Wolf, we'd be remiss if we didn't point out Jesse Jackson, who was on the balcony when Mr. King was shot in April 4, 1968, there in Memphis.
He, of course, a couple years ago, when he was there celebrating the 50th anniversary of the march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge, He also noted what this Yahoo article notes, the complete breakdown of civilization and the consequences of white flight and emboldening blacks with complete control of the city.
He actually said, we should make it illegal for white people to take their capital and close their businesses and leave Selma.
This is an actual quote that Jesse Jackson used.
it's a pretty incredible view when you think about it, because you've got basically a city
where all the infrastructure was, you know, left essentially by whites, all these beautiful homes,
beautiful businesses, and so on.
And it was left for the blacks who remain there.
But, and all that was required really was upkeep.
And that just hasn't happened.
You know, they, uh, I remember during the Freddie Gray riots in Baltimore when the New York Times went and did a little video short and they asked one of the blacks there, you know, why are you guys out out rioting?
And he goes, man, you kidding me?
Look around here.
You see this?
This is all they give us.
This is what they give us.
And that seems to be the mentality.
And that's really what's reflected in this article.
You've got a city that is now, uh, has full black representation.
I mean, they were marching for voting rights.
Yep.
Well, they got them.
And they've got now a black mayor, a majority black city council, a black congressman, woman, a black police chief.
Um, they've got everything.
A black superintendent of the school system.
Yep.
Yep.
But now as the, uh, the article says, the town has struggled amid white flight, a sinking economy, high unemployment, rising crime, and troubled schools.
So, of course, none of these things are the fault of any of the blacks who are in charge of this city.
None of them are the fault of any of the blacks who inhabit the city.
It's just the amorphous force of the economy, the unemployment rate, crime, and troubled schools.
Well, what are these schools troubled by, Mr. Kersey?
I mean, who inhabits these schools?
You know, I believe the last time I looked at the statistics, and I think we have them right here, I want to say that in a town that is now 80% black, 20% white, All of the white students attend private schools.
99% of public school students are black.
So literally, that is 100%.
If the schools are troubled, who are they troubled by?
It's their 99% black student population.
And of course the superintendent of schools, and I'm sure most of the teachers, are black as well.
One of the stories we won't get to today is there's a huge story in the Washington Post about the ending of Barack Obama's program to try and end school discipline disparities when it comes to black and brown students.
And they claim that there's an implicit bias, all this nonsense, these made-up words.
When you look at a school system like the one in Selma, How can there be an implicit bias?
I mean, basically, how do you even discipline students when every student is black?
So anyone getting in trouble is going to be this wonderful Wakandan.
This well-behaved Wakandan.
The article, you know, it really is basically a tragic article as well because You have what the article describes as a as once bustling storefronts along Broad Street in downtown Selma, where bland and fellow activists made history that are now mostly empty and still.
The old department store is gone.
Many restaurants, too.
The city's oldest neighborhoods with their quaint old cottages and 19th century mansions framed by towering live oak trees.
You know, I read a lot when it comes to the Selma Times Journal.
It's a fun newspaper to read because basically you're constantly hearing of marches to stop the violence.
You're learning that before, in March every year, the entire nation almost stands still to commemorate that anniversary of the march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge.
Well, in the articles that the Times Journal highlights, They have to have campaigns to get white people to come out and pick up the trash.
There are articles, no this is before, because they don't want people to see all the trash that is strewn about the city to see how bad the problem is.
Mr. Wolf, one of the saddest articles I've read was in 2015, oh it was 2016, and it was detailing a drive-by shooting that happened on Christmas Eve 2015.
I don't know where you were on Christmas Eve, probably with your family, trimming the tree, eating a Christmas Eve dinner, perhaps opening up one or two presents before Christmas, maybe going to church, Well, there was a woman, a black woman, who was trimming the tree.
Her grandchildren and some of her children were in their living room.
A drive-by shooting.
Some black gangbangers opened fire.
They kill her right in front of her family on Christmas Eve.
This is the world that is glossed over in this Yahoo piece that exists.
This is the quality of community, or lack thereof.
And I've always joked about the Detroit Corollary to Robert Putnam's study on diversity.
He talks about how the less diverse a community, the more social capital.
Well the corollary to that is the blacker a community, the less social capital that exists when you have diversity.
There's a massive correlation and Selma is the epitome of a city whose current conditions are a direct consequence, Mr. Wolf, to the supplanting of the Jim Crow laws that tried to keep in place some semblance of white civilization as demographic forces created a white minority within Selma.
Because again, Selma was I think 65% white when this march took place.
I think it was about 50%.
It was close.
It is traditionally a majority white city as it was built and all those places, all those businesses, all those gorgeous buildings and homes on Broad Street that this article mentioned I gotta tell every listener, you should go see Selma.
Because you see, as you noted, you see a footprint.
You see the infrastructure that white people, when they fled the city, when they participated in trying to find a, you know, in this crusade to try and find a place to actually raise their families away from this triumphant blackness that has enveloped the town.
You see... You see a...
It's sad because you see a glimpse of what... What you see is one of the poorest cities in the nation.
You do, but you see a glimpse of... 60% of children in Selma now live in poverty.
In 1960, the population was 28,000 people.
Now it's only 19,000.
And of course, now it's 80% black.
And 99% of public school students are black.
This city has just become really a ruin.
You say it's ruined.
What it really is, it is a case study in why laws once existed to protect the majority from the consequences of emboldening certain demographic groups to have complete control over the lives and the destiny of a place like Selma, Alabama.
You can read, I definitely encourage our readers to read this article, but it just has these beautiful vignettes that just paint a, I mean, really, they're not beautiful, but they're poignant.
And it paints a picture of just something that you would expect in a slum in Nairobi.
Homes, this is a quote, homes occupied by the poorest of the poor in the region.
where many homes lack sewage systems, leading raw waste to openly flow into yards and often back into drinking water.
That has led to an outbreak of E. coli and hookworm, an intestinal parasite and disease of extreme poverty that is more typically found in developing areas of Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia.
the article mentions a UN inspector on world poverty coming in and saying that Selma has
some scenes that he hasn't seen in the bleakest parts of Africa.
When I went to Selma, I drove around because I was trying to find some of the yard signs
that implored the citizens to stop shooting each other, quit killing each other.
Obviously, the memo Black Lives Matter has not made its way to Selma, Alabama because
there's so many, there's so much crime, there's the homicide rate.
If you actually do a per capita, it is one of the more violent cities in the entire country
when you have 19,000 people and you have 12 to 15 homicides a year and a couple score
non-fatal shootings.
To me, one of the saddest aspects was to look at all these houses, these dilapidated houses, and you could just tell that at one point they housed probably generations of families who were sheltered in these domiciles that were supposed to last for centuries.
And yet, as you mentioned, once white flight happened and Black families moved in, there was no upkeep, there was no maintenance, and then magically they just all started to fall apart.
That's definitely the case.
And the article ends on a note, Bland is driving presumably this reporter around the city and she normally does tours and she says that her point of giving these tours is to try to basically inflict people with guilt.
And it's unclear whether she's referring to whites or blacks, but probably she's referring to whites.
And she says at one point in the article that Selma gave so much to the world and nothing has been given back.
We have the history and that's all.
But then at the end of the article she says, I'm not ashamed to show it to him.
Because sometimes you have to play on the guilt.
You have to make people guilty.
We gave you so much.
Now look at us.
Help us.
Again, it's what they marched for across that bridge and then to Montgomery two weeks later was equality of opportunity.
They wanted the Civil Rights Act.
They wanted the Voting Rights Act, the Fair Housing Act.
And they got it all.
They got it all.
They got complete civil rights to the point where today they can elect all blacks to rule their city.
There's certainly nobody stopping them from living anywhere in the city.
There's no one discriminating against them in any jobs or anything like that.
Even crazier, think about the tagline moniker for Washington, D.C.
Taxation without representation.
There's virtually no taxation, with representation, because there's nobody who's actually producing wealth in this city, in this 80% black city.
I think I read where almost the majority of the students are on subsidized school lunches, massive EBT, welfare usage in the city.
There's nobody, there's no economy there.
The city is already just living off of federal subsidies, I'm sure.
And one of the angles of this article is basically saying how Martin Luther King was beginning to pivot away from the civil rights issues toward issues of economic justice.
And what does that really mean?
What that really means is now that we've basically we're on the march and it looks inevitable that we're going to achieve civil rights.
What's the next stage?
Well, the next stage is getting the handouts.
And that's what this is about.
That's what Bland is after.
She says, you know, help us.
Give us stuff.
You know, poverty is violence.
You have to solve this.
You have to just basically give us the material conditions that we were incapable of creating for ourselves by creating a thriving economy, by maintaining businesses and homes and so on.
Well of course we all know the next step of course is just confiscating white property or finding a way to tap into white people's bank accounts which I think is going to come because in Selma you still have a lot of the wealth is within the hands of that white minority that represents roughly 20% of the city and confiscate it.
Or at the very least forbid them from leaving and inflicting white flight upon them.
Jesse Jackson's idea.
Yeah, exactly.
I wanted to talk a bit about the article that was not written here.
And what I mean by that is, you know, we always read these pity stories that basically, you know, talk about how some amorphous forces of racism are to blame for the plight of blacks who reside in these cities and so on.
But what if instead of writing this article, they had written an article from the perspective of a denizen of Selma, whose great-great-grandfather, going back many generations, built one of those 19th century cottages that they described, but who had to flee the city because of violence in the schools, because of incompetence, because of corrupt city leaders, and so on.
When are we going to get a profile of that person, that family?
I would even say a profile on if there is one white student at the school, at the Selma High School, whatever it's called, or within the Selma public school system, because perhaps they had a family member who at one point had wealth, their wealth was tied into the equity within the home, and then due to the depreciating property values they were stuck in Selma.
They were unable to leave Selma, which is located in Dallas County.
So because of the ending of white privilege, white privilege even exists in Selma anymore.
It's a city that should be the beacon of blackness.
It should be a place where...
It's Wakanda.
Exactly.
I mean, white people built Wakanda for them and they are unable to even maintain a movie
theater that can only be reopened because, gee, golly, gosh, we just made a movie called
Selma which is supposed to canonize this moment and yet there's no movie theater to have the
premiere in the town that is, you know, what the movie is aimed at.
That's exactly it.
But yeah, it is interesting how the article basically makes the case that that, you know, King was about to lead a occupation of Washington where they were all going to camp out until they got economic justice, meaning, you know, a living wage, health care, all these things.
Look, living wages are provided by companies and businesses who employ people.
You know, Selma today, doesn't have these companies, doesn't have these businesses.
It's not like there's some barons of industry in Selma who are hoarding all the cash.
White people and their economy fled the city because blacks made it uninhabitable for them and their children.
And so a living wage wouldn't even be of any use unless it's provided by the government.
The night before Martin Luther King was assassinated, April 3rd, 1968 in Memphis, he was planning
on launching a boycott against Coca-Cola and Wonder Bread because of perceived discrimination
against blacks.
They weren't hiring enough blacks.
There weren't any Coca-Cola distributors owned by a black person.
And hilariously, during the speech, I think it's called, I've been to the mountaintop,
he's like, oh hey Jesse, what's that other company called?
Jesse Jackson is there.
Why I bring this anecdote up is because Jesse Jackson, Mr. Wolf, is right now trying to lead a boycott against Kroger in Memphis.
They just shut down two Kroger's in Memphis that were, that had been losing money for going on a decade.
And both of these Kroger's are located in 98% greater black areas of the city.
And he's saying we can't allow this to happen.
And again, if what you pointed out, and we're about to get switched subject here,
because I think this is a great natural change in the conversation, but we live in a society
where Martin Luther King, this is really the society that he wanted.
One where massive handouts and a redistribution of wealth has, occurs on a daily basis to actually create
this artificial black middle class.
And not equality of opportunity, of course, but equality of outcome.
And that does bring us to our next story, which is, you've probably, our listeners have probably heard
about the various lawsuits that are going on against Harvard.
And they've been going on for a couple of years now.
There are a couple of simultaneous ones running, but there's a group called Students for Fair Admissions,
which is suing Harvard.
And it's run by a fellow named Edward Bloom.
He's the guy behind it, and he fundraises for it and so on, but he was also the one behind the Abigail Fisher v. Texas case.
So he has, you know, the lawyers hired, they've raised millions for this lawsuit, but basically it's representing About a dozen Asian plaintiffs who had stellar credentials applied to Harvard and didn't get in.
And so they're claiming that there's de facto quotas on the number of Asian students who are admitted to Harvard.
And they've apparently been privy to the admissions data, which is huge.
Because we really don't have great data on Student admissions at elite schools.
We have data that goes back.
There's a Princeton sociologist named Espen Shade, who did an analysis of data from 1997.
And that data, he studied admissions profiles from seven highly selective universities.
He found that compared to whites, Asians have 140 point SAT penalty at these schools.
When they apply, yeah.
When they apply.
Yeah.
When they apply.
On the other hand, Hispanics get a 130 point bonus compared to whites, and blacks get a
whopping 310 point bonus.
And keep in mind, that's out of a 1600 point SAT.
So what you're saying is if an Asian student had a 1600 SAT score, in their eyes, that
person only had a 14400.
Effectively.
Or blacks who ... You could look at it this way.
Blacks who apply- 1440, I should say.
Blacks who apply to one of these schools have to get ...
They automatically get 450 points higher.
Thank you.
Then an Asian student applies.
That's exactly right.
450 points, which is just absolutely massive on the SAT.
But anyways, that data is basically old because there have been some Supreme Court decisions there, notably Grutter v. Bollinger back in 2003, that supposedly require more narrow consideration of race.
So we really don't know the extent of The discrimination that's going on here, but they have managed to see the data and they said that it is so shocking.
The article in the New York Times article here says that the plaintiffs say, quote, the documents were so compelling that there was no need for a trial and that they would ask the judge to rule summarily in their favor based on the documents alone.
So these documents apparently show pretty damning evidence of just outright discrimination Against Asian students or certainly, you know that that blacks are given and probably Hispanics to massive Massive legs up in the admissions race, you know in the coalition the fringes that are united to try and create this Massive animus against white students nationwide the whole white privilege cottage industry that's popped up you rarely hear about Asian privilege and
Anybody who reads, anybody who listens, anybody who reads Jared Taylor's American Renaissance knows that Jared is not trying to censor the data on how Asian students perform on test scores, on tests, and on IQ studies.
It's no secret.
They perform higher, as do Ashkenazi Jews.
And yet, we have never heard To my knowledge, anybody try and point out or attack in a collegiate or an academic article the idea of Asian privilege.
No, but that's because the real target of those things is whites.
And we know the way that that goes.
They're trying to lump in Asians with The Coalition of the Fringes, you know, referring to them as people of color.
Not colored people, as we'll see later, but be careful.
But anyway, so the Students for Fair Admissions are pushing hard to try and get this data revealed publicly.
And really, that's probably a lot of the purpose of this lawsuit is to create public outrage, to show the public exactly what's happening.
We'll get data that's 21 years newer then the 1997 data from the previous analysis and this could go a long way towards helping end affirmative action.
And you already see some little hints that people kind of see this coming.
Harvard seems to be admitting that this data is going to get out in this lawsuit and so they're trying to tailor it very narrowly So that only, you know, the quantitative data gets out.
Yeah.
That way they can of course claim that there's some intangible factor which accounts for, you know, some ridiculous SAT gap and GPA gap and so on.
And there's also an article in Vox that I read which is basically, you know, your textbook liberal article just running dissimulation for a potential loss, basically.
Saying they're trying to argue that our ideas of merit are flawed.
That because the idea of merit in our society was established by whites, people with political and economic clout, that those ideas are flawed.
That, you know, the idea that performing well academically or doing well on the SAT score, this is a white idea of merit.
And we need to switch to a non-Eurocentric idea of merit.
I expect, Mr. Kersey, that what we're actually going to see are rat battles and twerking contests for college admissions to Harvard in probably the next five years.
With that word, they'll just have some sort of definition by the shade of their skin.
You know, you had the old paper bag test for the black elite, where if you were lighter than a paper bag, you were allowed entry into some of the more refined segments of African-American life, you have to wonder if they'll do the reverse of the black paper bag test.
If you're darker than a paper bag, you'll automatically get acceptance, and there'll be no consideration of test scores, there'll be no consideration of any of those secret criteria that they don't let you know about.
The secret sauce.
The secret sauce that encapsulates... A proprietary blend of Hugh.
That's all I care about is Hugh.
Exactly.
That or how white your smile is compared to your skin tone.
I don't know.
Yeah, you can kind of see the way that things are going.
You could tell in the Fisher decision back in 2016 that the court was really They're basically grasping at straws.
They're trying to make sure that the use of race is as narrowly tailored as possible, that it should be a factor of a factor of a factor, as one of the justices put it.
And they're basically just trying to obscure the fact more and more that what's happening is outright discrimination.
And they want schools to put it in more and more obscure terms.
But really, you can see that if we get data out of this Harvard case, you'll be able to see transparently, look, it's not a factor of a factor of a factor.
It's worth 500 points on the SAT.
You know, we're not talking about some tiny little leg up.
It's not, you know, you're otherwise equivalent with other students.
And, you know, so we give you the boost because you came from an unfortunate background.
Yeah, that's not how this is working.
And whites are waking up to the reality of affirmative action.
You've got people, our listeners are certainly familiar with the polling out that shows that 57% of whites think that discrimination against them is as big a problem as discrimination against non-whites.
And actually there are pretty substantial portions of blacks and Hispanics who agree.
So people are understanding that really the only institutional racism that currently exists in our society is affirmative action and it is anti-white and to an extent anti-Asian.
It's becoming more and more explicitly anti-white.
I think that we see that reaction to what President Trump's election back in 2016, the inauguration of President Trump in 2017, and of course what he has just done by signing the By signing the bill to activate the National Guard to protect our southern border with Mexico.
That's true.
This is a dramatic move from President Trump.
It comes on the heels of people like Ann Coulter becoming former Trumpers.
A lot of people have been giving Trump a lot of heat over this- As they should!
Over this omnibus budget that passed and that explicitly precluded him from using any funds toward a concrete wall on the border.
Of course he was trying to claim that there's some sort of victory in there because 1.6 billion dollars went toward fence repairs, you know.
And so, Coulter and others have been just haranguing him non-stop.
Coulter was on Judge Janine's show and pointed out that Trump should just use the military
to build the border.
Just take something out of that $700 billion defense budget and actually defend our nation
for a change instead of some desert country in the Middle East.
Wasn't in that omnibus bill, wasn't there a couple billion dollars appropriated and
earmarked for the building of walls in Egypt and a couple other countries in the Middle
I hadn't heard that but I wouldn't be surprised if it was the case.
So now Trump is actually mobilizing and he's saying that we're going to send some National Guard troops down to the border.
Now we don't know how many he's going to send but we have some idea based on previous presidents.
George Bush back in 2006 initiated what he called Operation Jumpstart, which sent 6,000 troops down to the border, National Guard troops.
And these troops, because of the way the law works, they can't actually enforce immigration law, but what they do is offer support roles.
So they'll build infrastructure, they'll do trainings, they'll help with reconnaissance and so on.
And so Bush sent 6,000 troops down to the border, and that had an incredible amount of success reducing crossings.
A, because it just sends a massive signal that, look, if we are so-called militarizing our border, you know, that means you're not welcome here.
And so people will stop crossing, unlike what Trump did last month, which was talking about how much he wants to make a deal on DACA and caused a massive uptick in crossings.
It's all about perception resolve, Mr. Wolf.
This has been, I believe, One of the happier moments of the Trump administration for people like us, identitarians, who saw so much hope and so much promise in his election.
Because he was talking about these type of ideas.
And there was a great cause for concern.
Ann Coulter, no need to really go into that.
You can go to amrin.com.
Well, actually, I don't think her column is on AR anymore.
But okay, head to VDARE or go to Drudge Report and click on Ann's name to read the column.
My point is this.
This is one of those moments where it's that perception of resolve.
President Trump, even just by saying that this caravan of Hondurans, which was making its way through Mexico, and became a huge rallying cry for the dissident right on social media.
This is why you shouldn't delete your Twitter account.
This is why you shouldn't delete your Facebook account.
This is why you should fight for that social media access if, like American Resilience, you've been denied the ability to participate.
and the free exchange of ideas.
The hashtag Stop the Caravan, that was seen by tens of millions of people.
And I guarantee you, Ann Coulter is one of the few people that Donald Trump follows.
And she was.
One of 45 people.
Yeah, and she was tweeting and she was retweeting at President Trump, or at real Donald Trump,
all of these Stop the Caravan hashtags.
And you just have to wonder which one President Trump read.
Was it one by who knows what he may have read?
I think she definitely got to him.
She was just in an appearance at Columbia or something where she discussed a meeting she had had in the Oval Office with him apparently last year.
Where they got into a shouting match and were cursing at each other.
She's a little firecracker.
I'm sure that she really gave him the what-for.
She knows where he stands.
He knows where she stands.
We have so few people fighting for us right now, Mr. Wolf.
I read an article that Max Boot, the former neocon, now just a committed leftist, he was upset and he published in the Washington Post an article wondering why President Trump is trying to create this red meat situation for his constituency and his biggest supporters by putting troops on the border when he could be sending troops to every other country on the planet to defend their interests.
Oh yeah.
Send them back to Mogadishu.
That's what we need to do.
No, it's a bold move.
It's an effective move.
Actually, Obama sent National Guard troops down to the border.
He sent 1,200 down in something called Operation Phalanx.
What a great name.
Back in 2010.
And we know the reason he did it.
It wasn't because he actually cares about border security.
It was because he was trying to secure the border in the lead up to a possible amnesty deal.
And that's why he was fudging all these numbers about, you know, people who were basically stopped at the border.
He was starting to count them as deportations.
That's right.
Even though interior enforcement was way down.
He was basically trying to trick the country into thinking that the border is You know, very secure in that we're going to pass this amnesty package which is going to just finalize it.
We won't get to it this week, but this is a tease for next week because Mr. Taylor is going to be in Europe.
Daniel Horowitz at the Conservative Review has been doing this unbelievable series of articles about Obama's Basically, opening up of the border and the correlation to the opioid crisis and the resettlement of vast numbers of these underage children that was done, what, in 2014, 2015?
They were put all across the country and just this explosion of deaths of Americans.
And it is treasonous stuff.
And enough people aren't actually looking at what Horowitz is writing.
It is tremendous research and Mr. Wolfe and I will spend some time on it because it is
something that needs to be highlighted, it needs to be talked about, it needs to be disseminated
because this is the type of, let's put it bluntly, I mean how many Americans are dying
of opioids a year?
Isn't it over 68,000?
I think it's the equivalent of all the American deaths in Vietnam on a yearly basis.
And this could all be stopped, this could all be stopped if you simply built the wall.
And Trump, to his credit, he does highlight the drug problem and so on.
And hopefully these National Guard troops that he sends down will stop it.
But of course, we know that this is just a temporary solution.
It's an expensive solution.
Bush's 6,000 troops down there cost something like $1.2 billion.
I mean, it's not something you want to do on a year over year basis.
You need to build the wall.
We need something permanent that when a new administration comes in who's maybe not as Hot on border security is the current one, that there's something in place which is permanent, which will repel what you can only consider an invasion of our country.
And the drug problem is incredibly important, but even more important is the displacement of the historic American nation in their communities.
And what you just said leaves me with this thought that a coming progressive Leftist presidency control the executive branch say a Kamala Harris if that wall is built they would try and dismantle that wall and what a symbolic action like that would be because then the America what's left of the historic American majority will see that it really truly was about this tidal wave this not not just a rising tide of color, but the
But the just, come on, it's time, submerge us, that is the ultimate goal of the progressive left.
That is the manifestation of where this anti-whiteness that permeates all of their language, all of their policy papers, all of their white studies, and increasingly all of their Public discourse.
That's where this is headed.
All too true.
Well, we will continue opposing it with all of our efforts, and we invite our listeners to do the same.
We will see you back here next week for another edition of Radio Renaissance.
Our time is up.
▲
Export Selection