All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 31, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
58:52
Americans Are Dreamers, Too
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to this edition of Radio Renaissance.
I have in the studio our indispensable guest, Paul Kersey.
And this, in fact, is the day after the State of the Union Address.
Donald Trump's first, and it will be very interesting to see what kind of addresses he gives in his remaining three years.
I don't want to spend a whole lot of time on the State of the Union.
I find these discourses generally boring, and by and large, it's the reaction to them that is much more interesting than what is said in the speeches themselves.
But, Mr. Kersey, you watched the whole thing.
Tell me, what really stood out in your mind?
I think that the main thing people are talking about after that wonderful speech by the president is simply this.
Americans are dreamers too.
End of sentence.
President Trump has done some very interesting things by putting on the bargaining on the negotiating table.
DACA amnesty for end of chain migration, for a drop in legal immigration, for a number of things.
And we've seen the response.
The Democrats said, this is white supremacy.
This is, I think Nancy Pelosi actually said something in those terms.
So we now know how far gone the Democrats are from actually caring about law and order to basically associating Donald Trump, handing over the country in a lot of ways.
If DACA amnesty did happen, how many states that are currently red would then flip blue in 2020?
The point being though, by Donald Trump saying, Americans are dreamers too.
Gosh, I was over at Breitbart today just looking around and an overlay popped up.
They had a shirt that said, Americans are dreamers too.
They're already into, they're already trying to profit off of this term.
And I think that's the main takeaway from this event is that the Democrats are so unhinged in their hatred of Donald Trump that that clouds any sort of discernment for anything positive that he's doing.
I think it's two different things, though, and I believe that phrase appeared in the following sentence.
My duty and the sacred duty of every elected official in this chamber is to defend Americans because Americans are dreamers, too.
And he was talking about this in the context of immigration.
It's very clearly that he's referring to dreamers as not just these DACA types that Americans have the right to dream to.
So, yes, they are going to despise him because it's he who's saying this.
But at the same time, The Democrats were most notably booing and hissing when he talked about the importance of getting rid of chain migration, getting rid of the diversity visa.
He could say all he wanted about how wonderful the economy was doing, how black employment was down to record lows.
They just sat stony-faced.
But what actually got them to boo and hiss was when he talked about getting rid of programs that are essentially going to turn the country non-white and democratic.
That moved them to this kind of derision that shows, on the one hand, what you just suggested.
That anything that comes out of that man's mouth, they're going to disapprove of.
But especially going to disapprove of anything that is going to slow this process of white dispossession.
Bingo.
President Trump was also booed when he brought up Americans who have been killed by MS-13 members.
And you think about that, you step back for a second, and you think, you know, this whole civic nationalist approach that Donald Trump is doing, I know a lot of people within our little niche, we all lambast civic nationalism, but civic nationalism is very important because it really showcases that there is no olive branch to even give to, to our purported ideological enemies.
We have such We have such different viewpoints of where the country is headed, where it's going.
And as you noted, the Democrats are, hey, let's party like it's 2040.
And as Donald Trump is saying, hey, guess what?
We're going to do things that we're putting Americans first.
You know, again, we have, Americans are dreamers too.
Yes.
And this speech, which was again booed, and as you noted, the Daishiki-wearing members of the Congressional Black Caucus looking like they were emissaries from Wakanda.
It was embarrassing.
They sat on their hands the entire time when President Trump was gloating about the black unemployment rate.
I think it was Newt Gingrich who tweeted out, how can These people sit in their hands when he's giving such great economic news.
And you realize, man, Newt really does think in a different terms when everything is distilled down into economic units.
Again, they don't care about that.
The blacks really don't care.
And it's like, Newt, go back to the Heritage Foundation.
Go back and write a position paper, a policy paper.
Because you know what?
Donald Trump, through his devotion to civic nationalism, is showing there can be no peace.
They don't care.
Well, but Newt Gingrich, I think, has seen something that's important.
He's realizing, here is something that is genuine good news for black people.
And black people claim to care about their people, not just about their own personal careers.
And yet, this is something that they should be celebrating, but because they hate Donald Trump so much, that even this is something that is part of a racial consciousness among blacks.
I think he's on to something that's significant and important.
Here's actually what he said, I'll read it to you just so you know exactly the context.
He tweeted, quote, what does it say when the black and Hispanic Democrats can applaud the
lowest unemployment levels in their communities? It wasn't a question.
He phrased it as just a declarative statement.
Period.
So he's not asking you to think.
He's actually saying, making an emphatic statement.
Maybe it was a grammatical error on his point, who knows.
But the point being, that was a very interesting tweet.
Because again, forcing white people to address these questions to their followers.
Someone like Newt, who has a lot of followers on Twitter.
And this tweet has been shared a lot of times.
In my opinion, the most important tweet that came from this entire, entire State of the Union episode, Joy Reid, who's an MSNBC analyst, she's African, she's black, she tweeted, and I quote, Church.
Family.
Police.
Military.
The National Anthem.
Trump trying to call on all the tropes of 1950s era nationalism.
The goal of the speech appears to be to force the normalization of Trump on the terms of the bygone era his supporters are nostalgic for.
Hashtag State of the Union.
End quote.
Well, yes.
Talking about church, talking about state, talking about good things, talking about the things that Americans at one time used to cherish.
This is retrograde, apparently, in her view.
It's quite astonishing.
In effect, she's saying, if you say anything good about America, if you appeal to any sense of being part of a collective with shared values, that's wrong.
What the president should be talking about is the interests of blacks, of Hispanics, of homosexuals.
Nothing shared.
Isn't that in effect what that tweet means?
It's exactly what that tweet means.
We're going to talk about something that Michael Moore said in a few moments, but I would like to point out that Joy Reid and members of the media who share her opinion, and there are a vast number of people who do agree with Ms.
Reid.
I'm sure that everybody who was watching B.E.T.
last night for the address by the black congresswoman from California.
Her name escapes me for the moment.
She's Los Angeles.
Maxine Waters.
They live in such a different paradigm that it's hard for us to understand.
It really is.
They marinate in it.
But the way that Joy Reid looks at American history, she doesn't see the Norman Rockwell painting that I look at when she talks about church, family, police, military, national anthem.
Who doesn't want that?
What they see when they look at the American history, it's what Michael Moore said.
We'll talk about this a little later, but America was founded on genocide, built on the backs of slaves, and maintained through the subjugation of women.
Right.
It's all a fraud.
That's it.
It's all a fraud.
America could have been a wonderful place perhaps for white people, but if it was not good for her people, then to heck with the whole thing.
None of that matters.
But you know the blacks, apparently the Black Congressional Caucus, they all sat together and they chose a particular area where they would be right in the TV cameras when it was clear that they were just sitting there stony-faced and in their seats rather than standing up.
And yes, you say they were wearing this sort of kente cloth stuff, This apparently was in solidarity to protest what Donald Trump had said about African countries in Haiti.
And so they're saying, no, we love these countries.
We're going to wear something from Ghana, this lovely kente cloth stuff.
So yes, they are, by their silence and by their dress, they are saying we are a people apart.
We are not part of this State of the Union.
I think all of that is eloquent and all of that is wonderful.
But when the Democrats really start hissing and booing, when Donald Trump says we need to stop this chain migration, And apparently at one point he says, uh, this permits a single green card holder to bring in virtually unlimited numbers of distant relatives.
I think that is a bit of an exaggeration, not really distant, but they can then bring in, uh, I mean, I, if you follow it farther enough, I suppose that they eventually are distant relatives that come in.
Some Democrats shouted no, others groaned, others booed, and a few barked, Lies!
Now remember how upset everybody was when Congressman Joe Wilson at one point in one of Barack Obama's State of the Union addresses said, that's a lie or lies!
I believe that was in 2010 actually during the health care debates.
Yes, it had all to do with whether legal aliens were going to get it or not.
And, oh, that was a sign of terrible disrespect.
I don't see anybody bringing that up now.
If you say lies and it's a black president and you're white, oh my gosh, that is les majestés.
But with all of these Democrats, apparently there's a chorus of boos and groans and lies and no's.
Anyway, we've come a long way, but it just goes to show you these irreconcilable divisions that are now visible for all to see.
And this is only possible because Donald Trump is a civic nationalist.
He's not out there hammering the type of talking points that you see on American Renaissance or V-Dare.
He's being judicious in the application of his MAGA agenda, which is exposing how anti-white the Democrats are at this point.
And that is what you have to understand.
There's a big story going on right now on Michael Savage's radio show.
Lombasting Nancy Pelosi for spending so much of her time talking about whiteness and the way he framed it.
This is genocidal, the stuff that they're talking about.
Everything is distilled down to looking at how can we use the federal government to hurt white people, particularly white men.
And Savage on Monday on his national radio program, this is what he was talking about.
This is the type of thing that a devotion to civic nationalism is only going to expose, and as that belief that we're all in this together, we're a unified country, becomes even more exposed as a great lie, and the fissures begin to showcase, and before that great eruption transpires, This is how more and more people who are just normal white Americans who have never thought about our ideas are going to be forced to confront them.
Well, after all, the kind of things that Donald Trump wants to stop, chain migration and the diversity visas, in the United States, apparently, For the 10 years between 2005 and 2015, it was family visa sponsorships that accounted for 70% of all legal immigration.
70%!
He's right about that.
That is what drives the United States immigration policy.
Who you're related to.
And on the basis of this sort of family reunification, we've got 9.3 million new immigrants during that period.
And of course, Mexico tops the list.
Mexico.
We're turning Mexican.
Is that a good thing?
I think the fact that the Democrats were moved to their most angry denunciation in opposition to Trump, when he wishes to stop this dispossession, that just tells you what they're thinking.
They want a less white America, a more Democrat America, and anybody who for whatever reason, and Trump is certainly not a white nationalist, doesn't have a racial conscience as far as I can tell, he just realized that the United States has some sort of core that is slowly being dissolved by all of these newcomers coming in.
But, and after Mexico, of course, and then there's Indians and Filipinos, in order of the numbers who've come in for family unification.
It's that that actually got them freaked out and furious.
Before we jump to our next topic, it is important to go back over what he said.
Americans have dreams too.
The Democrats and the media elite are going to town attacking that, which leads me to ask, Obviously.
So Americans can have dreams.
It's like, it's okay to be white.
Yeah.
Yes.
It is a beautiful, simple statement that truly exposes what our enemies, our ideological enemies, who are invested in The de-whitening of America, increasing the communities of color nationwide, advocating for people of color, it exposes that no, white Americans can't have dreams.
The only dream you get is the nightmare that your ancestors tried to stop by actually putting in place the 1924 Immigration Act.
Right, right.
We are certainly not allowed to dream the way these illegal immigrants are allowed to dream.
No, the dream of a country that reflects our values, our heritage?
Oh, no, no, no.
That's a forbidden dream, an evil dream.
And I thought there was some irony, though, in the Democrats' choice of Representative Joe Kennedy III.
Bobby Kennedy's grandson, a white man.
If there was ever white privilege in America, I should think that he has benefited from it.
He is the person who responded to the speech.
And of course, to me, this is the key line.
He spoke directly to, he says, and to all the dreamers out there watching tonight, let me be absolutely clear.
And then he switches into Spanish.
Oh boy, oh boy.
I won't repeat the Spanish, but it means you are part of our story, we will fight for you, and we will not walk away.
Now, I thought these people were supposed to be perfectly assimilated Americans.
They've come when they're young.
How come he's speaking Spanish to them, huh?
If they're just like you and me, Mr. Kersey, aren't they?
Why is he speaking Spanish?
They're far more American than you or I, regardless of what language they speak, regardless of the mores they adhere to, and regardless of Regardless of the amount of money the federal government, through the redistribution of our tax dollars, goes to support their lifestyles, hey, they're far more American than you and I could ever hope to be.
That's right.
I apologize.
They are more American than you and me.
Makes no difference how many generations we've been here.
Makes no difference how many of our ancestors shed their blood for this country, how many elections we voted in.
Just how much this country is manured with their bones and their blood.
No, no, no.
They are vastly more.
I almost forgot.
I was just slipping into some kind of old-fashioned thought.
And I'm grateful to you for reminding me.
And then there was another official response by the Democrats.
This one by a Virginia state legislator, Elizabeth Guzman, who gave her talk entirely in Spanish.
And apparently one thing she said is that Donald Trump, quote, has pushed a dark and extremist agenda.
You know, I love it when people like Elizabeth Guzman, I wonder how long she's been in America, and her family's been in America.
I wonder how many wars her ancestors have fought in.
When they start explaining what our national values are, oh gosh, do they realize just how arrogant they are?
Telling us what our national values are and should be?
Well, her family might not have participated in any wars over the past few centuries.
But they're invaders.
They are fighting in a far more important war, and that is the war to end white privilege
once and for all and to supplant white Americans and usurp them.
So, in essence, if history is on her side, truly, as they state, well, she will be regarded as a true American heroine.
Oh, no question about it.
But yeah, let's move on to Michael Moore, the great liberal filmmaker.
Just this Monday, he gave a speech and he was talking about Donald Trump.
And he really sort of laid it on the line, I think, in the clearest possible terms.
He says, Donald Trump did not fall out of the sky and land in Queens.
He is a result of us never correcting the three original sins of America.
A nation founded on genocide, built on the backs of slaves, and maintained through the subjugation of women to second-class citizenship and economic disempowerment.
Okay?
That is what made America, apparently.
And we've not corrected those things?
Assuming that we're right, how are we supposed to correct this?
I don't see any slaves.
If there was genocide, there's no genocide now.
Are women really second-class citizens today?
What are we supposed to do to correct this?
Of course, then he goes on to say, As we seek to rid ourselves of Trump, we must also cleanse our American soul of its white male privilege.
It's voracious greed.
Now those are two completely different things.
And if he wants to be a communist, then it seems to me, I suppose he's probably got fairly substantial assets.
Does he give away all that he has?
Does he take all that he has and give to the poor, as a good Christian or socialist might be?
I wonder how he demonstrates the fact that he has purged his soul of voracious greed.
You know, Michael Moore has made a lot of money doing these documentaries.
He has a white male.
He could easily do something to cleanse America's soul of its white male privilege if he wanted to by either moving out of the country or he could commit suicide.
Of course I'm just joking there by saying that but isn't that what he is Stating that, I mean, how do you get rid of white male privilege unless you lock up white males and you basically make it so that the federal government, state governments can't hire white males?
You put in restrictions upon private and public employers even hiring white males so then you have a handicap?
That's just it.
In practical terms, how do we purge America's soul of its white male privilege?
I just don't even know how you'd go about doing that.
We're just supposed to hang our heads and constantly apologize.
Aside from, as you say, legislating specific barriers against whites, penalties for whites, special taxes on whites, barring them from serving on juries, or barring them from serving on grand juries, or perhaps boards of directors.
I mean, the things you could do.
You could say, okay, no jury in the United States can have a majority of whites on, because they're exercising their white privilege.
Or all white people should be taxed an extra 10%.
You know, pay the white tax on your income taxes.
Or, you know, when you buy something, sales tax.
Oh, you're white?
You know, you pay double.
All of these things are possible, and it seems to me they are not inconceivable in a future world in which others than ourselves are setting the rules.
I mean, we've benefited from privilege for 400 years.
Why should we not pay back some of it?
Yeah, I think that Michael Moore has probably read a lot about what happened in South Africa with the Black Economic Empowerment, the BEE, and he's thinking that this is the only way to do it.
To basically make it so that white people cannot get hired for certain positions.
And then you basically, in his mind, you cut off the ability for privilege and for wealth to accumulate.
I'd love for him to lay out specifics of how you go about this, but apparently he thinks that it's going to just happen naturally because he went on to say, the angry white guy is dying out.
I think by that means white people are dying out.
The angry white guy means every white guy.
And the Census Bureau has already told us that by 2050, white people are going to be the minority.
And I'm not sad to say, I can't wait for that day to happen.
I hope I live long enough to see it because it will be a better country.
Now, this to me, it's just so difficult for me to imagine a person of any other race looking forward to his minority status, hoping that his people will die out, looking forward with glee to this diminution.
I mean, there's something that is just pathological about white people that I cannot imagine occurring in anybody else.
It almost goes without saying that he shouldn't bring this up, but he has examples of what happens when a community, a city, a civilization loses its white population.
He needs to look no further than Flint and Detroit.
He did a documentary on Flint.
Here's a city that they don't even have the resources anymore to pay for maintaining their water system.
But that's the fault of white people, you know.
You know what?
I'll tell you something.
I became very interested in aqueducts because I read about how in Rome that throughout some of the colonies they built all throughout Europe, aqueducts still are working and bringing potable water, water that you can actually drink.
They still produce water 2,000, 2,100 years after they were built.
I mean, and here we are, a couple weeks removed from the shithole debate that Donald Trump started, and we learn about how Port-au-Prince, the oldest black republic in the world, in the history of the world, they don't have a central sewer.
And we learn that Eric Prince, back during the Clinton administration, when the Navy SEALs were doing some invasions, they had to get a number of shots before they went and swam, because all of the water, it goes out into the ocean.
And when they did their initial incursion into the country, A lot of the guys got sick.
They couldn't give blood for six years because of all the health problems.
A couple of the guys were quarantined.
I mean, when you think about why you have to get so many shots to go to these third world countries, you should ask yourself, perhaps our social policy on immigration should be that if you can't drink the water from a country, or you have to get a lot of shots to go to a certain country, we shouldn't be actively trying to import a lot of people from those places.
No, no, no, no.
Well, but you know, you just made the point that he is talking about a future non-white America.
Well, a fellow who's in the filmmaking business should understand what's going on
in the city of Los Angeles, for example, the filmmaking capital of the United States.
And there was a fascinating article in just yesterday's New York Times
about the city of Los Angeles.
And its point of departure was the turmoil in the city's newspaper, the LA Times.
And they talk about how this fellow named Jim Kirk has become the Times' 17th editor
Since the paper began publishing in 1881, That's 136 years ago.
But the third in the last six months.
They're just having this revolving door policy.
And apparently this management shuffle comes just when the newsroom voted 248 to 44 to join The News Guild Communication Workers of America.
The newsroom is voting to unionize.
It seems to me that the kind of terrible financial problems that newspapers are having is precisely the wrong time for the reporters to join a union, for heaven's sake.
Does that give the paper any kind of flexibility?
Absolutely not.
Or leverage, either.
This could be a death spiral, for all I can tell.
This could be a death spiral for all I can tell.
But in any case, the article in the New York Times about Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Times
talks about just how little social cohesion and how the city of Los Angeles has,
how it lacks a kind of philanthropic aristocracy, it lacks a depth of institutions,
And they're just scratching their heads trying to figure out why.
And one of the points that they make is that, well, let's see.
They say, for all its successes, Los Angeles has not developed the political, cultural, and philanthropic institutions that have provided, that have proved critical in other American cities.
Hmm, wonder why, wonder why.
They go on to say such things as it's made up of 88 different cities, including the city of Los Angeles, but it covers 4,571 square miles.
There's terrible traffic.
People sort of seem isolated.
They don't pull together.
They talk about all these Fortune 500 companies moving away.
In 1987, there were seven such companies.
Last year, it was only down to three, so it's cut in less than half.
All these Hollywood executives that work there but don't really live there.
And then they're just going to talk about how... Then they stumble onto a hint at what's actually happening and they pointed out that the region has become increasingly economically and ethnically diverse.
A challenge for any political or civic leader looking to unify a community.
Hmm.
Well, I think you also have to wonder, who are the people who are coming in?
Enormous numbers of Hispanics, for example, or Asians.
In Asian, there is no philanthropic kind of tradition.
If you look at Mexico, do you have the kinds of institutions, the cultural institutions, the philanthropic institutions?
That the New York Times says is necessary in cities and that can be found in cities like Philadelphia or even in New York.
These old WASP families that have been the glue that have held the city together.
Los Angeles doesn't have that.
They even quote a fellow named Austin Buechner, a former deputy mayor.
What we're missing is the ability to bring the entire community together on behalf of issues or opportunities that will benefit the community as a whole.
I wonder why?
Maybe diversity's got something to do with it.
The last time Los Angeles came together was in 1992 during the Rodney King riots when the people of Los Angeles came together to protect themselves from black rioters.
I mean, you're talking about a city that has been the The basis of how many apocalyptic films throughout the years, throughout the decades, going back to Omega Man.
I remember reading about the making of Charlton Heston's Omega Man and the city was so dead on Sundays that they were able to do a lot of the scenes where Charlton Heston is by himself going around the city because there's no one downtown.
The population of Los Angeles at the time was Very, very small.
It was very, very white.
I believe it was not until the 1980s that it actually became, might have even been the 1990s, that it became a majority-minority place.
It happened so quickly.
I mean, a hundred years ago, Los Angeles was virtually 98, 99% Anglo.
And you know what?
They did create these institutions.
But you know what?
They did create a city out of the wilderness.
I mean, my goodness, I remember watching a documentary on how Walt Disney He tore down acres upon acres upon acres of orange coves to build his Walt Disney land there.
And these cultural institutions, you know what?
When you have that much land and you have that much sprawl that then erupts because people are escaping the diversity that is created by prosperity.
That is the one horrible thing about how amazing America has been.
When you think about the urban areas, the whites left, due to the prosperity that whites are able to create, they're
able to abandon cities within 10 years of their inception because blacks follow. I
call it the black undertow effect.
Well, Hispanics follow. Again, going from the animal kingdom type concept of an invasive
species, I mean, again, white people create Los Angeles, invasive species come in,
white people abandon, and then it takes on this just horrific world that the New York Times notes
is no longer capable of sustaining a newspaper.
I mean that is, it's unfathomable to even consider the apocalyptic scenarios that we see of an asteroid hitting Los Angeles, or zombies, or Some sort of title way of happening?
It's far less frightening than the demographic transformations that we've seen and the apocalyptic scenario.
Well, you know, on the subject of apocalypse, not all that long ago, I watched the 1953 movie, War of the Worlds.
Great film.
Yes.
And in that movie, a lot of it is shot in downtown Los Angeles.
A downtown Los Angeles that is overwhelmingly white.
There are a few Hispanics, there are a few blacks, but it's just shocking just how remarkably different that city looked at that time.
And, you know, I don't know if you remember how the movie ends.
Everybody is in a church.
Yes.
They've all gathered for refuge and for hope and they're praying in this downtown church.
Yes.
All white people.
And one of these great machines that the Martians are using to just batter the city is about to break down the church.
And that's at the moment where these human viruses or germs or whatever it is suddenly start having an effect on these Martians.
They all start dying.
So they're saved just as they're praying to God.
But to imagine a downtown Los Angeles church full of white people on their knees praying, what an astonishing image that is of a bygone era.
And the Los Angeles we unfortunately know is the reality.
is the one that is in the Michael Douglas film that Joel Schumacher directed, Falling Down, which as Samuel Huntington pointed out in his great book, Who Are We?
Is that the future that white people are going to have in the country?
I would like to deviate one second and go back to that film, World of Worlds.
You watch that movie.
I was born, I won't say what decade, but That film holds up so well.
The special effects, but the white people in that movie look so different than white people look today.
You look back at these movies, whether it's Christmas and you're watching any of the various Christmas carol incarnations or iterations, or you watch It's a Wonderful Life, White people just look different.
Well, one difference is how they dressed.
They dressed so much better.
And you look at photographs of bread lines during the Depression.
All the men in jackets, many of them wearing ties, fedora hats.
Or sporting events even for that matter.
I know you laugh at these sporting contests, but you look back at some of the photos from the 1930s, 40s, 50s, Even the 60s, the men are all dressed in three-piece suits with hats.
But really, on a bread line.
I know.
These are guys who are down and out.
They need a handout to get a meal, but they still wear a hat, a jacket, probably not necessarily very clean, but they are still trying to look their best.
These days, people walk around looking like they were dressed by, I don't know, a concentration camp management that wants to spend as little money as possible on just covering their nakedness.
No, it's just that.
And it's the same with the civil rights demonstrations back in the 1960s.
When you see these black people, they look like they just came right out of church.
Very well dressed.
Of course we have learned in a lot of cases that they did come out of central casting because they were trying to portray an image that the national media wanted to show these moral, upstanding, dare I say it, bourgeois blacks.
Unquestionably the case.
But these days you can't get Mexicans to go out and demonstrate in favor of amnesty for illegals and tell them to leave the Mexican flags at home.
But anyway, yes, this whole question of the change in our society and the way the press is beginning to sniff around the edges, the fact of diversity in that city, the New York Times recognizes that.
It makes it a little harder to hold together.
It does.
Yes, it does.
And I thought that was our greatest strength.
Let me let me point out your illusion of Los Angeles where you see the what is that building called?
Is it the police?
It's the City Hall.
It's a gorgeous building.
You've seen all the movies.
The famous photo from 2007 or 2008 when Bush was about to do the amnesty, and there's that massive crowd of, it looks like there's tens of thousands, maybe even more than that, hundreds of thousands of illegals.
Do you remember that image?
It was on Drudge, and it's just this mass of illegal alien advocates who wanted amnesty.
And you look at that photo, and then let's go back and juxtapose it with the photos of the Martian invaders.
In the 1950s version of World of Worlds that shows the pristine Los Angeles.
And you have to ask yourself, you know, I wish Martian invaders would come because you know what?
As H.G.
Wells said, you know, this disease that humans were inoculated against would have saved us, but unfortunately our inability to deal with Well, the Californians did try to save themselves.
And that's something that this article doesn't point out, is that Prop 187, they did try.
And guess what?
A lot of white people who were behind the civic institutions, they gave up on the city.
Because the new California had given up on their dreams.
Right, right.
No, California continues to hemorrhage whites.
Southern California, in particular, continues to hemorrhage whites.
Not only just outside the state, but the northern areas that remain majority white.
No, this should be just as obvious as can be.
But just as in the New York Times, there was this glimmer of insight into what the problems are, namely diversity, I thought there was a fascinating aspect to an article that you called my attention to.
called Fathers and Sons in Prison Together.
Well, no, I'm sorry, the title of it was Father-Son Cellmates.
This was in the Philadelphia Inquirer just last week, and it talked about the remarkable number of people who are in jail with their fathers or, conversely, with their sons.
And in fact, this fellow named Darrell Goodman, he was locked up in a Pennsylvania jail called Graterford with his father.
And when he got out, apparently he got to thinking about this.
And there are no official statistics on this, but he found that there were 243 fathers in state prisons with their sons.
At Greater Ford alone, he counted 41 father-son pairs, including 17 sets of cellmates.
This is quite interesting.
Imagine being a cellmate with your father.
Isn't that the family business?
It's both an avocation and a vocation.
Well, you know, the family that does the crime together stays together, I guess.
He said he found seven families in which a father, son, and grandson were all locked up together.
Isn't that homey?
No pun intended, homie.
Yes, yes.
And I thought it was quite interesting.
The article said nothing about this, but they had several sets of photographs of fathers and sons.
Every single one of them was black.
Everyone.
Everyone, without exception.
And there were a number of aspects to this that I thought were quite interesting.
This guy Goodman, Darrell Goodman, who had been locked up with his father and was curious about the phenomenon, He says that he recalled childhood weekends spent visiting his father at this Graterford jail.
And this is a quotation from him.
The whole visiting room is filled with joy and love, and psychologically it had an effect.
I wanted to be part of whatever my father was into.
That really makes you wonder.
That was the only time, I guess, when he had this sense of being part of a family.
Visiting his dad with his other relatives in the prison waiting room.
Well, he got his wish all right.
And as this article says, Some young inmates now serving long sentences for serious crimes said they grew up in awe of their fathers and wanted to be just like them.
This is really quite, quite interesting and this article goes on to point out that people whose parents have committed crimes are considerably more likely to be perpetrators themselves.
Sexual offending, violent crime, all runs in families.
Now, one wonders why, doesn't one?
Again, we've seen some very interesting reporting lately from the national media as they begin to flirt with once unmentionable ideas that only people who engaged in the greatest sin, pattern recognition, dared to That's right.
That's right.
Of course, you know, before they get to some of these less thinkable possibilities, I thought it was interesting the way the language they used here.
I'm reading from the article.
Some researchers have described an accumulation of disadvantage.
Generational poverty.
Childhood trauma.
Learned behavior.
The anti-social influences.
Spatial contagion.
I like that.
Just being around it.
That's a new one.
Spatial contagion.
And toxic stress of living in a dangerous neighborhood and the compounding weight of official bias.
Boy, sounds like an irresistible combination of factors, doesn't it?
You know, when you got all that weighing on you, man, how can you help but be a criminal?
And then, this is good too, some propose that a parent's being labeled a criminal, being labeled a criminal, not necessarily being a criminal, but labeled a criminal, and the bias that may accompany that can transmit to a child, making him more susceptible to being caught up in the system.
Now, this is just magical thinking, it seems to me.
Your father was labeled a criminal.
Was he a criminal or wasn't he?
Well, he was labeled a criminal.
And the bias that may accompany that can transmit to a child, making him more susceptible to being caught up in the system.
I don't even know how that works.
But, you know, the imagination of the left is absolutely inexhaustible.
It's that school-to-prison pipeline that they want to continue to hammer upon and hammer upon and hammer upon and state that somehow because there aren't enough white people around these segregated schools that by osmosis I guess blacks aren't learning how to behave properly.
It's beyond magical thinking.
It really is beyond magical thinking.
But as you noted, it gets even better because guess what?
Well, they do quote somebody, a fellow named Kevin Beaver, of whom I had never heard before, a professor of criminology at the University of Florida.
He says, It's politically incorrect.
It's a minefield.
My research, and others', shows that probably a large extent of the reason that crime concentrates in families, why siblings resemble each other in crime and resemble their parents, is due to genetic factors.
Hereditary.
Fancy that!
And then the article went on to say that adoption studies show this very clearly, that the children of criminals, even if they're reared in perfectly sound middle-class families, are much more likely than the natural children or other adopted children to be criminals themselves.
So, I was pleasantly surprised to see this kind of... I mean, it's just a short paragraph, But it lays the possibility out there that there may be something other than this accumulation of disadvantage.
Reality has a well-known racial bias and regardless of the years that have gone by since we last flirted in the early 1990s with implementing sane social policy to govern interracial interactions, I mean again, we've talked about this before, I mean in Baltimore they were talking about doing What's the shot?
Norvo?
Oh, Depo-Provera?
Depo-Provera.
You go back and look at the Baltimore Sun.
They were actually doing this to try and stave off teenage pregnancies and the unwanted problems that teenage pregnancies bring.
that is in a couple, in less than a generation, more crime.
And of course that was attacked as being racist and eugenicist, you know, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
But as we know now, looking at what happened subsequently in Baltimore, those people were doing tremendous work
to try and stop the Malthusian nightmare from becoming a reality.
Well, of course, what you're proposing is eugenics.
That's Nazism.
That's evil right down to the ground.
These things are unthinkable today.
Depo-Provera or Norplant for people on welfare.
I mean, really.
Only the Israelis can do the cool things as we've learned.
The next step's Auschwitz, you know.
You start thinking in those terms.
But, you know, the general thrust of this story was, I think, captured in one of its opening sentences, the one about fathers and sons sharing, being cellmates.
Just as crime gravitates to certain neighborhoods, it also clusters in families.
Crime gravitates to certain neighborhoods.
You know, it makes it sound like a natural disaster, a cyclone.
A cyclone hits and all of a sudden all the people in the area become criminals.
And it clusters.
It's this evil presence that somehow arrives unbidden and affects certain groups.
But then they go on to say, according to one criminologist's analysis, 5% of families account for more than 50% of all arrests.
I thought that was quite a fascinating statistic.
It is very, very interesting that they'd be even thinking in those terms in something like the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Again, you're seeing articles being published by mainstream news sites that would have been unthinkable only a few years ago.
The ideas they're bringing up, yes, the media is obsessed with this concept of clustering.
We talked about that in that AP article that noted how in all of the Rust Belt cities throughout the country, whether it's St.
Louis, Milwaukee, Indianapolis, all of the violent crime, the homicides are largely clustered where blacks are found.
Okay, if you're going to say clustered, or as you noted in this Philadelphia Inquirer article, that it gravitates there, It doesn't really gravitate there.
It's just wherever blacks are found.
I mean, again, how far of a logical leap do you have to go to understand this?
Why do you have to continue to come up with this strange jargon that you're inventing to describe what is essentially black dysfunction?
You know, I think, I don't want to give people like us too much credit, but I suspect that one of the reasons why this kind of A bit of politically incorrect analysis will sneak into an article in the Philadelphia Inquirer or the New York Times in its analysis of Los Angeles has to do with people like us.
They know that there are many, many places where people can hear about the heritable characteristics of human beings.
They know that it is very easy to click on a mouse, click on a link, and you find alternative analysis to the whole concept of diversity.
They have to realize that they cannot live in that bubble anymore, and I think that alternative media is part of that.
No, not only is alternative media part of that, but I gotta tell you guys who are listening to this, I'm very, very excited because you guys did something great.
Jared Taylor has been working so hard over the past almost three decades with American Renaissance, and he came out with a book called If We Do Nothing.
It was a collection of the best essays from 25 years of American Renaissance, and I asked Our listeners, if they would mind going to Amazon and leaving reviews for this book.
There were four reviews.
Well, guess what?
You guys added three times the number of reviews.
There are now 12 reviews of Jared Taylor's book, If We Do Nothing.
And I gotta tell you, the reviews are actually quite good.
You guys put a lot of time and effort and thought into it.
So I do still encourage you to leave reviews.
But I did state that if we reach 10 reviews, There'd be a prize.
There'd be something given in return.
And guess what?
There is going to be something given in return.
Shoot me an email at sbpdl1.
That's the numeral 1.
So that's sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
You know, depending on how many emails we get, we'll see what happens, but I'm going to give up to five copies of my new book because we live here.
Away to you guys free.
So, shoot me an email to sierrabravo... what's P?
Peter.
Peter SierobrovSBPDL1 at gmail.com and yeah up to a certain point I will be happy to give away free copies of Because we live here, which is a compilation of some of the stuff that the PK character, the Paul Kersey character, has published over the past few years.
Well, and I have to thank you for making that appeal to our listeners.
I appreciate that much.
I appreciate that very much, Mr. Kersey.
I hesitate to make appeals of that kind myself, but it's always pleasant when others are willing to do it on my behalf.
And I know the response has been very gratifying.
It really has been, actually.
Well, I think we're coming to the close of this edition, but I did want to touch on an interesting lawsuit that has been brought against Walmart by the indefatigable Gloria Allred.
Boy, oh boy.
She sticks her oar into every troubled water there is, but this time she's bringing suit on behalf of a black woman named Essie Grundy.
And she faced discrimination because of her race at a Paris, California Walmart.
Would you like to tell us what the story was here?
You know, this story is so funny because one of the things I do know, there's an apocryphal story that one of the few Walmarts to ever close in the country.
was in Tuskegee, Alabama, which is home of the Tuskegee Institute.
They had a Walmart there.
Apparently there was so much thievery and so much shrinkage, that is employees engaging in theft, that they shut this Walmart down.
It's one of these stories that has been told.
I've heard it from a lot of people.
I tend to believe it because it is actually gone.
In fact, they were supposed to try and get a Walmart back to anchor something called the Washington Plaza, named after Booker T. Washington.
Washington Plaza there, which is adjacent from Tuskegee Institute is still pretty much Empty.
Devoid of any chain stores.
But this story is so fascinating, and it's actually quite funny because it comes on the heels of what we learned in Philadelphia, where it was a, what was the word, not inhumane, but it was indecent for black people to have to go to stores where there was plexiglass, where there was bulletproof glass.
And here we have a story where this black woman discovers That only African-American hair products have been locked away behind glass shelves, segregated from products for non-African-Americans.
Now, any Walmart in the country you go to is going to have normal hair care products.
Any area set aside for ethnic hair care products.
Any Walmart you go to, it's going to be this way.
This story is so great because she found it, it was an indignity I believe is the word, it was an indignity of the plexiglass in Philadelphia.
She found this to be such a form of racism that Walmart would take protective measures Which this is what Walmart actually noted that Walmart had took protective measures are part of normal practice to minimize product thefts of at-risk items.
End quote.
This is from Walmart.
So they have the data, you know again, and I believe Walmart is based in Bentonville, Arkansas.
And they've got all the data from all the Walmarts across the country.
They've got it on spreadsheets.
They know what items are stolen.
They know what items are constantly being being thieved and procured illegally and obtained by people so that they then have to take precautions so that it's not a lost leader, it's not an item that is It's we can't stop this anymore because we're not making any money off of it.
And from a distribution standpoint, it makes no sense.
So if you go to a Walmart and you see this, these black hair care products behind plexiglass behind glass, so that a employee, just like when you go to buy ammo, Mr. Taylor.
Right.
Walmart has very cheap ammunition.
So if you shoot, I shoot a lot, I like to buy Walmart range ammunition because it's very inexpensive.
But guess what?
It's behind glass.
Right.
It's locked up.
It's locked up.
I have to ask an employee to get it for me and he says, hey, how much do you want?
I would love to see when an employee is asked to get hair care products, if they're like, well, you can only get one hair care product.
Could you imagine that?
Because with ammo, you'd have to buy it right there in the sports area.
You can't go to the front and do self-checkout.
You can't take it with you because they don't want you to steal it.
But I would love to know, and this is something that's not in any of the stories I've read, If that same type of extra enhancement is forced upon the customers, when they grab one of the hair care products, do they then escort them to the checkout?
According to this story, that's exactly what happened.
She had to be escorted to the cash register to buy the products.
They wouldn't let her put them in her little basket.
Had to go pay for it right then and there and she felt deeply humiliated.
I gotta confess, I didn't actually know that aspect of it.
I just read the headline and I read the first part of the story because that makes it even funnier.
Because that means that a command came down from corporate saying exactly what happens with ammunition.
We cannot allow these people to take the product because A lot of the times, it doesn't actually go to the checkout.
Right.
It's procured and they abscond with it and head out the door.
Well, you know, Walmart headquarters are saying that sometimes they give advice, but then sometimes they say the decisions about which items are subject to additional in-store security is made on a store-by-store basis.
So, in any case, somebody has recognized patterns, a thought crime in America today.
But, you know, when I think about stories like this, I wonder, Doesn't everyone reading this story realize that Walmart doesn't do this out of prejudice?
Walmart doesn't want to have to have special locked-up cabinets.
Walmart doesn't want to have to have their employees running around with keys, going to the bother of selling this stuff to people.
No, they would love to have this on regular shelves.
They are forced to do this because they know which ones are likely to be stolen.
And when people read stories like this, doesn't Gloria Allred realize that by bringing this suit, she's advertising to the whole world?
These products are likely to be stolen.
And guess why?
There's no shame here.
It's like all the articles about, we have discovered that black children are five times more likely than Asian children to be suspended in school.
This is an outrage!
More and more people read those stories and they recognize this is not an outrage.
This simply reflects precautionary behavior because different groups behave in different ways.
This just seems to be completely lost on Gloria Alred and this plaintiff, S.C.
Grundy.
I'll tell you what, I don't want to encourage your readers to go to Walmart because Walmart is, it's somewhat depressing to go into a Walmart store and to see, you know, who's shopping in the stores.
It's depressing, but it would be funny if Our listeners would go to their local Walmart and take a picture and to see if in your local Walmart,
The black hair care products, the ethnic hair care products, were behind Plexiglas or not?
Because what I would love to do is to actually put together an Excel sheet to showcase where the Walmart's located, look at the demographics of the area, and then you could point out what is the percentage of blacks in the area that necessitates putting black hair care products behind Plexiglas versus leaving them free.
Well, but let's look at it this way.
Let's look at it this way.
If there are black hair care products on the shelves, it's because there is a certain percentage of blacks.
I mean, I don't think they're going to have those products in every single Walmart.
I can tell you that I grew up in an area that was devoid, a paucity of African-Americans, if you will.
They actually had a black hair care section.
Did they?
Yes.
And I think looking back on that, it's because Blacks would come in from other areas because they weren't kept behind plexiglass.
They were able to get it and probably steal.
Who knows the reason?
But it would be fascinating to actually find out where Walmart managers are required to put these items behind plexiglass.
But you know, by the reasoning of Gloria Allred and the plaintiff, S.E.
Grundy, Could you not say that locking up the ammunition is probably racial prejudice?
I bet you the percentage of people who buy ammo that's overwhelmingly white.
Is this not something that discriminates against whites?
In fact, I'm a little bit curious as to why they do lock up the ammo.
Is ammo really that much more likely to be stolen or Are they thinking in terms of potential liability?
If it goes out, if it is stolen and perhaps it's traced, I don't know.
I'm just wondering what the reasoning is for locking up the ammo.
It's a curious thing.
It's funny and it's a good question to bring up.
My whole point in making that reference is that, again, when you purchase the MO, you have to get it right there in the sports section.
In the supermarket that I go to, infant formula is locked up.
And a lot of places across the country.
CVS is all across the country.
I believe it's actually a policy for CVS to lock up infant formula.
They've gotten rid of, you know, CVS has tried to say, oh, we're all healthy, we're getting rid of cigarettes, blah, blah, blah.
You know, but again, they lock up now where the cigarettes used to be.
That's where they keep the infant formula.
And also like Gillette razors, depending on some of the higher quality packages.
They're locked up.
I guess.
Well, infant formula is pretty expensive.
It's pricey.
One of those little cans, what, I think it'd be $25, $30 for a can?
Depending on the ounces, you'd be shocked at the price.
Yeah, it's very expensive.
So maybe that's just a frequently shoplifted item.
It's a curious thing.
But anyway.
Well, we seem to have come to the end of our allotted time.
Mr. Kersey, always a pleasure to have you, and we look forward to seeing you next week, and we look forward to this opportunity to speak to our listeners in America and all around the world.
Remember, and this is, and I do have to, you just said all around the world, so I do want to put a caveat.
It is a little more expensive to ship things out of the country, so regrettably this opportunity, you know, email me at sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
This is only for in the United States for, you know, getting a signed copy of Because We Live Here.
So shoot me over an email and I'm very much looking forward to it.
But don't forget, go leave a review of either, you know, your book If We Do Nothing or, heck, leave a review for White Identity or Pave with good intentions.
It's always important to let people know what you think of a work that's been done because that's only going to showcase that, hey, this is something I should definitely read.
Look at these reviews.
Look at this.
Well, thank you very much and it'll be my pleasure to see you next week.
▲
Export Selection