Andrew Jarecki exposes Alabama's prison industrial complex, where guards sell drugs, inmates die from fentanyl, and private firms profit from slave labor while the DOJ Civil Rights Division crumbles. The discussion contrasts this brutality with Maine's successful rehabilitation model and critiques prosecutors who bury evidence to secure convictions for career advancement. Ultimately, the episode argues that social media radicalization and a lack of accountability fuel systemic cruelty, but Jarecki's documentary has sparked bipartisan legislative action, proving that transparency can empower families and drive necessary reform. [Automatically generated summary]
Well, there's an attorney general in Alabama named Steve Marshall who's always run on like tough on crime strategies and saying, you know, we've got to lock more people up and people who are in prison for violent crimes should potentially never get out of prison, ever.
And he says in the film, as you remember, that I asked him about the nature of crime, and he says, well, I think there are evil people in this world, people who have absolutely no regard for human life.
And this is a guy who's presided over a system that's killed, that's led to the deaths of 1,500 people just since we started making the film.
So this question of like, who are the good guys and who are the bad guys?
And, you know, what's the nature of cruelty?
What's the nature of punishment?
Are we putting people there to try to make them better, rehabilitate them?
Are we putting them there because they're drug addicts and we're trying to get rid of them as opposed to rehabilitate them or as opposed to try to get them off of drugs?
So obviously prisons have become pretty much a catch-all for the ills of society.
So if you have mental illness, much more likely to go to prison.
Once you're in prison, if you're mentally ill or you have bad social skills, you're much more likely to get into a scrape with a guard who probably isn't trained to deal with somebody who's mentally ill.
And you're much more likely to get murdered, which is what we saw happening in Alabama.
Well, you even the it's the old expression, who's going to watch the watchers, right?
Because one of the things that you detail is very obviously nonviolent people who spend all their time writing and reading, and they're getting retribution because they're calling attention to the terrible conditions at the prison.
So the one guy with the glasses who was beaten blindly, what was his name?
Well, there's originally, right, it was sort of more traditional drugs and people were using heroin and using whatever they could get a hold of.
But as the drugs have gotten more complicated and easier to bring in, now they can actually put, there's a drug called Flacco, which is a very significant problem there, fentanyl, obviously, also.
But these drugs can be brought in on a piece of paper.
So somebody could send you a letter and it could be in the letter.
And so, you know, there's this effort to kind of stop that, but then does it lead to people being unable to communicate with their loved ones?
Ultimately, the easiest way to get the drugs is for the officers to sell the drugs.
And so, you know, we say, and I think it's sadly true, that the Alabama Department of Corrections, and it's not just in Alabama, but obviously we use that as the lens through which we saw incarceration more generally.
But the Alabama Department of Corrections is the largest law enforcement agency in the state of Alabama, and it's also the biggest drug dealing operation.
You know, you're much more likely to die of an overdose inside the prison than you are out on the street in Alabama.
You know, one of the things that is very heart-wrenching is this callous approach.
You showed at the one time where all these prisons went on strike, so they all communicated with each other through these contraband cell phones that they all got from the guards.
So he entered a building that he wasn't supposed to enter, and he got 15 years in a cage.
And then on his way out, At least they're inferring that they killed him because he had too much information about what was going on inside and he was going to get out.
Yeah, this goes back to the story of a woman who we had met and her son.
When we were first communicating with the men using these contraband cell phones, and they were telling us what was going on inside the prison, inside the various prisons, we sort of, in the early days, we couldn't believe it because the way we got into the prisons to begin with is I had gone down to Alabama because I was always interested in incarceration and the problems of that system and the justice system.
I had made other films about the justice system.
And I was always curious about Alabama because it's sort of famously maybe the worst prison system in the country, but it mirrors a lot of others.
And my daughter was 14 at the time, Jeremy, and she said, you know, I'm reading this book by a guy named Anthony Ray Hinton, and it's a book about his wrongful imprisonment in Alabama, and maybe you should read this with me.
So we ended up reading the book together, and then we both sort of just spontaneously decided to take a road trip to Montgomery because we just didn't know anything about it, had never been there.
She was growing up in New York, and it was just not in her frame of reference.
So we went down there and we met a man who was the first black prison chaplain in the state of Alabama, Chaplain Browder.
And I said, well, I'm really curious about what's going on in the prisons.
And he said, well, you should just come in with me.
And I said, well, I'm a filmmaker.
They're not going to let me just walk into the prison in Alabama.
And he said, well, just don't come in as a filmmaker.
You just don't have to bring a camera.
You just come in and talk to some of the guys.
So I went into film.
Ultimately, we were allowed to film ultimately in one of the prisons.
And when we were in there to film this revival meeting, just because we were lucky enough to find a warden who felt like he wanted to show an example of how Christianity was active and important in the prison system, which I agreed with.
But then while we were in there filming with like five cameras, which was just unheard of, the men inside couldn't believe that there were any cameras in there.
And they started taking us aside and saying, listen, what they're showing you here is a very curated version of what's going on in this prison.
You have to get into these other buildings.
You've got to see what's going on in that dorm over there called the behavior modification dorm, where guys have been killed by guards.
And you've got to look in that dorm where people have been in solitary confinement for five years at a time.
You know, don't let them show you just what they want to show you.
And I felt much safer, you know, even though the warden had said to us, when you go in there, you know, don't talk to any of the men.
They're all very dangerous.
I immediately felt safer talking to the inmates than I did talking to any of the guards.
And when we left, it was really because we got kicked out, right?
We start, you saw in the beginning of the film, we sort of start getting nosy and we start trying to look in some of these other areas.
And then they shut down the filming, they throw us out.
And then we thought, well, you know, maybe we're stuck now.
How are we going to make a film about this?
We feel we have to because we're the only people that know what's going on in here, but they're not going to let us back.
So it was then that we found out that there was this network of men inside who had access to these contraband cell phones who were documenting what was going on.
So that was our way of getting into those buildings that we couldn't see inside.
And one of the first things we learned was one of the guys inside, Melvin Ray, texted us to say, hey, you know, this guard, it was a guard that we had been tracking already, who was a particularly violent guard.
He just beat somebody very badly, and he's now, that person, the victim, is at UAB Hospital.
So we jumped in a car and we went to UAB Hospital and just walked up.
I just put my iPhone in my pocket and we just walked up to the intensive care unit.
And when we got there, we found that this young man, Stephen Davis, had died from his injuries.
And as we started to get deeper into it, we went and visited his mother because we didn't even know if she knew that she had lost her son.
But in fact, she had been with him when he passed away.
She had sort of turned off the life support.
And we said, We want to make a film about this.
We're trying to tell the story.
And she immediately said, I'm in.
I want to help you.
I don't want this to happen to any other mothers.
You know, and this is a very nice white lady from Uniontown, Alabama with an oxygen tank.
I mean, she's not somebody that you would see ordinarily as kind of a heroic person.
But when she loses her son, she really becomes so activated and she ends up telling us the story.
And then she says, look, you know, they're lying to me already.
You know, my son just died last night, and they're already calling me and telling me things about how he was the one that attacked guards.
And none of this is true.
This all seems like it's fake.
So teach me how to record my phone calls.
So this older woman suddenly became a really important partner in making the film.
And this gets back to your question about Stephen Davis.
So her son, who was a drug addict, right, didn't kill anybody, but was in a car when a drug deal went bad.
He went to try to buy drugs and his friend went in the house and they had a fight and somebody got shot.
And then he got arrested and was charged with murder because that's how the felony murder statute works.
And so here you have a drug addict who goes to prison in Alabama and is in the highest security prison there and is targeted by a particular guard who is especially violent and is just beaten to death in front of 70 witnesses.
And then, of course, as we go through the film, we start tracking that in our investigation and we start looking into the cover-up and why they lied about how he had died and how they scrambled witnesses and how the Department of Corrections is organized so that they prevent people from finding out what really happened to their kids or their loved ones and they avoid liability and so on.
And there was one person that we ended up hearing from, this guy James Sales, who originally tells just the police side of the story, just says, well, you know, yeah, it's exactly the way that the guard said.
But then he kind of hints on the phone, listen, when I get out of here, I'll tell the real story.
He also, as he started to get closer to getting out, because he was killed a month before he was going to get out.
And so as he started getting closer to release, he just started to get more frustrated and more angry and started to say things to guards about like, you know, you know what I've seen in here.
And I'm going to, you know.
And then lo and behold, he gets found in a cell dead.
And, you know, he's bleeding from orifices in his body.
And it was pretty clear that he was given what they call a hot shot, which is they give you a cigarette that's got something bad on it and it can kill you.
You know, we knew because we had had this, we had visited some prisons as volunteers.
And I had gone on the death row with my filmmaking partner, Charlotte Kaufman.
We had gone into Easterling.
We had gone originally into Holman prison where they have the death row.
And we went in there with the chaplain.
And the lieutenant came down and said, you know, unfortunately, we're so understaffed right now, which is an understatement, that, you know, we don't have anybody to take you around.
But, you know, chaplain, I know you want to show your friends around the death row, so, you know, just go for it.
So we ended up walking around the death row for like two or three hours just talking to men.
And those men were very helpful.
They weren't, you know, we weren't talking to irrational people.
We weren't talking to, you know, they're people who were trying to get the story out.
And so we knew going in that there were a lot of bad things happening.
We didn't know exactly what.
And then when we went into Easterling and the men started calling us aside and saying, you know, they beat me so bad, I defecated on myself.
Or, you know, I just saw there were five stabbings this week and none have been reported.
We started to realize that it was really a huge crisis, but it was just being kept secret.
With the help of AI, scammers are getting smarter every day, sending emails that look legit but are designed to steal your data, passwords, and money.
If you want to stay protected, you got to check out Surfshark.
It's way more than your good old VPN.
It's an all-in-one security tool.
They have a ton of advanced features, and one in particular that's called Email Scam Checker.
This thing notifies you if an email you received is a scam or a phishing attempt.
So instead of just guessing whether the bank email is real, you can check it before you click.
And of course, Surfshark still provides the standard VPN benefits of hiding your online activity or allowing you to virtually change your location and access geo-block content while traveling.
The final kicker, one subscription covers unlimited devices.
So you can protect your phone, laptop, even share it with your household.
Pay for one tool, protect all aspects of your online life.
Go to surfshark.com slash Rogan or use code Rogan at checkout and get four extra months of Surfshark.
Surfshark.com slash Rogan or code Rogan for four extra months.
So it's crazy that you're relying on these guards to get in the phones that they're using to expose the crimes of the guards.
And it's like the guards are aware of the phones because they provided them to the inmates and they're contraband.
They're not supposed to have them, but yet they all do.
And so they have to ignore it if they want to keep selling them phones.
Well, another way of looking at it is that there's so little accountability that they don't actually think they're going to get in trouble for anything.
And if you remember that guard who kills Stephen Davis, Rod Gadson, this guy might be the most violent prison guard in America.
He's still working in the Alabama state prison system after he has a starring role against his will, I'm sure, but after he has a starring role in our documentary, which has been seen by millions of people, they still have him employed there.
He's been promoted twice, and now he's up for another promotion.
So I think to some extent the guards just say, well, you know, I can do whatever I want.
I can sell the cell phones.
And by the way, not all the guards are bad, right?
There are guards that we met there who were pretty heartbroken because they went into the system hoping to make change or trying to, maybe they wanted to work in the police department and there weren't any jobs.
But in their town, they had the ability to work in a prison.
So they kind of went in there and described to us that they wanted to help people with addiction.
They wanted to see if they could help rehabilitate people.
But when they got in there, they realized very quickly that was not what was in the offing.
He had some kind of like a some kind of plastic thing that he had made.
It did not appear to be anything very serious because the reason he had made it is because somebody had called him gay, and you have to fight your way out of that, right?
Yeah, in other words, you can't put up with that because otherwise they're going to turn you into what they call a sissy.
They're going to turn you into somebody that gets raped.
And there's so much rape in the prison that the DOJ report that came out said that there's rape occurring at all hours of the day and night in all areas of the prison.
So rape is such a significant problem.
And when Stephen Davis was in there and was accused of being gay, he had to make a show of fighting the person that was calling him gay.
He never went after the guards or anything like that.
And everybody that the lawyer spoke to, you know, a dozen witnesses who had seen what happened, all of them said as soon as the guards came in, he immediately lay down on the floor and put his weapon about 15 feet away from him, put this plastic knife 15 feet away.
And then the guards came in and just started beating him, even though there was no threat.
And the guards would say, Gadson was saying to Stephen Davis, you know, quit resisting, quit resisting.
I think that there have been two people who've died out of the 24, 25 cases that we know about.
But there are a lot of just maimings.
There are a lot of situations where people are just damaged, often permanently.
You saw what happened at Kinetic Justice when he, you know, Robert Earl Counsel, when he leads a nonviolent work strike, that guards come and attack him, and he loses sight in one of his eyes.
He's, you know, dragged out of the cell.
There's a huge amount of blood.
So, you know, especially these guys who are leading a nonviolent effort to try to improve conditions, they're always met with violence.
And then the strike really highlights something that I think a lot of people are unaware of is how many industries actually use the prison system essentially for slave labor.
I mean, that was a shock to me, I think, is that, you know, I guess we all sort of assume, well, if you're in prison and they ask you to mop the floor, you need to help serve the meals or something, you know, that's a reasonable thing to do.
I think what we don't realize is that those people are leased out to the governor, to the mansion where the governor lives.
I think for that job, they get paid a little bit of money, and then on top of that, they're charged for the cost of the van that takes them to the workplace.
They're charged for the uniform that they have to wear.
So it's sort of like there are kind of fees and fines that knock everything down to almost nothing.
And in a lot of cases, the $2 a day is a lot.
They're required to do lots of work unpaid in the prisons.
They do all the construction.
You could see that even the drug dorm where the counselor decided to leave his job, there was a professional drug counselor in one of the prisons, and nobody replaces him.
And so Raul Poole, one of the guys in our film, just starts running the drug dorm.
And that's a drug dorm that's getting money from the federal government to pay for drug treatment program in prison.
And that money is just not going anywhere.
Or money is just going into the coffers of whoever's running the prison system.
Do they do an audit of the money or is it just – There really is not any meaningful accountability.
You know, there's like the state auditor who we actually interviewed and spent a lot of time with just sort of threw up his hands.
You know, he said, there's just no way for me to keep track of this money.
And, you know, for example, they got this incredibly horrible set of findings from the Justice Department.
The DOJ went into the Alabama state prison system and did an investigation because for reasons I can explain that are kind of incredible.
But anyway, they went in there and they investigated the whole prison system, which I think they'd never done before.
You know, usually they investigate an individual prison or something like that.
And they went in and issued a report that said, this is beyond the pale.
There are horrific things that are happening in your prisons, people being murdered, and there's the highest rate of drug overdose and highest rate of rape.
And Alabama's response was to say, well, we think that's just anecdotal and you don't know what you're talking about.
And then they decided that their solution, the Alabama solution that we sort of ironically talk about in the title of the film, the one the governor talks about, is just to build new prisons.
And meantime, the DOJ did not say to build any new prisons.
The DOJ said, your problem is with corruption and brutality, and you're operating really a criminal enterprise, and therefore you need to address the underlying problems.
And Alabama's response was, well, the DOJ says the prisons are no good, so we've got to build new ones.
So we, you know, we always call it the Alabama Department of Construction because they don't really change anything unless they have the opportunity to build something.
And that's really good for all the governor supporters and all the other people who are, you know, in the construction industry.
And, you know, they've now started construction on these massive new prisons.
You know, Alabama's a tiny state.
It's like, you know, smaller population, I think, than Norway.
And they've got a tiny budget, and yet they figure out how to put together a multi-billion dollar prison construction plan.
They can't fund it at first.
The governor announces she's going to build these new prisons, which the DOJ did not ask for, and are not going to solve the problem.
And they admit, by the way, that they're not going to affect overcrowding, which is a huge problem.
The prisons are operating at like 200% capacity.
And, you know, when they're asked about it, the head of the Department of Corrections, they ask him, you know, is this going to affect the overcrowding?
Or is it just the same number of beds?
And he goes, no, it's the same number of beds.
It's not going to affect overcrowding.
So they're building these massive new facilities.
The governor can't get them paid for.
She can't raise the money in a bond offering.
So they go after the COVID money that they got from the government, which is not designed to build prisons.
It's very hard to argue that building prisons is something that's going to relieve some other kind of health problem or whatever.
And then I think they get fined for that, or you have to pay a fine if you use government money for a thing that's not supposed to be for.
And then when they start construction, they still can't raise the money, but they start building the new prisons even before they're authorized by the legislature.
That's how clearly it was communicated that these prisons were going to happen.
In other words, we had a crew in Alabama that was watching this site of this one massive prison that they were planning on building.
And there were just bean fields.
And it was quite beautiful, actually.
And one day I get a call from somebody and they say, we've got to start filming because there are 25 earth movers here.
And I said, well, that's impossible because the legislature hasn't even approved the new prison construction.
And they said, well, the prison construction companies know what's happening and they're already spending hundreds of thousands of dollars just to clear the site.
So the fix was in on this new prison construction.
And the governor announced that it was going to cost $900 million to build three new prisons.
So far, they've broken ground and are far along on the first prison, and it's up to $1.3 billion.
So when you open that door, a whole lot of commerce comes in.
A whole lot of companies come in, you know, and they ask them why was it so expensive?
How did it go from $300 million for one prison to $1.3 billion for one prison and counting?
And they said, well, it's inflation.
And, you know, meanwhile, I'm pretty sure that the government's not going to say that we got 400% inflation at the moment.
So it's, you know, it's kind of institutionalized thievery.
You know, it's the perverting of the system with money you see because, you know, for example, these big prison companies like Geo Group and Core Civic make money by having full prisons.
You know, they're private prison companies, but there are lots of prisoners.
There are a lot of companies that provide services to public prisons, to state prisons like, you know, Cisco and all these companies that sell food there.
But everybody makes more money if the prisons are full.
And so you have the head of Core Civic just did a shareholder call not too long ago.
And he's Heninger, I think his name is.
And they said, you know, what do you think, what's the outlook?
And he said, oh, with all the new immigration, prisons, and all the prisons and all the increased emphasis on law enforcement and on incarceration, this is the most exciting time in my career.
So, you know, you're really building this prison industrial complex every day, especially right now, I think.
And all these people are doing, they're all doing bad stuff.
You know, there's a company called Securus, which is run by Tom Gores, who is a big team owner, owns the Pistons, the Detroit Pistons, and some other teams.
And is a private equity guy worth about $10 billion.
And his company, Securis, does communications for the prison systems.
And they made deals that have now been sort of exposed, but they made deals with sheriff's departments where they had jails.
And they said, instead of letting kids visit their parents in jail and actually get to see them and hug them and maybe have some kind of normalcy, let's install video visit terminals.
So the cover story was the video visits are going to be great because you don't have to drive across the state to see your loved one.
But the contract specifically said that they had to replace in-person visits.
So when a kid went to go visit his dad, even if he was 20 yards away from him in the prison waiting room, he had to use a video terminal, which costs $12.99 for 20 minutes.
And he was not allowed to see his dad in person.
So that's an example of, you know, and that's in the contract that's in the Securist contract that said that they have to eliminate the in-person visits.
So when you allow that for-profit motive to be driving things in these state institutions where theoretically we should, you know, have some kind of like moral approach that makes sense for society or, you know, can help community or build our relationships or help people stay in touch with their loved ones when they're incarcerated.
When you add that for-profit motive there, the system is just designed to exploit.
It just is natural that all those people have to get, you know, they all have, there's a kind of a value to every visit.
Every time a visit, you know, every time a kid comes and visits a parent, it's worth $12.99.
Well, why do it for free if you can get $12.99 for it?
Is it one of the darker aspects of human nature in regards to our relationship with money that so many people, if unchecked, if you give them the opportunity to make more money at the expense of other people, they do it.
They do it, especially under the framework of a corporation.
The framework of a corporation allows you to have a diffusion of responsibility because you don't think that you're the one doing this horrible thing.
It's this thing that you work for, and I'm just doing my job.
And also, if you're involved in a corrupt system and this is your job and you think of these people as all good people that are part of the corrupt system, it sort of minimizes the horrible feelings that you have about that corruption.
Aaron Trevor Brandeis, I really believe, I've heard you talk about diffusion of responsibility before.
I think it's such a huge part of what drives all this is that you have people who don't really have to ask themselves the hard question.
Am I the person that's exploiting somebody?
Am I the person that's overcharging a mom?
Am I the person that's charging somebody a crazy amount of money for their medication or allowing somebody to die from medical neglect?
Because once you have a corporation and you look at that org chart, you know, you could see the org chart as, oh, that's a nice, orderly way of getting commerce to move forward.
But it's also a thousand points of responsibility.
Every one of those persons just takes a tiny measure of responsibility.
Well, I'm just in the accounting department.
I mean, I don't make the rules.
I don't make the laws.
And you see that in the healthcare industry, people recording their calls with their health care providers or their insurance companies saying, oh, I'm sorry, I really can't answer.
That's not my job.
Somebody else makes that decision.
And so when you have these massive organizations, there's a way for very bad things to happen.
And when you're trying to maximize profit, you just find some ways to justify things.
Like your main job is not to help people.
These prisons aren't rehabilitation centers.
You're trying to make like you actually profit off people becoming like functional members of society once they get released.
That would be amazing.
Then you'd have an incentive to make people better people in prison.
Like imagine if their profit was based on people being rehabilitated, re-entering society and becoming functional, proper members of society where they contribute.
Whether it's military industrial complex, whether it's the health insurance complex, whether it's pharmaceutical drug industry, when you look at the Sackler family and what they did with opioids.
I'm sure you've seen the Netflix, the Peterberg Netflix painkiller series.
Fucking incredible.
It's just incredible that that guy's just walking around.
You're responsible for the death of who knows how many people.
Because who knows how many people that had relationships with the people that got addicted also lost their lives, also lost everything.
Because you're dealing with a brother or a mom that's completely lost and addicted.
I mean, you know, I've heard you talk a lot about mental health.
And obviously, there are a lot of causes of mental health problems.
And, you know, that includes social media.
It includes sort of alienation.
It includes a lot of things that are present in society.
But the prison industrial complex and the experience of having somebody incarcerated has a huge impact on mental health.
I think people don't realize when you have 2 million people locked up in these facilities and many of them are just being traumatized every day, whether they're seeing somebody get killed or they're constantly in fear for their life.
The idea that those people are going to somehow be okay when you want to let them out 10 years later and they're going to rejoin society, you give them $50 and a bus ticket and you say, hey, I hope you can become a taxpayer.
Meantime, they don't have enough money to pay for one red roof in for one night.
They can't do anything when they get out of prison.
And then we say, well, why is there such high recidivism?
I guess that means they're bad people.
So let's put them back in.
So the mental health implications for the people that are incarcerated are huge and the people who are in their families, as you say.
You know, if you go into the I mean, all this sounds very dark and horrible, and it is, but there are a lot of positive developments that you can see when you give them a chance to grow in society.
So, for example, like I love what you say about community, you know, about the importance of building community and seeing the country as our community.
And, you know, if we're torturing people that are in our community, if we're being cruel to people that are in our community, what does it say about us?
And clearly, we see that there are so many instances where people are trying, trying to do something better.
There's a woman named Erica in Alabama who was a mental health professional.
And she described to me what it was like to try to give mental health services to people who were incarcerated.
And I was trying to figure out, you know, looking at these images of the places that they keep people in, these cells, these solitary cells with just a little tray slot.
And, you know, they're in there in a five by eight room with no windows, and they could be in there literally for years.
And I said to her, well, can you tell me like when you do a session with somebody and you're trying to talk to them about their suicidal ideation or their various problems, what does that look like?
How does that work?
And she goes, well, you know, it's a little uncomfortable because I got to be on my knees.
And I said, wait, why are you on your knees?
She said, oh, well, I have to be able to talk through the tray slot.
And I said, so when you're giving a mental health counseling session to somebody who's incarcerated, you're not allowed to open the door.
You're not allowed to see, assuming that person's not having a violent fit or something like that.
You're not allowed to sit down across from them and have that conversation.
She said, no, no, no, but it's okay.
I just put my mouth up to the tray slot.
And I just thought, you know, when you think about the idea that that's going to be somehow something that will give relief to somebody who's really struggling with a mental health crisis in prison, you know, we're doing the absolute minimum.
You know, we're checking the box that says, yeah, once a month this guy has a psychiatric evaluation.
But nobody's taking a picture of that and showing what it really looks like to have this nice, you know, young lady, this idealistic young mental health person kneeling outside of a metal cell with bloodstains on it talking to somebody inside.
Well, I have this one friend that I used to do martial arts with when I was a kid.
And when I was probably around 16, 16 or 17, he wound up going to jail.
I didn't know him that well, but I knew him as this guy who competed in tournaments and he would show up and train with us and he's just a pretty tough guy.
Because the world of fighting, like people that are interested in entering in competitions with people, you get a lot of troubled people, a lot of very angry people.
You know, a lot of them that come from violent households.
They were beaten as children or they were bullied as kids, depending on where.
I came from the most mild of those environments.
I didn't have anybody abusing me.
I lived in the suburbs of Boston.
I lived in Newton, which is a really nice neighborhood.
I just was interested in martial arts.
And then I was fascinated by this idea of bettering myself through competition because it was so scary.
And then all of a sudden I'm around like hit men.
I knew one guy who was a hitman for Whitey Bulger.
Because I think there's that question of, you know, people say, well, if you don't like the prison system the way it is, or if you don't think people should get locked up forever, then, you know, you're just soft on crime.
And, you know, obviously, you know, you're some kind of snowflake.
But clearly, there's a role for prison.
There's a role for jail.
The question is whether we should be putting people into institutions that just further damage them, further re-traumatize them.
It's like if you're releasing them back into the street, like what are you doing to the rest of society?
If you're taking a person who's committed a violent crime, making them way worse in jail and then releasing them.
This is like a slow bomb.
You know, it's a slow release bomb.
And then also they have no options because no one wants to hire an ex-convict, especially someone who went to jail for like aggravated assault or something like that.
So it's very, very difficult for these people and very, very difficult for society to make a decision.
You know, you want to make a quick fix of something.
You want to protect people.
Just keep them in jail.
Keep everybody in jail.
But there's zero emphasis on how to take a person from a completely broken childhood, broken home, violence, drug addiction in the home, all the chaos, complete accustom, completely being accustomed to violent crime because it's all around you.
It's in your neighborhood.
You imitate your atmosphere.
And then what do we do with these people?
You know, there's no emphasis whatsoever on it.
It's just using them as human batteries to generate money.
And that's evil.
That's what's really crazy.
And this is where people have subverted this idea of incarceration being some sort of a rehabilitation or correction, right?
They call them correctional facilities.
You're not correcting anything.
You're just making money.
You're just making money off of people and you're taking advantage of the fact that no one wants to pay attention to it because society generally looks at people that are criminals and have committed violent crimes as like, oh, well, fuck them.
Push them aside.
And look, there's some people that I agree.
Yeah, fuck them.
If there's people that have, you know, killed a bunch of people and raped a bunch of people and are constantly robbing people and breaking into houses that are violent, yeah, fuck those people.
Fuck those people.
But that's a small percentage of what's in jail.
A large percentage is nonviolent drug offenders.
And that's where it gets really weird.
It's like, so a person is deciding, you can have the drugs that we sanction.
You can have the drugs that we tax.
You can have these drugs.
You can have these prescription drugs.
You could have this drug that you buy in the liquor store that we call alcohol, which is clearly a drug.
You could buy your cigarettes.
You could buy your coffee.
You could get all these drugs that we like.
Adderall, you need Adderall.
Andrew, I think you have a little ADHD.
Maybe you some fucking speed and we'll sell you that speed and we'll tax that speed.
Anything else, we'll put you in a cage because you're not following our rules.
And it's like a grown adult telling another grown adult what they can or can't do with their life is responsible for what, 50% of the people that are in cages?
That's kind of crazy.
It's almost time for spring break.
So maybe you're headed to the beach or maybe you're taking the kids on a road trip or maybe you're just taking some extra time for yourself.
No matter what, you deserve a break and a reset and AG1 can help.
AG1 is your daily health drink.
Just one scoop combines your multivitamin, pre and probiotics, superfoods, and antioxidants to help support a healthy immune system and digestion.
Plus, it travels really well so you can start working it into your routine even when you don't have a routine.
Just slip a few travel packs into your luggage and have a nice flight.
I've talked about AG1 for a long time, and it's not just me.
I know a lot of people enjoy it.
It's very easy.
It's very convenient, and you deserve to take care of your health.
Visit drinkag1.com slash Joe Rogan, and for a limited time, get a bottle of omega-3 vitamin D3K2 and an AG1 flavor sampler for free in your welcome kit with your first subscription.
That's in $111 value at drinkag1.com slash Joe Rogan.
Yeah, I mean, there's this kind of illusion that everybody that is in prison for something that we don't think that the average person doesn't think they should be in prison for for many, many, many years, like a drug crime or being an addict, basically, that those people, that all those people have been let out already.
You know, that somehow like prison activist people have said, well, you know, all the people that are in there for drug crimes should be released.
But it's not really true.
You have an enormous criminalization of drug addiction.
So you're already making people sort of feel hopeless.
Then they're turning to drugs and then you're putting them into cages.
So like Steve Marshall, for example, the AG in Alabama, says, well, we've already released all of the nonviolent criminals, right?
So the only people that are locked in there are the worst of the worst.
So you have, you know, and he was put into a maximum security facility for entering an unoccupied building.
That's because there's sort of an inflation of this concept of violence.
So they will, in Alabama, I think there are 44 different crimes that are considered violent crimes.
And they include crimes that you and I would not consider violent.
You know, so if somebody threatens somebody verbally, like most people do in arguments with, you know, people that they're mad at or whatever, but doesn't assault somebody, that could be considered a violent crime.
If somebody enters a building, whether they steal something or not, that could be considered a violent crime.
And so it makes it easier just to, as you say, like, I like that image of the battery.
I think about it as like sometimes like the matrix, that, you know, for Alabama to do what it's doing, it's got to have 20,000 people in suspended animation because that's how you can use them for labor.
That's how you can use them to sell them stuff.
That's how you can charge them for fees and fines, you know, that you need that many people.
I think they did a terrible thing when they allowed private prisons.
I think it's a terrible thing.
I think, like, if you think about the people that founded this country and the people that wrote the Constitution, they had a great understanding of how tyranny can emerge.
And so they tried to create a system.
And again, 1776, crazy to think that we're still following those same rules today, but they had a great understanding.
But the checks and balances and make sure that one person couldn't accumulate all of the power.
Whoever first initiated the policy of allowing and paying for private prisons to exist in this country did not think it through like that at all.
Did not think of incentives, did not think of how people always, when given the chance to make more money, figure out a way to justify making that more money and come up with rules or regulations or carve-outs, caveats, some reason why they can continue to accelerate.
And then you don't think about the fact that prison guard unions and these private prisons, these people that own them, actively work to keep some laws on the books that maybe the general public would not want to be illegal anymore, certain things.
And they do that just so they can keep their prisons full, so they can keep making more money.
So then they take the money that they get from these private prisons where they're using people as human batteries to make sure there's still laws in place that are ridiculous so that they can keep arresting people so they can keep filling up their buildings and making more.
Well, the genies figured out a way to get into a whole new bottle because a lot of people say to us, well, this film that you made, the Alabama Solution, is obviously about Alabama State Prisons.
Are those private prisons?
And we always say, no.
Those are state-run institutions.
But they kind of function like private prisons in a way because they're able to make deals with Securius about their prison phone system.
And that makes millions and millions and millions of dollars that's extracted from the poorest people in the country, right, who are being charged high, you know, daily and even per-minute fees for being able to communicate with their families.
Then you have companies who are selling the food to the prisons.
You have companies that are doing health care contracts with the prisons.
And so there's so much money in that that they sort of, even though the state owns that piece of land, it still kind of functions the way that private prisons function.
So we've sort of just given over the care of 2 million Americans to companies that are accountable to their shareholders, maybe, but the shareholders don't know.
When Robert Earl Counsel was in solitary and you see the rats swimming in his toilet, rats are swimming in his toilet and he has rats in a water jar and what did he say?
And he's spending his time trying to organize nonviolent labor strikes.
He's trying to do hunger strikes.
He's trying to use every method that he can use to call attention to the problem that 20,000 other people have.
And he's using a contraband cell phone to talk to us, knowing that he's probably going to get retaliated against by the authorities once the film comes out or once they know that he's organizing a labor strike.
He would be an unbelievable asset to society if he were out in the world, right?
He's advocating for nonviolence.
He's obviously smart as a whip, and he's incredibly motivating to other people.
He's got that entire prison system listening to him when they want to be violent because they're so angry at the treatment.
And the prison system starts bird feeding them, starts to cut off their food rations to force them back to work.
And Kinetic, Robert Earle, is the person who says, you know, that's not going to solve anything.
We don't want to do that.
So, you know, you see this huge level of humanity, talent, thoughtfulness in people that are locked away.
And we just assume, well, if they're in prison, that means that they're bad people.
And meantime, there's so many other people on the outside who don't get locked up for doing things that are much worse.
I worked for a long time on the story of Robert Durst.
And when we discovered evidence that showed that he had killed his wife and his best friend and his neighbor in Galveston dismembered him, we found the only evidence that proved that he did those things.
And suddenly I was in a dialogue with the L.A. District Attorney, the L.A.PD, talking about how to get him arrested.
And even if I don't believe in the way that we incarcerate people, it's clear that there's a role for prison.
And there's clearly a guy like Bob Durst who keeps killing people needs to be taken out of society.
Well, he died now, and he was locked up in a facility in Northern California.
It was sort of a facility for senior citizens who had medical problems.
So, you know, a lot of really rich people, as you could tell from, you know, there have been a bunch of cases on this.
Really rich people hire consultants to help them navigate what prison they're going to end up going to.
They can negotiate for better conditions.
And so you end up, you know, with that sort of situation where a guy who maybe has stolen $100 million and not paid his taxes or taken money from his workers or committed some horrible act of fraud ends up in a prison farm, ends Ends up in a pretty nice facility where he has access to lots of things.
And then you have poor people that are locked up in places that have rats in their cells and vermin.
But yeah, I was always sort of amazed that Robert Durst was able to get away with what he got away with for so long.
Well, I knew a lot because I had made a film, a narrative film called All Good Things, about sort of Robert Durst's origin story, his relationship with his beautiful wife when they were both young, before all the bad stuff started happening and he became the guy that he became.
There was this kind of strange love story between this kind of difficult man and this very lovely girl, Kathleen McCormick.
And I made this film.
Ryan Gosling played the Bob Durst character and Kirsten Dunst played his wife and really investigated that story so that we could tell the tale of what had happened to them in an accurate way.
And while I was doing that, we reached out to Robert Durst, to the real Robert Durst, and I said, you know, we're making this film about, I guess we spoke to his lawyer, so we're making this film about you, about your client, and we'd like to talk to him, get his input, make sure that we're trying to tell the story accurately.
It was basically the story about him and his wife when they first met, this rich guy and this girl from sort of the other side of the tracks, and then how eventually that relationship got toxic.
Eventually he kills her.
And then later, his best friend, Susan Berman, who knows about what happened to his wife, starts to become problematic.
Then he kills her.
And then later, he moves to Galveston, Texas, and disguises himself as a deaf mute woman, if you remember this.
And he ends up becoming friends with his elderly neighbor and this guy named Morris Black.
And they go out shooting on Pelican Island and so on.
And eventually they have a little altercation because he figured out who Bob Durst was and that he was sort of on the run.
I guess we started working on that in around 2005 and it came out in 2010.
So in 2010, it's about to come out in theaters, this film.
And there was a big article in the New York Times about how accurate it was and how much we had done to make sure that the details were right and so on.
And the real Robert Durst reads the article and calls me out of the blue.
And I had tried to get in touch with him before without any success.
And he actually calls the distributor of the film first, Magnolia Pictures, and he asks for the president, Eamon Bowles.
And Eamon and I would use Bob's voice, like when we would talk to each other, because Bob had a very recognizable voice.
So when I would call him, we would hang up and I would say, bye-bye.
And that was always sort of Bob's tone.
And then one day somebody calls Amon's office and says, this is Robert Durst.
And so his secretary walks in the office and says, like, you know, in air quotes, like, it's Robert Durst on the phone, thinking that it's me.
And he picks up the phone.
He's like, hey, Bob, I'm not surprised you're calling.
I think we did a hell of a job on the film.
And there's a long pause, and he says, the guy says, who am I talking to?
And Eamon says, oh, who's this?
And he says, this is Robert Durst.
And so he reaches out to me.
I knew that he was trying to reach me so I could record my very first phone call with him.
And I call him and I say, listen, I'm keen to talk to you.
I've been making this film about you for the last five years.
And he said, well, I would like to see the film.
So I arranged for him to see the film.
And he calls me immediately after he sees the film.
And he says, I want you to know I like the movie very much.
The movie kind of shows him killing people, right?
And he said, well, you know, you did a beautiful job explaining what I was going through as a child and the difficulty I had and losing my mother.
And Kirsten Dunst was just like my wife, Kathy, and I cried three times.
And I would like to do something with you.
You know, I would like there to be something out there from me, my ability to sort of tell my story.
And I said, all right, well, why don't we sit down?
I'll ask you a bunch of questions.
And he said, that's fine.
Okay, let's do that.
So I end up sitting with him for three days.
I've just finished a movie about him, a dramatic film, which is now in theaters.
And I sit down with him and interview him for 21 hours.
And you think you do long interviews.
He's 21 hours with this one person.
And he is fascinating.
I mean, absolutely extraordinary.
He is incredibly honest about things that most people would never be honest about.
You know, he talks about how he had violent arguments with his wife.
Or he says, you know, that he says crazy stuff.
I mean, he explained to me that I said, you know, I think you were kind of offensive when you went to visit her mother.
You know, she had this mother who was in her 80s.
And you went to visit her mother.
And, you know, I think you did some odd things.
He goes, well, yeah, you know, I visited those people and they were, you know, that woman, she reads Yankee magazine.
And, you know, and she asked me how I liked her daughter.
And I told her that Kathy had come out of the shower and my penis was hard.
Like, you said that to her aging mother?
Yeah, yeah, I'm me.
What am I going to do?
Sure, that's what I thought, you know.
You know, or you say to him, well, what did you say?
You know, why did you tell the police that after your wife, after you put your wife on the train, you went to the neighbors to have a drink when that clearly wasn't true?
Oh, yes, I lied about that.
I said, well, why did you lie to the police?
Well, I needed to be somewhere and I wanted them to stop asking me questions.
So, you know, I told him that I went to the neighbors.
I said, well, that was so easy to disprove.
They just talked to the neighbor.
Well, yeah, but people don't usually do that.
So he's very candid.
He speaks very, very openly, almost like having a level of sort of Asperger's.
I mean, he is so good at telling the story his way.
And he tells you so many facts that are true that when he occasionally lies about really critical things, I think a lot of people just didn't pay attention to that.
I did because I had already researched the story.
So I knew when he was trying to tell me something that was bullshit that it was bullshit.
But, you know, I did have to put myself in a position of giving him the benefit of the doubt whenever I could.
Partly because that was the only, you know, you got to just get into that mode where you're trying to hear his version without debating it the whole time.
I mean, and that ultimately what happened with him, as you may remember, is he we find this evidence.
The evidence I thought was determinative.
I thought it was going to be something that police would ultimately use to convict him for murder.
But we … Trevor Burrus What was that evidence again?
Trevor Burrus So there's a … So there was a famous note that the killer of Susan Berman, this friend of Bob Durst in California, had left behind when he shot Susan Berman.
And the note said 1527 Benedict Canyon, cadaver.
And it was sent to the Beverly Hills Police Department.
And that very seldom happens, but people speculated a lot.
Well, why would somebody who killed somebody have sent a note to the police?
Well, maybe if he liked the person, if it was his best friend, this woman Susan Berman, and it was Bob Durst that did it, then maybe he wouldn't want her body to lie there.
And, you know, she has dogs.
They didn't want the dogs to mess with the body.
So he may have just killed her and then left this note.
But then later, when he was asked about it, he said, I have no knowledge about that note.
So when we're doing our investigation, we discover a letter that he had written to Susan Berman that has almost the exact same words on it because it's addressed to her at 1527 Benedict Canyon.
So we can see the handwriting on that, not just a handwriting sample, but a handwriting sample that's saying exactly what it said on the letter that with the same misspelled words, right?
Exactly.
And he writes, 1527 Benedict Canyon, Beverly Hills, California, misspells the word Beverly, puts in an extra E at the end.
And of course, this letter that we find, he also misspells the word Beverly.
So nobody had ever seen or the police hadn't known about this letter.
So we find it, and then I immediately start planning a way for me to show it to him in a second interview.
And he had always said to me, like, oh, if you ever need me to sit down again, I'm happy to come back and I'll ask, you know, I'll answer any question you want.
But I start to call him about doing the second interview and he gets very skittish.
And then this goes on for two years.
And so we have this evidence, but we need to show it to him.
And I had done a bunch of research.
I talked to Marsha Clark, for example, who was smart about how the L.A. District Attorney's Office works.
And she said, if you have the opportunity to sit down with him and show him the evidence, do that before you go to the police, because it's going to be very, the police are not going to be able to do something like that.
And he's going to lawyer up.
But you guys, before you're even in contact with law enforcement, you could show him the evidence and he's going to have to react to it.
And I bet it's going to be interesting.
So we finally get him to sit for the second interview.
And I show him the evidence in the interview.
And he has this incredible meltdown.
I don't know if you remember this, but he starts burping uncontrollably and he starts rubbing his face and breathing and he's obviously very, very surprised to see that there's this letter that matches the cadaver note that he admitted could only have been written by the killer.
So he's sort of in a he's trapped.
And I finished the interview with him and he gets up and goes to the bathroom and he leaves his microphone attached.
And while he's in the bathroom, he confesses to the murder.
He's, you know, he's a guy who talks to himself a lot.
And he always said that to me.
He said, oh, sometimes I talk to myself for long periods of time and I get in fights with people because they think that I'm hassling them, but it's just me.
I just talk to myself.
So when he goes in the bathroom, the first thing he says when he goes in is, there it is, you're caught.
He says that to himself.
And it's, it's, and then he goes on to say, killed them all.
So I didn't know that he said anything when he went to the bathroom.
And so we're working with the LAPD.
We're giving them the printed evidence, the letter that matches the cadaver note.
And it's a pretty strong case already.
And we don't know that he's said a word in the bathroom.
And it's not until 26 months later that we have an editor, Shelby Siegel, who is just going through audio and kind of cleaning up old tracks because we're getting ready to deliver the film to HBO.
And she sees on the editing system that there's a little waveform.
There's a little squiggle that shows that there's some audio when he's in the bathroom.
So the problem was that I had a microphone.
There was a microphone in the room and he had a microphone on.
So there's a lot of noise.
We're finishing.
I just finished the interview.
I'm incredibly excited that I got him to give this crazy reaction.
And it's pretty obvious that that's going to be part of proving that he's guilty.
And so I'm out there kind of whispering to the crew.
There's noise in the room and there's noise in the bathroom.
And so she mutes the other microphones and she hears him say, there it is, you're caught.
And she screams.
And she runs in the next room to where my other, our main editor was, Zach.
And she says, you have to hear this.
And he listens to it.
And he says, wait a minute.
I was there that day.
And we have audio that's a continuation of that.
That audio stops at There It Is You're Caught.
But he was in the bathroom for seven minutes.
So they go and get the drive that has the other seven minutes of audio on it.
And it's this long rambling confession.
And I come over and I listen to it.
And I can't believe what we're hearing.
I mean, it was extraordinary.
And I had to call the LAPD and the LA District Attorney and say, hey, I know literally two days ago, we gave you the documents.
We gave you the letter so that you could start this prosecution.
We found something else.
And so they come to New York and they listen to this confession.
And it's just, you know, absolutely mind-blowing that that happened.
And then when the film comes, when the series comes out, you know, we've been working with the police then for a couple of years while they were building the prosecution.
And when the film finally comes out, when the series comes out on HBO, he is arrested the day before the final episode.
So it's in the final episode that he makes that confession and they arrest him right before because they knew that he was going to go on the run.
You know, I don't think he's even all that aware that he sometimes just burbles out with these do you think he started, I mean, this is pure speculation, but do you think he started going crazy after he started killing people?
I think the way that he would have thought about it, you know, from inside the killer, right?
He doesn't think of himself as a murderer, right?
Steve Marshall in Alabama doesn't think of himself as, you know, this incredibly amoral person.
He thinks of himself as law enforcement, right?
Bob Duris thinks of himself as just a guy trying to get along, you know, like we all are.
So I think what happened was in 1982, he and his wife, who were having problems, in part, in large part, because he had big personality problems.
I mean, he was not an easy person to deal with at all, and was also very spoiled and was also, you know, had all these resources and had a lot of, yeah, and had a lot of power over her.
And so I think something happened between the two of them where they were at their lake house and there was an altercation.
He admitted to me that they had had a pushing and shoving argument that night.
And then he, and then, you know, he says he took her to the train and sent her into the city, but none of that makes any sense.
So I think what happened was he either accidentally or semi-accidentally killed her.
I think they had a fight.
They ended up getting into some altercation and she landed on the, you know, maybe on the stone of the fireplace or something like that, and she was dead.
And then he thought, well, it doesn't make any sense for two people to go down.
I mean, unfortunate that this had to happen, but I got to get rid of the body.
And so he found a way to make her disappear.
We don't know exactly what happened to her, but we know that, you know, he alleged that he had put her on the train to go in the city and they never found the body.
So after that, he's sort of widely believed to be a likely person to have killed his wife.
It was a few days later because he kept sort of held off on telling anyone.
And then later he said, oh, Kathy, you know, I put her on the train to go in the city.
And then I haven't heard from her.
What's going on?
So he had a bunch of explanations about why, you know, somehow she had run off with a drug dealer or she had run off with some boyfriend or something like that.
But none of those really held water.
But it took him a while to report her missing.
He waits five days to report her missing and does a brilliant thing, which is he reports her missing in New York City, even though the last time she's ever seen is in Westchester.
So they were at their house, their lake house in Westchester.
She disappears.
And he goes into the city five days later and he says, oh, my wife was at our apartment.
So he completely, this is why I'm saying he's very smart.
He completely redirects the police so that they make, because, you know, the police aren't organized for a guy to come in and give a phony story about what happened to his wife.
Most of the time, somebody comes in and says, my wife is missing.
And they say, oh, where did you last see her?
Let's help you try to find her.
So I think he was smart enough to flip that on his head.
And he says that my wife was in the city.
And so they do their whole investigation in the city.
They don't look at the lake house.
They don't figure out where she really truly might have been.
And it was sort of because it was so late in the game, because it had taken so long for him to report her missing, they didn't find anything that showed that she had been killed in the house.
And she may very well have been killed somewhere else, but they never find the body ever.
And so her family is bereft and they don't know what to do.
Yeah, his best friend's body was in her house where somebody shot her, and that's where they left that cadaver note, the note saying 1527 Benedict Canyon.
And then in Galveston, when his elderly neighbor disappears, the reason they find this out is because a bunch of black trash bags wash up in Galveston Bay, and a little kid is fishing with his dad, and they see something bobbing around in the water, and they see these bags, and the police come and they look in the bags, and there are all these body parts.
So he had actually taken off the legs and the arms and all that.
So, I mean, I think, you know, I think it's fair to say that there are people like Bob Durst who need to be out of society, you know, and are repeatedly causing problems for others.
But that's, as you say, that's the extraordinarily rare case.
And I think a lot of the sort of tough on crime politicians will say, so you guys just want to let Jeffrey Dahmer out on the street.
Nobody thinks that.
Nobody really believes that.
People are saying, well, no.
What we're saying is that people who are in prison for having entered an unoccupied building probably never should have been in prison at all.
And the people who are in prison with good reason because they robbed somebody or something, we don't necessarily have to believe that those people can never, ever have a chance to come out of prison and be productive citizens.
You know, you just have to take a nuanced view.
You can't just say, well, they're bad people and they're good people, especially because we've got so many bad people walking around and so many good people locked up and vice versa.
Yeah, the nuance part is so important because the real question is, like, what causes so many people to become bad people?
And how come no one's examining the root of this?
How come no one's looking at these deeply impoverished, crime-ridden communities that have remained that way for decades and decades and decades and offered up some sort of a solution?
You know, it's almost like you have to financially incentivize a company to radically improve the economic and the justice situation in any random community that's experiencing a lot of crime.
Like, it's almost almost like you have to figure out a way to privatize peace and safety.
You know, it's almost like the one way.
I mean, it's really what I was saying before.
Like, imagine if these prison companies got paid based on the amount of productive citizens emerge from their prisons and then wind up doing really well.
I mean you're right in a way that it's – in some way we are – we sort of are privatizing it because like in my neighborhood in New York, there's a group called the Doe Fund, which has been around for a couple of decades I think.
And they take guys who have had severe drug addiction, have ended up in prison, and are released and have no starting place, as you were describing.
And they give them a bed.
They give them a bank account where they give them a certain amount of money each week for working.
And it's not a huge amount of money, but it sort of is the first step toward even being able to sort of have a checkbook and be able to say, oh, okay, so I've got $100 and I've spent $50 and this is what I have left.
And they give them a job, which is they make deals with neighborhoods around New York for them to come and do like street cleaning and clean up the neighborhood.
And they give them a uniform, which is clean, and they put them out on the street with a big blue trash bucket and some functional broom and things like that.
And sometimes they'll put them out in pairs so that they can work in tandem.
And these neighborhoods become incredibly clean.
The guys stay in this facility for as long as they need to until they sort of get back on their feet.
They can't do drugs when they're in the facility.
So there's a little bit of tough love going on there, too.
But they end up bringing people back.
They end up bringing people back who were otherwise abandoned and who otherwise would have been additional homeless people lying on the street in San Francisco or additional people who are bothering people outside an ATM or whatever, because there's a level of desperation that you know you have.
We all know if we absolutely had absolutely nothing and we thought that our kids were going to starve, we would do a bunch of things that would probably get us in trouble.
And taking care of people that are in that situation and providing them some sort of a vehicle for improving their life is going to be a good thing, and it's going to have some impact.
But the real impact is going to be when you address the environment in which they came from.
You know, one of the places, for example, this can be done inside and outside of prison, obviously.
And I think you're pointing out a really important thing, which is the earlier the better.
So when you look at Head Start programs, which are one of the first things that people go to cut because you can't put your finger on exactly what they do.
But if you track people that got early education, you see that it dramatically reduces the likelihood that those people are going to go to prison later in life.
And if you look at people who are even in prison, like in the Maine state prison system, which is a very humane prison system, I have pictures on my phone of guys who are sitting at a bench working on models of tall ships, these beautiful, stunning pieces of art that they've been trained by other prisoners to build.
And they give them a proper workbench and they give them some time to do this work and they give them training.
And then they sell that stuff in the prison store and they make a couple million dollars a year that goes back into rehabilitation programs.
But over time, he just said, well, why are we throwing people away when we put them into prison for having made a mistake of some kind or even a series of mistakes?
And are these people that we want to be our neighbors?
And this issue of community is so important because how are we going to get back to some kind of brotherhood in this country?
It's so important.
And if we can demonize people so quickly and just say, well, look, my neighbor, he put his tractor on my lawn and therefore he's a horrible person and I'm going to go over and smash his tractor.
And as opposed to the guy saying, oh, I couldn't put my tractor in my garage because it had a flood.
Oh, you had a flood?
Let me help you.
You know, that it's, it's, that there's a level of, you know, rage right now that we're tapping into.
It seems like a higher percentage of the people are like the martial arts people that are going into it because of damage that they suffered.
People are being radicalized by hate and anger and frustration online.
And a lot of it isn't even real people that are writing these things or it's state actors and organizations that push certain narratives.
And you're being fed a lot of hate porn.
And people are sucking it up.
And it's highly addictive.
So it's consuming an enormous percentage of your available resources in terms of your attention span.
The people that I know that are addicted to Twitter, X, whatever, are genuinely mentally ill.
Like whether they realize it or not, because they're still functional, they still do their jobs, but they are fully addicted to a thing that is just people bitching back and forth with each other.
And they check responses all the time.
They can't wait to type in another response.
And they're sitting there looking at someone else's response and getting angry.
It's illness.
It's an illness.
It's like, this is not in your life.
Like, if you put that down and look around, what do you see?
You see the people that you know.
You see the neighborhood that you live in.
The stores that you visit.
And none of that exists.
It exists in this weird fucking cloud world that you choose to enter to get upset for no fucking reason.
And if you put it down, you will feel better.
But yet you think you're missing out on something.
So you have to go check it.
And when you're on the toilet, well, I'm on the toilet.
What am I going to do?
Let me check to see what people are pissed off at.
And I don't fucking agree with that at all.
Well, this guy's an idiot.
And then you're mentally ill.
And then it becomes because we have this bizarre political system in our country where we have two sides, only two.
We only have two perspectives.
And then you have a conglomeration of ideas that are attached to each perspective that you might not agree with at all, but you have to because you're a right-wing this or a left-wing that.
So you have to say whatever the fucking party wants you to say.
And if you don't, you're a Nazi or if you don't, you're whatever you are, a communist, whatever it is.
Fortunately, for a lot of kids, Twitter, which I think is maybe the most toxic in terms of what it can do, most beneficial in terms of like whistleblowers getting news.
If anything is happening in the world, I almost immediately go to Twitter.
It used to be a little better for that because now part of the problem is with AI generated content.
There's a lot of weird stuff when it comes to like, especially war stuff.
There's a lot of videos that are just completely fake and it's hard to tell.
Or they take a video that is real and highly exaggerated and they add AI to it.
It's very strange.
And you got to wonder who's doing that and why are they doing this?
Because a lot of people are doing that just for clicks because there is an actual economy based on engagement.
So you can make money if you're, you know, if you're putting up these posts and these posts are getting millions and millions of interactions, you're going to get more money.
And so there's a lot of people doing that.
So it used to be better because it used to be just pure information.
And if it was a video, it was just a video that someone took with their cell phone generally.
Now it's like a lot of weirdo stuff, a lot of weird fake stuff.
Also, there was a piece in the paper today that talked about how Trump gets a few minute video every day that's a compilation of all the attacks and all the explosions that have happened in Iran, but is not getting a more nuanced picture of it.
So to some extent, is kind of drinking his own Kool-Aid.
You know, but video, I mean, what we saw in Alabama, and I know you have some clips of this, and I think if you feel like running one, there's the level of depravity that's going on in our prison system is so much higher than the average person thinks it is.
And one of the reasons why we've seen so much outrage from people, finally, millions of people have seen the Alabama solution because people have HBO or they have watched it in theater.
And it's the first time they've been able to see inside.
It's the first time they've been able to really see it as opposed to reading a statistic or a lot of people die in prison or whatever.
And I think it does tap into our sense of humanity and it taps into our sense of community and the feeling that, like, I don't want to be a part of that.
I don't want to be part of doing that to other people.
You know, I could be tough on crime.
You know, we've shown the film to a lot of conservative viewers, including one of the founders of CPAC and various people who are pretty right-wing people and have said, look, I might be tough on crime.
Well, that's one of the great things about your documentary is it's clear.
I mean, there's no ambiguity at all.
It's like laid out there in full color.
You could see the blood on the ground.
You could see, I mean, it's horrific when kinetic justice, when that guy's beaten in his cell and you see how they dragged him out, he's face down, bleeding all they thought he was dead and he he managed to live and he's being dragged out and you're following the blood trail from his cell with the contraband cameras from the cell phones.
And had those cell phone cameras not existed, you'd have zero idea.
Like if those guards only decided to sell money bringing drugs in and not phones with cameras, who knows what you would know.
And it does, I mean, you know, I would like to believe that the average American does not want to harm the average other American, you know, and even if you get hyped up on Twitter or you get to see, you know, too many videos of people blowing up stuff or whatever, that ultimately people have that experience of saying, you know, I went to that like coffee at the church and I sat there with that guy who I really can't stand.
And, you know, we ended up having a conversation.
You know, people are, they're kind of amazed at how much commonality they can feel with people where if they just see the person.
We all know, like if you text somebody, your kids or your wife or whatever, there's just some places where texts are not good.
It's not enough.
It's not enough.
It's going to make somebody's feelings hurt, you know.
But when you get to sit down across from somebody, you realize that it's another person you can kind of relate to.
So it's really disturbing that whether it's social media or just the demonization of people, the way that we just turn people into these one-dimensional figures, and then we could just rage at them and just hate them.
Yeah, there's also that, I think, sort of nuance falls into that also, because people are made calm by the idea that they can just identify problems and that they're simple, right?
So if you say to somebody, hey, like locking people up for 75 years probably doesn't make a lot of sense, that's complicated.
Wait, now I got to make a determination of what's the right thing to do with another person.
And, you know, so you end up with a lot of politicians who say, well, I know this is these are the bad people.
These are the good people.
We've got to promote the good people and get rid of the bad people.
Not recognizing that like everybody is a little of both and that some people certainly do a lot more bad stuff in the world than good stuff and vice versa.
But you have to see yourself, you know, as you're describing, like you have to recognize what's happening in your backyard in order for the community to work.
You can't say, well, look, I'm always right.
My neighbor's always wrong.
And therefore, I'm just going to keep raging over this.
You have to say, like, you know, I could see myself doing something.
I could see myself.
Boy, if I really got out of hand, I could see myself having a, you know, taking a swing at somebody.
And that's probably not a good thing.
But I don't want to say that somebody else that did it is automatically just a horrible person.
And that's why, you know, if you see this Attorney General in Alabama, you know, this idea that he says there are these horrible people in the world, people who have no respect for human life, and yet he's presiding over 1,500 of them dying.
But he hasn't imagined that he's part of the problem.
Respect for human life while human life is dying in these places where people are taken if they show no respect for human life and they're being killed by the people who are watching over them.
And that's to some extent why when it's exposed, right, when there's transparency, when the press is allowed to report on what's happening inside prisons, people kind of get a conscience because they start realizing, eh, I wouldn't want to do that in front of my kid, or I wouldn't want to do that if it ends up in the paper.
I wouldn't want, you know.
And I think that is kind of a balancing effect, which is one of the reasons why this war on transparency is a huge problem, right?
We're not allowed to see what's happening in prisons, even though we're paying for them.
And the Supreme Court had this ruling that said that wardens could deny access to journalists simply by citing safety and security.
But meantime, the last 20 years, no journalist has been harmed inside a prison.
So who's all the secrecy keeping safe?
We're sort of perpetuating a system.
Our job going into the Alabama state prison system was to shine a light on that.
It shouldn't be that these guys who are incarcerated have to take life and death risks using contraband cell phones to show what's happening in institutions that I'm paying for and you're paying for it.
We're spending $116 billion a year in the United States on prisons, jails, parole.
That is an insane number.
And if we're spending that much money, we should sort of know what every one of those dollars is going to.
And we should have watchdogs who will say, hey, guess what?
In Alabama, they're supposed to be paying for a drug treatment program.
Yeah, transparency is always good, especially in something like that.
I mean, to me, the idea of preventing journalists from almost as akin to these ag gag laws that they've slapped in states that have factory farming to prevent people from filming the horrific treatment of some of these animals because it would be bad for business, which is fucking crazy.
Like it should be bad for business, and people shouldn't tolerate it.
They should take their business elsewhere, which is what transparency is all about.
You don't want to buy chickens from a place that brutally beats their chickens or pigs or whatever it is.
And I mean, and a lot of people say, oh, well, you know, it's going to upset, we don't need to upset the public.
Well, what are you doing something for inside a slaughterhouse that would upset the public?
Like, there are ways to, if you want to euthanize an animal or something like that, there are ways to do it where you're not using like a bolt and smashing their skull with it.
Well, the bolt is actually the most humane way because it instantaneously kills them.
The other way is when they hang them by their ankles and slip their neck.
That's a little rougher.
But that's if you want kosher.
There's a lot of weird ways that they kill animals, but it's really the beating and it's the horrific torture that the cruel people that work there sometimes do.
Because there's been some videos that have been released of people like beating animals with crowbars and stuff for no fucking reason.
Just sadistic, sick people that just happen to work in these places and become very accustomed to treating these animals badly, just like security guards become very accustomed to treating prisoners badly.
And just imagine what would happen if Tyson Foods or any of these companies just, the policy was just if the press wants to come in and photograph and the press wants to come in and write about it, they're allowed to come in once a week or whatever and just do whatever they want.
I went sort of on a series of prison visits in Berlin and Norway and a few other places.
And I was there with this sort of elderly woman that was like a deputy commissioner, I think, in North Carolina and the prison system, Virginia, Ginny.
And the first thing they do is they bring you to a concentration camp.
So they bring you to Soxenhausen before they take you to the prisons to see how the prisons are run.
And we're standing there in this concentration camp with the guide, and the woman says, well, this is where they would bring in the people on the trains, and then they would take them out.
And then this is where they would, you know, shave their heads, and then they would strip them down, and they would spray them with fire hoses and water, and then they would put powder, disinfectant powder on them.
They would take away all of their, you know, any kind of distinguishing marks.
They'd put them all in the same outfit.
And they would give them a number instead of their name.
They would be, you know.
And everybody started looking at it like very disturbed.
And Ginny leans over to me and she says, you know, Andrew, we do every one of those things in our prisons today.
And you realize that this dehumanization, this homogenization, this like making everybody look the same is part of just desensitizing us to what we're going to do to those people because they just look like they look like bad people because that's what happens when you shave your head and you're pale and you have the same outfit and you look like a convict.
And because of the tribal nature of ancient human civilization, we have almost like a deep-seated DNA that allows us to other people because those people were coming and they were going to kill your tribal members and steal your resources and do whatever they could to the survivors.
And it was all horrific.
And so we have this thing that we're able to do that allows us to attack or to go after people and just to not think of them as your brothers and sisters and neighbors and fellow human beings sharing this wonderful spinning ball.
No, these are evil people.
These are others.
You kill them.
These are fill-in-the-blank.
These are the Japanese.
These are the Germans.
These are the this.
These are the that.
Whatever it is that we're at war with, those are the people that are not us and we kill them.
And then there's the other side where you go too far the other way and you have these crazy no-cash bail policies where you've got violent offenders in and out of jail constantly.
You've got people that have been arrested 40 times, pushing old people in front of the train in New York City.
You've got people that are just like mentally ill, violent criminals, punching women on the street in Seattle, and they just keep getting out of jail.
But I think to the extent to which we could get everybody, which only is going to happen in little bits and little areas where we can make an impact, but we're trying, to say, well, look, it shouldn't be, you know, it shouldn't be that everybody who says that we shouldn't be running our prison industrial complex the way we are is soft on crime.
It's okay to be tough on crime.
It's okay to recognize that some people need to be separated out from society.
But if it becomes so polarized, then you get that progressive DA who, you know, there are some very smart ones, and then you get some who are just saying, well, you know, we just should abolish prisons and therefore, you know, we don't need any of this.
And that scares everybody and probably doesn't lead to any level because we all want public safety.
Like everybody wants to be serious about public safety.
Well, it's also like, if you're not addressing the root of crime, if you're not addressing the, again, the same neighborhoods where it happens over and over and over, you know, you don't have like this rampant crime that's developing in Beverly Hills, right?
It's all happening in these impoverished, gang-infested neighborhoods.
Like, why has there been no resources put into that?
Imagine the amount of return that you would get.
Like, I always say, if you want to make America great again, here's the best way.
Have less losers.
How do you have less losers?
Give more people an opportunity to succeed.
Well, it's not like we're all at the same starting block.
We all know that.
No one will say that.
No one will say everybody's at the same line and how you get by in this life is depending upon how much work you put in once you're at the line.
Well, that's not true.
So how do we figure out these people that are at the farthest end of the starting line, the most fucked, Put some money into that.
Fix that.
Put some engineering into that.
Put some like some actual thought in trying to devise some sort of a method to increase the odds of having more productive people come out of these places and give them help.
And you would have better neighbors.
You'd have more people that are thriving in whatever business, more people that are artists, more people in the economy.
I mean, if you try to make the, if the, you know, the ultimate adjudicator of everything is whether it is turning a profit, you know, you sort of race to the bottom, right?
Everybody's sort of, nobody really wants to do anything smart.
They just want to do things that enable them to get the most money the quickest.
But ultimately, right now, spending $116 billion a year on our prison system, you know, we've got 5% of the world's population.
Like, if that's not evidence of a broken society, look, not like it's better in some of these other places that don't have a high percentage of people because they just kill them.
Like, there's a lot of places where you do something bad, they just kill you.
And we don't, as you're saying, we don't invest in kids.
We don't, you know, like, how are we, how are we in a situation where we are paying teachers so little money that they have to use their own money to buy books and school supplies?
I mean, you realize why people slap that tinfoil hat on and tighten it down to the chin.
Because like at a certain point in time, like, why wouldn't we put more money into schools?
It seems kind of crazy.
When you've got, like, in California, they've got programs that like spend hundreds of billions of dollars and go nowhere.
Like, where's the railroad?
You spend so much money.
Where's all the tiny houses?
Didn't you guys get hundreds of millions of dollars for tiny?
Where the fuck is the tiny houses?
No tiny houses.
It's like not a one tiny house has been built.
There's a lot of that stuff, the 24 billion to the homeless, the homeless people increase.
Like, imagine if they put 24 billion into The education system.
Guess what?
You would probably ultimately wind up with less homeless.
If you put $24 billion into education and community centers, God, imagine the work that you could do in California with $24 billion just in education.
California would have the greatest education system in the country.
If you just paid teachers an exorbitant amount a month, had an amount a year, had fantastic oversight, these incredibly well-structured education systems, great counseling, social workers that can help work with kids, people that could give them productive ways to expel some of this excess energy that they have, figure out how to focus, figure out what kind of jobs they maybe excel at based on their personality type, educate them towards that.
You could get a lot done.
You could get so much done with $24 billion.
Instead, it just, it just disappears like Kaiser Sosi.
I mean, there's, and I think that when you say it's a conspiracy, I really believe that, you know, conspiracies do not have to include people in dark back rooms, right?
It's very often just everybody's sitting around the table.
Everybody knows what the motivation is.
And they just go, okay, yeah, I'll do the thing.
You do the thing.
There's not, nobody has to be rubbing their hands together and having secret meetings.
But I think there's an insidious element to the fact that people are agreeing that $24 billion should be spent on X, Y, or Z. Nobody really needs to get like a secret memo saying how they're going to steal that money.
Like they just go, oh, okay, in Alabama, what now?
We're allowed to spend $1.3 billion on one prison.
Great.
Okay.
Well, I'm not personally taking the $1.3 billion.
I'm not personally taking the billion-dollar overage myself, but it's going into the system the way that, you know, the first time that the red flag is they start construction before the deal is even signed.
That fucking thing was supposed to take like, I don't know how long it was supposed to take, but it went on long after I moved out and then came back to Boston like 10 years later.
It was still going on.
I'm like, this is crazy.
And by the time it did it, the population in Boston increased, so it didn't even really alleviate traffic.
But there's always going to be stuff like that.
If you have no oversight or if you have people that can figure out a way to inflate this and add on to that and da-da-da-da-da-da.
Well, the press is extremely important, which is why government, this government or prior government, they don't like the press, right?
Nobody likes getting in trouble because the press does when it operates at its best and when you have the people that are able to make a living being journalists and you're not firing everybody who's a good investigative reporter, then that should be, it's one of the reasons why the country was founded in that way, why freedom of the press is so important, is because it's the only disinfectant.
It's the only way.
And it doesn't mean people don't use the press in malevolent ways or people don't bullshit in the press, but people bullshit everything.
Yeah, but like the public kind of has a sense, or at least used to have a sense, and hopefully will again, that when somebody does an investigative story and they are able to produce the facts and figure out who's really responsible for a certain kind of corruption, that it reduces the corruption, just is the case, you know.
And it's like you can't really regulate it, or you can regulate it, but if you regulate it and nobody's paying attention to it, then the press has to identify that people are breaking the rules.
The DOJ right now is supposed to be the monitor of making sure that government institutions and others don't defy the Constitution, right?
So in Alabama, clearly, every time you see one of these events that happens in our film, those are all crimes.
Those are being committed by a state actor, by a prison guard, right?
Those are crimes being committed against our fellow citizens.
The fact that some of these people are incarcerated doesn't mean they're also supposed to be killed or maimed, right?
And so who really monitors that is the U.S. Department of Justice, because at the end of the day, their job is to maintain a constitutional level of care.
And it's not, by the way, that's not that great, right?
It's like you have to make sure that there's no cruel and unusual punishment.
Well, I have to also imagine that there are so many cases.
And if the press was allowed to weekly, if there was weekly access the press had to these correction facilities all over the country, the amount of cases would be fucking extraordinary.
But because they've been allowed to hide, because they've been allowed to do this stuff in complete secrecy with total control over whether or not things get released or don't get released, like it's just it's become just a part of the system.
It's like standard operational procedure.
And it's, I mean, but the cases would go down, right?
Well, I think your film was probably the first time most people ever got a chance to see.
And I would hope that your film and then also this conversation and the other ones that you've been having will move this conversation in a different direction where people start talking about it openly where they're forced to do something.
Because it seems like you have to force them to act.
And they're probably dealing with so many other cases as well.
This is just another burden to them.
And if it's the prisoners, oh, well, that's the least priority situation we have to deal with.
These people are bad people.
They're in jail.
Like those, the radio people that you used, their voices.
Like, it's God.
It's like, shut the fuck up.
Like, you're listening to them.
As a person who's had multiple podcasts with people that were wrongfully convicted, I've done a ton of them with my friend Josh Dubin, who was originally with the Innocence Project, and he's now with the Ike Perlmutter Center for Legal Justice.
Like his passion project is, besides being a successful attorney outside of that, his passion project is finding these very obvious cases of people that were wrongfully convicted that have spent a giant chunk of their life in jail.
And through these podcasts, we've gotten a bunch of these people out, and you've got a chance to have conversations with them.
I've had a few on here, and you have these conversations with these people, and you realize, like, these are brilliant people who lost a giant chunk of their potential to nonsense.
And I think that's, if it's, first of all, I think Josh is really smart, and I know you've done a lot with him, and I think that's so important.
There's, you know, there's always a tendency to sort of think of only wrongful convictions because, you know, everybody can agree that we shouldn't be locked up for something that we didn't do.
But one thing I want to talk, I haven't met Josh, but I want to talk to him.
And one thing I want to talk to him about is the fact that there is like a level of conviction on the part of a lot of prosecutors that they're on the, as you're saying, they're like, they're on that team and therefore they have to subscribe to everybody's guilty.
Everybody should be locked up for as long as possible because there are all these other people, there are defense lawyers and people like that, who are on the other team.
But then you end up with people like Steve Marshall, who, by the way, is running for Senate right now.
And we're pushing to get him to step down from his Senate run because he's sort of been exposed for what he's.
And by the way, he said that he had never been in the film.
He'd never met me.
He just came out with a whole public statement saying I had nothing to do with those people.
I never met them.
I got like 50 pictures in my phone of him walking me around the statehouse in Alabama.
But why is it that in Alabama, for example, there's a guy named Tafaris Johnson who was arrested for a murder a million years ago.
He's been on death row the entire time.
And the evidence against him totally fell apart.
There are a dozen people that gave him an alibi that said we were with him at this club that was across town.
He had nothing to do with this crime.
And yet, and by the way, the DA, who that office is the office that should prosecute that crime, they've asked for a new trial.
They've said that they're not confident that he's guilty.
And yet, the Attorney General's office is continuing to try to execute him.
They're trying to kill him for something which he clearly did not do.
There's another case, a guy named Chris Barber, where there's DNA evidence that showed that somebody else committed the crime, and the DA is trying to execute Christopher Barber.
And so, you know, there's this teaming, you know, where you become part of law enforcement, and then somehow you lose your sense of judgment or nuance or your ability to decide who's guilty and who's not guilty.
Which is very, I mean, it's disturbing that we haven't come up with ways to identify fairness, right?
That fairness should be the method by which you judge how a district attorney performs.
It's like, well, we decided to prosecute a certain number of cases.
Some of those cases weren't worth prosecuting.
Some of those cases were going to turn into wrongful convictions.
We're not just going to prosecute everything, which is why this whole thing about like Brady material, where you're supposed to give the other side anything that comes out in the investigation that might be used to prove their innocence.
You know, if there's something that goes against the criminal case, you have to provide it to the lawyer on the other side.
But regularly, prosecutors just bury this information.
You know, you have some witness that said, I was with that person at the time, and that witness's testimony disappears, or you have something that shows that the gun that they thought was used to commit the crime wasn't the one that was used to commit the crime.
So there's just a that's the thing, the teaming, the decision that you have to be part of one side or another.
You know, I really think that that part of your special where you're sort of like putting me in the position of somebody who's having to make a decision about what team I'm on and where I lose the thread, you know, that's like that's a very significant thing that you did there, you know, because it was like a way of bringing to the average citizen that feeling that they're all having right now.
I mean, I'm always curious about, I'm always asking myself what I should be, you know, what I should be spending my time on.
And I get involved in a film and it kind of grabs you and it could be a hold of you.
I feel like it decides.
I feel like I'm just sort of walking around thinking, maybe I don't need to make another one of these things.
They're very exhausting.
And then something happens or my shrink says to me, Yeah, I know you always say you're not going to make another movie, but I think you're better when you're making a movie.
I think you're better when you're engaged in something like this.
And I'm curious for, you know, you've built this incredible platform and you have access to just a remarkable number of people in the universe.
And what do you feel like your mission is?
What do you feel like is the, you know, when you get to the end of a week and you look back and you think, like, I did what I was, I did what I set out to do this week.
All I ever do is try to talk to people I'm interested in talking to, and that's it.
And I feel like that's what I started with, and that's what I stuck with.
And if I deviate from that path, if I say, oh, I'll get this guy on because he's famous and then I'll get more views, or I'll get her on because she's controversial and I'll get more views.
I don't think like that at all.
I don't allow it into my head.
I get a list of people on my phone that are interested in coming on the show and I spend a couple hours, a few times a week, just going over this list and then I'll go, hmm, that's interesting.
Let me look into this.
And so then I'll do a search on this person and what they're interested in.
And then maybe I'll watch a documentary or I'll get an audio book and I'll start listening to it on the way to work.
And then I'll decide.
And I'll go, yeah, okay, I like this.
This is cool.
I'm into this.
This would be a conversation that I'll be genuinely curious about.
And so that's the only way I do it.
And I've done it that way from the very beginning.
I either talk to my friends or I talk to people who I've seen a documentary that they did or I've read one of their books or I've watched a YouTube video with them in it.
I thought they were fascinating.
And then I reach out to my guy and I say, hey, can't you see if this guy's interested in being on?
And that's the only way I do it.
So I feel like as long as I do that, I will continue to give people this same service.
And this service is, this is an extension of my curiosity, my honest curiosity to the world.
So whoever I'm honestly curious about, sit them down, talk to them, do my best.
That's it.
And if I try to make it anything more than that, if I try to change it or distort it or move it in a general direction or make it have a message or make it make more money or whatever it is, I'll fuck it up.
I also think, you know, I think you talked about that you really like playing pool and that if you weren't doing this, you might just play pool all the time.
I'm fascinated by different people's perspectives, how they view the world, how they got to where they are.
What was their first step?
Like, why did they make these choices?
Like, what is it about the way they think that makes them unique?
And I don't think I'm ever going to lose that.
I think that's a very important part of my understanding of us as a species, us as a civilization.
And I'm very fascinated with the history of the human race and how we got to this point and where we are and how we define what is normal and what is not normal and what our standards are and how they get manipulated.
I don't think I'm ever going to stop being curious about those things.
I may stop doing this publicly.
I will never stop being curious.
I'll never stop watching all these documentaries or reading books.
I don't think I'll ever stop trying to have conversations with people, even if I don't do it publicly.
Because it's, I mean, this is totally accidental.
I don't know if you know the history of this podcast.
It started out with me and my friends just bullshitting in front of a laptop.
And there was no expectations.
It made no money for years.
And then it just kind of grew.
And I never promoted it.
I never went on anywhere and said, please watch my show.
I never took an ad out anywhere.
I just kept doing it.
And it just snowballed to the point where I'm like, all right.
And now I just feel like I have this responsibility.
And I get up and I go, all right, I got to do this thing today.
Let me clear my mind first.
So I go to the gym and I work out and I get in the cold plunge and I get in the sauna and I clear my mind out.
And then I'm like, make sure I'm prepared and just show up at work.
Especially if you're talking to someone that has something really important to say.
I mean, if I'm looking at my phone for a brief second, it's because it's something relevant to what we are talking about.
I want to send it to Jamie so he can pull it up on the screen.
But I think it's one of the great benefits of having these long conversations with people on a podcast is that that's time where you're not staring at a fucking device.
And most people lack that.
So I've gotten this completely unexpected education in life and human beings and how they think and what drives them and just what makes them interesting.
But so it impacts not just my relationship with them, but really my relationship with everybody in my life.
And what's really hard is talking to people that aren't interested in anything and don't engage with all these different things.
And then when you talk to them, it's like they're operating on this frequency that's like time and work and life has sort of ground down all their sensitivity and callused all of their senses to the world, their thoughts of the world, their perspectives of the world.
And they've developed these sort of placeholder opinions for things.
And it's so awkward.
And, you know, and over time, like, you know, Tony Robbins talked about this once, that if you make small changes in your life, like if you're both going in parallel lines, right?
And then you make a small deviation, a few degrees to the right, over time, you'll be way over here where they're kind of on the same path.
And that's what I find in life that's weird.
And then I think about how many people don't have the opportunity to do that because they have a job that's like mundane and it's consuming and they're involved in it all day long.
When they get done, they're exhausted and they never really satisfy their curiosity or encourage and engage with their curiosity.
Foster it, you know?
And it's what, to me, makes people fascinating.
When I talk to someone who's curious about things and it's really like, and it went down all, I was curious, so then I started researching.
And this is what I found out.
Like, that's the kind of person I want to talk to.
Yeah, it's really, I mean, I think it's also, you know, you're probably because it got big without a plan to get big, and because I think you're the essence of it is wanting to express curiosity, wanting to take in information.
How do you deal with the people who say like, oh, you know, you had so-and-so on.
You should have asked them this or you should have done this.
Yeah, and then you realize like, oh, I'm at the will of other people's opinions constantly.
And some of them aren't logical.
And some of them are petty, and some of them are shitty.
They're just shitty people.
They're mean.
Like, why are you being mean for no reason?
Like, you know, why are you being insulting for no reason?
And a lot of it is jealousy.
They're not getting enough attention.
They think you're an idiot.
Why are you getting so much attention?
I'm brilliant.
I should be getting more attention.
There's a lot of that.
There's a lot of ego involved.
But there's a lot of like very should be nice.
Like just people with shitty perspectives.
And you don't want to engage with that.
You don't want that in your head.
Because I think that's contagious.
And that's why people that are constantly surrounded by negative, shitty people, they develop negative, shitty tendencies.
It's just we imitate our atmosphere.
Which is why like this idea of pulling yourself up by your bootstraps is so fucking crazy.
When you're asking some kid whose, you know, dad's been in jail since he was three and lives in a crime-infested neighborhood and has 11 kids living in a one-bedroom apartment.
And you're saying, well, how come you went to jail?
Shut the fuck up, bitch.
You would have went to jail too if you lived there.
You don't know what you're like, what we need to do is figure out why are these kids in this situation?
Why are so many of our citizens, people of our community, stuck in these situations with no attention paid to it whatsoever?
And then you're wondering why so many people commit crimes.
You're wondering why your prisons are so full.
Like that.
When you engage with people that constantly have shitty perspectives and shitty, a little about that, a little when you're young is good.
But once you're, by the time you're like 19, 20, you know what an asshole is.
You know, you don't want assholes in your life.
You're like, avoid at all costs.
And online, if you're engaging with people online, you're getting at least 10% assholes.
I am probably as critical, like logically critical, as anybody's ever going to be about me.
Like, and what I do and the way I do it and like interviews that went well or didn't go well, I examine them.
You know, I think about it.
Like, when they're done, like, that was like, I should have stopped them from talking about that because I should have said, like, wait, that doesn't make sense.
Like, you let people ramble a little bit too much, and then they change subjects, you want to go back to it, and then something else comes up, and you lose, like, ah, I should have really challenged that a little bit more.
Or I should have done this, or I should have done that.
But, you know, you're freeballing.
You don't know what I don't have any like questions I know I'm going to ask.
I just have an understanding of the subject and I let it play out.
And I think that's why it's good.
I just think when you listen to people when I know you grew up in Ba-ba-ba.
Because it's hard for, especially if someone has an agenda.
You know, you could, after a while, you're talking to them.
The tendencies, the way they view the world comes out.
If I really want to know how someone feels about love or life, I want to ask them, you know, how they got to where they are in life, how they became who they are.
Like, give them a chance to brag.
Give them a chance to inflate their accomplishments or give them a chance to pat themselves on the back.
Give them a chance to dismiss other people's accomplishments.
Give them a chance.
You'll find out who people are without even pressing them on certain things.
And they also, like a lot of people, they have an agenda.
They really want to project something to the world.
And then there's people that don't.
Those people are amazing.
There's some people that come in, they're just open books.
They're just like just a mind, a curious person, just a person who followed a path, an artist, a singer, a comedian, a this or that, an athlete, like whatever it is.
That's why I love comedy so much because, you know, just listening, there's a joke in Pumping Mics, this little series that we did with Jeff, you know, Jeff Ross and David Tell.
And I got to watch, you know, six versions of Dave, who's just incredible, telling, they're both great, but Dave telling the same joke like six different times.
Which maybe some of that for some people come with being stoned.
Some people, but I see like the feeling, like in your comedy special, the feeling that it's coming in the moment, even though I know a lot of those things are things that you've been thinking about, talking about and honing over a lot of years.
It's the moment when it feels like it's coming naturally.
That's where like the biggest laughs are.
It's also like where the biggest connection, the biggest human being.
Well, hey, man, thank you for everything you've done.
Thank you for the Jinx, and thank you for the Alabama solution because it's really awesome.
And I really hope that through that film, a lot of people get outraged and the right people.
And enough attention gets put on it where you force people to do something about it.
And I don't think people have any idea how bad these fucking prisons are until they see that.
And I think those contraband phones and what those inmates have done and the inmates themselves, through the way they conduct themselves, and when you could see how intelligent these people are, and that you realize this is not right.
I mean, on the positive side, I would say, just so we don't end on a really negative note, the film has had an impact in Alabama.
It's having an impact in Alabama already.
And there are incredible demonstrations that have been happening.
There's actually, I don't know if you have it, there's a still of this if you want to look at it, but there's hundreds of people showed up on the steps of the Capitol, people really showing up with the intention of showing their loved ones being there and saying, listen, is really happening, and giving the rest of the public permission to understand that this is, you know, 45% of Americans have had an incarcerated relative or been incarcerated.
This is an infection.
This is happening in many, many, many places.
So for us, the film has been unlocking that, giving people a feeling that they're not alone, that they don't have to be ashamed of having somebody.
So, you know, these are people who've seen the film who've decided that they want to express themselves.
And this is happening more and more.
And we just saw there was a bipartisan bill that was just introduced by Senator Larry Stutz, who's a Republican senator, who said he saw the film.
He couldn't unsee it.
And he said, this is not, he wrote an op-ed about it not being an example of Christian values.
And he introduced this bipartisan bill for prison oversight, which is a real bill.
It's not a bullshit bill.
It's a real bill about how you take the investigations because you saw in the film the investigations are run by the same department that commits the crimes.
So I think we're seeing a lot of positive action as a result of the film.
And I think that's what transparency is all about, is if the public can see it, and I appreciate your talking about this and having this be in the public conversation because it's really important.
If people see it, they're not happy about it.
They understand that something more humane needs to be done.