Jimmy Corsetti and Dan Richards challenge mainstream archaeology’s dismissal of ancient megastructures like Baalbek’s 900-ton stones, moved without plausible Roman tech, and Gobekli Tepe’s buried 11,600-year-old pillars tied to climate shifts. They expose politicized science—embargo debates framed as Holocaust denial, COVID-19 fatality rate controversies, and suppressed dissent—while critiquing media bias, from processed food dyes to election coverage. Corsetti’s Rishat Atlantis theory, matching Plato’s descriptions with concentric rings and gold deposits, clashes with academic gradualism, revealing gaps in history and science’s weaponization for ideological control. [Automatically generated summary]
We talked about it before, but I don't want to say it publicly.
The debunking of the debunking by Flint Dibble.
You really nailed him on so many of those things that he was dishonest about.
I wish we knew in real time, but unfortunately, it takes a lot of research to be able to figure out what he was telling the truth about and what he wasn't.
Well, that's a bummer because that's his field of study.
Which is really kind of crazy.
It's a really fascinating thing that seeds do adapt to agriculture.
They adapt to the fact that it's better for the survival of the plant if when you develop agriculture, if they're more robust and they stay on the plant, it's better for the wild if they break off easy and they can scatter better and they can proliferate.
That one it looks like, out of any of them, if there's a possibility that one was domesticated and then went back to the wild and then was domesticated again, it would be rice.
That shows multiple types.
There's different ways the seeds can break off, right?
They can break in different points of the plant or they can just fall straight out.
And rice shows numerous paths there, where wheat only has one genetic pathway to that seed shatter where the seed falls off.
So it gets pretty complicated, but rice does...
Rice does have a lot of genetic possibilities for that.
Now, I'm not a geneticist, so I'm sure that somebody's gonna come and, you know, say this is pseudo crap.
But ultimately, at the end of the day, Flint was treating it as a debate, whereas you and Graham were both trying to sift to the truth.
And that's why he was not gonna give Graham one little corner, one little shred of possibility of being right anywhere, when in reality, it's a lot of, just like everything else in life, it's a lot of gray.
Well, it's also, this whole subject of the past is, it's so obviously confusing.
Because when you look at, I watched your video today, the Baalbek video, just looking at the enormous size of those stones, there's no reasonable explanation how people, like, what is that dated to?
This is where it gets fun is because they credit it to the Romans and the Phoenicians.
However, it goes beyond the sophistication and the capabilities that the Romans were known to have, whether it's the existence of the screwjack for lifting the stones.
But Baalbek, which is located in Lebanon, and I had the great privilege of going there in September of last year, exactly one month before things kicked off in Israel with the whole Hamas thing.
And if I hadn't got there then, I wouldn't have no chance.
Like right now, Israel's bombing Lebanon, and so it's a dangerous place.
But Baalbek, if there was one example, one ancient site on Earth that is evidence of a lost, ancient, advanced civilization—and by advanced, I'm not talking about space lasers here.
I'm talking about more sophisticated than what we were taught in school for the known capabilities.
And Baalbek has the largest stones that were ever quarried in human history, the largest stones that were lifted, stacked, and transported in human history, and the largest stone columns in all of classical history.
And we're talking—so the Trilithon stones.
Three stones, 900 tons apiece, or 800 metric tons.
And they were moved a half a mile from the quarry.
They were lifted and stacked approximately 30 feet off the ground.
And when I say stacked, they were perfectly lined up.
And Jamie, it's in my folder of Baalbek if you want to show some of these.
And they're absolutely massive.
So let me tell you right here, and I, of course, have the gentleman there who I'll tell you about later highlighted just to kind of show you for perspective.
Like, that's someone right there.
It's 5'11".
Those stones that are highlighted in red are the trilithon stones.
But these pictures do not do it justice because it's taken through an ultra-wide camera lens.
From the top to bottom of the red highlighted stones is 14 feet.
And technically 30 feet because there's stones that are actually below the ground there that you can't see because it's submerged under the earth.
So technically it was 30 feet, but 23 feet off the ground today.
And right there, this highlights...
So not only is that 14 feet from top to bottom, which you would never realize when you're looking at this.
And these are confirmed measurements, by the way.
This is right out of encyclopedias.
But notice how they're completely flush, nice and even with each other.
And the...
This exceeds the known capabilities of what the Romans had.
And it's worth mentioning that this site is some 2,400 miles from Rome, the capital.
And if they're going to say that this was created by the Romans, one, people need to understand that the Romans were renowned for documenting everything.
Yet this site is not credited to anybody.
They don't know exactly who did it or when.
But the academics conclude that it had to have been the Romans or the Phoenicians because, of course, there was no one before them.
And with this photo right here, let me say something else.
There is evidence of at least two but arguably three different architectures that were done at this site.
And I would conclude that this is evidence that this site existed in prehistoric times.
There's also – I could show you encyclopedias that talk about Baalbek being prehistoric in nature dating back 11,000 years of human history.
It was found by the Romans and the Phoenicians and built upon later.
And right here is evidence for all that have eyes to see.
Look how they obviously use broken stones and constructed on top of it.
Why would you go from making the most advanced stones in history that far exceed anything you see in Rome?
For example, if you were to go to the Colosseum, as magnificent as that is, it is architecture of mathematics and just brilliance.
But this right here, why would they use the—for all the feats of Roman history, why would they have the most impressive feats over 2,000 miles away from the capital?
In fact, let me just say this.
When I'm talking about 900-ton stones, the largest stone in all of Rome is 53 tons.
It's the Trasians' capital block that make up the Trasians' column.
It's an awesome way to improve your whole body health and just feel better in general.
But today I have a new special offer for you.
If you try AG1, you also get a free month's supply of AG's Omega-3 supplement.
These once-a-day capsules have high-quality Omega-3 fatty acids to take with your AG1.
Just that easy.
Over 80% of people are not consuming the right amount of Omega-3s in their diet.
And AG's capsules ensure that you'll get the essential fatty acids you need.
These nutrients provide additional support for brain and cardiovascular health when taken together with AG1.
And if you've ever taken fish oil before, you know that taste.
AG's encapsulated fish oil actually has a nice lemon taste.
Not bad at all.
If you're looking for a simple and effective investment in your health, try AG1. And if you've been thinking about it, try it now.
This November, you'll receive a one-month supply of AG Omega-3 when you first subscribe, in addition to the Welcome Kit with five AG1 travel packs and a bottle of vitamin D3 plus K2. So make sure you check out drinkag1.com slash Joe Rogan to claim this special offer.
So that right off the bat shows to me that the ones that were installed were not built by the Romans, but the ones that were quarried were made by the Romans.
They were trying to quarry out stones to match it.
Another thing is Roman architecture always uses the most impressive things right in the front.
You walk in the front of the thing, and that's where you're going to see the biggest stones, the most impressive, for obvious reasons.
These are in the back, completely on the opposite end of the entrance.
You have to, like, from what you told me, you kind of have to look for them if you don't know where they're at, right?
Like, you can't just show up on the site and they say, here's the Trilathon.
A lot of people hear these numbers and they don't wrap their head around exactly how important this is, which is that go to the article involving the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.
It's in the same folder of Baalbek.
And the largest stone moved in modern times is 340 tons.
And we're going to come back to all these photos, too, because it's extremely important.
And so this is where things get really fun is that they say, the academics, they say that the stones would have been moved on tree logs because that's their best guess.
And it's not an unreasonable guess.
But when you look into the nuance details, so I really nerded out hard on this.
So it's the measurement of stone and it's often used by alternative ancient history buffs to say that, hey, copper-based tooling could not have been utilized to cut granite stone like that's been claimed.
And there's no evidence that the Egyptians – the Egyptians never told us they used bronze tooling to cut the stones and make up the granite stones within the pyramid.
And so I started asking them, like, wait a second.
If they're going to say that they moved a 2.2 million pound stone on tree logs, well, they say that it was the cedar, the Lebanon cedar trees.
Well, I nerded out on this and there's something called the Jenka scale of hardness, which measures the hardness of wood.
And it's often used for if you're going to pick wood flooring in your house.
It's one of the softest on earth, not the softest, but it's so soft that it would never even be considered for flooring in your house because your furniture and your heels would dent it immediately.
And if you were to put significant weight on it, whatever that weight is, it would either crush it, crumble it, or at least dent it out of a circle or being a circular nature to roll on.
And so when you look into the nuanced details involving the mysterious accomplishments of the ancients, it becomes abundantly clear.
clear, like if I had one thesis, is that the true history of mankind was more advanced than what we were taught in school.
Now, how advanced?
That's the fun topic.
We'll dive into that here in the next couple hours.
But the reality is that there's evidence for all who have eyes to see that there are, I mean, again, brother, a thousand metric ton statue.
- And it took nine months. - And when they were pulling this thing on the ground, they had to consistently try metallurgy, different types of ball bearings for it to roll on because the ones they were moving would keep being crushed.
And then they had to use screw jacks that are just like you jack up a house floor with, like a sub floor.
They would use these screw jacks to lift the statue back up and put it on bearings.
Well, the Romans didn't have a screw jack.
The DG, we had metallurgy, we were trying different kinds of ball bearings and shit.
That's something way outside.
I mean, the 1700s, we're talking right at the cusp of them actually making structural steel.
You know, this is the beginning of iron bridges and shit.
They were actually making good metallurgy then, and it still took trial and error to move this stone.
And it's – that stone is basically the same size as the ones at Baalbek, a tiny bit bigger.
But the same kind of issues where they would have had to have jacked that thing up, they would have had to – which would have took steel or hard, hard metal.
Basically they had to have some highly advanced metal ergy for the time.
Not as good as we have now but 1700s level of metal ergy.
So there's something that you informed me of, Dan.
And let me just give you a shout out.
Hey, everybody, go subscribe to Dedunking on YouTube.
Your channel is a goldmine that is bringing – you are bridging together the facts that the alternative theorists are presenting as well as the academics.
And you're differentiating the truth.
And your channel is so valuable.
And what you taught me is that the invention of the screw jack was utilized in order to lift that thunderstone, the bronze horseman, on top of that – those metal rails.
So with the Egyptian – or excuse me, the Romans didn't have that.
That wasn't invented until thousands of years later.
So without that screw jack, they would have never been able to lift it in the first place.
I'm not opposed to the idea, but we need to get there first.
Like if we're going – like we're talking about the Thunder Stone or the Baalbek Stones.
Going from – like I feel like we need to exhaust every other possibility before we can start hanging our hat on something – Okay, what other possibilities could you even conceive of?
I think when most people think high technology, like you say, space lasers and stuff, powered things, like something where they were no longer using human power or water power, something they were harnessing energy or doing sophisticated chemistry, things like that's where I start to be like, well, I need more evidence to go that far with it.
However, the moving of the big rocks is something that I'm quick to say, but in order to do it, we would need If we were to do it, we would need technology well outside of what they had available to them at the time.
And in my opinion, if you look at those, like at Baalbek, to go back to that, you've got the three big stones that were put in a wall that don't have the Roman unit of measurement used.
And we've got three big rocks in the ground that do have the Roman unit of measurement.
I think that they gave up.
They realized they weren't able to do it.
They had one group carving them, and the guys tasked to move them, looked at them, what the fuck are you guys on?
So, Jamie, if you go to the Baalbek folder, you'll find an encyclopedia article that describes the evidence of human habitation at Baalbek dating back 9000 BC, which is 11,000 years ago.
And I'm not suggesting these stones were created back then.
And there's another – History that dates back at least 11,000 years, encompassing significant periods such as prehistoric, Canaanite, Hellenistic, and Roman eras after Alexander the Great conquered the city in 334 BCE. He renamed it Helopolis?
So just scroll through all these photos of the mountains because here's something that people need to understand that is unbelievably significant, which is that at Baalbek...
There are approximately 200 rose granite columns that were transported from the Aswan quarry in Egypt, which is 700 miles as the bird flies.
And what's wild is that the only way to get them to Balbek, because the Balbek is located in the middle of the Lebanon mountains, and it has an...
Average elevation of 8,000 feet with peaks reaching over 10,000 feet.
As you can see, there's a freaking ski resort there, which I couldn't believe when I was driving there.
There was literally the ski lifts.
I went there in September.
So they had to bring all of those multi-ton stone columns from Egypt, and the only way to get there was over these mountains, which is mind-blowing.
When you look at Baalbek, there's a lot of interesting things about it.
Like it has the largest temple of Jupiter out of anywhere on the Roman Empire.
Generally speaking, it's got some of the biggest temples in the Roman Empire period, but it's a far-flung corner of their empire, and it's not an important city really.
I mean, it's semi-important in the region, but it's certainly no Right.
But it has all these huge temples.
My opinion is, my thinking is that they showed up and there was this massive stonework there.
And these are the Romans.
They can't have the locals thinking their ancestors were better than the Romans.
So they fucking hijack it.
We just build big shit on top of it.
This is now ours.
We plant our stamp on it.
This is a Roman building.
This is all Roman now.
This was never your ancestors.
This was always ours.
And then the locals can't look to their forefathers or whatever legends they had in a couple generations.
So what you're looking at here is the Romans' most sophisticated crane in their history.
It had a max lifting capacity of 6.6 tons.
In other words, to lift just one of those trilithon stones, you would need 133 of these, which is obviously completely not feasible whatsoever.
You wouldn't have the space to do it, and it's just ridiculous to suggest you would coordinate 133 cranes around it.
So this is what I'm trying to say is that it's further suggestive evidence that the Romans didn't build it because they didn't have the capability to lift stones of that mass.
So the largest stones inside the King's Chamber of the Great Pyramid are approximately 80 tons imperial.
So actually 78 tons imperial or 70 tons metric.
Removed some 500 miles from the Aswan quarry and lifted and stacked hundreds of feet above the ground.
But here's what's wild is that those stones, the largest stones in the Great Pyramid, compared to the trilithon stones, the trilithon stones are 15 times heavier.
So it's like, you know, with these details, like, there's a reason why there is a growing interest in In the mysteries of lost ancient civilizations because smart people of all kinds of walks of life are looking into the nuanced details and realizing like, oh, wait a second.
Like when Graham Hancock says that there's a missing chapter of human history, like this is reality.
We don't know how they built the Great Pyramid.
It is a fact that the Egyptians left us with no explanation of any kind.
Out of the tens of thousands of hieroglyphs all over Egypt, not a single one of them describes how they constructed the pyramid or how they cut granite stones.
Big gaps in the knowledge is where we end up having these kinds of discussions.
And I think to go back to where we first started, we mentioned Flint at the beginning.
We have a problem, in my opinion, that most people that see things kind of like I do as opposed to like Jimmy or yourself does where I kind of need to take my steps to get to that ancient high technology, they end up going that just straight debunker route.
And then they get skeptical.
That's skeptical.
They get cynical.
They turn into assholes.
They turn into – they're looking for ways to – Appeal to authority.
Shoot this down.
I just – fuck your idea, right?
Your idea is wrong.
So I know what the implications are.
Instead of saying, well, maybe there's other implications.
That guy, Wikipedia, we can talk about that for a quick second.
John Hoops is a professor for Kansas University and he has been one of the earliest editors of Wikipedia consistently.
Graham Hancock's page, Younger Dryas' Impact Hypothesis page, All kinds of pseudo-archaeology and pyramids and Atlantis, all that shit.
He's got locked.
It's not just that he edits it.
Him and his buddies edit it, and you can't go in and edit it.
There's a scientist from the Comet Research Group that tried to edit the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis page and was told he can't because it's a conflict of interest.
A fucking scientist that works on this shit's a conflict of interest, but a scientist from outside the field isn't.
I watched him tell Forbes, hey, you guys need to cite Wikipedia instead of just, because they said the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis, and they just made a real quick article about it with no skepticism.
He says, you need to cite Wikipedia as well.
He edits the Wikipedia page and doesn't mention that he edits it when he tells people to go look at the fucking thing.
Let's forget about Atlantis for a minute, but I definitely want to talk about it.
But what you're seeing is impossible.
It's essentially impossible with today's technology.
When you're talking about those stones that were moved 700 miles through the mountains, If you tried to bring some engineers together in the United States in 2024, the best and the brightest, and said, here's your project, they would say, fuck you!
So, it just, it throws this, these facts, the physical facts about the size and the location they were brought from, that fly in the face of logic and credibility and our understanding of what's possible, not just then, but today.
So, for anybody to say, oh, we've figured this out, hey man, fuck You definitely haven't, and the problem is that you have these fucking names attached to you.
Harvard and Yale.
And you've decided, because there's a group of people that have been studying this stuff, and they fucking wrote some shit down, and you studied what they wrote down, and you did your own studying, you got a degree, you're the guy.
You're the only one.
And it's these same fucking weirdo weasels that put their pronouns in their Twitter bio.
And they're just crackpots.
They're crackpots masquerading as intellectuals.
Because the things that they're saying are completely bizarre.
They're all, 100% of them are captured by this woke ideology.
100% of them.
They're weird people, man, because they exist in this structure that's been completely compromised.
And that's our education.
Our higher education systems have been completely compromised.
And this is not to say that they don't teach you amazing stuff about medicine and science.
So with the biggest critics and the naysayers of alternative theories...
There's a common denominator.
Like when you mentioned the pronouns in their profile, almost all of them have it and they're not trans.
And if you look at their political ideologies, it is extremely left.
And these people are visceral.
They're toxic.
And let me just make a side point that I almost forgot is when we're talking about Wikipedia, a lot of people say, well, that's why you don't look at Wikipedia.
You don't trust it.
Who cares about Wikipedia?
I'm like, excuse me.
It shows up at the top of Google on anything that you search.
So it cannot be ignored.
Right.
And when you were talking a moment ago about the impossibility of the movement of these stones, I want to just emphasize this point one more time, which is that movement of that 340-ton stone at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art is one-third the weight of the largest stones in ancient history.
And when you look at what it took to do it, so it's like when people, you know, when you're using the word impossible, it's like, listen, what it took for us to do that, and it was a third of the weight, and he had to custom build this 260-foot-long truck with 196 wheels.
So we know that people lie and we know that people love to be in a position of authority to be the only people that are allowed to distribute the truth.
So nowadays there's a lot of conjecture about the historical accuracy of different things involving World War II. And Jamie, if you were to go to the Baalbek folder, or in fact, go to the folder called swastika.
So this is something that I got tremendous heat for.
Whereas that when I went to Baalbek, I noticed that there were swastikas all over the place.
All right, so real quick, while Jamie's on this slide, this is from the Hopewell Mound people, which is in modern-day Ohio, and that dates back 2,200 years ago.
2,200 years ago, and so here's the point that I'm making about the swastika, is that Look, people debate on whether it was the Milky Way galaxy, the Big Dipper, whatever you want to say its origins were.
I do not think that it's a coincidence that a symbol, as so specific as it is, is found on five continents around the world before transoceanic sea travel was said to be possible.
Right.
It wasn't until 1492 when Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue.
End of.
And it's like, no.
I believe this is strong, suggestive evidence that humans were traversing the continents and the oceans thousands of years before we were taught in school, which is evidence of being more advanced than we were taught in school.
I mean, it's not, you know, it's just Dan's idea, but the four directions, the cross that's the root of the swastika, that's pretty commonly used, even in Native American culture, as like, you know, cardinal points, right?
The thing is, though, it's like I have not found an answer on why he was looking for the Ark of the Covenant.
He was looking for Thor's hammer and the Holy Grail.
And the thing is to me, I'm like, I don't – what did – I feel like there's something that they knew about ancient history that we don't.
I don't know if this is true or not, but I want – I feel like I can't find a straight answer.
And let me tell you this.
If you go Googling for answers on Hitler's interest in archaeology – What are you up to, Jimmy?
You're going to find the same article.
So this is actually kind of explosive.
About two years ago, I made a video about Google sabotaging their search results.
Because remember how I'll show you if you Google some topic, it'll say there's like a billion results.
So I made a video on this.
And they would max out at – it didn't used to be this way because I remember watching a video years ago of people going thousands of pages to find some blog spot on some topic.
It then became limited.
I did an experiment myself many times on benign topics such as pancakes was one of them.
I typed in pancakes.
It had like a billion – like 700 million results.
And then it would only go back to page 41. And then it would recycle – All those pages before it, the dozens of pages, would recycle some of the same exact mainstream articles.
And so I did this on all kinds of topics.
And now Google has since removed the page numbers.
And so you can only just go see more, see more, see more.
And if you're looking for answers on this, they're going to keep sending you the same regurgitated mainstream articles.
So I can't find a reliable answer on why Hitler was so invested in ancient history.
And again, I don't give a shit about his Aryan stuff.
I forget what the numbers are, but they're really nutty.
But the point is, there's something particularly disgusting to us about that one genocide.
And it's really interesting.
And, you know, you wonder, like, how long it's going to take.
I mean, Dan Carlin has talked about this in depth, because...
He talks about the Mongols and that it's so far in the past, you know, we're talking about like 1200 AD. It's so far in the past that we look at it with almost like an objective perspective instead of a moral perspective.
So we say, you know, One thing that Genghis Khan did that was great, he opened up trade to the East, and he was a believer of all religions.
He could practice anything.
He didn't impose anything on people.
But he fucking killed everybody.
Like, if you were alive back then, he's way worse than Hitler.
He killed 10% of the population of Earth.
But the Nazis were so recent.
You know, we have grandfathers that are alive today that fought in World War II, and they can tell you, you know, like, hey man, I fucking remember this shit.
And then we have Jews like Ari Shafir's dad, who was in the concentration camps.
The Nazi thing, the fact that it's so horrific, it just like puts anyone who has anything to say that's coloring outside the lines, you get labeled the Holocaust denier and anti-Semite, you know, the worst labels that they can put on you.
And a good example of that is that podcast, oh God, I forget his name.
But it was the Tucker Carlson controversy where he had this guy on his podcast and he was talking about what William Churchill's role in the Holocaust was because they had put these embargoes on Germany and basically starving everybody to death.
And they just started calling him a Holocaust denier.
And that's like not what he was talking about at all.
That's not what he was saying at all.
He was just saying, no, there's a multifaceted explanation for why they decided to exterminate all these Jews.
And part of it was because of an embargo where they were starving people out.
What is his...
Daryl Cooper.
And what is this podcast called?
It's excellent.
I listen to it all the time, but my brain is not working right now.
The good news is that people are waking up to this.
A lot of people think just like us where they're objective enough to understand that like, well, that's silly.
And so they're putting themselves in a corner in this echo chamber where people just aren't listening to them anymore.
Like when it comes to like mainstream archaeology, we call it big archaeology, establishment archaeology.
They're putting themselves into a corner where people like if you're going to if I'm going to ask questions about the swastika and you're going to say I'm spreading dangerous Nazism.
Some people buy into it, but I've noticed that most people are like, no, he's asking a question.
We have shows like yours and yours and mine where you can have conversations about things and people get to see, oh, these people that are in control, they're all loons and they're all telling us that you have to think this one way or you're the worst person on earth.
So me watching him do that was like, yes, why aren't more people doing this?
Like, you guys should have been doing this from the beginning.
It's the most powerful kick in the sport.
But you were in trouble if you trained in other disciplines.
Like, Bruce Lee was a heretic.
And he's probably one of the most important figures in martial arts, not just because he introduced people to it, like myself, who became martial artists because I was a Bruce Lee fan.
He also combined all kinds of different martial arts, and that was Jeet Kune Do.
He developed a style that was essentially, he took Western boxing, he took some Judo that he learned, and karate, and all these different techniques, and just tried to find what is the absolute best thing for just fighting.
And that was, he was a heretic.
Like, his life was threatened for that.
And it's because the educators want to be the only people that can distribute information, and they don't want to be challenged.
When I was in high school, I had a teacher.
His name was Mr. Holman.
He was a very nice guy, but he was a smart guy that wanted to be the only smart guy.
And he was great talking to me because I was a stupid kid.
But unfortunately, one day I had watched a documentary.
And I've always had a very good ability to recall things.
And we were in class and he was talking about the pollution in Lake Erie.
And I had just watched a documentary about the extensive work that they had done to clean up Lake Erie and that they'd made these huge strides in removing pollution and crap and all these different things from Lake Erie.
And he was talking about stuff that he had learned in school 20 years prior.
And so when I was, I said, well, you know, there's a PBS documentary, and I brought this up in class, where there's been this extensive work, and they talked about the amazing accomplishments of cleaning up Lake Erie, and he got so mad at me.
I'm like, you're not mad at me, man.
You're mad at PBS. Like, I don't fucking do any research.
I watched a documentary.
But back then, you could say, you don't know what you're talking about, and I couldn't pull my phone out and go, oh, but what?
Look at that.
You can watch it, dude.
These people have done amazing work cleaning up Lake Erie.
But he didn't want anyone else to have any information.
What he should have said is, that's fascinating.
I haven't seen that documentary.
Can you recall the name of it?
Let's see if we can get it, maybe show it to the class.
I'm going to try to do that, because that's great.
That's a good sign.
What I'm talking about is what Lake Erie had become because of industrial engineering, And because of pollution and waste that was coming from all these plants.
So he was correct.
But time had changed and he did not like that I knew that and he didn't know that.
And I remember being in that class going, this is so crazy.
So I was in the military years ago, and it wasn't long after I got home from Iraq, and I was going to warrior leadership course, which is to become an E5, a sergeant.
And back then, they were teaching ABC, which is airway, bleeding, what was the other one?
circulation, whatever, and for emergency medical response if someone's dying.
And they had since updated where bleeding is the most important thing to focus on because soldiers were bleeding out.
And during this warrior leadership course, they're teaching the class.
30 people, wrong information, the sense outdated.
I try to interject to say, oh, this is what they're teaching now.
It was the same exact thing that happened.
Stop!
This is what's written down right here.
I'm like, no, but that's not even what they're teaching in theater right now.
This is medical emergency stuff that could save someone's life.
These three factors are the same, but now we know.
Thank you, Jimmy.
Now we know that bleeding is more primary.
That's the response of a real leader.
And a real leader, you're always going to have blowhards in your class that are going to want to hear their own voice.
They want to talk about stuff and chime in and correct people.
But you've got to let a certain amount of that.
And that's the Internet.
And people don't like that.
And that's why they wanted to ban people from Twitter.
They don't like these people coming along that have ideas, like the Great Barrington Declaration, where the government actually conspired to get these people removed from Twitter.
And we know that because Elon, thank God, bought Twitter and changed discourse.
But this was a concerted effort to take these people who were brilliant people, who had degrees, were experts in this field that they were discussing, and they decided they were going to remove them because they didn't go along with the narrative and they were confusing people in a time Where they were trying to force vaccinations on everyone.
The emotion side of it from the individual levels, like what you guys described, you have a teacher, the emotional reaction.
That's a huge part of it, but when the...
That's a huge part of it, especially with archaeology, because a lot of it's not really hard science.
A lot of it's like, I've got this arrowhead here, and I've conjured up this story, and so now it's my story, and you're not attacking the science, you're attacking me.
But it gets even worse when you look at it, what they get like this hate for Graham Hancock, in particular Graham Hancock.
That makes it where it's like you can't trust a damn word that comes out of their mouth when they're discussing.
Like if we were talking back to the martial arts, you know, one of the things that came out was Aikido was just ass.
It's no good at all for like man-to-man combat.
Was it for like samurais that have been knocked off a horse or some shit?
Well, it was designed to redistribute the energy of your attacker.
So if someone's coming at you with a sword, if you don't have a sword and a guy swings a sword and you're fast enough to get away from the path of the sword and grab the guy's arm or body and manipulate him to the ground to remove his sword, It's essentially a disarming strategy.
But if you hated Steven Seagal, if you were one of his many haters, you could just attack Akito without ever saying his name and just be digging him a ditch, right?
You could just be burying him without ever mentioning Steven Seagal's name.
You could just attack Akito.
Akito is a shit martial art.
It's not effective.
It's not very good.
And then by extension, you're making Steven Seagal look bad.
Those are their favorite tactics to do to Hancock.
Yeah, that is Northern Africa, and it's the most sophisticated construction we have ever witnessed on the face of the earth.
Anybody that disagrees, you need to really study what they accomplished just in the Great Pyramid.
It's mind-boggling precision.
It's not just the incredible feat of moving massive stones hundreds of miles through the mountains.
It's the mind-boggling precision of the construction of these buildings that It's so crazy.
It's almost like they made it so nutty that even if everything dissolved and expired, it would give us at least some clue that maybe something happened.
Maybe people had achieved a level of sophistication.
And my thought is, and this is just a guess, is that as we move towards metal and we move towards...
Using different kinds of combustion engines and electronics.
We moved in a very specific area of technology.
And we were allowed to do this because things have been relatively peaceful for a couple hundred years.
Okay?
Relatively peaceful.
And also, there's war in other places, so it allowed us to spend our time here devising ways to fuck up people over there.
That's the Manhattan Project, right?
I think that's the avenue that thinking goes in and innovation goes in.
And instead of combustion engines and electronics, you have something that we haven't even considered.
And that to me seems like what Egypt is.
It seems to me that they have this incredibly fertile area.
So if people look at Egypt now, you're looking at all the sand and all the shit.
That is not what it looked like.
In the thousands of years before the construction of the pyramid, it was a rainforest, and it was fertile.
And so my thought is these people probably had plenty of food, and so they didn't have to go anywhere.
And so they weren't attacked that often.
The Nubians conquered them, and that's when the statues started changing, looking more Southern African.
But you have these people that live in this incredibly resource-rich place, and they were able to spend thousands of years there.
And I think in those thousands of years, they devised methods that we still haven't even considered, because we went in a different path.
And we can't consider any other paths.
We consider our path, and we say, well, we're the furthest.
We live today.
Okay, so those fuckers in the past, they're basically cave people.
So you have to shut the fuck up because you were wrong.
So in the 1990s, a sheep herder finds this stone.
He starts kicking it and moving it around and he realizes, wow, this is a big-ass stone.
I probably bring in some smart dudes to figure this out and they start digging and they go, oh Jesus, this is these huge circles of giant stone columns with 3D carved animals on them at a time that we thought people were living in teepees.
There's no way when you're just struggling to find food, okay?
And if you've ever gone on a fishing trip or a hunting trip, it's fucking hard to get food.
When we have modern stuff, it's hard to get food with a rifle, right?
So these people were getting food and They somehow or another in between them while like running around trying to shoot rabbits with a bow and arrow They figured out how to make these massive stone columns and put them in position and and move them in circles and hundreds of them pretty great artists doing some relief carvings I mean, that's some that's not the same as just animals that were local to the area Just like what how do you even fucking know this is a thing?
So Gobekli Tepe, brother, if there is such a thing as an ancient conspiracy theory, it's this.
So I remember hearing Graham Hancock come on your show back in like 2015 or 2017, and he was talking about Gobekli Tepe.
And at that time, he had shared that the site was only approximately 5% excavated.
It's the first video on my channel.
It's like August 2017. And I share the details of it.
These pillars dates back 11,600 years.
It appears to be purposely buried at the same time of the Younger Dryas climate catastrophe.
This is fascinating.
And excavations were continuing.
So I'm like, okay, I'm going to backburn this topic of Gobekli Tepe for a little while, let them further their excavations, and I'll revisit this later when there's something new to share.
So earlier this summer, I'm like, all right, let me revisit Gobekli Tepe and see what's new there.
And I was astonished to learn that that 5% figure was still the same.
I had partnered – one, there's a lady who does tours there and corroborated the 5% figure.
And then there's a gentleman named Hugh Newman who's an author and also leads tours.
And he communicated with me that what they were going to do – and I couldn't believe this.
They're going to defer a full-scale excavation for, quote, future generations with a 150-year estimated timeframe for a full excavation of Gobekli Tepe.
And I'm like, wait a second.
Are you serious?
Like, this makes no sense.
We're talking about Arguably, not just the world's oldest ancient site, but arguably the most mysterious because it's, like you were saying, it's not supposed to exist.
Based on everything we were taught in school, it's supposed to be the Sumerians.
And then you have the site of Gobekli Tepe, made up of sophisticated pillars and concentric circles.
How could they defer excavations for future generations when this may be the most important ancient site on Earth involving our mysterious lost ancient past?
And so I started digging into this, and I couldn't believe what I found.
So they were doing large-scale excavations, but that has since ceased.
Just to clarify, they are still excavating Gobekli Tepe, but they have rolled and dialed back the large-scale excavations of the years prior, and they're focusing on conservation and tourism management of the site.
And like I said, with a 150-year timeframe, and I'm like, wait a second.
So not only have they never claimed that it's related to funding, but this is where things get bizarre, is that there's a Turkish conglomerate called the Dogez Group, which consists of 250 companies within Turkey.
It's a billion dollar industry.
And they're the ones that took over management and funding of the site back in 2017. And they announced this at all places, the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos in 2016 is when they announced this partnership, initial funding of $15 million.
At that time, they set up the infrastructure for tourism, roads, sidewalks, walkways, roofing platforms.
And since then is when they dialed back the excavations.
And I'm like, this makes absolutely no sense.
So it has – let me just be crystal clear here.
It has nothing to do with funding and they've never claimed it has anything to do with funding.
But their excuses, they have said, one of which is that, well, we want to wait for future technologies to develop so we can more safely excavate the site.
And I'm like, wait a second.
Hold on a second.
We're talking about pillars buried in dirt.
It's 2024. Do not tell me that we do not have the technological capability to dig rocks up.
One of which is that them saying that they're waiting for a future technology to develop to safely excavate the site, I'm like, what type of magical shovel or pressure, water hose are we talking about here?
That site is probably the second most popular place on the planet with people like ourselves.
And the more mystery is there, the more money...
We deal in mystery.
So if they excavate everything and we know everything there is about that site and it's all super mundane and there's nothing cool about it anymore, that tit dries up and there's no milk coming out.
He's of the same opinion where I think a lot of the same things, excuse me, happen in Egypt for the same reasons.
Zahi Hawass is quoted with saying that those New Age people, it doesn't matter what happens in Egypt, the New Age people, they come.
It's about tourism.
You know, ever since the Arab Spring, tourism in Egypt's been lower.
So I think a lot of the same, like we're going to talk in a minute about the hidden chamber in the pyramid that they've located and still haven't excavated for whatever fucking reason.
I think that might be part of it.
If you want to get super mundane and not conspiratorial, it's just a simple, The tourists keep coming while there's a mystery there.
As soon as we open that up, it's just an empty chamber.
None of which date back anywhere near remotely as old as Gobekli Tepe.
And so just to put this into perspective, Gobekli Tepe, according to ground penetrating radar, consists of approximately 200 T-shaped pillars.
Only 72 of them have been unearthed.
And as of just a few years ago, they're dialing that back to fully excavate them, which again, the 150-year time frame.
And I'm like, this is entirely unacceptable.
There could be hidden answers about our lost ancient past waiting to be discovered on these pillars because all the pillars are trying to tell us some sort of story.
They all have depictions, animals, all kinds of things on there.
He was on Ancient Apocalypse Season 1 for a minute.
He's the guy who made basically a star map of that pillar 43. And in his opinion, those three handbags at the top were three sunrises.
And if that's the case that would almost make sense because then they're like a picture of an Assyrian holding that would be like a holding of astronomical knowledge like this this symbol could have been a symbol of knowledge of astronomy.
Dr. Martin Swetman, his first paper on Gobekli Tepe's Pillar 43, he's got Scorpio on the bottom.
He believes that's Sagittarius, that that's the Sun.
Basically, it's a star map denoting the time that the comets smack the Earth, is what he believes.
Each one of those Vs, his latest paper on it, each one of those V symbols is a day.
Each one, in his opinion, each one of those boxes is a month.
And there is basically a full year denoting the whole thing, the way he's broken.
That's very interesting stuff.
And one of the things that's wild to me, when we talk about the lack of further excavations, is almost every pillar we bring up has new symbols, new iconography.
If we're trying to find some sort of ancient proto-language or something, we need more symbols.
We need more things on Earth.
And that's completely opposed by the mainstream archaeology.
The idea that these guys had any sort of written language is fucking ridiculous.
If you look at pictures of the excavation, it looks like it was all piled in with stones and dirt because if it was some sort of natural event, it would have destroyed the pillars.
The pillars are preserved.
So it wasn't just blown in with dust.
If you look at its gravel and like as Graham Hancock has explained that Klaus Schmidt, the original excavator of the site before his untimely passing in 2014, the people that have worked the site believe it was intentionally buried.
But isn't there also a carbon isotope dating of the ground soil that shows it's the same age throughout the entire – whatever feet it is of the dirt that's covering it?
So let me tell you a few different things about Gobekli Tepe.
When you bring up pictures of the pillars, notice how they all annotate animals on them.
Now, this is a fun topic, and I have a few other things to share, one of which is that if you want to talk about reasons not to excavate it, I'll give you two possibilities.
And this is just conjecture.
I don't know what the answer is.
Let me say this up front.
But part of it could have a religious implication as well as a climate change implication.
Let me start with that.
So we know it is an established fact that the Younger Dryas climate catastrophe happened between 12,800 and 11,600 years ago.
We know that there was vast changes in weather patterns throughout the Northern Hemisphere.
The only part of it that's debated and as well as near extinction events or extinction events of many different mammals in North America.
But What we know is that something happened, whatever it is, is what's debated, whether it's a cosmic impact, whether it's a pole shift, whether it's sun cycles, all kinds of conjecture all the way around.
But when I mentioned the WEF, they are the biggest proponents of the man-made climate change narrative.
They're the ones that want to get rid of gas-powered stoves.
They want us to get rid of vehicles.
They are pushing their initiatives around the world, and they believe that we're destroying the planet.
I'm not saying they're entirely wrong, but I don't agree with their ways of going about it, but that's a side point.
But here's the thing.
When you look at the legend of Noah's flood and Noah's ark and the flood, so I'm not suggesting that there was a flood that covered every mountain on earth and nor am I suggesting that there was a boat that housed every species of animal on earth.
However, if Noah's ark existed, many believe that it was crashed onto Mount Eret, which is also in Turkey.
And something fascinating is that in the Bible, in Genesis 820, some of the first verses after Noah emerged from the flood is that he was said to have constructed an altar to the Lord where he sacrificed some of every clean animal and some of every clean bird.
Gobekli Tepe is in Turkey, and every single one of those pillars annotates animals.
And some have suggested that it could be Noah's altar.
Now, that could be one reason why they wouldn't want to excavate it, is because Turkey is an Islamic country, and if there were some...
Christian religious belief that was corroborated, they might not want that to happen.
Another possibility is that the site itself might corroborate the Younger Dryas climate catastrophe.
And when we're in a timeframe where they don't like talking academics, they don't like talking about cataclysms, they want to pretend they didn't happen, they want everything to be manmade climate change.
They don't ever talk about the Sahara being green 5,000 years ago, like when you're talking about Egypt being a rainforest.
And so as far as the climate change narrative, there could be a possibility that they don't want the evidence of a prehistoric civilization that was more advanced than what we ever thought to believe that might corroborate some Christian narratives.
And if nothing else, they don't want it to be brought into the discussion of modern day climate change because notice on the topic of climate change, they never mentioned natural stuff.
They don't discuss the Milankovitch cycles, which consists of three variables, one of which is the Earth's precession.
The other is the Earth's tilt.
And the other is the distance from the Earth from the sun.
All three of those variables are constantly changing every single day, although immeasurable day by day.
They happen over tens of thousands of years.
But each individual of those variables impact climate on Earth.
For example, when I talk about the green Sahara, they believe the most likely reason has to do with Earth's processional cycle.
I'm like, well, wait a second.
Where's this in the conversation of modern day climate change?
If we're talking about us destroying the planet, I would just like an answer as far as where these three variables are in the conversation.
Jamie, will you bring up my Ice Age or Ice folder?
So I have an update for you from the last time I was on your podcast.
Go over to the graph.
It should be one of the first slides.
That one.
Hang out right there for a second.
So when I was on your show last time, Joe, I discussed – I said something very specific where I said I think the – this is with my exact words.
I think the data might indicate that cold is more often than it's hot.
And do you know what happened after that?
I was going to send this to you, but I held off because you've seen enough hit pieces.
So there was a hit piece done on me by Media Matters, which was funded by George Soros, and their networking of Vox and other – they did this hit piece on me to say that Jimmy Corsetti was on Gerald Rogan spreading climate change denial and inaccurate information.
The only thing...
If you could bring that back up, Jamie, please.
The only thing that I said wrong is that I said the data might indicate that the Earth is cold more often than hot.
Excuse me, no.
The data absolutely, definitively shows that Earth is cold more often than it's hot.
And what you're looking at here is straight out of the Utah Geological Survey.
It's prestigious.
It's found at the top of Google.
And what you're looking at here is data from the last 450,000 years...
Corroborated from data taken from ice core samples from Antarctica as well as Greenland.
And what it shows is that not only are we in the middle of a three million year old ice age, there's something called glacials and interglacials.
Glacials are where it's cold and the glaciers grow.
Interglacials are where things warm and glaciers recede.
What you're seeing here is four, arguably five interglacial periods over just the last five 450,000 years.
So never mind hundreds of millions of years ago.
What it shows is that the periods of cooling last seven to nine times longer than interglacials, which are periods of warming.
And here's the fun part.
Interglacials last anywhere from 10,000 to 30,000 years.
And our warming started 11,600 years ago, which means that we're already in the window for potential catastrophe for things to start cooling again.
So when I was on your show last time and I was mentioning Elon Musk talking about Ice Ages being a deep, deep rabbit hole.
It means that we're already in the window where things could start cooling again, and when it does, we're in a lot of trouble.
I think, and I can't speak on his behalf, I would, God, I gotta tell you, next time, could you just text him and ask him if he thinks it's related to pole shifts?
I need to tighten up my study on this, because I'm like, I think, because let me tell you something.
Let me share something right now that you've never heard on this show before.
You hear everyone talking about cosmic impact hypothesis.
You hear people talking about sun cycles.
Not a lot of people have been on here talking about pole shifts.
Let me give a quick shout out to Ben Davidson of Suspicious Observers.
I recommend maybe you link up with him.
Nobody has researched the topic of pole shifts and sun cycles as much as him.
And he brought something to my attention I had never heard before.
Jamie, the very first slide that you showed was of the Gothenburg excursion.
So there was a partial pole flip right in the middle.
See how it dates between 13,007 and 12,003?
So the Younger Dryas started 12,800 years ago.
And it's right in the middle of that ballpark range.
It is established science that when geomagnetic pole excursions happen, it changes weather patterns on Earth as well as the ocean current.
Jamie, if you want to Google, there's a space.com article titled that in 2025, some scientists are suggesting that the Earth's ocean currents may stop.
And nowhere in the articles do they mention anything about pole excursions.
So people need to understand that we're already in the middle of a pole excursion, which is a partial pole flip, which means that things are shifting inside the earth.
It's also known that that can cause changes in ocean current.
Now, most mainstream articles, let me just be fair and tell you what they'll say.
They'll say that, oh, no, it's related to man-made climate change.
We're changing the currents of the ocean.
I don't believe that.
But don't allow.
Don't let them take your data.
Look at this.
Nowhere in this article to explain why.
But here's the thing.
People need to understand that the number one thing that affects weather on Earth is, of course, the sun.
The second thing is ocean currents.
It's the reason why England is relatively temperate.
Also, if we weren't, We have no control over this thing.
This thing is constantly moving and both of those things need to be looked at at the same time.
The problem is this whole narrative of climate science has been adopted by these same fucking people that want Twitter pronouns.
It's the same sort of thing, and if you have anything to say about it, if you want to talk about a swastika being an ancient symbol, now you're a Nazi.
Now you're a climate denier, you're a vaccine denier, you're this or that, you're a Holocaust denier.
It's like the same kind of stupid shit.
And unfortunately with this one, this one is uniquely tied to money.
This one is uniquely tied to green agendas and the enormous amount of funding that is going towards these green agendas and people that are profiting off of spreading this narrative.
These philanthropic capitalists that are making hundreds of millions of dollars promoting this idea of climate change being our primary problem.
And the reason why you shouldn't listen to these people is because they're leaving out the key data involving Earth's historical climate data.
They're not including all these other details.
And so I think people need to look at pole shifts because it's very interesting in this alternative realm that you have people that are proponents of the cosmic impact hypothesis.
You have Dr. Robert Schock with the sun cycles.
You have other people talking about pole shifts.
I think people should consider that all the above are correct and let me explain why.
When pole shifts happen, Earth's shields are diminished.
We're in the middle of a pole shift right now.
The Earth's shields are diminishing, and it's been happening since the 1800s.
It's been accelerating over the last few decades.
This is scientific data.
The North Pole is shifting at, like, almost 40 miles a year when it was half that just a decade ago.
And when the Earth's shields diminish, we are more susceptible to cosmic impacts because— 40 miles a year?
Solid rock, beneath which a vast ball of molten rock earth core, which generates most of our magnetic field, is 85% iron and moves independently from the surface plates, which is why the magnetic pole changes position.
Well, because of all the things we were talking about, the educators want to be the only ones that distribute the information and they don't want to look at the full picture.
They only want to look at this one thing for the greater good of all of us.
It's better if you just get people to only focus on getting an electric car.
Well, I spent an hour on a Zoom chat with a dude because what Flynn had said was that there was no proof of metallurgy in the Ice Age.
And, well, of course, there's no proof of it, but he said that we can prove definitively there was no metallurgy.
And that's where it's like, well, no, because they look for levels of lead.
And levels of lead, that graph you just showed with the interglacial periods, lead follows that.
Because when there's...
More dust on the ground.
The reason they believe is that more dust on the ground, more gets kicked up, more ends up in the glaciers.
But that's the same dirt that would be kicked up if they were digging for iron, right?
So either way, you're going to end up with more lead in the glaciers.
So I talked to this ice core specialist for an hour on Zoom, and I'm like, man, so...
Flesh this out for you.
Explain to me.
So he explains to me how they determine whether or not lead's from an anthropogenic origin or if it's natural, and that's based on if there's an archaeological site that they can match the other isotopes to.
He went through all the troubles with it.
He even lamented having—he's got other people in his field that are hardcore anti-pseudoscience because they're climate change deniers they're dealing with.
And so he's all—and he's like, some of these guys are just too zealous, overzealous with it.
I get where you're coming from.
Then I put the video out, and Flint contacts the dude, and next thing you know, well, you know, I didn't exactly say it.
He doesn't change what he says.
He just kind of implies that I wasn't quite being accurate.
He doesn't give a full anything.
It makes it vague all of a sudden, and it's quite clear.
A full pole shift is when they believe that the innermost portion of the molten within the earth core shifts.
A geomagnetic pole excursion is a partial pole flip which they theorize is related to the outer portion of the mantle.
The Earth's crust sits on top of molten everything, and when that shifts, it shifts our compasses, and it's not unreasonable to suggest that when something shifts inside the Earth, it would affect things on the surface.
I touched on this in the last time I was on, but when it comes to earthquakes, as an example, Some originate in the crust, which is like 28 miles at its thickest, I believe, or on average.
And others originate in the molten outer portion of the mantle.
Well, if something shifts inside the earth, why wouldn't it cause issues on the surface, whether it be earthquakes or volcanic activity?
And some volcanic activity involving supervolcanoes coincides with geomagnetic pole excursions.
And so when I was on your show last time talking about pole shifts along with the ice ages, I was part of the same topic.
Why is it that Media Matters, funded by George Soros, decided to do a hit piece on Jimmy Corsetti, the YouTuber?
Brother, they came after me hard on this, which I, to be honest, I relished over.
There's so many parts of the liberal, the leftist platform that they need to have these narratives and one of them is climate change and that Donald Trump is a climate change denier.
It's very, very, very, very stupid and it's bad for all of us because I think we all need to have an understanding of how delicate Our environment is, and how delicate life on Earth is, and that it is this constantly changing thing that has never been static.
We know that.
We know about the dinosaurs.
We know about all these different things.
We know about the Ice Age.
But we don't truly have a comprehensive narrative that everyone accepts.
They're the ones that made, not the only ones, but, you know, I'm a lot less political than a lot of people in this community.
And I said it when COVID first started getting bad and you could see it on the internet, I was real quick to say, man, we're going to be fucking locked down for years, guys.
And everybody's laughing at me, but it's like, it's a political football.
Neither side is going to drop a square...
We don't live in a society of political compromise anymore.
We live in a society of give them an inch, they take a mile.
Neither side is going to concede one fucking inch on this, and we're going to be dealing with the same argument three years from now, and lo and behold, we were dealing...
The top 10 most still cited papers that have been retracted are all medical.
The medical community is fucked right now from COVID. It turned in on itself and just started.
And if you look at their papers and stuff, it's insane.
They are all at each other's throats in all kinds of different ways, still citing retracted papers and all kinds of goofy little shit because it became a political football.
We can see it on TikTok.
You watch it.
You watch a nurse come out there and she's going to do her little TikTok and you can just look.
Is that a donkey next to her name or an elephant?
If it's an elephant, she's going to tell you there's nobody in this hospital.
It's fucking empty.
If it's a donkey, she's going to tell you about the body outside, a machine outside making corpse starch out of the fucking dead people that they can't bury them as fast as they're dying.
It's It was so openly, easily...
The average Joe could look right through it.
Could just see if this is a fucking...
This is just an argument between the two parties, isn't it?
They just transferred this to the medical problem.
Well, you remember in the beginning days of the pandemic when they were really fear-mongering, when they gave a preposterous number of people that were going to die from COVID? Yes.
And what was the percentage at the high point?
Was it like 3.5% or something like that?
Or was it 30%?
It was something nutty.
There's a compilation video, Jamie, see if you can find it, where they're dunking on Donald Trump.
Because Donald Trump said, I've heard it's less than 1%.
Because the media was the one that were dunking on him, and they were coming up with this ridiculously high rate that turned out to not be accurate at all.
Well, I think we have those people, those people, the leftists or whatever you want to call them, the Flint dibbles of the fucking world.
These guys are...
Like we're talking about with climate change and everything else, they don't want to leave anything in there that could let the other side have anything.
They assume that the average rank and file Joe public is dumb as hell.
I mean, one of the things they'll always say about ancient apocalypse, complain about, they'll be like, well, he goes on there and he talks shit about archaeologists and everybody's going to believe everything he says because it's so well made.
It's like, man...
He didn't do that at all.
And in the first season, he did talk a little shit about archaeologists.
But the bottom, to me, if I'm watching anything, I don't care what it is, if the person says, you know, mainstream scientists disagree with me here, but here's what I have to say.
All my alarm bells go off, and that tells me I cannot hang my hat on what this motherfucker's saying.
They're puppets and they willfully, gleefully repeat these narratives.
And instead of saying, well, where did you get that information?
Who are you talking to?
Let's find out if that's correct.
Why does the World Health Organization think it's 3.4%?
Is there any nefarious intent behind this whole idea of it killing everybody?
That's forcing some enormously profitable venture, like forcing everybody to take these fucking new vaccines that you guys developed.
Could that be factored in?
Maybe?
Well, no.
You only hear that it's factored in once everybody's profited and got out, including Bill Gates.
Bill Gates, who's on television telling everybody to get the vaccine, you won't get COVID, and then afterwards, ah, it didn't work.
After he had unloaded all of his stock, he wasn't effective, and it turns out COVID wasn't as bad as we thought it was.
Well, you guys are really responsible for a bunch of people taking a medication that was unproven.
You're responsible for all the side effects.
You're responsible for all these, and you're responsible for fear-mongering, lying, closing down businesses, ruining economies, changing the political structure of the country.
When it comes to the economic side of it, I honestly think, out of everything, the jab notwithstanding, just strictly from a top-down perspective, those guys...
And check to see how many cowards there are out there that even though they know something to be true, are terrified of the blowback so they don't speak about it.
And when you do speak about it, you do get attacked.
You know, I obviously experienced that, and I was fascinated by it.
I mean, it was kind of horrifying to watch, but also fascinating.
Like, oh, so this is real.
Like, you guys are just completely all lock and step and all full of shit.
Because it's like, listen, we're spending all this money just to make sure that you guys toe the line.
That's what they're doing.
And so the news is not the news.
It's only the news if an advertiser agrees that it's the news.
And that's not good.
No, it's really bad.
That's not good for anybody.
Left wing, right wing.
If you think that somehow or another money gives a fuck about your political persuasion, It's so stupid that it got attached to a political ideology and from the most compliant of people.
Those are the ones who are the most willing to go along with the narrative because the consequences on the left of coloring outside the lines, they attack you so hard.
They crush you so hard, like this martyr-made situation.
Anything.
Anything where you're stepping outside the line to talk about it.
Like what you experience just discussing something that turns out to be absolutely correct.
They fund a big hit piece about you, which essentially acts as an advertisement for you.
Then people go to your channel and go, this guy's great.
Fucking show's awesome.
This is interesting information and just undeniable facts, the undeniable facts that no one can discuss, no one can debate in any way, shape or form the actual size of these stones, where they came from.
This is not under debate.
So just the undeniable stuff is unbelievably fascinating.
And then when they go to your channel, they go, where's all the Nazi shit?
You know, we should go back to Gobekli Tepe, Ganung Padang, and the Great Pyramid because there's some more stuff involving archaeology and lack of excavations that are actually pretty significant.
So going back to Gobekli Tepe, one of the photos that, Jamie, that you showed earlier was before excavations began, and do you notice that there was no trees there?
So one of the controversies is Is that there's some 800 trees that were planted on the site a full decade after excavations began.
And the trees are planted on top of ancient ruins, which stand to not only destroy the ruins, but also highlights that they can't excavate what's underneath them while the trees are there.
So when this property – this was a property owned by farmers and the Turkish government wanted to purchase the land for them and the owners felt that they were being low-balled.
So what they did was they planted olive trees on top of the site in order to increase the value of the land, which for me, when I first heard this, I'm like, I don't understand.
This doesn't make sense to me.
Gobekli Tepe has already priced this.
It's the world's oldest and most mysterious ancient site on earth.
It's priceless.
Now, to be fair, and Dan, you've harped on this, and I really agree with you.
Imagine being the owner of that property and you've got this, you've found these ruins here, you've got all these people coming out, they're paying you money to check shit out, you're selling all kinds of stuff, and now the government's gonna take it from you.
You've had it for ten fucking years, now the government's saying it's theirs.
So you go out and you start planting trees.
So when you dig a hole to plant that tree, you find an artifact.
Do you put that in the pile of artifacts to hand to Klaus Schmidt, or do you put that in the pile to sell to the antique collector that's not going to tell anybody?
Obviously.
He's pissed off.
My opinion is that guy sold a ton of fucking artifacts while that was going down.
But again, that's the kind of stuff that would possibly, you know...
This is where my skepticism can get a little cynical.
You know, I'm of the opinion if the Antikythera mechanism would have been identified as what it is when they pulled it out of the ocean, they would have never made it to a museum.
That there was somebody...
I was telling Jim last night we were having dinner, if the reports of giant bones that you see in the 1930s from guys that were over in New Mexico and they're bringing them back to the Smithsonian and they just never made it there, if they really did find giant bones, which I'm skeptical of, but if they did, this is probably an advertisement to sell them while they're traveling these things across the country.
Oh, you know, just happened to lose them along the way because this dude came over and bought them.
Especially when you think about those kind of like Crazy, old-school Rockefeller-type billionaires who really love to control information and everything.
If you have access to something that just undeniably throws the whole timeline into a question or throws a narrative of human beings into a question.
And they didn't know what it was, and they found it.
It was like some Corroded up gears and then they start doing some sort of a I mean, I don't even know how they did it how they Understand all the different pieces of it because it's all corroded together But they use some sort of scanning mechanism correct to and see if you can find what it actually looks like Yeah, you can buy replicas of it nowadays.
Monster that supposedly lived on Earth like millions of years before humans wake up one day and they find all these monkeys running around.
They decide they don't like us.
But the hypothesis is, how would you determine if there was a species or an advanced civilization that lived on the Earth a million years ago, five million years ago?
As soon as we have fossil fuels, as long as we had the first bit of oil had been created on the planet, you could have a civilization like ours.
So what would you look for?
The only conclusion is maybe nuclear stuff.
If they test it, like maybe a nuclear power plant, we might still be able to find some radioactive material.
But beyond that, not a goddamn thing.
After 10 million years, you're going to find a fucking bit of it.
That's what their conclusion is.
And this is a scientific thing.
This is a thought tool.
That's what it's called.
It's something that they use in science, in archaeology and history and stuff, presumably, to...
To look at that problem.
But these guys, like Flint, obviously didn't do that.
Like I said, he thinks people are stupid.
He said, right here on, sitting in this room, that, oh, well, you know, it doesn't matter how long something's underwater.
You might think that it matters how long something's underwater, but it really does.
Well, here's where things get nuts is that here we are talking about things as far as tens of thousands of years.
So we do have a site that Graham Hancock highlighted in Season 1 of Ancient Apocalypse called Ganung Penang in Indonesia.
And Jamie, I have a folder on this.
So this pyramidal structure could potentially be 27,000 years old.
It's hotly debated.
But as Graham Hancock highlighted...
There is a subterranean tunnel and chamber which may have those dates, and it's not being excavated.
And a geologist, Danny Nanabajawa, I never pronounce it correctly, forgive me, Danny.
But he is a geologist that analyzed the ground-penetrating radar, and he said there's strong likelihood that it's man-made.
Now, the skeptics, the academics will say, well, it's probably just a lava tube because the structure is volcanic in nature.
But something interesting has happened that back in 2014, the Indonesian government said that they were willing to allocate unlimited resources and funding to excavate the site.
Something shifted a handful of years ago where they're not excavating it now.
And as of today, there's no plan in place to find out what that subterranean chamber is.
So if it was indeed manmade, we don't know.
It could be natural.
It could be manmade.
But we're never going to know what it is until we go digging.
The lava tubes, there's all kinds of places in South America where they have a big pyramid built on top of a spring.
The lava tube could have been a cave that was sacred that they just kept embellishing and kept embellishing and kept embellishing, saying it's just a lava tube, not a man-made tunnel down there as a non sequitur.
Anybody who knows anything about ancient history could understand how a sacred site could have a pyramid built on top of it.
We were about the lack of excavations at Ganong Panang, and this should segue into something that's very, very interesting, which is the Great Pyramid of Giza.
I've already said that Gobekli Tepe is arguably not just the oldest, but the most mysterious ancient site on Earth because it's not supposed to exist.
However, the Great Pyramid of Giza, I would say probably trumps it from the standpoint that it's just so mysterious, its sophistication, as well as the fact that we have no idea how it was constructed.
And it's arguably the most debated structure in all of human history for two standpoints, one of which is that so many people debate on whether it was built to be a tomb for the pharaohs or whether it was some sort of lost technology and had some other purpose, whether it's energy or whatever.
Which is a fascinating topic and I'll have a story involving me visiting it there with a certain person that really is – it's a story in itself.
But let me say this.
So there – back in – eight years ago, back in 2016 through Muon Technology, they discovered that there's a hidden chamber in the Great Pyramid which is massive.
Jamie, I have a folder on this, Great Pyramid Hidden Void.
And it was established in 2017 through a scientific study.
So we're talking seven – discovered eight years ago corroborated – or eight years ago corroborated seven years ago in a study.
Actually, brother, they could just drill a half-inch diameter hole and set a little tube camber through it, and they could figure out what's in there by the end of the week.
That dynamic, sorry, really quick, that dynamic, you mentioned Christopher Dunn, when he saw one of my recent videos about two months ago, me and him are going to start, he's going to come on my channel and each artifact that he's covered, we're going to discuss one at a time.
He knows I don't believe in ancient high technology and he told me, basically to summarize what he said is that he is tired of having either yes men or cynics.
He wants somebody that doesn't agree with him to sit down and have a conversation about these things and that'll be honest and we can actually get somewhere.
It was like the guy had been waiting 40 years for me.
I had a fucking GED and I worked as an electrician.
I should not be the one sitting in the chair next to the man.
But all the people qualified to do it want to treat him like he's an idiot.
And I got to tell you, you know, when you walk through the Great Pyramid, there's nothing about it that resembles anything like a tomb.
It seems like it was some sort of industrial function that had a function of some kind.
So here's a story.
And I have his permission to share it.
So I had the – the only thing more wild than the topic of the mysteries of lost ancient civilizations is the diverse nature of people that are into this topic.
So I had the pleasure of connecting with George St. Pierre.
The GOAT, the legendary UFC fighter.
And because of him is how I went with him to Baalbek.
He had unique connections and I was able to go with him and we had connected.
And then I went with him from there to Egypt.
And we went inside the Great Pyramid.
It was his first time in there.
And we basically tipped the guard.
I'll just say it.
And we had the King's Chamber alone to ourselves for a few minutes.
And we were with Yusuf Awian, who's the son of the late Akim Abdel Awian, who was the mentor of John Anthony West.
And he was in the pyramid code.
And so George laid in the so-called sarcophagus.
And Yusuf did the om.
I can't do it, but you do it with your throat.
And he does it inside the box.
And it makes the whole granite box vibrate.
It's wild.
It's the reverberation off the stone.
So he did that to George.
George laid in it.
And he did it for about a minute.
So George comes out of the box.
His eyes were wide open.
And he said, yeah, there he is.
He said, I'm coming out of retirement.
I'm going to win the title.
And he just started pacing around the room.
So fast forward three, four hours later, I'm in the hotel pool with him.
Just last year, September of 2023. And just to clarify, at that time, he was considering doing a grappling match.
That's not what he was talking about.
He was talking about winning the UFC world title again.
So fast forward a few hours later, I'm at the hotel, the Mina House, Marriott hotel pool with the pyramids overlooking us.
And I'm like, hey, George.
You said you were thinking about coming out of retirement.
And he's like, I love his accent.
No, Jimmy, I'm not coming out of retirement.
And I said, well, what made you say that?
And he's like, he thought about it.
He's like, it's just how I felt.
So just to clarify, arguably the GOAT, although him and Jon Jones, you know, they're comparable, just different, but the GOAT. And his first inclination out of coming out of the box with his eyes wide open was, It was like, I'm coming out of retirement.
I'm going to win the title.
And I asked, and he's like, no, I'm not going to do it.
It's just how I felt in the moment.
And I'm like, when people talk about it in the context of it being some sort of energy device, some people have speculated that with all these legends of humans living to hundreds and even thousands of years, some people have proposed that maybe it was a DNA restoration.
I have no idea what it was.
I just don't think it was a tomb.
I think it was something else.
I think it was a functional structure of some kind.
But the fact that someone like him, with his history and his accomplishments, the fact that that was the first thing that he felt coming out of that box after doing the reverberation thing, is a story.
I don't—so between Gobekli Tepe not being fully excavated, Ganung Padang, as well as the Great Pyramid, arguably the three oldest and most mysterious ancient sites on Earth for some reason are not being appropriately excavated.
Every single person alive has an inherent right to know the true history of our origins and I don't care what country you're born in because people have come after me like you it is none of your business what's happening at Gobekli Tepe you're not a Turkish citizen and I say excuse me it is a they elected for it to become a World Heritage Site so they have thrown that out the window it is It's everyone's business.
It's like we have a very fractured understanding of the history of the people on Earth.
Gebekli Tepe is an excellent piece of evidence that points to that.
We don't really understand why they did it or who did it.
And there's probably more of those things out there that we missed.
The Sahara Desert is the greatest example.
If they did some sort of very comprehensive examination of the Sahara Desert, like say, if technology advances to the point where they can do some really comprehensive underground scanning of that entire part of the continent, who fucking knows, man?
It's called archaeology from space, and they use satellites.
So this is what's interesting, is that they can use satellites with LiDAR that can penetrate, like, I might be butchering this, but I want to say 10 meters.
I could be off on that, but it's a substantial amount of depth.
From a satellite penetrating through dirt.
I'm like, who would have thought that could even exist?
You know, a couple things about Ganong Padang worth mentioning.
When they were excavating like mad, the president was of the same opinion that Dr. Nadi Wajawa wrote a book even like Plato was right and Atlantis is in Indonesia.
So the president of Java back then believed that that was the case, so he was throwing money at it.
When he lost his bid to be re-elected and somebody else took over, he was the one that shut everything down.
He's in more lockstep with the archaeologists and stuff, the mainstream guys.
So that's one of the reasons it was a changing of the guard is why all of it just stopped.
So the WF conspiracy – it is nothing more than a conspiracy theory.
I am not at all convinced that there's something here with them trying to suppress ancient history.
Let me be clear.
But there is a correlation between what's going on at Gobekli Tepe and Ganung Penang that the minister – so this is a government position.
The minister of technology, education, research, and technology, something along those lines in Indonesia, this gentleman came into power I believe in 2018.
His name is Nakim or something Nakaram.
I have a slide of him in my Ganung Penang thing.
He's a global shaper within the World Economic Forum, and he is the head decision-maker of excavations that would or would not happen, this gentleman, at Ganung Penang.
Now, let me be clear.
I'm not saying he's suppressing it.
And I'm not saying that the WF is trying to suppress our ancient history.
All I'm sharing here is that it just so happens that the gentleman that's in charge of decision-making – Let me be clear.
I said it earlier.
They went from saying that there will be unlimited resources and funding to excavate Ganong Penang.
It stopped.
And as of right now, there's no plan and place to do it.
And I'm just sharing that the person who would make that decision or has the power to do so happens to be a global shaper.
Klaus Schwab, the former head of the World Economic Forum, I have a video of him gloating about how they've infiltrated government cabinets, the media, all over the world, and are enacting their initiatives.
And if everyone's worried about these secret societies and people that are in control and pulling the strings of the world, what are they worried about?
They're worried about fucking crackpots that dress like this.
So when I look at Gobekli Tepe, involving my little WF conspiracy idea, it is a bit bizarre that that partnership with the Doge's group was literally announced at the annual World Economic Forum meeting in Davos.
And I also should share this, that I may have been banned from Turkey.
So this is hilarious.
So after my video came out, what's his name, Karul?
What's his name, Dr. Karul?
So the head of archaeology in Turkey...
I took great issue with my conspiracy theories on it and has – he was quoted in an article saying that I should be sanctioned and then he followed up with like I will be sanctioned.
And I'm like, well, how are you going to keep me out of Gobekli Tepe?
Have I been banned from Turkey?
Because American citizens don't need a visa to go into Turkey unless they're going to be there more than 90 days.
So there's – if I could, I could apply ahead of time.
Like in Egypt, you can apply for your tourism visa ahead of time and I know if I was rejected.
I get Well, and it makes sense and it's the most likely explanation.
It's probably true.
But that means that then this is an issue of either mismanagement or incompetence because it is inexcusable that – because as of right now, their plan is that it will not be fully excavated.
It will not be fully excavated in any of our lifetimes.
And there could potentially be answers involving our ancient past at Gobekli Tepe, and it is entirely inexcusable that we wouldn't dig it up.
And I don't actually think it will take away from tourism by removing the mystery.
Half a million people a year are visiting it just because.
And if they dig up more of it, in my opinion, that's more reason to go there.
It's the same article, because it shows the thing that says unlimited amount of research funding, but it says it was taken from other funding, and then it says that there's a lack of funding right below it.
There's a thing to get, like, less conspiratorial but support it from a very real position.
There's a thing with science with their paradigms.
They've looked at it from a very long time.
With the origins of Earth sciences and history, they were expected to bear out the Bible, prove the Bible right.
Then evolution, and then Darwin, and then it was gradualism.
Prove the Bible wrong.
There is no major global flood.
And gradualism, they assume that everything happens slowly.
There's nothing catastrophic in the record.
And that lasted from the late 1700s, all the...
1800s, excuse me, all the fucking way up until 1980 when the KT dinosaur-killing meteor was accepted.
Before that, there was no such thing as punctuated equilibrium, which is what they call it now.
Where...
Which any kid could figure out is the way the fucking world works.
Slow erosion happens on the side of the bank, but sometimes there's a big flood that carves a big chunk of the bank.
I mean, this is no-brainer shit.
Life moves at a steady pace normally, and then every now and again something catastrophic happens.
So my point is that if they think that digging something up is going to change a paradigm that they're expected to maintain, they're not going to fucking dig it up.
The kind of opposition that they face to overturning paradigms, like the Clovis first thing, like when Flint was on here and he tried to play that one down.
Not only were careers ruined from that, but one thing you'll almost never hear mentioned was Clovis first was version two of this.
Before that, it was the Folsom point and Folsom first, and many careers were ruined by people that posited that the Americans were people before the Folsom culture.
Then they found the Clovis.
This is not some novel time of, well, there was a scientific debate and a few...
No, no, no.
This is standard operating procedure, the way it's always fucking been done.
So it's not a surprising thing that they're going to try to hide stuff.
The best dating is that the Great Pyramid is somewhere around 4,500 years ago.
That was from organic material taken between casing stones.
You could argue that the casing stones were restored because even the Romans restored parts of the Sphinx.
I don't know how old the Great Pyramid is, but if it was constructed 4,500 years ago, then our understanding of what was happening on the Giza Plateau at that time is vastly different than the people that were – if you look at any academic textbook, they show people wearing loincloths and barefoot constructing the pyramid.
Because one of the things they found is that when they studied the remains that were in the enclosures where the people that worked on the pyramid lived...
The only thing I could come up with was, and I have to test it, but like if you had a concave mirror, it creates a little circle of light like a magnifying glass does that will start a fire.
At a certain distance, it's going to be the same size no matter what.
So you could calibrate that and if you have to have everything exactly set up, but if you shot at a target and filled up a perfect circle, you could know it was exact range.
That kind of thing would work because you can't measure this with ropes.
You can't measure...
I mean, ropes sag and they're affected by humidity and stuff.
There's an outline around the pyramid where it was kind of scratched into the ground for where they think that they used water and stuff to do leveling.
And they generally measure around that, to my understanding.
And any deviation, even in millimeters, with each rock, as you get up to 2,300,000 stones to build the peak of the pyramid, any deviation on either side would fuck the whole thing up.
I was telling Jim actually last night that archaeologists frequently refer to the Clovis hypothesis as elegant and I often tell him that this is actually Christian stuff is even more elegant.
Yeah, there's a big, big to-do about it, because he released this article that we have to, or released a story, rather.
He wrote a piece essentially saying that you have to take divergent viewpoints.
You have to take a bunch of different perspectives.
We can't just be this left-wing echo chamber, and it's the reason why the business is faltering.
I mean, all of these I was just reading something about CNN's ratings and MSNBC's ratings post-election.
They've crashed.
All these left-wing kooks on YouTube are hemorrhaging subscribers, where people go, you guys are out of touch, you're not accurate, you're delusional.
And people are speaking with their subscriptions, and they're speaking with their purchasing of the Washington Post, and their purchasing of the New York Times.
The New York Times just debunked, in the most insane way, debunked RFK Jr.'s assertion that the ingredients in Froot Loops are different in Canada than they are in the United States.
They fact-checked it while saying he was accurate.
So their fact check, it's so dumb when you see the fact, I tweeted it.
The fact check is so dumb because the fact check says it's not correct, they have the same ingredients, except for these harmful chemicals.
Mr. Kennedy has singled out Fruit Loops as an example of a product with too many artificial ingredients, questioning why the Canadian version has fewer than the U.S. version.
But he was wrong.
The ingredient list is roughly the same, although Canada's has natural colorings made from blueberries and carrots, while the U.S. product contains red dye 40, yellow 5, and blue 1, as well as Butylated hydroxytulin, or BHT, a lab-made chemical that is used for freshness according to the ingredient label that is the fucking dangerous chemicals that are banned in Canada that we're trying to get rid of in America.
So they're literally saying he was wrong but he was right.
So, of course, you're gonna hemorrhage subscribers.
Of course.
You're crazy.
You're saying something that's nuts.
And also, what is your motivation?
What's your motivation for removing potentially harmful and toxic chemicals?
If someone is trying to do that for the greater health of the population, if we're saying that these things have been eliminated in other countries because they've been proven to be dangerous, what is your motivation for saying he was wrong?
Well, what I'm hoping is that what Jeff Bezos has said...
About the Washington Post, and I know what CNN is considering doing, and they've made some sort of a trend towards a more objective form of journalism.
But they're still compromised by the sponsors.
They're still compromised by the advertisers.
They're so compromised that I don't know if they can ever get to where they really need to be to compete with actual, objective, real journalists that are independent.
Because I don't think they can.
So it's kind of crazy.
It's like they're digging their own grave every day.
And then they're lashing out at all the other people that aren't digging their own grave.
There is a course correction and the problem is they've dug their heels in so much and they'll write articles like that New York Times article that is so crazy.
Oh, but they're still missing the whole fucking point.
So the ingredient count is roughly the same.
So there's still 19 ingredients in the Canadian version, but it's all just like sugar and wheat and like carrot dye and blueberry dye and whatever the fuck else they have.
There's a lot of kids that have, like, ADD kind of symptoms from red dye 40. Well, I mean, if you're left alone to your own devices and you're a child like I was, you would just fucking pour a bowl out of a bowl of that cereal until you're ready to explode.
You know, I would eat fucking Captain Crunch until I had a fucking heart attack.
The things that we will do, like the Milligram experiment I mentioned before, the experiment they did back after everybody was wondering here in the States why the Nazis were able to convince, rank-and-file normal people to do fucked-up stuff.
So they got guys in a lab coat, and they had an actor pretend he was getting shocked as a test subject, but the real test subject was the guy they had, quote-unquote, shocking that guy.
And the guy in the lab coat would keep telling him to do it more, and they found about 30% of the people, if they were told, would shock him all the way up to killing the guy.
And that kind of appeal to authority, that kind of worshipping of authority has really...
They're gutting it right now and they're paying the price.
Well, it's just dangerous because authority has a massive responsibility to be accurate.
And with that comes humility and the understanding that we don't know everything.
It's not possible, which is why we're constantly studying things.
And this need to be accurate and need to be correct and need to be the only one who has access to this information to educate people is preposterous.
It's really crazy, especially when it comes to something like ancient history, which is why your channel is so popular and your channel and Graham Hancock's shows are so popular and why these people that want to hold on to that throne are so adamant about labeling them with every possible horrible pejorative.
Well, yeah, that's a really easy way to get them out.
Like I said, they're losing authority right now, like we're talking about.
We're talking about mainstream media, or legacy media, I guess you could call it, falling apart and stuff.
What I mentioned about PewDiePie earlier, if you remember about 10 years ago, the Adpocalypse, that was, I think it was actually a Wall Street Journal article, but it was a legacy media that wrote about PewDiePie, and they fucking, like, threw him under the bus.
They, like, misconstrued him and everything else, and the effects were very real.
It slapped YouTube content creators across the board.
If you look up Adpocalypse, You can read all about it.
I've been picking on all of my friends in the real world that were laughing at, I forget the name of the site, Rumble, when everybody was like, oh, the right-wingers are going to Rumble.
And that's what the First Amendment is supposed to apply to.
And this is one of the great things about this administration that's coming in is that Donald Trump wants to apply the First Amendment to all these sites.
He wants to stop all this big tech banning, which is, by the way, was terrible for him in 2020. I mean it really – it's election interference.
It truly is because you're eliminating one complete side of the argument.
It's supposed to be one side thinks this, the other side thinks that.
They get together and discuss it and you as the person outside of it gets to see who makes a more compelling argument.
And the wonderful thing about community notes is you get to see whether or not someone's bullshitting.
So let's find out what's right and what's wrong, what's true, what's not.
That's what it's supposed to be.
But the problem with that is then you don't really have control of the election.
And that's what they found out in 2024. They don't have control of it anymore.
And you can get Beyonce and pay her $10 million.
It doesn't fucking work.
It doesn't work anymore.
No one cares.
No one believes them.
They don't trust them.
They make terrible life choices.
And you're like, well, clearly you're not a person I'm going to listen to when it comes to who's going to run the fucking world, Taylor Swift.
But that seems to be like production costs would seem at least slightly elevated for an event.
But the weird one was like the Beyonce one.
If it's true, and you know, there's a lot of sites reporting it as it is true, but we tried to look.
Jamie, look, it's hard to find what's true and what's not true.
Because there's a lot of money that was paid to staff, but it's like unclear what that means.
And then it's unclear where they burned all the money.
And then there's also the money that went to these activist groups.
And we're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars they paid to people to support this administration, which is kind of supposed to be the other way around.
Aren't these groups supposed to be paying money to prop up the campaign because the campaign believes in them?
No, you're paying these activist groups to support you, which is just...
That's part of the problem with everything is that it's profitable to spit out a narrative.
And that there's a lot of money being moved around.
And this is money in politics.
And as much as we can get that out...
We need to.
And I think one of the most important things about getting that out is this whole thing about pharmaceutical drug companies being able to advertise, which changed in the 1990s.
We have to recognize that before the 1990s, pharmaceutical drugs could not advertise on TV. And guess what?
We were taken way less and we were way healthier.
So this is not good, folks.
This is not good.
And other than Ozempic, which is at least curbing obesity to a certain extent, what are these drugs that are doing good?
If you look at the overall health of people, it's declining.
Obesity is rising.
Heart attacks are rising.
Strokes are rising.
All this shit is bad.
We're not moving in the right direction.
And yet there's a tremendous resistance for change.
But it's funny to me that they would spend so much money on this election when, I mean, it's kind of clear that When one person's platform is do this, this, this, this, and this, the other person's platform is not him?
I mean, that's like riding somebody else's coattails.
Deliberately.
She came in with the platform.
I'm not Trump.
So, okay, well, that's great.
But, I mean, once people have pierced through the veil of Trump's going to make everything illegal and put everybody that's not white into camps and shit, once they've got past that, what do you have?
If you're going to develop a real platform, you're going to run for president, I would think you would want to do that over a long period of time and be very careful about...
Treat it like a defense attorney.
If you were prosecuting this as a case, you would want to have all of your facts that show that you're correct and have all of your arguments, and you would want to have mock arguments.
If someone comes to you and says, well, what about this, this, and this?
That's not the case, and this is why that's not the case.
You would want to have all your ducks in a row.
To me, it's like a fighter that takes a last-minute fight, and they've been sitting around drinking beer, and they haven't gone through a 10-week camp.
Like, don't do it.
Don't do it.
You're not ready for this.
And if your only strategy is just like a wild punch, which is basically, he's a liar.
Meanwhile, you're lying about him every fucking day.
The Russia collusion shit, the very fine people shit, all the thing about taking Liz Cheney and executing her.
That's all lies.
You guys are just lying.
And you're saying he's a liar, but yet you're lying all the time and you're doing it like it's 1995 and there's no social media.
But you can't do that anymore, especially when the people that are paying attention to the podcast, well, guess what?
Podcasts are a hundred times bigger than anything you guys have.
And people are listening to that and they know you're full of shit and then your numbers decline even further.
So I think they were saying that CNN – how much is CNN down?
Because I was seeing this on Twitter and it's hard to know whether or not it's hyperbole or whether or not it's fact.
But they were saying that CNN's ratings are down like 80 percent of their peak.
And MSNBC is some other preposterous number, and they're both on the chopping block.
CNN is talking about mass layoffs of talent because nobody believes them anymore.
So it's counterproductive for you to use the same voices, which is why they got rid of Brian Stelter, and then they brought him back.
You know, it's funny, you can see the same pattern of attack that they throw at Trump being used against Tulsi Gabbard the last time around when she fucking nailed Kamala in the debate, and she was just like, you can stand here and say all cops are bad, but you got hundreds of thousands of people in jail and prison.
Leftist viewers deal, NBC, CNN, a Trump slump ratings crash.
Here's why.
So what's the numbers?
What does it say?
The Rachel Maddow Show, for example, easily MSNBC's top-rated program, though it only airs once a week, drew just 1.3 million viewers on November 10th.
Five days after the election, a drop of 1 million viewers from the month before.
In the key 25 to 54 demographic, the advertisers most covet, Maddow's numbers mark the smallest audience since her show has seen since April of 2022. And she's the number one show.
Which is like, you know...
If I only got a million people watching the show, I'd be so pissed.
Hannity nearly quadrupled her with 420,000 views to her meager 109,000.
She got 109,000 people in the 25 to 54. So it's a bunch of old cat ladies.
Outside of Maddow, MSNBC has seen an unprecedented plunge.
This is really bad news.
And what is that?
For example, on Tuesday, November 11th, the week after the elections, MSNBC attracted its lowest 25 to 54 demo ratings in 23 years.
Over on CNN, the demo number was the lowest it has been since June 27, 2000, when Bill Clinton was president.
For the overall week of November 6th through 13th, Fox News averaged 2.23 billion views while MSNBC attracted a paltry 550,000 and CNN just 399,000.
Think about how much money is being pumped into CNN. So go scroll back up a little bit.
In fact, Fox News saw its viewership jump by 38% overall since November 5th after dominating election night by topping all networks, drawing more than 10 million viewers.
It's so bad that MSNBC's Joe Scarborough and Mika, how do you say her name, crawled to Mar-a-Lago on Friday to kiss Trump's ring, drawing scorn for their utter shamelessness after years of on-air attacks.
You know, real quick, let me just, you know what they're not including is that on Rumble, Dan Bongino and Stephen Crowder had the number one and number two ratings on all of election night.
So they're not, they're just mentioning mainstream networks.
They're leaving out the fact that- What did Dan Bongino have?
He had over half a million real-time viewers live and same with Stephen Crowder.
They were very comparable.
They were the number one and number two platforms in the world.
I would agree that online they probably had the highest, but to compare the world watching CNN and Fox News and MSNBC that night was less than 500,000.
Archaeology is a canary in the coal mine, and you can tell that because you see this horrible thing happened before 9-11, and therefore they're connected.
And Sandy Hook happened right around the same time as the 2012 thing.
Ergo, it's just like, dude...
Puke!
You know, Alex Jones could give you some advice here, buddy.
So this is one of the things that Randall says, well, it's a natural feature, so it can't be Atlantis.
I'm like, well, who built Atlantis?
He said it was the god Poseidon.
Well, was Poseidon an actual individual?
Because if you look at the ancient Greek translation of Poseidon, it's Lord of the Earth, which I think is a modern-day translation for Mother Nature.
And humans have built on natural geological features throughout history.
If you were to bring up the Rishat structure from space, it's like no other place on Earth.
It is a mysterious site.
The consensus is that it's volcanic in nature and it's a collapsed volcano.
Volcanic dome.
But it doesn't match anything else anywhere else on Earth as far as volcanic domes go.
It matches more than a dozen similarities of the most – let me say this – the most consequential similarities to what Plato had described as a lost ancient city of Atlantis.
And it's made up of concentric circles.
If it had water, it – It specifically matches three of water and two of land.
It's made up of red, black, white color stones.
There's an abundance of gold in Mauritania.
Elephants, which were described to being on Atlantis.
You won't find gold or elephants in the Azores like Randall promotes.
It also has an opening at the south, which matches the description of Atlantis.
There's mountains to the north, which just so happen to be called the Atlas Mountains, which are in modern day Morocco.
Well, Atlas, which is a very unique name, was said to be the very first king of Atlantis, which also happens to be the name of the very first king in Mauritania, which is where the Rishat structure is located.
Oh, and there's another similarity is that Atlantis was said on those mountains that were said to be to the north, which are, again, happened to be named the Atlas Mountains.
Well, there was a river that was said to be flowing from those mountains.
And there's a scientific study that say that Tam and Rissat River flowed at the exact time of Atlantis, 11,600 years ago, either right through the Rishat structure or directly north of it.
And those are just a handful of similarities.
It is by far the most likely location of the lost ancient city of Atlantis.
Nothing can be concluded either way, but it is something that should not be ignored.
A lot of people say, well, it's not an island, so it couldn't possibly be Atlantis.
But what they leave out is the fact that the ancient Greek word for island was Nessos and Nesson, which had five meanings, one of which was island.
The other was promontory, peninsula, as well as land within a continent surrounded by lakes, rivers, or springs, which matches the Rishad structure.
So it's like, you know, a lot of people, and let me also say this, Because a lot of people – and I think all areas should be studied.
I'm not debunking the Azores.
However, the fact that it's in the Sahara Desert and that the Egyptians are the ones that came up with the tale of Atlantis, that's where it originates from, which surprises a lot of people.
Well, Egypt is in the Sahara and so is the Rishat structure.
And at the time of Atlantis, the Sahara was green.
It had one of the largest networks of rivers ever known to exist as well as the largest freshwater lake.
And so if the Egyptians were colonists of a destroyed civilization, it's not unreasonable to say that it was in the Sahara.
And let me say something else.
If Atlantis was described as being busy all day and all night and was a trading post— Does it make sense to be in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean or is it far more feasible that it would be in the Sahara Desert, which wasn't a desert at the time?
Because if it was said to be busy all day and all night with languages spoken from all over, where are all these people coming from in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean to go visit it?
It makes far more sense that it would be in that portion, in that region of the world.
Yeah, it's not just hard to get to, but not just inhospitable.
It's kind of war-torn, kind of fucked up, the kind of place where you're not going to have to worry about somebody playing a tourist trick on you.
They're just going to take your shit.
It's a lot of reasons that people aren't going there, but it's really interesting, even to me, where I'm a lot more skeptical.
So I do believe in a lost civilization, and I think that I think it's really interesting to find so many of those same things in the same area.
It's just uncanny.
Like Jim says, when it's just a stone's throw away from Egypt, really, it would make sense that they would have that package, a big chunk of those things, so accurately recorded.
And to find it right there...
Definitely.
This is one of the things I harp about on my channel all the time.
We need more honest skeptics.
This is definitely the kind of thing we need real scientists to go out there and do.
We don't need guys to knee-jerk and say, well, you attached it to Atlantis, so fuck that noise.
It can't be.
We don't need guys to say, it's definitely Atlantis, but there's nothing to see here.
The way that these guys attach the white supremacy thing is they go back to guys from the 1800s that wrote about Atlantis that had some old-school views on race.
Now, they believed in the biblical races, and the way that the biblical races came to be is something you'll never find John Hoops or Flint Dibble tell you because it guts their entire argument.
Before the Flood, there was one race of humans.
After the Flood, Noah gets drunk.
Three of his sons are around.
One of them picks on him, laughs at him.
Two other ones don't.
The one that picked on him was Ham.
The African people were considered to be the Hamites.
The Sam, the Semitic people, were in the middle.
And then the other one, the Japhaphites, which eventually became the Aryans, were considered to be the white people.
That was the European view of race for...
Up until about 150 years ago.
So, 200 years ago, a guy writing about Atlantis would not have thought it was an Aryan Atlantis because Arians didn't exist until after Noah.
It was one of Noah's sons.
So before the flood, there was no Arians.
So anytime somebody says that all this old school shit believes in Arians, all you have to do is scratch the surface and you'll find that's not the case at all.
This guy didn't believe in a white Atlantis.
Ignatius Donnelly did not believe in a white Atlantis despite Flint Dibble making sure to name drop that fucker anytime he gets a chance.
But they're going to make sure you think that.
They're going to eliminate, because the biblical races are something most people don't know much about.