John Fetterman shares his stroke recovery—near-fatal clot, AFib pacemaker—and primary win over Dr. Oz’s $28M campaign despite a $100M post-Labor Day smear attack. He slams unlimited PAC spending as election-corrupting propaganda, comparing it to studio warfare, and credits authenticity and family support for his resilience. Fetterman debunks 2020 voter fraud claims, citing Georgia’s Kemp and systemic safeguards, while clashing with Rogan over immigration, framing border security as compatible with legal pathways but rejecting unrestricted flows. Both agree on deporting criminals, yet clash on swing-state dynamics, with Fetterman calling for bipartisan solutions amid $1B+ Ukraine/Israel aid. Musk’s proposals are dismissed as political noise, though Fetterman aligns on food safety—highlighting how policy and populism collide in modern governance. [Automatically generated summary]
Yeah, no, I know it seems strange, but it's like, I mean, I'm a bigger guy, and I don't really can't afford custom anyway, and I hate...
I'm claustrophobic, and I hate them being in that kind of shit, and I've always dressed like shit, and...
And I know.
And then that whole thing kind of got away of us.
People assumed that there was a dress code issue there.
And I'm like, no, I wasn't behind that.
But, of course, everybody pointed at the dude that dresses like a slob.
And then the whole nation just had like a meltdown like, oh my god, the Senate's on fire because I dress like a slob.
But my life is just much better in D.C. that unless that I'm going to be on the floor, that I'm not going to be – you're never going to see me in a suit.
And I think that's a more authentic kind of way that I live.
And I don't judge anybody on how they dress or those things.
I just dress this way.
And there's also practical issues as well, too.
Like, I have chopstick legs, and I have no ass, and I can't keep pants up.
You know?
And hoodies, it's like I don't have to iron that shit.
You know, so it's just like easy, it's comfort, and it's like, I just feel like that's, I mean, and if somebody judge me, and people have said that, but it's like I'd rather have somebody know, and I promise you, a lot of people and dudes, especially in western Pennsylvania, love to wear suits all year, I mean, excuse me, shorts all year, and dress like that, but to me it's about comfort and practical.
Listen, people are going to judge you no matter what.
You're a big, giant guy who wears hoodies and you're a senator.
No matter what, they're going to judge you.
Who cares?
But I'm just trying to understand what is going on with the captioning because you can hear, but so there's some sort of a disconnect between hearing and understanding.
And my wife, Giselle, she's like, you're having a stroke.
Because they had that classic kinds of where, you know, half of my face.
I didn't know that, but it kind of just...
Yeah, just slumped.
Yeah.
And then they hotlined me over to the hospital.
And I wouldn't have survived if we were in a different – I mean, there's parts of Pennsylvania, and that's part of the tragic, that if I wasn't close to the kinds of hospital that I was, it's 100% that I wouldn't have survived that.
And it got me there in enough time, and they were able to, there was an expert there.
And I actually had, I met that doctor that literally saved my life.
And I'm like, oh my god.
And he usually wasn't based in that hospital.
He was usually out of Delaware, but he happened to be there.
And he was here to give me an award for being that kind of an advocate for those things.
And then I asked, really looking for like a countdown of like, well, what's the prognosis?
And I really, there wasn't much there on that.
And I had to, like, was I going to survive for long or, you know, what's that going to look?
And then, of course, the entire majority on the Senate really was on the middle of that.
And that's a big responsibility after that.
And then, so the primary, it happened.
And I actually had a really strong win.
And I won all of 67 counties.
Pennsylvania has 67 counties.
And we carried every county, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and all across Pennsylvania.
But at that point, I had a responsibility.
It's like, am I able to recover?
Or we're kind of...
Am I going to be okay?
And I wouldn't recommend being in that situation, but I made a commitment.
More than anything, I was more worried about being around, to be a dad.
I mean, I have three young kids, and my wife, you know, she lived through all of this.
So at that point, it started, I was in the hospital for about 10 days.
Yeah, and I start to get better and better.
The strength started to come back a little bit, but it was still rough.
And it was very, very clear though that I had a capacity to It's been impaired on hearing and those kinds of interaction and those things.
But that's the thing.
But I had to decide by August 15th, and that's my birthday, ironically, that if I step down by then or before, then they're going to have to find somebody to replace me on the primary, and that was going to be my dropout day on that primary.
I mean, I had, for the first time in my life, and I hope it's the last time that I'm confronted by this idea that the doctors weren't able to provide any kinds of certainty, or it's like, oh yeah, man, you're going to be okay, or things are going to be okay.
And the stress of the primary and on the ongoing kinds of issues, it was already weakened about that issue earlier, and everything kind of came together, and I guess my heart deteriorated to the point where that caused the clot.
And then the clot, that's what nearly took my life.
People used to thought he was, like, really brilliant.
I mean, he was like...
He was an amazing kind of surgeon, a celebrity.
And then he turned his career into like on TV. And then he started to pitch more kinds of questionable kinds of things and kind of bullshit kind of stuff.
And I don't understand why somebody would change his reputation.
I mean, he was really revered in that.
And I would have been comfortable to him operate on me.
But he kind of lost that.
And what was also pretty funny is that he clearly, he lived in New Jersey.
And so we were like, hey, we need to use that and point out that.
So we decided early on that we're going to just like, hey, you know, it matters.
It's like, I mean, there's nothing wrong with living on New Jersey, but there probably is an issue if you're running for the Senate.
And I really have like an ethos is that I'm not ever going to be mean and I'm not going to be personal about that.
So we tried to have a lot of fun with the fact that he lives in New Jersey.
And we just really just kept hitting him, hitting him.
And we had Snooki.
We did a cameo saying, gee, Mehmet, good luck.
I know things are going rough now, but you're going to be able to come back to New Jersey.
And that got viral.
And we did a lot of those viral kinds of moments.
And they have this thing where they have what's really penetrated.
And they have circles on things, like what's really part of...
I guess everybody wants the Iron Throne, I get, but it's really not.
But it also, it's a different kinds of skills, and it really doesn't transfer over very well on that.
But right now in Pennsylvania, right now, David McCormick, Connecticut man, Connecticut man, he's running in Pennsylvania, and he lives in Connecticut, and he's incredibly wealthy.
I think he's worth three or four hundred million dollars, and he's spending the same race in Wisconsin.
They're dropping crazy...
And really, that's an important conversation that the real problem in American politics for me is Citizens United and unlimited money.
When they decided that money is speech, and now that turns the whole thing incredibly damaging.
Right now, there's been at least more than half a billion dollars, half a billion dollars on the table in Pennsylvania just for president, not just the Senate races and other House states.
And I was the most, at least at that point, was the most expensive Senate race in history.
And it was over 300 $330 million for that one seat.
And all of those dollars, they're spent to destroy and tear you apart.
And then Fox News, I was their top target for four months.
And social media, and I stayed out of that.
I didn't enjoy, but social media, all the conservative influencers, everything.
And it just tore me apart.
And at that point, at the end of September, It was, I mean, I couldn't get away from it.
And it really, it's like, until you've had $100 million to destroy you, it's a next level kind of thing.
And then everyone was, they were saying, well, he's a vegetable, you know, he's a retard, or he's lost his...
His brain and all kinds of things.
And then that wasn't true.
But the kinds of terrible things and those kinds of very personal things.
To realize that there's so much money being spent just to attack you and that you're a part of this very, very large and corrupt machine that's going after you just because they want to control the state.
I mean, just imagine if you were a movie studio, and you're going to put out a movie.
And a rival studio has $100 million to tell America, that movie sucks.
That's shit.
And it's crazy.
And it's just...
There's always going to be unlimited money because it's all about the control of the Senate or the House or the presidency.
And when money is speech, it's going to be unlimited.
And what happens?
It's like, well, that's TV and on social.
And it's going to be, how can I destroy and break...
This individual.
And that's where it is.
And it gets incredibly personal.
And it has an impact.
I mean, certainly it has for me.
And until we have unlimited money, it's going to get more and more mean, personal, and expensive.
And if you look at the billions of dollars that's spent, how what we could have done for our society, the kinds of reels that we could build And other things if we didn't spend all those money to tear each other apart.
Yeah, it's very strange, and it sets a terrible tone for the rest of the country.
Because these races, even though when they're over, people go back to a certain level of civility, it's already been established that this is on the table.
These personal attacks, this evil, vicious propaganda, taking things out of context, conflating people's words.
You take a quote, take it out of context, clip that shit, put $10 million behind that, and that's in front of millions of eyeballs right there spontaneously on that.
And it's directly right at you.
And it's unlimited money.
I mean, when you look back on this race, it's like you are going to be stunned.
Just how much money is put in that.
How crazy those ads are.
And just, you can't get away from it.
Like Montana.
Montana has, I think, six or seven hundred thousand voters.
And they've dropped a quarter of a billion dollars.
I don't know how you could even spend a quarter of a billion dollars in Montana.
It's like if you have a hundred thousand dollars in cash, you have to pay that in going to a McDonald's.
I don't know how they do that.
But I promise you, everybody in Pennsylvania or in any of these kinds of contested states, they just can't get away from that shit.
And at this point, they just stop paying attention to it.
And I came to a very deeply broken and fractioned community.
And I actually started helping young men and women get their GEDs and just kind of getting their lives back on track in that sense.
And then that's why I did that for several years.
And then I decided I wanted to run for mayor and mayor of a small town.
And we had problems with inequality in a community that 90% of the population abandoned the community and left.
And if anyone's aware of the U.S. steel, I mean, I live right now across the street from that iconic steel mill.
I mean, that used to be America's Silicon Valley, like about half of the world's steel used to be manufactured there.
But now so much has changed.
And then I ran for mayor and a small town mayor.
And then that turned into, well, I decided like the kinds of issues that were meaningful to me and the personal kinds of experiences.
I just thought, hey, I want to project my kinds of experiences and my values.
And I started, I ran for the first time in 2016. I ran for the Senate.
I mean, it's pretty kind of strange that You have a small town mayor running for the United States Senate.
And but I mean, we had no money.
I mean, zero, zero money on that.
But we just we'd had a really like grassroots kind of a thing.
And we got out across.
Pennsylvania.
And we came up a little short, but we pulled in 20% of the votes, which people thought that was pretty remarkable.
And I carried my home county, which is Allegheny.
That's the second largest.
And that really kind of set the stage to run for lieutenant governor a couple years later after 2016. But 2016, though, that was where America met Donald Trump.
And I was early, you know, Turning the alarm off, saying, hey, we have to be concerned here.
Like, you know, Trump has connected with people in ways that it's like we have to be concerned.
And I'll never forget, it was June in 2016, and I was a surrogate for Clinton.
And Trump announced, hey, I'm showing up in a town called Manessin, which is a small town.
I'm like, why is he showing up?
Either he's crazy or they've plugged into something.
I have to see that.
I try to get into that just to kind of see what was going on.
But they recognized me and they said, yeah, get the fuck out.
And they made the mistake of just showing up in Philadelphia, Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, and assumed that they were going to be okay, but a lot had slipped.
And now the margins, Trump created margins that were unheard.
Like, you know, we referred to them as Romney margins.
So in other words, you have red counties, and Romney would cover those by about 60 to 65%.
And Trump did.
He created 80s, 80s.
We were losing 80-20, 80-20.
And like, well, yeah, that's a small county.
But yeah, you multiply that by 57, 57 other counties.
And that's how they scale up.
And that's how he won.
And he won by 45,000 votes.
And that's why he captured the blue wall.
And that made him president.
And here we are right now.
The blue wall is they're both fighting on the blue wall.
And the blue wall is Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan.
I'm like, hey, I was running for about Forgotten Places.
People where America's turned their backs on them and talking about those kinds of important issues like living wage, abandoning the industrial parts of America.
Some people watching what things have been left behind in places like Braddock, it's astonishing.
90% of people left and 90% of the buildings are gone.
And that whole region has just been...
Thrown away.
There was a path.
I mean, there were two other people in the primary.
And I thought I could maybe split.
I could split the other two and just sneak by and get 33% plus one extra vote.
But I came up a little short because I had no money because it's always going to be about money.
And then Katie McGinty, she won, but she lost.
And then that was that same cycle and then the same year that Trump won.
And, you know, my colleague and one that was just here, Senator Vance.
I mean, we were both in the same cycle.
We both ran in 22. So we both there for less than two years.
And it's really based on seniority, and it's just kind of like, hey, get on the end of that line.
So you are a freshman, and your influences, at least in the institution, are limited in some sense.
But if you have a bigger platform, and I did, and I try to have those kinds of impacts and having those conversations.
But my first couple of First half of that first year, that was a little, took a different detour because, you know, I was dealing with depression.
I was in depression and I realized that I was in a bad place.
So having to make those kind of choices and I signed myself in to Walter Reed to get help because the depression and so I think it's an important conversation.
And I knew, I thought at that time it could be politically, it could be difficult.
But I thought it was important.
And now if that costs me something politically, I'm okay.
So that's why I'm continuing.
So the impact I've had, I never fully expected that that voice would break through.
And I'm in contact with people constantly saying, thank you for talking about this.
I chose to get help, or I chose not to follow that path on self-harm.
And so I've had active conversations with members of Congress or fathers with younger kids, and they're like, hey, can you please talk?
And I do that, and I'm happy to talk to anybody.
And so that's a way I've had an impact through all of that and also my voice through after what happened on 10th, 7th, October 7th.
And I've decided I was going to be a very consistent voice for Israel through that.
So that's why kind of like the platform, but in terms of if anyone's being honest, whether it was Senator Vance or any kinds of freshman senators.
It's very limited because otherwise there's people that have been there for 25-30 years.
They're the ones that are the chairman and if you're a minority party, you have incredibly limited kinds of ability to move an agenda.
So the depression thing, I think it's very important that you talked about that.
I think transparency is something that people really appreciate.
So many people suffer from depression.
It's such a normal part of being a human being.
And for a guy like you, who's a senator, who's already gone through being attacked, already gone through all these horrible things that they said about you while you were recovering from a stroke, It takes a lot of courage to come out and discuss that.
But it is courage because you know you're going to be publicly attacked and it's a vulnerable point.
But I think it's not because I think so many people suffer from it.
I think there's courage in coming out and talking about it openly and realizing that people are going to use it as an attack vector and saying, you know what?
This is important to talk about.
This is important to acknowledge and to show people that you can recover from something like that.
But I was like, I have to be honored about that and honest.
And people, that really resonated with people.
I think the first person, I was the first politician, especially at that level, talking about self-harm.
And, you know, if people that are suffering, people that, I mean, you have a huge audience, I'm willing to bet plenty of them are suffering from that or looking through those kinds of issues.
And I promise people, whatever your path, whatever your path is for recovery, and I'm not an expert, but if you promise yourself to stay in that game, stay in that game, that you are ready, you're almost guaranteed to get better because I promise you it will get better.
And I was at the point where I was really, you know, in a very dark place and I stayed in that game and I am staying in front of you right now and having this conversation.
And so that's what I try to tell everybody, whether they're listening today or in other times when I've had that.
It's an honest conversation, but it is a red and blue conversation, and it's a rural and urban or suburban conversation.
It's men or women.
I've had conversations with teenagers, you know, with their parents, and they've even tried to take their lives.
And I can't think of anything much more tragic than especially a young person taking their lives over some of the things that...
And I never thought that voice would penetrate, but it did.
And that's why I'm willing to have that conversation.
Well, apparently it's very common for people that undergo major surgery to have depression afterwards.
And there's a bunch of physiological reasons for that, they believe.
My friend, Dr. Mark Gordon, who's done a lot of work on traumatic brain injuries and depression amongst athletes and soldiers, he did a lot of research on that.
And one of the things that they found is that people that Undergo like a long period of anesthesia and either heart surgery or any kind of major surgery.
There's a disruption of your endocrine system afterwards that leads people to be just weary and broken down.
And I could imagine that along with the Senate race and all the other chaos and all the stresses involved with that, it plays a significant factor.
They're roughly my age, and they had young kids, and they took their lives.
And they were both in the media, and one worked for an incredibly elite organization, and another one had a really strong position.
One had a heart attack and the other one had a stroke years earlier and I found out.
And I wish I could have talked to them.
And I did talk to them.
But it doesn't mean they were weak or that they gave up.
It's just I got lucky and I found my emergency brake.
And if you have any kinds of study on people and self-harm, there was an individual, he jumped off the Golden Gate and he survived.
And immediately after he says, as he crossed over the rail and he, I want to live, I want to live.
What have I done?
It's like I've made a terrible mistake.
And you hit the water going 75 miles an hour and it's very against chance of surviving, but he did.
And now he became obsessed with this idea, and he looked out for everyone that survived.
And about 45 people out of 1,800 people that have jumped over, they survived.
And it was unanimously people immediately like, oh my god, I want to live, I want to live, I want to live.
And not one single person thought, well, I wish I was more successful.
So I try to put that forward, and I can't imagine how difficult because They had children the same age mind and trying to explain to a 10-year-old son, like, why did daddy leave?
And those are dark conversations.
And so it's not about weakness.
It's about trying to get away from that.
People that are suffering from depression, if anyone's been there, it's like your mind is on fire.
And you just want to get away from that.
Please, I need relief from that kind of a thing.
And every now and then you have kind of like the eye of the hurricane where you finally thought maybe things could get better, but it roars back in and it's like you get back to that very dark place.
And I just tell everybody, I'm begging you, stay in that game.
I promise you it can get better.
And the depression is lying to you.
It is absolutely lying to you.
But don't make the kind of choice that you can't come back from.
That's really what, like, every person needs to have, like, that emergency, I call that, like, an emergency break.
It's like, you know, you're out of control.
You know, you're having the darkest conversation you'll have with yourself, and you have to have something to stop that.
Otherwise, you're going to go over the edge.
And everyone needs to have that, whatever that is, whether it's your family, whether it's your wife or your husband, or whether it is, or that there has to be some...
It has to get better.
It's going to get better.
You know, that's why I say, stay on the game.
And I'm not an expert.
I'm not trained in that.
But when people reach out to me and say, well, I feel like this, and I'm like, hey, it's like, you know, help works.
I promise you it will get better.
And I can't guarantee what your path will be.
But what I can say is that stay in that game and you are going to find your way on that path.
And you're never going to regret.
It's like, oh, you know, it's just the finality, the finality of that.
And you can make a bad choice, and that might set you back in life, but that's the one choice you can't come back from.
And you will leave people in your life that they'll never understand, or you wish you could reach back and you could let them know.
And stay away from that kind of blackness, because I promise you, you would regret And if you can't, come back.
The election and everything, I was convinced that I've lost everything.
It was difficult to fully speak, and my kids, they got pulled into the social media kinds of invective.
It's like I've destroyed my health.
I've...
And now I've...
Against odds, I won.
And now am I going to be able to do this job?
And...
Would I have been better off if I didn't survive?
And I got to that kind of a dark place.
And then I just had this spontaneous, where it's like, my kids, it's like, no, I love you.
It's like, oh my gosh.
It's like when they were visiting, I didn't want them to visit me at Walter Reed.
I was like, why would they want to be around this?
But they did.
It was like this kind of spontaneous kinds of love.
And it just was like a shot.
And it's just like, I can come back.
I can come back.
I thought, it's like, well, why would they want this mess back?
And then, you know, just working through a lot of those things and other kinds of techniques and things.
But that was probably the single most transformative event where it's like I realized that I can come back to my life.
Otherwise, it's like, I thought I've lost everything.
Would I be able to even do my job?
And it's like, do I even have a career?
I mean, I'm talking about, like, that was a significant national story after I signed myself in, and that pulled my kids in through that.
I mean, this idea.
After we announced that we're signing in, and there were news trucks outside their house, and And they had the trauma of thinking that dad could have lost after the stroke and now he is, it's just, it's put them through so much.
And that's why I was convinced that they probably don't want me around.
And then I made the stupid mistake of, I went on social media and things, I'm like, and just, I read some of that shit.
I mean, it's just, it's just, oh my god.
Millions and millions of views and videos and it's just like, you know, going after my family and saying, you know, hey, he's a vegetable.
He's, you know, he's a retard and, you know, sling blade and all kinds of things.
And it wasn't the individual kinds of insults.
It was the volume and just how widespread it was.
And I'm like, who jumps online to go after a stranger that's never really done anything to you personally?
Yeah, well, I mean, it's like if I have $100 million to convince you that you're a terrible person and you're the worst thing ever, and that inspires a lot of people, and hey, that's the mission.
It's like he clearly, he must be those things.
And, you know, there is no tap out.
There is no tap out.
It's like even after we won, after I won, in some sense, it actually accelerated.
And the second you step into that kind of arena on the federal level for like a Senate seat, if it's like a purple state like Pennsylvania, you know, I promise you there will be tens and tens of millions of dollars.
and their mission is to turn you into the worst thing in the world.
And whoever survives, that's the one that's going to be in that seat.
And I still will never understand why someone, independently wealthy kinds of people, will spend Incredible amounts of money.
And I tried people.
I'm like, there's no glamour here.
I'm in a 500-square-foot apartment and I'm here with my phone.
I'm like, hey, Grubhub, what's it tonight?
And then I watch TV on Netflix and things and I ask my colleagues.
I'm like, hey, is there kind of secret society?
You know, like, you know, crazy parties or, you know, sitting around with cigars and, you know, all this.
Yeah, that we all have witty kinds of dialogue on West Wing.
You know, like talking like all this, you know, kinds of turn...
And really, it's just like, and I describe that as a lot of it's just bad performance art.
That's usually what it is.
It's just bad performance art.
And some people, like if you're in a safe place, In a safe state or a safe seat, you, and especially if you have the resources and they're incredibly wealthy people, they buy a house and they move their life there.
So you're able to kind of things, but like I don't have those resources and I'm in a very, very, the ultimate purple.
Well, there's certainly no glamour if you're honest.
But I think there's a lot of people that look to certain members of the government that have jobs that pay $150,000, $170,000 a year, but somehow or another acquire hundreds of millions of dollars over the course of their career Usually through some kind of insider trading.
I mean, I don't own any of those stocks or anything.
And definitely, like, if you have any kinds of impact, or you know that there's something coming, I mean, yeah.
How is that legal?
Well, no, we should have the kind of legislation to make sure that you're not – like if you are on Congress, you shouldn't have any kinds of stocks because you are going to be passing kinds of laws, et cetera, et cetera, that you have to separate that.
They really shouldn't be a part of that kind of a thing.
And I mean, I'm all out.
I'm open.
All of us, we have to have our wealth and all that there.
And if I'm not the poorest, I'm probably the bottom five.
And other people there are worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
So we can't have that situation where if you're going to be involved on those kinds of legislation, that you can't be enriched by Those kinds of, and there has to be some kind of influence.
Well, I strongly feel that the internet should remain the way it is in terms of people being able to post on social media anonymously if they so choose.
But the problem with that is it can be captured by money, and it can be captured by these enormous groups that have bought farms, whether it's state actors, whether it's other countries, other nations that are doing that to try to attack our system and to try to promote certain narratives, or whether it's our own country itself doing it, because I think we do it, too.
You know, very, very left and very, very right in between.
And I think it's really...
I think that's your responsibility, especially if you're an elected leader, to...
Be challenged, to challenge yourself on the ideas.
And it's like, clearly, one side doesn't have all the answers, and the other side can't be 100% wrong.
And it's just like being challenging and living or taking in other kinds of perspectives.
I think that's a responsibility, because otherwise, if you only just cocoon yourself into...
And it's just, it turns into a gigantic circle jerk, and that's why it just turns people to just kind of dig in, and it's like, hey, you know, the problem is them, and we have to...
Everyone's agreeing with you, you get social credit from saying the things that these people all agree with, and you feed off that.
But when it's being captured by...
It's not just these people exchanging ideas.
It's also a bunch of people that are manipulating people's ideas.
You know, I don't know if you've ever paid attention to, like, Rene DiResta's work with the Internet Research Agency.
Would they...
What they uncovered, what they were doing was using, this was like during the 2016 election, using social media and it was a lot of Russian troll farms and troll farms in other countries.
The appeal is that people think that this system is completely rigged and it's captured by money and special interests and enormous corporations and that here's a guy who's outside of this system completely.
And the evidence of that is how the system turned against him and how you got to see people on television every night talking about Russiagate, talking about how he's a puppet of Putin, talking about the Steele dossier, talking about all these different things that turned out to not be true.
I mean, when I was in grad school, that was like put up as like, well, I mean, people enjoyed that.
And now that became a term in politics saying, oh, we affect even President Obama's like, hey, we all want to secretly go full Bullworth, full Bullworth.
And but but that's what really he channeled in where he would say, You know, it's kind of like he projects kind of like, well, I don't give a fuck, and just say all those kinds of a thing.
And people have responded to those kinds of things.
And, you know, a lot of people, that's the bug.
But you have to understand that for enough people, that's the feature.
And that's kind of what they want.
And whatever that is, it describes a brand that, you know, it's not, I don't admire that, but you still have to kind of marvel at the level to say crazy kinds of things.
Well, I guess maybe we're both old enough to remember when George, in the George Bush, Al Gore, he's like...
God, this guy.
And that moved the polls.
People were like, he rolled his eyes at Bush, you know, like things.
And like, you know, like it used to be much more staid.
And now think of what's been said now and all of the stuff.
And I don't think people aren't paying attention to some of the, whatever the latest outrage is.
It's the polish of speaking like a congressman, like a senator, like a presidential candidate.
But it's this kind of bullshit way of communicating that's inauthentic, that even though it's effective, even though it's polished and smooth, people never get a sense of who that person is as a human being.
Trump is not polished.
He's not polished in that sense.
But you get a sense of who he is as a human being.
There doesn't seem to be a veil.
There doesn't seem to be this disconnect between a human being and the thoughts.
You might not agree with him, you might think he's crass or rude, but at least you know that he's the guy that's talking, these are his thoughts, and people trust that way more than they trust someone who's, you know, polished but full of shit.
You know, and you're losing politically if you're telling people to not believe what their eyes are seeing.
You know, like these kinds of issues.
And it's like I'm not going to lie or I'm not going to toe a line if I don't believe in that.
But in terms of the conversation, I think it's all I've got.
And it's not because I don't care.
It's actually I'm very committed and I really do care.
But I think people are, you know, like, I think authenticity, that's the last, that's really, that's one of the last meaningful currency in this shitty business.
So I was having a conversation this morning with a friend of mine, and we were talking about voter ID, and he was shocked that you don't need voter ID in, I believe, it's 15 states.
15 states require no ID. I think it's 24 or 25 states require ID, but only, I think, 11 of them require you to have photo ID. This is a weird one in this election that I've tried to look at.
As objectively as possible.
And I can't see any reason why you would not need ID to vote unless you wanted people to vote that aren't qualified to vote.
It's like, and usually, it's kind of local kinds of communities and people, they either know that person or it's not, it's never going to be organized in a point where you can pack a box or you can't determine that kind of a thing.
It's just that, you know, after election, election, election, it's just never been, you know, in 2020, out of over millions of votes in 2020 in Pennsylvania, there were five or six You know, once.
And what happened is that they turned out to be the Republicans, and they used their deceased, their dead moms, you know, to vote for Trump through that.
And that was documented.
And they were all caught, they were charged, they were convicted, and all those votes.
Well, people also, we need to remind that, you know, the voter database, they're cross-checks against deaths and, you know, who's moved or what's their status are.
Like, you know, all that's cross-checked back and forth, back and forth, back and forth.
So it's a living kinds of thing where it's continually updated and all of those kinds of things.
And it self-checks.
And remember also...
In 2020, you know, Trump, they was like, there's cheating, there's all these things are happening.
And remember, there's probably 57, 58 red counties.
And all of those commissioners that are in charge of that, they were like, hey, no, there was none.
There was none.
And even in Georgia, even in Georgia.
Governor Kemp, like, hey, you know, Georgia, you know, it was very close, but it was honest.
But other than making things a little bit easier to cheat...
What would be the logic behind not having voter ID? I've tried to look at this as objectively as possible.
I can't find any reason why you would not require someone to be able to prove that they're the person they say they are when they're putting in their ballots.
Well, it's also – some people may not believe that in a lot of these kinds of communities, ones that I live in, for some people, they don't have an ID necessarily or they've lost it or whatever.
And unfortunately, once he's voted, even though he was not eligible to vote, his vote is going to count.
Texas removed some, I mean, there's lawsuits about it, but Texas removed somewhere in the neighborhood of a million people that were ineligible to vote, that could have been voting.
People on the Trump side, they all said that Dominion's was corrupt, and that cost Fox $800 million.
They had to pay $800 million about defamation for saying that it was rigged, or if it's not, and there was no evidence, and they had to just acknowledge that That this was the honest thing.
It was a documentary during the Bush administration and one that they showed that the Diebold machines – and Diebold was a significant contributor, I believe, to the Republican Party.
They showed in the documentary that you could use a third-party input to change the results.
And they actually proved it in the documentary, and people were pointing to this as, oh my god, the Republicans are cheating, and the Republicans have used this to try to rig the election for George Bush.
Yeah, well, I mean, I think we can all agree that we need to have a, just like our border, we need a secure border and we need an absolutely secure voting system as well, too.
I mean, that should never be considered controversial.
But there is an organization that's moving these people to swing states.
There's a significant number of these people that are illegal immigrants that have made their way to swing states.
And then there's been calls for amnesty.
There's been calls for allowing these people to have a pathway to citizenship and allow them to vote.
The fear that a lot of people have is that this is a coordinated effort to take these people that you're allowing to come into the country then you're providing them with all sorts of services like food stamps and housing and setting them up and then providing a pathway to amnesty and then you would have voters that would be significantly Voting towards the Democrats because they're the people that enabled them to come into the country in the first place and provided them with those services.
This is a big fear that people have and that you're rigging this system and that this will turn all these states into essentially locked blue like California is.
And he said that in 1999. And I voted for the border deal.
And that went down.
And that's – I mean he said that 25 years ago and that was absolutely true now that they had an opportunity to do a comprehensive border bipartisan and that went down because Trump – he declared that that's a bad deal after it was negotiated with the other side.
But didn't that deal also involve amnesty, and didn't that deal also involve a significant number of illegal aliens being allowed into the country every year?
I think it was two million people.
So it was still the same sort of situation, and their fear is exactly what I talked about, that these people will be moved to swing states, and that that will be used to essentially rig those states and turn them blue forever.
If you have a significant number of people that are being moved into swing states that have come across the border illegally, and then you've provided them with all these services, you've provided them with food stamps, EBT, you've provided them with housing, You could, if you gave those people amnesty and allowed those people to vote, and it was very organized, you're talking about 75,000 votes over a few counties that switched everything over to the Republicans.
You could see how you import 10 million people over the course of four years.
Illegally, and then move a significant number of them to swing states, and then provide them with all these services, and then give them a path to citizenship, you could essentially rig those states.
I mean, I haven't spent a lot of time in Texas, but it's very clear that immigration has remade Texas.
And I think generally it's for a good thing.
And like my wife, my wife's Brazilian.
And her family was undocumented, and she was seven years old when she was brought here.
And I'm the big pro-immigration guy that there was, but it also has to be true that we need a secure border.
And we have to work this out, because we are pretending that you have millions and millions of people living in the shadow.
And they are here.
And we have to work together and figure out a way to get forward because they're here.
And it seems incredibly a difficult kind of logistics thing.
And I think it's also un-American to round everybody up and the vast majority of them are just living legal lives and doing a lot of the jobs that other people here would never do.
And this is the thing that's been said about Springfield, Ohio, that these Haitians that have moved to Springfield, Ohio, people are complaining about them.
But the people that have employed these people are saying, listen, these people are taking jobs that other people that lived in this community don't want.
They work very hard and they're very happy that they have this pathway to be in America now.
I think most people that come here come here because they want a better life for their families.
And America is essentially a country that was founded by immigration.
And Republicans, even the Republican governor was saying, like, these are – We're good workers, and this is not the problem.
They aren't eating geese.
And it's just like, you can be very pro-pro-border, like I am, or you can be very strict on immigration, but you don't have to demonize or try to turn a group of people in that they're eating your dog.
Because some people do that in places that are just Americans.
Ducks are edible, and some people want to eat a duck.
You're not going to stop it, but that's not the major problem that people face.
So this is the pro side of it, right?
The pro side of it is you give a pathway to people that are from very unfortunate circumstances, and I think we would both agree, That if we were living in those countries and there was a pathway to citizenship in the United States, all you had to do was make it across the border.
We would both do it.
It was better for our families.
It was better for our future.
If we were living in a place that had no hope and no future, and all you had to do is make it to America and you could work.
We would all do it.
I would do it.
You would do it.
I bet everybody listening to this would do it if they found themselves in that circumstance.
That's the best aspect of it.
The best aspect of it is good people that are ambitious, that want a better life, which is how this country was founded.
The worst aspect of it is Venezuelan gangs are taking over apartment buildings in Aurora, Colorado and San Antonio, Texas.
That's the worst aspect of it is that they're letting in gang members.
Venezuelans emptied out their prisons and essentially According to the president of Israel- Yeah, the marial boat lift, you know, the whole- Right, what happened in Cuba.
Yeah, the same kind of deal.
Emptying out their prisons and instructing these people to make it to America.
This is a significant problem with the open border.
And there's also in it that all of this is about a truth, is that America is a beacon to the world.
Millions of people.
The demand to become a citizen here or to participate in our amazing society, the demand outstrips the space.
And we're already the very pro-immigration.
We allow more kinds of a path more than any other nations in the world on that.
And people are willing to die and they put themselves at risk just to kind of get here to be a participant here.
So America isn't the problem.
America is America is one of the great hopes in the world.
And that's why so many people want to come be a part of that.
And that's why it has to have an effective border.
And it's like, you know, we had a real issue here and we wanted to address that.
And that's why, you know, my former professor said that you're never going to have the kind of a deal because it is useful for both sides to weaponize that and to demonize one side or turn the other thing in there because it's a serious, important issue.
But what's contradictory is that, say, if you're coming from Canada or Europe and you're a highly skilled, college-educated person who wants to live in America and become a United States citizen – The path to citizenship is incredibly difficult.
It's hard.
You have to go up for review.
You have to show that you're doing something that Americans can't do.
You have to be a person of significant talent or ability.
There's something about you that we want you in here.
Yet, if you just make it across the border and walk in, People want to give you amnesty, and they want to allow you a path to citizenship quickly.
Without any of those hoops, you don't have to take tests, you don't have to go up for review.
Not only that, but once you get here, once you apply for amnesty, there's a significant wait period where you're allowed to maintain your residence in this country.
But if I'm President Federer, man, I'm like, hey, we got to figure this out.
We got to figure this out.
What would you do?
I'm not going to demonize the Republicans and say that you're xenophobic.
I mean, the second you start calling somebody, oh, you're xenophobic, it's like, well, then the conversation is going to shut down.
Right, right.
And I'm saying, I... It's like a serious conversation requires serious people and the second – and that's when you talk about unlimited money and it's like suddenly you're like – I mean I had gigantic billboards saying Fetterman equals open borders and Fetterman – it's just like I get turned into – A Marxist.
Yeah, just all these kinds of things.
And it's just like, and of course, that was never true.
And then when I had the opportunity, because, you know, as I'm a senator, and we have that kinds of legislation in front of me, I'm like, yes, we need to have a serious ones.
And now people are like, we're shocked.
They're like, oh, wait a minute, I thought they told us that he was all like bordering, opening up and whatever.
And it's like, these are the kinds of, you know, like, parts of the times we've become too fragile, you know, like, oh, they're not allowed to talk about those things.
You're not allowed to have these kinds of conversation.
I never understood why that's really a problem.
But it's like when people discover, it's like, well, hey, he seems to be kind of reasonable, or me, I disagree with some things, but he's not what $100 million, you know, trained me to think that that's what...
I would have – for me, I would have started with the HR2 and there are elements that are – they're just not palatable to – there are members of my colleagues that they come from more deep blue states and that becomes – it's not palatable to some people.
Well, I mean, it's just, it's got to have, you know, the best border deal is the only one that can pass.
And, you know, HR2, HR2 was described as like, kind of like, you know, I joke, I call that the only fans list of what Republicans want for immigration.
And there were some people that were frustrated saying, hey, no, no, that's – Well, that's one of the more frustrating things about bills, is that you can take a bill about an issue, say energy or whatever, immigration, and attach a bunch of other stuff, like support for foreign aid, support for specific wars, or whatever it is.
You could throw a bunch of stuff in there that really shouldn't be in there, and then you have these bills that are 2,000 pages long, and no one's really reading them.
Well, again, I think eventually if you are living your best lives and you're following the law and you really just showed up because, hey, I have no path for a life that I would want for my kids.
It wasn't just, hey, send in the PhDs and those kinds of things.
I mean, that's what really made our nation.
And, you know, the steel industry, the steel industry, you know, in my part of the state, that came from, it was European.
It was all kinds of immigrants.
They all came in.
They couldn't build the houses fast enough.
And that was all foreign labor.
And a lot of them were sacrificed 'cause it was an incredibly dangerous business in the steel industry. - Yeah. - And that built our nation and that became part of our society.
And that's really every kinds of wave, you know, and that.
And to me, America has to be open and a path for anyone that's playing by the rules because the group that you're from, or the part of, you all started the same kind of a process.
It's inevitable.
That's the enduring truth.
And that's what made America special and that made us make us strong.
It's like I would want to make sure that we first we have to acknowledge the truth.
It's like immigration has been an issue because America is an amazing country and they're coming from broken countries where they've all recognized that there's not a meaningful path for them to have a quality of life and they're willing to risk their lives and sometimes they even drown and it's like I can't imagine turning Could you imagine turning your children over to a coyote?
If you're trying to leave, imagine in Pennsylvania, it's like walking to North Carolina with your kids on your back.
These are desperate kinds of situations.
And it wasn't an invasion in that sense.
It was just people wanting to have a part of the American dream.
100%.
And acknowledging where that's at, and it needs to have a path.
Otherwise, you're going to have to round up, and that's not realistic, and there's not the resources, and that's going to be incredibly disruptive, and it's going to be damaging economically as well, too.
Whether there's actually a barrier or, you know, hiring, you know, thousands and thousands of more agents and whatever that it takes on that.
And it's like the best border deal in that situation is the best one that can pass.
Because otherwise, if I could wake up with a perfect head of hair, it's like practicing the possible, and we were as close as we've ever gained in years and years, and that never came into place.
Well, again, that's just like taking some kind of an inventory of, like, who's actually here on this?
And we have to figure out who's actually here on those kinds of a thing.
And there are going to be – statistically, that's a fact that out of X million people, for example, it's a fact that statistically that some – that things – terrible things are going to be – Perpetrated by those things.
And, you know, statistically, in some sense, that Native Americans, you know, like, not the American citizens, you know, and the criminality, if anything, the criminality is slightly higher, you know, in immigration communities as well.
And some of the most pro-pro-American kinds of views, that's projected in those kinds of communities.
I mean, just like the community that brought my wife and their family to this country.
And that's kind of where we're at.
And I think what we're seeing now in this cycle, there are more and more Latinos that are changing their views on some of those.
They're like, hey, we do need We do need a secure border on that.
It's not necessarily assumed that because you are a member of a demographic that it's not necessarily consistent that it's going to be strong blue kinds of...
And a secure border with more and more resources put on that.
But it's impossible to make sure that, of course, you're going to have members of the immigration community that are going to commit kinds of terrible kinds of crimes.
And you're going to see, and those are going to be talked about in the popular media as well.
It's undeniable.
I mean, they're incredibly tragic, and it's a fact.
And that's actually the truth of the American story.
Immigration made our nation, and there were hard truths, and we have a hard truth right now, and we need to have a secure border, and we have to find a way to celebrate Our immigrations and the kinds of what immigrations and the contributions that they made to this nation and also to weed out or to minimize the kinds of negative kinds of things and those kinds of resources because we can't possibly support an unchecked kind of a situation that we had and I described that.
If you had 300,000 people showing up at the border, well, that's the site of Pittsburgh in a month.
Where are they going to go?
How are we going to give them an American dream already?
Because they're all going to need certain kinds of resources.
And that should never be controversial to say that's not sustainable.
And if we want for every immigrant their American dream, it's impossible if it's unchecked like that.
And, you know, I'm certainly not going to discount some of the experience of some people that have been hit by eggs or other things or, you know, inflation.
But right now, our economy right now, it's really, it's the world's envy throughout all those things.
By any metric, it's our unemployment, the stock market, and, you know, the hundreds of thousands of new jobs that are being created through it, all those things.
And our inflation now has been kind of eased back into the check.
But it's undeniable that there was an incredible And inflation that hit certain kinds of families hard through those things.
And I think that the next kinds of wave, whether it's AI or those other kinds of innovations, whether that it's green energy or those kinds of a thing, that's going to continue to juice our economy.
A lot of that came from Pittsburgh too and you would see those kinds of cars but it always had a human in there but that was the first time I saw like a robot car driving around in Austin and yes that creates there's a lot of dislocation that's possible.
I mean, that was a big part of one of their demands, was that they see what's going on in China.
They see that they're using automation to completely control shipping yards, that it's all done with machines and computers now.
And this is going to displace a lot of people.
This is something that Andrew Yang talked about in depth when he was running for president because he was talking about the need for some kind of universal basic income to provide people with, you know, money and food and housing because jobs are going to be non-existent in a lot of different sectors, a lot of different markets, a lot of different things that have traditionally been done by people, specifically driving.
Yeah, well, I mean, universal guaranteed income, I'm not sure.
I don't know, because you're going to have to have a lot of resources to provide a lot of that.
And that creates all kinds of other issues and dynamic.
But I'm not afraid of technology, but it's also acknowledging that there are going to be kinds of changes in those things.
And I'm a big believer in technology takes us into a more productive kinds of economy, and they're going to help solve some of the challenges that we have in our society for those kinds of things.
But I think we have to find the perfect balance that we don't stifle innovation, but we also have to remember that there are going to be people that might be left behind or they're going to struggle.
I mean, hey, I was mayor for 13 days and I live in a community that was left behind by some of those things.
And now the steelworkers, the steelworkers.
I live across the street from the steel mill.
And then it was announced that Nippon was buying U.S. steel.
And basically, all those steelworkers, they were done.
You know, they used euphemisms saying, well, we're going to honor current labor deals.
That's a euphemism saying, as soon as that's up, you're done.
And then that's going to be thousands of union jobs.
And if you think it's going to be easy for those men and women to pull down six figures or those kinds of an income, it's like how insensitive to say, well, hey, learn coding or whatever.
It's like, well, hey, it's not – Coding is useless anyway.
One of the things that I was reading that was really crazy, and I'd love you to find out how much of this is accurate, Jamie.
One of the things was this guy was explaining how scrap metal in the United States is shipped to China.
Where they make things with it instead of making things here because and then we buy what they make with our scrap metal which seems to me kind of insane American manufacturing is a Significant problem that we faced and it was really highlighted during kovat right where there wasn't ships coming in because everything was kind of locked down for a while and people realize like hey So much of what we need,
particularly computer chips and medicine, so much of what we need is being made overseas.
And that's why Congress came together and President Biden led the whole CHIPS legislation.
And it's like, we've got to make shit in America.
And it's like, of course, the future is in those kinds of industries and those things.
So we have to protect the American economy for that thing.
And that's a bipartisan kind of a push for that.
And COVID, that relieved a lot of vulnerabilities.
It's like, where a lot of these things come from?
But going forward on that, it's like we can never just surrender that American manufacturing, we can't assume and we can't allow that to turn completely outsourced.
No, it would be horrible, and it would be nice to bring things back.
And it's also, you know, one of the things we've been discussing a lot is that so many of the things that we need today, like particularly phones, are being made in an unethical way.
Like, we would never allow the working conditions that exist in these factories overseas Where American corporations are having their products made in a way that you would never legally be able to do in America, and yet they're doing this just to make more money.
Yeah, well, I mean, let's also talk about rare earth stuff.
The Chinese have strategically just snapped up that market.
I mean, that's really – that's a significant security issue.
We're going to have to – We're going to have to address that.
And thankfully, we have identified some large deposits.
I think it was Nevada, but rare earth kinds of minerals.
I mean, that's a serious security issue because the new economy and a lot of the new technology is going to depend on those kinds of incredibly, I think, a lot of kinds of minerals that some people have never even heard in their life have no idea why that's important.
That's what's also true, is especially what happened after Russia invaded.
And it was very clear that Europe had, have Russians kind of by the short hairs, that a lot of their Europe was, they were dependent on some of the Russian gas.
That's a fact too.
And, you know, it's also what's true is that fossil fuels are part of our energy stack.
Our energy has to evolve, whether that's hydrogen or nuclear.
Now, even nuclear, that conversation is re-emerging.
Because they could have turned, you know, we could have never returned.
I mean, that was really tense.
Now they're reopening that because Microsoft is going to buy the electricity because now that's going to be nuclear to run the data centers and those things.
It's an important conversation.
So if you are committed, and I think it's, you know, I do believe that you really have to make sure that nuclear is part of that conversation, too.
Because, you know, zero kinds of emissions, and that's dependable kinds of energy that doesn't depend on the wind or the sun.
But ironically, some people pretend that you have to have a conversation.
But, you know, for the foreseeable future, that fossil fuels are part of our stack.
And for me, energy security is very important.
You know, national security I mean, if we can't power our economy, then it's a significant risk for our economy and our American way.
And now, I think we're a net exporter of energy.
So I think that's a good thing.
I think that's a great way to be.
And it's being honest about that and the path forward.
And I think everything has to be on the table because we have to have a portfolio that produces the kinds of energy that we're going to need to power our economy.
Another significant issue that a lot of people are concerned about is government interference in online censorship and what was exposed during the Twitter files that the FBI had contacted the original owners of Twitter and instructed them that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation,
was trying to get I think?
That we're running these social media companies were being directly influenced by the federal government, and they were using this power to silence people from speaking out against certain things.
This is very concerning to a lot of people, this idea that the government would infringe on our ability to be whistleblowers, to expose issues that have been hidden from the American people because of greed and money and politics.
And I think social media is kind of difficult to control.
There's a difference between misinformation or just outright lying, or it's an agenda of a foreign nation that's trying to sow all these kinds of sentiments and those kinds of things.
And it's kind of difficult to police all those things, and it's an ongoing kind of situation.
But I'm always going to try to err on the side of free speech.
And then there's incredibly more and more kinds of platforms, just like one I'm on right now talking about these kinds of things.
And I'm not, you know, clutching my pearls if there's having conversations that I may or may not agree or disagree on what's being talked about those things.
But I think people are also, there's also a level of responsibility to be, you know, to discern what you're hearing.
It's like, do I think that's true?
Or I think that's trash.
Or it's like those kinds of thing.
And just because always asking myself, in what I'm read, is that just true?
Or is there a perspective?
Where is it coming from?
Who's behind those kinds of a thing?
So, I mean, it's a difficult kind of what's the appropriate kind of balance.
But it's absolutely...
It's also a fact that there are bad actors behind some of those kinds of conversations or some of those kinds of misinformation as well, too.
And absolutely...
Incitement is not free speech and encouraging people for violence or those kinds of a thing.
But what the fear is that the government was interfering when you had 51 former intelligence agents that were testifying that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation.
When it seems pretty clear that they knew that to not be true.
And that Twitter actually listened to these people.
And they did block that.
And it did probably have a significant impact on the 2020 election.
Well, but the other thing that had a significant impact was in 2020, I forget his name, but he had to investigate, you know, Clinton's about the emails.
There's both sides and they have agendas to suppress some kinds of a thing or to bring something to the front.
And it's undeniable that it can have an impact on that as well, too.
I never went down either of those rabbit holes, whether it was the Clinton emails or if it was the Hunter Biden's kind of laptop.
But it hasn't really changed overall the dynamic that in our cycles, the last three cycles, it's really – it's about – For me, it's about a referendum on what we want, a vision for America.
Is it a Trump kind of a vision, or do we have an alternative?
And I've always been very clear it's going to be incredibly close, and it's going to be incredibly, at times, very divisive.
And here we are now, and it's still back to a coin toss.
And I've always predicted that it would be, you know, even back to 2016 because, you know, we're really going to have a lot settled out before this election.
It's going to take America in a very two stark and distinctive kinds of directions.
It's like, well, you know, endorsements and surrogacy doesn't really count for much.
It doesn't count for much and sometimes.
But, I mean, that was a significant increase.
And he's getting involved, and he's showing up at those kinds of events.
I mean, in some sense, I've said this publicly, that he's even a bigger kind of star than Trump can be.
And for some people in Pennsylvania, like, that's Tony Stark.
He's involved in undeniably kinds of important things, like SpaceX.
Or he was one of the original charter, he was on the charter of OpenIA.
He was involved in that too.
So, I mean, that's significant.
And I don't agree with some of his views on politics, but it's undeniable that he can move the needle in some sense of convince some people that it's like, hey, if he says that he's the right choice for president, that that's going to resonate in some circles that that's going to resonate in some circles in Pennsylvania.
And I've worn that.
And acknowledging it, it's just like, hey, I know people and they admire him.
And you may not agree with his politics, but really it's impossible to ignore that he is going to have a level of an impact on that.
Well, I think what a lot of people are excited about with Trump is this possibility of change.
The Elon Musk edition is one of them, or RFK Jr. is another one, this idea of making America healthy again, removing additives from foods that have shown to be toxic that are illegal in other countries.
I mean, this is, I think, a significant issue that shouldn't be a partisan issue.
This should be something that we all should be concerned with.
Why do we have ingredients in our food that is illegal in a bunch of European countries because they found out that these things are dangerous?
You know, go to McDonald's in, like, the UK. You know, the French fries has three ingredients.
Potatoes, salt, and I think maybe oil.
And look at what's in America's side on that.
It's much different.
I support that.
But if anything, more of – and I know your city that we're in now, Austin has an amazing food kind of scene.
And again, if anything, more of the crunchy, more liberal side.
We're on part of the whole organic kinds of a thing and more impurity and things.
I don't think that's an issue.
And honestly, I don't think that that's going to be the kind of mantle that somebody like RFK Jr., that's not his.
So I think having a more pure and safe and abundant kinds of food in our country, I absolutely support that.
And, you know, I'm selective what I feed my children.
I mean, when we were, you know, when I was a kid, it was like Velveeta, you know, like, hey, now we have real cheese.
Or did you ever have, like, Ecto Cooler, like that green, like, antifreeze kind of color of high C and some of the kinds of foods that we had when I was a kid.
That would be unthinkable kinds of now.
And I think the quality of our food and kinds of more impure, I think that's been an ongoing conversation.
And organic can't become elitist.
It can't be It can't be too expensive.
And I fully support making it more and more pure and more safe on that.
And I would absolutely – I would celebrate if I could buy the same French fries that you get in the UK. I think there should – you don't need more than three – I have a buddy of mine who lives in Australia, and he came over to America, and he loves quarter pounders in Australia.
Well, not only that, it's really fucked up because you could make it a product of America if you butcher it here.
So if you import cattle from Australia, say, and then you bring it to America, and then you cut it up and then package it, because you've cut it up and packaged it, it's now a product of America.
So you could write that on the label.
You know, I had Will Harris, who runs White Oak Pastures, which is a regenerative farm.
This guy spent 20 years and untold dollars changing an industrial farm that his family had and turning it into a regenerative farm.
And in doing so, provided people with a much more natural and healthy choice.
And he's also done a great job of exposing these practices.
Oh, before we wrap up, I think we have a situation, whether it's the situation on Israel or there's a lot happening about the election right now.
But it's really a strange place in our nation right now.
But I promise you it's going to be, depending on whenever people hear this conversation, our world's going to be about to change or maybe has changed.
And so I just hope, though, I just hope, though, that we're going to be able to respond in a way for an order kinds of transfer of power and we are going to be heading into a more peaceful and a more productive and collaborative kind of direction throughout that.
But we're in an incredibly divisible place right now.
And I just want to be part of a conversation to make sure that we can be more constructive.
But right now, it's a difficult place right now, and we're coming down to a coin toss election.