All Episodes
Feb. 24, 2022 - The Joe Rogan Experience
02:48:16
Joe Rogan Experience #1783 - Ben Burgis
Participants
Main voices
b
ben burgis
01:40:53
j
joe rogan
01:05:55
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
Joe Rogan podcast, check it out!
The Joe Rogan experience.
Train by day, Joe Rogan podcast by night, all day.
Cheers, sir.
Cheers.
Salute.
joe rogan
So this is for you.
Oh, thank you so much.
It's got a little JRE label on the back of it.
This is your own in the side, this little thing.
Oh, yeah.
This is a part of a thing we did with Fight for the Forgotten, which is, I don't know if you know what that is, but it's a charity that my friend Justin Wren put together.
They build wells for people in the pygmy population in Uganda and in the Congo as well.
And so they did a thing with Buffalo Trace where we picked out one very specific batch and they literally gave us a barrel of whiskey.
So we have one giant bottle and then a bunch of these bottles to give out to guests.
So there you go.
ben burgis
Nice.
Oh, man, this feels strange.
I've got to tell you, in the late 90s, I watch news radio all the time.
So feels weird having a drink with you.
joe rogan
Yeah.
It feels weird just being me.
It's weird for people to feel weird to meet me.
So that's odd, too.
So your book speaks to my heart.
Did you bring a copy?
ben burgis
I did not.
joe rogan
You have a book with you?
ben burgis
No, I have a book with me.
This is a book by my friend Adolph Reed.
So it's about growing up in New Orleans under Jim Crow and kind of how the South and the country has changed and how it hasn't changed.
So this is good stuff.
unidentified
Okay.
Cool.
joe rogan
Well, that's a good book, too.
But tell everybody about your book.
ben burgis
Yeah, so my book is called Canceling Comedians While the World Burns, a Critique of the Contemporary Left.
And I wrote that a while ago.
So that was before we went through this surreal experience where during weeks that the United States and Russia have been closer to the brink of war than the Cuban Missile Crisis, you know, than they have been since the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Somehow we've had weeks of news cycle about Joe Rogan.
I don't know how that happened.
joe rogan
Yeah, I'm a controversial character, apparently.
ben burgis
Apparently, and apparently those controversies are the most important thing in the world.
joe rogan
Well, the most important thing in the world in media is ratings.
And unfortunately, outrage is what sells.
And if you could be upset at something, and so there's like a perfect storm with me.
First of all, it was questioning the COVID narrative.
And then it was having on doctors who also questioned the COVID narrative.
And then it was me getting COVID and recovering very quickly, but taking the wrong medication in their eyes.
And then it was, you know, like posting up the brought to you by Pfizer videos and like showing like these people are bought and paid for by pharmaceutical companies.
And then it's all the other things.
It's like every clip that we talked about before the podcast, like every clip that I've ever said taken out of context.
And if you smush them all together, how horrible it looks.
But it's not really, it's not really that they think it's important.
They don't give a fuck what's important.
They're just trying to stay alive and they're trying to get as many views as possible.
And they're trying to escape what is this undeniable demise of modern mainstream news.
ben burgis
Well, that's the, yeah, we were talking about this a little bit before we started.
And I think what's really, I mean, whatever.
This is not like a mind-shatteringly original insight or whatever.
You know, lots of people have said this, but I think what's really gone on is that the economic collapse of traditional media has meant that the profit incentive now is just to cater to whoever you have left, right?
So if you have, you know, like if you're on Fox, then like, you know, whatever like couple million conservative old people are, you know, watching at any given time, you want to give them the narrative that's going to keep them scared and angry and watching the news.
If you're on MSNBC, then, you know, you spend the entire Trump years talking about Russia, you know, because like that's what, like, that's what scares their audience.
Yeah.
And people don't, you know, and one thing that really disturbs me about this, I mean, like, the book is about all of the things that people who I basically agree with are getting wrong, right?
So in other words, like, I'm a socialist, I'm a columnist for Jacobin Magazine.
joe rogan
Are you a straight-up socialist?
Are you a Democratic socialist?
Because I know that you've been represented as a Democratic socialist.
ben burgis
So, I mean, look, the reason I put Democratic in there, right?
You know, which, you know, which I, which I do.
But the reason I put democratic in there is because there are obviously countries that have existed that have called themselves socialists that have not had things that I care about like free speech and multi-party elections.
And so I certainly don't want to associate myself with that.
But look, I mean, short term, I care very much about having socialized health care, about having tuition-free higher education so people can go to school without having to be in debt for like decades, which is obscene.
Obscene.
I mean, that's ridiculous.
joe rogan
Yeah, I'm with you 100% on both those things.
ben burgis
And I do think that the level of inequality that we get from our current system is indefensible.
In other words, that if one person has more than another just because they chose to work harder, then that's one thing.
unidentified
Right.
ben burgis
Person A wants to stay home and watch Netflix and person B, wants to work for more hours.
Then person B should get more money.
I am totally fine with that.
But what bothers me is when you have these massive inequalities that have huge effects in people's lives that are linked to things that aren't under their control.
And I think we have a lot of that too.
joe rogan
I would agree with you 100%.
My position on this, whenever people push back against the concept of socialism, or when I was supporting Bernie Sanders for president, I was saying that, well, look at all the things that are technically a socialist concept that we accept, like the fire department.
Imagine if you had to have money to get your fire put out.
Like we don't think that.
Like if your house burns down, we call the fire department.
They show up.
Our taxes fund the fire department.
That is essentially a socialist endeavor.
I mean, it's a socialist institution.
ben burgis
Yeah, it's taken outside of the, it's taken outside of the market.
It's provided just as like a right that you should have just for just for being a person, right?
You know, you shouldn't have to do anything special to get your house put out if it's on fire.
And you also shouldn't have to do anything special to get treatment if you're sick, to go to college in the first place.
It seems to me that a lot of people who like don't think that there should be a higher minimum wage are the same people who will go turn around and say, oh, if they wanted to make more money, they should go back to school.
But then they don't want to pay for that, right?
So which one is it, right?
Like, should they be paid more doing what they're doing or should they go back to school?
Because if it's none of the above, then it sounds like you just don't think those people should have good lives, or at least you don't have a plan to help them have good lives.
joe rogan
What's fascinating to me, too, is when you look at public school versus public services like the fire department, fire department people get paid well.
It's a good job.
If you're a member of the fire department, I have friends that are in the fire department.
It's good benefits.
The hours are cool because you get to work like 24-hour shifts.
You sleep there.
You work there.
My friend Ray was a fireman for years.
And he would say he worked a few days a week.
And then there were long shifts and they weren't always called to fires.
So sometimes they're just cooking and working out and hanging out around the firehouse.
But it's a great job.
It's like a job that people look forward to getting.
It's difficult to get.
How come that's not the same thing with teachers?
Like what kind of a fucking world do we live in where teachers don't get paid well?
I mean, I'm not saying fire department people shouldn't be paid well.
Of course they should be paid well.
They should be paid great.
It's a fucking very risky job.
It's very valuable to the community.
But fucking so is teaching.
How is there such a disparity?
ben burgis
So is teaching.
And it's crazy that there are so many people who look at K-12 teachers and say, like, oh, how come, you know, how come they get summers off or, you know, whatever, you know, or like don't like that the, you know, which no, it's ridiculous.
joe rogan
It's so stupid.
ben burgis
And they don't, you know, and I guess what gets me is when people see someone like a unionized school teacher who has some good benefits, a little bit of job security, not nearly as good as it should be, like we've been talking about, right?
You know, but like, and they say, oh, well, why should they have those things when I don't?
Instead of saying, well, how can I get those things?
joe rogan
Yes.
ben burgis
Right.
So I could have them too.
joe rogan
Yeah.
ben burgis
You know, because it doesn't, you know, it doesn't benefit you as an ordinary person if like somebody who has a job like that is paid less.
In fact, what it does is it's bad for your kids if they go to public schools because the kinds of things that teachers unions want, like smaller class sizes, are things that are, you know, like the conditions that they teach in are the same conditions that the kids are learning in, right?
So I think it actually benefits everybody.
Like I think that Finland is supposed to have the best public schools in the world by a lot of metrics, the best school system in the world.
They actually don't really have private schools in Finland.
And it's very strong unions.
People are certainly getting a better deal as teachers there than they are here.
But so many people think the solution is to privatize things or is to.
joe rogan
That's the solution if there's no other options.
I mean, if you're a guy right now and you have a child and you have enough money to put them in a really good school that you have to pay for versus a really shitty school that you get for free, that makes sense.
ben burgis
Yeah, I don't blame anybody for making that decision as an individual.
I mean, like what I would ask.
joe rogan
They shouldn't have to make that decision.
ben burgis
Yeah, exactly.
I think what we should have are like excellent public schools so that like everybody can just do that.
joe rogan
Imagine.
I mean, that's- Imagine that that's controversial.
Like, literally, one of the most important things for the future of our society is raising children correctly and educating them by correctly, meaning like giving them the opportunity to grow and pursue their interests and find out where they fit in life and have enthusiastic, well-paid teachers, not people that feel like they're being taken advantage of and fucked with and just exhausted all the time.
ben burgis
Well, and it's weird too, because a lot of the same people who are hostile to that will say when they're talking about like corporate CEOs, like, oh, you can't complain about how much they're paid because they have to be, you know, like you have to have that as an incentive or they're not going to give you their best work if they're not being paid 500 times more than people who work there.
But it's like, wait a second, so why doesn't that logic go for teachers or other public employees that like if they're paid more, you know, then you're going to get, you know, then you're going to get a better performance out of them.
Why is it only CEOs?
joe rogan
Well, it's just, we have a very distorted set of values when it comes to like what's important.
And this is, again, not saying that fire department people are not important.
They're fucking hugely important.
I respect them very much.
And I'm glad they get paid well.
But I mean, they should get, it should be like that with all of what I would think of social services, services for the community that we would gladly pay for for taxes, fixing infrastructures, fixing roads.
The problem I think with a lot of people is they just don't trust government to handle the money well.
They think that you're going to get a lot of bureaucracy.
It's going to be bloated.
There's going to be a shitload of people that are working.
They're not going to resolve it.
And it's going to be sort of that same situation where if you donate to charities and then you find out that like 90% of the money goes to infrastructure and just some of those shitty charities where so much money goes to the people that are working there that very little of it goes to the actual charity itself.
ben burgis
Well, of course, that's the private sector too.
joe rogan
Yes, it is.
It is with everything.
ben burgis
I guess I would just say one thing about the bureaucracy thing, because I know that that's something that's an easy association in lots of people's minds, right?
You know, that more government means more bureaucracy.
And if you're thinking about people who are like petty gatekeepers, you know, who are going to be able to approve or deny something, it's like very natural to resent people like that.
But what I would say is that what situation is actually going to give bureaucrats more power?
Is it going to be if you have something like Medicare for All, for example, where, or just like how public schools already work, right?
That K through 12, that every kid has to be educated, you know, like you don't have to go through a special process.
So if it's universal programs, then you don't have what you have with means-tested programs, where there's somebody who's looking over your application and deciding whether or not you qualify and deciding which hoops you have to jump through.
And that really seems to me like where bureaucrats are really going to get most of their power.
And that's not to say, like when I'm saying that, I'm not saying that like there are no legitimate complaints about any of the agencies that do these things.
Of course there are, right?
Of course.
But what I would ask though is what the options are, right?
So because if you privatize something, then you're still, you know, you're still having decisions be made by decision makers who you don't necessarily might be very distant from you.
But the difference is, at least when it's public, then theoretically, right, you can at least elect the people who are overseeing it.
Whereas if something is like subcontracted out to a private corporation, then that's not even true anymore.
There's another layer in between you as an ordinary person and control over this institution.
I mean, like if the federal government does anything bad, then we can theoretically get rid of them.
Although I think there are a lot of very undemocratic things about America's political system that make it way harder to do that.
I mean the fact that we've only got two political parties that are basically allowed to participate in all the – the fact – Yeah, you can go on and on.
We could go on and on, right?
joe rogan
The money that's involved in getting these people elected.
ben burgis
Yeah, the money definitely, right?
joe rogan
Exorbitant amounts of money from special interest groups.
ben burgis
Yeah, no question, right?
So like I think it's – I think we've got like – we've got like a little bit of democracy there, not nearly as much as we should, right?
But like Jeff Bezos isn't up for election by anybody, right?
Like he's just there, right?
So like if you have – like if for example you didn't have like the public post office, right?
It was just like Amazon taking the – like Amazon trucks and that's it.
Then now you're talking about an institution that there's no democratic control over, right?
There's some like a little bit of indirect control in the case of the – the post office, which by the way, I would point out that like when conservatives talk about bureaucracy and inefficiency and stuff like that, they always bring that up.
But like if you actually look at polls, like 90 percent of Americans like the post office.
joe rogan
The post office is amazing.
They can get a fucking letter across the country for less than a dollar.
ben burgis
Right, yeah.
joe rogan
How crazy is that?
Yeah, you could – What does it cost for a stamp?
What's it at now?
ben burgis
Yeah, it's like – I know it's less than a dollar.
It's been a while since I actually – I think my wife usually like – I just email stuff.
joe rogan
I don't fucking mail shit anymore.
ben burgis
But the fact that you can take a letter from Austin to like rural Alaska … For a buck.
joe rogan
For a buck is … Fucking bonkers.
ben burgis
… is ridiculous and no private company would have the incentive to do that, right?
Right.
And I think that that's like one of the things that Bernie Sanders was talking about the two times he ran for president.
It's not one of the things that was played up the most is postal banking.
It's one of the things that was played up the most is postal banking.
You know, which is the idea that you could have like basic banking services offered at the post office, which they actually do have in some Scandinavian countries.
joe rogan
And that was … Basic banking services like deposits and withdrawals and stuff like that at the post office?
ben burgis
At the post office.
joe rogan
Why would you do that?
ben burgis
Which is because it's a public institution.
It already exists everywhere, right?
You know, their post office is all over the place.
joe rogan
So they would sort out money as well as mail?
What if the money goes to the wrong places like the mail sometimes goes – I get mail from wrong people sometimes.
ben burgis
Well, the mail does sometimes.
Sometimes go to the wrong places.
I would point out if you look at like FedEx … Or two wrong people, I should say.
You know, FedEx versus the post office.
You know, it's the – I don't actually think the failure rate is worse with the USPS.
joe rogan
No, we have a problem with the UPS here.
We get – our fucking packages get stolen.
Yeah, and I … They just leave them here and we're not here and someone snatched it.
ben burgis
Yeah, well, I don't know.
That's – you know, if the alternative is they put the thing on the – you know.
Yeah, probably.
joe rogan
Put the fucking thing on the doorman.
We'll come get it.
You got a lazy UPS driver.
But you're subject – like at home, I got a great guy.
It's like you're subjected to whoever the fuck it is that's running that route, you know, unfortunately.
ben burgis
No, fair enough, right?
But what I would just point out is this, that like right now there are a lot of people who for one reason or another, they can't get a bank account, right?
You know, that they have – that – I mean the most like extreme case might be like somebody who's like homeless, you know, so they don't have an address.
But like even short of that, right, there are people who for one reason or another have trouble getting a bank account.
So you have all these like parasitical like cash – you know, check cashing businesses and stuff like that.
unidentified
Yeah.
ben burgis
That like prey on people like that.
And I think having some kind of public alternative would like go a long way to helping with that issue.
There are countries that already exist.
You know, so I think that like in the short term, like the stuff that makes sense to me is finding ways, you know, where it makes sense.
It might not always make sense, right?
You know, but finding ways that you can expand what's not just like you have to find some private corporation to do it for you.
But that can be within the sort of, you know, the public, uh, the public sphere.
And then, look, I mean, there are things that we'll probably always need, you know, private businesses for.
I'm under no illusions about that.
You know, that you, you know, if you don't want to have like the way grocery stores were in like the Soviet Union in 1985 or whatever, you know, you have to have, you know, like there are certain things, price signals and, you know, firm failure, you probably do need to have.
But I do think like at the sort of outer edges of what I would like, that it would be good if it was a long-term goal to move towards having it be more of a norm that workers like own like a lot of a lot of private businesses, you know, that there are, you know, if you look at like the Mondragon Corporation in Spain, you know, that that has like 80,000 worker members, you know, who own that.
You know, you have like the equivalent, like an operating agreement, which is like the equivalent of a union contract, but there's no like separate boss to negotiate with.
And you, you know, might not necessarily directly elect managers because there could be things that are like, you know, technical things that, you know, managers have to do that like you want that to be more of a traditional job application, but you can at least elect the people who hire them.
And even if I could like, you know, whatever, like a magical genie would just like somehow grant me, you know, that like all of my political preferences were satisfied in ways that I don't think they're going to be anytime soon, given all those problems with America's political system we talked about earlier.
But like, even if that happened, I don't think that like every single business should have to be like that.
That if you, you know, like hire a guy to, you know, to do like graphic design for your podcast for 10 hours a week or something, that they have to have like voting rights in a cooperative.
Like that would be silly.
But I think that you can, I think we could move towards an economy where that was like a much more common thing.
And I think that would be way better off because the way it is in like the kinds of corporations that dominate the economy right now, where you'll get like Amazon workers who are like sometimes like working at the warehouse and then they have to have like a second job at night and their boss literally has enough money off of that to buy his own spaceship, right?
That strikes me as a level of inequality that's really hard to justify by the principles that we kind of started with.
joe rogan
Well, what do they pay at Amazon?
Are they egregiously underpaid?
ben burgis
I don't think that they're egregiously underpaid by the standards of the standards of like, you know, corporate America as a whole.
I think it is up to 15 now.
I'd have to check the exact numbers.
But I think that the, but like what I would, what I would question is just this, though, right?
Like when you're dividing up the revenues that the whole company is making, then you say like there are lots of ways that if you are in a cooperative and people could vote on pay scales, there are lots of things you could do to convince somebody.
joe rogan
You mean like employees vote on pay scales?
ben burgis
Yeah, like if you have like a worker cooperative, right?
unidentified
Right.
ben burgis
You know, then.
joe rogan
Well, the problem with that is a lot more workers than there are Jeff Bezos's.
And if they decide to say like, we, we should get most of the money.
ben burgis
Okay, but they, but what do you think?
What do you think Jeff Bezos is doing?
Like, what's the right now?
Yeah.
joe rogan
Coke.
He's doing Coke and he's banging his girlfriend on a yacht.
He's living like a guy who's got $183 billion.
ben burgis
Going to space.
joe rogan
Going to space on a rocket ship that looks like a dick.
He's shooting a giant metal dick up into the heavens.
He's literally trying to fuck space.
Yeah, that's what he's doing.
That's what you're supposed to do when you make that kind of money.
My fascination with Jeff Bezos is his transformation from nerd to like this like muscle looking guy.
He looks like a jiu-jitsu black belt.
He looks like a tank.
It's kind of crazy.
And now he's got, he used to have this like very respectable, normal wife.
And now he's got this bombshell girlfriend.
It's kind of hilarious.
I love it.
I love a good cliche.
I really do.
I love the fact they have to take down a bridge because he made a yacht that is so fucking big in order for it to get out of the place where they're making it.
They have to disassemble a fucking bridge.
And he's like, yeah, disassemble the bridge.
What the fuck, man?
Why do you need a yacht so big?
What are you doing?
What are you doing?
He's just out of control.
But that's like, I feel like everyone that gets to that level of wealth seems to go out of control.
ben burgis
Yeah, no, it definitely does.
It definitely does seem that way, right?
And then their kids, in many cases, start out of control because they grew up their entire lives having this level of wealth that makes it easy to get anybody to do whatever you want to do.
joe rogan
That's part of the problem.
The other part of the problem is there's no time to be with the kids.
So when you're working and you're the CEO of Amazon, I mean, the fucking hours that guy was putting in is probably insane.
He's probably working when he was working.
He's not the CEO anymore, but he's probably working 16 hours a day.
How the fuck can you instill some sort of sense of normalcy in your children when you're never home?
It's not really possible.
And so then he's gifts.
ben burgis
Yeah, now he's too busy storming coke and going into space and all that stuff.
joe rogan
And banging his bombshell girlfriend.
Woo!
Yeah.
I feel what you're saying.
Do you think that, do you have hope for the, I mean, there seems to be such a polarization in this country.
There's people that I completely disagree with on the right that are like, pull yourself up, bury bootstraps, all that stuff.
Like, that is nonsense talk.
When people talk like that, I'm like, Jesus Christ, man, not everybody is starting from the same position.
It's a crazy disparity.
And until we address that as a society, until we look at these impoverished communities that have been impoverished for decades and decades and decades.
And, you know, if you really want to talk about where my real feelings of socialism lie, my feelings of socialism are there are communities and it's not just inner cities.
It's like Appalachia.
It's these coal mining towns.
Like we have to dump money into these places and help these folks.
Because if you don't, you're going to have people that come out of there and they're going to cost you exponentially more money and all the problems that they create in their own lives and other people's lives with whether it's crime or whether it's drug addiction or whether it's whatever despair that comes out of these horrific starting points that these people are from, that can be fixed.
And this is like where I'm a bleeding heart.
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, it can be fixed, but like it sure hasn't been.
joe rogan
It hasn't been even addressed.
No, not even addressed.
There's no talk whatsoever about looking at communities like Baltimore and saying, hey, this has been fucked from the beginning.
Like what do we do?
Like look at the red line laws they instituted.
Look at the fact that the same, what was his name?
Woods.
What was the cop that we had on?
Michael Woods.
He was on, he was a police officer in Baltimore.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
And he was working there.
And one of the things that he noticed was they found a rap, like a, you know, a arrest sheet from like the 1970s.
And it showed all of the same exact crimes that they're dealing with in the current time, all in the same areas.
And they were all happening.
Like the same thing was going on, all the different arrests for violence and drugs and all this different stuff.
And he was like, Jesus Christ, this is not, like, and he felt this feeling like I'm in a system that's broken.
Like, you're not going to fix this.
Like, you're just going to keep arresting people.
And you keep having this, you know, the systemic inequality in this area that's just been fucked for decades.
ben burgis
Yeah, no, absolutely.
I mean, I think that, because by the time you're dealing with that on that level, you're treating symptoms.
You know, that like it's, it's already, the problem has already happened.
And, you know, don't get me wrong, I know people commit crimes for all kinds of reasons.
I'm not saying it's all economic, but like also, I don't see a lot of like kids in the suburbs joining gangs, right?
Like there is a reason.
There is a reason for that, right?
For sure.
The things that really drive up the violent crime rate are things that have a lot to do with poverty and inequality.
And I think that if you, you know, you talked about Appalachia, I mean, like, the Obama administration's like response to like all the coal, you know, like the sort of misery caused by all the coal mines closing was to, you know, just kind of sprinkle the region with learn to code bullshit.
Well, that's exactly it, right?
Because like they put up these technology training centers, so it's essentially telling people to learn to code.
Because like, yeah, if you're like a 50-year-old laid-off coal miner, you'll definitely get the coding job in preference over the 22-year-old kid, you know, who just who just graduated.
It's absurd.
And then like Trump came in, and he said he was going to bring the jobs back, and there are fewer jobs there than ever, right?
I mean, I don't think that, I don't think any of these people are serious about helping working class people either in places like Baltimore or in places like Appalachia.
Because I think the Democrats, increasingly, the kind of liberalism that's dominant in the Democratic Party right now, I think isn't really about that.
I think that what it's really about is trying to have a more diverse ruling class.
Like, I know that sounds like an oversimplification, but I really think a lot of it's just about that, right?
You know, that like what they, like, to the extent they're concerned with social justice, what they're concerned about is disparity, you know, that you have more black people than white people who are, you know, living in poverty and going through a criminal justice system and all this stuff.
And that's absolutely true, right?
That that is, and that is completely a result of the fact that, you know, up until the 1960s, we literally lived in an apartheid country, you know, that in much of the United States, you know, we had Jim Crow laws, you know, on the on the books, you know, and I think this, I think the horrible racial history of the United States is the reason for that.
But what's the goal, right?
Is the goal, is what you count as justice, having like exactly demographically correct proportions of every group living in poverty.
It's also this, like all of that stuff.
Like, it's ridiculous.
I was just going to say, like, the Republicans are even worse, right?
I mean, like, Republicans, when they claim that they're like big populists now, it's like, well, what do you actually want to do?
Do you want Winnipeg for all?
Do you want, you know, like, they don't support any of that stuff.
joe rogan
Well, it's also their positions are weaponized, you know, and there's so much polarization.
I think it's very unhealthy to have two positions, a red position and a blue position, because people are so malleable.
They're so easily manipulated.
And they want to be a part of a tribe.
And they'll just subscribe to these ideas and then they take comfort in the fact there's other people that agree with them.
So they get in these Facebook groups and they just like, you know, talk about stuff that everyone else in their little echo chamber agrees with.
And they feel like the whole world should bend to their will.
And it's just a bizarre time.
ben burgis
Absolutely.
I mean, we, you know, what we were talking about earlier about the fact that the collapse of traditional media means that everybody gets to curate their own little media, right?
joe rogan
You know, that you that's a problem too, right?
ben burgis
It's so easy now to just like expose yourself to absolutely nothing all the time except people who agree with you.
Because yeah, if there are only a couple million people watching like one of the traditional networks at any given night, then what's their profit incentive?
Their profit incentive is to like relentlessly pander to whatever audience they have they have left.
So if you know if you're Fox, you know, you scare old conservatives and whatever, like the MSNBC has their own version like we were talking about.
But I think that like this is why I try to like go out and do debates all the time because which like some people, and this is one of the things I talk about in the book, right?
Some people on the left don't like that, right?
They say that like if you're, you know, if you're like if you talk to a bad person basically, right?
You know, they'll say like, oh, you're platforming.
joe rogan
Yeah.
ben burgis
You know, that person.
joe rogan
That's so stupid.
ben burgis
Which is a word I hate so much, but they have, but I get that more than anybody.
Yeah.
joe rogan
Because I, I, you know, people want to say that I'm like a fake liberal because I talk to conservatives and I'm friends with some conservatives.
Like that is the dumbest fucking thing to ever you.
We need to communicate with each other.
We're supposed to be in a community.
The community is the human race, first of all, and then the United States second.
We're supposed to be a community.
And if there, I have a lot of friends that have completely different perspectives than me.
I have a lot of friends that are like very Christian.
I have friends that are very Muslim.
I have friends that have no religious affiliation whatsoever.
I have friends that are right-wing and left-wing.
And I don't mind all those things.
As long as you're not a suppressive person, you're not suppressing people that have an opposite position or an opposite perspective.
Like, why not?
What are we doing here?
Aren't we just talking to each other?
Shouldn't we communicate with people?
But when I have people on, you know, I'll get all this pushback.
Like, or someone like Ben Shapiro.
Ben Shapiro is a lovely guy.
Meet him, get to know him.
He's very nice.
I don't agree with him a lot.
A lot on a lot of stuff.
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, look, if I love the guy.
unidentified
Sure.
ben burgis
I mean, look, if Ben Shapiro ever wanted to come on my show and argue with me, I would 100% do that.
joe rogan
I bet he could.
ben burgis
Okay, well, you know.
joe rogan
But he talks really fast.
You got to be careful.
Because it's hard to keep up with him.
It's like his fucking brain is on a different RPM.
Whenever I talk to him, I try to slow things down.
unidentified
Slow down, youngster.
ben burgis
That's awesome.
joe rogan
But he's very enthusiastic.
Yeah, I don't agree with him on a lot of things, particularly on gay issues.
He thinks that gay folks should just not do it.
ben burgis
It's this ridiculous.
joe rogan
It's the strangest position.
I just don't understand that.
ben burgis
So if you're gay, you have a moral obligation to just be celibate for your entire life.
joe rogan
No, you're supposed to actually engage in heterosexual sex.
Yeah.
Okay.
But what's amazing is that this is the same thing.
Well, this is where it falls apart, right?
Because this is all based on ancient writing.
Because God said this.
Who said God said this?
Who are these fucking people?
And what else did they say God said?
Did they say anything about zombies?
They say anything about people coming back from the dead?
Like, what did God say?
I mean, how much did they say that doesn't make sense?
Do they say anything about parting oceans?
And like, did anybody like lead someone to a place and part a sea?
Because that doesn't seem real.
Maybe someone was lying.
ben burgis
Yeah, right.
That's like – yeah.
unidentified
I mean, anybody who does, anybody who knows gay people, right?
joe rogan
Like, I have gay friends that are like, you could never tell they're gay because they don't, you know, they just seem like a man.
And then I have gay friends like, oh, no straight guy acts like that.
ben burgis
Yeah, they're like gay from space.
joe rogan
Yes, super gay.
Like when you meet a super gay person, first of all, they enjoy behaving that way.
That is how they like to talk.
That's how they like.
Like, Justin Martindale is a great example.
My friend Justin, he's gay as fuck, but he's hilarious.
I mean, he's hilarious with it.
He's like, he's a joyful gay person.
You wouldn't get confused when you're around him.
You wouldn't say, what do you think this guy is?
Like, that guy's gay.
You know, but like, that's how he is, man.
ben burgis
That's what he is.
joe rogan
He's supposed to make a choice to have sex with women.
Like, fuck that.
ben burgis
Yeah, and that sounds like a good deal for the woman, too.
Jesus.
Yeah.
joe rogan
That woman just closing his eyes, thinking about beards and shit.
It's so dumb.
ben burgis
Yeah.
And I think, and also, I mean, we could talk too about like, okay, so there's the party in the Red Sea stuff.
There's also the slavery in the Bible, right?
joe rogan
Like, that's a ton of it.
You know, and then treating women as second-class citizens, condoning slavery.
There's a lot of murder in the Bible for disrespecting people.
Like, how about that the one guy when the kids called him bald and they killed all the kids?
Them kids, they killed the bear.
Because they called the kids because they called him a bald guy.
Like, what the fuck?
Coming from a bald person, let me tell you something.
unidentified
That's an overreach.
joe rogan
That's ridiculous.
ben burgis
But it's this idea of the idea.
You don't think if some kids teased you about that, they would deserve the death penalty.
unidentified
No.
joe rogan
Listen, I think there's some things that are fascinating about religious traditions that I think they can act as a scaffolding for moral behavior.
And some of the kindest, nicest people I know are Christians.
And I think that there's something about that sort of structure, that religious structure.
When I was younger, I was much more of what you would say like a traditional agnostic or atheist.
Like I thought it was dumb.
I thought the religion was dumb.
I don't think it's dumb anymore.
And I think it's greatly beneficial to some people.
And I think it does give them a structure.
And if you, Jordan Peterson said something that really made a lot of sense to me.
He said, it's not whether or not I believe in God.
He goes, but if you live your life like God exists, you will have a higher quality of life.
And it's that if you live your life like you are a part of this enormous community of loving beings that are all connected to this higher power and that you have this like moral obligation to be a good person and that there's great value and benefit in that.
And then there's a spiritual path to take of a righteous person who's really trying to do good in this world.
And I think for a lot of people, religion can act as a scaffolding to sort of substantiate and enforce those kind of positive traits and positive paths of life.
And I think there's great benefit in that.
I think there's great good in that.
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, look, I'm an atheist, but, you know, but I have tremendous respect for Christians who get what you just described out of it.
I have to say there are Christians who get very different things out of it, right?
You know, that they want to ban abortion and make gay people go back in the closet and all that stuff, you know, but like, but look, I mean, I think like Cornell West, you know, I think that's a Christian.
I have immense respect for.
joe rogan
Have you ever met him?
ben burgis
No, no.
He was on, like, so I used to do a segment on the Michael Brooks show, and I think he was on that at least once.
joe rogan
I missed that guy.
Yeah.
He was great.
ben burgis
Yeah, he was.
He was one of my closest friends for the last couple of years before he passed.
joe rogan
He was a funny dude, too, man.
ben burgis
He was a very funny guy.
What he would do.
joe rogan
Good impressions.
ben burgis
The Nation of Islam, Obama.
joe rogan
He was just a really thoughtful, interesting guy who knew a shitload about politics and about socialism.
And he was a really good guy to sort of defend these positions of democratic socialism, too.
Because he didn't seem like a bad person.
And even in critiquing other people that disagreed with him, I felt like he did it for the most part pretty reasonably.
ben burgis
Yeah, well, I think that one thing that he really got, and I actually think he helped me to get, you know, since in the, you know, in the years since I met him, is that like a lot of people who agree with his position, with my position, don't think nearly enough about what's going to be appealing to like most ordinary people that they have.
Because if you're just, you know, like, which is one of the reasons I wrote the book, that like that stuff was starting to drive me crazy, you know, that like it seems like what a lot of people want to do is be part of an in-group and like yell at everybody who doesn't, you know, who isn't like already on board with like every single thing on a checklist.
And that's just not going to, that's just not going to work, right?
I mean, that's like if you actually care about this stuff, right?
Like if you think, yeah, I think that we have like a grotesquely unequal society.
I think that, you know, I think we need to have national health care.
We need to, you know, not fight all these wars around the world, all of that stuff.
And like, you're actually talking about this stuff because you care about it, which let's be honest, not everybody does.
I mean, some people, politics is like a weird hobby for them, right?
You know, but like if you really care about that stuff, then you want to present that in a way that's going to appeal to ordinary people who haven't read everything that you've read, who aren't like necessarily don't have all the same like subculture, you know, sensibilities that you have.
So like, yeah, I mean, it drives me, it drives me crazy when I see people who want all the things that, you know, all the things that I want, who are instead of trying to, you know, find ways that they can explain this to people who might like, you know, agree with them on some things, disagree with them on some things.
Like a lot of people, like most people aren't like centrists in the way that the media means when they say centrists, right?
Which is like the, you know, whatever socially liberal, fiscally conservative, all that stuff, right?
You know, like most people, I think, just have weird combinations of views, right?
Which is because like if you spend all of your time thinking about politics and tweeting about politics and all that stuff, you're like kind of an unusual person.
Most people don't do that.
They have other things that they have to do.
So they might have political reactions to things.
They have political impulses, but like they haven't necessarily thought through every single thing, you know, to probably don't have the time.
Yeah, of course they don't.
joe rogan
If you want to get involved deeply into the weeds and politics, you're going to, it's a tremendous amount of hours for years and years and years just to get a base understanding of what's going on.
That's why it's so impressive when you talk to someone who really does know a lot about politics.
Like whenever I talk to like my friend Kyle Kalinske, whenever I talk to him about politics, like that motherfucker knows a lot.
So when we had the end of the world podcast when it was the election this past year, when we brought him, I brought him up, like, you're the voice of reason.
Like you actually understand what's going on here.
And he called it every step of the way.
See, all these people that had like these conspiracy theories about Trump, like, oh, the mail-in votes.
He explained.
He's like, the mail-in votes are going to be majority Democrat votes.
And he goes, so if you look at Trump getting way ahead in places like Pennsylvania and a couple of these other states, he's like, this is what's going on.
There's a lot of the Republican folks are going to show up and they're going to vote in person.
And then the mail-in is going to be overwhelmingly Democratic.
And then he's probably going to lose a lot of numbers overnight.
unidentified
And they're like, oh, we went to bed and he was ahead.
joe rogan
But then he's like, Kyle Kalinsky explained it, explained it all on the podcast, clearly called it.
And that's because that's a guy who's been really studying politics at a very comprehensive level for a long time.
And he can give you the real information about it.
unidentified
Yeah.
ben burgis
And most people, like you said, they don't have the time.
I mean especially when you're in an increasingly precarious economy where lots of people like might have a couple of jobs and like drive an Uber on the side, you know, like just because they're trying to … Unless you're just listening to podcasts all the time and really educational podcasts on politics.
joe rogan
And even then, you're going to get a cursory sort of understanding of it.
ben burgis
Yeah, absolutely.
So I mean, I think that what you should really be when you approach people to try to convince them of the things that are important to you, you shouldn't start from a place of do you have all the right, you know, do you have all the right positions?
joe rogan
Right.
ben burgis
Like all of this stuff.
Because, you know, by definition, look, if everybody, you know, if everybody agreed with me about all this stuff, we'd be living in a very different country right now.
unidentified
Right.
ben burgis
You know, like, like, so, so I think that you need to assume the real question is, does somebody have like values that are just like totally incompatible with mine?
And or do they just have like economic interests that are going to like lead them to like they're never going to agree with me, right?
Like Jeff Bezos and I are never going to agree on like what tax rates should be for obvious reasons, right?
joe rogan
You know, like I would like you to talk to him, though.
I think that would be an interesting conversation.
I don't, I've never heard him discuss money in terms of like wealth and taxes and things like that.
I wonder what his position is on that.
I feel like there's a system that's in place that you would almost be negligent if you didn't take advantage of it.
You know, if you're a guy who's making a lot of money and this is how you could pay X amount of taxes and this is like, these are your deductions and this is like the law.
You follow the law to a T. And then the rest of it you can give out charitably if you choose to.
But like, I wonder what his position is on all that stuff.
Like when you've got that kind of money, yeah.
ben burgis
I mean, I think that my suspicion is that it starts to look very different, right?
joe rogan
You know, once you get all that cash, right?
ben burgis
You know, like you're gonna, you know, like you're gonna feel very, it's really hard to convince somebody that, like, who's benefiting that much from the way things are now.
joe rogan
Did you see the image of him at the New Year's party with his girlfriend?
No, Jamie, help me out.
This is so important because someone needs to superimpose this with an image of Jeff Bezos from like 1989.
Like what he looked like when he started Amazon versus what he looks like now.
I mean, when did he start Amazon?
Must have been the 90s, right?
Because it was an online book thing.
Yeah.
And he was like this kind of nerdy guy.
Now look at him and look at his girlfriend.
I mean, this is amazing.
Look, he's got fucking heart.
The hardest stuff in his defense, this was actually a party that was for, it was like a disco theme party.
So you're supposed to dress like this.
So everybody dressed like that.
They all dress silly.
It was just, it was a fun party.
So he had these glasses.
They were like heart-shaped lenses.
And he's got this bombshell girlfriend who's leaning on him.
I love it.
I love excess.
I love when people are preposterous.
ben burgis
Yeah.
Yeah.
joe rogan
I love it.
ben burgis
No, I mean, fair enough.
Like, and again, I don't blame anybody as an individual for like taking it.
Like, look, if you're told, here are the rules, right?
That this is like that everybody has to function in, like, within reason, like if you're not like, you know, doing some things that I do think, you know, Bezos has done, but like, you know, but if you, you know, but there are like a list, you know, like if you're not like busting unions and this and that, right?
Then like, look, if you just look at how it started, how's it going?
joe rogan
They did it.
Someone did it.
Ah, look at that.
That's fucking amazing.
That's amazing.
Work hard, folks, and you don't have to be a dork.
Imagine, shave your head, get a bombshell girlfriend.
unidentified
Woo!
joe rogan
I love it.
Happy days are here.
ben burgis
Yeah, let's go.
joe rogan
That's literally different lives.
He's led billions of dollars, hundreds of billions.
Not hundreds of millions, sir.
Hundreds of billions.
That's outrageous.
ben burgis
Yeah, no, I mean, he's on track to be the first trillionaire, right?
That's what this is.
joe rogan
Oh, there's trillionaires out there.
ben burgis
Yeah.
Okay, are there?
Because I thought they were saying, like, in 2020, they were saying that, like, at the end of the trillionaires are all non-public.
unidentified
Okay.
joe rogan
See, if you think about like the royal families, like they don't have to disclose their wealth.
These people that have literally, they own countries.
ben burgis
Yeah.
joe rogan
I mean, if you think, I mean, I wouldn't have to name the countries, but there I know for a fact because I have talked to people who are in fact billionaires, who are very wealthy business people that laugh.
And they've told me the royal families in some of these countries are worth trillions of dollars.
And they don't have to disclose it.
So when you get this public list of who the richest people in the world are, that's the richest people publicly.
That, you know, like they have to disclose it.
They're not oligarchs.
They're not people that are in charge, literally in charge of the oil, all the oil in a particular part of the world where billions of dollars are coming out every day.
Like, come on.
There's a shitload of money involved in that.
ben burgis
Yeah.
And I mean, the thing is, even if you're not one of those people, right?
Like, you know, the non-non-public trillionaires from those countries that you're talking about, like, one thing that I think people often don't think about enough when they think about stuff like this is, okay, if you have a system where you're going to get like wealth gaps that extreme, right?
You know, that you can have people who are trillionaires maybe or who at least have hundreds of billions of dollars, then you're just not going to have political democracy the way that we should have it because, you know, the idea that like everybody's going to have the same amount of influence on the government is just ridiculous.
joe rogan
It's ridiculous.
ben burgis
You know, once you get to that level, right?
Because if you work at an Amazon warehouse and you want to call your congressman, you'll be lucky if you have a conversation with an intern.
joe rogan
But Jeff Bezos can make a phone call to Biden.
ben burgis
Yeah, no, absolutely.
joe rogan
And he's a Biden motherfucker.
ben burgis
Because if he told him, right?
joe rogan
Listen, bro, take a couple extra Advil and let's have a conversation.
I need to be awake for this one.
Yeah.
ben burgis
Yeah.
Which you might have to for Biden.
joe rogan
What happened to the left where somewhere along the line, this is to get back to your book on the subject that we started with.
What happened to the left where they are willing to they there's something that happened where they became the side that accepts censorship and even promotes it.
And my thought is that something morphed during the time where social media became it became a tool of a lot of right-wing people.
And this is actually like pre-Trump, but was certainly accentuated during the Trump administration.
It's like people had a chance to anonymously say things through social media that maybe they wouldn't say around the office because like say if you have like 10 people in your office and nine of them are Democrats and you're a Republican, you really have to keep your mouth shut, right?
But when you get on Twitter, you can talk all kinds of crazy shit or Reddit or whatever.
And then all the other people that agree with you, they get attracted to you and then you form these echo chambers and then some of them are very aggressive in sort of pushing these ideas out.
And we saw that a lot with like Milo Yiannopoulos and there was a lot of like these like very influential online right-wing people that were, you know, they had like cheers from the fans and they had like these throngs of supporters and they silenced those guys.
They pulled those guys off social media and they found out that it was effective to do that.
And then it became a thing that they got really into where they're into silencing dissenting opinions and it's gone so far that they're doing it to left-wing people that step even remotely outside of the bounds of the orthodoxy, remotely outside of the bounds of what they consider to be the rigid, the rigid maintaining of this ideology.
They step outside of that, they silence people.
And they're pulling videos down left and right off of Instagram and TikTok and Twitter in some ways.
Twitter's like less censorship oriented, even though people think of Twitter as being like a very censored place.
It's one of the more lenient online platforms.
But what the fuck happened?
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, the Milo case is interesting, actually, because I think that, I mean, I understand that he got kicked off of Twitter, and that was definitely part of it.
But he was still riding pretty high after that happened.
Like, I think that in Milo's case, and this is what, you know, when I kind of try to tell people that the ways that some people on the left want to deal with figures like this, like forget morality for a second.
They're just not going to work.
So here's what I mean by that, right?
That like Milo's career was built on people trying to stop him and heckle him and stop him from speaking and all that stuff.
My view on that guy is that honestly, he wouldn't be that interested if he just showed up on a college campus and just talked and nobody interrupted him.
But that was why, because he was like, oh, he's speaking edgy, forbidden truths.
And that was the dangerous ideas to her.
That's what it was called.
I think where Milo really got dropped, where Milo was really ended, right?
And I'm not saying there aren't other cases that are more like what you're talking about, but it seems to me that where Milo was really ended was when the right dropped him after the age of consent stuff.
Like he was going to speak at CPAC and they canceled that.
His book deal, you know, got dropped.
joe rogan
But it wasn't just the right dropping him.
I mean, that was across the board.
ben burgis
People dropped him.
Well, I mean, everybody else had always hated him, right?
But then after that happened, right?
joe rogan
But that was just a thing where it felt like it was so unacceptable to so many people that it's very rare that one idea becomes a thing that completely stops all the momentum that someone had.
Like he was a very popular cultural figure, and then he vanished.
Like has essentially been not just deplatformed, but removed from the cultural conversation.
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, like a week before that happened, he was on Bill Maher, right?
You know, that's so wild.
joe rogan
And Bill Maher was praising him and comparing him to Chris.
ben burgis
Chris Franchis, which I do not think Milo Yiannopoulos deserves.
But yeah, look, I think that I mean, I think that there are a couple things going on there with censorship.
I mean, I would push back a little on the idea that the right isn't like plenty pro-censorship in lots of ways.
joe rogan
I wouldn't say that.
ben burgis
Okay, well, I think.
joe rogan
No, I think that people politically like to silence their opposing or their opposition.
When someone opposes their position, I think they like to do that.
But I think is like the left is traditionally been the ACLU, which those Jewish lawyers supported the idea of Nazis being allowed to say whatever they want because they said that the counter to that, the opposite of that, is the suppressing speech, and it's a terrible, dangerous road to go down.
And the answer to bad ideas is not silencing those ideas.
It's better ideas.
That's my position.
And that's an old school liberal position, but that doesn't exist that much in the left wing of today.
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, that's 100% my position.
I think that, and I think that it's really dangerous that a lot of people, like even though most of the stuff you're talking about is driven more by like mainstream liberals, that like it's not like whatever, you know, people running like these insanely profitable social media companies, right?
It's not like they want all the stuff I want, right?
But I see way too many people on the left going along with it and I think it's super short-sighted, right?
Because like – How did it happen though?
joe rogan
Do you think it happened by what I'm saying?
That like they found it was effective for silencing people they felt was problematic.
So they just adopted these ideas and then they sort of shifted their ethics.
ben burgis
I think there's some of that.
I think that a lot of it is that a lot of people feel powerless to change the world in any way that actually matters.
And so they end up getting sucked into these like culture war distractions about who said what in 1995 that we can like get mad at them about and what the, you know, whatever, like just whatever like weird nonsense people are arguing about this week, right?
The green M ⁇ M, you know, and that like some of this stuff is part of that, right?
That like they have a, that like if you don't, like, if you can't actually, you know, change the world, like create a more equal society or whatever, you can at least get somebody fired.
You can at least get somebody kicked off.
And then you felt like you've won something.
And I think that that's, again, I think it's incredibly dangerous because like people who want, for example, you know, Spotify to kick you off, you know, there's a move on, you know, petition, you know, for them to do that.
That like what I always say is even though, and the thing that really gets me about the calls for censorship is, okay, I think there are principled reasons that, you know, free speech is important and we should have like open, you know, open debates about controversial ideas.
I think there are ways that we have a better society if we do that.
But also, I think it's crazy that anybody who basically agrees with me about politics would support increased corporate censorship, right?
Because if you have like some like social media company, right, you know, that's, that's going to be owned, you know, like they're going to have some CEO who's partying like Bezos in that picture, you know, like is are they, you know, whose side are they going to take when there are future things where people say that something is misinformation, right?
joe rogan
Exactly.
You know, because like and by what definition is it misinformation?
ben burgis
Because the problem is that every political argument is to some extent an argument about facts, right?
Like that like in 2002, even though my position was, you know, as like a college like anti-war activist, was that even if Saddam Hussein did have weapons of mass destruction, it'd still be against the war because I think the rationale still wouldn't have made sense to me.
But like that was like part of what people were arguing about was whether there's weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
And look, if you had had social media companies in 2002 in the way that you do now, and they had misinformation policies, who would be more likely to get bounced for misinformation?
People who said, who agreed with the government, agreed with the New York Times, said there were WMDs, or people who thought that Bush administration officials were conspiring to lie to the public?
Right.
And I think that who's going to, if there's something that comes out tomorrow about some horrible labor practice at Amazon, who are these companies more likely to side with, right?
People who say, yeah, they did this thing, right?
Or the company saying, no, it's a lie.
It's misinformation.
And I think the issue with free speech is always who gets to decide?
And I think this is the same reason.
I mean, look, this is the same reason I don't like, you know, I don't like the CRT laws either.
Right.
Because I don't like the idea that there are going to be people who are second guessing what happened in some classroom to say like, was this too close to like, you know, to one of these ideas that we don't like?
you talk to your students about something that like flew a little bit too close to the sun of CRT.
And that makes me-By CRT, you're talking about critical thinking.
Oh, yeah.
Sorry, critical.
Sorry.
Critical race theory.
Yeah.
And I think that actual critical race theory, there are parts I agree with.
There are parts that I disagree with.
But I don't want to live in a ⁇ I want to live in the kind of society where when there's some controversial idea that's out there, people can talk about it and debate about it.
And if you can, you can discuss it with students in a classroom.
I think ideally the way that education should work, it should foster critical thinking.
Instead of this is exactly what you should think, you should be encouraging students to Think about it more clearly and to argue about it and to decide and to decide what they think.
Ultimately, if you want people to be citizens in a democracy, to the extent that we have one of those, that's what you want.
That's how you want them to grow up, I hope.
joe rogan
Yeah, absolutely.
You want discussion.
The way you sort out, if you're an observer, the way you sort out who has the better argument is to watch them discuss.
You remember the Gore Vidal and William F. Buckley speeches, which is a great documentary.
What is it called?
ben burgis
Best of Enemies.
joe rogan
Best of Enemies.
It's a fantastic documentary where it shows that, I mean, this is the difference in our culture today versus then.
These guys, I believe it was on ABC, these guys had this really highly rated debate series.
I think they did like, how many of them did they do?
Six of them or something like that?
ben burgis
I don't remember how many, but they did a few.
joe rogan
They did quite a few.
So they were going back and forth.
And William F. Buckley was a famous conservative.
Gore Vidal was a famous liberal.
And they had these fascinating discussions.
And they did them on national television.
And they became this point of discussion through the entire country in the world where people sat down and, you know, some people took Buckley's side, some people took Gore Vidal's side.
And this is how we sort things out.
We don't sort things out by silencing people.
We don't sort things out by saying you have an unacceptable position because it doesn't fit in with what I'm saying or it causes this or that.
And it's just a dangerous way to set a precedent because you're filtering ideas.
You're filtering ideas through your own standards.
And I don't think that's good because I think it's bad for you too.
It's bad for your ideas.
If your ideas can't stand the vetting of an opposing position, then your ideas might suck.
And you maybe should look at them.
Maybe you're lazy and you don't want to go through the hassle of debate or of serious discourse.
But if your ideas can't handle that kind of a discussion, you probably shouldn't have them.
You shouldn't adopt them.
You shouldn't be holding on to them.
That's my position on all this.
And I think this, whatever someone's trying to silence someone, it's more political than it is anything.
It's more, this person has an incredible amount of influence and they don't align up very rigidly with what our ideology is.
And they could cause us problems if they discuss certain things in an unorthodox way.
And we don't like that.
So we're going to silence them and we're going to pretend that they're something that they're not.
And we're going to do that openly.
And it's going to be obvious.
unidentified
Yeah.
ben burgis
And I think, and I think especially, like, look, if you think the status quo is totally fine, that like everything is the way that it should be, I can, I guess, understand.
joe rogan
Who the fuck thinks that?
unidentified
I don't know.
joe rogan
That's a crazy argument.
There's not a single person alive that thinks everything's perfect.
Right?
ben burgis
Is there?
I mean, if so, I haven't met them.
joe rogan
I never met them.
So I don't think you can have that argument.
ben burgis
Yeah, so I mean, if you think that there are things that are really seriously wrong with the society that you live in right now, have discussions.
Then you, like, the last thing that you want to do is to make it harder to get your ideas out about that out there so people can talk about them, people can hear about them, right?
Like, I think that if you, you know, if you want, if you want to have, like, you know, in my case, you think that like we have, you know, we have way too much economic inequality.
I think it's particularly crazy to support more corporate censorship.
Because again, who do you think is going to get censored, right?
Like, if there's some Starbucks worker who's got fired when they're trying to organize a union and Starbucks says that, no, they weren't really fired for that.
It was really, you know, because they, you know, whatever.
joe rogan
They showed up late.
ben burgis
You know, they showed up late.
I mean, okay, so somebody's lying.
Right.
Do we want Twitter or whatever platform to be making decisions about like who's lying and like, oh, which of these sides is misinformation?
I don't, right?
Like, not just because I support free speech, though I do, but also just because I don't trust at all, right?
You know, that they're going to take the side that I would want to on that.
joe rogan
Of course.
And so one of the things that I talked about when I made a video recently when they said that I was saying misinformation.
And I was saying, well, look at what used to be misinformation just a few months ago that's now fact.
There's like the lab leak theory.
The lab leak theory, if you said that before, you'd get kicked off of social media.
Now it's on the front cover of Newsweek.
The idea that if you get vaccinated, you can still spread COVID and you could still get COVID.
That was crazy talk.
Rachel Maddow was on television saying the virus stops with you.
You can't spread it.
You can't catch it.
It stops with you if you're vaccinated.
That's not true.
We know that's not true.
So that was, if you said that I think people who are vaccinated can still catch COVID and they can still spread COVID, that would be misinformation.
But now that's accepted as fact.
There's a bunch of those.
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, I think in that case, I think that might be less like, you know, people didn't know that and more just kind of Rachel Maddow's an idiot because like if you, you know, because what they always said is like the F, like, you know, whatever it is, even for like the original version of COVID, the, you know, wild COVID, whatever they call it, right?
They, like, you know, whatever 90-something, you know, percent, you know, like rate of effectiveness of like Pfizer or the other.
joe rogan
But if you read the literature, that's not really even accurate.
ben burgis
I mean, but this is the thing, like, whatever you think the effectiveness rate is, right?
Like, it was never 100%.
And if, and if, like, Rachel Maddow thought that it was 100%, that's like, that one seems more like an issue of like Rachel Maddow not understanding, you know, medical science.
But again, I don't, I don't want.
joe rogan
So that would make it misinformation.
ben burgis
Right?
Yeah.
joe rogan
So it's the same thing.
That's my point.
ben burgis
Yeah, sure.
I mean, like, actually, so here's an example I completely agree with.
At the beginning of the pandemic, like back in, was it like March, you know, 2020, maybe until sometime in April, Fauci, the CDC, everybody was saying, don't wear a mask.
Right.
You know, and, you know, as we established, I am not some, you know, like there are a lot of things that I would rather spend my time on than like trying to sort through all the COVID stuff.
But like even I at the time was like, well, wait a second, that doesn't make sense.
Why not?
Right.
Like, you know, why would that, like the reasons they were giving didn't make sense to me.
And then they kind of said, I mean, like, I know some people say this is an oversimplification, but I think if you go back and look at it, this is kind of what they said.
Oh, we lied about that so that like all the masks wouldn't get, you know, get bothered.
joe rogan
That's not an oversimplification, simplification at all.
ben burgis
That's exactly what they said.
And which is crazy to, like, the thing that's crazy to me is like, okay, if you're going to do that, and I don't think you should have done it, but if you're going to do that, like, you have to resign after that, right?
Like, once you've shown that you were willing to like lie, lie to people, like, if you think it's important that people trust, you know, medical authorities, which, you know, I mean, I can see why, public health crisis, you know, that you think that was important.
Yeah.
Like, what's going to undermine that more?
Right?
People, you know, random people on the internet, you know, like saying things that, you know, that might not be true about it, or, you know, or people going on podcasts, you know, who might say things that are wrong, or like the CDC, like admitting that they were lying about something important.
That's going to undermine that.
That's going to undermine that like crazy.
And I would not have wanted people who were pointing things like this out at the time that like, oh, the stated reasons why masks were supposed to be bad didn't really make sense, which they didn't, right?
You know, because it was like, well, it's going to encourage people to be reckless.
and it's like, well, okay, that's an argument against like seatbelts, right?
joe rogan
I don't think that was the...
ben burgis
I mean, that was one But not Fauci.
joe rogan
I don't think Fauci used that argument.
ben burgis
Yeah, I think the WHO did.
I think that was like if you go to their website, I think that's one of the things that they said there at one point.
But they'd also say, well, people don't know how to use them properly.
So it's going to end up being more dangerous.
And there were a bunch of things they threw out.
None of it quite seemed to add up even at the time.
And then again, then they came out and said, no, actually, it's not like the science changed when that happened.
And I think that I certainly wouldn't have wanted people who were pointing that out to not be able to do that because of some misinformation policy.
joe rogan
Don't you think that the issue really was that people were afraid?
And when people are afraid, then they will support harsher measures to ensure safety.
And one of those measures would be to silence people that may be spreading information that could get people in trouble.
So they're willing to compromise their values because they think there's a greater good to be had.
Like there's a different time.
And that's one of the more dangerous things about a thing like a pandemic because people will compromise their positions because they feel like there's a greater good to be achieved.
And so we need to silence these people.
Like this was during the presidential campaign.
And this is one of the things that I found out that I was really shocked by.
Twitter banned Brett Weinstein had a thing that he had put together called Unity 2020.
And the idea was instead of this rigid two-party system, we have people of the left and people of the right.
What if you had like a really reasonable person, well-balanced person from the right and a really reasonable, well-balanced person from the left and we brought them together, very popular people and put together like a party and called it like the Unity Party.
And so he made a Twitter page and Twitter banned the page.
ben burgis
What was the reason they gave?
joe rogan
Some bullshit reason.
But the reason was they were terrified that these popular podcasters and people were going to take votes away from the left.
Because these people like Weinstein and his wife are progressives.
I mean, they taught at a very progressive university.
A lot of people that are progressive that feel disenfranchised with some of the standards of the Democratic Party, and they weren't really interested in a guy like Biden, who is this career politician who's basically full of shit and having him be president.
Like, aren't there more reasonable, more attractive alternatives?
So they put together this thing, and Twitter fucking banned it.
And I think the reason why they banned it is the same reason why they changed the standards of presidential debates after Ross Perot was in the elections back in the 80s.
Was it the 90s?
When was that?
ben burgis
92 was the first time.
And then I think he ran again in the 96.
joe rogan
This is exactly the same.
They were worried that that can fuck up an election.
If you get enough people that say, hey, you guys are making a lot of sense, I'm going to vote Unity 2020.
If that becomes a big thing, and the Republicans aren't going to vote Unity 2020, they're going to stick with their base.
They're going to stick with their guy.
They're Trump people.
We've got a guy.
He's our winner.
And they were worried and concerned, I think, that this Unity 2020 thing, even if it's like 10,000 votes in this place and 5,000 votes.
ben burgis
Yeah, it doesn't take that much to.
joe rogan
It doesn't take that much to swing elections.
ben burgis
No, definitely not.
Yeah, I mean, look, I certainly wouldn't have voted for Unity 2020.
I think that the Democrats and Republicans are too close together in their positions already, right?
There are too many things that they basically agree on that I don't like, you know, but I certainly don't think that you should be banned for Twitter.
joe rogan
It's crazy.
But that's the thing about these social media platforms is that they've become too big.
They have too much influence.
It's not as simple as like, this is a private business.
They can do whatever they want.
Like this private business is the way that people distribute information to billions and billions of people.
The idea that Facebook is just a private business is bananas because it literally influences worldwide elections and it comes standard on your phone in many countries.
It is the internet to a lot of people in other countries.
The idea that that's just a private company is crazy.
ben burgis
Well, and the thing that's particularly crazy to me is like, look, I understand like a conservative or libertarian, you know, who'd say that, oh, they're a private business.
They can do whatever they want because that's what they would say about everything, right?
You know, that like private businesses should be able to do what they want.
And like, you know, and obviously, you know, I'm a socialist.
I really disagree with that, right?
But like what's crazy to me is when people who are on the left who say that who want there to be more lots of restrictions that I agree with on private businesses then turn around and say, oh, this isn't really a free speech issue because it's like a private business.
It's like, oh, wait a second, guys.
joe rogan
Because it supports their desires.
ben burgis
Which one is it, right?
I mean, like, like as, you know, because if you are on the left, and I don't mean like if you're a liberal, but like if you're a real leftist, then I would say that, you know, a lot of the core of like your worldview is that you understand that private businesses can have a crazy amount of power over people's lives.
And that can be, you know, in certain respects as dangerous as the power of governments.
And of course, the two are not unrelated, right?
Because private businesses, like we were talking about earlier, have a crazy amount of influence over what the government does.
So like, do you, like, I think wanting private corporations to be more powerful because you think that it's going to silence like just the people that you don't like seems like it just always seems like you haven't thought this through at all.
joe rogan
No, but that's the problem.
And this is where I come to you with this.
Like, how do we get people on the left to realize that this is a tremendous error?
And that is not just I understand that they think that short-term this is beneficial because they can silence people they disagree with, but to understand that for I mean, it sounds a little grand, but for the human race, this is a terrible thing to have.
This is a terrible thing to have because you're discouraging discourse.
And it's one of the most important things that we have is the ability to talk things out, the ability to find out how a person thinks and to consider how that person thinks and whether or not that would apply to you.
Like, can I use these thoughts?
Do they have a point that I haven't considered?
Is there something about the way they're looking at the world that maybe there is a perspective that I have either ignored or I just haven't been aware of that will enlighten me and change the way I look at things?
Maybe I look at a person coming from a different walk of life from a different part of the world or different education, whatever it is.
Like, let me take in their point of view and see.
See if this is helpful.
See if I can help.
See, we need more friends than we need enemies.
We don't need more enemies.
So this silencing people, oh, you're just creating enemies.
You're polarizing.
We need communication.
Most people want the same thing.
In terms of like, what do you want from life?
You want your friends, your family, your loved ones to be happy.
You want to be able to pursue your interests and your dreams and your goals.
You have these ideas and these projects you want to do, these goals you want to achieve.
You want to be able to pursue those.
And you want to not be hampered by bullshit while you're trying to do that.
And you also want to be a good person.
Like, that's universal stuff.
Then it comes to like, well, what is a good person?
Like, what should you be allowed to do?
What should you not be allowed to do?
How do you infringe upon the rights of your neighbors with your ideas?
Do you support the community with your ideas?
Is it beneficial to people?
And these are all where things get weird.
And then we get ideologically driven into a left or a right category.
And I believe that many people that are either on the left or on the right are just looking for a gang.
They're just looking for a gang to be in.
And they find it and they just adopt their positions and they adopt this predetermined pattern of thinking and this ideology that they subscribe to because other people on the left do it or other people on the right do it.
And when you do it, those people on the right are like, yeah, good for you.
Good for you, Ben.
You're thinking the right way now.
You're on our side.
And there's like, for human beings, there's a great feeling of camaraderie that comes with that.
You're part of a tribe.
It's very attractive.
And that's a problem.
ben burgis
Yeah.
And I think it's also a problem when, like, how are the tribes being divided up?
And is it in a way that's going to actually advance the things that you want, right?
Like, if it's really about different regions of the country or like, you know, for the diminishing number of people who still watch cable news, you know, which cable news channel, you know, you watch.
And, you know, basically it's like, you know, red team versus blue team culture war stuff, right?
Then I guess the question is, are you ever going to get the kinds of systemic changes that would really help people to do a lot of the things you just talked about, right?
Like have like, you know, be able to, you know, for example, like lots of people can't spend very much time with their families, you know, because they have to work all the time.
You know, lots of people can't do the things they want to do in their life because, you know, they can't go to school, you know, because, you know, like higher education because, you know, they can't, you know, they can't afford it or they don't want to be like saddled with decades, you know, of debt about it.
And so the question is, like, how are you going to achieve those things?
And if there's somebody standing in the way, who is it actually, right?
Is it somebody who's a member of the elite who has genuine power, right?
And whose interests might not coincide with your interests, right?
Because if you had a union at your workplace or if you had like, you know, then their profits would go down or if you taxed them more to pay for some of the things we were talking about, you know, like that, you know, like that would be bad for them.
Is it them or is it like your uncle who like, you know, whatever, like, you know, voted for Trump or something, right?
Like is which, which one of those people should you get mad about?
And I think that the problem is that a lot of people are trained to just like fixate on this whatever just passing bullshit is going on in the news cycle, you know, that like, what are people mad about this minute?
You know, it's going to be something else in 12 hours, right?
You know, but like there's this sort of constant outrage cycle that I think is fed by the profit incentives of media companies because they have to hold on to the audience that they have left.
joe rogan
Well, also they have advertisers.
A lot of those advertisers brought to you by Pfizer.
They have these ideas that you have to subscribe to.
And if you don't subscribe to those ideas, then they don't want to support your program.
And this is like either a said or unsaid thing.
It's like I was listening to this thing where these people were talking about people in positions of power.
Like how do you get these like sort of cookie cutter politicians?
Are they told what to do or are they the kind of people that will do what they think and say what they think other people want them to say?
And I think there's a lot of that.
There's a lot of they don't really necessarily have these principled positions.
What they're doing is they're saying the thing they think that people want them to say.
They're saying the thing they believe people want to hear and that that's going to advance them in their career.
And they're these, you know, we don't have to name the names, but we know these people, these cookie cutter type politicians we know are full of shit, but they say things that are the right things to say given the current political or social climate.
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, look, remember, and they'll also say what they think they have to say at a given point, and then it's like completely forgotten six months later sometimes, right?
Like that, like, think about the 2020 election, like all of those Democrats who some of them said at the beginning of the primaries that they agreed with Bernie about Medicare for all, but even the ones who didn't, right?
They would all say, oh, we at least think there should be this public option where everybody should be able to maybe buy into some sort of public health insurance or whatever.
And that was like the entire debate.
There were like a hundred, you know, whatever.
I don't know how many Democratic debates there were.
It felt like a million, but they have like however many there were, this was always at least like 20 minutes of like every single one of those.
Like they would go on and on about this.
But then like somehow now, that's just disappeared, right?
Nobody's like now Biden's president, it still says on his campaign website, you know, that never got taken down, right?
That he wants there to be this public health insurance option.
Kamala Harris, who said at one point that she agreed with Bernie about Medicare for all, is the vice president.
A lot of these other people are, you know, Pete Buttigieg, you know, said he wanted at least Medicare for all who wanted.
And like he's, you know, he's in the cabinet.
There are all these people who are back to being senators.
And it's like, well, that's what they, you know, when they had to position themselves to win that primary, they said that they cared about like all, you know, the millions of Americans who don't have health care or the like millions more who maybe even do have health care.
joe rogan
How about they said they were going to decriminalize marijuana and release everybody that was in jail for it.
ben burgis
Yeah, when's that happening?
joe rogan
Exactly.
ben burgis
It's all bullshit.
joe rogan
It's all bullshit, but that is the sort of stuff that we're talking about, that they don't really believe these things.
They're saying these things because they believe this is what people want to hear, and that gets those people out to the polls.
That gets those people out to the booths and gets them to vote.
And this is unfortunately where we find ourselves as a culture until we can read minds.
And Elon Musk, hurry up with that technology.
We need to be actually able to read people's minds.
ben burgis
Yeah, I don't know that I want Elon to be able to read my mind.
joe rogan
You're going to read his mind too, though.
And you're going to see, oh, my God.
Why'd you write this book?
ben burgis
Yeah, I wrote this book because I was pissed off.
Like, I think more than any other book that I've written, it came out of intense frustration that I was feeling at that time because I saw a lot of people who I think on paper, they agree with me about most of what I've said tonight.
Maybe not the, you know, maybe not the free speech part, but like, you know, most of the rest of it, like, who were doing all of these things that seemed to me like they were either feeding into these absolutely ridiculous sideshows that like stop people from actually focusing on these issues that we're talking about, you know, like, you know, the title, right?
The title example, you know, canceling comedians, you know, people who would like freak out, you know, about like what Dave Chappelle says in a stand-up special as if like the things that you say in a stand-up special or like an editorial that you're writing for the New York Times about like exactly what you want to happen, right?
Like every sentence, you know, Dave Chappelle is saying in the stand-up special is literally what he thinks.
And, you know, and I think that like one to anybody you're trying to appeal to to like actually build some kind of like political program to actually accomplish any of the stuff I've talked about.
Like, what does that make you look like?
That makes you look like an overgrown hall monitor, right?
Nobody is going to want to follow that person anywhere, nor should they, right?
Like that they, because that's just incredibly damaging and unappealing.
And I wanted, like, I mean, it's funny because I think that like when I sort of use that as the example in the title, right?
Like I was kind of trying to come up with like the most ridiculous example that I could come up with, right?
Like, you know, that like people would be like, you know, in terms of like ridiculous priorities or sort of people being like weird moralistic scolds, like, you know, what would be the biggest example?
Not getting mad at like corporate CEOs who bust unions, not getting mad at like, you know, politicians who commit war crimes, but, you know, or, you know, like maybe you get mad at those people too, but like somehow, you know, my friend, I disagree with him about a lot, a lot of things, a lot of things, but the, but he is my friend, Dave Smith, you know, heard him talk about the outrage budget.
joe rogan
How dare you disagree with Dave Smith about anything?
ben burgis
Well, I'm pretty sure that he disagrees with a whole lot of things you agreed with that said earlier.
joe rogan
No, Dave's awesome.
I'm just joking.
unidentified
Yeah, yeah.
ben burgis
But no, I mean, like, but I think he is a, I think he is a good guy.
And he's, you know, I mean, I've been, you know, I've been on his show several times.
And he has well thought out perspectives.
Yeah, he has.
joe rogan
You may agree or may not agree, but you can see where he's coming from.
ben burgis
Yeah, I can see where it's coming from.
And the other thing that I really respect about him is that I think that a lot of libertarians, like, even though they'll like agree on paper, you know, like that, like with, you know, yeah, we shouldn't be fighting, you know, we shouldn't be fighting these wars, you know, we should like, there shouldn't be all these people in prison or whatever.
It seems like in practice, what really gets them excited is like tax cuts, right?
And I think that, and I think Dave is genuinely not like that.
I think that he actually like devotes way, as far as I've ever been able to see, he actually devotes way less time to stuff like that than to like the United States backing this genocidal city war in Yemen.
joe rogan
That's the big thing with Dave.
It's interventionalist foreign policy and the corporate backing of these horrible regime change wars.
That's the thing that he hates more than anything.
And the actual cost of human lives and suffering.
He's a deeply compassionate person.
He really firmly opposes these things.
And he wants to talk about them whenever he can.
And it's one of those things where, I mean, he talked on my podcast about how that got him kind of booted off of those political talk shows on cable.
ben burgis
Yeah, because nobody wants to hear about dead kids in Yemen like what they want to hear about is like whatever culture war thing people are screaming about each other.
joe rogan
Whether that UPenn swimmer should be able to compete with women.
ben burgis
By the way, I love the thing that I love most about that example is whatever you think about it, right?
Like, and I, you know, I mean, look, if I had to like actually think about it, I'd say, yeah, whatever, let them, you know, I don't care, right?
But whatever you think about it, the idea that everybody is going to get this excited about something that happens in an Ivy League swim meet, right?
Like, it's like, really?
That's what you care about?
Like, rich kids like swimming?
Like, that's not really what I care about, right?
Like, it's not what I want people to care about.
So, so, I mean, whatever.
joe rogan
But it's also, but it's a lightning rod for this discussion of like, what is a woman?
ben burgis
Yeah.
joe rogan
And this is a new part of the ideology.
This is a new discussion.
Like, what makes a woman?
Is it biology or is it how you identify?
Is it how you feel?
Or is it your chromosomes?
And this, when it comes to sports, sports is where the rubber hits the road.
And that's why it's this sort of, it's like, see, we told you there's a difference when someone's lapping people and they're identifying as female, but they're a biological male and they're destroying the competition.
But when they competed as a biological male, which was just a little while ago, they were not very good.
They were okay, but they weren't nowhere near the top 10.
And now they're dominant.
They're the number one in the country.
Like, this is a, it's a very interesting discussion of where the rubber meets the road in terms like what defines who you are.
And also, like, are we talking about how you treat a person or are we talking about competition?
And so there's a reason why men can't compete with women.
Like, as a biological male, who identifies as a biological male, you are not allowed to compete in a women's division.
There's a reason why there's a division between men and women.
So when we make this distinction, what is the criteria that we allow someone to cross that distinction and be a female or be a male?
And this is nothing to do with cruelty or bigotry or discrimination.
This is just a discussion about what is a woman and what is a man.
And sports are a great way to sort that out when it comes to this particular aspect of it, the physical aspect of being a female or a male.
Another is birth.
You know, like, can you get pregnant?
Can you give birth?
I mean, if there's a competition, like, who's going to create the most babies?
And it's males versus females, and it's people who identify as a female versus people who are biologically female.
Well, the biological females are going to dominate that competition.
ben burgis
Yeah, well, it's, you know, probably a good thing that we don't have giving birth competitions.
joe rogan
I know, right?
unidentified
You know what I'm saying?
joe rogan
No, I mean, the rubber meets the road in terms of like these ideological discussions, which are valid discussions.
They're valid discussions because I've met a lot of trans people that, like, I had Blair White on the podcast recently.
I mean, when you meet Blair White, there's not a fucking doubt in your mind.
Like, this is someone who, for whatever reason, nature and genetics has given the wrong sex to a person that is distinctly female.
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, as far as like the actual rules for like sports leagues, I know, I'm sure you know way more about this than I do, but like I have a, I know different like sports have handled it differently in terms of the requirements, that like it's not necessarily an absolute thing like, you know, trans women can or can't compete.
Like sometimes, you know, there are like hormone requirements and stuff like that, you know, that there are different ways of trying to.
joe rogan
Do you know what the hormone requirements are, though?
ben burgis
No, I have to say, that's where it gets weird.
I have no idea, right?
joe rogan
The thresholds for many sports, I mean, it's handled differently in different places.
But there's a guy named Derek.
He's got a website called, it's a silly name of a website.
It's called More Plates, More Dates.
It's like something he created a long time ago.
But he's he doesn't, I don't think he necessarily has a degree in chemistry and biochemistry, but he has a deep understanding of it.
And the way he was breaking down the amount of available testosterone that a biological female has, like the threshold versus what's acceptable for a trans woman to compete against biological females.
And it's substantially more.
Like it's on the outskirts of like physiological normality.
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, again, I don't know what like if there's a good compromise here that would like help like, you know, that would maintain a reasonable level of fairness, you know, without just saying like, you know, I think there are like legitimately a couple different, you know, covering a couple of different values that you have to balance to like try to figure that one out.
I would say that I think like most contexts, like, you know, most of the things that trans people, you know, who are like advocating for more anti-discrimination laws, et cetera, are talking about are not going to be nearly as hard as this kind of like edge case about, you know, about sports, right?
joe rogan
Yeah, no, I agree with that.
ben burgis
You know, because like I think it's mostly like, can you be like, you know, like employment and housing, you know, and all of that stuff.
And I think it is, like, I think it is important that, you know, that you have, you know, that you have, you know, civil rights laws that, you know, that cover everybody.
Now, I do think that because of some of the weird dynamics of this particular issue, right, like, you know, you're going to get things that are harder calls, right?
You know, like this.
joe rogan
Like sports.
unidentified
Yeah.
ben burgis
And I, I, again, I just, like, in terms of, like, what some sports league should require in terms of, you know, hormones or whatever, like, I have absolutely no idea.
But again, I think that it's, this is, this is not like in terms of things that I'm going to get like mad about, right?
You know, on an on a day-to-day basis, right?
joe rogan
Like, well, you would if you had a daughter that was competing against that person.
ben burgis
Yeah, maybe.
joe rogan
A lot of people have been training their whole life to be an elite swimmer and had dedicated a massive amount of time.
And someone came around that had a massive biological advantage.
ben burgis
Yeah, although, of course, if I had a trans daughter, you know, then I'd want to make sure that whatever the rules were were going to be fair to her too, which is why, like, again, you know, like what the right sort of exactly where the rules should be set.
joe rogan
Do you think if you had a trans daughter and your trans daughter competed as a male for many, many years and was just sort of mediocre and then all of a sudden competed as a woman and started dominating, don't you think you'd feel a little bit of guilt?
ben burgis
I mean, I guess it depends how much, like, how much she was, you know, like, how much we're talking about, right?
Like, because I think in that swim meet case, the UPenn thing that you mentioned earlier, if I'm remembering right, like, and maybe you can correct me on this, like, like, what I know about this is like scrolling through Twitter, you know, like, you know, what I saw.
But, like, I don't think that she even won by that much, did she?
Or did she?
joe rogan
Giant amount.
ben burgis
Giant amount?
How much did she win by?
I thought she was.
joe rogan
Okay, let's find out.
She's breaking records.
I mean, she's breaking records in multiple meets.
ben burgis
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, again, I think.
joe rogan
I mean, this is the thing is, like, there's a video of her literally lapping the other female swimmers.
And this is, again, when we're talking before, one of the things we brought up is the Lakota culture has this term.
And this term is called the Hayoka.
And the Hayoka is the sacred clown.
It's a part of their culture where someone makes fun of everything.
And it's like a sacred part of their culture where they subject everything to mockery.
And anything that can't stand up to mockery, anything that viciously defends itself against mockery, that's an illegitimate thing.
Another thing that the Lakota people had was what their version of a transgender person was.
It's like two-spirit or something.
Also, a sacred part of their culture because it was a wise person that understood both genders.
And this person you could come to, and they had a deeper understanding of what it means to be a woman and what it means to be a man because they essentially were both.
And so they had a deep amount of respect for people who are trans in their culture.
And I think that's a great way of approaching it.
That whenever you have these unique circumstances, someone who is biologically male but clearly is much more of a female, sometimes more of a female than a lot of biological females who are much more biologically much more oriented towards male thinking and male behavior.
I mean, all of this is good for everybody.
It's good for us to accept and it's good for us to learn from these perspectives of these people that have very unique and different, but also common in terms of like when you have giant numbers of people, like hundreds of millions of people, you have quite a few people that have these experiences and we can learn from them.
And instead of discrimination, and I don't necessarily think sports is a discrimination, though.
That's where it gets weird.
Because again, there's a reason why we make a distinction why males compete against males and females compete against females.
And I think we need to sort that out.
ben burgis
But you don't think like do you think that there is some sort of reasonable compromise to be arrived at there?
Or what's your position?
joe rogan
With physical sports, it's a problem because there's so many benefits to being a biological male.
There's so many benefits to the size of the lungs, the size of the heart, the physical strength, the fact that you're going through puberty.
And that's the difference between someone who goes through puberty and maybe someone who doesn't.
Right, the transition to you.
And then there's the ethical dilemma about that.
Like, should you do that?
Because there's a great deal of people that have not done that and wound up becoming gay men.
And so is that, like, what's the right choice and who can make that choice?
And when do you have the ability to make that choice?
Should you be able to make that choice as a child?
Should you wait till you're an adult?
You know, there's a lot of decisions that we don't allow people to make until they're of grown age, like tattoos.
You can't get your face tattooed when you're four, but you can when you're 24.
You know, it's, you know, it's, I mean, I'm not saying that they're the same thing, but what I am saying is that we're hard, right?
We're faced with many dilemmas that require discussions and compassionate, comprehensive discussions.
And the only way you can do that is without censorship.
ben burgis
Well, yeah, I mean, obviously I completely agree on that.
I mean, I think that the youth transition thing, you know, again, I think that this is like, this is a little bit of a hard case because I think that on the one hand, yeah, you're absolutely right.
I mean, the idea, like, you know, no sane person thinks that like little kids should have complete medical autonomy and just like get to like do whatever they want, that would be ridiculous.
But at the same time, like not getting a tattoo when you're a kid isn't going to like have some like really bad effect.
You could just wave and it's fine, right?
Like whereas like with something like this, if you do have that experience that, you know, that you're, that you feel as if you're like trapped in the wrong, you know, kind of body, which, you know, I'd imagine could be like incredibly traumatic if that's not dealt with.
joe rogan
We can only imagine.
ben burgis
Yeah, exactly.
Like, I literally don't know, but it sounds like it.
joe rogan
Neither one of us know.
ben burgis
But I think that like then like having to go through what from your perspective is the wrong, is the wrong puberty, right?
I mean, like the stakes are higher, the tattoo thing, right?
Now, what does that mean in terms of like what level of medical gatekeeping there should be or like what the clinical practices should be?
I'm like the last person to say, right?
joe rogan
Yeah, I'm the last person to say too.
I just think it has to be something that we can discuss.
ben burgis
Sure.
joe rogan
The problem is when people want to suppress people's ability to make choices and when people want to suppress people's ability to discuss these things, I don't think that's good for any of us.
I mean, these are very complicated human issues.
And by human issues, I put them in the same category as a lot of other things that are very messy.
They're complicated to talk about.
They're human issues.
And this is one of them.
ben burgis
Yeah, no, I mean, it certainly is.
And I also think that, again, it goes back to one of the big points in the book, which is that I don't want people who might be like if you've thought about one of these issues we're talking about a lot, right?
Like and you think like you have and you might get very impatient with people who you think are wrong about them.
You think that they haven't thought about it as much as you maybe, and you think that they're not like sensitive enough to like what people might need, then if you're just sort of writing somebody off, that they're done because they're not like, they haven't evolved to exactly where you think they should evolve to yet, I think that that's bad on a human level.
That's just a bad way to interact with people.
And I also think that I think it's bad politically because somebody could like on some like incredibly messy, sensitive issue, right?
You know, like they could, you know, like they could they could land somewhere different from you on that.
And I'm not saying that like there isn't a bottom line.
Like I think there is a bottom line.
I think like non-discrimination laws, stuff like that, right?
Like I think that's incredibly important.
But I think that if you're writing people off based on that stuff, when it could be that there are all these other things where you could actually get them on board with what you want, right?
And instead of saying like, you know, when you said in 2020 that you're probably going to vote for Bernie and there were people who there were people who freaked out about it and a lot of that was like bad faith.
It was like ginned up by supporters of other candidates.
But there were people who were like, you know, real leftists who were like mad that like Bernie, the Bernie campaign like put out that like video where they were like, you know, clipping that.
And that seemed crazy to me, right?
Like Michael Brooks and I wrote an article for Jacobin about it at the time.
And like it just seems to me like whatever like the idea that instead of being like, oh, hey, good.
Like here are all these things we can agree on, right?
We think we should have healthcare and you're willing to like support this.
And by the way, like if you, you know, if you really care about, you know, trans people, I mean, like, I think, you know, Bernie Sanders was probably your guy, right?
I mean, like, that they, he's the, you know, he wanted to fund transition costs as, you know, part of Medicare for all.
You know, like, that, that would be, that would be the most, you know, pro-transposition.
But like, if you're going to say, like, you know, somebody, you know, like, if you think, oh, Joe Rogan is wrong about like exactly how like sports, you know, the sports issue should be, you know, should play out.
So I don't care that there are all these other things, right, that he, that he agrees with us about.
I don't care if he's willing to support this thing.
It would be incredibly beneficial.
You know, like we just need to like cast him out, right?
Say like, say like, no, we just want nothing to do with you.
Or maybe like once you agree with us on 100% of everything and like, you know, repent, right?
You know, then maybe, then maybe we'll have something to do with you.
I think that that's, I think that's a, I think that's a stupid and I think it's a self-defeating way to like try to do politics.
And I think it's also just a bad way to live your life.
joe rogan
Well, I agree with you that writing people off because they don't share all of your opinions is ridiculous.
And it's not the way you get people to take your position.
It's the opposite.
They're going to push back.
They're going to push back.
If you're going to reject people because they don't agree with 100% of your positions, they're going to dig their heels in.
That's a natural thing with human beings.
They're not going to go, well, I guess I'll change.
No, that's not what they do, man.
They fucking dig in.
ben burgis
Yeah, nobody's ever said, like, you know, like nobody's ever been in an argument on whatever, Facebook, where, you know, somebody, you know, like somebody says, you know, somebody says that they're a terrible person and they're, you know, whatever, they're a, you know, they're a fascist or a Stalinist or whatever it is they're being accused of being, right?
You know, and said, oh, you know what?
joe rogan
You're right.
ben burgis
You're right.
Good point.
Right.
You know, like now I get it.
unidentified
Right.
ben burgis
You know, like that's, that's not actually how you appeal to human beings at all.
I mean, like, anybody who knows, like, that's, like, that's something that, like, I think an alien within like 10 minutes of interacting with people would recognize is not going to work.
Right.
I mean, like, I think if you talk to people like their people, like you, you know, like you're taking what they're saying seriously, like if you, if you think they're wrong, you can like try to explain why you think they're wrong and you can show them how the things that you want might actually help them.
I mean, it's not always going to work.
There's no guarantee because that's just life.
You know, there's no guarantee.
But I mean, like, sometimes it'll work and the other thing's just not going to work.
joe rogan
So what positions did you take in your book that you got pushback from?
ben burgis
Oh, boy.
So, yeah.
Well, there were a few.
Although I will say most people who got mad at the book didn't read it.
joe rogan
Of course.
Why would they bother reading it when they could just get mad?
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
I mean, there were like – What if I read it and it clouds my judgment because now I agree with you on some things?
I'm trying to say, fuck you.
ben burgis
Yeah, exactly.
Like there were so many, like the number of people who got mad about the book before it came out, just based on the title or the discussion.
joe rogan
Do you want to have another drink before you talk about this?
ben burgis
Oh, yeah, absolutely.
Yeah.
Please.
joe rogan
You might need to refill.
ben burgis
This is really good.
joe rogan
Buffalo Trace.
ben burgis
Yeah, that's good stuff.
So, yeah, the number of people who got mad about it before it came out versus the number after, I think is really revealing.
joe rogan
That's hilarious.
ben burgis
I mean, it's literally true.
But I think the people, the people who did read it who got mad, which is not most people who read it, but the people who did read it who got mad.
I think there were a few things.
One of them was about the Andy No incident from 2019.
You remember this?
joe rogan
The Antifa thing where they threw milkshakes at him and stuff?
ben burgis
That they that, and in general, the part of it where I was criticizing, you know, Antifa, that they, that, like, I think that they, I think there are a lot of people, you know, who, at least maybe not a lot of people in the world as a whole, but a lot of people within a certain kind of subculture who have,
you know, convinced themselves that, like, I don't know, it's really important that people be using these kinds of like, you know, street tactics to like, because they think in their heads that it's always like Germany in 1933 and like, you know, Nazis are about to take over or something, which is delusional.
But they, you know, I think if you, you know, one of the points that I make about that in the book is that if you think about like what was actually going on in, you know, Germany in the early 30s when you had, you know, like Nazis who were like going around and like smashing up like trade union halls and like, you know, and fighting with people in like socialist and communist parties and stuff.
Why would any, like, you know, why would corporate America have to bother with any of that now, right?
They're already winning, you know, just fine, you know, without it, right?
Like, so.
joe rogan
I don't know what you're saying.
ben burgis
Okay, sorry, let me back up, like, try to be clear about this.
So I think the idea that fascism is what's like on the horizon in America, I don't think makes sense because I think that arose under very different circumstances than what we've got right now.
I think that the role that the things that fascists were doing in Germany before they took over there, Italy before they took over there, were in response to the perception that the system was under threat and there would be like maybe even like communist revolution and this was like the only thing that,
you know, the only thing that like, you know, the wealthy elites could kind of turn to to stop that from happening, you know, would be like allying with German business interests, allying with Hitler.
And that's just such a radically different situation than the United States now that I think the idea that you'd be obsessed with like street fighting with like the few people who like the Richard Spencer types or whatever just seems, I think that's, I think that makes no sense.
I think that it's a, I think it's a diversion.
I mean, I think it's a distraction, honestly, you know, from things that actually matter more.
And I think that it's really dangerous when people would make excuses for behavior like attacking Andy No, because it's because if you think about that, like the things that, here's the thing that most disturbed me, right, when that happened, that I would see people who would be defending that online who would say, well, you know, he's not like really a journalist, you know, because like whatever they would say about him, right?
You know, he's like a propagandist or he's like really siding with like the proud boys or one of these groups or whatever.
And it's like the misinformation thing, right?
Like who gets to decide what counts as a journalist?
And I certainly don't want that decision to be made by like individual vigilantes.
joe rogan
Although the problem with Antifa is the name.
Calling it Antifa, like anti-fascist.
Like you're like, well, of course.
Of course I'm anti-fascist.
unidentified
Right.
ben burgis
Who wouldn't be?
joe rogan
That's the problem.
Let's define fascism.
Put up the definition of fascism.
And this is part of where the problem lies.
Like when we discuss fascism, whether we're discussing the connection between the corporate interests and the government or like what is the technical definition of what a fascist is.
Just Google it.
Okay.
Yeah, here.
Fascism, a form of far-right authoritarianism, ultra-nationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and the economy that rose to prominence in the early 20th century of Europe.
There's other definitions of that, though.
That's the Wikipedia definition.
The problem with Wikipedia is sometimes it gets ideologically captured.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation and forcible suppression of opposition.
I don't see that in our country.
Here's the other one, though.
A tendency towards or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control.
The problem with that is when you're trying to control by violence and street action and throwing milkshakes at people, you're trying to control the way they behave and they think.
That's a form of fascism.
It's a kind of fascism.
What you're doing is, in a sense, you're intimidating people into not opposing your perspective.
You have large groups of people.
They incite violence.
They lit the fucking apartment building of the Portland mayor.
Portland, one of the great things about it is it's the least fascist place on earth.
It is literally the most open-minded, progressive city on the entire continent.
ben burgis
You don't think Nazis are about to take over Portland?
joe rogan
There's not a fucking chance.
And yet that's the stronghold of Antifa, and that's the place where they find the most fascism they have to combat against.
It's a form of bullying.
It's a form of gangs.
They're trying to enforce their ideology.
And unfortunately, their fucking mayor has let them go so far with it that even he's pushing back now.
He's calling for greater police protection and they're trying to enforce laws now and arrest people because he was being targeted so much that he turned it around and is like, we have to do something about these people.
Now you think, now you think, like, it's like a gangman.
It's like they get into this ideology and they're into this whole community of like stopping these fascists and they're looking for them when they don't even exist.
The technical definition of fascism is not running rampant in fucking Portland.
It's just not.
ben burgis
No, no, it's not.
And I think that like, if you want to say like there are like far-right groups who might commit hate crimes, et cetera, then like, first of all, I actually don't think that a lot of people who do stuff like this would be like just I'm skeptical that like they're really going to be the ones who are who are going to do something there.
joe rogan
But like if do something there in what way?
ben burgis
Oh, that like that like that like if you have like actual fascists who are like showing up with guns, right?
You know, that's going to run.
Yeah, they need to find them.
Like I don't think, I don't think most people who sign up for stuff like this, this is a point Michael Brooks made to me like after the in Michigan in 2020, there was like some protests at the state capitol over lockdown stuff where like lots and lots of people actually had guns there.
He was like, oh, where's Antifa here, right?
You know, like, you know, why not, right?
joe rogan
Is that when they were trying to kidnap the governor?
That was the FBI red-led operation.
ben burgis
That was before that, but that was related.
joe rogan
The same kind of stuff.
ben burgis
Yeah, it was the same kind of stuff.
So, I mean, like, the protests were like real.
The governor plot seems like that was just the equivalent for this stuff.
joe rogan
It was ginned up by the FBI.
ben burgis
Yeah, it was like one of those, it was like one of those cases with the post-9-11 security state where you have some mentally ill Muslim loner who like the FBI spends like two years convincing them to join their fake terror plot and they finally say yes and they arrest them.
It seems like way too close to that for comfort.
But I guess the thing that's that might connect to some of what we were talking about earlier about Antifa is I think that the reason one reason why people end up like obsessing with like about like marginal far-right groups, like the Proud Boys are not about to like, you know, march on Washington and like, you know, and install whoever is.
joe rogan
Also, that guy, the fucking head of the Proud Boys, was in the FBI too.
ben burgis
That's true.
joe rogan
That was the craziest thing.
When that turned out, there was the one guy who was, what was his name?
Enrique something or another, who turned out to be an FBI informant, and he was the head of the Proud Boys.
They were always interviewing him on television.
Yeah, it's like Gavin McGuinness, who started it as a LARP.
He started it literally as a joke.
It was based on a Broadway musical.
That's why they called it Proud Boys.
They were joking around.
And then it became a thing.
And then a bunch of people, once you created an organization, then a bunch of people can join it.
Then they infiltrate it.
And then they decide to radicalize it.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
Proud Boys leader Enrique Tario was an FBI informant.
Like, what in the fuck, man?
ben burgis
Yeah, it's like during the McCarthy period when like half of the people at like some like little local communist party meeting would be FBI agents because they were devoting so many resources to like trying to stop this like very marginal – this very marginal group.
joe rogan
So people were upset at you because of the Andy Ngo thing that you didn't think that was – I mean obviously it's just not a way to treat a person.
No, no, it's beat him up.
And he's the, if you ever met Andy, he's this tiny Asian gay man.
ben burgis
Yeah, right.
joe rogan
The idea that this guy is this jackbooted thug that's there to take down, you know, democracy is fucking preposterous.
ben burgis
No, no, it is.
And I think that the and I think that like the problem is like when you make an obvious point like, hey, there's absolutely no justification for like physically attacking this guy, you know, that they,
that like, that that that's insane behavior, that like this is this serves no good purpose, you know, whatsoever, that like a lot of the things that people said about it at the time when they were trying to justify it were, you know, turned out to be bullshit, which is also true.
That also, you know, and also, by the way, I don't want to set the precedent that like we're going to have street violence where people who like, you know, somebody decides they don't count as a real journalist and that they're like helping bad people or creating dangerous effects or something and they could just attack them.
Like, I mean, why, you know, I mean, I'm sure I've, you know, I'm sure I've written lots of stuff for Jacobin that people would say that about, right?
joe rogan
What is a journalist?
This is the other thing.
Like, what defines a journalist?
Like, how do you decide who is and isn't a journalist?
Do you have to be connected to a specific organization?
Because there are many people that are connected to specific organizations that are propagandists.
Do you have to have a degree in journalism?
Because there's many people that have a degree in journalism that are liars and they work for gigantic corporations and they spew out all the nonsense that this corporation wants them to say.
Like, what is a journalist?
ben burgis
No, absolutely.
joe rogan
Do we have a rigid criteria for what is – I mean couldn't you not be a person who believes in the truth, who decides to dedicate yourself to discussing things and researching things and doing it in a very honest and like doing it as a person in good faith and putting out the information as you've discovered it?
Like, isn't that journalism?
Like, who decides who's a journalist?
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, certainly nobody at WikiLeaks had a journalism degree, and I'm really glad that that exists.
joe rogan
How about Edward Snowden?
Was what he did?
Does that count as journalism?
I've heard people say that Glenn Greenwald's not a journalist.
ben burgis
Which is ridiculous.
Preposterous.
Because, I mean, he broke.
I mean, whatever you think about Glenn or his politics or any of that stuff, I mean, just from a journalism perspective, like first with the NSA revelations and then again in Brazil, you know, with the material that helped free the former president, you know, who was unjustly imprisoned.
Like that that's, I mean, that's the most important stuff that journalism can do, right?
So if that's not journalism, you know, if that's not journalism, right?
Like, I don't know why journalism is important.
joe rogan
Once you go to Stubstack, you're not a journalist anymore.
ben burgis
Yeah, and I think that the, and I think that's incredibly dangerous because you could imagine, I mean, look, you don't have to imagine.
You can just look at what actually has happened with Julian Assange, right?
That like that, you know, like the government says, like, you know, that, oh, there's no freedom of the press issue here because that's not really journalism.
He's just like some kind of, you know, enabler of terrorism, you know, because he did this.
That's certainly not a road that I want to go down.
But the problem is, as obvious as so many of these points are, that, like, it's, there's absolutely no good justification for physically attacking a non-combatant, you know, like somebody who isn't like going, you know, like.
joe rogan
He's mocking and laughing when you hit him in the head with a fucking milkshake.
Like, what was that?
ben burgis
No, it's, you know, it's terrible behavior.
So like you make that obvious point.
You make the point we're just making about journalism.
And it's, it's like, on the face of it, you'd think, okay, this is like, this is all obvious.
But the problem is it's that like team, like rooting for your team behavior that like.
joe rogan
You're willing to accept horrible behavior as long as it's enforcing your ideology.
unidentified
Yeah.
ben burgis
And then if and then if somebody like me said, you know, says that I think that, you know, like, you know, that I think this is bad, then, oh, see, so you're not being loyal to the team, right?
Like you're siding with Andy No, who's on the other team.
And you're siding against people who are on your team.
So they'll just have a reaction to that that's not actually about the thing itself or like showing what's wrong with the argument.
joe rogan
Yeah, and I should be really clear.
I'm not like I had Andy No on my podcast and I was skeptical of a lot of things you were saying.
One of them, the traumatic brain injury from that.
I was like, what kind of brain injury do you have from that?
Like what are you talking about now?
ben burgis
Yeah, I know originally there was these reports that there was like concrete that was like mixed the milkshake somehow and listen man.
joe rogan
I watched him get hit with that.
That's like that's not what gives you brain damage.
I know what gives you brain damage.
ben burgis
Yeah.
joe rogan
You got to get you got to get hit.
Like if that guy got hit with a fucking piece of concrete, he would go down.
Okay.
He's not just going to take it on the chin and keep walking and get a traumatic brain injury from a milkshake.
ben burgis
Yeah.
joe rogan
It's silly.
ben burgis
No, and look, and I think that.
joe rogan
Unless there were some other shots that he took that weren't on camera.
ben burgis
And I think Andy No, like as somebody, like the issue is not, do I like Andy No?
Because I actually don't, right?
I mean, like, I think.
joe rogan
Why don't you like him?
ben burgis
So he wrote an article that was, I think it was for Quillette.
I'm not sure about that part, right?
It might just have been somewhere else.
But he wrote an article about visiting Britain where he was claiming basically that there were like, you know, parts of London that were like under Sharia law or that, you know, like it, and his evidence was that was that there were like no drinking signs that like it's since been pointed out that like other like non-Muslim neighborhoods, they have the same things, right?
Because you're just not allowed to drink in certain places, you know, under generally applicable laws.
I think that he's, you know, and I think that, I think that probably in general, right?
joe rogan
He's a provocateur.
ben burgis
Yeah, I think he's a provocateur and I think that he's, I too have a lot of questions, you know, about the honesty or at least the commitment to sort of checking things, you know, before you before you go into print with them.
And my sense is that, you know, his politics are completely different from mine.
But none of that matters for this, right?
Like none of that is the point, right?
I don't want just like, you know, if we're talking about like, you know, should we have a taboo against like physically assaulting journalists?
joe rogan
Yeah, physically assaulting people you disagree with.
ben burgis
You know, then like, yeah, we should.
And it should be anybody, right?
You know, but like also, I think that, you know, it shouldn't depend on whether you think they're honest.
It shouldn't depend on any of that stuff, right?
You know, that's that that is not something that should be happening.
And I think it's a bad door to, I think it's a bad door to open up.
But I think that that's something in the book that a lot of people, I shouldn't say a lot of people, most people who got mad at it never cracked it open.
But like, you know, but like a lot of some of the people who did get mad at it, you know, because they read it had a problem with that.
I think some of the Dave Chappelle stuff in the first chapter because they thought I was like defending a transphobe.
You know, like I think that that was, you know, that that was an issue with some people.
They, you know, trying to, you know, I think that this stuff in later in the, you know, in the book that just in general, I think a lot of people who got mad about it sort of misinterpreted the sort of main claim in a crazy way, right?
That like, you know, in other words, that they thought that the main thing that I was saying was that like online cancellation is like the most important part of problem in the world or, you know, something like that.
And that's not what I think.
You know, what I think is that this is not a way that you should act towards people.
One, because on a human level, it's just a toxic way to operate.
And two, if you actually want to win people over to ideas that you think are important so you can accomplish something that's important in the real world, then getting bogged down in all of this kind of, you know, online shit throwing and trying to get people fired and all of that stuff for all the reasons that we're talking about, I think it's like the worst, most counterproductive thing you could do.
joe rogan
I think there's also a real issue with communicating through social media.
It's such a, you know, it's a way of communicating that takes away so much of what it is to be a human.
To be a human is to look at a person, to have a conversation with them, look them in the eyes, to talk about things in depth, to recognize their perspective and allow them to talk.
So you give them, there's a sense of camaraderie.
You're two human beings expressing ideas.
With social media, you're just printing something out and you're throwing it out into the ether.
And then the other person responds and you don't see each other.
You don't trying to be biting and nasty.
And the way you win is through vitriol.
It's a shitty way to communicate.
And one of the best ways to get attention is to be the biggest cunt.
That's how people get attention online, to say the most mean, the most vicious thing that you can.
And it's like a fun little game.
ben burgis
Totally.
And you get validation for being the first person to throw, you know, throwing the first stone, right?
joe rogan
And people support you because they wish they had said it, or they don't want to be the person who sticks their neck out, but they'll like it because that, yeah, go get him.
ben burgis
Yeah.
joe rogan
Go get him, Ben.
ben burgis
Yeah.
Or they just don't like, or they just like, you know, they like the tweet, ha, right?
You know, that like we got that guy.
And then they just never think about it again.
Or sometimes like if they thought about it in the first place, like like I gave, you know, there's a there's a guy who I am Wendell Potter.
You know who this is?
No.
Okay.
So Wendell Potter used to be a health insurance executive and he would like lobby, you know, Congress on behalf of health insurance companies.
And then at some point in the past, like I think like maybe 15 years ago or something, I'm not sure about the timing, he decided, you know, like he had a crisis of conscience about doing that.
And he left the industry and he, you know, he started like what he's done since then is he just campaigns for Medicare for All, right?
So this is this is a this is a really good person.
And he had, I remember back in this, this was like spring 2021 maybe, Wendell Potter tweeted out something like the fact that people don't understand how much Medicare for All would help us even during this time when people are losing on health insurance,
you know, because of, you know, economic disruptions, all this stuff shows how many people bought the lies that I used to tell, you know, when I was a health insurance executive.
And this guy, who I'm not going to name because I don't want to like, you know, shame this guy, that's not the point, right?
You know, but like is this guy quote tweeted that, right?
Like he just probably saw it on his feed and he didn't really know it was Rob.
He quote tweeted it and said, and I quote, oh my God, this fucking piece of shit actually admitted it.
And that got like 20,000 likes before enough people told him who Wendell Potter was that he finally like took down the tweet.
And what gets me about that example is that if the guy who originally tweeted that had literally just clicked on Wendell Potter's name on the top of the tweet, that would have taken him to his profile picture where he would have seen like all these names that have like for Medicare for all in the title.
And he would have realized like what point he was making when he tweeted that.
But why would you do five seconds of research about somebody before denouncing them when you can get that little endorphin rush from like, you know, you're a piece of shit on Twitter and then you know who likes to do it.
joe rogan
Do you know how Levinovitz is?
ben burgis
Who's that?
joe rogan
He's a writer.
He's got a very interesting perspective on this.
And he calls Twitter and social media processed information.
The same way processed food is bad for you, that processed information, ultra-processed, where it's down to, instead of having a conversation with someone, it's down to quote tweeting a thing completely out of context and trying to rule with them.
Oh my God, this piece of shit just admitted it.
Like that kind of thing.
That's an example of like ultra-processed information.
And when he said that, it was like one of those aha moments where it's like, that's what it is.
That is the thing that separates human beings and normal human interaction between social media interaction.
It's too easy to do.
It's too simple.
It's like basically like fast food or like some sort of processed fucking snack.
It's terrible for you.
It's terrible for your brain.
And people engage in it easily.
ben burgis
Yeah.
And much like those other examples, the profit incentives of the companies that run it, you know, are all in favor of people doing all this stuff because the more people are doing that, the more minutes per day their eyeballs are on Twitter.
unidentified
Sure.
joe rogan
But I think, you know, it's almost a simplistic version of it because I don't think they meant that.
I don't think they created it in order to get people to do it that way.
I think they created it.
Like when you go back and look at Twitter, what it initially was, it was like you would put at and then your name is like, is going to the movies.
Like you would even talk about yourself in the third person, you know, like at Joe Rogan's going to the gym.
Like that's how people did it.
And then slowly but surely it became a way where people espoused opinions and then it became Arab Spring and then like it became all sorts of different ways that people express themselves.
Like this idea that it started out with this insidious notion.
ben burgis
I don't think it necessarily started out with an insidious notion, but I do think that the ways that it's changed over time are ones that like just the fact that like that like you know likes and retweets and all that stuff are part of it, I do think it's a kind of feedback mechanism.
Like, you know, John Ronson's book, So You've Been Published.
Like, he talks about that at the end.
He uses the analogy of those electronic speeding signs that'll show you as you drive by how fast you're driving and what the speed limit is.
And he points out that on paper, there's no reason that should work because they're not giving you any information you don't already have.
Every car has a speedometer in it that tells you how fast you're driving.
A normal low-tech speed sign would tell you what the speed limit is.
But just that moment of validation that you get from driving past and see the two numbers come together actually does seem to get people to drive more slowly and it reduces accidents.
There are tons of studies about this that show that it does that.
And in that case, it's that kind of like immediate feedback loop of validation is a good thing.
But in social media, that kind of immediate feedback loop of validation that you're going to get 10,000 people who like and retweet because you said somebody's a piece of shit or whatever is incredibly toxic.
I think it makes it harder for, you know, harder to communicate with people.
It makes it harder to even listen to what somebody who disagrees with you thinks for long enough that you could think about how to convince them, you know, to try to persuade them of your point of view.
And it makes us even more atomized than we are already.
If you spend all of your time scrolling, which again, maybe it wasn't the original intention, but I think that the more time people spend scrolling through their social media feeds, right?
You know, the better it is for the bottom line of these companies.
Would you agree with that?
joe rogan
Oh, for sure.
Yeah, and it's also hugely addictive.
With the likes and the retweets and all that stuff, they just made things incredibly addictive.
And the numbers.
When people look at numbers, they want to look at how many likes they get for something.
And then when they find certain things that get more likes, they gravitate towards those things.
You've seen the social dilemma, the documentary.
ben burgis
I actually haven't seen it, but I know what it is.
joe rogan
It's really good.
It's really good.
It highlights a terrifying future because they're essentially saying this leads to this massive polarization of these perspectives in this country.
And it's almost like setting us up for a civil war.
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, I don't think there's going to be a civil war, but I do think that I do think that you're going to get a lot of more people who get all of their sort of emotional connection to politics is about getting mad at people who are on the other team and not even getting mad at people with power who are on the other team.
unidentified
Right.
ben burgis
But just like getting mad at whoever, right?
Like the way that after the 2016 election, something that I felt like I hadn't seen before was the amount of time that people were spending talking about Trump voters, just like ordinary people who voted for Trump.
And that seems crazy to me because, I mean, especially after 2020, where the turnout was ridiculously high on both sides.
So you've got 70, however million people that you're just going to write off, like they're just unredeemable, they're just irredeemable, deplorables.
I don't know how you think that you're going to accomplish anything, right?
joe rogan
Like if you – They're not thinking like that though.
They're not thinking in this broad perspective.
They're not looking at what's best for the human race.
What's best for the community of the United States or my city or my country?
No, they're not thinking like that.
They're just thinking like what feels good.
What feels good is like, fuck you, Trump supporter.
unidentified
Yeah, no, exactly.
joe rogan
That feels good.
ben burgis
Exactly.
Like, not like, look, I mean, one of the, you know, like, one of the reasons I always thought that Bernie Sanders would have won the 2016 election if he'd been the nominee is that there are, I'm not saying all of them.
I'm not even saying most of them.
But I think there's a chunk of people who voted for Trump in 2016 who absolutely would have voted for Bernie.
joe rogan
I think so too.
Yeah, I don't have any doubt in my mind.
I think there's a lot of people who want a person that has a legitimate, like a really well-thought-out perspective that they have been consistent with their entire career.
That's Bernie Sanders.
And he really does look out for the working person.
He really does look out for working families.
ben burgis
And if you go back and see clips from him from the 1980s, it's all the same.
joe rogan
So this book, why comedians?
What about comedians?
Yeah.
ben burgis
Yeah.
So I mean, I think that's an example of a larger thing, but I think it's a really interesting example.
So I think the larger thing that it's an example of is that when people, this is my claim about why a lot of people on the left get sucked into this, right?
You know, when people feel like they have no real power to change anything like big and structural that actually matters, they get sucked into picking fights that they think they can't win, right?
If you can't win the ones that matter, then find a way to care about the stuff that is not going to change the world for better but you derive some kind of satisfaction from.
So if it's like yelling at Dave Chappelle, then that's something that can scratch that You know, if it's if it's antifa, right?
Like, look, the things that actually create like misery for working people in the United States are big structural things that can't be solved by punching anybody in the face, right?
You know, that's not going to, that's not going to work.
But, you know, you can get diverted to finding someone, finding someone you can punch, and you get that sense of satisfaction.
And I think that what the comedy example really shows is the way that people get sucked into this way of viewing the world that's all about individual moralism, right?
Is this person a good person or a bad person?
Is that person a good person or a bad person?
And it becomes just this constant inventory of the soul.
And I think that we're doing that so much that we almost don't even notice that we're doing it.
It just almost goes without saying that that's how you would interact with this stuff.
And so I think that comedy, you know, as a form of entertainment and what it's really good as a form of art, as something that can help us kind of look at the world around us at a slightly different angle than we would in the normal course of things, because it kind of holds things up in a different way.
I think that that can only work if it's operating in a space where people aren't constantly thinking about like, oh, is this, you know, is this guy a good guy or a bad guy?
Is this joke that I'm about to tell something that is morally acceptable or not?
If you're in that space, I don't think you're going to be able to, I don't think you're going to be able to do it right.
joe rogan
It's an interesting thought that people will attack things that they think that they can have an impact on instead of going after these big impossible problems that seem insurmountable.
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, look, perfect example.
Think about the summer of 2020 after the murder of George Floyd.
There was this wave of protests and riots and unrest that was like without precedent in a very, very long time, if ever, right?
And all of that was originally about police violence.
But how much has actually changed in terms of how policing works in the United States since then?
There were some cities that cut budgets for a while.
Most of them have put it back.
But in terms of things like how easy it is to hold a police officer accountable, if they use violence in an unjustified way, I don't think that's gotten much better.
joe rogan
Well, it's changed in New York City.
In New York City, police officers can be civilly now.
ben burgis
Yeah, and that's a good step.
I don't think it's a complete solution because for one thing, I think a lot of people who are most likely to end up in these situations are not in a good position to afford good legal representation.
I know sometimes in a high-profile case, you'll get people doing it pro bono, you know, who are good lawyers.
But, you know, again, I think it's a good step.
I don't think it addresses most of the problem, but I think it's something I support for sure.
But here's the thing.
I think that much more than people like, you know, actually changing how policing works in America is a really heavy lift.
But what's really easy is getting every corporation in the world to put out some sort of Black Lives Matter thing.
That's easy because it doesn't cost them anything.
Why wouldn't they just do that?
joe rogan
That's also good for business.
ben burgis
Sure, yeah.
joe rogan
Or work capitalism.
ben burgis
Yeah, yeah.
joe rogan
I mean, that's the thing.
This woke signaling that, you know, that your business is a part of the good side and that you should support this business.
ben burgis
Yeah, no, absolutely.
And again, like, it doesn't, you know, like, like it earns them some goodwill.
It doesn't cost them anything.
Why wouldn't they do that?
Right.
Like, that doesn't, that does very little to solve like anything that the name of this stuff is supposed to be about.
But again, it's easy, right?
Or like when people like knocking down statues, which don't get me wrong, I don't think there should be statues of Confederate generals in cities.
I mean, I don't think that's something we should glorify.
But I also saw a lot of like after the really bad statues came down, people started going after gray area statues and, you know, George Washington statues.
joe rogan
What's interesting about the Civil War, the Civil War statues is many of them actually came up.
They were put up during the civil rights demonstrations of the 1960s.
And they're really cheaply made.
They're these shitty responses to the change that was happening in the country.
ben burgis
Yeah, right.
So again, I think that like, should you have, like, should there be statues to Robert Lee, Robert E. Lee?
No, I don't think so.
But I also think it's revealing that people end up getting spending this much time on these purely symbolic things, right?
You know, like we've got rid of all of the really objectionable statues, and now we'll say, well, how about George Washington?
How about whoever, right?
And then you search for things that, you know, you can change the name of it, right?
You know, like my, you know, my mom has gotten really into bird watching in her retirement, and she told me that there's like some kind of warbler that's named after a Confederate general that people are like trying to like get that changed.
It's like, okay, you're really like, you know, they're digging deep.
They're digging deep, right?
Warblers.
I know, right?
joe rogan
It is kind of weird, though.
You know, like if you have like a Hitler warbler, you're like, fucking weed celebrating.
ben burgis
Yeah, no, and like whatever.
I mean, I guess.
joe rogan
Sure, I guess if I were in the warbler with a fucking wing up in the air like a Nazi, like, hey.
Hey.
ben burgis
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah.
But again, why did you, why comedians in the title?
And like.
ben burgis
Yeah, yeah.
So I think that, I think, because I think it's a example that makes it really dramatic because comedians don't and really can't exercise political power.
They might, you know, influence to a certain extent the way that people think about certain things, but nobody's, you know, nobody who's doing comedy is making decisions, you know, that directly directly impact people's lives.
So if you were actually trying to do that, you know, like if you're actually trying to affect real change, this doesn't make any sense.
What I think it is, is it's a symptom of how extreme this kind of moralistic approach to politics can get, right?
That like you're this concerned with like constantly, you know, testing, you know, whether somebody is a good person or a bad person or they ever said anything that, you know, that might show them to like to really be a bad person and nothing could ever just be a bad moment, right?
That, you know, that it has to be like, this is the moment where you really revealed the, you know, how toxic your soul was or something, you know, rather than just like you said something stupid because sometimes people say things that are stupid, you know, that like I think that that kind of moralism,
when it's applied to comedy, I think that that's, I think that that's like maybe the most extreme symptom of what I'm talking about because it's one thing even to get mad at somebody because like of something they wrote like in an editorial, right?
That they're telling you like exactly what they think should happen, you know, that like if I, you know, if I write, you know, if I write something for Jacobin and, you know, some people get upset about that, okay, at least it's a Jacobin article.
I'm literally saying exactly what I think, right?
But if you're doing, you know, a count, like, so, so that last Dave Chappelle special at Netflix, you know, that people, people got mad about, and which, by the way, I, you know, hadn't even watched, but since I had written this thing, you know, people kept asking me what I thought, and I finally watched it.
And I thought that the way that it was portrayed as if it were this, like, just festival of transphobic, you know, hatred was ridiculous.
That in fact, the overall theme of the special, as far as those issues go, was about him like moving towards a place of greater understanding.
And, you know, and like.
joe rogan
And it's also kind of a love letter to his friend that committed suicide for supporting him, was attacked for supporting him.
And then she jumped off a fucking building and committed suicide.
This is like an homage to this person's life and this long part of it.
Like I worked with Dave during the entire time he was piecing that together because we started doing shows in Austin like November of 2020.
I mean, it might have even been earlier than that.
And we were working together while he was putting it together.
And he was responding to this idea that he was transphobic.
And he was saying, like, this is so crazy.
Like, this is who I am.
And this is about this person who, when I was accused of being transphobic, this person defended me and was dragged by people.
There's been some talk of whether or not how much of that was creative license because people have tried to find what the tweets were.
How many of them were DMs?
Like we don't know.
I mean, I don't think you could dismiss that.
Or how many of them were people who actually knew her personally then committed suicide?
And this is trying to make, it's the highest form of comedy in a lot of ways because you're trying to take this like socially sensitive issue and extract laughs from it, which is very difficult to do.
But in no way was it transphobic.
In no way was it hurtful or cruel or mean?
ben burgis
Well, I mean, I mean, actually, he spent a couple of minutes of the special explaining why the bathroom laws in North Carolina were cruel.
And at the end, when he's talking about his dead friend, like one of the crucial moments comes when he's describing their back and forth, you know, when he had her open for him.
joe rogan
It's hilarious.
ben burgis
Yeah, which is a hilarious thing, but there is this like really moving part of it, right?
At the end where, you know, he, you know, she tells him, you know, like, I want you to recognize that I'm going through a real human experience.
And like it really sinks in in that.
And the idea that watching this would make somebody more transphobic just seems absurd to me.
But what people did, right, is they literally quoted individual sentences that he says in it.
Like there's one point in the special where he says, I'm a TERF, right?
Turf standing for trans extension turf.
Radical joke.
unidentified
Yeah.
ben burgis
And it's like, okay, but literally within like two minutes of him saying, I'm on Team Turf, he says, I'm not saying that I don't think trans women are women.
It's like, well, hold on, right?
Like, you know, if you take both of those literally, right?
Those two don't go together.
But of course, that's not how comedy works.
That's like thinking that like somebody who writes a novel, that like every sentence of the novel is like what they actually personally think is true.
But I think, and I've got to think that a lot of people who write articles like this must understand that on some level, right?
That they, that like this is not how comedy works.
But I think that, you know, sometimes it's like bad faith.
They're, you know, they're just being dishonest.
There's definitely some of that.
But like also, I think that like sometimes if you get this invested in like making these like moral indictments of people over these culture war battles, then you're just not even pausing to think about that.
Like you're just like trying to find evidence.
Like you're just like sifting through it to like find like it's like you know Freddie DeBoer, the commentator?
joe rogan
No.
unidentified
Okay.
ben burgis
So Freddie DeBoer is a is a writer.
He wrote a really good book about the education system called Cult of Smart.
And he has this essay from a few years ago called Planet of Cops, where he says that it seems to him that like increasingly everybody in the culture is a cop now, right?
What he means by that, and he develops the metaphor and he says things like, you know, oh, there's the new movie that people are getting excited about.
You know, well, give me, you know, give me two hours and 500 words and I'll find you your indictments, right?
You know, that it's, it's like this sort of constantly sifting through things to like find evidence that people have have committed some kind of sin or or or infraction.
And I think that like that's how people are approaching that.
Like when they wrote these articles, you know, about how, oh my God, did you know that Dave Chappelle said that he was on Team Turf, you know, that special?
Like, look, there's a mission, right?
You know, you got to get those indictments, right?
So you just have to sort through all of it until you can find something that, you know, that looks like a smoking gun of evidence.
And I think that it's like, it's a, obviously it's a terrible way to write about anything.
But I think what's interesting to me about the example of comedy is that it's sort of the most absurd possible application of doing that.
Because, I mean, just to be like simplistic about it for a second, right?
Like if you're saying something in a stand-up special, like generally speaking, not every sentence, but like you're saying it because you think it's funny, right?
That that's which is just a different thing from saying something because like, oh, you know, here is exactly what I think, right?
joe rogan
It's like the example that we were talking about before the podcast, which I'm not going to do because it's actually in my act now.
Someone put a quote that I said about what a piece of shit I am.
I'm like, hey, you got to put the whole quote.
There's like a lot more to that.
And it's clearly joking.
But it's that thing that they do is also because someone is getting a disproportionate and exorbitant amount of attention.
And when someone is like a Dave Chappelle or myself who's got a disproportionate amount of attention, there's so many people that want to look at that and go, flaws, holes, pepper kegs, throw rocks.
And it's a normal thing to have this sort of reaction to someone who you feel either their take on things isn't valid or it doesn't align with your own or there's a reason why you're morally superior to them because your position is better.
ben burgis
Yeah, no, I think there's a lot of that.
And it's also, I mean, it kind of goes back to what we were saying earlier about the BLM protests and the aftermath and all of that stuff.
Like if you get somebody, like if, I mean, obviously in a case as high profile as like Dave Chappelle, like Netflix isn't going to dump him because like, why would they do that?
Like, that would just be putting a lot of money on the.
joe rogan
Well, not only that, but there's no reason to.
unidentified
Right.
joe rogan
Here's the thing.
It's like if Dave Chappelle was saying all trans people who would die should die and they're not human.
Okay.
Yeah.
Get rid of them.
unidentified
Right.
joe rogan
Everybody would agree to that.
Like you shouldn't put that on your network.
But you cannot look at any of the things that he said and rationalize any of these accusations that people have towards him.
He is not that guy.
He is a lovely guy.
If you meet him, he was one of the kindest, nicest, sweetest guys.
And that's who he really is.
ben burgis
And it's really striking, too, because if you remember when all this was going on, there was like a week of the news that was all about how there's going to be this huge walkout of trans employees at Netflix.
You remember this?
joe rogan
Yeah, they took like a lunch break.
There was like five of them.
ben burgis
Yeah, there were like five people and it's not even clear that they all worked at Netflix.
joe rogan
No, most of them didn't.
And then the one of them that was there, they found a whole bunch of racist shit that she had put on Twitter.
And they're like, hey.
And then not even jokes, just like racist stuff.
It's like, god damn it.
I get what's going on.
These are like, they're humans.
Humans are flawed.
And, you know, just because they said a thing that was incorrect doesn't mean that they're whatever position they have, they can't have a good perspective on something.
unidentified
Yeah.
ben burgis
And what, and what kills me about that example is at that very moment that that was going on, right, that there was this like super hyped up, you know, walkout that like got all this attention.
There was like, you know, two people on their lunch break or whatever.
Like at the same time, there was the John Deere strike going on.
And that was, that was, you know, thousands of people, you know, were out on strike for to, you know, to get better, you know, wages and working conditions.
joe rogan
John Deere, the tractors?
unidentified
Yeah.
ben burgis
Yep.
Yep.
The workers.
joe rogan
I remember that.
ben burgis
Yeah.
Yeah.
If you go to.
joe rogan
I believe you.
But I mean, I never heard a peep out of that.
ben burgis
Yeah.
Well, that's the thing, right?
So like you compare the scale of the two things and then you compare the scale of the coverage.
unidentified
Right.
joe rogan
One of them is jokes.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
But it's also jokes from the greatest living comedian.
That's part of the problem.
It's like you, and also a guy who you sort of associate with left-wing values and progressive values and you want him to fall in line.
And I think that's part of the blowback is that, you know, they want to shame him into falling in line with their ideals.
And one of the things that he said, like when we talked about the special, and this is, we did a show together and he did this speech at an arena.
And he's like, I am not going to comply with the way you want me to think and want me to behave.
That's not what I'm doing.
ben burgis
Yeah.
And again, like, what's his response going to be realistically?
Like he's he's just gonna um like keep talking shit.
joe rogan
That's what he's gonna do, right?
I mean it's gonna be funnier and funnier, right?
ben burgis
You know, but like he like the idea that like saying like he's a terrible person, he's a transphobe, like is gonna get him to like see things more from your perspective.
In fact, he talks about this in the special, right?
That like he, you know, he has the thing about the woman who like followed him out to the parking lot or whatever to you know to give him a hard time.
And the point is that like all of that, like his reaction was just fuck you, right?
You know, like, of course it is, right?
You know, but like then like actually meeting this trans woman and like having this, you know, like, you know, like, you know, having the interactions that they had and like having that mean something to him, right?
Like that, like that did way more probably to get him to see things the way that people were yelling at him, wanted him to see them than like people just like saying, you know, that like, cause if you say, like, if somebody wants to like shut you down or silence you or like berate you until you, you know, you stop thinking what you think, then I, I mean, maybe like if somebody's powerless enough, they'll just shut up because they don't want to deal with it, right?
You know, but like otherwise, like, one thing it's not going to do is to get them to say, okay, now I see you're right.
joe rogan
Right.
ben burgis
Especially if they're not saying their perception.
They might say the words if they think they have to, right?
But they're not going to think it.
joe rogan
Right.
Now, when you wrote this book, like what inspired you?
ben burgis
Yeah, so I think there were a few things that have been going on and it kind of all started to build for a while.
That I was getting frustrated that a lot of people who I align with on most things were getting sucked into the way I see it in the book, right?
That they're that like that these kinds of what I call pathologies of powerlessness, right?
You know, that you're, because you know that you can't, you know, accomplish things that actually matter, you end up getting sucked into all of this nonsense.
You spend all of your time trying to prove yourself to other people you already agree with, you know, and to and to denounce people for not agreeing with you in ways that are not going to lead to a single person getting health care or a single workplace being unionized, you know, any of those, any of those things.
And I think there were a few examples that were really starting to get to me at the time.
So one of them was what happened.
I remember in 2019, the Democratic Socialists of America, which is an organization I'm a member of, I think it's flawed, but I think it does good stuff.
I encourage people to do that.
But they had this convention actually in Atlanta where I live, and in which I didn't, I mean, I was there for like a minute because I was like meeting with my editor, but I didn't go to the thing itself.
I kind of hate sitting through meetings in general in life, but there was this montage of clips that came out afterwards that Tucker Carlson played on Fox News and stuff like that of people announcing all of these bizarre like rules that like you weren't allowed to like clap at the convention because there might be people with like rare noise sensitivities and just things like this and of course you know they're like right-wingers who compiled that were
cherry-picking like the worst most ridiculous moments from a weekend but is that what the one where this person is like point of privilege is that you were a part of that i wasn't part of that but i were in that room while that was going down uh yeah i i wasn't in the room at that minute right that come on man that is no right it is ridiculous and here's what gets me about this right that's like okay granted the worst moments are being cherry-picked but Also,
it's not, you know, they're not being made up, right?
Like this stuff actually happened.
And also, it's not even like there was somebody in there with like a hidden camera, right, to get this footage, right?
They were streaming it to the world.
joe rogan
Oh, no, they know that.
I mean, it doesn't mean it's not still ridiculous.
And also the lady calling everybody comrades.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
What's going on here?
ben burgis
I mean, I think that like what's going, like what gets me about this is that knowing that this is the face you're showing to the whole world.
unidentified
Right.
ben burgis
Right.
That like anybody in the world who wants to tune in and watch this can do that.
You're still doing this stuff.
Like, was it somebody, yeah, the point of privilege thing, I think, was.
joe rogan
You stop using gendered language.
Oh, come on, man.
It's hilarious because it just shows like, what are we fucking concentrating on?
You're mad that people are, there's chatter because you're easily distracted.
How about get the fuck out of here then?
Why are you in a large crowd of people?
What do you do at the movies?
What do you do at a bus station?
Shut the fuck up.
Like, you want everybody to comply?
ben burgis
Yeah.
joe rogan
Because you've got some weird tick.
unidentified
Right.
ben burgis
And why are people doing that?
Because like you said, they can't be, I assume they're not going through their entire lives, right?
You know, trying to get people to do this stuff.
joe rogan
Maybe they are.
ben burgis
Maybe they are.
joe rogan
Maybe they're activists at work too.
Maybe they're just really annoying.
ben burgis
Yeah.
I mean, if so, they're probably winning over a lot of new converts all the time.
But they, but, you know, by doing that, right.
joe rogan
Was that the most annoying time in that meeting or were there more annoying times during that conference?
ben burgis
Yeah, I mean, the stuff, the stuff that I saw, you know, which was not, you know, which was not that much of it, but the stuff I saw, like the things that made it into that montage were the most annoying things that I saw.
But like, I guess what gets me about this is that knowing that everybody in the world can see this, if you're still acting this way, right?
Then what that shows me is that you do not care at all, like how any, you know, normal person is going to react to seeing this.
And I know there are people who get this twisted.
When I say normal person, all I, you know, it's like, oh, do you just mean people who are, you know, whatever, right?
You know, like fit some demographics or something.
No, when I say normal person, I mean like people who aren't like bathed in this political subculture.
So like stuff like that starts to seem normal to them, right?
Like just anybody who's, you know, of any background, any, you know, any race, sexual orientation, whatever, who doesn't like, you know, who doesn't spend all day every day thinking about politics, right, is going to see this and say, wait, what?
joe rogan
But I don't even think that's a politics thing.
I think it's just a social issue.
And I don't think they're thinking at all that everyone's going to see it.
I don't think that was even a consideration at all.
I think in that moment, they were very self-indulgent and they had the access to a microphone and they couldn't wait to yap.
And that's part of the problem with people.
You just can't wait to, as a person who yaps professionally.
ben burgis
I mean, look, that's why I, I mean, I said earlier that I hate meetings.
This is one of the reasons why, right?
That they, that, like, it's, it's always every time I've ever had to go to a meeting for anything, you know, there's always, there are always people who talk just because it's important to them that they like hear themselves talk.
joe rogan
Oh, yeah.
ben burgis
Like, it's awful.
joe rogan
You know, that's why it's funny.
That's why that video is funny.
I mean, that's a good version of that.
That's like the super ultra progressive version of that.
ben burgis
Yeah.
And it's, and, you know, I get that it's funny.
It's also like seeing, you know, seeing people who are supposedly fighting for all the things that I am, like, act that way is also like painful.
It's like, what, what's wrong with you, right?
Like, why would you, why would you do this, right?
joe rogan
Why do you think you need someone there to go, calm down, Francis?
unidentified
Yeah, I think.
ben burgis
I mean, that's, I think you do, right?
And that's part of the problem.
That's part of why I wrote the book because I guarantee you, however many hundreds of people were there in that hall, right, you know, where that was happening.
joe rogan
There's a lot of eye rolls.
ben burgis
There's a lot of eye rolls.
There's no way there weren't tons of eye rolls, right?
I'm sure.
Like, like, I, you know, I actually think the very limited amount of time that it was around that weekend, I think I heard a few people, you know, do the verbal eye rolls to me, right?
joe rogan
Did you know?
Point of privilege.
By the way, my friends say that sometimes just for a joke.
We're having a conversation.
They're like, point of privilege.
And they'll just spit out something.
ben burgis
Yeah, right.
And it's like, I think, but the thing is, people, most, you know, most everybody who's rolling their eyes, I mean, I think, I actually think my friend Kale Brooks was there.
He might have actually, he might have actually had a um like i think somebody came actually came over to his table and and uh they were you know and like told them to like not clap and you know they were like what's what's what's what's wrong with you uh and like why are you clapping you're ruining life you know they actually did have a little thing about that but they uh is you supposed to do this are you supposed to yeah i i think so or that was like a beatneck thing right yeah and
That's – and like – but most people who are going to roll their eyes aren't going to say anything because you don't want to be the guy who says – Right.
joe rogan
You don't want to be an asshole.
ben burgis
Yeah, exactly.
joe rogan
You're not there to be an asshole.
ben burgis
Right.
Like you're there because like you actually care about the issues that the organization is about.
You didn't sign up for this so you could spend your time arguing with crazy people about whether clapping is OK.
Right.
So I think it's a very understandable impulse.
But I think what I started to realize when I was thinking about examples like this is that for a long time – like it's not like I didn't know that there were a lot of people who were ridiculous in ways like this or a lot of people who were like unhelpfully moralistic in ways like what I was talking about in the comedy chapter of the book or who would excuse things that shouldn't be excused like in the Andy Ngo part.
But I think what I always told myself was like – None of this matters that much.
Like some people, some leftists are idiots but whatever.
Like in the greater scheme of things, it's not that – like we live in a world where there are imperialist wars and union busting and et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
This is such a minor irritation and like why spend time talking about it and thinking about it?
But then at a certain point, my perspective started to change because I actually think that the fact that there are all of those other issues that are more important is a reason.
It's a reason to try to get people to stop acting like this because if you actually care about doing something about those bigger issues, then if you look to like any – like just working class onlooker who you might be trying to – like ideally you'd want to reach out to, right?
unidentified
Right.
ben burgis
If you look like this lunatic who's like getting mad at people because they're clapping instead of doing whatever they're supposed to do with their fingers, then they're not going to have – They don't have anything to do with you.
Who can blame them?
joe rogan
You got to weed out the freaks.
Yeah.
It's like some people just – they can't see the forest for the trees, right?
ben burgis
Yeah.
joe rogan
That's – they're concentrated on this one thing when what you're trying to accomplish is this more inclusive view of socialism and how socialism could fit into our modern culture.
Instead, they want – They want you to not clap or not talk.
I know.
Please watch your idle chatter and the noise you make.
I'm easily distracted like, oh my god.
ben burgis
Yeah.
joe rogan
Self-indulgence.
It's like it's a real problem with any group.
And whenever people are trying to be like ultra-sensitive and ultra-progressive and ultra-open-minded, you open the door for annoying people.
You open the door for people that just need a tremendous amount of attention.
ben burgis
Yeah.
And there's got to be a way that you can – Yeah.
You know, square the circle of saying like, OK, look, are there obviously – you know, should there be more accommodations for disabled people in like society as a whole than there are?
Sure, right?
But anything that you could call a disability should like you crank the dial of accommodation up to 11 like at all times.
You know, no, right?
Like should you care about like, you know, not discriminating against transgender?
Absolutely.
Absolutely, yes.
Does that mean that like you need to be constantly on guard for like anything that somebody says in a comedy set that could be like interpreted if you look at it in just the right light?
No, right?
And I think that if you think especially that the things that should be the biggest priorities are about the actual distribution of material resources, you know, who has – you know, Who has health care?
How much inequality do we have?
Have we built up the labor movement?
All of these things and trying to get the United States to not have this kind of imperial world policeman foreign policy, which by the way.
As we've been, like in these, we were talking about earlier, right, in these last weeks, while people have been freaking out about, you know, whatever's going on in the news about, you know, things that Joe Rogan said 15 years ago or about what Whoopi Goldberg said on The View or whatever.
joe rogan
We're about to go to war.
unidentified
Yeah, exactly, right?
ben burgis
Like, this is, you know, I mean, however slim the chance, like the fact that there's the standoff with Russia that like that has the potential if that happened, right?
I mean, that would be an absolute like human catastrophe, right?
Even if it stayed conventional.
That would be ridiculous.
And by the way, is one of many, many reasons that I wish Bernie Sanders were president right now because he put out an article in the op-ed about how important it was to, in the Guardian, about how important it was to negotiate, to stop this, you know, from escalating.
And I'm not, you know, I'm not sure that I don't know what's going to happen, but like when I see like Biden canceling, you know, the meeting with Putin, you know, like I get I get nervous and I think that like given how destructive that would be,
right, like that's, that's got to be, you know, like that's got to override almost everything else right now, just in terms of like how important it is that we stop acting like this.
I don't know why the United States has to have the kind of role in the world where we're negotiating about what happens in Ukraine at all, right?
Like, like why is it important that the United States have this, you know, be like present in everything that happens.
joe rogan
It's a weird role.
ben burgis
Everywhere on the planet, you know, that they, that, uh, that, you know, when, you know, when the United States invaded Panama, I think that was totally unjustified.
But, you know, like the, you know, Gorbachev, you know, wasn't like involving himself, you know, in that, right?
You know, because the Soviet Union didn't have that role in the world.
And I'd rather that we didn't either.
I'd rather that, like, instead of having like however many hundreds of military bases the United States has all over the entire, you know, like every part of, you know, every part of the world right now and constantly fighting these like low-level drone wars that like most Americans have like forgotten that they're even happening, you know, in distant countries.
Like I think that, I think that if we redirected the kinds of resources that we spend on having this role in the world to taking care of people's material needs in ways that, you know, it wouldn't fund all of it, but it would do a lot.
joe rogan
It would do a lot.
Well, listen, man, I really enjoyed our conversation.
Thank you for doing this.
It was a lot of fun.
ben burgis
Yeah, thank you so much for having me.
joe rogan
My pleasure.
ben burgis
Thanks for the Buffalo Trail.
joe rogan
Enjoy the whiskey.
And tell everybody where they can find you on social media and where they can get your stuff.
ben burgis
Sure.
So I have a show called Give Them an Argument, which you can find on YouTube and all the usual podcast places.
I write for Jacobin Magazine.
You can find me there.
And as far as all the links to everything and this book and other books and everything else, just go to BenBurgess.com.
That's probably the easiest way to find everything.
joe rogan
Social media as well.
It's on there.
ben burgis
Yep, social media, Twitter, at Ben Burgess, but all the links are on there.
unidentified
All right.
joe rogan
All right.
Thanks, Brian.
ben burgis
Thank you so much.
unidentified
My pleasure.
All right.
Export Selection