Peter Boghossian and Joe Rogan contrast martial arts—where combat disciplines like BJJ and Muay Thai demand testable, reality-based training—against faith-driven systems like Kempo or religious rituals that reinforce unexamined dogma. They critique modern academia’s trigger warnings and ideological policing, which stifle open debate (e.g., Star Trek labeled "white culture") while prioritizing rigid social constructs over meritocracy, like diversity quotas in philosophy departments despite educational disparities. Boghossian cites biological realities, such as Tay-Sachs syndrome in Jewish populations or sickle cell anemia in Black communities, to reject blank-slate theories, arguing that silencing dissent—like punitive gender policies or expelling students for intoxicated interactions—undermines progress. Their core message: authenticity thrives on honest, unfiltered discourse, not performative rituals or ideological enforcement. [Automatically generated summary]
Yeah, I tried Jeet Kune Do, I tried Taekwondo, I tried Tai Chi, so I tried them all, and then I actually, one of my turning points was when Ron Van Cleef, who was in the original UFCs, early UFCs.
Well, I started in New York City before the UFCs came along, and I trained there, and then I trained in New Mexico, and now I train with Matt Thornton from Straight Blast, who's John Kavanaugh's coach, who's obviously Conor McGregor in Nelson's.
When we were talking before the podcast, we were talking about critical thinking in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and martial arts in general.
And there are a lot of people that have very distorted ideas of many things, not just of their ability to handle themselves physically, but Just of the world in general.
And I think martial arts sort of highlights a lot of those critical thinking issues.
Yeah, and I think that's one of the reasons I was so excited to come on this podcast today, is because I think you're ideally situated to have that conversation with me.
Jiu Jitsu Brazilian Jiu Jitsu specifically aliveness training training against resisting opponents We don't talk about this is a huge area that nobody is talking about we can understand all of reason and rationality Through Jiu Jitsu through corrective mechanisms through aligning your beliefs with reality I mean little things from you know testing ideas yourself not having to take it on faith I was talking to one I was talking to...
There's something about the type of person who would either, if you frame it in terms of subjecting yourself to that, there's something about that that fundamentally differentiates us, if you will, from people in fantasy-based martial arts.
It develops a kind of character, it develops a kind of attitude when you place yourself in situations and get tapped.
It's a type of corrective mechanism.
Jiu-jitsu is a corrective mechanism.
It can help you align your beliefs with reality.
And I'd love to explore that with you today and talk about what that means.
Just in the case that some people might not know what that means, what I mean by tap is submit.
When you do jiu-jitsu, believe it or not, I just assume that people know what we're talking about, but I've talked to people and go, okay, what is jiu-jitsu?
What are you doing?
Submission grappling which is jujitsu is one style of it, but it's all about using leverage and technique against joints or chokes against arteries like choke holds to Cut off the blood to your brain or neck cranks and when you train jujitsu as opposed to other martial arts Other than wrestling which I consider martial art you can go full speed on that you go you go a hundred percent and that's the difference between those martial arts and striking based martial arts where
you really shouldn't go a hundred percent because You only have so many punches your head can take before your body just stops working.
That's just a fact You could train sparring hard for you know a certain amount of years, but You're gonna you're gonna your mind is gonna turn into mush.
unidentified
There's just no doubt about it We know that for a fact people do jujitsu into their 60s.
There are no, like, you know, bowing rituals and masters and all this nonsense.
All of those structures, I think, are put in place to conceal the underlying paucity of the effectiveness of the techniques.
And people come up with this...
So the other thing about that that I think is so important is that all of these combat-based martial arts...
I've been waiting for this conversation for a long time.
All of those combat, these combat-based martial arts, let's take a look at, you mentioned wrestling.
We know it works.
We know, there are some things we just know that they work.
We know that kickboxing works.
We also know that it's head trauma for kickboxing.
We know that Muay Thai, which is, in my opinion, an insane activity, but we know that it works.
We know that Western boxing works.
We know that jujitsu works.
So the reason that we can test these things, we can take people and hopefully later on we'll talk about the difference between Brazilian Jiu Jitsu and Japanese Jiu Jitsu, right?
Same techniques, different pedagogy, different training method.
That's a $2 word for training method.
We can take that.
We can adjudicate these things because we take two people of equal weight and we stick them in a cage and we have some very basic rules.
And also for your listeners who aren't familiar, MMA gloves are very thin.
You know, I think people who don't understand MMA, they think that they're kind of like boxing gloves.
And so you call up, unbeknownst to me, you call up, you know, like I heard a show, your buddies with Eddie Bravo, right?
You call up and say, look, we got this guy in here.
He says that he has this technique, pinky blitzkrieg.
I'm gonna send them over there put them up against your good purple belt get it on video and we'll see what happens So it's a it's a way to test it now now if that works You'd be like holy shit like I can't this is awesome.
Like we nobody ever thought of the pinky blitzkrieg.
It's incredible But what you've done there is you that's a core component of critical thinking it's a willingness to revise your beliefs and It may sound like bullshit, but you're completely open to the possibility if this works against a resisting opponent, right?
So let's say that I tap out his purple belts and he's like, all right, well, brown belt.
At some point, it would be so absurd that you'd think that Eddie and I were in on it, right?
I don't know the guy.
I've never rolled with him, never met him.
So you'd call someone else.
But...
And then you can test it.
So you can watch it.
Eventually you can test it with, you know, your friends.
So this idea of testability and people can figure out things for themselves.
They don't have to go on the history of tradition or, you know, some guy punched a bull in the head or there was a blind nun walking through this and she killed all these guys.
It's a waste of time, but I'd argue it's even worse than a waste of time.
If it were just a waste of time then you know you could have been staring at a wall But you thought that you were doing something to help you achieve a goal and the goal was to win a fight So you thought you were engaged in activity that the whole There's no resisting opponent.
So when there's no resisting opponent, it's not a it's not testable You can't bring the tools of science to write so So you thought you were engaging in activity that brought you closer to your desired objectives, but it didn't.
What it does do is it helps your precision movement.
And you could argue that learning how to execute these patterns in a very beautiful way shows control and it shows precision movement.
The problem with it is that there's some of those movements that are completely ineffective like double knife hand block or thrusts, knife hand thrusts.
There's movements that are not applicable to MMA. But the concept behind it is actually something that a lot of really good mixed martial artists like Carlos Kahn did or even Conor McGregor are doing.
They're doing a lot of like movement training.
And although I don't think kata is the best way to achieve those kind of goals, I think that there is something to be said for not just Martial arts techniques, but other things is like yoga I think is extremely effective in enhancing your ability to To control and manage your body in movements.
Yeah, or even if you shadow box jabs and crosses and uppercuts and stuff, even if you do that, you could not be doing it correctly and then you'd be practicing the wrong thing over and over again.
Right.
That will take you away from your goal.
That's why you have to have some kind of a resisting opponent.
Resisting opponents are the corrective mechanisms for everything.
And just as they're the corrective mechanisms in the physical domain, they're the corrective mechanisms in the cognitive and intellectual domains as well.
That's why prayer is so insidious.
It's because people think that they're They're doing something that's in their own well-being.
They're doing something that's good, but they're just talking to themselves Mm-hmm, but there is some aspects and I would agree with I don't know if I would I don't like labels I have a real hard time with labels even labels for things that I think are good things like I think that Some people get a lot out of prayer,
and not necessarily because they're praying to a non-existent deity, or they really truly believe that if they wish for a new car, it's gonna come to them.
But I think that the mind, when focused on positive thinking, And and and focused on love and focused on that the tenants of Christianity like of Godly behavior and compassion and all these different things and look You truly are looking out for your fellow man and wanting to be a good person all those things I think there is merit in that I think you can you can you can certainly find benefit in that as a tool for mental management I mean does that mean there's a guy in the clouds
with a harp and all that jazz and Of course not.
But I think that it's, in a sense, like Tai Chi.
I mean, if a guy thinks that he's going to take Tai Chi only and get into the UFC, it's hilarious.
He's going to get fucked up.
But if a guy in the UFC, like Conor McGregor, for instance, who's so concentrated on movement, really gets involved in Tai Chi, I think he would probably get at least some benefit out of it.
Because in that slow-moving...
This, like, rhythmic pattern, what you're doing is you're exercising your body in an unusual way and expanding the possibilities of your interactions with opponents, expanding what your body can and can't do.
I think yoga does that.
I think there's a lot of different things that do that.
I don't know about now anymore, but certainly when I... I think there's some people that teach Tai Chi and even practice Tai Chi that are just doing it for their health.
So he has zero ambitions to win a fight with anybody.
He's in his late 70s.
So if somebody says that, I have no problem with that at all.
And I think it's true, and certainly motion would be better than non-motion.
And the problem is exactly the same problem with religion when people are making objective claims.
They're making claims about the nature of reality.
Right.
I want to know what's true.
The problem is that people, every time you talk about faith or religion or what have you, people shut down or they have barriers.
We don't need to talk about that.
All we need to do is talk about jiu-jitsu.
That's why this is so perfect.
Because with jiu-jitsu, you can figure things out yourself.
You can figure out what works, right?
The pinky blitzkrieg.
You can figure out what doesn't work.
You can figure out what you're capable of.
If I tap you, if you tap me out 20 times, I'm under no illusions that the 21st time, I mean, I could get lucky.
I could get lucky against Rory.
I could get lucky against Matt Thornton.
It's always possible.
I could get...
It's highly unlikely, but I could get lucky.
The problem is that if you look at the way that people engage these rituals in their lives, what these people are doing is they think it's taking them towards an end.
It's exactly identical to fantasy based martial arts.
I think also a parallel, like in fantasy-based martial arts, the benefits of it, like I was, like I said, I did Taekwondo for a long time, and I got really good at it, and I competed a lot, and I was essentially in a cult.
I mean, Taekwondo, although it's a beneficial cult and it helped me a lot and in a lot of ways it made me the person that I am today because in training and doing really difficult things and competing and overcoming nerves and fear and all that stuff, there's a lot of benefit in it.
But then I had a distorted perception of reality because of it.
And that distorted perception of reality was shattered once I started boxing.
And then I had to learn all the other aspects of martial arts.
Like one of the most sobering moments of my life.
I trained at Carlson Gracie's on Hawthorne in Hollywood in 1996. And this is before Vitor Belfort made his debut in the UFC. And I had this long, extensive career.
History of competing in Taekwondo tournaments and I had kickboxed and I'd done quite a bit of boxing training and I wrestled in high school I thought I was a pretty good martial artist and I just got fucking mauled like I had never exercised like I had no idea what I was doing and I just remember the feeling of helplessness and the guy who one of the bunch of people mauled me but one of the guys that mauled me I'll never forget is this Brazilian kid who was a purple belt who was basically my size He wasn't
any bigger than me, and he wasn't like some super Mario Sperry black belt guy.
He was just some guy who just beat the fuck out of me.
I mean, almost disdainfully, and he was a nice guy, but I mean, when he was training, he was training really hard, and he didn't give me any slack.
I was just getting wrecked.
And I remember thinking, wow, what a stupid illusion I was under.
It's probably 90%, even though a lot are watching it.
So what you're demonstrating for those who are listening is there's these drills that you do where someone will pretend to throw a punch, and another person will step aside and do their counterattack.
Yeah, so also the the key deliverable I think in this call one of those in this conversation is that Whether it's shadow boxing or whether it's kata or whether it's taking a knife and doing a drill when I used to do those train with sticks I was really really good, but I always knew the angle So it was fantasy based if you took the angle out of it.
I would just get beaten to death I mean people what do you mean by angle?
So, like in De Robio or Screamer, there are 12 angles.
It goes like 75 degrees, 75 degrees the other way, baseball swing, reverse baseball swing, stab, overhand stab, attack to the knees, attack to the other knees.
So when you do those, when you train, you know, guys just do the numbers.
One, two, three, and, you know, you get so good at it.
I mean, it's pretty crazy.
I can show you stuff here.
You know, it's like, if I know the angle, it looks awesome.
It's fantasy-based martial arts because the opponent isn't resisting.
You have to have a resisting opponent.
But here's the deliverable for this conversation, I think, is that if you train in a certain way, absent a corrective mechanism, but you think that corrective mechanism is an actual corrective mechanism.
In other words, you think you're training in a way that will bring you closer to reality, but you're becoming further from reality.
What that does is that's devastating because you need that corrective mechanism.
You need to bring your thoughts in alignment with reality.
And that was the great thing about the UFCs is because now we have all these people and we can see what works.
So think about the guys, you know, I listened to your show with Eddie Bravo, I think, and he said he was just practicing the The rear naked on his leg.
Well, that's not going to work because there's no corrective mechanism.
The question is, and I mean, the great thing about this conversation is that we can test this stuff, right?
I mean, this is the ultimate, we have people, we have, so for that we need to look at, the only big word I think we need here today is pedagogy, like the training method.
It's a big word for training method.
We don't even need pedagogy, just say training method.
So we look at the training method.
What I think you would need for that is, well here, I guess here's my question to you.
Would it be better in your mind to train shadow boxing or to do some light boxing with guys with your focus mitt over there, guys holding up focus mitts at the same speed that you were shadow boxing?
And I think that that goes along with shadowboxing, especially if you're a striker.
If you're a striker and you don't shadowbox, I think you're doing yourself a disservice.
I think there is a benefit to visualization and to movement and to...
There's things that happen when you throw combinations in the air as far as your dexterity, especially with kicking.
And your ability to even do combinations without any resistance or without anybody trying to counter you, there's benefit in stringing together those reps, those repetitions.
And I think, so sometimes if I go in to straight blast and there's nobody on the mat, there's nobody to roll with, sometimes what I'll do is I'll just go through the motions.
Like I'll do rolls or I'll go over my back shoulder or I'll just, you know, fall down.
There's merit to that in that I think I already know how to do it.
I'm sure that I could improve on it without any question at all.
Your example of yoga is a really good one.
I think it's certainly true that you can use muscles in yoga that you don't in another activity.
And I think that those have benefits to MMA. In fact, I'm sure they have benefits to a lot of other things.
I Probably should but if I would I just spend that hour doing jujitsu to be blunt with you But I think that you can get things out of yoga and get things out of these other activities but you have to be conscious about the reason why you're doing these things and The way to get better ultimately like yeah, so you could shadow box at a certain level And again, I guess, I think we can think about it in terms of the layup example again.
It's not necessarily, the ball is the corrective mechanism with the layup.
The person is the corrective mechanism in the fight.
And as long as somebody knows what they're doing and they're training in a certain way, it's not necessarily that shadowboxing will take one away from one's goal, if it's being practiced correctly.
I think Kata would take one away from one's goal.
But I think that the whole project like if you think about and that's why I think the shadow boxing is such a good example of this What is it that...
Okay, so when someone shadowboxes, the point is to warm up, that accomplishes that.
You could do that with squats too, right?
Or, you know, you could do that in any whatever number of, you're looking at me like you're lost.
You might be a little off track in that I think you think there's very little benefit in a lot of these activities that I think aren't primary activities.
I think, yeah, if you wanted to break it down to what is the only...
There's a broad range of things you could do to improve all sorts of athletic endeavors.
Like, there's a lot of people that don't believe you should do any strength and conditioning training.
You should just do technique, and you should just do sparring.
There's a lot of people that go that route.
And then there's other people that think that's absolutely foolish.
You should primarily, especially once you learn the skills, If you're competing, you should focus primarily on strength and conditioning because really it's just about burning your body out and reaching an incredibly high level of cardio so that when you compete, you know all these techniques already, you will now have a gas tank that's superior to your opponents and that will lead to victory.
There's a lot of modalities and there's a lot of schools of thought.
So it's interesting to me, I see guys who come in who are just super strong.
And I think to a certain extent, we need to be careful because strength, and again, I'm not speaking from experience so much, I'm speaking just conceptually.
I think there's a tendency for strong guys or big guys to over rely upon their strengths and their size.
The concept of strength and conditioning, a lot of people think, oh, well, you're doing squats and deadlifts.
Yeah.
A good example is a guy I've had on this podcast before.
His name is Nick Kurson.
He trains Rafael Dos Anjos.
He trains Ruslan Provodnikov, who's a famous boxer.
A lot of world-class athletes.
Joe Schilling, whose glory t-shirt I'm wearing, one of their best fighters.
Excellent kickboxer, world champion.
What he's doing is his strength and conditioning program.
He trained under Marv Marinovich.
And Nick does a lot of plyometric exercises, a lot of sprinting, a lot of box jumps, and all these really unorthodox techniques.
And the idea is to improve your ability to execute things.
Improve your ability to close the distance.
Improve your ability to get out of the way.
Improve your ability to maintain a high workload through the rounds.
If you can only throw, let's say, 50 kicks in a round before you get exhausted, and if you can improve that through strength and conditioning, make it 75 or 80, you're going to have a significant advantage over the pace that you can push on your opponent.
And that is, in his opinion, and many other people's opinion, and this is...
This is a really open debate right now in the world of martial arts because it has not been solved because it relies on so many variables.
It relies on the athlete themselves, their mental fortitude, their dedication to their craft, how good is their technique in the first place before they embark on a strength and conditioning program.
There's so many variables.
I think to unbox all this and to make it a little bit easier for people that are going, what the fuck are they talking about?
What we're saying is there's a lot of people that have distorted ideas about reality itself and a method for exposing that kind of thinking which is like this sort of Dogmatic religious thinking, which is ultimately accepted by all the people around you, but never critically judged.
A really good method is jujitsu.
And the reason why jujitsu is such a good method is because jujitsu is one of the few martial arts that you could practice at any age.
And you could also watch those techniques being applied by other people.
Yesterday I went to the Eddie Bravo Invitational, which was at the Orpheon Theater in downtown LA. Some of the best jiu-jitsu fighters in the world were going at it, and it was really amazing to watch.
It was awesome.
It was a crowd filled with thousands of people who are fans of jiu-jitsu and practitioners So it was a really educated crowd and what was cool about that is we all understood like when a guy got to a position like oh And you know the crowd would cheer when someone would get out of a heel hook or they would cheer when a guy would be able to Tap a guy with a rear naked choke and we were watching all these things play out so there was lessons for me and As someone who's not competing and sitting in the audience,
because I've spent so much time doing Jiu-Jitsu, I was watching these interactions take place in a very logical and trackable...
By the way, what's interesting is Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, as it was first created or first sort of established, It came from Japanese Jiu Jitsu and Elio Gracie and Carlos Gracie who were probably two of the most important people ever in the history of martial arts.
They sort of manipulated those techniques and improved upon them and made the art more about the submissions than it was about the stand-up and the bringing the fight to the ground.
And in doing so they established a series of techniques and you know we refer to those techniques as the basics.
There are some people in that world that think that the basics are all you need.
And they don't accept the new techniques.
And it's really fascinating because that's essentially how jujitsu became effective in the first place.
It's because the new techniques that were established by Carlos and Elio Gracie and all these different movements, like the guard, like learning how to do triangles off your back, all these different things, which people had no idea in the early UFCs.
Hoist Gracie tapped out Dan Severin.
Everybody's like, what the fuck is he doing?
He's got his legs wrapped around his neck and his arm.
What is this?
And then Dan's about to go out and he taps and everybody's like, whoa, this is crazy.
Well, those were, in our world, completely new techniques.
Well, there's a lot of new techniques that are constantly being established now.
By these young, innovative practitioners that some of the old guard are ignoring.
And my good friend Eddie Bravo is a perfect example of that.
I went with Eddie de Brazil in 2003, and he competed in the world championships, and he beat Gustavo Dantes, who was a world champion at the time.
He tapped him in his first fight, and then after that, he fought Hoyler Gracie, who is one of the greatest Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu competitors of all time.
Hoyler Gracie is a national hero.
They closed the other mats off, they put a spotlight on the main event, and they thought that Hoyler was gonna wreck this young kid.
It wasn't even a black belt at the time.
Eddie was a brown belt, okay?
And Eddie, with his unorthodox techniques that people had laughed at, tapped Hoyler Gracie in front of everybody.
And he got him with a triangle, but the setup was his rubber guard setup.
He has all these crazy guard setups and, you know, his game has advanced light years since then.
But the point being that people mocked him for that.
It didn't help that he went to his next fight.
He fought Leo Vieira and he popped his rib early in the fight and got dominated in that fight and almost got tapped.
But there was also a giant emotional letdown because you couldn't believe he just tapped Hoyler Gracie.
And now he's moving on, and he's fighting Leo Vieira, who's another monster Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu artist.
But here's the point.
For the longest time, people, there was two schools of thought.
There was the old guard that just did not accept him.
They openly mocked him.
And, you know, they really criticized his whole movement and his techniques, what champions did he produce, all this.
This doesn't really work on Real Fighters.
Until he had a rematch with Hoyler many years later, and just wrecked him.
I mean, it was worse than the first time because Hoyler didn't tap, but he got his knee destroyed.
I mean, if you watch that video, Hoyler just deals with the fact that his knee is getting ripped apart while Eddie is mangling it.
But it was never a moment where Eddie was in trouble.
He dictated the entire match, and we played the fight on the TV, on the podcast, and had Eddie explain what he was doing.
And even when it looked like Hoyler was improving the position, And he was like, no, I let him do that so I could do this, and then I would adjust.
And he was like explaining.
I pulled him back on top of me, because I knew if I did that, I would be able to move his arm higher up on my shoulder, then I rolled him back onto his back, and then I can get deeper in on it.
And when he was explaining that, it was even more humiliating.
Because you've got this guy, Hurley Gracie, who's a multiple-time world champion, who just did not learn these new techniques.
Feels like he's got these old techniques, and that's it.
And if you don't learn it, and if you're not willing to revise your beliefs, and if you're not willing to test this and accept the conclusion, you might think something's common sense.
Common sense is irrelevant, which relevance is what works.
Yeah, these new techniques that are constantly being innovated, they're constantly changing, like it's almost impossible to stay up on all of it unless it's a monster part of your life and you're absorbing them every day.
Like the leg lock game is this new...
Element that over the last like few years has really come into play in a major way thanks to a bunch of guys John Donaher, Eddie Cummins, Gary Tonin who won the Eddie Bravo Invitational yesterday.
These like really high-level practitioners and instructors are Constantly adding new improvements to approaches and techniques so it's all applicable It's all you can watch it happen in real time and even as someone who's not competing like me sitting in the audience I understand the positions and the movements So when I see all this new stuff and I see all these new approaches is like wow this game just continues to grow and evolve Yeah, and what amazes me is when I watch kids' classes, kids are doing the craziest stuff.
I've been saying this for a while, but I'll say it again.
The UFC has changed martial arts so radically that there's been more improvement since 1993. There's been more evolution than there have been in the last 10,000 years.
That's real.
That's 100% true.
You go back and watch martial arts from 1993 and watch the UFC today, it's a completely different realm.
It's fascinating.
The difference is, of course, when you talk about jiu-jitsu being applicable, it's applicable inside jiu-jitsu.
The problem is when you get someone who's a really good wrestler who's an awesome kickboxer and you can't use your jiu-jitsu, you're still going to get fucked up.
Like a guy like Chuck Liddell, who you're not going to take down and he's going to knock you dead.
I mean, you listed that as one of the martial arts that don't really work, but that's the martial art that Chuck Liddell learned for striking under John Hackleman.
Right, but then that highlights the problem that we brought up earlier that you really can't resist.
You can't train 100% resisting with kickboxing if you want to be a healthy member of society.
You're gonna get fucking brain damage.
I mean, I'm pretty sure I have brain damage and I stopped really getting hit in the head when I was 22. I mean, I really haven't been hit in the head that much since then, but I'm for sure something's fucked up in there.
Yeah, I was watching a guy hit the pads about a brown belt a couple weeks ago, and I just thought to myself, I mean, the whole thing was moving, and I thought to myself, like, wow.
Like, if that guy ever hit me, I mean, that would be it.
I mean, it would just be over, and I watch people kick the heavy bag sometimes.
Jesus Christ pull up Melvin manhoof trains with I forget his trainer's name Mike Mike's gym and I forget how to say his last passing year passing year I forget how to say it cuz he's their daughter Dutch they're from Holland But there's a bunch of videos of Melvin, but Melvin kicking the pads with him.
Yeah, and the other thing that's interesting to me about that is those are culturally reinforced, right?
There are these rituals, there's the bowing, the master, there are other people that you're friends that you come to do these things with.
All of that reinforces the delusion.
It's very similar to...
To religions, the way that religions focus, with the difference being that people in religions, people who have faith, they think there are better people as a consequence of them having faith.
Whereas very few people in the delusional martial arts think that.
They think they're good fighters, but, oh, the techniques are too dangerous to test, or, you know, we can't do this.
If we did this, we'd kill you.
But those cultures of delusion keep people trapped in thinking about things that remove them from reality.
Yeah, there's definitely some of that, but I think there's some good to the idea of respecting a dojo as a place where you, when you walk into it, like one of the things, stupid, but it's true.
When I was a kid, I used to have keys to the dojo.
It was a dojang, because Taekwondo is the Korean word.
Even when no one was there, I would bow when I would walk in.
I would go to work out in the middle of the night.
I would go there.
I had keys.
I would train sometimes.
I'd show up at midnight.
I'd go there and lock the door and go in myself.
When I stepped into the training area, I would always bow.
It was almost like an OCD thing.
I wouldn't not do it.
In my mind, I had been trained and taught that when I entered that room, I had to bow.
There's fucking no one there, man.
I'm by myself.
I always bowed.
Like one time my girlfriend, my girlfriend was a freak in high school.
She wanted to fuck in the gym and I was like, we can't.
For me, it was an execution of discipline, of my mind.
Like, it was very hard for a 17-year-old boy to not have sex with this hot, I think she was 16, 16-year-old girl who wanted a bang in this karate or taekwondo gym.
For me, it was like, what martial arts meant to me at the time Was it was the first thing that I had ever done that made me feel like I wasn't a loser So my whole life I'd been insecure and we had moved around a lot when I was a kid I didn't really have a whole lot of friends and I never felt like I fit in and I always felt You know, I didn't know my dad and you know, my stepdad is a little distant There was all this stuff going on, right?
There's all these things that just didn't feel right didn't didn't make me feel good And then this one thing came along that made me feel good.
This one thing came along that I had gotten really proficient at really quickly and was absolutely obsessed with.
I don't have that notion of sacred when it comes to like a space but I do in terms of like my approach to things Like, if I'm focused on something, like, I don't allow myself to get distracted if something is critical.
Something's, like, really important to focus on, and I decide, this is what I'm doing now, now I'm doing this, you know?
Like, the way you engage with someone, like, if you care about someone, here's a good way, not just relationships as far as, like, sexual relationships, but friendships.
If you care about someone and you really enjoy being with them and they're one of the most important people in your life, like, when you interact with them, I think you should interact with them under that...
Provision or with that thought in mind with that with that intention with what?
I missed you the intention that you care about them very deeply These are important people in your life.
Yeah, yeah Like you don't you don't ever want like I don't I would never like like really good friends.
I would never yell at them and You know call them a piece of shit I never want you in my life or say say crazy things to people that sometimes people say to hurtful hurtful things Yeah It doesn't mean don't be critical.
It doesn't mean don't correct someone if you see your friend doing something stupid.
I don't think that's a good example.
I think because marriage is not something that like it's like something you're trying to do You know marriage is like or even relationships friendships are just there.
Those are those are their interactions Relationships are it's different like it should be fun and enjoyable and all that good stuff What I'm talking about is a discipline.
So that space, the dojo, the dojang, represented a sacred place for me because it represented this new ticket.
I wasn't about to cash that in for some pussy.
Holla!
You know I'm saying like that was my thoughts Matt now my I mean if there's anything I would think that The world like life itself is that environment life itself is that that dojang life itself is that thing so You don't ever want to You don't want to steal you don't want to commit crimes against people you don't want to do things to hurt people all those those those Those terrible things that we see
out in the world, if the world was your dojang, if the world was your church, if the world was your sacred place, you would never want to commit bad acts in your sacred place.
I wish we could come up with some way, especially when we see what's going on in the Middle East and we see what's going on in the world, we see the way we're treating our environment, our climate.
I wish there were some way to make that real and palatable to people.
So that we would start being more authentic and more sincere with someone.
And I think what you said, it's not about criticism the way I look at it.
I think it's about forthright speech.
You can be forthright in your speech with somebody and not be an asshole, not be a jerk.
I think those kinds of relationships, for me, Aristotle talks about that too.
But for me, I think that the most meaningful relationships are those People with whom I can be authentic and be myself and be real and those are kind of I don't like the word sacred though It's I guess that's the one kind of nitpick I have Because you attach that to religion well because I attach it to the inability to revise something right I attach it to the utmost respect Yeah,
so if we replaced a sacred for respect, I think we'd be on the same page.
I don't say it in terms of harps and the clouds and all that kind of jazz.
And when we were talking about don't be an asshole to people you care about, Doesn't mean, it certainly doesn't mean I'm some sort of a perfect person.
It doesn't mean that I haven't been an asshole.
And then sometimes when you're responding to someone else being retarded or someone being ridiculous, you can be an asshole because you don't have the patience for it anymore.
Because you don't have the, at the moment, you don't have the temperament to...
The maturity.
Yeah, it could be maturity.
It could be...
You're overwhelmed.
There's a lot of variables.
So if someone hears this and says, you know, oh, well, man, I've been an asshole lately.
Maybe I'm a bad person.
It's just recognizing those moments where you probably could have handled something better and continuing to improve.
And then also this idea, this is a really important one, because people have this idea that somehow I'm 30 years old.
I shouldn't be doing this anymore.
I'm 50 years old.
I should have learned by now.
That's all bullshit.
Throw that away.
Toss that shit aside.
These ideas of numbers that people have in their head that by a certain age you should stop.
You are alive.
And if you are alive and if you are thinking, all those numbers that you keep attaching, well, you know, when Einstein was 30, shut the fuck up.
Stop doing that.
That is a waste of your time.
And stop saying to yourself, I should be better by now.
I'm such a total non-helping thought.
What you need to think of is life.
You're living, you're alive right now, and if you've made a mistake and you're still continuing to learn and grow, that's all just data.
No, but I, you know, we go around, we talk about what they're grateful for, everyone's grateful, and I think that there's something, it's an opportunity to be authentic at that time, but it's also, like, I think verbalizing those things are important.
So it's not just the negative, oh, I shouldn't be doing this, but it's the positive.
Look, as a general rule of thumb, if you ever have any doubts about it, just be kind to people.
Also, it's great when you reinforce it with your friends, verbalizing it.
I'm a big fan.
I tell my friends I love them all the time.
My wife jokes around about it.
She goes, I don't know any men that tell their friends they love them all the time, but all my friends do.
We all tell each other we love each other.
I love you, brother, and we hang up the phone.
Do it with all my friends.
And, you know, we're always hugging and always saying, I appreciate you.
You know, I think it's really important.
I have a very tight-knit group of friends that I care about very much, and they're all very motivated, and they're healthy, and, you know, they're not without flaws, but they've got shit going on, and it empowers me.
Because you got the tattoos, you got the build, you've been in the ring, you're friends with whoever you're friends with, and I think that whether you like it or not, you're in a position, particularly with young people, to look up to you.
And that is exactly the kind of behavior that we want to see modeled.
It's not emotionally immature for a guy to cry at a tragic event.
I tell my friends I love them.
I tell people, I tell my buddy over there, I'm incredibly grateful for the opportunity to stay his house, etc.
And I think that that kind of, we live in a culture that's suppressed these, particularly males, this ability for men to communicate in an authentic way.
I think that that journey from you as a 17-year-old to now...
I mean, there's some really core lessons for people out there struggling with maybe issues of sexuality or issues of feeling they hate the world or they're not good enough or their self-esteem issues.
I'm 49. I'd much rather people say about me, hey, Pete's a really good guy than Pete's a really smart guy.
You know, I want to embody those virtues.
But more than that, I think that the story that you told there, it's something that's accessible to people, and it's a type of thing that we need to do.
We need to figure out how to move our culture towards these more humane ways of dealing with people.
And my own opinion is that we don't need superstitions to do that.
You're a perfect example of that, right?
We don't need...
People making objective claims about reincarnating in times through bodies like the Dalai Lama or...
Like all these, the false beliefs and all the things, what they are is like scaffolding, I feel like.
They're scaffolding for evolution.
And I think that that's ultimately the benefit that...
Religion does provide is in in these insane beliefs in the sky gods and all these different things and we show reverence to these These deities and they have these rules and we must follow otherwise we'll be punished in those rules There becomes order and in the order becomes society and that's that's something that people always like to fall back on like we are a Judeo-Christian Sound founded society and our Judeo-Christian ethics like I saw some woman who was arguing about Muslim terrorists and that was like one of the big things that this is a This
country was founded on Judeo-Christian ethics.
So what?
Monkeys were founded on eating bananas, and we're not monkeys anymore.
You know, it's like, it's such a stupid fucking, like, just because something's founded on something that's illogical doesn't mean you should have reverence for that illogical thing.
And Satan is in the hearts and minds of these enemies.
They never say that.
Because it's so preposterous that we're slowly, as evolution, as thinking...
I know evolution is the wrong word for that, but as it improves and expands, we are no longer accepting the idea of Satan.
Culturally, Satan was an accepted thing hundreds of years ago.
It was parallel.
Like, if you looked at the mentions of Satan and the mentions of God, they were right up there together.
You're blaming Satan on the bad things, and you're praising God for the good things.
That's no longer the case.
Now we just cling to these absurd notions of this one that's watching us all the time, and you've got to sort of peripherally mention it and casually reference it without going into detail, and you're allowed to do that because it makes people think, well, you're on the same page as me.
You're a God-fearing Christian man like myself.
I'm a God-fearing Christian man myself as well.
God bless you.
God bless you as well.
But if you go, Satan is looking out for you.
Satan is watching you right now.
Satan is just letting the air out of your tires.
You go, well, that guy's a fucking idiot.
We've moved past Satan, but we haven't moved past God.
Even if there is some all-knowing entity that is controlling everything and is filled with love and has a grand plan for the universe, they have yet to show themselves.
So this is all just a concept and an idea with no basis in fact and as we have Found more facts about the nature of reality in the world itself It seems more and more preposterous with every day every day the scientists come up with these new equations that show the Way the universe could have possibly be been formed and that every day that these fucking guys at the CERN laboratory the large hadron collider
Are discovering these what were at one time theoretical particles, showing them to be true, and their calculations to be correct.
We have a deeper and deeper understanding of the universe.
But we think now, we love to think that right now that we're filled with knowledge, and we love to look at ourselves now and look at the past as, well, they didn't know back then, but we know now.
But if we looked in the past, they would have the same ideas.
They would look back at those poor monkey people with the bananas and they go, those fucking dummies, they didn't even know houses yet.
We will one day look back at 2015, like what a bunch of fools.
What a bunch of ridiculous people that were still, they had this incredibly complicated society and this wonderful access to information, but yet they were still shackled down by ideology and killing each other over religion and ancient superstitions that That dictated their behaviors, like what a weird time to be in, they'll look at.
They'll look at us now in 2015, they'll say, what a strange time, this adolescent period of enlightenment, where they're still concentrating on stupid shit, and the fucking president of the United States can openly talk about God, and no one goes, what is God?
What are you saying?
What are you saying?
Do you think Jesus came back from the dead?
What do you think?
Do you think someone walked on water?
Do you believe in a literal translation?
Are you an Old Testament guy or a New Testament guy?
Well, the New Testament.
The New Testament was made by Constantine, who was a fucking Roman emperor who wasn't even Christian.
He didn't even believe it.
He became a Christian on his fucking deathbed.
Like, that's when he became a Christian.
Like, all these people that are, like, really into the New Testament.
And, like, I'll talk about Old Testament shit, and people will get mad at me on Twitter.
They'll send me this fucking hate text.
You understand, motherfucker, what the difference is between the Old Testament and the New Testament.
Because the New Testament is utter horseshit.
It's created by a bishop and a fucking emperor.
That's a fact.
That's like established religious fact.
Like, everyone knows where it came from.
And not only that, it was written hundreds of years after the death of Jesus.
So what are you talking about?
Because if you're talking about the old stuff, you gotta go deep.
Go to the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Go to the fucking...
Go to the most ridiculous aspects of that and tell me, you basing your life on that?
Because that's even more preposterous.
They found them in clay pots in Qumran, written on animal skins.
These people thought the world was flat and the sun was 17 miles away.
And we're gonna...
They did.
They really did.
This is how we're gonna live our lives?
This is it.
This is all the facts we need.
Fuck the Large Hadron Collider.
Fuck CERN. Fuck Stephen Hawking.
Fuck quantum physics.
Fuck Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Fuck those dudes with their telescopes.
No, we're gonna base it on leather skins and charcoal ink.
They put a cover of, they put the Quran's cover on the Bible, and they read passages to people in the street, and they asked them, what do they think about this?
And, you know, they were like, well, you know, this is ridiculous, and this is outrageous, and it was all from the Bible.
I've had conversations with people where they're fucking furious at me because I don't believe in their death touch.
I've had conversations with people where they're like, you know, you are arrogant, and your belief in martial arts, and you're in a position of influence because of your work for the UFC, and what you're doing is you're fucking up because you're not telling the truth about certain...
Stop.
Stop.
Abandon it.
But if you're like me, who, like I said, martial arts and the dojang was so sacred to me, I wouldn't even have sex with my girlfriend there.
That represents such an important part of their life.
It's just so lucky for me that it happened during my formative period, where I was exposed to reality at a young age, where I had to accept it.
I was like, oh, Jesus.
I had to accept that these techniques don't really work all the time.
Some of them work, but you have to learn all the other stuff for them to work at all.
Yeah, I wonder about, again, so few people have written about this, I wonder about the experience that you had of that, and I had of that, we were in the same boat, realizing over time that these things just didn't work and we had wasted our time, and I wonder how similar that is to someone's escape from a faith.
He's a hilarious stand-up comedian, a friend of mine.
And he was in Jehovah's Witness?
Is that what he is?
Yeah, I think so.
And he won't accept any stupid shit now.
Because he's like, no, when it comes to the regressive left and some of these ideologies where you have to look at something in a certain way and you can't look at it in any other way, it's like a dogma.
And he's like, no, no, no, I've seen this before.
I know what this is.
What you're doing is you're saying you have to think a certain way.
That's bullshit.
It can be discussed.
You can discuss certain aspects of people's behavior or gender identity or gender pronouns or...
Yeah, a hundred percent a hundred percent and I think martial arts is an excellent vehicle for that though one of the things that was Explained to me when I was really young that really did sink in my instructor I was a disciple of General Chae Hyung Yi, who was the founder of Taekwondo.
He taught it to troops, and he was one of the guys who really honed the techniques for maximum power and efficiency and leverage.
They had this idea that martial arts was a vehicle for developing human potential, and I read that when I was like 15, and I've always used that phrase, because I think that's such a massive...
Questions, adversity, puzzles, different things you have to figure out, the questions you have to ask of yourself, examining your own behavior, objective reasoning.
There's all these different variables that come into play when it comes to life.
And I think those are highlighted in the realm of martial arts because if you can land a kick and you knock someone out, then that happened.
That worked.
You were in the ultimate...
Especially the Ultimate Fighting Championship is a perfect example of that, but there's no higher level of problem solving than problem solving with dire physical consequences.
Because your emotions are on the line, your fears, your anxiety, there's so many fight or flight mechanisms in place.
There's self-doubt.
There's, you know, how much discipline did you truly execute in training?
Did you give everything you had?
Did you reach your full potential?
Most people go through life without even coming close to their full potential and they live life in this this weird fog of uncertainty and of regret and of Just this feeling that they're not accomplishing what they want to,
that they're not achieving their full potential and that martial arts is a vehicle for developing potential because through the very difficult training and through pushing yourself when you don't think you can and through this Overwhelming desire for comfort where you don't want to get out of bed, where you don't want to do the training, where you would rather just blow it off and don't go to class.
By forcing yourself to do that, it engages the muscles of discipline.
So when you defeat somebody, like if you work really hard and you tap someone out, you get a sense of, you get a little, I'll speak for myself.
I feel good.
Like, wow, I worked for this.
I tried hard.
I work on my baseball bat choke now and I feel pretty good.
So, that activity, your hard work brought you to a point in which you would tap somebody out and as a consequence of that, you feel self-esteem.
What we have done is we have inverted the system.
We tried to teach self-esteem absent any accomplishments.
That's not the way it works.
Self-esteem is a byproduct of hard work, of something that you have done as a direct result of an accomplishment.
So every few years they give Americans, they give kids all around the world a test.
I read this in Martin Gross' The Conspiracy of Ignorance many years ago.
Excuse me.
And the test is like, hey, all these people in the world, you know, the Koreans, the industrialized world, the Japanese, Germans, etc., they took this.
How do you think you did in relation to them?
Americans consistently score in the bottom quartile in terms of their math and science, how well they did comparatively.
But they score extraordinarily high, number one, almost always in terms of self-esteem.
We have taught the wrong things.
We've focused on the wrong things.
Our school systems have been oriented toward the wrong things.
And I think, again, you can just bring that back to jujitsu and look at it.
You couldn't possibly...
You could teach someone all the selfs that you walk in, they get a white belt, you teach them to feel good about themselves, do this, do this, do this, but does it work?
You could get a lot of the lessons from martial arts out of a lot of difficult endeavors.
I just don't think you get the problem-solving aspect at such a high level.
Some people find that in rock climbing because it's scary.
And in accomplishing that and then getting through that, you learn about yourself.
You learn about your ability to overcome adversity and to face your fears.
But I just think that martial arts is a more intense version of it because there's all this connected to combat and to the physical challenge of overcoming another human being.
And it's one of our biggest fears.
One of our biggest fears, other than falling off of a mountain, is being dominated by another human being, getting your ass kicked in conflict, where we have this long history of war.
But we were talking about the conversation that I had with my friend Duncan Trussell, where I said that, and it was kind of a revelation for the both of us, human history is a history of the wars.
When we talk about human history, it's like the stuff that happened in between the wars and some inventions, but it's mostly the wars.
That's most of the history.
Whether it's World War I or World War II or Vietnam, there's all these different conflicts that happen, and those are the bulk of our history.
When we consider the eras in the past, When we consider the ages of the different things that happened, we consider Genghis Khan and Napoleon, Alexander the Great, and all these different things that happened.
I consider that to be just an extraordinarily interesting question.
But I wonder if what you just said, that our history has been a history of war, I wonder if, inherent in every species that has evolved, they've had a similar history of war.
Because they've been subject to different evolutionary mechanisms and pressures and such, different atmospheres.
But I wonder if it's conflict over resources, conflict over...
Whatever, maybe they have another gender or something.
I wonder if that's just intrinsic in the nature of life.
I think what's intrinsic in the nature of life is that sort of problem solving and that nature wants to find the best Method of achieving a goal and so the methods that are ineffective die off and that's why 90% of the living species that have been on this planet are extinct They no longer exist because they weren't effective enough to be to keep reproducing and And you can say, no, a lot of them because people wipe them out.
People are evil and people are horrible.
People are the dominant species.
It's what species do.
I mean, many animals have wiped out animals.
You know, there's a real issue right now with wild pigs and ground nesting birds because wild pigs being an invasive species, they're dealing with these birds that nest on the ground that didn't have these animals hunting them.
And, you know, how do we weigh the concerns of the spotted owl against the loggers?
I mean, you're talking about some really important things.
And the recourse to, oh, I'm offended or I can't think of what makes me upset, makes me think that maybe...
Soon, universities won't be the place.
I mean, we'll have to have these discussions out of the universities, which would really be, it's great for you in your show, but it's terrible for the society, it's terrible for the university, it's terrible.
Universities, in a sense, have ceased to have these sorts of conversations.
Yeah, that's a good point, because liberals in terms of...
Social change and progress and you know acceptance of various different people I think that's wonderful.
It's great But I think that this regressive left with this very rigid ideology of what you can and can't say and the the behaviors in which they they engage in enforcing these things I think it's preposterous and I think that ultimately what's going to happen is you're not going to have these kind of Structures these these these places where people go and you're going to be learning things online and Yeah, and it's going to be a lot worse before it gets better.
Well, see, here's what happens, because I was actually just brought up in charges again, and if you don't do that, then, you know, people can say, well, you didn't warn me.
Well, actually, I did.
I warned you the first day.
See, not only is it in the syllabus, it's bold in caps, in the syllabus, in increased font.
She is incapable, and I don't want to pick on her because, in a sense, she's just a victim, right?
She's a victim of this malicious ideology that's running across campuses now.
But people like that are not capable of engaging and entertaining ideas because they have this, the university protects them They can say they've been aggressed.
They can say they've been kind of violated, if you will, like cognitively, intellectually violated.
But what's really interesting about that, two things.
One, she thinks that she can arbitrate everybody else's reality.
So she thinks, I can understand if I say something and he's offended by it, or I say, you know, Taekwondo and so on.
But she thinks that The regressives think that they arbitrate people's reality and they know what other people should be offended by, which is amazing.
Any time you hear someone use that word you can automatically assume they're an aggressive leftist and the next thing out of your mouth their mouths will be some kind of smear campaign.
Like, we're adding all, here's the thing about, like, adding all this extra shit to define things that are already defined by the original word, we don't need, you're doing it to prop up transgender.
And then they have these diversity initiatives and diversity requirements.
We need more faculty of color.
And I actually think that can be a good thing in some circumstances.
So, but what they mean is they mean diversity in the most narrow, bigoted kind of a way.
They mean it in terms of skin color.
They don't mean in terms of ideological diversity.
They're not out there hiring, you know, Republicans and libertarians or conservatives.
But the other thing that's interesting is that You know, I think it was on Sam's podcast with Douglas Murray, he said, we're going to be talking about pronouns are the big thing now.
We're going to be talking about pronouns while these people are sneaking nukes in our cities.
It is a failure to morally triage.
It is a system-wide failure that's trickled down to individuals within the system to make it almost impossible for them to make discerning judgments about things.
And so we have this consequence now of an entire generation of students who's being trained not only to suspend moral judgments, but to think they're better people as being a result.
And it's also beautiful that this is all coming from academia, because if you think about what a university is in academia, like a lot of people that are in academia, went to college, Went on to grad school, got their masters and their PhD, started teaching, never entered the real world, stayed in a sheltered environment, and now they're dictating this sort of behavior and thinking.
And then this radical ideology coming in this area and wanting to redefine reality in this area, they're not going out into the real world and experiencing the Congo and all these crazy Fucked up parts of the world and understanding like you're dealing with like an inherent problem with the human race like you can't redefine it by Changing pronouns and cisgender.
It really is the most insidious form of cultural myopia like they think they have latched on to some timeless.
They're just making shit up and They think they've latched onto some universal truth about reality, and now they have this moral—and I think that the underlying moral impulses that they have are pretty good ones.
You don't treat people differently on the basis of their race in general.
I think I can find parallels when I was talking about, again with martial arts, is that like the dojo to me was sacred because this was something that was transforming me and changing me from a loser to someone who had like a possible Or
Had horrible experiences with bad people, or, you know, maybe abused in high school, bullied, fucked with, and now they've found some culture where they're being not just accepted, but it's invigorating to them.
Like, we're gonna change this world, and we're gonna make things awesome for people, and we're gonna, you know, we're gonna make...
Ask people what their preferred gender pronouns are.
This is so important.
We really need to get on this.
And they're living in this environment, and again, you're dealing with really young people, like I was when I was young, and I was looking at this stage of my life as this transformative journey that I was on, and I was wholeheartedly dedicated to it.
You know, those things tend to have a life of their own, and then it's like, oh, Boghossian, he's the guy who hates Asians, right?
He's the guy, whereas, no, I'm just the guy who, and this is the earlier point I was going to make, the very thing that these regressives One of the things that they don't understand, perhaps the most important, is that reason is liberatory.
We can emancipate ourselves through reason and rationality.
But the only way to do that, the way that reason acts as a lubricant, is in social discourse.
We need to be able to have conversations.
It's non-negotiable.
Free speech is not a negotiation.
I 100% agree.
And so these people, they want to disinvite people if they don't agree with them as opposed to having, you know, an alternative speaker for their point of view or debate.
I'm not a fan of debates, but, you know, or debate.
But what they want to do is they want to shut down the discourse.
But let's take that at a deeper level and take a look at that.
Part of the problem with that is Is that I Firmly believe and I think I have evidence for this overwhelming evidence actually is a Pedigree and long pedigree in Western intellectual thought we can derive our values We can sit down and I can talk to you and we can figure out look at the black statue there are Hendricks there we can figure out Why we shouldn't discriminate against people on the basis of their skin color.
But the only way that we can do that, it doesn't come from a wand, is that you need to be able to ask questions, right?
So we can figure things out in discourse and dialogue.
That's how we figure things out.
And these people want to shut down discourse.
But if they do that, then they become their own enemies.
They're the worst type of ideologue because they have beliefs, but they haven't derived those beliefs.
And the only way, they're taking away the one thing that we need to figure stuff out.
It's like, in jujitsu, they're taking away the resisting opponent.
In this case, they're taking away the dialectic, the dialogue, free speech, open inquiry, the ability to say things on campuses without being smeared as a racist or a homophobe or a bigot.
It's incredibly frustrating on an individual level, but then when they have institutional support of this stuff, then when they have woven their tentacles into academia, into, you know, very high positions, and it's across the United States, Western Europe, and again, remember, there is a hierarchy of things you can't talk about.
You know there is and if you you want to figure something if you can figure out the relationship You mean this would be epic you figure out why?
I love my freedom of language with you here on the show you figure out why feminists are in bed with Islamists and then we got something because this to me is one of the most bizarre fascinating disturbing Grotesque I mean, if there were ever a group who actively...
I mean, it's even worse than the former Baltic states and the Soviet Union, the only military alliance in history, their primary objective was to attack themselves.
This is even worse than that.
I mean, these people, you could not possibly find a group of people who are more antithetical to the most rudimentary feminist values than the Islamists.
It is not possible.
Never has it existed.
But yet these people are in bed with each other.
And it happens over and over again.
I mean this whole situation where you're laughing.
There's something about a skin color that trumps other things.
Think about that for a second.
These people, the only people who care, this isn't my line, I read this somewhere, but the only people who care about race are racists and regressive leftists.
The regressive left really are the new racists.
They're really looking at everything in terms of race.
And I think there's a lot of sexism in the regressive left because they don't really like men.
And there's a lot of anti-masculine ideology that gets perpetrated on people The point where you're thinking, like, you're supposed to be more soft-gendered.
Gender's supposed to be a fluid thing.
Like, you're not supposed to be overtly masculine.
That's nonsense.
How come you can be overtly feminine once you become transgender?
How come you, if a woman wants to wear, like, a push-up bra, have her tits poking out, and a short skirt, and high heels, and a lot of makeup, and do her hair up, that girl's giving in to the patriarchy.
But, if a transgender does it, you go, girl.
If a transgender man all of a sudden adopts those traditionally feminine views.
And they subscribe to ideas that are just not in accordance with reality.
And I think, and I'm not using the term regressive here, I think liberals in general tend to believe that if we can change social systems somehow, and I think that there's a lot of truth in this, Steven Pinker kind of, in the blank slate, deconstructs some of these ideas, but liberals kind of think if you could only change the institutions in society, then things would, by definition, be more fair and more equal.
We're all born blank slates, and all of these disparities and inequalities come about as a result of problems within the system, inequalities within the system.
Unless you're really an ideologue on the right, you would be hard-pressed to say, why shouldn't we try to do our best to create systems of justice that are more fair?
I'm a big fan of John Rawls.
Absolutely.
Any reasonable person would say that.
But these people, they don't believe in differences between They think that the differences between men and women are not biological.
They think that they're cultural artifacts.
They think that, you know, and I don't know if you want to get the whole race thing, but the race thing is another thing, but they think that race is only skin deep.
It's a social construct, you know, rather than saying, well, why do Jewish women get Tay-Sachs syndrome?
Why do black people get more sickle cell anemia?
But again, you know, I noticed my hesitancy in discussing these things because I know that anytime you bring this up, this is an opportunity for people to smear you, tell you you're a bigot, a racist, a homophobe.
And it's also the pinnacle of identity politics.
Where the things that I say are discredited or they look at me because I'm situated in the body that I am for the sexuality I had no choice over whatsoever and they use that as an opportunity to discredit my speech.
I mean the whole thing is just, it is literally, if you could say, well let's make a list of all the things that we can write down to make it impossible to solve our problems.
I mean, I think one of the most important aspects of this is what you said about silencing debate.
And that debate and discussion is the only way we figure things out.
And I don't know...
I met you today.
I know you because of your work.
I know you because of your associations with friends of mine, like Sam Harris.
But I don't know your thinking until I talk to you.
And when I talk to you, I go, oh, okay, I see how he sees that.
Or he sees things in a different way.
And it's hard for people to do that because we have this rigid set of ideas that we have in our head and we would like to reinforce those on everybody because it makes life simpler.
Well, if you think the way I think and I think the way you think, it's perfect.
So that's why the problem is when we hang out with people who only believe like we do.
It's called a filter bubble.
It's a book about it called The Big Sort.
We tend to be more confident in the beliefs that we have.
But what we should be doing is we should be going to different gyms.
You should be going to your buddy Tenth Planet.
You should be going and checking out different things because you need to test these ideas to see if they work.
In the same way, we should be listening to ideas.
It's a problem if you're a liberal and you only listen to liberal stuff.
Or an atheist and you only listen.
You really need to listen to, challenge, and engage yourself by opening yourself up to these experiences and starting with the possibility that you could be wrong.
So if you're a black belt in Brazilian jiu-jitsu and you walk into someone's school and the blue belts are routinely tapping you, you've got to do some thinking.
You've got to be honest with yourself.
And it doesn't matter how much time you've put into it.
And that is a beautiful thing about high-level problem-solving in martial arts.
That if it works, it works.
And it's hard to do that when it comes to ideas like compassion and justice and getting along and how you should treat people and how people should be accepted.
There's things about...
Diversity and about equality that I think we all agree with.
I mean, I think you shouldn't be judged by your sexuality or what you look like or where you were born or, you know, fill in the blank.
Nationalism seems to be kind of fucking silly to me.
I've tried so fucking hard to get along with people that are unmotivated, or lazy, or they have constant problems in their life, they don't look at themselves objectively, and you talk to them about things that happen in their life, and they have a fucking myriad of excuses.
It's overwhelming, and if you have those people in your life, they will overwhelm you with their issues, and you will never get anything done.
And so, my take is, try until you can't try, and then get the fuck out of there.
And explain your thoughts in a way that will inspire debate and inspire thought.
Explain your thoughts in a blog in a way where people can read it and like it and share it with friends.
And that's one of the beautiful things about today is that you have this ability that's never...
Literally unparalleled access to other human beings.
It's never been like this where you could just write something you put it on Facebook you could be a Carpenter in Kansas and you write something beautiful on Facebook and it'll be shared across the world within minutes Yeah, I'll add one more thing to that and don't treat people if you've been treated negatively by people don't stoop to that.
It only takes one shock of chicken one to make a chicken seven instantly.
Really?
Yeah, because it's never experienced that.
That's why, for example, in the criminal justice system, harsh punishments don't work.
They just don't.
And that's borne out by overwhelming empirical evidence.
But I think the theoretical background for that is the chicken story.
That's why, like, my...
He was telling me that when his son...
He never yelled at his son.
This is a funny story, looking at you with all the tattoos.
And his son wanted to get a tattoo.
And he slammed his hand down!
And he said, no!
And he screamed and his son was so shocked.
It was like such a shocking thing because he had never raised his voice.
He'd always been chicken one.
You know, he'd always been.
But when you really start to think about the implications of that, of what kindness will do, of what, of why being, There's your word again.
Vituperative, nasty, harsh to people.
The best way to change moral attitudes is through rapport.
The best way to help people.
And if you read the Christian books, they talk about this interesting book called Tactics.
The main thing is, you know, develop relationships with people.
They're friendly.
They're kind.
They're trustworthy.
You have communities with people.
And that gets them involved in their community and thus their faith-based business.
Same thing with jujitsu.
I have like some great guys.
I was just hanging out the other day who do jujitsu.
Jujitsu is also interesting, just parenthetically, because you have such a trust of the people you work out with.
I mean, you have a bond.
A buddy of mine is a prosecutor for the state and you know how you have to Say, hey, I know this guy.
Well, he knew another guy who's also a friend of mine, and they did jujitsu together, and he told the judge and the lawyer, and they said they don't have a problem with it.
Neither one of those people do jujitsu, right?
Because there's no freaking way that I would let someone do jujitsu sit on a Jury with somebody else who's either the prosecutor the defender because those people trust each other Because you have to trust each other when you do jiu-jitsu or people will break your arms They'll choke.
Yeah, you're practicing breaking each other's arms Yeah, so I think that that that chicken story and I told that because often we think that the best response to be When we're being mistreated or we perceive an injustice or unfairness is to lash out.
And a type of emotional maturity is just to not lash out.
You know, maybe a really good strategy, which I've adopted, it's certainly much easier than attempting to do the emotional work of being kind and compassionate, is to just ignore people.
You don't have to meet their nastiness with nastiness.
Well, that's a good approach if you can pull it off.
Sometimes people get pissed off, though.
You're like, fuck this guy!
I think that also is what I call the battery effect, and it's also a good aspect of jiu-jitsu.
I think human beings have a certain amount of energy that they store up in their body, because I think we have our bodies are...
We have this ancient structure that's been passed on from generation to generation, thousands and thousands of years of human beings.
And for the most part, up until really recently, you were constantly engaged in physical activity and conflict.
And your body is designed for that.
And I believe your body has a certain...
Amount of requirements for the expenditure of energy and when you don't meet those requirements your battery overflows and I think that's what road rage is and I think that's what Irrational responses and I know personally from my own experience in my own shortcomings when I have had irrational responses is because I have not maintained my body correctly and I have not taken care of that battery and And then when it comes up, especially when you're someone like me, it's even more consequential because I've done it my whole life.
So my whole life has been about exploding, punching, kicking, wah, wah, wah, just all the kettlebells, wah, jujitsu, wah.
It's all this, wah, wah, wah, wah, wah.
And in doing that, if I get it out of my system, I'm tranquil.
Everything's calm.
But when I don't get out of my system, my body's like, I think this is an opportunity to go fucking crazy!
I mean, there's guys that invent moves that they think, like, one of my favorite videos is these guys in Harlem.
It's not videos is a series of them who practice some sort of fake kung-fu and like one guy will Will be like he'll throw a punch and then the other guy will go well someone does that to me What I'm gonna do is I'm and they don't say it like this they say it in a very urban way like No,
no, no, no, no, that shit ain't gonna work cuz I'm gonna step over here and I'm attack with a chicken wing and then I got a I got a monkey paw and they invent all this stuff I'm attack your ribs from this position and then there guys also in on it because they're also practicing bullshit Choreograph like oh, yeah.
I see how that would work What's hilarious is sometimes these guys actually have fights And when they have fights, it becomes like two kids in a fucking schoolyard.
It becomes a brawl on the ground.
They wind up clawing at each other and they can't do anything.
There's no kung fu.
There's no monkey paw.
There's no attack the ribs with your knife point fingers and all this stupid shit, but you watch these guys do it and me as a person who studied martial arts my whole life, I know I don't practice kung fu, but I know what is actually kung fu and what is some shit that someone's making up.
They're just practicing and making things up.
Well, they could go to even a kung fu dojo and pretend that that stuff's real, and the kung fu guy would go, like, what are you talking about?
And it's also very much, it reinforces your own, like if you have a lack of Willingness or ability or whatever it is to question the reality that you've been Shown that you have subscribed to if you've if you're not willing to question it Yeah,
you find someone else who's also not willing to question it There's some comfort in that and if you reassure each other there's some come no, that's absolutely right and that's why it's so important for people to be honest with themselves and How do we promote those values of people of self-honesty?
Well, I certainly think there's a great benefit to talking to people and having people be honest, and even in an uncomfortable way, where when you listen to it, it makes you think, oh, like, there's lights that go on in my head when I hear someone say something.
Maybe they'll be vulnerable, or maybe they'll be, like, introspective in almost a painful way.
When I hear it, there's lights that go on in my head where I go, wow, okay, I'm getting some real shit from this person, and I'll find in myself these moments that relate to what this guy's saying, and I try to see themselves from this point of view as opposed to a newscaster.
When someone is...
Today in Los Angeles, we found out the hard way what happens when you don't obey the law.
There's no reality.
There's no human in there.
This is a strip club DJ. Coming up on the main stage, it's Lexus!
$14 kamikazes!
Order now!
You know what I mean?
It's like...
These are patterns that are not real that people will subscribe to and adopt and then perpetrate.
And they do it over and over again in the business world.
Hello, Jim!
How's the family?
Is everything good?
These patterns are like they protect you from having to be vulnerable and real.
By adopting these predetermined patterns of behavior that we all are comfortable with and we all know, as a God-fearing Christian man, I'm a God-fearing Christian man myself, so I understand where you're coming from there, sir.
Just give me a handshake right now.
I know we're on the same page.
What they're doing is they're removing the possibility of vulnerability, of reality.
Well, I don't get sad at cartoons, but I do feel the impetus to help people like that.
Like, I do feel that it's important that people are laboring under beliefs about reality, like, again, fantasy-based martial arts, that just simply aren't true.
And they're wasting their time.
But unlike fantasy martial arts, these people vote, right?
The one thing we've always had is we've had strong institutions and strong universities, and now we're seeing those being undermined, at least in the humanities in general, and even to a certain extent in the sciences.
But anecdotally, can you come up with specific examples?
That's where I haven't heard it interfered with, except for the idea of promoting more women in science, and there's somehow or another some sexism involved in science.
In other words, they're telling you, this is important to us.
Anytime you impose a value on a system that is...
Winning is the value, and that's a marketplace, right?
That's a competition, that's a free market.
Any time you say, well, you know, you also need diversity, then you're making it more difficult to win.
A meritocracy is like that.
You want people in a system In academia, I can tell you what those are.
You need to be well published.
Your works need to be cited by others.
We have all these metrics.
They're pretty straightforward, and you either live up to the metrics or you don't.
But now, this is why I was talking about the sciences, when you try to put people in positions who are not qualified for those positions, you undermine the meritocracy.
So when you're trying to put people, if you say, well, there's not enough women here, we need to find more women.
There are not enough African-Americans, well, enough, it's a trickier, but there are very few African-Americans who study philosophy.
If you're an African-American with a PhD in philosophy, man, you are your gold.
Because they want to promote more African Americans, get involved in philosophy, and then perhaps that will sort of engage more people into pursuing that?
Like, that whole thing undermines the meritocracy.
But the moment that you start talking about putting a diversity requirement on, for example, my discipline, philosophy, in essence, I think what you're saying is, it's not important.
Your discipline isn't important.
Because we don't do that when the outcome really matters.
What we're looking for is to bring people into these disciplines that may not have had the opportunity and that might be bad for the overall discipline.
So they're underrepresented, so we want more people in the discipline.
As long as...
Look, that's not bad in and of itself...
But we need to have a conversation about what that means.
See, part of the problem with regressives is they look at outcomes instead of opportunities.
We need to construct systems to give everybody, regardless of their skin color, their ethnicity, an equal opportunity and an education of the first rate.
And what we're seeing instead is systems being created to orchestrate or engineer outcomes.
Produce this many black, you know, African, whatever it is, or Hispanic, whatever it is.
The First of all, that's a bad way to think about it.
It's a horrible way to think about it.
But the other problem is, meritocracy matters.
If anything should be institutionalized, it should be systems that are raced blind.
Systems that don't...
Look, think about it.
You could also think about it like this.
Think about the black guy who is in philosophy, who's incredibly smart and qualified.
I have a student of mine, Matt Hernandez.
The kid is freaking genius.
Like, truly one in a million.
Like, much smarter than I am.
He's published stuff.
I mean, the kid's awesome.
He's Hispanic.
He's going to get his PhD in philosophy.
He got a full ride, a full scholarship.
The crime, the shame is that when Matt gets in, people would say, well, he just got it because he's Hispanic.
When you look at surveys of So I think that these lines are primarily drawn upon class, which is something else no one wants to talk about, instead of race.
It just so happens that fewer African Americans, or you could frame it the other way, more African Americans are born to poverty than white folks.
That's just a fact.
We can also talk about something that's really interesting about criminogenic factors or risk predictors.
They're not what you think for people who would be violent criminals.
They're just not what you think at all.
But people try to make that a racial issue.
But when you look at these systems, when you look at these school systems, for example, I just totally lost my train of thought.
I started thinking about race and Jimi Hendrix's photo back there.
So what we need to do is, well, we need to start thinking about opportunities.
Well, the other thing is we need to think long-term and not short-term.
We need to look at the problem and be honest.
And there are some structural issues with our electorate and the way that we've established politics in this country of offices of four years and then eight years renewable.
We need to have a longer-term vision and a look at what this wants to be.
Right now, we face a problem in that we're not adequately educating poor people in our country, and the majority of those happen to be black.
And this is an enormous problem.
This is going to come back to haunt us.
But the solution to that problem is not diversity initiatives.
Here's the other reason why that's bad.
It's not even a band-aid.
It's worse.
It's because people then say, well, look, this philosophy department, this department has so many minorities, things must be going well.
Actually, no, they're not going well.
It was an artificial solution that was put in, and the underlying structural inequality and economic disparity hasn't been addressed.
And what about all the poor people that live in West Virginia or Kentucky?
Those families have been generations and generations of coal miners.
I mean, just because other white people have made it into universities and made it into certain institutions, you're being racist if you think that those people shouldn't get an equal shot at things as well.
And so the way we fix it is, again, this is John Rawls' idea, public education of the first rate.
However, every time I would say that, people would say two things.
They'd play identity politics.
You're just white.
You're saying that because you're white.
That gives them, that's their ticket to discredit what I'm saying.
That's why people, they use that as an excuse to not listen to your arguments.
It's really, it's perverted.
I mean, it's really despicable.
So they use that idea as an excuse.
So you've just said that.
But the other thing that it does, I mean, if you really start to think about what kind of a society do we want to move to?
What are the limits of our institutions?
What role should the meritocracy play?
Should you disrupt that if there are racial inequalities or imbalances?
These are questions we have to address.
People in a democracy have to address this.
And you cannot have fear of talking about this because someone's going to call you a racist.
You just can't.
So if you want to put a proposal forward that says, or an idea, well, I don't think, you know, hiring should be this way, you need to have that conversation.
But there's one other issue, there's one other tactic that the regressive left use, and that's the idea of privilege.
They love that word.
Privilege.
Oh well, you know, you don't even see your privilege.
Privilege is yet another thing that's used.
And look, I think the impetus for that is good.
The danger here is that because these people are so nasty, so mean-spirited, and so generally insane, that we discard everything that they're saying.
We throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Now we need to be conscious and careful that we don't do that.
We need to acknowledge that they're saying some important things.
They're, you know, racial treatment of people on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, not discriminating against someone because they don't feel comfortable in a male body or female.
Or a guy, Mark Fisher, I roll with, is a gay and has this gay jiu-jitsu thing.
These things are important.
These things matter.
These things are things that we have to talk about.
And if I have privilege, I want to be conscious of that.
And if I'm Treating someone in a way that's unjust or if it's unkind, I want to know about that.
That's not the guy I want to be.
So how do we talk about these things?
How do we engage these?
Well, here's how you don't talk about them.
You don't talk about them by constantly smearing people with privilege, saying, you have privilege in Portland State, my university.
They had an event where minority students could speak about all these things, but students who were, I can't remember the exact phrasing, not of color, were invited to listen.
It's certainly racism in that sense, but isn't it an opportunity for people that have been marginalized to express themselves in a platform that maybe a lot of people that have been marginalized haven't had that opportunity?
Absolutely.
Isn't there room for people of a specific race to speak about some issues that maybe they would understand intimately that you or I wouldn't because we're white folks?
So is it bad, though, to have someone have the opportunity to, like, let's allow African Americans to speak and let's allow these white folks to listen to what they have to say.
And then maybe you have another conference or maybe a debate or maybe a conversation where you allow someone to have a retort.
So the first problem with that is if you frame it in terms of an opportunity, then if I say, yes, it's bad, then it'd be like I'm denying people an opportunity.
The problem with that, one problem, I asked my buddy who's an appellate court judge, and he said he thinks it's unwise, or his son actually said this, he didn't say this, his son is on the, he clerks for some Supreme Court, I don't even know what he, but somebody, he's a lawyer, board certified, etc.
Or past the bar, excuse me.
Part of the problem is that if you do that, so I was amazed that that was legal.
I'm not a lawyer.
I don't pretend to be a lawyer, but he said it's actually legal.
The problem is that you then need to hold then white people or whoever any other group can hold and say look blacks can't speak basically.
So we can get in and we can talk about how great it is.
And the only way that's going to be clear to everybody is if you allow open thinking and open speech and allow people to express themselves and you accumulate all that data and you get an understanding of what is okay and what's not okay, what's hurtful, what's not hurtful.
I had Thaddeus Russell on who's a great guy and he teaches at Occidental and we were talking about that issue where there was a young man and a young woman who got together and they got drunk and they had sex and the girl decided that Either she decided, her friends convinced her into it, that she had been raped, even though she had sent him a bunch of text messages saying, are you coming over, bring condoms, told her friends I'm getting laid, lol.
And he had gotten to her, they were both intoxicated, but because he's a man, he was kicked off the campus.
He was kicked out of school.
They're suing, there's a big lawsuit.
She stayed.
They both had sex.
There was no force, there was no...
No lies.
There's no...
No one held anyone down.
No one did anything against anyone's will.
But they decided that he had committed sexual assault because they were both drunk and they could not consent.
So I get this very attractive young woman comes up to me at the end of class.
I'm kind of discombobulated.
I got all this shit in my head.
And she hands me this note.
And so you can get out of it if you have jury duty, military orders.
Doctor's note, excuse from my boss's boss, the dean or whatever.
So that way, just in case I'm audited, right?
If I'm audited, I can say, or if I say, hey, why did this person get off of this, but I didn't, you know, do anything, and then next thing you know, she's paying me, I'm sleeping with her, who knows?
It's just so much easier for me.
So I'm reading this note, and it said, would you please excuse Mr. So-and-so from this thing, and his system is, whatever it was.
unidentified
And I'm looking at this, and I'm like, Who's Mr. So-and-so?
Because if I do, you know, if people do demand something and they'll say, well, look, this person gave you, this is not a mister.
I'm like, you have a problem with that?
I mean, I can pull the same regressive card that they can.
You're being homophobic.
You're being transphobic or whatever it is.
So people have been choosing their own pronouns, but the craziest thing that happened to a colleague of mine is he was told that, and again, I call anybody any pronoun you want.
You want to be called Z, I got no, I got biggest shit to worry about.
Whatever happened to people just being fucking crazy?
Isn't that an option?
Is that possible?
You know, I was listening to a Radiolab podcast, and they were interviewing this guy who, a guy, sometimes, sometimes he's a girl, sometimes goes back and forth, and his gender is fluid, and in the middle of the conversation's like, I just switched.
I mean, when you have a bunch of people that are hypersensitive and that are trying to enforce these ridiculous ideas on people, and they're trying to pound these things down, they're looking for these moments where they can...
Solidify this.
These moments they could point at you.
These moments, well, I call them green lights.
I call them green lights.
Because they might not be upset.
They might not really be upset, but they have a green light to act upset.
If people want to find you on Twitter, it's Peter Boghossian, B-O-G-H-O-S-S-I-A-N. He's probably going to be fired from his job at Portland State University after this podcast.
So please, you're going to open up a Patreon page and ask for requests.