Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 12, 2024 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James

01:31:50

Did The CIA Use Hunter Biden In COINTEL OPS To Plant DISINFO With Our Enemies?

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No!
	No! No! No! No!
	This show is brought
	to you by shop.allamericangold.com Visit their website or call 800-951-0592 for the best deals on high-quality physical gold and silver right now.
	Welcome to another Just Informed Talk radio show.
	I'm your host, Craig James, joined by my co-host, Nick Ngo.
	And today we have a lot of stories to cover.
	I hope you guys are ready.
	We're going to try to break them down one by one, piece by piece, bit by bit.
	We have a number of stories across the spectrum, everything from what's happening with Donald Trump to more shakeups at the RNC, all the way down to some very strange happenings out there in Haiti.
	Uh, and a number of other stories in between, so we're going to try to hit on each and every one of those.
	But before we do, I got to start by saying thank you to everybody out there listening.
	If you're listening here on the Front Range Colorado Rockies from Colorado into Wyoming and over in Nebraska, we thank you, we welcome you, and I hope you all are ready because we're about to get hit by a huge winter storm.
	This is going to be the big one, I guess.
	So we're all getting prepared.
	That's coming in the next 24 hours or so.
	So make sure you have all of your affairs in order as far as stocking up and getting ready.
	You know, those storms can just pop up out of nowhere, but we know this one's coming.
	So there you go.
	And also everybody listening on the live stream, whether you're on Rumble, YouTube, So, we have some stories that we're going to get into here today that really do, I believe, explain just where we're at and where we're headed.
	Of course, one of the biggest stories that was all over my social media feed last night, Nick, was this story about a Boeing whistleblower named John Barnett, who was found dead in a hotel parking lot from an alleged self-inflicted gunshot wound.
	I'm sure he shot himself twice in the back of the head, right, as it usually is.
	He was claiming that Boeing was cutting corners on their planes, and he was in the middle of giving testimony about exactly that.
	This was the day before day three of his testimony, and he is found dead.
	What is your first assessment on this, Nick?
	I think most people can put... I'm seeing a lot of, you know, comments like Epstein and, you know, he was... Clinton had her way with him, etc, etc, you know.
	But what do you think?
	Well, unless it's Officer Barbrady that's investigating, any sane and rational person that hears that understands that he was murdered.
	Yet, it says suicide is the initial.
	There shouldn't even be any period of time where it's assumed that it was a suicide.
	In this case, zero time that that happens.
	Absolutely and you know it's interesting the coroner who made that proclamation is already coming under scrutiny but I mean if you're a coroner and somebody's brought to you and they have a gunshot wound in their head and the police tell you hey we found this guy with a gun in his car or wherever
	I guess it's a fair assessment to say it was, if you don't look at the context of the situation, meaning if you don't, you know, take into account the fact that this guy was on day three of giving testimony against one of the biggest defense contractors in the world, talking about how they were making a shoddy product by cutting corners, which, you know, you go, well, why would that matter?
	Well, it matters for a number of reasons, but I guess, namely, you could talk about millions, if not Possibly in the long term, billions of dollars at stake as far as stock prices go and faith and confidence in a corporation like Boeing.
	So we've seen some of the stuff happening, but I want to play, Nick, if you have anything else, just go.
	I'm going to pull up this clip of John Barnett talking about what he experienced at Boeing.
	Yeah, for me, I do see that the motivation is because they want to make sure they deliver on their contracts so they continue to get more of them.
	But I don't know any project managers that would cut corners just to put people in danger.
	That's outrageous.
	It's not good.
	It's not good.
	And, you know, here's the thing.
	We all, I guess, could appreciate, yeah, you know, jet airliners have revolutionized the way we travel.
	We can get from point A to point B in a fraction of the time it has, you know, historically taken us, and that is a good thing.
	And so it's commendable that Boeing makes aircrafts that deliver us from point A to point B on time.
	But again, you know, if you start cutting corners to satisfy the contracts, then you're really, you're doing something very dangerous.
	And let's hear what Jon Barnett said before he died about all of this.
	One, this is not a 737 problem, it's a Boeing problem.
	And I know the FAA's gone in and they've done due diligence and inspections to assure that the door plugs of the 737 are installed properly and the fasteners are thought properly.
	But my concern is, what's the rest of the airplane?
	What's the rest of the condition of the airplane?
	And the reason my concern for that is, back in 2012, Boeing started removing inspection operations off They left the mechanics to buy off their own work.
	So what we're seeing with the door plug blowout is what I've seen with the rest of the airplane as far as jobs not being completed properly, inspection steps being removed, issues being ignored.
	My concerns are with the 737 and the 787 because those programs have really embraced the theory that quality is overhead and non-value-added.
	So those two programs have really put a strong effort into removing quality from the process.
	When I first started working at Charleston, I was in charge with pushing back defects to our suppliers.
	And what that meant was I'd take a group of inspectors and actually go to the supplier and inspect their product before they sent it in.
	Well, I'd taken a team of four inspectors to Spirit Aerosystems to inspect the 41 section before they sent it to Charleston, and we found 300 defects.
	Some of them were significant that needed engineering intervention.
	When I returned to Charleston, my senior manager told me that we had found too many defects, and he was going to take the next trip.
	So the next trip he went on, he took two of my inspectors, and when they got back, they were given accolades for only finding 50 defects.
	So I pulled that inspector aside and I said, did Spirit really clean up their act that quick?
	That don't sound right.
	And she was mad.
	She said no.
	Said the two inspectors were given two hours to inspect the whole 41 section and they were kicked off the airplane.
	Wow, so that doesn't sound like somebody who is, you know, desperately about to take their own life to me.
	That sounds like somebody who's genuinely concerned about the quality of a product and trying to raise this issue so that it can be fixed.
	That that's we're getting into very strange territory.
	If you really want to go down a conspiracy hole with this, never forget that our good old pal Nikki Haley was on the board at Boeing.
	And, you know, this all came out and started happening right around the time she started running for office.
	I don't know if there's a connection there, but probably not.
	However, I will say it is.
	It is very, very disheartening to know that there are people out there who still would, you know, Take this kind of action against somebody who is only trying to make the product better, only trying to help.
	This is where we get into this realm of just pure dark evil, and that's where we're going to pick it back up when we come back.
	Everybody stay tuned.
	You're listening to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	We'll be back after the break.
	Welcome back to Just a Forum Talk Radio, I'm your host Craig James with Nick Ngo and Nick, you know, we kind of, we're talking about in the first part of the show what's going on with this whistleblower.
	I mean, this is such a terrible thing and it's pure evil and, you know, we'll wait to see if more details come out and we'll try to cover it as it continues to unfold.
	The story is not yet told and we're going to wait and see how it all plays out, but Obviously, you know, there was something nefarious there.
	And we are very skeptical of this initial finding of suicide, given what we know he was trying to expose.
	As I said before, you know, this is, you know, could cost that company billions of dollars in the long run, perhaps millions in the short term.
	And it could also affect how contracts are given out going into the future.
	So there was a lot at stake there.
	So it's no surprise that That kind of action seemed to be the only reasonable course for people who are motivated by pure, unadulterated evil, greed, and lust for money and power.
	So, let's get into some other stories, though, because that one's obviously still developing.
	We'll wait and see if we get more information on that.
	Maybe we'll go into that next week, if we get more from that.
	One of the things I wanted to cover here today on the show, Nick, and by the way, to all of our audience out there listening, if you are interested in contributing, comments, thoughts, questions, concerns, etc., make sure you call or text.
	The line is open.
	It is 877-536-1360.
	is open.
	It is 877-536-1360.
	When you text that phone number 877-536-1360 you will actually get a direct line into the show.
	I will be able to read your comments here on air and we can talk about whatever you have to contribute.
	I know some people don't want to get on the phone and I understand it's a lot of pressure to get on live air every day, right?
	Unless you do it every day.
	Then it gets easier.
	But yeah, go ahead, text in, let us know what you think about everything.
	But I want to jump into this true social post that Trump put out yesterday because there's been a lot of controversy around Trump, especially with people like Alex Jones coming up and saying, you know, that he's going to go on the warpath against Trump if he doesn't come out against the vaccines, which, you know, Nick, I don't want to be a dead horse because we've kind of We've covered that already to a degree.
	We've given what we think the scenario is.
	The political calculus makes no sense, and I know that sounds like I'm some kind of D.C.
	lobbyist, political whatever, political focus group runner like Frank Luntz.
	At this point, we've already talked about what Trump did and why we think he did it, but he did put out a post on TruthSocial yesterday that I thought was interesting.
	He said, my first acts as your next president will be to close the border, drill baby drill, and free the January 6th hostages being wrongfully in prison.
	Now, Nick, I think that those are three policy issues or policy stances platforms that we can get behind, right?
	Yes, that's common sense.
	I mean, look at the people that have been locked up without a trial.
	You know, they, you know, that's written into our founding documents is that you get a speedy trial.
	and a fair trial, and they've never even taken any of the evidence to court or for a lot of them, and no one's even had a hearing even.
	So what they were doing is completely illegal.
	It's called, as we talk about many times on here, deprivation of rights under color of law.
	And Liz Cheney was out there front and center.
	Her father's the devil, and she's out there saying, oh, this is a travesty.
	It was an insurrection.
	But in reality, they're the ones that had the insurrection.
	They're the ones that denied the troops to come in.
	They're the ones who stole an election.
	They're the ones who committed treason.
	And they're going to deny the January 6th protesters, who were peaceful, by the way.
	Most all of them were peaceful.
	I don't think I saw any violent ones in particular.
	It's just the provocateurs who are not even protesters.
	They're actually police officers or assets of the police.
	So, we're sitting here looking at this and, you know, we cannot let this go.
	We cannot let this go.
	It was a fraud that they perpetuated on the American people.
	They denied us our rights.
	They used it to, you know, kick in people's doors years later for no reason.
	Then they, you know, they lie about it.
	They try to pressure them into Um, and to helping them, uh, go after other people that are innocent as well.
	Me, it's, it's out, it's outlandish.
	And, you know, I really want to see something happen because what they did was illegal.
	Okay.
	By holding these people.
	And, um, you know, Liz Cheney needs to be held accountable.
	You know, uh, Ken Buck or, or forgive me, um, Ken Buck, Ken Buck.
	He's in our congressional district, and he's an acolyte of Dick Cheney.
	He went to law school with Liz Cheney.
	They were all best friends.
	Like you were saying in the pre-meeting, you were like, well, we'd love to have him come on and explain what he thinks about Liz Cheney.
	Let me give more context, Nick.
	I really do want to contribute a little bit of context here because new information on Liz Cheney's deceit and perverse actions surrounding events on January 6th has now raised serious concerns for her arrest and prosecution, according to this article that I have here in front of me.
	So, apparently, a May 2021 report revealed that Liz Cheney secretly orchestrated the Washington Post op-ed by all 10 living former defense secretaries, including her father, warning against Trump's efforts to politicize the military prior to January 6th.
	However, Let's read further.
	In the Washington Post op-ed, the disgraced Congresswoman warned that involving the military in election disputes would cross into dangerous territory.
	Weeks later, Liz Cheney led the effort to impeach Trump and throw him in prison for not securing the U.S.
	Capitol prior to January 6th protesters.
	But now, it is widely reported that it was in fact Pelosi, Democrats, Mayor Bowser, and the Capitol Police who refused Trump's request to secure the U.S.
	Capitol with 10,000 National Guard troops.
	So Cheney actually then later in that committee suppressed evidence indicating that Donald Trump had authorized National Guard troops to be on standby during the Capitol Hill riots in January 6, 2021.
	riots in January 6, 2021.
	For context, Cash Patel, the former chief of staff to the Secretary of Defense, joined the Epoch Times for an interview on the security planning and protests of January 6.
	During the interview, he admitted that Mario Bowser, the mayor of Washington, D.C. at the time, turned down the thousands of National Guard troops, and that Chris Ray's FBI also refused to notify the Trump administration and his cabinet secretaries that they believed there could be a situation like the mass protest at the Capitol that took place.
	Pelosi also refused to have the National Guard in place at the U.S. Capitol.
	Capitol during all of that that went down.
	So the Washington Post interview with the Washington, D.C.
	police chief, the...
	Chief said that he believes his efforts to secure the premises were undermined by a lack of concern from House and Senate security officials who answered directly to Nancy Pelosi and Senate Leader Mitch McConnell.
	So, ultimately, let's just summarize everything.
	So Liz Cheney worked on her role at the January 6th committee hearings to suppress exculpatory evidence for Donald Trump while at the same time lobbying for him to be impeached for his actions.
	So, Nick, I don't know how much more of a criminal you can be, but it reminds me – you know who Liz Cheney reminds me a lot of?
	She reminds me a lot of Meghan McCain.
	And they share a lot of similarities, right?
	Especially when it comes to their paternal familial relations.
	It's almost not shocking, however, like you said, there are people in jail right now who still haven't seen a fair trial, and this is insane.
	We live in, I mean, I could go down a very dark black pill road there, but I don't want to, Nick.
	What do you think?
	You know, there's a reason that, uh, John McCain, no name had a wrinkled flag that had folds all over it.
	It was completely wrinkled over his casket.
	There's a reason that that was allowed to happen.
	It was, it was deliberate because he's a disgrace.
	And you know what?
	Uh, I don't, I don't wish that Cheney, um, you know, departs this earth anytime sooner, but he is an older guy.
	I think he's going to have.
	Uh, a messy flag over his casket too.
	Now, um, with all of this, it, I know for a fact that they knew about this before it was going to happen.
	I know that.
	And they knew, I know that they knew exactly what was going to happen.
	They knew that they, um, um, let's just say, I know that they knew about where the conflicts were going to take place even, and they knew it weeks in advance.
	I'll tell you what.
	You're talking about January 6th, right?
	Yep.
	So, so I know, I, they tried to get me there.
	I'm going to be quite honest.
	I was, I was basically, I'd been working on a documentary for three years and they were, were so much excited to get me into DC on January 6th.
	They told me that they were going to film me and they wanted me in, you know, wherever the crowd was, they wanted me to go and they were really trying to entice me to go.
	And I was lucky enough to have friends like Unik and others who have, uh, who had information.
	And I didn't know if the information that I was being given was true or not, but I was told, and I can say this now, um, because everybody knows who my sources are, I guess, at this point.
	Um, and you know, Nick, they're real.
	They were very real.
	They told me, um, probably a few weeks, maybe a month or two before January 6th, that if I went there, I would regret it and that it was a trap.
	Now, I didn't do much with that information other than casually share it, I think, with my audience and say, you know, I'm not sure about this, but I've heard it's going to be a trap.
	You probably don't want to go.
	I decided not to go because of that information I was given.
	But again, you don't know what anything is until it happens, really.
	Somebody can tell you something's a trap, and then you don't really know until it happens.
	And that's my experience of January 6th.
	So, you know, when I look at these stories, I feel like I could easily be one of those people sitting in that gulag night.
	Not that I would have broken the law if I went to D.C., but the level of entrapment that happened that day, the level of deception and manipulation.
	And, you know, when you talk to a guy like James Martinez, yeah, he may be a little out there.
	He's the media ecologist who we've had on the show here before who talks about some, I would say, what is it, like psychic warfare is a good way of kind of describing it, Nick, right?
	Yeah, Psy Wars, using electronics, and then also MKUltra.
	He's an expert in that stuff.
	Right.
	He basically wrote the book on MKUltra, and he talked about mass formation psychosis, but then also he talked about how there were some really nefarious things taking place on January 6th with regard to how they were manipulating the crowd.
	And there are techniques that, I don't know, if you want to believe it or not, that's up to you.
	I don't know if it's true or not, but he talked about how, you ever heard of, Nick, have you ever heard of the people who can astrally project themselves?
	Is that what it's called?
	I forget.
	Astral projection?
	Yeah.
	Like the men who stare at goats type thing.
	The army works on these programs where they have people that can supposedly transport themselves to places and see things and times.
	I don't know if any of that's true or not, but I do know that what he was describing to me is that they would take people who have, and this is something we talked about on air, that they would take people who have that kind of ability Or similar abilities and they would have them in the crowd, basically influencing the crowd to do things that they wouldn't otherwise do.
	That's a little out there for me because that gets into like psychic warfare and all that stuff.
	But we all know the truth of what happened today.
	We saw what Ray Epps did.
	We saw the Asian provocateurs.
	We saw the Antifa dressing as Trump supporters.
	We saw the tearing down of barricades and then the influencing of crowd to go into restricted areas they should have never went.
	We saw the people smashing windows while the crowd was trying to pull them back and tell them no.
	We saw Ray Epps get called a fed the night before.
	We saw him march around D.C.
	telling people which way to go and what to do.
	We saw obviously what we just went through with Liz Cheney and her covering up the exculpatory evidence to Trump, showing that Nancy Pelosi and Mayor Bowser and others were really the ones who didn't want the Capitol secured because they wanted and needed January 6th to happen, which At this point it should be so obvious and clear that January 6th was a part of a strategy used to undermine the validity of the protest against the fraudulent election, right Nick?
	Yeah absolutely and you know the questions I have about it is whenever okay clearly Antifa were federal assets and they are being used as provocateurs okay so when did they pick them up and say here's the deal you become an asset and you don't get any charges was it you know were they already fed assets before they burned down cities You know, was it before or after that?
	Because that's where they probably rounded him up.
	Or was it like the Gretchen Whitmer situation?
	Where they were just basically paying them and training them to do it, and then just, when they did it, they just went, oh well, I guess we can arrest them now.
	And they never did.
	They only arrested the people that were following their lead.
	Stay tuned, we're gonna come back.
	You're listening to Just Form Talk Radio.
	Welcome back to Just Forum Talk Radio.
	I'm your host, Craig James, with Nick Ngo.
	And Nick, you know, we're talking about January 6th, we're talking about Liz Cheney, and we're talking about the corruption in D.C.
	more overly.
	And you asked some great questions about your, you know, suspicion about Antifa and how they were being ran by federal agents.
	It seems as though they were agent provocateurs being seemingly influenced to do things they may have otherwise not done, or given the green light to do things they would have not done.
	We know still to this day, there are people who are in, you know, in prison right now without even having seen a trial yet, and others who are serving 20-plus year sentences for merely protesting and following a crowd of people into places.
	Some people didn't even go into the restricted areas, and they're in prison longer than others.
	So, there was a lot there, and we can definitely keep updating people on that story.
	But there's another big story today, Nick.
	And that other big story is the testimony of Robert Herr, who is the special prosecutor in charge of investigating Joe Biden and his classified document mishandling case, which you could also just argue is straight up the exact same thing they're accusing Trump of, yet somehow he's not coming under criminal indictment and Trump is.
	So that's an interesting thing, probably because the classified documents that were in Biden's garage unsecured were the documents that, you know, That Hunter was probably selling to the Chinese Communists or something, so we can't talk about those.
	But, you know, Trump had the evidence of when he was set up by the FBI and the DOJ and the intelligence agencies with Crossfire Hurricane and the Russia hoax, and that's why they're going after him so hard.
	But, some interesting things I want to talk about.
	So, apparently the latest development is that today, The special prosecutor, Robert Herb, resigned Monday from the DOJ to testify today before Congress as a private citizen without any restrictions.
	Now, to keep in mind the context here, his findings did conclude that Biden willfully Took classified documents and held them in an unsecured location, which is exactly, again, what they're accusing Trump of, and they say he should go to prison for the rest of his life for.
	But in his testimony, part of his testimony included these words.
	He said, this evidence included an audio recorded conversation during which Mr. Biden told his ghostwriter that he had just found all the classified stuff downstairs.
	Oh!
	He's just an old man who forgot he had all this classified information in his garage unsecured.
	Which...
	Is the reason they gave for not pursuing prosecution or an indictment against him is that he was just an old man who's confused about what papers he took.
	He just took the wrong papers, Nick.
	It's like, that could happen to anybody, you know?
	You have a background in intelligence.
	How easy is it for you to just, you know, put a bunch of classified, top-secret documents in your briefcase and just walk out by accident?
	Because you forgot you had them, right?
	Is that a normal thing?
	Heck no, the controls that are put in place, especially for Top Secret, because he had a lot of Top Secret stuff, and the compartmentalization, it would be practically impossible for anyone to do that.
	But Dick, he's just an old man who's forgetful, and he may have forgotten all of the security protocols and all of the layers of protection to keep the documents, right?
	I mean, that's just, that's a reasonable thing, isn't it?
	Oh yeah, yeah, sure, sure, sure, sure.
	That doesn't make him any less guilty.
	You know, even if he's confused about what, let's say, let's assume he is confused about it.
	I don't know, it doesn't absolve you from what you did.
	And look at it this way, too.
	They probably said, oh, this is counterintelligence because we know what we're giving them.
	You know, that's probably how they try to sweep it under the rug.
	I'm so sick of the counterintelligence argument.
	It's disgusting, man.
	Well, counterintelligence... Let's explain for the audience who haven't been listening to us, who are maybe just new listeners, explain counterintelligence and explain how they could use that as an excuse to say, you know, there is no culpability here and that... Could you just explain that theory one more time?
	Yeah, usually with counterintelligence, they're trying to catch spies, basically spies for other countries that have infiltrated our government or they're trying to do things like that.
	That's usually, that's what the original intent was.
	Okay, but then, you know, John Brennan went out and perverted what it meant.
	And made it so basically it was a license to commit crimes and say, Oh no, it was just to catch other people committing crimes.
	So those crimes don't count.
	No, no, no, no.
	That's not how it works.
	And so this is an extreme example.
	This is just like the ideal example of the problem that they has become.
	Okay.
	We created.
	a kill drone okay think of what is that movie with with Arnold Schwarzenegger you know Terminator okay imagine making a kill drone with your enemy they said it was counterintelligence the CIA did this they made a kill drone with the CIA the CIA and China made a kill drone because they said Well then we'll know what they have and how to stop it.
	Are you kidding me?
	You'll know what they have and how to stop it until they produce a million of them and send them over all at once, right?
	Go ahead, I don't want to interrupt.
	It's been going on for too long and someone's got to put a stop to it.
	No, I agree.
	I agree 100%.
	So here's the thing.
	You want to know what really frustrates me, Nick?
	It really puts on full display the two-tiered nature of our entire system.
	Not just our justice system, but everything.
	Because think about it.
	Let's take a second and do a little thought experiment.
	I'd love to do this.
	Let's give the benefit of the doubt to Joe Biden and Hunter Biden.
	Let's presume that they were working counterintelligence.
	Let's presume that they were being given a slew of information to sell abroad that was basically disinformation.
	Let's just take that position and say that that's true.
	What really bothers me is not that that was happening, because let's say it's necessary to deceive our enemies, so we take high-ranking political officials, we give them a bunch of information to sell, they may even believe it's real, and they may even think they're committing treason and getting away with it, but the intelligence officials know that it's not, and it's all part of an elaborate ruse to get our enemies to buy information that they think's real, that then they can try to use against us, but it ultimately is sabotaged and set to backfire.
	Let's give them the benefit of the doubt, right?
	And that's why they're not getting prosecuted.
	When Trump takes information, though, this is where it's all flawed.
	Because even if you suppose that that's the case we're facing, right?
	When Trump takes evidence that proves the intelligence community with the FBI and the DOJ sabotaged his presidency and tried to not only rig the 2016 election, but then tried to get him impeached for crimes he never committed because he was coming in there to expose what you just described, this whole counterintelligence thing, which is
	It's so corrupt and so broken that, like you said, people like John Brennan can come in and just weaponize anything they want and just do it with impunity and never have to worry about prosecution because anything and every crime they commit can be labeled counterintelligence.
	This shows you how broken the system is because when somebody tries to stand up and say, I've been framed for merely pointing out that this system is broken and corrupt, Now Trump is facing not only the indictments, the 91 indictments and whatever it is across all these different federal jurisdictions, but he's also facing, you know, literal sabotage by the intelligence community.
	They wrote that entire letter before they rigged the 2020 election, Nick.
	They lied about Hunter Biden's laptop.
	And maybe they were trying to protect their big counterintelligence operation, but at the end of the day, Is this how- because do you know where this all leads, right?
	This all leads to complete and utter chaos and destruction and lawlessness, which is where it already is, right, Nick?
	Yeah, and then the lines are clearly blurred, even with what they're doing.
	So look at it ethically.
	Okay, let's assume Hunter was doing counterintelligence, or whatever.
	Then, ethically, he would not be allowed to keep the money, and it would be used as evidence later, and it wouldn't be his money, you know, if they were going to do it that way.
	Okay, and then look at it this way.
	His spy chief, he even said it on On the record, on audio, he recorded it himself.
	That he's business partners with the Chinese spy chief.
	He's disappeared.
	And I want everybody to know that spy chief that disappeared, the Defense Intelligence Agency has him.
	He's been singing like a canary for the last couple years.
	And he's gonna be bringing the house down.
	He knows everything about Hunter.
	He knows everything about the corrupt.
	Okay, we'll be back.
	Everybody stay tuned.
	That's a bombshell.
	Welcome back to Just a Forum Talk Radio.
	I'm your host Craig James with Nick Nolan.
	Nick, you were making a big Revelatory statement right before we went to break.
	Do you want to continue and expand on that?
	Sure.
	The Defense Intelligence Agency has the Chinese spy chief.
	He defected a long time ago, a couple years ago even.
	And I'm sure that, you know, to let everybody know, the Defense Intelligence Agency is much like the CIA, but it's for the military.
	And they've had him for a long time.
	So they know exactly what's going on.
	They know who's involved, who's a traitor.
	They probably has a list of all the people who are Chinese assets to include politicians, I'm sure.
	Now, to put it in perspective, spies are screened whenever they go into the tradecraft and they get hired.
	So you have to have no mental health issues, no financial ties to foreign companies, no criminal record, no drug use, no prostitution or promiscuity.
	If someone was cheating on their wife, they wouldn't even get a security clearance because it could be used against them.
	And get this, for counterintelligence in particular, You literally cannot even have a speeding ticket and then look at the model of who they used, Hunter Biden, if they're going to try to even say that.
	To say it's corrupt and broken is almost an understatement at this point.
	Let's presume that that is true what you're saying, which I don't know if it is or not, but let's assume that the guy that Hunter was working with is And it has defectiveness.
	I mean, is that information out there?
	Are you, like, breaking that here?
	It was published when it happened a couple years ago, and it was before Hunter Biden's information even came out.
	So I guess it was before the election even.
	I think it was probably six months before the election.
	That summer when that information came out and then it got buried and it was all swept under the rug and that's what happened.
	He defected.
	And I firmly believe that to be true.
	I saw maybe two or three news reports about it and then it just disappeared.
	Um, so, uh, you know, and think about what that's going to be doing.
	Yeah.
	And I bet it has a lot to do with the whole, uh, COVID-19 thing.
	I'm sure that, you know, when president Trump said is from China, he's talking about China in Ukraine where these bioweapons labs being run by the CIA, the DOD and, um, DARPA in particular and Tony Fauci.
	You know, with the droplets, that guy, he's, you know, intimately involved in all this, and it's all coming to a head.
	These people are evil, and in the end, there are going to be trials for what they've done, and that's why they're so desperate right now, because they know what they're facing.
	It's not a couple of years in jail, you know, and even if they tried, Yeah, I mean, like I was saying before, even if we presume that all of this is counterintelligence and that they're all being ran to spread this kind of disinformation to our enemies, blah, blah, blah, it doesn't change the fact that they were weaponized against an innocent U.S.
	citizen in Donald Trump.
	And that has to be taken into account.
	Even if you assume that they are doing this for the greater good, as they say everything they do is, then, you know, is it an acceptable collateral damage that a private U.S.
	citizen is targeted with crimes they never committed and framed for things they've never done simply because they want to reform and change for the better a system that has been corrupted and is easily corruptible going into the future.
	Because if you have the ability to deem anything that violates the law a counterintelligence operation, and you can do this anytime you want with regard to anything, well, all it would take, obviously, is for some type of person with nefarious intention to get into that position.
	And then next thing you know, you are running these counterintelligence operations domestically against your political opponents, thus creating a fascist regime, which I am very disheartened to say we may be living in right now.
	What do you think, Nick?
	Yeah, it's going to be short-lived.
	You know, they can't control information.
	They're doing their best.
	You know, when Elon Musk bought X and there's a few other variables, even if it's a few breadcrumbs here and there, these people are out of control.
	The government has been out of control since Kennedy was assassinated.
	Nobody said anything.
	Everybody just kind of, you know, you had George Bush Sr.
	who did it.
	He organized the whole thing.
	Uh, you know, he, he, you know, even went in and intimidated Hoover.
	Hoover wrote a memo about it, how he came and intimidated him after he, he, uh, cause Hoover knew that he was going to do it.
	Hoover was his, he was tasked with getting rid of the anti Castro Cubans.
	He went in there and flexed and then walked out of the room.
	And ever since then, basically these cronies, uh, from the CIA have been in charge of the government ever since.
	Uh, there, there's, uh, you know, there's no way.
	To combat it, other than to break up the CIA, the skills and tradecrafts are still definitely necessary, but they need to reorganize and then move them to different agencies, because they've just gone out of control.
	And they're always, the ends justifies the means, is always their motto.
	And then if you look at it, they're operating domestically now.
	It's not part of their charter.
	They aren't even allowed to do that, but they have been for a long time, and it needs to stop.
	Well, and it's just like what JFK said in that speech we've played here on the show so many times.
	You had me play it the other day.
	You know, these are guerrillas by night instead of armies by day, and their mistakes are not publicized.
	They're hidden and swept under the rug.
	And this is where it becomes dangerous, because at what point do their mistakes have to be publicized to understand that, you know,
	If you're trying to justify your actions by framing another person for crimes they never committed, and you think that's the right action to take to protect sources and methods, I think that's why that buzzword's been coming out.
	John Brennan said it, Adam Schiff said it.
	Other people are saying it now when they talk about President Trump receiving briefings, intelligence briefings as the GOP nominee.
	They keep saying sources and methods, sources and methods, sources and methods.
	I think that's a kind of a signal about what Hunter Biden is and how this is all part of the cover-up.
	Right, Nick?
	Yes, absolutely.
	And when we come back from the break, I'm going to explain sources and methods and how they're abusing what that actually means and perverting it, as usual.
	Exactly.
	We're going to come back and talk about that, plus a whole lot more.
	Stay tuned.
	You're listening to Just Form Talk Radio.
	Welcome back to Justice Forum Talk Radio.
	I'm your host Craig James with Nick Nolan.
	Nick, you wanted to expand on your previous comment on sources and methods.
	This has become quite a buzzword that they keep throwing around, and maybe it is because Hunter Biden was some, you know, pawn in their Penultimate game of deception, which they have to rely on now to sow information with our enemy that is ultimately beneficial to the American people.
	But it does seem to me that there's just so many places this can go wrong, and it already has with what we've seen happen to Trump, right?
	Yes, absolutely.
	And their whole idea of sources and methods, because as soon as they use that buzzword, then they slap a classification on it.
	You know, sources and methods, slap a classification on it.
	Since Edward Snowden came out and published all that information, or had it published, Basically, anything that they, you know, it's ridiculous.
	Any and all forms of collection are known now because of the publication of the hacking tools.
	For example, Vault, what was it, Vault 7.
	And also, everybody knows that they have hacking tools they can hack into your phone.
	Everybody knows that there's You know, spyware built into your electronic devices and backdoors.
	Everybody knows that.
	It's common knowledge.
	Everybody knows that.
	So what is he talking about?
	Human intelligence?
	Okay, everybody knows that you can do that.
	It's just the same.
	It's ridiculous that they say sources and methods and protecting it.
	What they're talking about is the source material, who it came from.
	Like who was the person that was in the room when they spied on Trump?
	Who, you know, who they were.
	That's what he's talking about.
	He's going to keep that from him?
	Who cares?
	You know, they're full of it.
	These people are criminals, man.
	You know, we have microphones so sensitive that they could hear a fart in the wind or a submarine across an ocean.
	You know, this sort of stuff is all public information.
	It's all there.
	So what, you know, at this point, outside of what's called woo-woo science, that would otherwise seem like magic or whatever, Everybody already knows the methods of collection except for maybe a person's specific name that's involved in operation or the name of an operation.
	So what are they even talking about?
	I know, I know.
	It's frustrating because, you know, there is a part of me that really does, like, first of all, I know there's good people in all of these places.
	I mean, you can't sit there and tell me, oh yeah, every single person at the CIA is evil.
	I don't believe that.
	I know that there's good men and women in all these places.
	The problem is, again, with leadership and decision makers, they're the ones that have to be, you know, basically held to a higher standard.
	You know, if they're being given this level of power and then you give them that level of power without any, you know, check or balance to it or any scrutiny of it, even if they are working for the better of society or the greater good, as they see it or whatever their doctrine is, as they see it or whatever their doctrine is, whatever they follow, it can so quickly spiral out of control and it already seemingly has with, again, I hate to bring it up every single time, but the weaponization of these intelligence services
	but the weaponization of these intelligence services against people who, you Trump came out with an open criticism saying, look, you know, we have, we have problems that we need to fix and address.
	So did Kennedy and you saw what they did to him.
	And, uh, you know, whereas they, they seemingly, assassinated kennedy they've essentially politically assassinated trump and or at least they're trying to with lawfare and the media and everything else and so my question is you know do those ends justify the means of protecting an intelligence service that is continuing to grow into a more and more unaccountable entity yeah
	that's what it's become it's it's a tangled web we weave and we're going to come back and talk about more in our two big stories Welcome back to Just Forum Talk Radio.
	It's Hour 2 of the Just Forum Talk Radio Show with your hosts Craig James and Nick Doe.
	We have a lot of stories to get into here, Nick, and I think we...
	Put that whole story into the context that it can be placed.
	I don't know if we can go any further on it.
	Unless you have anything else you want to contribute on on what we just were discussing for anybody just joining us.
	We're talking about counterintelligence and we were talking about and this all came from Liz Cheney in January 6.
	Maybe they're going to just say January 6 was another counterintelligence operation, right?
	Well, yeah, probably.
	But you know, the funny thing is, Greg, Obama, of all people, wrote in an Executive Order 13526.
	It's about classified national security information.
	Section 1.7 classification prohibits and limitations.
	In no case shall information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified in order to conceal violations of the law, inefficiency, or administrative error.
	He's the one who wrote it.
	And now we're sitting here, uh, you know, they're, they're trying to protect, you know, the people that went after Trump and all these other things.
	Look, it's already an executive order by Obama.
	You can't make it classified if you're, if it's to cover up a crime, you know, and here we are.
	Yeah, well, I don't know.
	We'll see what happens with that.
	We have texters.
	If you want to call or text 877-536-1360.
	This is an interesting text.
	I'm not sure I understand it fully, but it says, somebody from the 970 says, in 1983, less than $20,000 in maximum promise campaign bribe.
	ER donations to five members of Longmont City Council allowed the contractor to short my grandpa's now roller coaster ride named Hover Road three million dollars in gravel for bonuses to project project managers.
	I don't know if I understand that because I don't know the context of it there, but interesting, interesting.
	And thank you for contributing.
	Again, 877-536-1360 if you want to contribute.
	But Trump did comment on what's happening today on Capitol Hill, and I want to read his post he just put up not too long ago.
	He says, quote, Big day in Congress for the Biden documents hoax.
	He had many times more documents, including classified documents, than I or any other president had.
	He had them all over the place with zero supervision of security.
	He does not come under the Presidential Records Act.
	I do.
	He had many docs in Chinatown and they were moved all over the place and heavily used.
	My boxes were moved by GSA.
	We're secure.
	Most carried clothing, shoes, sporting equipment, kitchen stuff, newspapers, pictures, magazines, awards, etc.
	The DOJ gave Biden and virtually every other person and president a free pass.
	Me?
	I'm still fighting MAGA.
	Yeah, I mean, it is rather disturbing to see how they've selectively targeted Trump and, you know, perhaps the whole reason they hate Trump, and they hate him more than anything else, it's not, you know, the PSYOP is obvious with the manipulation of the population to hate Trump for everything he stands for.
	We all know why people in Hollywood hate Trump, because he helped draw a huge light on the satanic pedophile rings that are running those blackmail operations that are running most of those places.
	We all know why the TV actors and quote-unquote opinion news people have vendetta against Trump, because he has exposed them for being the puppets that they are.
	But I guess it comes down to you have an American public whose interests are not being served.
	Now, they may argue in and amongst themselves behind closed doors that this is for the greater good, that we're too stupid to understand what's best for us.
	Therefore, we have to be lied to.
	We have to be manipulated.
	We have to be given a set of false premises to run our assumptions off of.
	But I look at it From kind of a constitutional perspective where, you know, this is a government that's supposed to be by the people and of the people and for the people.
	And I guess it's true that it's of and for the people, but not all.
	You know what I mean?
	And that's where we're getting into this conflict, I think, between those who think that their actions are for the greater good.
	They know things that we don't, I'm sure.
	I'm not saying that that's not true.
	I think they understand full well the threats we face as a nation.
	And I would say, you know, even further that when you look at that, you have to take a step back and understand that there is, you know, there's a lot of work that goes on behind the scenes that we don't know that is for our betterment.
	But it's gotten out of control, right, Nick?
	And we have a caller, too.
	We may bring him on here in a second, but go on, Nick.
	Sure.
	Yeah.
	And it's just as you, you know, we were talking about earlier, Kennedy explicitly stated that there needs to be restrictions on unwarranted concealment of pertinent information and burying mistakes.
	You know, that's, that was long ago and, and that's been the, uh, uh, modus operandi, the, uh, you know, what they do is standard operating procedure.
	Yeah.
	All right.
	Well, we got a minute or two before the break.
	Let's go ahead and see what our caller has to share with us.
	Uh, caller, are you there?
	Yes, I'll be here.
	So what's up?
	Hey, it's Mickey.
	I sent you the text message about Hover.
	My grandpa caught the contractor shorting the gravel underneath Hover right there between 3rd and 9th Street by like 10 inches of gravel.
	And so he had him turn it all back up again, all the way down to the Boston Avenue.
	And so they offered him $150,000 to meet the other way.
	And he said, no, within a week, he got voted off of his own job.
	He said, well, he wasn't there by the one that's a council.
	Wow.
	Yeah, he explained to the city council what they were doing.
	And they still kicked him off anyways, disrupting.
	And so he finally got put back on the job in the 21st, 21st, 21st, something like that.
	And Hoover stopped stealing the wheat and the concrete.
	But that's the power of, like, maximum campaign contributions to a city council people.
	And here's the jokes on them, because they stole $3 million.
	We're going to have to look more into that.
	That's an interesting story that I think may be very interesting to uncover more on.
	It is something we see commonly, though, in any kind of government.
	You see, you know, they cut corners and they do things that allow them to skim a little off the top.
	Right, Mickey?
	I might be moving in.
	Yeah, I don't think we have a good connection.
	We're going to have to let you go.
	We don't have a good connection, but please continue to contribute.
	We would love to hear more, okay?
	Yeah, so that was interesting, Nick.
	How about that?
	Yeah, well, a perfect example of what he's talking about was, you know, perhaps Nikki Haley.
	Look at her.
	She's on the board of Boeing, and I'm sure she got some bonuses at some point and some sort of financial compensation.
	I wonder if any of that money that was saved by using bad parts.
	By cutting corners.
	Oh man.
	I know exactly what you're saying.
	I think our audience gets it too.
	Wow.
	That would be an interesting connection there.
	Oh boy.
	Again, the tangled webs we weave.
	We're about to hit a break here, but everybody stay tuned because when we come back, I really do want to get into some of these other stories here.
	We have Peter Navarro being ordered to prison next week in more complete and total Just lawlessness.
	We have celebrity, or the majority of Democrats, Nick, are opposing certifying the 2024 election if Trump wins.
	So we'll see if they have their own January 6th, except I'm sure in their January 6th, they will be allowed to overtake the Capitol and we will just become a banana republic fully.
	We'll talk about that and much more when we come back.
	Everybody stay tuned.
	You're listening to Just Form Talk Radio.
	Welcome back to Just Forum Talk Radio.
	I'm your host Craig James and Nick Ngo is with me here.
	You know it's funny that today is a slew of stories have been breaking across the board.
	We started in one place and we've ended in a whole different place but that's okay because that's what we do here is we cover the spectrum when it comes to the news.
	One story I thought was interesting Nick is this story about A poll that was recently conducted where 57% of Democrat voters said that they would oppose certifying the election if Donald Trump were to win.
	So, you know, it's interesting for all the talk about how sacred our democracy is over the last few years from these Democrats, they don't seem to really like it when it doesn't go the way that they want.
	And that is indicative of, you know, exactly a trend that we've seen time and again here with, you know, our country.
	It's going in a direction that I don't think people understand or like.
	Now, Nick, do you think that if there is a scenario where Trump wins, they'll light the – I mean, they've already said essentially – who was it?
	Alex Jones with Tucker Carlson said that the plan is if slash win, Trump wins in 2024 in November.
	They're basically going to activate the Antifa, Black Lives Matter, rioters again, and they're going to actually interlace in and amongst them these pro-Palestinian Activists, you know, whatever, crazy people.
	And they're going to basically try to create chaos and havoc across the country to do exactly what is described here, is to basically scare and intimidate Democrats into not certifying the 2024 election results.
	Nick, is that a reasonable, is that why we're seeing polling coming out like this?
	They're laying the groundwork for that?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	They know they can't win.
	And you know, the funny thing about it is, didn't they take away some sort of ability to not certify the votes?
	I think they took away that ability.
	They changed the law even.
	So their argument is moot.
	They cannot even do that because they did it to themselves.
	Well, at this point, it looks to me as though the groundwork is being laid that if Trump wins, or when he wins, there will be riots, there will be protests, there will be all kinds of things.
	And again, it probably will look something similar to what happened on January 6th, except I'm sure more things will be on fire, more murders will happen, more violent crimes will take place, and who knows what their end goal target will be.
	You know, I see everything going a certain direction, and at this point, you know, the writing's almost on the wall.
	And it's like, how do we save this republic that has gone so far in a direction that is antithetical to what its founding principles were, Nick?
	I don't know.
	It's going to be difficult with 320,000 unvetted immigrants being flown, illegal immigrants, being flown into the United States.
	That's just, think about the state we're in.
	We're giving money to everybody else.
	We're ignoring our problems.
	We've got the borders being invaded.
	We've got our financial system is about to collapse.
	They're about to take all the stock from everybody, too.
	They're going to clean house.
	You got BlackRock buying up, you know, 40% of single-family homes last year were purchased by investment companies, mainly BlackRock.
	And, you know, we've got these Antifa people violent out in the street, you know, not getting charged with anything.
	As a matter of fact, they're being used as assets to be provocateurs after that.
	And now they're changing everything, and they're about to change with this new TikTok ban.
	They're about to put in – they're going to sneak in a Trojan horse there.
	Thomas Massey tweeted about it, and apparently it would give them sweeping powers where they can just basically take down a website situation.
	So that's what Alex Jones is really talking about.
	It's the president will be given the power to ban websites, not just apps.
	The person breaking the new law is deemed to be the U.S.
	No, I was going to say, that's why Trump's come out against it, too.
	He said, look, TikTok's not our problem, it's Facebook.
	Which I agree with 100%.
	At least TikTok, we all know it's a Chinese-run operation to undermine the culture and morality of America.
	probably collect blackmail on future US politicians and members of the government that they can use later because they have all this information from TikTok that they use.
	Maybe when they're a teenager they use TikTok and then they grow up, go to college, and end up working in the government.
	China can use that to exploit against them.
	Well, what if that's what's been happening with Facebook?
	What if that's what's been happening with all these social media companies from the perspective of the U.S.
	intelligence agency, that they would use the information gathered on those platforms to then go after people at a later date who have positions of power to make them more compliant?
	It all is, you know, you talk about this Orwellian dystopia that we seem to be walking headfirst, or diving headfirst into, and I feel like we've already, you know, broken the plane of the water, and we're basically under the water right now, inundated by it.
	And, of course, you know, everything that you see go through Congress, you must be skeptical of, because they do things like exactly what Massey is pointing out, hydrogen horses within things, and that is something that You know, I think.
	And then one more thing I wanted to add, Nick, to your point about the 300,000 illegals coming in that are being flown in.
	You've coupled that with the millions that are crossing the border, and the demographic shift is one aspect of it, but really what people are starting to point out, and I think Elon Musk said it yesterday, but people have been pointing this out for a long time, it's that The flooding of these Democrat cities with illegals has little to do with changing the way they vote.
	It's actually trying to re-establish larger amounts of political capital with regard to how the electoral votes are appropriated, right?
	So if you increase the population and then they do a census, and the population is much larger, then you get appropriated more Uh, votes in Congress, more representation in Congress, and they actually count illegals as well.
	So, really, that's why Democrat cities are being turned into these unmanageable you-know-what holes with these huge influxes of legal immigrants is because it then will afford that city more power in government.
	Yeah, that's true.
	And, you know, the funny thing is about that, Craig, when they first started doing the census, it was implied that it would be American citizens, at least in my estimation, because according to the Constitution, they're supposed to protect our borders.
	And they're not.
	So I think that the Supreme Court should have a case brought to them about that, and maybe they could fix it.
	And also, off of what you were saying earlier, too, That they would, you know, basically use information as blackmail.
	Facebook already does that, that's right.
	You know, for example, they just, the intelligence agencies, and the NSA in particular, just bought up all the data from everybody's social media and from all their stuff.
	They don't even have to illegally spy on you anymore.
	You know, you got all these corporations spying on you.
	We need a Bill of Rights, a Bill of Internet Rights.
	And by the way, look at it this way too.
	They're allowed to sell your information from your messages on social media.
	And that needs to be protected the same way as a federal mail is.
	It needs to have the same protections.
	Just like if you even try to hack in, you're damaging the mailbox, that's a federal offense.
	Same deal.
	And that's what it needs to be.
	And certainly, you know, if you have a David Hasselhoff video out there where you're, you know, in college you made a mistake one time and you drank too many shots on your birthday and you're eating cheeseburgers in the closet on the floor, you know, that's going to be used against you.
	Yeah.
	No, I mean, that's true.
	And that's what it is.
	So it's something that I think it's very clear that we're striking a nerve with, not we're, but the people who are trying to do these things are having nerve struck when it comes to, you know, what they're trying to get through in Congress.
	Of course Trump would be aware of it.
	Think about it.
	I mean, if they pass this bill, right, that Massey's been a critic of, that is a Trojan horse, then, you know, what's to say that Once the Democrats have a majority, they can't pass bills that, you know, ban true social.
	You know, because it's a disinformation portal where Trump spreads white nationalist lies about white supremacy and overthrowing governments.
	You know what I mean?
	Like, so there is an obvious reason behind The fact that we shouldn't be just blindly saying, oh, you know, TikTok is Chinese communist, so we should get rid of it.
	But here's my thing, Nick, and I'll let you talk in a second.
	I think they want to shut down the Internet.
	I really do.
	I think that the way we're heading is toward a future where we have an Internet here in America very similar to that of China.
	It'll be an intranet, not an internet.
	It will be closed off and regulated.
	Not that it isn't already, but I think they want to make it so that you need an ID like in China to get on the Internet so that there is no anonymity anymore.
	And if you think about that and why that's bad, I mean, the original, a lot of the original founding documents, I believe, for our country were written anonymously because they were under threat of basically imprisonment and execution by the crown who was, you know, over, was ruling over for our country were written anonymously because they were under threat of So they want to reimpose that type of control over the discourse in America.
	Now, of course, our enemies are running counterintelligence and disinformation, misinformation, etc, etc.
	But at what point do we accept?
	Do we?
	Embrace the idea of the same thing our founding fathers did, which is that we have inalienable rights that are not given by man, but given by God, that can't be taken away by man regardless of what the happenstances we are in, right?
	Yeah, Craig, it's called deprivation of rights under color of law, and I really think that something needs to be done.
	If someone knowingly, and this is already on the books in the law, but if they knowingly try to legislate against our rights, then they get 30 years in jail.
	No questions asked, no negotiations, do not pass, go straight to jail.
	It needs to stop and there needs to be extreme penalties because this has gone on too long.
	There needs to be an example made of these people.
	And I think we should look at who introduced the bill and look at those people, investigate them, investigate those Congress people.
	What are they up to?
	Why would they?
	What are you doing?
	Just like when they try and take our guns, the only reason we're trying to take our guns is...
	I think you're missing it.
	We don't need to investigate the Congress members because we already know they're puppets.
	We need to investigate the NGOs and the lobbying groups and where they're getting their money from and why they're doing what they do.
	And the foundations, as we've talked about this on Conspiracy Theory Friday, or not Friday, Tinfoil Friday, you know, the foundations ever since the inception, they've been investigated years ago, and it was found that basically they were formed for intelligence agencies to, and wealthy people, the intelligence agencies didn't come in until after the fact, but they wanted to be able to drive policy Yeah, it was the Open Society Foundation.
	America and they wanted, so that's why they had to make foundations and then do it through the foundations so they can say, Oh, it wasn't me.
	So George Soros can say, Oh, it wasn't me.
	It was, it was, it was them, you know, and then get this, you know, I, I shared with you a story that I want to do.
	I think that that's what I'm, I'm going to be covering on tinfoil Friday this week.
	God willing is this story about, uh, the, the NGO I shared with you earlier.
	I'm not going to give any information out yet because I haven't completed my investigation, but it looks bad.
	It looks like there's an organization out there that is doing a lot to Well, I don't want to say much, but you know the one I'm talking about, right, Nick?
	The one I sent you all that info on?
	Yep.
	Yeah, so we're going to get into that too.
	But here we have a texter, our good friend from Minnesota.
	By the way, if you are texting into the text line, just know that if you send a screenshot, we cannot see that.
	It's just the way the system works.
	We can only read your text, so we can't actually see screenshots that you send or pictures.
	So just keep that in mind when you're texting the text line.
	Our friend from Minnesota, I believe this is Kathy, she just texted in and said, Minneapolis Antifa was one of the first to enter the Capitol building during the January 6, 2021 insurrection, quote unquote, posing as a supporter of Donald Trump, who invited Antifa into the Capitol building during the president's speech at the peaceful election integrity rally.
	This guy's Facebook page shows a live stream of himself attending the Biden inauguration and smiling when Biden said he was going to open up the borders.
	Yeah, that's what we're dealing with here, folks.
	Layer upon layer upon layer of deception, lies, and criminal malfeasance.
	It is just the never-ending struggle to get to the truth.
	But we will persevere, and I hope you'll persevere with us and stay tuned.
	We're going to keep diving down on everything you're listening to on Just Form Talk Radio.
	We'll be back after the break.
	Welcome back to Just Form Talk Radio.
	I'm your host Greg James with Nick Ngo.
	And Nick, you know, we're talking about a lot of things here, but we're really just unpacking what may be coming ahead.
	And before we go any further, though, we do have another caller.
	What do you say, Nick?
	Do we want to bring him on?
	Bring him on!
	All right, let's see.
	All right, caller, you're on the air with us here on Just Form Talk Radio.
	What do you got for us today?
	Can you hear me?
	Yes, we can.
	Well, the Bible says in Revelation, who can fight against them?
	To refer to the secret societies that have taken over basically the world.
	Their goal is a one world government, a one world religion.
	And it's not going to be Christianity.
	It's going to be worship Lucifer.
	I think the only solution to this whole thing would be to bring back the lie detector test and have every judge, politician, school board person, ask them one question.
	Are you a member of the secret society?
	Yes or no?
	And that will eliminate a lot of these evil people.
	Why don't you guys get a hold of Ken Buck if you have to disguise his voice or whatever.
	Well, I'm just asking one question.
	Are you a member of the Secret Society?
	I don't know, but I'd sure like to know.
	Yeah, what a great point.
	If we don't do something drastic, as you can see, like this guy getting murdered, you know, he didn't commit suicide.
	Come on, give me a break.
	But the people that did this are going to get all scot-free, like Hillary Clinton, the imposter that they call a president.
	Come on, give me a break.
	Another thing is, how come all these good Republicans allow the Federal Reserve to money launder our money and then collect A trillion dollars now a year on interest.
	Come on, no country can sustain this.
	We need to tell them that what they're doing is totally illegal.
	that was established in 1913, I believe it was, at Jekyll Island.
	I mean, this is a poem.
	All right, I think you're cutting out, caller.
	We're going to go ahead and let you go because I think your signals going in and out, but great points and we really appreciate you.
	Please feel free to keep contributing.
	I think that was amazing, right, Nick?
	Yeah, polygraphs for everybody who's joining, you know, saying they're not part of secret societies, which, you know, the very word secrecy is repugnant in an open and free society.
	I'm quoting JFK there, right?
	Yeah.
	Is an incredible observation.
	Plus, I mean, we're all aware of what's going on with the Federal Reserve and how it's all basically just a big Ponzi scheme.
	And we had Anne VanderSeel on the show the other day to explain that in detail, and you've been covering it as well.
	So have a lot of other people, including Joe Jaquin and Jason Walker.
	They've been doing a great job at it.
	There's a lot of information that we as Americans are newly becoming aware of, and we're waking up people every day, but there still is not enough people aware, I think, for us to really take on a lot of these things.
	But this is the battle.
	The battle is information, right?
	Yeah, it's an information war.
	Fifth generation warfare.
	Speaking of information war, this story just came out.
	Embattled InfoWars founder Alex Jones has warned that the Justice Department is attempting to shut down his InfoWars broadcast and put him in prison.
	He cautioned his viewers that the move can happen any day now.
	He said he's refrained from publicly disclosing the extent he and his family have been persistently probed by federal agents.
	But he goes on and says, quote, I have not talked about on air yet what is happening behind the scenes, but it's not time to do it.
	Yet for a lot of reasons, the legendary talk show host told his viewers on a live transmission, he goes on to say, but I have been very honest with the crew.
	So, I mean, look, Nick, we all know that when you get big enough and you become enough of a nuisance, you're an annoying or pesky enough fly, you know, that they will eventually try to swatch you.
	And that's just what happens, but I think the idea of information warfare really lies in it acting more like a fire, less like a You know, once it starts, it can spread.
	And I'm not saying that we're destructive like fire, but we should be considering ourselves destructive to forces that are evil, right?
	Absolutely.
	You know, we're trying to stop the criminal element, as we talked about.
	CIA, FBI have good people in there.
	DOJ have good people in there, but there's a criminal enterprise that has infiltrated the United States government that we are fighting legally and lawfully using information to expose them.
	Yeah, which is, I think, you know, one of the ideas of and behind the First Amendment to a degree.
	So, to a large degree, and like the other, like the caller just said who called in, I mean, it is in part a big deal that there are secret societies because When you have secret societies, they have secret agendas, and those secret agendas may not align with what is legal or lawful, and then they work to affect those nefarious ends at any cost.
	And, you know, their loyalty is not to the Constitution, which they take an oath to protect and defend.
	Their loyalty lies in a secret room behind closed doors with a group of people who We don't know.
	And we don't know what their agenda is, whether it's good or bad, we don't know.
	And that's, you know, this is the, I guess, the eternal struggle that we're going to keep facing, right?
	The eternal battle is good versus evil.
	And, you know, what happens is there becomes this gray area where people think that what they're doing is good and it may be bad and vice versa, but I guess we're at a point now, Nick, where sunlight is the best disinfectant.
	We have to just keep talking about these things, getting them out there, because if we don't know it exists, how are we ever going to stop it?
	Right, Nick?
	Yes, that's the biggest problem.
	It is so well done, it's hard to identify the actual enemy, but it's muckrakers that are out there that are real journalists, not yellow journalists, are the real people that are on the front lines here that are trying to expose what they're trying to do.
	And, you know, it's important that they continue to do so and have the ability to do so, especially whenever, you know, there's no way that they're going to win an election.
	You know, Joe Biden clearly didn't win the election, the previous election, and they definitely can't allow a fair election again in the future because, you know, otherwise they're going to be held accountable for what they've done.
	So, you know, we need to be able to, all the way up until the election, have free speech.
	And as you said, I think that they are going to try and shut down the internet if they can't get this bill through, and I don't think they will.
	Then they're going to just have no other choice but to shut it all down.
	It's the only logical response to the spread of information that they don't like.
	I mean, unless they just think that they can keep running the same operation over and over again.
	I've heard people say, and I think it might be true at this point, that enough people are sick and tired of Joe Biden that it's not even going to be...
	Possible to rig the election, meaning they can send out all the mail-in ballots they want, and they can try to do their scorecard hammer operation again, which is the AI-backed manipulation of votes, if you believe in that theory.
	It's just not going to change the fact that the majority of people just don't like the direction our country is headed.
	I mean, we all go to the grocery store, right, Nick?
	We all see our bills going up.
	We all see the price of the gas pump going through the roof.
	We all see the invisible tax that is inflation taking its toll on our day-to-day lives.
	I mean, I can tell you that there are people out there struggling.
	For instance, I played that clip of that lovely woman down at the Lake, I think it's Lakewood City Council here in Colorado, saying, look, you know, I was told if I saved this amount of money, I would have $35,000 or $40,000 a year to live off of and that would have gotten me what I needed.
	I mean, now they have to make the decision between, you know, keeping the electricity on and going to the grocery store and fighting with illegals at food banks for what's left.
	Is this the country we want to live in?
	I don't.
	I don't want to do it.
	And especially when you have people getting exorbitantly rich.
	It's just a bad system at this point.
	We're going to talk about it much more when we come back.
	Stay tuned.
	Welcome back to Just Form Talk Radio.
	I'm your host Craig James with Nick Ngo.
	And Nick, we have a couple other stories I want to get into.
	Anything you want to contribute though off of what we were saying before the break?
	Yeah, the inflation is really hurting our seniors.
	And I was in Medicare sales last year, and countless people that I talked to, I could tell they were in really bad shape.
	And not to mention, they told me all their physical ailments so that I could help them get the right plan for them.
	And they should not be working.
	And Nikki Haley thinks they should work five, six more years longer than that.
	Yeah, yeah, don't worry.
	Let's increase the age of, you know, when you get Social Security and Medicare benefits so that you have to stay a wage slave a little bit longer, you know, even if you're suffering from a crippling illness or some sort of tragic ailment.
	Yeah, we better keep you in that workforce.
	We want you to work until you're about 70, 75-ish if you make it there so there's no chance of retirement.
	That way we can fix, that's how you fix Social Security, right?
	And of course, I'm being facetious.
	You know, Social Security is, man, it's tough because we're paying into it and we may never see the benefits of it, given how it's been mismanaged to this point.
	But yeah, a couple other stories I want to hit on before we finish up here.
	Laura Trump being named the co-chair of the RNC, that's a big deal, big step in the right direction.
	And only a day or two after she was announced and elected, There was a huge shakeup with more than 60 staffers being fired from the RNC, including some who are in charge of some of the social media accounts that were purposefully not talking about Trump and sidestepping him so that he didn't have to be mentioned.
	It's a good day that in our country when we finally have some shakeup and reform that leads to, you know, embracing the will of the American people, really.
	That's what it comes down to.
	As I said before, I had my experience at the local county RNC precinct caucus meeting on Saturday of last week.
	And it was it was shocking, you know, that that a lot of people there would not be what you consider normal conservatives.
	And as I said before, these are moderate Democrats who have been made into political refugees by the left wing.
	zero zealot activists that have overtaken the party.
	And, you know, maybe they they'll say the same thing about MAGA.
	But the truth is, our country is being divided in a way where people are starting to wake up to the fact that it's a uniparty.
	If you're a moderate Democrat or a moderate Republican, quote unquote, you're really just a member of the uniparty.
	And maybe that's what we should strive to in an ideal world where people aren't criminals and there isn't massive corruption and there isn't a broken system.
	But though in the real world, you have to have people who take a stance that is, you know, in a way, a complete rejection of the status quo, because we've seen what the status quo has, you know, yielded what it's produced.
	You judge a tree by its fruits.
	You know, this is biblical.
	Jesus taught us that.
	These people's fruits are tainted and bad.
	And this is what I, you know, I'm getting at, is that there has to be reform and it's starting, and it's a good thing, right, Nick?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	And as you said before, sometimes it was darkest before the dawn.
	You know, the world isn't getting worse or darker.
	It's the veil sheltering you from reality is lifting.
	That's what's happening, listeners.
	Yeah, and honestly, it's tough for a lot of people.
	I understand it's tough.
	It's been tough for me, and I know it's been tough for you, Nick.
	It's a difficult pill to swallow when you look around and you see the world for what it is, but as I always encourage everyone out there, when it seems hopeless and when it seems the worst, You have to rely on God and understand that God is on our side.
	If God is for us, who can stand against us?
	When we stand up for what is righteous and good and moral and decent, then we are essentially We've become spiritual warriors, and if we embrace God and let Him work through us, we can do great things.
	So that's my opinion on it all.
	And you know what really frustrates me, Nick, is when I go to these meetings and you never hear anyone... I mean, I'm not saying...
	In specific regard to the Republican meeting, because I wasn't there very long and it was my first one for the Republican caucus here in Colorado, but some of these meetings you go to and you never hear the name of God invoked.
	You have this society and population that's been trained to believe that the separation of church and state means that you shouldn't ever reference God in regard to the decisions that you make.
	I don't think that's it.
	That is completely antithetical to what the Founding Fathers believed and what our country is founded on.
	Principally, our country is a Christian nation.
	Christian morality and Christian principles are what made the framework for our nation as it exists today.
	And those have been degraded so much over time that now you have Joe Biden bringing, you know, debaucherous, degenerate, drag Transgender people into the White House where they're flashing their, you know, chest, bare chest in public in, you know, glorifying depravity.
	I mean, Kamala Harris just had a party with HBCU students at the Second Lady's house or whatever.
	I think it's called the Naval Observatories that the Vice President had at home there.
	And they're playing this degenerate rapper's music who talks about awful, sick, sexual promiscuity to the point of just grossness.
	And it's like, people, wake up!
	We are a nation in decline, and the more we reject God, the more this is all going to fall off the rails.
	Right, Nick?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	And as you said, the Founding Fathers made it so you can worship in any religion that you want, So long as it's within the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
	And the Bill of Rights and Constitution are based on Christian principles that are going to be immovable.
	That's why they fixed those to start.
	It's a constitutional republic.
	We start here, this is where we start, and then move from there.
	And so, you know, those people that are out there saying, Church and State, Church and State, no, no, no, no.
	Constitution, Bill of Rights, And then go from there.
	They've got it all backwards.
	Let's separate church and state even though the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence are products of Christian men who sought to create a nation free of a tyrannical government that was seeking to persecute them based on their faith.
	which is predicated on the belief that all men are created equally and endowed with by our creator, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, right?
	So I'm really one of those people, Nick, who, you know, I think maybe sees through a lot of this stuff and then a lot of people are waking up to it and that's good.
	That's what we want to keep doing.
	We want to keep having that happen.
	We have a texter from the 701, I don't know where that's from, but texting and saying, Personally, I'd rather see TikTok sold to someone here stateside, at least here we have a chance of putting our arms around what they're doing.
	That'll never happen if they're based in communist China, but I mean, to your point, Nick, and...
	And the points we were making, even if it's owned by somebody here in the States, it's still going to be used for the same nefarious purpose, which is why Trump said it's probably better if we address the problem with Facebook before we start looking outside our borders.
	You've got to put your own house in order before you can help anyone else.
	But we're hitting a break.
	We're going to come back.
	Our God's Grace is Greater segment.
	We'll let Nick get his final thought in.
	Stay tuned.
	Welcome back to Just Form Talk Radio.
	I'm your host Craig James with Nick.
	Now, you know, our last segment is always our God's Grace is Greater segment because in the midst of a tumultuous and fallen world where evil seems to win time and again, there is goodness and hope that we are given through Scripture to understand not only to see what is good that God has made and can do, but also to give us hope to see a future where God can prevail and will prevail.
	So I'm going to talk about that in just a minute.
	Before we do that, though, I want to let Nick give his final thought for the day.
	Well, Craig, the enemies of America are on the run.
	They're being exposed.
	They're retreating.
	And they are going to fall.
	It's a mathematical certainty at this point.
	We have the high ground morally, spiritually, and God is on our side.
	And everybody needs to remember that God wins in the end.
	It's the truest thing there is and that is something I really want to stress here with the serendipity of it all as we land on Psalm 62 talking about trust in God alone.
	How appropriate for what we've just talked about here today that Although we live in a fallen world where evil is time and again seeming to win, that that is not the scenario.
	That is not the case.
	God will prevail.
	And in order for that to happen, we have to trust in Him and let Him guide our actions.
	So I'll read these verses to you.
	Another Davidic psalm, trusting God alone, it says, Psalm 62.
	I am at rest in God alone.
	My salvation comes from Him.
	He alone is my rock and my salvation, my stronghold.
	I will never be shaken.
	How long will you threaten a man?
	Will all of you attack as if he were a leaning wall or a tottering stone fence?
	They only plan to bring him down from his high position.
	They take pleasure in lying.
	They bless with their mouths, but they curse inwardly.
	Rest in God alone, my soul, for my hope comes from Him.
	He alone is my rock and my salvation, my stronghold.
	I will not be shaken.
	My salvation and glory depend on God, my strong rock.
	My refuge is in God.
	Trust in Him at all times, you people.
	Pour out your hearts before Him.
	God is our refuge.
	Men are only a vapor.
	Exalted men, an illusion.
	Weighed in the scales, they go up.
	Together they are less than a vapor.
	Place no trust in oppression or false hope in robbery.
	If wealth increases, pay no attention to it.
	God has spoken once.
	I have heard this twice.
	Strength belongs to God, and faithful love belongs to you, Lord, for you repay each according to his works.
	There's so many things I could go into on that, but I want you all to know that these words, not only were they true thousands of years ago, but they're true even today.
	And as we read them, we must remember that putting trust in God alone is how we overcome this.
	But how do we connect to God?
	Well, we've been given a way, a way to connect to God that no other That at no other time in history were we ever given, and that was through our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, when He died on that cross for our sins, so that we can complete that relationship with God and find eternal salvation.
	So I'm asking all of you out there right now, if you haven't, now's your chance.
	Open your hearts, say a prayer, accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior, and watch the connection you make with God and how things can change that you thought were impossible.
	And on top of that, I want you to take these words, go read Psalm 62 over again today by yourself in quiet contemplation and understand that what happens in this world depends on how we react to the affliction that we face and we can overcome it by trusting God alone.
	So that's where I'm going to leave it.
	Thanks for listening.
	God willing, we'll be back tomorrow.
	Same time, same place.
	Patriot Radio News Hour coming up next.
	Great show.
	You'll want to stay tuned.
	I'm your host Craig James.
	This is Just Inform Talk Radio.
	Thanks to Nick Ngo.
	Thanks to the Texters.
	Godspeed and God bless each and every one of you Patriots!
	24 may be the year of a black swan event.
	This is a national security event with high impact that's very hard to predict.
	Warning, financial collapse is imminent.
	That's why Craig from Just Informed Talk teamed up with the most reliable company for buying real physical gold and silver at the absolute best prices available.
	Visit shop.allamericangold.com today.

▲