Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 19, 2024 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James

01:35:09

Texas National Guard Troops Start A Civil War With Federal Border Agents After SCOTUS Ruling?

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music.
	24 may be the year of a black swan event.
	This is a national security event with high impact.
	That's very hard to predict.
	Warning.
	Financial collapse is imminent.
	That's why Craig from Just Informed Talk teamed up with the most reliable company for buying real physical gold and silver at the absolute best prices available.
	Visit shop.allamericangold.com today.
	And remember what Benjamin Franklin once said, by failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail.
	Welcome to another Just Informed Talk Radio.
	I'm your host, Craig James.
	Thanks for joining us.
	We have a big show for you today.
	In the second hour, we're going to be joined by the FBI whistleblower, Nate Kane.
	He's running for Congress in West Virginia.
	We're going to talk to him about what he's been through up till this point as one of the people who came forward to expose the cover up of what was going on at the FBI with regard to the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton crime cartel.
	We're going to talk to him and get his take on what happened and what he plans to do about it as he is, of course, like I said, running for Congress.
	So we're excited for that.
	And we also have a lot of other topics to talk about today.
	Namely, we're going to start talking about this Supreme Court decision which has just come down.
	Essentially, we have justices ruling that our territorial sovereignty no longer applies and that you as an individual citizen or as a state have no power to control the border.
	As far as keeping our country from being invaded, we're going to look at that decision.
	We're going to discuss it and what Trump said and how another one of his predictions has become true and has been proven accurate.
	We're going to talk about that.
	A few other stories, too, as well.
	But again, I want to say thank you for everybody joining us.
	If you're here in the Front Range from Colorado up into Wyoming and over Nebraska, We are blessed to have you guys with us.
	Also, if you're listening on the live stream at Rumble or YouTube or wherever you're listening, thank you.
	Please leave your thoughts in the live chat or comment below this video.
	I'll be there reading everyone and Also, if you want to chime in, you can call or text.
	The text line is open.
	877-536-1360 is the number.
	So, we got a lot to cover here today.
	We're going to really try to dive a little bit deeper in some of this stuff.
	I also want to let you all know that we're joined by somebody who's becoming a bit of a regular here.
	You guys probably know him if you've been listening for the last few days, but I'll introduce him one more time.
	You guys know him.
	He's a U.S.
	Air Force veteran.
	He is a military intelligence insider.
	He's also known as the Benghazi whistleblower, one of the people who came forward to expose what was happening, and that was the Clintons as well, actually.
	So he's going to be joining us today.
	As a bit of a co-host, and we're going to talk about, you know, what's coming up in the future with regard to that a little bit later as well.
	I have some interesting and very positive news for what we're going to be doing here with the show going into the future.
	With that, though, I want to take a second and bring on Nick Ngo.
	Nick, are you there, sir?
	Nick, are you muted?
	All right, well, we'll bring Nick on.
	I apologize.
	All right.
	Hey, there you are.
	There he is.
	How you doing, brother?
	Doing great.
	Thanks for having me.
	Well, you know, like we've been talking about, we may be having you a lot more regularly going into the future, but we'll talk about all of that later when we finally get that all figured out.
	But for now, Nick, you're going to be joining us here in the first hour, and then you're going to be joining us in the second hour to help interview Nate Kane.
	I'm sure you guys will have a lot you can talk about, both of you guys being whistleblowers who came out against the Clintons and are still alive, thanks be to God, right?
	Yeah, surprisingly.
	I'm honestly shocked that I haven't been, you know, suicided yet.
	I mean, obviously, I would never harm myself.
	I just want everybody to know that.
	I'm glad that you said that because I didn't, it's not even funny.
	I only laugh because it is so absurd that we live in a time where they can get away with that kind of thing.
	But I think like you said before, it was you who told me, you know, if you're going to come out and be a whistleblower, make yourself as visible as humanly possible because that in and of itself is a form of protection and be very loud, right?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Otherwise, you might end up, you know, they'll figure out some sort of way to get to you.
	They'll engineer something.
	And if anybody out in our audience is listening and you work at one of these big corporations or you work for the government and you're seeing stuff, I mean, we want you to go through the right channels, but we want you to come forward and expose it, right, Nick?
	Yeah, if you have a security clearance and there's actually a procedure that you have to go through, and I'm sure that Nate will cover that today for us.
	I'm very much looking forward to it.
	So, we have a few stories I want to cover here with you, Nick, and we're going to kind of start with this big story, what happened yesterday.
	A ruling came down from the Supreme Court on Monday.
	They sided with the Biden regime and allowed border patrol agents to now remove the razor wire that's been installed at the Texas-Mexico border.
	This was a 5-4 vote.
	The Supreme Court granted Biden's emergency request.
	The two individuals who basically flipped the court in favor of Biden were Justice Roberts.
	Not really a big surprise there, but the one that everyone is shocked and surprised by right now, Nick, is Amy Coney Barrett's decision to side with The Biden regime in removing the border.
	So, Nick, I want to ask you, does a country... I mean, first of all, I guess you can give us your thoughts on what it means for America to have this kind of decision come down from the Supreme Court.
	And then I'll talk about some stuff that Trump said where his predictions were proven accurate.
	But, you know, when you hear this kind of ruling, what's your initial thoughts and reaction?
	You know, when I saw it, Craig, I thought to myself, this isn't necessarily a good thing, but then if you really step back and think about it, a lot of times the Supreme Court does things, and they might even guide a little bit, but you might have to refile in a different way to challenge it.
	Maybe they have the right to remove the razor wire.
	Maybe they're trying to edge or nudge people into thinking, OK, maybe they have the right to do that.
	But what they're really saying is that you should get rid of the treasonous person or the person that's failing to uphold the constitutional duty.
	And that's really how you fix the problem.
	Maybe that's what they're trying to do.
	Yeah, I mean, I've heard that as one explanation to a degree, but, you know, a lot of the right-wing conservative ink right now, some of the people at least, are coming out now and saying that Biden's trying to start a civil war.
	That they want this conflict between the Texas National Guard and the U.S.
	Border Patrol because it will be a flashpoint for, you know, this narrative they're trying to sell about civil war and chaos.
	You know, they have their movies they're releasing that are priming us and predictably programming us for a civil war.
	Part of me, Nick, worries that what they're trying to do No, and I tell you that with every time they try to pull something new that is clearly an encroachment upon the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, you know, they use lawfare to drag it out.
	And, you know, they work tirelessly to try and wear us out.
	And, you know, the spirits of people are high.
	They can see who the problems are and what we got to do to vote them out and get the right people in.
	I agree.
	I mean, one of the things that crosses my mind is, you know, we've talked before about the idea of this continuity of government, this hidden infrastructure that we can't see as far as how the government's being ran right now.
	It's a possibility, I'm not going to say it's 100% true because we can't know, or at least I can't, but to me it would seem as though if we are fighting this clandestine battle, right, where let's say hypothetically that the military is actually in control and this is all a lot of theater, I guess my question is,
	Because the people who have been the bad actors historically know they're untouchable, and they know they're untouchable especially when they're in the public realm, are they waging their overt war publicly because that's the only place they can do it?
	And I want to get your thoughts on that when we come back, Nick.
	And we're going to talk about that and a whole lot more.
	Plus, Nate King coming up in the second hour.
	Stay tuned.
	You're listening to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	Welcome back to Just Forum Talk Radio.
	I'm your host, Craig James.
	We're joined by our friend, Nick Ngo, U.S.
	Air Force veteran, military intelligence insider, Benghazi whistleblower.
	But more importantly, Nick, you've been here with us for the last few shows consecutively, and we're really looking forward to having you on here going into the future.
	Hopefully, we're going to get all those details squared away, and then we'll make an official announcement.
	I want to take a second here and kind of like let you, if you recall the question, basically the question I had before the break if you want to respond to that at all.
	I was talking about, you know, Amy Comey Barrett making this decision and how it seems as though if a lot of these public officials know they're untouchable to a certain degree as long as they remain in the public light, that that's why they're waging their war overtly in public as opposed to... None of this is happening behind closed doors because it can't.
	Behind closed doors, other factions are in control is what we're to believe.
	What do you think of that?
	Well, if that's the case, this may be a point to highlight that an Article 4, Section 4 of the United States Constitution says the United States shall guarantee to every state in the Union a Republican form of government and shall protect each of them against an invasion.
	And on the application of the legislator or the executive, when the legislator cannot be convened against domestic violence, So, a couple of things.
	Posse Comitatus was passed at the end of the Civil War, and that said that the military could not be used for domestic affairs, basically, to take care of policing.
	However, if I remember this correctly, George Bush Jr.
	had actually repealed Posse Comitatus around the same time That Obama then got rid of the ability to use propaganda against our own citizens.
	Connect that.
	So I think that any sort of issue that the military could run into In regards to posse comitatus, which says that the military is at the end of the Civil War to make sure that the troops weren't used as domestic police force, I'm pretty sure that Bush had repealed posse comitatus.
	Wow, that would be an interesting turn of events.
	I do know that Obama was partially responsible for allowing, making legal propagandizing the American people.
	That, you know, we could go into more detail on, but I guess if that's what's happening, Then it would make sense that this is something that we're seeing publicly, so like you said, we can see the unconstitutional nature of it all.
	I found a couple things interesting about this.
	First of all, I heard somebody who is I can't remember who it was, I heard say this the other day, but somebody who's a legislate, or no, I heard a congressperson, I don't remember which one, say that they were seated in having like a conference with one of the Supreme Court Justices of want to say
	Alito or Scalia, not Scalia because he's dead, but one of the sitting justices, maybe Alito.
	And they were saying, you know, if you, you know, stop sending this stuff to the Supreme Court, if you don't want an invasion, then you need to make it happen in Congress.
	And I thought that was, you know, because Congress could supersede the Supreme Court ruling, correct?
	I don't know.
	I guess it could always be challenged as unconstitutional.
	But here's the thing, you know, the military swears an oath, and they were there before we even had a government, formal government set up, you know, they had their own laws and regulations, and they're outside of the system itself.
	And they're the safeguard for our country, the immune system, if you will, for the corrupt parts of our government.
	And, you know, they have the authority to protect against both foreign and domestic enemies.
	And it's the federal government's job to protect the border, and they may not be doing so.
	So the military is within their rights and their responsibility to step in.
	And if there's conflict with the United States government, it's very clear that they are domestic enemies.
	But what kind of – I mean, is there a scenario where, like, you see this spiraling out of control?
	Let's say they look at this ruling.
	Border Patrol is sent down, Greg Abbott tells the Texas National Guard, do not stand down, do not allow it.
	Do you think it just, where do you think a situation like that goes?
	Well, I don't know.
	I know that it's a conflict that they're trying to build up, and they want something to happen to start a civil war.
	But I know that our military will not do what they expect them to do or want them to do.
	But my point is, is the U.S.
	Border Patrol technically military?
	I don't think so, right?
	I mean, they're a paramilitary force, but they're not a part of the actual military, are they?
	They're not part of the military, so the military does not take orders from them.
	But I guess my point is, like...
	If the Deep State were trying to start this civil war, they would use a paramilitary force like the Border Patrol, which is outside the purview of the military, to go into direct conflict with another sort of paramilitary force in like the Texas National Guard, who is technically... I don't know how that, you know, structure of command works, but I'm pretty sure Texas National Guard is outside the military as well.
	Am I correct?
	Um, somewhat.
	I mean, when they're activated and of course, um, they are right now and they're activated, they are, um, you know, they are in the chain of command, uh, to military, uh, for certain, you know, for certain stuff, if they're under their jurisdiction or under the governors, it gets, it gets kind of complicated from there.
	However, um, you know, their, their, Responsibility is to protect the border, as we were talking about from the Constitution there.
	They don't report to the federal government, really.
	So, whenever someone tries, let's assume that it escalates.
	You've got the federal troops coming to cut the wire.
	You know, they could stand in their way, perhaps, and then, you know, if they try and escalate things, then, you know, they would be fully authorized to use any form of force that they need to to neutralize threats.
	Like, domestic threats are the same as ones if you're on a battlefield in Afghanistan, you know, but they, of course, they'd have orders to de-escalate if they can.
	Yeah, I mean, I guess that's where my mind goes is that, you know, this is sort of a gray area where if they were to try to start this domestic civil war type conflict, they would use these these kind of gray areas like with like we talked about the federal border patrol paramilitary force against, you know, the National Guard of Texas, which is sort of outside of the military's purview as far as, you know, they ran on a state basis, you know, through that
	Function.
	And so, interestingly enough, I don't know that it's going to escalate beyond just them speaking to one another and, like you said, maybe standing in front of each other.
	But who knows, right?
	We've got to keep an eye on this stuff and... Well... Go ahead.
	Sorry to interject here.
	I just found out more about the law with Posse Comitatus.
	The Posse Comitatus Act does not apply to Army National Guard and the Air National Guard.
	When acting in law enforcement capacity within its own state, when ordered by the governor of that state, or in the adjacent state, if invited by that state's governor.
	So this is what people have been talking about.
	Like, I know one of the podcasters out there who talks about Civil War all the time, Tim Poole, had mentioned that he thought, like, the Civil War would start with something like, you know, a state that has abortion legal, like Colorado, would get into a fight with another state, like, where it's illegal, which I'm pretty sure it's illegal in Texas now.
	Um, and that that would be where you would have this, you know, sort of standoff and then you would have some sort of, but I think the border makes far more sense, especially with regard to, you know, the federal government trying to exert this control over a situation that they're obviously orchestrating to have happen.
	They want our country invaded.
	And I also thought it's interesting, you know, a part of me, Nick, He thinks more broadly.
	It's easy to narrowly focus on one thing and think, OK, well, I know I'm right on this, where they're like, OK, well, they're invading our country.
	With the way that the world is going, sometimes I think they're letting all these third world people in because they're the first people who are going to get drafted once we get into a full World War skirmish.
	You know what I mean?
	Sure, and then they're inviting them to enlist in the military even though they haven't been vetted.
	I mean, they probably don't even know their real names.
	Well, it's like when the Romans conscripted the barbarians to fight on their behalf and then they ended up turning around and fighting them, you know what I mean?
	Yeah, and that's a real threat.
	You know, maybe they're planning on letting all these people in, having them join the ranks, make their own little Separate part of the military kind of like the French Foreign Legion did rather, you know, they're separate from the regular military They're basically used as mercenaries all around the world and assassins So, you know, that's what I was thinking when I started to see that that's what they plan on doing is they plan on making their own group within the military and You know possibly turning them on us.
	I I mean I just feel like, so a couple things that cross my mind when I think about it.
	First of all, you know, of course it would, there would be, I feel like there may be some military tacticians or whoever who think, okay, well, we need more bodies to send, you know, if we get into a big conflict, we're going to need people to send to these wars.
	Like, you know, you see what's happening in Ukraine now.
	The average age is like 45 or something for their soldiers that are active duty because all the young men have been killed.
	So in some weird way, it's like these guys are like, okay, well, let's bring in this, these third world, you know, migrants.
	And then once they get here, it's like, surprise, gotcha.
	We're going to go to war.
	These guys are going to get, you know, put on the, you know, the speed where the boats, the landing boats, right?
	You know during D-Day ship them right to the front line and then you know in a way that's How they see it happening and then, like you said, will end up happening more likely is that they'll develop a force that will be used against us ultimately.
	And it was the same thought I had about, like, the cartel.
	I kept thinking to myself, I was wrapping my brain around this the other day, and I know this is kind of off on a side, but it's also kind of related.
	I was like, we have every capability in the world to take out these cartels, the Sinaloa and all the rest of them.
	It's not like that's impossible, but then I thought, What if, you know, the cartel is just another form of, another layer of defense for, you know, keeping people from trying to invade us, right?
	I don't know.
	I mean, that was just thought.
	Like, you leave that force down there, kind of a wild card, you know, they can fight to protect that area that ultimately may not protect our border from the invasion coming from South America.
	But, you know, if China lands, they're going to have a problem dealing with that.
	You know what I mean?
	I don't know.
	I'm not a military tactician.
	That's just my layman thoughts on it all.
	What do you think?
	Sure, if you think about it in those terms, the United States would just go down there, you know, with the CIA or whoever, pay these guys and say, you know, depending on how this goes, you guys could get a bigger bonus, but here's the money up front to do X, Y, Z, and they're hired guns.
	They'll do, you know, they have a chain of command, but they're hired guns, ultimately.
	Yeah, that's what I was getting at, like, with the South American- it's all like a merc- it all feels like mercenary stuff, you know?
	Anyway, that's an aside from the point we were making about Amy Coney Barrett.
	Now, I have some interesting thoughts on Amy Coney Barrett's decision here, but Trump had a thought that he shared before this decision came down, meaning I think he may have had inside info on it coming down.
	Obviously, he probably knew the decision was coming down before it was made, but Trump basically predicted that judges and justices, he said this right before this ruling came out, would make legal rulings to outwardly disprove the notion of favoritism regardless of constitutional law.
	And I think that essentially what we just saw with Amy Coney Barrett is that proving itself.
	Trump's remarks essentially said, you know, when a Democrat appoints a judge, They act however they want, but when a Republican does, the judges or justices go out of their way to prove that there is no favoritism, right?
	Which leads to rulings like this.
	What are your thoughts on that, Nick, as we hit a break?
	Well, if you remember from a couple of days ago, we were talking about how Biden is one of his mentors is a Jesuit priest who has basically said that he's all for open borders.
	I hope that her faith doesn't have anything to do with her decision.
	Oh no, is she a Jesuit or the female equivalent of one?
	We'll talk about that much more when we come back.
	There's a lot more to uncover here on PAQ, plus Nate King coming up in the second hour.
	It's going to be a great show.
	Everybody stay tuned, make sure you call or text if you have anything you want to share, 877-536-1360, or leave a comment below or leave a comment in the live chat.
	Either way, we'll be back.
	Stay tuned, you're listening to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	Welcome back to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	I'm your host Craig James.
	We're joined by our friend Nick Ngo, U.S.
	Air Force veteran, and he's been co-hosting the show for the last few days.
	We're going to hopefully have a position for him soon, make it more official, but we're going to wait to make that announcement coming up here in the next few days.
	I hope you guys stay tuned for that, but today's show is going to be great.
	We have joining us in the second hour, Nate Kane, the FBI whistleblower, whose findings in the FBI, the work he did as a whistleblower, was actually covered in the Durham Report.
	We're going to talk to him about his experience, what he's gone through, and now he's running for Congress.
	So we're really excited to have him join us in the second hour.
	Me and Nick will be interviewing him.
	That's something to look forward to.
	So, you know, Nick, we've taken some time this morning to talk about what's happening on the border.
	How there is a possible gray area where they may be working to start civil conflict, what they call the quote-unquote civil war, which everybody seems to be predictably being programmed to want to engage in, I guess, or to be ready for, or to be willing to accept when it's presented to us by the fake news.
	I think what could happen, Nick, more overly, would be a scenario where The Texas National Guard refuses to cooperate with the U.S.
	Border Patrol, correct?
	And they say no, we will not remove our barriers because...
	This is a territorial invasion.
	You're failing to uphold your end of the constitutional oath that you took.
	We are going to fulfill that oath regardless of whether you want it or not.
	And I think what'll happen is, even though it may not become a hot conflict with people shooting each other down there, let's say, I would imagine This will be like a January 6th level talking point, which will become nuclear, metaphorically speaking, in the fake news, and they will run this 24-7 on headlines, Texas National Guard declares insurrection against federal government, you know, so on and so forth.
	What do you think of that scenario?
	I feel like that's what's coming next here.
	Well, if they try and do the insurrection angle, which would be a valid reason to use the military and domestic affairs outside of the National Guard, I think that, yeah, they're going to try and escalate this.
	That's their only hope, is to distract from the fact that the Democratic Party doesn't offer anything but squalor and and degradation of our morals.
	And nobody wants that anymore.
	So they got to do whatever they can.
	They know they're not going to win this next election.
	So they got to do whatever they can to prevent it.
	Well, they're not going to win it legally, at least, it seems, because they've gotten really good at cheating.
	But I really want to stress to the audience that you may start hearing these headlines.
	And I hope I'm wrong.
	A lot of time, Nick, I make these predictions and unfortunately I end up being right more than I'm wrong, which I guess is why people still tune in to a degree.
	But this one I can feel in my bones.
	They want to sell this narrative of division, especially ahead of the election.
	It's, as I've said before, What they their main export from the fake news propagandists is fear because fear puts you in a fight-or-flight response mechanism or mode and then you can be easily manipulated or pushed in whatever direction they need you to go as long as you're constantly living in fear.
	I talked about this with with simply looking at the way they handled the COVID pandemic and everything else since essentially 9-11 and the establishment of these 24-hour news stations.
	They want you constantly living in fear because then they can control you more easily.
	Now, I think that they've been priming the population for this Civil War narrative and they're gonna unleash it with, seemingly with this I mean, if you're a Border Patrol agent, Nick, I mean, you've served, you've been in the arena, as they say.
	These guys working on the border, how do they sleep at night with what they do?
	How do they sleep at night knowing they're betraying this country so deeply and taking orders from such corrupt criminals?
	What do you say to that, Nick, as a person who's served?
	Well, you know, they need to step up.
	You know, I know that they're being spread thin and there's probably working 12-hour shifts on and off, but they need to speak out.
	They need to blow the whistle.
	They need to go to Congress.
	There's a process to do that.
	There's also, they could just go to the news and talk about certain stuff.
	Obviously, they have to keep some stuff that they can't talk about, but they should definitely be blowing the whistle and sounding the alarm.
	Let's not forget, though, that all of our institutions have been infiltrated to include Customs and Border Patrol, especially them, because without that infiltration, the drug flow and human trafficking would slow down.
	That's prior to the invasion.
	There is already a couple of people that were associated with the Mexican cartels that were at a chief of staff, for example, the chief of staff Around the time of the Customs and Border Patrol Fast and Furious, he is connected to Carlos Salinas, who runs the cartels, really.
	He's like the godfather of all the whole country.
	I've seen, yeah, stories exactly like what you're saying, where you have these individuals who are, you know, basically infiltrators from the cartel who get positions and then use them exploitatively.
	You know, it's interesting to me, they'll call us conspiracy theorists for saying that, but you just referenced directly some, an incident that occurred where, you know, we have Fast and Furious, which, it's amazing how short the attention span is by design of the American, average American citizen at this point.
	With regard to just, you know, these people who put the Ukrainian flags in their bio and proudly take their jab vaccines and trust the government implicitly with everything.
	They don't, a lot of them don't even know about, but most of them, even if they did know, have completely forgotten already.
	What happened, even just with this Fast and Furious thing where you had, what was it, the DEA was basically selling guns to the cartels that were unable to be traced or tracked and then just sort of disappeared, right?
	Yes, yes.
	And Dennis Burke was involved in that.
	He was a U.S.
	attorney and covering for that.
	He resigned and he wasn't prosecuted.
	And the chief of staff there, He was, uh, let's see, we got, uh, Marco Lopez Jr.
	He is affiliated and connected to the, uh, uh, the cartels in particular, Carlos Slim or Carlos Salinas.
	And he was in when Napolitano was the governor, and he was the youngest, the third youngest person to become mayor.
	I think he was 21 years old or something like that, in the border town called Nogales.
	And he basically infiltrated Customs and Border Patrol at that time, and that's who was in there.
	And that's the kind of game that they've had running for a long time.
	I mean, it's an interesting dynamic because, like I said, I think this has been being set up, this has been in the works for a while.
	I think they've wanted this narrative.
	We'll see if they're able to sell it.
	They probably will definitely try to.
	We're going to hit a break here in a second.
	When we come back, Nick, I want to get your thoughts on a few other stories, including how the corrupt FBI is now working to censor pro-Trump Americans ahead of the election.
	We'll listen to a clip from Kash Patel explaining exactly what they're doing, and we'll get your take, Nick, and I'll chime in my two cents.
	But everybody stay tuned.
	We have more.
	Plus, like I said, Nate Kane in the second hour, the FBI whistleblower.
	Just a lot of amazing, powerful information coming up here.
	Everybody stay tuned.
	You're listening to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	We'll be back after the break.
	Welcome back to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	I'm your host, Craig James.
	We're joined by our friend, friend of the show, Nick Ngo.
	We'll have some exciting news about him and how he'll be joining us going in the future coming up very soon.
	But Nick, You know, we have this clip I want to share.
	It's Kash Patel talking about how the FBI is now working to censor pro-Trump Americans ahead of the 2024 election.
	I thought this was sort of an appropriate clip to play as we're about to have in the second hour, Nate Kane, the FBI whistleblower who helped expose the FBI's cover-up of what took place with the Clinton Foundation and was actually cited as a part of the findings in the Durham report.
	as well as working with the Trump administration.
	He has a pretty interesting background.
	He's running for Congress.
	We're gonna have him on in just a second.
	But Nick, I wanna play this clip and I guess we'll just listen to the clip and then we'll kind of talk about it, all right? - Okay. - I love having you on the program because one, you have been so professionally right.
	You predict things months and years before they happen.
	You've done so on this program.
	We probably should build our own Cash Stinger, where it's like somebody telling the future, right?
	Like the great whatever Johnny Carson used to do, right?
	Where he'd hold stuff up to his head and he'd predict things.
	Well, I got one for you.
	I wasn't planning on rolling this out yet, but if you want one... Sure!
	Okay, well, I was going to continue my compliment, but please!
	Alright, so Chris Wray just testified to Congress, or informed Congress, that he is guaranteeing the election security of the United States of America.
	Now, you've got to ask yourself, wait a second, what does that mean?
	How can he do that?
	Somebody call Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and the other guys and ask them if they have canceled every one of their contracts with the FBI's Election Task Force to censor United States information.
	Ask them.
	Ask them if taxpayer-funded contracts are still in play from the FBI and DOJ to these social media giants and whether or not they are meeting with them weekly and monthly with FBI leadership to talk election security.
	So this is still ongoing?
	Yeah.
	What you're saying, like the same censorship regime for social media to ding people or ban them from questioning the results of the election, this is still ongoing?
	No, the same people that met leading up to the last election, the FBI and Twitter, the FBI and Facebook and their 80 person election security task force would go there and tell and suggest, oh, you can't put this out.
	You shouldn't put that out.
	It is not the FBI's job to tell media companies what they should and should not put out.
	And the media should be revolting.
	That a law enforcement agency is dictating to the media what they can and can't put out.
	But of course they're giving them a hall pass because what they don't want them putting out is anything pro-Trump.
	And we spent millions, tens of millions of dollars as taxpayers allowing for this election rig job to happen and we are essentially allowing it to happen again because no one at these companies is shredding these contracts.
	So that was Kash Patel on the Benny Johnson Show talking about how the FBI is still going to be working behind closed doors with this quote-unquote election integrity, you know, organizational effort.
	So, Nick, you know, This is all basically the same thing we just saw in 2020, right?
	What happened with that FBI agent who was brought up, Elvis Chan, and his interactions with lobbying for security clearances for people at Twitter.
	And then bringing those people into these meetings in the San Francisco office, FBI field office, telling them, you know, basically priming them for the Hunter Biden story so that they could pull the plug on that when it was necessary.
	What do you think, Nick, the next move will be?
	What do you think?
	Like, I guess more overly, you know, we know this is happening.
	What do you think the big story is going to be heading into the 2022 election that they're going to try to censor like they did with the Hunter Biden laptop story?
	Shoot, anything detrimental to the Bidens or the United States government, probably for that matter, they're probably going to try and have them censored.
	If they're still doing that, that's unconstitutional.
	But here's a thing, a way where we could get back at them.
	OK, so if they are doing that for only against one candidate, then even though it's completely illegal and they're getting paid to do it, You can then say that they are not listing in-kind donations to the candidate, which is illegal, too.
	And then that's illegal campaign finance violations, right?
	So we could do it that way and pull them into court and say, hey, look, you're getting paid for this, and you're not listing it as donations to this candidate.
	So it's illegal.
	That's one way to shine some light on it, I think.
	I agree a hundred percent.
	I mean, this, I guess my frustration, and I've said this before on the show, but I'll kind of reiterate it for you here so that we can discuss it, is, you know, I've been hearing this same thing about in-kind donations since, what, 2018 when Robert Epstein was warning us about the 2020 election saying all Mark Zuckerberg had to do was send out a go-vote, you know, notification and he could sway the election to the tune of millions of votes.
	And that this is all has been happening.
	And you talk about taking these guys to court.
	I get frustrated and maybe you feel the same frustration, Nick, that I do.
	But I don't know if you have any solution outside of what I've suggested, which I'll tell you my frustration and I'll tell you my suggested solution.
	Essentially, you know, I see it as almost impossible to get the people Uh, committing the crimes to then go and investigate themselves and prosecute themselves for committing the crimes because the same people working at the FBI and the DOJ who are behind these crimes are the ones that we would have to expect to bring charges against, you know, themselves essentially at that point.
	And my only solution I could figure out in my head And I don't even know how this works legally.
	It's the only one that seems to work in my brain, is to have constitutional sheriffs from across the country just start arresting these people.
	I don't care what federal badge they have.
	If they are committing crimes in the jurisdiction of a constitutional sheriff, he should have the authority to arrest them and bring charges against them there in that jurisdiction, because that's the only way I can see There being any sort of retribution for these crimes, you know what I mean, or culpability?
	What do you think of that?
	I think that is a brilliant plan.
	Let me tell you why.
	Because the National Guard can basically take the orders from the governor, right?
	And they can operate domestically.
	And they can also be deputized.
	The sheriffs have the ability to deputize whoever they want.
	It could be a homeless guy on the side of the street.
	And they can deputize them, give them a badge, give them arresting power, and if they do that, as you said, which would be genius, then, you know, sheriffs can arrest anybody.
	Anybody.
	Anybody.
	So I think that's a brilliant plan, Craig, and that's a solution.
	Well, that's my solution, and I'll get into a little more detail on that when we come back.
	Anyway, everybody stay tuned.
	We have much more to talk about, plus we're going to be joined by Nate Kane here very shortly, coming up in the second hour.
	Everybody stay tuned.
	If you want to call or text, the text line is open.
	Share your thoughts, 877-536-1360, or leave a comment in the comments below, or let me know what you're thinking in the live chat.
	We want to hear your thoughts on this.
	Everybody stay tuned.
	We'll be back.
	You're listening to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	Welcome back to Justformed Talk Radio.
	I'm your host Craig James.
	We're joined by our friend Nick Ngo, U.S.
	Air Force veteran, military intelligence background.
	He's the Benghazi whistleblower.
	He's been joining us as a co-host for the last, I don't know, a few weeks, right?
	So we're looking at You know, really working with him a lot going in the future.
	We're very excited about that.
	We'll make an official announcement coming up here soon.
	In the next hour, we're going to be having Nate Kane on the show.
	Hopefully, God willing, as long as everything works out, he is scheduled to be on with us.
	We're going to be talking to him about his incredible story and his new push to run for Congress.
	Very interesting.
	A gentleman who has an interesting background is an FBI whistleblower.
	But Nick, before the break and in our final segment, we were just talking about solutions for this problem that we see happening and coming where you're having, you know, would this be?
	A constitutional crisis if we have a situation unfold in this nation where we have to resort to having constitutional sheriffs deputize National Guard to arrest federal agents who are working, who are breaking laws in these jurisdictions by illegally doing things.
	First of all, I mean, the most Yes, absolutely.
	And clearly it's by design.
	And it's unconstitutional.
	is facilitating the invasion of America and essentially violating their constitutional oath.
	Right, Nick? - Yes, absolutely.
	And clearly it's by design and it's unconstitutional.
	They are derelict in their duties.
	And if, you know, as we were just describing as part of their duties that they swore to uphold and defend, they are supposed to protect the border And then if they are obstructing the ability to do so or inhibiting the ability to protect our border, they are in fact criminals.
	You're not supposed to follow unlawful orders.
	And I think you're genius.
	Behind that idea, and you should really contact people, and listeners should too, to encourage the sheriffs down on the borders to deputize the National Guard.
	Well, I mean, I can't lie.
	I've been saying this idea for a very long time now.
	It's been the only thing I see as a viable solution.
	That was exactly the thought I had right before the break, was that the best place to implement this to start would be constitutional sheriffs along the border, like you just said, because if they So, like we said, I mean, if they are able to, let's say, deputize the National Guard, then they can start arresting the Border Patrol agents when they go to remove the razor wire.
	Now, I don't know what happens when a constitutional sheriff with the Texas National Guard attempts to arrest a federal Border Patrol agent.
	I don't know.
	That could be, in and of itself, the shot that, you know, is heard around the world if something were to go off there.
	But I would imagine As long as these Border Patrol agents, I don't know that, you know, some of them are surely corrupt if they're letting this happen or they just don't care.
	But most, I would imagine, see what they're doing as being unjustifiable and I feel like they would stand down.
	What do you think?
	I think so too.
	They might have a sidearm or maybe even an AR that they barely use, but these guys are trained professionals and that would be a very bad idea to attack people from our military with fully automatic weapons who've been trained, heavily trained, to use them.
	I don't think that would end well for the U.S.
	Border Patrol, but I don't know.
	And I don't know how anyone would react.
	I mean, this is kind of, it's new territory for us in modern terms, at least.
	We haven't seen anything like this in quite some time.
	And again, like you said, like I said, I think it's by design.
	But when we come back, hopefully we'll get Nate Kane online sooner than later and get him going.
	But we have a lot more to talk about here.
	Nate Kane coming up in the second hour.
	Everybody stay tuned.
	You're listening to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	I'm your host, Craig James, joined by Nick Ngo.
	Make sure you text 877-536-1360.
	We just had somebody text in.
	Uh, and I'll share what they texted in just a minute.
	Everybody stay tuned.
	A big show coming up for the rest of this, uh, show.
	At least, Hour 2 coming up.
	Stay tuned.
	Welcome back to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	I'm your host, Craig James.
	Now, Hour 2 of the Just Informed Talk Radio show is going to be very interesting.
	We're going to be joined by a very special guest.
	You know him as Nate Kane.
	He is the FBI whistleblower who's got an incredible story that we're going to dive a little bit into.
	Plus, we're going to talk about his upcoming run for Congress and much more.
	Also, we're joined, as you guys know, by Nick Ngo, U.S.
	Air Force veteran, military intelligence insider, Benghazi whistleblower, as he's also commonly known.
	He's going to be with us as well in this second hour.
	We're very excited.
	Before we get them on, though, I want to take a second and thank one of the sponsors.
	You guys know it's WarriorMBS.com.
	You heard them over the break, but Warrior Mind, Body, Soul is an amazing program for men specifically.
	It's a team-oriented experience that's built on this premise that we need to make men stronger, to make this society better.
	It's all based in scriptural teachings.
	It's a Team-oriented experience that will help you increase your mental clarity, supercharge your physical fitness, and provide a fresh spiritual grounding that will support everything else you do.
	All you need to do is be 16 years or older and be an actual man.
	If you know what I mean, these days you have to be clear.
	The curriculum is based on a biblical worldview of men and masculinity, and all you need is a smartphone and about 30 to 45 minutes per day to get involved.
	Jeremy Sladen, former professional baseball player and a certified trainer, will help you personally set up a diet plan and a workout regimen.
	And you will be held accountable by other men, iron sharpening iron at its best, where in this experience you guys will be broken down into teams, and then you'll compete with one another against each other to hold each other to completing your goals and being successful as men should and then you'll compete with one another against each other to hold each It's really a powerful program.
	I'm thankful to them for being a sponsor.
	Make sure you go check them out today and set up that call with Jeremy.
	It's WarriorMBS.com.
	WarriorMBS.com.
	That stands for Mind, Body, Soul.
	WarriorMBS.com.
	Thanks to them for sponsoring the show.
	Without further ado, I want to bring on the guest we have for the second hour.
	You know, he's got a very interesting background.
	He's a veteran, and he's also known as the FBI federal whistleblower.
	He's been written about everywhere, and he's been around for quite some time, exposing a lot of the corruption that's happening.
	He was referenced in the Durham Report, and he's also got a very extensive background in cybersecurity.
	So, without further ado, I want to bring Nate Kane on the show.
	Nate, are you there?
	Yeah, I am.
	Thank you so much for having me on.
	Absolutely, Nate.
	It's a pleasure to have you on, and we're also joined by Nick Ngo.
	So, Nick, you can feel free to chime in whenever you want.
	Nate, I really wanted to have you on because, you know, we have some mutual friends and I feel like your story is going to become more and more important as we get closer to this upcoming election, not only for the fact that you're running for Congress, but for what you've been through up to this point.
	And I guess where I want to start to give our audience a little bit of background is could you explain How you became this quote-unquote FBI whistleblower, how did that all come about?
	And, you know, I think that's a good place to start for context if you want to just kind of expand a little bit on that so they can get an idea of your background.
	Then we can talk about, you know, your upcoming run for Congress and some other things as well.
	If you don't mind, could we start there, Nate?
	Sure.
	So I, as you mentioned, I'm an Army veteran.
	I got out of the military and I started working as a Navy civilian.
	Then I went to work as a Marine Corps civilian.
	And when I was with the Marines, I ended up being put into a very specialized unit.
	It's called a cyber protection team.
	That was really kind of my first introduction into the intelligence community.
	And I was detached.
	My unit was part of the national mission going after hackers that were hacking our national critical infrastructure.
	And so I got trained in cyber core, which is, you know, they basically teach you how to hack and how to find, you know, the enemies within the system.
	They, our unit became detached and attached, detached from the Marines and attached to the NSA.
	So while I was there at the NSA, I got read on to programs like FISA, Section 702, Intelligence Authorities, SIGINT, all of those kinds of surveillance tools that we hear about today that are oftentimes, unfortunately, being abused.
	But while I was there, and after I got through their schooling, it was pretty advanced training, I got offered a position working at the FBI as a cybersecurity subject matter expert, and I went there as a contractor.
	They offered me twice my salary, so it was pretty hard to turn down.
	But it was one of those moments where I was just extremely excited and proud to go work for the FBI.
	I've had law enforcement in my family for my whole life, and I had a great respect for the FBI.
	And when I went to work there, everything seemed fine.
	I was doing my job, you know, focused primarily on setting up, developing and architecting their vulnerability management system for all of their field offices and around the world.
	And what ended up happening was I came to the office one day and I overheard a conversation that I wish I hadn't heard, but I couldn't ignore it.
	But basically, it entailed allegations that somebody had seen transcripts of a conversation from the Seventh Floor, which is the senior leadership in the FBI, that the FBI had multiple investigations into Hillary Clinton, and that they had credible evidence of criminal activity, and they were going to shut down their investigations over fears that Hillary Clinton was going to become our next president, and they were afraid of reprisal from her.
	So they decided to shut down the investigations.
	Now, when I heard this, I couldn't believe it, but I couldn't ignore it.
	And so I went looking.
	I had access to, I had a top secret clearance.
	I had been read on to multiple programs.
	I had access to the FBI's internal database.
	And so I went and I did some searches and I did not find those transcripts.
	But what I did find was a lot of evidence, evidence that was being compiled
	on Hillary Clinton, evidence that was made up primarily of suspicious activity reports that had been reviewed and looked at by FinCEN and had analyst notes indicating a high credibility of four major crimes, and those were money laundering, public corruption, securities exchange fraud, and terrorism financing.
	And these had case numbers.
	They were being reviewed out of three different field offices, primarily the Little Rock, Arkansas field office, the New York field office, and the Washington field office.
	So at that point, I thought, well, you know, the rumors about them shutting anything down, that must just be rumors because, you know, they had case files.
	They had case numbers.
	They had three separate field offices.
	How could you possibly cover something that big up?
	And that's kind of how I thought about it.
	To be safe, I downloaded these files onto my government computer, classified computer, and I just kind of sat on it.
	And at the time, there was a lot of things that were going on within the FBI.
	And I remember, you know, you had the email investigation that was going on in the email server.
	The email server that was found in Chappaquiddick in Hillary Clinton's basement of her home up there.
	And this email server had become a big deal.
	They, you know, the FBI had investigated, and then they kind of closed it, and then they reopened it.
	And they had done a quick Down and dirty review of everything on there.
	Of course, the big kind of big warning sign to me was that her Wait, hold that thought.
	We're hitting a break.
	When we come back, pick it up.
	I mean, but Nate, you're talking about a server, you know, like you wipe it with a cloth, like that kind of server?
	Exactly.
	All right.
	No, when we come back, we're going to let Nate keep going.
	Everybody stay tuned.
	You're listening to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	We'll be back after this break.
	Welcome back to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	I'm your host, Craig James.
	We're joined by the FBI whistleblower Nate Kane, who is running for Congress in the second congressional district of West Virginia.
	We're going to talk to him about that in a minute.
	But before the break, we were letting him tell us about his background as the one of the quote unquote FBI whistleblowers who's come forward.
	His experience is something that we should really be paying attention to, especially as we come into another election year with so much on the line.
	And Nate, you know, you were you were basically We stopped and left off right where you were talking about this server that was uncovered in this, I think it was a bathroom, right?
	In Chappaquiddick, if I'm not mistaken.
	That's right.
	And this was the one that held the infamous 33,000 plus, I guess, emails that Hillary Clinton supposedly, or allegedly, I guess, or do we know now, I guess, deleted.
	Well, her lawyers, yeah, deleted them.
	Right.
	Go on.
	And what was significant about that, and that to me was like the first warning sign that there was something maybe to these rumors that they were going to cover something up.
	Because in all my years, and I've had a top secret clearance for 26 years, I've worked for government, various agencies, various, you know, DOD.
	Um, groups and what I will tell you is there's been probably four or five times that I've been subpoenaed, uh, where, you know, there were emails that had gone out and they wanted to review those.
	And I was told clearly, you know, without any kind of misunderstanding, do not delete these, these emails or you will be guilty of a crime.
	And so the fact that she was subpoenaed for that server, and then her lawyers deleted those emails, and nobody ever was charged with a crime for that, that was kind of, to me, the very first warning sign.
	But then, as you'll remember, Comey went out in front of the J. Edgar Hoover Building, and on that day, when he had the infamous press conference where he basically said, Oh yeah, Hillary Clinton had all of these classified thousands of classified emails on that server.
	And in addition to those thousands of classified just secret and confidential, they also had seven email chains that had what they call special access programs.
	So for those that don't understand what that is, that's above top secret.
	So a special access program is something that's compartmentalized, that it's usually the kind of information that could get people killed.
	And so it's extremely protected.
	When I've had to get access to some SAPs, as we call them, I've had to do things like go to see my security manager, and this is inside of a secure compartmentalized information facility, what we call a SCIF.
	I go to the security manager.
	I have to sign for access to that document.
	It's usually in a folder kept in a safe.
	They have to unlock the safe.
	Only two people have the combination of that safe.
	Then I look at-- she has to verify that I am somebody who's on the inside cover of that cover letter for that special access program.
	And then it's carried into a safe room within the SCIF to where they have specialized equipment to prevent surveillance.
	And I go into there to read it.
	They don't want anybody, even with autopsies of clearance, seeing these documents by, you know, walking by and, you know, shoulder surfing, you know, and overseeing something that they shouldn't be seeing.
	And so then when I'm done, I have to close it up with the cubs letter and then bring it back to her and it gets put back into the safe and signed back in.
	That's how serious this is.
	So the fact that there were seven saps or seven email chains with saps in them on her email server was very telling to me because you can't just get something.
	You can't just accidentally email that, you know, out of a skiff or out of the top secret network.
	That's something that is very protected, and you would have to, with intent, walk that out.
	And so all of that, by the way, falls under the Espionage Act.
	So the moment that they said, he said all of that, and then he goes, but no reasonable prosecutor would bring a charge against her for that.
	And he talked about how she was unsophisticated and all of this and giving these excuses.
	And as you mentioned before we went to the break about how she made that claim, what do you mean?
	Wipe it with a cloth?
	I mean, all of that was Kabuki theater.
	She knew darn well what she was doing, because see, as a classification authority, which the Secretary of State is, she would have been highly trained in how to handle classified documents.
	But at that time that all of that was going on, that press That, uh, press meeting was happening.
	Um, what ended up occurring was I'm sitting in my cubicle and, and I hear all of a sudden I hear my, my, uh, my boss, the, uh, unit chief.
	So the information assurance division cussing and swearing in his office.
	And so I get up and I walk over, I had a good relationship with him and I, you know, stepped in his office.
	I'm like, Chuck, what's going on?
	And he, And he was just, he was watching the news and watching this press release, a press conference, and he said, we at the FBI, we don't make determinations.
	We only investigate, meaning they don't, they don't choose whether or not to bring an indictment.
	That's not the FBI's job.
	That's the Department of Justice's job.
	The FBI's job is simply to investigate and then provide their findings to the Department of Justice.
	And so when he said that, I was still kind of being naive at the time, and I said, well, do you think maybe, because I knew about all this other stuff that I had found when I'd been looking into things, I said, do you think maybe they're going light on her with this server because they're going to bring some major charges on other stuff?
	And he goes, no, they're covering this up.
	And at that moment, that's when I realized I had to make a decision.
	So at that point, I walked back to my desk and I sat there kind of stunned for a while.
	And I prayed about it, and I felt very clearly that God had put me there at that time and at that place for a reason.
	And so I prayed, and I felt the Lord give me a confirmation that He had me there for that reason, and I needed to do the right thing.
	Now, it took a time, because I had to figure out how to do this.
	The people involved in covering this up were essentially Robert Mueller, who now was, you know, was the special prosecutor being sent out against, you know, Trump.
	It was also Comey, who was, you know, now was the FBI director, but at the time of Uranium One, which was a lot of these documents and the money laundering stuff was about that.
	He was the deputy director and Robert Mueller was the FBI director.
	But you also had Michael Atkinson, who was the At the time was the head of public corruption, but now was the Intelligence Community Inspector General, the guy who I would have to go through in order to file a whistleblower complaint.
	And then you had the Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein, who was the U.S.
	Attorney in charge of the investigation into all of the stuff related to Uranium One.
	Now, all of this stuff's going on, and I'm going, how in the heck can I even report this?
	Because everybody in my chain of command, essentially at the senior level, was involved in the cover-up.
	So, I spent some time doing some research, and I found that within the law, I could take the stuff directly to any of the two intelligence committees, and I could hand over documents to a senior staff member.
	I had a courier card, which allowed me to carry top-secret documents outside the FBI.
	And so I just needed to make an arrangement, but you know, this is scary stuff.
	You're talking about very, very powerful people who I was essentially going to, you know, blow the whistle on.
	And, uh, you know, including, you know, people within our own government and also Hillary Clinton, uh, and Russian intelligence agents.
	And so, uh, I ended up making arrangements through a, uh, YouTuber who had, he had, he had done some interviews of some pretty prominent whistleblowers.
	Um, one of them, I mean, Bill Binney, who was the NSA whistleblower, and I figured he may have some contacts in Washington, D.C.
	I knew he was a Christian as well.
	He always ended his show with a Bible verse.
	So I reached out to him.
	Sure enough, he did have those connections.
	He had a connection with somebody who could walk in and talk to Devin Nunez, who was the chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
	And so we set up a clandestine meeting.
	On, it was 2017, October 31st, I walked out of the FBI with over 458 classified, you know, pages of classified documents on a thumb drive and met with Bill Still, this was the journalist or YouTuber, and then
	Um, we met with a senior staffer to Devin Nunez and drove around the Capitol for about three hours while I debriefed him on everything that was on that thumb drive.
	And at the end of that conversation, he asked me, can you go back in and get some more information for us?
	And at this point I was just like, Oh my gosh, are you serious?
	This took every bit of courage to do that.
	And now they want me to go back in.
	I only had a week left, but they were specifically looking for him.
	Yeah.
	They were looking for an intelligence report that they had word on.
	That would prove, because it would show, it would be dated, it would have to be documented, and it would show that the FBI knew well in advance of the CFIUS Committee, which is the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., there was a document that would prove the FBI knew that a Russian energy company named Rosatom was dirty and was trying to infiltrate our uranium supply chain with a bribery and kickback scheme.
	And they had all the evidence of this, and yet they failed to notify the CFIUS committee, and they allowed for essentially the sale of 20% of our uranium supply to Russia through this company.
	Uranium One was a Canadian mining company, but they were processing 20% of the U.S.
	uranium supply chain.
	And it ended up that company was being sold to Rosatom, this Russian energy company, even though Rosatom was known to be dirty.
	So they allowed for this to happen, knowing that information.
	And so that was essentially the bulk of what I was bringing out.
	But what I brought out had a lot of other stuff in there, including, like I said, there were documents that showed that regular payments and actually, this is how I met Nick Ngo.
	There were regular payments that were coming out of the Clinton Foundation, being wired through multiple shell bank accounts, and ending up into the account of somebody who was on the terrorism watch list, and he was the head spokesman of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
	And all of this, by the way, was in the run-up to the Arab Spring.
	And I think that this was all, you know, part of a essentially a plot to, you know, cover up criminal activity that was going on with gun running, guns that were being moved in Syria and all of that.
	And Nick, of course... Yeah, we had to arm the moderate rebels, right?
	Wasn't that the thing?
	I mean, your story is incredible, Nate.
	I cannot tell you.
	I mean, I followed it in real time from, you know, the moment I first heard your name.
	I've been having people tell me about what you're doing and to follow your work.
	And I've seen it kind of evolve over the years where you kind of expose us.
	Do you feel, and I want to let Nick jump in.
	Nick, if you have anything you want to ask or share, please feel free to jump right in.
	But, I was just gonna say, you know, although I'm sure you feel vindicated, Nate, for the fact that the information's been made public now and that people are aware, is it frustrating that there's still been no recourse for these crimes?
	Oh, without a doubt, it's extremely frustrating.
	You know, in the end, the only person that paid any price was me.
	After I completed my disclosure, and eventually I ended up going through the Department of Justice, IG, to get that secondary bit of information to both the House and the Senate Intel Committees.
	But four months after I completed my disclosure, the Democrats took over the House, and I'm pretty sure that, you know, Adam Schiff became chairman.
	I'm pretty sure they leaked those documents back to the FBI.
	They were able to figure out who it was that had accessed them, and I got raided.
	By the FBI at my home in Maryland.
	And they put my family through quite an ordeal.
	In the end, I was never charged.
	Not even a suspension on my security clearance.
	And I still hold my clearance today.
	But they put us through hell.
	And nobody, you know, who was actually a criminal in this matter, did any time.
	And then to make matters worse, the judge that signed off on the search warrant of my home, there was a, this was a A Maryland magistrate, the Daily Caller, had sent a FOIA request to that magistrate asking the singular question, was the judge notified that Dennis Nathan Kane was a protected whistleblower under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act before signing off on that search warrant?
	And a Clinton-appointed judge put a seal on that answer, and then she sealed her justification for putting a seal on that answer.
	Think about how corrupt that is.
	The very people who I was blowing the whistle on was, of course, the FBI, but also the Clintons.
	And then a Clinton judge puts a seal on the answer as to whether or not, essentially, that search warrant was illegal.
	That's wild.
	It is.
	And, of course, the FBI doxed my name because I had anonymity.
	They doxed my name, making me public.
	Ultimately, they doxed me to the New York Times.
	Somebody at the New York Times decided to run a hit piece on me.
	I ended up getting poisoned twice.
	I had somebody loosen the lug nuts on my vehicle right before a long trip.
	I had multiple death threats on social media, and it was a horrifying time.
	I ended up having to leave and flee Maryland and move to West Virginia, where at least here, I can protect myself, and I can exercise my Second Amendment.
	Brother, I know that God is at work in your life, man.
	I can tell you that right now.
	This is a Christian show, and we put Christ first, and I can see that He's there, man.
	He's protecting us, and we're going to come back.
	We're going to talk about West Virginia and a lot more.
	Everybody stay tuned.
	You're listening to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	We'll be back.
	Welcome back to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	I'm your host Craig James.
	We're joined by the FBI whistleblower who basically blew the lid on the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton crimes right there that were and still are being covered up by the FBI, Nate Kane, who is also running for Congress in the 2nd Congressional District of West Virginia.
	And I want to talk about that.
	Right before we left, though, Nate, you really dropped a bomb, you know, talking about what you experienced post, you know, blowing the whistle and coming forward and exposing all these crimes.
	And one thing you said that stood out to me, kind of is ringing in my head, is that you said, you know, I exposed all these people, but I'm the only one who suffered any consequences or retribution for these crimes.
	You talked about being poisoned and having, you know, people make threats on your life and loosening love nuts on your car.
	Obviously, that's a threat to, you know, your safety and your family.
	You know, I said right as we were leaving, you know, God has a mission for us.
	You know, we as Christians are to live a certain way and to act with integrity and to do the right thing.
	And when you do that, you know, it may not be easy and it may come at a certain cost, but God will be there to protect you.
	And I believe that that's what's happening with you, brother.
	And I gotta say thank you.
	Thank you for what you're doing, and I hope you're an encouragement to others to see that, you know, even if there isn't an instant justice, that God will not only protect you, but He will ultimately deliver us through all of this, right?
	Absolutely.
	There were some miraculous things that occurred, and I should share them with you, just because I think your listeners would want to hear this, and I think it will encourage them.
	Um, one of the things is that when I blew the whistle, when I did through my second disclosure and I had to go through the IG, um, I had to get a lawyer and it was not cheap.
	I mean, you know, the, I met with this lawyer and he basically right off the bat asked me, are you independently wealthy?
	And, you know, do you have, or do you have any rich relatives?
	And I told him, I said, no.
	And I said, why are you asking?
	He says, cause I'm expensive.
	It was $750 an hour.
	And he was one of the best whistleblowing attorneys in all of Washington, DC.
	But, uh, I didn't have the money for that.
	And I asked him if he could do a pro bono and he laughed and said, are you kidding me?
	You're going up against Hillary Clinton, the FBI and Justice Department leadership and Russian intelligence agency.
	He said, my law partner would throw me out of the office if I tried to do this pro bono.
	That's way too much liability.
	And so I went home that night and I wept.
	I got with my wife.
	I thought my life was over.
	I was going to either end up dead, or in jail, or both.
	And I got on my knees, and we got on our knees together, and we just prayed, and prayed, and prayed.
	And then eventually went to bed, and I woke up every hour on the hour just filled with anxiety.
	And all I could do, you know, was what I know to do.
	when your situations are out of your hands, I just got on my knees and would pray, and then I'd go back to bed, and then I'd wake up again and get on my knees and pray and go back to bed.
	This went on for like two days, and then I got a phone call from that attorney.
	And his name's Michael, and Michael calls me up, and he goes, well, Nate, he says something interesting happened.
	He says, I went down to Nashville to go talk to a lady that I know down there.
	She's 80-something years old.
	She has more money than she needs.
	And I thought maybe she'd be willing to donate $10,000 or something like that to get you a legal fund started.
	And while he was talking to her, she asked him about what happened, and she asked him what this was going to end up costing me, and he said probably a couple hundred thousand dollars.
	She pulled out her checkbook and wrote a check for $200,000.
	Wow.
	And then we went into an escrow account that, with multiple lawyers and co-counsels and everything else, ended up coming to $196,000.
	So it covered everything.
	God is so good.
	God answers our prayers, man.
	I mean, that's incredible.
	He does.
	So that was kind of miracle number one.
	The second miracle occurred when we were, after we had some money, about two weeks later, we decided to go get some counsel from a defense attorney.
	And we wanted to go meet with Victoria Towsing and Joda Genova.
	Victoria Towsing was representing the other Uranium One whistleblower, a guy by the name of William James Campbell.
	He was an FBI informant who had been informing on situations related to Uranium One and 10X.
	And so we went to go see her, but right before we went in, I was just, you know, again, still stressed out.
	And I just asked Michael, I said, Michael, can we pray before we go?
	And he said, yes.
	And he grabbed me by the hand and we prayed, sitting in his car.
	And right about then, I had this flashback memory from 10 years earlier.
	My wife and I had been at a church in Southern California, in Moreno Valley, a church named Palm Canyon Christian Fellowship.
	And we had gone through this exercise where they were having the church basically practice this practice of learning to hear God's voice.
	And so what we were doing was we were praying and fasting, and then we were supposed to sit quietly with a notepad and listen for that still small voice and write down what we hear.
	Well, I did that, and all I heard was, go to Saccars.
	So I wrote it down.
	And then, you know, this was back before cell phones.
	I got on my computer.
	Well, cell phones were there, but we didn't have the smartphones.
	But I got on my computer, and I got onto MapQuest, and I looked for some place called Saccars.
	Didn't exist.
	My wife even remembered this story, because at the time, she was a Spanish major, and she thought, well, maybe I heard wrong.
	Maybe I heard God wrong.
	Maybe it was Socorro, which means health in Spanish.
	And there was a place named Socorro, New Mexico.
	But I told her, I said, no, I know what I heard.
	It was Sicaris.
	But we couldn't find anything.
	So I just kind of forgot about it.
	So now, fast forward 10 years later, I'm sitting in the car with Michael.
	He's praying with me.
	He says amen, and I realized, I had this flashback of that memory, and I realized his last name is Sicaris.
	Michael Sicaris.
	And what's amazing about this is I didn't even pick him.
	I ended up calling on my friend, who is Bill Still, to find me a lawyer because I was too scared to come out of hiding.
	And so, he had found this guy, Michael Sicaris.
	And so when I had that revelation that 10 years earlier the Lord had told me, go to Sicaris, it wasn't obviously And I think oftentimes, a lot of times, the Lord speaks to us in that way.
	This, what it did for me, though, is it completely removed all fear.
	standing next to the temple, he says, "Destroy this temple in three days, I'll rebuild it." They didn't understand what he meant until afterwards.
	Absolutely.
	And I think oftentimes, a lot of times, the Lord speaks to us in that way.
	This, what it did for me, though, is it completely removed all fear.
	At that point, I knew exactly that I was right where God had intended me to be for 10 years He had been guiding my steps so that I would be there at that moment, at that moment in time.
	Well, I mean, he knows how many hairs are on our head, and he knows where we are headed before we know, and I think You know, the serendipity of God's plan when it comes together is one of the most magnificent things you'll ever experience.
	And to all of our listeners out there, I encourage you to really strengthen your faith.
	And if you haven't accepted Christ, now is your opportunity to repent.
	Accept Him and watch Him do things in your life that you never thought were possible.
	I've seen it in my own life, Nate, and I can see that it's happened in yours.
	And before we go further, we're hitting a break here in a minute.
	I want to bring Nick on.
	Since he's been with us since the beginning, Nick, is there anything you want to ask him going into the break, and then we can give him time to respond coming back?
	Yes, I want to say something and then ask something.
	So, if you're not paying attention, you won't be able, like Nate has, to see miracles like this happen.
	And for him, everybody has, I'm sure, plenty of them happen in their lives.
	Some people You need to really start paying attention to that when those things happen in your life.
	It lets you know you're on the right track.
	So I wanted to ask him, in regards to the Uranium One deal and all that, there's a gag order put on the witness that was the informant for the FBI.
	Rod Rosenstein did that, at least that's the way I understand it.
	And he was kept from talking.
	I kind of wonder, What exactly they had going on?
	I heard a rumor that Robert Mueller even personally was involved in delivering the Uranium One sample to Moscow in 2009, which could make a lot of sense.
	But, you know, I think that this goes much more, much deeper than anybody really kind of understands, you know, because I've even heard rumors that, you know, combined with that, besides the email stuff that David Kendall The same person that represented Clinton in the bleach bid and Whitewater and other scandals.
	He was trying to get the money, $1.2 billion of Gaddafi's money that was hidden from the United Nations via two 40-foot cargo containers.
	He was tasked to go recover that money.
	It might be all tied to that, too, with the money laundering.
	And I wonder if that same money ended up in the Clintons and their foundation.
	Because after the Uranium One deal, they ended up getting, what was it?
	I think it was $145 million, quote-unquote, donation to the Clinton Foundation.
	It's just a big criminal enterprise, right?
	I want Nate to respond.
	We're coming back.
	Stay tuned.
	You're listening to Justaform Talk Radio.
	Welcome back to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	I'm your host, Craig James.
	Now we're joined by a very special guest, Nate Kane.
	He's known as the FBI whistleblower.
	Nate, so I want you to respond to what Nick's statement in question was before the break.
	And, you know, maybe we're going to have to schedule you to come back, Nate, because there's so much we didn't even touch on your work with the Trump administration or your work as far as the 2020 election goes.
	I do want to have you respond to what Nick was saying, and then have you and Nick kind of go at it for a minute.
	And then I really want to make sure that we talk about your run for Congress, Nate, and get that out there and get people information on that in West Virginia.
	So let's start with, Nate, you responding to what Nick was saying before the break, and I'll let you and Nick go at it for a minute.
	Sure.
	I want to just comment real quickly on the intro song coming in on this last segment by Johnny Cash.
	The Lord actually spoke to me about that song, and so it's very interesting that it was playing as I was coming in, because I really do feel like that's what my run for Congress is all about.
	It's about being God's instrument to go down to Washington, D.C.
	to call out the corruption and to call out the evil that has been going on in our country for far too long.
	And so it's pretty interesting to hear that song as I was coming in.
	Oh, amen, brother.
	This is God's plan.
	It's a serendipity, man.
	It's all there.
	It is.
	Yeah, go to Nick's and then we'll let Nick go for a second.
	I mean, Nate, you can answer.
	Oh, sure.
	Yeah, so to answer Nick's question, yes, there absolutely is something more that's going on.
	They've been so secretive and they've hidden so many things.
	One of the things that was interesting is that thumb drive, I was authorized to maintain by the Department of Justice IG Michael Horowitz.
	In case the HPSE or the Senate Intel Committee did nothing, I could take it to the Judiciary Committee.
	And the FBI, when they raided me, it seemed their sole purpose was to get their hands on that thumb drive and get it out of my possession.
	And there was a lot of evidence on there.
	Um, so, you know, there was, there was a lot going on at that time in North Africa.
	Um, there were some things that were going on.
	Um, I think I've, I've mentioned this before in a few interviews, although it's been a while.
	Um, but there was a guy by the name of Mark Terry that was involved in gun running, uh, legally.
	Uh, he was called in by the state department.
	He had come up with this plan on how to get weapons to the Syrians.
	by basically, because we couldn't sell directly to them, by selling them to basically the Qatar, and then the Qataris would then give those weapons to the rebels in Syria.
	The problem is, and it was all small arms only, but what ended up happening was in an interview that came out later, he said that he was basically removed from that project, and they kicked him out of the plan, and Hillary Clinton took over, and they kicked him out of the plan, and Hillary Clinton took over, and she decided to add Stinger missiles and other things to
	And, and I think a lot of the evidence of that was known, you know, by the embassy in Benghazi.
	And so a lot of it had to do with that.
	And, and there's some suspicion that, that the whole reason why Hillary Clinton gave the stand down order on Benghazi on, you know, saving, you know, the lives of those that were in Benghazi was in order to allow that whole thing to burn to the ground to get rid of all the evidence.
	And that has been talked about by many, and that's actually how I met Nick, because we were piecing pieces together between what I knew and what he knew, and we were seeing this pattern of illegal
	I would just interject also that it reminds me of Steven Paddock with the arms dealing stuff and what happened there in Las Vegas during that mass shooting.
	But Nick, I want you to wrap it up with any other questions and then we're going to give Nate a chance to talk about his upcoming election.
	You there, Nick?
	Are you muted?
	I just want to come out on the Egyptian embassy.
	I apologize.
	So the Egyptian embassy was given up during the Benghazi attacks as well.
	It's related to what you talked about.
	Hillary Clinton had just visited Egypt prior to that.
	And then the Egyptian dictator that was later killed during his trial from poison, this is dirt.
	Before the recess, he was poisoned.
	He actually said that he had dirt on powerful world leaders.
	and then he was murdered in between and during recess.
	I wonder if it has to do with the money that Gaddafi had hidden in two 40-foot cargo containers in Ghana, in particular, where David Kendall tried to launder the money back to the United States.
	I wonder if it had something to do with that.
	But that isn't really too much out there spread, that information.
	But I have pretty good sources on this, and I think that that's pretty true.
	I wonder if that's even in all that data that you had.
	That's possible.
	There were so many countries that were involved in, because basically what I have had all of the money trail coming from multiple countries around the world, many of them that are on a list that you cannot take money from, and it was being funneled through multiple charities.
	Eventually making it into the Clinton Foundation, and there was money going out from the Clinton Foundation paying for supposed construction projects in places like Africa and Haiti and things like that, where there was not really any kind of, you know, these companies were clearly shell corporations, they weren't building anything.
	That reminds me, so this is the reason I found out about this, and she was trying to launder the money to Turkey through a construction project, and so it's kind of weird that you say that, and I've got pretty good details on that.
	Yeah, so it's always a dangerous thing when Nick and I get together.
	Well, yeah, I was going to say, Nate, I don't know if you're interested.
	We may have to bring you back on and do maybe even the whole two hours because there is so much we can unpack.
	But we have a couple we have a couple seconds.
	Tell everybody about your run coming up for Congress.
	I'll let you talk about more on the other side of the break.
	But just just tell us what you know you plan to do.
	I think you already gave us a good idea.
	But what is that looking like now?
	Well, in November of 22, after the election, and you had mentioned that I had worked on some election integrity things back in 2020, I was so disappointed to see that a lot of the same stuff that went on in 2020 happened again in 2022.
	And I prayed, and I was with my family, we were having prayer time in the morning, and I just said, God, I pray that you would raise up righteous men and women to run for office.
	And you know, you better be careful when you pray prayers like that, because I heard very clearly the Lord speak to me and say, what about you?
	And my immediate response was, hold on a minute, Lord.
	I meant other righteous people, not me.
	You'd have to be insane to run for office right now.
	You know, I mean, it's like when this whole, you know, when this whole thing goes down, the people that they're going to want to hang is going to be on the top in Congress.
	Brother, brother, we'll talk about it.
	Why would I want to do that?
	We're hitting the break.
	We'll come back.
	Perfect segue.
	We'll be back.
	Everybody stay tuned.
	You're listening to Just One Talk Radio.
	We'll be back in just a second.
	Welcome back to Just Form Talk Radio.
	I'm your host Craig James.
	We're joined here by Nate Kane and Nick Nonick.
	Thank you for joining us again.
	We'll see you again tomorrow.
	I want to give Nate a second to kind of just finish up his thoughts and give anybody information about how they can, you know, help contribute to his campaign and support him.
	That I want to do.
	And then, Nate, interestingly enough, we do end every show with our God's Grace is Greater.
	As soon as you're able, because I really want to keep going into some of the other stuff, like working with Trump and the 2020 election.
	And this is going to be a big show.
	Go ahead and take it from there, Nate.
	So, yeah, as I said, you know, I kind of started off this campaign as a reluctant candidate and just being obedient to the Lord.
	But what's happened is, as I've gone out, talked to the people, My district is huge.
	It's the whole northern half of the state.
	It's a rural area.
	It's a lot of distance, and there's 27 counties in my district.
	So, we're doing a lot of traveling and getting out and talking to a lot of people and running a very grassroots campaign.
	And what's happened is, as I've gone out there talking to people and hearing what they've been praying for, essentially, for the last five years, is for God to raise a righteous man to That's a heavy burden.
	It's a humbling experience to know that you've got people that are praying and they're hoping that you are somebody that is going to live up to that standard.
	So first and foremost, I ask that people please pray for me.
	Pray that God will help to keep me within His alignment and what He wants me to be doing.
	Um, but also I do need help.
	Um, one of the things is I'm running against a lot of very powerful people.
	It's an open seat.
	But the fact is, is that the state party leadership and a lot of the people that are, you know, kind of in the political world have already chosen the successor.
	And the guy who they've chosen as a successor, Riley Moore, he's got some interesting connections.
	He was the vice president of the Podesta Group.
	He was a foreign registered agent with multiple countries, including Iraq and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Azerbaijan, Hong Kong, and he was a He was an unregistered agent working and lobbying on behalf of the Ukraine.
	So tell them where to go.
	Tell them where to go, because we only got a minute left.
	Okay, so the best place to donate to my campaign is go to my website.
	It is natecain4wv.com.
	That's n-a-t-e-c-a-i-n, the number four, wv.com.
	There's a donate here link up in the upper right hand corner.
	And that is the best way that people can help me, because I am running a 100% I don't have any PAC money.
	I got no corporate lobbyists donating to me.
	None of that.
	It's all coming from, you know, people like you and like your listeners all over the country, 40 different states.
	But, you know, I'm being outraged 10 to 1 without a doubt.
	And I think God does that intentionally because this is a bit of a... Well, I was going to share this verse real quick.
	Everybody go to NateCain4wv.com, support his campaign.
	And I was going to share Romans chapter 5.
	It talks about how...
	When we face affliction, we have to trust that it will produce endurance, and that that endurance will help us find a proven character, and that that proven character will help us lead others to hope.
	That's what I think you're doing.
	That's the affliction we're all facing in these times that are so unstable.
	But Nate, thank you for joining us.
	We're going to work on getting you back on, brother, because I want to give you the full two hours to go, you, me, and Nick, and just get all this out there.
	Thank you to everybody for tuning in.
	Thank you to Nick Ngo for joining us today on the show and getting through so many interesting topics.
	Thank you to Nate Kane.
	Go support his run for Congress.
	Nate Kane, the number four, WV.com.
	Stay tuned.
	Great show's coming up next.
	I'm your host, Craig James.
	We'll see you tomorrow, God willing.
	Until then, Godspeed and God bless each and every one of you patriots.
	Are you prepared for the next financial collapse?
	I want you to know that the structural case for gold and silver in portfolios is growing stronger every day.
	With the economic outlook more uncertain and geopolitical risks rising each day, gold and silver are a store of value that can protect your assets more effectively than any other investment around.
	That's why Craig James of Just Informed Talk Radio has partnered with the folks at All American Gold to provide you with the most direct and cost-effective way I think so.

▲