All Episodes
Previous Next
April 24, 2023 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
35:28
What's The REAL REASON Behind Fox News' FIRING Of Tucker Carlson? | JustInformed News #324
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi, welcome to another episode of Just Informed News.
I'm your host, Craig.
We have a lot to talk about here today.
We're starting with this major breaking news story that just took place not too long ago.
Apparently it's been announced that Tucker Carlson has decided to part ways with Fox News.
We're not exactly sure of all the details yet.
However, Fox News has released a statement stating that Tucker Carlson is no longer with the network and that his last show was apparently last week.
And there was no announcement of this, no warning, no nothing.
We're going to look at the details surrounding what's happening, all the theories that are being speculated online.
The truth is going to shock you, I believe, because, or it might not, either way, There is a lot we're going to dive into.
We're going to dive into what everyone's saying is happening, what's possibly going to be coming in the future.
This is a major story because Tucker Carlson is, in fact, the highest rated cable news host in history.
So this isn't just anybody leaving.
This is somebody who's going to be able to make a huge difference wherever they end up landing.
We're going to talk about what's going to be happening there, plus a bunch of other news stories we're going to try to get through here.
We're going to talk about Hunter Biden apparently trying to hide in the White House to avoid some very sticky legal issues.
We're going to talk about also something that they don't want us to really look at, the truth about what's happening in Sudan.
Apparently right now as we speak, there's a pretty disastrous situation taking place in the country of Sudan, but it's just another manufactured color revolution as per the global war Between the East and the West, essentially, the war between Russia and the United States is happening in Africa as we speak.
We're going to talk about how that's happening and what the timelines look like there.
Plus, we have a lot of other news stories to get through other than all of that, and we're going to try to hit every one of them.
So, with that being said, we're going to start, though, by saying thank you to the sponsors of this video.
You guys know them as Noble Gold.
Noble Gold Investments have made it their mission to stay on top of the most important economic news.
Three bank runs in the last month.
These are the second and third largest in history.
The government is taking steps to guarantee all deposits.
That means more money printing.
Plus, the Fed is sitting on unrealized losses of around $1.2 trillion on their $8.3 trillion bond portfolio.
And the Fed will continue to raise interest rates even if they tank the economy.
Do you know who are the only ones not afraid?
The ones who are invested with Noble Gold Investments in gold.
Gold is the most stable asset outside of any government control and thousands have approached Noble Gold Investments to get their hands on gold.
Hurry and go to noblegoldinvestments.com to secure your wealth now.
And you'll get a free five ounce America the Beautiful coin with each gold or silver IRA if you qualify.
Remember that's noblegoldinvestments.com.
Again, that's noblegoldinvestments.com.
Thank you to them for sponsoring this episode.
Go check it out.
More links in the description if you're interested in that.
But with that being said, let's just start with the first story here.
Tucker Carlson is out at Fox.
Tucker Carlson, the highest-rated cable news host in history, is out at Fox News.
The news comes days after the network cut ties with the host Dan Bongino, 48 hours after the network settled with Dominion Systems for nearly $800 million.
This is a huge story.
Let's look at the actual statement from Fox News.
Anomaly posted this, which I thank him for doing, a friend of the show.
He posted this blurb from Fox News.
This is their press release as of today.
It says, quote, Fox News Media And Tucker Carlson have agreed to part ways.
We thank him for his service to the network as a host and prior to that as a contributor.
Mr. Carlson's last program was Friday, April 21st.
Fox News Tonight will air live at 8 p.m.
starting this evening as an interim show helmed by rotating Fox News personalities until a new host is named.
Fox News Media operates the Fox News Channel, Fox Business, Fox Digital, Okay, so does that mean that he's not going to be on the Fox Nation website anymore?
And Fox is international and free ads for television service.
Fox weather currently number one network and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Okay.
So does that mean that he's not going to be on the Fox nation website anymore?
It looks like it.
And so you have to start asking yourself, well, what happened?
Why is Tucker leaving?
First off, I'll tell you my quick take on Tucker, why I like him, why I think he's got the right ideas on so many different things.
I'll disagree with him from here and there, time to time.
But overall, I think he's got the right idea.
So what do I think about this?
Well, I think that Tucker's going to go and make a huge stir in the world.
Maybe he's running Planning to run with Trump as a vice president of Canada?
I'm not sure.
Could he run and make a big wave?
Yeah.
Could he run against Trump and probably get a huge amount of votes?
Yeah, he probably could.
He could definitely beat DeSantis.
He's, like I said, the highest rated cable news anchor in the history of this country.
And I think Tucker Carlson as president is a very, um, let's just say a very interesting thought, you know, talk about somebody who will just shake up the establishment.
Now, again, there are things that I disagree with Tucker on, but he seems to be evolving and willing to learn and become better as time goes on.
Now, who knows if any of this is going to happen?
He may just end up going to Rumble and making his own channel and making millions of dollars there, you know, tens of millions, maybe a hundred million bucks.
But what are some of the speculations about why he was fired?
Here's one from Robert Kennedy Jr.
over on Twitter who says, Fox fires at Tucker Carlson five days after he crosses the red line by acknowledging that the TV networks pushed a deadly and ineffective vaccine to please their pharma advertisers.
Carlson's breathtakingly courageous April 19th monologue broke TV's two biggest rules.
Tucker told the truth about how greedy pharma advertisers controlled TV news and content, and he lambasted obsequious newscasters for promoting jabs they knew to be lethal and worthless.
For many years, Tucker has had the nation's biggest audience averaging 3.5 million, ten times the size of CNN.
Fox just demonstrated the terrifying power of big pharma.
Okay.
Well, there's that possibility.
And I think that's a reasonable one.
Tucker did go on a monologue the other night about the insidious connection between Big Pharma, their lobby, their advertisers, and the news progenitors who lie on behalf of these companies to try to deceive you into doing things that are probably against your best interests as far as your health and well-being was concerned.
Is that it?
Is that the only reason?
Well, now there's a few other things.
This weekend, he gave a speech, and I watched this actually randomly.
I wasn't planning on watching it.
I just happened to catch it online.
But in this speech that he gave to the Heritage Foundation, he said a lot of things that probably stirred a lot of people the wrong way or shook them in the wrong direction.
And one of the things he said was right here.
We'll watch this clip of him Giving a speech where he talks about transgenderism, of all things.
And, uh, could this be part of the reason as well that Fox News is getting... I mean, we all know.
Let's just be honest, though.
What are we getting into?
We all know why they fired, right?
We all know.
Are we not in agreement on this?
Like, it's so obvious.
He's one of the few people that actually tells the truth on television.
And even then, He was handcuffed.
He could only say so much.
I mean, but the fact of the matter is that he, like us, sees things that are obviously truthful and honest and real, and he'll say it how it is, for the most part.
I'm not saying he's perfect and everything he says is factually true and that he's 100% right about everything, but I am saying he's like the only person on the television left who doesn't lie, who doesn't propagandize, who doesn't read a script that was carefully curated And handed down from the US government to tell to the people that's just full of outright, you know, provable, provably false statements.
So on top of that, I'm just saying this as an observer of what's going on.
things so of course they're gonna cancel them of course they're gonna take them off the networks of course they're gonna get rid of them I'll go ahead and put this video of Tucker Carlson up and you guys can tell me if you can spot what might have also been triggering some of the executives over at Fox fake news network so watch this I'm just saying this is an observer of what's going on there is no way to assess say the transgenderist movement with that
Policy papers don't account for it at all.
If you have people who are saying, I have an idea, let's castrate the next generation.
Let's sexually mutilate children.
I'm sorry, that's not a political debate.
What?
It has nothing to do with politics.
What's the outcome we're desiring here?
An androgynous population?
Is that really what we are?
Are we arguing for that?
I don't think anyone could defend that as a positive outcome.
But the weight of the government and, you know, a lot of corporate interests are behind that.
Well, what is that?
Well, it's irrational.
If you say, well, you know, I think abortion is always bad.
Well, I think sometimes it's necessary.
That's a debate I'm familiar with.
But if you're telling me that abortion is a positive good, what are you saying?
Well, you're arguing for child sacrifice, obviously.
It's not about, like, oh, a teen girl gets pregnant, and what do we do about that, and victims of rape.
I get it.
Of course I understand that, and I have compassion for everyone involved.
But when the Treasury Secretary stands up and says, you know what you can do to help the economy get an abortion?
Well, that's like an Aztec principle, actually.
There's not a society in history that didn't practice human sacrifice.
Not one.
I checked.
Even the Scandinavians, I'm ashamed to say, it wasn't just the Mesoamericans, it was everybody.
So that's what that is.
What's the point of child sacrifice?
Well, there's no policy goal entwined with that.
No, that's a theological phenomenon.
And that's kind of the point I'm making.
None of this makes sense in conventional political terms.
When people, or crowds of people, or the largest crowd of people at all, which is the federal government, The largest human organization in human history, decide that the goal is to destroy things.
Destruction for its own sake.
Hey, let's tear it down.
What you're watching is not a political movement, it's evil.
So if you want to assess, and I'll put it in non, and I'll stop with this, I'll put it in non, I'll put it in non-political, or rather non-political.
Specific theological terms.
And just say, if you want to know what's evil and what's good, what are the characteristics of those?
And by the way, I think the Athenians would have agreed with this.
This is not necessarily just a Christian notion.
This is kind of a, I would say, widely agreed upon understanding of good and evil.
What are its products?
What do these two conditions produce?
Well, I mean, good is characterized by order.
Calmness, tranquility, peace, whatever you want to call it.
Lack of conflict.
Cleanliness.
Cleanliness is next to godliness.
It's true.
It is.
And evil is characterized by their opposites.
Violence, hate, disorder, division, disorganization, and filth.
Well, Tucker, he's pretty much hit the nail on the head there, I would say.
And of course, when you start speaking in these terms, I think it was very clear to him by this weekend that he was leaving Fox News.
That's why he probably spoke so candidly at this Heritage Foundation event.
And I also think that at the end of the day, all you can do is kind of analyze what's being said here, what's being done.
I think that there is no coincidence here, though.
That there was a coordinated effort to put all this out, this kind of propaganda out as he was already known to be leaving.
Tucker Carlson out of his job as AOC was calling for his job.
So this is a fascinating story.
So yesterday, apparently, AOC went on the major fake news networks and said essentially that Tucker Carlson was guilty of, you know, inciting violence and that he had to be removed and censored.
And on top of that, you had other Interesting things happening where Ray Epps, you guys know him from January 6th, he went on 60 Minutes this weekend and basically accused Tucker Carlson of being one of the main individuals responsible for his life being so disastrously terrible.
Ray Epps, of course, being the insurrectionist, right, if you're going to use that term, The person who we suspect was a Fed operative who was inciting the riots that took place on January 6th, right, inciting the supposed insurrection, which I would argue wasn't really an insurrection at all, but he's coming out on 60 Minutes now And he's saying that Tucker Carlson is essentially to be blamed for his problems and what's happening in his life.
So first, let's watch this clip of here it is.
AOC demands Biden administration regulate Tucker Carlson Fox News due to incitement of violence.
Well, let's see.
Watch the clip.
Do you think media organizations or social media platforms should be accountable for the role, for being platforms for incitement?
I believe that when it comes to broadcast television, like Fox News, these are subject to To federal law, federal regulation, in terms of what's allowed on air and what isn't.
And when you look at what Tucker Carlson and some of these other folks on Fox do, it is very, very clearly incitement of violence.
Very clearly incitement of violence.
And that is the line that I think we have to be willing to contend with.
So you know already that what happened there was that there were insiders at Fox who knew that Tucker Carlson and Fox News were parties.
But we're listening to you and we're not getting the benefits that we want.
Excuse me.
Uh, you know that there were insiders at Fox News who were basically leaking this before it ever happened.
They knew Tucker Carlson was leaving.
They knew it.
So they leaked it to their friends at the other fake news.
And then what do you know?
They bring AOC on so that she could have this.
Predictive, you know, programming moment where she sits down and says, we have to censor Tucker Carlson because he's inciting violence.
We need to take him off the air.
We need to shut him down.
Because this is creating another illusion, right?
That, you know, these people are, you know, not only are they right, but they're being vindicated by the actions that are being taken by the corporations.
When in reality, I mean, what's more likely?
Is it that AOC has some predictive power or some not predictive, but the predictive programming is what this is, but that she has the sway.
You know, she's she's has so much clout that her just telling Jen Psaki was what got Fox News to get rid of Tucker Carlson or or is it more likely that
After Fox News basically agreed to pay over three quarters of a billion dollars in a defamation lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems that Fox News decided to essentially get rid of their biggest talent because maybe they can't afford it.
But more likely it's because he's uncontrollable.
Because he cannot be controlled.
He can't be told what to say or what to do.
And he basically made the demands within his contract negotiations saying that if I can't say the truth, then why am I here?
Because he's always made that clear in his programs that one of the things he liked about Fox News, if you will, was that they gave him freedom to say what he wanted.
Now, obviously, if he's parting ways, the only reasonable explanation is that Fox News has started saying, well, you can't say this.
You can't say that.
They're editing him.
They're editorializing him.
It is what it is, but I'll give you a little preview of what the news is going to look like without Tucker Carlson, what it looked like before and what it's going to look like, or what it looked like before during COVID.
And this is kind of, if you ever seen the movie, They Live, this is what the news is going to keep looking like more and more without people like Tucker Carlson being allowed to be on it.
Watch this.
If it will play. - Yeah.
Either way.
Been having some trouble this morning with the internet.
So when that loads, maybe we'll play it.
Maybe we won't.
I thought that was definitely worth sharing with you guys.
And actually with the Delta variant, which is the hardiest and most contagious variant we've seen to date, we need all the protection that we can get.
That's why the vaccines are so effective.
This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.
We've got to get them vaccinated.
And hopefully they will do it willingly.
I think we really need to make it clear that there are privileges associated with being an American.
We have to be more calm.
We have to be more forceful.
If you do not want to get vaccinated, you can work from home.
You can homeschool your children.
You can shop online.
So where is this coming from?
People saying, I'm now being forced to be vaccinated.
If you want to travel, you better go get that vaccine.
You should be wearing masks even when you are vaccinated if you are indoors.
If you wish to have these privileges, you need to get vaccinated.
You have to say something coming out, you know, you don't get vaccinated, you know you're going to die.
I mean, let's just, let's just be really blunt for these people.
All right.
So obviously there's something wrong there with the, uh, gateway, uh, We're having some issues with that.
Technical difficulties, excuse me.
But you get the gist of it.
Now, the other thing that people aren't, you know, really talking about is the concept of what this opens up in the realm of possibilities for Tucker Carlson.
Was he parting ways from Fox because... And we'll get into another question of whether he was fired or was parting ways, was this a mutual agreement or something.
But can Trump And Tucker run together for president?
I don't know.
That answer is still yet to be determined.
Would Tucker even want to get into politics?
It seems as though from what I've heard him speak about over his career that he's not too inclined to want to do that.
But it would stand to reason that he is, in fact, one of the people who has said previously That, um, you know, he would be interested in working with Donald Trump, or not, or he would be interested in doing things to help the country.
But I don't think he's really interested in doing politics, but who knows, that might have changed.
And he might have seen the opportunity there.
I mean, he could technically run with Trump, and that would be a pretty formidable ticket.
I think that would be huge.
Tucker could run by himself without Trump, and he could be a formidable ticket.
I would vote for Tucker, honestly.
And if you put Tucker up against Trump, I would vote for Tucker over Trump.
I know a lot of you guys are going to be like, how could you?
How could you betray us?
It's just because I think Tucker has a more rounded grasp on the things that are happening.
And I think he would, I think he would deliver more plainly on things that Trump didn't deliver on.
I'm not saying Trump's bad.
I'm not saying that I wouldn't vote for Trump because Trump is, like I said, the best of what we have, but I've said it before.
He's the best of what we got.
If something better comes along, then you bet your bottom dollar I'm going to look at that and be like, okay, well, that's a possibility.
Do I think Tucker would do a better job than Trump?
Well, I guess we wouldn't know until we, you know, actually put them in there and see what happens.
Tucker to me doesn't strike me as somebody who's controlled by the establishment, but at the end of the day, I think Trump and Tucker could both do very well if they were to be put back in office.
I would actually say a Trump-Tucker ticket, Trump-Carlson would be I think that would win.
I don't think Trump and Carrie Lake, necessarily.
I'd like to Carrie Lake a lot.
I'd still like her.
I don't know that she has it.
Obviously, DeSantis and Trump aren't seeing eye to eye.
They can't work together very well.
I could see Trump-Carlson ticket, you know, winning.
I could see it actually doing really well.
I could see it dominating Joe Biden.
I mean, but of course, we gotta remember, they're gonna fix the election anyway.
If Trump and Carlson get together on a ticket, You can bet your bottom dollar that they'll be releasing every bioweapon they have so they can bring in more mail-in voting, so they can run another color revolution in the country, and to put us under a more subservient situation.
I think that that's just my rational take on what's going to happen here.
You guys let me know in your comments below what you think.
Do you think Tucker stands a chance against Trump?
Am I crazy?
Am I nuts for having that inclination to think that Tucker is enough of an outsider, just like Trump was back in 2016, that he could present a different perspective?
Now look, again, I will be very clear.
I've heard Tucker say things that I disagree with.
I've heard, you know, I've seen him do things that I totally disagree with and I'm not some, you know, person who's just like...
Going with whatever the next fad or trend is.
But I've always kind of thought this to myself, that if, in fact, there were a ticket of Tucker and Trump, that it would do really well.
And I also thought that Tucker could do really well on his own without Trump.
Yes, there are two.
The country, I get it.
There's a lot of diehard Trump people that will never vote for anybody but Trump.
And that's just what it is.
I'm not saying whether that's good or bad.
It just is what it is.
However, I could see Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump either going head to head in the primary and then end up in some kind of situation where they're doing better.
But anyway, I digress.
What do you think?
Let me know in the comments.
Am I crazy?
Am I right on?
Am I close to the truth?
What do you think?
Because I'm very fascinated to hear your thoughts on all of this.
And on top of it, though, we have a few other stories we're going to get into real quick here.
The ex-acting CIA director.
Remember this story we talked about the other day?
He revealed that the 50 spies that signed the letter on Hunter Biden was Russian disinformation.
He did it to help Joe Biden win the presidential election.
Remember when that came out?
Well, guess what?
It's already being blacked out by the media.
Here it is, Matt Tybee talking about the blackout being in effect, where you have this revelation that came out from a person who penned a letter.
This is the letter that was documented about this.
They were actually interviewing Morrell, this guy named Matt Morrell, who has this
Essentially has come out and he's the one that leaked this information about how it was Secretary of State Antony Blinken and that he was the one with basically the Biden campaign who was responsible for calling or basically getting this 50 these 50 intelligence officials together to sign this letter to say that you know the Hunter Biden laptop was the Had all the earmarks of Russian disinformation.
So that's already being blacked out in the media.
So, of course, let's not take our eye off the ball here and not look at the other news that's happening around the country.
And on top of that, we talk about, like, Tucker Carlson in 60 Minutes and Ray Epps.
Well, here it is.
Fake News 60 Minutes running an entire segment on Ray Epps without showing his criminal assault caught on video.
Eight other men are serving years in prison today for standing next to Epps and committing the same criminal act.
And on top of that, think about this.
In that show, that hit piece last night, like I talked about, or that fluff job, that cover-up, the predictive programming that they have to run on the fake news, they had Ray Epps on there.
And what was Ray Epps doing?
Ray Epps was essentially saying that Tucker Carlson was the reason that his life was so disastrously awful now.
Not as much to do with the fact that he went and, you know, was possibly a Fed working to be a Fed agent provocateur to start this insurrection in the Capitol.
No, no, no.
It was Tucker Carlson's fault.
So again, I think they were just trying to get ahead of what they knew was already coming, which is they knew Tucker Carlson was out at Fox News.
So whatever it was, let me know in the comments.
Do you think Tucker Carlson was out at Fox News because of AOC going on national TV and calling for him to be removed?
Was he removed because, like RFK Jr.
said, he was calling out the vaccine, the insidious nature between vaccine companies and Big Pharma and the news and the lies that they put out and manufacture to create cover and protection for the bottom line for both individual corporations.
Both sections of the corporate world.
Or was it something more akin to Tucker coming out at that Heritage Foundation and basically saying what he believes about transgenderism and abortion and all this stuff?
I really think it's a combination of all those things.
So I'd love to hear what you think.
If you think he's going to enter politics, if you think he's going to stay out of politics and stay in his lane.
It's all very fascinating to me.
But don't worry, because Ray Epps, here's a little snippet of him on 60 Minutes.
Watch this.
And I can't believe they aired this.
And actually, it just shows you how dumbed down our country is.
And I hate to say that, but if you think about it, They show video of him, to him, of him committing the crimes that many people are in jail for right now.
And then they just give him like these little softball questions about how he feels so, you know, like, how does that make you feel?
And you're like, wait, what?
Watch this.
I'll put it out there.
I'm probably going to go to jail for it.
Tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol!
Into the Capitol!
What?
No!
No!
Peacefully!
Fed!
seemed so over the top, he must have been a government agent, a Fed sent to entrap them.
When you said, we have to go into the Capitol, we have to go into the Capitol, what were you thinking?
I said some stupid things.
My thought process, we surround the Capitol, we get all the people there.
I mean, I had problems with the election.
It was my duty as an American to peacefully protest, along with anybody else that wanted to.
The next morning, January 6th, Epps was out by the Washington Monument, still focused on a single goal.
We are going to the Capitol, where our problems are!
It's that direction!
Yeah, but when you watch it, he's the victim here, guys!
Can't you understand?
He's the victim.
No, I don't know.
I think it's fascinating.
I think he might know too much, as somebody said in the chat, and I think that's probably 100% true.
He's too involved with the operation to set people up that day, and that's probably why they can't, you know, that's probably why they're running so much cover for him.
Because how many other people were doing the same thing he was doing that are in D.C.
in a gulag, right?
And or face or already either facing long prison sentences or have been convicted and sentenced to long prison sentences who are sitting in jail right now.
60 Minutes isn't running like cover story saying, oh, I know you were there to the QAnon shamans.
They're not like having him on to be like, yes, we know you were there and in the Capitol and doing all these things, but how does that make you feel?
It's like, no, they're not doing that.
So we know what the truth is about all this stuff.
It's all a bunch of garbage and lies.
And on top of that, Hunter Biden apparently, now this is the funniest story of the day.
I thought I'd use this or tell this one because I think it's worth noting.
Hunter Biden may be living at the White House to evade legal papers from his baby mama.
Now, let's talk about Sudan.
I want to share this report.
So, the war is escalating between Russia and the United States, and NATO has already been essentially exposed as having used Ukraine as the proxy for this war.
World War III has already started, and now it's basically moving into the rest of the world.
Sudan is a great example.
I'm going to play this short clip.
From RT News, which is Russian, you know, backed TV to be fair.
It's called Russia Today or Russia TV.
And, you know, so take it with a grain of salt.
But this is kind of a background on what's going on in Sudan.
And then I'm going to show you an interesting timeline of all the things happening there.
And I think it's worth watching and paying attention to.
Watch this.
Now over to Sudan where the evacuation of foreign nationals is underway as ongoing military clashes in the country enter their 10th consecutive day.
The violence ranging in the country has forced foreign governments to evacuate their citizens.
These include the US, UK, France and Germany, as well as Egypt, China and others.
Russian citizens are also awaiting extraction from Moscow's embassy in Khartoum.
Hundreds of evacuees and four planes landed at a military airport in Jordan's Amman early on Monday.
A spokesperson for Jordan's foreign ministry said there were a number of foreign nationals on board the aircraft.
Today we're talking about 343 Jordanian citizens who were evacuated from Sudan, in addition to a number of Arab brothers from Palestine, Iraq, Syria and two citizens from Germany.
Unfortunately, there were deaths in the streets.
My factory was broken into and some equipment was stolen.
Praise be to God, Lord of the worlds!
I do not know what to do in such circumstances.
We have not seen anything like it in our lives.
On Sunday, more than 100 evacuees sent to Djibouti by the French military.
One French national was reportedly shot during the evacuation process.
The Sudanese military accused the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces of opening fire on a French convoy, while the RSF claimed it came under attack by military aircraft.
The French Foreign Ministry has not commented on the situation.
Okay, so I only play that clip to give you a little context on what's happening in Sudan and why this matters.
And why does it matter?
civilian planes and damaging at least one runway.
Okay, so I only play that clip to give you a little context on what's happening in Sudan and why this matters.
And why does it matter?
Well, it's because basically Sudan agreed to create a military base for Russia.
And almost like clockwork now, the Sudanese government is collapsing and it's falling directly into a civil war.
Watch this timeline that I found that kind of explains this.
This is pretty crazy.
August 24, 2022, the U.S.
ambassador appointed to Sudan following a 25-year lapse.
September 20, 2022, U.S.
ambassador warns Sudan against finalizing Russian naval-based deal.
November 11, 2022, Blinken urges Sudan to consider U.S.
support for the rapid formation of a civilian-led transitional government.
December 5th, 2022.
UN Brokers Framework Agreement between Sudan's military leaders and leading pro-democracy parties.
December 7th, 2022.
Blinken threatens travel ban for Sudanese who endanger Framework Agreement deal.
February 12th, 2023.
Sudan confirms deal for Russian Naval Base key players Lavrov and Bernan.
February 16th, 2023, Biden administration sends $288 million in humanitarian aid to Sudan.
March 9th, 2023, Victoria Nuland visits Sudan to discuss democracy.
23, conflict escalates between Sudanese armed forces under General Burhan and paramilitary group RSF under Dagallo.
April 22nd, the U.S. evacuates Afghanistan or Afghanistan, Sudan.
Now, what's fascinating, too, is to watch the representatives for the Biden administration come out and say, it's totally normal that under, you know, Joe Biden, we've had several key, you know, countries had their embassies being evacuated.
You know, that's totally normal.
That's just what happens.
You know, you have to evacuate, you know, embassies regularly.
That's just part and parcel of, you know, being a country.
It's like, no, that's not normal.
And it's only because of the same tricks that they used in places like Ukraine and places like Afghanistan and places like Iraq, et cetera, et cetera.
They're doing now.
It's Sudan, and it's international brinksmanship on the highest level.
This is about blocking the development of this naval base in Sudan for Russia.
So that's what this all is.
And if you don't believe me, then just look at this article, because it kind of tells you what's really happening here.
Chinese ambassadors suggesting ex-Soviet states aren't real countries, which is now sparking fury in Europe.
Now, why is China coming out and saying this, right, to say that ex-Soviet countries are not essentially their own countries, that they are still partially territories of the USSR, the former USSR, Russia?
Well, it's because China wants their territory back.
They want Taiwan back.
They've already taken Hong Kong.
They want to expand in that region.
They've already put out the Nine-Dash Line that's claimed most of the South China Sea as being their territory and not any other countries who share those territories.
So this is essentially the East and the West bifurcation which is happening and has been designed and created and implemented by design here.
So that's what you're seeing, folks.
You're seeing this being put into action here.
The World War III is on full effect.
It's in full effect.
And it's only going to get worse from here.
There is good news and I'll tell you about that in a second.
Before though, I want to say thanks for watching.
Make sure you like, share, subscribe.
There's links in the description if you want to support this channel financially.
Let me know what you think in the description below.
Do you think Tucker Carlson could be the president?
Do you think he's going to run with Trump?
Do you think he's going to stick in his lane and do media broadcasting?
Maybe start his own company?
Maybe try to rival something like what Glenn Beck has at the Blaze?
What do you think he's going to do?
What do you think really happened at Fox?
Why do you think they got rid of him?
Even though I think we all know that.
And tell me what your thoughts are on him as an individual.
I'd love to hear it.
Please leave your comments below.
I'm going to read through all of them and see what they say, what you guys say later.
But with that being said, I want to say thanks for watching this episode of Just Informed News.
We'll see you on the next one.
Until then, my name's Craig.
▲
Export Selection