All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 10, 2022 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
01:01:29
Twitter Files 3: How 'FED-CONTROLLED' Twitter [DIGITALLY ASSASINATED] Trump! |JustInformed News #260
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The storm is getting closer.
We are the digital soldiers.
It's time they run forever.
We are the digital soldiers.
We will bring the light to this field of fight.
Hi, welcome to another episode of Just Informed News.
I'm your host, Craig.
Thanks for joining me.
We have a lot to cover here today.
Hope you guys are having a wonderful Saturday, enjoying your weekend.
We're going to be picking up where we left off, covering the Twitter files.
You guys know this is round three, but this is where it's starting to get very interesting.
And we're going to talk about the truth that is being uncovered here.
And it's not just about the deplatforming of President Trump from Twitter, although that's how they're framing it.
There is a lot more in this that we are finding out that's not shocking, really, to those of us who have been paying attention for more than a few minutes.
But it is shocking to have them openly admit it.
And we're going to talk about what it is.
I believe this is all just a part of another psyop that's meant to keep us inundated with this information that is essentially going to come to nothing because they're going to tell us they're committing crimes.
They're going to tell us that they're taking away our rights and our freedoms.
They're going to tell us to our face what they're doing.
As per the karmic retribution of the Satanists who are doing this all.
And then nothing's going to happen.
Nobody's going to go to jail.
Patriots are still going to be locked up in prison for January 6th and other things that really were not as bad as the fake news wants us to believe.
And the people who are committing the major crimes are going to get away with it scot-free.
And I know people go, oh, that's black-pilled.
Why are you so pessimistic?
Look, I've only been doing this for long enough to understand one thing.
If I haven't understood anything else or found anything else through the work that I've done for the many years I've been doing it, it's that there is a cycle.
There's an order.
There's a repeating cycle that happens when these things can happen to us, right?
They commit the crime.
They lie about the crime.
Then they tell us they committed the crime.
Then they rationalize why they committed the crime.
Then everybody on their side, which is the deep state unit party, whatever you want, the globalists and their, you know, zombies that they've manufactured in the brainwashing cult that they're all a part of, say, oh, well, it's not really that big a deal.
And then they move on to the next thing because they use whatever distraction narrative change to shift it away so that we never talk about it again.
Because if we were really serious about, you know, going after criminals in this country, perhaps we would have done things like, I don't know, hold accountable to people who framed the president of the United States with the whole rush hoax thing.
But do you see how nobody's talking about that now?
We're all talking about January 6th, and we're talking about Twitter being infiltrated by the feds to digitally assassinate a sitting president.
Well, just like with the Russiagate thing, they're going to tell us what they did.
They're going to rationalize it away and say, oh, it's not a big deal.
And then they're just going to move on and do another thing.
They're going to commit another crime against us.
As we're talking, they're committing crimes against us as we speak.
They're shipping billions of our taxpayer dollars to Ukraine to fund a proxy war against Russia, which is really...
Just a way of protecting their money laundering vassal state, which we've already uncovered.
They were funneling the laundered money from Ukraine to the Bahamas to the Sam Bakeman Freed who was running a crypto Ponzi scheme, which was then donating the money back to campaign coffers of the politicians.
And we're sitting here going, January 6th, man, the feds were at Twitter?
Oh no, it's like, yeah, the feds were at Twitter.
We said that when it was happening.
And I know people, you know, I'm right there with you.
I don't know what to say.
Like, what do we do?
The Department of Justice has been infiltrated.
It's being run by these same criminals.
The FBI has been infiltrated.
It's being run by these criminals.
Our intelligence services are working hand-in-glove with these criminals, if not being the masterminds behind a lot of these operations.
The country was stolen.
Another thing, are we going to go back and talk about the stolen election in 2020?
Why January 6th happened in the first place?
I could go on for days about this because it's just this cycle just never ends.
And you watch it happen in real time.
You go, wow, that's crazy.
So, I figure that's where we'll start.
Before we get started, though, I'd be remiss if I did not thank the sponsor of this episode.
You guys know him, it's Noble Gold.
Noble Gold, I mean, you know, it's cold out there in the investment world at the moment.
Luckily, I'm warm and snug inside with my financial family at Noble Gold, and they can look out for you as well.
They can set you up with a precious metals IRA to keep you out of the monetary storm.
These guys are great.
They'll help you with everything you need.
Get a stunning free 3-ounce silver American virtue coin when you open a qualifying IRA account with them this month.
You can't go wrong with Noble Gold Investments.
Give them a call today at 877-646-5347 to find out more or visit noblegoldinvestments.com.
Remember, there's always risk of loss, and past performance is not indicative of future results.
There's also a link in the description if you want more information about Noble Gold.
Thank you to Noble Gold for sponsoring this episode.
So, with that being said, I had to start with that whole diatribe to kind of like parse this out.
To be like, let's temper ourselves, right?
Before we get into the Twitter files and the frame job to digitally assassinate Trump and how the feds have infiltrated Twitter.
All these things that we already knew, but now we're just getting confirmation on.
Let's temper ourselves.
Let's look back.
Let's see how they operate, how they work this all against us, and then that way when we get this information, it makes it more manageable, it makes it more reasonable to see it for what it is at least, and then we can actually do something about it instead of constantly being pushed and pulled into the in and out of these cycles where, oh, we're going to get Twitter now.
Oh, we're going to get those Russia hoaxers.
Oh, we're going to get the intelligence services.
Oh, we're going to get, you know...
Hunter Biden.
Oh, we got Hunter Biden now because look, we have his laptop and he's still selling art.
He has a gallery hanging today where he's selling art for $200,000 a pop.
He's not in prison.
John Brennan's not in prison.
James Comey's not in prison.
Jim Baker's not in prison.
Peter Strzok's not in prison.
Lisa Page's not in prison.
You know, pretty much every criminal that we could name, just off the top of my head, not in prison.
But you know who has been indicted?
You know who has been facing trials?
You know who has been being arrested and shackled and humiliated by the FBI and the DOJ? Everyone associated with Trump.
All of the people who weren't committing crimes, all of the people who are being framed, all of the people who are being persecuted, they're the ones who are still facing persecution.
You know who is in prison?
The January 6th protesters protesting the fraudulently stolen 2020 election.
They're in prison.
And I say all of this to not go off on a rant because we have only so much time and I want to get through these posts.
So, I digress.
Twitter Files Part 3 details internal debate over Trump's ban after January 6th riot.
Here it is.
This is just kind of an article detailing what was uncovered here.
They have it all there.
But we're going to actually read through a thread that I found.
But before we do that, I want to point out a few things.
First of all, Speaking of criminals who are not arrested, and in this case, their family members, here's an interesting one.
Members of Twitter's Trust and Safety Council have resigned in protest against Elon Musk.
You cannot make this up.
One of the women who resigned, as is noted here at the bottom, is Leslie Podesta.
Who is Leslie Podesta?
She's from the Young and Resilient Research Center, who is helping at Twitter with, you guessed it, The Councils on Child Sexual Exploitation Prevention Advisory Group with her friends Erliana and Ann Collier.
So, you literally have the family members of the people that were involved in the original WikiLeaks Podesta email dump.
Their family members are resigning against Elon Musk because of what Twitter is uncovering now.
Nobody's in jail.
How many people at Twitter were working for the feds?
This is a great one to kind of go down the rabbit hole on.
Kevin McElhania was the senior corporate security analyst.
He was an ex-FBI intelligence analyst for 12 years.
Doug Hunt, ex-FBI Special Agent.
Mark Jarosuszki was a ex-FBI 20 years.
Douglas Turner, ex-FBI 14 years.
Ex-Secret Service 7 years.
Patrick Gee, ex-FBI Special Agent.
Karen Walsh, ex-FBI Special Agent.
Russell Handorf.
XFBI special agent.
These are current members of staff at Twitter.
Michael B., XFBI, 23 years.
Vincent Lucero, XFBI agent, 22 years.
Kevin L., XFBI agent, 25 years.
And these are all Twitter senior director of product and trust, revenue policy, XFBI, 15 years.
Matthew, Claire Q., current Twitter senior corporate security analyst, XFBI, 8 years.
Bruce A., it's like half of Twitter is being run by the FBI. And they're like, no, there's no FBI here.
What are you talking about?
We're an independent company.
How dare you say that we're being ran by being infiltrated by the FBI? Elon Musk would never do such a thing.
Why?
Because Elon Musk stands for, well, wait, what does he stand for?
Here he says, in a tweet, he actually says, I think Trump would have lost anyway, yes.
Or says, do I think Trump would have lost anyway?
Yes.
And as a reminder, I supported Biden, Hillary, and Obama.
Nonetheless, election interference by social media companies obviously undermines the public's faith in democracy and is wrong.
Well, thanks, Elon!
So he's walking that harsh line you've got to walk where he's telling us, oh, I'll expose all these people so that you'll trust me and use my platform so I can convert it into a recreation of the Chinese WeChat app, which is the manufacturing of the social credit system here in America where your entire life is tied which is the manufacturing of the social credit system here in America where your entire life is tied to your digital identity, which is used just like in the Chinese Communist Party to restrict your access to, I don't know, public transportation, your bank accounts,
If you don't capitulate with the narrative, with the agenda of the party that's in control, that's what he wants to bring to us.
So just remember, Elon Musk is not trustworthy.
So let's read through the Twitter files.
I've digressed far too much through all of this.
Let's read through what it is.
So this is it.
I'm going to read them all.
Let's go read through each and every one of the Twitter files that have been uncovered here.
Thread, the Twitter file is the removal of Donald J. Trump, part one.
October 2020 to January 6th.
The world knows much about the story of what happened between riots at the Capitol on January 6th and the removal of President Donald J. Trump from Twitter on January 8th.
We'll show you what hasn't been revealed.
The erosion of standards within the company in months before January 6th decisions by high-ranking executives to violate their own policies and more against the backdrop of ongoing and documented interaction with federal agencies.
The first installment covers the period before the election through January 6th.
Tomorrow, Schellenberger, MD, will detail the chaos inside Twitter on January 7th.
On Sunday, Barry Weiss will reveal the secret internal communications from the key date of January 8th.
Whatever your opinion on the decision to remove Donald Trump that day, the internal communications at Twitter between January 6th and January 8th have clear historical import.
Even Twitter's employees understood the moment was a landmark moment in the annals of speech.
Is this the first sitting head of state to ever be suspended, says one Twitter employee on an internal Slack chat board.
As soon as they finished banning Trump, Twitter execs started processing new power.
They prepared to ban future presidents and White Houses, perhaps even Joe Biden, the new administration, says one exec will not be suspended by Twitter unless absolutely necessary.
Here is the conversation.
And I'll leave these up.
If you want to read, I'm not going to read through each and every one of these because it would be a lot of reading.
There's a lot of posts to these.
So what I'm going to do is I'm going to stop for a few seconds on it.
So if you want to read through it, just pause the video and then you can read the full conversation and I'll read the selections that I find that I think are truly important.
But I'll do it this way so that you guys can read these on your own as we go through it.
Twitter executives removed Trump in part over what one executive called the context surrounding actions by Trump supporters, quote, over the course of the election and frankly the last four plus years.
In the end they looked at a broad picture, but that approach can cut both ways.
Here's an internal conversation.
Hi, Bajai.
I'm working with Blank on my team to put together a doc to share with you, or with a POV from research, ours academics with whom we have been working, etc., on Donald Trump's language as coded incitement to further violence.
Oh, really?
In the meantime, here's a quick take.
The decision on whether to pull that particular tweet or use that as a last straw for Trump depends on many factors, including one, overall context narrative in which the tweet lives.
We currently analyze the tweets and consider them at a tweet-by-tweet basis, which does not appropriately take into account the context surrounding.
You can use the yelling fire in a crowded theater example.
context matters and the narrative that trump and his friends have persuade pursued over the course of the election and frankly the last four years must be taken into account when interpreting and analyzing that tweet the larger question is around our moral imperative see it's it's all they're moral imperative they're more they're virtuous they're moral people and decision is a company which user sentiment should not drive based on number one
and i believe his tweet does violate our rules when taking that historical context plus current climate into account oh really The bulk of the internal debate leading to Trump's ban took place in those three January days.
However, the intellectual framework was laid in the months preceding the Capitol riots.
Before January 6th, Twitter was a unique mix of automated rules-based enforcement and more subjective moderation by senior executives.
As reported, the firm had a vast array of tools for manipulating visibility, most all of which were thrown at Trump and others pre-January 6th.
As the election approached, senior executives, perhaps under pressure from federal agencies with whom they met more as time progressed, increasingly struggled with rules and began to speak of Vios as pretexts to do what they'd likely have done anyway.
Here's where it gets interesting.
After January 6th, internal slacks show Twitter executives getting a kick out of intensified relationships with federal agencies.
Here's trust and safety head Yoel Roth lamenting a lack of generic enough calendar descriptions to concealing his very interesting meeting partners.
Here he says, it happens I'm a big believer in calendar transparency, but I reached a certain point where my meetings became very interesting to people and there weren't meeting names generic enough to cover anything.
Anyway, let me know.
Saying, very boring business, meaning that it's definitely not about Trump, with a winky face emoji there.
Pretty much, he says, definitely not meeting with the FBI, I swear, he says sarcastically, to which somebody responds, laughing their butt off.
Okay, so let's just take a full stop here.
This is the internal message that's between Yul Roth and his cohorts over at Twitter where they're joking about the fact that they're meeting with federal agencies about President Trump.
Now you've got to remember, this is still while President Trump is the President of the United States, so they're having meetings with the FBI. So you're telling me that the same FBI who framed Trump with the intelligence services, the same DOJ who fraudulently tried to prosecute him and go after him with these crazy investigations, the same Congress that they're telling us is, quote, not, you know...
Manipulating and pushing for this sensor behind closed doors.
All of these individuals, it turns out they were actually having direct meetings with them, talking about Trump, trying to go after Trump.
And I'm sure, who do you think were at these meetings?
I don't know what the timing is on all this, if it matches up, but perhaps people like Andrew McCabe, before he got fired, were having meetings with the FBI. Perhaps people like, you know, Rod Rosenstein.
Perhaps people like, you know, The director, Chris Ray, and everyone else, they were having meetings, I'm sure.
Anyway, let's go on.
There's more to uncover here.
executives whose names are already public.
They include Roth, former trust and policy chief, Vijaya God, or Gad.
I don't know how to say her name.
It doesn't matter.
People, oh, you don't even know how to say her name.
Who cares?
These people don't matter as much as the truth matters, right?
Right.
Bye.
You can read it right there if you want to know it.
Recently, Plank walked Deputy General Counsel and former top FBI lawyer Jim Baker.
One particular Slack channel offers a unique window into the evolving thinking of top officials in late 2020 and early 2021.
On October 8, 2020, executives opened a channel called US2020XFN Enforcement.
Through January 6th, this would be home for discussions about election-related removals, especially ones that involved high-profile accounts, often called VITs or very important tweeters.
It goes on.
Starting tomorrow until November 15th, this channel will be used for the following reasons related to U.S. election.
Trends identified that require scaled investigations, high-profile accounts escalations that potentially require soft interventions, scalable solutions, required edge cases, so on, so on.
You can read all this.
If you want to pause it and read through all this, I'm not going to read through every single word here.
But it talks about it.
It goes on.
Can you please make sure everyone on your team is within the channel?
The teams that we included are as follows.
Site integrity, safety policy, product trust, safety operations, media ops, global escalation team.
If you have any requests or concerns, please let me know.
Notice how these corporations, especially Twitter and these other ones, they have the most useless individuals working there, and they make up all these ridiculously nuanced, you know, just...
Ridiculous titles.
Site integrity, safety policy, product trust, safety operations.
It's like, you could have just named it the censorship department.
You don't need to have all these stupid names that everybody knows is just a euphemism for your censorship regime.
Safety operations.
Oh, really?
Because it's really safe.
We have to make sure people are safe when they're tweeting, right?
Anyway, I digress.
Again.
There was at least some tension between safety operations, a larger department whose staffers used a more rules-based process for addressing issues like porn, scams, and threats, and a smaller, more powerful cadre of senior policy execs like Roth and Gad.
The latter group were a high-speed Supreme Court of moderation, issuing content rulings on the fly often in minutes and based on guesses, gut calls, even Google searches, even in cases involving the president.
So now this one's fascinating.
So what happens here is they say that they want to escalate this for a tweet Trump put out where he said 50,000 Ohio voters getting wrong absentee ballots out of control.
A rigged election.
So this is a conversation between an employee and Yoel Roth.
It says...
Rigged election would be enough to be in violation, right?
Roth says, if the claim of fact were inaccurate, yes.
So then the person goes and Googles it and says, but it looks like it's, or Roth goes and Googles it and says, it looks like it's true, though, where it says 50,000 Ohio voters to receive new absentee ballots after error found.
Oh, really?
Well, good thing they could Google, at least.
During this time, executives were also clearly liaising with federal enforcement and intelligence agencies about moderation of election-related content.
While we are still at the start of reviewing the Twitter files, we're finding out more about these interactions every day.
Policy Director Nick Pickles is asked if they should say Twitter detects misinfo through Twitter.
Human review and partnership with outside experts.
The employee asks, I know that's been a slippery process.
Not sure if you want our public explanation to hang on that.
Yeah, so that's what they say.
Pickles quickly asks if they could just say partnerships.
After a pause, he says, not sure we'd describe the FBI DHS as experts.
I mean, it's being proven now with this information that the FBI and the DHS were working with Twitter to censor information.
Now, that's a clear and obvious violation of the First Amendment in whatever realm that you could ever imagine it, yet, whoa, it's a threat assessment for safety operations at Twitter, so don't tell anyone.
Anyway, let's go on.
or this post about the 100-bind laptop situation shows that Roth not only met weekly with the FBI and DHS, but with the Office of Director of National Intelligence.
Wow.
Yola's checked in.
Here's what they said.
What's new for you since our last check-in?
Hacked materials exploded.
We blocked the New York Post story.
Then we unblocked it, but said the opposite.
Then we said, or then said we unblocked it, and now we're in a messy situation where our policy is in shambles.
Comms is angry.
Reporters think we're idiots, and we're refactoring an exceedingly complex policy 18 days out from the election.
In short, he says, F my life.
Weekly sync with, you guessed it, FBI, DHS, and DNI, Department of National Intelligence, regarding election security.
The meeting happened about 15 minutes after the aforementioned hack materials implosion.
The government declined to share anything useful when asked.
Monthly meetings with the FBI briefed on several ongoing investigations.
So...
Let's just take this as a moment to clearly and uniformly acknowledge the fact that what we said was happening was happening.
We were right.
They were wrong.
The leftists, the liars, the propagandists, you know what they're doing now?
You go all throughout Twitter and you can see how they're framing it.
They're saying things on Twitter and the fake news reporters, journalists on Twitter are saying, this is just a complex way of telling us things we already know.
Oh, this is not a story at all.
NBC News, CBS News, ABC News, do you know how many minutes of coverage they have on their networks of this combined, of these stories that are breaking?
Zero!
Zero!
Double zero!
A goose egg!
There is zero coverage of this story.
Why?
Well, because it's not a story to them.
This is how our country operates.
The government works with the fake news and the big tech companies to censor us, to violate our First Amendment right, to illegally violate the Constitution and the Bill of Rights against we, the people, Because they are criminals and they can get away with it because there is no recourse that we have because they control the only actionable department from which we could find recourse, the Department of Justice.
So how are we supposed to, everybody says we have to go to the courts, we have to sue them.
It's like, how?
They run the Department of Justice.
What are we supposed to do?
And this should be a wake-up call to everybody out there that we are literally on the verge of becoming...
We are essentially a banana republic at this point.
We are a tin-pot communist dictatorship at this point.
And whatever is going to happen is going to happen.
Civil war, I don't know.
But there's going to be something.
There's going to be a reckoning for all these individuals.
I don't know what it is.
I'm not calling for anything.
But I'm telling them, and I'm telling you out there, listening...
There is going to be a reckoning.
These people are going to face the consequences for their actions one way or the other, whether it's in this life or the next.
They are going to face every judgment imaginable because they have violated the governing principles of our constitutional republic, which is the governing document itself.
That's why it's a constitutional republic.
It's based off a constitution.
These are supposed to be immutable laws that cannot be violated yet.
Here we are watching them in real time violate them over and over and over again.
Just like I said at the beginning, it starts with going all the way back.
You go back to the Russia hoax and go to today and do everything in between.
Nobody's in jail.
Nobody's faced any consequences.
And all that's happened is they've become more powerful and more dedicated to the mission of destroying what freedom is left here in this country.
So let's continue because there is more.
It says, Ross reports the FBI, DHS, DNI is almost farcical in its self-flagellating tone.
We blocked the New York Post story, then unblocked it, and then F my life.
Yep, he says there.
And then here's what it says here.
I'll let you guys pause if you want to read through that.
Anything in there?
It's kind of reiterating.
Some of Ross' later slacks indicate his weekly confabs with federal law enforcement involve separate meetings.
Here, he goes to the FBI and DHS respectively to go first to an Aspen Institute thing, then take a call with Apple.
Well, guess what?
What was he doing at the Aspen Institute?
Oh, well, he was giving a lecture on vaccines and COVID-19.
Isn't that nice?
So while he wasn't...
This is like literally the craziness of this PSYOP, right?
We have this guy, Yoel Roth, who, by all accounts, let's just get a little context to who Yoel Roth is.
Here's one example.
Donald Trump on Yoel Roth in 2000, and I believe this is in 2020.
Fact check me on that.
But here's Donald Trump on Yoel Roth.
Let's watch.
Let me get the audio corrected so that you guys can hear it.
Here it is.
Here's one.
This is our...
This is the arbiter.
This guy is the arbiter of what's supposed to go on Twitter.
He's the one he thought that...
He thought...
And he used CNN as a guide.
CNN, which is fake news.
He uses CNN as a guide.
His name is Yoel Roth.
And he's the one that said that...
Mail-in balloting.
No fraud?
No fraud?
Really?
Why don't you take a look all over the country?
There's cases all over the country.
If we went to mail-in balloting, our election all over the world would look as a total joke.
It would be a total joke.
There's such fraud and abuse, and you know about harvesting, where they harvest the ballots and they go and grab them and they go to people's houses and they say, sign here.
No, it doesn't work out.
Now, an absentee ballot, you can't be there or you're sick, and you go and you register and you do all sorts of things to get that ballot, and there's good security measures, but where they send out, like in California, millions and millions of ballots to anybody that's breathing.
Anybody in California that's breathing gets a ballot.
But Mr.
President, that's not true.
Excuse me, wait a minute, I'm not finished.
So here's your man, and that's on Twitter.
So that was just a video back of Trump describing Yoel Roth.
Here's a few more context, contextual pieces of information on Yoel Roth, who he is.
I found this fascinating.
Elon Musk saying Twitter's both a social media company and a crime scene, to which somebody says, I think I may have found the problem, a post from 2010 of Yoel Roth where he says, quote, Can high school students ever meaningfully consent to sex with their teachers?
Really?
Elon Musk says this explains a lot, and then finally goes and says, looks like Yul is arguing in favor of children being able to access adult internet services in his PhD thesis.
Now look, people will go and point at this and say, look, Elon, he's fighting against these people.
He's on our side.
He's really just a white hat who's pretending to be a black hat who's helping us.
Don't fool yourself for one second.
All he's doing is trying to bring a broad coalition on board with him and his platform and in order to do that he has to appeal to the 80% that he claims to want to seize and capture.
He's said it openly and that's why he's taking a stance against what most rational normal people in this world and country Would see as being despicable, disgusting, immoral evil, which is the degeneracy that comes from people like Yoel Roth and his ilk.
Here's another post from Yoel Roth on his Twitter account.
Now I'll let you be the judge of what's being said here, but this is just him in his own words having a conversation with his friends on social media.
Watch this.
People go, oh, you're crazy, right?
Yoel Roth on Twitter, 2014 May.
The history of locative media needs to acknowledge its early adopters, namely gay men, the homosexualization of mobile communication.
To which somebody replies, Sharona Pearl, his friend, apparently says, oh, so it wasn't the Jews who controlled the media, but the gays.
Can I tweet that?
To be safe.
Kidding, people.
Kidding.
Yo, Ross says, in response, the Jews got old media, the gays new.
To which she replies, translation, the Jewish gays rule the world.
Now this is them in their own words.
So this isn't me like going out and being like, oh, the Jews are all coming for us.
Oh, no, we got to be watch out.
I'm not saying that.
But this is them telling us what they're doing.
The gay Jews rule the world is what they say in their own words.
Oh, but it's a joke.
It's just a funny joke from 2014 back when, you know, We could just joke about those things and you weren't going to get cancelled like Kanye.
Is Yo' Roth going to get cancelled?
Well, no, because he's a gay Jew.
But I digress because this is just giving you an example of who these people are, how they think, and how they view the world.
They want to sexualize children, put them on adult internet sex websites.
They brag about how the gays run the media and how the Jews had the old media and the gays have the new media.
And you're like, oh, but Craig, that's anti-Semitic and homophobic.
And you're like, wait.
That's them saying it!
I'm not saying it!
They're saying it to us!
And they're laughing at us!
They're laughing at us!
And you know the funny thing is, regardless of what you think about all of that, that's fine.
You can have your own opinion.
It doesn't matter to me.
What matters to me, though...
It's that there is, as I've said before, there is a Jewish mafia.
There is a gay mafia.
There is an LGBTQ suicide cult.
It's all pervasive and within our society, and it's tangible, and it's real, and it's visible, and they laugh at us, and they mock us, and they ridicule us, and then the worst and most insidious, nefarious part of it all is how they have twisted society, propagandized us, and brainwashed, and turned into this cult movement of You know, passing anti-free speech legislation saying you can't say anything anti-Semitic.
But then they label everything anti-Semitic and then they laugh at us and brag about how they control everything and they rule over us.
And then, you know, you go, Craig, you sound like Kanye West.
You sound like one of those anti-Semite, blah, blah, blah.
I don't know what I sound like because I'm just telling you the truth.
It's like...
You can objectively look at facts logically and say, well, that's a fact.
The sky is blue.
The grass is green.
Yoel Roth tweets about how the gay Jewish people run the media and how it's all a big joke and it's just true, but they laugh about it.
It's them telling us what they're doing, guys.
I'm not...
Okay.
Anyway, on top of that, you guys know my feelings and all that, but guess what?
That guy that we just found out everything about, he was at the Aspen Institute giving a talk on vaccines.
So, before having a call with Apple.
Now, let me ask you this.
Why would they at the WF and the WHO, the Aspen Institute, all these other TED Talks, etc., etc., all these rich billionaires, why do they always get together and talk about how they want to depopulate the world, how we have an overpopulation problem?
And then they help manufacture and release a virus called COVID-19, which is essentially just like kind of a weaponized flu virus so that then they can inject us with mRNA-based vaccines that seem to kill us in mass.
So it's almost as if they present a problem, then they present a final solution.
And who does that remind you of?
Who is the archetype that's been built?
What's the archetype that's built up in our culture so that we have this programming to be violently triggered by listening to the notion of somebody's final solution?
I can't remember.
Maybe you guys will let me know in the comments.
I can't remember whatsoever.
There was something about a final solution that we're all supposed to remember as being so evil, but then when other people manufacture problems and then give us final solutions for those problems, which they still to this day actively want us to partake in, I don't know.
Maybe we shouldn't be going along with the agenda of these psychotic, lunatic, demonic, degenerate, evil people.
That's just me.
Let's read on.
It goes on to say here, the FBI sends reports about a pair of tweets, the second of which involves a former Tippecanoe County, Indiana, counselor and Republican named claiming between 2% and 25% of ballots by mail are being rejected for errors.
Again, the same thing's happening here.
I'll leave a pause on this if you want to read it.
FBI concerning two tweets.
So they're getting FBI reports concerning two tweets about shredding of mail and ballots that has proven to be false because PolitiFact One of the biggest fake news lying organizations on the internet says so.
Oh really?
I believe it was deemed no vile on numerous occasions.
Oh yeah, no violation.
Okay, interesting.
FBI's second report concerned this tweet by John Basham where he says Democrats are in complete panic as their massive push for vote by mail is backfiring on them.
Two things are unfolding.
An unexpected number of registered Republicans are returning ballots.
Between 2% and 25% of ballots are being rejected for heirs.
So that's what the FBI was flagging.
The FBI flag tweet then got circulated in the enforcement slack.
Twitter cited PolitiFact to say the first story was proven to be false, then noted the second was already deemed no violation on numerous occasions.
The group then decided or decides to apply a learn how voting is safe and secure label because no one commenter says it's totally normal to have a 2% error rate.
Roth then gives the final go ahead in the process.
Okay.
Examining the entire election enforcement slack, we didn't see one reference to moderation requests from the Trump campaign.
Trump White House or Republicans generally, we looked.
They may exist.
We were told they do.
However, they were absent here.
In one case, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee joked tweets about mailing in ballots for his deceased parents and grandparents.
Stood in rain for an hour to early vote today.
When I got home, I filled in my stack of mail-in ballots and then voted the ballots of my deceased parents and grandparents.
They vote just like me.
Trump 2020.
It was a joke, but they didn't know that.
This inspires a long slack that reads like a parody.
I agree it's a joke, concedes a Twitter employee, but he's also literally admitting in a tweet to a crime.
Oh, if only they took crime seriously, right?
Then we might be in a real good place.
The group declares, Huck's an edge case, and though one notes we don't make exceptions for jokes or satire, they ultimately decide to leave and be because we've poked enough bears.
Oh, really?
Could still mislead people, could still mislead people, the humor-averse group declares, before moving on from Huckabee.
Oh!
And then I'll leave, I'll pause.
I mean, you guys want to read all of it?
Not going to read the whole thing.
You can pause it and read it if you're so interested.
They poked enough bears recently as the tranny, degenerate, leftist insurgents, the sleeper cells that run half these media tech corporations, they tell us how we need to censor free speech.
Ross suggests moderation, even in this absurd case, could depend on whether or not the joke results in confusion.
This seemingly silly case actually foreshadows serious later issues.
It says, I could see us taking action on our misleading claims that cause confusion about the established laws, regulations, procedures, and methods of a civic process, but it's not one that we could really label in a useful way, so it's removal of a stupid and ill-advised joke or nothing.
I may be inclined not to remove without a report from voting authorities.
Oh, really?
Voting authorities!
That would be great.
34.
In the docs, execs often expand criteria to subjective issues like intent.
Yes, a video is authentic, but why was it shown?
Orientation was a banned tweet shown to condemn or support or reception.
Did a joke cause confusion?
This reflects will become key in January 6th.
In another example, Twitter employees prepare to slap a mail-in voting is safe warning label on a Trump tweet about a postal screw-up in Ohio before realizing the events took place, which meant the tweet was factually inaccurate, or factually accurate, I should say.
There it is.
Obviously, if you want to pause it and read these, pause it and read these.
It says, very well done on speed.
Trump was being visibility filtered as late as a week before the election.
Here, senior executives didn't appear to have a particular violation, but still worked fast to make sure a fairly anodyne Trump tweet couldn't be replied to, shared, or liked.
Trump saying, big problems and discrepancies with mail-in ballots all over the USA must have final total on November 3rd.
So then it says, This tweet can't be replied to, shared or liked.
What's the recommendation?
Well, they recommended that they shut it down.
Flagging right now with leadership given its POTUS. We'll set up a call.
Can we use a new doc per PLL review?
Exactly.
That's what they do.
Very well done on speed.
The group is pleased with Trump.
Tweet is dealt with quickly.
That's what they say.
And of course, you can read through all these.
I'm going to try to pause for a second on each one if you want to read through it.
Seemingly innocuous follow-up involved a tweet from actor whose ubiquitous presence in argued over Twitter data sets is already a Twitter files in joke.
James Woods saying, Twitter is suppressing this tweet by the president.
Here's a screen grab.
After Woods angrily quote tweeted about Trump's warning label, Twitter staff, in a preview of what ended up happening after January 6th, despaired of a reason for action, but resolved to hit him hard on future violations.
Considering the bug out this weekend, James Woods being so over the strike limit that our tools won't work on him, I suggest we action him for something worth the fiasco, rather the screenshot, since we don't have firm policy basis for action on his account.
Yep, are you fine letting this one lie?
We can hit them hard in the future, they say.
Here is a label applied to Georgia Republican Congressman Jody Heiss for saying, say no to big tech censorship and mailed ballots are more prone to fraud than in-person balloting.
It's just common sense.
Twitter teams went easy on Heiss, only applying soft intervention with Roth worrying about a wah-wah, wah-wah, censorship optics backlash.
Devil's advocate.
Well, that makes sense for these people.
They are advocating for the devil most of the time.
The quoted tweet still shows up with the EDI, and the actual content Rep Heist says is lower level, more fraud with mail-in ballots than in person is much more of a legitimate statement, even if scale is still minuscule.
I think I'd lean towards just putting a soft intervention on this rather than a full intervention.
Yup, I was just typing that.
Blah, blah, blah.
I'll let you guys read all these.
It becomes a self-reinforcing, wah-wah, censorship cycle.
Yep.
That's how they think about us.
That's how they laugh at us.
That's how they mock us.
Currently responding to social watches, whining to public policy, I regret nothing, but I'm happy to iterate what rules they violated.
See, they regret none of their decisions because they're doing this for political purposes.
Ideologically driven, these people are censors.
They are the fascist authoritarians they accuse us of being.
Meanwhile, there are multiple instances involving pro-Biden tweets warning Trump may try to steal the election that got surfaced only to be approved by senior executives.
This one, they decided, just expresses concern that mail ballots might not make it on time.
So there's so many examples here, and you can read through these, where this is just an edge case with commentary encouraging voters not to vote by mail.
I believe we should label it.
Oh, really?
This is so disgusting and terrifying.
They're going to try to steal the election.
You have one week.
If you haven't voted yet, don't mail.
Drop it off or vote early.
If you can't vote, make sure your family is unless they're Trump supporters.
Just let them forget.
Oh, well, that's okay.
We let that slide.
That's understandable.
Even the hashtag stealourvotes referencing a theory that a combo of Amy Coney Barrett and Trump will steal the election is approved by Twitter Brass because it's understandable and a reference to a U.S. Supreme Court decision.
Of course, I'll let you read through all of these if you want.
I'm going to just pause so you can pause the video yourself if you want to read any of this here.
It goes on and says, Never fear, Yoel Roth is here.
It was quickly taken off by Yoel Roth.
He says, quote, And of course, Yoel Roth intervening and taking any restrictions off of that tweet.
It goes in.
Interesting.
So they're advising on those as well.
DHS, the Homeland Security, the same people that think that most of America are terrorists, the same organization, the same department in the United States government that has labeled U.S. citizens terrorists for questioning fraudulent elections, yes,
that same one, or not wanting their children to be propagandized and brainwashed into castrating and mutilating their genitals, that DHS is telling, The head of trust and safety or whatever his title is, Yoel Roth at Twitter, that it's the Seidel Smartmatic Voting Machine, you know, conspiracy theory.
It's like 47 different conspiracy theories, bro.
47, bro.
Okay.
December 10th, as Trump was in the middle of firing off 25 tweets saying things like, So, I'll let you guys read that.
But what were they doing?
Well, they were de-amplifying the President of the United States.
Oh, okay.
That's normal.
That's totally normal.
Some executives wanted to use the new de-amplification tool to silently limit Trump's reach more right away, beginning with the following tweet, where it talked about Jim Jordan going on and giving, I guess, a video on Newsmax.
Interesting.
However, in the end, the team had to use older, less aggressive labeling tools at least for that day until the L3 entities went live because they just weren't ready to do it.
The significance is that it shows that Twitter in 2020 at least was deploying a vast range of visible and invisible tools to rein in Trump's engagement long before January 6th.
The ban will come after other avenues are exhausted and Twitter docs execs frequently refer to bots.
Namely, let's put a bot on that.
A bot is just any automated heuristic moderation rule.
It can be anything.
Every time a person in Brazil uses green and blob in the same sentence, action might be taken.
Oh, that's what they did, huh?
So they're using blobs.
Great.
Or they're using bots, I should say.
But weren't they the ones that told us the Russian bots were the ones that stole the election?
Isn't that interesting how they employed bots against us, the American people, to manipulate our election process?
Hmm, interesting.
Interesting.
In this instance, it appears moderators added a bot for a Trump claim made on Breitbart.
The bot ends up becoming an automated tool, invisibly watching both Trump and apparently Breitbart will add media idea to bot.
Trump by January 6th was quickly covered in bots.
Yep, there's the proof.
You want to read it?
Pause it and read it.
There's no way to follow the frenzied exchanges among Twitter personnel from between January 6th and 8th without knowing the basics of companies' vast lexicon of acronyms and Orwellian unwords.
To bounce an account is to put in a time-out, usually for a 12-hour review, and that is the cool-off.
So there it is.
You can read through these yourself.
Gave a heads-up to folks.
Give it another few minutes, then proceed with bouncing.
Yep.
Interstitial, one of many nouns used as a verb in Twitterspeak, denialist, is another, means placing a physical label atop a tweet so it can be seen or can't be seen.
PII has multiple meanings, one being public interest interstitial, i.e.
a covering label applied for public interest reasons.
The post below was also referencing proactive visibility filtering.
You can read all that for yourself.
This is all a necessary background to January 6th.
Before the riots, the company was engaged in an inherently insane, impossible project trying to create an ever-expanding, ostensibly rational set of rules to regulate every conceivable speech situation that might arise between humans.
This project was preposterous, yet its leaders were unable to see this, having become infected with GroupThing coming to believe sincerely that it was Twitter's responsibility to control as much as possible what people could talk about how often and with whom.
When panic first breaks out on January 6th, there's a fair share of what-the-f type posts mixed in with frantic calls for Twitter to start deploying its full arsenal of moderation tools.
What is the right remediation?
Do we interstitial the video?
Asked one employee in despair.
Yeah.
Goes on.
You can read all that for yourself.
Video of a person being shot on Capitol Hill.
That would be Ashley Babbitt.
This freedom or death tweet from Stop the Steal gadfly Mike Kudre elicits heated reactions.
Today is one of the most important days in our nation's history.
We cannot allow global hegemony to take over this country through fraudulent means.
What happens today determines the next hundred years of our country, freedom or death.
Roth groans about Kudre, this a-hole, but still seems determined to stick at least superficially to rules itching to act if this constitutes incitement.
Interesting.
It goes on.
At 2.39 p.m.
Pacific Time, a comms official asked Roth to confirm or deny a story that they'd restricted Trump's ability to tweet.
Roth says, we have not.
You can read that for yourself.
Minutes later, Roth executed the historic act of bouncing Trump, namely putting him in timeout.
I hope you are appropriately corpsect, says a colleague.
This theme of policy perhaps being stressed by queries from communications executives who themselves have to answer the public's questions occasionally appears two days later you see chatter about pulling comms out of the loop.
We're already getting questions about conspiracy theories and our enforcement process all the time, not a wait-and-see thing.
Let's talk about that, but we need to hammer that out ahead of an emergency and evolving situation.
Respectfully, it needs to be your team doing so holistically.
I don't think it's wise to reach out to comms folks proactively on this.
email from GAD, the Jaya GAD, on January 6th announced that three Trump tweets had been bounced, but more importantly, signaled determination to use legit violations as a guide for any possible permanent suspension.
Really?
Well, there you go.
You can read for that of yourself.
What the actual F says, or safe to say, Trump's go home with love and in peace tweet mid-riot didn't go over well at Twitter HQ. Patrick Conlon says, what the actual F, can this go to staff too?
I'm labeling it now, says Patrick Conlon.
Yes.
Great.
A few last notes about January 6th.
Roth at one point looked and found Trump had a slew of duplicate bot applications.
Oh, really?
So that means that so many people inside the company had put bots on him that they were having duplicates put on him.
By the end of the first day, the top execs are still trying to apply rules.
By the next day, they will contemplate a major change in approach.
Watch this weekend for the play-by-play of all that went down by January 8th, which will describe Sunday.
Twitter will be receiving plaudits from...
Our partners in Washington and the sitting U.S. president will no longer be heard on the platform.
Lastly, people on the left, right, and in between want to know what else is in the Twitter files from suppression, sour banning, or of leftists to lab leak theorists or amplification of military propaganda or conservative accounts.
We know everyone has questions and while we've stumbled on tidbits here and there, topics ranging from COVID to foreign policy, the reality is data sets are enormous and we're still working through them.
And that's the end of Twitter Files Part 3.
The saga continues.
Now everybody wants to say, you know, this proves Elon Musk is a good person, but I'm going to temper everybody to say, don't fool yourself into following Elon Musk down that primrose path to hell.
Next thing you know, you're going to have a Neuralink stuck in your head in a computer chip controlling what you say and do, and you're going to be strapped into this never-ending, nightmarish hellscape forever.
And I don't want that for you guys.
I want you guys to be happy and have a great life.
So, that means we're going to wrap it up with our God's Grace's Greater segment.
We do at the end of every episode today.
We're finishing chapter 14 of Mark.
If you guys aren't familiar with this, we do our God's Grace's Greater segment at the end of every episode.
We're going through all the four major Gospels.
We started in the book of Matthew.
We're in Mark chapter 14 right now.
We're going to go through Luke and John next.
But we're finishing Mark chapter 14 right now.
Verse 66 is where we're picking up.
We're reading to the end.
And we're going to talk about it.
And this is Peter denying Jesus.
And we're going to give you the context and talk about it in just a second.
But let's read the verse.
While Peter was in the courtyard below, one of the high priest's servants came.
When she saw Peter warming himself, she looked at him and said, You also were with that Nazarene Jesus, but he denied it.
I don't know or understand what you're talking about.
Then he went out the entryway, and a rooster crowed.
When the servant saw him again, she began to tell those standing nearby, This man is one of them.
But again, he denied it.
After a little while, those standing there said to Peter again, You certainly are one of them, since you are also Galilean.
Then he started to curse and to swear with an oath I don't know this man you're talking about.
Immediately a rooster crowed a second time, and Peter remembered when Jesus had spoken the word to him.
Before the rooster crows twice, you will deny me three times.
When he thought about it, he began to weep.
Now, this is a fulfillment of Jesus' prophecy again.
He was predicting the future when he told Peter that he would deny him three times before the rooster crowed twice.
And essentially, Peter had followed Jesus after he had been picked up by the soldiers to be brought to the Sanhedrin to face this supposed trial before he faced Pilate and the Romans.
But what ends up happening here is very interesting.
Peter does something I think we've all done at some point in our lives, but that we all strive not to do if we're a true Christian, that we want to live our lives in not doing, and that's denying Jesus.
Have you ever denied Jesus?
Now, I know that for a lot of you out there, you're going to say, no, I've never denied Jesus, and I'm sure you haven't.
But sometimes we can deny Jesus without even realizing it.
Sometimes just by not bringing him up when we know we should.
We're essentially denying Jesus.
We're falling into a trap, and that's because we're sinful, and that's because we do make mistakes.
We are human, which is exactly why Jesus came to die for our sins, so that by His grace we could be saved from our own pitfalls, our own downfall, our own inability to do the right thing always.
We could deny Jesus by doing something as simple as just sinning.
Think about it.
If we're not following the commands of Jesus, then we are essentially denying Him, right?
And I think that that's not for me to say to you as a rebuke, to say, oh, you're this evil person and I'm a pious person who doesn't do it.
I fall in the same trap.
But time and time again, the way I remediate it, the way I fix it, is by going back to Jesus and saying, Lord...
In this situation, I may have fallen short, but I beg your forgiveness and I pray you'll help me become better for you.
And that's how we're going to end up living our whole lives.
We're going to end up living our whole lives continually going back to God and begging Him to show us the way forward.
And in my opinion, I think that's not that bad a deal, right?
We're not actively seeking to deny Jesus as Peter, I don't think, ever wanted to deny Jesus.
He loved Jesus.
He was one of Jesus' most devoted disciples.
Yet he denied him regardless because when that moment came and he was faced with the persecution, he made the mistake that we all make as humans.
The one mistake that the only person who didn't make it was Jesus himself.
Now, what can we learn from this?
Well, we can learn a little bit from Peter's story.
Peter went on to become a great man of faith and doing great things for the faith.
And eventually, I believe, became a martyr of the faith.
But, in this particular instance, he fell short.
But remember that Jesus died for us all so that we could overcome this shortcoming that happens time and time again in our life.
So, if you're one of those people out there right now who feels like you've just fallen short of Jesus, that yesterday you said you were going to devote your life to Jesus and then you denied Him by sinning, by committing a sin that you didn't want to do, but you did because you're weak.
Or you did because it was convenient and you weren't thinking straight.
And you did because of whatever reason...
Don't think that it's all lost.
Don't think that you have no hope.
Your hope is still there.
Go back to Jesus.
Turn your life over to Him.
Ask Him to help you fix that thing and become better and forgive you.
Because you know what?
That's what the sacrifice on the cross was about.
It was about saving us from ourselves.
Saving us from an eternal fiery damnation because Jesus knew that we were going to fall.
But he was going to be standing next to us to pick us up every single time.
Don't use it as an excuse to continue to fail and to knowingly go against Jesus.
That's not how we're meant to live our lives.
But never forget that there is forgiveness that is available if you go to Jesus.
So, I pray for all of you out there.
I hope that we find our way back to Jesus, just like Peter did.
After he fell short.
We can come back to Jesus.
It's never too late.
So I'm going to leave it there.
We'll say a prayer and then we'll wrap it up.
Lord and Heavenly Father, thank you so much for this incredible scripture that you've given us, Lord.
I pray that in our lives, you'll help us come closer to you every day.
Forgive us our sins, Lord.
Help us strengthen ourselves in you.
Help us pick ourselves up when we fall short.
Just like we've seen here with Peter and his denial of you, Lord.
He wept because he knew he had betrayed your trust and your love and your sacrifice.
It's the same reason why we feel the shame and sadness that we do when we fall short of your glory, Lord.
But we also know that through your promise, through your sacrifice, through your grace, through your mercy, we can be redeemed.
And we give great thanks for that.
And I pray for myself and others, everyone out there watching, Lord, that we can...
Fall back into your mercy.
Fall back into your grace.
Find forgiveness for our sins.
Become better and stronger for you, Lord, so we can be there not only for you, Lord, but for all those who need us and for ourselves as well.
We thank you for this day and every day, Lord, and most of all our eternal salvation.
In Jesus' name, amen.
Well, I'm going to go ahead and leave it there.
Like, share, subscribe if you guys like this content and want to see me make more.
Leave your comments in the description in the comment section below.
I want to hear what you guys have to think about everything we covered here today.
And there's a link in the description if you want to make a donation.
Your financial support is what keeps this channel alive.
We are going to be off tomorrow, but we'll be back on Monday.
So stay tuned for that.
We'll see you on Monday.
Until then, my name is Craig.
▲
Export Selection