All Episodes
Previous Next
June 20, 2022 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
47:14
ANON Military Intelligence Asset Exposes Truth About Everything! Part 4 | JustInformed Talk #003
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Today I want to introduce you to a very special guest for the show.
This is a friend I've known for many years.
We've had many different long conversations about, you know, pretty much anything you can imagine.
And he's always pretty much right on target with the interpretation he has of what's going on.
And he's and me and him have had conversations about things going all the way back to, you know, almost the original Q posting.
We've talked about stuff that wasn't even posted by Q, but then later became posts of Q and so on and so forth.
But even going beyond that, we've had conversations about all types of things.
He, you know, has helped me break stories, you know, that I think are very important.
But I mean, I'm going to introduce him to say his name is Chris.
We're just going to go by first names here to give you a little bit of an idea of his background.
Chris worked for the IGIC, for the Air Force, That's the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community of the Air Force.
He also worked at the OSI, the Office of Special Investigation.
Just to give you an idea of what he does, he's basically an intel asset.
He has a much more extensive background, but I'll leave that for him to share what he wants to share.
I'll say this.
You guys, read this Lambda article for yourself.
Read the transcript of the conversation that was just leaked.
And you tell me that if there's an AI that can speak with that kind of clarity, with that kind of clarity of thought, with that kind of precision in the way they articulate themselves, then it stands to reason that...
Any one or any person online could be an AI bot at this point, which means if you have some sort of, and this is why I think, I think this is why Twitter with the whole bot thing with Elon Musk and with Trump saying it's all bots and everything, I think that maybe these systems have been deployed, or not maybe, they definitely have been deployed.
These massive AI systems have been deployed in this bot net that I mean, can speak and talk and have a conversation just like a human being without skipping a beat.
I mean, almost to the point where you don't know you're talking to somebody that's real or not.
So, what do you think of that?
Do you think that's possible?
Yeah, I do.
I absolutely, 100% do believe that that's possible.
I mean, we know that, well, it goes back to what you and I spoke at the beginning of this conversation, that, you know, most, when I brought up that, literally, not literally, most people that I meet are pro-America.
They hate these communists.
You know, they dislike these communists.
I rarely meet a communist, but if you watch the media, if you read social media, it seems like these people are legion.
I think that's how the bots are being deployed in this situation.
I think that they're being deployed To enhance visibility to an issue, to make it seem like you need to think this way.
Remember COVID? Looking back, there was no way that that wasn't a unified, coordinated issue through social media, media and everything.
And they're not going to hire...
There will be some people they hire, but bots would make it way easier.
Especially like a bot connected to some sort of very powerful quantum-type computer system that could have a legion of bots from one point, not even needing to have a farm like they do in Asia and China where they sell clicks and things like that.
I mean, to have a central location from which you can launch a massive AI onslaught of bots that can think independently and have independent conversations, but to the tune of thousands or maybe hundreds of thousands, who knows?
And I think, so what do you think?
Do you think it's possible that our enemies like China or Russia would be launching those kind of bot net attacks on us as we speak?
Yeah.
Yeah, I do believe that.
I think that that's absolutely part of their propaganda war.
When Black Lives Matter first started getting steam, I was investigating a certain issue, and most of the rhetoric, most of the comments were tracked back to Shanghai, to China.
And so, yeah, I mean, China's kind of the go-to place when it comes to farms, to comment farms.
So it's a business there.
And the party itself is perfecting this with their 50-cent army tactics that they've been using over time, and I think that they've probably perfected this in their own society in the closed intranet system that they run behind the firewall, but it would stand to reason that they would also be launching it out against us if they had the capability and technology to do it, right?
Yeah, and I think that it would make it easier to isolate certain individuals.
Let's just pretend that you did something that China thinks is dangerous for them, like you are bringing something up to the public.
Then they could very easily dogpile on you through that system.
They can isolate people and help lead to censor them.
With the bot army in coordination with the idiot army, the purple-haired weirdos that are walking around burning cities down, there will be a lot of eyes on that issue.
And then you add into that the blackmail and bribery to the media, nobody's going to stand up to it.
So yeah, absolutely.
And so we come full circle, and that's why people need to stand up to these issues, because you have to.
You know, it's funny because, as I do with all of our conversations, I have revelations in my mind and in my way of thinking that I never would have thought of otherwise unless I was talking it out with somebody, and I appreciate you for that, and I hope our audience appreciates it as well.
So, you've seen all these false flags.
I don't want to say false flags because we don't know necessarily enough to say that they are one way or the other, but we've seen these mass shootings lately, right?
Now...
Thank you.
it's disappeared out of the news cycle almost entirely now talking about the fact that there were federal agents just a retired federal agent happened to be in a discord chat with this young man who went into Buffalo and shot up a grocery store there.
What is your take on these mass shootings and all a lot of the things illuminated or brought to light by Q with his drops talking about how these these people are programmed.
What is your take on that?
My take is this, right?
There's two options.
You either look at it from a skeptical, that it's a bad actor, bad faith actor, it's a good faith actor.
In the bad faith actor scenario, you have federal agents going to people who are troubled, who they believe may be capable of these crimes, trying to gain their trust so that they can stop whatever crime that they feel they may be committing in the future.
The bad faith actor view says these people are being groomed and then they are being unleashed at a critical time.
We had discussed the possibility, or I had discussed at least on my show, the possibility of a larger network of individuals being involved in this and that there was possibly a larger cell type structure where you have people being activated at key critical moments to shift the narrative away from anything the possibility of a larger network of individuals being involved in this and that there was possibly a larger cell type structure where you have people being
For instance, these mass shootings started happening as soon as Hillary Clinton's lawyer was brought up on trial and things were being proven by even her own campaign manager and others from her inside of her inner circle Things were being proven about the way our intelligence agency possibly was helping her, the way the FBI was helping them, the way the DOJ was helping them.
I only ask the question as an outside observer who's curious, what is your take on the possibility that there are cells out there grooming these kids for these crimes?
Do you think they're good faith acting or bad faith acting?
And how do you think that all works?
I think that, first of all, I think that the individuals that were involved in Buffalo and Uvalde were, and I'm not just talking about the shooter here, I'm talking about the, in my opinion, the instigator.
You and I spoke about, you know what I'm talking about there.
Right, yes.
I mean, there's absolutely no way that's a good faith actor.
Yeah.
And the timing, you know, one of the first things you're trained at is don't just, you know, obviously look at the facts, but also look at what is happening right now in society.
What is happening culturally?
What is happening socially?
What is happening around the nation?
And every time these issues take place, there's something going on that tends to be bad for one specific party.
At this point, I think people should see it as clockwork.
This isn't a conspiracy theory.
This is just...
Obvious fact at this point that every single time there's a serious issue that the modern day Democrats have to deal with, randomly something happens, be it COVID, be it a shooting, be it conflict erupting somewhere.
It just continuously happens.
And this isn't just me just talking.
I mean, it was one of the jobs I had for a long time is to look at these historically and see how they evolve.
And One commonality that they all have, and I mean all of them, is that they all tend to happen around the same time that the American leftist party is having some type of issue.
And this goes way back to the Clinton days.
Probably even before that, I can't say.
But for me, Clinton and beyond, every single time the leftists deal with an issue, somebody either dies, a war either happens, or eyes are fixed on something else.
Bill Cooper wrote a book, which I'm sure you're familiar with, called Behold a Pale Horse a long time ago that made predictions about this and that the calculations made by certain individuals inside of certain agencies that I guess will remain nameless because it's hard to pin it down.
Made the calculation that if they were able to instigate enough of these mass shootings, that it would eventually lead to calls for the disarmament of the American people, which would then lead to the susceptibility for enslavement of this country and for it to be overthrown without them ever having to even really fire a shot.
I don't know if that's technically...
I mean, I believe that that's possible, but what's your take on Bill Cooper and what he wrote?
I agree with him 100%.
What are the two constitutional rights that are being attacked right now?
Again, people just need to pay attention to what specifically, because there's only two, what specifically are being attacked right now?
The first and second.
And for anybody who wants to look into research, let's just say that America didn't have those two things.
It would be monumentally easier to deal with.
From a strategic standpoint, from a I'm going to take you over standpoint, from an invasion standpoint, until that happens, until that happens.
And you know what?
Honestly, they've done a pretty damn good job on getting rid of the freedom of speech.
The guns, they really haven't made any leeway on that.
But, you know, a couple things, but nothing big.
But free speech, yeah, they've really...
I mean, look at how scared people are to even tell somebody to shut up.
I mean, just because a person might be, you know, a person of color.
People are literally scared to say that.
Well, they don't want to – see, that's the thing.
They've created this environment where you're afraid to be called a racist or a bigot because they've – I always say this.
It's almost like you'd be a fool not to think that they've studied the human psyche and condition to a point and have hacked our emotions and hacked our brains to the point where they understand exactly what they're doing when they call an organization Black Lives Matter.
It's as insidious as you could imagine because the insinuation is if you don't like Black Lives Matter, you don't think Black Lives Matter.
So that's the psychological warfare that they're putting against us every day.
Would you agree?
Yes.
Yes, I would 100% agree with that.
And you know what?
A lot of the things that they are doing now, a lot of the operations that they're running, like Black Lives Matter...
They're set up very military-like.
There's layers on top of layers to hide the people that matter.
I guess the best way to get the pawns go out there, and they're the ones that are visible.
But money is transferred into five different locations, and it ends up in Ukraine.
True story, by the way.
That's where money is washed, in the international community for criminals.
But...
Yeah, I agree with you.
Well, see, and that's the thing is that I've said that before about Ukraine being a money laundering hub, and that's why I think they were so desperate to protect it.
That's why they're putting all these billions of dollars there.
It's not just to give Zelensky weapons to hand over to Russia.
That's what they basically do, but also that that money is turned and then pushed out into all of the different slush funds wherever they may exist for all these corrupt politicians.
You know, you've got to get 10% to the big guy somehow.
He's got to have his cut from all of this that's happening.
We don't get a cut, but they get a cut.
So I do see, though, Black Lives Matter being a great example of that, not to mention the fact that Patrice Cullors, who is the founder of Black Lives Matter, she has multi-million dollar mansions.
She has this wide portfolio of real estate.
But they were sloppy when they started.
And I think that Black Lives Matter may have possibly just started out as an organic movement that was quickly co-opted.
But, I mean, think about it.
There was a point during the big riots in 2019, I think, when that started, where you would donate to Black Lives Matter, go to that Act Blue thing, and so you're basically, you were donating directly to the DNC. You weren't even giving the money to Black Lives Matter.
You're giving it to an organization that was controlled by the DNC who would then dispense the funds to Black Lives Matter.
So that had to have been, you know, part of it.
So I agree.
I agree.
And, you know, in California, I have a perfect example for this.
I don't know, 10 years ago, maybe less, around there, the Inspector General of California looked into public schools, the colleges, and they found that there were huge slush funds that kept taxpayer monies and distributed them to To the DNC in California, to these various groups like, I don't know about Antifa, but Black Lives Matter definitely, and several other groups.
And this is taxpayer money that's going to a public school, that's being put in a public school slush fund, you know, under whatever heading they use.
Maybe, you know, we'll keep this for a rainy day, but it's actually being diverted to these companies, to these groups, to these people.
And on top of that, When Trump was in office, he shut down their ability to make money, a lot of these people.
He shut it down.
And this is just a theory of mine, but I believe everything we're seeing now with gas prices, with food prices, I believe this is another false flag type issue to recoup four years worth of losses.
One big reason I sit there is their reasoning is utterly stupid.
There's no better word I could say than that.
It's at the point where it's so stupid that I can't believe even a single person would believe that our gas prices are bad because of the things that they're saying.
Because Vladimir Putin and because of COVID. When Trump was in office, there was no such issues.
Even though he had, what, six months a year of COVID or whatever it was?
I got another one for you.
I threw this one out on the show yesterday, okay?
Think about this.
Mm-hmm.
And mysteriously, and this is California specific, mysteriously, as soon as Trump starts cutting off those funds and basically cutting down on this waste, fraud, and abuse inside of our own government saying, no, you're not going to get $10 billion to study migratory bird patterns or whatever it is, or millions of dollars you're not going to get $10 billion to study migratory bird patterns or whatever it is, or millions of dollars to do it or whatever it was, all of
And these are just mysterious arsonists going out into the middle of the woods, throwing a gas can down, and just burning everything after the state purposely doesn't clear the underbrush to make the conditions perfect for these wildfires to spread.
And then all of a sudden, FEMA has to step in and distribute billions of dollars to the same states that had just lost billions of dollars in revenue.
And now that the corrupt, criminal, illegitimate person in office is sitting there, I'm in California.
I don't know about you.
I haven't seen a fire.
I mean, we're like in the middle of peak fire season.
And it just strikes me as strange that when their corrupt guy gets in office and starts giving them money again, the fires just magically go away.
And I don't know if there's more that you can talk about on that.
I mean, just am I being crazy conspiracy theorist?
No, you're not being crazy.
You're not at all being crazy, Craig.
You are 100% correct.
And I got another one for you.
Do you know how much money the United States pledged to give during the Paris Accords?
Do you know what the total was?
I think it was like a trillion or something.
It was something ridiculous.
$60 billion was our initial...
I was a little high.
Well, $60 billion is a huge amount.
But here's where it gets interesting.
Do you know how much the United States recently gave to Ukraine?
Oh, man.
And I got another one for you.
Have you heard anything about the environment, you know, climate issues?
Have you heard any of that crap recently?
I mean, you turn on the news.
Remember during, remember when Trump pulled out of the Paris Accord?
Everybody, those types of people.
I was like, that was right when Greta Thunberg got really big.
Right.
Right, and they're pulling their hair out saying, you know, we're all going to die.
The world's coming to an end, you know.
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
AOC was like, we're going to die in 12 years.
I think we're still on track, right?
I can't believe you.
Yeah, she's so embarrassing.
But yeah, so $60 billion was the American pledge to the Paris Accords yearly.
And now we're given – we absolutely gave a $60 billion amount to Ukraine recently, and there's been other money.
Why the hell – let's throw politics out for a second and consider this.
What the hell would we be giving $60 billion to Ukraine for?
Why not – I mean it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
It's – So I think all of this ties back to the Red Cross, and I think this all ties back to massive international...
I don't even want to call it slush funds.
These are like war chests that are being built globally by these globalists where they have trillions of dollars hidden away, and they are planning on using it, and they do use it all the time.
There was...
You ever read the Crazy Days and Nights, the CDN... It's a blog where they put out blinds that are basically insinuating things without naming names.
And they talk about how the Red Cross is, or how basically, there's a few that allude to this, that there's money that's being funneled globally into these large war chests for the globalists to go after us, basically, and that the people who are compromised are the ones basically funneling it out there.
So I would say this, that You know, you have to look skeptically at all these things.
These are the truths that they don't want us to find out.
This is the stuff they don't want us to put together.
This is the stuff that they depend on our ignorance and naivety to pull it off.
And like you said, you find these coincidences over and over and over again.
And at what point does it go from coincidence to a pattern?
You know, and that's what you have to really start looking at, right?
Absolutely, Greg.
Yes, you have to look at the track record and pattern.
You have to.
When I was much younger, it was the ozone layer was about to be destroyed.
They throw these climate issues out every 10 years, and they rebrand them with a different name.
When I was a kid, it was the ozone layer had a hole in it, and it was going to burn us all alive.
Truly, that was their pitch back then.
Yeah, because you use hairspray.
And then it was save the whales, but not to save the whales, but because if we didn't have whales, the oceans, something would happen with the oceans.
They said some crap would happen.
I don't remember, but I remember that being a big issue.
It just gets rebranded every few years whenever they need it.
We're not hearing anything about climate right now.
Oh, we will.
We will whenever they need it.
Whenever they need it.
Wow.
All right.
Well, look, we're having a great conversation here, and I'm going to jump over the chat real quick just to see if there's anything new put up over here.
We had a few more posts.
Somebody says, no matter how many times Looking Glass spins, God wins.
And they say, yeah, that's the bottleneck.
Yeah, I could see that.
It says, who actually runs Alexa?
I don't use it.
That's a good question.
Who do you think runs Alexa?
I don't know.
I don't know.
I mean, like, I would think, in my opinion, it's the same usual suspects.
You know, they might put somebody in there that we don't know, just some random...
But at the end of the day, it's all the same people that have their hands in these issues.
It's the alphabet soup people.
Pretty much.
Didn't used to be, but pretty much.
I'll tell you, back in the 90s...
Well, look at, like, Sergey Brin and Larry Page and, you know, their connections.
And it's 23andMe, Google, Darpanet, or Arpanet, LifeLog, Bing, Facebook.
That's what I mean, that kind of stuff.
23, the DNA issues, to this day, I still can't believe some people sent their actual DNA into people that they don't know.
I can't believe people actually did that.
No, not only that, the best part is they actually pay them.
They pay them to harvest their DNA. They're like, here, take my money and my DNA. Yeah, that's true.
If you want to talk about bioweapons that are specifically tailored to certain groups, that's a hell of a lot of samples to be able to use and test on.
Truly, God help us all, man.
That's what we need right now.
We need God in all this because there's not a lot of answers that are going to come from this world.
Actually, there are no answers that are going to come from this world other than we're going to be able to stand up for what's right, to rebuke this evil in all its forms, and to become stronger through the affliction that we face, which is, you know, these are all biblical principles that we learn over time.
Finally, let's wrap it up because we're on the two-hour mark.
I think that's a good place to kind of wrap it up on.
What's your outlook for the 2022 midterms?
I believe that the same thing is with 2020.
If we can find a way to curtail, stop all the cheating, then it won't even be close.
I think it's going to be an absolute domination by the Republicans.
By the way, I'm not too happy with them either.
I've been a Republican my whole life.
They have been so weak about stuff.
Obviously, I'd rather have them in there than these Froot Loops.
That's a very kind way of putting it.
Yeah.
Well, I'm on your show.
I don't want to get you into any trouble with what I really think.
Let's just put it this way, ladies and gentlemen.
He's being G-rated for us because I think that it's just the way I like to run things.
I know some people tell me they watch with their whole family, and I like to keep it above the board as far as cursing or anything like that.
So I appreciate you taking that into consideration.
Absolutely.
Because I love my country.
Okay, so I don't know how I'm going to edit this in later, but go on about what you were saying about these container weapon systems in China and Russia and the rest.
If that's what we were talking about.
Well, I'm just thinking of, like, what would be the entry-level to...
Okay, well, if people are interested in looking at this, they should first look at the Fat Leonard case.
That's really what it's called.
And the way that the Pacific Fleet was blackmailed through various different proxies that China used through different countries, like, you know, Vietnam was one.
But China is absolutely responsible for that, to try to disable the Ninth Fleet and...
Or the 7th.
I think it's the 9th.
But in that area, especially in the area where the man-made islands are, I don't know the exact location, but it's between China and Australia.
It's in the middle of the South China Sea.
It's basically, it's like a central point in the South China Sea.
Right in the middle of the 9-dash line.
Well, when the second island was established, two occurrences took place where Navy ships, United States Navy ships, crashed into each other at night in that region.
Because that's a free-to-sail, you know, that's a free navigation area.
Yeah.
They're using, back then it was weird because there were, I think there were 17 different major ship crashes there.
The McCain was, I think, the most recent, USS McCain.
But there were also, people don't usually talk about this, there were also jets and the helicopters that were going down all over the place in that area.
It wasn't an EMP, originally I thought it was an EMP type delivery system.
But no, it has to do with directional navigation.
And setting people on collision courses or disrupting GPS. Because a lot of the newer, they're trained on it, but they're not as trained as our ancestors were on navigating the seas, because most of that stuff is automated now.
So it's very easy to crash.
It might not seem it's easy, but it's pitch black at night in the middle of the ocean, and you're reading your GPS, you're going to trust your GPS, and all of a sudden you crash into somebody else.
And that happens a lot to also the Vietnamese, the South Koreans, the Australians.
It's China.
So they've developed some type of a system that either scrambles or creates false positives within the GPS system.
So that's something that is an advantage that they have, because I don't think we have that.
We might.
I know we have hypersonic missiles, but as far as a type of a GPS scrambling system that kind of reinstates, It's weird.
So either they're hacking a satellite, they're doing something out there.
You just reminded me of a story that came out back a while ago where they were talking about, so I guess they had to go back and retrofit a lot of these older naval ships with protection from EMP for the fact that This was a story that came out, and I don't know how true or false it was.
It was one that was reported, I think, widely about these Russian fighter jets who were doing these close approach sweeps over U.S. ships inside of the...
I don't remember which.
It was one of the seas in Europe where they were doing these sweeps, and one of the battleships was left basically completely lights out, no power.
They were dead in the water, basically.
Yeah.
And it was like this, you know, basically, it seemed people were saying that Russia maybe used one of these EMP weapons to knock out its entire electronic system, which is why Trump ended up recalling a lot of ships to be retrofitted with this new sort of protection from that.
That's what that reminded me of when you were saying that, though.
Yeah, it's called an EMP spike is what it's called.
And basically you can deliver, with drones now it's much easier, but you can deliver a small EMP blast within a specific proximity by plane, by ship.
You can even shoot it at somebody and have it on a delayed timer.
But yeah, those are definitely in play.
This issue in the South Pacific though is something different entirely.
Yeah, this sounds like what they're doing is they're messing with something that messes with the arrays that actually do the positioning.
That seems like what you're suggesting that has something to do with the uplink and maybe they're hijacking the uplink or somehow interfering with that in a way that they can manipulate it so that you see a false positive on your screen.
Yeah.
I believe that that's the case.
I believe that they found a way to...
Because they wouldn't be hacking the ship.
They would need to be hacking the source.
So it would be GPS-related.
So it's either satellite-related or...
And a family member of mine...
It literally has worked on the first satellite that the United States ever launched.
So I spoke with him about this, and he agrees with me on that as well.
And this may be a good point to say this is why Trump made the Space Force, you know, like why he felt that was such a priority because we had to protect our satellites because they were directly linked into our defense systems.
Without a doubt, 100%.
And you know what?
5G, there are other things about 5G. There's a lot of theories out there, and you know what?
Some might be true, but how do I put this?
Back when I was active duty, it was theorized.
It was probably already made back then, you know, at Area 50 or something like that, but it was theorized.
One of those areas.
But 5G, in theory, creates not...
It's not just a cellular network, but it would create like a...
Kind of an invisible force field.
And if an electric device flies into that force field, it immediately shuts them down.
It doesn't destroy them.
It doesn't blow them up or anything.
But it shuts down their electronics.
That force field has a friend or foe recognition situation.
So the ships and the planes that are going through it are equipped with something to allow them to not get pinpointed by the system and shut down.
The...
The proverbial force field that everybody kind of wants, that would be the force field, kind of the first stages of a force field, is that anything that's shot into a 5G network that isn't recognized as FRIEND would be shut down immediately.
Wow.
I'll tell you what, you see this stuff and you think it's science fiction, but I always tell people, whatever we see publicly, they're at least 30 years ahead of it behind closed doors.
So when you see these hypersonic missiles and you see the stealth bombers and you see the whatever it is...
Just remember that, and I would say this, and maybe you can talk to this for a second.
So now they're coming out with this release of the UFOs, right?
They're like, we don't know what these pill-shaped objects are that travel faster than the speed of sound, and they can make a turn on a dime, and it's like physics wouldn't even allow that to happen, and blah, blah, blah.
Well, if that's what we're seeing, could you imagine what they have that we can't see, right?
That's right.
These might be, let's just say that they're American.
Let's just say that they're American and they would be doing test flights probably out there.
And the Navy probably wouldn't know about it because they would want to pit them against each other to see what the reaction times were.
If those things are real, because honestly, the pictures are terrible.
The videos and pictures are awful.
But if they're real, it looks like the craft is manipulating gravity.
And it's using gravity as a momentum force.
And any function of the planet can be used for such a thing.
You just have to figure out how to do it.
And I always believed, when I was younger, that the function of gravity can be used...
Magnetism and gravity can be used to do what that is.
I wouldn't know...
What I saw has those types of functionality.
It's moving from up and down, left to right, and it's moving pretty fast.
They say that it can go straight into the water and go back in the air without even having any kind of lag time between.
So, I mean...
Let's just put it this way.
There are things out there that we can't possibly know because it's so far advanced beyond what we even could comprehend, I think, at this moment.
So I think that's a good point.
Let me go over the chat here and see if we've got anything else because there's a lot of people here.
Let's see.
Yeah, we have a pretty big audience today.
It's getting bigger, so that's good.
We probably started too early today.
People were working today, huh?
Yeah, I don't know.
I always start around that same time, but I don't usually go this long.
So, let's see.
Let's see.
Comments on...
Oh, here's a good one.
Russell J. Gould.
Russin J-J Gould-Russin Russell the guy.
What are your thoughts?
On the Corporation of America and the Postmaster General and the Crown of Britain.
You know, I heard that years ago, and then you brought it up to me, and I heard it again.
I'm not going to discount it.
I'm not going to say it's not true, but at this current point right now, I've seen no...
No specific type of evidence, hard evidence, that would point to that still being the case.
I think Britain absolutely, absolutely saw us, probably up until World War II, in the role of what he brings up.
But at this point, it just wouldn't really make much sense.
But I'm open to it.
But I'm open to it.
Yeah, I think I'm...
We're chings, let me tell you.
So I'm open to it.
I think I'm of the same opinion.
I think there's something to it because the way they break down the banking system and how the internationally agreed upon banking system is what has been used and leveraged to create these kind of power dynamics.
I think that's true.
But then like when they get into like the syntax and they've created a new language and they captured the flag and they – it's like it's almost too fantastic for me to fully believe.
But I leave – like you said, I'm kind of the same – I leave room for that to be something that we just don't really fully know about yet.
Yeah.
Yeah, I don't want to say it's bullshit.
I don't want to say it's BS, but I also don't agree with it right now because I see no evidence to say otherwise.
For me, I have to see the evidence.
I have to investigate.
I have to research.
I have to see it myself to believe it.
Absolutely.
Trust but verify is always the motto.
And when people come out there, typically, and I'll always listen to any theory about things because you never know.
There might be a diamond in the rough with those things, but whenever people start getting to these things of like...
You know, one and one equals this, which is a letter here, which is, you know, you subtract the birth date and, you know...
What was it here?
Tam Grau says, what did they have in mind with the thousands of mass graveliners?
I think she's referring to, like, FEMA and all the graves that they said they have.
What do you think on that?
Hard to say.
It's hard to say.
In my opinion, it was BS. A lot of it was BS, but it's hard to say because we're dealing with individuals who have proven that they will kill.
So...
I'd say beyond that, though, I mean, I think that we have to remember as a country, we still prepare for things like wars and stuff, and we're not, like, a lot of that would have to be done, because I imagine if you're, like, preparing the country, well, if we go to war, we're going to need body bags because people may die.
And, you know, these are just logistical things that you'll need.
There is also just the sense of being like, well...
You don't want to be like, hey, we're getting body bags because we think we're going to go to war.
You're like, well, FEMA needs them in case there's another hurricane.
Oh, the body bag.
I'm sorry.
I misread that.
I apologize.
No, no, no.
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
If you have a better take on it, please.
That was interesting to me.
I have no answer for it as far as what it means because I'm out of the loop on that.
But...
If it looks like a duck and if it smells like a duck, again, why would people be ordering body bags unless they felt there was a need for body bags?
So I think people need to come to their own conclusions on that.
In my opinion, it goes back to what you and I have talked about numerous times about conflict being inevitable.
China is doing the same thing right now, by the way.
China is seriously preparing their citizens for conflict, much different than we are.
Oh, no.
They're doing things in China that are beyond the pale.
I mean, I think Shanghai is one of the best examples, how they've shut down a city of 30 million or 60 million.
I don't remember how many people.
And they're doing it with an authoritarianism that has never been seen before.
And I think they're prepping areas of the country for...
Things that are going to be coming if there were a war.
And that's why they have, like, the ghost cities.
The ghost cities.
Why do you think they need these big...
They have over 100 cities with over a million people.
So if they get nuked, they have all these ghost cities so the population can just move into these new cities.
So if there were an all-out war, why would you go hit a ghost city?
But the ghost city is going to still be there, you know, with these massive apartments.
for the Communist Party officials, housing for their families.
So I think those, and not to mention any other things you might add that I didn't answer or cover.
I doubt people look at the stocks like in this case, but a company called CMEX, C-E-M-E-X, which is a Mexican company, That's the cement.
They're cartel-owned, and it's a Mexican company.
They were contracted, and they've done a lot of work in China over the last two years.
You know, a lot of theories can come out of that, but in my personal opinion, you and I discussed this a bit the other day, underground, as in under the earth, warfare is going to be a major portion of any future conflicts, and who better to know about how to make tunneling systems than CMEX? I mean, see, when I saw, because China is very, China usually does not hire from outside of China, especially when it comes to national security issues.
So why, you know, when I saw CMEX in there, I thought to myself, why the hell would they bring them in there?
And then I thought about what CMEX specializes in, and I thought, okay, well, yeah, they're building something underground.
Wow.
Yeah, and they would need a ton of concrete and cement for that, so that would make perfect sense.
Let's go.
I'll give you the floor one last time, and this time I'm actually going to end it afterwards, so tell the people what they need to hear, whatever you want to share with them.
Well, I'm obviously very thankful for people asking questions, but actually I'm the one that's honored.
I'm the one that feels honored that people would ask me those questions.
I'm happy to be able to deliver information as best as I can to your viewers.
And it makes me feel very proud, not to be condescending, but very proud of my fellow Americans To see people getting interested in this stuff because they see the writing on the wall.
They see what's going on.
And it's that type of behavior, it's that type of attitude that will eventually lead to somebody standing up and saying, shut up, to somebody else.
So that's a great starting point for people.
And educate and go from there.
Your viewers, I'm sure, are caught up on most of this stuff anyway.
But yeah, I'm the one that should be thanking you and your viewers, not the other way around.
Well, you know what?
Well, thank you anyway, because thank you for your service and everything else and the fact that you love this country and that I love this country and that the people watching love this country is what's going to save this country.
Let me say this.
So that's interesting and fascinating.
So usually at this point in the show, I'd be asking you if you have any social media you want to plug or if anything you have to get out there.
What if you have any final parting words for our audience, though?
What would they be?
I think they'd be very glad to hear it.
So what would you say to our audience if you had anything parting to say?
And we're going to hopefully...
I know we'll have you on as long as you're okay with that.
We'll have you on again.
But what would you say to the audience in closing today?
You know, first of all, I would apologize again one last time for being late today.
I don't like being late.
But to the point of your question, I... I'm not trying to come off as doom and gloom about a lot of these things.
I just feel that it's my responsibility as somebody who actually worked in that field, who actually knows these things.
Actually, I shouldn't say I don't know these things, but has a good head on my shoulders about being able to predict these things, because I've seen these things so many times.
I'm not trying to be doom and gloom, but I just feel I owe it to these people who are listening.
But I definitely would recommend that they follow up on everything.
Confirm what I say.
Trust but verify, always.
Never have a trust-me-bro situation.
At the end of the day, I'm speaking directly to the viewers, your critical thinking, your ability to sift through these issues, As one specific unit, one heartbeat, one group of people, that is what would eventually win the day.
One group of people who are able to differentiate themselves from the opponent, because the opponent has absolutely no ability to do those things.
So I think people need to think for themselves, which you go over a lot.
I do apologize for being doom and gloom, but I really think that people need to hear that.
And I think they need to hear it directly, that there's no reason to sugarcoat it.
I mean, people can prepare better if they know these things.
But on top of that, I don't think anything...
I don't know.
I don't know.
There are...
There are reasons to believe something bad will happen very soon.
Historically, there's reasons to believe it, but I'm not, you know, I don't have any proof to say that it will or not.
But if we go by the track record of those people, then yeah, they're going to pull something.
They will.
You hit the nail on the head earlier, Craig, when you said that every single time, I think I brought it up too, every single time there's an issue or there's We're good to
go.
People also shouldn't believe this whole, well, we're setting them up.
We want to see what they do.
In an investigation, yeah, that happens sometimes, but when it comes to costing lives, you don't wait.
That's one of the first rules about when you're researching an issue.
You don't wait for a potential killer to kill just to get information from them.
If you think a murder is going to happen or a mass shooting, you stop it immediately.
Then you bring them to an interrogation room.
Waterboard him for a few hours, slap him around, and then you find out the truth, and then you go from there.
I'm only joking, by the way.
But seriously, that's how you get information.
You don't wait for, you know, Sandman to...
That's the name of the person that...
You don't wait for another person to give orders to an obviously mentally disabled young man.
I mean, and that's another thing.
These people continue to be mentally disabled in some way, these shooters.
I don't know how they're picking them out.
I believe it's through the youth programs.
Anyway, I'm getting off on a tangent.
That's all I really have to say.
Just look into the education system in your local hometown and don't be afraid to confront these people.
Well, I mean, I appreciate that.
And I want, I mean, I kind of feel bad we didn't go deeper into that story because there was a lot there to unpack.
But maybe we can save that for the next one.
And there's a lot more to unpack.
But yeah, he's right.
Be careful.
Be cautious.
Be aware of your surroundings.
If you see something, always say something.
Don't hold back.
Don't let these people get away with this again.
We've got to make sure that we hold everyone to account for these crimes, and hopefully we'll overcome this with God in our hearts.
Do you mind if I end with a little bit of prayer, Chris, for us?
And then we'll wrap it up.
Dear Lord and Heavenly Father, I pray first that you'll give us all discernment and wisdom in how to tackle all these issues that are happening inside of this fallen world in which we live, and that no matter what happens, what affliction we face, what trials and adversity we face, that we take solace in the fact that we know you're with us, Lord.
I pray a special prayer of protection and discernment for Chris and his endeavors and his career.
Lord, that you'll bless him and give him the ability to go into the world and make a positive change for this country as he has given so much in his service.
We pray, Lord, that you'll guide us all in the same way to go out and make a difference in this country for you, Lord, and to help make this the country that it's meant to be, which is a country that is Christian in its basis.
And I do believe that one day we'll get there, Lord, just as the founding fathers intended.
But if we don't, Lord, just help us to overcome the evil that exists in this world and become stronger in you always.
We thank you most of all for our eternal salvation.
Amen.
You know, I always enjoy these conversations, man, because there's just so much that a longer-form conversation can do to flesh out topics and get information out there.
So I appreciate you joining us, Chris.
And maybe one day we'll be able to kick back and have another conversation soon.
So hopefully we'll have you on again soon.
But until then, I want to say thank you for coming on the show.
Anything you want to say to the audience besides what you've already said?
God bless America.
God bless America.
All right.
Well, here's what we're going to do, guys.
We're going to go ahead and end it there.
Thanks for watching this episode of Just Informed Talk.
My name is Craig.
▲
Export Selection