All Episodes
Previous Next
June 18, 2022 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
31:17
ANON Military Intelligence Asset Exposes Truth About Everything! Part 1 | JustInformed Talk #003
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi and welcome to another episode of Just Informed Talk.
I'm your host Craig.
Thanks for joining me.
Yeah, I know it looks a little weird right now.
You can see we have a few different ways of looking at me.
But today I want to introduce you to a very special guest for the show.
This is a friend I've known for many years.
We've had many different long conversations about, you know, pretty much anything you can imagine.
And he's always pretty much right on target with the interpretation he has of what's going on.
And me and him have had conversations about things...
Going all the way back to almost the original Q posting, we've talked about stuff that wasn't even posted by Q but then later became posts of Q and so on and so forth.
But even going beyond that, we've had conversations about all types of things.
He has helped me break stories that I think are very important.
I'm going to introduce him to say his name is Chris.
We're just going to go by first names here to give you a little bit of an idea of his background.
Chris worked for the IGIC, for the Air Force.
That's the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community of the Air Force.
He also worked at the OSI, the Office of Special Investigation.
Just to give you an idea of what he does, he's basically an intel asset.
He has a much more extensive background, but I'll leave that for him to share what he wants to share in that regard.
But with that being said, Let me just introduce my good friend Chris to you guys out there and let him introduce himself.
Let him tell you who he is.
Here you go, Chris.
Why don't you tell the people who you are and why you're here.
Well, thank you for that introduction.
I really appreciate it.
And to everybody else watching, hello to you, too.
Craig said pretty much everything.
I was in the Air Force, worked for the IGIC, Inspector General.
I was hand-picked by them when I was 19.
And the only reason I bring that up is that kind of funneled me towards the intelligence-type approach.
Originally, I went to Texas to be a cryptolinguist.
And then I worked for the Office of Special Investigations.
And after retirement, I worked for the government.
So, yeah.
There's a lot of stories in between there, but I'll tell you what, the first thing, the first job actually was the, I'm pretty sure very few people even know that this happened, but America had a broken arrow situation back in 97, where a...
It was an A-10, I believe.
It was stolen literally right off of base and flown.
It took off and it headed west and had a full payload.
Long story short, what the news reported was that the pilot deviated from course and crashed into the Rocky Mountains.
But the truth is, the first thing I was working on was that, and it was just riddled with bullet holes.
Anyway, long story short, it was shot down over the Rockies.
This is when I was at Hill Air Force Base.
So that was a pretty rude introduction to things.
Let me just say, hold on, before you go any further, let me just say...
Probably I told you this either.
No, that's crazy.
That's the first time I've ever heard it.
And I have to say this, that for everyone who doesn't know what Broken Arrow is, it's a movie from the 90s about basically the theft of a very...
Could you explain the plot to that movie so people don't know the Broken Arrow plot?
I mean, just in general so that they understand what it is.
I think the movie was a stealth...
And I believe it had a nuclear warhead on it, I believe.
But in this case, it was an A-10 Warthog.
It had a full payload of, I think, JDAMs or whatever missile it carried.
And that took place in 1997, for anybody interested.
I... Yeah, it should be easy to find.
It took place in 1997.
It crashed into the Rockies.
Well, it crashed into the Rockies.
So my introduction to the intelligence community was walking into a hangar Thank you for joining us, Chris.
That's an incredible introduction.
So with that, I don't know if we can top it, but we'll try.
Here's some good things that we can discuss, I think.
And if there's any background noise, guys, just don't mind that.
It'll be over very Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Just ignore it.
We can hear you fine, Chris, so there's no worries there.
Now, let's start, I guess, with China, alright?
So our last conversation centered around the Chinese and this possible invasion and how they had been, you know, basically, you know, planning to have this happen.
And kind of a lot of people, I think, looked at it and kind of were skeptical.
But now we have these recordings that were just leaked of these high ranking Chinese office military officers who have been talking about strategizing the actual invasion of Russia or invasion of the United States with the help of Russia.
Now, this becomes all the more true, given what we've seen happen lately in Ukraine and the way that China and Russia have become very, very close with.
What is your take on that whole situation starting with China, going into Russia, and then we'll get into Ukraine?
But let's just talk about China and Russia's relationship and China and Russia's relationship to the United States right now.
What do you think our audience needs to know about that?
Well, I think that the Russians and the Chinese, it's a relationship of convenience.
It's not a relationship of open friendship.
It's a convenient relationship.
They both need each other at this point, even more so after the recent administration here in the States.
So they need each other very much.
They have nobody else, really.
As far as the invasion, yeah.
I mean, it's...
I hesitate a little bit there because it would be a massive undertaking to invade the United States.
I mean, a massive undertaking.
They would need to have several million on the initial blitz.
They would have to get them into the States.
In the last 10 years, it's become much easier for them to do that.
I'll say that.
Because of shipping containers and their relationship with South America and Canada.
That's a big concern.
I mean, in many ways, I don't know if your viewers or anybody has really paid attention, but China's kind of started to box us in by becoming allies or opening...
Typically, they're not allies.
They're trade partners.
That's what they call it, trade partners.
The Belt and Road.
Salton Road, exactly.
And they get these countries in a debt, try to make it as simplistic as possible.
They get them in debt, and then from that debt, they know the country can't pay it back, and from there, they'll put bases in that country.
That's called China's debt diplomacy.
You guys can look that up if you want to get more info on it.
Yeah, I mean, I would consider China to be the most...
In a straight fight, we would destroy China.
I mean, we would absolutely destroy them.
However, considering who we have making decisions for this country, I would put China as the thing that I'm second.
I'm worried about the second most.
First thing is obviously the decision makers, this administration, not just the administration, but the Senate, the Congress, very weak Republican leadership that doesn't push back on these loonies.
And So, yeah, they're absolutely a threat, 100%.
They were a threat when I first started.
Bill Clinton was the president at that point, and he did nothing but appease China.
China was probably 40, 50 years behind us in the 90s.
And then you had Proposition 187.
You had a whole bunch of things happen because of the Clinton administration.
Also, at the same time, Clinton traded them a hell of a lot of tech and weapons system that caught them up.
Probably saved 40 years off what they would normally have to research.
Well, in hindsight, you know what's crazy is we look back at all these decisions made by these leaders, and it kind of makes you wonder when you see the writing on the wall, as it is now with hindsight being 2020, that we know these people have betrayed us a long time ago, but we didn't see it all the way back then.
So now we have China that's building this parity with us as far as weapons, technology, AI. AI is really disturbing.
We had a whole discussion about that, and I want to talk to you about that here in a minute, but...
Let me ask you this.
Okay, so we talked about China briefly.
We've talked about how China and Russia have this connection and this symbiosis that is basically a product of our pushing them into this corner.
But what do you see happening?
Do you see the Ukraine invasion as being the blueprint that China wants to follow for Taiwan?
Or do you think Taiwan is something that China is hesitant to move on because of the U.S. relationship there?
What do you think?
I think that conflict with China, and again to your viewers, I apologize.
They're doing the floor.
They'll be done in like three minutes in this area.
It's not noticeable.
I have headphones on, so if it was noticeable, it's not very noticeable.
Okay, good.
Yeah, let me think.
Okay, let's talk about the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Is that kind of giving, emboldening China to move on?
Is that like a blueprint they want to follow?
Is that why they're locking down Shanghai and other major cities?
Is there a buildup for this invasion that may not involve any type of war against the United States?
Or are they going to hit this?
I mean, do you think they would do something as crazy as hit our Pacific fleet?
Or do something that kind of rash to take Taiwan back?
I think that they would have to deal with the United States before they go to Taiwan.
Taiwan and Ukraine are a different story.
We have a protectorate pact with Taiwan, whereas Ukraine, some decision makers, the corrupt ones, have business dealings there, but as far as on paper, legally, there's really no pact with Ukraine.
Taiwan's a different story.
Not to mention that Taiwan creates a whole hell of a lot of chips, and we need those chips.
So the The real decision makers in the United States would absolutely want to prevent that.
So for China to make a move, they would need to disable more than the Pacific fleet.
I mean, they would need to...
We're in the nuclear era.
We're beyond the nuclear era now.
So they would need to probably push all the way to...
They would need to push far into the homeland of America to even hold Taiwan.
It's just...
If you look at it from a...
Throw out politics and just think about this from a logical standpoint.
They really would lose more than they would gain by trying to attack Taiwan with the alliance that's been built in the Pacific against them.
Not to mention that they're antagonistic to actually every country in that area.
So it's not like people would be lining up to help out with that.
So for them to actually make a move, they would need to take the United States out of the conflict.
How they do that, there are several different options.
I do believe that, you know, again, logically speaking, I do believe that conflict is absolutely inevitable, both with China and internally.
What do you think the timeline on a conflict is?
Is it accelerating?
Is it decelerating?
Are we on a fast track?
Like, where do you see this all heading in the next, you know, two to four or five years?
Just from here.
I think the perfect time, if China was going to make a move, it would be before the midterm elections.
Because from everything that I've looked at and I've been working on, etc., The left is going to get absolutely demolished.
Now, this doesn't take into consideration their ability to cheat.
But if we're talking fair elections here, they're going to get the floor wiped with them.
So if China has a window, it would be a weak president of the United States, an internal strife within the United States, And shaky grounds with allies in Europe, which we do have right now.
I mean, we're not as strong with our allies as we used to be.
So if I'm China and if I really want to invade, and if it has to happen, then I would do it in the next few months.
I'm not saying that that's going to happen.
I'm just saying from a strategic standpoint, that would be the best, that would be the most advantageous time.
Because after the midterms, who knows what's going to happen, you know?
Yeah, I think it stands to reason that that's a logical timeline, but I also think it stands to reason that China is very good at playing the long game.
So they have plans for 50, 100 years and further, I think, for what they have in mind for the world at large.
So who knows what kind of timeline they'll put themselves in, although I think it would stand to reason What we've seen in China lately is you're seeing...
I was just reading articles today about these bank runs in China.
We keep hearing about Evergrande, the collapse of the real estate industry in China, although these things are not as likely to have as much of an impact as they would in other countries because everything's propped up by a fiat currency in the Chinese yuan.
But it stands to reason that the Communist Party believes in the mandate from heaven, right?
And any threat to the actual party structure itself and the ruling class would be basically a cause for them to make these kind of drastic moves.
And I think if they look at Russia and say, hey, if Russia can get away with that, then we can get away with this.
It may be a fool's errand on their part, but I think, you know, who knows?
They're kind of a wild card when it comes to all of that.
So I just thought that was interesting, and I thought our audience would enjoy getting your take from it.
Let me jump over.
To the chat right now.
And by the way, if you guys are on Foxhole watching, make sure you leave comments in the chat and I'll go check those as we go.
But yeah, go ahead.
Say what you wanted to say.
Well, just one quick point.
You're absolutely right.
When I was studying China, when I was looking at China, when I was active duty, they do have a long game.
And we see their long game.
They will create strife within countries, or they will create debt dependence.
And so their long game, in the end...
One of my former colleagues, friend of mine, says China doesn't have to do anything.
All they have to do is just do what they've been doing.
Considering the leadership of decision makers in the United States, he believes that eventually it'll take care of itself for China.
I don't believe that.
I believe that there are a considerable amount more pro-America people than the public's led to believe.
It's just as they cheat on, you know, in elections, who could trust a poll, you know?
If they come out and say, you know, whatever, 50% of Americans are angry today, who could trust anything they say?
Every person I've spoke to during an investigation or outside of an investigation has always been pro-America, or at the very least, not anti-American.
Very few people I've met.
So whenever I see that...
Anyway, long story short, you're right.
Well, how are these...
And that's a good question.
How are these people getting promoted to such levels of prominence inside of our government, especially elected offices, when you see these people who basically campaign on and espouse these anti-American views and say America was never great and say we're not an exceptional nation, et cetera, et cetera, and they when you see these people who basically campaign on and espouse these anti-American views and say America was never great and say we're not an exceptional nation, et cetera, et It amazes me when I see them talk so terribly about our nation,
But at the same time, I wonder, is everything fixed?
Because after the 2020 election, I have no faith in the electoral system because it seems so broken and so ripe with fraud and abuse.
What do you see our nation doing in the future to end that?
Because this kind of goes into another rabbit hole I think we can dive into to consider is that you've heard these devolution theories about QAnon and how everything has to get really bad before it can get better because people have to see.
And then it goes into all these rabbit holes, which I'm not as big a fan of because I believe that we have to be the change we want to see.
We can't just rely on some outside force to swoop in at the last second and save us from oblivion when we're obviously...
The whole country is burning down.
I'm not going to sit around and say, yeah, the good guys got it, you know?
So what are your thoughts?
I know this is a long question, but what do you see it as?
As long as corrupt individuals control the voting blocks, the voting booths, just check to your viewers.
Look into who is controlling your local voting booth.
I guarantee that you will find...
At least one of these weirdos that somehow wormed their way in there.
That's how they did it.
They wormed their way into these voting booths and they...
In my opinion in this, because I wasn't there, but I have enough evidence to substantiate it.
Actually, the public now has enough evidence to substantiate it.
They throw away votes.
They add votes.
And if nobody's there to check it, and if nobody's there to report it, and if the person that it's being reported to is not doing anything, then nothing's going to get done about it.
So it goes back to the circle that Q used to bring up.
Something...
They used to say it's something like, you just forgot how to play.
The people want to fight back, but they forgot how to do it.
They used to say something like that.
I don't remember the exact words.
But I agree with that.
I think that people are truly waking up now because it's hurting them in the wallet.
Everything is so expensive now.
People are like, what the hell is going on now?
Whereas back then, they probably just chalked it up to politics.
But now that they're seeing that there really are issues, in the schools, their kids are dealing with these whacked out teachers.
The gas prices, the food prices, everything is...
So what I'm getting at here is that when Q brought up, it has to get bad before it gets better.
I think...
I don't know how much more worse it could get.
I mean, like...
I mean, what are we talking about?
I don't want to...
It could always get worse, but my point is that from a societal standpoint, if your cities are burning, if everything is too expensive and people can't afford it, if the school system is bad, the public school system, if you have a government that's Openly going against the rights of the people, then eventually two things are going to happen.
One, those decision makers are just going to take completely over everything, or the people are going to rise up and put an end to it.
There's no middle ground on that.
At this point, there is no middle ground, because they are unwilling to talk about anything.
To your viewers and to you, you might not see them as an enemy.
They see you as an enemy.
Oh, no.
I've said that multiple times.
I believe that, you know, when they look at us, they see a threat to their power, and that's really what we have to remind ourselves every day.
And, you know, that's why I said, you know, it does have to get bad before it gets better, I think.
But I also said, you know, don't sit around waiting for somebody to swoop in and save you at the last second because you have to be the change.
This reminds me, I had a great guest on Tuesday, Jeff Dow, former NSA analyst, worked under Admiral Mike Rogers.
He was talking about how...
You know, he gives great information about how to get involved in your local elections, starting on the county level, starting in the local government, realizing that you can affect change by getting into those positions now.
Get in there now before the 2022 midterm election, which we will talk about in a second here.
But to stay kind of on topic where we were at, I don't know, we're jumping around all over the place, right?
So who knows what topics we're going to be in here in a minute.
But let's kind of go back to Russia, Ukraine.
Let's talk about that for a second.
What do you see happening in Russia and Ukraine when it comes to these massive bio labs that have been uncovered?
What is your take on the public?
How much should the public really know about these things as far as, you know, Could that be an actual epicenter for the real COVID? Was it always Wuhan?
Could it have been some joint effort with Wuhan and China and Ukraine?
There are so many theories popping off on the internet.
I'd love to hear your take on it.
When I was being trained in my early days, the person who trained me told me that, something I'm sure you've all heard before, if it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, it's a duck.
And the bottom line is that the COVID outbreak took place at the worst possible time for President Trump and the best possible time for the current position holder.
I don't consider that to be a coincidence.
I don't consider the unified front by the media to be a coincidence.
I don't consider...
I don't know how it is in your town or your viewers' towns, but everything, where I'm from or where I was working at that point, everything was about COVID, about do this, do that.
I think that was more of a test run than anything.
I mean, it felt like a test run.
We used to do that when I was active duty.
You know, we would have test runs on certain things to see how people would react.
Hold on.
What do you think it was a test run for?
It could be a test run for several things.
For the real bioweapon, because COVID... And at the end of the day...
I'll just say, I don't believe the numbers at all.
I mean, like, from my own research, and I have a feeling that a lot of people who are watching this, they don't believe it either.
I don't buy it for one second.
The timing, everything.
I believe that there is a COVID virus, of course, but I don't believe that it killed whatever.
I'll say this.
This is what I think, and I've said this before on the show publicly, and I think it's just the only thing you have to look at is I think it's the 2019 to 2020 flu statistics where you see this massive fall off where it goes like it drops by 98%, and then that exact number is what happens with COVID.
So it's like I think they just, this is my opinion, that COVID is the flu.
They brainwashed everybody to believe the flu was COVID.
Then they told everybody they were going to kill their grandma if they didn't basically put themselves under house arrest and shoot themselves up with experimental vaccines.
And now these vaccines, I mean, do you have any thoughts on those?
Because I think, you know, whatever you think on that would be worthwhile to hear.
Because I have so many opinions.
I'm not a doctor.
I don't give medical advice.
But I say that...
What I've seen with these vaccines looks a lot like worldly population programs being pushed by, you know, these globalist-backed organizations like the WHO, WF, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, etc., etc.
They've been talking about it openly for a long time about how, you know, they need to get rid of people to make the world better.
So what do you see that as being?
Well, it goes back to the test run.
What I was saying, what I brought up earlier is that if they were to run a test and they see how successful it was, and frankly, it was very successful for them, the way that they were able to shut down the world very quick, then if they were to release something else, something serious this time, and tell the public, well, hey, COVID is back, you have to follow the same, then the world would be in serious trouble at that point.
Because the people like us who are skeptical would end up being the ones hurt the most because we would be the ones saying, this is not real.
And then it would end up being real.
I've said that one before, too, that that could be how they get us with this stuff.
There's other avenues.
They can put it into water.
They can put it into food.
As far as my research into COVID, it doesn't have to be in an injection.
It could be put into food.
It could be put into water.
Who knows?
Let me just say, I have no proof on anything I just said.
I'm just throwing out hypotheticals.
If they wanted to put it in food or water...
That would be easy.
I've always been, even before COVID took place, I was always the most concerned about the pharmaceutical company because we have most of our medication.
We, as in the West, have most of our medication created in China and in India.
And they don't care at all about guidelines or standards, so who knows?
Who knows what's going into it?
It wouldn't be...
Do we have any hope for the audience here?
This is getting pretty dark pretty quick.
I'm sorry.
Hey, man, you wouldn't mind.
Yeah, I know.
Again, I have no proof of that, but it's the truth, though.
I mean, if you logically and rationally think about it, it is the truth.
The medications are created in those areas, and...
That's our enemy.
I mean, that's our opponent, I should say.
Okay, so let me kind of switch topics, but not really.
I want to go into something else here about the biolabs and Metabiota, Hunter Biden, Rosemont Seneca Partners, Ukraine, etc.
I want our audience, I want to ask this question to you as a person who's seen the other side, right?
You know the other side.
We know there are good guys inside of all these places of power in our government, regardless of if there's a deep state, regardless of whether there's a never-ending bureaucracy, people who have either been compromised or apathetic or just don't like this country and want to destroy it to bring in communism, whatever it is, right?
Let me ask you this.
What do people...
The good guys, let's say, on the inside, how do they look at something like Metabiota and Ukraine and these bio labs and this enriching of Hunter Biden paying his father off, all of the blackmail compromising, crack-smoking Chinese prostitute spies, Russian prostitute spies, Russian gang members stealing laptops?
I mean, and then who knows?
Only God knows what other kind of evil stuff these people have done.
What...
I ask this question, why isn't the FBI kicking down their doors?
Why aren't these people being arrested?
Why aren't we having real trials for these people?
Because the American people, for me, it's like, how is this evidence?
You want to go after Trump for all these crazy things that never happened, and then in the same breath they turn around and say, oh yeah, just ignore the fact that we have a laptop that contains video proof of Hunter Biden and evidence of Hunter Biden giving bribes to his father from foreign governments.
I mean, is there a battle going on right now behind the scenes that we can't see?
Like, what's happening here?
I don't believe so.
I don't believe that there's a battle going in.
I think that the good people...
There are good people.
Don't get me wrong.
There are good people.
But I think that the good people who are in decision-making roles are very few and far between.
And so, you know, the rank and file...
I mean, if we're being upfront with each other, if we're being honest, the rank and file probably wants to put them in the dirt.
I mean, honestly, they see them as traitors and they want them out of here.
Well, here's a good question.
Let me ask you this then, because I know there's only so much you can really answer.
But what would you say to anybody watching who's inside of these agencies, who may be either a decision maker or close to a decision maker?
What would your plea to them be as far as getting them to stand up against this in whatever way they can, you know, hopefully legally and lawfully?
That's what we want.
We don't we don't want extra judicial anything.
We're working within the parameters of the legal system.
But what would your plea to them be to say, you see this just if I can see it and I'm just some guy.
Right.
And you can see it.
And you know what you know.
What would your plea to them be?
Because I've been trying to make an appeal to these people in law enforcement, these people in the intelligence community, these people in the FBI and the DOJ, that they need to do something to expose this.
Because, I mean, we're getting enough information now.
But how do we get it out?
How do we get this cancer out of our government?
How do we get these people, you know, to do the right thing?
What would you say to them? - I would say, I would say that, hey, I'm going to go inside.
Is that okay?
I'm going to go inside.
Yeah, go inside.
It'll take me two minutes.
Go ahead.
Because they're mowing the lawn now.
I've got to go inside.
Give me literally two minutes.
All right.
So he's going to take a break there.
He's got to do his thing.
So like I was saying, what would your plea be to those people?
To do the same thing that I did with you when we first met.
To find somebody such as...
Have you ever told your...
You probably haven't told your viewers, but a long story short...
Yeah, no, tell them.
Tell them the whole story.
It's fine.
I met Craig in...
I think it was, maybe it was before Q, or it was right around the same time.
It was right around Q, yeah.
Right after it started.
He had maybe 500 subscribers.
He was on YouTube at this point.
And I saw a guy, I saw a young man that had a good voice, spoke well, was interested in what he was doing, researched his topics well, and had a podium, and liked being on the podium, liked being able to talk about various things.
So...
That's when I sought you out for the first time, because I figured that I could give you information, or we could research certain things, and you would get it out there.
So that would be my suggestion, because they can't go to the media, and they can't go to the news about it.
The news wouldn't do anything about it.
They would have to go to an independent source, such as yourself.
And there's a lot of people like you out there.
They were trained the same way I was trained.
You have to be careful about who you're talking to, obviously.
They know this already, but I want to explain it for your viewers.
When we look for somebody that we can have a mutually beneficial relationship, to your viewers, I've become his friend through the years.
We've been talking for probably five years now about these various things, but it's a normal thing for people in the intelligence community to seek out somebody who's in your position.
You know, and work for a mutually beneficial relationship.
Give you information, work on things together, and you tell it to the public.
And it was working very well on YouTube for a long time.
You were up to, I think, 300,000 at one point.
Yeah, I think they...
It was about that, wasn't it?
Yeah, it was about 300.
They caught on pretty quick, though, after they started seeing the information that we were putting out there.
They got pretty scared, so...
We were a year ahead of a lot.
Yeah.
We were a year ahead of a lot of things.
We were way ahead of a lot of different things, stories that came out later.
But I'll say this.
So what do we need to be ahead of now, I guess would be a good question.
Where do you see everything going from here into the midterms?
▲
Export Selection