All Episodes
Previous Next
March 30, 2022 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
01:22:04
Hunter Biden Laptop BLACKMAIL May Trigger Massive Cyber Attack! | JustInformed News #078
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Had to rise up just so they could see me Did what I had to do just to feed me And what was left over I put towards my dreaming But the only thing in life that has meaning Are the things you gotta work for, believe me Hi, welcome to another episode of Just Informed News.
I'm your host, Craig.
Thanks for joining me.
We have a lot to get into.
Today's going to be a major episode because we have a major breakthrough in Congress of all places.
Can you believe it?
Yeah, I'm shocked just as much as you are.
Apparently today, in this line of questioning coming from Matt Gaetz, as he was questioning, I should say, the FBI assistant director of the cyber division, Brian Vordren, you cannot make this up.
It is incredible.
He called the FBI on all their lies about the Hunter laptop.
He confronted him on where is the laptop?
Who has possession of it?
Are they not investigating all of the compromising material that's on it?
And then he attempts, which we'll see if that goes through all the way, to enter an actual physical copy of Hunter Biden's hard drive into the congressional record.
This is a major deal.
I don't care what anybody says.
This is huge because if you understand what this means and implicates, it means that, you know, they're going to try to stop this trial.
Trust me, Jerry Nadler and his handlers were already trying to squirm their way out of allowing it to be entered into the official congressional record.
But this is big.
I want to play a clip from the exchange, but first let's look over at this story here.
FBI cyber chief says he doesn't know where Hunter Biden's laptop from hell is.
Huh.
Interesting exchange here.
It says the FBI Assistant Director of Cyber Division Brian Vorendrin on Tuesday said he doesn't know where Hunter Biden's laptop is because it's not in his purview.
Hunter Biden's laptop was previously abandoned at a computer repair shop in Delaware.
The Delaware repair shop owner, John Paul Mack Isaac, contacted lawmakers about Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop, and the FBI was in possession of the computer by December of 2019.
The FBI withheld the laptop from President Trump's legal team during the first impeachment.
Emails on Hunter Biden's laptop revealed he was involved in international money laundering operation and acted as a bag man for Joe Biden, among other crimes.
Hunter Biden took money from China, Russia, Ukraine, and other countries.
And today, Congressman Matt Gaetz asked the FBI Cyber Chief Brian Forgen if he knew where Hunter Biden's laptop is.
And I'm just going to play the exchange, guys, because when you see this exchange happening, God bless Matt Gaetz because you can tell he's nervous.
I can tell at least.
I've met him a couple times at a few of these conferences that I've been to.
He's a really nice guy.
He seems pretty genuine to me.
But you can tell he's nervous because think about what he's doing here.
He's going up against the FBI, the DOJ, all these corrupt government officials, and he's putting forth evidence that Of major corruption, seditious conspiracy, treason, corruption, bribery, blackmail, all of the sexual crimes that were on the laptop, all the drug crimes that were on the laptop.
And this isn't just anybody.
This is the supposed president, the illegitimate, fraudulent president's son of all people.
And the line of questioning that Matt Gaetz goes through with this FBI assistant director is great because it just confronts them on how are you not doing anything?
How are you not aware of this?
How are you pretending that you don't know anything about it?
I mean, you're the FBI, so unless you're complicit in the cover-up of all this, then nothing makes sense.
Because otherwise, you have a sitting member of Congress handing you on a silver platter, here, here is the laptop, here's the hard drive, here are the contents, here are the crimes.
You look at it and tell me what you think.
But they're like...
I don't know about that because this guy is just as nervous as Matt Gaetz because he knows it's the deep state.
And the deep state is ruthless.
And they're evil and criminal and corrupt.
And they're willing to do anything they have to to shut this kind of thing down.
But how do we do it?
How do we beat them?
What do we do?
We defeat evil and corruption by bringing it into the light.
Showing it to the whole world.
And I think that's exactly what we saw here today.
I'm going to play this.
I think it's an awesome step in the right direction.
Now, granted, this isn't going to solve every problem overnight, but just listen to this line of questioning.
And then look at the exchange at the end where he tries to enter the hard drive into the official congressional record and Jerry Nadler, who's presiding over this committee, which is investigating corruption at the FBI and what they did.
Just watch how it all goes down because it's fascinating and it's also very telling when you see the reaction by this guy.
He's like, I'm in the cyber division.
It didn't say anything about us talking about this today.
It's like, this is your job, dude.
Literally, this is your job.
Okay, let's watch.
Here is it.
The laptop.
Sir, I'm not here to talk about the laptop.
I'm here to talk about the FBI cyber program.
You are the assistant director of FBI cyber.
I want to know where Hunter Biden's laptop is.
Where is it?
Sir, I don't know that answer.
That is astonishing to me.
Has FBI cyber assessed whether or not Hunter Biden's laptop could be a point of vulnerability allowing America's enemies to hurt our country?
Sir, the FBI's cyber program is based off of what's codified in Title 18, Section 1030, a code which talks about computer intrusions, right, using nefarious intent.
Well, you've talked about passwords here.
I mean, Hunter Biden's password on his laptop was Hunter02.
He drops it off at a repair store.
I'm holding the receipt.
From Max Computer Repair, where in December 2019, they turned over this laptop to the FBI. And what now you're telling me right here is that as the Assistant Director of FBI Cyber, you don't know where this is after it was turned over to you three years ago.
Yes, sir.
That's an accurate statement.
How are Americans supposed to trust that you can protect us from the next colonial pipeline if it seems that you can't locate a laptop that was given to you three years ago from the first family Potentially creating vulnerabilities for our country.
Sir, it's not in the purview of my investigative responsibilities.
But that is shocking that you wouldn't, as the Assistant Director of Cyber, know whether or not there are international business deals, kickbacks, shakedowns, that are on this laptop that would make the first family suspect to some sort of compromise.
Mr.
Assistant Director, Have you assessed whether or not the first family is compromised as a result of the Hunter Biden laptop?
Sir, as a representative of the FBI cyber program, it is not in the realm of my responsibilities to deal with the questions that you're asking me.
Has anyone at FBI cyber been asked to make assessments whether or not the laptop creates a point of vulnerability?
Sir, we have multiple lines of investigative responsibility in the FBI. They're all available in public source.
Well, I would think you'd know this one.
I mean, I would think that if the president's son, who does international business deals, referencing the now president with the Chinese, with Ukrainians, I mean, have you assessed whether or not the Hunter Biden laptop gives Russia the ability to harm our country?
Sir, again...
We can do this back and forth for the next couple of minutes.
I don't have any information about the Hunter Biden laptop.
But should you?
I mean, you're the assistant director of FBI Cyber.
By the block and line chart?
No, sir, I should not.
Who should we put in that chair to ask questions about this laptop that FBI has had for three years?
Sir, I'm not in a position to make a recommendation.
So you don't have it.
You don't know who has it.
You don't know where it is.
You're the assistant director.
You know, earlier you talked about whether or not you were the Grant Hill or the Christian Leighton.
It sounds like you're the Chris Webber trying to call a timeout when you don't have one.
Who is it?
Do you even know who has it?
Do you know who we should put in that chair to ask these questions to?
No, sir, I don't know who has it.
Well, could you find out and tell us?
You're going to have to give us briefings thanks to Mr.
Liu and Mr.
Massey's question about whether or not the FBI was taking a $5 million test drive on the Pegasus system that was being used to target people in politics, people in government, people in the media.
People in American life, so will you commit to give us a briefing as the Assistant Director of FBI Cyber as to where the laptop is, whether or not it's a point of vulnerability, whether or not the American people should wonder whether or not the First Family is compromised?
Sir, I'd be happy to take your request back to our office.
Gosh, I mean, will you advocate for that briefing?
You will?
I will be happy to take your request back to the FBI headquarters.
Well, do you believe that that is a briefing that the Congress is worthy of having, I guess?
Sir, I'm not going to answer that question.
I'm here to talk.
The invitation says, oversight of the FBI's cyber division.
It does not say anything...
Well, right, but I mean, this is a cyber asset.
This is a point of vulnerability.
If there are passwords, if there are business deals...
If there are references to things that could harm our country, like, you can't even sit here right now and say that you know that there's not a point of vulnerability.
Maybe there are other crimes.
Let me just pause it real quick, okay?
I have to, because I'll let the rest of the video play in a second.
But think about this.
This is the head, or the assistant director of cyber division at FBI, saying that this is not a cyber asset.
There's no big deal.
It's not under my purview.
But remember, what is the story that we've been looking at from Jack Maxey about what they're uncovering in this laptop?
They're finding these Department of Defense encryption keys with long 20-year-plus expiration dates.
So, yeah, this is totally in his purview.
If a crackhead was running around, throwing his laptop around that contained this very classified, very secret information and access to classified and secret information, I would imagine, this is just me, That that might fall under his purview.
But again, the FBI has been covering up since the beginning.
They were the ones who have framed Trump.
They're the ones who have been illegally spying.
The whole organization's corrupt top to bottom, just like most of the intelligence agencies and the rest.
So confronting them on this, you know, good on them, but let's just see how it ends.
Maybe they're tax issues or whatever, but as it relates to, I mean, is the first family sufficient cyber infrastructure to protect?
You don't even know if they're compromised.
Tell you what, Mr.
Chairman.
I seek unanimous consent to enter into the record of this committee the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop, which I'm in possession of.
Whoa!
I'm not...
I just watched Jerry Nadler's handlers tell him what to do.
This guy is so incompetent.
He doesn't even know what he's doing up there.
He's like the penguin from Batman.
Let's watch his handlers tell him what to do in this case because it looks like he was caught off guard by it.
There's no objection to that.
I've never had...
I will object pending further investigation.
What's the basis of that objection?
It's unanimous consent request, and I object pending...
I have a subsequent question.
Mr.
Chairman, I seek unanimous consent to enter into the record the receipt...
It may very well be entered into the record after we look at it further.
Mr.
Chairman, I have a subsequent unanimous consent.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Mr. Chairman, I seek unanimous consent to enter into the record the receipt from the Department of Justice to the MAC shop.
Mr. Chairman, this is Ms. Deming.
Am I next?
Without objection.
All right, so there you saw it for yourselves.
So...
Look, this isn't going to cure everything overnight, but this is a good step in the right direction to get into the truth, right?
I mean, think about it.
What is he doing?
I mean, Matt Gaetz is standing up to a pretty powerful machine and handing over information that's pretty damning to the deep state as a whole and this corrupt, fraudulent, illegitimate administration that's occupied our capital.
So...
I look at stories like this and I think, man, we're heading in the right direction.
As long as we can keep holding these people to account for their crimes, then we can get this going and get the ball rolling.
As of this video, I'll see if I can figure it out as we're recording here, but I don't know if they've allowed this hard drive to be entered into the congressional record yet, but it seems as though it's going to be, and if it is, then that's major.
But, you know, how these Democrats work.
They're all cheaters and liars and scammers and con artists and frauds.
And so they'll figure out, surely, some way to either keep this from entering the record or to, you know...
The worst thing they'll do is, like, they'll be like, oh, Matt Gaetz is in possession of crimes against children.
He should be arrested.
It's like, wait, he's bringing this to you to investigate it.
But they're going to try to spin it in some crazy way or just not talk about it at all, pretend like it never happened.
Because this whole hearing was about how the FBI has been regularly breaking the rules that they say they follow in how they conduct their investigations and how they conduct their police work.
And this is just another example of their dereliction of duty.
You see for yourself very clearly that these people are not only incompetent, but this is like on the verge of an entire organization, an entire agency inside of our government with other agencies working in coordination to try to undermine the sovereignty and security of this nation by lying about these obvious criminals who have taken power through a coup in our government.
I don't know.
I guess maybe I'm the crazy one, right?
I have no clue.
But either way, as we always do, we start over here at justinformednews.com.
If you haven't come over here, sign up, hit that subscribe button, put your email address in before you do that.
Also, don't forget informednews.com is the official news website for Just Informed News and Talk.
We'll get through a bunch of articles that were posted over here.
You guys should go check it out, though.
If you can't sit through the full hour-long episode, you can get the same headlines here at informednews.com.
Also, Stick around to the end.
We do our scripture reading where we do a deep dive into scripture.
Today we're going to do most of the book of John chapter 14.
I hope you guys stick around for that.
We may have a little surprise, but the point in the scripture that I'm highlighting here is, and Jesus told him, I am the truth, the way, and the life.
No one comes to the Father except through me.
We're going to do a deep dive into this scripture later, so I hope you guys stick around for that.
Now, one more thing.
I want to give a special thank you to Victory Book for sponsoring this episode.
Victory Book, if you don't know what it is, is a personal goal-setting system, and it's for people 8 to 108 years of age.
You're never too young or too old to learn to dream bigger.
The audiobook and flipbook are free to download at victorybook.com.
That's, again, visit victorybook.com and download your free copy today.
And a special thanks to Victory Book for sponsoring this show.
Now, let's get into the next story here.
You have Chuck Grassley also...
Putting out or entering into the congressional record all of these emails that prove and show Hunter Biden was working for the communist Chinese to facilitate these deals.
So I think...
Personally, I do think they're going to try to play like a three-card money here, meaning they're going to keep moving everything around so you don't know what's going on because there's so many crimes.
So my theory on how they're going to try to hide this and deceive the American people as they always do is that they're going to highlight these kind of smaller crimes that can be more or less explained away like, Oh, yeah, he's an independent businessman.
He can do deals with China.
It's not Joe Biden's fault.
And they're going to say, oh, well, you know, he wasn't doing this and he wasn't doing that.
But the big major crimes, the drug crimes, the crimes against children, possibly the other major, major crimes that were uncovered in there, just the overall conspiracy.
If he was holding DOD network encryption keys on his laptop, as we talked about in the last episode, those things are treason, seditious conspiracy.
That's some big stuff.
You could get major trouble for that.
So I think it's going to be like a three-card money game where they keep sliding around talking about his taxes and the media is going to try to manipulate every story as it comes out to be like, oh, and the continuation of his tax fraud investigation.
And it's like, no, we're not investigating tax fraud.
We're investigating this corrupt son of the supposed president, Who's compromised fully and bribing his father or taking bribes on behalf of his father and his father's brother and running this organized crime cartel in our government.
That's what we're wanting to get to the bottom of.
Not like, oh, he didn't pay child support for a few years.
It's like, what?
Now, I'm more worried about the treason than the seditious conspiracy, thanks.
But, yeah, you can get them for all of it.
It doesn't really bother me.
I mean, if you commit crimes, you should, you know, obviously be held accountable.
Matt Gaetz also, though, introducing this piece of legislation, just going in the same, you know, step of what we've been talking about.
He's introducing resolution to strip security clearances from intel officials who lied about Hunter Biden's laptop and It's called, I think here, the quote, spoke-who-cried-wolf resolution.
Now, this is a resolution that would basically remove the security clearances for the 50 intelligence officials who penned that letter about how Hunter's laptop was not real when we know now, in fact, it was.
And I say good.
I say all these people should have their security clearances removed.
And I'd say even further that they should be investigated for what they did.
They knew.
They knew.
You know they knew.
When they penned that letter, they knew.
If the FBI had the laptop in 2019, and that letter was penned, I guess, what, around 2020, right before the election, then you cannot tell me for one second that they didn't know about the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop, the compromising information that was on there.
But again, I feel like this is how they strong-armed Joe Biden into running.
I don't think he had any intention of running.
I think Joe Biden was happy to go, you know, sit on his island, in his island house, which is right next to Jeffrey Epstein's in the Virgin Islands, if you didn't know.
But he was more than happy to go down there and hang out at his Delaware Beach house and mumble around and be a complete pervert and fool.
And he was happy to do that, but then they were like, oh, this is great.
We have somebody that we can shoo into the presidency through this coup with the illegal ballot harvesting, the voter fraud through the computers that we talked about yesterday, which may or may not have been directed through an AT&T network server center in Nashville that was bombed on Christmas Day right after the election, conveniently by some lone wolf person who...
Chose Christmas Day of all days to go bomb a network facility, which makes you wonder, was that a deep state operation to cover up the crimes that they did where they were routing the real-time voting manipulations into the machines that were all connected to a network?
These are the things that...
They knew all this, and I get a little bit off on a tangent here, but suffice it to say that I think these people should be stripped of their security clearances, and we'll just get into the next story here.
Conservative CNN host S.E. Cupp exposes media double standard on Hunter Biden laptop story on CNN. So usually I don't play these clips because they're just, you know, they are what they are.
It's CNN. But this one's pretty great.
So what it is is this person, Essie Cup, going on to Brian Stelter's show and she's basically calling him out in front of his face and Stelter being the coward, the little potato head coward that he is.
He doesn't, he just ignores her basically and says, uh, uh.
And then he tries to pawn it off on some other lady who's there who has no idea what to say because, you know, they're complicit in the cover-up just as much.
So watch this.
And it's it's almost refreshing, except when you realize that it's CNN and their viewers won't believe it anyway, because, you know, their viewers are have been brainwashed and programmed to not believe anything that discounts the the ideas and the agenda, the narrative that they've been implanted with by these liars and these the narrative that they've been implanted with by these liars and these crooks and these crooked, So here you go.
And the conflicts have been, you know, questioned by everyone, including like Sean Hannity at one time questioned her conflict.
The outrage is warranted.
Those texts are very troubling.
And we should be looking at whether Clarence Thomas knew or or or if that's a conflict.
But listen, you don't have to look far to find a very similar story that was really ignored by the media and, in fact, called false over and over and over again.
and that's the Hunter Biden laptop story.
Hunter Biden is a relative of a very famous person the way Ginny Thomas is a relative of a very powerful, famous person.
And I, you know, my...
Twitter feed is clogged with blue-check reporters who are instantly believing that there is some tie between Ginny and Clarence.
And, you know, the rush to dismiss Hunter as not a relevant story by lots of reporters I think is hard to ignore.
I wonder, Jane, do you have a reaction to that?
Yeah, your mic stops working.
As an investigative reporter, do you look at the Hunter Biden story and say, there's a lot more to dig into here?
You know, I mean, that Hunter Biden story is, Hunter Biden is being investigated by the Justice Department and by the IRS, as I understand it at this point.
And so it seems that there's no shortage of legal interest in Hunter Biden, and yet we have not seen that Ginny Thomas has been called by the January 6th Committee because there's been such sensitivity about not calling a Supreme Court Justice's wife.
There's talk of subpoenaing her, but I would say, if anything, they've been, you know, leaning over in the other direction in order not to take action on her because of the complicated issues that have to do with the three branches of government and one not wanting to interfere on the other.
Yes, but the legal interest in the Hunter Biden story would make the journalism interest, I think, even more warranted.
To raise it.
The other big Supreme Court story this week, of course...
All right, yeah, it's like, oh, let's get off of this subject really quick, right?
So think about this.
You know, they didn't answer the question, obviously.
I mean, it's CNN. I don't have high hopes for them to have any semblance or shred of journalistic integrity when it comes to reporting on the truth.
But here you see them confronted on their own news show, and all they do is just deflect and go, do you have anything on that, Ginny?
And Ginny's like, you're asking me?
I didn't hear you.
What'd you say?
Was that Ginny Thomas, the wife of Clarence Thomas?
Is that what I heard?
It's like...
No!
No, no, no, no, no.
You guys are criminals.
You guys are corrupt and you guys are screwed.
Let's just put it that way.
Because as soon as this information comes out and we see how criminally corrupt you all are, I mean, look at this little potato-faced, you know, fool.
I don't like to make fun of people's appearances because I think that's irrelevant to any conversation.
But you can't help but see a face like that and think to yourself that this guy has done such irreparable damage to our country that he should be brought up on charges.
He is a criminal.
He is.
The lies that he put forth to the American people, the suppression of information that he helped facilitate to facilitate this coup in our government, the ways that he has damaged our nation are immeasurable.
And he himself knows fully well that what he's doing is harmful and detrimental, and he does it anyway, knowingly.
That's what makes these people criminals.
And detestable and loathsome.
And that's why they all should be investigated.
They should all be brought under investigation.
They should be fired from their jobs.
I mean, but then again, that would require these deep state corporations and their globalist backers to actually have, you know, a set of priorities that weren't destroying America as a whole.
So I really doubt that will ever happen.
But, you know, you look back at all these liars and fools and you kind of laugh at them.
Here's another example.
Joe Scarborough back in 2020 telling us and ranting about how Hunter Biden's laptop is fake.
Let's watch because you've got to put this stuff on to show how evil and corrupt these people are and morally deficient and bankrupt.
It is so obviously disinformation that the person that writes the story won't put their name on it because they know it's a lie.
History will expose you all as fools and useful idiots for the Russians for four years now.
For four years now, there has been a line from Russian agents into the campaign.
It's unbelievable how stupid you think Americans are.
How stupid you think Americans are.
The idiocy.
The sheer idiocy.
You are revealed right now, but you will be revealed throughout history for basically running cover for Russians and an ex-KGB agent who said the greatest tragedy of the 20th century was the collapse of the Soviet Union, a regime that, yes, killed 40 million of its own people.
Oh, wow.
Yeah, thanks, Joe.
I don't think that he would stand by that today, but maybe he would.
And that's again part of their strategy.
Double down, double down, double down.
If you get caught in a lie, double down.
Double down on your lie until there's nothing left.
Until you basically, this is the problem too, is that they keep doubling down on their lies because they have nothing to lose.
If their lies are exposed, then they lose everything.
And they have nothing to gain by telling the truth.
And a guy like Joe Scarborough, who has a very questionable past with the mysterious death of one of his assistants or one of the people that was working for him, his staffer, that just wound up magically dead in his office.
I don't know how that happened.
I'm sure she just fell and hit her head like Bob Saget.
No big deal.
No investigation.
Let's just put this inside.
It's like...
Joe, we know you're compromised too.
We know you lie for a living.
We know that you're paid by MSNBC to report the propaganda that you're handed by the deep state.
And we know that you have, again, not one of these people that I've shown so far, as far as the journalists go, Have a shred of journalistic integrity.
And as a matter of fact, I would argue that they're either pawns of the globalist deep state that's trying to destroy America, or they're willfully involved with the plot.
They're a part of the plot.
They're happily joined into it.
Or they're compromised into it.
I don't know.
But look, to hear people say things like that, it's like, are you a journalist?
Oh, great.
You're not a journalist.
It's just an opinionated editorial show where you just give your opinion on things.
Well, it would be nice if a part of your opinion included, like, a shred of truth, and that would be something to see.
All right, so here's a big one.
So you guys know I have, you know, I've had all these people that I've known through the years now, you know, doing what I've done, and sometimes I'll just get a random email from somebody.
This one came from a retired military officer, pretty high-ranking.
I don't want to say who.
But they sent me this link to this article, basically.
And they told me to be careful about this.
And they think they're preparing for a Russian cyber attack.
But I'll talk about it in a minute.
Here you go.
The article is, Again, this is from a local WLWT news site in, I believe, Cincinnati here.
It says the White House is sending a strong warning to prepare for a cyber attack by the Russians, giving new urgency, saying, unfortunately, it's like the perfect storm of opportunity for the bad guys.
So remember, they tell you what they're going to do before they do it, and I think more likely than not that this is something that they have in the works.
Some sort of major cyber attack.
The type of cyber attack that they've been warning about are these, what they're called as wiper attacks.
Wiper attacks, as it's explained here on firewall.com, a wiper attack involves wiping, overriding, removing data from the victim, unlike typical cyber attacks, which tend to be for monetary gain.
Wiper attacks are destructive in nature and often do not involve a ransom.
Wiper malware may be used to cover the tracks of a separate data theft.
So this is how to recognize this threat.
If your network is the victim of a wiper attack, it likely won't be covert as wiper malware actively destroys data.
It is not meant to linger quietly in the background.
How to prevent this.
Networks should be segmented with access to crucial data limited to a select few.
Files should also be backed up in another location.
You likely already have a firewall set up, but keeping your network secure is a job that could use some support.
The Security Operations Center experts at firewalls.com can do you something good.
I'm not trying to give them a free advertisement, but that was where the information was coming from.
So think about it.
What you see here is them telegraphing their next move.
I've said this a thousand times and I'll say a thousand more.
Event 201.
They knew the pandemic was going to happen.
They planned it.
They literally sat down and had a giant conference where they planned out how they would run this pandemic, what they would lock down, what it would look like.
They even had literature put together that showed specifically exactly what we saw with COVID with this fake virus or this imagined virus that was for the event 201 that was called the St.
Paul's acute respiratory syndrome, which was a coronavirus outbreak.
So a type of coronavirus.
So they plan that.
And I guarantee you we're going to have an either.
There's either going to be something like a major cyber attack or there's going to be another pandemic push.
You see in Shanghai, China, major shutdown, millions and millions and millions of people going under lockdown because of a few COVID cases.
Now, what I think they're going to do is one of two things.
They're either going to, A, try to, right before the election, maybe in the next few months, start saying there's new Omicron or Omicronyelta or Delta, Delta, Vita, Beta, or whatever they're going to tell us.
They're going to make up some new name for a virus, and then they're going to tell us about it.
They're going to warn us it's the most dangerous one yet.
And then they're going to say, we need masks.
We need social distance.
We need lockdowns.
We need all mail-in voting.
Got to have all mail-in voting.
Cannot force people to go to the polls.
It's inhumane with this disease out there.
Which, conveniently for them, the flu season always happens right around the election time, so they can just say, hey...
It's the flu.
We have to use mail-in ballots and we have to use these unattended drop boxes.
And it's not abnormal if hundreds of thousands of votes just come in the middle of the night from who knows where.
That's totally normal.
That's how our election systems ran now.
We're a third world dictatorship where you don't have a say in the vote.
We just fix it.
We just stuff the ballots into the boxes and we fix the voting machines so that you don't have a choice.
That's one alternative.
The other is what they've been projecting for a long time.
You've heard the World Economic Forum and others have these same type of Event 201 type conferences where they go through these scenarios of a cyber pandemic is what they called it.
Equivalent to a cyber 9-11.
Equivalent to a massive cyber attack using malware like this wiper attack stuff.
So that's why, you know, the best advice, you know, I've given people for this is always be prepared in this kind of thing.
It's good to have a computer equipment that's not connected to the Internet.
You have to store all your data offline.
Make sure you have, if you have a firewall type of system to secure your Internet, please do it.
I mean, look, I'm not a cyber expert by any means, but I do know that...
We should be aware of this and we should be prepared in case they try to pull this off because they have every incentive in the world right now to try to shut down all the internet.
Why?
Well, because the internet is being used to expose them.
Look at the Hunter Biden laptop.
Jack Maxey from a little town in Switzerland.
It could be effectively changing the whole world if he gets the right information out.
So what do they do?
They're limited in their options.
They have to do something.
They have to disconnect the internet of the globe.
And that's why I think they're going to try this.
They're going to do some kind of false flag or it'll be Russia or it'll be like some false flag they blame on Russia, whatever it is.
I don't know.
But you know who they'll blame it on.
Regardless of who does it, they'll blame it on Russia.
They'll try to convince us we need to start a war.
Because this is how historically they've always gotten out of these things.
You always see with these criminals, these corrupt uniparty actors, if you will, that this is how they get out of their crimes.
They'll stage a major false flag event or some sort of awful thing.
Remember this.
Just remember one thing.
The day before 9-11, the Pentagon, with Donald Rumsfeld there, made an announcement that, by the way, And I don't know the exact numbers.
So you guys fact check me on this in the comments if I get it wrong.
But he's like, by the way, the Pentagon can't find about a trillion dollars.
But no big deal.
It's not a big deal.
I mean, if that happened today, they'd just be like, oh, what was that?
One of those spending bills that we passed two weeks ago?
It's like, no.
But back then, it was over a trillion dollars, I believe.
And that's pretty big.
I think it was like 1.2 trillion or some ridiculous number.
And again, fact check me if I'm wrong on that.
The very next day, two planes smashed into the World Trade Centers, another plane hit the Pentagon, and another plane was going toward the White House that ended up crashing in a field.
So it's obvious what they do when they're backed into a corner.
They act in such a way that they have to create such a spectacle that it draws everybody's attention off of it.
So let me just say this.
I pray this doesn't happen.
I hope it doesn't happen.
But, you know, when I get these people telling me this stuff, all I can do is share it.
I don't know what else to say.
Sometimes they put these stories out there for whatever reason.
I don't do a lot of that anymore.
I don't like to talk to a lot of those sources anymore because, look, I'm not playing the games.
I'm just looking at the information.
I'm not trying to be some conduit for information that I can't verify or speculate on.
But I do want to bring you guys information that I think is important, that I think, you know, when that was brought to my attention to me, the first thing I thought was, well, I've been saying this for a while.
They're going to try some Cyber 9-11.
So there you go.
And what else are they trying to cover up here?
Well, January 6th panel moving to hold Trump aides Dan Scavino and Peter Navarro in contempt as they already have others.
And they've already referred Steve Bannon for criminal prosecution.
But the thing about this story that you have to understand is really this next part here, what Trump says.
He says they are liars, they are cheaters, they are the ones who are destroying this country.
And in his statement, he kind of lays it out in a very succinct manner.
He says here...
So the radical left Democrats in Congress and the unselect committee continue to seek the destruction of lives of very good people but have no interest in going after the criminals and dogs who cheated like mad dogs on the 2020 presidential election.
You gotta love how he writes, right?
It says all the evidence is in and conclusive, but they and the fake news media refuse to look at it or report it.
They call it the big lie, but the big lie is the exact opposite.
They are the liars, they are the cheaters, and they are the ones who are destroying our country at the voting booths, the borders, the gas stations with our military, our vets, foreign relations, and everywhere else.
And I couldn't have said it better myself.
They are the liars.
They are the cheaters.
They are the ones who are trying to destroy our country.
I've been saying that for a while now.
Sometimes you feel like a broken record.
But you have to continue to confront these people with the truth.
And the truth is, we know about the crimes.
We know what they've done.
All we need now is to have an uncorrupt or non-corrupt agency like the FBI or the DOJ to actually do something about it.
But that will require them to not have been involved with the corruption in the first place.
It's like asking Congress to give itself, you know, a pay decrease.
It's like asking the FBI to investigate itself.
They're not going to do it.
What incentive does the FBI have to investigate its own corruption?
Zero.
Because they don't care about the public trust.
They don't care about that social contract.
They care about manipulation and deception.
And they just have decided that it's easier to manipulate the populace with this mockingbird media garbage nonsense lies 24-7, and it's easier to manipulate them with the big tech censorship, and it's easier to buy these companies up with these shell companies that are black budget-funded, intel agency-propped-up organizations that end up acting in covert ways against the American public in all kinds of different ways, as you saw with what they did to President Trump.
They basically used intelligence agency shell companies to spy on him and then turned around and were just like, oh yeah, it wasn't us.
That never happened.
And you're like, dude, we have all the evidence.
We got all the receipts.
But here's what's coming.
They're going to try to keep people from running for Congress for re-election.
I'm going to go through all of the underhanded tactics that you're going to see come out.
This is another one.
Efforts to bar members of Congress from running for re-election because of January 6th are unconstitutional.
This is a good write-up on it.
But what it goes through is the fact that they're going to try to get these people disqualified from being able to run for office, and this is the most unconstitutional thing you could ever imagine.
But I'm going to go through why they're going to be going after Cawthorn especially.
McCarthy is already not happy, apparently, because we saw this yesterday where Madison Cawthorn gave an interview.
And he talked about how when he got to D.C. he looked up to a lot of the politicians there, but he soon realized that they were not who they seemed to be.
He said that he was confronted by politicians who asked him to participate in sex orgies with other members of Congress.
He witnessed people who were leading the fight against drug addiction in our country, the people in Congress, the representatives who say they lead the fight against drug addiction in our country were doing key bumps of cocaine in front of him.
And many other things.
So apparently he's going to have a sit-down meeting with Kevin McCarthy because Kevin McCarthy's going to tell him that's not right.
Don't tell them about what we do here.
Don't tell them about the orgies.
Don't tell them about the cocaine.
What are you doing?
You're never going to run ever again.
We're going to make sure that you're never allowed to run for Congress ever again.
You told the secrets of our lifestyle here.
Right?
I mean, that's what I see.
Kevin McCarthy, look, I have no respect for him.
He's just as spineless and cowardly as Mitch McConnell, as Chuck Schumer, as Nancy Pelosi.
You know who does have a spine and is not a coward?
People like Matt Gaetz.
Why not?
Why wasn't you, Kevin McCarthy, who brought this up?
Why wasn't you, Kevin McCarthy, who tried to enter into evidence the...
Contents of Hunter Biden's laptop.
You've obviously been given a copy.
Most congressmen have been supplied this.
That's why Matt Gaetz had it.
Giuliani and Maxey and the rest, they're all trying to get that information to Congress.
You could have easily gotten it.
You know it existed.
You know members of Congress have it.
So you tell me, Kevin, why you're not pursuing this and why now you're going to sit down and try to have a come-to-Jesus moment with Madison Cawthorn to try to intimidate him from telling the truth about these corrupt people in our legislative bodies.
Why are you covering up for their crimes, Kevin?
Do you really love this country or do you just love your job?
Ask yourself that question, Kevin.
I mean it.
Ask yourself that question.
Do you love this country or do you love your job?
Because right now it does not seem like the former is true.
Anyway, progressives build shadow online powerhouse, can be activated at election time.
So this is another one of their nefarious tactics the Democrats are going to be using in the upcoming election.
What they've done here is pretty insidious.
They put together this Real Voices Media Network, and it's been serving social media users apolitical and non-ideological content to build up a big social media following.
So this seemingly apolitical network is actually part of a plan by progressives to help them come election time.
When activated, this network will be used to boost the Democrats.
Well, of course.
Of course it is.
I mean, think about it.
This is how they operate.
Everything they do is seeded with this underhanded deception.
And this is just another example of that.
What you have here is whatever this Real Voices Media Network is.
It's just some, like you said, it's an apolitical social media account.
That right when election time comes, because it's got massive followings, it's going to be Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Biden, Stacey Abrams, Pelosi, all these criminals, all these corrupt criminals are going to be being boosted by these platforms.
And this is one of many, I'm sure.
I mean, how many other platforms are they boosting up like this?
And mark my words.
Big tech is helping with this scam.
They're not just sitting by and going, oh, I wonder how that's getting boosted.
No, no, no, no, no.
They're putting it in their algorithms to boost this stuff so that it gets massive followings, artificially inflated followings, which then, I mean, I saw it on Twitter when I used to be on there.
I mean, you go on there.
I had like 70,000 followers on Twitter, right?
Not that many, but it was enough.
And I would make a post and I could get pretty good engagement.
You know, dozen, two dozen, maybe 100 people will look at it.
Sometimes bigger.
I had videos that got over a million views when Trump retweeted me.
Yeah, he did that.
When I was putting up information about the doctors who were standing against the lockdowns.
But...
Here's what you see, is that on Twitter, the corporate media has this anemic, at least when I was on it, following.
They have these huge numbers, like millions of people follow them, but they put up a news article, and it's like they get three responses.
And I think that's what put a big target on my back, because I subscribed and followed all these news organizations, so there'd be like three comments, and one of them would be me basically fact-checking them and saying how everything they say is wrong.
So, I mean, that's probably why I got kicked off Twitter, among other things.
But it just goes to show you how they manipulate the system and how these big tech companies are giving these in-kind donations, and that's criminal in and of itself.
And we haven't...
I mean, there is zero regulation on any of this.
It's the Wild West on the Internet still.
And the problem is, is that...
Imagine the Internet is the Wild West...
And each one of these companies, these corporations, is like a little town in the Wild West.
And there is no governance that is beyond, like, the sheriff of that town.
So, like, Facebook, the sheriff is Zuckerberg and his minions.
And Twitter is the new CEO, whatever his name is, and his minions.
And Google the same.
And we're talking about Google here in a second, about how they've infiltrated the Biden administration with a person who you may remember from the Q post named Eric Schmidt.
But, yeah.
Yeah.
That's another story we're going to get into.
So here's another one on how they're going to steal the election further and continue to move in unconstitutional ways.
They are unilaterally extending the unconstitutional proxy voting scheme through May 14th.
If you guys don't know what the proxy voting scheme is, this is a scheme that was put forth by the Democrats during COVID so that members of Congress didn't even have to be In the Congress to vote.
They could send people to vote for them on their behalf, proxy voters.
So like, you could just have somebody pay a staffer to sit in Congress every day and make votes because a lot of what happens in Congress is these people don't show up and then things get passed with like barely anybody there.
They have enough for a quorum and then they pass things that are Crazy.
So they have this unconstitutional proxy voting scheme that they'll be running so that they can have their minions always at the ready to vote for or against whatever they have to do.
But that's not it.
There's more scams and strategies that they're going to be employing.
This is one of the worst right here.
You have Project 65, which is seeking to kill all the Trump lawyers by canceling them, the progressive left's latest move to destroy America.
Great post over here on Revolver.News.
and the part that you have to probably know is around here.
I'll just read this.
When the left wants something, you can be sure that limitless streams of money will soon pour forth to fund their destructive crusade.
Recently, Axios profiled something significant you might have missed.
You might have missed Project 65, a new initiative funded by millions in dark money to destroy as many Trump-affiliated lawyers as possible.
Project 65, a new initiative funded by millions in dark money to destroy as many Trump-affiliated lawyers as possible.
At the retail level, Project 65's purpose is to file bar complaints against 111 lawyers wherever they are licensed.
At the retail level, Project 65's purpose is to file bar complaints against 111 lawyers wherever they are licensed.
At the wholesale level, it seeks to amend state bar rules so that no lawyers with a sense of self-preservation will ever again want to bring election-related contests on behalf of President Trump or any other populist conservative candidate.
At the wholesale level, it seeks to amend state bar rules so that no lawyers with a sense of self-preservation will ever again want to bring election-related contests on behalf of President Trump or any other populist conservative candidate.
According to Project 65, everyone secretly knows that elections in Atlanta, Chicago, or Philadelphia, my hometown, are entirely above board.
So any legal challenges to them must be in bad faith.
And he talks about his mom's story of poll watching in Philadelphia must have been hallucinated, and a slew of election fraud cases in Philadelphia must have magically disappeared from the annals of the law.
The Chicago corruption of Mayor Daley in the 1960 presidential election is an old wives' tale.
Election fraud in America simply doesn't exist.
Of course, some exceptions exist for Democrats' complaints of voter fraud, of course.
Don't expect Project 65 to file a bar complaint anytime soon against losing candidate Stacey Abrams over her frequent claims to be the legitimate governor of Georgia.
Project 65 is led by David Brock, the founder of Media Matters.
You guys remember him.
He was the hit piece artist and still is, who runs this corrupt organization, which we'll talk about.
For America and the super PAC, American Bridge 21st Century, Brock is still on his lifelong quest to expiate his decades-old sin of writing The Real Anita Hill, a book attacking the credibility of Clarence Thomas' harassment accuser.
Wow.
Brock will be joined by an advisory board that includes former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, Clinton affiliate Melissa Moss, and Republican so-called Republican Paul Rosenweig.
So here you go.
I'm just going to explain what this is in short, because it's a long article.
If you want to read through it, there are links to all the articles below this video.
But you have David Brock now going after and targeting any lawyer representing Trump or representing this election, and they're trying to get him disbarred.
They're trying to intimidate them, and they're trying to basically scare them out of pursuing the litigation further.
Now, does that sound like an organization that wants to get to the truth of something, or does that sound like an organization that's trying to actively hide something?
Because to me, it sounds like the latter.
And David Brock is such a despicable human being and a loathsome individual.
I've had, you know, his Media Matters hit squad have written hit pieces on me and my channel when it was on YouTube, calling me a conspiracy theorist and other things.
So...
These people lie for a living.
These people are incredibly well-funded by, like I said, this dark money that just comes from who knows where, and they're able to affect an outcome, and that's what makes them so dangerous.
So be aware that there are several tactics the Democrats are going to be employing in the run-up to the midterm election to try to undermine the legitimacy of the election and to undermine the ability for us to get a fair election or to even find out what happened in 2020.
And I think that's wrong.
And I think it's worth talking about.
But here you go.
Here's Biden caught using a cheat sheet.
Literally on his cheat sheet, it has the answers and questions, or the questions and answers.
So, I mean, could you imagine to be this?
I mean, just out of it and dumb or mentally deficient that you need something that says this, it says cute, tough.
They labeled it because in case he didn't realize tough Putin Q and a talking points.
It says, if you were, if you weren't advocating for regime change, what did you mean?
Can you clarify?
So again, we watched the video yesterday, right?
And it became quite apparent to me that he had the question they were going to ask.
So they asked the question that was probably given to them to ask him that was on this sheet that he had an answer to already written.
And he still screwed it up.
He still screwed it up.
I mean, and it says here, I was expressing the moral outrage I felt toward the actions of this man.
I was not articulating a change in policy.
That's exactly what I said yesterday.
It's kind of eerie.
I kind of pulled up a piece of paper and I looked at it and I kind of like pretended like I was him reading off of a piece of paper.
But I didn't know they had an actual piece of paper with bullet points that was like the literal exact question that he was asked with the exact answer that he gave, which he still ended up messing up.
Because he can't speak clearly.
And his dementia is obviously taking a hold.
Man, we have so much.
I'm sorry.
I've got to talk less because we have so much more to get through.
I hope we don't go over too long.
Rand Paul is warning Biden is a national security risk because he is in cognitive decline.
Again, kind of going into the same story here.
He says, quote, So, you know, I feel the same exact way.
I mean, we should do what Tucker says here and invoke the 25th Amendment.
I mean, they wanted to use it against Trump, right?
Trump needed the 25th Amendment.
He had to take a cognitive test.
Maybe we should have a cognitive test for the guy who needs a bullet point answer on the question, you know, why did you say something?
That he can't remember that response?
I don't know, man.
I think we should invoke the 25th Amendment.
Tucker says it very clearly here, let's see.
So Biden just said everything that he has said for the last week Is true, and none of it has been corrected by people who work for him.
The truth is, Joe Biden has no idea.
Joe Biden has no idea what his publicists say when he goes to sleep.
Then midway through his answer, Biden starts walking back his own comments.
He does that just minutes after saying he would never walk back his own comments.
None of that occurred, Biden said.
Look, it feels almost like we're being mean to the guy by quoting him.
And no one wants that.
No one is making fun of his age or his diminished condition, only trying to defend the country.
Then moments later, Biden declared that no reasonable person would think he wants regime change in Russia.
Watch this if you can stand it.
Because it's ridiculous.
Nobody believes we're going to take down, I was talking about taking down Putin.
Nobody believes that.
All right, joke's over.
Too much is at stake.
If there was, in U.S. history, ever a time to invoke the 25th Amendment, it is now.
As Joe Biden himself put it, for God's sakes, this man cannot remain in power.
Yeah.
I agree with Tucker 100% there.
And, you know, look, it's the truth.
So another lie the White House has been caught in.
Here you go.
Let's watch.
...her extraordinary qualifications, her...
And did you get any chance to watch much of the Judiciary Committee hearings?
I didn't get a chance to see any, but unfortunately...
The President watched portions of Judge Jackson's hearing yesterday and today and is proud of the way she is showcasing her extraordinary qualifications, her experience, and her even-handedness.
They can't even get that right.
The lies are so crazy that these people put out there.
It's like, they asked Biden, did you watch any of the hearings for the confirmation of this Supreme Court justice that you nominated?
No, I didn't do that.
And then a week before, his own staff was like, Joe Biden's watching all this.
It's like, dude, what is happening here?
And it goes even further that the big networks have come out and just said, no, none of this happened.
You know, ABC, NBC, CNN, or CBS, whatever.
They all said, oh, no, no, no, this didn't happen.
It's all made up.
Can't make this up, man.
Watch this cut together of it all.
Today, Biden insisted he was not announcing any policy change, but simply expressing moral outrage.
I'm not walking anything back.
The fact of the matter is, I was expressing the moral outrage I felt.
The White House knows that the president's words matter.
But, David, the bottom line is, while this is being criticized as a gaffe, the White House Simply doesn't see it that way.
The president has no regrets.
Biden says Putin's behavior is unacceptable and that he should be able to express his own outrage and frustration.
In fact, again today, Biden said that Putin, quote, shouldn't remain in power.
President Biden surprised the world today when he stood by his comments that he made in Warsaw that Vladimir Putin, quote, cannot stay in power.
It was expected that he was going to clean up those unscripted words.
Instead, he clarified that in his personal opinion and not a new policy.
The president's comments about Vladimir Putin came at the end of a carefully prepared speech in three days of intense diplomacy.
Today, he said the message was intended for the Russian people.
Back from Europe, President Biden tried to quiet a controversy of his own making.
One that shook allies and sent his own administration into 48 hours of cleanup.
Amid this crisis, President Biden's approval rating is down to 40%.
55% disapprove in a new NBC News poll that also found about 7 in 10 Americans expressed low confidence in the president's ability to deal with the war in Ukraine.
I mean, guys, like, honestly, could they get any more of, could it be any more transparent in how much they lie?
And they deceive and they lie by omission and they continue to sculpt this narrative of what's true when it's completely separated from reality?
I mean, and this is what they depend on.
This is how they brainwash the masses.
This is the cultural indoctrination that they've engaged in for so long.
But here's another story.
A former Google CEO indirectly paid salaries in White House office.
Hmm, played an extraordinary role.
Huh.
Just like Mark Zuckerberg's foundation played a huge role in the 2020 election, now we find another big tech CEO has wielded his influence in the Biden White House.
Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt's charity foundation indirectly paid the salaries of two White House employees.
This included the current chief of staff, Mark Adinoff, who is one of the most powerful officials in the office.
In total, at least a dozen employees at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy are former associates of Smith.
Huh.
That's interesting.
Very interesting.
You guys remember back when Q was going through a lot of this stuff, we heard a lot about Google and Eric Schmidt.
One of the things...
Like, first of all, I went back today and just read through a few of these old Q posts, and it is crazy when you read through these and you realize that everything that's said here is true and came true.
I mean, everything.
Well, pretty much everything.
It was all explained to us a long time ago, but when you put Google, or Goog, the short abbreviation for Google, in, you get all these stories that reminded me of how they were...
You know, the private email servers that were...
Why they had to wipe the $30,000 off Hillary Clinton's server.
Remember the acid washing of the server from Hillary Clinton?
That's the whole reason that she kind of lost the election was because they found out she had a private server and then they tried to subpoena the information off that server and then she just acid washed and deleted it all.
But remember that the reason that they got rid of it was because they were using unsecured, non-governmental emails to write to each other back and forth under secret names, like a burner account type deal.
And that it was Loretta Lynch, Clinton, James Comey, James Clapper, Christopher Steele, Andrew McCabe, Rod Rosenstein, Susan Rice, John Brennan, Huma Abedin, Valerie Jarrett.
Do all those names ring a bell for you?
All these people were using Gmail accounts secretly to coordinate on this secret server, including Barack Obama, all of the things that were happening clandestinely that they didn't want to have on the official governmental record because everything that these government employees, supposedly government employees, do has to be kept in the public record.
Now, it can be classified, it can be redacted, it can be put under a higher classification, top secret, whatever, but But it has to be recorded and kept.
So how did they go around that?
They went to the CEO of Google at the time, Eric Schmidt, allegedly, and they had him help set up these secret servers, which they were using to secretly communicate with one another off the record.
Now why would Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch, James Comey, James Clapper, any of these people, Andrew McCabe, Rob Rosenstein, McCain, whoever, Why would any of them have the necessity to have secret email accounts where they're having secret off-the-record conversations?
Oh yeah, now this is where Ukraine and the Hunter Biden laptop seems to make a whole lot more sense.
They were coordinating all their corrupt schemes to enrich themselves, and they couldn't have a record or a paper trail of it, so they got the guy who was running Google to help them set up these secure points of contact so they could talk to each other without ever having to leave a public record.
Maybe.
Allegedly.
I don't know.
And then you go through the rest of them and it's no better.
It's even worse.
And yeah.
And then it talks about AT&T and how they have a contract with the NSA.
And it talks about AT&T and how it works with Google and Facebook to prevent unfair censorship.
Right.
I think that we all know what they were engaged in, and it's so obvious.
And then here's why they're also panicking.
Trump leads both Biden and Harris in the 2024 Harris poll.
DeSantis is the heir apparent.
So apparently he is still winning in the polls, which doesn't surprise me at all.
Here's another one.
Will Smith's so-called apology to Chris Rock is very suspicious.
Well, the gist of the story is this.
First of all, Will Smith, I told you in this video yesterday that it was all fake.
It was all staged.
It's all meant to elicit this cultural programming, social engineering ahead of the election.
convince people that it's okay to commit violence against people for saying speech that you don't like.
But then Will Smith came out today and put an apology letter out saying how he apologized to the Academy and he apologized to Chris Rock and violence should never be in a place of peace and love and dah, dah, dah, dah, dah.
And he goes through this whole contrived apology statement.
But what they pointed out was that the Academy was opening an investigation into him and that the Academy was talking about taking away his first ever Oscar, which they care way more about that little golden statue than they care about anything else in this world.
And I would say more than they do there if they have any faith in God, I would say that it's very possible that these people love these little statues more than that.
That he literally...
As soon as they announce they're going to investigate and that they may take his Oscar away, which this is the first one he ever got, right?
They were like, he's like, oh, I got to apologize.
I can't lose my Oscar.
So here you go.
His contrived, you know, non-sincere apology is just so he can save his Oscar because that's what kind of coward we're dealing with here.
Okay.
But hey, there's a few other ones here.
Jon Stewart coming out and talking about America has always prioritized white comfort over black survival.
And, you know, think about it.
This is the kind of racist ideology that has become so pervasive throughout our culture.
And the argument that he's making is simply that because the systems were in place that, you know, We've overcome over time, like the institutions of slavery and segregation, etc., etc., the things that were not only fought for by black African Americans, but also by white people and people of all ethnicities fought to ensure that we would have this equality that we have today.
But now, what they've decided is that they want reparations because they need equity.
So what we're going to do is punish the ancestors of people who did things for the sins of the past so that they can have some sort of equal equity with us.
Now, that, to me, sounds like communism.
Socialist communism that they're trying to put on us that everybody's equal, right?
We just got to take away from you to give to him so that you guys have the same.
No big deal.
Oh, it could be any contrived reason.
It could be whatever it is.
In this particular case, it's, oh, reparations.
Oh, yes, we were historically unable to compete.
And look, I'm all for certain social welfare programs that do help the African-American community.
For instance, the opportunity zones that were brought up under Trump administration were obviously meant to not just benefit black individuals, but were also opportunities for communities to grow and become better.
Which is more important than giving an individual person a $400 check and saying, oh yeah, here's your reparation.
That's not going to solve anything.
But that's the way they think.
They think, oh, if I just give money to people, it solves things.
Like Jon Stewart, he's a very rich white liberal.
Reparations don't affect him.
They don't take money out of his pocket.
They don't make his gas more.
And if they do, if they make everything more expensive for him, he doesn't notice.
He has people who probably shop for him.
He has people who cook his food.
He has people who serve him.
He has people who cater to him all the time.
So none of this affects him in his life.
Yet, people who are average Americans, yeah, I think we'd notice if you just start taking money out of our pockets and giving it to people for things we didn't do.
That hardly seems like the American system that I want to live in and in a part of But it's funny how all the racism really is so one-sided.
It's not even close.
They call us racists, but they're the racists.
Look at this.
This Keaton6 or whatever this is on social media.
I mean, this is how dumb the liberals are.
are.
Let's just do this.
It says, why did we even give this cotton-picking, shucking-jiving, no Calvin brittle hair, canto?
I don't know what any of this means, by the way.
How Half of it, I have no idea.
Any attention talking about Candace Owens?
That's what she tweeted about her back in 2020.
Now, today, after what happened with Chris Rock and Will Smith, Chris Rock's one joke was rooted in misogynoir, texturism, and ableism, degrading a black woman in a room full of her peers on live TV. The fact y'all don't see that is violent is beyond me.
So was this violent, too, when you said this up here about Candace Owens, a black woman?
Oh, no, that's right, because you can only be racist if you're white.
And if you're black, apparently, you can be racist against other black people, and that's not violence, but I don't know.
It's so confusing.
The mental gymnastics these people have to jump through to justify what they do is far beyond me to understand.
But don't ever forget, too, Will Smith made $280,000 between him and his wife to attend that ceremony last night.
So he was paid...
I mean, more than most Americans will make in years for sitting through an event which he got up in the middle of and committed a violent assault against the person hosting the event.
And him and his wife got $280,000.
That's how much the gift bags were worth that they were given when they got there.
That shows you how corrupt and dysfunctional our system truly is, right?
Here's an interesting story.
Cruise ship with fully vaccinated passengers and crew members docks in San Francisco after COVID outbreak.
Huh.
What do you know?
They might need that fourth booster.
Maybe a fifth one, too.
Maybe Pfizer will just come on the ship and start handing them out for free.
Then here's another one.
The networks are finding controversy in banning sex talk with kindergartners.
Yeah, can't make it up.
Now to Florida tonight, where Governor Ron DeSantis has signed that bill into law, banning instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity with younger children through third grade.
ABC's Victor Akendo in Florida tonight.
Tonight, it's official.
Florida's controversial Don't Say Gay bill, as it's known by critics, signed into law by Governor DeSantis.
I can't even watch it because it's not a don't say gay bill.
It's an anti-grooming bill and they're going to paint it as this, oh, it's anti-LGBT. Why do you need to teach kindergartners through third graders about sex at all?
Besides, like, boys have a you-know-what and girls have a you-know-what.
That pretty much should be the extent of the sexualization of children ever.
And here we are, these corrupt, soulless demons trying to enact this gay, queer agenda on our society and trying to force it down our throats, even though it's a sin and it's an abomination.
And they try to sit there and tell me, oh, well, it's don't say gay, and these kids need to be able to say gay.
It's like, why do kids need to talk about sex at all?
They're children.
And these are very young children.
These aren't like...
I mean, I get like puberty, middle school, high school, you have to have sex education in a regard, and parents should be involved with that, and it should be up to the parents what you tell your kid about what to do if it comes up.
I'm a proponent of abstinence.
I'm a proponent of waiting for marriage.
I'm a proponent of marriage is only between a man and a woman.
Those are the things I would teach my children.
I wouldn't be teaching my child in kindergarten about the queer ABCs and showing them depictions of gay and homosexual activities.
These people are sick.
They're sick in the head.
They are demented and they are evil.
But these are the kind of people, Florida teacher worries he can't discuss his personal love life with kindergartners.
What?
It really hits hard in my heart professionally and personally both.
Professionally, it truly makes me feel like I am not trusted as a professional.
I know my kindergarten standards through and through and nowhere in our curriculum does it have anything about teaching sexual orientation or sexual identity.
Oh, good.
Fine.
If he's not in there, then what are you complaining about?
He just banned something that you say doesn't exist, so why are you upset?
But he goes on to say, quote, It scares me that I'm not going to be able to have these conversations with my children.
I don't want to have to hide that my partner and I went paddleboarding this weekend.
It's like, what?
What?
What?
You don't have to hide it.
You're a kindergarten teacher.
Teach them about colors.
Teach them about shapes.
Teach them about anything but you and your partner paddleboarding.
How about that?
Start there, and then we can have a conversation.
But you want to go and tell your little children that you're in a classroom with about your paddleboarding with your boyfriend?
First of all, beside the fact that it's a sin and I hope this person repents and changes their lifestyle and finds Christ in their heart and understands what they're doing is so sinful and it's wrong.
But beyond that, what is your incessant need to tell these kids about it?
How about you just do what you're paid to do and teach them?
Not indoctrinate them.
Not tell them about your life partner and paddle boarding.
How about you just do what you're getting paid to do?
You get a paycheck to teach them?
How about teach them about the colors?
Teach them about the shapes?
Teach them about the 50 states of America?
Teach them about the flag or something?
Teach them how to do the...
I don't know what you do with kindergartners.
Teach them whatever you teach kindergartners except for whatever this guy is trying to say he needs to be able to tell them.
But remember, Seth Dillon said it so perfectly here.
I had to highlight this, right?
So somebody here called Babe Truth, I guess, says, Intentionally misgendering someone isn't harassment?
I guess when you're a bully, you just don't know any better.
And Seth Dillon says it so perfectly here.
He says, Intentional misgendering is when a man calls himself a woman.
And bullying is when he forces you to affirm his false identity or suffer consequences.
We're standing up to the bullies.
Now, you know Seth Dillon, he's the guy who runs the Babylon Bee.
He was kicked off Twitter because he wouldn't pull down a tweet where he basically said that Rachel Levine was a man who is the transgender secretary of health and human resources for Biden.
And it's just like everything he said is true.
It's misgendering when you tell me that the dude with the dress on is a woman.
That's misgendering.
And when you force me to believe it, you're the bully, not me.
Okay?
Not me.
And as we see here, Governor DeSantis blasts Disney for claims they will work to repeal Florida's anti-grooming law.
And this was a great clip that I saw here.
But for time purposes, I'm going to go ahead and let you guys watch it on your own.
What he says ultimately is that he's not going to let some California liberals tell him what to do and how to run the state of Florida.
And I think that's the truest thing you could say about it.
My only question about Ron DeSantis is, and I know I might get some heat down in the comments about this, but here's just my thought, and I just have to share it.
So I put this out on social media.
You guys can follow me on Gitter at JustInformTheLetterU if you want to get more of these profound thoughts.
But it says, Ron DeSantis, this is what I wrote, Ron DeSantis is great.
However, he's a Harvard-educated elitist at the end of the day.
I know actions speak louder than words, but hear me out.
They propped up George W. Bush as the character needed to deceive us all into voting for him only to be betrayed after 9-11.
Am I the only one truly suspicious of this guy?
I love what he's doing, but...
It's eerily similar to what George Bush did in Texas before he took office.
Yale, Harvard, secret societies, etc.
Just a thought.
Don't shoot the messenger here.
This is what I think to myself when I think about Ron DeSantis and how he's just skyrocketed into fame.
The thing about Ron is I love that he's doing what he's doing and I respect what he's doing.
I'm appreciative of what he's doing.
But...
Have you seen how he kind of, like, when he came on the stage, he adopted all the mannerisms of Trump.
He talks, like, with the karate chop hands, and he speaks a lot like Trump, and he kind of emulates Trump in a way that's so eerie to me.
Like, it's just not right.
It's just a little bit.
And I think to myself, you know, Harvard, Yale.
Bush went to Yale.
He went to Harvard.
All these secret societies that we talk about but you can't talk about because they're secret, like George Bush said on Meet the Press when that guy came to an untimely death right shortly thereafter speaking about it.
But I just have to ask the question because I'm always skeptical, and I only bring this up because I want to be reassured that he is not going to pull a George Bush on us.
We're like, he runs a state and does this great job running the state and seems like he's all for us, but then he gets in a position of power where he can make a difference and make decisions, and he doesn't.
That's my fear.
Although, if I'm wrong about this.
I'll be the first one to put up my hand and say I'm sorry and move on and go on with my life because I do like Ron.
I like his governing style.
I like the way he composes himself and I like the way he's pushing forward with the agenda that he promised in his election.
I just worry.
I worry.
But maybe I'm worrying for nothing.
Usually that's the case.
So today we're going to do our God's Grace's Greatest segment at the end that we always do.
We have a lot to get through here in this one.
We're going to do most of chapter 14 from John, the book of John.
And I'm going to jump right into it because these are words that, I mean, you cannot imagine that Jesus is giving us these words and knowing what he's going to go through.
But he gives us the words that we are meant to live by.
And I'll read some of them for us here.
And it says...
John 14, 1, going forward, your heart must not be troubled.
Believe in God, believe also in me.
In my Father's house are many dwelling places.
If not, I would have told you.
I'm going away to prepare a place for you.
If I go away and prepare a place for you, I will come back and receive you to myself, so that where I am, you may also be.
you know the way to where I'm going Lord Thomas said we don't know where you're going how can we know the way Jesus told him I am the way the truth and the light no one comes to the father except through me now imagine what that's saying to us What is Jesus telling us there?
He's telling us not to be worried.
That he's going away, but he's going to come back.
And he's going to come back for us.
And, you know, the doubting Thomas here, you know, we don't know where you're going.
How can we know the way?
Well, he says, I am the way, the truth, and the life.
No one comes to the Father except through me.
So what he's telling us is that he is the way, he is the truth, he is the light, he is what we have to focus on in order to understand, you know, what we need to do in our lives, to get into heaven, to go to be with God eventually one day.
But he goes on and he says here, The one who has seen me has seen the Father.
How can you say, show us the Father?
Don't you believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me?
The words I speak to you, I do not speak on my own.
The Father who lives in me does, his works.
Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me.
Otherwise, believe because of the works themselves.
So there, he's making it clear that he is the Father.
That he is a part of God and God is a part of him.
And that that is a part of us.
Which is, I mean, so comforting.
But then going even further, he says, I assure you, the one who believes in me will also do the works that I do.
And he will do even greater works than these, because I am going to the Father.
Whatever you ask in my name, I will do it, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son.
If you ask me anything in my name, I will do it.
Now what this is saying is not that he's going to just grant any wish, but I think what he's saying there is that when you ask things, you have to ask in his name.
To ask him to come work through his father, with his father, in his father that he is already a part of, to do things that otherwise couldn't be done.
And I think the insinuation here is that anything is possible if you ask through Him.
And that's just my understanding of it.
And going even further, it says, If you love Me, you will keep My commands, and I will ask the Father, and He will give you another counselor to be with you forever.
He is the Spirit of Truth.
The Word is unable to receive Him because it doesn't see Him or know Him.
But you do know Him because He remains with you and will be in you.
I will not leave you as orphans.
I am coming to you.
So, He's telling us about the Holy Spirit.
So there He goes through all three.
The Spirit of Truth that will be in our hearts.
God and Him in the Father as one together.
And that's my message to all of you out there, is that Jesus told us how He would be with us.
Remember that the Holy Spirit is in our heart and that He is with us and that He will never leave us as orphans.
So if you feel alone or you feel abandoned and you're feeling like there's no hope left, like you've lost everything, like, you know, that you don't even feel God at all and you don't know how He could be with you right now, remember, we were told explicitly, clearly, That God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit will be with us always.
And that they will never leave us.
So you are never alone.
Jesus is always in our hearts.
The Holy Spirit is always with us and God is always with us.
And the three are one and they are with us always.
And I pray for each and every one of you who are going through the toughest times of your lives even, whatever that may be, whether it's with addiction or sickness or just strife within your family or with your friends or co-workers, whatever it is, the problems you're going through right now, as it says here, it says, ask in the name of Jesus and he will do it.
He doesn't say what he's going to do, right?
He says he'll do it.
That means He's going to give you an answer when you ask Him, but there's no guarantee of what that answer is going to be.
He will just give you an answer.
Only He knows what that is, and only you have the ability to open your heart, to reach out to Him, to let Him speak to it.
So that's my message for you.
That's where I'm going to go ahead and wrap it up.
I want to say thank you for watching this episode of Just Informed News, and we'll wrap it up with a little bit of prayer.
Dear Lord and Heavenly Father, please speak to our hearts, Lord.
We know you are with us always, and we pray that in all things that we ask, we ask those in your name, and that you come and give us the answers that we need.
We don't know what those are.
We only hope and trust that you will Give us the things that we need and we know that part of your plan is for us to come to you in prayer and come to you with open hearts and ask for you to step in and intervene in ways that sometimes we can't even imagine.
For all those out there who are going through the toughest times of their lives, whatever that may be, Lord, I pray that you'll make it so that they can see you in their hearts and that they can feel you in everything that they do and that they can talk to you and have an open conversation.
I pray that we'll all find that peace in our heart with you.
In Jesus' name we pray.
Amen.
All right, guys.
I hope you enjoyed that episode.
We got a lot in.
So again, these episodes are just progressively getting longer and longer.
So I hope that that was enjoyable.
Also, if you're on Rumble, if you're on BitChute or Gab, make sure you subscribe, like, all that stuff.
But that's it for me.
I want to say thank you for watching this episode of Just Informed News.
I'm your host, Craig.
▲
Export Selection