All Episodes
Previous Next
March 23, 2022 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
01:16:15
Biden Wants EVIL Child Predators Grooming Your Kids! | JustInformed News #073
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Had to rise up just so they could see me.
Did what I had to do just to feed me.
And what was left over, I put towards my dreaming.
But the only thing in life that has meaning are the things you gotta work for, believe me.
Take it to your hands up.
Hi, welcome to another episode of Just Informed News.
I'm your host, Craig.
Thanks for joining me.
We have a lot to get into here today.
We're going to talk about a bunch of different stories, but we're going to start with the hearings happening now for the next Supreme Court justice.
This is just insane.
We're going to go through it all.
You're going to want to stick around for that.
So let's just jump right into it.
Ted Cruz grilling Biden's Supreme Court pick over CRT and child porn.
So remember, you know, These people that we're going to talk about here today, the ones that are supposedly representing us in Congress and supposedly standing up for what is important to us, these individuals that we know have betrayed us, that don't represent us, that only represent the special interests, that are a part of the unit party, the same Lindsey Graham's and even Ted Cruz to a degree.
You know, Ted Cruz is a guy who is all over the place.
You know, one that he's saying these things that completely align with everything that a lot of the conservative movement and Christian movement believe.
And then the next thing he's on Capitol Hill saying that, you know, January 6th was a bunch of domestic terrorists, you know, taking over the Capitol.
So, you know, and calling it an insurrection.
So, you know, these people, I don't trust them at all.
And I know that this is such an important thing that they're going to toe whatever line they have to to show the people watching, their constituents and others, that they are hard on this mean, evil judge and they're going to keep her from going in.
But you know, at the last second, there's going to be some of them, I don't know who, I don't know when, or I don't know how, but there'll be a few of them who go...
Well, you know, I guess we can get over all this stuff we're going to go over here in this article that details a bunch of highlights from that hearing.
Well, it's not that bad that she's really not hard on crimes against children.
That's not a big deal at all.
It's not important to the American people to keep CRT and racist indoctrination out of our schools because a lot of these lines of questioning Into what she believes as an individual are going through the fact that she sits on the board at a school where they teach critical race theory and they have racist programs inside the school.
They have some program for white parents to learn how they're racist.
It's just...
It's insane.
It is insane and disgusting, and it's the antithesis of what Martin Luther King preached, obviously, about how we should have a society that is basically colorblind, that we look at people based on the content of their character, not the color of their skin.
How hard is that?
That's the biggest thing I don't get.
Everybody's like, oh, well, you know, white people, you're racist.
Honestly, it's gotten to the point where I don't even...
I don't think these people are serious.
I mean, the ones that go cry racist over everything.
So let's just be honest.
What this woman represents who's trying to get on the Supreme Court is another radical judicial activist who's going to legislate from the bench and not rule based on the Constitution, but rather rule on their emotional feelings at the time because we have to feel for these criminals and the pedophiles and we have to have Now,
I'm not saying don't be compassionate to individuals who have made mistakes that want to change their lives, but there has to be a line in the sand, and we're going to go through these issues point by point and show how her positions on some of the most critical issues are so wildly out of tune with the majority of this country and what is proper according to the Constitution that I cannot fathom Then putting this wildly liberal...
Weirdo on the court, to be quite frank.
So let's go through a few of these things.
First, we have this right here.
This is Ted Cruz going through some of the curriculum that is based on, that is inside of this school where she's on the board and sits.
And her best friend, mind you, by the way, before I play this clip, her best friend from college is the president or head of, the chairman of the board at this school.
And it's a private school where they indoctrinate kids into woke, racist, LBGTQ ideology.
Yeah, I think there's a big problem there.
But let's go ahead and watch.
...find really quite remarkable.
One portion of the book says babies are taught to be racist or anti-racist.
There is no neutrality.
Another portion of the book, they recommend the babies confess when being racist.
Now, this is a book that is taught at Georgetown Day School to students in pre-K through second grade, so four through seven years old.
Do you agree with this book that is being taught with kids that babies are racist?
Senator, I do not believe that any child should be made to feel as though they are racist or though they are not valued or though they are less than, that they are victims, that they are oppressors.
I don't believe in any of that.
But what I will say is that when you asked me whether or not this was taught in schools, critical race theory, my understanding is that critical race theory as an academic theory is taught in law schools.
And to the extent that you were asking the question, I understood you to be addressing public schools.
Georgetown Day School, just like the religious school that Justice Barrett was on the board of, is a private school.
Wow, okay, so let's unpack that a little bit, guys, right?
Okay.
So he's showing her these books, basically.
One of them is called Anti-Racist Baby by this, you know, the race-grifting, you know, racist Ibram X. Kennedy, that guy.
But, like, he's pointing out that at this school, this Georgetown Day School, where she's on the board and her best friend is the chairman of the board of this school, that, yeah, they're literally indoctrinating kids in this CRT woke feminist theory, this LGBTQ cancer that they try to spread throughout our society, right?
So, you understand quickly that she goes...
Just like the other justice who was on the board of a religious school.
Notice how she said religious.
So, again, there's a part in this where she talks about religion, and it's not very good for any of us.
But you see quickly here that it's a religion to these people.
She defines it as, she categorizes it with religious belief.
As she said right there.
And she's a judge.
She's not mincing words.
She picks her words very carefully.
So what I think...
You have to remind yourselves when you look at a clip like this.
And you can watch all the full clips.
I'll leave a link down below.
But what you have to remind yourself, right?
Is that...
They treat this stuff like religion.
And they're just as rabidly zealous over the idea of showing your kid how to touch themselves and grooming children and engaging in this mass...
Cancer is filling kids' heads with cancer, basically, is one way to put it.
These terrible ideas and trying to tell your little son or daughter, oh, it's okay to dress up like a girl.
Here, I'll put on the makeup for you.
And we don't have to tell mommy and daddy because mommy and daddy don't understand like I do, right?
Grooming your child at these public indoctrination centers.
But the other thing that was funny about that, she's like, I thought you were referring to public schools, not the private school where I'm on the chair and I know that we literally teach this woke feminist racist theory and LGBTQ nonsense.
So it goes to show who this person really is, who she truly is, what she actually represents.
The likelihood of her going through, at this point, they stole the election.
They can steal anything.
And they have all these senators compromised, and, you know, the Democrats are in control, right?
So...
I pray that this doesn't happen, though, because at this point, this woman is a disaster.
Let's go into some other things.
Here is another one where Ted Cruz, I'm not going to play this because it's kind of like it's just him with a board circling things, but he basically puts together that she has an average of 47, almost 50%, less sentencing than what the prosecutors recommend in these cases of child abuse and videos of child abuse and other things.
So you see very quickly that there's not only a pattern, but the ideology that she embraces in her own school that she's the chairman of the board, or not the chairman, but on the board at, that this ideology has metastasized into her rulings and everything that she's doing from the bench when she's making these decisions.
And we'll get through a few other things here that are very important.
For instance, let me just go here.
Alright, so this is the one, Jack Posobiec said this, and I thought this was exactly hitting the nail on the head here.
Let's look at this.
It says, Judge Jackson is removing the consideration that every piece of child pornography has at least one victim that gets re-victimized every time someone views it.
If there was no demand, there would be no supply.
She's only seeing it from the eyes of the criminal, not the victim.
And that's like the truest statement in this whole thing, right?
She's literally framing everything from the viewpoint of the criminal who is abusing the child or distributing and disseminating the actual content.
And that in and of itself hurts that child because that child is going to have to, if that child is alive even, because we know there's a high rate of suicide with people who are abused and in a lot of cases some of these videos and pictures I'm sure are of things that are so heinous and awful that kids were being hurt in.
And it just goes to show you, though, that there's no consideration for the victims, and it's this woke ideology that's really dangerous, right?
But here's a little exchange between her and Marsha Blackburn, I believe, and this is an interesting exchange.
I'll play a little bit of it.
And Americans need a Supreme Court justice who will protect our children and will defend parents' constitutional right to decide what is best for their own kids.
And here we need a little clarity.
At a time when these parental rights appear to be under assault by the radical left, your public comments about, and I'm going to quote you, the transformative power of progressive education, end quote.
These are deeply concerning.
You serve on the board of a school that teaches kindergartners, five-year-old children, that they can choose their gender and teaches them about so-called white privilege.
This school has hosted an organization called Woke Kindergarten and pushes an anti-racist education program for white families.
Your public endorsement of this type progressive indoctrination of our children causes one great concern when it comes to how you may rule on cases involving parental rights.
Parents also know that it's only a matter of time before we have the next pandemic, and they're concerned about more mask mandates or lockdowns from unelected bureaucrats that would harm their children's mental health and stunt their development.
The American people want a Supreme Court justice who will protect their families' freedoms, not allow government overreach into private family decisions.
Yeah, and you can watch the full clip if you want because some of these are a little bit longer I don't want to, you know, sit here watching clips from the thing all day and in their entirety.
We'll hit the parts that matter.
And that part was the part that mattered to me, just that beginning part there, because what Senator Blackburn is saying is, effectively, this woman, is engaged in promoting and embracing an ideology that's so toxic and so corrosive to our society as a whole and multiple ideologies between the CRT and the LGBT and all the other stuff, right?
It's so dangerous and corrosive that we should never even be considering people like this because they're mentally unstable.
To hold these positions is to be, in my opinion, mentally unbalanced.
If you tell a three-year-old boy that he can be a girl and that just by believing it, it makes it so, you're mentally deficient.
You have a problem.
You have an issue.
You need to go get therapy and help and you need to go find a church and open up a Bible and start praying because God have mercy on all our souls when we have to take account for what we stood up for in this life and I just don't believe that That filling these kids' heads with this toxic ideology,
teaching them that one race is better than the other, teaching them that one race is evil, teaching them that their gender is fluid and they can just identify as a unicorn if they want, you don't think this is going to have a massive detrimental impact on these kids later in life?
And to be as sick and twisted in the mind to want to do that to a child...
I mean, it is beyond me how we've come to that point as a society overall, but that we have these people trying to get into our Supreme Court.
So I'll leave the link to that article.
It's got a few other videos and some more information that you'd probably find interesting about what happened in today's confirmation hearings.
But, you know, look, it's not good, guys.
It's definitely not good.
But with that being said, you know, we always start over here at justinformednews.com.
If you guys haven't signed up, come here.
Hit the subscribe button after you put your email address in, and then you'll get an email notification as soon as these videos are posted.
Please make sure you do that so you get informed as soon as they're up.
Plus, don't forget to go to informednews.com because informednews.com is the official website for justinformednews and talk.
If you guys haven't tried it out, it's a breaking news 24-7 news website.
It's definitely not good.
And if you can't sit around for the whole hour here and watch every article that we go through, then definitely go here and just get your news.
And it's a great tool.
And the majority of the news we're going to cover here came from informednews.com.
Also, the scripture of the day today is from 1 John 4, verse 9.
And it says, God's love was revealed among us in this way.
God sent his one and only Son into the world so that we might live through him.
And I'm going to do a deep dive into that off of an incident that happened yesterday that I'll talk about in more detail at the end.
So if you want to hear about that incident, stick around because at the end we do our segment, God's Grace is Greater.
And one more thing, guys.
I am so happy and proud to say that this episode is sponsored by Patriot Toner.
If you guys haven't tried it out, you can save half of what you'd spend at a big box store on toner cartridges and support a like-minded, Patriot-owned small business.
I can tell you that these people are great.
Go to PatriotToner.com and tell them Craig sent you for 30% off your first order.
Again, that's PatriotToner.com.
Go try them out, guys, because they're supporting the show, and I appreciate it.
Thank you to Patriot Toner for that support, and with that being said, let's just jump into the next story here.
MSNBC, Judge Jackson is the victim of racism and sexism!
Of course she is!
We knew this was coming!
I'm just glad it finally got here because I was waiting for them to start slinging all these accusations of racism and sexism at us for asking questions about her woke ideology and the detrimental impact she's having on these children as a board member at this school and then the detrimental effects she'll have on society as a whole if she ever gets into a higher position of power like the Supreme Court.
I'm sure she's already done enough damage in her own wheelhouse where she is now.
So I look at it this way.
You see these stories and you're just like, oh, here we go again.
All right, guys, let's watch MSNBC tell us how it's racism and sexism that's preventing Judge Jackson from getting a fair hearing.
The point, Simone, of getting votes, and she's expected to get all the Democrats.
Studies do show that women face a higher bar in confirmation hearings.
Those studies don't even take into consideration women of color generally because there have been so few, obviously none at this level.
So today, black women leaders, groups like Black Women's Roundtable, She Will Rise, they're hosting virtual watch parties because, yes, This is a historic moment, but Judge Jackson also faces a time that is at the intersection of racism and sexism and intense political divisions.
Talk about that in the context of today's questioning and what you heard.
Tell me more about how everyone is racist and sexist who doesn't believe that she is correct.
Please, could you explain how racist and sexist everyone asking her questions is that doesn't agree with her and politically align with her and want her to be in office or in power?
I mean, we knew that was coming, so I don't know if that's like a shock or even worth reporting, to be honest, like these idiots who go out and say, oh, it's racist and sexist because women of color don't get a chance.
It's like, look, First of all, the whole thing's been racist from the beginning, but not in the way that these people are saying.
It's been racist because the president, the illegitimate, fraudulent, never elected criminal in office right now, that guy, he came out and said, I'm a black woman.
That's like my best Joe Biden after he's had his nightly drug cocktail to put him to sleep.
But no, it's like, think about it.
We knew this was coming, but it was all racist on the opposite, because these people are the racists.
It's funny, because then they go around championing this racist cause of like, oh, we're going to stop and end racism and Black Lives Matter.
We're going to defeat the patriarchy and racist people, white people.
But you're like...
Do you not understand that everything you've done up to this point has been embracing the fundamental idea and principles of racism?
You are engaged in acting racist.
Now, I think a lot of these people have justified it in their mind to be like, well...
You know, I think that there was a lot of racism back in the old days, so we just have to be a little bit racist now to make sure that we make up for what happened in the past.
And it's like, you don't understand.
That didn't work out well back then.
We had a whole civil war because of it.
Because they were like, oh, well, you know, we can just keep slaves a little bit longer, among many other issues.
Slavery was not...
Contrary to popular belief, slavery was not the only issue that caused the Civil War.
There were a lot of other factors.
A lot of them had to do with money.
But let's talk about it in terms that we understand.
If you open the door for this racism to start filling in the minds of these people who mindlessly watch this stuff and believe everything like it's gospel, because they usually don't have a very good connection to God or religion at all...
So they adopt the religion of, you know, the person on the TV is the religious figure that they look to and they believe in them.
It's these kids, man.
The kids today, they treat these pop stars and the movie actors and all the rest like they're, you know, idols.
This is what the whole Bible, a big portion of the Bible and one of the Ten Commandments tells us not to do.
We only worship one God, God the Father.
Three in one.
God, Son, and Holy Spirit.
So when I see this, it's not surprising as much as it is like, oh, okay.
And of course, we're going to go back to The View guys.
And you go, oh, Craig, man, why do you keep going The View?
I don't want to see those idiots talk.
I don't want to watch them talk either.
You think I go and do it because I want to watch The View?
I do it because we have to expose these people.
And we have to remind ourselves every day that people like these racists and idiots on The View...
Have millions and millions and millions of followers and people who watch them every day and treat what they say as gospel and go out in the world and affect change based on this nonsense they're being told by these idiots on this stupid TV show that is so stupid and is conducted in such a ridiculous way that...
Let's watch.
Let's just watch these women.
Oh, God bless them.
I don't know.
Here we go.
Well, I know that we're going to get to critical race theory as the show goes on, but in regard right now to this hearing, when I left the TV, they were taking a lot of the time we could be hearing about Judge Brown's record and a lot of her thoughts and her philosophies, which is what I remember about these hearings.
You constantly hear tough questions and then they answer.
Right now, Senator Graham was just taking the mic to troll her a little bit about every other hearing that's ever gone on in the history of time.
And it was...
It felt like we were being robbed in seeing a future Supreme Court Justice tell us who she is.
Grassley asks the stupid...
Alright, so I'm going to stop it there because I want to address this in portions.
Okay, because there's a lot to unpack with these morons.
They're pretty dumb.
That lady literally, I mean, she was just saying, she's explaining how I felt robbed because, I think it was Lindsey Graham or something, I felt robbed because Lindsey Graham was telling them about all of these other things.
You know what she didn't mention?
She didn't mention the fact that the last two Supreme Court justices who were brought before these confirmation hearings had their entire names drug through the dirt.
They were slandered.
They were threatened.
They tried to intimidate them.
They made up false stories.
They tried to get Kavanaugh arrested for rape that he never committed, apparently.
And they basically tried to destroy Neil Gorsuch.
And it was Amy Coney Barrett, right?
So they've done this to everyone.
This isn't like...
The last three, actually.
So, they're just glancing over that, and it's like, I don't see any of this about contagiousness.
First of all, because the left's never going to say anything bad about her, because Joe Biden, like, he's a black woman, black woman, we're going to be on the Supreme Court.
Right?
And of course, she's like, you cannot criticize a black woman.
You cannot criticize anybody but white people.
Remember that.
Only white people.
And maybe Latino because it's like they can pass for white or something.
And that's not me, guys.
I don't want to criticize anybody based on the race.
I'm telling you what they believe.
What they have said publicly.
What they have stated as the operating motive behind what they do.
So, consider this, right?
She's saying...
I feel robbed that Lindsey Graham would talk about these things and we couldn't hear this brave, beautiful black woman talk about how she's going to rule on the bench.
But it gets worse.
It gets so much worse.
Let's watch these women destroy this country a little bit more.
Watch.
Stupidest question, I thought.
What was his question?
He goes, I mean, he says, so, Justice Judge, do you believe that the First Amendment applies equally to conservatives as well as liberals?
Oh, he did ask that.
What a dumb question.
She had, like, a look on her face like, man, are you stupid?
She's got some really tough questions, though, because the...
Yeah, it's like the look every single person has on their face who isn't a complete moron when they listen to Joy Behar speak.
You know...
See, this is another thing.
They're so callous and they're so flippant in the way that they disregard the plight of others inside our society.
That's the true evil, the insidious evil that is inside these people because they look at it and they see a question like that about, well, do you think conservatives have the same First Amendment rights as liberals?
And, of course, they're like, it's such a stupid question.
And I think that the insinuation is like, of course it is.
But then they ignore the censorship that's been happening.
They applaud it.
They encourage it.
They promote it.
You know what the problem is with these people is that they are all authoritarians.
They are all little despotic, wannabe, you know...
Dictators who want to tell you how to live your life, and they've huffed their own fumes so much.
They're huffing their own fumes so much, their own disgusting fumes, that they've literally gone into this fever dream, and everybody...
Tells them how great they are.
Oh, Joy, you did so great today.
Oh, Joy, that was so brave.
Oh, Joy, they were so right about how stupid that question was because those stupid conservatives don't deserve to talk, but they should have the same rights, but we should censor them and restrict their ability to speak freely because they're evil, domestic terrorist, insurrectionist, racist, white supremacist, Nazi, blah, blah, blah.
You know what these people are?
These people are pariahs.
These people are the most evil, and it's kind of like the banality of evil, really.
But the evil that is being brewed on this witch's coven, or whatever you want to call it, is just beyond me.
But let's keep going, because there's more, guys.
There's more, unfortunately.
This emphasis, which we talked about yesterday a little bit on child pornography, when you actually look into it, even for one minute, you see that she falls within a very normal spectrum of how they've corrected in their guidelines for what the law has not caught up in, in technology.
Okay, another blatant lie they're telling their audience.
Oh, they haven't caught up in technology.
The insinuation is that, and this was the explanation given by Kentucky Justin Brown, we'll watch it in a minute, where she said, well, you know, I tried to adjust, we've been adjusting the, you know, laws against these, you know, crimes against children, because back in the old days when mail was the only way to pass this information along, people would accumulate large collections.
And now, you know, you can just have a large collection on a thumb drive.
So, you know, it's not that big a deal.
It's like, what?
How does that make sense?
Again, that goes back to what Jack was saying.
Jack was sober when he's saying, you know, you're completely forgetting to look at this from the viewpoint of the victim in all of this.
You're only looking at it from the perspective of the criminal.
And this person has the gall, I mean, but they all have, they have no, absolutely no shame, so I'm not surprised.
But this person goes up there and shamelessly says how, you know, and it was just, it's just not, it hasn't been updated yet.
And Contagia is just so progressive that she understands that, you know, giving lighter sentences to these people for these crimes is just a part of the progressive movement.
Now again, all I can say at this point is, you know, I don't think that this woman is going to be good for us, but I have a feeling that she's probably going to get railroaded through and the traitors in Congress, there will be some who end up voting for her and she'll end up being on the bench, but I pray not.
But let's keep going.
On her face, because the worst thing, you know, the most triggering crime for me is pedophilia and child pornography, just as a human.
I didn't need to be a parent to be disgusted by that.
But to look at this woman with how respectable she is, as you're watching them grill her on that, you can see this visceral reaction.
And she did what a Supreme Court justice, a future Supreme Court justice should do.
She stayed there.
Yeah, grilled her.
I'm not going to watch any more of these morons.
It's not even worth it.
Alright, she's like...
If you saw the look on her face, she's so proud and composed and...
Again, again, these people are apologists for this woman who is obviously a left-wing lunatic who would destroy our country if she's ever given a seat of power.
But on the path our country is headed anyway, I mean, it should just be another thing, right?
So let's watch.
I put this together.
I thought it was kind of funny because this is exactly what I thought of when I... Basically, when I saw this this morning, I... This is what came to my mind, and so I got a little creative, and I made a little, whatever you want to call it, a meme video, whatever.
But it's to illustrate a point, and I think you'll understand what point I'm trying to illustrate after you watch the video, and I'll play it for you here.
But remember, this is Joe Biden's Supreme Court pick explaining why she is soft on criminals who distribute videos of child abuse.
So watch this.
And I made this, by the way, so you're welcome.
The guideline was based originally on a statutory scheme and on directives, specific directives by Congress at a time in which more serious child pornography specific directives by Congress at a time in which more serious child pornography offenders were identified based Based on the number of photographs that they received in the mail.
And that made total sense before when we didn't have the internet, when we didn't have distribution.
But the way that the guideline is now structured based on that set of circumstances is leading to extreme disparities in the system because it's so easy for people to get volumes of this kind of material now by computers.
So it's not doing the work of differentiating who is a more serious offender in the way that it used to.
So the commission has taken that into account and perhaps even more importantly courts are adjusting their sentences in order to account for the changed circumstances.
What you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard.
At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought.
Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it.
I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Alright, yeah, there you go.
You know, I put it together because it's the first thing I thought of after I heard her say that.
I thought of basically everything we know about Hunter Biden, all the pictures and all the things that have been released, the videos and whatnot, of him engaged in the sexual deviancy.
But then furthermore, there's been a lot of, you know, like the one picture that came out and they say it's of him with an underage girl who's standing there naked.
And apparently Jack Maxey may be releasing more damning information against, you know, Hunter Biden from the laptop here in the next imminent future.
But, you know, that's that's what it reminded me of.
It was that's a scene from, I think, the movie like Billy Madison or something.
But it's true.
It's true.
And I posted on all my social media.
So if you guys aren't following me on my social media, then you haven't seen it yet.
So I encourage you to go find me on social media.
There's links below this video if you want to find those.
You know, another thing they're trying to do now is they're trying to turn into like a Pizzagate thing.
Media Matters is now accusing Holly, Josh Holly, of launching a smear campaign that included attempts to connect her, Judge Jackson, to QAnon-adjacent Pizzagate conspiracy theory.
QAnon-adjacent conspiracy theory.
Oh, man.
QAnon adjacent pizza cake conspiracy theory.
You hit all the buzzwords there.
They hit them all.
So give it to the Media Matters for doing that, but That's what they do.
They have to always have these attacks put on those who want to stand up against this stuff.
The idea that it's connected to QAnon is just absurd because, first of all, Q has been around for a couple years, and second of all, there's absolutely nothing To pull this and put it into print is just pulling it out of thin air to create a narrative to try to undermine the arguments of Josh Hawley.
So, you know, excuse me, I got something in my throat.
But you see it for yourself, right?
It's fairly obvious.
They're going to keep saying it so it's sexist and racist to say anything negative about her.
And if you point out what she did and how she's lenient on people who commit crimes against children or video crimes against children or share videos of crimes against children, that you're a QAnon-adjacent Pizzagate conspiracy theorist.
Okay, can we address the facts now that you gave me this label and derided me and called me names?
Can we talk about the actual facts of what this is?
Oh no, we can't.
That's right.
Can't do that.
Here's Jeffrey Toobin, you know, Zuman Toobin.
This guy was literally...
I don't know why I'm laughing, it's sick.
But this guy, let's just say he was being friendly with himself during a CNN interview while he was on camera, and he didn't realize that his camera was still on, and when he stood up, it was very apparent how friendly to himself he was being.
If you understand what I'm saying, this is a family show, I don't want to get into too much detail, but...
Yeah, this is the same guy.
He's going to tell us about child porn now.
Let's listen.
I'm sure this is going to be worth watching.
At one point about these kiddie porn cases, and this came up, I remember, when I was an assistant U.S. attorney back in the 90s, is that when those sentencing guidelines were written for those cases, this was a time when the people who committed these crimes would order individual photos And then get them usually through email.
And then they would be sentenced based on the number of photos they possessed.
This was all pre-internet.
Why does it matter?
I'm not even going to play the rest of this idiot.
Because it doesn't matter.
Who cares?
I mean, it...
I'm getting kind of repetitive here and thankfully we're finally on to the next topic.
Here is something I wanted to talk about.
Washington State School will begin disciplining students based on race.
The Clover Park School District debated its new culturally responsive student discipline policy.
It means student discipline would not be consistent based on conduct.
Instead, a school considers a student's race and background.
It would likely offer harsher punishments to white students even if the conduct is identical to that of black or Hispanic students.
I mean...
Really?
Are you kidding me?
Again, they're opening the door to this racism, right?
And that's the most dangerous thing we can do as a society, is open the door to this racist ideology and let it fester and manifest and metastasize within our culture.
I mean, it's already done so much damage and it's continuing to do damage on purpose, by design, by these big globalist, you know...
Davos, you know, billionaire, trillionaire, whatever they are, evil individuals who are trying to destroy this nation.
We know that.
They fund all this stuff.
Their corporations fund this stuff.
George Soros funds this stuff.
All the criminal elites fund it, and they all promote it, and they say how great and good it is, and they bring kids into strip bars with drag queens, and they do awful, horrific things to children before they're even old enough to understand who they are, before they even go through puberty.
And these people sit here, right, and they go, well, you know, I think it's a good idea.
We should just, you know, be culturally responsive, right?
I mean, of course the insinuation is also racist in and of itself that black and Hispanic and whatever other raced children besides white children are somehow in need of a hand up and that they're, you know, even though they commit the same crime, they deserve a lesser punishment because why?
Why?
Did anybody give a good answer at least to that?
Oh, yeah, that's right, because you're trying to breed a generation of racists who will eventually hate each other to the point where it will destroy our country from within.
Because these people, again, are being manipulated by these powers, these higher-up powers that are inside this world, not the real higher-up power, and obviously the devil, They're being manipulated.
They're being spun into this frenzy and they're going to keep going and going and going because they have no idea.
They live in a hedonistic, you know, all about me culture.
It's never about anyone else but themselves.
It's all about their feelings.
It's all about how they feel.
It's about their truth.
It's about what they believe.
And you can't have a differing, a dissenting opinion to their belief system.
And if you do, then you are to be socially ostracized.
You are to be censored.
You are to be targeted for harassment.
You are to be banned from ever, you know, speaking publicly or holding public office or having an opinion on anything.
So that's the system they want to create because, again, these people are authoritarian, want to be dictators.
years.
And, of course, Joe Biden reminds us of, you know, what this whole thing is all about as we get into some more different news here.
You know, we are at an inflection point, I believe, in the world economy.
Not just the world economy, in the world.
It occurs every three or four generations.
As one of the top military people said to me in a secure meeting the other day, 60 million people died between 1900 and 1946.
And since then, we've established a liberal world order, and that hadn't happened in a long while.
A lot of people died, but nowhere near the chaos.
And now is a time when things are shifting.
There's going to be a new world order out there, and we've got to lead it.
We've got to unite the rest of the free world in doing it.
All right, there's more New World Order talking.
Again, when you hear them talking about that, you should be very concerned.
And I say that because these are the talking points that these globalists use, where the New World Order, that's where it all came from.
I mean, you'll remember, right?
Alex Jones was talking about this stuff all the way back in 2003.
I mean, like him or love him, the thing about Alex Jones is this.
I agree that he gets it right most of the time.
time.
I just don't like the way he presents information.
I don't like his bombastic nature.
I don't like the crazy outbursts.
I don't like any of that because it's just, it's, it's one thing to have an opinion and maybe, you know, make a few remarks, but again, it doesn't even matter what I like about Alex Jones.
It's just that I don't, I don't want to watch that.
It's just not appealing to me, right?
I could watch a dozen other shows from different content creators or, uh, whatever who do a better job and cover a lot of the same issues, but that doesn't mean he wasn't right about practically everything he's predicted over time.
And when you look at a guy like Alex Jones and you think, oh man, how did he know all this?
You're like, well, I think it's fairly obvious, but here's the clip.
This is 2003.
Hello, I'm Alex Jones and I'm a syndicated radio and television host based in Austin, Texas.
And for many years I've been exposing the criminal activities of the global elite, also known as the New World Order.
I remember five years ago being on the radio and reading UN documents on the air that were public and having callers call in and say, there is no New World Order, the news said so, they said dangerous people, talk about it.
And I'd say, excuse me, there's a World Bank, there's a World Court, you don't have juries, you can't face your accusers.
This is run by a group of elite families.
They're the shareholders of XYZ Bank.
Well, people don't call my syndicated show anymore and disagree with that fact, because now in the news they admit, yes, there's a world government, yes, there's a new world order.
So let's look at the New World Order and what it has in store for you and your family.
And I assure you, my friends, it is nothing less than total enslavement.
We'll look at the type of cashless society control grid they're putting in.
The destruction of the Bill of Rights and Constitution in America.
The disarmament of the people.
The end of national sovereignty.
The militarization of police.
And yes, the concentration camps that are a fact.
Not rumor, but fact.
The documentation begins.
The rumors end right here on this show today.
Yeah, and he's right again.
Boy, was he right.
It seems like I actually should go back and watch some of his older stuff because it seems like he was a lot more tame back then, a lot more calm and not screaming at the top of his lungs and everything and cursing and yelling all this crazy stuff all the time and dressing up in costumes.
He does a lot of crazy stuff.
Sometimes it's funny.
I'm not going to lie.
I've seen some things that are pretty funny, but it gets a little tired after a while.
You're like, dude, I get it.
He figured out the formula on how to go viral, and then he was exploiting it, and he really was one of the first to exploit that, to break through the mainstream narrative.
In that way, he was very smart.
But, yeah, you saw it right there.
I mean, he says everything we're living right now.
He said it.
He called it.
He called his shot.
So, you know, again, Alex Jones is right, and we were all just catching up to his world.
Yeah.
But here he is, and this is disturbing, because if Alex Jones is usually right on things, when he says stuff, people tend to perk up and listen.
And I saw this from a good friend, Zach Voorhees.
He shared this over on social media.
This is Alex Jones making another prediction that I hope doesn't come true, but it's better that we call this out and know it, you know, so that we...
This is how you can prevent these things, is you call them out, you make it public, and you scream as loud as you can and make sure everybody hears you, so that when they try it, people are aware of the idea that it's not there.
Now, again, there are problems with that, too, but we'll watch.
Warning and saying that they have intercepted and arrested Canadian intelligence operatives at a high level that tell them that is the next big shoot to drop, that there are plans to assassinate American officials and leaders of To be blamed on Russia.
Now, would Russia assassinate U.S. leaders?
No, that would blow up in their face.
Would Russia have a motive to kill U.S. leaders?
Absolutely not.
They would turn them into the devil overnight.
That's the worst possible move.
Well, then who has a motive to kill U.S. diplomats?
Who has a motive to kill?
Well, you know who?
The deep state.
They have the motive for all of that.
Yep, they do.
And I, you know, Alex is always making these predictions and then they end up coming true and you're like, ugh.
But, you know, it's good to be, you know, broad in the, you know, places you take in information from.
And I think Alex Jones is just as valid of a source as anything else.
So I would say that there's obviously something more to that and it would make sense.
That they have to escalate this war.
I mean, look at what's happening with that Hunter Biden laptop.
You guys haven't watched yesterday's episode where we went through it in detail.
You know, you should probably go back and check it out because, like, they need a distraction right now.
Hunter Biden's laptop, and it's coming this week, there's going to be stuff that's going to be, according to Jack Maxey, big.
I don't know.
But I'd imagine that...
In order to prevent us from fully seeing and realizing the level of corruption, because it's not just about the stuff with kids, which is all evil and demonic, and the stuff with the sex and the drugs.
It's a lot more overly is about the corruption, about the emails, about it showing this pattern of corruption and bribery that was being funneled through his son Hunter into Joe Biden's pocket.
And that the countries that he's now trying to deal with, he obviously has a major conflict of interest with like China and Ukraine and Russia because he's been taking bribes from them for who knows how long.
As is half of Washington apparently.
And that's apparently why we can't get anything done in this country.
And that's also why you have a bunch of little Ralph Wiggums on Capitol Hill raving Ukrainian flags saying, I'm helping.
I'm helping!
That's literally, and if you guys don't know the Ralph Wiggum reference, it's a person from the show Simpsons.
It was the son of the police chief who was like a complete moron.
He was like the dumbest kid on the earth.
He would just walk around like a, you know, and just do, you know, the kid that ate glue.
He was basically the kid that ate glue.
A little too much of it, too.
I found this, though, about Hunter's Laptop.
I thought it was interesting.
You know, since we're on a little InfoWars kick here, why not?
We'll just watch this video real quick.
The FBI is now investigating whether those alleged Hunter Biden emails are actually connected to a larger foreign intelligence operation.
They may be related to a foreign intelligence operation.
Foreign intelligence operation.
And finally, after a year, the New York Times has verified the left's worst nightmare.
Yes, Hunter Biden's laptop is very real.
As the New York Post reports, it's not until the 24th paragraph in the New York Times story that mentions emails involving Hunter Biden and his associates in those deals Followed by these two sentences.
Those emails were obtained by the New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr.
Biden in a Delaware repair shop.
The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.
It took the gray lady nearly 17 months to grudgingly concede even a fraction of what the New York Post readers learned in October of 2020 and what voters would have learned had it not been covered up by the complete control of the lamestream, mainstream, mockingbird media.
The information found on the laptop may be part of a Russian disinformation campaign.
Part of a Russian disinformation effort.
Described by many intelligence experts as having hallmarks.
All the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign.
This is a classic example of the right-wing media machine.
What is even odder than that is that Joe Biden made this bizarre declaration in the middle of skyrocketing inflation and crime and the possibility of World War III. So we established a new civil rights cause of action for those whose intimate images were shared on public screen.
How many times have you heard?
I'll bet everybody knows somebody somewhere along the line.
That in an intimate relationship, what happened was the guy takes a revealing picture of his naked friend or whatever in a compromising position and then, literally, in a sense, blackmails or mortifies that person.
Send it out and put it online.
Why would Biden do this?
Because it is a greasy, slippery slope to Biden's involvement in massive pay-to-play corruption and quite possibly further impending, incriminating, compromising, blackmail of crusty old Joe himself.
Beyond Joe Biden's perverse leanings, how far does the Biden grift go into the depths of engineered global pandemics, or worse, The U.S. company Metabiota, Inc.
was awarded $18.4 million in federal contracts under the Pentagon's Defense Threat Reduction Agency program run in Georgia and Ukraine for scientific and technical consulting services.
Metabiota researches global field-based biological threat research, pathogen discovery, outbreak response, and clinical trials.
Metabiota had been awarded $3.1 million for their work in Sierra Leone, one of the countries at the epicenter of the Ebola outbreak.
And according to the Gateway Pundit, Hunter Biden's investment company, Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners, funded San Francisco-based MetaBiota as early as 2014.
Rosemont Seneca's website also showed MetaBiota as one of the companies it has invested in.
MetaBiota then partnered with Black& Veatch, a company with ties to the Department of Defense, to set up labs in the Ukraine.
The cover-up of Hunter Biden's laptop is far more than his twisted crackhead lifestyle.
The emails on that laptop are crucial to stopping Joe Biden's lust for a New World Order, no matter what the price.
Biden titled these pleas to the Senate flying in the face of American sovereignty, the threshold of the New World Order, the Wilsonian vision, and American foreign policy in the 1990s and beyond.
An excerpt from the first speech reads, I shall urge that we revive the concept of a new world order, rescue the phrase from cynicism, and invest in it a vision that should become the organizing principle of American foreign policy in the 1990s and into the next century.
The moment is upon us to define a compelling concept of a new world order, to commit ourselves to it, and to lead the world in its realization.
And now is the time when things are shifting.
There's going to be a new world order out there.
And we've got to lead it.
We've got to unite the rest of the free world in doing it.
John Bowne reporting.
It's hard to believe that we're already into March.
Sorry, guys.
The video kept playing.
Yeah, you saw it there.
You know, I had to share that because when I watched it, I thought it was a good compilation.
And I'll leave a link to it if you want to share it wherever you want to share it or go look at it, watch it again, watch the full thing, whatever.
But with that being said, you know...
You see the Hunter Biden laptop and you see the desperation happening in what's going on in Ukraine.
And let me just start by saying this, that there's a massive effort to start purging the Internet right now.
What you're seeing in Ukraine is just an excuse to go after a lot of other people, and it's a pretense.
Pretext.
But here we are.
I want to play this.
I was trying to find the right thing.
All right.
So Charlie Kirk suspended from Twitter after naming Rachel Levine's biological sex.
And also there's another story here from our Right Side Broadcasting Network where it says YouTube has suspended them ahead of the Trump rally for a week so that they cannot put it out there.
And I want to talk about this quickly because I think it's important.
So this is what's happening.
This is like the purge 3.0 or whatever iteration of the purge we're on as far as the big tech companies silencing and censoring those who will talk about issues that they cannot have the public become aware of because of how complicit they were in the cover up in the first place and how complicit they are in the corruption that's ongoing.
Both reasons.
So big tech now is going after RSBN and they took down Charlie Kirk.
And there's a bunch of other people I saw that have been getting suspended and their accounts taken down.
So my theory is this, and I'm probably right.
I think.
They have to get ahead of the Hunter Biden laptop.
They know Jack Maxey's talking about it.
I think all the insiders know that what was on that laptop is so disgusting.
Again, I don't know, but I think this time it's different because the laptop's actually being disseminated.
The hard drive's actually being passed out to as many people as they can.
You have the New York Times actually acknowledging it exists.
This isn't like the Hillary Clinton email server where she deleted all those emails because she deleted it.
We never were able to get back those 30,000 emails or whatever.
And that was how they solved it.
They acid-washed and they deleted it.
So all the emails that would have shown how corrupt and criminal she is...
That was kind of a different story than this because we actually have the hard drives.
They have the hard drives and they're passing them out.
But they're getting ahead of it by suspending and canceling and censoring anybody who would be the type of person who would stand up and talk about this when it becomes so publicly known that they can't hide it anymore.
So it's like getting ahead of this story by deleting people before it can become a story.
It's what they did to us in October 2020, right before the election, two weeks before the election.
The day the story of Hunter Biden comes out, they just start deleting channels.
Of course.
So they know what's coming.
They're fully aware of what's coming down the pipeline.
And Ukraine is where I get worried because it's either – Ukraine is going to be the natural place where they're going to have some flashpoint that's going to take over the news cycle and suck all the air out of the story about Hunter Biden if it even – if it comes out in the way that it seems like it's going to.
But here's what's happening.
Ukrainian TV host calling for genocide of Russian children.
I'm going to go through rapid-fire a few of these articles on Russia.
Ukraine's Zelensky referendum proposal gets response from Russia.
He wants to have this sit-down referendum, and Russia is like, you know, this is crazy.
You're not even really in a place to be making these demands, and it's not going to go well.
You know, you have Morning Joe, Mika and Joe Brzezinski on there, going back and forth, which I think is kind of funny because it shows you how the narrative is changing so much that, like, one day Morning Joe is like, oh, we shouldn't be in Ukraine.
Those Republicans want to take us to board.
Then the next day, like, somebody sent him the memo saying, like, Joe, Joe, we're supposed to be for this war.
And Joe's like, oh, yeah, yeah, we got to send MiGs, send rockets, send the 10th military, or 10th battalion, or whatever.
Um...
So, you know, I see these people doing it, and I think we all see it.
It's fairly obvious.
Going, though, into the idea that the New York Times is a fake news organization, here's a funny one, Candace Owens, who received an email from the New York Times asking for comment regarding me advancing ideas that Ukraine is a corrupt country, similar to Russian state TV. I replied informing them that I actually got my ideas from the New York Times and provided them links to their past articles.
I know, that's what you have to do, because they depend on the concept that people have a short memory and don't remember how they were lied to, like, every single day for the last who knows how long, pretty much since that organization has been in existence, the New York Times.
So when you pull up their own articles and say, hey, remember this article you wrote about how bad Ukraine is and how evil Zelensky is and how corrupt he is?
Yeah, that was the one I was talking about.
And they're like, uh...
I don't think I'm going to write this story anymore.
Moving on.
You must be one of those QAnon-adjacent pizza gate conspiracy theorists.
Yeah.
Shut up.
Stop.
Stop.
Don't tell me.
Don't tell me things I don't want to hear.
La, la, la, la, la.
They put their fingers in their hair.
That's the level of what we're dealing with here, folks.
It's pretty bad.
Tucker talking about Ukraine.
I thought this was good.
I wanted to play this little clip.
It's him explaining...
The absurdity that we're going to make these claims on the Today Show and these fake news networks that President Zelensky is somehow defending democracy as he bans 11 political parties and basically gets rid of all dissenting media in the country.
Yeah, watch this.
In a democracy, citizens can have any opinion they want to have.
They can express any opinion they want in public whenever they care to express it, including through mass media.
If citizens are dissatisfied with their political leadership, they can challenge their leaders for office.
Now, all of these things are true in every free country in any period, always.
These are not just features of democracy, these are prerequisites for democracy.
So with that in mind, you should know about a political party in Ukraine called Opposition Platform for Life.
With 43 seats in parliament, it is the largest opposition party in that country.
Over the weekend, the president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, banned that party.
Opposition Platform for Life is now prohibited from, quote, all activity within Ukraine.
So with a single command, Zelensky made it impossible for anybody to run against him for president.
He did this not just to Opposition Platform for Life, but to 10 other political parties that he believed were insufficiently loyal to him.
They're all illegal now.
Obviously, there's a war underway in Ukraine, and on that basis, Zelensky has declared martial law.
But we must tell you there is no evidence that the opposition parties he banned were aiding Russia in its war against Ukraine.
Opposition Platform for Life, for example, denounced the Russian invasion the moment it happened, just like everybody else.
But Zelensky took the opportunity to turn Ukraine into effectively a one-party state, which it now is.
So having banned all opposition, he then seized control of the country's media outlets.
Zelensky signed a decree that combines all national television channels into a single platform that he controls.
He described this as a, quote, unified information policy, and it certainly is unified.
So if all of these details seem shocking to you, if this is not the Zelensky you've heard about on the Today Show, then you may not have been paying attention to Ukraine.
Zelensky has been solidifying complete control over Ukraine for a long time, since long before the Russian invasion and the war.
Last year, he had his main political opponent arrested and his assets seized by the state.
At the same time, Zelensky shut down three of Ukraine's most popular television networks, channels that, not coincidentally, had criticized him.
So how should we, as Americans, assess this?
Well, first and most obviously by admitting this is authoritarianism, it's not democracy, and then second by acknowledging that actually it's pretty common.
Well, you know, I hate to say it, but it doesn't seem like we're going to be acknowledging those things, at least not on the liberally demented side of the media that refuses to acknowledge any truth about things like this.
So, you know, I see where he's coming from.
I think Tucker's 100% right.
I mean, look at what they've done.
They're going to sit there, and like I said, the little Ralph Wiggums, you know, God bless them on Congress, who are, you know, waving their Ukrainian flag saying, yay, safe Ukrainian penguin bear, I'm helping!
And this guy's literally turning into a one-party authoritarian dictatorship.
And of course, they're going to keep cheering it on.
Let's send him more missiles!
Yeah, that's going to make it better!
A few more stories here.
This one's interesting.
This is kind of true.
Ukraine cannot sow spring crops.
This war will have huge implications for world grain supply in 2022 and 2023 and far-reaching consequences for those importers used to importing grains, especially corn, but also wheat and barley and oil seeds.
And this is from a Dutch farmer saying, you only have one chance to sow.
If we cannot sow now, we will not reap.
This will have enormous consequences for the world market.
So remember, guys, food's going to get more expensive.
Stock up now.
There's going to be shortages.
I don't know how much we're going to feel them here in America, but if it's global, it's going to be disastrous.
You know, one of the big things that starts a lot of wars is, you know, population insecurity, you know, like not being able to have things like clean water or...
Let's put it this way, developed countries losing access to things like clean water and access to food and shortages of food and that kind of thing.
That can be a hugely destabilizing factor and lead to conflict regardless.
You know, it's something to be aware of.
It's something to be aware of.
Governor DeSantis here slams the NCAA and declares Emma Wyatt the winner of the 500-yard freestyle swimming event, not Leah Thomas.
So it's a man, baby.
That's Leah.
William, by the way, is his name.
William Thomas, the giant man who is dominating women in college swimming, formerly ranked in the NCAA as around 420, and now ranked number one, of course, because he chose to go play against women.
Yeah, that story is just good for Governor DeSantis on that one.
Never forget, though, when we talk about coronavirus and what its impact has been on us, Jesse Kelly reminding us coronavirus was weaponized to make sure Donald Trump didn't win re-election and lined the pockets of the pharmaceutical companies.
Lives ruined.
Nation's now broken.
Don't you dare let them get away with it.
With whoops now, we must have public trials and a reckoning.
And I could not agree more.
I believe that's certainly what we have to do.
Two stories to wrap it up here.
Hillary Clinton testing positive, I'm sure fully vaccinated too, even though her, she's evil enough where she would not take the vaccine and tell everybody she did.
But she's positive for COVID-19.
And of course, Sakai, I call her Sakai, tests positive for COVID after two meetings with Joe Biden.
But I kind of like the other article, the way this one is phrased here.
Vaccinated Jen Sakai comes down with a case of COVID and she does have symptoms.
Well, the vaccine's working out for you, isn't it, right?
It's really effective.
Really effective.
Okay, guys, so now we're going to do what we do at the end of every episode where we talk about God's grace and how it is truly greater.
So this segment, we're going to look at a piece of scripture, but before I get into the scripture, I want to address an issue that took place, an incident, let's just say, that took place yesterday in the comments.
I was reading through the comments, as I always do, and I enjoy reading your comments.
I get a lot of ideas from you guys.
Oh yeah, I didn't even mention, before I get into the incident, I did want to mention this in today's show, that a lot of people are telling me that Bill Barr is somehow still in the plan or something, and that it's all part of the plan.
Look, if it all turns out that it was all some elaborate scheme to make us look this way when we should have been looking that way, or to facilitate this whatever plan, I'll apologize.
But until then, I'm going to call it like I see it.
So I wanted to address that.
Next, I want to say, there was a person in the comments, and I don't want you guys to go try to find this person, and I don't want you to try to yell at them or get mean at them or do anything to them, because I think they know what they did was wrong.
But I'm going to preface it to say that You know, they made a comment that I think was really flippant and it was very, let's just say, it was careless and reckless.
They made a comment that, you know, I will only describe as saying they made an open threat against my family.
A direct threat against my family.
Now look, I put myself on this show every day and I am fully aware that I get threats and I get harassment and all that stuff.
It just comes with the territory because when you put yourself out there, people are going to go after you and I get it.
I'm not okay with that because it sucks and it's not fun.
Trust me, you don't want this kind of attention a lot of times.
But when you do something and you make a mistake or you make a threat like that, I take it very seriously.
And I took it very seriously.
And, you know, after going through, you know, how I was pretty angry and upset, and I made some choice words with this person, I basically said, I was going to make it my life's mission to find out who they are and expose them, because you don't make threats against my family, ever.
And I think all of you probably feel the same way, right?
I don't think that's appropriate, I don't think that's right, and if it had escalated further, I would have called the authorities and made it very clear that when you do that, I will find out who you are.
But, that being said, They apologized, and I think they understood they were wrong.
But the irony of it all was that they were trying to make a point about how me saying that we should love our enemies and that we should leave open the ability for God to redeem anyone because we're not the judge...
That in order to get me to understand that that was a false doctrine, that something bad had to happen to members of my family, so that I would realize that the teachings of Jesus Christ were incorrect, and I should hate these people, or hate people, and not show up.
So today, this God's Grace is Greater segment may go a little long, but I'm going to go through a couple verses that I want to bring up in...
I believe that they were wrong, but I can understand a part of what they were trying to say.
So outside of the threats and the obviously stupid comment that they know was a stupid comment that they should not have made, and I don't think, you know, you shouldn't do that kind of stuff.
That's really not good.
But, the first one I want to share is this verse.
And this is out of the book of 1 John chapter 4.
And it says this.
We're going to start it in verse 7.
And we're going to read all the way through to verse 19.
It says, or actually to verse 12.
Dear friends, let us love one another because love is from God and everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God.
The one who does not love does not know God because God is love.
God's love was revealed among us in this way.
God sent his one and only son into the world so that we might live through him.
Love consists in this.
Not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.
Dear friends, if God loved us in this way, we also must love one another.
No one has ever seen God.
If we love one another, God remains in us and His love is perfected in us.
So I start there because, look, Jesus told us that we have to love one another.
And it has to be a core principle in our lives that we cannot be close to God if we don't look at everybody with an open heart that's full of love.
Now!
That's not to say that we're to embrace everybody and bring them in and say, you know, Joe Biden, I know you've done all this sick, corrupt, and disgusting things, and you're evil, and you should come and we should hang out.
No, because that's how you get corrupted.
And I want to address that in 2 John.
And this is in 2 John.
There's only one chapter in 2 John.
But it's verse 6, and we're going to go all the way up to verse 11.
So let's read that real quick.
It says, The one who remains in that teaching,
this one, has both the Father and the Son.
If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your home and don't say welcome to him.
For the one who says welcome to him shares in his evil works.
So I understand we have to rebuke evil.
And we don't invite evil into our homes.
We don't actively go out and search for evil to come partner up with it.
Because like it says there, if we welcome evil into our home, then we're sharing in the evil works that evil is conducting.
But don't forget that we have to show love and compassion and kindness as Christians, even to those who we find the most repugnant, the worst among us.
We don't have to do it in a way that says, oh, welcome, come hang out with me.
I want to go to Epstein Island with you.
No!
No!
That's not what you're supposed to do.
You're supposed to show them the kindness.
What did Jesus say?
I can't remember the exact number of times, but he said if your brother hits you 10 times and asks for forgiveness or hurts you 10 times and asks for forgiveness, I'm sorry I'm not getting that quote exactly.
I should have looked it up before, but you guys will be familiar with the verses I'm talking about.
I'll link it in the description after.
If he asks for forgiveness, you're to forgive him each time.
So if he hurts you and then asks for forgiveness and then hurts you again and asks for forgiveness and then hurts you again and asks for forgiveness, we are supposed to forgive him.
And that's not easy.
And that was the point I was trying to make.
Is that it's not about us living in this world being the judge.
We are not the judge.
God is the judge.
And only God can make these decisions of what's in a man's heart.
Not us.
We can rebuke evil.
We can stay away from it.
We can not welcome it into our circles and bring it into our homes with our families and friends.
But we're not meant, in my opinion, to act as the judge.
We can rebuke evil.
We can say that this is evil.
That is evil.
But we cannot judge what's in a person's heart.
And that's all I was saying.
There's story after story in the Bible, if you actually read it, that shows how God changes the hearts of some of the most evil men.
Kings who burn babies to Baal in an altar.
They throw them in the fire.
And God comes in and changes...
Something happens in their hearts and they turn their whole lives around and they start worshiping God and prosperity comes to their kingdom.
And that's just one story.
There's multiple stories of that.
Paul and how he went from Saul to Paul and what God did for him.
He was persecuting Christians.
He was leading Christians to their deaths.
Okay?
And God changed his heart.
So, just remember that although we're meant to rebuke evil, we're not meant to partner with evil, it's not supposed to be a part of who we are, and we're not supposed to bring it into our lives, that we're not the judge.
Only God is the judge.
And God can take anybody, the most evil among us, I know that sounds counterintuitive, but read the Bible.
He can take the most evil among us and make them do His will.
And if they turn their lives over to Him, if they confess their sins to Him, if they repent and turn away and ask for forgiveness, God can do things with those people that we never imagined.
So, that's all I wanted to say about it.
You know, again, that person apologized for the comment.
I don't want anyone to go out and try to find this person or give them a hard time or try to be mean to them.
I don't want that.
Please don't.
Because I've already forgiven them.
Right?
That's what we're meant to do.
Forgive and love one another.
So, that's my message for today and we'll close it with a little bit of prayer.
Dear Lord and Heavenly Father, thank you so much for giving us all of the scriptures and the verses and the knowledge and the wisdom that comes with it so that we can have discernment in how to love in this world and help us to love We're good
to go.
And I pray that all those out there who have these feelings of anger and resentment and hatred that you will help resolve that in their hearts and all our hearts so that we can not only go out into the world with love but with compassion and care and bring the gospel to as many people as we can with those things as opposed to hatred and all the evil that comes along with that.
As tough as it is, Lord, to follow a lot of these things that you've taught us to do, we just pray that we have the ability to do it.
And if this is a part of whatever wisdom or discernment that we need, we pray that you'll give it to us in our hearts, that the Holy Spirit can speak through us and help us live better lives in you and through you.
We thank you for this day and every day.
In Jesus' name we pray.
Amen.
Look, another great episode.
I enjoyed it thoroughly.
We went a little long today.
I don't know.
These episodes keep getting longer and longer.
It's like it started at like 40 minutes and now it's at like we're over an hour.
So who knows?
By the time we're done, I'll be like this will be like a five-hour podcast.
I'm kidding.
I'm kidding.
I'm going to try to keep them around an hour.
That's it, though.
Make sure you like, share, subscribe.
If you're on Rumble, make sure you subscribe there.
If you're on BitChute, make sure you subscribe there.
Leave a comment.
I want to hear what you guys have to say.
But, you know, be considerate of what you say, I think, because we shouldn't be attacking each other, I think, as much as that is.
But other than that, though, thanks for watching this episode of Just Informed News.
My name is Craig.
We'll see you tomorrow night.
▲
Export Selection