All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 9, 2021 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
30:04
China's Secret Deal With Apple EXPOSED? | JustInformed News #007
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to another episode of Just Informed News.
I'm your host, Craig.
Thanks for joining me here.
You guys know this is the new format show where we just get straight into the news and then we talk about scripture.
If you guys don't know, though, you've got to go to justinformednews.com to get access to these episodes.
That's justinformednews.com or you can find me on bitshoot.com slash justinformedtalk or rumble.com slash justinformedtalk as well.
Now, Hey, let's get into the first story.
The Fox News Christmas tree lit on fire and a suspect is in custody.
This is a disturbing story.
It took place last night where, I guess, right outside of the Fox News building in New York City, they have a Christmas tree that was apparently set on fire by somebody.
It says police took a 49-year-old individual into custody.
So it appears that person may be responsible for this.
So...
Let's think about it rationally, logically.
Who likes to set things on fire?
It rhymes with Shmantifa.
It is Antifa.
Who knows?
We'll have to wait and see what the facts bear here.
But this is disturbing on so many levels.
I mean, it doesn't seem like it was accidental.
It seems like this was intentional, especially since somebody's been arrested.
So we'll see how it pans out, how the story...
It's hard to get ahead of the story before we have all the details.
We'll wait and see what ends up coming from that.
But...
Just, you know, crazy times we live in.
Kimmel, Colbert, Fallon, all plummeting in their ratings for the last four months straight among this key youth demographic.
And, you know, I want to talk about this story because, A, people, you know, see this and they go, what's happening?
How is this possible?
When you have three talentless, unfunny, you know, quote-unquote comedians, On air every night, spouting their political garbage.
People don't want to see that.
People don't want to watch that.
I mean, to be quite honest, at one point, some of these guys were funny.
And that's sad that they've taken this hard left turn.
But it's the only way to make it, right?
So they knew they wanted to be in a certain place in their career, which is, you know, on this late night talk show, because everybody knows who the late night talk show guy is.
But they understood that in order to get there, in order to be selected for that position, they had to have a political, you know, leaning that was left.
And this is why the indoctrination is so dangerous.
And especially when you have people like this who are probably, if I would imagine, very cutthroat individuals who, you know, work their way up in a very, you know, Rough manner, if you will, considering the nature of that job, how hard to get, and so on and so forth.
Either way, though, these guys, you know, I watched this down here.
They have this clip of Stephen Colbert doing a monologue about Roe v.
Wade and how the Supreme Court...
And, you know, as an adult now, looking back, you know, when Colbert first came out, we all, as I was younger, so I thought, this is, like, interesting.
It's getting me into politics.
And that soon quickly changed where, you know, it was like a satire and funny to, oh, I realize what they're doing here.
They're indoctrinating children with this comedic politics.
And this is a real big problem in our society, especially when you look at how, you know, Let's just be kind and say unintelligent these people who are filling these positions are.
I mean, are unimpressive at least.
They may have high intelligence, but they definitely are unimpressive, and they don't have any points that really can be stuck unless you have an audience with a laugh button or applause light that comes on to cue them and teleprompter telling you what to say for your monologue that was pre-written for you by a team of writers.
I mean, at the end of the day, these guys are really just saying what they're being told to say anyway.
But, you know, listening to this, you know, you see how they do the out-of-context quoting of the Supreme Court justices.
You know, they cherry-pick the argument that favors, you know, their side for a portion of it, and they go with that.
They, you know, ask questions, you know, these reciprocal questions that really don't I mean, one of the arguments that Stephen Colbert was making was that, you know, women, they were talking about the difference between the 15-week rule and the 24-week rule, I think, as far as the limit for abortion to be had.
And he was basically making all these arguments that made no sense.
Not even taking into account, it was such a callous thing to say, but he didn't take into account once in his whole monologue the idea and the true fact, in my opinion, that Upon conception, this is a human being that is inside of a woman.
And you talk about bodily autonomy, but then at the same time, you have to grant that same bodily autonomy to a developed, you know, enjoined and fertilized egg that's going to become a human being, right?
Either way, you know, these people are hacks, and their ratings are showing it, and they're going to lose most of the people that end up watching unless they change their act.
and we'll have to see how that goes.
This video should be pulled.
Mistakenly leaked email reveals Biden's FDA pressured Google to censor problematic YouTube video on monoclonal antibody drug for COVID. So, of course, again, this is the government getting involved now.
It's the FDA writing emails to YouTube to get videos removed that talk about things like monoclonal antibodies.
So...
At the end of the day, let's just call this what it is.
We have a government that's continually getting more and more brazen with their censorship and their push for it in society at large.
And I think in certain cases, yeah, you don't want people making videos telling you how to make poison and go take it or something.
I understand that.
But when it comes to people's health and them wanting to take in a...
A plethora of different information to make a good decision to consult as many sources as they can when it comes to your own personal health.
The FDA should not be involved in censoring that conversation.
That's a conversation that we're free to have as American citizens.
And because YouTube is the digital open speech platform for free speech, it was at one point, it was the, you know, the Common place for it, common grounds that should be protected constitutionally,
and I think these companies should be basically broken down like the telecommunication industries were broken down when the monopolies were busted up and they fractured off into all those different phone companies because they saw there was a problem with one company or a few companies having that much control.
So here's the same situation.
We have it very problematic that a few people in Silicon Valley are controlling the conversation, but it's even more problematic and then it's even more imperative because this proves that the government is influencing this, which would mean that if the government's already interacting in this way, then we can establish that there's a...
A case to be made that these companies should be broken down and should be divested and they should be basically taken over and restructured because you can't have people censoring.
I err on the side of free speech every time.
And that's what I think this shows.
But Alex Berenson was a journalist who was sent by accident an email that seems to show the FDA pressure at a lobbyist at Google to delete a YouTube video that explained the potential of new monoclonal antibody treatment for COVID-19.
They said that it was very problematic and it needed to be removed.
The story goes on to illustrate what the conversation was between those individuals in the email.
And it just, you know, again, this is the government intervening, saying that they know better.
They know science.
They are science.
Fauci is science.
No other conversation can be had outside of a government-approved conversation.
And that's what this is.
This is how it's dangerous, too.
So, yeah.
Oh, here's a good one.
This is the deal with the devil, according to Breitbart.
Apple signed a $275 billion contract with China, secret contract with China to avoid crackdown.
Now, this reminds me of stories that we covered in the past where, you know, there was that thing.
It was Q. Yeah, that's right.
I'm saying that sarcastically.
But it...
I was talking a lot about Apple and China.
We had a lot of conversations, a lot of deep digs on it.
Well, now it turns out that, yes, in fact, Apple had a secret deal with China for $275 billion.
It started, oh, you guessed it, in 2016, right when Orange Man, bad, got elected, Again, sarcastically speaking here, it says, Code for advancing the communist agenda and helping them continue the
internment of millions of individuals when it comes to the Uyghurs, Muslim population there.
So there's a lot that's wrong with this, but there's a lot that we knew was going on.
And now they're just coming out and saying, you know, it's funny because they called you a conspiracy theorist when you said Apple's making these deals with China and that they're basically helping them, you know, commit human rights violations.
They're helping them censor the Internet for the Communist Party to gain more and more power and control.
They're engaged in all these atrocities with the factories and the conditions and they had suicide nets around some of these factories.
Well, guess what?
It turns out For $275 billion, Apple was willing to look the other way, and Apple was willing to participate in these things to agree to put more Chinese-made products in their lines, more parts used from Chinese-made manufacturing.
This is definitely the danger that...
President Trump was talking about for his whole four-year term, and I think this is a lot of the driving force in Washington, D.C. against President Trump and America First.
These people had deals.
They had money on the line, and so they had every incentive.
They look for means and motive when you go to a trial.
I think there might be one more I'm forgetting, but you have means and you have motive.
Apple definitely had the means to cut these deals, as you can see here, $275 billion.
And they had a motive to then get rid of Trump, right?
Because Trump was threatening all of this.
He was threatening their exploitation of cheap labor in China, which ultimately, I mean, hey, for...
What it is, right, I guess you could say we're getting a great deal, but then you look at the actual, you know, implications of it, and it's horrible.
It's horrendous.
And it not only is it bad for the people in China, right, who end up in these terrible conditions and bad, you know, situations, having, you know, this crazy factories and low wages and all that, but It's ultimately bad even more so for us as American consumers because look at what happened when the pandemic hit.
China was basically showing us, I believe, in no uncertain terms, how dependent we were on them.
They were like, hey, we just released a flu, right?
And you guys were so, you know, dependent on foreign intervention as far as manufacturing in our own medicines and medical equipment that All we had to do was release a little virus, and you basically were crumbling, right?
Stores were shutting down, everything.
So part of me sees what's happened in China as this strategic aim to weaken and undermine the United States.
And they've strategically targeted these corporations and brought them in and given them these sweetheart deals.
Basically say, hey, we will make it easier for you to do business here than in America with the hopes of overtaking America.
And our politicians, for the most part, have basically turned a blind eye to this.
So they're either being paid off or they're being, you know, corporate America is allowing this to happen.
You know, the lobbyists at Google, the lobbyists at Apple, the lobbyists for all these social media companies, they're all going and all these corporations that are exploiting this cheap manufacturing in China are going to Congress and saying, hey, we want this cheap manufacturing.
You know, prices are going to go up if we don't do this.
So...
It's a dangerous game that's played and it's always being played.
That's just the way it is with this global stuff.
I think it's funny how Apple's just openly working with the Communist Party in China and nobody even seems to bat an eye at that.
But, you know, President Trump tries to start his own social media company, and, you know, they're already having the politicized government agencies coming in and trying to scrutinize the deal and trying to pull it through a fine-tooth comb to see if there's anything that comes out.
If you guys want, I'll leave a link to this.
The Trump Media and Technology Group had their investor presentation.
I have a copy here from sec.gov.
That you can watch or read for yourself if you're interested in learning about that company and seeing what all the stuff is that we talked about in yesterday's video, which was that the government agencies are coming in and trying to, you know, As they would put it, their due diligence in examining this deal that's going through and what this investment presentation is suggesting.
You're more than welcome to read through it.
Here's another fascinating story, though.
Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated by Thane Eugene Caesar, declares RFK Jr., who says it was the security guard who fatally shot his father from behind after planning the murder with Sirhan Sirhan.
So, wow.
Yeah, I've heard this theory, I think, out there before.
I'm not sure if this is totally new, but I know that they have had talked about two shooters and all of that.
And look, we all know what John F. Kennedy Jr.
was trying to do when he was president.
Now, he wasn't perfect.
He had a lot of flaws.
He did a lot of bad things.
That being said, you know, he did a lot of good things.
So he tried to do a lot of good things for our country, I believe.
And I think that his brother was on the track to do the same or attempt to do the same things that his brother had done.
And, you know, we look at what happened with JFK Jr.
and we're reminded that when you stand up to powers that be and you start stirring the pot like Trump did and you start stirring it like John F. Kennedy did, that eventually what ended up happening is what Chuck Schumer alluded to.
I mean, that just seems to be what happened, right?
What Chuck Schumer alluded to on, I think it was either Morning Joe or it was one of those NBC shows on Sunday, political shows, Meet the Press or something, but he said he told the guy who was interviewing him, he said, look,
Look, they have six ways from Sunday to come after you in referring to the intelligence community and referring to the way Donald Trump was basically going toe-to-toe with them saying he didn't do any of this stuff and it was all fabrication with regard to the Russia hoax.
Well, in this case...
RFK Jr.
was fixed to do the same thing.
JFK Jr.
was on that track when he was president.
It seems that a lot of people didn't like the way he did things.
Look, there was just a lot of stuff going on.
George Bush and his guys over at the CIA, and then you have all the other people that were involved with it.
You've heard all the theories at this point.
There are a lot of them.
But it wouldn't surprise me at all that in this case some of these accusations being made by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
are true.
He's basically saying that Thane Eugene Caesar, he murdered his father, claiming he fatally shot the President hopeful from behind in 1968.
He believes that Caesar was working with Saron and guided Kennedy towards the Palestinian-born gunman while working security that night.
He also said that, or RFK Jr.
also said, Sirhan fired once in Kennedy's direction and then into the crowd while Caesar then the fatal bullet as the senator from New York fell to the floor.
So I guess it's implying that Sirhan fired and then Caesar shot the fatal shot.
There are others who believe there were two gunmen that night, a theory that was bolstered then when the coroner determined Kennedy was shot from behind.
And RFK Jr.
made this claim just hours after Caesar passed away in the Philippines where he moved shortly after the assassination and called for a new probe.
The LAPD unit that investigated my dad's assassination was run by active CIA operatives.
They destroyed thousands of pieces of evidence, claimed RFK Jr., It would stand to reason that the CIA wouldn't want RFK obviously getting into power when he was running.
The fact that he was shot...
By these two individuals, and then there seemed to be a unit that's being accused by RFK Jr.
of coming in from the LAPD that was full of all CIA agents that were destroying evidence.
Wow.
You know, it would stand to reason they wouldn't want him to be in power, because what would be the first thing that...
You know, RFK, Robert F. Kennedy would have done.
What would be the first thing that he would have done?
He would have demanded to know what happened to his brother.
He would have started going, inquiring, you know, making inquiries.
He already was, I know, looking into it.
He was already researching, investigating what happened to his brother.
He was trying to figure that out, I think.
And that's a lot of seemingly what drove him to become, to get into politics more, like he had, you know, showed an interest to do.
So, yeah, you can read the story if you want.
It's fascinating.
You know, you can read through this, but apparently this guy, Thane Eugene Caesar, was a Lockheed Aircraft employee.
Yeah, does sound a lot like the clown show.
So think about it this way.
You know, you see it for what it is.
These people have a lot more control than they let on.
And this is tragedy.
Sad for the Kennedy family that everything happened to them and has continued to happen.
A lot of it they did to themselves, especially with some of the later Kennedys.
But here you go.
I just thought that was an interesting story I was sharing.
Here's one interesting.
I guess somebody said Melania Trump is on...
Parler now.
I guess this is her official account just was picked up the other day.
I don't know if that's true or not.
Parler's a tough one.
I like using it, but it's kind of buggy.
It doesn't work that great.
I prefer Gab and Getter over those.
Alright, here's a scientist behind the UK AstraZeneca COVID vaccine saying that the next pandemic may be more contagious and more lethal.
Oh, thanks!
Because that's helpful.
Let's just tell it.
It's like fear is this thing in our culture.
We have to generate fear.
We have to push fear.
We have to make you afraid.
And I don't buy into that.
I don't want to ever buy into that.
I want to buy into...
Believing in the good of humanity, believing in God first, and sharing the gospel with others, and having hope, and knowing what was said there in Jeremiah 29-11 about...
Before I know the plans I have for you, and it talks about a future and a hope, you know, that's the kind of life I want to live.
I don't want to live in these people's, you know, fantasy of fear and delusional fear that just keeps coming.
But, yeah, so we've seen all the stuff.
I'm not a doctor.
I don't know about periocarditis, myocarditis, heart problems associated with the vaccines.
I don't know about any of that stuff.
I don't even know about monoclonal antibodies or anything like that because when I got COVID, Thanks be to God.
I got through it.
I had a few.
I think I did a Z-Pak and that was about it.
That was about as it got was a fever and a little cough and cold.
So I know it's a lot worse for some people and I understand.
Look, and again, here's the thing.
I don't I want to tell you one way or another, go get a vaccine or don't get a vaccine.
Because that's your choice.
That's your choice.
You go do the research.
You consult the doctor.
I'm not a doctor.
I don't have medical training to be able to tell you if this is good or not.
But I do know that I listen to a lot of doctors, and I've made a decision for myself, and that's between me and my doctor.
And that's what we have to get back to as a society.
I see a lot of people in the comments whenever I talk about something like this.
They're, oh, yeah, you've got to, this is that.
It's the worst thing in the world.
No, no, no.
We live in a free society, hopefully.
And in a free society, you make the decisions for yourself on how you live your life, obviously within the realm of what's legal.
And at that point, I'm okay with that.
You know, I don't want to promote something that I don't know anything about.
I don't want to say it's bad.
I want to tell you to go do your research.
And that's just something I don't offer here on this channel is an opinion on whether you should or shouldn't do something medically.
I don't think that that's my place.
So, you know, I can tell you that I've made a decision for myself and my family And I'm happy leaving it there.
Now, do I think that they want the mark of the beast?
Do I think that they all want you injected?
And do I think that the medical industrial complex makes money when you're sick and not when you're healthy?
And they'd have every, you know, interest in the world to have people more sick because then that would generate more business for them.
I'm not saying any of that.
Just saying.
You know, I'm not saying any of that's connected, but I'm saying that if you think about those things, then you can make a decision for yourself, I believe.
Yeah, so the next one will probably come out either close to the midterm election or close to the next election.
There'll surely be another COVID because they've got to have mail-in voting.
Don't forget that.
Here was a funny thing I saw.
I don't know if this is true or not.
California store owner prices all items at $951 so thieves can be prosecuted.
And apparently it's funny because it's like a coupon.
You go to the front and then everything drops back to the normal price.
But they just do that so that when you steal it, they can be like, oh, he took $950 worth of stuff because he took one of these candy bars, right?
So, I don't know if this legally would hold up, and I'm not sure if this is real or just a joke, but it is interesting, especially out here in California, since I am here, this is true in a lot of ways, is that store owners don't have any choices.
I mean, they're getting robbed blind.
And nobody's doing anything.
Nobody's getting arrested and there's no restitution besides what they can expect from insurance that only covers so much.
And if it's a habitual problem, it's something that can put somebody out of business.
So, yeah, I shared that.
Finally, Pope Francis says the sins of the flesh aren't that serious.
Now we have a person here on earth telling us that, you know, one sin is worse than the other.
Like, you can do a little sin.
I'm pretty sure the Bible is very clear on this.
So I was going to do today Proverbs chapter 4 and the two ways.
This is what I was going to do.
But I thought, you know, since the Pope brought it up, Let's just hear what the Bible has to say about it.
You know, because what Pope Francis is saying, that sins of the flesh, you know, they're not that serious.
You know, sex outside of marriage and that kind of thing.
But actually, if you read the Bible, which I'm sure his papalness has, you know, you'll understand quickly that God's very clear on this and that there's several places you can look to find it.
But here's just one that was interesting I found in Proverbs where it says avoiding seduction, right?
So, this is one of the Proverbs, Proverbs chapter 5 here.
We're going to reverse to verse 14.
I'll just read the whole thing here in case the Pope's listening or anybody who knows the Pope.
My son, pay attention to my wisdom.
Listen closely to my understanding so that you may maintain discretion in your lips.
Safeguard knowledge.
Though the lips of the forbidden woman...
Help.
She's as bitter as wormwood and as sharp as a double-edged sword.
Her feet go down to death.
Her steps head straight for Sheol.
Help.
She doesn't consider the path of life.
She doesn't know that her ways are unstable.
Now, my sons, listen to me.
And don't turn away from the words of my mouth.
Keep your way far from her.
Don't go near the door of her house.
Otherwise, you will give up your vitality to others and your years to someone cruel.
Strangers will drain your resources and your earnings will end up in a foreigner's house.
At the end of your life you will lament when your physical body has been consumed and you will say how I hated discipline and how my heart despised correction.
I didn't obey my teachers or listen closely to my mentors.
I am on the verge of complete ruin before the entire community.
That's pretty clear, right?
What's being said here?
It's being said, the forbidden woman, meaning the woman you're not meant to be with, the woman who would be sex outside of marriage, now whether that's the internet and your pornography, because think about it.
It's all of that.
It's pornography.
It's actual physical stuff.
Jesus said, you know, you look at a woman, you've already committed the sin of adultery.
You look at her lustfully.
So even if it's just on a computer screen, but it's still a sin, and it's not just any sin, because we know what the penalty for all sin is.
It's death, and it's straight to Sheol, right?
So when you think about that, how are we saved?
What have we done to be saved?
Well, nothing.
Jesus did something.
Jesus went up on the cross.
Jesus gave his life.
Jesus was resurrected.
Jesus made us a promise through that action that we would be saved and have eternal salvation as long as we believed on him.
Right?
So, that's my message for you guys and his papalness and anyone in the Catholic Church who listens to him and says that and thinks it's okay or it's a lesser sin.
All sin, the wage for all sin is death.
So that's something that I just thought I'd clear up.
I mean, just, you know, it's something worth sharing.
And, you know, turn away from it.
I like that it tells you what to do here.
Just don't let it consume you.
Get away from it.
Get it out of your mind.
You know, get it off your computer.
Have safeguards up if you need those.
Have whatever you need.
You know, stay away from the bar.
Stay away from wherever you're, the places where you would be engaged in this kind of behavior.
Stay away from it.
Repent.
Turn to God.
Turn to Jesus.
And that's what you need to do in your life.
And that's where I'm going to go ahead and leave it.
But I want to say thank you guys for watching this episode of Just Informed News.
And if you guys want to help keep this channel alive and going, I would really appreciate some donations.
You know, look, there are a lot of you guys who have been donating and supporting me for a long time now.
And you guys are...
I don't have words to express how thankful I am that when I basically lost everything through the YouTube purge and all my social media purge, where I got kicked off all the big tech stuff, that you guys stuck around.
You guys kept supporting me.
You guys kept writing me positive messages, praying for me.
I felt every one of them.
I've read practically every comment, and I'm just sorry I can't respond to everyone, but I am so grateful.
Thank you for that.
We'll keep coming.
That's it for me, though.
Thanks for watching Just Informed News.
My name is Craig.
▲
Export Selection