All Episodes
Previous Next
April 19, 2021 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
43:45
BLM Extremists Prepare For Next Level Riots, MORE 2020 Election Fraud Evidence, & New MSM Hoaxes...
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
- The officer sent me a photograph of a Department of Defense, the Department of Defense official website, and it's either the Navy or the Air Force.
It's a Navy, a Navy.
And the, you know, you have your picture up on, this is on their Twitter, right?
It's on their social media, you have a photo that's there, you know, whoever you are or whatever symbol you want to be.
On the Eagle, this is an official U.S. government, on the Eagle is a mask.
It's incredible.
I'm like, you know, all I'm doing is I'm like this morning, I'm like calling around to some of my buddies who are still in uniform.
I'm like, what the heck is going on?
You know, as I'm watching a couple of days ago, as I'm watching these beautiful eagles just swooping down and grabbing fish, you know, out of this great lake.
And I'm like thinking to myself, how did we get to this point?
How did we get to this point?
So, and it's because we've given in, right?
We gave up.
We gave up.
And there's these institutions that are now surrounding us.
And it's not a lot of people, folks.
It's a very, very small percentage.
But these institutions who I, you know, personally, I have zero faith in those institutions anymore.
I'm sorry.
On this episode of Just Informed Talk as the mainstream media continues to bolster leftists promoting next-level riots in response to the outcome of the Derek Chauvin trial and the death of George Floyd.
We're going to talk about where that's heading and how the media continues to use it to hide the real news and not cover the stories that matter.
We're going to talk about those stories, so you're going to want to stick around to hear about that and a whole lot more.
Hi and welcome to another episode of Just Informed Talk.
I'm your host Craig.
You guys know we start at justinformednews.com, the official website for Just Informed Talk.
And if you guys haven't subscribed yet, please consider doing it.
It helps me out big time.
and you'll get an automatic email notification as soon as the videos are posted here on this website, which they're always posted first here at justinformednews.com.
Just come here, put your email address in the bar, and hit subscribe.
It's that easy.
That's all it takes.
Then you'll automatically be signed up to receive those emails.
So please consider doing that if you haven't yet.
But if you also want to watch it on a different platform, I also post them over here to justinformedtalkonbitshoot, which is bitshoot.com slash justinformedtalk, and on rumble.com slash justinformedtalk as well.
So those are places where you can find these videos in their entirety and that's just a great way to help channels to either sign up here or subscribe on either of these two channels or do all three.
It helps out however you want to do it.
Also, we're going to look at President Trump, and he is still adamant that the fix was in in 2020.
And regardless of how people continue to say, oh, you need to move on, focus on 2022, focus on 2024, President Trump is still adamant that there was a fraudulent election that took place, as am I, as are probably many of you out there watching.
We're going to look at that.
Plus, we're going to talk about Mike Lindell's new social media platform that just launched, frankspeech.com.
As of right now, it's just a streaming video.
It doesn't seem to have much complexity to it at the moment.
I don't know if that's going to change.
We'll have to wait and see.
For now, he's having many different people come on, and we're going to look at a preview for his movie called Absolute Interference.
We're going to check that out a little bit later in the video.
Plus, we're going to look at a bunch of other very important stories that the media is not covering.
They want to distract you from, they want to keep away from your attention.
So, with that, we're going to start right here with this story.
And this is where we're going to kind of pick it up.
Okay, so you guys know right now, if you haven't been in an airport and seen a CNN screen lately, which I know nobody out there in this audience is probably intentionally watching CNN ever, unless, like I said, you're either stuck in an airport or you're being tortured by some evil person who puts that on and straps you to a chair or something.
But...
That being said, CNN's been running this trial, so has all the other networks.
They're trying to make this the next OJ trial, and of course you have people like Maxine Waters going out there and basically saying, if we don't get the verdict we want, we're going to be confrontational and be criminal, is what she's basically saying, I should say.
I don't know.
And, you know, at the end of the day, we all know what happened in January 6th was a part of a broader setup that the left had orchestrated, in my opinion, and facilitated by using crisis actors and others in order to have that happen specifically on the day that the votes were going to be and facilitated by using crisis actors and others in order to have that happen specifically on the day that the votes were going to be pushed through Congress so that then they could distract from election fraud
And, you know, I think it's amazing to me because, you know, how many times did the psychotic leftist, you know, or Me Too movement or the Antifa or BLM movement go and walk into Congress and storm into senators and representatives' offices and stage sit-ins and harass people on elevators and occupy the entire building.
And nobody ever called that domestic terrorism, yet on January 6th when patriots, who for the most part, I'm not going to say everyone there was 100% peaceful because it wasn't, There were some people there who were obviously the outliers, those who were acting in a malicious way.
But for the most part, we're talking about many people who are in there exercising their First Amendment rights, going in, telling the lawmakers that we're not happy with you, ignoring our calls for you to investigate this fraud of an election that took place and you facilitating the stealing of the most powerful ignoring our calls for you to investigate this fraud of an election that took place Joe Biden is a crook.
His whole campaign was crooked.
Everyone associated with the 2020 election who helped turn a blind eye or facilitate voter fraud should be investigated and then indicted.
And I mean, I'll stand by that all day, every day.
Because it's the truth.
But here is where we're at, right?
Vandal smearing pig blood on the home once occupied by Derek Chauvin, a defense witness.
So this is the kind of intimidation that they are engaged in.
This is the kind of reckless behavior that the left has facilitated, condoned, and endorsed for years now, it seems.
They've actively worked in a...
Very organized fashion to develop tactics that we haven't really seen used on this kind of scale since, I don't know, I mean, going back to Mao Zedong when he took over China with the revolution there,
or rather what they called Mao brigades where they had children running through the streets, you know, Basically harassing individuals who didn't support the Communist Party and torturing them, arresting them without trial, you know, doing summary executions, that kind of things, those kind of things, and then or back to, you know, Hitler's Germany where you saw what happened to the Jewish population there in the run-up to World War II and into World War II specifically.
So this is where we're heading as a nation, in my opinion, if we don't Put some kind of, tap the brakes, get these people in check.
These people are psychotic, they're criminal, they're reckless, they're dangerous, and they're engaging in very dangerous behaviors, and they're being, you know, facilitated, they're being encouraged by acting members of Congress.
And also in their local cities.
Here we have a Minneapolis City Council candidate who's encouraging riders to burn down a wealthy neighborhood.
Now, this is according to this website here, which supposedly found a screenshot of a post that was made by this Margarita Ortega.
And this is something that I guess was public and then has been since changed to private, but apparently the post read something like this.
Allegedly, she said on a social media post, just a personal thought, just in case you all feel like burning...
So I guess Lake of the Isles is some kind of richer subdivision in the Minneapolis area, and it has the most luxurious homes, and it's owned by the city's wealthiest residents.
So the encouragement there is, you know, take your aggression out on those who have succeeded because it's reckless, it's aimless, it's directionless anger.
It's just venting anger.
So you might as well go destroy people who, I guess, in this person's mind, supposedly deserve it because of their socioeconomic status, not because they would bring justice for anything that happened to those who have been wronged, but because in their mind, anyone who is wealthy but because in their mind, anyone who is wealthy is automatically, you know, the root cause of the injustice that exists in the world.
And it couldn't be because those people worked very hard and either, you know, through hard work and determination or a number of other factors were able to build up, you know, status and wealth that gave them the ability to live their life where they are now.
It has to be because systemically they are the oppressors and they must be targeted according to this person allegedly, which is according to this article, which highlights this.
So, you know, I just look, it's hard to verify this kind of stuff because, you know, you see it's a Facebook post that went private and, you know, they're kind of picking this up secondhand.
But it does give you an idea of the kind of people we're dealing with here.
And it goes even further when you talk about Maxine Waters.
She's going out there now in Minnesota and she's saying basically...
That they have to escalate the violence, right?
They have to start confronting people.
She's out there, you know, taking to the streets with these protesters saying, if we don't get the outcome that we want, which is not even possible because I think they want first-degree murder charge, and there is only a second-degree murder charge that could be gotten in this case at most, That they're going to riot.
They're going to supposedly peaceful protest, which involves burning things down and killing people.
That's how these leftists operate.
But this is it.
Kevin McCarthy presses Nancy Pelosi to take action against her for the statements that she made in inciting violence.
Kevin McCarthy tweets here, Maxine Waters is inciting violence in Minneapolis just as she has incited violence in the past.
If Speaker Pelosi doesn't act against this dangerous rhetoric, I will bring action this week.
So, Ultimately, it's just sad to see these individuals, these weak leaders in Congress, Kevin McCarthy being one of them, depending on Pelosi to do something about this.
Pelosi's right there with Maxine Waters encouraging her, encouraging this kind of reckless, dangerous rhetoric.
And there's going to be no reprimanding of Maxine Waters for any of this.
And Kevin McCarthy is basically a lame duck, and so is Mitch McConnell.
They're rhinos.
They're weak.
They're not standing for the American people.
They allowed this election to be stolen and didn't stand up to do anything about it.
They are the worst kind of awful political hack traitors that you could ever imagine.
Just one step above most of the Democrats.
So, you know, what do we expect?
I don't expect much.
You can see her.
You can watch the video if you want to.
I'll leave a link to this article where she's out there saying that they need to take to the streets and, you know, basically be confrontational.
And that's what they're encouraging.
So not to mention the fact that after she made that decision to go out and make that kind of rhetoric and express that opinion and that incitement, that then subsequently thereafter there was a drive-by shooting that was pretty much that then subsequently thereafter there was a drive-by shooting that was pretty much targeted at National Guard who were there to keep the So it truly defies logic how these individuals get away with what they do, other than to know that the whole system is corrupt.
Of course, the leftists are rushing to defend Maxine Waters as the expulsion petition circulates that was, I believe, put together by Marjorie Taylor Greene.
And, you know, the things that these people say are awful unnoticed.
I know I've been getting it for quite some time and it's even gotten worse now after I appeared in that HBO documentary.
I mean, just the level of violent threats, the level of hate, hateful comments, the level of just disgusting things that people say to try to, you know, intimidate, to try to threaten, to try to, you know, coerce you into backing down or to changing your opinion coerce you into backing down or to changing your opinion or to just, you know, in general, express express their own, you know, obviously demented sickness against others is disgusting.
And you can scroll through these tweets and you can read them for yourself, but I'm not even going to give them the dignity of going through them.
But you know what this whole organization is about.
The Black Lives Matter co-founder, Patrice Cullors, is buying several million dollar homes.
And when she was confronted with this, it was pretty much the funniest thing I've ever seen.
She basically made the argument...
Now this is an affirmed...
She has said, I am a Marxist.
I believe in Marxist principles.
I am 100% Marxist.
Yet, here she is buying a million-dollar-plus home and then many other homes that total in the millions of dollars.
And she's saying, well, but it's my family.
So I'm bringing my family out of poverty by giving them these homes.
No.
All you're doing is enriching yourself.
Obviously, you're a fake Marxist.
I guess somebody else put it one way that I thought was good.
You're the truest kind of Marxist there is, where you enrich yourself at the expense of the people you claim to care about the most, and then you just continually lie about who you are and how you are in society.
So, that I guess would be a true way of looking at it.
But yeah, these people, you know, the Black Lives Matter folks, they truly are the epitome of hypocrites and it's really, it's unfortunate to see this kind of thing happen where, you know, you're buying millions of dollars worth of homes and then her excuse is, oh, well, I was just, I was giving them to my family.
You know, so that it doesn't count.
I don't have to be a Marxist when it's my money, right?
I just have to be a Marxist when it's your money, right?
That's what they kind of want you to think.
But, you know, the saddest part of the whole, talking about January 6th and, you know, the hypocrisy of the left, because we see this trial with Derek Chauvin, you know, for basically, look, I don't think that what he did necessitates a kind of reaction and the kind of hate and the kind of, you know, complete, audacious spectacle which it's becoming, right?
It is obviously a procedural thing.
I think he may have used some techniques that they are taught to use, that he may have used them improperly.
He may have used them improperly, and of course that would be for a jury to decide.
But at the end of the day, the way that the media has turned it all into a spectacle, and they blare this trial in perpetuity every day on their networks, and they ignore a story like this about Ashley Babbitt,
a woman who was gunned down in cold a woman who was gunned down in cold blood in the Capitol on January 6th by an unknown police officer who was working in the Capitol, and they are not putting that police officer's face all over every TV screen in the nation.
They're not calling for a mass boycott of all government law enforcement agencies.
They're not calling on sit-ins protests at the Capitol for the outrageous...
Murder of Ashley Babbitt.
No, you don't see any of that.
You don't see the big-time network TV host saying, you know, I stand with Ashley Babbitt.
You don't see any of that stuff.
You know why?
because Ashley Babbitt was not of the right political persuasion, and she was not in the victim class of individuals who are continuously made to feel as though they are the target of a never-ending hate campaign that is being pushed and she was not in the victim class of individuals who are continuously made to feel as though they are the target of a never-ending hate campaign that is being pushed by a white supremacist system that only really
that only really exists in the minds of these sick individuals who use it to enrich themselves, to empower themselves, to divide our nation further and continue to keep us as, you know, basically they're captives if they're able to pull this off.
So the DOJ is lying about the Ashley Babbitt case.
This is from Techno Fog.
I thought this was a great, concise piece worth sharing.
The force was excessive, so the DOJ punts on willfulness.
So what happens is, I'll read this in its entirety because it's not that long, and it is so concise, and it's so well thought out and well put, I think it's worth sharing, but it says today, and this is about Ashley Babbitt, this young woman who had a full life ahead of her who was just there protesting on the Capitol, who was shot in cold blood and died there in the Capitol.
Nobody seems to really care about it that much, especially the people who say they care about police being brutal and using excessive force.
And they care about that, but not when it's a white Trump-supporting woman who was unarmed being shot by police in the Capitol building.
I guess it just doesn't matter.
Not that her race should matter, but everything in these days is about race.
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia issued a press release explaining their decision to not prosecute the officer who shot and killed unarmed protester and veteran Ashley Babbitt on January 6, 2021.
It states that DOJ officials, along with the Metropolitan Police Department's Internal Affairs Division, quote, conducted a thorough investigation of Ms. Babbitt's shooting.
This included reviewing video footage, getting statements from officers and other witnesses, collecting physical evidence and the results of Ms. Babbitt's autopsy.
They explain, quote, as members of the mob continued to strike the glass door, Ms. Babbitt attempted to climb through one of the doors where the glass was broken out.
An officer inside the speaker's lobby fired one round from his service pistol, striking Ms. Babbitt in the left shoulder, causing her to fall back from the doorway and onto the floor, unquote.
It says, you'll notice there's no mention of a verbal warning to Ms. Babbitt or other efforts to subdue her without the use of deadly force.
Continuing on, the DOJ maintains that the, quote, focus of the criminal investigation was to determine whether federal prosecutors could prove that the officer violated any federal evidence.
Laws concentrating on the possible application of 18 U.S.C. subsection 242, a federal criminal civil rights statute, unquote.
It says the press release focused on the term willfully.
It says, quote, here, prosecutors would have to prove not only that the officer used the force that was constitutionally unreasonable, but that the officer did so willfully, which the Supreme Court has interpreted to mean that the officer acted with a bad purpose to disregard the law.
So, I mean, just right there, can we just pause and look at the parallels between what's happening with this Derek Chauvin case, right?
A case where a guy who is obviously, you know, a violent criminal, he has a violent criminal history.
He is engaged in, obviously, the crime alleged was that he passed off counterfeit money.
He's confronted by police.
He's uncooperative.
He's combative.
He resists arrests.
He is obviously, after the autopsy showed, he was obviously high on fentanyl, which is a very powerful drug that can kill a lot.
It's killed many, many people, thousands and thousands of people.
He ends up having a type of attack where he loses his life as he's being attempted to be put in police custody.
They're treating this like the cop basically took him and made a summary execution against him, and they're vilifying Derek Chauvin as if he is basically the worst human alive.
Yet in this case, we don't even know who the cop is, and this guy shot a woman at point-blank range, an unarmed woman, without giving any verbal warning and without giving any other attempt to try to stop her from coming into the building.
I mean, so you could make an argument that this is the double standard that we face now in America.
And most of the racists on the left...
Are happy about this, right?
Because their cure for racism, because racism exists previously in our society, and it did exist back a long time ago, and for a while it did exist there, their cure is, we're going to cure racism by becoming the most disgusting racist people that we can be, and then enacting racism against people so that we can fight the racism that happened in the past.
That's basically where we're at as a society.
But here it goes.
The DOJ concluded, quote, So that statement right there tells you everything you need to know about how the DOJ operates and how
there's a two-tiered justice system in our country where it's rules for thee and not for me.
We're going to unequally apply the law where we see fit because we're not ever going to have an objective standard of law.
We're going to have this standard of law that applies to people who are in this victim class that is perpetual, that's meant to divide us.
And then there are those who are outside of that class who just don't get the same equal treatment under the law.
So as Technofog goes on here, they actually break this down really well, it's
It says, And it cites
the court case there.
that the action of the officer in the shooting to kill Babbitt was excessive in relation to a legitimate government objective.
Kingsley v. Hendrickson, and it cites the court case there.
It says, this is an objective standard.
The force must be objectively unreasonable when viewed from the standpoint of a reasonable officer at the scene.
Here, Babbitt was unarmed, was climbing through a window and not attacking anyone.
In response, she is shot and killed.
That's easily excessive.
This brings us to willfulness.
We have serious thoughts about the DOJ position that there was no evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer willfully violated Section 242.
As an initial matter, the DOJ press release neglects to mention whether the officer used excessive force.
Instead, going right to an analysis of willfulness, we believe this reveals their intent to soften the blow of the press release.
As to willfulness, 18 U.S. Code applies, quote, when the defendant understands that he is unjustifiably invading a legally protected interest or acts in reckless disregard of the law, unquote.
However, the defendant need not have been, quote, thinking in constitutional terms, unquote, as long as his, quote, aim was not to enforce law but to derive a citizen of a right and that right was protected by the Constitution, unquote.
That's another case site here, screws versus United States.
It says here the DOJ exaggerates and at worst lies about its willfulness burden.
We doubt the DOJ couldn't prove willfulness in this case.
In fact, the DOJ has brought Section 242 prosecutions with less egregious facts.
As the DOJ has argued in other cases, the officer's prior training on the use of force could be viewed, quote, as evidence that his conduct was willful, unquote, are we to think that this officer didn't have training on when force became excessive?
And again, I've got to stop right there.
That's exactly what they're arguing about Derek Chauvin, is they're saying that because he had training, that what he did was excessive, yet they don't apply the same standard here to Ashley Babbitt's case.
It's insane.
In another case, the DOJ argued that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that to establish willfulness, the jury was required to...
Find that the defendant intended to use more force than was reasonable under the circumstances, i.e.
force that violated the victim's well-established due rights as a pretrial detainee.
Yeah, summary execution would count as being, you know, violation of your right to a pretrial detainment.
What makes the Babbitt case different?
The victim and the location.
This case should have gone to the jury.
If this killing took place in Minnesota or Chicago, the results would have been different.
I couldn't agree more.
Great work by Technofog, and it's a great piece.
I'll leave it in the link description if you want to share it.
Another story here, Alan Dershowitz is the first guest on frankspeech.com.
This is Mike Lindell's new venture.
And of course, Mike Lindell has decided to, with the help of Dershowitz and others, sue Dominion for $1.6 billion, which I believe is exactly what they were trying to sue him for.
So it's, you know, ultimately at the end of the day, it's going to be he said, she said, but what's going to end up happening is if they can take this to court, which I hope they do, then you'll have discovery and then you'll have to be able to have access to Dominion's source code to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that what Mike Lindell is saying is untrue.
And if you want to hear what Mike Lindell is alleging, I'm going to play this trailer from Mike Lindell's movie Absolute Interference right now.
What we always had was we always had pressure from foreign influences, foreign interference from different countries, better.
Back in the beginning of this country was Great Britain and France.
It's just migrated to countries like China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, North Korea.
And these are all countries that have had some play in our election processes for the last, probably for the last decade.
We've migrated from People going in and voting by raising their hands to paper ballots.
Now we're into the 21st century and we have these machines.
And these machines, what we do know, one of the things that we do know for certain, is that the machines are connected to the Internet.
Our FBI and CISA, the cyber arm of the Department of Homeland Security, yeah, they gave out these alerts and they said, hey, Iran is interfering in our election process.
The machines are not supposed to be connected to the Internet.
They're supposed to be free of the internet.
Well, if it's connected to the internet, that means that anybody in any country, and I can name some of the countries.
So we know China.
We know Iran.
We know Spain had something to do with it.
We know Serbia.
We've had Italy come up.
We've had Germany come up.
You can't have a million people sitting at computers controlling this.
So you have to have some algorithm, some set of steps that computers can run automatically to control it.
Mm-hmm.
That's what I figured out.
It's impossible to have this same glitch in every single county.
And so far, it's been every single county you've done in the United States.
So far.
The same thing, the same machines, the same attacks, the same people, the same corruption that went on, the same crime against humanity across all the states.
So for me to get 1.000 and I'm a physicist?
That ain't natural, buddy.
Right.
So it couldn't be done by humans.
No, no.
It's about 100% impossible.
No, no.
Had to be machines.
Yes.
And they had to be online.
Constantly online.
Constantly online, everybody.
No way could you ever do that humanly to make all of them exactly increase the same percentage.
When I've shown this to other people, they've said, well, gee, how could people do that?
And I say, you couldn't.
It has to be machines, and it rhymes with Dominion, and it rhymes with Smartmatic, and ES&S. All these machines that were used out there cannot be done by humans, and you have to have access before, during, and after.
This is too extensive.
It could not be done by humans.
It has to be done by computers.
A room full of computers somewhere that's connected to the internet, preparing, monitoring, controlling, cleaning up the mess afterwards.
And you have to have each step, and it could not be humans.
So it was a well thought out plan.
We had the most massive cyber warfare attack, Mike, in history on our electoral system.
This is cyber warfare.
This is the Chinese doctrine of unrestricted warfare.
And it goes all the way back to the writings of Sun Tzu.
The acme or the pinnacle of war is to win without fighting.
I mean we just can't not allow this type of activity to occur with machines that we know are connected to the internet when they're not supposed to be.
We have IP addresses, internet protocol addresses that are electronic highways going back into these countries and we can See the activity.
We can actually see the electronic activity.
And believe me, folks, if you're paying attention and you watch some of the data that Mike Lindell is talking about putting out there, take a look at it.
I mean, this is not made-up stuff.
This is real stuff, and it proves that we had foreign interference in our election.
WVW Broadcast Network is pleased to present the Mike Lindell docu-movie Absolute Interference.
Scientific and national intelligence proof that enemies, foreign and domestic, used computers to hack the 2020 election.
The Mike Lindell docu-movie Absolute Proof was seen by 70 million in the first four days and 150 million in the first four weeks.
Mike Lindell.
has absolute proof that the largest cybercrime in world history occurred through absolute interference.
And now, here is your host, Mike Lindell.
So there you have it.
That was the trailer.
The movie itself comes out tomorrow, April 20th, 2021.
And yeah, it's going to expose a lot.
I actually know some of the people, especially I know the executive producer, I know one of them, Mary Fanning, very well.
These people are trying to bring you truth.
They're trying to bring you what's happened.
They're trying to show you what happened.
That's why President Trump has kept saying, look, this is happening and we're exposing it and we're going to keep exposing it.
We shouldn't be looking at 2022.
We shouldn't be looking at 2024.
We need to look back at 2020 and we need to never stand down.
Because if we stand down this time, they're going to continue to take more and more of our freedoms.
They're going to continue to subjugate us.
They're going to continue to use this kind of cyber warfare, this absolute deception to steal power in our nation, and we can't allow them to do that.
So...
I think it's a movie worth watching, so I hope you guys go check it out.
Speaking of which, you have Republican attorney generals who are coming out and fighting this insane court-packing decision, and there's a great article here on Breitbart.
I'll share it with you if you want to read through it.
Ultimately, this is a part of the manipulation.
This is a part of the fraud that we're talking about here.
This is why we're seeing every facet of government being infiltrated now, trying to be co-opted, corrupted, trying to be flipped for the Democrats so they can have absolute power in this country, so they can just keep changing laws until the laws that they broke won't exist anymore.
That's their game plan.
So this matters even more than anything else.
And there's a very good reason why Derek Chauvin's trial is playing 24-7 on every major fake news outlet, and they're not talking about this story.
They're not talking about how they want to pack the Supreme Court.
They're not talking about the election that happened in 2020 and the fraud that took place.
They're trying to change the subject.
They're trying to divert your attention, and you should never let them do that.
Here we go.
You know, Biden's press secretary, the, you know, communist hat wearer herself, is saying that, you know, it's totally okay that Maxine Waters is inciting violence.
So we should have covered that story earlier, but I'll leave a link to it anyway.
Another story about face masks and that they are ineffective.
This is a Stanford study that they're ineffective to block transmission of COVID-19 actually can cause health deterioration and premature death.
Well, maybe that's why they want you to wear six of them, right?
And get the vaccine.
It's because maybe they want your health to deteriorate.
Maybe they want you to prematurely be passed on.
Maybe that's a part of the agenda here, folks.
If you can't see that, I don't know what to tell you.
This is an interesting story, too, about a Dominion advisor speaking on Mike Lindell in that movie who met with John Podesta offering anything that would help defeat Trump, according to emails released by WikiLeaks.
So this is kind of a touching back on part of the story that wasn't covered because it's only recently become relevant.
But if you look back on emails exchanged between Podosta and this Dominion advisor, they were willing all the way back in 2016 to try to help facilitate the fraud, which eventually came in 2020.
So not that anyone is really surprised by that, but I just thought it's worth covering.
So that's pretty much where we're going to wrap it up.
I'll leave links to everything that we covered here today.
There's more to come.
So that's just it for this one.
And a few more things before we go.
Look, if you guys want to help support this channel, the only way I'm able to do this work is with your help and your donations now because I don't have any major sponsors.
I've been kicked off of all the major social media platforms.
I'm basically now funding this whole thing by myself and I'm trying to stay afloat So if you can, please consider making a donation.
Your donations are what will keep me going in this time that is so trying.
It's hard to get sponsorships now because my traffic has been so severely struck down by the censorship that took place, whether it was kicking me off of YouTube, Twitter, all the different social media platforms, taking away Patreon, taking away GoFundMe, Making it impossible for me to have the audience that I once had makes it very difficult to get advertisers and to support myself via that.
So this channel has become nearly impossible to continue to fund myself.
And it's only with your help and donations that I'm able to do it.
So when you click that donate button, please consider making a donation.
You can do it via Fundly, which is like GoFundMe, the one that I haven't been kicked off of yet.
And it's pretty simple.
Or you can go to Cash App and make a donation through that.
Or you can use a Bitcoin address if you want to do a crypto donation.
But that's it for now.
Look, your support is what's kept me going to this point.
Trust me, it's very difficult and without your continued support, I'm not sure how much longer I'll last.
I'm trying to get between in this in-between stage.
I'm hoping that new social media platforms will pop up like this Frank speech and others where I'm able to build an audience without being, you know, underhandedly, you know, Worked against, let's put it that way, without having, you know, the deck stacked against me and, you know, making it impossible for me to continue to grow and have that kind of growth.
Especially, you know, it's great to get on other sites like Rumble and BitChute, but everything there is relative growth, you know, for what you can do.
So at the end of the day, just share these links.
Consider donating.
Say a prayer.
That probably could help me more than anything else is to just say a prayer or leave a thought over at the prayer wall.
Yeah, I really would appreciate it.
And just say a prayer for me and my family, especially as, you know, the game, the notoriety I've gotten has gone up, and especially with this HBO thing, like I said, and then the death threats started coming, and then the other threats and the violent language and just disgusting things.
Just say a prayer for us so that we can get through this.
So I really appreciate that because...
I'm doing this for you guys.
I'm doing this for us.
And I'm doing this most of all for Jesus, for my Savior, our Savior, Jesus Christ, who I want to honor.
And that's why we do our segment we do at the end here called God's Grace is Greater, where we talk about God's grace and how it is truly greater.
And today, I have a parable from the Gospel of Luke, which talks about the lost sheep.
And As easy as it is for us to look at the people who we disagree with, as a lot of the people who look at us do, and try to judge them and to look down on them, which, look, I'm not saying I'm perfect.
You've probably even heard me in this episode say things that, you know, characterizing individuals and their actions, which is not me being the Christian that I want to be.
And it is the toughest thing, I think, for us to do.
So I found this parable.
I've shared it before, I believe, but I want to share it again to show the kind of love that God has for us, especially...
The kind of love that is reserved for those who can help sinners find the gospel, find Jesus, find God in their lives, and reconnect.
It says here, this is Luke 15, 1 through 7.
It says, All the tax collectors and sinners were approaching to listen to him, and the Pharisees and scribes were complaining, quote, This man welcomes sinners and eats with them, unquote.
So he told them with this parable.
Jesus said, What man among you who has a hundred sheep and loses one of them does not leave the ninety-nine in the open field and go after the lost one until he finds it?
When he has found it, he joyfully puts it on his shoulders, and coming home, he calls his friends and neighbors together, saying to them, Rejoice with me, because I have found my lost sheep.
I tell you, in the same way they will...
There will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over 99 righteous people who don't need repentance.
And that's how I try to remind myself to be every day, to remind myself that we as sinners We're always going to have Jesus coming after us, coming to us to save us, because He won't let us leave.
He won't let us slip away.
He'll leave the 99 righteous to come after the one who has fallen, the one who has sinned, because that's the love, that's the promise, that's the guarantee that Jesus made when He sacrificed Himself on the cross for our sins.
But I think that we should all take that as a lesson for ourselves and our lives on how to help others, how to go after those who we see as lost, who we see as irredeemable, and say, no, we can help you.
We can show you the way.
We can lead by example.
We can set an example.
We can stand up for what's right and do the right thing and be good, honest, righteous individuals and do our best to help others come to Jesus.
So that's the way I read it, and That's the way I hope that it resonates with you, and I hope that if there is somebody maybe in your life who, or maybe yourself even, and you feel like you've sinned and you've lost and you've gone far, Jesus is not going to leave you.
God is not going to leave you.
God will come and find you and bring you back.
Just remember that you can open that door by saying a prayer.
And even if it's somebody in your life who you think has gone too far off the deep end or is in a place where it's a dark place and you're not sure if they can come back from it, you can help them find Jesus.
You just have to start that conversation.
You have to reach out to them.
You have to go and find the one lost and leave the 99.
Leave that comfort zone that we tend to get wrapped up in.
And as I say this, I want these words to resonate not just with you, but with myself and all of us here.
I want us all to try to do these things in our life, and that's just the message I want to share with you today.
So I hope that helped, and that's pretty much where I'm going to sign off.
I want to say thank you for watching this episode of Just Informed Talk.
My name is Craig.
▲
Export Selection