Jim Fetzer, Joe Olson, and Danny Cirrus dissect a manufactured shooting at a Washington D.C. dinner, alleging a fake ear injury for Trump while analyzing Russian claims of Western war and global oil rationing across twelve nations. The discussion expands to debunk the Boston Marathon bombing and Capitol riot as staged events, with Danny Sears arguing the Trump assassination attempt was a Hollywood script lacking bullet holes or suspect credentials. Ultimately, the episode asserts that major recent tragedies are elaborate conspiracies designed to manipulate political standing rather than genuine acts of violence. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Ukraine's Drone Warfare Shift00:04:50
Somebody, not just anybody, you know.
I need someone.
I was younger, so much younger than today.
I don't need anybody's help in any way.
I love now these days, but I'm not self assured.
I'm not my channel.
I'm not the door.
Help me if you can.
I'm feeling down.
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on the Rod Deal, right here on Revolution Radio Studio B, this 27th day of April 2026.
Joined by co host Joe Olson and special featured guest Danny Ceres, with whom we'll be discussing in detail.
The shooting at the correspondents' dinner in Washington, D.C., during the second hour.
We begin with Lavrov claiming the West has declared an open war on Russia, using Kiev as a battering ram.
Remember now, this man is the most experienced diplomat in the world today.
When he speaks like Kiev Hutton, the world listens.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
Claimed Western nations have entered into a direct confrontation with Moscow, stirring the Ukrainian state as currently functioning as a geopolitical battering ram.
Lavrov characterized the expansion of Western influence across Eurasia over recent decades as a primary driver of global instability, specifically highlighting regions where, as he stated, Russia has historically maintained a strong presence.
Of what he referred to as legitimate interests, according to ZN.ua on April 24th.
Let me add the increasing belligerence of the European Union and NATO states in supporting Iran, Ukraine, in attacking Russia, has made them, those states themselves, targets.
Where some consider the possibility that Russia may be compelled to retaliate, Scott Ritter will address it by and by.
Meanwhile, We have a very interesting report for Terminator fans.
Ukrainian robots seize a Russian position.
Ukraine President Zelensky recently announced that ground robots, also known as unmanned ground vehicles, captured a Russian position.
Zelensky said it was the first time in the Ukrainian war that an enemy position had been taken exclusively by robots.
Ukraine's increasing use of drones in its defense has received a good deal of attention as Russia's invasion has dragged on.
Really, remember, it was a defensive operation to protect the population of the Donbass when Kiev was about to launch an all-out assault that would have generated a bloodbath, a genocide parallel to Gaza.
It was at that time Putin realized he had to intervene with a special military operation.
While Moses has focused on aerial and maritime drones, the Army's use of ground robotics has been a quieter story, but one with growing significance.
Military ground robots are rapidly transforming battlefield tasks.
For the foreseeable future, the greatest impact will be in supporting roles rather than directly replacing infantry.
So while this capture of an enemy position by robots is a milestone moment, it shouldn't be overinterpreted.
Joe, I'm fascinated to hear what you think about this robot business.
Give me your thoughts, my friend.
Well, everybody's talking about how machine guns and tanks and airplanes rewrote the war agenda after World War I.
And then we had aircraft carriers that rewrote the agenda after World War II.
Well, now we're in the 21st century and it looks like everything's going to be drone and electronic warfare rather than old fashioned kinetic warfare.
Inflation Hits Travel Rationing00:07:20
And so all of our previous war planning is turning out to be totally obsolete.
But the problem is that we're in a media environment where you don't know what the truth is anymore.
You know, they've got these AI influencers talking and they sound so convincing.
I mean, I've seen Scott Ritter and Douglas McGregor and Colonel Williamson, and they all sound exactly like them and they have plausible stuff.
But then you start searching for it and you can't find any backups for all of the hyperbole that they're spouting on these websites that are non official websites.
So that's the danger.
You know, we live in a Media environment where you have no truth at all from any of the established media or the government officials.
And the little bit of truth we have on the internet is being polluted by the electronic media AI.
So who knows where we are.
Good points, Joe.
Meanwhile, Trump pulls plug on Iran talks as U.S. sees as Iranian ships.
He declares, We have all the cards.
When nothing could be further from the truth, Western Journal reported.
President Donald Trump canceled negotiating with Iran at last minute Saturday.
U.S. Special Envoy of the Middle East, Steve Woodcock, and Jared Kushner, Trump's son in law, who played a key role in the various historic diplomatic measures such as the Abraham Accords and the Hamas Israel hostage negotiations, were set to travel to Islamabad over the weekend for a second round of talks with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps.
Trump then told Fox he had canceled the trip, telling his representative that you're not going to be making any more 18 hour flights to sit around talking about nothing.
When in fact, it's been the Americans who have been unwilling to engage.
Last time, Rand sent a contingent of 70 with all kinds of documents, records.
They were ready to sit down, talk brass tacks, real numbers, the whole bit.
And Kushner and Witkoff wouldn't engage.
Meanwhile, Iran has said it will not accept maximalist U.S. demands.
And of course, that is completely appropriate.
Here we have a bit more about it.
Trump told reporters he decided to call off the planned visit by envoy because the talks involved too much travel and expense.
Well, imagine you're talking about a war that's wanting one or two billion dollars a day.
And he says it's too much expense to try to.
Fly a couple of guys off to Pakistan for peace negotiation.
What an absurdity.
What an absurdity.
Meanwhile, we're dealing with an election extinction level event.
Here's a very, very good report talking about the consequences there's taking place.
There is no diabetes in different states.
From the United States, UK ministers could act on it.
Refineries, pipelines, even power infrastructure.
One of the main pipelines alone.
Lost about 700,000 barrels a day in flow.
So step back and look at the bigger picture here.
Strait of Hormuz already being controlled, shipments restricted, both the US and Iran blocking it now.
Now Saudi production and refining getting knocked out piece by piece.
Not random.
Doesn't seem like it's random, okay?
This is coordinated chaos, manufactured collapse on the global oil supply from every angle.
They are clearly choking all the routes and hitting the infrastructure, and they keep the entire system unstable so nothing flows normally.
And now you've got markets reacting to all of this.
Stocks are shaky, oil prices bouncing all over the place because nobody knows what's real anymore with this ceasefire, you know, in quotes.
Oil already spiked to almost $100 a barrel just from the Strait of Hormuz getting choked off.
And now every headline moves the market up and down.
Total instability here, total insanity.
Joshua Reid says this Mark my words, in about a week, Americans are going to wake up in the morning and feel what this chart actually means.
And he is not exaggerating because what that chart is showing is a near collapse in traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.
When that flow slows down or stops, it affects everything fuel prices, shipping costs, everything goes up and supply chains get strained.
And within days, people start feeling it at the pump if they're not already feeling it.
I cursed Israel's name out at the pump last time I was filling up my tank, okay?
I mean, come on, it's getting ridiculous.
I don't remember the last time the gas prices were this high in.
Vancouver, okay.
This is actually insane.
Even at the grocery store, everywhere, this is the kind of disruption that ripples through entire systems fast.
At the same time, inflation is blowing up too.
Gas prices are hitting people instantly and it's starting to bleed into everything else.
Even airlines are cutting flights and raising prices because fuel costs are so unpredictable.
So you've got the situation where one move in the Middle East sends shockwaves through the entire global economy.
And it's becoming clear this isn't just a regional conflict anymore, it's a full system squeeze.
What follows fuel rationing?
Famine.
Ann Vandersteel says right here in Bangladesh fuel rationing is active.
Universities closed.
Military deployed in oil depots.
Sri Lanka fuel rationing active.
15 liter per week cap for private motorists.
Four day school weeks.
Scaled back public sector operations.
Slovenia 50 liter per day cap on fuel for private drivers.
200 liters for businesses and farmers.
Indefinite.
Philippines national energy emergency declared.
Four day working week in place.
Pakistan, four day work weeks and school closures still in effect.
Myanmar, alternating driving days imposed.
Thailand, diesel price cap imposed.
Government officials told to work from home and limit travel.
Fuel exports banned except to Cambodia and Laos.
Vietnam, tapping fuel price stabilization funds.
Officials encouraged to work from home and limit travel.
Kenya, rationing by major fuel suppliers going on.
Rural areas already running out.
Egypt, fuel and electricity.
Rationing active, malls, restaurants, and retailers shutting down at 9 p.m.
India, China, unbelievable.
South Korea, Japan, refineries requesting government's release of stockpiled oil.
Stunning stuff.
How much is going on here?
The consequences are already enormous, but they pale in comparison to the famines to come if this is not resolved.
Israel Prepares for Iran War00:02:55
Meanwhile, Joaquin Ekoopian discusses how Trump and his paranoid Pete lost war against Iran as a road to U.S. Hegemon's ruin.
I have no doubt he's got it right.
Today's Middle East war against Iran is the Anglo American Zion Empire's Armageddon Waterloo.
The Satanists ruling the planet are using their Zionist versus Islam World War III plotted centuries ago as a fascist ticket to radical depopulation.
After all, The Zionist Rothschild Jewish state founders have been backing both sides to every conflict and war they created over the last few centuries.
It's the latest installment of City of London Bankers' Wars, thus far limited to a regional, yet at any point it can be thrust into a Connecticut World War III entanglement, the likes of which none of us alive today have ever witnessed before involving the most powerful military forces on earth.
He's got it exactly right.
Meanwhile, Israel Katz declares Israel is waiting for U.S. green light to attack Iran and plunge the country into the Stone Age.
We've heard language like this from the president of the United States talking about annihilating an entire civilization, not only a form of collective punishment, illegal under international law, the Geneva Convention, the UN Charter, but genocide, a civilization with profound roots that goes back thousands of years.
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said Thursday Israel was waiting for a green light from the U.S. to break the ceasefire and renew attacks on Iran, to plunge the country into the Stone Age, and finish off the Khamenei family, a sign that the Jews sits on the brink of collapse.
Israel is prepared to renew the war against Iran.
The IDF is ready to defend in defense and offense, and the targets are marked, Katz said, according to the Times of Israel.
But, face it, Israel is not going to go unscathed.
Iran, I dare say, is prepared to wipe Israel off the map, literally.
What yet do we have?
Cover Up of American Ship Attack00:07:40
John Helmer reports.
Israel has turned America into a war criminal.
John Helmer has published a disturbing report of a U.S. sub attack on an unarmed Iranian freighter, the Iris Dina, returning from participation in an Indian exercise in the Indian Ocean.
Washington knew the Iranian ship was unarmed because only unarmed ships were permitted to participate in the exercise.
Seeing an easy target that could not fight back, Washington directed the sub, USS Charlotte, to attack the Dena.
The war criminal Charlotte's crew first torpedo destroyed the ship's propeller and left the frigate immobile.
The Charlotte's second torpedo hit 90 minutes later.
After consultation between the Charlotte, U.S. Navy Command, and the Pentagon, in those 90 minutes, Dina's captain had assembled the Iranian crew on the aft deck to prepare for evacuation or surrender of the ship.
According to custom laws of naval warfare, if the crew of the damaged ship is assembled to abandon ship, the attacking ship must cease its attack.
But the Charlotte received orders to ignore the laws of naval warfare.
And renew attack on the Iranian frigate in order to give Trump a victory to crow about.
The Charlotte second torpedo was unlawful as it was fired to kill life on a disabled ship whose crew was assembled for surrender.
The second torpedo hit aft where the crew was assembled, killing 104 assembled for surrender.
This war crime reminds of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in 1967.
When the Israeli attack on an American ship resulted in 205 dead and wounded Americans, Washington covered up the attack to protect Israel.
This one, however, is being exposed in space.
How horrific!
Meanwhile, we have the Trump ad men caught covering up massive war damage.
No doubt.
Sarah Jane Collins reporting.
American bases in the Middle East suffered extensive damage from Iranian strikes, far worse than publicly acknowledged, the new report alleges.
Insiders tell NBC News the public has been shielded from the true damage inflicted by Iran, including that an Iranian F-5 fighter jet breached U.S. air defenses to strike a base in Kuwait.
NBC writes that its conclusion is based on finding by the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute.
And interviews with congressional agents and other U.S. officials.
AEI's assessment reportedly found that Iran hit more than 100 targets across 11 U.S. bases in the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
Two officials told NBC the F 5 attack marked the first time an enemy fixed wing aircraft has struck an American military base in years.
AEI estimates.
Iran inflicted well over 5 billion damages in its retaliatory strikes, according to NBC.
That comes in addition to the death of 13 service members, injuries to nearly 400 troops, per the Pentagon's account, which you know is grossly underestimating.
Some Republican lawmakers are reportedly inked that they are not receiving the full picture of the damage inflicted by Iran.
Indeed, they are not, because the desire here is to keep the war.
Going.
Joe, your thoughts on these reports.
Yeah, well, the 1973 War Powers Act requires the president to notify Congress 48 hours prior to taking military action.
There's not much evidence that Trump did that, even if you just talked to the Gang of Eight.
So that's a little bit of a problem.
And then the president is only authorized to use force for 60 days without going to Congress to get an extension.
Today's day number 59.
So Trump knows that he's in a narrow window.
And Larry Johnson said that the Pentagon generals have all unanimously told Trump it's time to stand down.
You've absolutely lost this thing.
So that's a nice little.
Change of events.
And then last week on Tuesday, draft dodging Donnie, Senator Tammy Duckworth, a Democrat from Illinois, got up and did a 17 minute sting on Commander Bonespur.
And she was wounded and unconscious in Iraq and she was saved and brought back.
And so she's an absolute 100% veteran and she thinks it's pretty insane that this man and none of his relatives are going to be enlisted in fighting any of these wars.
Another member of Congress today in the House, a Democrat, Said that they've got ample evidence that what Kushner and Witkoff have been doing is privately negotiating a $5 billion investment deal for the land that they're going to take in the Middle East after the war's over with the Gulf State GCC conspirators.
And so, bottom line is, they said as soon as they win the midterms, there's going to launch a massive investigation into all the money laundering that's going on with the Trump family.
And then there was an interesting thing that came out on Saturday.
America's Strangest History.
The Pentagon Protected Aquino.
This is a 27, 28 minute long video, and it includes Anthony LaVey, Paul Vallee, and Aquino.
And Aquino was the one that formed the Church of Satan, and he was heavily invested in doing a whole lot of stuff with.
Satanic rituals and child abuse.
And it's just a shocking rebuke of what our government's actually like.
And it's strange that about the same time that he formed the Church of Satan, the military said, well, we'll allow Satanism to be one of the practice religions that is being taught in the military.
So, in addition to Buddhist and Hindu and Catholic and Muslim, you could also be a Satanist in the U.S. military and you could get satanic worship.
This included a guy named Anthony LeVay.
And then, strangely enough, the guy Paul Valelay is a retired major general, and he is the advisor to TPUSA.
And so TPUSA has been infiltrated by Satanists, too.
No doubt, no doubt.
Erica Kirkswold has been to turn Turning Point into a mini AIPAC.
Meanwhile, Kevin Barrett, Israel.
Runs the Pentagon.
Does anyone have any doubt?
Trump's Situation Room Reality Check00:03:20
Shortly after assuming office in 1961, then President John F. Kennedy approved a U.S. invasion of Cuba.
The subsequent big debacle, during which almost all U.S. forces involved were killed or captured, is still considered one of the worst ever American military defeats.
Following the disaster, Kennedy ordered the construction of the White House Situation Room, a 5,000 square foot secure 24 7 intel and communication complex in the West Wing basement, dedicated to crisis management and high level national security meetings.
It allows the president to securely monitor events, communicate with world leaders, and command U.S. forces worldwide.
On February 11, 2026, at 11 a.m., President Donald J. Trump summoned his top advisors to the Situation Room.
That meeting resulted in the ill-fated decision to attack Iran.
But the decision was not driven by Trump nor by any of his American advisors, according to the New York Times account, based on inside sources who were present.
The boss in the White House sit-room that day was none other than Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Quote, Mr. Trump sat down.
But not in his usual position at the head of the roomed mahogany conference table.
Instead, the president took a seat on one side, facing the large screens mounted on the wall.
Mr. Netanyahu sat on the other, directly opposite the president.
Appearing on the screen behind the prime minister was David Barnea, director of Mossad, Israel's foreign intelligence agency, as well as Israeli military officials.
Arrayed visually behind Mr. Netanyahu, They created the image of a wartime leader surrounded by his team.
Netanyahu delivered a hard sell pitch demanding that the U.S. attack Iran.
He claimed absurdly the Iranians would love having the U.S. attack them.
Even more bizarrely, Netanyahu insisted that the son of Iran's dethroned U.S. Muhammad Shah, who in reality is despised by virtually all Iranians, would be acclaimed as Iran's new U.S. backed Israel friendly leader.
Netanyahu's sales talk was wildly divorced from reality.
But Trump knows little about Iran.
What little he knows is wrong, because it comes from Netanyahu.
Indeed, Trump decided to run for president in 2016, primarily because Netanyahu's billionaire friends incited him against Obama's nuclear agreement with Iran, promising lavishing funding in return for embracing Israel's Islamophobia.
We'll be right back with Joe Wilson and Danny Cyrus after this break.
Keep Revolution Radio Free Speech Alive00:04:14
Legs.
This is the quickest way to clear doggy joint pain.
Doing physical therapy for your dog's arthritis.
We'll be right back.
Listen up.
Are you angered by the injustices inflicted upon the innocents of the world?
Do you have a message you'd like to share?
Any knowledge you'd like to impart to those willing to learn?
Have you ever listened to our shows and thought, hey, I could do this, but you just don't know how to kickstart your hosting ambitions?
Or are you an established professional host thwarted by censorship in other areas seeking pastures new?
Contact us here at the world's number one free speech network, Revolution Radio.
We provide the platform.
The training and the airtime to any budding host wanting the chance to take those first talk show steps.
Established hosts can find a safe and secure home here, where their message can ring out loud and clear, unencumbered, free from sponsorship overreach.
Drop us a line via our email, support at revolution.radio, or head into our Discord server to say hello.
We'll take everything from there.
Revolution Radio, where hosting dreams become actualized reality.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light.
Dark World.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio.
We are not.
We are not.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, eight p.m. Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at freedomslip.com, the people's station.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener supported radio.
And now we return you to your host.
Well, Colonel McGregor may be our leading expert on geopolitics and military affairs.
Pentagon Unaware of Space Surveillance Risks00:15:34
And here we have a wonderful interview he's doing with Judge Napolitano, who has the best guess, perhaps, anyone in the world, with a possible exception of Jimmy Dore.
Here we go.
In your view and from your perceptions, did the American negotiators in Islamabad a week and a half ago negotiate on behalf of the United States or on behalf of Israel?
That's a loaded question, Judge.
I think we have to say that there was no negotiation because ultimately we had the Iranians that showed up with a contingent of almost 70 people, armed with all sorts of data, information, analyses, because they fully expected a negotiation to occur.
Instead, what they got was a team from the United States that presented Mr. Netanyahu's demands to them.
And they can't accept those demands.
And I think that's been made pretty clear.
And while there was some discussion about the enriched uranium, ultimately the outcome was simply no, we cannot conform to your expectations.
And our expectations are Mr. Netanyahu's expectations.
So, frankly, I think the answer is pretty clear.
We negotiated on behalf of Israel.
If Donald Trump comes to his senses and enters into some kind of an agreement, say, along the lines of the JPCOA, which he condemned as a private citizen and literally ripped up in his.
First term, would Netanyahu try to wreck or disrupt such a peace plan so as to continue the war?
Because without it, he has no political ground on which to stand.
Well, I think Mr. Netanyahu regards this as an all or nothing proposition.
In his estimation, and I think in the estimation of the people that surround him, this is Israel's best shot.
At removing what Israel considers to be its most serious threat and, more important, its most serious obstacle to their domination of the entire region.
Now, why do they feel that way?
Because they have essentially unconditional total control of U.S. military power in the region.
I think the CENTCOM commander, who's now Admiral Cooper, his predecessor was Kerrilla, these men have fallen all over themselves to ingratiate themselves with Mr. Netanyahu, understandably, since that's ultimately.
The man that is calling the shots in the region.
So I think Mr. Netanyahu's view is either I make this work, I realize the Greater Israel Project, it becomes real as a result of destroying Iran, or we in Israel are going to have a tough time surviving in the region.
And I think he's probably right because you can't call all of your neighbors subhuman or criminals and then expect to get along with them when the war stops.
That's his position.
So, yeah, I think he's in this to the bitter end, and he's going to do whatever he can to obstruct any sort of arrangement that brings this conflict to a close.
Were you struck by the language chosen by Prime Minister Netanyahu at a press conference after that negotiation was over when he referred to Vice President Vance as reporting to him as other administration officials do daily?
Do you think that was just a turn of phrase or revealing something deeper that we should know about?
I think it was more likely a Freudian slip.
Because remember, he went on to elaborate and say, Well, I hear from everyone in the government in Washington on a routine basis, practically every day.
They all report.
I think he's telling you the truth.
And, you know, when he tells you the truth, you should pay attention because we don't hear the truth that often from him.
So on this particular occasion, I think he very definitely is telling you what's real.
Before the war began, most Americans probably had never heard of the Strait of Hormuz.
It was functioning properly and commercially.
Now, of course, it is the center of the conflagration here.
How could Pentagon planners not have foreseen what would become of the Strait of Hormuz, how Iran would use it as a chokehold to resist American aggression?
Well, Judge, I don't know that they didn't realize that.
You know, I've got to go back 20 years.
But if I go back 20 years, I can identify lots of plans connected with potential operations against Iran.
And all of those plans were written with an understanding that, first of all, if you were going to try and employ ground troops, you were probably on your way to the loony bin because the various routes of entry and points of invasion and so forth were troubled with mountain passes and lots of choke points, about 300 different points in time.
And space with bridges and so forth, that you had to give up on the notion of going into the country very far, unless your only objective was to occupy Khuzestan, which was ultimately what Saddam Hussein tried to do.
Those are the oil fields.
But otherwise, everything revolved around targeting and trying to induce the Iranian government to comply.
But most of these plans were developed before there was the full realization of how profoundly warfare had changed.
I don't think a lot of people in the Pentagon or the Department of Defense and the planners at the top were completely aware of how lethal the connection would be between space based surveillance and the persistence surveillance that results and the instantaneous communication of targeting information to hundreds of different strike systems, manned and unmanned, all kinds of missiles, and the pinpoint accuracy with which they would be launched.
I just don't think people realize that they should have figured it out.
By watching what emerged in eastern Ukraine when General Sorovikin established the initial defense against which our forces, the NATO forces that had been trained by us in Ukraine, tried to attack and failed miserably, but they didn't do it.
So I think, in fairness, that particular item was not fully appreciated.
I think they still thought, well, we have bases in the region, bases in the Persian Gulf.
We're close enough, we can amass enough firepower that we can enter and leave without too much interference.
I don't think they understood the implications of the military development inside Iran.
So, you could say we grossly underestimated them, but I think we missed this paradigm shift in warfare.
Colonel, I'm going to put a number up on the screen.
It shows the number of subscriptions that Judging Freedom has.
As you can see, we're eight, eight away from the landmark number of 750,000.
I'm sure it will happen while you're on air with us and how fitting and appropriate that is.
Chris will let us know when we reach that.
You have often expressed admiration.
For the professionalism of some IDF officers with whom you interacted.
But how could, again, Pentagon planners have brought themselves to accept this Mossad and Netanyahu offered plan that bombs alone and missiles alone would result in regime change?
Yesterday we interviewed Joe Kent.
You know who he is.
He told us everybody in the government, the American government knows the Israelis.
Exaggerate and are full of themselves.
Well, this is true.
And I'm not necessarily saying that about all of the senior officers that I met because large numbers of them were very balanced people.
I also happen to know that many of them were removed and replaced by others.
And I think we have to understand that since the ground force option was off the table from the very beginning, at least insofar as invading Iraq is concerned, that all of the strategic and operational planning from that point forward was done.
by the air power community.
And by that, I mean Air Force officers and naval officers.
Very little attention was paid to the use of ground forces anywhere, but potentially within the framework of the Persian Gulf.
So I don't think it's entirely surprising because the air power community takes it as an act of faith that if they're allowed to attack with aircraft and missiles long enough, they can win any war that you want them to fight.
They really truly believe that, and they'll point to anything, whether it was successful or not, and try to claim credit for having won the war, surely with the use of air power.
So, I don't think that's the issue.
I think the larger issue is back to what you said.
They didn't really understand what they were up against, that the enemy they thought they were going to fight turned out to be very different.
And that's essentially what happened to us, I would argue, in many places, including Vietnam.
You know what?
If you read the intelligence reports and the assessments of the Germans before we landed in Normandy, we depicted the German army as on its last legs.
We expected to get much further, much faster than we did.
And as a result, when we went to Okinawa, we used far more forces than we did at Normandy because we recognized that we'd underestimated it.
So, you know, I wish I could give you a better answer, but I think we just miscalculated and underestimated.
Joe, do you think that's correct or.
Would it have been rather that Israel was forcing our hand into a war we didn't really want to fight, but they had so much on Trump, he felt he had no choice, lest he be exposed for the pedophile he is?
We get reports, Trump said, I don't care what you do, start a war if you like, just don't release the rest of the Epstein files.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, that's exactly what's going on.
I had some really interesting conversations with Judge Napolitano and Douglas McGregor at the National conversation in October back in Dallas.
But I want to mention here's part of what the problem is that the president gets to select who his team is.
So his Joint Chief of Staff is Lieutenant General Daniel Kane, who retired from the Air Force in 2021 and then joined the CIA from 2021 to 2024.
He was completely retired.
He went to a MAGA event wearing his uniform with a MAGA hat, which is a violation of the military dress code.
And Trump spotted him with the MAGA hat and says, Oh, you're the kind of guy I need to have in my administration.
Well, he was an F 16 pilot.
So, if this is who's helping you direct your forces, he knows nothing about infantry or Navy.
And so, that's part of where you get your problem.
And then he fired his Secretary of the Navy, a guy named John Phelan, who was a hedge fund wealth manager and large MAGA donor.
So, that's how he got appointed to be Secretary of the Navy.
He was never in any branch of the service.
Underneath him is undersecretary, a guy named Hung Kao, who's an Annapolis graduate, and he's currently a captain.
And what they did with General Kane is since he was only a lieutenant general, when they appointed him chief of staff, they gave him four stars.
So that's how this whole little Mickey Mouse game works.
And once he gets four stars, and that's what you end up retiring with, and that's where all of your retirement commissions and benefits and everything else come in.
So he double dipped by going to work for the CIA, and now he's double dipping again by.
Being appointed a four star general because he's a pilot that was appointed by the to be the joint chief of staff.
So, bottom line is it's a giant cluster F, and then uh, Heg Seth, which is also called Heg's keg breath by a whole lot of people, uh, is grossly unqualified and he's the one that's uh, completely hyperbolic on all this stuff.
He's helped, he's one of the ones that's blowing in Trump's ears.
So, bottom line is uh, Trump is was never an effective manager, that's the reason why he was bankrupt six times.
He never wrote his own.
Biography that was written by a guy named Tony Schwartz.
And Tony Schwartz said that Trump has never read a book in his whole adult life.
And when we were asked by Robert David Steele to write a memo to the president, we were strictly told do not make it more than 800 words because Trump won't read more than two pages of anything.
So that's what we're dealing with somebody who's absolutely stunted and surrounded by his own echo chamber of gold worshipers.
It's ridiculous.
I think you're talking about the ghostwriter of Art of the Deal, not here.
Yeah, that's it.
Yeah, but it appears Trump has never read a book in his adult life.
It would not surprise me.
Meanwhile, instead of downplaying or escalating, and Colonel McGregor, had we gone further, suggests Trump's best move would be to cease the engagement on humanitarian grounds that the world needs.
The Strait of Hormuz should be open to get fuel and fertilizer and so forth, so that he's going to cease the combat operation against Iran, which may be resumed in the future to make a gracious humanitarian exit.
Alternatively, resign on grounds of health, but get the guy out of Dodge.
I mean, here's what he's done instead Trump orders Navy to fire on mine lane vessels.
In the Strait of Hormuz, Sant says, third U.S. aircraft carrier has arrived in the Middle East.
That's the USS George H.W. Bush.
Trump warns the clock is ticking.
Those carriers are very large targets for Iranian missiles, Joe.
I think they've been very prudent in not wanting to raise the ire of the American people by sinking these carriers.
But already 60% of the American people are convinced this war is a disaster.
Trump has got to end it.
And if, in fact, Iran is forced to sink our ships, including our carriers, the world is going to recognize they had the right, even the obligation, under the circumstances.
Third Wave of Iranian Missiles00:10:53
Meanwhile, Scott Rear explained Iran's saturation attack on Israel.
One URL and a thousand percent.
I do believe Israel is being massively hit.
You should too.
Massively hit.
Excuse me.
Do I know you?
Marty Mouser, Royal Suite.
Look at those missiles.
Yep.
Wow.
That's a saturation.
How many are striking?
Yeah, that's.
This is what happens when Israel runs out of intercepted missiles.
Wow.
How long am I landing?
Yep.
Well, I would say that 90% of them are landing.
More than most of them are being intercepted, but most of them are.
Yeah, but even what we call an interception, remember.
The Iranians, their warheads here, I love what I'm sorry, this is what I used to do for a living, but I love watching these videos.
These are warheads that have decoys.
So a lot of what we see might be interceptions or actually Israel hitting decoys, not the actual missile.
Wow, look, they're still hitting.
This is live, Scott.
Yep, I mean, this is stunning.
These are missiles that also have acceleration capability.
So you see this missile coming in right now, it's maneuvering.
And it's accelerating.
So it's coming in and it's adjusting to hit the target.
These are precise strikes.
Whatever's on the ground there isn't anymore.
So this is Israel waking up to the fact that Iran is a modern industrial state with extremely advanced capabilities.
It also should be a warning to the United States and anybody else that thinks ballistic missile defense can save us.
I don't want to get too off topic here, but the Golden Dome that President Trump has spoken about.
Is based upon technology that either doesn't work, doesn't exist, will never work, and will cost us trillions of dollars by the time it's done.
Let this be proof to us that missile defense doesn't work.
And the best way you protect yourself against a ballistic missile attack is to have good diplomacy to avoid conflict to begin with, which is what should have happened.
But, you know, Iran allowed itself to become what they call a threshold state.
They enriched uranium to see.
Go ahead.
I see your finger up.
I was going to make a quick correction.
So the video, and I was wondering, I was checking my team.
The video that I said was live was just a footage that just came in.
So it was a loop.
So we saw these many missiles landed.
Right, right.
It was just a single thing.
It was the same one again, exactly.
So, but it still looks like a significant amount of missiles landed.
Yeah, I was looking at the behavior of the warheads going in and going, that looks exactly like the one I just saw.
It looked exactly.
It looked very, very similar.
But if I do get anything wrong, please do correct me.
Never feel bad to correct me.
But you were saying, I want you to continue the previous point you're making.
I'll keep feeding you information as they come in.
No, the point is, and I cautioned Iran, I've been saying this for many months, you don't wave a red flag in front of the Israeli bull.
If you don't want the Israelis to charge, don't give them an excuse.
And, you know, Iran should have left its program limited to 3.75% enrichment necessary for its legitimate peaceful nuclear purposes at the maximum 20% limited run to produce fuel for the Tehran research reactor.
But anything above that, there's no reason for it other than to threaten the ability to enrich up to weapons grade uranium.
And so when Iran got to 60%, they're one enrichment cycle away from weapons grade.
And then you have Iranian officials and generals.
Many of the people killed, by the way, were people who had said, Iran is ready to make the next step to nuclear weapons.
And then Israel said they had intelligence that Iran was preparing to do that.
And so they launched this strike.
But if Iran had just ratcheted down its nuclear posture, there would have been no excuse for Israel to do this.
But what Iran did by behaving what it did, it gave the IAEA, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the ability to issue a Board of Governors report that said Iran is in non compliance.
This provides political cover for the Israelis.
I'm not saying what the Israelis did was legal.
It's not.
It's an illegal act.
It had no authority under international law.
But the Israelis can make the case that we had no choice but to do this because of what Iran was doing.
Iran simply kind of pursues this, not by.
This is a third wave you're seeing right now.
This is a third wave.
It's one missile striking.
The third wave, as you were speaking, the reports, the third wave has begun hitting Israel as we speak.
How many waves would you expect, Scott, considering your expertise?
Well, I mean, it depends on how many missiles are available.
I. Again, this is a speculation on my part.
I'm not privy to Iran's plans.
I would expect about six waves in the sixth one because the way I think is that I'm going to set, I just go through in my mind, it's rough calculations, but what missile saturation does, meaning how many missile air defense missiles are available to Israel, how many waves it would take to exhaust that, and then how many waves of intelligence information I would need to be able to put that sixth decisive blow into.
Into Iran, but again, this is a speculation on my part.
I don't know what Iran's capabilities are, I don't know how many missiles they have, but clearly, they have enough to launch.
What is this?
The third wave?
Yeah, I'm just looking now at the footage of the third wave.
The team will stream it in a second, but this is the footage here we're looking at earlier.
Yeah, boom, boom.
I mean, look, guys, this is let me say it again here for you.
This is a bad day for Israel.
Did you anticipate this?
Wow.
Well, yeah, this is what we saw.
If you remember Operation True Promise 2, this is what we saw at the end of Operation True Promise 2 when they sent that final wave in and every single missile that went in hit the target.
That's what Iran is capable of doing, and now Iran is doing it.
And the interesting thing will be if Iran can do this tomorrow night and the next night and the next night, because that's how you break Israel's back.
If Iran repeats this four nights in a row, five nights in a row, Israel can't survive this politically.
They can't survive this.
It'll be the end of the Netanyahu regime.
So excellent, excellent, excellent.
Scott Ritter is so damn good.
Joe, your thoughts about that wonderful report?
Yes, I attended his book signing event in Elgin about three years ago and bought his copy of his book, Disarmament in the Time of Perestroika.
He was the very first weapons inspector approved by Russia and the United States to inspect.
The missiles that were being limited by the START treaty.
And he helped draft the treaty, helped design the equipment, and he worked with both teams.
He was back and forth between the New Mexico labs and Russia, and he spent several years in Russia.
So he's learned to speak fairly good Russian.
He grew up as an army brat, most of his life in Germany, and then his teenage years in Turkey.
So he speaks a little bit of Turkish and he speaks a little bit of German.
So he's a wonderful man and a true patriot.
And he was framed by the FBI on two telephone sex sting things that they ended up giving him nothing in the way of a sentence because they knew that.
He had been framed.
So, bottom line is, yeah.
And then they took away his passport and stole all of his documents the last time he's getting ready to go to Russia, left him stranded at the airport with nothing.
Let me just sideline a few of the other stories.
We'll not be gobbling as we turn to the shooting event at the Hilton.
Israel's casualties have hit historic levels for the first time.
The IDF lost 47 soldiers in five hours.
Tucker, they hate Christians.
Tucker's stunned by Israeli settler violence.
Ooh, Christian Zionist by Caitlin Johnstone from the OONS Review.
Get this massive rainfall after Iran destroys U.S. weather modification radar.
This is absolutely worth looking at more closely.
What we had was artificial drought in Iran.
Artificial drought, and now that they've taken out the weather radar that was causing it, the rainfall has been enormous.
Engineered in part by U.S. radar systems that were blasting energy to ionize the atmosphere to steer clouds away from Iran and to actually cause a drought.
It's just classic geoengineering, multiple ways to achieve this.
But what has happened is that since those large radar installations around the Persian Gulf have been destroyed by Iranian drones, the rains have returned.
Remember what Zygmunt Brzezinski said, who was the advisor to Jimmy Carter.
He started the Trilateral Commission.
He's the father of Mika Brzezinski on Morning Joe Ball.
It's big news, I think is how you pronounce it.
Big news Brzezinski.
He said technology will make available to the leaders of major nations techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised.
Techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm.
Will son of a gun.
We've got evidence that that's exactly what they've been doing in Iran.
Iranian expert accuses U.S. Israel of weather manipulation to deepen the drought.
An Iranian water resource specialist has accused the United States and Israel of manipulating regional weather patterns to intensify Iran's severe drought.
According to the Middle Eastern Media Research Institute, they claimed in a July 30th interview on the Iranian YouTube channel that both nations had been deliberately diverting clouds away from Iran.
For over four decades.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill on bull hordes during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities, and that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Boston Bomb Drill Was Staged00:04:03
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston Either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourselves.
Because we know who they are and what they do.
This is what they do, and we must fight back.
You can torture us and bomb us.
Fire is catching.
And if we burn, you burn with us.
Are you awake yet?
I hope.
We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
But time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
The war is coming, and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
Denial is not a choice anymore.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener supported radio station on the planet, not giving up.
Revolution Radio.
Well, while Jim's away, the uranium enrichment is 100% straw dog because, as Nutten Yahoo said, he'd been dreaming of 40 years of being able to knock out Iran.
Oh, we're still on the break.
Hey, we're still on the break.
But you just don't know how to start your hosting ambitions?
Or are you an established professional host?
Thwarted by censorship in other areas, seeking pastors new, contact us here at the world's number one free speech network, Revolution Radio.
We provide the platform, the training, and the airtime to any budding host wanting the chance to take those first talk show steps.
Established hosts can find a safe and secure home here where their message can ring out loud and clear, unencumbered, free from sponsorship overreach.
Drop us a line via our email, support at revolution.radio, or head into our Discord server to say hello.
We'll take everything from there.
Revolution Radio, where hosting dreams become actualized reality.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener supported radio.
And now we return you to.
Your host.
Media Footage Angle Is Suspect00:15:39
Well, my special guest today, Danny Sturis, has a vast background in law enforcement.
Danny's been spot on.
So many false flag phony events in the past, including the Kobe Bryant helicopter crash, which was completely manufactured, and probably a dozen others that we've discussed before.
Not to spoil the bottom line, but this was a 100% staged event.
This was manufactured in order to give Trump a boost.
He had never before attended a correspondence dinner because he labels them as fake news, but he did so now for the special occasion of being portrayed as a victim.
Butler was a prior assassination attempt that was also manufactured phony.
One of the interesting aspects here, you'll see occasionally his right ear, it's perfectly normal.
It appears that if Butler either cut his ear with a razor blade, that's a technique known to wrestlers, or he actually had a fake earpiece, Or use a little blood packet, but the whole thing was phony, fake, manufactured.
And by the way, another fringe benefit that Trump sought to exploit as a marketeer is during his press conference, he began touting the virtues of the ballroom.
Remember how controversial it's become.
Most people believe it's outrageous that he destroyed a part of the historic White House to construct this gigantic ballroom.
So, if you ask yourself in an event like this who benefits, Donald J. Trump.
Politically, he's casting himself as a victim.
Historically, the public has tended to rally around presidents who are subject to attack.
Here, he's not only trying to boost his popularity, but promote his monstrous ballroom as though it were somehow going to enhance security when the Secret Service didn't perform their job.
They were in on it.
The whole damn thing is phony baloney.
Danny, I'm so glad to have you here.
Speak out if you contradict anything I'm saying here because we want to get to the truth.
My friend, welcome back.
Hello, sir.
Good to be with you today.
Yeah, you know, I wish I could say I had smoking gun evidence, you know, of this was either, you know, true or not true.
We don't have any of that yet.
I've been through so many different clips, everything that's available.
And, you know, but we do have some very strange anomalies that we're going to cover.
Today, about what we can actually see.
You know, not reports.
We're going to go over the actual evidence, which, you know, is what I go by.
I don't really care about a lot of reports because most of them are BS, but I want the physical evidence.
You know what I mean?
And that's what we're going to be looking at today, sir.
Danny, I get it.
I get it.
I get it.
Look, from the point of view of scientific reasoning, inference is the best explanation.
Which hypothesis, if it were true, would confer the higher probability upon the available evidence?
And I guarantee you, Hypothesis This was a stage event is overwhelmingly greater probability of the available evidence if it were true than that this was an authentic bona fide shooting.
I guarantee.
And it goes on and on.
And remember, too, in terms of scientific reasoning, your conclusions are always tentative and fallible.
Tentative.
If you get more evidence or alternative hypothesis, you may reject conclusions you previously accepted.
Conclusions you previously rejected and leave others in suspense.
Fallible in the sense that no scientific conclusion is ever guaranteed 100% true.
It's always possible, even though it's the best supported, it could turn out to be false.
Let's take a look at the evidence you've acquired here, Danny.
Should we begin with the ballroom just before the shooting?
Yeah, we can.
It's just a short clip there and it kind of shows Trump and everybody and right when the shots rang out.
So it's a good way to start.
Okay, here we go.
That guy there is performing a magic trick for everybody.
That's what the paper is that he's holding up.
He's like a magician of some sort, and he's performing a trick for the president and for everybody there.
Have we seen enough?
Yeah, that's probably enough, sir.
I mean, you can turn the sound down.
I just want to set up what we've seen basically is a bunch of people in a room.
And, you know, there's no activity other than we do hear some gunshots, what appear to be gunshots in the background.
And then, you know, some Secret Service are standing there and then they push the president down and everybody gets under their tables and gets on the floor.
So everybody in that room definitely believes that they heard some gunshots because you did.
You heard them.
They were in a sealed ballroom, the door was closed.
And there was no direct threat to anybody in that room.
There were guards at the door.
You know, there's no way the guy was going to be able to come through the door or anything like that.
It wasn't going to be able to happen.
But that's basically what set it off.
And we can see there was a magician there that was doing, he was going around the room doing magic tricks and stuff for everybody.
And he was doing a magic trick.
So a lot of people say, what was that guy holding up the paper for President Trump?
He was simply doing a magic trick where he was guessing the name of.
The press secretary's child before it was even born.
And then, right when he got to the crescendo of the joke, he was actually correct and he did guess it, and then the gunshots went off.
So, very interesting timing.
I saw a little interview with him explaining exactly what he was doing, what he was saying at the moment.
And he said, right when he got to the punchline, the gunshots went off.
And he had something really interesting to say because he was actually pushed to the ground at the same time that President Trump was, and they actually looked at each other for a minute or two.
And his comment was that Trump was pushed to the ground very harshly, not gently.
I mean, he was really tackled hard to the ground that would probably injure a lot of people.
And he was pushed to the ground and held to the ground.
So, you know, obviously they believed in that room, okay, the people around him and his security around him, they believed what was happening was real.
I don't agree with that at all.
They're good actors, they know how to make it look real, throw them down to the ground a little hard.
Trump may have even said to do it.
Trump has participated in these events and wrestling events.
We had a state confrontation with Ed McMahon and it looked real and it was totally fake.
That could be, sir, but you've got to take in count his age these days and so on and so forth.
So, whatever, I'm just repeating the comments of the magician in the interview.
He just said he was pushed to the ground rather harshly.
The magician, I'm convinced, was in on it too.
Now, here you have, Danny, the footage where.
We got the assailant running up the hallway.
Now, how you could have an assailant running up the hallway when you got a presidential event security and he not be shot dead on the spot is beyond me.
You tell me how that happens if the security isn't in on it.
Okay, here's the part I want to talk about.
So I'm trying to stay objective here, right?
So the problem with this particular footage that was released that I don't like is if you look at it, it's on a monitor.
So you can see in the background, if you look close, it's a computer monitor.
It's not just the Footage.
It's footage of somebody looking at a monitor.
But the monitor is black and white, okay?
And it's grainy.
So, you know, I'm a little bit troubled by this because I know hotels now have much better camera footage than this.
They have 4K or better video, and it's much more clear, okay?
And also, I'm troubled by the angle.
I want everybody to think about that because the angle of this camera is not in the center of the magnetometers, it's off to the right.
And it's up against the wall.
And to me, it seems like it should be right in the center of the magnetometers.
In other words, what it should be doing is showing a line of people coming into the magnetometer, people going through, and then on the exit.
So, you have what's called the departure angle, and you have the arrival angle of the magnetometer.
And it's over to the right against the wall.
It's not down the hall, so we can see everybody coming in, and it's not towards the ballroom, so we can see everybody going towards the ballroom door.
So, the angle is really kind of suspect.
And then again, we have the black and white video, and it's very grainy.
And to me, I'm just like, okay, what's the deal with this hotel?
Why would they have such poor footage like this that's grainy?
You can't see anybody's face.
You can, you know, it's really, really bad.
So let's roll this and you'll kind of see the guy run through.
You have to make the obvious point, but that's what you want grainy, fuzzy footage if you're faking an event and you don't want the details to be visible.
You'll see the guy rushing up, running by, and seemingly shooting the Secret Service agent who's wearing a vest.
Here he comes.
Here he comes.
But they didn't see him coming.
Give me a break.
Okay, sir.
So what I'd like to say to that.
Go for a minute.
Go ahead, okay.
If we can pause that for a minute, okay.
So, this is important.
Can you go ahead and turn the volume down there?
Hang on, hang on.
I'm just gonna let him run by again.
Here we go.
There we go.
Go ahead, Danny.
Okay, so now listen, we don't see any shooting, so I want to be clear about that.
Yeah, good.
We don't see any, sir.
Now, let me really break this down because this is what matters.
Okay, this is really what matters.
So, what happens is the suspect comes into the view there of that particular video, and the supposed shooting or the reported shooting by the media, okay, that's what counts, is before this.
It's before this, okay?
So, the report is we can't see any video of it.
The report is that he walked up as he approached the magnetometer, okay, and that he had a gun or pulled out a gun.
And that he shot a Secret Service agent basically point blank in the chest area and hit him, and that he had a vest that stopped the bullet.
Okay, so that's the report.
Now, are there any video of this?
No, there is no video of this.
Not yet, anyway.
I've looked everywhere, I have not seen the video of the shooting.
Then, supposedly, after the shooting happens, he takes off like a running back and he runs through the whole crew of magnetometer.
And he gets to the end, and that's where we start to see him.
We see him at the end as he runs through.
We don't get to see at the beginning when he's in line and he's approaching the people of the magnetometer.
What we should see is we should see a line of people approaching the magnetometer.
Next, please, next.
And we see the next person come through and the next person come through.
We should be able to see him standing there for a matter of minutes while he's waiting for his turn to approach the magnetometer.
We don't get to see that.
We don't get to see his demeanor.
We don't get to see any of that as he's waiting in line and approaching the magnetometer.
We only see the end stage of it.
So there's no shooting.
Now, here's another thing that I want to point out, even with this footage.
And then there was some new footage released that we're going to get to that clears this up.
So, what happens as he's running through the magnetometer, he gets to the end.
You can see there's officers on the left that have their guns out.
So their guns are out.
That's important.
They're already out, they're already aimed in on target, and they got a direct line of sight of him.
So, at any time, they can put him down.
He could be shot.
There's a little crossfire, though, that's a little bit of a danger as they follow him through the magnetometer to the other side.
And that's a little risky.
But they had a clear line of sight on him as he was running into the magnetometer and through it, and there's no shots fired.
They just followed him with the guns for some reason with no shots.
And I find that very bizarre if this gentleman had just actually shot a Secret Service agent and you heard the shots go off, which we can't hear and we cannot see that.
That's just a report from the media.
So I can only go.
My wife thought I was cheating on her because I look so dressed up lately.
Go ahead.
What we can see in the video.
Here's much, much better.
Much better.
This clears it up, sir.
Benny, in the first few seconds of his show, this footage was released on Sunday.
So things change, like you said, and we have to change the way we look at things because now we have new color video showing what's going on.
So if you want to go ahead and show the opening of this, we can clearly see the same footage.
Now, Danny, you don't see it.
You don't see it.
Yeah, now I see it.
I see it now.
I mean, look, here he comes running, running.
Why didn't the guy shoot him right there when he was running?
Stop right there.
So, can we go back to the beginning of that footage?
I'll back it up.
And then pause it just a few seconds in, if we can go to the beginning.
Right when you see the guy pause it.
Yeah.
Right there.
Go ahead and roll it and then pause it.
Hang on, Danny.
I just have to get to the.
But that's this is critical video because it's very much more clear.
And he's supposedly carrying a pistol and a shotgun.
I know.
I'm going to get to all that, Joel.
I'm going to get to all that.
If we could just go back to the beginning of the video, which is critical because we're at the end of the video now.
The suspect's not even in the video now.
Right.
We need to go to the beginning.
Okay.
I don't know why I'm having trouble.
Oh, I think I see what I can do.
But it's very clear.
Benny opens this show with this new video, which I, you know, it's new evidence because all we had was that grainy footage before.
And this is our first color video.
What I like about this video, sir, is it's a different angle as well.
It actually is showing the arrival angle of the magnetometer.
So that changes everything.
We should also have a departure angle view, but we haven't seen that yet.
But this is more of what I would call a side view or an arrival angle of the magnetometer.
Here we go.
Okay, I got to back it up again.
Can I try it?
As soon as he runs through, pause it.
No, see, you're at the end.
There we go.
There.
Stop.
There he is.
Video Evidence Shows Shooting Details00:09:53
Can you stop with him in the middle, sir?
Is there any way you can stop with the suspect in the middle?
I have.
Okay, leave it right there.
Just pause for a minute.
Okay.
So now I want to cover it.
So the magnetometer is off in the distance there.
You can see it probably about 30 to 40 feet back.
There is the beginning, and then the shooting happened behind that, so we can't see any of that in this video.
Can't see it now.
This guy was standing in line, all right.
And the report is the report now.
This is just a report, there's no photos, there's no eyewitnesses, there's nothing, no evidence of this.
Just the media saying that he had a shotgun, okay.
A shotgun is 18 inches to 24 inches long, it's they're pretty heavy, I don't care what model you have, you know.
Where did he have the shotgun?
Was it down his pants?
Did he have it over his back in a sling with a jacket over it?
Okay.
And a shotgun is a really interesting weapon.
It's a close range weapon, it has multiple different rounds you can choose, different kinds of buckshot, all kinds of different things.
Definitely not what somebody would bring to an event like this would be a shotgun.
That would be the last gun in the world you would bring.
And I also want to report that now the suspect, the story has changed multiple times from the media.
This is just from the media that instead of flying there, now he took a train there, is the newest report from the mainstream media.
He took a train there because he could hide the weapons in a bag.
You know, that's what they're saying.
But, you know, still there's no video from Amtrak or anybody else showing them.
Showing him, and you're telling me there isn't enough evidence to conclude this whole thing is a stage phony event, Annie.
I'm kind of taken aback by that, frankly.
Well, let me let me finish, sir.
What I want to tell you though, there's we're going over the evidence here.
So, what happens is we don't have any footage at all of the suspect coming into the property, nothing in the parking lot, nothing coming in the door.
We know they have cameras at all the hotel doors, we can't see him walking around before he comes down the hallway.
And comes into the ballroom and the magnetometer.
We don't get to see any of that.
And I'm very troubled by that, why we can't see his demeanor or anything about him.
We can't even see his face clearly in this video.
You just see a shadow.
They're just telling us it's that guy.
Okay.
But we definitely don't see a gun.
Okay.
We don't see a gun at this point.
On his left hip, I do see what looks like something flopping, like some sort of a holster, but it's empty.
He doesn't have a gun in his hand.
He definitely doesn't have the shotgun that they keep talking about.
They keep saying, oh, he brought this shotgun.
He had a shotgun.
That's just really cornball to me.
I don't see the shotgun.
Did he drop it at the magnetometer?
There's reports also, the media saying he shot the Secret Service man with a shotgun.
I find that complete.
That's just not possible.
So there's no way he's going to be standing in line with a shotgun down his pants, okay, with multiple people.
He's going to walk up to the magnetometer and the guy says, hey, you know, can I see your code or whatever?
And then all of a sudden he pulls out a shotgun and shoots the guy in the vest.
There's just no evidence of that.
Okay.
There's no evidence of that.
Now that now we're getting to the current time here where you have it frozen and he's running down the middle of the magnetometer.
He's arms are flailing, his hands are flailing in the air.
He doesn't appear to be carrying a gun.
I mean, I've zoomed in, I've watched, I don't see anything that resembles a gun in his hand.
And all the Secret Service and police are standing there and several of them already have their guns out as he's approaching that lane and there's no shots fired.
And I find that hard to believe that those guys on the left right there.
They have their, they're carrying Glock handguns.
You can see their Glocks.
They got them dead to rights.
They have a perfect line of sight as he's running and they don't fire any shots.
There's no, I find that very hard to believe.
They had them dead to rights right there.
That would have been time to take the shot.
You're not going to let them run past you.
The other thing that if you're not going to take the shot, why wouldn't you trip him or why wouldn't you tackle him?
He didn't have a shotgun.
He didn't have a machine gun.
He didn't have a handgun in his hand.
They just didn't act, act.
What they did, sir, is they just kept their handguns pointed at him the whole time he ran through them.
Ran through the magnetometer and then passed them.
All they did was point their guns at them.
Let me make the following point as an illustration.
Given they're there to protect the security of the President of the United States, what's the probability that this is real that they don't shoot him?
What's the probability that this is fake when they don't shoot him?
I mean, this is just one more very classic illustration of how we know this whole thing was a staged, phony, fake event.
And ATF has legalized a 12 gauge double barrel shotgun pistol.
And so he could have actually had that in lieu of a regular shotgun that you're saying is 84 inches long.
And also, I'd like to make one other point.
This is a real big anomaly for me.
The 1947 Succession Act of the president, after FDR croaked, they decided they needed to have a chain of command.
And so the second is after the president, is vice president, speaker of the House, speaker pro tem of the Senate.
And then it's all cabinet officials state, treasury, defense, AG, interior, agriculture, commerce, labor.
Uh, health and human services, virtually every one of those people was in that room at that time, and that's a violation.
They're not supposed to have more than two or three people are supposed to be on this list that are not in that room, and that appears to me to be a big anomaly.
When you have the president, I think Joe, technically, it's just one is you know, one key in that chain is not supposed to be there to be the survivor.
You know, if there were a mass attack, I don't think it's a bunch of them, I think it's just one, yeah, but all the top 10 were all in that room.
Oh, I mean, I like the point.
I'm just making.
Yeah, yeah.
Just one other thing.
One other thing that makes you think, well, maybe they had all this planned and nobody was going to be hurt.
Yeah.
Yeah.
All right, sir.
Can I keep going on this?
Because you got it.
It's perfect.
Where you have the video stopped is perfect.
So please don't start it.
Okay.
Leave it right where it is.
So if you look at it, that gentleman down on the lower left hand screen, he's got his Glock handgun on.
He had that guy.
Dead to rights, even before, if you look at the backdrop behind him right now, there's three officers standing against the wall.
So that is a crossfire.
So you could say, okay, even though he's got him point blank, there's no way to miss right there at that moment.
You know, he could see those guys in the background because you have to be aware of always behind your target before you shoot.
But before that, if you don't try to do it because you're going to mess up the video, but he had him before he approached that point.
So he had a Drek shot.
Before he approached those officers, 15 or 20 feet.
He had his handgun on him the whole entire time as he approached, where he had a clear shot where there was nobody in the crossfire.
And he never fired.
And I'd like to point out that nobody there, nobody that I can see, even that guy that crouches down that has them dead to rights, nobody fires any rounds.
There's no flashes off the guns.
There's no nothing.
Everybody draws their gun and points it, but nobody tries to.
Tackle the man.
Anybody could have reached out.
Exactly.
One guy at the end, they could have tripped him.
He's in a perfect position to block him.
I would have just either tackled him, sir, just real quick, sucked my leg out and tripped him.
It would have been easy to take him down.
But he doesn't make a move until he passes.
So here's what I'm saying, sir Secret Service are very, very good with their guns.
They do a lot of drill and shoot.
Just all kinds of scenarios.
They're constantly practicing and they have to be ready for that moment.
These guys already have their guns out.
And I just find it the anomaly is, sir, I find it very interesting that I don't see anybody make a shot on the guy, especially after he already shot.
So he's proven that he's using deadly force because he already shot out.
Everybody's screaming and yelling.
And nobody on this end of the magnetometer is firing any rounds.
I don't see it.
They're not trying to tackle him, they're not trying to, in any way, seem to try to stop him.
And I look at the suspect, and he appears to be wearing like a bulky t shirt.
He's not wearing a sport coat.
He's wearing all black clothes.
I don't know if that's a dress suit.
It's hard to see, but it's not a sport coat to me.
And you can see his arms.
So the skin on his arms is exposed like he's wearing a short t shirt.
He's not wearing a long sport coat that he could be hiding weapons under.
And I just, you know what?
We can't see what happened when he approached the magnetometer.
That's really the footage we need, but we cannot see it.
We're just seeing the afterfact.
And where did his coat go if he was wearing a coat?
How could he have hidden, sir, a shotgun in that clothing that he's wearing?
Love it.
We'll be right back with Danny Sears and Joe Wilson talking about what I have long since concluded is a 100% staged event at the Correspondent Theater at the Hilton Hotel in Washington, D.C. We'll be right back.
Bullets Must Have Gone Somewhere00:15:11
Ayo, which would break the spell and confirmation, never sleeps.
Sleep.
Revolution, Ayo, which would break the spell and confirmation, never sleeps.
Never sleeps.
Into revolution radio where truth breaks the spell and information never sleeps.
I'm going to go to the hospital.
I'm going to go to the hospital.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at freedomslip.com, the people station.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the twin towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S. Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there.
Had this not been a nuclear event?
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9 11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read American Nuked on 9 11, available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call in listeners or chatters are solely the Opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener supported radio.
And now we return you to your host.
Now, Danny, this next clip is law enforcement drawing guns as chorus.
Respondent dinner erupts in gunfire.
Shall I play it?
Yeah, hold on one second, sir, if I could.
Okay, I just want to set it up before you do that.
Okay, so it's this is very important.
Okay, this is really what matters as far as I'm concerned because we're going over the evidence, we're not going over the reports.
The reports are no good to me because they're just people talking.
There's no eyewitness, there's no nothing.
So, this is what we have, unfortunately, right now.
It could change, maybe the release video in the future, and we'll see a little more clearly.
But as soon as the guy passes the magnetometer, nobody fires off a shot.
Everybody then points their guns the other way as he runs through.
And the reports are okay, these are the reports.
The reports are that they fired five to six shots at the suspect as he ran through the magnetometer, okay, down towards the ballroom.
We can't see that.
Can't see that.
There should be cameras down there at that.
Danny, that appears to be complete bullshit.
They just made sure not.
Sir, I'm getting to that.
Please.
I'm getting to that.
What we don't see, sir, is if that is the case, if that's the case, okay, there would be.
Bullets against the wall by the ballroom there at the end of the hallway.
Bullets do not stop, sir.
Handgun bullets will go 150 to 200 yards, no problem.
And that's not that far.
So we should see a pot mark of bullet holes at the end of the hallway, which they're not showing us, by the way.
Yes.
The next thing that they don't understand, and this is a point that I'm going to make Secret Service are very good with their handguns, okay?
They have to practice and they have to drill.
They wouldn't get that job if they weren't.
They just wouldn't, you're just not qualified.
That's one of the aspects.
You have to be very good, and they drill constantly.
If they fired these five or six shots, as said, we can't see it on video.
If they did at that close range, they would have hit the guy.
All those guys discharging their weapons, somebody would have put a hit on the target.
They would have got him somewhere.
Okay.
But what I find really strange is nobody hit the guy.
After all the shots they say that was fired, that we cannot see in video, the guy is unscathed and he didn't get hit.
And I'm thinking, how is it possible that those Secret Service guys have their guns out, sights right on the guy, they fire shots, and there's no hits on the target?
I mean, that's just really, really poor performance there if you can't hit the guy at that range.
I understand he's running, but you have a clear line of sight.
He's not bobbing left or right, he's moving in a straight line.
There's no way that many guys.
With their guns already out with that much time trained on the target, miss and all those shots miss and go into some sort of a wall.
The bullets had to hit some kind of a backstop.
They didn't disappear into thin air.
Okay.
They didn't do that.
Okay.
And we can't see that.
So we should see the media should be showing us a wall with the bullet holes and the pot marks into the drywall.
We don't see it.
The next thing that we see after this, sir, is what's troubling.
All we see is the suspect on the ground with his shirt removed and he's handcuffed.
We don't get to see the tackling, the report of somebody, somebody tackled him.
Okay.
Why didn't somebody tackle him when we could see it on video in the magnetometer?
But somebody later after this tackled him.
Okay.
And that's important.
We don't have it on video.
All we have him is laying on the ground and he's handcuffed.
That's all we have.
And we have that video, sir.
And we're going to show that next.
So it's important to go, we're going over the evidence of what we have.
I don't see any evidence of gunfire.
I don't see any evidence of bullets.
He's unscathed.
The first reports were the media said, Oh, he was shot.
That was the first few hours.
Oh, he's shot.
He's going to the hospital.
But then we find out they changed the story again to, Well, they shot at him, but they missed, and the suspect is not hit.
So the story kept changing.
And then finally, a video came out of him on the ground.
And we have a color high def cell phone video of him laying on the ground.
I don't know if you want to play that, but it's right there in one of those links.
You can see.
Well, we'll get there.
Okay.
So that's the point of it, sir.
We're going over the evidence.
And the problem is, we don't have enough video.
We need the approach angle before the magnetometer.
Why wouldn't we have a camera there?
We should see people in line lining up to the magnetometer, just like at the airport.
They show everybody coming in, going through, and then coming out.
We don't have that.
We have this weird camera angle at the end.
Very strange to me.
And then we can't see afterward anything.
We don't have any footage afterward except for a couple of well placed cell phone videos, which we're going to show.
Wouldn't you agree?
That at the Hill Note in Washington, D.C., where a lot of these events, where Ronald Reagan was shot on the outside before, they'd have cameras everywhere, everywhere.
We had to be covering every square inch here with very high quality video.
And it's further proof this whole thing was a stage phony event, that it's not there, that the one original footage was so grainy, and that all the other points you're making are impeccable, Danny.
I'd love there, no bullet holes.
Joe, your thoughts, Joe.
And get my mute off.
Yeah, we had two problems at Butler.
You had enormously horrible handgun use by Secret Service.
And then down at the golf course where Ryan Roof was shooting at the president, you had a Secret Service agent that was like point blank range and fired nine rounds and didn't hit the guy with one of them.
So I don't buy the argument that the Secret Service is impeccably trained.
These were DEI hires under Biden and they were all terrible.
So don't tell me that story.
I'm sorry.
I have no faith that anybody in the Secret Service is a straight player.
Well, you'd certainly agree that there's no bullet residue in the wall.
Oh, no.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And even if you hit a solid body shot, it could still go through a soft tissue and hit people in the background.
So, bottom line is, yeah, the whole thing is completely concocted.
But just the fact that, yeah, yeah, it's our good Marine Corps expression happy horse shit.
It's not all Secret Service, by the way, sir.
I want to point out that some of those guys are wearing police uniforms.
So, there's a mixture of.
There's a mixture of the local police, some Secret Service.
You know, there's kind of a mixture of different agencies there.
So, but nobody landed a shot on the guy.
And I'm just putting myself in that position of the guy at the end of the magnetometer.
I'm putting myself in the position of the officer standing there's uniform that's strained on his gun.
If I already knew that he had fired a shot and taken down a Secret Service and he's approaching me, okay, I'm going to shoot him.
I'm not going to allow him to run through the magnetometer.
If I don't see a gun in his hand, if I don't see him carrying a shotgun, wielding a handgun, shooting his way through, you know, something like that, and I see his hands are clear, I'm going to tackle him.
I'm going to try and trip him.
I'm going to take action.
I'm not going to let him just run past me.
You're going to see either my gun going off and he's going to get hit.
There's no way I'm going to miss him.
I have a perfect line of sight.
And if he runs past me, sir, and I turn, I'm going to drop him as he's running.
And if I fire five or six rounds, I can guarantee you that at least one or two of my rounds are going to make contact with him.
I'm going to get him somewhere in the back and the shoulder and the butt.
He's going to get hit.
But all these officers that did fire, according to the reports, all missed.
And those bullets had to keep going.
The bullets went somewhere.
They went somewhere, sir, if the reports are true.
If Leo Rands were fired.
The bullets had to go somewhere, and I would like to see that somewhere.
I would have loved to walk into that place with you after the fact, and I would have said, Sir, come on, follow me.
And we would have walked right to the end of the hallway, and you would have seen me looking at the walls, trying to find some bullet holes.
You know what I mean?
And it kind of reminds me of the Las Vegas event because the Las Vegas event happened.
I want to bring that up.
When the Las Vegas event happened, the security guard went to the guy's door.
Supposedly, he opened the door.
And he had a rifle and he opened fire on the security guard.
Okay.
Those bullets, okay, from the 5.56 rifle, his door was adjacent to the hallway.
He had a direct shot down the hallway when he opened his door.
We would have seen pot marks and rip marks all down the drywall, down that hallway.
And at the end of the hallway was a beautiful brass elevator and it took up the whole hallway.
And they made a mistake of showing us a close up of the brass elevator.
I zoomed in on that.
And I can see every square inch of that elevator, and I saw not one bullet hole, not one pot mark in that elevator.
So, all these rounds that they supposedly say he let go with that machine gun at the security guard as he ran down the hallway, but no damage anywhere from the rounds was complete bullshit.
And as you know, they completely locked off that floor, wouldn't let anybody inspect it because they wanted to do a renovation.
And they wanted to do a renovation because then nobody could go up there and inspect for what wasn't there, and that should have been bullet holes all over the place.
And they weren't there because it didn't happen.
Because it didn't happen.
Here's another odd thing about the Las Vegas shooting.
You had plenty of people with cell phones that were down on the ground at the event, and you don't hear any sonic booms of a high velocity, 3,000 foot per second bullet go by, and you don't hear any hits.
Like when you hit something with an AR, it sounds like you hit a watermelon with a hammer.
And if it hit anybody anywhere, you would hear those, and none of the cell phones indicate that at all.
And so, bottom line is, we're pretty sure that was recorded sounds going off at the At the event with recorded flashes and only a random amount of shots, and some of those were fake and some of them were.
I would agree with that 100%, Joel.
But I'm trying to stay into the example of the down the hallway, there was no damage of gunfire.
So if there were these bullets, sir, that they did fire, believe me, the media would be showing the wall and the damage in the drywall and all that because they were firing down by the ballroom where the door was sealed.
So we would see bullet damage from these rounds.
And we want a crime scene, it's a crime scene, and they haven't finished dressing it up, so let's wait until they give us another day before they say, 'Here's all the bullet holes.' Yeah, we could see that.
We're going to see something manufactured.
This is Hollywood, they might show us some other footage that we haven't seen, but I was grateful that Benny did show us this color angle of the man.
Yeah, big improvement, yeah, because we didn't have that before, all we had was that grainy footage that showed nothing.
So, again, should I play this video clip now?
Criminal History Remains Vague00:14:42
Yeah, play the next one, sir.
Go ahead.
Turn the sound up, maybe.
Well, I've got the sound, but there's.
Where's the closing room?
Where's the closing room?
This one is basically everybody.
Tell me what you were saying, Danny.
Well, everybody's rushing in the room.
You can even see military police over there, sir, because they show up with their weapons.
And they're clearly marked military.
Where's the closing room?
But these guys don't even know what's going on at this point.
Yeah.
Bro, somebody go.
They just heard gunshots, so that's it.
We got one down.
Here comes the military.
What the f?
Oh, my grandkings, right there.
Stay down, everybody.
Ladies and gentlemen, stay down.
Yo.
Where's that at?
Inside.
Inside.
Laughably, but this is all aftermath, sir.
It's all over right now.
The guy's already gotten up.
And then they close the door.
Watch him slam the door.
There it is.
The beginning.
You don't even want anybody going in there.
They close the door.
All right, let's move on to the next clip, sir, before we run out of time.
Can we move on to the next one?
Yeah, yeah, definitely, Danny.
Definitely, there's another clip where they can show him on the ground and he's handcuffed.
Yeah, yeah, you see it.
Uh, let me see if it's this, it's on X.
I think it's the one that's marked on X.
Okay, marked on X.
Okay, got it.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
It's not that one, it's not that one.
No, I got it.
I got it.
I got Danny.
Here we go.
Okay, in either case, you know, they show him handcuffed, and no, I don't think that it.
Maybe they took the video clip down, but they show the suspect handcuffed on the ground.
So, sir, I want to spend a little time.
You've got the image of him on the ground down here in what you provided.
There it is.
Go ahead and show that if you want.
If you can't play the clip, go ahead.
So, there are the guys cuffed, and we have video of.
That.
So there's a video of him actually laying on the ground with a few officers standing around him, uniformed officers, and he's handcuffed and it's over with.
Okay.
And that's basically all we see.
And then they're kind of shoving the guy with the cell phone out of the room that was taking the picture of it off in the distance.
So we can verify that photograph by that video.
And I gave it to you.
But I wanted to go into the guy's background really quick.
Okay.
So right away, on all these events, sir, what's really important is that we look at the background of the Of the person that they're saying is the shooter.
And a lot of times, I can't tell you how many events we've covered, the shooter comes up as a ghost.
In other words, they don't exist on paper and I can't find them.
And that's very strange.
Okay.
That's how we kind of know something strange is happening.
But in this case, sir, in this case, this guy did come up in background.
So I was able to find him.
Okay.
And I looked into his background.
But I found some very interesting things about his background.
And if you want to show the other pictures that are underneath there, I found some very interesting things that, you know, Very strange.
For instance, his background is very, very vague.
Very vague.
I see his parents.
He has, you know, his parents.
He's got three siblings, his cell phone number.
I can see everything about this guy.
But then when I went into his job history, okay, and his personal history, I don't see any school records that he has this master's degree that they're talking about and all this stuff.
As a matter of fact, I have no records of him, any school records at all.
And that's very strange for somebody like this that's a scholar.
For instance, if I look at your background, I can see everything that you've ever done with your PhD, all your schools, everything that you went to.
I can't find anything for this guy.
It's very strange.
It's not listed.
And that's kind of strange.
The next thing I went into his job history, and I look at his job history, and he had a job as a mechanical engineer for a short time, but he didn't have any job listings as a teacher.
He did not have that in the records.
I understand there's a lot of reports of it, but the records are what matters, and he doesn't have any.
And I thought that was strange.
Why can't I see his teaching credential if he was a teacher and all these other things they said about him?
He only had one job, and he had it up until 2025.
And then He also has listed that he is a member of this C2 organization, but it doesn't say that he's a teacher or anything.
It doesn't have any credentials whatsoever.
And like I said, anytime I look up a school teacher, I can see their teaching credential, I see their job history, I see all these other things.
And this guy's background, I've never seen anything so vague before.
Okay, it's really strange.
They're saying he was.
What about the claims he graduated from Caltech?
Is that true?
Well, that's what I wanted to get at.
So we're rolling through that.
Yeah.
What I'm saying is, when I looked up his background, I don't see any of that stuff.
And if I look at a regular person like you or I look at Joel, I always find all of their academics.
I see everything.
It's an electronic world that we're in, sir.
Everybody has electronic fingerprints.
And that's how we always bust these events in the past because we can see what we're dealing with.
You know, unless it's a minor, if they're under 18 years old, then we can't see them.
But if they're an adult, we can see their criminal history.
We can see how many times they've been to jail, how many parking tickets they got, how many traffic tickets.
This guy has such a clean record, sir.
He doesn't even have a parking ticket.
No traffic tickets at all.
None.
And when I look under assets, sir, he doesn't even own a vehicle.
He literally has nothing to his name.
And I find that near impossible.
Everybody has a car, everybody has to get around and has an automobile.
I can see it.
I see the VIN number, the type of car.
I can see everything when I go into the person's background.
This guy has nothing.
He's never committed a crime in his life, not even a parking ticket, no car, no automobile, no property, no nothing.
When I look at his residential history of where he's lived, he's lived in some apartments, but he was living in a house in Torrance, California.
And I even found the house, sir.
If you scroll down on the photos, you'll be able to see the photo of his home.
I actually took a picture of it.
There it is.
And that's the house he was renting.
It's not in his name, sir.
He doesn't own it.
He was just living in it.
It's a three bedroom, two bath, pretty nice neighborhood.
Not a high scale, just a middle class neighborhood in Torrance.
And that's the house he lived in.
And I was able to scroll around and look at the neighbors and look at the whole thing.
And he lived there.
That's where he lived.
Okay.
But the media reports that they were searching his apartment.
And I thought that was strange because he doesn't live in an apartment, he lives in that house right there, according to the records.
I understand there's reports that he lives in an apartment, but that's not where he lives.
He lives in that house right there.
That's what the records show.
That's where he lives.
So, very interesting background.
He has none of these credentials that you're reading right there on the screen.
He has none of them in his official background.
None of them I could see.
He doesn't even own a car.
How was he getting to school?
How was he driving around for his dog?
And why is he supposed to be a super genius with straight A's, the perfect?
ACT, near perfect SAT, graduating from Caltech.
I mean, this is all horse shit.
All horse shit.
Yeah, I want to know the sources, sir, for that information.
Now, you said it best.
New information can come in and then we have to change.
Okay.
But I want to see that information come in.
I want to see the shooting at the magnetometer when the guy had a weapon in his hand.
We should have that video.
I want to see the shotgun down his pants or I want to see him wield it.
I want to see it.
Okay.
They're not showing it to us.
It's a story.
There's too many stories.
I want to see him come into the hotel.
I want to see how he's walking.
I want to see does he have a sport coat on?
How is he hiding the shotgun?
Even if it's a short shotgun, it's still going to be heavy in his pants.
Did he have a holster?
I want to see him walk up in his demeanor, walk up to the magnetometer when he said hi to people in front of him and maybe behind him.
I want to see all that.
They're not going to show it to any of that.
They're just going to show it.
Well, they released this manifesto and he goes on and on about how terrible the administration is without actually naming it.
Yeah, you know what, Joel?
That's nice.
They, They released his manifesto.
I want to see him writing the manifesto.
You know what?
I hear Dr. Fetzer has a manifesto too, and I haven't got a reader yet.
You know what I mean?
But he's supposedly at the end of the manifesto, he's walking around saying how terrible the security is at the hotel.
So he apparently is writing this thing as he's walking around the hotel telling everybody the reason why he's going to try to kill everybody in the administration.
It's beyond crazy.
That's all crazy stuff, you know, and I don't see anything in his background at all that has any.
Any evidence that he could have gotten any weapons training?
He has none of that in there.
But what I'm trying to say is his real background, which this is, folks, this is what really matters.
What the media reports does not matter.
What matters is the evidence of what we can see, okay, and what we can hold and what we can read.
That's what matters, okay?
And the records show that this guy doesn't have that background that they're showing.
He's real, but I don't see any of this school stuff that they're touting.
None of it, which I find to be very strange because every time I look up somebody and they tout that, I usually can see it.
Oh, yeah, there's this agree.
Again, sir, if I were to look you up, I would see all of your stuff, your books, everything that you've done.
It'd be this huge, long list of all kinds of things.
I'd see where you live, your house, your cars you drive, all this stuff that corresponds with what we hear.
But this guy, I don't see anything on what we're being told.
His job history is strange, his no assets, whatever.
Why would a guy like this, that supposedly had these credentials, this fabulous school, these great grades, this great future, why would this guy snap, never committing a crime in his life, not even a parking ticket, no traffic tickets, no criminal history at all?
All of a sudden, one day he wakes up and he says to himself, You know what?
Today would be a good day to go out and buy a shotgun and a handgun and get on a train.
Because I don't want to get caught by the TSA, right?
And I know what I'm going to go and throw my entire life away and embarrass my family and my friends.
And I'm going to go across country on a train to this hotel and I'm going to sneak up to the president and shoot him and get into a gun battle with the Secret Service.
I think that would be a great idea.
Nobody does that, sir.
They don't wake up and just become a killer criminal like that.
You know what I mean?
It's very, very strange.
Usually they have a criminal history multiple times, they've been to jail.
You can see a criminal history.
And for this guy just to snap and ride this train all the way across the United States and have these guns in his bag, you know, I just think is complete BS.
I'm not ready to say this was 100% false flag because all the information isn't in.
But, sir, this is really looking strange to me.
I want to see the shotgun.
Why can't I see it?
Can I see the handgun?
Why can't I see a video of the guy walking into the hotel?
Like you said, there are cameras all over the hotel at the bell desk, at the door, in the lobby, when the cars pull up, in the foray.
We would see cameras everywhere seeing this guy, but we can't see.
Anything of this guy until he runs through that magnetometer.
I find that very highly suspicious to me, sir.
And you put that with his background, sir.
Wonderful.
That doesn't exist on what they're telling us.
And he has no criminal history.
And all of a sudden he just snaps and decides to throw his life away like this.
Because you really are throwing your life away.
Whether he would have been successful or not, he's going to the jail for the rest of his life.
Or he's lucky he's not dead.
If that's real, why isn't he full of bullet holes?
He should have been bleeding on the floor.
But that didn't happen, sir.
Jailer of Valhalla, Danny.
I mean, this is all scripted.
This is all staged.
It's ridiculous.
It's laughably fake.
Laughably.
Danny, you did a superb job once again.
I cannot thank you enough, my friend.
Meanwhile, Joe, everyone, spend as much time with your family, your friends, the people you love and care about.
We do not know how much time we have left.
Support Revolution Radio and God willing, We'll be back on Wednesday and we'll do it all over again.