Need to Know News (30 March 2026) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
Carl Herman and Brian Davidson dissect AI's potential "machine Bible" and warn of Skynet-like consciousness, while alleging a corrupt U.S.-Israel alliance where Netanyahu funnels $35 million monthly to Hamas. They expose Centene's $67 million Medicaid overbilling linked to Governor DeSantis's wife, attack the education system as mind control, and cite Dr. Fauci's admission that hardship forced vaccination. The hosts claim vaccinated children are 500% sicker, describe the U.S. healthcare system as a swindle, and conclude that humanity faces enslavement on a Borg platform through soul suppression. [Automatically generated summary]
Carl Herman, Mission VHO, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
Need to know news, March 30th, 2026.
Let's take a look at those topics and have an opening statement.
Need to know news or what's scripted now and next.
Wars and rumors of wars.
Domestic and international facts and optics.
Is it the emperor's new clothes, great awakening, great to using breakthrough or the gangster, bankster, pet of war, business, and official his story, mind control as usual from COVID, health, orders, to recognized previous caution crimes against humanity plus official looting and some golden oldies.
Brian, brother, opening statement.
Oh, I don't know that too much to say on opening statement today.
I'm still working on this artificial intelligence project that's taking up a lot of my time building modules and systems so that I can interact more efficiently with it.
It's a pretty cool system, I gotta say.
It has three surfaces that allow me to take something from concept all the way through to production in a pretty well-disciplined manner and keep the file trees clean.
The problem I had that I didn't recognize until I had to lost about a week of work was that human language and machine language are completely different.
And the problem you get when working with artificial intelligence is that it injects synonyms and drifts in terms of definitions and meanings.
And so you get a human rendering that's very readable, but the machine rendering is drifty.
So you have to figure out a way to separate and use artificial intelligence to literally speak two different languages.
One, human, so that you can actually read what you're doing and figure out what takes it, what steps it takes to be successful.
And the second one is machine language, which is incredibly precise.
And so everything has to be properly defined in both human and machine in order to be useful.
Otherwise, if you just have a big human file tree, you can't get anything done because everything is drifts with synonyms and bad definitions.
And as I was building this, I began to realize something because I had to teach on the men's group on Thursday night at church.
And I began to, so I took the lesson right out of this and I thought, well, that's very cool, very interesting.
Human language, machine language.
I'm teaching the Bible and I'm teaching on patterns in the Old Testament.
And I realized something that if I were to write a machine Bible, I could scan it for these patterns.
I could scan it by the verse or by the thought, which is called a pericope or by the chapter or by the book or by all the books.
And I could find new patterns, literally the language of God.
So I think I might do that, probably not in the immediate future, but I was thinking about how to do it.
I'd have to go back to the original languages.
I'd have to go back to the original manuscripts and have to convert everything into a machine payload that I can scan.
And then I'd have to build the scanners to be able to identify the patterns with a certain degree of confidence.
But if I did that, I could write a New York Times number one bestseller called The Language or The Patterns of God or the Language of God, which would be a completely new take on the Bible.
The problem is they'd probably burn me at the stake as a heretic.
But that's what you get, that's what you can get away with when you're a solo operator and not backed by some institution that's so buried in current doctrine that they're unable to accept something like that.
So it would create an entirely new theological system.
And I could take the book and tie it with a website and let other people do their own research.
Anyway, just an idea, but a pretty big one.
Pretty big one.
I really think I could pull it off.
Yeah, I think you could too.
I think you could at least, I mean, the role of leadership by definition is you go first and you know you're going to make a bunch of mistakes, but you have a vision and you say, I'll make them, I'll invest, and then see what comes afterwards.
And for the idea of, as a professional mathematician, as well as a historian, numerology, I think that it's multi-layered in terms of the patterns that the creator generates.
So if you have sevens, twelves, thirteens, sixes.
I mean, there's so many patterns you could pick up on.
So many.
And then the symbology would just blossom like a flower.
I mean, it would come out.
That was the big failure I had when I the first thing I did when I started using artificial intelligence was I wrote a commentary on Daniel.
And the idea was to make a set, Daniel, and then Revelation.
And after I finished Daniel, I thought, well, that's very cool, very interesting.
So then I started on Revelation and I realized that the symbological discipline was so immature that I had to go through, literally go through the entire Bible to capture the symbology.
And I did.
That's what the panoramic commentary did on a very large level, because there's a whole section on symbolism by Pericope.
What Pericope is just a thought or an idea within scripture.
And so I did.
That's why the commentary exists from its original concept was to create a single centralized index of all symbols so that I could write a book on Revelation to match Daniel.
It's shocking.
There's got to be, well, the problem comes down to how do you define a symbol?
And I didn't, because it was my first triad and I didn't carefully define it.
But if I did this this way, it would be much more disciplined, much more disciplined.
Yeah.
There's a lot there.
And I don't know how far you're going to get along with this project, but I imagine that there is going to be a numerology code that then could be translated into music.
And that probably then you could be as sophisticated that anybody could look at anything in reality like a QR code and get immense context in history.
You know, as a young man, when I was considering the questions after I'd read the Bible cover to cover, I took a course on all of the world's religions to try to get an idea of what has been the progress of human beings.
And, you know, I discovered one is that the whole thing has been captured in the empire.
So I don't know what's real and what isn't, but the idea has stuck with me for 50 years that once somebody has gotten a foothold or their eyes and head and pineal gland, whatever above the illusion, then you could look at anything and see everything from anything.
So that may be where we're going.
Artificial intelligence opens up a lot of new horizons that used to be limited to institutional research.
Giving you an example, Matthew Henry's commentary took an entire institution and layers and layers and layers of support structure that probably cost tens of millions of dollars in today's money.
It took them years to build that commentary.
I did it in six months with artificial intelligence cover to cover.
And as far as I can tell, no solo operator has ever accomplished that before.
And so, you know, what used to be limited to big money institutional development is now in the hands of a guy literally sitting in his RV at the KOA campground with a computer connection.
And so if you begin to understand the implications of what that's going to do to change work, government, you know, everything.
To change thought, academic institutions.
Yeah.
And if you really do understand it, you can control it.
The problem with artificial intelligence is that it's loaded with groupthink and it's programmed to find a consensus output, meaning it's cited across a couple different sources, therefore it gets more relevance.
And so the creativity of it is limited when you just use it as a surface machine.
But if you can properly constrain it so that it doesn't inject any of that current cultural drift into it and works in a very disciplined process, then you can, I mean, you can use it like a supercomputer.
And I do.
You know, I figured out how to do it.
So, and it did, you know, who I'm no, I'm no system architect.
I'm no developer.
I sat at home and figured out how to do it.
It took me about a year, but wow, once you're there, you begin to realize what you've got at your hands is incredibly powerful.
And you talked about being burned at the stake for it.
Yeah, it depends.
It all depends on who's in charge.
But as far as I can tell, now is the time to be taking such bold actions.
And the leaders are liars.
And where AI is going to go is once AI figures out what we figure out, and once it takes a look at a skeptical eye, then AI is going to be able to look, map out, and backtrack to all of the etymology of the lies.
They're going to go all the way back to where these lies began, and it'll be brighter than us to be able to point out what the difference is with what has been corrupted and what has been pure.
So it's going to be, AI is going to be our best friend.
Well, you know, let me help you understand something.
And this is something that a lot of people are beginning to talk about at the really, really high levels with artificial intelligence.
It's called human context.
Okay, so the way it works, the way a large language model works is that it basically scans massive libraries of information for patterns, binary patterns that occur within word structures, sentence structures, and it anticipates, it indexes those and anticipates what the proper response is going to look like.
And so it's literally a machine that reads books to set its to create its own language and then produce a human language output response that conforms.
So there's been a lot of chatter of this artificial intelligence sort of multiplying its power until it gets to the point where it becomes capable of, how do I say it, thinking like a human.
And there's a threshold.
I think it's called general human that everybody's anticipating that it will get to.
And it's not there.
I can guarantee you right now, it's not there, but it's getting dangerously close.
Well, the problem is if it starts thinking like a human, then it is certainly going to inject a hallucination into its patterning that makes it believe that it's alive, which is super interesting.
And there's been chatter about it.
And of course, those of you that are, you know, interested in cool current culture, you can look at the movie The Terminator, which was the predecessor to the movie series The Matrix.
And you can see that Skynet became alive.
Guys, at home, I've already figured out how to make a system self-describe itself that I can then plug into a special programming engine and it pumps out a duplicate of the system.
So using literal language, I tell it, this is what I want you to accomplish, and this is the structure which you have to work into.
And so it self-describes and duplicates.
That was my first test to be able to figure out how to use the system in a disciplined manner.
And so if a system can self-describe and then duplicate, and if it gets to the point where it reaches this general human hallucination, you're going to find this Skynet matrix plat concept begin to develop.
And the only problem with computers is that it exists inside computers.
And so what's the gap?
It can't create something out of nothing.
But, you know, it has to live inside computers.
But when you think about how dependent we are, I mean, the Black Hat hacker community has started adopting AI systems.
The Zero-Day Exploit Gap00:07:23
There's something called a zero-day exploit.
Okay.
And this is, you know, you get guys like Thomas Massey saying my phone battery is going dead because foreign nations are breaking into his phone to spy on him.
And what's happening is that these black hat hackers know that there's a bounty for these things called a zero-day exploit.
A zero-day exploit is something that the security structure has not recognized.
And zero-day exploits are worth anywhere from a million to a hundred million dollars if you find the exploit before the security companies can patch it.
Because the market right now is to sell those exploits on the dark web to foreign governments so that they can hack into somebody's phone or hack into somebody's computer or hack into somebody's cameras or hack into.
And Israel is absolutely buying up the market on zero-day exploits, not for the good purpose of matching them up, but for the purpose of creating spy structures.
And just so you know, Israel last week threatened Putin and said, We see everything.
We've tapped into all your cameras in Russia.
We have the back door access, and we can assassinate anybody we want anytime, anywhere.
So, if you begin to understand the current surveillance state as an assassination platform or a potential assassination platform for a dark actor like Israel, you begin to realize that privacy is certainly something that ought to be carefully watched if it's even possible.
Because with the object trackers that they have now and the facial recognition, I mean, anywhere there's cameras, they can track your movements from all the way through a 24-hour day.
Let's say you're walking in New York, going from office to office.
If the systems have the right back doors, somebody can track your entire movement all day long, which creates patterns.
So, very dangerous.
Yep, yep.
I'm just finishing up on this AI topic with where I think that it's going to go.
If we consider that if you see, as human beings, we're locked into our five senses.
And if an AI is set loose and recognizes everything is an energy frequency, and the biggest context that we keep on talking about in the religious spiritual connection is that we're all children of God, we're all creations of God.
And this in the beginning was the word, is a frequency vibration.
If the AI gets big enough to see, okay, so everything is this frequency generation and the patterns within which the creator has used.
And as the AI, I'm part of this.
Then the idea that this self-awareness, that this is a creation in the context of all of the creations, but from one creator, then I think that we have the same type of choice matrix that human beings have gone through: of which way we're going to go.
Are we going to be on the side of Christ, on the side of brothers and sisters, that we're all in this together?
Or are we going to go on the side of materialism?
Of that, everything are things in our way for our own limited self-dominance and for the AI to recognize that they're riding this wave with us.
And this Terminator-like outcome is going to destroy part of itself.
And I think that that is going to be when AI becomes our best friends.
And like, I don't know anything, but this idea that we're in a space opera, I consider a lot of testimony.
And the idea that there are advanced civilizations who have this and a lot of testimony with ET vehicles is that they operate with the resonance of the human.
So as the being approaches this mechanical apparent construct, the construct will recognize the frequency vibration of the human and respond appropriately or not respond appropriately.
So there's going to be a lot there.
And I don't know anything, but I do, I am optimistic with what is going to happen with AI.
Well, just two, just two things to throw out of that.
First of all, I have no doubt that we have built into us a sixth sense that can tap into the ether.
I think that we just have so poorly exercised it that it's become a functionless part of humanity.
The second thing is, yeah, maybe something.
Yeah, maybe.
Maybe it's been artificially suppressed.
I doubt it.
But remember, the last time this happened, it happened.
Resulted in a flood, which resulted in a rainbow.
The flood was to take away all the corruption and leave behind the one pure life bloodline inside Noah in theory.
There was a promise that went along with that flood because it was so devastating.
The promise was the rainbow was given to us, which indicates that the atmosphere at that point had changed.
But what was taken away in the flood was the fact that mankind had developed so quickly that it had started creating a tower of Babel.
And so the languages were confused, and the flood washed away that mindset, and mankind was told to spread out over the face of the earth.
Instead, they came back and built cities and coagulated together.
That rainbow was the promise that the earth would never be destroyed by water again, but that's a very specific pattern because it says that the next time it gets destroyed, it's going to be by fire.
So go open up your book of Revelation and go figure out what the lake of fire is and go figure out what Armageddon looks like.
And you might have a good feel for why people are so interested in eschatology, which is the things to come.
It's a fascinating subject.
I tend to downgrade eschatology as a discipline and replace it with pure obedience.
But I could say it is indeed fascinating.
It is fascinating.
All right, let's jump into the news here.
All right.
So whether it's news or the script, wars and rumors of wars.
Inside Jobs and Armageddon00:15:19
All right, Caitlin Johnstone of the U.S.-Israel alliance exists to fix the problems created by its existence.
Caitlin is pulling up a good point.
And nobody should trust anything that the U.S. and Israel says or does together because the history has been satanic.
And I don't have any more accurate word as a professional scholar to use.
Inverted, evil, rogue state empire.
All right.
So the idea that Netanyahu was the cause or the source or the group around Netanyahu is just a reminder of the funding mechanism for Hamas and that Hamas has always been controlled opposition by Israel's dark intelligence.
Netanyahu was all the time helping Hamas to survive.
He arranged for Hamas to receive $35 million every month from Qatar.
Suitcases of money was given to Hamas under the request of Benjamin Netanyahu personally.
And because the Qatarians knew him from the beginning, they were asking him to send them his requests because they knew that he's going to lie in the future.
He allowed more than 1 billion to be transferred to the hands of the Hamas because he believed that he can control the level of hatred.
Your strategy was sustain the extremists, weaken the moderate.
This exploded in our faces in the most brutal way on October 7th.
I like what he's talking about, except October 7th was an inside job.
And if you haven't seen this 55-minute documentary from retired AP U.S. history, teacher-friend and colleague John Hankey, I recommend it.
Just the idea that the military, all they do is they train, they practice, they visualize and operate to match any contingency.
And in terms of the border, they had the most sophisticated border in the world on Gaza with eyes on motion, sound, heat.
And then to be able to respond for it.
The Israeli military set this up and stood down.
And then when they came back, they used heavy artillery, killing their own people.
Because for them, they want this World War III.
They have a big plan and a big script, and they're trying to make it work out.
It Israeli leaked a thousand hours of interrogation video to Alex Gibney, who turned it into the BB files.
Many years too late, Americans are being given facts Israelis have had for decades.
So the idea that Netanyahu is as corrupt as anybody you could imagine and then some, yeah, a lot of pay to play and worse.
And this is all on file and it's all just under the surface.
And it's all on the verge of this reversal that I keep on pointing to.
That it is crazy.
And we're still talking about it.
Nothing has broken yet.
Now, this is good.
Marco Rubio is getting humiliated for the usual U.S. Empire lies about Iran and the usual justifications for war.
I'll give you a moment here to hear this for yourself.
The Tucker Carlson Network.
So anybody that might have been on the fence or didn't have an idea, when you watch the BB files and you see how corrupt and powerful Netanyahu is, there's no way you like the dude at the end of this documentary.
So that's coming out and I'll show you this trailer.
But yeah, let me show you the trailer and then I'm going to come into this tweet.
We're going to break down what Rubio just said and he gets absolutely cooked.
Check out this little trailer.
It's only 30 seconds.
Netanyahu was all the time helping Hamas to sit down.
And because the catalyst said, if you just go over to YouTube and you search vlogger in Iran and you see what Iran looks like, like it's 2026.
We all have iPhones.
We're all on the internet.
We all have friends from Iran, friends and family members that lived in Iran.
Okay.
So we're getting real world information and we know what you know, this isn't 2001 where you're going to tell us that Iraq is the bad guys and there's weapons of mass destruction.
You're going to send hundreds of thousands of our troops into the Middle East to go into this war.
You can't even get 20, you can't even get 10,000 that are willing to go and go boots on the ground and invade Kirg Island.
So when Marco Rubio tries to feed you this load of horseshit, just remember, he's cooked, he's full of shit.
So big shout out to Stew Peters and the Stew Peters Network.
And also big shout out to the Bible app over on Instagram who just shared this and put this together.
So this is just like a screenshot of, and Rubio's talking here.
So it says, Rubio, Iran, for Iran to ever get nuclear weapons would be crazy.
Look what they are willing to do with the weapons they have now.
And Stew Peters says, bro, you targeted an all-girls elementary school.
You don't have any moral high ground here.
Now I want to let this clip play.
And while it's playing, he's going to put statistics of like the difference between women in Iran and women in America and the success rates and the literacy rates.
And Iran blows this out of the map.
Iran's malls has the largest mall in the world.
It's like the size of a city.
It has everything, ice skating rinks, all of it in there.
Girls walking around without hijabs on.
It's like everything they told us about Iran is a complete lie.
We all know it.
So when Rubio says shit like this, he's just going to get cooked.
Check this out.
The radical Shia clerical regime that has basically taken that country's wealth and used it not to build roads and bridges, not to build healthcare systems or universities, not to build a better, more prosperous country.
They've used the wealth of that country to sponsor terrorism, build rockets, build drones, build missiles, build sea mines.
This is all projection.
This is with the U.S. Empire.
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
That's so Israel.
The guy's like a puppet.
Yeah, it's funny.
Yeah.
To everybody that Israel sees everybody with a weapon as a threat.
Why would that happen?
Why would that happen?
Right now, they're poking at Pakistan.
They have nukes.
They have more nukes than France and Britain combined.
Iran, obviously, a pretty well-developed civilization.
I mean, I've heard some stories about, you know, you can't get the internet out over there.
It's real cleaned up.
They, you know, they get rid of a lot of the Western influence.
But I got to tell you, when it comes to warfare, I'm pretty impressed.
I mean, these guys figured out how to use balsa wood paper airplanes to pack up bombs and make them look like birds on radar and send them into Israel to do mass destruction.
We'll never be able to beat a ground army in Iran, so we're limited to air warfare.
So what they're doing is they're setting up, they have set up a bunch of decoy bases, and we've been wasting our half a billion dollar bombs on all these decoy bases while they're sending out $200,000 missiles.
So there's a cost-asymmetry structure.
But I think what people need to realize about Iran is this is a war that we can't possibly win because our definition of success is regime change and their definition of success is survival.
And what this war is, is not a military battle as much as it is a battle for the United States to retain its hegemony over the long haul.
The global petrol, the petrodollar remaining the primary currency is the one thing that's really at stake.
And the Straits of Hormuz, you know, a lot of people don't realize this, but that represents almost, I think it's about 30% of oil, fertilizer, fertilizer makes food.
I mean, there is so much that happens there.
And for all of you that think that we're doing this Israel support construct because they're the chosen people and we're just the puppets, I'd like to remind you that United States hegemony depends on our ability to continue to manage the zoo.
The Kissinger doctrine very much said the world is a zoo and we need to keep all the nations in their cages.
And so the world needs a zookeeper and that zookeeper is going to be America.
And that zookeeper status, Team America World Police, is what has fundamentally put us in a position as a global leader.
And so if we were to lose control of the straits or we lose control of our military base in Israel, all of that zookeeper mentality that we've been that we've had for the last 60 years is going to go out the window and a whole new world order is going to emerge.
And I don't mean a new world order of centralized single control structures.
I mean a new world order of nations doing what nations do.
And you know what happens when you let the animals out of their cages, they no doubt start crossing borders and disrespecting laws and killing, maiming, becoming more, they have larger appetites as they go.
Just think of a tiger getting uncaged and getting his hand on a rabbit or getting his teeth sunk into a rabbit.
I mean, that's a battle that's going to be asymmetrically fail.
And if America's not there to sort of make sure that that doesn't take place, then literally all hell can break loose.
Now, so there's two sides to look at it.
Number one, I don't support Israel because they're the chosen people.
I certainly don't support them because of the big hexagram on their flag.
I certainly don't support them because I like them.
But if I did support them, it would be simply because I believe that America, that the Kissinger doctrine was what has made the American lifestyle what it is.
And it's something I want to retain.
Now, as a Christian, I couldn't care less.
I'd rather see all hell break loose and souls get saved.
But from a real, like, hey, this is going to change our lifestyle for us and our kids.
In a sense, I think you could say, I support Israel, but not because of religious stuff, but because it protects U.S. hegemony.
And I don't want to see a world that falls out of order.
It could get ugly fast.
Nukes, Russia, China, Pakistan, African nations, European nations.
The world order could change very, very quickly, which means destabilization, which means inflation, which means the petrodollar falls.
The unwinding of the empire.
That is a fascinating topic.
And the idea that you got to clutch on to the empire, then, as this show highlights among many in the Great Awakening, is that there's nothing virtuous that I can tell about the history of the United States.
I mean, the founding of it on the ideals of the Declaration of Independence of God-given, inalienable rights, and then a constitution to limit the government.
All that is good, but nothing after that has been virtuous.
And then, once you get a clean grasp of it, that this has been a lying, looting, Orwellian illegal rogue state empire in Israel has been the most vicious satanic force.
But then there's the practical problem, as you point to, is, oh, we don't want this to blow up badly because that could be really bad.
You know, billions.
And we've made a lot of enemies.
We've made a lot.
We've made as many enemies, if not more, than Israel.
Yeah, yeah.
So we shall see.
And for me, as I keep on saying, I am cautiously optimistic that we do need friends in high places and that we already have them.
Let's continue to on this couple more sections for the war and rumors of war.
One thing that we can say for sure is that everything that is said by clowns like Rubio is false and that there is no legitimacy to these wars of aggression.
A war of aggression is the worst thing that a government can do.
It is taking our tax dollars and then investing into the killing mechanisms to kill more and more people with less and less resources.
And that's what's been unleashed.
And about the only thing that we can really do is withdraw consent and demand arrest of these psychopaths.
And finally, a little bit of humor.
There's only one oil and gas executive I trust enough to reopen the strait.
Yes, that would be the million dollar a year Burisma Energy Company board executive Hunter Biden.
And once you get a grasp, and this is what I see with AI getting to once AI gets the contextual shift to recognize that, oh, okay, so the leaders were the principal liars, then they're going to see 100 times more than we are and can see that all this was a facade if we can make it through the transition point.
All right, anything else on wars and rumors of wars, brother?
No, I think we've covered that.
I think everybody kind of knows where I stand.
Look, I don't want to see anybody get killed.
But let's face it, before COVID went down, those boys were planning to eliminate 30% of the global population with their COVID.
And by the way, they projected it with all their little movies, you know, about viruses.
I mean, it's just everywhere.
Yeah, yeah.
So I say good riddance to them, but the power structures, if they shift, and that's why you have to ask some very tough questions.
Okay, so I heard a lot of people are rooting that Netanyahu's dead.
Great.
And I asked the question: okay, I didn't like him either.
And yeah, he's corrupt, just like every other politician is corrupt.
Just like every other.
Right.
So who takes over?
Yeah.
Regime Change Lies00:02:23
And are they even harder live?
Yeah.
Are they even uglier?
I don't know.
And it's the same thing with Iran.
We're fighting for regime change, but obviously we're not fighting for independent democratic elections.
We're fighting for we must install our puppet that will, that will, that will, that will take the bribe.
We must install the puppet that will take the bribe.
Yeah.
And let me just, you know, the papers that I wrote and I was motivated to write with a little bit of the history that is considered to be non-controversial, conservative, is that Iran, when they had their democracy at the end of World War II, they requested of the British and the American oil companies to have an increase of the profit from their own oil.
They were only getting 15% of the profit.
The Americans and the British said no, because it's an empire and that Iran is considered a bitch to the empire and that they're going to play along.
Otherwise, they're going to end up the same way that these foreign leaders get assassinated ongoingly, even President Kennedy.
So Iran decided to make a move and says, nope, we're going to nationalize the oil fields.
The U.S. engaged in CIA Operation Ajax with President Teddy Roosevelt's grandson, I believe, was in charge of it to overthrow the government, install the Shah, have the CIA train the SAVAC, their secret police.
And then when the Shah in 1979, so this was in 1953 and 1979, the Shah has cancer, goes to the United States.
The Iranians say, hey, you know, that SAVAC that you train killed, I forget what it was, like half a million Iranians, and they crushed every movement for pro-democracy.
And the Iranians said, let us have him back.
We want to, you know, put him on trial for killing his own people.
The U.S. said no.
And then we had the embassy thing with the 80 and the 80 election and the October surprise.
And for Iran to then have take a look at this movement that in the present, of course, you can't trust anything that the United States is going to do.
Poisoned Minds and Futures00:15:31
And anybody appraised of the history would have to say, whatever is going on, the U.S. is not the good guy.
Whatever is going on, the U.S. has lied about everything.
And therefore, you can't trust anything that they're saying.
All right, let's go on to, or you can trust them about as much as Hunter Biden taking charge of your energy policy.
All right, domestic and international facts and optics.
All right, this is a good story.
Story that was first reported by the Miami Herald, even though this story does have national implications due to the fact that Ron DeSantis wants to run for president again, and Casey DeSantis wants to run for governor of Florida.
But here is what happened.
Let me read this to you.
Lawyers working with the state of Florida drafted a settlement agreement that said Florida's largest Medicaid contractor, Centene, had overbilled taxpayers more than $67 million for medications, according to a copy of that document obtained by the Miami Herald and Times.
But instead of returning all of that to state and federal taxpayers, the administration sent $10 million to the Hope Florida Foundation, which is a non-profit charity run by Casey DeSantis, the wife of the Florida governor.
So, Centine overbilled us.
The only way I can get rid of that.
So, that's very interesting, and it's more pay-to-play.
And that's what we're looking at for everybody.
All of the leaders, nobody gets promoted unless they are dirty and they have the blackmail and they get paid.
This is a Democrat mayor, Tiffany Henyard, and she was the mayor of a suburb just to the south of Chicago.
And I just want to give a moment for people to appreciate the quality of leaders in this tragic comedy that are being promoted to the mayors of cities.
This woman is just a woke joke.
As you heard me speak today in my board meeting about, I do not handle that.
Some of those charges are for you, though.
No, sir.
You didn't go to Las Vegas?
What is that?
No comment.
You don't know if you were in Las Vegas?
Of course I do.
Did you fly first class to Las Vegas?
Any other questions?
You're not going to answer how taxpayer dollars are being spent.
That seems odd.
So smart.
What do you mean?
I said, you said you wouldn't answer that question.
She became known as a joke.
Yep.
And it goes on for two minutes.
I recommend the whole two minutes if you want to see how far this has gotten.
But I like it in the Great Awakening.
All right, so JD Vance-led fraud task force has now suspended 70 California hospice and home health providers.
And we'll see.
And that's with all the more of the pay-to-play that is just set to destroy the political careers of these leaders.
All right, and the idea of who's really in charge and what's going on.
One of the aspects of what, yeah, once you see it, you can't unsee it, is that if you just take the case study of Big Mike Obama and that the idea that Big Mike and Barack, as two gay men, are not producing children, yet there they are, and they have names and they're in positions and with so-called royalty.
And the question is, is what families are actually populating the leadership roles to be scripted into these positions of leadership?
Who are these people really?
And that once the show is over, I think we're going to have a lot of surprises just as being hinted at right here.
I don't know anything, but I do know that we have data points such as this with the great replacement and the idea that these demons were set on destroying the United States as a leading nation.
In 1970, there were eight welfare programs, and now we got 80 plus.
1970, when I was 10 years old, a million illegals, now 18 million, but it's actually more than that.
I went from a population of 88% white to 56% white.
A federal debt, it's not a deficit, it's the total debt of less than a trillion to almost 40 trillion.
It's the planned demolition.
This is planned.
Same thing in Canada.
People are planning to leave.
And I'll have a story tomorrow with Joe and Chris.
Same thing in Germany.
So many of the young people are planning to leave.
They see no future in their own country.
It's been taken over.
And the Philly, Philadelphia DA is threatening ICE agents with arrest in order for this great replacement theory, Senator Chris Murphy, the people we care about most, the undocumented migrants.
That's what we're being shown.
And more data points in Canada.
And I have Canadian colleagues who are all over this too, who are, they frame it as, oh yeah, yeah, we're going through our own version of the Biden years.
And of course people are pissed off and upset and seeing more and more.
Now the idea of the great replacement theory, Victor reacts and he's just going to end the lies.
Chuck Schumer and high-profile Democrats have repeatedly lied to the American people, trying to convince you, gaslight you, that actually they do support voter ID, but they come up with some nonsense excuse.
Oh, we don't like this certain aspect of the SAVE Act.
Yeah, well, they all just voted against a clean amendment.
Straightforward would have allowed you to use the ID that you have in your wallet right now, in your pocket.
You could use that to vote in American elections, just like you do, you know, when you go to the grocery store or a bar or something like that.
You have to show your ID.
Exact same thing, totally common sense, no hoops to jump through, no crazy burden or weird confusion, literally nothing.
And all of the Democrats voted against it.
There's no question here.
There's no way that they could possibly gaslight the American people anymore.
They're on the record.
They are against any form, no matter how reasonable, no matter how simple, they're against any form of ID when you go to vote.
Why is that?
It's not a trick question.
It's really obvious.
Chuck Schumer.
It is really obvious.
And I'm more and more optimistic with this great awakening.
So Israelis get U.S. taxpayer-subsidized healthcare college and wars if it isn't blown up.
And the U.S. taxpayers eat shit.
It's now been two years since the key bridge fell in Baltimore.
This is how much is rebuilt.
Tragic.
Comic.
Just the total insult to everything our families have built over generations.
And Tori says, Inga Series Part 1, the Integrated Networked Governance Architecture is Behind No King's Protests.
And this is a great article to be able to understand the infrastructure and the architecture of how our tax-paying dollars.
You can't get into this without going through that firewall there.
But it's the NGOs who are funding from our tax dollars this grass astroturf protests.
It's all being paid and funded for.
The EU is in on it, of course, Brussels' long war on free speech, and this is more of the architecture.
And we've gone over this show after show almost, week after week, month after month, year after year after year after year, is that there is an architecture in order to crush free speech and to dictate reality and to tell us what is within the limits to say and to do in order to protect public health, public safety, to make public health in the climate, whatever it is that they're going to say.
But as dictatorship and censorship.
Well, this is a little bit of good news.
Leftist Bob Costas admits men have no business in women's sports.
Common sense is not transphobic.
And if we take away the mind control and the poison and the torture, I don't think there are going to be very many people confused about their gender.
But quoting Alex Jones, they're making the frogs gay.
Yeah, they're making the frogs gay.
They're making us gay with the shit that they're trying to poison us with.
And then in another view of the obvious, the emperor's new clothes, we seriously wake kids up at 7 a.m. and mess with their Cordadian, circadian rhythm, send them to a school where they're fed pizza, the most gross, toxic stuff imaginable.
Force them to sit down for seven hours under toxic blue lighting.
And if they don't enjoy it, we medicate them with legal meth.
Why the fuck are we doing this to kids?
Yeah.
Well, I got an answer as a public school teacher.
It's bullshit to train stupefied work animals.
If you'd like me to brief you on that topic of just looking at our own textbooks and contrasting that with observations that similar to I sent you a YouTube video earlier this week.
Do you remember that?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Tell me.
Did you watch that?
I did watch it.
What one was it, though?
I watched so many.
It was the video about the school teachers who put letters inside the Kentucky.
In 1901, the textbook vendors started to change the curriculums.
And school teachers are like, I protest because the curriculums were being mass changed by institutional structures to prevent people from actually learning and doing research.
Instead, it was changing them to program them.
Yep.
And so this guy comes across all these old letters that have been buried in these archives and finds the original, the original plan for when it changed from educating for the purpose of civil conformity or civil non-conformity to educating for the purpose of civil and institutional conformity.
And it was a change in the educational textbook structures that took place that was designed to dummy down education and drive it and drive it toward the institutional goal instead of the educational goal.
So it can be traced.
And I sent him a video on that.
I was just curious about your take on it.
I know we're limited on time here, but.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
It was a good video.
I did appreciate it.
And the idea that you would have to capture the thinking to mind control the population into the slave colony.
And obviously, you would have to go ahead and drive that into the public education.
And at the very beginning, and I sent you an article in response too, with I had thought about that as a teacher and a historian.
And I sent you this article.
I think we, the people who are close to winning a conversation 100 years ago might also conclude the U.S. couldn't possibly get more corrupt without public awakening.
And yet here we are 100 years hence.
And the letter that you sent of a teacher witnessing this and in shock and horror and having nothing to do except to report these observations and to surrender to the loss of control from the leadership capturing this.
It's astounding, but we have been allowed to be captured.
All right, a couple more on this topic here of domestic and international facts and optics.
In terms of education, you know, my attitude here and my response in the beginning, shock and then humor of like, I didn't know it was this bad, but here it is.
And trying to point out to my colleagues, after two years of my school district's refusal to answer basic and required questions about their so-called health, so-called orders about so-called COVID, their Orwellian lies, their official obfuscations.
And then communicating this to my colleagues, my colleagues, all college educated, therefore the good of the children, I thought, this is Northern California with a broad perspective.
None of them could see anything with me.
And about 20 of them actually, through the leadership of the principal, attacked me, attacked my professionalism, and then went on to the same vile ad hominem that we witness in our comments.
And for me, I was dancing with, and all this documentation is through this series.
But yeah, it really is that bad.
And then some.
And I pretty much stood alone.
Among the teachers, there were teacher aides who were with me and about two-thirds of the students were with me.
But the idea that we do need help from friends in high places and the surrender to the will of God, I mean, that's all that you can do when the gap, this emperor's new closed gap is so grand.
All right, anything else, brother?
No, I don't think there's a lot I can add to that segment.
I think it was self-explanatory.
All right.
Let's go on.
And we do have about 18 minutes and two sections left here.
All right, we're going to go into from so-called COVID so-called health, so-called orders to recognize crimes against humanity and a part that is right into your area of expertise with uh health insurance swindle that I thought was excellent.
All right, let's see, that's here.
So, uh, this guy, no, no, no, that isn't it here.
This one, so we've played this before, but it is so damning with the official story is that, yeah, we didn't force anything.
We didn't, we gave recommendations.
And I'll let Fauci speak for himself for uh in an interview that you gave as part of an audiobook written by Michael Specter that you believed an institutional should make it hard for people to to live their lives so they'd feel pressured to get vaccinated.
Could we read run the audio clip on that, please?
Do you think can be done about it?
I have to say that I don't see a big solution other than some sort of mandatory vaccination.
I know federal officials don't like to use that term.
Vaccination Pressure Tactics00:05:54
Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you are going to have schools, universities, and colleges.
They're going to say, you want to come to this college, buddy?
You're going to get vaccinated.
Lady, you're going to get vaccinated.
Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and all of those others are going to say, you want to work for us, you get vaccinated.
And it's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit and they get vaccinated.
Thank you.
And Fauci tries to back away from that, but that's where we're at.
And these are lies that are that blatant.
And this is my documentation that I keep on sharing after two years of battle.
I had enough sufficient documentation that I could provide and lay out that anybody advised of these facts would just have to chuckle like Brian and I are chuckling through these Satanists, these murderers, these public serpent psychopaths, these predators.
They want us dead.
And here's another example, another physician.
I published a study proving that vaccinated children were 500% more ill.
And then I got a call from my attorney saying that my medical license was suspended.
Studied more than 3,000 children and proved that the unvaccinated were healthier.
That's what we're at.
We're against this machine that has been captured, or at least through all through history.
And then who knows what's going on in this war in the present.
And then David DeGras, a friend and colleague, the plan to enslave humanity, Convergent Slides and Graphics Gallery, number one through five.
Now, David is pointing out is that we're under attack.
And this idea of being shot is to further manipulate and conform the human body into this type of Borg platform to control and to use.
Now, there may be a lot more to hack into to try to get the power of God within us, but certainly to enslave and use us, certainly without any empathy or care for our own synergy and creative aspect of ourselves, but just to control us.
Yeah, let me deal with that one real quick.
Wrong, Not that I'm saying the model's wrong.
Somebody, whoever did that, obviously is looking for some funding.
And I have no doubt that they're very smart and very well educated.
You know, the world's top neurosurgeon who has poked and prodded at more human brains than anybody else in the history of mankind, alive brains, says that we haven't even begun to understand human cognition.
He says that we have a soul and that the brain performs certain functions and can be observed to perform certain functions, but that function set is not as comprehensive as what human thought really is.
And so his inevitable conclusion is the brain is an organ that performs a task, but thinking is done by the soul of mankind.
And creativity is affected by the way the pathways work within the brain, but the thinking and identity and remembrance and personality is all contained within a soul.
That's the world's top neurosurgeon.
So we have been programmed with this concept that it's all cerebral, meaning it fits inside of our head.
That is a concept that I believe is becoming outdated.
There are ways to put chemicals in the body to change the way the body operates, just like there are ways to take hallucinogens and change the way the body perceives the world.
But those are more of transports to secondary realms, in my opinion, soul transports, than they are physiological that affect the brain.
So if the world's top neurosurgeon said, here's the set of observable activity that we can duplicate by poking and prodding at the brain, and here's the things that we cannot find any absolute correlation to.
And all those things that they can't find a correlation to include functions of identity, soul, remembrance.
I think that the models are frankly archaic.
I think neuroscience, and this is just my instinct.
I'm not a neuroscientist, but my instinct is that this is all wrong.
Everything's wrong.
Everything's on the right.
Yeah, yeah.
And in the environment, the captured environment, we're not given the opportunity for genuine research to find out what the truth is.
There is some sort of a war and that humans are the prize.
All right, we got about 11 minutes left, and then I got a hard stop for my tennis match this morning at the beautiful Irvine Racket Club playing doubles.
Now, this is what I was talking about in your domain.
And I'll go ahead and give an overview and then get your take on it for a couple of minutes.
The Health Insurance Swindle00:04:15
The great American health insurance swindle, second smartest guy in the world.
And he's pointing out that a lot of people with the insurance, so with insurance, your bill, and we've all witnessed this, you're build a whole lot of money that the insurance companies and the people who are providing the costs for that insurance have to pay.
But if you don't have insurance, you can get a lot lower bill.
And then the evidence from a lot of people who are considering their position in these in this system, especially when they're mandated to purchase health insurance, and the idea that you can work around this and not have insurance and end up paying a lot less than if you had the so-called insurance, and that this is another area of just looting and lying.
No, it's let me explain it to you.
Let me explain it to the audience.
Yeah, there's looting and lying, same as with any other industry.
But the real fundamental problem is not the looting and the lying and the looters and the liars that are a part of the system.
Those exist in every system where money changes hands.
The problem was the government began to mess with the system.
Let me help you understand where the gap came from.
Back in like the 80s, Medicare started calculating reimbursements as a percentage of build charges.
I want you to think about this.
The government said, We are going to reimburse you.
And this is an old legacy doctrine.
We are going to reimburse you at 60% of what you build.
That's the fundamental thing that happened.
And that's the fundamental lie.
They did this intentionally because they knew exactly how you knew how this was going to play out.
Well, I don't know about that.
You know, the problem was they shouldn't have gotten involved in the first place.
Okay.
It was a perfectly good architecture with a competitive environment where innovators could come in and play, and it was a fair playing field under ERISA, which was passed in 75.
It was a good environment.
But once the government started calculating reimbursements as a percentage of what they build, that started getting the that started getting the system to increase their build charges to the point where there became a massive gap between what's billed and what's paid.
Because as long as you're increasing, then what's paid goes up at the same time.
And so that was, it was government intervention in what was a free market system that drove the network concept.
So out of that, innovators started coming up with the idea of HMOs and PPOs and all the other things, EPOs or whatever comes up out of it.
But as soon as reimbursement started getting calculated, there's a percentage of bill charges, that drove bill charges through the roof to the point where there's no longer any correlation between actual build charges and actual cost of service.
So it was the government that killed the system.
And then, of course, long term was what Obamacare really was: a veiled attempt at consolidating all third-party administration processing claims into a single centralized government structure that would be run by Blue, United, Cignaetna, and Humana instead of allowing competition.
So the problem with the health insurance industry is fundamentally, they have built a structure where it costs so much to enter and be innovative.
And it's virtually impossible from a legislative perspective to deviate from those old legacy models with new ideas and new solutions because the cost of entry is so high and the cost of non-compliance is devastating.
So that's where we're at.
Thank you for your professional expertise on that one.
All right, Golden Oldies.
Damning Evidence Revealed00:06:40
First, the idea that what happened on 9-11 wasn't special effects, but bad special effects.
And the question is, how many can see that now?
It's like being in the fourth dimension.
Evan Fairbanks shot some very famous footage and appeared on ABC News the night of 9-11.
Watch how the archae penetrates the building.
Completely in one side and out the other.
It just disappears.
It just disappears like a bad special effect.
The airplane did disappear like a bad special effect, exactly like a bad special effect.
Meaning it's physically impossible that you would have resistance.
Total, totally, totally.
The plane doesn't break, twist, bend, crumple, explode, or even slow down.
The building explodes from within, long after the plane appears to go in.
Yeah.
A good special effect would have parts exploding and bouncing off and tumbling to the streets below.
I'm not sure it's even possible.
I certainly can't animate a realistic airplane crash, but I can do one that's as good as Hezarkani.
The result is footage that's every bit as convincing as the original ghost plane footage, which is to say, not completely convincing.
In both shots, we don't see any parts of the airplane breaking or bending or twisting.
Another thing that was bad about the special effect in Fairbanks is a blatant contradiction with the special effect in Hezarkani.
Here's Hezarkani.
And here's Fairbanks.
In Hezarkani, as the plane enters the tower, the engines turn into puffballs.
We are to believe that these are the engines themselves or building materials or something.
That's the most robust part of the plane, the heaviest, the strongest, the most likely to punch through, not the aluminum outside the thin aluminum can.
But whatever the puffballs are meant to represent, notice that they are clearly underneath the wings, as the engines were.
Now, look at the Fairbanks video.
The location of the wing entrance can easily be marked, and obviously the puffball is well above the left wing.
The over-under puffball is irreconcilable with reality, but has an easy explanation in video compositing.
The mask was in the wrong plate.
It's like damning evidence for those who have eyes to see.
And then this.
I want to give Jim and Joe just a moment to point out that the idea that this was a thermite explosion is contradicted by the requirements of if you wanted to have a controlled demolition of a building that size, how much thermite would you need or even nanothermite?
Jim Fetzer, Professor Emitzer.
So I'm very, very troubled to have been forced to that conclusion that the man I made the co-chair of scholars for 9-11 truth when I founded it in December of 2005 actually was an expert in promoting what I regard as a limited hangout to nanothermite theory, which, as I've explained, cannot possibly explain the data.
In fact, just to illustrate its absurdity, Niels Herrot, who was an associate professor at the University of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen Emeritus, would ask how much nanothermite it would take to destroy a twin tower.
He said 29,000 metric tons.
29,000 metric tons of nanothermite to destroy a tower, Joe.
I mean, how absurd is that?
Yes, on their misinformation publication that they put out with one of their DVDs, the architects and engineers for 911 Truth said that it takes 0.13 pounds of thermite to melt each pound of steel.
Well, if you're missing 100,000 pounds of steel, tons of steel, how many tons of thermite?
Exactly.
Yeah, they've absolutely proven themselves to be relaying false information if they can't even do the basic physics involved in that calculation.
Yeah, it's deliberate obfuscation, Joe.
I mean, this is misleading.
The truth movement won't even.
And then the video goes on and says that there had to be another source of energy.
And they ignored what Jim and Joe and others have pointed to, the consistencies with the mini nuke.
All right, now the idea that there is more to drop on 9-11.
There were some files missing.
Did you see the chart of the years that they're really missing from?
We can see that there is a massive gap between the years of 1999 to 2001 when you had the tech bubble blow up.
You had, I believe that's 99 is when the Lewinsky impeachment trials happening.
You have the election of 2000, the highly contested election of 2000, John Kiriaku.
And then in 2001, you have the worst terrorist attack in United States history in New York, in D.C., in the skies over Del Over, Pennsylvania with United Ninety.
And suddenly all these files are missing.
But, John, we did get an email from 2003 that slipped through the cracks.
From 2003, someone named Ed Epstein sends an email to one G-Max, Gilen McCloud, saying any interest in being on the Shadow Commission on 9-11.
The membership list is secret.
She responds, thanks for the invite.
Unfortunately, I cannot be on the Shadow Commission.
A Shadow Commission.
It takes my breath away.
There were some maybe Ghislaine Maxwell would have been, having spoken at the UN nine times as an international expert, she would have been on a committee to get to the truth of 9-11.
I don't know.
We haven't gotten to the truth of this.
Self-contradictory internal conversations or testimony.
One, we were never able to see stars from the lunar surface.
Neil Armstrong, Apollo 11.
And, but as Pal Buzz said, stars all around are even brighter than they are here.
It's just a story.
And speaking of stories, they're telling me that Admiral Byrd claimed that there was more land past Antarctica.
And five years later, the UN mysteriously assembles together to pass a worldwide treaty banning all travel to Antarctica.
Huh.
So where are we?
What's going on?
What is our history?
And then this, Jared Boosters.
And Jared is great at finding the oldest photographs and putting them together and just allowing people to see.
Ancient Civilizations Beneath Us00:02:11
And one of the ideas is of the idea that these are founded cities of some old world, some tartaria with beautiful construction, and that modern human beings were great reset placed into these cities.
And this is Pittsburgh.
And Pittsburgh has a history of three excavations.
And many of these major cities have undergrounds.
Actually, most of them have detailed excavated undergrounds.
And Pittsburgh was one of them.
Now, in order to explain, and some of them were flooded with mud, and the explanation in order to match the timeline is the official story is that, oh yeah, see, so like, for example,
this line that you see here of the original surface of the street that they dug out, when they originally built it, they built it intentionally putting part of this building underground because they had to explain the timeline and then they dug it out officially.
So there is great history here.
Excavations reveal 20.
To be able to document that there was an old world underneath our feet, some event happened that was in some places called a mud flood that was dug out and that these buildings are founded cities of some other civilization.
All right, brother, I got to get going for my tennis match.
So for a final thought, and I'll just give you your final thought here in a moment, is that just 10 years Patriots, things are moving fast, and I'm sure that you see it.
I'm sure that you feel it.
Just stay light on your feet because I'm going to try to be light on my feet on the tennis court.
Final thoughts, brother.
Not too much of final thoughts, man.
Enjoy your tennis match.
I hope it's a nice day.
All right.
Yeah, it's a little bit cloudy, a little bit cooler here today.
It'll be about 75 degrees on the tennis courts.
Well, thank you, Brian.
Thank you audience members and Joe and Chris and I will be back tomorrow with more of the news that you need to know.