Truth vs. NEW$ Inc, Part 2 (29 March 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
Jim Fetzer hosts a panel with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson alleging Israeli-Zionist manipulation of Trump's administration to facilitate genocide in Palestine while empowering tech billionaires. They claim Iran retains intact nuclear capabilities, link the Epstein files to a Gates-Rothschild pandemic profit scheme, and reinterpret the JFK assassination as a Bush-Israel coup. The discussion also critiques the IOC's transgender ban and condemns the U.S. as a "favor bank economy" where leaders sacrifice morality for power, ultimately accusing Trump of betraying his base. [Automatically generated summary]
The truth versus news incorporated all that stuff that's going on in the world that is penetrating and affecting us.
And it looks like if you saw that first colour, you realize that we're in a lot of perilous times ahead.
So you gotta know what's going on and be prepared for the worst.
And I guess we're gonna, well, let's get into some more structures, Jim.
And here on the 29th of 2026, you got it on Sunday.
Here's Paul Craig Roberts asking: Has Trump let Netanyahu destroy America?
I don't think there's a lot of room for doubt about it.
Donald Trump's re-election of president was a hopeful development for Americans.
Obama and Biden had dismantled America with open borders and DEI.
Millions were walking into the country claiming health, food, and housing benefits.
Merit was cast aside.
The system of race and gender privilege took the place of merit inequality under law.
White heterosexual males had become second-class citizens.
Trump's win was convincing.
He found himself with a majority of the Supreme Court.
Republicans had the House and the Senate, though by narrow margins, AI and data centers were invigorating the economy.
Trump pardoned the wrongfully convicted January 6th insurrectionists.
The Justice Department was pursuing the Democrat officials who had weaponized law and committed felonies.
The border was being closed.
It looked like America would be put back on its feet.
But before the chance at renewal could be set in stone, Netanyahu and the Zionist lobby intervened.
Trump was moved from Maga to Mega.
Trump gave American approval to the Israeli genocide of Palestine.
He fortified the genocide with American money, weapons, and diplomatic cover.
He attacked Iran for Israel twice.
The first, after Israel's attempt failed to destroy Iranian uranium enrichment capability used only for peaceful purposes, not for weapons.
The second Trump attack on Iran was as Net Yah's partner in a sneak military attack on Iran, thus initiating a major war that has not turned out to be the cakewalk Trump promised.
Indeed, meanwhile, Colonel Wilkerson, why Trump is wedded to Israel?
Sean, I think it means exactly what it sounds like.
It means Israel is in deep trouble right now.
And let me back up and give you a real taste of the trouble they're in.
Most of the video of late has shown simply nothing going up and lots coming in from both Hezbollah and Iran.
And it's coming in with a rare synchronicity and planning and targeting.
And it is hitting almost everything at which it is targeted.
Some serious damage is being done to Israel, and there is nothing going up in the way of air defense.
It is so bad that, in fact, Iran is probably going to shift back to its cheaper versions, that is to say, drones primarily, and continue to pummel Israel because they don't even have the capacity to shoot those down now.
So it's growing increasingly perilous.
I misspoke when I asked you a question.
This is my fault.
The diversion is from Ukraine to Israel.
That's the same thing.
That's correct.
Yeah.
They're trying to get more in there and give them some kind of capability.
Now, the only reason there aren't just thousands of Israeli WIA and even KIA. is because they've been confined to the bunkers underground.
They cannot live above ground now.
They live in the bunkers.
The other aspect of this I was not totally aware of, I suspected it until Ted Postall called me.
You know, Ted.
Right.
Down at Women Mary and had me on the phone for about 40 minutes explaining to me this situation.
I go back to Kong Sok-Ju and Yee-Gun in North Korea when Jim Kelly was negotiating with them and offering them this huge package of economic incentives.
And Yee Gun stopped him mid-sentence and essentially said, we already have the bomb.
Blew Jim away.
I mean, he was assistant secretary of state for that region, blew him away.
Well, here's what Ted Polk told me.
He believes, and I think he gave me enough evidence for that belief to convince me, that the Iranians underground not only, let's go back, they not only survived the marvelous bombing of Donald Trump's B-2 bombers, et cetera, et cetera, they survived with most everything intact.
So they are deep underground right now.
And he thinks that they are making a nuclear weapon and that they soon will reveal that they have that nuclear weapon or two or three or four.
As Kong Sok Ju said, we've got six to 12.
And that will change the entire picture because they've shown they have the ability to fire these Kuam Shah and other hypersonic missiles.
They put that warhead on that.
And we have an entirely different ballgame, one with an intensely dangerous perspective for the entire region, indeed for the world.
Is Trump desperate?
I watched that cabinet meeting, Judge.
I only had a few minutes.
I got out of the car and my daughter told me about it and I turned it on YouTube and I went straight to the minute for Witkoff giving his presentation and it was so sycophantic.
I had to go back and watch some of the earlier stuff, the Secretary of the Energy, for example.
Those people, Judge, have their heads so far up Trump's derier that they couldn't see the sunlight, let alone tell the truth.
Most of the things that were being said at that cabinet meeting to that now, as Jeff says, Jeff Sachs says, this megalomaniac who's showing it more and more and more, even if he were not that, he could not possibly make a decision based on what they're telling him because what they're telling him is all pablum.
And most of it's lies.
And I want to ask myself, you know, where have you been, Witkoff?
Where has Kushner been?
Well, you've been out there making billions of dollars for yourself.
You certainly haven't been doing diplomacy.
And you're lying here in front of the president of the United States in a cabinet meeting about a serious issue, possibly one of the most serious issues confronting not only Southwest Asia, but the world at the moment.
And you're lying.
your sycophancy is so deep and so profound that you're lying in a cabinet meeting on national television in order to make more favor and more money for yourself.
This is absolutely right.
Absolutely grotesque.
Meanwhile, Joe can't on Israel, spying on America.
The NSA not only has this bizarre raw data sharing agreement with the Israeli government, but that we share that data with the Israelis despite the fact that our own intelligence community has for many years considered the Israelis to be one of our top cybersecurity threats on par with Russia and China.
They're just constantly spying on us.
Could you update Americans on the relationship that we have with Israel and how often they're spying on us?
I would just say that we should be very concerned about it.
The Israelis spying on us, they do it.
I mean, countries spy on each other.
I would just say the amount that Israel spies on us, I think is something that we should be concerned with.
Also, like our information sharing with the Israelis, I think is it helps us in some ways because the Israelis do have a very competent intelligence service.
They can fill in gaps that we don't have.
They have good access in the Middle East, obviously.
They're very good.
They're a very competent intelligence service.
However, the Israelis, when they give us information, we do need to keep in mind that that information could be used to influence us as well as inform us.
And I would lean heavily on the influence because there's a lot of times where they'll give us accurate information, but the timing in which they do it, the manner in which they do it, they definitely have an agenda.
And when you're working with the Israelis, especially if you're used to working with other foreign partners, it is very easy.
I'm just saying this from personal experience.
It's very easy to kind of get complacent with them because a lot of them are dual citizens.
And the guy you're talking to might be from Florida or, oh, yeah, I went to college in Ohio or something like that.
And so you kind of turn off a lot of your counterintelligence radar when you deal with them.
And so I think a lot of times the reporting that will come from the Israelis, it won't be caveated.
And I've seen this happen where it's just like, hey, we just discussed a broad set of data, but we never said that this all came from the Israelis.
I've seen that happen before.
So the espionage angles is a concern.
But what I would say is that even a bigger concern is just like our level of comfort with the Israelis in discounting the fact that because we both broadly think that like terrorism is bad, that we always have the same strategic agenda.
We're seeing right now with what's taking place in Iran that we don't have the same strategic agenda.
We might have some tactical means, like neither one of us want ballistic missiles pointed at our people.
Okay, great.
Beyond that, though, we've got very, very different agendas, and we have to keep that in mind.
Meanwhile, Malaysia becomes the first country to declare U.S. trade deal null and void after Supreme Court tariff ruling.
Wow.
One click away from some moral courage.
Do you have a benefit, friend?
I thought the story was right there.
It ain't.
Let me turn to Jesse Ventura.
A short take.
Jesse, not happy.
So Jesse Ventura went on Piers Morgan show, and man, he did not hold back.
He is fucking fed up with Donald Trump.
You know, he's a Minnesota guy.
He was governor of Minnesota.
He governed as an independent, actually, ran one as an independent.
Very, very rare.
He was able to pull that off.
He endorsed Tim Walz, and Tim Walz, of course, delivered free school breakfast and lunch for kids, you know, legalized weed, like a whole bunch of stuff.
So he's very politically involved, specifically in Minnesota.
And as soon as the ICE Gestapo thugs showed up in Minnesota and started shooting people in the face, started breaking up families, started arresting innocent people, you, this guy awoke from his slumber and was ready to crack some MAGA skulls.
Okay, so he goes on Piers Morgan's show here.
He's going to talk about what ICE did to Minnesota.
He's also going to talk about his thoughts on the Iran war and Trump.
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is glorious.
Let's take a look.
You said the ICE agents came to your school.
Yeah, the ICE agents came to the school where I went to high school chasing some guy down just like the Gestapo.
And I heard people were offended calling them that.
Really?
I can tell you right now, if my parents would have been alive and they would have seen what happened in Minneapolis, they would have called it the Gestapo too.
So they come to my school.
They use tear gas and pepper spray at the school.
Now, here's a question I have, Piers.
My uncle Emo fought in World War I and he was gassed.
He came home, but his life was ruined.
He could never do anything.
What did they do?
They outlawed it.
Gas using chemical weapons became a war crime.
Why is it that you can't use them on your enemy, but you're allowed to use them on your own people?
That has always been, where is the media on this?
You know, using chemical weapons against our own people, which is in essence a war crime.
Well, I think I wouldn't describe the gas used by ICE agents as chemical weapons.
I mean, that infers weapons of mass.
Tear gas, they're spraying people from six inches away right in their face.
I can't use that in war.
I wasn't allowed to carry tear gas or any type of chemical weapon in war.
It's banned from war.
It's considered a war crime.
You can't use it against your enemy, but you can use it against your own people.
Doesn't something ring wrong there for you, Piers?
Well, a lot rang wrong about what was going on in Minnesota, and I'm very glad that it has been resolved, at least for now.
And I think it hasn't been resolved.
Well, no, not completely, but nothing's been resolved.
No, I understand.
We have two dead people here.
Two people were killed by the Gestapo here.
Yeah, I understand.
And those investigations are ongoing, but at least the ICE activity that was going on and the way it was being conducted.
There are no investigations.
There are no investigations.
What is he talking about being removed from Minnesota, which is a good thing?
And I thought what happened was appalling.
And I said so at the time.
Let me ask you about Iran and your view of this war.
Well, here's how I feel about it.
There's a simple thing as a leader.
And you know this having been in the military, Trump wouldn't know it because he's a draft-dodging coward.
But anyway, it's this.
A war is justified if you're willing to send your kids.
Because how can you send somebody else's kids to a war if you won't send your own?
So I'm calling right now for Baron Trump.
Donald Trump's on, you know, after all, he's had three wives.
He's had kids by each wife, and nobody's ever served in the military.
To my knowledge, a Trump in the last hundred years has never done military service.
Well, Baron, you can change that.
Enlist in the United States military right now.
Do something your father didn't have the courage to do.
Do something your father didn't have the patriotism to do.
I want to see a Trump in the military.
Everybody in my family is.
Look at how uncomfortable Piers is.
So I.
He is uncomfortable, but of course, for a good reason.
Moquain, your thoughts, my friend.
Yeah, Piers Morgan.
Ventura Challenges Status Quo00:09:01
He always lines up on the side of status quo, you know, the bullshit side of things.
And then, you know, when he gets people like Jesse Ventura on there talking deep truth in his face, you know, he doesn't have much to say, really.
Yeah, Jesse, you know, he shoots from the hip and he's right.
Everything the guy comes out with saying, you know, he's got the moral angle on a lot of things that he talks about, you know.
So, yeah, I mean, what happened with his state, Minnesota, you know, in the way of ICE coming in, gangbusters and killing the protesters and all of this, you know?
Yeah.
So, you know, finally, they, you know, brought the ice home and they're not quite so offensively in people's face.
But, you know, there was just a, I don't know, the anti-King protests all over the world.
They just had another one, basically, where cities and people, throngs of people all over the world are against Trump.
He's really, you know, hated by the entire world because he's in the hip pocket of Netanyahu, who controls him.
You know, that's why we're there, because Trump does what he's told, whether it's Netanyahu or the city of London telling him what to do, he does it.
And he does it in his own, you know, ruffian bully way.
So people think, oh, that's him.
No, no, no, no.
He does what he's told.
He's been in the back pocket of the Rothschilds since they've been bailing him out several times years ago.
And like I say, he was groomed from a very early age to become our future leader, as opposed to the typical politician in America.
Oh, yeah, yeah, he's talking MAGA, yeah, yeah.
You know, he sold the bill of goods, you know, he was conservative, you know, stopped the Democrat-Republican thing.
It's all a game, you know, the Democrats bringing in the people.
No, it's the people behind them.
It was basically the controllers, which are the oligarchs, bringing in the people from everywhere into America to overflow the size of the capacity of America to take care of itself.
You know, it's all globally done.
It's not Democrats versus Republicans.
That's just the show that they put on to fool everybody.
So they keep voting, oh, okay, let's go with the Democrats.
Let's go with the Republican.
And nothing ever changes because who owns the Democrats and the Republicans?
It's the same ones pulling the string behind the curtain, you know, that does all the war and everything else that's horrible on this earth.
You know, so, you know, Trump wedded to Israel, duh.
You know, he's a pedophile and they know they got the goods on him.
And he's doing his best to be a wartime president and stay in power.
He may even try and stay in power beyond his four years.
So, yeah, but I've been predicting that he may not even last 2026.
I have a feeling he's not going.
His health is going down.
I mean, the guy's under so much stress.
His mental and emotional as well as physical health is very impaired at this point.
And he's getting worse by the week, too.
It's being displayed more and more, his incapacity to be fit for the job.
Bring in that amendment.
You know, we need that amendment to get rid of him.
He's unfit.
Yeah, and Joe Kent, he does make sense as far as his counterintelligence expertise.
You know, Israel has always not been our friend.
When have they ever really been an ally?
You know, yet, you know, they do that whole brainwash.
Yeah, our close Middle East ally.
Everybody else out there that's darker skinned and Muslim.
Ooh, they're the terrorists.
You know, it's all a con job, you know.
But hey, it's been working very effectively and now we're at war.
Here we go.
So, yeah.
Brian, take it away.
Well, I like the conversation related to Lawrence Wilkinson and Wilkerson and Jesse Ventura, but it's the same argument.
And I've been talking about this since the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference is that they are assimilating us to normalize the illegitimate use of force in American society.
And that's exactly what Ventura and Wilkerson were talking about.
They're different conversations, but they're the same problem.
So whether you're talking about justified use of force overseas or force at home, the real question is who decides when force is justified and what happens when that decision-making breaks down.
So what Ventura is basically arguing is that government force is now being used domestically in a morally questionable way.
And I've said this for a long time.
I don't necessarily want the feds coming into our cities and, you know, overwhelming the local police forces and the sheriff and the local constable.
But then on the far side of it, our leaders are sending others to war without any personal stake whatsoever.
So I like Ventura's arguments.
And he's not just criticizing policies, he's questioning legitimacy.
So I think he's right to raise a moral consistency argument, just as Wilkerson was.
And basically, it's, if war is justified, should it meet a moral standard or just a political standard that happens to satisfy our appetites at the time.
And so, you know, take Ventura's statements, which I thought were legit, and Wilkerson's statements.
Wilkerson's claiming Israel is under heavy pressure and U.S. is being told incomplete or incorrect information.
And Iran's real capabilities are intact and underground.
And so he argues, you know, will we run out before they do?
But that's not a tactical problem.
That's a strategic failure.
And what the American media is doing is conditioning us to accept this strategic failure as a part of, you know, our all-inclusive leadership package that we so graciously elected.
So we're in a really, really tough spot.
One guy's talking about the misuse of force at home.
The other's talking about miscalculated force being used abroad, but they're both pointing at the same thing.
A full breakdown of how power is exercised.
Now, this is exactly the systematic problem that we ran into in Vietnam and that we've run into with a lot of different things.
And right now we're being acclimated to living with this illegitimate use of force.
We ought to be protesting that force has become routine instead of exceptional.
And When it does become routine, the mistakes just end up multiplying.
Yes, yes, yes, absolutely right.
Meanwhile, monumental mega fail.
New Olympic Eligibility Rules00:02:12
President Trump appoints Mark Zuckerberg, Sergei Brinov, and Larry Ellison to the Science and Technology Board.
What a terrible idea here.
The mega implosion continues unabated.
This time on the Big Tent front, with President Trump appointing to the Science and Technology Board some of the most duplicitous and dangerous puppets around.
I agree.
These are terrible, terrible choices.
Meanwhile, transgender women athletes have been banned from the Olympics by a new International Olympic Committee policy on female eligibility.
This is welcome news.
Geneva, transgender women athletes are now excluded from women's events at the Olympics after the IOC agreed to a new eligibility policy on Thursday, which aligns with U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order on sports out of the 2028 Los Angeles Games.
Eligibility for any female category event at the Olympic Games or any other IOC event, including individual and team sports, is now limited to biological females, the International Olympic Committee said, to be determined by a mandatory gene test once in an athlete's career.
It is unclear how many, if any, transgender women are competing at an Olympic level.
No woman who transitioned from being assigned male at birth competed at the 2028 Paris Summer Games, although weightlifter Laurel Hubber did at the Tokyo Olympics in 2021 without winning a medal.
Epstein Files and Population00:14:00
And Epstein files show they planned the whole thing, and that's in relation to COVID.
So let me give you three numbers: 28, 99, and 150,000.
First, we've got population.
Now, the world today has 6.8 billion people.
That's headed up to about 9 billion.
Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
So in the next five to ten years, for the next pandemic, we'll solve all those problems.
You say the next pandemic, there will be another pandemic.
Absolutely.
We don't know when.
you know the risk per year two percent three percent so we you know we'll have to prepare for the next one That, you know, I'd say is will get attention this time.
The pandemic sadly was fairly predictable, and it won't be the last pandemic.
The next one could be far more severe.
I had predicted there was a risk of a pandemic, and sadly, you know, that came true.
The brand new Epstein files show that they may have planned the whole thing from the get-go.
These documents prove that the infrastructure needed to profit from a major global pandemic had already been meticulously planned years before COVID-19.
It exposes a massive financial system designed around pandemics that was quietly running long before the world ever shut down.
Furthermore, it also shows many of the key players who were involved.
Through an extensive review of these newly released documents, investigative journalist Sayer G has exposed a hidden network which directly connects Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and a host of other extremely powerful individuals.
It places Epstein front and center, revealing the instrumental role he played in orchestrating the connections, brokering the deals, and guiding the strategic decisions.
Also, that Gates and his friends could plan for future pandemics years ahead of time.
So, the trail of evidence starts in 2011, with internal emails from JP Morgan Bank showing that Jeffrey Epstein helped design the financial apparatus, which would later go on to secure over $100 million in funding for the Gates Foundation.
So, in these emails, Epstein was advising the bank's most senior executives on how to pitch a Gates anchor donor fund, specifically for the purpose of bringing in investment for vaccines.
Now, this would, of course, be masquerading as a charitable project, but was in fact designed to generate massive profits.
Indeed, it set up a permanent pipeline where massive amounts of money could flow into vaccine development under the cover of philanthropy.
Now, by this time, Bill Gates was already heavily invested in vaccine development, though, according to Epstein, he was terribly frustrated.
This was because the Gates Foundation had quote already spent billions, yet there was little that could be held up as a great success.
And Epstein was right.
Gates had already had a long history with vaccine development, dating back to the early 2000s.
However, his efforts were already being met with controversy and criticism.
This was particularly true regarding the mass distribution of vaccines throughout the third world, which were later found to cause widespread infertility.
It's also true of the grand promises of disease eradication through specialized new vaccines, which in many cases actually made the problem worse.
Now, it's also worth noting that Gates himself is on record, proudly proclaiming the vaccines could successfully reduce the global population by a significant amount.
The world today has 6.8 billion people.
That's headed up to about 9 billion.
Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
And indeed, it's phrases like this which really make you wonder about his intentions.
But when we fast forward just two years into the future, this vaccine funding project that him and Epstein were colluding on would finally materialize.
So, in 2013, the Gates Foundation went on to create a special investment structure, which they called the Global Health Investment Fund.
On the face of it, it allowed private investors to inject money into drug and vaccine development for the stated purpose of improving global health.
In return, investors would bring in steady returns between 5 and 7 percent.
Nothing too strange there.
However, the key difference and what made this unusual was that these investors were offered a 60% guarantee of principal.
And what does that mean?
It means that private investors would only be risking a maximum of 40% of their original investment.
Things didn't go well, of course.
The other 60% loss, well, that would be covered by the Gates Foundation and its partners using philanthropic and public money.
Now, in plain words, private investors got to keep most of the profits if things went well, but they were mostly protected from the biggest risks by charity and taxpayer-backed money.
And why is this significant?
Because this setup basically turned global health issues like pandemics into seriously profitable business opportunities, all with low risk.
It means that there was now a real incentive to pump massive funds into these kinds of projects.
And it also.
I think he's got it exactly right.
Joachim, your thoughts right off the bat.
Yeah, well, we'll start with Bill Gates and Epstein's part in it.
Yeah, I mean, there's a reason why they call it the Epstein class, because, yeah, he ran with all the bigwigs, the puppets of the world that control a lot.
Whether we're talking scientists or academia or the government or the big business, you know, he had his hand on the pulse of all of them that are the, quote, movers and shakers.
So, yeah, and basically, Gates has been proven to be a mass murderer.
You know, some of his vaccines in India had the government of India calling him basically a criminal, and they took a lawsuit against him.
If he ever shows up there, they'll arrest him.
And he should have been in prison a long time ago.
He's like the brave new world for the basically the he's going for all the things that we're trying to oppose, you know, the absolute centralized control over a depopulated human population on this earth.
So, you know, it's no surprise that, you know, he gravitated to Epstein.
And, you know, Epstein's kind of like the fixer for all these bigwigs.
You know, I just wrote an article on the police raid on the bank in Paris that the Rothschilds own and how he's in tight with the Rothschild, particularly Ariana Rothschild and the American New Jersey girl Rothschild.
He's in tight with them.
And, you know, he's got his mark on all of these movers and shakers of the world.
You know, that's what the whole Epstein files are showing us, you know, and that's why now we hear the term all the time now, Epstein class, because he ran with all of them.
You know, as far as the transgender issue, yeah, yeah, this is like, you know, shut the border down to all the foreign invaders.
Good idea.
And yeah, let's make it a fair playing field on the athletic field where women can compete with women and not be blown apart by the men that are pretending to be women.
Duh, you know, it's very basic.
Yet, you know, they let the left take over and the Democrats are, oh yeah, totally, you know.
And, you know, finally the Olympics said, nope, can't allow the transgenders.
And so that part of it is good.
In the whole scheme of things, you know, it's relatively minor for what the evil agenda that Trump is all about that we're seeing now more than ever.
You know, and that more than ever, seeing the agenda of Trump has a lot to do with the techno-fascist state, surveillance state that we're now living in.
You know, the people like Larry Ellison taking over TikTok and All the media platforms, you know, trying to control and make sure that, you know, you can't say anything against Israel and all of this kind of anti-Semitism bullshit that they're putting in there.
Well, you know, Trump is in bed with the techno-billionaires, you know, and it's very, very evident.
So, yeah, this is like we're looking at all the things that have gone wrong.
That despite the, yeah, the MAGA and he's a nationalist, a populist, you know, all this bullshit that they labeled him as the good guy.
We're finding out that he's a tool for the new world order that's all about depopulating the earth.
And he's got all the people around him that are basically in favor of that.
Brian, your thoughts?
Yeah, it's funny.
There's a common theme among all of those articles.
And the common theme is how to buy out the interests that you were created to oppose.
So think about the first article on Substack about Trump appointing all these billionaire big tech machine realities into these institutional spending machines.
That's a real issue.
Why would an anti-establishment movement partner with the very institutions that it was built to oppose?
Well, so everybody can get rich.
I mean, everybody can sell moral high ground.
It's very expensive.
You can sell it, though, very, very cheap, make a lot of money for it.
It's the same thing in essence with the Olympics article.
You know, that would have been a standard sports report, but think about how much money is in the trans agenda.
Think about what type of issues come up with that.
You have little kids that are going to need lifetime medical assistance.
And, you know, sports is something that used to unify Americans.
You know, the whole idea of competition and excellence and national pride.
And the Olympics were supposed to be sort of the top tier of merit and unity.
But now it's all disjointed and discombobulated with a political power struggle related to a minority group that thinks that they have special rights.
We used to compete with the world.
Now we're just sort of fighting along with ourselves.
And then you talk about Epstein-Bill Gates' connection.
Well, of course, none of that surprises any of our listeners.
There's no doubt about that.
But here's a perfect example of the medical-industrial complex that used to be the Hippocratic Oath and thou shalt do no harm, just simply selling its soul for a new profit structure that's out there.
Think about all the hospital beds that have been occupied and paid for as a result of the illnesses from these vaccines.
Think about the actual cost of the vaccines and the government contracts associated with them.
Who cares about the moral position on it?
It doesn't matter because this is just all about rich people getting richer.
As for Bill Gates and world population decline, it doesn't shock me one bit.
These people have always thought that they were superior, better, and that their money put them on a higher ground.
I got to tell you, there's going to be hell to pay for guys like that when it's all said and done.
That is zero responsibility to the American people whatsoever.
The ones that made him rich, and now he's talking about cutting the fat, killing off 15% of the population.
So you've got a lot going on here, but I think that the issues are very provocative when you put them under a magnifying glass because every one of them is about taking something that ought to have been sacred ground in terms of protection and selling it off for a profit to your political elite buddies.
Yeah, yeah, stunning, stunning stuff.
UN Matters and Jail Time00:07:51
Meanwhile, Joaquin has a new piece that I had not intended to omit.
Here we have it, I think.
Epstein files lead to Paris police raid on Rothschild Bank, beginning at the end for their criminal bloodline.
Very worthy.
This week, the Rothschild dynasty once again sprang back into the headline news.
And Joaquin, I hate to say, yeah, let me see if we cannot manage.
Last Friday, a week ago on March 20th, French police raid at the Paris office of the Edmund Rothschild Group, the Rothschild family-owned private Swiss bank and asset management firm, reporting on a Paris police raid, seizing bank documents, was initially delayed until Tuesday, March 24th.
Paris prosecutors are ostensibly centering their investigation on French diplomat Fabrice Adon, who previously worked at Edmund de Rothschild Group from 2014 to 2016.
Prior to the Rothschild Bank, Aiden served as France's deputy representative at the UN from 2006 to 2013.
Within the January 30th Epstein-Boss release, documents show that from 210 to 213, Aiden's name is listed over 200 times.
He sent confidential materials, including UN Security Council memos on both his personal and UN email accounts, directly to Jeffrey Epstein.
The French law enforcement probe involves Aiden's alleged bribery and the Rothschild Bank's potential complicity in Epstein's illicit entrapment operation trafficking underage girls.
Joachim, I'd like for you to elaborate on what you have here.
Well, I do a little bit of a background history on, you know, we're seeing here how our pariah, you know, Jeffrey Epstein is in bed with the Rothschilds.
And basically, the situation is this.
He comes in as this quote expert on fiduciary matters and talks to them when they're in crisis.
You know, the Department of Justice is going after and finding the bank that Ariana the Rothschild is the CEO of.
And so he brings in the, you know, his quote expertise.
And so, you know, they are indebted to him because they're getting this quote inside advice.
And of course, because he knows everybody, he's an insider on a lot of different matters that are very much in the interests of these, you know, profiteering controllers.
And so, you know, a lot's been made of this police raid in Paris now on the Swiss bank loaned by the Rothschild.
But my point is, if you get the understanding of background history here, they're going after this guy.
They always do this to placate the pressures that have been building globally amongst the global masses for action against all the customers that he gave little girls and boys to that are all in these very powerful positions to placate the pressure.
They go for the lowest hanging fruit.
And my contention, this guy that did the UN, you know, position for France, and then he was in the bank for three years.
They're going after him.
And, you know, yeah, maybe he did some shuffling of some confidential matters of the UN and all that.
But the point that I make is it makes it look like, oh yeah, they're going to bring down the Rothschilds.
Yeah, we're turning the corner now.
The good guys are going to win.
They do this.
And the bottom line is, yeah, Aiden may go to jail.
He may have his hands slapped.
They've already kind of ruined the careers of the ex-Prince Andrew and Peter Mandelson.
Both of them, you know, basically kids underage.
But they're not going to end up in prison, nor will Ariana de Rothschild, nor will any Rothschild, because they still have the power of the world.
So my view is, is this going to be the turning of the corner and we finally get justice against these controllers of the earth that have been responsible for non-stop war and economic depression and shortages of food and fuel and all the rest of the horrible things that we're now dealing with.
No, it's not going after the power structure.
It's a side story to get the people go, oh yeah, yeah, we're winning.
They always do this, you know.
And yeah, this guy might even go to jail, but he's not the power source.
That's my point.
So that was kind of the gist of the article.
If you get the overall historical picture, you realize, you know, that nothing really ever changes, even though they put a little, you know, a little tidbit out there that titillates the view of a lot of people that we're on the verge, you know, the good guys are going to win, you know.
And it's all just a sideshow, just like Trump was a sideshow.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I didn't have a chance to read the article, and so I'm just trying to follow along here.
And I don't know if I have a lot of thoughts on it because I didn't have a chance to even grunt for it.
Sorry.
Oh, oh, that's all you want to say.
I get it.
Yeah, I just didn't.
If I'm not going to talk about something if I didn't read it, no, it's okay.
It's okay.
Not a problem.
Meanwhile, we have the fellow winners.
Covert Action Magazine raising the very appropriate question: Should Lee Harvey Oswald be exonerated?
For those of us who have spent decades, the answer is all too obvious.
JFK Shooter Conspiracy00:08:37
He was standing in the doorway of the book depository when the JFK motorcade passed by, which means he not only cannot have been the lone-demanded gunman, he cannot have even been one of the eight assassins that were distributed through Dealey Plaza, where Edward Lansdale and George Herbert Walker Bush appear to have been the supervisors on the scene.
There's more about it in a recent presentation of mine, finding consensus on JFK's assassination at the False Flag and Conspiracy Conference.
Let me welcome back everyone to our phone.
Let me just add what appears to have happened had been Rob shooter, Tony Escadero.
You're talking about talking about the other.
Zach Lawrence was an Air Force expert.
He was the joint chief shooter.
Harry Weatherford was a Dallas Deputy Sheriff.
He was a Texas oilman shooter.
Tony Escadero was an anti-Castro Cuban and appears to have fired three shots from the window of a broom closet in a uranium mining company here in the Daltechs that was a CIA asset.
The weapon is so unreliable.
The man that got Carcano, it was known as the humanitarian rifle in World War II for never harming anyone on purpose.
He had two misses before the hit after the limbo was brought to a halt.
One miss hit a distant curbing and injured a bystander by the name of James Tag.
You can see he's got a scar on his face.
That was from a fleck of concrete that was knocked up by the bullet impacting the curb.
And you had another hit on the chrome strip above the windshield of the limousine.
So three shots, but two misses and one hit.
This, by the way, note well, was the only weapon that was not silenced in order to create the acoustical impression of only three shots having been fired in Dealey Plaza.
Plus, Richard Hook was so brilliant at this.
He noticed that there's a figure behind his cedro that appears to be George Herbert Walker Bush supervising him in the Daltech.
Now get this: Bush was arrested coming out of the Daltech.
He was actually taken into custody.
He wasn't booked, but he was arrested.
And he identified himself as a Texas oilman, which was his cover.
Bush, when he was appointed director of the CIA, was said to be the first civilian with no prior experience with the agency, but that was false.
He actually had supervised the Bay of Pigs operation, which was codenamed Operation Zapata, which was also the name of the Bush oil drilling company.
And I suspect, had it been a success, that Zapata would have had a concession to drill all over the Caribbean basin.
More recently, we had Rob Reiner be cited by David W. Manic, MTPHD, the leading expert on the medical evidence in the case, as possibly identifying shooters.
So here I explained that his identifications were flawed.
And that when you get to the big picture, you need to distinguish between the sponsors, the facilitators, and the mechanics.
Where the sponsors include CIA, Joint Chiefs, Anti-Castro Cubans, Mafia, Fed, Texas, Oilman, Israel, LBJ, each of whom put up their own shooter.
The facilitators, Lyndon of the assassination, Edgar of the cover-up, the mechanics then being the shooters themselves, their supervisors and coordinators, including George Herbert Walker Bush and Edward Lansdale, who appears to have positioned the shooters and determined the sequence of shots.
Finally, and this has a lot to do with timing: this videographer from Idaho wants to do a documentary on this guy.
You hear it's talking about truth in question.
The film is not designed as an endorsement or a rebuttal, but as a serious long-form exploration of a complex figure whose ideas, academic career, and public battles raise important questions about free speech, asset censorship, and the boundaries of a contemptible debate in modern society.
In a time when platforms, institutions, and media increasingly decide which viewpoints may be heard, Fetzer's story offers a compelling case, study, in the cost of intellectual independence.
And for those who may find this to be a worthy enterprise, GiveSendGo.com/slash James Fetzer would allow you the opportunity to contribute.
Let me get us back to the scene.
Anyone who wants to comment on any of the above, I mean, obviously he's got it right.
Lee Oswald should have been exonerated long ago.
Jim, the prosecutor, New Orleans Garrison already knew Lee had been in the doorway.
Early research published in 1966 by Harold Weissman, volume two of his whitewash series, known as Photographic Whitewash.
The last four pages were already devoted to the difficulty the Warren Commission staff was having concealing that Lee had been in the doorway of the book depository when the motorcade passed by.
So really isn't a lot of room for doubt about whether Lee deserves exoneration.
Joaquim, just a few brief words as we tie things together.
Yeah, obviously, you know, he was the fall guy, you know, the loan gunman, you know, it came from basically the JFK assassination that they always use.
Oh, it's always a loan gunman, you know, and it's never a loan gunman.
It's a, you know, a whole planned operation, you know, almost always involving intelligence services.
You know, so yeah.
And then to have CIA man himself, George H.W. on the scene, you know, no surprise there, later to become the CIA director and then the president, you know, and biggest, probably the biggest pedophile president in all history, you know, although Trump's giving him a run for the money, I have to say.
But, you know, and of course, he was responsible for the Nebraska scandal.
Yeah.
So, yeah, it's good that we're finally, you know, bringing out more of the truth on the JFK assassination because that was actually a coup.
And of course, Israel played a part there too.
You know, we know that JFK confronted Ben-Gurion, the first prime minister of Israel, and say, hey, you know, the buck stops here if you continue with developing nuclear weapons.
Israel's Role in JFK Death00:02:52
And so they got rid of them.
You know, they played a part in JFK's demise as well.
So yeah, we've never gotten over it because the world and the United States in particular has never been the same without JFK.
Brian, final reflections as we tie together our show today.
Unfortunately, our government that we have hired and elected and put into place and the institutions that we've hired and elected and put into place to protect our rights and to tell us the truth has betrayed us through personal ambition that has allowed people to climb the ladder in something called a favorite bank economy, meaning you won't get that position unless you do favors and you have friends in the right places.
And then as long as you protect those friends in the right places and do those favors for people, you'll fit just perfectly inside this bureaucracy and you'll be able to work right through the institutions.
So unfortunately, every leader of every U.S. institution that we have has some level of compromise.
And all of that is tied to crimes.
So that favor bank economy drives power.
Power is the power to break the law.
And so therefore, the people at the very top of the food chain can break the law indefinitely and indiscriminately without being exposed.
And then you take on top of that and combine it with a completely corrupt and controlled media that trades truth for access as a long-term sort of trading plan.
And you end up with a situation where there's absolutely no transparency left.
The emoluments clause of the Constitution was designed to keep our politicians honest.
Unfortunately, it had no teeth because it had no actual enforcement mechanism.
And that's something that politically was forced at the beginning.
And it had something to do with the cigar box that Ben Franklin had when they tried to get him on the emoluments clause.
It was tested all the way through the system.
And it turned out that the emoluments clause had no other teeth other than public embarrassment or impeachment.
And those don't work to fix institutions.
We hired Donald Trump for change.
And unfortunately, he has done nothing.
And don't give him the credit for the Epstein files.
That goes to Thomas Massey and all the rest of the people in Congress that worked hard to make that out.
Donald Trump opposed it the whole way.
He betrayed us.
I'm sick of it.
I don't want an economy.
I want the moral high ground.
I hate to say it, but it's more important to me to be right than to be rich.
Trump Betrayal and Change00:00:50
Excellent comments.
Don, take us out.
Well, excellent comments on an excellent show.
I think this might be our best show and the most critical show.
Of course, the time makes it so critical.
And this is one show you've got to watch and share and save.
And this happens here on Home Sunday, March 29, 2026.
I'm so proud to have these three gentlemen and scholars, their intellects, like nobody else.
You can't find a better panel than what we have here.
And I'm so glad that they like to share things with the world.
And so you can form that can carry that on, folks.