Truth vs. NEW$ Inc, Part 2 (9 Febuary 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson examine Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged survival, exposing FBI Director Kash Patel’s flip-flop on Epstein’s clients and Trump’s intimidation of investigator Thomas Massey ahead of his May 19th reelection. They link Epstein’s ties to Silicon Valley, Harvard, and figures like Steven Pinker to a claimed media cover-up, comparing it to JFK, Vietnam, and Charlie Kirk’s suspicious 2022 shooting—no blood trail, guards smiling, wife’s unnatural composure. The CDC’s January 5th vaccine schedule revision, spurred by Trump’s December directive, faces backlash as 28 states reject it, fueling skepticism about medical establishment complicity in false flags like Sandy Hook. Epstein’s influence and media silence underscore systemic deception, while ICE’s Super Bowl ad contrasts with past failed narratives, revealing a broader crisis of trust in institutions. [Automatically generated summary]
All the stuff that we have in the first hour here on Blabor World the 9th, 2026 has been heavy news that you need to know to survive.
And we got more comments coming here.
So, Jim, lead on.
I think we're briefing ourselves for what's coming.
Thank you, Don.
We got a couple of additional stories before Brian comments.
Namely, check this out on the Truth Seeker.
We have photographs of Jeffrey Epstein in Tel Aviv with a couple of bodyguards.
They modified his nose slightly, but I don't have any doubt that is the guy.
Here's another comparison photograph for your.
This was also Jeffrey at a restaurant where Dave the tip of Israel's devious spear doing the Mossad's work.
Compromising, powerful men.
You could see it in his smirk.
It was a devil's call.
It was a devil's call.
Or an angel's foe.
Or an angel's fall.
Will the miscreants escape?
Will the miscreants escape after years of rape?
Who says that Epstein's dead?
Who says that Jeffrey Epstein's dead?
They said that it was suicide, but do we know he's really dead?
Murdered claims, Dr. Michael Biden.
Now there's a man to believe.
From the Kennedy case to George Floyd, he would never deceive.
Just Prince Andrew in the net.
Just Prince Andrew in the net.
What punishment will he get?
What punishment will he get?
What do those secret videos show?
What those secret videos show will we ever know who says that Epstein's dead?
How can we believe what officials said?
It's not like he was some disposable clerk.
There was condescension behind the man's smug smirk.
Who says that Epstein's dead?
His crowd plays by different rules.
The rest of us, they play for fools.
Why believe the man is dead?
Why did they charge him again?
It was a way for them to win.
They brought him up and let him go.
Who runs the country after all?
Don't believe the man is dead.
I think it's wonderful.
GC Dave is a gift.
I need Brian.
Your thoughts, my friend.
Yeah, I guess on Epstein, I could do just like every other commentator out there and, you know, talk about the horrifying gravity of the situation and the depravity of the men behind it.
But I think I would rather take a look at this from an institutional decay perspective and ask the question, what would the founding fathers have done to prevent something like this?
And I think that if the founding fathers were alive to see this Epstein crisis, they wouldn't be surprised by the corruption at all.
As a matter of fact, they built our system, assuming corruption would exist.
But what would trouble them right now is that the people are not taking the appropriate actions to force our institutions to confront it.
So, right now, the institutions appear completely unwilling or simply unable to confront it because of the favor bank and personal ambition to raise in the institutional ladder.
I mean, remember, these are government corporate jobs where the only upward mobility these people have is to continue to work for the government or go find another job with a government-aligned agency.
Madison was very clear about this.
He warned us if men were angels, no government would be necessary.
And because men are not angels, he said government must be designed so that ambition is made to counteract ambition.
And that was the logic behind the checks and balances structure and the open courts and public accountability.
But obviously, we have a major problem with the journalistic structures here in America because the ownership is consolidated.
And that's why you're seeing the rise of a lot of alternative media right now.
Jefferson went even further.
He warned that when people fear the government, there's tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there's liberty.
And a justice system that continues to seal the records, delays accountability, and shields the powerful, teaches the public that not liberty, but instead fear and distrust is what's driving this machine.
Washington cautioned that the greatest threat to the Republic would come not from foreign enemies alone, but from internal decay.
So when institutions lose virtue and faction replaces duty and the law becomes selective, the republic basically enters this collapse phase of self-corrosion.
So, you know, what went wrong here?
It's not the Constitution.
The Founding Fathers anticipated this kind of evil.
What failed was enforcement.
Oversight continued to weaken as we loaded up our institutions with yes men.
All the powers began to consolidate inwards, and Americans were basically not watching because they were too busy watching their televisions and getting brainwashed, and accountability was deferred in the name of stability.
So the system designed to restrain and punish depravity and vice instead learned to quietly manage it and reward those who are silent about it.
So if I was a patriot taking a look at this, which I am, I'm not in despair mode at all.
I want to see this system restored.
The founding fathers didn't want us to trust these institutions blindly.
They demanded that we watch them, challenge them, and correct them.
But when justice fails at the top, legitimacy fails everywhere else, public confidence continues to erode, and the institutions become worthless.
So, this leads to the dangerous position of either a tyranny government that walks too far to try to control civil unrest, or on the other hand, the real patriots begin to start taking action.
The problem is right now, we don't have any leadership out there that's really designing structures for how to do civil disobedience properly.
And instead, you get this substituted FBI-based false flag mechanism that's designed to villainize the Patriots.
Redacted Revelations00:04:00
So, we're in a really bad spot.
And the best way to do this is to basically tear apart the monopoly on the journalistic structures.
Jim, I'd like to make one more comment on the three-plus million files that were released on January 30th is to look at how when he was released from prison, his sleepovers for 13 months in Palm Beach jailhouse.
He had a whole wing to himself, and he was out every day doing whatever he wanted, and he just slept over at night.
But anyway, that sweetheart deal, Dershowitz.
But anyway, the big takeaway is after that, when he was released, what happened?
Every single player in the big sphere of power embraced this man, knowing he raped children.
They ran and flocked to him.
I mean, we have the entertainment, Woody Allen, and a whole bunch of other people in the entertainment were his close buddies.
We have the scientists, all the top scientists, the brave new world types that were, you know, trying to put a basically depopulation on the human population growth.
They were all embracing them.
We have the government leaders still having contact.
There was talk in one of the emails of Don Jr. meeting him in 20, what, 20 or 19 or something like that.
Yeah, 2019, just shortly before, about six months before supposedly he died.
You know, there was talk in an email release of Don Jr. meeting him.
You know, and so it's like we have every walk of life, you know, the top leaders and players, you know, basically embracing this man after it came out to the whole world that he was a pedophile running a black male operation for Israel.
So that tells you a lot about the power structure that's running the earth.
It is satanically driven death cult, and they all were in on it together.
That's what it says.
That's the important takeaway: the ones in control with the power are all players in this death club satanic, and you and I ain't in it, like George Carlin said.
Yes, I think you got it exactly right, Joaquim.
Shocking, stunning, all this nasty stuff.
Meanwhile, because Lane Maxwell has pled the fifth in the House oversight, testimony today is Lane.
Today she pled the fifth.
Meanwhile, as the Epstein files reach Congress, Massey vows to use the nuclear option, namely, Reading the names of the perps in Congress.
Members of Congress will begin reviewing unredacted Justice Department files on convicted sex affairs, Jeffrey starting Monday.
Thomas Massey's Nuclear Option00:15:57
I saw them come out, talk about it with Rokahana.
They're still redacted.
The files they have made available that was supposed to be unredacted remain redacted.
The Associated Press obtained a letter breaking down the agreement with a dozen department lawmakers will be allowed to view more than 3 million previously released stocks at DOJ headquarters, but may not make electronic copies and must provide at least 24 hours notice to access them on the site.
Staff members will not be permitted to assist with the review.
And as I say, Massey is suggesting that if they don't come forward, he will take the measure of releasing the names, I believe, obtained from the witnesses, the victims themselves.
Meanwhile, Trump is furious that Massey is still at 80% in the betting markets.
That means you got to put $4 at risk to win one more dollar if you're going to bet on Thomas Massey.
Although, you know, I think it's a safe bet.
Well, and Donald Trump has endorsed your opponent, correct?
Coming up in so, but the good news is that you drew the top spot on the May 19th primary ballot in a race where name ID is high.
Research shows that it gives a 1% to 2% advantage.
And there it is.
And so that's good news.
Now, Dave, you're still, I think I saw one of those Kapali market, or somebody said you have an 80% chance of winning now.
Even though they're throwing all this money, you know, the Zionists, Miriam Adelson, one of them, they're spending a lot of money to try to discredit you and get you to lose.
So how is that going?
Well, I like looking at those betting markets.
I don't bet on them because it would be insider trading, inside information.
I would clearly, I would bet on myself, obviously.
But I look at that, and I'm surprised I'm at 80% in the betting markets.
That means you got to put $4 at risk to win one more dollar if you're going to bet on Thomas Massey.
Although, you know, I think it's a safe bet.
I'm not encouraging people to bet.
But what's interesting is the people on the internet who are saying Massey doesn't have a chance, or Donald Trump says he just pulls a single-digit number, you know, out of thin air every time he talks about my polling.
He said I'm at 8%, I'm at 9%, I'm at 6%.
If you believe that, there's free money on the betting markets, right?
Like you can spend $1.
My opponent's at 20%.
And if you believe he's going to win, you're going to end up with $5, okay?
Clearly, people don't believe that, or the market would move in the other direction.
Now, I do think it's going to move.
I do think they're going to pummel the crap out of me here pretty soon.
They've got millions of dollars.
We saw it in Jamal Bowman's race.
We saw it in Corey Bush's race where the AIPAC folks said we can't have any dissension.
And I'm even more rare on the Republican side.
On the Democrat side, you have a few dissenters from APAC.
On the Republican side, I'm literally the only one.
So this guy's probably the limit on what they could spend against me, maybe 20 million, maybe more than that.
My own polling shows that I'm ahead.
My opponent has about it's like maybe 15% name ID, maybe 20%.
So when we poll what we do, we don't like to do this, but we want to know the number.
After we get them to answer the first question, we say, oh, by the way, did you know that other guy is endorsed by Donald Trump?
Does that change your mind?
And it does change their mind.
He goes up like 20 points and I go down 10, but I'm still winning by a good margin, even with the counter endorsement from Donald Trump.
So I do like my odds there on the internet.
I would love for some independent group to come in and poll it.
I don't go, you know, I could release my 20-page poll and show everybody where we're at with everything, but they would just discount it because there's so many liars on the internet talking about polls that don't exist or weren't done scientifically.
I so like this guy.
Trump is so furious that Massey's still ahead.
He's actually attacked his wife.
Talk about hitting below.
Thomas Massey is being bullied heavily by Donald Trump.
Thomas Massey is up for reelection.
And although my views don't really align with his politically, except for being anti-war and sending this money, you know, overseas and stuff like that, what Donald Trump is doing to Thomas Massey is downright damn near disrespectful at this point in time because he has now shifted his focus from attacking Thomas Massey to going after his wife.
And I feel like that's the lowest of the low because she is not running for office.
And Thomas Massey, for those who are not aware, he is remarried.
His previous wife died.
So we're talking about someone who lost their former wife.
I think about, it's been about what, a year?
About a year and a half ago.
And now the president of the United States, who he 100% supported and backed, is going after his new wife.
Let's go ahead and get into it here, ladies and gents.
Thomas Massey reveals that FBI Director Kash Patel concluded there were no Epstein clients before reviewing a single interview that could have been, could have implicated 20 alleged clients, including six billionaires.
So this is why Trump is going after Thomas Massey.
But I asked Kash Patel here just recently, the day before he had testified to the Senate that Epstein, even though there were a thousand victims, that Epstein was the only perpetrator.
And so the next day he came to House Judiciary and I said, well, the victims, which we prefer to call survivors, the ones who are still alive, the survivors tell me that you guys have at least 20 names.
And I just, and I don't have the, I told him one of the names, Jess Staley, right, who's the CEO.
Jess Staley is also a banker.
His name has come up quite a bit.
So Thomas Massey let the cat out the bag.
You know, he joined alongside Marjorie Taylor Greene and Rokana to help the Epstein victims here because it's the right thing to do.
And obviously, he's taken a lot of heat from members of his own party and, of course, Donald Trump because he decided to do that.
But what he unveiled in this interview here was that Kash Patel and them are liars, as we all thought, and that not only did they have information, but he was told that they had at least 20 names.
So Kash Patel, Pam Bondi, Dan Bongino were lying through their teeth.
And Donald Trump is mad, not just because Thomas Massey decided to join alongside Rocana and Marjorie Taylor Greene for this effort.
He crossed partisan lines, but also because he didn't do what Trump told him to do.
He didn't bend the knee and he let the cat out the bag.
He let people know that Kash Patel and them were lying.
Let's go.
I think she's doing a totally reasonable job of reporting.
Joaquim, your thoughts about all of the above.
Yeah, the reality is it's a major cover-up.
It has been from the get-go and Massey and Rokana.
And, you know, all the representatives, 434 representatives, senators and House representatives all voted for the Transparency Epstein Files Act, all of them but one.
So, and then Trump signed it.
And so to then come out, it's like a deja vu of last July when the three stooges were out there saying, oh, yeah, there's nobody, there's no clientele list that Epstein had.
He did not supply any underage minors to anybody.
It was just between Max Field and him.
And nobody in this world believes that.
They all know the very rich and powerful, on and on they go.
And the names have been bounced out there for a long, long time, actually.
You know, but they need to be tried in a court of law, you know, and prosecuted, of course.
But we're talking, really, we're talking hundreds of child rapists that are in powerful positions that have been covered and protected.
Among them, Trump, of course, but there's hundreds that are unprosecuted.
And the government that is only loyal to Trump, the dictator, pedophile, is willing to forego, you know, the constitutional law, the rule of law in America, and the American people.
They betray the American people with obstruction of justice, withholding evidence.
That is a major crime.
They're traitors.
And, you know, so are all the representatives in Congress that also take all the money and have also been compromised either as an enabler of pedophilia or pedophiles themselves.
We're talking about the majority of the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Majority that are compromised.
So, you know, for them to negate that, oh, nobody else involved, that's a joke.
It's a horrible joke to try and play on the world.
But my latest article pushes home the point that we're not going away and I don't care.
Don't bring World War III, but even if it does, as it waged the dog so everybody doesn't pay attention to the FC files, it's not going away.
We're here to stay and we're here to demand justice.
We're here to transform the rock that's basically taking control over Washington and basically all the governments of the world.
They're all pretty much in it, especially in the West.
So yeah, this is like as big as any.
And I say, you know, Epstein, as a horrible person, you went silent, Joaquin.
You went silent, Raj.
You're saying Epstein is a horrible person.
Your sound has been cut off amazing.
Brian, Brian, pick it up, Brian.
Look, Massey's most likely to win his district, but you're still going to have this Jewish lobby spending machine dump, you know, between $30 and $50 million into a house race.
And that's going to compress the margins and perhaps increase turnout against him and create a bunch of noise.
What they're really afraid of is not Thomas Massey himself, but it's what Thomas Massey represents, which is the ability to bypass the Trump endorsement and the ability to withstand attacks from the mainstream media that is a completely hardened opposition.
But, you know, Massey's favored.
He's not guaranteed, but he's certainly advantaged.
And this isn't a Jamal Bowman situation where the incumbent has already lost trust.
He's doing a good job.
So if the election is tomorrow, Massey likely wins.
But the bigger question is, if Massey wins, what's actually beginning to take root?
And let's be clear, he doesn't represent a third party.
He's not like a cult of personality.
He's not a populist media movement.
And he's not a Trump counter movement.
He's rejected all those paths.
So what he's really building is like a strain, a constitution first, instead of personality first, procedural system that is skeptical of executive power, regardless of what party.
It's going to be hostile to any permanent emergency governance, which we need very much right now.
And it feels more like a Madisonian type Republicanism with a bit of a civil libertarian restraint on it.
Now, Massey has not submitted to total party discipline because his district trusts him completely.
So the proof of concept works, and that's going to inspire 5 to 15 similar figures nationally to begin to rise in their districts because they're going to start taking Massey type realignment very seriously.
And that's going to work very, very well to displace these entrenched institutional systems that have been failing us.
Not because he's radical, but because he's predictable about how he'll respond to corruption.
So if Massey wins, he's not going to found a new party.
Well, what he's going to prove is that constitutional independence can survive even within the Republican Party.
And that's going to scare the institutions that depend on the Republicans all aligning themselves together with Trump.
And it's going to scare Trump.
So I would venture to say that if Massey wins, he's going to create a whole new strain of patriot, and they're not going to be called MAGA.
Yeah, and I predict he will win indeed.
You make very nice points.
Washington Post's Credibility Crisis00:16:38
Meanwhile, House Republicans are fleeing the majority in jeopardy.
Check this out.
Georgia Republican Mary Lautermeyer has announced he's not going to run for re-election, becoming the 29th House Republican to abandon ship in what has become an historic exodus threatening the party's narrow congressional majority ahead of the critical 2026 midterms.
Lautermark joined 28 other House Republican clean Congress, outnumbering Democrat departures and raising concerns about the GOB's ability to hold power.
Total congressional retirements reach a modern record of 54 lawmakers announcing before the election year, signaling unprecedented dissatisfaction.
Republican departures create opportunities for Democrat gains and open seats during an historically challenging midterm cycle for the majority party.
Wave of exits comes amid reported frustration with partisan gridlock, redistricting challenges, and tension over Trump's second term agenda.
More Epstein's monster.
The real story is how we are ruled.
For the past year, I've investigated what I know about the Epstein piles.
He's figured out the main themes.
Something I found most interesting was what he had to say about cultural impact.
Steven Pinker appears in at least one video sitting behind Epstein on his private jet.
Stephen Hawkings was a friend who visited the island for a second.
Hawking is in a wheelchair.
Noam Chomsky sympathized with Epstein and considered him the victim of a witch hunt.
Woody Allen was a frequent dinner guest in bars arranged by Jewish talent agent and society fixer Peggy Siegel, another friend of Epstein.
In his phone recording, Woody Allen is accused by his then-wife, Mia Farrell, of raping their baby daughter.
Allen went on to marry his adoptive daughter, Soon Yeh.
Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dunnett were flown on Bennett's Jet 2 in 2002.
This article shows how some of Epstein courted connection with Silicon Valley and popular scientists.
He kept an office at Harvard.
His many connections are mentioned here.
Maomi Wolf published a July 2025 article on the network, which touched on Epstein's influence on science and culture, broken by agents like John Brockman.
And why is the mainstream press silent on Epstein?
Winter Watch Reports.
CNN, Jewish.
Fox News, Rothschild Puppet.
MSNBC, now, MS Now, Jewish.
ABC News, Jewish.
NBC News, Jewish.
CBS News, Jewish.
New York Times, Jewish.
Bloomberg, Jewish.
Washington Post, Jewish.
Every single aspect of the media is Jewish.
And rest in peace.
The Washington Post.
This is from Jefferson Morley, who has a site called JFK Facts.
And for reasons I shall not review, I've been skeptical of his role within JFK research.
A friend wrote a gloat over the evisceration of Washington Post, a newspaper and website where I, Jefferson Morley, worked for 15 years.
This is predictable enough in the right-wing media, but lamentable when coming from friends and JFK facts readers.
Let me quote extensively so I can dispatch definitively my friend wrote.
And let me say I agree with all of this.
I read with amusement a Peggy Noonan column on Feb 6 regarding the recent layoffs at the Washington Post and her lament on losing a great newspaper.
That was a thing of journalistic grandeur from some point in the 1960s through some point in the 2020s.
That timeline is interesting as it was in the 60s when the public began to lose almost total confidence in government and the media.
It's been downhill since.
While technology and social media account for a huge portion of the change, it was the cowardice of journalists and newspapers when they succumbed to the CIA's propaganda through Operation Mockingbird.
The CIA penetrated newspapers, had at least 400 journalists and Patsys chronicled by Carl Bernstein of the Post, including the Post Bob Woodward, and the media became not a watchdog against bad government, but a mouthpiece for it in covering up the truth about JFK's assassination, a war in Vietnam, Watergate,
and the various coups the CIA and the National Security State continue to perpetuate.
He claims his fails on multiple grounds, but no, I don't think so.
And Joachim, I welcome your thoughts.
Well, yeah, we've known that the Washington Post, along with the New York Times and all the major publications in mainstream media, are all just pulp propaganda platforms for the government.
It's a fascist basically takeover, a merger between big media, big tech, and big government.
That's the bottom line.
And the military-industrial complex.
And if you analyze all of it, controlled by Jews and Israel, all of it, all of it.
That's why we're having wars.
That's why everything else is going wrong.
And the Epstein and the rest of it.
You know, it goes on and on.
But good riddance to the Washington Post.
My understanding is they have been laying off, you know, and Bezos, Jeff Bezos, you know, they took over the Washington Post a few years back.
Yeah, another Amazon idiot.
But anyway, the Washington Post and the New York Times, all the major publications, they're unloading their employees.
They can't afford it anymore.
That's because they didn't get the memo that mainstream media, nobody pays attention to anymore.
That's the bottom line.
And they haven't for many years now, actually.
It's been a process where obviously the internet and alt news were the ones that are actually delivering the news to the people, particularly the younger generations.
And the people that are still reading the New York Times and Washington, they're usually very old and they're just set in their ways and don't know better.
So, you know, but yeah, good riddance to all of the mainstream media that are just pure liars, pure propagandists, you know, on and on and on.
At one time, yes, they did serve a purpose.
They were much more accurate reporters about what's going on, but they haven't been there for many, many decades.
So it's time to move on.
It's now the alt news world and podcasts and all the rest.
I'm old school because I still like to write.
And that's where my forte is, is in the writing.
Spontaneous speaking, yeah, I dent and get all this anger, but you know, I'm not about popularity.
I'm not about being an influencer and all the rest.
I'm just about talking the truth.
That's my main objective in everything I do.
So there you go.
Brian.
The Washington Post didn't die just because it lied all the time.
Sometimes I think that the reporters over there knew that their inside sources were just institutional talking points.
It's dying or it died because it lost the courage to confront institutions.
And that makes a difference when you work for the institution thinking that the institution is what's going to butter your bread instead of getting out on the streets and doing actual reporting.
Then you're going to find yourself caught up in a web of lies no matter how you cut it.
Now, a lot of people might think that it was Trump 1.0 that killed the media.
That's not true.
Trump just exposed the fragile state of it.
It didn't invent distrust of the press.
He basically just weaponized the fracture that came as a result of Vietnam and JFK and Iraq and intelligence failures and financial crisis coverage and Anthony Weiner and Hillary Clinton and all the rest.
So Back in 2016, the media might have told some truth, but the truths that it told didn't threaten the power structure.
Trump just simply exploited the fact that they were so weak.
And the Washington Post's tragedy is almost purely editorial.
I mean, a newspaper ought to be more than its opinions column and its mistakes.
It ought to be out there exposing corruption and breaking real stories and publishing truths that are uncomfortable to the institutions that it's covering.
But they wouldn't cross that line anymore with intelligence agencies being what they are and this whole national security safety first sort of religion that's come over.
So they basically just lost their spine and the structure died along with it.
You know, the problem is that independent media where people are hired to go find stories was replaced with simple, easy access where you get an email from an institution's representative.
And therefore, that's the beginning of the story.
You might as well just be deploying artificial intelligence to pump out propaganda at a particular angle.
And that's really all they came to be.
So they didn't, they're not journalists and they deserve to die.
Trump 1.0 was the breaking point of the foundation and they've never been able to recover from any of that.
So what's left?
Everybody's resistance and the mainstream media tells the truth.
Yeah, nobody believes that anymore, especially on the right-hand side where guys were willing to break loose from the system, set up their own shop and do a good job.
Like, and I hate to say it, but Tucker Carlson, Megan Kelly.
I mean, I still haven't heard an apology from any of them about the bullshit that they pushed, but that's the way it was.
So the Washington Post, their final failure was handcuffs and prison cells of laziness and collaboration with the institutions rather than journalism.
And that's where you go to die if you're in that game.
Yeah, I agree.
I think they lost credibility.
The public no longer believed in them.
And, you know, that meant they weren't going to survive.
Meanwhile, Jimmy Dore, Charlie Kirk is not dead.
He's got a guess.
He's got a good point with Ridgetop Hysterius.
Ridgetop started in 2002 with one truck and the simple promise.
So bizarre by themselves.
And then you're like, well, what if it's a publicity stunt?
And it literally, every single question that I've had, it's like, man, I don't know.
Because it sounds totally, it sounds insane, but I don't know what else to make of all of this stuff except if there's like one solution.
Anyway, I'm going to put it together.
I'm not saying that that is definitely the case by any stretch of the imagination.
I don't know what it is.
But that's the first thing that I looked at that answered more than like one question in a vacuum.
Like, is it possible?
It seems like it would answer a lot of questions, but I don't know.
You know, I don't know.
So you're saying that if Charlie's still alive and this whole thing makes sense.
Then Candace played that recording of her after how Candace didn't react right after her funeral and all that stuff.
None of the people acted as though he was really dead.
This is his point.
The video of her kind of draping herself over Charlie the night that Trump won.
And I'm like, man, also seems normal.
And Charlie seems to very much trust her and they seem really close.
I can't make this make sense.
Then Candace played that recording of her after the memorial and she's elated.
There's not a, there's, there's no grief, no grief, like none.
And I stopped, that's when I started going, dude, is it insane to think it's possible that he could actually be alive?
And this is a huge publicity stunt.
And so at that point, I went and started looking back.
And I'm telling you, like, I'm going to put this video out either tomorrow morning or tomorrow afternoon as kind of like the starting point.
But every single thing that I, every single thing that I've looked at from that day that I just was going, what is going on?
Why are they behaving like this?
If you insert publicity stunt, it answers it.
Every single one, literally without exception.
You got Farnsworth on the wall.
They shot Charlie.
They shot Charlie.
It's like the least convincing thing I've ever seen.
You got Mike McCoy, who just like gets on the phone and starts walking away the second that Charlie gets shot.
You've got the, you've got Charlie getting carried to the truck.
There's no blood trail.
These guys with the first aid bags walk up and try to help.
They're like, nope, we don't need any help from first aid.
They carried him.
He has a neck wound.
That makes no sense.
You've got, you know, you've got people afterwards who are behaving like there's nothing else.
And then there's about 10, you got the security guards over him, they're like smiling at each other while they've got a principal who supposedly just got his head blown off.
None of it makes any sense, unless what?
You got Kash Patel who blocks the, he blocks Tulsi from looking into whether there's foreign intelligence.
All of these things are so bizarre by themselves.
And then you're like, well, what if it's a publicity stunt?
And it literally, every single question that I've had, it's like, man, I don't know.
Because it sounds totally, it sounds insane, but I don't know what else to make of all of this stuff except if there's like one solution.
Auschwitz Shooting Allegations00:02:15
Anyway, I'm going to put it together.
I'm not.
I don't think the word publicity stunt is right.
That it was a stayed shooting to save his life.
That's what he should be talking about.
The wound on the neck moves around.
The blood doesn't soak into the clothing.
It actually reverses.
It was added by CGI.
And there's even a crowd scene where they're reacting allegedly one would have thought to the shooting, but in fact, the tent is empty.
It's a rehearsal, a crisis crowd rehearsal they actually played on ABC.
I don't know what more one needs to be convinced.
And of course, I've already played Jeffrey alive today.
I move that up.
Meanwhile, oh, DC Dave, who said that Epstein's dead?
I love it.
And here we have a clip.
This was an SS offer from Auschwitz saying how he never saw any gas chambers or any blood.
I mean, this is.
Army officer arrived to testify for the defense.
Tees Christofferson was posted to Auschwitz in 1944.
He said he only heard of mass Jewish deaths there after the war.
He said he never saw evidence of mass gassings.
As Tees Christofferson tells it, Auschwitz was a clean and happy work camp.
He was there in 1944 studying the production of synthetic rubber, and he says he talked to inmates almost every day.
Testifying through a German interpreter, Christofferson said the air at Auschwitz was very clean.
There was no smell of burning flesh, no evidence of gas chambers.
Because there weren't any.
It was indeed a labor camp.
And Here we have a spectacular pro-ICE ad aired during the Super Bowl.
We'll take a look at this.
It's very short, but I agree it is effective.
They're friends and neighbors, sons, fathers, their little league coaches and veterans.
They're people who love this country.
These are immigration and customs enforcement officers.
Cdc's New Childhood Immunization Schedule00:03:34
They are removing violent criminals from our streets and neighborhoods.
It's dangerous and difficult work.
But ICE has one mission: to make America a safer place to live.
And that's what they're doing.
This is law enforcement.
This is ICE.
Yes, I think that's right.
And there was Stop Anti-Semitism Super Bowl ad that backfired.
we'll see if it'll play this ad anyway that's been flashing in san francisco and a bunch of other cities i believe We're calling it the pedal.
So what happened?
I can't answer that, but we can't hear it.
We'll let it go.
Finally, well, we have vaccine shock.
States are breaking away.
America's once-unified childhood vaccination playbook is splintering after a fast-track CDC rewrite, leaving parents between Washington's focus schedule and a growing list of states refusing to follow it.
The CDC adopted a revised childhood immunization schedule January 5th, following President Trump's December 5th directive to compare U.S. practice with pure nations.
The new federal approach reduces several universal vaccine recommendations and leans more on risk-based guidance and shared clinical decision-making.
As of January 20th, KFF report 28 states plus DC are rejecting the CDC schedule for summer all-vaccine created a patchwork with no single national standards.
Federal officials say insurance coverage will remain in place for vaccine previously recommended through 2026, even as recommendations change.
Acting CDC Director Jim O'Neill signed a decision memorandum adopting updated childhood immunization guidance after a scientific assessment ordered by President Trump.
The stated goal was to align the U.S. schedule with international best practices from peer countries and rebuild public trust after years of declining confidence.
The new schedule keeps several vaccines as universal recommendations while shifting others toward high-risk or shared decision-making models.
The move appears to me to be fully warranted and appropriate.
Joaquim, have we got you here, my friend?
I cannot see you if we can go ahead and address the issues.
I see him.
Brian.
He's gone.
Brian.
You're muted.
Brian, you're muted.
Yeah.
Okay.
So I guess I'm going to try to run an analysis on the new information related to vaccines.
Evident Lies Masked Truth00:06:23
I never trusted them.
The Amish don't have any, and they don't have any autism either.
Jimmy Doerr recently run a pretty extensive clip dealing with the CDC knew all along, but there was so much money in it.
The previous stories that we dealt with have to do with these mainstream media or semi-mainstream media guys that are now beginning to realize that all the people that they thought died in false flag events aren't really dead.
Duh.
But those of us who have been around for a long time that actually understand the game have been saying these people weren't dead for a long, long time.
Nobody believed us because everybody wanted to synchronize some form of the mainstream media story with the evidence and the facts.
And so they came up with some sort of weird hybrid solution where you've got some sort of blend of something's off.
I can't really tell what it is because the cognitive dissonance just won't go away that you've been lied to and you've believed a lie and you've allowed the fallacy of mass belief to change your mind and drive you a particular direction instead of following the evidence.
And that's the problem that we have.
We've been dealing with this for years.
Oh yeah, well, yeah, Sandy Hook wasn't right and it was fake, but the kids still died.
People still died.
Oh, Las Vegas, that wasn't right.
But people still died.
We have to admit that if we want to have any sort of credibility out there.
This has been happening for so long.
And we've been exposing it for how many years now, Jim?
30, 40 years.
These people don't, when they run these media propaganda operations, these people aren't killed.
They're just simply redeployed.
And it's the fake identity that gets killed.
Ask me.
I'm a private investigator.
I know who's real and who's not.
I know which names are real and which aren't.
I don't expose it on because it creates too much liability, but I certainly understand it and I know it.
And I can even track the characters that are inside these false flags.
But I don't want to go there because I just find that it's more trouble than it's worth as you get deeper and deeper and deeper down the rabbit hole.
Besides, everybody says, oh, you're crazy.
Well, we know exactly what's taking place and we have known it for years.
You should have been listening to us a long time ago.
I told you Charlie Kirk wasn't dead.
I told you Jeffrey Epstein wasn't dead.
I told you that the day after he died because I found the earliest and most reliable post related to being extracted from the cell.
I told you that these people aren't dead, but that's okay.
We take it one step at a time and we try to win one mind at a time.
Now, the fact that these mainstream media guys are still trying to come up with some hybrid strategy where it's sort of a synchronized blend of what they used to believe and what they're now coming to believe.
And so they come up with these weird dinosaurs of ideas like people are really dead, but the event was fake or staged.
You know, we've been seeing this for years.
It's worthless to even argue with these people.
Joaquim, I'm glad to have you back.
Your thoughts, my friend.
I think I'm on a record now for the number of times they make sure I don't talk, you know?
Crazy.
Yeah, there's a whole industry, you know, the crisis actors and the false.
It's an industry now.
And that's they keep cranking them out, you know?
Charlie Kirk, yeah, you and I, Jim, quite a ways back.
In fact, within about three days after the death, quote death, you know, quote death with Epstein, you know, we were like, I'm not so sure about this one.
And more evident, more evident.
Yeah.
So it's another one, you know, yep.
And but I'm not even going to get into the details.
They're very well covered.
You know, and the same applies to Epstein.
And then the, oh, yeah, I was talking about, you know, when it comes to Israel, you can't do this or that or that because there's all these laws.
Well, another one that I forgot to mention earlier, and it was touched on in the latest stories.
You can't be a Holocaust denier.
There's another one.
They'll take you away for that, you know.
So, yeah, I mean, the whole thing, that was another conjured up Jewish thing, you know, make everybody feel guilty so they can use the race card and anti-Semitism card against you.
You know, on and on and on, you know, it gets old.
You know, and then the vaccine.
Yeah.
You know, there's some kind of regimen where, you know, the kids are getting like, I don't know, 75, maybe it's even more than that now.
75 pokes of poison into their bodies, their little young bodies, you know.
And then we wonder about the autism rates soaring and all of this kind of shit.
You know, with the COVID and the vaccines, the trust that the American people has in the medical establishment and in the government is gone.
And in the big pharma industry, number one, it's gone.
The human immune system is a wonderful mechanism by which humans are able to negate disease and all kinds of contraction of this and that.
And the injections, yeah, big pharma wants us.
So they put poison in the back.
I'm glad that more and more people are getting it.
Oh, looks like I'm frozen again.
No, no, we got you back.
I'm Absolutely Shocked00:01:37
We got you back.
But yeah, it was brief.
Go ahead.
Keep going.
Oh, but not your voice is out.
Oh, Akeema, this is a new record.
This is a new record.
This is a new record.
I'm shocked.
I'm absolutely shocked.
Well, Kim, we cannot hear a word.
We cannot hear a word.
Don, where are we?
Time-wise, I think we're there, right?
Oh, we're perfectly fine.
I did a good job on that.
Yeah, too bad we're having some technical problems, but I think they are trying to hack us.
I know I've been attacked.
Not a lot of doubt about it.
Not a lot of doubt.
I think it was seven times with Joachim in one show.
Seven times.
Don, take us.
I guess that means we're doing something right.
I think it does.
That's not a good sign at all.
If you're doing something right and getting their taxpayer, you know, in a free world.
Man, this is a free show, Truth versus News Incorporated.
And we spent a lot of time and energy to put this together.
Jim is just a marvelous gentleman doing this.
And so this is February the 9th, 2016, 2026.
Yeah.
And thank you so much for watching and please share this because there's things you're going to hear here you won't hear anywhere else that need to be heard and dealt with.
So pass it along, put it on, post it as you can anywhere.