All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 27, 2026 - Jim Fetzer
59:42
Truth vs. NEW$ Inc, Part 2 (26 January 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
|

Time Text
Train Crashes in Spain 00:06:24
Welcome back, folks, to Truth vs. News Incorporated.
All that news out there is shaking the world here.
And this is the 26th of January, 2026.
And by golly, we got lots going.
So Jim, lead on what we got now.
Oh, thank you, Don.
Yes, yes, yes.
Well, we got more going on in the Middle East.
Jonathan Cook says Trump board of peace is the final nail in Gaza's coffin.
U.S. President Trump has declared the three-month ceasefire in Gaza a great success and now wants to move to phase two of his so-called peace plan.
What does success look like?
Israeli soldiers killed more than 460 Palestinians since October, including at least 100 children.
Israel's level another 2,500 buildings, the last of the few still standing.
And amid a continuing humanitarian catastrophe, it'd be Israel.
There's a blockade of food, water, medicine, shelter.
At least eight babies are known to have frozen to death as winter temperatures plummet.
Marking the transition to the new phase, Trump announced last Friday a board of peace to determine the enclave's future.
Peace here is being used in exactly the same Orwellian sense as ceasefire.
This is not about ending Gaza's suffering.
It's about creating Big Brother style narrative control, selling it peace, the final eradication of Palestinian life in Gaza.
The narrative spin is that once Hambas is disarmed, the board will take on the job of Gaza's reconstruction.
The implicit assumption is life will gradually return to normal for the survivors of the two genocide Israel has carried out, though no Western leader is acknowledging it as a genocide or cares to find out how many Palestinian have actually been killed.
But as we shall see, peace is definitely not what the board is aiming to achieve.
It's a cynical exercise in smoke and mirrors.
The term board hints not only at Trump preference for the language of business over politics, but alludes to the business opportunities he intended to make from Gaza's transformation.
His plan is to strip the United Nations and thereby the International Committee of any oversight of Gauss's fate.
We're back to the time of viceroys.
Colonialism is again out and proud.
Meanwhile, Israelis are openly boasting of more train wrecks in Spain, which had the gall to endorse a Palestinian state.
So speaking on something of which Spain has been most proud, it's a very sophisticated system of high-speed rail.
Israelis are openly boasting on that.
There'll be more train crashes in Spain.
Yes, there are going to be more train crashes in Spain.
That's why every decent human must fight this cancer.
I hope our brothers and sisters in Spain to go over there and catch these terrorists.
Monstrous.
Meanwhile, Greenland's sovereignty is a problem.
Won't fly with Trump's security vision.
President Trump has been explicit about what the Greenland framework is meant to achieve.
It's not a symbolic gesture, not a temporary partnership, not an exercise in diplomatic niceties.
Trump has repeatedly described the deal as long-term, infinite, and forever, because in his view, U.S. security demands arrangements that cannot be undone by foreign politics.
That framing matters.
Trump is not negotiating for access.
He is negotiating for certainty.
And certainty is exactly what traditional notions of sovereignty refuse to provide.
Sovereignty is often discussed as if it were an abstraction or a moral principle.
In reality, it is a mechanism for political reversal.
Sovereignty means that the people of Greenland or the political leadership of Denmark retain the right to change course.
They can hold a referendum.
They can elect a new government.
They can reinterpret agreements.
They can demand withdrawal from Trump perspective.
That makes sovereignty compatible with permanent U.S. security operations.
A defense posture that can be overturned by a vote in Nuke or Copenhagen is not a defense posture at all.
It is a lease at a landlord's whim.
And Trump has made clear he does not defend leases.
The latest report I have is Trump wants to buy Greenland for 700 billion bucks with an additional 100,000 to each of the 57,000 residents of Greenland.
But I've not seen that spelled out anywhere, Joaquin.
Your thoughts.
Yeah, I heard he put a price tag on every citizen of Denmark, all 56,000 or whatever.
Yeah.
Well, you know, we talk about sovereignty and sovereign nations, but really it doesn't exist anymore.
There is no sovereign nations anymore.
Venezuela's Destructionbyss 00:08:00
It's a lawless world led by Trump, the dictator.
He does not believe in international law.
It's obvious by his actions.
So he's just going to grab.
He's a land grabber.
I mean, he's been at it for a while now.
And he's making all these accusations that, you know, he's grabbed.
He's not got control of the government of Venezuela, but he says he's got, you know, control of Venezuela.
He's going after Mexico, Panama.
I mean, you know, that's that part of the world, you know, and then he's, you know, making war everywhere else, too.
And this Greenland thing, he's not able to let go.
He's going to do brute force and impose this on the rest of the world.
However, the rest of the world is not going to just sit back passively and keep taking it, caking it on the chin.
He's created such a backlash of really hatred against it.
You know, he's a menace to the whole entire world because he endangers the safety and lives of every single human being on this earth with his brute force policy of thuggery.
We've never seen anything like it in our lifetime.
And I don't think any U.S. president in history has exercised such dictatorial kind of actions ever that I can recall.
So, yeah, it's a bad situation getting worse, and it's not going to be a good outcome for America or for that matter, Trump.
He's going down just like Israel is going to be going down.
And speaking of Israel, yeah, they are the assassination squad of the earth.
They know how to do it.
They are the true terrorists.
Let's face it, U.S., and I've been saying this a long time too: U.S. and Israel are the true terrorists.
They twist all the semantics around to blame others, like in the form of Islamic terrorists.
No, they don't have any of that compared to the death and destruction caused by the U.S. and Israel.
So, and the facts that have come out about the casualty, the number of deaths through U.S. terrorism.
And then, you know, the whole board of peace, that's just another investment he's going to make more money on.
He's what?
He's charging a billion per member of the board.
I mean, it's unbelievable that this guy's coming up with all this shit.
And America and the world is sitting there just kind of like dumbfounded by how much audacity this bastard has.
He's just setting it up for the world crisis of World War III all around.
And a very bad ending for him.
And unfortunately, he's going to take America down.
But then, as I allude to in many of my articles, that's the purpose.
He is basically the wrecking ball of America to destroy.
That's why he has his job.
That's why they reinserted this bastard into the position he's in right now to take down America and you might say even the whole world.
What an ingenious plan.
Brian, your thoughts.
Yeah, it's very interesting how all three of these stories contain different elements that get to the same thing, which is where do the power structures exist when this is all said and done.
I got to say that their plan here is pretty smart.
The more I understand more about it, if you can, and I'm going to get to Jonathan Cook's point first, if you can weaponize language, then you no longer need to say peace means reconciliation and diplomacy.
It means peace means a process that we've applied without any sense of justice.
So peace now is equivalent to boards and frameworks and initiatives, which basically dumb down the idea of what's right and what's wrong and instead put it in the hands of a super powerful elite that have been appointed to different positions to administratively bury tragedies like Gaza and others.
And so truth as a casualty of war is the first thing that goes.
And then it's going to be bodies that actually die as a result of the truth that becomes the casualty.
So I would say that this false fake peace thing that they're driving isn't a mistake at all.
It's a strategy designed to give them more power.
Now, the second article was the Spain trash train crash discourse.
And, you know, the key signal here is that they're boasting modern power doesn't need to destroy everything.
It just needs to undermine confidence and give the people a reason to fear and normalize this function.
So now train populations are to expect failure.
And it's sort of a a psychological warfare against civilian life when they basically say we have the power to shut down your entire system.
I think what they're really doing here is testing something very, very dark, which is how far can we push the people before they're going to say that we're tired of being tested here.
And then the third one was Greenland.
And this is a good example of where does all this lead.
It's sovereignty in Greenland is now reframed as inconvenient to American security and geography is now reduced to security assets.
Folks, don't forget Greenland's a sovereign nation.
So let's go ahead and mask the resource control and strategic denial as a security vision.
And that will give you the framework for a post-nation world order that all comes down to what the powers determine needs to be done rather than whether or not consent is justified or whether or not this power is justified.
So if sovereignty is disposable everywhere you look, then it's temporary everywhere you look.
We've lost our language, therefore we've lost our law.
And if we've lost our law and we've lost our language, we've lost all sense of justice.
And we might as well just concede to the new world order and lay down and play dead.
If people were awake enough to see it the way I see it, they'd be fighting mad at a government that's completely out of control.
The problem is you're talking to a brick wall.
Nobody cares.
Nobody cares.
Influence And Bribery 00:11:52
Wow.
Meanwhile, what was the theme of Trump's first year back in office?
Each week, off the wire, looks a variety of stories.
Trump's second year's theme is determination.
AP reporters say.
Determination.
They're also reading more about it.
Video.
Israeli billionaires boast about how they dominate the U.S. government.
Yes, they don't make any bones about it.
Here we have Kim Iverson, who's proven to be a very smart gal.
I'm quite impressed.
American politics.
They don't deny that this is exactly what they're doing.
You have Haim Sabin.
He's an Israeli-American billionaire media executive, extremely influential political donor, specifically to Democratic politics, whereas Miriam Adelson, they're on the stage with him, donates to Republicans.
So both sides there happily getting along, gleefully chatting about how they buy U.S. politicians.
This is what Haim Sabin had to say.
We had many sessions here about how important it is to get involved, to build a relationship with politicians and to have access.
You both mastered that.
So can you share with us, I want everyone to learn today.
How do you build a relationship with the politicians?
You both mastered that, by the way.
He says, You both mastered that, like the buying of American politicians.
So, how do you do it?
I understand what you're asking, but I want to be cautious how I...
Well, you just get a guy named Epstein and you blackmail them.
That's what you do.
It's a system that we did not create.
It's a system that's in place.
And we just play within the system.
The contribution and the financial support grants you the access.
Oh my God!
He admitted!
He's not wrong.
It's not really their fault that they're able to do what they do.
It's our fault.
It's our system.
The system's in place, and our politicians are up for sale.
Now, Miriam Addison was asked the same question.
This is what she says.
Miri, you and Sheldon created a lot of relationship over the years with politicians.
I want you to share with everyone why it is so important and how do you do it.
Again, writing checks is part of it, but there is more than writing just checks.
So how do you do it?
Can you allow me not to answer?
You choose.
I want to be truthful, and there are so many things that I don't want to talk about.
I mean, first of all, what is she talking about that she can't talk about?
That's suspicious.
I'm just going to say Epstein.
Again, there's just a lot of money behind it and a lot of influence behind it and a lot of brainwashing and blackmailing.
And that is what's behind our politicians waving the Israeli flag, gleefully censoring Americans.
They're advocating for the benefit of a foreign country.
We have to somehow change the rules, somehow change the rules of the game in order to prevent this from happening now and from happening again.
She's, I say again, she's very good.
Meanwhile, Joaquim reinstalled fascist dictator Trump's death to America paves way to dystopian hell.
I'll begin a part and Joaquin can add more.
The writing's been on the wall for some time.
Every embired decline desperately lashes out tyrannically during its final days of crumbling power.
And there's always a Nero or Trump having sold their soul to the devil for fame, fortune, and now borrowed time survival.
As soon as Donald Trump allowed the Rothschilds as the Jewish eight-pounders to repeatedly bay him out of bankruptcy and was out blackmail operation and travel him as a protected pedophile, it's only a matter of time before the dastardly criminal truth finally surfaces to bring Trump's day of retribution ever nearer.
Along with nearly the entire AIPAC bribed and blackmailed the U.S. Congress, Israel holds Donald Trump in firm grip by the balls.
He knows if the Epstein bombs get fully released as mandated by his own signed Epstein Transparency Act, with 99% still unreleased over a month after that December 19th deadline for several reasons.
Trump will soon no longer be president.
Caught between the rock and a hard place, the least present traitor of the American people must comply with his Zionist Israel first orders, plunging humanity into World War III with another unprovoked, imminent Israel-U.S. joint attack on Iran.
Overwhelming evidence continues piling up to confirm that the oldest city in U.S. president in history, just months away, an octogenarian, is crumbling under the mounting pressure of full-blown exposure as a pedophile.
His brazen recklessness now endangering our planet makes it more than obvious that he'd rather ignite World War III than face prosecution for his rape and sodomy of children.
The latest revelation of child rape survivor Sasha Riley, on top of Trump's long history with Jeffrey Epstein, are destined to topple the Trump second term presidency unless preempted by World War III.
Joachim, further thoughts, my friend.
Well, I mean, you know, it's pretty obvious from the earlier clip with Iverson that, you know, they use money, bribery, it's outright bribery through APAC.
That's a foreign entity, and it's the only nation on earth, Israel, that allow is allowed that.
Every other nation has to, you know, do the foreign, you know, the foreign registration act, agency registration act, um, compliance.
So, yeah, it's outright bribery.
And then, of course, the Epstein and P. Diddy, and there's a whole bunch of others out there pushing all the kids to the, you know, VITs.
You know, that's the way they get sexual blackmail extortion control.
And it's been this way now for a long, long time in America.
That's why our government does not serve Americans.
It serves Israel.
It's never been clearer or more blatant in our face than right now.
So, and their man, you know, he's a Jew, he's a Shabbat Jew.
He is basically representing this satanic death cult, which is basically the whole Israel project.
And, you know, we're reaping the horror of what he's doing as the world dictator right now.
So, you know, it's just a matter of time before finally there will be a force of resistance that steps up and starts making an impact to change the outcome.
Because if a force does not step up in the near future, the whole human race, I'm afraid, could become extinct.
Brian, your thoughts?
Yeah, I kind of want to take these one step at a time here.
You've got Trump's first year back, and that sort of deals with the surface theme versus the real theme.
And of course, what is he trying to project?
That his first year is resulting in strength, restoration, and decisiveness.
But the reality is he's consolidating executive authority, federal enforcement, and this security first framework instead of fixing the problems that are fundamental to our particular form of government.
So, what he's projecting is that the way that you win this is not with justice and rights and with proper words and with court fight.
It's you win through force and leverage.
Now, that might be the reality of where we're at on certain issues, but the problem is if the foundation is so crooked and rotten institutionally, how are you going to build a force and leverage platform that has any actual bite to it on top of a bad foundation?
So, what he's doing is just basically appealing to populism, which got him through the election, and now he's just simply consolidating power.
As for the next article, I think it was the billionaire clips, how they get power.
They don't feel like they need to hide the truth any longer.
They're saying it openly now.
Influence is obvious.
It doesn't need to hide.
It's, I mean, the quiet part that they won't say out loud is that there are no more consequences if you play the game with us.
And so they're trying to reframe the power structures as I have the legal high ground to, as long as I control the influence, my outcome is inevitability.
Whereas democratic processes are basically just going to be reduced to pure theater.
So power is boasting right now that it thinks resistance is futile and it's no longer credible whatsoever, and that our democracy has nothing to do with the actual word and the actual foundations of what it means.
It's just simply no longer credible.
And then I think part of that was sort of the donor sovereignty over voter sovereignty, who actually governs elections decide administrators.
They don't decide policy boundaries whatsoever.
And billionaire influence completely operates across parties, administrations, and totally outside of public accountability.
And Trump's role is to play right into it, channeling this sort of populist anger while he allows his donor classes to really draw the lines.
So all the voters get to do is choose the driver of the vehicle, but the donors get to choose the destination of the vehicle.
It's getting to be a pretty dumb system overall.
And I think Joachim's article was right on in terms of what it all means for where we're at.
We've got a system that's so rotten and so broken that it's going to be very, very difficult to correct at this point.
And Donald Trump promised us during the first administration that he was going to correct us.
Remember, drain the swamp, get rid of the bad guys, get rid of the power influences and structures.
Well, show me the purple walk.
It's getting old.
Secured Settlement with Columbia University 00:05:56
It hasn't happened.
Turns out Trump himself is part of this swamp, just has a slightly different cast to it.
Actually, more overtly Israeli, as I see it.
Meanwhile, Pat Bondi brags about prosecuting Americans for anti-Israel speech.
She actually brags about it.
This is more than we have secured a $200 million settlement with Columbia University for violating the civil rights of Jewish students and Jewish employees.
We've secured a $75 million settlement with Northwestern University for anti-Semitic conduct.
We've secured a $60 million settlement with Cornell that includes provisions to halt anti-Semitic conduct.
And we've launched a full investigation into the University of California's system for systematic anti-Semitism.
Remember when Donald Trump said this about who controls him?
And it was the Jewish Zionist donor, Sheldon Adelson.
Just as I promised I recognized Israel's eternal capital and opened the American embassy in Jerusalem.
Jerusalem became the capital.
I also recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.
You know, Miriam and Sheldon would come into the White House probably almost more than anybody outside of people that work there.
And they were always after, and as soon as I give them something, always for Israel.
As soon as I'd give them something, they'd want something else.
I said, give me a couple of weeks, will you please?
But I gave them the Golan Heights, and they never even asked for it.
You know, for 72 years.
Okay, so remember, so that's here he is saying.
Miriam Adelson, you want to come up here?
Come up here, Miriam.
Miriam gave my campaign indirectly and directly $250 million.
She was number one.
When somebody can give you $250 million, I think that we should give her the opportunity to say hello.
And Miriam, make it quick.
So there he is, just telling you, he's bought by the Adelsons.
They gave him $250 million.
That's it.
And so here's now Pam Bondi being introduced, his attorney general, being introduced by his biggest donor.
And let's watch, shall we?
Anti-Semitism has been allowed to grow unchecked in this country.
Too many institutions have abdicated their moral responsibility to speak up.
Too many so-called leaders have stayed quiet.
Actions have consequences, and inaction has consequences too.
We've sued violent protesters under the FACE Act for intimidating Jewish Americans worshiping at synagogues.
So she's using the face.
She's admitting, okay, here we are.
I'm doing the bidding of my donors, the Zionist donors, and we're suing American citizens at the behest of Zionists.
They felt intimidated at synagogues.
Did someone protest the Gaza genocide on a street or something?
So they're protesting.
So from what I understand, they were having sales of land in Palestinian and Palestine, and people were protesting that.
And they felt intimidated.
Yeah.
Oh.
And so she's going to prosecute them for that.
Oh, thank God.
This is the first time since its passage, the FACE Act in 1994, that it has been used to protect a house of worship.
Working with Secretary Linda McMahon, who has been a champion for you as well, and Harmee, we have secured a $200 million settlement with Columbia University for violating the civil rights of Jewish students and Jewish employees.
We've secured a $75 million settlement with Northwestern University for anti-Semitic conduct.
We've secured a $60 million settlement with Cornell that includes provisions to halt anti-Semitic conduct.
And we've launched a full investigation into the University of California's system for systematic anti-Semitism.
What?
Systematic anti-Semitism.
How will we possibly have that if AIPAC owns all like everyone with Massey?
So this is the FACE Act was written in 1994 and signed into law by Bill Clinton.
And it was supposed to be protecting people who were trying to get go into abortion clinics.
Because remember how they had people out and they actually killed a doctor?
And so that's what that was about.
People or it was to protect people exercising their First Amendment right to religious freedom at a place of worship.
It also prohibits intentionally damaging or destroying property of such facilities or places of worship.
So the law was created in response to a wave of violence, blockades, bombings, and murders targeting abortion clinics and providers in the early 90s.
There was the murder of Dr. David Gunn.
It provides both criminal penalties and civil remedies, and it's enforced by the Department of Justice.
It protects not just abortion clinics, but also fertility clinics and other reproductive health.
So they're using that.
Well, there's, of course, more, and Jimmy is so damn good.
Meanwhile, DOJ sues Anti-Semitism has been allowed to grow unchecked in this country.
Too many institutions have abdicated their moral responsibility to speak up.
Too many so-called leaders have stayed quiet.
Actions have consequences, and inaction has consequences, too.
It's just unbearable to hear her go on and on in a sanctimonious fashion when she's a total puppet.
Minneapolis daycare fraud investigation now has spread to other states.
Insurrection Act Gambit 00:13:12
Many Americans are starting to wonder if our entire 38 trillion national debt was simply fraud committed by scumbag foreigners.
If you subtract all the daycare fraud, Medicare fraud, H-1B visa fraud, and other federal systems are being scammed by legal immigrants.
Would most Americans even have to pay income taxes?
After Nick Shirley exposed a massive multi-billion dollar Somali daycare fraud system in Minneapolis, other independent journalists began pounding the pavement in their home states.
They're looking at the many federal programs across the country, find that Americans are being ripped off at a staggering level.
Seems like the fraud is coming from every direction except from the American people.
Sir Gonzalez decided to look into all the bombing, all the booming tax companies in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
They're bringing hordes of H-1B workers from India.
What she found was extremely similar to the fraud Nick Shirley found in Minneapolis.
Are you surprised?
And will Trump use the Insurrection Act on Democrats?
Perhaps to forestall a midterm election he's likely to lose.
Katie Pelvick sat down with Trump for a News Nation interview covering everything from Minnesota's chaos to Greenland to Iran.
But the most revealing moment came when Trump discussed how far he's willing to go to enforce immigration law against Democrat obstruction.
The Insurrection Act, he's ready.
I didn't think they needed it yet, Trump said about Minnesota, but I would have no problem invoking it.
He noted 40% of past presidents have used the act.
It's not some unprecedented emergency measure.
It's a tool that executives have employed throughout American history when state and local government failed to maintain order or enforce federal law.
Given what's happening in Minnesota, violent mobs, NIS riots, local officials actively obstructing federal agents, invoking it would be entirely justified.
Trump's just waiting to see if the situation resolves without it.
Not likely, I suspect, especially now.
Joaquim, your thoughts.
Well, a few more murders.
He'll get around to it, I'm sure.
It's all in the cards.
It's all been planned out.
This whole, you know, right versus left divide, they're exploiting it to the max.
So, yeah, they're going for civil war.
And of course, before civil war actually comes on, he'll declare the Insurrection Act.
He'll declare.
I mean, he's already been basically ordering Congress that he has all this executive power.
You know, there's so much overreach on his part.
No president has basically done this before, where there is so much overreach.
And I just uncovered some information that just a few days ago, he was threatening the top leaders of the Republican Senate and saying basically, You better pass this expanded law where I take over more control, or else I'm going to have an opponent against you in the next election.
That's what he's doing.
He's doing what he's done to Massey, to all the leaders of the Republican Party.
And so they are now having a coup against him.
They realize they've lost the American public.
They're not going to win the election come November, these Republicans backing Trump the whole time.
So they're realizing we have to now go against him because of his overreach with the dictatorial executive branch.
So now we have to oppose him and hope that the people will vote for us in November.
But I'm telling you, Trump is so hated by Americans and the world that there's no way the Democrats are going to regain control over both sides of the Congress.
So, you know, it's, and then he's the total lame duck in his last few years.
Nothing's going to get done.
It's all going to except other than the agenda of the ones that bribe and blackmail.
They get their way, but everybody else, no, there won't be anything for Americans except total detriment and destruction.
That's what's headed for Americans.
So we have to rise up and do Revolution 2.0, mobilize our troops, ready to go against the government.
That's what it come down to.
Brian.
Well, when Pam Bondi begins bragging about prosecuting Americans for speech, the story isn't about her.
It's about the precedent that she's glad to see it's been set.
You know, it used to be that the law regulated conduct, but with Pam Bondi saying it, what she's saying is that the law now is going to regulate your viewpoint.
And so now the new public order is you must be ideologically compliant with whatever the cultural winds say you need to do.
And so what she's basically saying, and she's smart enough to know it, is that speech is no longer protected unless it aligns itself with the new narratives that they've chosen to roll out.
And so here you've got a prosecutor boasting instead of justifying.
And her restraint is obviously already gone.
And so with the Department of Justice on the next one, law enforcement or lawfare, it's pretty simple.
Anti-Israel protesters signal selective enforcement.
That's it.
It's not whether the protests are disruptive.
It's what causes the problem.
The problem is resistance to the agenda.
So they're going to go ahead and roll out this lawfare pattern where protest is tolerated by the guys dressed in black when it's politically useful and it's going to be prosecuted when it's geopolitically inconvenient.
Boy, does that sound similar to the summer of love versus January 6th or what?
This is the same story over and over and over.
And what they're trying to do is teach the good citizens who are beginning to wake up to self-censor and they're going to reframe any dissent as oh, those crazy extremists that aren't going along with what the mainstream media is telling them to do.
And then you've got the Minneapolis daycare fraud.
And here's a perfect example of what's not being prosecuted.
Massive financial theft, multiple, multi-state implications, real victims all over the place.
Yet that story, very little urgency, very little moral framing.
And, you know, it matters.
It makes it important when the state increasingly goes after policies and words faster than it's going after actual theft.
And that seems to be the theme that I'm seeing right here.
Now, what's the end game?
Oh, the last article was the Insurrection Act.
Doesn't it seem logical?
The Insurrection Act, this isn't speculation.
This is conditioning.
They're preparing us to accept federal force as a substitute for domestic stability.
And they're preparing to set themselves up to protest the frames as rebellion or to frame the protesters as rebellion.
And you don't need an insurrection.
You know, you just need a label.
If you can throw the label at somebody, you've got your insurrection.
That's where I see this stuff going.
Well, let me ask the two of you: could he be using the Insurrection Act to preclude the midterm elections he's destined to lose?
Seems to me that would be a Trump gambit worth contemplating.
Joaquim, your thoughts.
Yeah, I think that's probably where it's going.
I definitely believe that.
He realizes he's made up such a mess.
The Republicans are going to get blown away in November.
And so, yeah, I think it's probably going to come down to that.
I think it's on schedule for him to do that.
Yep.
Brian.
No, I think the Democrat agenda is so irreparably gone that it's not going to recover for another 10 years at least.
They're going to need a whole new nation, a whole new group of leaders to be able to come up and fight against what the Republican Party has become.
Trump's not going to lose.
The midterms might be difficult here and there in terms of how blue is blue and in terms of how red is red.
But overall, we're going to have control of this thing for quite a while because they've simply overplayed their hand with COVID, with the January 6th Insurrection Act, with the voting irregularities.
They've overplayed their hand.
Now, I say that as a sort of enlightened cultural commentator that comes from the false flags and conspiracies community.
But even here in Deep East, Texas, where I am rubbing elbows with guys, mostly church guys, I get it, but almost every one of them understand and feel that there's something very, very wrong.
And it needs to be corrected by leaning right instead of leaning left.
I can't find a single person, haven't met a single person in quite a while that thinks that the proper corrective action is to lean farther left toward the progressives.
So I think this thing's in the bag, and I don't think Trump's going to lose.
He might lose popularity, he might lose momentum, but he's not going to lose it because, oh, that bad Trump, it's going to be more of the Democrats just are never going to be able to muster the forces to beat him.
You don't think that they could lose their majorities in the House and the Senate during the midterms?
Well, look, I've been wrong when it came to my predictions before, but I feel like the cultural tide has just simply swung so far to the right that Trump can act like a dictator and get away with it.
Instead of, I just feel like the tide is leaning a lot more toward conservative trending rather than progressive trending in spite of all the rhetoric that comes out from the mainstream media.
Fascinating.
Meanwhile, just in.
Literally, busloads of illegals were still being blown out of Minneapolis by DHS.
That's worth noting.
They're continuing deportation.
This is despite the rioting and obstruction done by the left.
DHS is not slowing down.
keep pushing hatred blown home meanwhile by the extreme call doesn't detour the extremists in minnesota The high for today in Minnesota and St. Play was in the negative, not the wind chill, but the actual temperature.
Governor's Scramble 00:02:47
Despite the dangerous cold activists and far left have still got outside to continue their disruptions against DHS, hundreds of thousands bundled up together at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, the Whimble Federal Building or downtown Minneapolis, where Mayor Jacob Fry posted pictures of himself at a march and said it's minus 10 degrees, yet thousands still shut up strong in Minneapolis.
That's who we are.
Similar to some anti-Israel protests, crowds gathered at MSP to disrupt airline customers because deportations in our DHS flights leave from the airport on a daily basis.
People who refuse to move out of the road were taken into custody.
Meanwhile, watch California governor in panic.
California is about to experience a supply chain disruption that could make the pandemic shortages look like a dress rehearsal.
Not because of a virus, not because of a port strike, but because the governor's own regulatory agenda just collided head on with the economic reality of running a grocery distribution network and one of America's largest supermarket chains just blinked.
Kroger is shutting down major distribution centers across California and the fallout is spreading faster than Sacramento can spin it.
I'm Sophia Miller and on this channel we don't wait for the press release version of the truth.
We follow the money, we track the timeline, and we ask the questions that make powerful people uncomfortable.
If you value independent investigative journalism that cuts through the noise, subscribe right now.
Hit that like button.
And here's what I need from you in the comments today.
Tell me how much you're already paying for groceries in your state.
Real numbers.
Because what's happening in California right now is a warning signal for the rest of the country.
And we need to document this in real time before the narrative gets sanitized.
Here's the thesis, and it's simpler than anyone in Sacramento wants to admit.
California imposed the most aggressive warehouse worker mandate in the nation, demanding climate-controlled facilities, ergonomic redesigns, and quota transparency systems with compliance deadlines so tight that upgrading was cheaper than operating.
Kroger did the math.
They ran the numbers on retrofitting aging distribution centers across the state versus consolidating operations outside California's borders and absorbing the longer haul distances.
The spreadsheet told them to pull the plug.
Now hundreds of workers are getting pink slips.
Store managers are being told to brace for supply delays and the governor's office is scrambling to control a story that exposes the hidden cost of legislation written by people who've never run a logistics operation.
Jews, Crime, and Accountability 00:10:39
This isn't about labor rights versus corporate greed.
It's about what happens when regulatory mandates ignore the economics of razor-thin margins in a commodity business.
And somebody is going to pay the price.
And it won't be the politicians who wrote the law.
Let me take you through how we got here step by step.
Fascinating, actually.
Meanwhile, Tucker slams the ADL for weaponizing anti-Semitism.
This is from the Jerusalem Post-Washington conference this week.
And the man speaking is a guy called Yehuda Kaplan, who I don't think I'd ever heard of before, but now apparently works at the State Department in the Office to Fight Anti-Semitism, which I guess part of the State Department.
And here's what he said.
Watch this.
I get off a plane.
I am the president's representative, and I am walking off with a Yamulka, and I have kosher food, and embassies will have kosher food.
It is a game changer.
The appointment is a game changer.
And it's not about history.
It's about education.
And how do we educate?
Indonesia has 350 million Muslims living in the country.
How do we change their textbooks?
How do we hold the people in Gaza accountable that if America is paying for UN textbooks and supposedly the changes are made, why are those textbooks not being used and why are they using their old textbooks?
We have to teach people it's not okay to educate your kids to be a martyr.
Okay?
And we have to hold those countries accountable.
How do we battle anti-Semitism on the internet?
How are we doing better on algorithms?
What companies can we work with?
We are going to have a whole division within the office of the Special Envoy to Combat Anti-Semitism that is going to work on technology and working with the greatest leaders in technology, many of whom are Jewish and have offered their assistance.
The office is going to be revamped entirely to be one of the highest profile offices in the State Department.
Nothing will convince Indonesia to come our way.
Like sending Rabbi Yehuda is probably my mind.
How do we hold the people of Gaza accountable?
So there is truth to the claim that in the pedagogy that is administered in a lot of places, there's incitement.
Maya the martyr is a character, and that is awful, and U.S. taxpayers shouldn't fund it, and we ought to hold anyone accountable who does.
At the same time, the definition of anti-Semitism in recent times, according to some of the Israel First Crowd in the United States, has really migrated.
Like, this isn't my line, but I certainly associate it with anti-Semitism used to mean somebody who didn't like Jews.
Now it just means somebody Jews don't like.
That's not a standard that we can live with because the reason anti-Semitism is terrible, it's against my religion.
I'm totally opposed to it.
And by the way, it does result in violence.
I think we just saw that, and I hate it.
But it's anti-Semitism is wrong because hating anyone on the basis of their DNA is always wrong.
It's a universal principle.
It does not apply to one group.
My group or your group applies to all groups.
And if it doesn't apply to all groups, then it's not a principle and I can just ignore it.
Right?
So that's the problem I have here.
Yeah, but the U.S. ambassador to France, Jared Kushner's father, says that anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism.
And I don't believe that.
I think that you can be critical of foreign policy choices that a country makes without the assumption that you hate the religion or the ethnic group associated with that country.
Like when I was critical of Joe Biden, that didn't make me anti-Catholic.
And when I'm critical of Benjamin Netanyahu, that doesn't make me anti-Semitic.
Well, I agree with that.
And I. You can see where Matt Gates would have been a really good attorney general.
He makes relevant distinctions.
I love the way he put it.
Anti-Semitism used to be hatred of Jews.
Now it's anyone Jews hate.
Joaquin, your thoughts.
Yeah, we're seeing the Zionization of America like never before.
Dare say anything about genocide and the Israeli government?
Oh, anti-Semitic.
Here we go.
Yeah, I mean, they're taking it to such a limit.
And the masses of the people, they understand right from wrong as far as if you kill other people, women and children, especially, that's bad.
You shouldn't do that.
It's basic.
And that's an instinct that we have as human beings.
So they can dance around, they can put in their clowns in there to enforce the anti-Semitism, you know, make sure, you know, it's just more and more in our face.
And the more they come at us with trying to eradicate the anti-Semites, the more we're going to be entrenched at criticizing Israel and Jews that are so Zionist and want to brainwash everybody into total complacency when they are committing genocide against Palestinians.
And of course, the genocide against the human race, because that's what I keep bringing out: depopulation plan, AI robotics, they're going to be replacing us.
So, you know, let's face reality.
Brian, your thoughts.
Okay, so they've expanded and contracted the definition of anti-Semitism so far and so wide that it's become absolutely meaningless.
It's like throwing around Nazi at somebody that you don't like because you because they're authoritarian.
And there's a time and a place for authoritarianism.
So Tucker Carlson calling out the anti-defamation league is a great shift in the right direction.
He's been pretty consistent since he left Fox Network.
But just using a word that means anti-against people who spoke Semitic languages as a whipping block doesn't go very far.
And apparently the Jews can't get together and figure out exactly what it applies to.
Is it Zionism?
Is it people that are members of the Jewish religion?
Is it anybody who quote unquote calls themselves a Jew?
Is it just the ones over in Israel, or is it the ones that live next door here in America?
How far does this word tend to go and how sensitive is it?
Well, it just comes down to, I guess, how you want to accept it.
And it's such a malleable term.
And yet, here we have a Department of Justice head saying that she's cracking down on it at the universities as if, oh, you can no longer criticize the policies of a state.
Now, I would go so far as to say, I don't know who these people are.
I mean, seriously, I'm going to take that position.
There's been so much mixing of the species and matching of the different bloodlines and so much Kazarian gypsy.
I mean, you're talking almost 2,000 years of decline and degradation of bloodlines.
So who wakes up today and says, I'm a Jew?
Well, I guess the guy who was taught by his father and his grandfather that he's a Jew.
And I guess that guy was taught by his grandfather.
And maybe at some point down the line, somebody just decided we're going to be Jews now.
And so now we're all Jews.
But I venture to say that it's not going to be a DNA crime anymore.
And it can't be a last name crime anymore.
And it can't be a political policy crime because obviously that's protected under free speech.
So what is it, an anti-religion crime?
Oh, now all Jews are the same.
They all fit in the same religious order.
You know, it's stupid.
And it almost feels to me like they're putting it out there just to keep the funding rolling because there's absolutely no way you're going to be able to sit in front of a judge and define this word in a way that makes sense that this person was threatened because they're a part of a certain group that's susceptible to criticism.
And basically, when the accusations replace actual arguments, you can tell how insecure the power really is related to this.
Now, the other story was the economic stress as a result of Kroger.
Hey, no problem.
Everybody raise your rates for any California truck or any California grocery that needs to go in there.
Yeah, that's easy.
That's not going to cause a collapse.
It looks like Kroger just decided they aren't going to pay it, play it anymore.
So what's the option?
Okay, well, we got to go ahead and move these populations quietly out of California to Texas.
We got to go ahead and mix them all up.
And let's go ahead and label any resistance to that movement extremism.
And from here on out, we'll go ahead and let police try to be out there policing speech instead of crime.
And let's just go ahead and turn them into soft, authoritarian management structures instead of, oh, you just committed a murder or you just committed a felony.
You know, this is just stupid.
There's no guidance on this.
It doesn't make any sense.
And the street-level triage is virtually impossible.
Heavy Information, Light Management 00:00:50
So what are you going to do?
You're going to police social media?
Okay, good luck.
Well, I think the bottom line is where the hell says, Don, Don, it's always a joy to do these shows with you, my friend.
Take us out.
Whoa, you're enjoying the shows.
Well, we're getting a lot of information out there that needs to be out there.
And the information is pretty heavy and set up enjoyable, I think.
And things are getting, like I say, heavier here in 2026.
And this is the 26th day of January.
And so one month has gone by and things are really getting compounding heavier and heavier.
So you want to share this widely.
We can only do so much and there's such a big variety out there right now that we can't.
Export Selection