Truth vs. NEW$ Inc, Part 2 (29 December 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
|
Time
Text
And welcome back, folks, to Truth versus News Incorporated on December the 29th, 2025, going to 26th.
End of the year, all kinds of catastrophes are happening and closing in around us.
And we'll give you a recap at the end of the show.
And Jim, this is an explosive show.
What do you got?
What's the next blast?
Well, Epstein.
Chris Edges.
How the Epstein Glass Fails to the Top.
Chris Edges reports.
let's hear a bit of it
anand girdadas author of winners take all the elite charade of changing the world notes that the circle of powerful men and a handful of women who surrounded jeffrey epstein are emblematic of our privileged cast that lack the empathy to see the suffering and abuse of others
whether that was sexual abuse of children, the financial meltdowns they orchestrated, the military fiascos they backed, the addictions and overdoses they enabled, the monopolies they defended, the inequality they turbocharged, and the housing crisis they milked, and the technologies they failed that failed to protect people.
People are right to sense that as the emails lay bare, there is a highly private, merito aristocracy at the intersection of government and business, lobbying, philanthropy, startups, academia, science, high finance and media that all too often takes care of its own more than the common good, he writes.
They are right to resent that there are infinite second chances for members of this group, even as so many Americans are deprived of first chances.
They are right that their pleas often go unheard, whether they are being evicted, gouged, foreclosed on AI, obsolesced, or yes, the Epstein emails, in my view, he writes, together sketch a devastating, epistolary portrait of how our social order functions and for whom.
Saying that is an extreme, the way this elite operates is.
This class includes Republicans, Democrats, business people, diplomats, philanthropists, healers, professors, scientists, royals, super lawyers, from former Treasury Secretary and former President of Harvard, Lawrence Summers to Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Steve Bennon, Bill Gates, Alan Dershowitz, Woody Allen, Deepak Chopra, Peter Thiel, and even Noam Chomsky.
If this neoliberal era power elite remains poorly understood, he writes, it may be because it is not just a financial elite or an educated elite, an oblise oblige elite, a political elite, or a narrative-making elite.
It straddles all of these, lucratively and persuaded of its own good intentions.
These people are, he writes, on the same team.
On air, they might clash.
They promote opposite policies.
Some in the network profess anguish over what others in the network are doing.
But the emails depict a group whose highest commitment is to their own permanence in the class that decides things.
When principles conflict with staying in the network, the network wins.
Yes, yes, yes.
Meanwhile, we have unredacted photos of Trump on Epstein plane.
A fair number of these photographs showing up now.
I am finding it very difficult to imagine Trump is going to be able to escape on this case.
There's some more.
There's some same little girls.
It's really all pretty disgusting, all things considered.
Meanwhile, Trump accused of rape and later the victim commits suicide.
Some of these stories are really rather horrific.
She was found with her head blown off with a shotgun, and it was declared to be a suicide.
Epstein files.
Trump accused of rape, and later the victim committed suicide, was found with her head blown off.
The police did not believe it was a suicide.
We're getting a lot of redacted that are being unredacted.
In case you missed what's happening in the Epstein file scandal, in this new Epstein files released last night, it showed Trump was accused of rape.
Later, the victim commuted suicide.
Found with her head blown off.
Yes, just one of the stories we're getting here.
Meanwhile, Joaquin has a new piece.
Israel and the Epstein files are going to do Trump in.
I think he has got it right.
Joaquin, I'll read a bit here and then invite your elaboration.
The handwritten letter below is released in the December 23rd Epstein file trove of documents claiming to be among the 30,000 files released thus far in compliance with the File Transfer Act, Transparency Act, passed in November.
The ledger was allegedly submitted to FBI's evidence shortly before the 2020 election, allegedly by Jeffrey Epstein himself in August of 2019, addressed to Larry Nasser, notorious,
the fellow incarcerated pedophile convict, who instead of 13 months of jail cell sleepovers like Epstein got 175 years for abusing underage female U.S. Olympic gymnast athletes, mailed through the U.S. Postal Service just ahead of Epstein's suicided August 10th, alleged dead.
Larry's first sentence ostensibly alludes to Epstein, her part at planned suicide, but the mail envelope was postmarked August 13th, three days after his reported demise.
Dear L.N. As you know by now, I've taken the short route home.
This is thus like a suicide letter.
Good luck.
We shared one thing, our love and caring for young ladies and the hope they'd reach their full potential.
Our president also shares our love of young nubile girls.
When a young beauty walked by, he loved to grab snatch, whereas we ended up snatching grub in the mess halls of the system.
Life is unfair.
Yours, Jay Epstein.
Of course, the fact Epstein DOJ, Trump's a DOJ would even disclose this doc at all, accompanied by a post on X the same day, December 23rd, including the disclaimer below, casts doubt on its authenticity.
But then that's the whole point of making it public and keeping it unrepacted.
Like the 608 completely blacked out pages released by the DOJ warning on X states, some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI before the 2020 election.
I think we can infer from the Trump admin that everything implicating Trump is imaginary at fantasy and anything exoning him is legitimate and bona fide.
Joachim, yeah, there was an article that just came out on the 29th, which is, I guess, still your time, the 29th.
And it's basically about a Watergate attorney named Nick Ackerman.
And he's basically saying, yeah, Trump was a U.S. FBI informant.
And then, of course, in September of this year, early September, we have the House Speaker Mike Johnson also saying Trump was an FBI informant.
We have the writer of three books on Trump, the biographer, Michael Wolf, also saying that Trump turned Epstein in to the Palm Beach police.
He got the ball rolling against Epstein.
But Michael Wolf insists that it wasn't because, oh, he wanted to protect these girls.
No, he wanted to protect his own interests because Epstein was pissed off at Trump for stealing a property that Epstein was ready to buy.
And he outbid him and he did some finagling with the numbers, money gain.
And Epstein was really pissed off.
And supposedly, that's what started them.
And this is like just months in advance of actually the Palm Beach investigation, where they had their falling out over this piece of property in their neighborhood.
They both have mansions on beachfront property in Palm Beach.
And that's what got the ball rolling, where, you know, Trump was afraid he was going to go down because of his financial improprieties that Jeffrey Epstein knew all about and was ready to expose.
And so, yeah, I believe that he did work with the FBI to, you know, take down Epstein and endearing himself to law enforcement protected him.
You know, it was a two-win situation for Donald Trump to make that move to get rid of Epstein.
And lo and behold, he's president in July and August of 2019 when Epstein was apprehended and killed, quote, killed.
I personally think he's probably in Israel, you know, a couple of cosmetic changes, and that's where he is.
He could have been murdered too.
It was one or the other.
Definitely not suicide, and everybody in the world knows that much.
But anyway, yeah, this article gets into some of the actual released files that are not so pro-Trump, either a slippage of an oversight to allow it in, or I even have a theory going where they recognize Trump.
He's a couple of months away from being an octogenarian.
And let's face it, this guy's mental and physical health decline is in steep downfall right now.
It's in free fall.
And this guy's been so erratic in his first year in his second term of presidency that the powers that should never be, perhaps it's the same ones we're talking about, you know, Israel and Rothschild and the rest of them.
They may have decided to pull the plug on Trump and leak a few of these articles that basically incriminate him both witnessing a murder as a pedophile.
There was a situation where she was like 13 and her uncle in Michigan was farming a route to the VIP's wife, Trump.
They were on a yacht on Lake Michigan, and her uncle basically threw her newborn infant into the lake to drown.
Trump was a witness to that, you know.
And then there's the other ones in Texas, the limo driver hearing a conversation that Trump's having in the back seat with Jeffrey Epstein, and they're all heated and angry because they had both raped this girl.
And anyway, what happened was shortly after that conversation, this girl in Oklahoma had her head blown off.
The police that arrived on the scene could see it was no way, it was supposedly a shotgun blast.
It was no way that it was suicide.
And yet it was passed off officially, quote, like they always do as suicide.
So yeah, there are leaked documents that are very incriminating of Donald Trump.
And my view is it could be done on purpose because they see him as such a grave liability to their whole machine operation of controlling the world because of his erratic and decline.
And you don't know what's going to happen next with the guy.
I think it could be that they decided they're going to throw him under the bus, you know, just like basically Trump has tried to throw the Democrat pedophiles under the bus like Clinton.
Well, I think they might be both going under the bus.
And this might be the agenda.
Hey, you just bring in JD, who's completely controlled by Peter Thiel and Palatine and Israel, you know, bring him in.
And he's the sharper minded.
He'll do what he's told, you know.
And they hook him up with Erica Kurt, you know?
Yeah.
It's like the scenario from hell that they're bringing in now.
So yeah, it's got its two-edged sword.
In a good way, it's good that Trump's being exposed.
In the bad way, it may be just another move on the power of the power structure to make sure that they have complete control.
So we'll see how this plays out.
Very interesting dynamic going on right now.
By the way, is there such a thing as an assistant suicide?
Assistant suicide?
Well, they call it suicided.
You know, they've been suicided, you know, like basically Epstein was.
Yeah.
So, yeah, it's a curious story.
And, you know, 30,000 documents, 680 pages were completely blackened out, redacted, where you didn't see a word, you know?
So, yeah, on the one hand, they made sure that everything was out there.
And then they put out a couple where They basically negate it.
They say, oh, this is false.
This is false.
And it's been proved to be false, you know.
So, yeah, there's a lot out there to digest right now as the world burns, you know.
And recall, too, now they got over a million more files to release.
And it turns out a lot of those redacted can be unredacted.
Hal Turner reported it, and it's startling what they were redacting.
You understand why they redacted it serious stuff.
Ryan.
Before I jump into the next segment with a bit of a rant about the justice system, I need to ask Jim a historical question.
When was the last time America had a prosecutor that was serious about prosecuting crime?
When was the last time?
Yeah.
When was the last time we had a district attorney or an attorney general that would have taken on something like this?
Probably Bobby Kennedy back in the day.
That's exactly what I was thinking that you'd say.
Probably Bobby Kennedy.
And now we've got Pam Bondi replacing, you know, Bill Barr, who replaced Merrick Garland, who replaced Loretta Lynch, who replaced Eric Holder, who replaced go on back, And we're never going to have any serious justice.
But I'll tell you this.
We don't need more Epstein documentaries.
We don't need more outrage.
We need more prosecutable chain of evidence, indictments, convictions, asset seizures, and institutional reforms.
You know, justice isn't a documentary.
It's a docket.
And the way this government is treating it, it's as if it's a show where the narrative needs to fade.
What you've got to remember from a private investigator perspective is that transparency is, it needs to be forensic, not narrative enforcing.
So the Epstein materials that have been produced appear to have been redacted as if the Sandy Hook files had been redacted.
Everything was stripped out.
All the origination of all the documents was stripped out.
All of the timestamps, all of the meta content.
It was all designed to make sure that it was never prosecutable at all.
And what we need to do here in this situation is appoint a special counsel or an independent prosecutor who has the will and the means to do something.
He has to have authority across federal sex trafficking, conspiracy and RICO charges, financial crimes, money laundering, wire fraud, obstruction, witness intimidation, evidence tampering, etc.
You can't investigate the Epstein class while being politically managed by the same institutions that are under scrutiny.
You've got a fox watching the in-house situation here when you've got so much cross personnel who are institutional controllers that are part of the scandal itself.
Second thing we need to do is we need to get into a mindset of victim-centered justice, at least to start.
So we need a basically survivor evidence pipeline that has the interviews, the protective orders, the subpoenas that are ready for the survivors to identify.
And we need to make sure that there are safe channels for these witnesses who currently fear retaliation.
We need to protect the victims and preserve the defendants' rights because the convictions have to be able to survive appeal.
Next, we need to follow the money, not just the man.
Remember, he wasn't just a loan predator.
We need banking records, shell companies, trusts, foundations, services, settlement payments, NDAs.
And we need to pursue asset forfeiture where crimes are proven in exchange for more people to basically become witnesses against this.
So we've got a lot to build before we start talking compromise, blackmail, money trails.
We need to examine all the plea deals that Epstein got.
They were basically protection architecture.
Who negotiated?
Who benefited?
Why, where.
And if it was selective charging or soft landings, followed by sealed records with the defensible rationale, all that stuff needs to be thrown out.
So basically, we need hard accountability on document handling.
And so far, we're seeing kid-grade puppy play with all these files.
This is pathetic.
They're not serious about it.
They never will be serious about it.
Bobby Kennedy might have been serious about it.
But take a look at the special prosecutors that we've had.
Look at Ken Starr.
Look at some of these other special prosecutors that have been put in place.
They're all politically controlled machines.
Oh, I think you're absolutely right.
I think you're absolutely right.
And while he's having technical issues, of course, meanwhile, there are tons of references to Trump in the Epstein piles that are being criminally deleted in real time.
Justice Department releases more Epstein files as some disappear from DOJ website.
I mean, it's absolutely shocking.
They put them up and they take them down when they realize they've let out something they didn't mean to release.
Actually, the Department of Justice released more files from the Jeffrey Epstein case.
The DOJ has not commented meantime on why at least 16 files disappeared from its public webpage for documents related to the Epstein investigation.
They were removed less than one day after they were posted.
ABC's Johnny Fernandez has the latest.
The Department of Justice posted two more batches of Epstein files on its website.
The latest includes the grand jury testimony from April 2007.
In those records, an individual identified as a 21-year-old woman describes being recruited by Jeffrey Epstein when she was 16, along with other underage girls for illicit massages at his Palm Beach mansion.
Her name is redacted from the files.
Sources tell ABC News that Friday's release represents less than half of the department's files on Epstein and includes never-before-seen records from the investigation and thousands of photographs, many of which are heavily redacted and was released without context.
President Trump had a long-standing friendship with Epstein.
White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles says Trump's name appears in the files, but not doing anything awful.
Trump says he and Epstein eventually had a falling out.
I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein.
I threw him out of my club many years ago because I thought he was a sick pervert.
ABC's peer Thomas spoke to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanch, who also served as the president's criminal defense attorney.
Will every document that mentions President Trump, every picture of him, every video, every bit of information related to him in these files be released today or at some point in this process?
Assuming it's consistent with the law, yes.
So there's no effort to hold anything back because there's the name Donald J. Trump.
Friday's release also includes some never-before-seen images of Bill Clinton and Epstein together.
The former president has not been accused of any wrongdoing.
The White House chief of staff told Vanity Fair that there is no incriminating information about Clinton in the files, saying Trump was wrong about that.
Clinton spokesperson releasing a statement in part saying this is about the White House shielding themselves from what comes next or from what they'll try and hide forever.
Saying the idea of Bill Clinton, who is a horn dog, wouldn't take advantage of all these young lovelies is completely absurd.
Meanwhile, we have a story Joaquin is already mansion.
Trump witnessed the killing and disposal of an Epstein victim infant that was on the boat where the newborn, the baby, was dumped in the water to drown.
Reports emerging Friday from various outlets, including UK edition of American Outline newspaper the International Business Time, pointed inclusion of the document of an FBI intake from March 3rd, 2020, regarding a complaint from the unnamed woman who said she'd been trafficked at 13 in the early 80s, described in incident 1984, the killing of her newborn child aboard a yacht in Mona Lake, Michigan.
According to the dock, the woman's at her own call carried out the killing and disposed of the baby in the water where Trump witnessed the incident, just as Joachim has reported.
Meanwhile, Matt Gate told Tucker he was blackmailed.
I'm Michael from the Warren Treaty, and I'm in my Ozimpic era.
Mike?
I'm terrified of use car shopping, and I cannot afford to overpay.
Buddy, I'm always here to help.
Show me, Carfox.
Carfax can show how damage impacts price, so you don't have to overpay.
Always look for me and shop millions of great deals at Carfax.com.
All right, welcome back to College Football Addiction, the College Football Playoff Quarterfinal coming up with Miami and Ohio State Chris Chang.
Wrong link there, sports fans.
Sorry about that.
Meanwhile, Epstein, Israel, and the CIA, how the Iran-Gondra planes landed at Les Wexner's base.
This week, the Times awoke from its slumber to publish an extensive investigation on Epstein, purporting to put to rest the question of how the man made money early in his career.
The time dismissed the possibility Epstein could have worked for or adjacent to intel agencies.
Abundant conspiracy theories hold that Epstein worked for spy services or ran a lucrative blackmail op.
But we found more prosaic explanations for how he built a fortune.
To the paper's credit, the journalists have put into the record details that took an impressive effort to track down.
For instance, the paper reported about Epstein Business Associates in the 1980s.
Expene had been spending extravagantly, and despite his lawfully compensation at Bear Stearns and his work for Douglas Lees, he found himself strapped, even occasionally bouncing rent checks.
Back in New York, he joined forces with John Stanley Pottinger, a lawyer who'd recently left a senior post in the DOJ.
Epstein Pottinger and his brother rented a penthouse office in the Hotel St. Maurit's on Central Park South.
The broker, Joanna Cuthler, told us Epstein instantly stopped her on the commission.
The time deserved credit, we suppose, for digging up that nugget from the one-time broker.
But had the paper decided to look up rather than look down, they may have noticed something a bit more revelatory in their own reporting.
Stanley Pottinger at Hammond was a notable figure in the scandal.
It became known as Iran-Contra, in which CIA used Israel as a middleman to move off-the-book weapons to Iran in the early 80s under CIA supervision.
Pottinger advised an Iranian banker on shipping embargoed arms to Iran using fraudulent paperwork at overseas dunny companies.
In the very same period, Potner and Epstein worked together selling tax avoidance strategies from a penthouse by Central Park.
Pottinger's system eventually gave rise to a network of covert intermediary shipping arms around the world.
CIA's profit became a sludge fund used to illegally bankroll the insurgent contra army, which waged a war against Nicaragua's leftist government while simultaneously trafficking cocaine to the United States.
Joachim, your thoughts, or we lost.
Brian, yours.
I don't necessarily want to put a ton of more time into Epstein tonight, but I will say this.
If this nation isn't going to get serious about prosecuting crimes, then there are no crimes.
And if there are no crimes for the elite, there are no crimes for us, the little guy.
And if there are no crimes, then there are no borders, there are no rules, and we might as well descend into absolute chaos.
Because until we start enforcing the law equally and beneficially, then all it is is servants and slaves of the masters.
And that's what it seems like.
And it's growing to seem that way here in America.
Now, when the servants become tired of the masters and overrun by the masters, we sometimes get French Revolution-style responses to these particular things.
We get clannish behavior that grows tired and frustrated from the lack of transparency and honesty within our government.
And I can tell you that it's a very thin area that goes from victims to they are tyrants.
And it was they are tyrants that was laid out in the most famous sermon in American history where Jonathan Edwards, I believe it was, argued from the Bible that when a tyrant has overrun his responsibilities, and he argued, I believe it was from Romans 10 or Romans 13, that is the human's responsibility to overrun that slave master.
Now, our founding fathers built that in to our Constitution, and that's why they put the Second Amendment in place.
So these government officials that are covering this up and burying it and gaslighting us better be aware that the time is coming when the American people will say that we've had enough and will begin to rise against the media, against the narrative structures that are in place to control us, and against the cultural assimilation that makes us weaker and weaker and weaker by the day.
The day is coming.
Judgment is coming, and people are noticing.
They can't control this story much anymore.
It's been big for a long time, and the people are tired.
And all they could possibly do is gaslight us into total assimilation and a sort of a psychotherapy sink session where we think that there's nothing that can be done.
But the dick, the day is coming when real men in America will rise to the top and will begin to take these things seriously.
The reason there's some hope you could be right is that even in fighting the British, it was a tiny percentage of the colonists, only like 10% who actually carried the burden of the war.
So that when you discount all the cell phone addicts, computer gamers and all that, you know, the couch potatoes, we might have enough American men of red blood who dedicated to the country to actually make it happen, Brian.
So I don't.
Let me throw something out there about that, okay?
Yeah.
Samuel Adams and his crew were very small and they didn't get a lot of support from the pulpits, which were basically the equivalent of the local newspapers.
But they tarred and feathered those tax collectors nonetheless.
And you know what?
As soon as they did it, everybody got behind them and said, hey, we might be able to pull this off.
We're done with this.
That was the beginning of everything when they pulled the tax collectors off the boats, did the Boston Tea Party, and tarred and feathered the tax collectors.
So I'm not saying we need to tar and feather the tax collectors, but when the day comes that real leadership rises, there will be men.
I suspect that they're military men who are talking on this very day in the Green Dragon Tavern about what steps need to be taken and how.
I believe there are patriots out there.
I just don't think they're called white hats, and I don't think that they're technical patriots.
I think they're small teams of guys who have said enough is enough.
We're no longer being treated as Americans.
Well, Keene, have you caught enough of all that comment?
You're welcome.
Would you like to take a stab or move to the next?
Yeah, I have to say that, I mean, there are West Pointers out there, myself and McGregor and Mearsheimer, and there are, you know, patriots that are military men that are trying to do good.
I have to believe that right along with you, Brian.
Because, you know, I mean, we're appalled at what we're seeing every day, every week.
And, you know, there are, and I would imagine that there's a faction within the U.S. military that are active duty right now that are also on the same page as us.
Now, we got to hope and pray that they're willing to go to bat for America and Americans.
But, you know, we have a lot that we're up against, that's for sure.
Do you think there's a chance that there are enough veterans and militia members and others who care about America and the Constitution to make it happen?
Brian, I think you got a chance.
You could have it right, my friend.
We shall see.
Meanwhile, Owen Schriver and Jake Shields expose the occupying our occupied government.
Does anyone surprise by whom we are occupied?
Well, we're going not to hate to save lives, but we're going in and trying to help these people find their family out and clear out their things.
It's like, and I'm not, we're cleaning all houses.
We're not asking like if it's just the White House because I'm like, I'm like, I'm going to help everyone's house.
And they're like, yeah, yeah, of course.
You know, I don't hate anybody, but you know what I do hate?
I think I hate government.
Definitely, yeah.
You need a very limited government.
I definitely hate our current government and most governments.
They're just such like, I hate both sides.
You know, I was considered myself right, but like after Israel, I was, I think, oh, yeah, I guess I'm anti-war, pro-free speech.
Well, we saw how that flipped after.
Isn't that wild?
I'm calling it a political bizarro world.
Yeah.
And then before the left was anti-war, but now they love the war with Ukraine.
Well, now, now, because of this administration, the left is going to get to run on anti-war in the midterms in 2028.
So we've given them that ground.
Yeah, but they love the Ukraine war still.
Oh, yeah.
Well, it doesn't matter.
The consistency doesn't matter to leftists.
I hate both of them.
Isn't that the big difference, though?
You know, that's why you're seeing this fracture in the MAGA movement, because a lot of people on the right, a lot of conservatives actually have principle and they are free thinkers.
You can't just tell us one day you're against war, the next day you're for it.
Exactly that way.
In my mind, like, and like the January 6th thing, I wouldn't want to put the BLM rioters in jail for 30 years if I disagreeing with them.
And they wanted to put the January 6th guys for their entire lives.
They wanted to.
Some of them would have been if it wasn't for the party.
No, I know.
What they did was evil, and no one's being held accountable.
Like January 6th, it's got blown over.
Not many commentators help.
Wait, weren't you involved in that?
Yeah, I spent a couple months in prison.
Yeah, you're more outrageous than me then.
Well, I was talking, I was talking to my lawyer because we're getting ready to file a lawsuit.
And I was saying this the other day when I was in here with Alex, you know, and people are attacking Alex.
Oh, you know, you've turned on Trump and I view it differently.
It's like if you have, I don't even put it like that.
I would say if you have a friend, let's say you have one of your best friends, he's been dating this girl for a long time.
He's like, hey, I'm going to marry this girl, but you know, she's been cheating on him.
It's your duty as a friend to tell her.
Right.
So would that be you stabbing your friend in the back and turning on your friend?
Or would that be you being a good friend?
You being a good friend.
You're not a good friend if you don't fucking tell him.
That's what I'm saying.
And so it's the same thing with Trump.
It's like, Trump, these Iran strikes are going to kill your approval rating.
There it goes.
Trump, these dirty sales techniques to get the big beautiful bill passed is going to hurt your approval.
There it goes.
Trump, the Epstein debacle is going to hurt him.
So it's like, we're trying to help.
We don't want war with Ukraine.
Oh, let's send them more weapons.
Yep.
Let's see.
What else we got?
That the VA Fund, after securing 10.4 million grant, pushes for censorship to advance Zionism.
Of course.
The Jewish American neoconservative Tikva Fun, which a Trump admin awarded over $10 million in September to counter the pathology of anti-Semitism and teach the Talmud, has already gotten to work pushing censorship to advance Zionism.
New York Times last month told a remarkable story about how the record $10.4 million grant they secured from the National Endowment for the Humanities was rammed through from the New York Times.
One of them 10.4 mil to the conservative Jewish educational group Tikva for a project aimed at combating anti-semitism was awarded after the scholarly council voted against it.
Quite a five people with direct knowledge of the discussion were granted anonymity to discuss confidential matters.
Council members said they were questioned about the vagueness of the Tikva application and concerned the project tipped into advocacy, which the agency is supposed to avoid.
Little more than two weeks after the Tikva announcement, the White House fired all but four members of the Endowment Scholarly Council, no doubt, because they hadn't done the White House bidding.
Meanwhile, Zionists want Candace hospitalizing.
AI puppy is selling out every month because kids actually think it's real.
The pet stores.
It's difficult to know where to be given this person.
I mean, in a just society, she'd be in a mental war by now.
She would have been in a mental ward a while ago.
I personally am a big opponent to bringing back the involuntary commitment laws in the 1960s.
In my view, she should be involuntarily committed to a mental asylum.
Don't lose sight of the fact that people like Josh Hammer are the ones who have publicly defended and staked their entire name, reputation, career, legacy, everything worldview on the idea that it's seemingly okay to mass slaughter hundreds of thousands of Gazan women, children, fathers, grandparents, babies over the past several years.
Like that, I don't know if I ever had to choose someone that maybe would be qualified of being in a mental institution involuntarily committed, I would probably choose the person that's saying, yeah, it's totally okay to mass slaughter 100,000 plus innocent people.
I don't know if you guys tuned into our last stream, but I reacted to this Alex Jones clip.
And a lot of people were making a fuss about this on Twitter and saying, oh, wow, isn't this crazy?
Alex Jones and Candace Owens are beefing.
Now, I kind of took something else away from this clip.
And what I took away was I found it a little bit weird.
And I'm not questioning any of Alex Jones's.
I'm not questioning his faith.
I'm not questioning.
I would never do that.
I think that's ridiculous to do that.
But I did find it bad bit to use the Trump phrase sanctimonious that Alex Jones was coming out and saying, I prayed for Candace Owens.
Alex, I love you.
But this is the wrong approach here.
You might disagree with Candace.
You might think she's going down a path that will lead to no golden goose or whatever.
You know, she may very well be headed down a path that leads to nothing.
But like, let her do that.
Who cares?
Why is that so, you know, why is that so off limits?
Why is everyone freaking out and saying she needs to be locked in a mental asylum because she's going down a path that people don't like?
I mean, if anything, if I was Candace Owens, I'd say, well, that kind of makes me feel like I might be going down the right path.
If literally, I'm not saying this about Alex, but Laura Loomer, Josh Hammer, the worst people on the internet are freaking out beyond belief right now and saying she needs to be locked away.
So I'm going to say that maybe there's a chance she's over the target because.
And remember, too, she's the number one most popular podcaster in the world today.
The Bible proves that the Jewish people are the most unique people on the face of the earth.
They are a chosen people.
They are a covenant people.
They are a cherished people.
They are the apple of God's eye.
The unchallengeable fact of the Bible is that Israel and the Jewish people are unique.
Listen, Israel did not choose this uniqueness.
God chose it for them.
Listen to David's prayer in 1 Chronicles 17, 20.
It's one of the most powerful words in the scripture.
Oh, Lord, there is none like you, nor is there any God beside you.
And who is like your people, Israel?
Listen, the one nation on the earth whom God went to redeem for himself as a people.
Chosen and still cherished.
Deuteronomy 7 and 6, for you, Israel, are a chosen people, a holy people to the Lord your God.
The Lord your God has chosen you to be a people for himself.
Listen to this next sentence.
A special treasure above all the people on the face of the earth.
That includes the United States of America.
Well, if you wonder, you know, about those thousand or more pastors who went to Israel to become Zionist shields, they got a perfect example of one.
Joaquim, your thoughts, your thoughts.
Yeah, first of all, you know, he's quoting the Jews of the Bible, supposedly.
Well, the Ashkenazis are from Eastern Europe, Russia, Western Russia, Ukraine, you know, that's where they come from.
They were the kingdom of Khazar back a millennium ago.
And therefore, all of these, quote, chosen people that they're referring to are not the Jews of the Middle East in the biblical ancient era.
They are imposters, and they're cashing in on that falsehood to basically be accepted that we're all supposed to bow down because God ordained them as the chosen people.
I mean, this is such garbage.
It's on a false premise, a lie.
And they built their country, you know, in the Middle East, basically as a promise to Lionel Rothschild, the Baron, back in 1917.
And it's created nothing but trouble and friction and death the world over.
But the Middle East is like the center of all the horror that's going on.
So, you know, and then the influencers that get paid by Israel and the pastors that get paid by Israel, on and on, you know, and of course, they're moving towards the technocracy of tracking every move we make on the internet.
You know, they'll get rid of the cash and it'll be digital dollar and social credit scores, the whole bit.
So if you are honest and say what's real, you're going to be punished and you won't maybe even get access to having food, you know?
I mean, that's where they're very rapidly going right now.
It's a digital gulag that they're creating so that a handful get to survive with their AI robotics and the rest of us will perish.
That is their agenda.
And I bring this up all the time because there's no greater crisis on this earth than the human genocide.
Right.
All right.
Let's.
There's some ammunition in those two clips.
Let's start out with Candace Owens and let's just recognize it for what it is.
They're changing dissent into diagnosis.
So, whenever you think of Candace Owens and whatever you think of the investigations that she's working on, you have to remember that there is a free line in society that you just don't cross.
And that line is the one that turns disagreement into diagnosis.
So, when I hear public figures casually talking about reviving involuntary commitment laws, talking about metal wards and asylums because they don't like where their questions are going, I don't hear true concern for the truth.
I hear control language.
And we ought to be able to recognize that language instantly because it's been used again and again in history.
When you can't beat the argument, you attack the person making it.
Now, that's a big warning sign that they're doing that to Candace.
And I'm not canonizing her.
She can be right, wrong, half right.
That's not even the point.
The point is what happens when a nation, what happens to a nation when wrong becomes insane and insane becomes lock them up?
Haven't we seen this before?
The pattern has been around for a long time.
And what's going on right now is that the ones that are grasping so hard at the narrative are spiraling.
And, you know, they're trying to make the public nod along as if it's the patriotic duty to agree that that shouldn't happen.
So fundamentally, in a free society, Charlie Kirk taught us bad ideas get defeated with better facts, not with padded walls.
Although they did take him out in a sense, although I don't think he was killed, obviously.
Now, next one, John and Aggie.
And while I agree that there are dispensational Christians that think that Israel is going to have some sort of big revival, you don't really need to go beyond Moses' last sermon in Deuteronomy 32, which is called the Song of Moses, which comes right after the second half of Deuteronomy 28, to understand something very, very basic about the Bible.
Blessing and protection are conditional, not automatic.
Okay.
Deuteronomy 28, 15, if you don't obey the Lord your God, these curses will come upon you.
Deuteronomy 32, go read that carefully.
It's called the Song of Moses.
It's his last sermon that he delivered to the new generation of Israelites in the wilderness before he marched up the mountain to die, which was commanded to them.
And Deuteronomy 32 creates a song that Israel has to sing until the end of time, reminding them that if they forget their God who raised them, took care of them, and brought them out of the wilderness,
if they forget that and act violently, arrogantly, and without injustice, that he would make their land desolate and send hunger and plague and all sorts of bitter destruction upon them.
So if Haggie's being realistic, he's got to recognize that scripture doesn't permit pastors to bless mass killing, siege warfare, civilian destruction, simply because the perpetrators claim a very misunderstood covenant identity.
So it's foolish.
Zionist theology collapses once it divorces itself from border-based righteousness.
It doesn't teach that you can be in the land without obedience and be God's people.
It doesn't teach that you'll receive blessing without justice.
And it certainly doesn't teach that you can have the covenant without repentance.
And by the way, in case you're going to argue Genesis 12 to a guy like me, please don't.
There was always warnings that covenant breakers would be scattered.
And so don't try to pull this Israel can do no wrong because the Bible demands it.
You're not going to fool me with that.
You're not going to fool anybody who's serious about understanding their Bible.
I'll just say, I'm no biblical scholar and not even a believer myself, but I sure appreciate your critiques, Brian.
They do us a whole lot of good in keeping on the straight and narrow about these theological issues that are so extraordinarily controversial.
Meanwhile, we got the curious case of Charlie's phone.
What if you die?
Shocking first question.
Charlie Kirk was asked at the Hampton Donner meeting, donor meeting.
That sounds like a threat.
Pro-Zionist Israel turning point, Erica Kirk lied again about Charlie Kirk's text predicting his own murder.
Let's take a look at that one before we conclude today.
We promised each other we would never live in fear.
And he would say, if they're going to get me, they're going to get me.
But he was not messaging people the day before saying, I'm going to be murdered.
They're coming after me.
Someone's going to kill me.
He didn't say that.
And I had a cell phone.
He didn't say that.
And I have a cell phone.
Well, my first question is, why do you have a cell phone?
And why doesn't the FBI have that cell phone?
That's what that doesn't make sense.
Unless the FBI isn't really investigating this and they're not.
So, well, guess what?
At their meeting, this is what a lot of people missed.
At their meeting, Candace Owens got them to admit that he actually did, that what she just said is not true.
She got them to admit that Charlie actually did text that.
Let's listen.
That was going around that was viral.
And it was Erica saying that she had Charlie's phone and that Charlie never texted anybody the night before saying that he thought that they were going to kill him.
And that obviously reflected poorly on me because I was the one who said that he did, in fact, text multiple people the night before.
And then I went on Jimmy Door on Friday, Jimmy Dore's show, and I clarified.
I said, Andrew Colvett told me specifically that he was one of the people that received this text message.
So I got that first person.
I didn't get that from a source.
I got that directly from Andrew Colvett.
And then somebody who had access to Dan Flood's communications said that Dan Flood similarly received a text message.
They owned that right away and explained.
Erica said that she has Charlie's phone.
She's looking at his eye messages.
And it turns out that he, like everybody else, communicates on signal.
He communicates on Telegram.
And that those community, when she heard me say that, they then went and looked.
And yes, that what I said was true.
So that part.
So there she's admitting that Charlie did text that.
So all the people claiming that Candace was lying, making it up, just like they claimed she was lying when she said that Charlie Kirk had turned against Israel.
And then she had to show the text messages.
And then they, Josh Hammer, and all the rest are all liars.
Nobody ever comes back with, we're sorry, we sorry, we called you a liar.
Said the same thing with this.
They said she's crazy, these crazy conspiracy theories.
That well, now they're Erica Kirk is there admitting.
And what doesn't pass the smell test for me is Erica saying, oh, well, after I heard you say that, I went and checked.
Well, you had already said that on Glenn Beck after she said that.
Of course, why wouldn't you check then?
So I think she means that after she heard me, after she heard Candace Owens say it on the Jimmy Dore show, that Andrew Culvert told her directly that's when she went back and checked.
Why would you wait?
Really?
You're not reading Charlie's.
You're not reading his signal chats?
Really?
You're not reading his Telegram message?
Really?
You only looked at his text message.
So you're going through Charlie's phone, but you're not looking at that other stuff.
I don't believe it.
It means Erica is a big fat liar.
I don't have any trouble believing that, but it certainly seemed to be proven.
Joachim, your thoughts.
Yeah, Erica Kirk was groomed as a teenager to basically be part of the deep state, Zionist deep state, you know.
And I believe that probably years in advance, they had designed to put her in charge of Turning Point USA, especially when Charlie went off the reservation on Israel.
So she was, he became the target.
And yeah, I tend to believe that he's probably alive somewhere and decided, okay, I had enough of this, you know.
And they have her in charge now.
And she's doing all the right things for Israel.
That's for sure.
But she's also proven herself to be a complete fraud and a show for Israel.
So who wants to even listen to that bitch?
I agree.
She's over at play.
She's a very poor actress and she's out at herself.
Brian, your thoughts.
Well, the Jimmy Dore clip goes back to the insanity plea again against Candace.
Okay.
So I want to say this as plainly as I possibly can as an American patriot.
The United States cannot survive as a serious country if it can't handle controversy without reaching for a straitjacket and a room with rubber walls.
If we don't like the journalist's conclusions, we don't silence her.
We argue with her.
We investigate better.
We publish facts.
We don't normalize the language of institutional and narrative force designed to get us to assimilate.
Because once that door is open, it's not going to be used against people that we dislike.
It's going to be used against anybody who inconveniences a narrative.
That person might be on the right or the left or a Christian or an atheist or a populist or whatever.
This mechanism doesn't care about ideology.
It cares about obedience.
So for this entire episode, I guess I'd like to just say keep it legal, keep it factual, and keep it humane.
Let's stop calling for violence.
We don't need mob mentalities.
We don't need character assassinations.
We don't need mental wards as political tools.
We want to protect this country.
We want to protect its core American principles.
And we need to have truth tested by evidence.
And if our courts aren't working, then we need to convene new courts.
This arguing policy all the time is just basically watching this narrative machinery grind our lives into oblivion and grind this nation into oblivion.
The warning is, if our courts no longer work, the people have an obligation to convene a new court.
A lot of wisdom from you today, my friend.
Meanwhile, let me just say, if you go onto YouTube or onto my bitch channel, you'll find I have a top 12 stories for the year that I did with Louisa, the Goldfish Report.
We do this annually.
I think you might enjoy them.
And I'll be sure to put the link in the stories for today.
Don, take us out.
Oh, boy.
Okay.
I want to add one little thing.
We're talking about Charlie Kirk and Turning Point.
I saw a video about Turning Point and about the fact that it's really a money handling thing.
I can't trace it.
It got millions of dollars.
And I think it had something to do with why Charlie had the gold.
And not a turning point that's for the good in America, but it's a turning point that's corruption at the core.
So with that, we're bringing a year of news to a close.
2025 was closing it.
And it's been a rough close.
It's closing in chaos, I think.
And so come back next week if we're still here in 2026.