Welcome back, everyone, to False Flags and Conspiracies Conference 2025.
I'm your evening host, Lorian Finton, and tonight we have John Hanke, who can't be with us this evening, but he will be with us, I am told, tomorrow.
And he is, he sent along a presentation about justice for Charlie Kirk.
That is the name of it.
I'm going to be playing that for you.
And tomorrow he'll be talking about Israel.
I think tomorrow's our big Israel day.
And if you want to find out more about John, you can go to his YouTube channel, which is quite extensive.
It has all four of his movies out there.
He's an award-winning filmmaker.
He's a JFK filmmaker.
That's how I believe Jim Fetzer met him, and that's how I met him.
And you can find him at Real History Channel 1.
Real History Channel 1, the numeral one.
So look for John Hanke.
I'm sure you've seen his films.
He has a very unique style of filming.
Everybody loves it.
And I do hope you enjoy his presentation today.
Let me work on that, and I'll get it going for you here in just a second.
How do we know Israel killed Charlie Kirk?
I got 99 reasons and this bitch is number one.
Israel had something to do with Charlie Kirk's horrific murder.
This is insane.
When Charlie was first killed, it was common to hear good people say stuff like Netanyahu had to come out and start screaming at the top of the line.
I didn't kill him.
Not because there's any evidence he did.
I have no evidence that Israel had any role in Charlie Kirk's assassination.
They don't say such stuff so much anymore.
In fact, Ritter says it was Netanyahu's panic that Americans knew he had killed Charlie that forced him to stop bombing God.
How do we know Israel killed Charlie Kirk?
I got 99 reasons and this bitch is number one.
Israel had something to do with Charlie Kirk's horrific murder.
This is insane.
When Charlie was first killed, it was common to hear good people say stuff like.
Netanyahu had to come out and start screaming at the top of the line.
I didn't kill him.
Not because there's any evidence he did.
I have no evidence that Israel had any role in Charlie Kirk's assassination.
They don't say such stuff so much anymore.
In fact, Ritter says it was Netanyahu's panic that Americans knew he had killed Charlie that forced him to stop bombing Gaza for about five minutes.
So when we do a cause-effect analysis of what actually pushed this peace plan forward, etc., it's going to be about support for Israel rapidly waning, creating a panic in Israel.
Why else would a Israeli prime minister go on American social media not once but twice and say, I didn't kill Charlie Kirk.
We didn't kill Charlie Kirk because he understood that even the thought of Israel being involved was stripping support away.
The purpose of this video is to destroy the idea that we lack proof that Israel murdered Charlie.
I'm looking forward to hearing these guys say the evidence shows beyond a reasonable doubt that Israel killed Charlie Kirk.
They even had it on a new don't believe the hide!
Don't believe it!
In the videos of Charlie's murder, even as he falls to the floor, we see no blood splatter behind him.
This is a problem, you see, because the bullet that was allegedly fired at Charlie from this rifle is notoriously powerful, and, as we'll see in a minute, would certainly have produced a massive blood splatter on the tarp behind Charlie.
So people were talking, since the first day, about the complete lack of blood seen on the tarp behind Charlie.
This is very powerful evidence that the charges against Tyler Robinson are lies.
But now that people were focused on the lack of splatter, some began to notice this camera behind Charlie being taken down and seemingly disappearing within the first minutes after Charlie was shot.
Candace Owens was one of Charlie's closest friends and had been a prominent member of Charlie's organization, Turning Point USA.
She realized that she knew this guy from her time in Turning Point, and she used her contacts inside Turning Point and found him.
He told her he had the video, but he refused to give her a copy.
And she insisted that he at least let her view the video, and he agreed to that.
She got to see it.
There's nothing gory about this footage from the back.
The thing that really stood out to me is that there's no blood.
There's no blood.
So Candace confirmed for us the already powerful evidence that the massive blood splatter that this bullet certainly would have produced is missing.
If I'm not seeing any blood, what are we to take from that?
What we are to take from that is that the story we are being told that Charlie was shot with a large caliber high-powered rifle, that story is positively a lie.
So Candace's revelation sent Charlie's killers into a panic.
Because no blood splatter means Tyler Robinson is innocent.
And that means that this rifle was planted.
And that means that the FBI are not just inept boobs, but it means they are taking direction from the killers.
The FBI are collaborating with the killers.
They are accessories to murder.
And so, the panicked killers sent out this bonehead, Andrew Colvette, to shovel the biggest load of crap since, geez, since they told us JFK was shot from behind, since they told us Building 7 was brought down by spontaneous fires of burning paper.
In his stupid panic, Colvette confirms that there was no exit.
Thank you very much, idiot.
There is no longer room for doubt that the FBI's story that this was the murder weapon is a ridiculous lie.
This bastard, supposedly Charlie's friend, wants us to know that no, the FBI isn't lying.
Charlie, you see, was a man of steel, like Superman, except for the getting killed part.
But nevertheless, this was a miracle.
Benjamin God himself, it seems, reached down and miraculously stopped the bullet from splattering blood all over the nice tarp behind Charlie.
It's a miracle!
Charlie is with Jesus!
Now shut up!
If this was a miracle, the miracle would have been Charlie got shot in the throat and he managed to live.
What's the miracle here?
The bullet didn't pass through?
That's it?
This Colvette guy is the lowest imaginable scumbag liar.
He just confirmed for us the essential point.
There was no blood splatter behind Charlie.
We can't believe anything the FBI says.
But that question, at least, about blood splatter is settled.
What are we to take from that?
This effort to find the truth has been a real team effort.
But this guy has been a star player on that team.
He's a 10-year combat veteran of U.S. Special Forces.
He knows guns and bullet wounds from too much first-hand experience.
None of this story is possible.
Do these people not realize who's in America, what we did for the last 20 years?
Do you know how many tens of thousands of Global War on Terror veterans there are that know exactly what it looks like when a high-powered rifle round hits a human body, especially in an area like soft tissue in the neck?
You know how many people hunt out there and know exactly what a 30-odd six round does to it?
Well, people like me are going to say, uh, yeah, no, actually, a 30-odd six-round will go through and through a elk at 500 meters.
Well, let's talk about where Charlie got shot.
He got shot here in the carotid.
If that did hit a vertebrae in his neck, let's understand that neck vertebrae is some of the most fragile bone in the human body because it's so flexible to handle what we do with our neck.
Obviously, this would be far thicker and stronger than a human vertebrae in the neck.
Let's see what this 30-odd six rounds does to it.
cow femur go or brian hit that directly in the center Clean through quarter-inch steel.
Clean through 3/8 inch steel and half-inch steel.
The official narrative now is it's a miracle, and Charlie Kirk's bone density is that of steel.
That's part of the official narrative now.
From turning point, none of this story is possible.
So, beyond question, says our expert, the fact that there is no blood splatter proves that this is not an entrance wound from a 30-odd 6, and the FBI is lying, and Tyler Robinson is innocent.
And so we begin our journey to get to the bottom of the murder of our friend, Charlie Kirk.
You've probably seen this video that the FBI made public of the person who the FBI says was the shooter.
But there are several huge problems with this video.
Start to finish.
We're going to start at the beginning.
Here's the first three seconds of that video.
And here they are again, slower.
and again even slower but let's start with that very first frame This is magnified six times.
And if you use your imagination, you may be able to convince yourself that there is the image of a person at the tip of this yellow arrow.
And here's the next frame, and the next, and the next few.
And you can make out this next bit on your own, especially in slow motion.
But let's now go back to that first frame and notice the field of view of the camera goes well to the left of this yellow arrow.
To help see more clearly, I'm going to move forward 20 frames to this view.
Our original yellow arrow in frame one was about here.
Any shooter would have to have been here at the far left edge of the roof in order to get an unobstructed view of Charlie, as you can see in this series of pictures of that roof.
The FBI says Tyler entered here, went to his shooter's perch here, fired a shot, and then ran off.
I recreated that scene just to show that if it had happened the way the FBI says it happened, this camera ought to show it.
The video the FBI gave us is inexplicably, inexcusably, and ludicrously missing at least the first 11 to 15 seconds, about 400 frames.
What the fudge, FBI?
You all need to get a new director, one who doesn't want you to look like morons.
So why did the director not have someone run onto the roof and crouch down and then pretend to shoot all for the camera?
I'm guessing that the director, being an experienced Mossad murder planner, knew that everything that can go wrong will go wrong, and that if he had sent someone with a rifle to that position on the roof, the local cops were likely to spot him and arrest him and at least sound the alarm and shut down the rally.
This is a good time to remind everyone we've already proven that neither Tyler nor his grandfather's rifle killed Charlie Kirk, and we're now exploring the details of that event to expose this relationship between the FBI and their Mossad overlords.
This is a continuation of that same FBI-released video of the quote-unquote shooter on the roof.
Whoever this person is, making this spectacular leap, it was sure to draw the attention of anyone who happened to see.
So why did this person not take the same stairs down from the roof that they had taken to climb up to the roof?
Why?
Other than to provide the camera with this impressive commando-style leap.
And right here, I'll hand it over again to my favorite Viking.
He picks up a floppy object, like a bag or a jacket of some sort.
Watch right here.
Watch what he picks up.
Floppy object.
See how it flops around?
Yeah.
And takes off running.
Okay, again.
See that?
That ain't a 44-inch fucking long gun, boys and girls.
Then watch the left hand takes the hat off.
There it is.
Hats off his head.
Left hand puts it back on.
No 44-inch long gun.
Now you have to decide for yourself, but I'm completely persuaded by this firearms expert that this person did not have a 44-inch 30-odd 6 rifle, which really comes as no surprise since we know that Charlie Kirk was not shot with such a weapon.
Why would this person even have such a weapon that was not used, right?
And the crazy train is just leaving the station.
We'll pick up our Leaper's travels again right here.
he walks to the street, that is to the border of the campus, and the FBI video leaves us here for some reason,
But they tell us that this person, whoever the hell they were, crossed the street and pretended to drop this weapon that he didn't use and that he didn't have in this wooded area for the FBI to pretend to find.
This weapon was planted as part of the plot to incriminate Tyler Robinson.
Any idiot, even me, could figure that out.
Of course, obvious facts never stood in the way of deep state lies being published without comment or criticism in the media.
And so, of course, the news was full of all this crap about the FBI finding DNA all over the rifle.
But somehow no fingerprints?
Shh.
The FBI would never do that.
would they?
If you were paying attention to the early news about Charlie's death and Tyler Robinson's arrest 33 hours later, you will have seen or heard this story of how Tyler's parents recognized their son from surveillance footage released by police.
And Tyler's father confronted his son on the phone and Tyler confessed to his father.
Now, you've seen several examples at this point of how the killers, through their stringently controlled media, lie.
But seeing through their lies, we know Charlie was not shot by Tyler with this weapon.
Are you surprised to learn then that all this confession nonsense is lies?
You remember how Candace spilled the beans about there being no blood splatter behind Charlie?
And how the photos showed that she was correct.
And this bonehead completely corroborated her.
So a week later, she also dropped this bombshell.
What I've learned is that his father does not believe, his parents don't believe that their son committed this crime.
I was like, huh?
Excuse me?
That's a far cry from what the media has been telling us.
Remember, the media presented this amazing story.
The father realized his son was guilty, so it goes, right?
And then he phoned over a friend to help him convince his son to turn himself in.
And eventually they said, you've got to do the right thing here.
We know this is you.
That's what the media was putting down for us to pick up.
It was kind of the opposite.
That quote-unquote family friend informed the family that Tyler had been identified as the shooter.
He recognized him.
He knows Tyler.
He gives them the heads up.
And then I'm told, turned himself in, was because that family friend slash neighbor slash former detective told him, hey, it's best for you to turn yourself in because there's only one of two options here.
Either you turn yourself in and everything is peaceable, or, you know, the SWAT team could come in here and arrest you and things could get crazy.
This story that Tyler Robinson had confessed was a huge deal in the media, and now...
I can't believe Candace.
The Utah County Sheriff came up in front of the podium and literally acknowledged everything that she said.
So this isn't debatable.
Utah County sheriffs have acknowledged this is how that went down.
Candace got this right, guys.
Geez, so let's review.
They said Charlie was shot with a high-powered rifle.
He certainly wasn't.
They said Tyler shot Charlie with this rifle.
He positively did not.
They said Tyler leaped from the roof with this rifle and hid it in these woods.
That can't possibly be true.
They told us he confessed to his parents, and the sheriff says that he did not.
I may have skipped some minor details, too stupid to mention, but is there anything left of the so-called case against Tyler Robinson?
Besides nonsense, there is less than nothing.
Don't believe the height!
This clown is Stephen Gardner.
He's a Trump-loving YouTuber who claims he speaks for TPUSA, and here's what he says.
My understanding from speaking with a couple of people high up at Turning Point USA, they let me know that the injury took place right below the jaw in the C2.
The bullet crashed through C2 all the way through C7, and then they found the bullet lodged in that meaty area around T1, the thoracic first vertebrae.
By C2, this fellow means this particular bone in the neck.
A shot from the roof that Tyler Robinson was supposedly on would have come in at a nine-degree angle.
And the trajectory of that bullet from that location and at that angle is represented here by this black line.
So that, as we see, a bullet that hit Charlie in the C2 vertebra would first have to shatter his jaw.
And of course, that's nothing like what we see during the event that killed Charlie.
And if this clown is telling the truth about what the autopsy says, then the autopsy has to be a lie.
Surprise.
Though I have to wonder, if you're the Mossad, why would you even bother to do an autopsy?
You're just going to make the autopsy up completely.
You don't actually have to perform an autopsy if you're just going to write up an imaginary one.
You just have to imagine it.
Or maybe, I bet you didn't think of this, the autopsy was also a miracle.
You see?
God reached down, I mean, up from hell where this God lives, and he wrote the fake autopsy report.
God did it.
It's a miracle.
Charlie is with Jesus.
Now shut up.
Don't believe the height.
Colonel Douglas McGregor is a right-wing racist extremist, a hero of the First Iraq War, and a former advisor to the Israeli military, a former Trump supporter who Trump nominated to be ambassador to Germany.
But here, McGregor accuses Trump and Israel of murdering Charlie Kirk.
Well, I would say that most people realize that Charlie Kirk was killed because people all over the world were listening to him.
And he came around to understanding that what is happening at Gaza is in fact an atrocity.
I think he discovered that Epstein was a serious player in Washington.
There needed to be an understanding that the Mossad had a lot of information about people they didn't want to release and that this was being used for blackmail purposes.
And that, of course, offended Donald Trump.
And I think his statements were resonating very strongly with people under the age of 40 who listened to him and agreed with him.
So somebody decided he had to be stopped.
This is a right-wing panel discussion held live at Charlie Kirk's funeral.
That is Steve Bannon on the end.
So I was in line with people for three hours talking to all the folks.
And they were Christians and they were happy and they had families and they were lovely people.
And I started talking to them.
And none of them that I spoke to believed that the shooter that they got and have arrested actually did it.
Again?
None of them believed that the shooter that they got and have arrested actually did it.
Seems things have gotten out of hand.
As we'll see, the killers have absolute airtight control of the news networks, making sure only their lies are being told.
But recently, there are all these former mainstream right-wing news stars that the deep state created, built, and promoted to get Trump elected, and it worked.
But these stars have all recently been fired for daring to mention Epstein or for criticizing Israel's genocide in Gaza.
They lost much of their audience when they lost their platforms at Fox, but they are fighting, using the truth, to get their audiences back.
Like this guy, Michael Savage.
The right-wing deep state made him, but they took away his platform for condemning genocide.
And they cannot get him to swallow any of their lies about his comrade Charlie Kirk's murder.
I know I shouldn't do this.
I'm risking an awful lot to go up against this FBI, the MAGA FBI.
Something's very wrong with what I just heard.
So we saw a video of a person jumping off the roof.
It looked very legitimate to me.
However, there was no rifle in his hand.
They're trying to claim he removed the barrel from the Mauser and fit the receiver and stock in his backpack and barrel in his pants like all in two seconds.
It is not easy to remove a Mauser barrel.
We are not hearing or seeing reality.
And by the way, the photo of the rifle allegedly left in the woods has the barrel installed.
So we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel.
Wait, I'll stop now and reassemble it and leave it in the woods in a box wrapped in a towel.
He left breadcrumbs.
I don't believe a word of it.
I shouldn't do this.
I know I'm putting myself at risk, but I can't take it anymore.
I can't take the bullshit from this fucking government.
I flew with Donald Trump in Air Force One.
I consider him close to me.
I have not been able to get near him.
I don't buy one word of this narrative, not one single word.
Tucker Carlson was a darling of the right-wing deep state.
They made him.
But after Trump got elected, because he showed some independence, Fox fired him.
And he's lost much of that Fox audience.
But Tucker seemed fearless speaking at Charlie's funeral to that crowd of people who don't believe that the shooter that they got and have arrested actually did it.
Tucker tells a parable, so I'm going to explain a little.
And it actually reminds me of my favorite story ever.
He means Charlie's murder reminds him of Jesus' murder.
So it's about 2,000 years ago in Jerusalem, and Jesus shows up and he starts talking about the people in power and he starts doing the worst thing that you can do, which is telling the truth about people, and they hate it, and they just go bonkers.
They hate it.
And they become obsessed with making him stop.
This guy's got to stop talking.
We've got to shut this guy up.
So who were these people who wanted to shut Jesus up?
These were the people who Jesus called hypocrites, said they were dead and rotting on the inside.
Jesus was talking smack about the political leaders of the state of Israel, the chief priests and Pharisees, the political leaders promoting the interests of the state of Israel.
By any definition, they were Zionists.
And they killed Jesus because they saw him as a political threat.
So what's the parallel with Charlie?
As we'll see in a few, Charlie was in a fierce dispute with the modern Zionist leaders about whether it was right for Israel to exercise state power inside the United States of America.
And I can just sort of picture the scene in a lamplit room with a bunch of guys sitting around eating hummus thinking about what do we do about this guy telling the truth about us.
We must make him stop talking.
And there's always one guy with the bright idea and I could just hear him say, I've got an idea.
Why don't we just kill him?
That'll shut him up.
That'll fix the problem.
It doesn't work that way.
It doesn't work that way.
Everything is inverted and the Beatitudes tell it, I think, the most crisply.
Everything is sort of the opposite of what you think it's going to be.
Jesus loved irony.
The meek will inherit the earth, says Jesus.
The last will be first, says Jesus.
And Chucker is laughing because the Zionists killed Jesus to shut him up and ended up giving him a springboard to global fame across 2,000 years.
Pretty damn ironic.
And now, says Tucker, the Zionists have killed Charlie to shut him up.
Millions who used to sympathize with Israel know the Zionists did it.
And any politician who continues unquestioned support for Israel is finished.
This murder of perhaps Candace's closest friend has fundamentally changed her view of the world.
Charlie was concerned about the speech restrictions.
And inevitably, this happens when you get into bed with Israel.
You can't criticize them at all before you start enduring threats.
This is an important point that we'll go into deeply later.
Something is not right.
Nothing we are being told is true.
And Pam Bondi is trying to use the assassination of Charlie Kirk to lay the groundwork for hate speech laws in America.
The very thing that Charlie was fighting against.
They all just got right to work trying to pass laws.
Exactly what he's messaging me about that he doesn't want to happen.
They're trying to use his death to justify.
This is a hugely important and complex point.
Sarah Milgram was an American Jewish woman, and Yaren Leshinsky was a German Israeli, and their murder was used by Pam Bondi, who is a complete loser and a tool to try to criminalize any criticism of Israel.
The shooting event was full of weirdness.
The two were shot outside an out-of-the-way, low-key Jewish museum in an out-of-the-way, low-key area of Washington during an out-of-the-way, low-key, private event.
They were two of the lowest-level, most expendable employees of the Israeli embassy.
And the shooter acted just as if he had been programmed by Mossad.
Charlie loudly and publicly opposed this push to criminalize criticism of Israel.
Hmm.
Candace applauded him, and Charlie thanked her.
Candace calls Charlie's opposition to criminalizing speech and thought Charlie's legacy.
They want to pass speech laws, which will basically just give them the full power to go after you for wrongthink.
Okay?
And they're doing it in the most disturbing way ever by going after Charlie Kirk's legacy and using his assassination to say, oh, well, now we've got to get hate speech done, which, by the way, who was the person and the leader who said that he was passing laws against speech in America?
That was Bibi Netanyahu, okay?
Years ago on record saying that he was working with the government of America, and any person that criticized Israel would find themselves on the wrong side of the law, okay?
You can find that clip of him saying that.
And now what's happening?
Well, we have an occupied administration.
There's no question Trump is occupied by Zionists.
Okay, he's completely impotent.
He's completely powerless.
He cannot say anything that goes against Israel or Bibi Netanyahu.
He's letting them do whatever they want.
No pushback whatsoever.
It's very clear Bibi is in control and his administration is saying that.
It's terrible.
It's absolutely terrible.
But this was the plan.
Okay.
This was the plan.
They're going to arrest us for saying that we don't support Israel.
Something that Charlie was passionately against.
Am I cynical for believing that, yeah, the feds are obviously lying.
And I would say at some level, in a very big way, were involved in the death of Charlie because they wanted this sort of radical way to push through laws.
It's us versus them.
The elites versus the rest of us.
That's it.
Everything else is a mirage.
Damn.
Candace is just a person, but she is very well informed.
And she just said Charlie's murder was the Fed's plan.
Damn.
So that they could make criticism of Israel illegal.
Damn.
Which means she says that it was Israel's plan since they have occupied Trump.
Damn.
She just said Israel orchestrated Charlie's murder.
Israel has occupied Trump and through him, the FBI.
So that they can start putting people in jail in America for criticizing Israel.
So are we done?
Sort of, maybe.
Candace is a total wow.
She was closer to Charlie than anyone.
She knows as much about TPUSA as anyone.
But she's only just starting to wake up.
With the collective detective skills of the entire internet community, let's see what more we can put together to strengthen her case against Charlie's killers.
Let's note at the start that Netanyahu has the entire resources of the Mossad, the Israeli Department of Murder and Terror, at his disposal.
Deception is their primary and guiding principle.
Who else do you suppose created this fake miracle, supposedly stopping a 30-odd six round?
It's not a miracle, it's trickery.
Save bet it wasn't the FBI.
It is common knowledge that the Mossad made pagers explode all over Lebanon, killing dozens of civilians and wounding hundreds.
Further murderous trickery.
They somehow smuggled agents and weapons into Iran long before they used them to launch a completely unprovoked, completely surprise attack.
Again, murder by trickery is their thing.
It's what they do.
If Israel killed Charlie Kirk, they likely had their agents and weapons in place well in advance, even years in advance.
It's what they do.
Charlie said Israel was complicit in the October 7th attacks.
So I've been to Israel many times.
The whole country's a fortress.
When I first heard this story, I still have the same gut instinct that I did initially.
I find this very hard to believe.
I've been to that Gaza border.
You cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19-year-old with an AR-15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier.
The whole country is surveilled.
I think some questions need to be asked.
Was there a stand-down order?
Was there a stand-down order?
Six hours?
I don't believe it.
Israel's the side of the size of New Jersey.
When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's 45 minutes.
Wow.
Six hours.
They're live streaming the killing of Jews.
Did somebody in the government say, stand up?
That is a legitimate non-conspiracy question.
The whole country is the IDF.
The whole country is.
But the fact is now, Bibi and the Israeli hard-right government has a mandate they're going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza.
I don't use that term lightly, okay?
They're talking about basically removing 2.5 million people from there, okay?
This was two years before his murder.
One imagines Israel would have started targeting him then.
Kind of a duh.
Charlie's security detail had been with him for quite a while.
And his security team, again, Justin, Dan, Brian, and Rick, they love Charlie.
But they were much cooler than I.
That does not mean they are innocent.
But so let's see how much of the evil wizard's DNA we can find lying around on the scene of Charlie Kirk's murder.
So, what did happen here?
When I first saw Charlie's injury, I thought, well, that's kind of a sloppy amateur shot.
Wouldn't you aim to hit him between the eyes?
What professional hit did you ever hear of where someone was shot in the neck?
Well, if you, like me, thought that, that's because we aren't professional killers, nor are we evil wizards skilled to the max in the dark arts of murderous trickery.
There was nothing sloppy about Charlie's wound.
Charlie was hit very precisely in the most vulnerable spot on the human body.
I mean, look at this.
The infamous jugular vein and the less famous but more potentially lethal carotid artery at their fattest, practically on top of each other, right near the surface and protected by nothing.
One discrete piercing wound in this very, very precise location, and Charlie will bleed to death in a matter of seconds.
Heart stopped in 30 seconds, less even.
And now, perhaps, we have an idea that Charlie was killed not by a bullet, but by a specialized weapon of some kind that severed the largest artery and the largest vein in the human body.
Now, there are those who can't cry a real tear for Charlie and who can't imagine why anyone would want to go looking for his killers.
There is so much beauty in this world.
Why would you waste any portion of your life looking at something so evil?
Okay, bless your heart, I guess.
But right now, we're not looking for blood or bullets.
We're just looking at what seems clearly to be some sort of small explosion under Charlie's shirt.
You can see something is going on.
Something is violently puffing Charlie's shirt in the front.
In super slow motion, we see that this explosive wave moves up and then seems to fade to the back.
We can also see this under-the-shirt action looking from the front.
We can't see it as clearly maybe, but it's important that it shows up on both of these cameras because it reinforces that this is not some sort of optical illusion.
And this is about as clear, slow, and careful as we can get.
Two views, eight frames.
Frame one is just before the explosion.
These two black squares, very likely, are holding some device underneath Charlie's shirt.
A device no doubt fitted on him by his security detail that Charlie thinks is for his protection.
And just one frame later, we see some sort of explosion is beginning.
Now, an explosion will show huge changes in one ten-thousandth of a second, as we see here.
And these phone cameras are only 30 frames a second, so we can't expect a perfect match in capturing an explosion.
Their camera shutters are not perfectly synchronized.
They're off by a few thousandths of a second, which is why I think that on the right, we see something here, seeming to emerge from under Charlie's shirt.
But the picture on the left doesn't show this because I'm guessing its shutter clicked a few thousandths of a second later, and Charlie's shirt, which is going to rise violently in the next frame, here, has already risen to cover whatever this is.
In this next frame, the explosion continues, pushing the shirt up so that it covers whatever is inflicting a wound on Charlie at this exact moment.
The shirt is well up over the wound, especially on the right.
The shirt is starting to return to come back down.
Perhaps there's something going on here, or here, or here.
I'm sure I don't know.
In any case, what's clear is that something happened under Charlie's shirt, causing it to ride up and cover whatever was going on under the shirt.
And when it was done, Charlie was mortally wounded, with such enormous blood loss that his heart likely stopped within a few dozen seconds.
And we see the same crazy explosion under Charlie's shirt taking place in the back.
This whole event is only four frames long, a tenth of a second.
This large peak is come and gone in one thirtieth of a second.
You can't see an event that quick with just your eye, but it's clear enough in these frozen camera frames.
This act of murder, evidenced by this large puff, was invisible to the naked eye.
We don't have a real clue at this point what caused it.
Charlie's shirt exploded front and back, and he was invisibly mortally wounded.
Further evidence of murderous trickery, no?
But something happened under Charlie's shirt that killed him.
The desire by the killers to hide their treacherous trickery may account for why we haven't seen the video from this camera or this one or this one.
Super high-definition video might reveal some of the secrets.
But we're going to see what we can see.
Many observers noted this black square on the right side of Charlie's neckline and wondered what the hell it was and whether it had anything to do with Charlie's non-bullet caused wound.
And a few people who were familiar with such things said that this black square was very probably a magnet used to attach a microphone to a person's collar as seen here.
We started here with this black square, and so our community of internet sleuths went out sleuthing, looking for devices under Charlie's shirt.
And we saw this picture seeming to show something, but while whatever this is very likely played some role in killing Charlie, it seems unlikely to have been what actually wounded him on the other side of his neck.
Still, it seems clearly to have been behind where this black square is in this picture.
And it must have been involved somehow in the events under Charlie's shirt.
See?
See that black box in his shirt?
That is a black box in his fucking shirt right there.
Tell me that is not.
Tell me that is not a black box.
It's a little black box in his fucking shirt, bro.
You fucking seen it.
The fellow who discovered this video is, I think rightly, very excited to have found at long last a picture of the device that killed Charlie.
This definitely looks like some sort of unaccounted for device.
But is it on the left or on the right or in the middle?
And whoops, there it is.
Damn.
Right under the spot where the fatal wound is going to appear.
I still don't know what this black thing is.
But two points.
First, I think this picture surely is a picture of the same device we see here in this picture.
And the second point, then, is that this whoops picture tells us definitively that this device in this picture is in the kill zone.
We don't know how all the pieces of this puzzle go together.
But let's remind ourselves, we don't know what exactly they put under Charlie's shirt, or what they told him to make him think it was necessary.
We can see they put something, and we don't know what, but we know that something exploded under Charlie's shirt.
This is an established fact, absolutely beyond question.
We know that this explosion left Charlie mortally wounded.
These absolutely critical facts have gone completely unacknowledged by the criminal clown car that is the FBI.
How can that be?
Oh, you know what else we know?
We know that the evil wizards of Mossad used exploding pagers to murder dozens of people in Lebanon in a very similar fashion.
And although we're only just getting started, we've got every reason to suspect that these same criminals murdered our friend Charlie Kirk.
But, you see, the problem for the killers was and is that even if the wizard can make himself invisible, and even if the wizard can make his dagger invisible by hiding it under Charlie's shirt, for example, the official lie is that Charlie was shot with this rifle from this rooftop by this unarmed leaper.
The killers have to try to make this story look good.
So the person who, say, touched a triggering mechanism under his brown shirt, setting off whatever device it was that exploded under Charlie's shirt and killed him, that brown-shirted trigger man had to time the explosion perfectly with someone else in the rear near the rooftop making the noise of a rifle shot.
But to get the timing right, someone, say in a black shirt maybe, standing next to Charlie, where everyone who had to see him could see him, someone had to give a signal to both the explosives trigger man and to the rifle sound effects wizard hiding in the background.
Even before anybody knew anything, people were pointing at this guy, sending signals, like a third base coach.
Literally, just like this third base coach sending this signal.
When Signal Man touches his shoulder, he's saying, get ready, finger over the button.
And when he brings his hands together, that means go.
Push it.
Fight the power!
How dare you say that this random brown-shirted innocent guy is a killer just because he touched his shirt.
Oh, an instant after black shirt guy signaled, and at the exact instant that Charlie's shirt exploded.
Oh, but this button pushing is just one of a startling series of incriminating events.
He was part of this team.
Here he arrives after triggering the explosion to join this exclusive team of two helping Charlie bleed to death on the ground.
More on that in a minute.
But here he is again at the front of the team, loading Charlie's now bloodless and lifeless body into their SUV.
So he's on the security team.
So then why is he facing towards Charlie?
Unlike everyone else on security, all facing the crowd of 3,000 potential assassins.
It's a fair question.
But three seconds before he joined these guys, he met his plaid-shirted partner in crime for the second most surreptitious, carefully choreographed underhanded handoff I've ever seen in my life.
Again, in slowest, slow motion.
To my eyes, you can just make out that Brownshirt has something in his left hand in these two frames.
I wouldn't say that it's clear, and I don't want to make too big a deal out of these three dark, overly magnified, grainy video images, but he clearly has something under his shirt in these well-lit photos.
Something that he appears to trigger just as Charlie's shirt explodes.
That is, he seems to have the trigger for the murder weapon under his shirt, which you would think is something he'd want to discard ASAP.
But let's back up a few frames and catch him just as he enters the frame.
From five feet away, he reaches out to Plaid Shirt and touches him arm's length on the bicep.
What's that about?
Is he congratulating him on what a great job they did killing Charlie?
No, they teach you this magician shit in spy school.
Like all magicians, with his right arm and his right hand, he's ostentatiously misdirecting your attention away from that left hand we were just looking at.
By moving in on Plaid Shirt, he hides whatever is happening next between them.
As he moves in, he moves his extended right hand down Plaid Shirt's arm, and at the same time, he moves his left hand in between them and out of sight.
With his right hand, he is invisibly holding Plaidshirt's left hand, and by now bringing his hands together, he can securely and secretly place whatever it is in his left hand into Plaidshirt's left hand without either of them having to look at the transaction.
This is not a skill you learn while training to provide security for celebrities.
This is a black operations spy technique.
Really solid evidence that this was a Mossad team, trained in Mossad schools.
How to make a handoff without looking.
carrying out a Mossad operation.
We've had more than a little bit of an introduction to this fellow, but we're just getting started in our examination of this plaid shirted member of the team.
What was he doing before this carefully crafted handoff with brown shirt?
Words fail me.
Are you ready to be wowed?
This is the first frame after Charlie was hit.
Plaid shirt flinches at the shot, and then he calmly, confidently sprints into action, leaps over the table, no hesitation, no waiting for orders or directions.
He somehow understands instantly exactly where to go and what his mission is.
No hesitation about whether to go left or right, decisively and counterintuitively over the table.
How does he know that he's not going to land on Charlie's throat?
This had to have been choreographed and practiced to perfection.
So you want to see what perfection looks like?
From the sound of the shot to his handoff with brown shirt, nine seconds.
Damn, and you ain't seen nothing yet.
I mean, what was this all for?
Couldn't he have just turned right, right here, and met Brownshirt over here?
Not nearly so spectacular, but was spectacle the point?
Surely not.
So let's see what we maybe missed.
He seems to be stuffing something into his pants with both hands, no?
But I don't see whatever it is.
Oh, until right here.
Right?
You can't see anything at all until he starts to turn.
But then, for one or two frames, less than a tenth of a second, it's almost too obvious.
But when did he pick this thing up that we are now seeing so clearly?
He certainly doesn't seem to have it here, right?
So when did he pick it up?
We see him moving his right hand back, getting ready to receive the thing that he's going to then stuff into his pants.
The right hand seems to be clearly empty.
So let's look at his left hand.
We can see his left hand move back and forth, and we can see he has something in his left hand.
Then he brings his left hand back to meet his right hand, and he stuffs whatever it is into his pants as best he can, and we see it sticking out here.
As he now makes the second most carefully hidden handoff of the last three seconds.
Damn, no?
Two incredible handoffs in three seconds.
And then he runs off to deliver both devices to some secure disposal location before turning up to watch them load Charlie's body into the hearse.
We've seen a good deal about this guy already.
Most significantly, that he gave the kill sign to exploding Mike Triggerman and to Rifle Shot Sound Effects Man.
When Charlie gets hit, like Plaid Shirt, Blackshirt also flinches when he hears the shot.
And then, without hesitation, like he's practiced it a thousand times, he rushes to Charlie and pushes him to the ground, making sure he ends up exactly in the prearranged location in order to accommodate Plaidshirt's flying entrance.
Blackshirt seems very likely to have been the person who stripped the murder device from Charlie so that Plaidshirt could run off with it.
We might be inclined to think that he is the team leader, since it is also he who led Charlie onto the UVU campus.
So, given his apparent leadership role under his title of Blackshirt, let's examine the evidence showing that Charlie's security team killed him.
Anyone might ask, since Charlie was bleeding to death, why did his security not immediately transport him?
Every second they are waiting, Charlie is bleeding out.
But if you are my favorite Viking, you have much more knowledge and sophistication to bring to this discussion.
Security detail very clearly did not try to save Charlie's life.
I confidently can say that because I can watch it as somebody who is an actual trauma medicine expert and have treated people in combat, right?
Like on the ground, high-powered rifle round wounds just like this, and nothing, nothing was done correctly.
No one there is stopping the bleeding.
Not one person.
Nobody's got any blood on their hand whatsoever.
Everybody's got their hands down there doing something with Charlie.
If he had had his hands buried into a carotid artery, his whole hands would have been covered in blood.
I mean, that's just the reality of the situation.
Tell me why, turning point.
No one treated Charlie Kirk.
No one tried to stop the bleeding.
You can see it right here.
No blood on anyone's hands.
Who is this security detail?
Who are these people?
Unequivocal and the pinnacle of expertise.
Many observers noted the lack of any blood coming out of Charlie on this belated run to the hearse.
I think we can conclude now that there's no blood because Charlie's security detail had rendered him dead and bloodless.
Not that it matters especially, but I know from my 50 years of research experience, that if you're the head of such a black operation slash assassination, you don't typically put yourself out in front giving signals.
You don't make yourself the trigger man, and you don't ostentatiously run around collecting the evidence of the crime.
Instead, you blend into the background.
So while Blue Shirt was in the very thick of things, he appears to have the least responsibility.
He can't be charged with anything, as I say, a characteristic of the person who actually is in charge.
And watch this here.
Unlike Blackshirt and Brownshirt, this guy doesn't flinch when the shot goes off.
That's a wow.
And after the shot, he never looks at Charlie.
He takes two steps backward with blind confidence, never looking at Charlie or even behind him.
Here, we also see no flinch and no look.
He and Brownshirt exchange what feels like a long stare, and then he moves into action.
He somehow just knows where he's going and what he's supposed to do when he gets there.
Moving with speed, confidence, and determination.
This no-look business is huge.
This is bona fide, unmistakable mossad DNA.
This guy has had it pounded into him for 20 years.
Don't look at the victim you just murdered.
Not looking makes you appear innocent.
Act as if you don't even know who got shot.
You're not even supposed to know he was the target.
So don't look.
That might work when you're pretending to be an innocent bystander at the park.
But at Charlie is the first place you're supposed to look when you're working security for Charlie.
This fucker is so highly trained, so used to committing violent murder, that he not only doesn't look, he doesn't even flinch at a gunshot.
He's also the only team member with any gray hair.
Obviously, he's the senior member, and he gets my vote then as the guy in charge.
But fuck him.
The point is, this was such a complex, perfectly performed ballet, the result of hours upon hours of practice, that it is incriminating in the highest degree.
It is like fingerprints or DNA, as promised, massage DNA.
All over the murder scene.
We are fighting opposite sides of the same coin.
It's us versus them.
The elites versus the rest of us.
That's it.
Everything else is a mirage.
I want war with all of you.
Okay.
All of you.
Millions of people around the world are standing on the side of goodness, and we are going to see this thing out.
And like I said, there will be justice.
Actual justice.
Give me a shovel.
Some riders, I know what damn devil.
On this episode, you might be a dumb motherfucker.
This is my rifle.
It takes two different tools to take it apart.
It takes a torque key and an allen key.
Now, if I take a shot and immediately disassemble this, I have to remove the bolt, remove the magazine, grab my allen key, hit the two bolts on the bottom, put those away in the alley key, grab my torx key, remove the scope, put everything in the backpack, make sure I have everything, and make my way downtown.
Okay, which is going to take a lot longer for him than it is for me, especially because his fine-tuned motor function, something as simple as grabbing an all-enkey to a little bolt, is going to be extremely impaired due to a dump of adrenaline throughout his bloodstream with an extreme elevated heart rate is going to make these fine-tuned skills extremely difficult.
I mean, just for him to think and analyze of what needs to be done to disassemble this rifle and get away would be difficult.
We're not even going to touch the topic of him assembling a rifle on top of the roof, which if you reassemble the rifle and you take a cold dead shot, it's not going to be 100% accurate, okay?
Or the fact that he disassembled this after taking a shot, which the rifle is going to be off and he found no gloves.
There's just so many inconsistencies, it just makes zero sense.
I mean, I'm still working on this, and I have taken this rifle apart a thousand times.