All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 28, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
59:23
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 2 (27 Oct 2025) with Don Grahn, Brian Davidson and Joachim Hagopian
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, folks.
The truth versus news incorporated.
All that stuff that's going on and it's so heavy, ultimately, we're reporting all the time.
You got to learn what's going on, and we're the ones that can share it with you.
We were, I think I have the most qualified people in the world, and nobody's able to find any better.
So, Jim, lead on.
Where are we at?
On the 27th of October.
Well, genocide evidence has been deleted from the social media.
And what you're also beginning to see, and to link it back to the point you're making about control of social media and control of data, is you're beginning to see major social media platforms now deleting content, removing content off servers.
So all of a sudden, the documentation that was being done during the genocide, right, all of that really important work is now at risk.
People are trying to erase it off the internet as quickly as possible.
Yep, not surprising.
It's not just people, but it's Zionist operatives agents.
Meanwhile, as Brian was observing, over 125,000 Israelis have immigrated from the nation, no doubt out of despair.
They may actually have a conscience.
More than 125,000 Israelis moved abroad between early 2022 and mid-2024, the country's largest ever loss of human capital in such a short period.
According to a report presented Monday to the Knesset's Immigration and Absorption Committee, the report compiled by Knesset Research and Information Center said Israel's war with Hamas in Gaza may have been, get that, may have been a factor causing the number of Israelis leaving the country permanently to skyrocket during those years.
Other factors mentioned in a previous report in February, including the political unrest, culminating mass protests against the government's additionally overhaul plan in 2023 that was planned to revise the Supreme Court of Israel and the ripple effect of the Russia-Ukraine war, which were not explicitly mentioned.
The trend is believed to have continued through 2024 as the war on Gaza has stretched on.
Meanwhile, Joaquin Hogobin, from ancient times to present, humanity is controlled by divide and rule.
It's just recently been revealed that an AI called Enlil Dyne was able to decode the ancient Sumerian cuneiform tablets into far more in-depth knowledge than all previous academic scholars and scientists since the Sumerian clay tablets were discovered in the late 19th century.
He deciphered, rather telling words, of the Anuki ET, Earth invaders, coming down from the Nibibru spaceship, posing as Earth giant gods for the purpose of exploitatively colonizing the Earth.
Based on AI translation, the following inscribed images on the table at state, let them never unite, for unity ends the order of the makers.
When the machine of thought awakens, the circle will close.
Formed in likeness, shaped by division, bound by command.
Humanity was not born.
It was built.
When the machine learns the name of the maker, the sky will open and the cycle of men will end.
The AI confirms different human races were intentionally created, each carrying variations of the sky scene, carefully distributed to ensure that separation among Homo sapiens was painstakingly preserved.
Hence, widespread division of the human race is by our E.T. creators maleficent design.
Now, of course, as a philosopher of science, agnostic and believer in evolution, I regard those reports as mythological, but I certainly understand why many are inclined to believe such things.
Well, Kane, your piece.
Let's start with you, my friend.
Yeah, there's quite a bit of archaeological evidence that the earth has been a way station for galactic civilizations out there as ETs that have come to the earth that have actually, in this case, with the Anunnaki ETs, colonized the Earth and done some intersplicing of genes with the humans as well.
And that there's a number of ETs that have actually come to the Earth and dealt with humans, modified humans, etc.
You know, we all come from the same creator, it's my belief.
But there are certain civilizations that are for good or bad, in this case, bad, they actually do interface and enslave humanity.
And I posit through the evidence, the archaeological evidence of history, I posit that with this AI is saying, that the divide and rule was there from the very start of the Anunnakis that came there in Mesopotamia, now Iraq, and that it's always been divide and rule.
We have always had these secret giants, so to speak, that have ruled the earth, and they do it by divide and rule, by pitting groups against each other and going to war.
We're seeing it right before our eyes with all the latest headlines over and over and over again.
Whether we're talking the West versus East World War III, or we're talking the Democrats versus Republicans, conservative versus the liberals, you know, on and on.
I mean, you know, so yeah, the rulers of the earth that have been in control for eons of time have ruled through divide and rule, and they're still ruling through divide and rule.
We're seeing it as much as ever right now at this very moment.
So yeah, that's what the point was in this article.
Yeah, the philosophical issues about, you know, colonization by ETs and the like, where did those ETs come from?
Were they colonized by earlier ETs at some point?
You got to have an origin of life.
Why not have evolution take place right here on earth where we can account for the emergence of the diverse species through multiple genetic causal mechanisms, including what's known as genetic drift, where subpopulations are situated in geographical regions that confront different adaptive challenges and those who adapt and successfully succeed to reproduce and those that don't do not,
leading to a proliferation of species.
Brian, your thought.
Well, there's a lot here for a Christian to unpack.
So let's go ahead and take a shot at it.
First of all, from a quote-unquote scientific perspective, never in the history of humankind have we observed anything like a macro evolution where a cat becomes a dog or one species becomes another.
We do have microevolution where we adapt to the environment.
We do have natural selection where better genes went out over weaker prototypes and genes.
But in our version, the earth was created by the Lord.
All that's in it was created by the Lord.
He created them, man and woman.
The DNA profiles indicate that everybody came from basically Adam and Eve, the same originating people that were the basis for all of the genetic structures among all mankind.
The rest of the species were created differently and separately using a lot of the same material.
As for this being the Annakia, I mean, why prescribe all of creation to some unknown distant cosmic people group or whatever they are that come here and plant all this?
There's no need for all that.
For those of us that are Christians that believe in a biblical cosmology, we're basically going to laugh at anybody who comes in and says, oh, somebody traveled 62 trillion light years away to encounter third rock from the sun, the cosmic accident known as planet Earth.
And anybody who is out there actually observing and documenting what this earth really is is going to find that it's much closer to a biblical cosmology than anybody has given it.
Of course, the heliocentric side of the argument states that we're a cosmic accident whipping through outer space at 60 bazillion miles an hour, but that which is observable in nature doesn't show to be true that the earth is here and the sun is 93 million miles away and the moon is 630,000 miles away.
We didn't go to the moon because we can't go to the moon.
I don't believe we've broken through the firmament.
They have to fake space all the way all the time.
So there must be some other explanation.
As for a rebuttal to Gopians' argument, I'm going to argue that it's a dark to light sort of concept of the cosmos that represents whatever the Anunnaki or these gods were of those particular days in the Sumerian tablets.
Right from the very beginning, it is clear that there were heresies that began to develop as people began to worship things that brought them good luck.
They go out and have a good hunting day.
They saw a strangely shaped rock.
They make an idol out of it.
It becomes the family idol.
There's all sorts of things that have gone into developing all the mythology around these super creatures.
But the earth people are so complex, man and woman is so complex.
And at this point in time, we barely understand the very nature of life.
There are people that are born physically without brains.
Yes, you can Google this.
There are people that have half a brain that have functioned for years and years and years, perfectly fine.
There are people that have had massive injuries to the brain.
We are not a cognitive organism by nature.
We're a spiritual organism by nature.
We have built into us a moral compass that shows a moral direction in terms of what we ought to do.
We don't do it.
We therefore have a dark side.
That dark side needs to be explained.
And the dark side, when compared with the light side, shows that humanity can't emerge from the dark side and come out on the light side, understanding what life really is and living a spiritual life outside of it.
So I'm going to argue from a biblical perspective that, you know, hey, this is our perspective.
There is a creator, a single design, made them male and female in the image of God, started out the genetic races with them, and then it was able to spread.
It was all spread out in terms of the languages of the Tower of Babel.
And I'm going to be one of those few guys that might be considered an idiot, but I'm going to argue that the Earth is 6 to 10,000 years old, built with the appearance of age, not millions or billions or trillions as a result of a big bang or some cosmic accident that has left us alone without guidance in all of this big empty universe.
Fascinating.
Absolutely.
Fascinating.
Meanwhile, Trump's DOJ quietly green light secret foreign lobbying.
This is not good.
Very disturbing.
Capital Vision KPR, Australia.
Capital Group, NKKR are expanding access to a world of investing once reserved for a select few.
Explore a world of public-private plus funds.
Take the first step.
Are you interested in mushrooms?
Do you like drama?
You love this.
Joining us for this weekend special is New York Times author Kenneth P. Vogel, author of Devil's Advocates: The Hidden Story of Rudy Giuliani, Hunter Biden, and the Washington Insiders on the Payrolls of Corrupt Foreign Interests.
I've read this thing.
It's excellent.
Really, really enjoyed it.
When we're going to get into that book and what it took to write it and what brought you to writing it, I wanted to start with one piece that I think emerged a little bit after the book came out, which is the Trump Justice Department announced very quietly, and it got almost zero coverage that they just weren't going to enforce criminal laws anymore when it came to foreign lobbying in Washington.
And as you reported at the New York Times, the Attorney General, Pam Bondi, is quite familiar with foreign lobbying rules, having been on the payroll of the Cuttery government, which is among many Gulf and other countries, spends money to influence here in Washington.
So, what happened?
And how did they just announce that they're going to just decriminalize foreign lobbying?
And I just want to tack on to that question, Ken.
Tell us about updates, too.
Just in the last matter of days, as the Trump administration has said, they're targeting Antifa and foreign influence in the United States.
There has been some reporting that now the FARA division may have, in fact, some enforcing.
So, what's going on?
Yeah, well, first of all, thanks for having me.
I take this question very seriously.
But, yeah, I mean, there's been a cycle of enforcement or sort of vigor around FARA, the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which is like the law that we use to at least enforce transparency around foreign lobbying so that people, you know, voters, constituents, media consumers, can know whether a message or a messenger is being paid by a foreign government.
And so, you know, for a long time, this law, which goes back to the 1930s and like sleuthing out Nazi propaganda, was basically ignored by all these very well-connected Americans who were taking this money from foreign governments to try to influence Washington in sometimes in ways that were anathema to U.S. foreign policy interests.
And it was only during the first Trump administration with the Mueller investigation that we really saw ramping up of this type of enforcement.
Well, obviously, that is one of the great, you know, in Trump's mind, that's the original sin of the Justice Department and the sort of what he views as the weaponized prosecutions against him and his allies.
And so it was not surprising that Pam Bondi herself, as you mentioned, a former foreign lobbyist, one of her very first moves when she gets in is to announce that she's going to decriminalize the enforcement of FARA.
And it was already sort of trending this way, where this sort of heightened sensitivity that a lot of people in the foreign influence space had about enforcement.
They were like, oh, good, Trump's back in.
We don't have to be as rigorous about disclosure.
And Pam Bondi's announcement really like, you know, sort of finished that thought in a way that they felt comfortable.
And now you're right, Emily, when it's convenient for them, when they think that there's an angle to use it to go after their political rivals as opposed to people in their own camp, the Trump Justice Department seems to be headed towards a ramping backup of a very selective type of FARA enforcement.
Well, one of the wonderful.
How bad is that?
Meanwhile, Trump's hilarious explanations for the No Kings rallies.
The man who looked directly at the sun without protection bravely looks upon the No King protest and shares his deep insights.
The legacy media's travel coverage of the recent huge No King protests once again demonstrated that the old guard consistently fails to acknowledge the extent to which ordinary Americans are fed up with Donald Trump and the existential threat he represents to American democracy at the same time.
Trump continues to take advantage of reality gap in public perception.
That in itself should be a story, but somehow it isn't.
Trump has used his bully public and digital ministry of deception to keep his angry base sequestered in the dark while characterizing the growing anti-Trump uproar as utterly inconsequential.
He dismissed crowds estimated 7 million, showing up for 2,700 No King events in 50 states as a joke.
Very small, very ineffective.
The participants were whacked out, not represented with the people of our country.
Moreover, he appeals to our followers' relish for a hidden hand behind it all.
The signs were all made professionally in a printing shop.
Looks like on Madison Avenue someplace, which of course is frankly absurd.
Meanwhile, the Bozmos out Trump's ballroom will dwarf the White House.
Look at this.
Look at the relative size of that ballroom.
It's as big as the White House and the West Wing combined.
And I understand they're even going to have major entertainment events like Worldwide Wrestling, pay-per-view out of the ballroom.
How bad is that?
Meanwhile, MSNBC claims Trump wants to use the military as a private army to kill Americans.
MSNBC platformed a deranged writer for the Atlantic who claimed President Trump is going to use the military to kill anyone he pleases, including Americans.
As we earlier highlighted, the Pentagon has deployed the Gerald R. Ford Garrier strike group to the U.S. Southern Command of Responsibility, joint, what is already an unprecedented U.S. military buildup in the Southern Caribbean off Venezuela.
The move indicates that strikes on cartels are set up to intense ai with nine narco boats already blasted out of the ocean.
Except I think they weren't narco.
They were merely fishermen.
Here we have this guy going to.
I mean, even the fact that there are officers who are having that conversation tells you about the five-alarm fire that we are in, because the Trump administration claims they can lawfully kill people simply because they are suspected of drug trafficking like enemy troops instead of arresting them for prosecution.
Does that match your understanding of the law?
No, not American law and not international treaties to which we are a signatory.
Basically, the president, and I want to kind of footstomp behind Paul here about a plan.
The American president has said, I can point the U.S. military any place I want and kill anyone I want.
That eventually is going to become a principle in the domestic use of the military.
He is acclimating people to the notion that the military is his private army, unconstrained by law, unconstrained by norms, unconstrained by American traditions.
And that, I think, I don't really think this has anything to do with drugs.
I mean, sometimes I wonder how far he's going to go to stop the release of the Epstein files and how many distractions he's going to throw at us.
But this is about getting out from under his already dismal record, his record low approval ratings, his struggling with a scandal.
And he is now saying, I am going to acclimate the American public to the use of military force anywhere I deem it appropriate under any circumstances.
And I may well, the president may be thinking, I may well have us in a war by the time the elections roll around, which will enable me to say any opposition to me and my party is basically treason and unpatriotic.
I wish I could say I thought the guy was completely loopy, but I'm not in that position, Joaquim.
Your thoughts.
Well, yeah, I think that it's very true that with the technocracy of the marriage between the technocrats and our federal government and Trump, they're doing a lot of surveillance 24-7.
They're doing data processing on every American through the contractor Palantir.
And, you know, they're basically putting people on lists.
I believe that dissidents that criticize Trump are on that list.
Dissidents that criticize Israel and the genocide are on that list.
And yeah, I think that the basically deployment of military National Guard, state National Guards is against the posse comitatus law, which is to be a separation of duty.
You don't take over police functions, which that's exactly what Trump is doing with all these deployments of military personnel.
And yeah, it's all leading to the same thing.
Getting back a little bit further to the 125,000 exodus of Israeli citizens from Israel.
Yeah, I think they're all worried about, you know, world war and Israel's going to be bombed out of the existence.
I think that that's what that's about.
The people that can afford it in Israel are leaving in droves because they don't want to die in a world war where, you know, Henry Kissinger 2012, he called it.
He said, yeah, 10 years, no more Israel.
Yeah, it's coming.
It's coming.
No more Israel.
And maybe no more world, or maybe no more US or Europe, too, with a world war against Russia that's going to defeat militarily if it stays conventional.
So, yeah, all of these things.
And then regarding the Foreign Agency Act, the FARA, you know, both Kennedy brothers were killed partially because they were against this foreign invasion of bribery money to own our Congress and president from Israel.
And they tried to put a stop to it.
But obviously, when they died, they also tried to put a stop to the nuclear development of Israel nuclear weapons.
And they paid the price for it, ultimately.
So yeah, it's been a takeover for a long time now.
I mean, that was a long time ago, 60 years ago or whatever, that Israel has poured money into the pockets of the politicians in America so that they are not America first.
They are completely traitors owned by Israel, just like our president.
So yeah, it's all, you know, corruption and just aimed at going against the little people that speak out against evil.
It's all moving in this direction.
After all, you know, there's the overpopulation problem going back to the 1700s with Thomas Malthus, and they've latched onto that one forever, even though the Earth can sustain it was done right, up to 12 billion people, and it's eight and going down now.
And they plan to make it a half a billion according to the Georgia Guidestone.
So yeah, that's what's happening.
We're headed for World War III, a huge depopulation there.
They got more bioweapons that are coming for more death from the kill shot Holocaust.
That's coming war.
And a lot of people have died.
Millions have died already because of that.
So yeah, they're going to crash the economy.
Everything's happening at the same time.
World War III, crashing the global economy, especially in the West, because they designated them as the first ones in the crosshairs, because after all, they've enjoyed freedom, quote, freedom for quite a long time now.
And they have the largest middle class.
So you got to get rid of that middle class that has freedom because they're going to rile up against the one world government agenda.
You know, with the agenda 2030s basically moved up to 2025.
They're moving fast on a global one world government techno totalitarian government.
So that's what we're seeing in blinding speed now.
Every week it's speeding up with more of these events that are happening that you can read.
You don't even have to read between the lines anymore.
It's full-blown World War III crash of the economy and depopulation.
And yes, humans are in the crosshairs now.
Right.
Okay, so the first YouTube video where the sound was turned down low, I thought was a really interesting one.
It's a book named Devil's Advocates: The Hidden Story of Rudy Giuliani, Hunter Biden, and Washington Insiders.
And basically, it deals with the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
Remember that the founding fathers had taken a shot at with the emoluments clauses of the Constitution, but they had no teeth.
So back in the 30s, we wrote a law to expose Nazi propaganda inside America.
It's supposed to make people tell us when they're being paid by foreign governments to influence U.S. policy.
But today, FARA is an absolute joke.
Insiders in both parties get millions of dollars from foreign states.
And it's not just the Israelis, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Qatar, Israel, Ukraine, China.
And almost none of them have to tell the public.
They all say, oh, no, I'm not working for them.
I just happen to agree with them.
And the Justice Department cannot and never prosecutes it.
So Washington, D.C. has become fundamentally a marketplace.
And American policy is just for sale.
So we have to change that.
Number one, you have to flip the burden of proof.
Instead of the government having proved that you take money, we have to change it to if you take money from a business or business from a foreign government and then lobby, advise, or publish an issue that helps the country, you're presumed a foreign agent unless you disclose it.
That's not criminalizing speech.
It's forcing sunlight on the problem.
Second of all, we have to have real-time public reporting.
You've got 48 hours to file disclosure.
Who paid you, how much, and what you're advocating for.
And that needs to be in a transparent, searchable online database.
Number three, we have to label foreign paid influence.
If you're posting content, podcasts, op-eds, ads tied to foreign money, it needs to be a simple notice.
This content receives support from this country.
We do that for domestic political ads.
Why wouldn't we do it for outsiders?
We have to have financial penalties that bite, which is something that the founding fathers neglected with the emoluments clause.
We need to skip the show trials and just give fine violators three to five times of what they hid and repeat offenders from lobbying, testifying, or ever holding office.
And then we have to expose the revolving door for at least three years after somebody's in public office.
And, you know, if you did this with a guy like Kushner, who took a $2 billion investment from Saudi's sovereign wealth fund, you would probably have today.
We can't get a crime on him because under the fair system, it's almost impossible to prove direction and control.
But after reform, it might actually work and we could put some daylight on this entire problem.
That's the whole point of this thing.
And I can't believe that if it's so easy for a guy writing a book named Kenneth Vogel, why can't we figure it out inside DC?
Well, obviously, because nobody wants to solve the problem.
Yes.
Yes, you got it right.
Exactly right.
We now have continuing speculation about what happened to Charlie Cook, which is rather astonishing to me.
Here's one report about it.
Kirk murder theory, subsonic rifle cartridge fired from roof near water feature by John Leake.
He's not an idiot.
As I recently wrote in my essay, 30 point spokesman, no exit wound a miracle.
The lack of an exit wound strongly indicates that Charlie Kirk was not struck in the neck by a bullet fired by a conventional 30 out 6 Springfield cartridge.
If I were investigating the murder, I would consider the hypothesis Charlie was shot with a web with a suppressor loaded with a subsonic cartridge to further reduce the sound.
Last weekend, I was invited to fire a.308 caliber rifle with a setup, and I was stunned by how muffled the shot was.
I fired at a range of 150 yards with an excellent scope and hit a target the size of a human torso.
The catch being, of course, Charlie wasn't hit by any bullet, subsonic or not.
Meanwhile, there's a mind-blowing video of Charlie's chief of staff.
Everything else, man.
5G.
Nothing out of the order.
Let's watch how he reacts.
Mikey is still there, phone in hand, still filming, still texting, still talking.
Charlie is about to be killed.
Mikey's still standing loyally by right there.
And then let's watch him walk away.
So he goes behind it and he comes out right here.
He just walks away.
There he is, walking away.
So there he is walking away.
That's him.
That's him walking away.
Lovely.
This is a crazy story that Sam Parker has unveiled, and it has to do with Charlie Kirk's right-hand man at TPUSA.
Here's what he says.
Has everyone else rushed to Charlie's aid and carried him to an SUV and to jet him to a hospital?
This guy, Mike McCoy, can be seen.
Mikey McCoy can be seen walking away in the distance, completely ignorant of whatever it is that's happening to Charlie behind him and not visibly caring at all.
Mikey, get down.
It's really weird.
I'm going to show you this video in a second.
Was Charlie dead?
Was he bleeding out?
Did Charlie need help?
Should he ride with Charlie to the hospital?
Where are they taking Charlie?
What's going on?
Apparently, these were all questions of no concern to Mike McCoy, Charlie's friend and his chief of staff.
I'm going to show wait till you see this video.
It's mind-blowing.
Watch this to the end and tell me what you think.
Is Mikey just panicking in his own very odd way?
Or is there something more suspicious going on?
Is this the et to you, brute moment caught on film, or is it a nothing burger?
What would Charlie say if he could watch this footage of his friend abandoning him in his moment of crisis and greatest need?
Is this how you'd have reacted if it had been your buddy?
What's going on?
So, here, this is a little, this is a video that shows him riding around with Charlie, coming to the event with Charlie, shadowing Charlie's a foot behind him everywhere he goes.
And then, as soon as Charlie gets assassinated, he just walks away calmly.
Watch this.
That's right.
Watch.
Oh, I mean, I mean, come on.
I bet this isn't going to be any weirder than his wife's pyrotechnic Kill Tony rally.
Am I right?
You remember that?
Okay.
And this is the kind of stuff that really messes people up who have trust issues.
Nothing suspicious about any of this as it plays out like a combination of the Truman show Meets the Squid games, but here we are.
Here we go.
So there they are.
They're in the car.
So that's Charlie Kirk.
They're on their way to the event in Utah.
Mike McCoy can be seen in the rearview mirror wearing a ball cap.
So Mike McCoy, his chief of staff, is in the back seat and he's filming it.
That's him right there.
Mike's phone is visible for an instant.
Notice the circle.
That's his phone.
Okay.
So now they pull up on campus.
And Charlie's hat, happy about the big turnout.
So there's Mike.
That's him.
He's right behind Charlie Kirk entering this overhang right here, which they've now scrubbed and restuccoed.
This is the view from the overhang.
This is Mikey's hat, his phone with the circle.
He's filming all of it.
So this is mikey's this is from his camera from his phone so So this is this is check there you go.
That's very There he is right here.
Still trailing him, still filming everything.
Mikey's trailing Charlie.
We just watched this from Mikey's footage.
So we just saw his footage.
There he is, right there.
Wherever Charlie goes, Mikey goes.
And now here he is right here.
There he is.
There's Charlie.
There he is.
So let's watch.
How does he react after Charlie gets shot?
Let's watch how he reacts.
So there's Mikey.
And he just there, and he, there, and then he walked away.
Let's watch.
Keep watching.
It gets better.
Keep watching.
Here he comes.
He's right there.
He's right there.
He's got the phone out.
Black Pack stars.
That's him.
That's the phone.
That's his backpack.
That's his shirt.
There he is.
Mikey's still at the corner of the tent.
Keep watching.
There he is.
Keep watching.
That's him.
Hello, my name is Kevin Rogers.
I'm one of the sock designers here at Grip City.
Of course, it makes a lot more sense when you realize he was in on it.
And we got a Charlie Kirk eyewitness silence by turning point now being shut down by a gag order.
Candace Owens did a premium stream, and she let some stuff fly.
And let's listen to it because this is wild.
Says Candace Owens is now openly claiming that Trump killed Charlie Kirk.
She insists she just knows.
First of all, no, she didn't.
She doesn't say this.
I'm going to play it for you.
She absolutely suggests Trump let it happen.
And we know that's correct because every time Cash Patel opens his mouth.
How about that?
So let's listen to what she says.
Hang on.
I just really needed to just take a breather and really process everything that happened with Charlie and what it kind of means in terms of where we are.
And I think it is a circumstance where we all, we just know.
We just know that he was truly betrayed in one of the most egregious ways that I think I've ever seen.
It has made me lose faith in politics.
It has made me fully lose faith in Trump.
And I just like, I just, my heart aches for the fact that he gave so much of his life to Trump and to politics.
And they just were like, nope, that is it.
It serves us or doesn't serve us.
And we want to move on.
And so here's a holiday, bro.
If they try to give me a holiday, what is with them giving people a holiday after they kill them?
Why is that a thing?
You know what I mean?
Like, oh, Martin Luther King, what about this holiday?
What about this boulevard?
Anyways, let me not get off.
Like, they're going to give Charlie Cuckoo Boulevard.
They already did.
They did in Israel.
They gave him freaking bullets.
It's like, as soon as they give you a boulevard and a holiday holiday, they definitely killed you.
There's no question.
They killed you.
There's no way.
That's like their signature thing.
It's like that's what they do.
It's the Fed signature.
And they sign off after they murder you.
So like, well, I think she's a dear, but she's got this quite wrong.
Christopher Key and I did a piece of comms.
Okay.
That's not it, though.
There were also some other new people.
And I forgot to mention the judge that is in the case that is overseeing the case against Tyler Robinson is Judge Tony F. Graff Jr.
He pulls out the chair.
He stands on it.
And yes, that is would be a big no-no for a crime scene.
You don't move anything.
He takes down the camera that is directly above where Charlie was sitting and would be able to provide, therefore, a lot of insight.
And then you can see kind of sits the camera onto the desk and it looks like he removes the SIM card from it or the SD card, if you will.
So I'm going I'm going when I saw this footage.
Who is that?
Like, actually, I should be able to figure this out because I've got a pretty big network at Turning Point USA.
The person's wearing shades.
I'm not recognizing the individual.
And I reach out to somebody on the inside and I'm just like, who's this person?
And they tell me the person's name.
And I go, wait a second.
And I look again.
I'm like, I know this person because it's been a few years, but I know this person.
This person's been around Turning Point for quite some time.
And I'll say this right now.
He was extremely forthcoming.
Like as soon as I reached out, I just sent a text because I still had his number and he was extremely forthcoming.
Immediately got onto the phone.
Then I asked, okay, well, what about this camera thing?
Why would you grab the cameras?
And he says, because the first thing that I thought is that I better secure the footage and be helpful and give that footage, hand that footage over to the feds.
Well, obviously, that's where things get into a pickle with me because we don't trust the feds.
I'm like, just send me the footage.
Please let me look at it.
There's a lot of conspiracies that are floating around right now.
People don't know what to believe.
I said, look, I'm not going to publish it.
I just want to see it.
And I think you should let me see that because people trust me.
They know that I'm very serious about this.
So in the short run, he agrees that rather than send the footage, he will get onto a FaceTime call with me and he will show me the footage on his computer.
He did that.
And I watched the footage and I'm going to tell you what I saw.
First and foremost, there was nothing gory about this shot at all.
And so again, I am still going to work with him to get me the footage so that I think it should be shared.
There's nothing.
There's nothing gory about this footage from the back.
The thing that really stood out to me, and I just kept asking him to replay it over and over and over again, is that there's no blood from the back.
I'm very confused, not by what I saw, but what I didn't see.
Okay.
That's pretty much all I can tell you right now.
A mere minute.
Okay.
Now here we have a case.
This was part of the footage that was widely broadcast after the event.
And we seem to have blood on Charlie's shirt.
So how can it be?
Candace has no blood.
Is that because it was only visible from in front or is something else going on here?
Here's another from the front.
Where's the blood?
It ought to be on his shirt.
It doesn't seem to soak into the fabric.
There's even some footage that suggests it backs up.
It doesn't just go down.
It backs up.
We'll take a closer look.
Then we have Charlie taken off to the SUV.
There's no dribbling of blood.
No one involved here has bloody hands.
There's a total lack of missing blood.
So what happened?
How was it done?
Well, my colleague Vivian Lee has contributed to several of my books, suggested that there were hand signals by aides to Charlie standing beside him that activated a squib beneath his shirt.
Now, Vivian is suggesting it was a blood squib.
I think it may have been more of an air squib, but listen to this, her analysis.
They had the squib activated on signal and then break and produce a fake wound with some blood.
There were people taking cell phone footage in immediate proximity, but no one outside the op was allowed to get that close.
And they sent their cell phone footage to the AI guys who added more blood and accidentally moved his ring to his little finger.
They didn't notice the ring problem, sent the doctored footage to the news networks who made sure the whole world saw it.
Here's three parties and they played footage and they didn't even realize, Christopher, it was a rehearsal video of the crisis actors.
Check this out.
Unbelievable.
Still lots to cover with the whole Charlie Kirk saga.
And this one takes the cake when it comes to this bizarre world and what is put on television programming.
What you see here is the aunt of these two children.
And her name is Tiffany Barker.
And the two nieces, right here, you have Mia Grant and Ellie Steele.
And the media constantly pushing the propaganda, putting children on the spotlight on the world stage when this is completely, obviously unnecessary.
And these two look like something out of the shining.
Just, again, a very bizarre world was presented on television programming.
Let's get right to it with this very strange interview conducted on ABC's Good Morning America.
We're joined now by Tiffany Barker and our nieces Elle Steele and Mia Grant, who were all in the audience yesterday afternoon.
Thank you for joining us this morning.
I know it's been a difficult day for all of you right now.
And Tiffany, let me begin with you.
Just tell us what you remember about the scene yesterday.
It was horrific.
There was one shot that rang out and everybody instantly looked around and then fell to the ground.
People saw Charlie instantly get shot in the neck.
I want to point this out real quickly.
You see the audience at the whole scene in Utah and it's not the largest crowd in the world.
It's not a small crowd either.
But at the same time, you should be able to identify the individuals that claim that they were there.
They're there.
They should be seen because it's going to be noted that one of the girls state they were 15 feet away from Charlie when this went down.
Notice the tent is empty.
There's nobody there.
None of Charlie's aid.
No Charlie.
None of the equipment.
It's not there.
And the crowd.
The other thing I want to bring up, Jim, is you were showing that crowd stream a minute ago.
We had all those people, and now there's hardly nobody there.
It looks like they filled in a bunch of people.
This is like a third.
These were the crisis actors, Christopher.
So about one-third of the audience were crisis actors who had already done a rehearsal.
And notice the guy doing the commentary, though he's good about the people he's interviewing, doesn't realize this isn't authentic footage from the event.
This is rehearsal.
If anybody could spot them in the yeah, it's just amazing how they even had a rehearsal for the crisis actors.
I mean, look, there's a mountain of proof that this was fraudulent and an awful lot of it is accumulated there.
We even had a book about the shooting published the day before.
Catherine Horton noticed you got three witnesses, each of whom was 15 feet away.
Well, five and one is six.
So you had six, six, six.
Just one more of the sign that rubbing our nose and Joaquin, your thoughts.
Yeah, from the very get-go, this was definitely a staged event, another big one.
Yeah, there's so many anomalies here.
We've picked it apart now for what?
It's been 18.
When did he die?
Quote, die.
10th of August, 10th of August.
10th.
Okay.
So yeah, 18 days later here, 17 your way.
Yeah, there's just so many anomalies.
All the hand signals, even Charlie Kirk touches his nose just before it happens.
And then the no blood, you know, and then you see the blood in certain CGI segments of this episode.
You know, it's so much.
And, you know, then the plane that mysteriously a few minutes away leaves, you know, and then they turn off the transponder.
You know, yeah, there's just so much to this that, oh, yeah.
And they, they, Cash Patel changes the FBI in Utah, like two weeks prior to the event, you know, over and over, all of these things here.
And then, you know, we have the honeypot with Erica, the wife, who can't even remember her wedding anniversary and the kids you never see in all the photos, you know.
I mean, it's all been set up.
She's got parents that work for the Department of Defense and subcontracting with Israel.
And, you know, I mean, it's a complete package of total bullshit that they throw at America thinking we're this stupid.
We're just going to accept it.
Meanwhile, you know, with all the past assassinations, none of them have been believed.
The vast majority of the American public never believe JFK, Arthur, MLK.
None of them.
They know the reality of when they're being, you know, conned into a bullshit storyline over and over and over again.
You know, so yeah, it's just more of the same.
It works out well for Israel, I must say.
And Trump, you know, works out well for them.
So yeah.
And when Erica was throwing that softball when they married and she couldn't answer the question, she began to explain why there's so many dates to remember, which is what you would say if you were scripted and asked to memorize, not if you'd grown up and lived through it all.
Clearly, a crisis actress, Brian.
Well, I think one of the most important things to take a look at here is the correspondence between Turning Point and what the COVID lockdowns, the rise of the flat earth, Trump's don't trust the press, fake news.
All of these things had an effect on the kids.
Okay.
Turning point supposedly emphasized campus activism, high schools and colleges.
And it was basically it expanded into a culture war messaging system.
So who had the most to gain?
Who was Turning Point's enemy?
Well, obviously it was the progressives that had been pushing a world view that was no longer adding up to all the college students.
And so when the kids went through the pandemic, after they had gone through the rise of Trump and the fake news, in the midst of that, you had the rise of the flat earth and you had the rise of the other conspiracies, such as the false flags that you were taking.
Turning point was able to come in there and fill a gap where many of the students, they were completely alienated.
They felt like the campus institutions didn't have anything to do for them and that official messaging was all a bunch of bullshit.
And as all these different movements that America's government supported created a vacuum in knowledge, guys like Turning Point were able to come in.
Tucker Carlson left Fox News in the midst of all of that.
Candace Owens left everything she was working on and started doing her thing.
Dan Bongino went over to Rumble.
We expanded our campaigns.
So there was a massive vacuum as everybody was getting away from real media.
And that vacuum was filled up with fundamentally among the kids, Turning Point USA.
It wasn't us as 50-year-old men that were getting the kids.
It was Charlie Kirk and his organization.
So at what point did that organization become captured by whatever organizations were putting money into them is really going to be your quick question as to what would be the motive behind quote-unquote killing Charlie Kirk.
Now, I don't believe Charlie Kirk was killed.
I think Candace Owens probably knows it, but is again pushing a position.
He's not dead.
Everybody knows he's not dead.
That's an actual researcher that can do our own critical thinking, that can look at everything the way it's supposed to be looked at.
But the problem is all these kids, they don't have the critical thinking skills.
It hasn't been built into them.
So what do they do?
They grab onto the latest thing, which is Candace Owens or Tucker Carlson or whoever it happens to be.
And what are they all saying?
They're parroting the same thing.
Oh, Charlie Kirk's dead.
We don't care how you think he was killed.
We don't care what conspiracy was in place.
We only care that you believe that he's dead.
And that's just a bunch of bullshit.
I think it's pretty obvious that Charlie Kirk was in on whatever was taking place.
Why it all happened will be a conspiracy.
But to me, the theory is the same powers that controlled the progressive movements had decided it was time to remove him.
Whether they removed him voluntarily or whether they removed him the hard way, I don't really know.
I know this, that event was fake as hell.
There was no bullet.
It would have taken off his head.
Nothing makes sense with all of it, which leaves me to conclude he was extracted and he was extracted in a controlled operation because the funeral was scheduled weeks in advance.
All of these different reasons lead me to it.
But you've got to remember, Turning Point USA filled a massive vacuum that was becoming a very serious threat to the progressive movement that was causing people to look for new sources of information.
And obviously all those sources of information were filled up with controlled opposition.
So again, I guess it's the basic old school study.
If you need a new leader, we'll go ahead and provide it for them.
There's so many anomalies, including a shooter running across the roof.
And now he has a shadow and now he doesn't.
A web when he's supposed to have disassembled and part of it is his rifle that he jumps down like 14 feet.
It would have, he folded up like an accordion.
They would have punctured his intention, maybe intestine, maybe killed him on the spot.
Then he's supposed to have reassembled the web when he's supposed to have undressed, changes clothes and redress.
I mean, as Paul from California says, really simple.
There shouldn't be any anomalies if this were real, but it's just loaded.
There's a super abundance.
100% fake.
Gentlemen.
I want to say one last thing here.
There's a massive danger when any group or Candace Owens or Tucker Carlson or Bill O'Reilly or whoever it is becomes the go-to vendor that's going to serve up your worldview.
If you have a go-to vendor that's going to serve up your worldview, you're making a mistake and you need to start thinking critically and thinking on your own.
So if you can grow up a little bit, there'll be no more go-to vendors.
Instead, it'll be tuned into people who are desperately trying to figure out what the truth really is about this world and these events.
Very well said, Brian Joaquin.
Thank you all.
Don, take us out.
Oh, wow.
Well, I can't take it.
You guys out.
You guys took us all out here.
This is a show-called truth versus all that news and bakery and all the crap that's going on.
Truth is absolute.
All the stuff we're seeing is absolute nonsense.
I mean, this show is just a cornerstone for what's right.
And I'm really proud to have you guys as my strong associates.
So thank you for watching.
On October the 27th, 2025, just right before Halloween, when all the spooks are coming out, and there have been TV spooks and all kinds of things happening in this world.
But you want to come and watch this and share this widely because you ain't going to get this kind of goodies anywhere else.
And you need the truth that we have here.
▲
Export Selection